HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2010.07.07 - 10143July 7,2010
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #10163
BY: Public Services Committee, Jim Runestad, Vice Chairperson
IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS — MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY
CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND APPLICATION FOR FY 2011
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the State of Michigan offers funding to local communities under PA 511; and
WHEREAS this funding is targeted to divert non-violent offenders from prison into local
jail or sentencing alternatives; and
WHEREAS Oakland County has been receiving Community Corrections funds since
1994; and
WHEREAS the application has been completed and is requesting funding in the amount
of $1,824,345 for plans and services for the grant period October 1, 2010 through September 30,
2011; and
WHEREAS a total appropriation of $2,115,175 is requested for probation residential
services, which the State now pays directly to the Probation Residential Centers since they hold
the contract for all residential services; and
WHEREAS the grant application seeks full-time eligible funding for positions 7425, 7426,
7428, 7429, 7432, 7433, 9243, 9247, 9291, 9295, 9648, 9649 and PTNE funding for position
9292 within the Community Corrections Division; and
WHEREAS the grant application also seeks funding for positions 7834 and 9396,
whereby the State will fund 50% of the costs, and the County will match 50% of the total costs for
these two (2) positions in the Community Corrections Division; and
WHEREAS the grant application seeks full-time funding for positions 7419, 7420, 7418,
7421, and PTNE funding for positions 7417 and 9397 within the Sheriff — Correction Services
Division; and
WHEREAS any programs created through these funds become part of the County's
Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan; and
WHEREAS PA 511 of 1988 requires that the "County Board or Boards of Commissioners
of the County shall approve the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by their advisory board."
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the application to request $1,824,345 from
the State Office of Community Corrections for the purpose of continuing programs contained
within the Office of Community Corrections FY 2011 grant application for offenders who meet PA
511 eligibility is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
approves the $2,115,175 allocation for probation residential services to be administered by the
Michigan Department of Corrections / Office of Community Corrections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
approves the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by the Community Corrections Advisory
Board.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move adoption of the
foregoing resolution.
PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE
Public Services Committee Vote:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Runestad and Taub absent
GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Community Corrections
GRANT NAME: FY 2011 Community Corrections Comprehensive Plan and Application
FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Department of Corrections — Office of Conuanniry Corrections
DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Barb Hankey 248 451-2306
STATUS: Application — Resolution required
DATE: June 10, 2010
Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #01320, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed
internal grant review. Below are the returned comments.
The captioned grant materials and grant application package (which should include an application Report
from Fiscal Services to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners', the grant application, and this
Sign Off email containing grant review comments) may be submitted to the Chairperson of the Board of
Commissioners for review and signature, with informational copies to the appropriate Board of
Commissioners' committee(s).
DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Department of Management and Budget:
Approved. — Laurie Van Pelt (6/8/2010)
Department of Human Resources:
Approved. — Cathy Shallal (6/8/2010)
Risk Management and Safety:
Approved by Risk Management. — Andrea Plotkowski (6/8/2010)
Corporation Counsel:
After reviewing this grant application, there appear to be no unresolved legal issues that require action at
this time. — Karen P. Agacin ski (6/10/2010)
Gaia Piir
From: Agacinski, Karen [agacinskik@oakgov.com ]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 9:16 AM
To: Hankey, Barb; 'Piir, Gaia'; IShallal, Cathy; 'Laurie Van Pelt'; 'Julie Secontine'
Cc: 'Nancy Falardeau'; Pearson, Linda; 'Davis, Patricia'
Subject: Grant Review: Community Corrections - FY 2011 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application -
Grant Application
;RANT INFORMATION
)perating Department: Community Corrections
ereartnaent Contact: Barbara Hankey
.:ontact Phone: 248 451 2306
)ocuinent Identification Number:
Funding Period: October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011
cw Facility / Additional Office Space Needs: No
TS Resources (New Computer Hardware / Software Needs or Purchases): No
d/WBE Requirements: No
Mulcting: Continuation
._pplication Total Project Amount: $1,824,345
'nor Year Total Funding: $1,682,695
iew Grant Funded Positions Request: 0
...."-hanges to Current Positions: Continuation of position numbers: 7421, 7425, 7426, 7428, 7429, 7432, 7433, 7834 (.5), 9243,
247, 9291, 9292 (PTNE), 9295, 9648, 9649, 9396 (.5), 7417 (PINE), 7418, 7419, 7420, 9397 (PTNE)
;rantor Funds: $1,824,345
Fatal Budget: $1,919,036
VIatch and Source: None required; $94,691 GF/GP for .5 of SR positions 7834 & 9396
'ROJECT SYNOPSIS
elais is the application for the annual MDOC grant for Community Corrections programs. A resolution approving the application by
he governing board of the county is required as part of Public Act 511.
