Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2010.09.23 - 10329- September 1,2010 Miscellaneous Resolution 114219 BY: Public Services Committee, Jim Runestad, Vice Chairperson RE: Circuit Court - Family Division - Oakland County Child Care Fund Budget 2010-2011 TO: The Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WIIEREAS. Pursuant to provisions of Act 280 of the Public Acts of 1975. Oakland County required to tievelop and submit a plan and budget lOr the provision of funding of foster care services to the Bureau of ,FLiven i le Justice, Department of Human Services, annually; and WHEREAS.. 1 he Oakland County Circuit Court - Family Division, County of Oakland, and the Oakland County Department of Health and I luman Services have developed the attached foster care services budget for the State's fiscal year, October. I. 2010 through September 30, 2011: and 'WHEREAS, The Public Services Committee has reviewed this budget and recommends its submission to the State Office; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Oakland County Board of Comm issiorters authorizes submission of the 2010-2011 Oakland County Child Care Fund Budget to the Bureau of Juvenile Justice's Child Care Fund Unit, Department of Human Services. MR, CHAIRPERSON, On behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move the adoption of the tOregoinv, resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Public Services Committee Vote: Nlotion carried unanimousIN on a roll call vote • urt Contact Pomo urt Contact Person Cooperrider, John {Oak Cooperrider, John {Oakland) "112 E-Mall Address Cooperriderj@oakgov.com Fail Address rTelephone Numbs 248-858-0256 ITelephone Numbe Hull. Susan (Oakland) 2011 ill Hull. Susan (Oakland) HS Contact Person ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES COURT $25,379,861.00 COMBINED $2,878,725.00 $26,929,651.00 OHS f2,878 725.00 $1,549 90.00 $0.00 $ I Page 1 of 1 DHS-2091 (jjoitlive\eeNJOLL2091.htm) r A 1 COUNTY CHILD CARE BUDGET SUMMARY Michigan Department of Humen Styvkes (OHS) Child and Family Services County Oakiend Fiscal Year !October 1, 2010 through September 30, TYPE OF CARE I. CHILD CARE FUND A. Family Foster Care B. Institutional Care — C. In Home Care-- D. Independent Living ea..441.1..11.1.14.1rif $1,032,325.00 $4,549,937.24 $50,000.00 1 $4,5491937.24 $1,082,325.00 E. SUBTOTALS F. Revenue — $5 460 840.00 $29,979,798.24 $2,300,000.00 $35,440,638.24 $2,300,000.00 G. Net Expenditure $5,460,840.00 $27,679,798.24143,140,638.24 COST SHARING RATIOS County 50%1State 50% CHILD CARE FUND Foster Care During Release Appeal Period COST SHARING RATIOS County 0%1State 100% JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES FUND Basic Grant $ 1 COST SHARING RATIOS County 0%1State 100% $15,000.00 Maximum IV. TOTAL EXPENDITURE $33,140,638.24 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THE PROGRAM BUDGET PRESENTED ABOVE. We certify that the budget submitted above represents an anticipated gross expenditure for the fiscal year: October 1, 2010 through/September 30,12011 , Presiding Judte I ii ,._ ,., , IV Date County Direct o DNS Sign tu . -Date 8 Chairperson, Board of Commissioner's Signature Data AndlOr County Executive Signature Date The Family independence Agency will not discriminate AUTHORITY: Act 87, Publication of 1978, as amended. against any Individual or group because of race, sex, COMPLETION: Required religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, political PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, government. hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an DHS office In your county. DHS-2091 (Rev. 5-00) Previous edition may be weed. MS Word-07 https://jjoltfamcare.net/genfune.exe 8/3/2010 PRIOR YEAR (12 Month Period) THIS YEAR (Most Recent 12 Months) DIFFERENCE (Totals) Child Care Fund Summary Report DHS.4472o(jjoit_live\cef\JJOLT_4472.htm) Page 1 of 2 CHILD CARE FUND SUMMARY REPORT Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice COURT-JUDICIAL SUMMARY REPORT (Section A completed by Family Division of Circuit Court) Section A is required from all courts as part of the Annual Plan and Budget process. _ PRIOR YEAR THIS YEAR DIFFERENCE (12 Month (Most Recent (Totals) Period) 12 Months) FROM: FROM; (SECTION A) 1/1/2008 1/1/2009 PERCENT REPORTED ITEM TO: TO: 12/31/2008 12/31/2009 DON. Neglect Total Doling. Neglect Total Required information Abuse Abuse (4. or -) I. JUDICIAL (For all Youth Served) : 1. Number of Youth 3842 483 4325 3392 299 3691 -15% Having Petitions/Written Complaints Filed 2. Number of Youth 2259 412 2671 1950 267 2217 -17% Having Petitions Authorized 3. Number of Youth 2057 423 2480 1907 277 2184 -12% Adjudicated 4. Number of Court 1552 1568 3120 1594 1537 3131 0% Wards at Beginning of 12 Month Period 5. Number of COU rl 1594 1537 3131 1369 1100 2469 -21% Wards at End of 12 Month Period 6. Number of State Ward 28 239 267 27 143 170 -36% Commitments (Act 150 & 220) DHS — CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES (CPS) SUMMARY REPORT (Section B completed by County Department of Human Services) Section B is required from all county DHS Departments having Child Care Fund Sub-Accounts as part of the Annual Plan and Budget process. FROM: 1/1/2008 FROM: 1/1/2009 (SECTION B) REPORTED ITEM TO 12131/2008 TO: 12/3112009 PERCENT https://jjolt ,famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Child Care Fund Summary Report DHS-4472 (jolt livelecEBOLT_4472,htm) Page 2 of 2 441 .41 — Delinq. Neglect Total Delinq. Neglect Total Required information Abilae Abuse (+ or -) , i. CPS, PETITION, and ADJUDICATIONS 1 1 1. Number of CPS 4608 4608 5772 5772 25% Complaints Investigated I 2. Number of Categcry I 1143 1143 1443 1443 26% and Category 11 CPS Cases ,._ 3. Number of Petitions 287 287 316 315 10% Filed 4. Number of 273 273 277 277 1% Adjudications 1. Number of Youth in 0 0 Detention 2 Number of Youth in 0 0 Diversion Programs 3. Number of Youth 0 0 supervised by Probation Officers ' 4, Number of YOuth 0 0 waived to Adult Court 5. Number of Youth in 0 0 correctional confinement 6. Number of Youth in 0 0 , Drug Court The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race. sex, religion, age. national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing. etc under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an OHS office in Your county. AUTHORITY: PA 87 of 1978. COMPLETION: Is required. CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLET1ON: Child care fund will not be reimbursed. https://jjoltfameare.net/genfune.exe 8/312010 DHS-167, In-Home Care Certification (jjolt_litvegf\JJOL11167.htm) Page 1 of 2 IN-HOME CARE CERTIFICATION Fund Restriction and Program Requirements Michigan Department of Human Services October 1. 2010 through September 30, 2011 In-Home Care (NC) program expenditures are restricted to now or expanded programs that are alternatives out-of-home institutional or foster care. II4C funds may not be used to duplicate services. A. ELIGIBLE CLIENT/STAFFING 1. Children under lite jurisdiction of the Court, as an attemative to removal from the child's home, provided that. a. such care is an alternative to detention or other out-of-home care and: *A written complaint has been received and accepted by the Court the expenditures are not for judicial cost " the caseload Sae or services are intensive * non-scheduled payments are not made to pay for basic family needs otherwise available through public assistance programs • the parent(s) and the youth have agreed in writing to receive IHC services, or a temporary order has been entered pending art adjudication hearing; or b. such care is provided to children who at the dispositional hearing are °teletext into IHC as an alternative to foster care or Other out-of- home care, and: *the expenditures are not tor judicial oasts the services are intensive. and * non-scheduled payments are not trade to pay for basic family needs otherwise available through public assistance programs 2. The IHC earty return option may be used to accelerate the early return of a youth from family foster care institutional care, or other out-of-home care when the case identifies an early return goal arid the services are provided to members of the child's family. The case plan should identify the family strengths and deficiencies which, if corrected. would permit the youth to be returned home early. IHC services would typically be provided to the family during the time that the youth is in out-of-horne care and, if necessary, for a period of time after the youth has returned to the family. 3. The County Department of Human Services (DHS) may provide IHC services if the juvenile court orders care and supervision of a court ward. 4. The County OHS may provide NC services from its subaccount for CPS category I, or category 1,1 or category III cases provided that: such INC services prevent the need to petition the juvenile court for removal or prevent placement in voluntary foster care. and * non-scheduled payments are not made to cover basic family needs otherwise available through public assistance programs. 5.111C funds shall not be used to meet the court staff-to-youth population ratio of 1 to 6,000 as specified in the Juvenile Court Standards and Administrative Guidelines for the Care of Children 6. Court staff hired after 4/30/85. who are responsible for case plan development and monitoring, must meet the qualifications established in the Juvenile Court Standards and Administrative Guidelines for the Care of Children, " Supervisory Personnel Probation Officers* Counselors 7. County DHS staff and supervisor staff providing direct INC services must meet the standards set forth in Rules 400.6124. 400.6126 and 400.6126 of the Administrative Rules for Child Placing Agencies. 8. County DHS staff and supervisory staff providing direct IHC services must be state civil servants assigned to classifications and levels equivalent to staff arid supervisors in the state foster care program. 9. In INC programs. county OHS or Juvenire Court contractual staff who are responsible for case plan development and monitoring, must meet the requirements of staff supervising children in foster care, as established in the Juvenile Court Standards and Guidelines for the care of children. 10. NC reimbursements for program and administrative office space. county purchased supplies, salaries and wages for county employees who provide direct services or support for these services are subject to the same restrictions as reimbursements in county-operated institutions. B. USE OF THE IN-HOME CARE OPTION FOR NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS If all other IHC requirements are met, budgeted non-scheduled payments for services available to youth in foster care may be provided to youth in their own home. (Non-scheduled payments are defined in the Child Care Handbook). C. CASE RECORD DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS Individual case cocumentation is required for ail IHC clients. A caseload list is required for every IHC component. As a minimum. ease records must include the following: * family case assessment which identifies, by service component, the problems and need for INC services https://jjoh.