ZENTTEW STATUS: Application — Resolution Required
skfter reviewing this grant application, there appear to be no unresolved legal issues that require action at this time.
['hank you,
Caren P. Agacinski
Vssistant Corporation Counsel
)enartment of Corporation Counsel
200 N. Telegraph Road, Bldg. 14 East
;ourthouse West Wing Extension, 3rd Floor
'ontiae, MI 48341
'hone Number: (248) 858-8677
:ax Number: (248) 858-1003
agacinskika,oakgov.com
his e-mail is intended only for those persons to whom it is specifically addressed. It is confidential and is protected by the attorney-client privilege and work product
loctrine. 'Ms privilege belongs to the County of Oakland, and individual addressees are not authorized to waive or modify this privilege in anyway. Individuals are
idvised that any dissemination, reproduction or unauthorized review of this information by persons other than those listed above may constitute a waiver of this
invilege and is therefore prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. if you have any questions. please contact the
'w..partment of Corporation Counsel at (248) 858-0550. Thank you for your cooperation.
6/10/2010
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
"Expecting Excellence Every Day"
Office of Community Corrections
Community Corrections Plan and Application
Fiscal Year 2011
CCAB Name: Oakland County
Email the application to:
and
Send one copy of the application to:
MDOC-OCC@michigan.gov
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Office of Community Corrections
Grandview Plaza Building, lst Floor
P.O. Box 30003
Lansing, Michigan 48909
Due Date: June 1,2010
'Note: Counties with multi-year contracts are required to complete Section 1, Introduction, and a new Comprehensive Plans and
Services Program Description Plan for any program proposed to be changed.
SECTION I INTRODUCTION . .
A. General Information
1. Name of CCAB Oakland County
Contact Person Barb Hankey — Title: Manager
Address 2300 Dixie Hwy Phone Number: 248 451 2306
City Waterford Fax Number: 248 451 2319
State MI E-Mail: hankeyb@oakoov.com
Zip 48328
2. Fiscal Agent Laurie VanPelt
Contact Person Julie Shih Title: Fiscal Analyst
Address _ 2100 Pontiac Lake Rd Dept 409 Phone Number: 248 858 1247
City Waterford Fax Number: 248 858 1066
State MI E-Mail: shsihi@oakoov.com
Zip 48328
3. Federal I.D. Number 63-
4. CCAB Chairperson: Judge Rudy Nichols Title; Cicuit Court judge
Address 1200 N. Telegraph Bldg 12 Phone Number: 248 858 2000
City Pontiac Fax Number:
_ State MI E-Mail: nicholsr@oakoov.com
Zip 48341 ..
5. Type of Community Corrections Board:
County x
City/County
Regional
6. Units of Government Represented: Oakland County
7. Date of Submission: 31-May-10
8. Date Application Approved by CCAB: 27-May-10
9. Date Approved by Government Unit: Pending July 7, 2010
_
B. CCAB Membership .
Representing Name
County Sheriff Ann Russell
Chief of Police David Malloy, Chief Novi Police
Circuit Court Judge Rudy Nichols, 6th Circuit Court
District Court Judge Phyllis McMillen, Waterford District Court
Probate Court Judge Rebecca Schnelz, Probate Administrator
County Commissioner Helaine Zack
'Service Areas Christina Nichols / Sara Wade, Oakland County Office of Substance Abuse
County Prosecutor vacant
Criminal Defense Jack Holmes .
Business Community Mona DeFranciso, Oak Park Career Center
Communications Media Fran Anderson
Circuit/District Court Cheryl Braxton, Northeast Area Manager Probation Officer
General Public --Fred Mester, Judge - retired ...
_.
C. Summary
1. Please provide in this section a clear understanding of local issues, long and short term goats, local
priorities, and strategies to address local issues and the State Community Corrections Board Priorities.
Briefly summarize the key points of the Community Corrections Plan and provide an explanation for the
following:
Tip: Excel maintains a 1200 character limit per cell. Once you have entered 1200 characters "wrap text" will not work. Use "Alt
Enter to create a hard return for your text. Additional Cells have been provided for this question in order to avoid the 1200
character limitation.
a. How will the state prison commitment rate be reduced or maintained if low as a result of the implementation of the plan.