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 DATE: The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age. national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with Cisablitties Act you are invited to make your needs known to an DHS office in your county. DHS-167, In-Home Care Certification (jjolt1ive\ccf\LIPL,T_167.htm) Page 2 of 2 *day of intake *type of complaint/allegation. supported as follows: j delinquency — a copy of the complaint or court order, when applicable, placing the child in IHC as part of a formal disposition. (2) abuse/neglect — allegation and substantiation entered on the D4S-133 in Department cases; *treatment plan which identifies the treatment, objectives and the action steps and timetables which will be used to reach the objectives • case plan changes as a result of supervisor/case worker or contracteeicontractor case reviews *quarterly progress reports *dales, type and purpose of service contacts made with the client. Note: weekly face to face contact is required • legal status of youth and the family, and the living arrangement of the youth at termination of NC services. Note: Case record content for all foster care cases, under the supervision of a county DHS, should be maintained according to Services Manual Item 722 (6a-9). It is suggested that all IhIC material be Kept in the first inside section of the foster care file. Ii-IC service purchases from a Private or public provider requires a contract unless the service is supportive of a large component (i.e., clothing or dental work for a youth serviced through an established IHC program as for example, intensive supervision). These non- scheduled payments do not require contracts. Only IHC expenditures described in the Annual Plan and Budget and approved by Child and Family Services are reimbursable. Ii-IC funds and services are subject to state review and audit and non-compliance with the above restrictions and requirements may result in withholding or repayment of state reimbursement. All [NC contractual services purchased with county appropriated monies Plan be the sole responsibility of the county. The signature of the County DHS Director must be with authortty from the County to enter into contractual agreements on behalf of the County for the expenditure of the County Child Care Funds. The county must have all IFIC contracts processed through the county's formal contract approval procedures. The signatures below certify that IHC policy stated in this document have been reviewed. It is understood that these are conditions for claimill'HC fund reimburstvnent. _ DATE: UL(2,- Presiding Judge of )Family Division of Circuit Court, Juvenile Division and/or County Director of Department of Human Services as Agent of the County AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978. RESPONSE: Is required. CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will not be reimbursed. https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfunc .exe 8/3/2010 DHS-2093 - Summary (jjolt_1ivelccf\JJOLT_21091htm) Page 1 of 2 Michigan Department of Human Services I October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 2 I. List all service components which make up the 1HC program and specify the requested information for each. CCF Other Public Gross Court Service (Adm. Unit) Expenditure Funding Expenditure Components 1 1 intensive Court 1,041,022.26 0.00 1,041,022.26 Probation _ 2 STRIDE (Short- Court 76,075.99 0.00 76,076.99 Term Rapid Intervention and Diversionl 3 Parent CHOICE Court 22,060.00 0.00 22,050.00 Program 4 Famlly-Focused Court 468,336.00 0.00 469,336.00 Juvenile Drug court 5 Crossroads for Court 101,230.00 0.00 101,230.00 Youth LPC Day Program 6 Crossroads for Court 891,015.03 0.00 591,016.00 Youth Learning Center 7 Wraparound Cowl 22,131.00 , 0.00 22,131.00 Service; 1 0 Psychological Court 937,662.00 0.00 937,662,00 Clinic Services 9 Juvenile Reentry Court 991,426.00 0.00 991,426.00 Program DHS Service 1 Components ! Subtotal - Court si 4,549,937.24 0.00 sI 4,549,937.24 Subtotal - DHS $ 0.00 $ 0.00 SI 000 ._. Grant Total $ 4,549.937.24 $ 0.00 $ 4.549,937.24 . _. II. For each service component listed above, there must be completed a separate 1N-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (DHS-2094), filling in the appropriate budget items. If something does not show, please review budget detail forms. 1The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or I https://jjolt.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/12/2010 [Service Component (Full Title/Name) Intensive Probation Check One F In Home Care Basic Grant Court DHS 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\coNJOL111.1094.htm) Page 1 of 8 1N-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094) Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice October 1,2010 through September 30. 2011 A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit 1. Salary arid Wages ! NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST , Michael Carninidi Intensive Caseworker 40 $49,189.00 Karen Evanson Intensive Caseworker 40 s60,389.00 i . Kevin Gross intensive Caseworker 40 $80,389.00 Ed Jones Intensive Caseworker 40 $49,189.00 Dave Pachmayer Intensive Caseworker 40 $49,189.00 Jerry Seawright Intensive Caseworker 40 $60,389.00 1 , 1 i BIll Hamilton Intensive Casework Supervisor 40 $75,897.00 Tracey Howden Technical Assistant 10 $11,036,00 (1/4 of Salary) Dallas Coleman Chief, Casework 10 $16,520.50 (114 of Salary) . Pamela Davis Manager - Court Services 8 09,144.40 (1/5 of Salary) I College Interns (8) College Intern 20 $67,224.00 2 Fringe Benefits (Specify) Michael Caminidi $33,341 .00 Karen Evanson $44,057.00 Kevin Gross $41,745.00 Ed Jones $33,341.00 https://jjoh.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\cciASJOLT 2.094.htm) Page 2 of 8 • Dave Pachmayer $33,341.00 Jerry Seawright $36,844.00 Bill Hamilton $42,474.00 Tracey Howden $7,747.75 Dallas Coleman $10,165.00 Pamela Davis $9,464.60 Clinic Interns $2,776.00 $813,842.25 Total Personnel B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above) 1. Travel Rate/Mile Estimate No. of YEARLY COST Miles Mileage .5 69330 $34,665.00 2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed' YEARLY COST Electronic Surveillance $73,300.00 Communication $800.00 $ .__. 3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed Rate/Unit YEARLY COST Client Motivation $4,120.00 - Travel and Conference $300.00 Telephone $3,000.00 Indirect Cost (14.26% x $518,556) $73,945.00 . Must comply with the definitions $190,130.00 and limits Total Program Support listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbooic. https://jjoh.fameare.net/genftmc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 3 of 8 • 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ive\ccf\JJOLT_Z094.htm) C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UNITS/ NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST r Drug Testing 10.00 test 1500 $15,000.00 Adolescent Anger Management 225.00 session 98 $22,050.00 Group Therapy $ $ 2. Closed End Contracts $ _ $ $ $ $37,050.00 Total Contractual D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of (Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST $ S $ $ $ $ $ 4 $ $ 1. $ $ ._. Total Nan-Scheduled $0•00 E. SERVICE COMPONENT IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT (Add Totals for A, B. C. and 0 above) Total Service Component Cost $1,041,022.25 https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Number of Youth Petitioned Number of Days of Shelter Care Page 4 of 8 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\ccfiTOLT ,2094.htm) If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. triird party payments) specify the following: F. PUBLIC REVENUE: SOURCE To Pe Provided YEARLY COST , $ - $ i _ $ : . $0.00 Total Public Revenue G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost {E-F) TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED WIC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE (Gross Costs Less Other Revenue) $1,041,022.25 AUTHORITY' Act 87. Public Acts of 1978. as amended. ' COMPLETION: Is Required. PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local government. DNS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may be used MS Word-97 The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color. marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing, etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an OHS office in your county. IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471) REPORT/REQUEST Michigan Department of Human Services One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new, revised or continued component. Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered F IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU, ' Intensive Probation 7 BASIC GRANT October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 -Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number Davie, Pamela (63) F COURT 7 DHS (248 ) 868-0247 I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply. 1. COMPONENT STATUS CONTINUED 7 TERMINATED 7 REVISED 7 NEW 2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED A: Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT 7 NEGLECT B. Children NOT limier Jurisdiction of Court 7 WRITTEN CPSoateoryI.IIor IIi COMPLAINT CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE I COURT 3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT — (Check primary area(s) only.) A REDUCTION IN: F Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 11— 11— I- F Number of Adjudications Number of Days of Family Foster Care Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220) , 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ivelcefITOLL24,094.htm) Page 5 of 8 4. SERVICE FOCUS F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home r-- Effect early return from foster or institutional care II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR INSTRUCTIONS: . in columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete). . In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year. lime Renee! Reported Oct 1 thru Sept. 30 Time Period Requested Oct. 1 thru Sept 30 5 8. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 9. PROJECTED COST NUMBER PROJECTED NUMBER , A. Number of Youth/Family Served 306 $ 330 $ B. Number of Service Units (Define Service Un4=calendar days 49998 $ 59400 $ ) _ _ C Total Component Cost $1,057,474.50 $1,041,022.25 D. Average Cost Per Unit $21.15 $17.53 _ . E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family $3,455.80 $3,154.61 III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified In Section 1.3. 10. NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS — DAYS A. Youth Petitioned $ B. Adjudications 56 210 0421,470.00 _ C. Days of Family Foster Care $ D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention 90 3288 $555,672.00 1 E. Days of Shelter Care a F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 208 39520 $61678,880.00 G. State Wards Committed $ https://jjolt.famcare.netigenfunc ,exe 83/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\c,cfuTJ01.7 ,2094.htm) Page 6 of 8 IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION: For ALL Components In effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed 13. Assess strertg1hs. weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results. Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served by this component. IN-HOME BUDGET DETAIL REPORT A. Program Support 1. Personal Mileage. Oakland County reimbursement rate is $.5 for all employees. The $34,665 mileage reimbursement would cover the six casework, one supervisor and eight college intern positions. 2. Electronic Surveillance. This option remains a favorite of ICU staff, both as a front end transition for those entering ICU from temporary detention and as a consequence for short of program failure. We anticipate an ongoing usage of ten units for ICU youngsters with a possibility of another four for court ordered home detention cases. As in past years, we retain the flexibility to increase capacity if caseloads warrant. 3. Communications. Cellular phones are now available to all Intensive Caseworkers. The use of the cellular phones increases the efficiency and effectiveness of staff time. It allows for quick responses to the needs of this high-risk population. 4. Client Motivation Fund. This has been a part of our program since the Early Offender Program's inception. The fund is designed to shape behavior by providing specific rewards. Part of the money is also used to underwrite group reward and enrichment activities. B. Contractual Services Drug Testing: $10/test x 1500 tests r. $15,000.00 Adolescent Anger Management Group Therapy: $225/session x 98 sessions .7-- $22,050.00 GRAND TOTAL $37,050.00 INTENSIVE SALARIES PROJECTED FRINGE 2011 BENEFIT NAME SALARY Michael Caminidi.. $49,189.00....$33,341.00 Karen Evanson.... $60,389.00. .. .$44,057.00 Kevin Gross $60,389.00. .. .$41,745.00 Ed Jones $49,189... 333,341.00 Dave Pachmayer .$49,189.00. ...$33,341.00 Jerry Seawright... $60,389.00.. ..$36,844.00 Bill Hamilton $75,897.00. .. 342,474.00 Tracey Howden(114) $11,036.00.... $7,747.75 Dallas Coleman(1M)$16,520.50... 310,165.00 Pamela Davis. 41/5) $19,144.40 $9,454.80 College Interns. $67,224.00. ... $2,776.00 https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report tholt_live\ceMOLT 20941W Page 7 of 8 TOTALS $518,559.90... $295,286.35 1N-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT REPORT/REQUEST I. Service and Cost Information for Fiscal Year Completed or Being Requested for Next Fiscal Year: (All financial and program figures are projections based on actual experience October 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010). A. Number of Youth Served (2010 -2011) We project service to 330 youth (228 new youth and 102 current youth). Six workers with an average caseload of 19 youth and an average length of 180 days of service. B. Number of Calendar Days of In-Home Care (2010 - 2011) 59,400 We are projecting 59,400 days of in-home care (330 youth x 180 days). A service unit is defined as calendar days of in-home care. (See Program Description) C. Total Component Cost (2009 - 2010) - $1,005,135.42 Actual Cost for 2009 -2010 is based on actual six months October 1,2009 through March 31, 2010 projected over the fiscal year. Projected amount has been adjusted to reflect known amounts owing but unpaid as of March 31, 2010. II. IMPACT EVALUATION Must be completed for continuing or ending components. Areas of Impact Number of Youth Numbers or Days Costs Youth Petitioned Adjudication's 56 210 421,470 Days of Family Foster Care Days of Out-of-Home Detention 1122 3,288 555,672 Days of Shelter Care Days of Residential Treatment Care .. 22 youth 39,520 6,678,880 3,960 days State Wards Committed A. Each new adjudication costs $2007 to process through the system from signing of the petition, through entering of a new disposition. A cost reduction of $421,470 was experienced by the 210 fewer youth adjudicated. (The 210 fewer adjudications X $2007 r- $421,470 cost reduction.) B. A consequence of Intensive youth re-adjudicating is frequently temporary detention pending Court actions leading to a new disposition being entered. Our experience is 50% of this population would be placed in detention for an average of 42 days. A reduction of 210 fewer adjudicated youth X 50% X 42 (average days of detention) results in a reduction of 4410 days of detention. From that group we must subtract those who received short-term detention as a consequence of rule violation, but no petition had been filed. Therefore, Intensive Probationer's would have served 4410 (days of detention) 1122 of those days (short-term detention as part of the original disposition) which equals 3288 days of reduced care. The current per diem of our https://jjolt.fameare.netlgenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (Jjolt_1iveccf\IJOLT12094.htm) Page 8 of 8 Children's Village detention center is $169. The cost reduction achieved is, therefore, $169 (per diem) X 3288 (reduction in detention days) = $555,672 (cost reductions). C. It is projected that 75% of the Intensive population would be placed residentially if not for Intensive Probation. Three hundred six received services in 2009 - 2010. Seventy-five percent of this population or 230 youth would have been placed residentially. Our actual youth placed totaled 22. The reduction of youth placed residentially is therefore 208. The Children's Village current per diem is $169. 208 (reduction of youth placed) X 190 (average length of stay at Children's Village) = 39,520 (reduction in days of care) X $169 = $6,678,880 (cost reductions) III. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year, this section must be complete. A. Assess strength, weakness' and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended Impact areas and results. Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected numbers and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served by this component. All figures are prorated based on October 2009 through March 2010 actual figures. Three hundred six youth were served by the Intensive Probation Program. Ninety-three percent of the youth were successful in community placement. Seven percent were placed residentially. We are targeting an average caseload size of 19 youth for the new fiscal year. This projects to 330 youth served. In 2009, we projected 344 youth served. We will involve supervision to identify additional intensive youth. V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Must be completed for all components. exoept those being terminated, each year, (Narrative may be attached) Oakland County's research and experience indicate that 87% of the youth serviced by Intensive Probation would recidivate if not provided with Intensive services. Intensive Probation is projected to serve 306 youth in 2009 - 2010 (Youth targeted for reduction). If Intensive services had not been provided to this population, we would have expected 266 adjudications. Our actual experience was that 56 new adjudications occurred. We therefore experienced a reduction of 210 fewer youth adjudicated. intensive probation is designed to maintain high-risk delinquents in their community in lieu of residential care, while safeguarding the community as much as possible. A team approach, including paid paraprofessional intern monitors, assures frequency and intensity of contacts fat least one, face- to-face contact per week). Special tools have been designed to give probation staff the repertoire of responses needed to work with this high risk population. Youth placed on intensive probation either have the offense history or the level of dysfunction to a point where they would have been placed out of the home had it not been for this program. AUTHORITY: PA. 87 of 1978. COMPLETION. Is required. CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds wit not be reimbursed. The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sax, religion, age. national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. if you need he with reading, writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act. you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS office in your county. Notes Edit Date Saved By Comments Imps://jjolt,famcare.netigenfune.exe 8/3/2010 Page 1 of 2 DHS-2093 - Summary (jjolt_live\ceNJOLT_2093,,htrn) Michigan Department of Human Services I October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 I. List all service components which make up the IHC program and specify the requested information for each. CCF Other Public Gross Court Service (Adm. Unit) Expenditure Funding Expenditure Components 1 Intensive Court 1,041,022.25 0.00 1,041,022.25 Probation 2 STRIDE (Short- Court 75,075.99 0.00 75,076.89 Term Rapid Intervention and Diversion) 3 Parent CHOICE Court 22,050.00 0.00 22,050.00 Program 4 Famity-Focused Court 468,336.00 0.00 468,336.00 Juvenile Drug court 5 Crossroads for Court 101,230.00 0.00 101,23040 Youth LPC Day 131- t_o ram . 6 Crossroads for Court 891,015.00 0.04 891,015.00 Youth Learning Center . 7 Wraparound Court 22,131.00 0.00 22,131.00 Services 8 Psychological Court 937,652.00 0.00 937.652.00 Clinic Services 9 Juvenile Reentry Court 991,425.00 0.00 991,425.00 Program DHS Service Components Subtotal - Court $ 4,549,937.24 $ 0.00 $1 4,549,937,24 Subtotal - DHS 0 0.00 $ .00 $17- 6. -617 $ , Grant Total $14549937,24 0.00 $1-7,571 , II. For each service component listed above, there must be completed a separate IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (DHS-2094), filling in the appropriate budget items. If something does not show, please review budget detail forms. I The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or htips://jjolt.fameare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 DHS-2093 - Summary (jjoit_1ivelecNIOLT_i'093-htm) Page 2 of 2 AUTHORITY: Act 87, Public Acts of 1968. as amended RESPONSE: Required. PENALTY. State reimbursement will be withheld from local ovemment. group because of race, sex, religion, age. national origin, color. :riarital status. polItical beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing. etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an FIA office in your county. DHS-2093 (Rev. 9-99) Previous edition may be used. MS Word-97 1 of 1 https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Check One In Home Care Basic Grant 2094-Budget Summary Report (ijolUive\ccf\JJOLT_20941.htm) Page 1 of 7 1N-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094) Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice October 1. 2010 through September 30, 2011 TService Component (Full Title/Name) STRIDE (Short-Term Rapid Intervention and Diversion) A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit DHS F Court 1. Salary and Wages NAME(S) FUNCTION , No. HOURSIWEEK YEARLY COST $ $ $ a $ 2. Fringe Benefits (Specify) $ $ $ $ , S $0,00 Total Personnel B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above) -1. Travel Rate/Mile Estimate No. of YEARLY COST Miles $ 2. Supplies arid Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* YEARLY COST $ https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ivele.cfAIJOLL2094.htm) Page 2 of 7 $ $ $ S. Other Costs (Desciiption/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit YEARLY COST , , 1 $ $ — $ _ $ « Must comply with the definitions $0.00 and limits Total Program Support listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbook. C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UNITS/ NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST Crossroads for Youth 82.23 day 913 $75,076.99 $ $ - $ 2. Closed End Contracts $ $ $ $ t 75,075.99 Total Contractual D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of https://jjolt.fameare.netigenftme.exe 8'3/2010 Page 3 of 7 - 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\ccfWOLT_2094r.htm) rriaAtzlotionl TO be Provided Each Service Unit i YEARLY COST 4 $ $ 4 3 3 $ $ 4 $ $ A $ $ 1 $ $ $0.00 Total Nor.-Scheduled E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT (Add Totals for A. B, C. and D above) Total Service Component Cost $75,075.99 If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following F. PUBLIC REVENUE: SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST $ S Total Public Revenue s0.00 G. Subtract Total PublIc Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F) TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE (Gross Costs Lees Other Revenue) $75,075.99 • AUTHORITY: Act 87. Public Acts o 1878. as amended. COMPLETION. Is Reauired. PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld fmm local aavarnment DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may be used. MS Word-97 The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, politicat beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing. hearing. etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an OHS office in your county. IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4.471) REPORT/REQUEST Michigan Department of Human Services One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State https://jjoit.famcare.netigerifiinc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 4 of 7 • 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ivelecf\HOLTL2094,htm) Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered F IN HOME CARE PROM: THRU: STRIDE (Short-Term Rapid Intervention and - BASIC GRAN October 1, 2010 Diversion) through September 30, 2011 Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number F COURT r- DHS (248 ) 858-0247 Davis, Pame13 ($3) I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply. 1. COMPONENT STATUS F CONTINUED 7 TERMINATED r REVISED 7 NEW 2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT 7 NEGLECT B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court r WRITTEN COMPLAINT 7 CPS Gategory I. II or III r— CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE / COURT A 3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check primary area(s) only.) A REDUCTION IN: F Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention 1-- Number of Youth Petitioned r— Number of Days of Shelter Care F Number of Adjudications F Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care 7 Number of Days of Family Foster Care 1--- Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220) 4. SERVICE FOCUS F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home r Effect early return from foster or institutional care SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR: INSTRUCTIONS: . In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete). . In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year. Time Perhad Reported Oct 1 thru Sept. 3G Time Period Reauested Oct 1 thru Sept 30 PROJECTED 5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST B. 9. PROJECTED COST NUMBER NUMBER A. Number of Youth/Family Served 392 $ 400 s .. B. Number of Service Units (Define Service unitoday.lunit ) 784 $ 800 $ A C Total Component Cost $73,125.00 $75,075.99 https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfune.exe 8/3/2010 Page 5 of 7 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livelcoNJOLL2094,htm) D. Average Cost Per Unit $93.27 1 $93.84 E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family $186.54 $187.69 III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified in Section 1.3. 10. NUMBER OF . ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR , 12. COSTS DAYS A. Yollth Petitioned $ B. Adjudications 115 115 $230,805.00 - C. Days of Family Foster Care $ , -( D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention 116 4830 . _ $816,270.00 _ E. Days of Shelter Care $ ' F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 115 21850 850110 G. State Wards Committed s IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENTIEVALUATION: For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed 13. ASS8SS strengths. weakness' and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results. Explain the reason(s). or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served by this component. IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT REPORT/REQUEST SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND REQUEST FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR. II.A.6. To date, 176 youth have been referred to the program. There have been 21 session to date, with an average of 8,4 referrals per session. it is projected that an additional 216 referrals will be made from 3/31/10, for 24 sessions, with an average of 9 referrals per session, giving a total of 392 referrals for the 2009-2010 fiscal year. 11.A.8. Projecting 48 program sessions for fiscal year 2010-2011, with 9.5 referrals per session. Sessions are designed to accommodate up to 10 participants, anticipating "no shows" and weeks with less than 10 referrals. 