The maintearce or reduction of the prison commitment rate is our first objective. This will be accomplished by meeting all of our objectives in -
targeted areas for prison diversion. if our second felony objective is acnieved, there will be an additional 25 offenders diverted from the Group
2 category. This would lower the overall prison commitment rate from 18.6% to 18.1%. Acheivement of our third felony objective would
require diverting 45 technical violators from prison. This would lower the overall prison commitment rate to 17.8%. Acheiving both of these
objectives would bring the prison commimtment rate to 17.4%. The rmplementaiton of the listed stratgies shows the methods by which we will
achieve these objectives thereby reducing the PCP.
b. How will the use of the jail be improved as a .result of the implementation of the plan.
_
The implementation of our plan would greatly improve the jail utilization and reduce the number of early releases. For example, at 100%
utilization the Challenge to Change program has a potential to save 8,855 jail beds. Our midyear report projects about 1,800 days saved
within this program. By increasing the utilization we could save an additional 7,155 days or 20 jail beds over a year. Managing beds though
earned early release is preferable to mandatory early release, saving jaN beds through programming means less emergency act releases. The
recommendations made by pretrial services as to the release suitibility of defendants serves to divert defendants from coming into the jail in
the first place. The exceptional superviison of pretrial defendants provides the courts with a viable option for higher risk defendants. By
supervising these defendants within the community jail beds are opened for those dangerous and sentenced offenders.
c. How will community correction funds (induding residential servcie.$) be used to meet your objectives.
The Community Corrections funds will be used to keep programs in operation that divert offenders from prison and / or jail. The use of the
PROs, specifically PEP, is key to achieving our felony objectives. Our jail objectives can only be reached by continuing to mainlian the "in jail"
programs and those which have be developed as alternatives to jail.
SECTION II ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC PLAN
A. INTRODUCTION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR STRATEGIC PLAN
Strategic Issues, Goals, and Priorities have been established by the Office of Community Corrections in accordance with Public
Act 511 and State Board priorities. CCABs will be required to establish Key Objectives and Strategies based upon OMNI Felony
Disposition, JPiS, CCIS and local data that will support these Goals and Priorities.
Strategic Issues are identified as Felony Dispositions, Jail Utilization and Local Priorities. Strategies such as "continuum of
sanctions/services" and "public education" may be appropriate to support your objectives. For example, to support the objective of
reduced prison commitment of probation violators a strategy might be to improve knowledge and understanding by stakeholders of
principles of risk and need and the importance of appropriate matching of offenders to programs.
OCC will provide the CCABs with OMNI Felony Disposition and PIS data. CCABs are to analyze this data along with local CCIS
data and develop Key Objectives and supporting Strategies that will provide for the attainment of Goals and Priorities established
by the State Board and OCC, as well as local objectives and priorities promoted in the comprehensive plan,
Example: Fertile Strategic Issue of Felony Dispositions, consider the stated Goal and Priority outlined in the application and
complete an analysis of your county's prison commitment rate data provided by OCC. Establish objectives related to prison
commitment rates. For example:
1. Reduce PV commitment rate to 25%
2. Reduce Straddle rate to 35%
3. This will result in an overall PCR of 22%
Under "Strategies," outline in bullet form those steps to be taken, including continuing, new and revised programs, new initiatives,
and revised policies or practices, that will support the attainment of the objectives you have specified. Identify if these are "new",
"continuation," "modification," or for short term (this fiscal year) or long term implementation. For Example:
1. Develop policy for "structured sentencing" that allows straddle cell offenders and probation violators to serve jail time with
jail based programming, followed by Residential Services or intensive supervision with continuation of programming in the
community. (New, FY 2011)
2. Initiate a jail and community based Cognitive Behavioral Treatment program that targets higher risk/need straddle cell and
probation violators. (New, FY 2011)
3. Improve communication and sharing of information with stakeholders and referral sources so they are more
knowledgeable and comfortable with available programs and principles of risk/need. (New, FY 2011)
4. Reduce number of pretrial and misdemeanant offenders in jail so additional straddle cell offenders and probation violators
can be housed and treated in the county jail. (Long term)
5. Target Straddles and Probation Violators for Residential Services. (Modification)
Page 6
1. Felony Disposition Analysis (Note: Multi County CCABs are to complete an analysis for each county.)
Strategic Issue: Felony Dispositions
Public Act 511 of 1988 stipulates that counties shall develop a community corrections comprehensive plan and provide an explanation of how
the county or counties prison commitment rate will be reduced by diverting non-violent offenders, and promote recidivism reduction while public
safety is maintained. The Act is intended to encourage the participation in community corrections programs of offenders who would likely be
sentenced to imprisonment in a state correctional facility or jail, who would not increase the risk to public safety, have not demonstrated a
pattern of violent behavior, and do not have a criminal record that indicates a pattern of violent offenses.