11.B.6. Each day is considered a unit. Each youth is expected to attend a two-day weekend of 7 plus hours per day. Parents are expected on the evening of the first day. To date, there have been 362 units utilized. We project an additional 432 units for the remainder of the year, for a total of 784 units utilized for the 2009-2010 fiscal year. LB.& Projecting 912 total units utilized for fiscal year 2010-2011, two units per 456 youth referred. 11.C.7. To date, $34,125.00 has been expended on 21 program sessions, with 176 youth referred. An additional $39,000.00 will be expended on a projected 24 sessions with 216 youth referred for a total cost of $73,126.00 for fiscal year 2009-2010. https://jjolt.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\epfiJOLT2094.htm) Page 6 of 7 II.C.9. Projecting a total cost of $75,000 for fiscal year 2010-2011, with total program session of 48 with 456 youth referred (average of 9.5 youth per session). 11.D.7. Average cost per unit to date is $93.27 II.D.9. Projected cost per unit for fiscal year 2010-2011 is $82.23 II.E.7. Average cost per youth/family to date is $186.54 II.E.9. Projected cost per youth/family for fiscal year 2010-2011 is $164.46 IMPACT EVALUATION ill.B. Local research and statistics indicate that approximately 38% of youth on probation will be returned to court for technical or criminal violations while on probation. Thus, if STRIDE services were not provided, we would expect 149 new adjudications. Our actual experience was that 34 new adjudications occurred. This represents a reduction of 115 youth. The cost of processing a violation from authorization to disposition is $2007. 115 fewer adjudications represents a cost reduction of $230,805(107 x 2007). 111.D. The consequence of readjudication is frequently temporary detention pending court action. The average length of detention is 42 days and the per diem is $169. Thus the cost reduction is $816,270 (115 fewer youth detained x42 x 169). III.F. Youth who are readjudicated while on probation typically are placed residentially. The average length of stay in placement is 190 days. The cost reduction is $3,692,650 (115 fewer youth placed x 190 days x 169). PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION In the first six months of fiscal year 2009-2010, 176 youth were referred to 21 program sessions, for an average of 8.4 youth referred per session. Supervision has taken an active role In staff utilization of this program as follows: 1) During weekly meetings, staff are directed to canvas assigned caseloads for potential referrals. 2) Referral to the program will be considered before a violation of probation is approved by supervision. 3) The program liaison will communicate to area supervisors program availability and referrals to date. 4) The program liaison will maintain records as to referral sources. Based upon year-to-date statistics, the program has lowered the recidivism rate of youth attending, and fewer youth are being placed residentiall V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be attached) The purpose of this project is to establish a community based, daytime intervention as a tool for responding to minor infractions committed by youth placed in their homes. The STRIDE Program, offered by Crossroads for Youth (CFY) staff, is a weekend consequence program for technical violators on juvenile probation. Composed of 3 to 4 Treatment Team members and the STRIDE Coordinator, staff pick up the youth at their homes or a designated location each Saturday and Sunday morning, and either parents or CFY staff return youth to their homes each evening. Staff immediately begin to establish relationships with the youth upon pickup. Upon arrival at the STRIDE building on Saturday morning, youth are offered a light breakfast and are orientated to the https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8[3120 10 2094-Budget Summary Report (fjoitiivekcf\EOLT 094.htrri) Page 7 of 7 program. They must complete a general information sheet and then participate in an introductory discussion. Youth move on to participate in I or 2 group initiatives and community service projects. Throughout the course of both days, the STRIDE treatment team provide several didactic presentations that address different adolescent issues. Topics include impulse control, substance abuse education, positive decision making, and positive self-esteem. On both Saturday and Sunday evenings, the treatment team facilitates group discussion centered around processing the day. After the full weekend on Sunday evenings, youth are instructed to write about their experiences. In addition to the light breakfast served each morning, a mid-morning snack, lunch, an afternoon snack and dinner are also provided for each participant. Parents are strongly encouraged to attend a parent meeting with the STRIDE Coordinator on Saturday evenings. If parents attend, they take their child home with them on Saturday night. If not STRIDE staff transport the youth home on both Saturday and Sunday evenings. AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978. COMPLETION: Is required. CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will not be reimbursed. The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age. national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing. hearing, etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS office in your county. Notes Edit Date Saved By Comments https://ijoltfarneare ,netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Servtce Component (Full Title/Name) Parent CHOICE Program Chedt One F In Home Care Basic Grant Cur: OHS 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livelecf\ITOLT_2094.htm) Page 1 of 6 • IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094) Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 4nnnIl A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit 1. Salary and Wages NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST 4 $ $ A $ $ A $ 2. Fringe Benefits (Specify) $ $ $ $ $ $0.00 Total Personnel B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in HA" above) 1 Travel Rate/Mile Estimate No. of YEARLY COST Miles $ 2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* YEARLY COST $ $ https://jjolt.fa.meare.nevgentimc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 2 of 6 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1iveleeNJOLT_2094..htm) $ i 3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit YEARLY COST S $ $ $ * Must comply with the definitions $0.00 and limits Total Program Support listed tor court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbook C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1. Unit Rates UNIT ' TOTAL UNITS/ NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST Mary Seyuin 226.00 session 98 $22,050.00 , . $ $ , $ 2. Closed End Contracts $ * $ $ $22,050.00 Total Contractual D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS TYRE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of hftps://jjolt.famcare.netlgenfune.exe 8/3/2010 $22,050.00 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\ocf\JJOLL2094.htm) Page 3 of 6 (Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST $ $ $ $ _ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Non-Scheduled $0.00 E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT (Add Totals fork B. C, and D above) Total ServiCe Component Cost 022,050.00 If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following: F. PUBLIC REVENUE: , SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST $ $ , $ $0.00 Total Publn Revenue G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F) TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE (Gross Costs Less Other Revenue) AUTHORITY: Act 87, Public Acts of 1978, as amended. COMPLETION: Is Required. PENALTY- State reimbursement will be withheld from local government. DH5-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may be used. MS Word-97 The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race. sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing. etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an DHS office in your county. IN HOME CARE1BAS1C GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471) REPORT/REQUEST Michigan Department of Human Services One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was Stale https://jjolt.farricare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 4 of 6 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livelecf\LIOLI_2094.1attn) Reimbu^sement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued component. Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covert% F IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU: Parent CHOICE Program r— BASIC GRANT October 1, 2010 1 through September 30, 2011 Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number _ Davis, Pamela (63) F COURT r OHS (248 ) 858-0247 I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply. 1. COMPONENT STATUS F CONTINUED r TERMINATED r REVISED I— NEW , 2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT r NEGLECT B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court r WRITTEN COMPLAINT r- CPS category I, II or III r- CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE 1 COURT 3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check primary area(s) only.) - A REDUCTION IN: F Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention r Number of Youth Petitioned r Number of Days of Shelter Care F Number of Adjudications F Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care r Number Of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220) 4. SERVICE FOCUS F Provide early interventior to treat within the child's home r Effect early return from foster or institutional care II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR: INSTRUCTIONS: • In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and costs (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete). • In columns 8 8, 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year. Time Period Reported Oct 1 thru Sept. 30 Time Period Requested Oct. 1 thra Sent. 30 8. 5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 9. PROJECTED COST NUMBER PROJECTED 1. NUMBER ' A. Number of Youth/Family Served 300 $ 320 $ IEL Number of Service Units (Define Service uffit=calendar day ) 16625 $ 21000 $ C Total Component Cost $18,000.00 $22,050.00 https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfune.exe 8/3/2010 208 F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 39520 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livecoNJOLT_2094.htm) Page 5 of 6 D. Average Cost Per Jnit $1.08 $1.05 E. Average Cost Per Youth/Farnily $80.90 I $68.91 III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified in Section 1.3. 10, NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBERS OR 12. COSTS DAYS A. Youth Petitioned $ B. Adjudications 56 210 s421,470.00 C. Days of Family Foster Care $ D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention 90 3288 , $555.672.00 E. Days of Shelter Care $ ,......_ G. State Wards Committed $ IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION: For ALL Components In effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be GOM plated 13. Assess strengths, weakness' and problem areas of this component Assess the intended impact areas and results. Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the protected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth serveo by this component. In 200812009 (projected through the end of the 2008/09 fiscal year) the CHOICE program will have had 130 parent referrals. These parents represent 270 youth under Court jurisdiction. Parents are required to attend six out of eight classes to complete the series. CHOICE has been able to keep the number of parents completing the class to approximately 90%. Thus approximately 320 parents will complete the course. By providing education about parenting adjudicated adolescents, the parents learn skills that will help them handle their children at home, and thus prevent out-of-home placement. The goal of the CHOICE program (Court Help on improving Control and effectiveness) is to assist parents of adjudicated youth to learn efective parenting methods. The program also provides a support network for the parents to reduce their feelings of helplessness. The eight-week program is based on research, which shows that youth are more likely to recidivate when their families are identified as highly dysfunctional. In order to reduce repeat adjudications and avoid out-of-home placements, parents' management skills are stengthened through training and role-play. The average group size is 10 to 12 parents. The parent education groups are run by a part-time psychologist who reports to the Chief of Clinical Services. The psychologist participates in casework staff meetings to discuss issues in parenting and family functioning. Strengths and Weaknesses: The strength of the program is that it teaches parents of juvenile delinquents how to handle their difficult adolescents effectively. By providing parents of juvenile probationers with effective parenting skills, repeat adjudications are reduced and thus out-of-home placements are also reduced. Another advantage of the program is that it provides support to parents of adjudicated delinquents and helps them learn parenting techniques from other parents. The weakness of the program is that it is of a predetermined duration. Some parents may need additional time to learn the parenting methods, or would like the ongoign support of such a group. https://jolt.famcare ,netlgenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 . 