Goal: Reduce demand for prison resources and related budgetary requirements.
Priority: Reduce prison commitment of offenders who can be safely and effectively sanctioned and treated in the community by following
the principles of effective intervention (i.e., risk, need, responsivity).
a. Using OMNI Felony Disposition data supplied by OCC for Calendar Year 2008 and 2009 provide an analysis of felony
dispositions in your county(s).
Consider such issues as increase/decrease in the total number of felony dispositions, changes in law enforcement,
prosecutorial or judicial practices, trends in prison commitment rates, in general and for specific SGL categories, and offender
characteristics.
OMNI data reflects that Oakland County's prison commitment rate (PCR) decreased from 22.3% in CY07 to 19.5% in CY08 and to 18.5% in
FY08. The county's PCR is now lower than the statewide rate of 19.3% by .8%. There were 129 fewer prison dispositions in CY 2009 than in
CY 2008 whIch accounts for the .8% drop in the PCR. Overall there was also a decrease of 353 total felony dispositons (.5% change) from
CYD8 to CY09. The SGL N/A category was reduced from 22.5% to 19.5% and the straddle cell rate was reduced from 31.4% to 29.8%.
Oakland County is below the statewide average in every ctegory except presumptive prison which is to be expected. CY09 OMNIF data shows
that of the 488 straddle cell prison dispostions, 343 (30%) of them were in Group 2 this makes the third year consecutive year we have
acheived recductions in this group. Of the 343 from Group 2, 145 (42%) of them were not under MDOC supervision. Of the 187 SGL N/A
prison dispositions, 69 (37%) were from Group 2, with 51 (74%) of them not under MDOC supervision. In the past the PCR for intermediate
b. Describe how local policies, practices, and programs are having an impact.
Clearly local programs and policies are having an impact on the prison commiment rate, we have been able to reduce the overall prison
commitment rate by 3.8% in 3 years. In addition, aggressive targeting oi straddle cell offenders has also led to a 1.6% reduction in that
category just over the past year.
c. Include information on the "offender target population" that identity offenders suitable for community corrections programs which have been
approved by your local unit of government; and how available sanctions and services will be utilized to support your local objectives and
priorities.
The target populations for Oakland County Community Corrections mimic the State Board priority targt populations. We specifically
target straddle cell offenders for several of our programs. We also have been actively targeting probation violators and OUIL III
offenders. Over the last few years our targeting has also begun to include offenders with higher risk / needs scores. When
misdemeaonors are included (pretrial supervision) they do meet the State Board suggested criteria of being DV, OUIL II, or retail
fraud. Our goals and objectives are very specific to these target populations and so when the sanctions and services are utilized by
the courts, our stated objectives will be acheived.
Page 7
Key Objective(s):
Notes: Five objectives are not required - objectives should be measurable and provide sufficient detail to monitor progress.
Use numbered outline format.
Example: Reduce PV commitment rate to 28%.
Objective # Objective
To maintain the overall and straddle cell PCR at no more than the statewide average
1
To decrease the PCR for straddle cell Group 2 offenders not under MDOC supervision from 42% to 35%. Amounts to divertng an
2 additional 25 offenders from this category.
Decrease the PV technical PRO from 25.3% to 21%
3
4
5
Strategies:
Notes: Every objective must have at least one strategy.
Ensure you provide detail on specific programs promoted as strategies.
Include all current or modified policies/practices/programs that support reduced prison commitment rates as well as new
initiatives using numbered outline format.
Example: Promote repeated commitments to residential services for probation violators rather than using incremental sanctions such as
jail and prison (Modification, FY 2011).
Strategy # .. Strategy
Continue to have Probations supervisors review any cases in which the agent recommendation is for prison to ensure that programming is
1 being recommended in every appropriate and targeted case.
To develop a quick program eligibility flow chart for use by probation to assist in making recommendations in the PSI
2
To expand the number of offenders on which a COMPAS is completed prior to sentencing by adding an additional staff to the Central Intake
and Assessment Unit to help in their completion. 3
Continue to promote the use of COMPAS as part of the PSI and encourage EB sentencing for straddle cell offenders (particularly for those
with Group 2 offenses not under MDOC supervision). This will be achieved through assignment of a second person to the CIAU who will aot 4 as a probation liasion.
Continue to promote the use of PEP and explore the possibility of using the swift and certain sanctions model (like the HOPE program).
5
Page 8
Assessment:.
Notes: Using „PIS, OMNIi, COlS and local data as appropriate, briefly explain how you will assess the attainment of your objectives
including haw frequentiy you will measure your objectives, e.g., monthly, quarterly, etc.