2094-Budget Summary Report (Jjolt_1ive\eet\JJOLT_2094.htm) Page 6 of 6 In assessing the success of this program, you might look at the results of the intensive probation program since this program is really tied to that one. The children and parents are in the parenting program, CHOICE, because they were in the intensive probation program. V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be Completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be The goal of the parent education program is to assist parents of adjudicated youth in learning effective parenting methods, and to provide parents with a support network to reduce their feelings of helplessness. The program is named CHOICE, or Court Help On Improving Control and Effectiveness. In order to reduce repeat adjudications and avoid out-of-home placements for youths, parents' management skills are strengthened through training and role-play. We expect 9-10 parents to attend each group. The number of Service Units represents the number of in-home care days multiplied by the number of youths served. The parent education groups are run by a part-time psychologist who will provide both direct and Indirect services ( maintain case records, provide written progress reports, etc.). The CHOICE progam uses realistic everyday scenarios that parents can use. Examples of skills learned and practiced by parents, which are covered in the course curriculum, include basic discipline skills, problem solving with a teenager, conflict resolution when handling an adjudicated youth. AUTHORITY: PA. 87 of 1978 COMPLETION: Is required. CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will not be reimbursed. The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age. national &gin. color, marital status. political beliefs or disability. If you need he with reading. writing, healing. etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a OHS office in your county, Notes Edit Date Saved By Comments hups://jjolt.fameare.netlgenfanc.exe 8/3/2010 Service Component (Full Title/Name) Family-Focused Juvenile Drug court Check one F- In Home Care E Basic Grant DNS A. PERSONNEL (Employees Of the Court) Administrative Unit F Court 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltliveccAITOLT_2094.htm) Page 1 of 10 IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094) Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice October 1, 2010 through September 0. 2011 1. Salary and Wages NAME(S) FUNCTION No HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST Jacqueline Howes- Drug Court Supervisor 20 $34,498.00 !Evanson A , Jordan Geiger Juvenile Drug Court Probation 40 $60,389.00 Officer Megan Abraham-Wentz Juvenile Drug Court Probation 40 $60,389.00 Officer , Candace Sereno Clerk/Technical Assistant 20 $17,976.00 -, Pamela Davis Manager - Court Services (1/6 of 8 $19,144.00 Salary) 2. Fringe Benefits (Specify) Jacqueline Howes-Evanson $17,626.00 Jordan Geiger $39,168.00 Megan Abraham-Wentz $37,887.00 Candace Sereno $13,726.00 Pamela Davis $9,454.00 $310,256.00 Total Personnel B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees Identified in "A" above) 1. Travel Rate/Mile Estimate No. of YEARLY COST Miles Mileage .55 28,720 $15,796.00 2, Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet rf Needed* YEARLY COST 5 Stationary, Brochures, Pamphlets, Promotional Videos, Flyers, Training $1,000.00 https://jjoh.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 2 of 10 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt1ive\ceNJOLT_20941tm) Supplies $ 3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit YEARLY COST Client Incentives $4,000.00 Conferences/Travel $5,850.00 Indirect Costs (14.28% x $192,395) $27,435.00 . Must comply with the definitions $54,081.00 and limits Total Program Support listed for cowl operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbook. C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UNITS/ NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST Jail Alternative of Michigan (Drug 10.00 1 Test 2000 $20,000.00 Testing) Office of Substance Abuse Services 42.00 1 Unit 2000 $84,000.00 $ $ 2 Closed End Contracts , $ , $ $104,000.00 ' Total Contractual D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of (Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST hftps://jjolt.fameare.netigerifune.exe 8/3/2010 E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT (Add Totals for A. B. C. and D above) Total Service Component Cost 7 $468,336.00 Page 3 of 10 • 2094-Budget Summary Report ajoltiivelccfJJ01.,T_2094.htm) s $ $ $ 1 , 6 $ $ $ $ $ , $ $ 1 $0.00 Total Non-Scheduled If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component .5 generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following: F. REVENUE: PUBLIC SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST $ , $ $ OM Total Public Revenue G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F) TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE (Gross Costa Less Other Revenue) $468,336.00 I AUTHORITY. Act 87. Public Acts of 1978, as amended COMPLETION: Is Required. PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local government. DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous editien may be used. MS Word-97 The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status. political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing. etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Aet, you are invited to make your needs known to an OHS office in your county. IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471) REPORT/REQUEST Michigan Department of Human Services One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State https://jjolt.fameare.nevgenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 4 of 10 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\ccf\HOLT_2094.htm) Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued component. ! Component Title CHECK ONE 1 Time Period Covered i F IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU: 1 Family-Focused Juvenile Drug court 1 I— BASIC GRANT October 1,2010 through September 30, 2011 Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number 1 Davie, Pamela (63) COURT r DHS (248 ) 858-0247 F I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply. . 1. COMPONENT STATUS F CONTINUES r TERMINATED r RE'viSES n NEW 2, TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT r NEGLECT B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court /— CPS category I, II or III /— 2161IIINEN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE 1 r CONIPIIINT 3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT – (Check primary area(s) only.) A REDUCTION IN: r Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention r Number of Youth Petitioned 1— Number of Days of Shelter Care 1 r Number of Adjudications ry Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care r Number of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of Slate Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220) 1 4. SERVICE FOCUS F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home r Effect early return from foster or institutional care II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR: INSTRUCTIONS: • In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete). • In columns B Si 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year. Time Period Reported Oct. 1 thru Sept. 30 Time Period Requested Oct 1 thru Sept. 30 , a. 5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 9. PROJECTED COST PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER , A A. Number of Youth/Family Served 45 $ 45 i $ B. Number of Service Units (Define Service Unit=i unit = 1 15,165 s 15,165 $ Wender day 1 _ C Total Component Cost $368,336,00 $468,336.00 D. Average Cost Per Unit $24.29 $30.88 https://jjoltiameare.net/genftuic.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\cp1WOLT_2094.htm) Page 5 of 10 E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family AO 86.24 I $10,407.47 IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of :ntended identified in Section 1.3. 10. NUMBER OF i ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED I 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS i DAYS , A. Youth Petitioned $ B. Adjudications $ C. Days of Family Foster Care a D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention $ E. Days of Shelter Care $ F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 26 7,020 s1.193,00.00 G. State Wards Committed a IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION: For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed 13. Assess strengths. weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results. Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served by this component. PROBLEM AREA Circuit Court Family Division is serving a growing number of substance abusing juvenile offenders. A concomitant reduction in treatment resources has added to the difficulties of dealing with this population. Traditional methods of intervention and service are ill suited to respond to the needs of these youngsters and their families. In 2009, Oakland County authorized 335 delinquency petitions for alcohol and controlled substance offenses. These offenses constitute approximately 24.45% of the total 1,427 delinquency petitions authorized in Oakland County in the same period. Of the 2,216 adjudicated Oakland County youth between 2006 and 2009 who were administered the Alcohol Chemical Dependency Inventory (ACDI) risk assessment test, over 28.3% scored medium to high risk for alcohol dependence and 29.4% scored medium to high risk for drug dependence. 45.6% of juvenile offenders in Oakland County advised via the aforementioned test that they used drugs or alcohol prior to or during the commission of their crimes. There were several problems with the system for processing drug offenses prior to institution of drug court. Length of time between offense and treatment could be up to six months. Treatment was fragmented and variable, since service providers were not prepared to treat court wards on a priority basis. Approximately 30% of youth adjudicated for drug crimes were placed in a residential program, where intensive specialized substance abuse treatment was not available, at a per diem cost of $170 per youth. Recidivism rates for youth charged with drug offenses was a discouraging 70%. A. PERSONNEL: JUVENILE DRUG COURT SALARIES https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 813/2010 Page 6 of 10 2094-Budget Surnmaty Report (jjolt_live\ecf\JJ01LT_209,4.htm) NAME Projected ...Fringe 2011 Benefit Salary J. Evanson $34,498.00. M. Wentz $60,389.00.. J. Geiger. ... .$60,389.00... C. Sereno.. .. $17,975.99.. P. Davis $19,144.00... TOTALS. ... $192,395.00. . . $117,860 Total 2009-2010 Projected Salaries: $310.255.00 B. PROGRAM SUPPORT: 1. Personal Mileage. Oakland County reimbursement rate is $ .55 for all employees. The $15,796.00 mileage reimbursement would cover the two Probation Officer positions. 2. Electronic Surveillance. This option remains a favorite for JDC (Juvenile Drug Court) Probation Officers as a consequence for non-compliance and as a front-end transition when a youth has been temporarily detained prior to entrance into the program. We anticipate an ongoing usage of four (4) units for Court-ordered home detention cases. However, we retain the flexibility to increase capacity if caseloads warrant 3. Client Incentives: A crucial and highly effective aspect of drug court is the support, encouragement and rewards offered by the judge and treatment team at status review hearings. Participants and their parents are recognized for their accomplishments with verbal praise, public recognition and applause, as well as with more concrete items. Rewards and incentives are earned through an accumulation of points and dispensed as follows: 10-point week: Public recognition, praise, applause, edible treat (selected from the Incentive basket"), 3 or more consecutive 10 point weeks: Fast food certificate, release from home detention, curfew extension, and public recognition. 85% of Phase I or Phase II points: Move to next phase PLUS certificate of recognition, PLUS gift certificate. 90% of Phase III points: Move to Phase IV PLUS certificate of recognition, PLUS gift certificate. 95% of Phase IV points: Graduation, including ceremony and certificate of recognition. Family accomplished goals: Gift certificate for entire family, to be used at a restaurant or movie theatre. Youth may receive gift certificates for movies or CDs, meal or theatre vouchers or small gifts like tee shirts, or assistance with obtaining hobby supplies and lessons. To encourage improvements in self- discipline, release from home detention, curfew extensions, reductions in supervision requirements, and other rewards are also considered. Since graduation to the next phase is identified as a key incentive, graduation certificates are awarded to document this accomplishment. Group incentives are also used as a means of providing constructive replacement activities for drug abusing behaviors. These include field trips like bowling, indoor rock climbing or health club visits, or enrollment in classes in music, fine arts, and the like. Group activities usually Include families as well. I 4. Conference/Travel. JDC team members attend the annual Michigan Association of Drug Court Professionals annual conference, the National Association of Drug Court Professionals' annual conference, as well as various seminarsItrainings throughout the year to further enhance their knowledge of techniques for successful drug court case management. .. 417,626.00 . .$39,168.00 .$37,887.00 . .$13,725.00 • $9,454.00 https://jjoltfameare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoluive\ccf\JJOL:f_2094,htm) Page 7 of 10 I C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1. Jail Alternative of Michigan (JA.M.S.). Drug testing services are provided to all participants and families at a rate of $10.00 per test. An average of 2000 tests are administered annually. (2,000 x $10 = $20,000.00). 2. Office of Substance Abuse Services (0.SA.S.). OSAS is the Coordinating Agency for the Juvenile Drug Court. OSAS contracts with Oakland Family Services (OFS) to provide therapeutic intervention, including but not limited to group, individual, family & conjoint therapy and family education. Although each participant's treatment plan is individualized, the average amount spent per participant/ per unit is $42.00. The JDC averages 2000 units per year. ($42 x 2000 = $84,000) D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS N/A E. SERVICE COMPONENT Service and Cost information for FY completed or being requested for the next fiscal year (All financial and program figures are projections based on actual experience from October 1, 2009 through May 31, 2010). Number of Youth Served (FY 2009-2010). We project service to 45 youth. Two probation officers with a maximum caseload of 15 youth and an average length of days of service per youth is 337 for a total of 15,165 days (45 x 337 = 15,165).' *It should be noted that maximum program capacity at any given time, is 30 participants. We anticipate that through the duration of FY 09-10, 45 total youth will be served. F. PUBLIC REVENUE N/A 1. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION t The program was implemented in June 2001. 2. The program's target population is delinquent youth between the ages of 12 and 17 years. 1 Areas of Impact include a reduction in the number of days in out-of-home, residential treatment care. 4. NIA II. SERVICE & COST INFO. FOR FY BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FY We anticipate serving 45 youth and families during FY 20010-2011. The average length of stay (in calendar days) per family is 337 days. it is therefore anticipated that 15,165 days of service will be provided (337 x 46 = 15,165). The average cost of service per unit is $30.88 for a total request of $468,336.00. https://jjolt.famearemetigenfunc.exe 813/2010 Page 8 of 10 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\ccf\DOLT,2094.11tm) Based on the above, we are therefore requesting a total of $450,341.00 for FY 2009-2010. Ill. IMPACT EVALUATION Areas of Impact: # of Youth . ....# of Days Costs: Days of Resident Placement: 28 7,020 $1,193,400.00 IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Oakland County's research and experience indicate that 70% of the youth serviced by the Juvenile Drug Court (JDC) would have either entered long-term detention or would have been made a Permanent Court Ward (PA 150) If not provided with these services. The JDC is projected to serve 45 youth during FY 2009-2010 (youth targeted for reduction). If the JDC had not been provided to this population, we would have expected 31 youth to be placed residentially. Our actual experience was that 45 youth were served, therefore, it would have been expected that 31 would have been placed in residential treatment. However, only 5 were placed residentially. We therefore experienced a reduction of 26 fewer youth in our detention/treatment facility (Oakland County Children's Village). The average length of stay in an out-of-home, secured facility with a residential treatment program is 270 days, at a cost of $170.00 per day. Therefore the reductions are as follows: 26(reduction of youth detained) x 270 (average length of stay in residential treatment) = 7,020(reductions of days of care) x $170 (cost per day in residential treatment) = $1,193,400.00 (cost reduction). All figures are prorated based on figures obtained from October 2009 through March 2010. Forty-five youth were served by the Juvenile Drug Court program. Eighty-nine percent of the youth were successful under community supervision, while 11% were placed residentially. We are targeting an average caseload size of 15 youth per probation officer over the next fiscal year, for a projection of 45 youth to be served. Strengths and Weaknesses: The strengths of the JDC program include frequent, random drug testing of all participants. JDC continues to assure that all staff are aware of current drug trends and the most effective testing for such drugs. Participants are tested according to program requirements and behavior Indicators. Parents are also tested if information and behavior indicates testing is warranted. Another strength is the intensive monitoring of all participants through frequent face-to-face and telephone contacts. The assigned probation officers and interns are able to develop positive relationships with participants and their families. They are also able to attain current information on the status of participants and thus able to respond in a timely manner. A third strength is the fact the team has remained relatively stable since its inception and all have a clear understanding of strength-based programming. The current presiding judge, referee, defense attorney and one probation officer were present at the initial hearing of the drug court, The coordinator and the other probation officer joined a few months later. Although several prosecutors have sat on the team, the office of the prosecuting attorney has consistently been supportive, as has our coordinating council. https://jjolt.famearemetlgenftme.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\cctWOL.T_2094.htm) Page 9 of 10 Intended Impact Areas: The intended impact of the program is to reduce the number of chemically dependent youth placed in residential treatment after coming under the jurisdiction of the courL The expected percentage is 70% or 31 of the 45 youth treated. 5 youth (11%) were actually placed in residential treatment for a 59% reduction. Additionally, the program uses weekend detentions as a sanction for drug use and other program infractions. 39 youth received Life Preparation weekends throughout this period. It is expected that this sanction will continued to be used in subsequent periods. It has been noted that as the youth progress through the program, the need for this sanction, as well as other sanctions, markedly decreases. How the 45 Youth Served Were Impacted by the Program: 14 youth graduated during this period. Of the 13, 3 are attending college and 10 are working and/or completing their high school education. During this period, over 82% of youth participating in the program experienced a significant improvement in their school behavior and grades. Difference between Projected #s and Cost w/ Actuals The projected numbers are what we anticipate having to pay for each child. This is just an estimation. The actual numbers represent what was actually spent. This number will vary. We may project spending a certain amount per child, but in actuality, we may end up spending more on one child and less on another. The numbers are only estimates, hence the term "projected costs". We try to keep the numbers around a certain range because the cost per unit is always an "average" number. It could increase or decrease, depending on the needs of the child. Section II - Impact shows 30 Youth in Residential This is explained under section IV - Program Assessment/Evaluation: "If the JDC had not been provided to this population, we would have expected 31 youth to be placed residentially. Our actual experience was that 45 youth were served, therefore, it would have been expected that 31 would have been placed in residential treatment. However, only 5 were placed residentially. We therefore experienced a reduction of 25 fewer youth in our detention/treatment facility (Oakland County Children's Village)." The Options program has ten (10) objectives that include: serving 45 youth at full capacity; offering coordinated, systematic, and accessible treatment services for youths and families; providing frequent judicial supervision; providing intensive case monitoring, providing intensive drug testing; issuing immediate sanctions and rewards; creating a collaboration among the Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, treatment providers and Court personnel; expediting case processing; creating community linkages and support; and achieving client/family satisfaction. Since its inception, the Options Program has served over 210 participants and approximately 357 family members. To date, 88 youth have graduated from the program. These have been very high-risk youth, with 73% of them having started their drug use prior to the age of 13, and an average age of first use of 12.6 years of age. Most have been poly-substance abusers, but the primary diagnosis has been marijuana dependence. Had the Options Juvenile Drug Court program not existed, these youth would have been ordered Into residential placement. https://jjolt farricare.netigenfunc.exe 8512010 2094-Budget Summary Report ("jolt liveceNJOLT_209,4.htm) Page 10 of 10 V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be attached) Entitled Options, this family-focused juvenile drug treatment court program is a joint effort between justice and public health treatment systems in an effort to address the problem of substance abuse for eligible youth within the community. Realizing that alcohol and other drug use contributes to illegal behavior, the mission of the Family Focused Juvenile Drug Court program is to promote public safety by reducing juvenile criminal recidivism, assisting substance abusing juvenile offenders and their families achieve drug-free lifestyles, and supporting families as they formulate healthy relationships. The focus of Juvenile Drug Court is to intervene in substance use and eliminate criminal behavior through intensive Court supervision and the utilization of various treatment tools. This post-adjudication program targets severely substance abusing youth that are non-violent repeat offenders, charged with alcohol and controlled substance related violations, or charged with minor delinquency where substance abuse is a contributing factor (e.g. property crimes). The program's target population is 12 to 17 year old adjudicated non-violent youth who are residents of Oakland County and have a documented substance abuse history. Most are very high-risk, poly-substance abusing youth with some mental health diagnosis. Clients are expected to participate in a 12-15 month program consisting of three, 12-week phases and an aftercare component. Movement to higher phases is dependent upon performance and points earned in the previous phase. Various incentives and sanctions (penalties) are utilized to ensure compliance with program guidelines. Successful completion is dependent upon several factors, including maintaining at least 45 consecutive days of sobriety and acquiring at least 426 points. Through intensive supervision (including weekly, face-to-face contacts with Probation Officers and Jurists), and In collaboration with over 19 community agencies (including the Office of Substance Abuse services, Community Mental Health, schools, job placement services and a 51:11c3 partnership), the Options program is able to provide services to not only participants, but also parents and siblings. Our community partnerships also afford us the opportunity to meet the special needs of our participants, while providing services at low or no cost to families. The Options program has ten (10) objectives that include: serving 45 youth at full capacity; offering coordinated, systematic, and accessible treatment services for youths and families; providing frequent judicial supervision; providing intensive case monitoring, providing intensive drug testing; issuing immediate sanctions and rewards; creating a collaboration among the Prosecutor, Defense Attorney, treatment providers and Court personnel; expediting case processing; creating community linkages and support; and achieving client/family satisfaction. Since its inception, the Options Program has served over 183 participants and approximately 317 family members. To date, 88 youth have graduated from the program_ These have been very high-risk youth, with 73% of them having started their drug use prior to the age of 13, and an average age of first use of 12.6 years of age. Most have been poly-substance abusers, but the primary diagnosis has been marijuana dependence. Had the Options Juvenile Drug Court program not existed, these youth would have been ordered into residential placement. AUTHORITY: PA. 87 of 1978 COMPLETION: Is required CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Chid care funds will not be reimbursed, The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex. religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing. etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS office in your county. Notes Edit Date Saved By Comments https://jjolt.fameare.netigenlime.exe 8/312010 DHS F Court A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit 2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Exampies) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed' 1. Travel Rate/Mile Page 1 of 6 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\ecf\EOLL2094.htm) IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094) Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice October 1. 