Make sure to use the appropriate data in your assessment.
Adcfitionai cells have been provided to answer this quest;on.
Example: Example: CCIS will not tell you if you have met a PCR reduction objective; however CCIS will tell you if more of your targeted
offender's have been enrolled in programs.
The OMNI reports will be our main source of data to determine how we are doing in attaining our goals. Goals will be monitored on a quarterly basis, as that is
generally how often OMNI reports are released. Other goals and objectives will be measured through program utilization and completion rates, specifically the
number of COMPAS reports completed through the Central Intake and Assessment Unit (CIAU).
Program utilizartion numbers will be tracked through our C*Star database so that we canmonitor usage in the PEP and other PROs. C*Star will also allow us
to track target populations.
Page 9
2. Jail Utilization Analysis (Note: Multi County CCABs are to complete an analysis for each county.)
a. in CY 2009, how many times did the County declare an official Jail
Overcrowding Stale of Emergency per Public Act 325 of 1982: 0
b. Does your county submit JP:S data?
yes
c. If no, when will the dale be submitted and/or whaf steps have been initiated to
resolve any discrepancies? 1
d. Do the quarterly JPIS reports relied t the actual jail utilization? — Its close but the S.O. tracks some categories differently.
e. What vendor or jail management software is used to report jail utilization? Northpointe
f. Strategic Issue: Jail Utilization
Jail resources should be prioritized for use by individuals convicted of crimes against persons and/or offenders who present a higher risk of recidivism. Local comprehensive
community corrections plans should reduce the demand for jail beds by diverting non-violent and lower-risk offenders, promote recidivism reduction while maintaining public
safety, and reduce jail overcrowding.
Goal: Operate local jails at 90% or less of the rated design capacity which can reduce the costs and liabilities for She county.
Priority: Improve jail utilization and reduce reed to board inmates in other facilities, avoid releases under the emergency overcrowding act, maintain jail at or below the
rated design capacity.
(1) Provide an analysis of local jail utilization using JPIS data (if available) including the average daily populations, lengths of stay. .
Local jail data shows that there was a significant reduction in the LOS for sentenced misdemeanors from 28.9 in 013 to 23.6 in '09. The LOS for sentenced felons also
decreased slightly from 88.4 to 86,9. These reductions have pushed the overall LOS down as well from 30.7 to 26. The large reductions in the LOS have 2 major
contibuting facotrs. First, there are less arrests being made within Oakland County the jail reports about 3,000 less admissions from last year. Second the large number
of early releases are clrivng the LOS down. A majority of the early relases are misdemeanors therefore that is were the large impact is being seen. The unsentenced
poluation is reported at 29% with the sentenced population being 71%. The reduction of the PCR means that more offenders are being kept locally, and there was an
increase in straddle cell jail sentences, 59 additional offenders over 08.
(2) What policies and practices influence jail population (i.e., bed allocation plans, earned credits, and status of any jail overcrowding task forces) of stakeholders that
infiuence the fail population.
The granting of a 25% time cuts for offenders woo complete the LESP or Challenge to Change has helped the jail poputtaion. However, the biggest infulence on the
current jail population is the Emergency Release Act. The Act triggers early releases when the jail is at 95% of capacity. Therefore we are releasing offenders on
almost a daily basis. While many of these releses are within a few days of the originally scheduled release date, it is not the ideal situation for dealing with overcrowding.
There were over 3,000 early releases last year. These releases happen automatically and with not much fanfare, which has dulled the urgency to deal with jail
overcrowding. The CJCC has not meet since the fall of 09, and its current status is undetermined.
Page 10
Key Objective(s):
Notes: Five objectives are not required.
Refe- to the most recent PIS data while establishing objectives to improve jail utilization - the objectives should be supported by the data.
Example: Reduce LOS of sentenced misdemeanants by 10 days.
Objective # Objective
I Maintain or renuce the current unsentenced jail populational 29%through the use of pretrial services and pretrial supervision options
1
To ensure :Mat those released under the Emergency Jail Crowding Act have COMPAS scores considered to be low risk for violence and recidivism
2
increase progam utilization lo 55%-103%, specifically PRCs, LESP and Challenge to Change
3
o j To reduce group 2 straddle cell offenders jail commitments from 64.8% to 60% (involves diverting 56 offenders).
4
Maintain or reduce the LOS for sentenced misdemeanor and felony offender populations through programming and structured sentences.
5
Strategies:
Notes: Every Objective should have at feast one strategy.
Include all current, proposed, or modified policies/practices/programs to improve jail utilization such as sheriff's good time, trustee credits, earned release
Example: Grant additional 5 days credit beyond sheriffs good time for trustees (continuation).
Strategy ft Strategy
To promote the use of existing'. In jail" programs to probation agents through presentations to line staff and supervisors
To provide Circuit Court with COMPAS scores so that only the lowest risk offenders are being granted early release under the act.
.Provide Probation Agents with the COIV1PAS scores prior to the PSI so that the ''needs of the offender as well as progrmming options may be consicered in
3 the recommendation
Develop an eligibility tree to simplify program placement decisions and encourage structured sentences
4
To promote the Step Forward program as an appropriate sentence for Group 2 straddle cell offenders that are considered high need according to the
5 COMPAS scores.
Assessment:
Notes: Using JPIS, OMNI, CCIS and local data as appropriate, briefly explain how you will assess the attainment of your objectives including how frequently you will
measure your objective, e.g., monthly, quarterly, etc.
Make sure to use the appropriate data in your assessment.
Example: CCIS will not tell you it you have met a PCR reduction objective; however CCIS will tell you it more of your targeted offender's have been enrolled in programs,
It is hoped that the JPIS data will be available again soon. Trying to measure achievement based on different data sets does not produce reliable results. JPIS has been
our main assessment fool of objectives in the past and will continue to be in the future I' if is fixed. We will also be using new reports form the Northpointe web service to
determine program utilization as well as appropriateness of offender placement.
Page 11
_ .
Current Jail Utilization:
Note: Regional CCABs should list each county and the rated design capacity (RDC) for each facility. Please refer to JP1S data for detailed information
County Rated Design Capacity Utilization as percentage of Rated Design Capacity. .
Oakland County 1438 96% i
Has the jail operational capacity increased or decreaseo within the past year? Please describe below:
The current bed capacity for OCJ is 1,438, this is 370 beds less than in 2008. These bads were lost due to closures of the Southfield, Boot Camp and Frank Greenan
facilities. The modification of the work release program, se that all offenders are monitored electronically and do not physically retrun to the jail, is a practice that will have a
significant affect on the jail popluation. Some Circuit Court Judges have voiced disdain for the new work release and have vowed not to use it. especially in 01.Jil._ Ill cases.
Page 12
3. LOCAL PRIORITIES:
Present information relative to any other local priorities, e.g. public education, which have not been identified in the above sections.
The Offender Link system by OmniLink is fully implemented within the Pretrial Services Supervision and Electronic Monitoring Units.
Defendants are required to calf into the automated phone system based on differential levels of supervision. The "script" or series of
questions has been customized to meet the needs of pretrial defendnats. All responses are recorded. The system provides the case
maangers with exception reports and a to do' list daily. If individuals do not appear on the list, they are in compliance. This allows the case
managers to spend more time assiting high risk / high need defendants rather than answering routine caiss all day. This also allow for the
advancement and intergration of EBP within the supervision unit. The Offender link system also has the capaicty to remind defendants of
their court appearances. A reminder call will be made to the defendant 3 days and again one day before the scheduled hearing. The cost
of the system will be funded th much the JAG until 2013. As a result of the effeciecny of the software a full time case manager was moved
from supervision into the Step Forward program,
Budget cuts continue to be a source of concern. The Sheriff's Office closed the Frank Greenen satellite building on May 7, 2010. This has
reduced the jail capacity to 1,438. To offset the loss of beds, the Sheriff's Office moved all work release offenders to electronic monitoring.
Offenders on the program will still be considered "in custody" but will be confined to their own homes when not at work. This frees up the
remaining bed space for offenders who are not considered good risks to be in the community. However, this move has not been embraced
by all Circuit Court Judges, espeically in OUIL III cases. There is also some concern as to if the EM portion of the sentence complies with
the statutory requirement that all OUIL111 offenders serve a minimum of 30 days in jail. The effect that the changes to this program will have
on the jail population, speicifcallly the OUlL III offenders remains to be seen.
The pretrial risk assessment project has been placed on indefinate hold. The only pieces left to complete are training and implementation.
Unfortunately unforeseen funding issues have caused county administration to halt the project. A time line for resuming the project has not
been given.
Recently Community Corrections has partnered with the Oakland Livingston Human Service Agency who was received a large DOL grant to
assist offenders in obtaining employment. We found office space within our facility for OLHSA so that offenders may immediately be
referred to, and seen, by the OLHSA staff. They also assist with transportation, housing and are running a parent reunification group within
our facilities. The partnership has gained attention national as a promising model for other agencies who have this DOL grant.
Page 13
348 750
67,208
198,979
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
DDJRP BUDGET SUMMARY'
Oakland County
FY 2011
198,979
67,208
346,750
612,937
198,979
67,208 1420-01
346 750
612,937
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
, EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUREAU - OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
BUDGET SUMMARY
Oakland County
FY 2011
FtINDING SO RCES
CciS TOTAL
PROGRAIVI -ACCOUNT CATEGORY PROGRAM i pLAris i,, LOCAL TOTAL . FIIIIRP/CTP IVIDOC • ••• •• • FEE REVENUES
CPDE / SERVICE FUNDS • RESOURCES FUNDING
FUNDING
Community Service
Placement A19 - -
Work Crew A25 - _ -
Su b Total - _ _ -
Education
Educational Services BOO - - -
Cognitive Change 617 292,645 292,645 - 292,645
Sub Total 292,645 _292,645 - 292,645
Employment & Training
Employment &Training Services COO - , -
Sub Total
Intensive Supervision
' Day Reporting D04 - I -
Electronic Monitoring DOS _
Supervision D23 - I -
Sub Total -
- I
.
Menial Health .
OUtpalient El 8 101,000 I 101,000 - 101,000
Sex Offender Treatment E19. I _ _
Sub Total 101,000 - 101,4)00 I - , 101,000
Pretrial Services:
Screening/Assessment F22 355,661 - 355,661 , 1,161,517 1,517,178
Supervision F21 133,518 - 133,518 I 293,977 - 427,495
Electronic Monitoring P24, 65,677 - 65,677. - 65,677
. . .. - 2,010,350
Sub Total 554,856 - • 554 856 1 1,455,494
Substance Abase
Testing G1.7 - - I - _
Qutpalient Treatment G* .. 88,328 88,328 i 88,328
C4gnitive Tieatmerit G19 - - - I - -
.Sub Total - 88,328 88,328 • - - 88,328
Case Management
Screening?Assessment 122: 29,265 8,931 38,196 . 165,853 - 204,049
Jail-Based/Case Management 12a 92,038 - 92,038 98,835 190,874
Community Case Management 124 387,693 101,720 489,413 572,995 1,062,408
Sub Total 508,996 110 651 _ 619,647 637,684 - 1,457,331
Other ZOO , - -
Sub Total - -
i
I Total Program Funding . 1,457,49719879: 1656 -
,9 1 475 2293,178
I
_ _.
3,949,654
IO.CAO Administratidn.
.Personnel. 69,354 1 69,54 615,311 - 684,665
1Contractual Services 27,207 27,207 - 27.,207
Equipment - I -
Supplies 500
I 500 - 500
Travel 750 750 - - 750
Training 750 1 750 - 750 i
._=000 1,000 Board Expenses 1,000 1
Public Education 1,000
I 1,000 - - 1,000
Other 100 100 - - 109
Sub Total . 100,661 100,661 615,311 715,972.
Totals WM/ 1 558,1-58 198,979 :: 1,757.137 2,908,489 4,665 626
Rider D
DDJRP
sessrnent & Tre-alrient Services
In Jail Housing/5 Day Assessment
Residential Services
Intal.DDJRP Funding
SCHEDULE A
FY 2010
Award
FY 2011
Application
Variance
FY 2011 Application Variance
vs FY 2010 Award as %
$1,212,708 $ 1,350,697 $ 137,989 111.38%
469,987 473,648
$1,682,695 $ 1,824,345 $
3,661 100.78%
141,650 108,42%
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS/SHERIFF'S OFFICE FY 2011 COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GRANT APPLICATION
FY 2010 Grant Award versus FY 2011 Application
Fund 27370 Proiect # GR0000000093 Bud Ref 2010
Revenue + Activity l'A"
Dept. Program Account
REVENUES
Community Corrections
1070401 113180 615571 Grants State
Sheriff - Corrective Services
4030301 112650 615571 Grants State
EXPENDITURES
Community Corrections
Name
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
1070401
113000
113000
113000
113000
113000
113000
113000
113000
113000
113000
113000
113000
113020
113020
113035
113035
113035
123010
123010
123010
113120
113120
113120
113120
113130
113130
113130
113150
702010 Salaries
722740 Fringe Benefits
731213 Membership, Dues
732018 Travel, Conference
750294 Materials, Supplies
773630 IT Development
770631 Bldg, Space Rental
731941 training
774636 IT Cost
778675 Telecommunications
776666 Public Education
731818 Board expense
702010 Salaries
722740 Fringe Benefits
702010 Salaries
722740 Fringe Benefits
730373 Contracted Services
702010 Salaries
722740 Fringe Benefits
731458 Professional Services
702010 Salaries
722740 Fringe Benefits
731773 Software Rental/Lease
730373 Contracted Services
702010 Salaries
722740 Fringe Benefits
731458 Professional Services
702010 Salaries
$ 44,596
27,020
100
750
500
10,000
7,669
750
7,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
81,253
52,011
27,084
18,776
10,797
283,216
154,582
1,650
23,100
900
11,487
4,845
157,568
106,482
5,000
80,514
43,926 $
25,428
100
750
500
10,000
9,207
750
7,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
80,031
53,487
26,677
19,225
19,775
218,717
136,614
330
22,048
950
6,267
8,931
203,634
134,059
50,000
76,339
(670) 98.50%
(1,592) 94.11%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
1,538 120.05%
100.00%
100.00°/.
100.00%
104.00%
- 100.00%
(1,222) 98.50%
1,476 102.84%
(407) 98.50%
449 102.39%
8,978 183.15%
(64,499) 77.23%
(17,968) 88.38%
(1,320) 20.00%
(1,052) 95.45%
50 105.56%
(5,200) 54.65%
4,086 184.33%
46,066 129.24%
27,577 125.90%
45,000 1000.00%
(4,175) 94.81%
4030301
4030301
4030301
4030301
4030301
4030301
4030301
112650
112650
112652
112652
112651
112651
112620
215
(5,976)
2,121
(2,713)
10,014
100.00%
139.67%
91.35%
107.92%
98.47%
109.23%
100. 00%
3,661 100.78%
$141,650 108.42%
1,761 107.46%
99,113 244.78%
137,989 111.38%
1070401 113150 722740 Fringe Benefits
1070402 113190 731458 Professional Services
Total Community Corrections Division
Sheriff - Corrective Services
23,620 25,381
68,458 167,571
$ 1,212,708 $ 1,350,697 $
702010 Salaries
722740 Fringe Benefits
702010 Salaries
722740 Fringe Benefits
702010 Salaries
722740 Fringe Benefits
731885 Support Services
Total Sheriff's Office
$ 21,000 $ 21,000 $
542 757
69,105 63,129
26,788 28,909
176,886 174,173
108,458 118,472
67,208 67,208
$ 469,987 $ 473,648 $
$ 1,682,695 $ 1,824,345
NOTES:
County responsible for 50% match in costs for one (1) Community Corrections Support Specialist and one (1) Supervisor - Community Corrections - Total match is $94,691.
State responsible for payment and billing the Probation Residential Centers. The County is responsible for requesting the allocation and tracking the costs.
County requesting an allocation of $2,115,175 for FY 2011.
FISCAL NOTE (MR #10163 July 7, 2010
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, TOM MIDDLETON, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS — MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY
CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND APPLICATION FOR FY 2011
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above
referenced resolution and finds:
1. This is the 17th year of the grant application with the Michigan Department of
Corrections, Office of CommunIty Corrections.
2. The Community Corrections Division has submitted a request in the amount of
$1,824,345 for plans and services and an appropriation of $2,115,175 for the
Probation Residential Centers.
3. The application is $141,650 more than the FY 2010 grant award of $1,682,695.
4. The grant period is from October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011.
5. The application seeks full-time eligible funding for positions 7425, 7426, 7428,
7429, 7432, 7433, 9243, 9427, 9291, 9295, 9648, 9649, and PTNE funding for
position 9292 within the Community Corrections Division.
6. The application seeks funding for positions 7834 and 9396, whereby the State
will fund 50% of the costs, and the County will match 50% of the total costs for
these two positions in the Community Corrections Division.
7. The application further seeks full-time eligible funding for positions 7419, 7420,
7418, 7421, and PTNE funding for positions 7417 and 9397 in the Sheriffs —
Corrective Services Division.
8. PA511 of 1988 requires that the "County Board or Board of Commissioners of
the County approve the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by the advisory
Board".
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Gingell,
Greimel and Taub absent.
Resolution #10163 July 7, 2010
Moved by Runestad supported by Zack the resolution (with fiscal note attached) be adopted,
AYES: Coleman, Coulter, Douglas, Gingell, Gosselin, Greimel, Hatchett, Jackson, Jacobsen, Long,
McGillivray, Middleton, Potts, Runestad, Schwartz, Scott, Taub, Woodward, Zack, Bullard, Burns
Cabello. (22)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolution (with fiscal note attached) was adopted.
I IEREBY APPROVE THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION
.0,4 ,............_._......._____,..------
7 / I 3 /AP