2010 through September 30. 2011 Service Component (Full Title/Name) Crossroads for Youth LPC Day Program Check One In Home Care Basic Grant : 1. Salary and Wages NAMEIS) FUNCTION NO. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST , S S 1 $ 1 S 2. Fringe Beneftts (Specify) S S $ ' $ $0.00 Total Personne. B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above) Estimate No. of Miles YEARLY COST YEARLY COST 0 https://jjoit.fameare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 2 of 6 2094-Budget Summary Report (ijolt_live\ceNJOLT094.htin) $ $ 3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed Rate/Unit 6 YEARLY COST $ I $ V $ W Must comply with the definitions s0.00 and limits Total Program Support listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbook. C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1. Unit Rates UNIT I TOTAL UNITS/ NAME(S) , RATE (Describe) L CONTRACT YEARLY COST per diem 95.50 day 1060 001,230.00 , $ 1 $ 2. Closed End Contracts $ $ $ $ ( Total Contractual S101,230.00 D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No Units 1 Average Cost of https://jjolt.farncare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT (Add Totals for A. B, C. and D above) Total Service Component Cost I $101,230.00 $101,230.00 Page 3 of 6 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltlivecciWOL,L2094.htm) (Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY CART S $ , 6 $ $ $ I , $ $ $ $ A O Total Non-Scheduled M If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care runds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (I e. third party payments) specify the following: F. PUBLIC REVENUE: , i SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST 1 $ $ 4.00 Total Public Revenue G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-Fl TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE (Gross Costs Less Other Revenuel AUTHORITY: Act 87. Public Acts of 1978, as amended. COMPLETION: Is Required. PENALTYI State reimbursement will be withheld from local government DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may be used. MS Word-97 The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex. religion, age, national origin, color, marital status. political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing. hearing, etc.. under the Americans with Disaoilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an DHS office in your county. IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471) REPORT/REQUEST Michigan Department of Human Services One of these forms must be comoleted for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State https://jjalt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 4 of 6 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\coNJOLT_2094.ht4n) int' the oast Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued Component. Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered F IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU: Crossroads for Youth LPC Day Program r BASIC GRANT October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number MCFook, net COURT r OHS (248 ) 628-2561 Ca (63) F I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that MAY- 1. COMPONENT STATUS CONTINUED r TERMINATED 7 REVISED 7 NEW F , 2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINOUEN'` 7 NEGLECT B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court r- WRITTEN COMPLAINT r- CPS category I. II or Iii I-- 81816.147EN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE 3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT — (Check primary area(s) only.) A REDUCTION IN: r- Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention r Number of Youth Petitioned r Number of Days of Shelter Care I— Number of Adjudications F Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care r Number of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220) 4. SERVICE FOCUS F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home r Effect early return from foster or institutional care II, SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR: INSTRUCTIONS: . In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and costs (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete) . In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year. Time Period Reported Oct. 1 thru Sept. 30 lime Period Requested Oct. 1 theu Sept. 30 5 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 8. 9. 9. PROJECTED COST NUMBER NUMBER A. Number of Youth/Family Served 12 $ 14 $ B. Number of Service Units (Define Service unit=day ) 1069 $ 1060 $ C Total Component Cost $102,090.00 $101,230.00 D. Average Cost Per Unit $95.50 $95.50 https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 1 E Average Cost Per Youth/Family $7,230.71 $8,607,50 Page 5 of 6 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ivelc :efITOLT_2094.htm) III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or endirg components and should correspond to areas of intended identified in Section 1.3. 10. NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12, COSTS DAYS A. Youth Petitioned $ B. Adjudications $ C. Days of Family Foster Care $ D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention $ E. Days of Shelter Care $ , F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 12 1872 a316,368.00 G. State Wards Committed $ IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION: For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed 13. Assess strengths. weakness' and problem areas of this component. Assess the Intended impact areas arid results. Explain the reasonls). or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No 's and cost and the actual Account for all youth served by this Component. Strengths: Youth and their families receive counseling, behavioral interventions and educational services. Youth have limited access to the community six days per week. There is a large component for community service. Family work is facilitated in the youth's home and at the program. Parents are accessible. The program can be used as a step down from residential programming. Students are transported in school buses driven by staff holding commercial drivers licenses. The program encourages the learning of independent life skills and employability skills. Referees and Judges support recommendatioins made by agency staff for students who have attendance problems. Weaknesses: Youth are returned to their community in the evening hours, which requires reliance on parental supervision. Youth have access to the community. A portion of the parents have difficulty supervising/parenting their child. Parent participation in supporting the program is critical in the child's success. When parents are unable or unwilling to support the child and the program, the youth may have difficulty being successful. Problem Areas: Transporting youth in a county the size of Oakland County. Bus rides in the morning and evening can be impacted by distance and traffic conditions. Routes are continually revised to keep them as timely as possible. The targeted population for this program frequently have school truancy/refusal as part of their presenting problems. A portion of these youth will therefore refuse to get up in the morning and be ready to catch the bus provided by the program. Intended Impact: tittps://jjolt.fameare.net/geriftiThe.exe 813/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livelccfWOLT 2094.htm) Page 6 of 6 Increase academic skills To keep youth in their homes. To empower parents. To repair parent and child relationships. To assess additional family needs. To increase a sense of self - through individual and family therapy. Of the 10 youth served: 10% (1(10) received treatment from another facility 10% (1/10) were detained ° rn d the raratia tufaLguakita and are in the community with their family V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components. except those being terminated, each year. {Narrative may be attached) This is an intensive six day per week treatment program for 10 males between the age of 15 and 17. The program is operated in conjunction with the existing Life Preparation Residential Program. The program is designed to provide realistic and achievable goals for each youth so that the greatest preparation for life in the community can be achieved. Programming is an integral part of the Work Education continuum. Legally mandated buses pick up and return youths to their family homes each day as they enter the demanding world of young adult expectations. Youths can use this aspect of the program as a means of entry into Work Education treatment or as a step-down towards re-entry into their community and family. The Department of Human Services will riot discriminate against any AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 Of 1978. lodIvidual or group because of race, sex, religion, age. national origin. COMPLETION: Is required. color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will reading, writing, hearing. etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities not be reimbursed. Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS office in your county. Notes Edit Date Saved By Comments https://ijolt.famcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Service Component (Full Title/Name) Crossroads for Youth Learning Center Check One 17 In Home Care Basic Grant DHS A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit F Court Rate/Mile 1. Travel YEARLY COST Estimate No. of Miles 2. Supplies and materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* YEARLY COST Page 1 of 7 2094-Budget Summary Report (ijoit_livelecNJOLT_2094.1itrn) IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094) Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 1. Salary and Wages NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST $ $ $ $ 2. Fringe Benefits (Specify) $ $ $ $ .. OM Total Personnel B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above) haps://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 2 of 7 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_liveccfUJOLT_209 ,:.1.htra) 1 $ $ 3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit YEARLY COST $ S $ $ .. Must comply with the definitions $0.00 and limits Total Program Support listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbook. C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UNITS/ NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST Per-Diem 95.50 Day 9330 $891,015.00 $ $ $ , 2. Closed End Contracts e S $ $ $891,015.00 Total Contractual D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of https://jjolt.famcare.neVgenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\cefWOLT_2094.htm) Page 3 of 7 (Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST $ $ , $ $ 1 $ $ $ $ $ , $ $ , &fl AA 7ota: Non-Scheduled E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT (Add Totals for A. B. C, and 0 above) Total Service Component Cost s891,015.00 If you plan to fund any porton of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies. or if this Component is generating revenue (is. third party payments) specify the following. F. PUBLIC REVENUE: SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST $ $ 1 Total Public Revenue G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost {E-F) TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE (Gross Costs Less Other Revenue) s0.00 7091,015.00 AUTHORITY. Ad 87. PubJic Acts of 1978. as amended. COMPLETION: Is Required. PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local government. DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may be used. MS Word-97 The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or j group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marita; Status. political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing, etc.. under ; the Amencans with Disabilities Act. you are invited to make your needs known to an OHS office in your county, IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471) REPORT/REQUEST Michigan Department of Human Services One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which tiers was State https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfune.exe 8/3/2010 Page 4 of 7 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ive\coNJOLT_2094.4m) Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new. revised, or continued component. . Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered F IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU: Crossroads for Youth Learning Center n BASIC GRANT October 1,2010 through September 30, 2011 Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number F COURT 7 DHS . (248 ) 628-2561 m aiie i63) 1 cPeek, et PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply -1 , COMPONENT STATUS F CONTINUED 7 TERMINATED 7 REVISED 7 NEW 2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT 7 NEGLECT B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court I I— COMPLAINT r CPS category I. 11 or 111 1.— &HAIEN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE . 3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT — (Check primary area(s) only.) A REDUCTION IN: r Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention i , r Number of Youth Petitioned 1— Number of Days of Shelter Care 1 n Number of Adjudications F Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care r-- Number of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220) 4. SERVICE FOCUS F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home r- Effect early return from foster or institutional care - ' 1 II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR; INSTRUCTIONS: • In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete). • In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year. Time Period Reported Oct. 1 Int Sept 30 Time Period Requested Oct. 1 thru Sept. 30 , — 5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 8. 9. PROJECTED COST NUMBER PROJECTED , NUMBER A. Number of Youth/Family Served 92 $ 104 $ , B. Number of Service Units (Define Service Llnit7-.DAY ) 7976 $ 9330 $ . C Total Component Cost 0,015,547.N ;891,015.00 , : D. Average Cost Per Unit $127.33 ;95.50 I. https://jjolt.farnearemetigenfune.exe 8/3/2010 1 E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family $11,038.55 I $8,567.45 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livelecnEOLT ,_2094,htm) Page 5 of 7 IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified in Section 1.3. , 10. NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS DAYS A. Youth Petitioned $ B. Adjudications $ C. Days of Family Foster Care $ D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention $ E. Days of Shelter Care $ F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 92 11656 $1,969,864.00 ., G. State Wards Committed $ IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION: For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed 13 Assess strengths. weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results. Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No. s arid cost and the actual. Account for all youth served by this component. Strengths: Youth and their families receive counseling, behavioral interventions and educational services. Youth have limited access to the community six days per week. There is a large component for community service. Family work is facilitated In the youth's home and at the program. Parents are accessible. The program can be used as a step down from residential programming. Students are transported in school buses driven by staff holding commercial drivers licenses. The program encourages the learning of independent life skills and employability skills. Referees and Judges support recommendatioins made by agency staff for students who have attendance problems. Weaknesses: Youth are returned to their community in the evening hours, which requires reliance on parental supervision. Youth have access to the community. A portion of the parents have difficulty supervising/parenting their child. Parent participation in supporting the program is critical in the child's success. When parents are unable or unwilling to support the child and the program, the youth may have difficulty being successful. Problem Areas: Transporting youth in a county the size of Oakland County. Bus rides in the morning and evening can be impacted by distance and traffic conditions. Routes are continually revised to keep them as timely as possible. The targeted population for this program frequently have school truancy/refusal as part of their presenting problems. A portion of these youth will therefore refuse to get up in the morning and be ready to catch the bus provided by the program. Intended impact: https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report tholt_1ivelccnBOVI -_2094.htm) Page 6 of 7 increase academic skills To keep youth in their homes. To empower parents. To repair parent and child relationships. To assess additional family needs. To increase a sense of self - through individual and family therapy. Of the 92 youth served: 3% (3192) received treatment from another facility 4% (4192) are currently receiving treatment In another Crossroads for Youth facility 5% (5192) truanted from their homes - no follow-up info available at this time 31% (29192) were detained 56% (51192) successfully completed the program and are in the community with their family V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be attached) The Learning Center cluster provides a daytime environment heavily weighted toward education, community service and social skill development for both boys and girls. Students, age 10 to 18, are transported in legally mandated buses six days a week. There are two campuses to localize groups and reduce the time spent in transport. While the students live in their family homes, the program's twelve hour days extend supervision to a point where it is difficult to find them in trouble in the community. Since many of the students have had issues with school attendance, frequent communication with court caseworkers and families is essential and critical. Often, this valuable communication leads to shorter lengths of treatment and prevents more costly out-of-home placement. At times when court caseworkers see a need for a more consequential approach, Crossroads for Youth offers overnight working weekends in conjunction with its residential programs. Many Learning Center students have benefited from "step-up" or "step-down" involvement with our residential programs; this flexibility allows the Court to individualize interventions in the most efficient and effective manner possible. The students are able to exercise this option with little or no disruption in school placement and ancillary services. Family involvement, as noted earlier, is an essential element of the Learning Center programs. Youths are expected to take advantage of individual, as well as, group therapies, which concentrate on functional behavior in the family, community and at school. Typically, groups deal with substance abuse issues as well as anger management and Inappropriate social behavior. While treatment is clearly important at the Learning Center, the greatest emphasis is directed toward school attendance, performance and behavior so that lengths of stay can be as short as one school semester. Both campuses offer some educational evaluation, individualized course adaptation and G.E.D. preparation if appropriate. The Southwest Learning Center offers a "courtyard setting" within a recreational area in the fast growing suburb of Walled Lake. As a smaller setting, it offers an intimacy among the students and with staff that is seldom seen in school programs. At the same time, the Southwest Campus enjoys all the technical, recreational, and administrative support as its main campus counterpart. The Main Campus Learning Center offers a setting integrated within the Crossroads for Youth community in Oxford. Students participate in the full array of campus wide activities already described. Learning Skills to Succeed The Learning Center is a highly structured day treatment program for young people who face challenges in school, the community, or at home. Offered by Crossroads for Youth, a private, non-profit agency, the program is held six days a week and incorporates academics, innovative therapies and confidence-building exercises to help children learn the skills they need to succeed. https://jjolt.fameare ,netigenfune.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltiivelccfaTOLT_2094.htm) Page 7 of 7 With several locations in metropolitan Detroit, the Learning Center cares for children from throughout the community. Participants are referred by their schools or the court, and are typically age 10-18. The ultimate goal of the program is to counter challenging behaviors early so children can focus on building a bright future. Helping Children Succeed Children in the Learning Center begin each day at 6 a.m., commuting to designated program locations. They engage in a full day of academics, therapy, exercise, community service, work crew and more. Most participants don't return home until 8 p.m. each evening. This intense structure helps students quickly identify problems and begin to verbalize issues. Throughout the program, students must follow a strict dress code and attendance policy. They cannot interact with participants outside of the program. Students "earn" their way out of the Learning Center through a stage system which helps them become more responsible and independent. Each stage has goals, behavioral expectations and privileges. This includes things like showing a willingness to control language and demonstrating good decision- making skills. We also use individual and group problem-solving techniques as a foundation for therapy, encouraging children to work together to overcome problems and reach goals. Program Components Beyond helping students deal with challenges, the Learning Center teaches important skills which will help them throughout life. Learning Center components include: Academics. In conjunction with local school districts, we provide students a comprehensive education. At some locations, we also offer vocational training in landscaping, home improvement, silk-screening, auto mechanics and more, helping children obtain valuable on-the-job experience. Students can transfer school credits to their own institutions upon release from the program. Community Service. At least once a week, Learning Center students participate in community service projects such as visiting area hospitals and hospices. The projects help build student's trust, confidence and self-esteem. Individual Counseling. Children meet regularly with therapists, psychologists and social workers to discuss problems and work through difficult personal issues. Family Counseling, The Learning Center staff works with students and their families to overcome problems. Life Skills. Through various programs, as well as, day-to-day living, participants learn essential life skills such as social norms and manners. Substance Abuse Group. Learning Center participants attend regular educational programs and group discussions on substance and addiction. Work Crew. Students must complete daily chores such as cooking, cleaning or lawn maintenance. AUTHORITY. P.A. 87 of 1978. COMPLETION: Is required. CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETIOK Child care funds will not be reimbursed. The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any Individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin. color, marital status. political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing. hearing, etc„ under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a OHS office in your county. Notes Edit Date Saved By Comments https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Service Component (Full Title/Name) Wraparound Services Check One F, In Horne Care Basic Grant A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit r OHS F Court 2094-Budget Summary Report Wolt_1ivelceLLIOLL2094..htm) Page 1 of 8 IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094) Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice October 1,2010 through September 30. 2011 1. Salary and Wages NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST - $ , $ — $ $ i $ 1 2 Fringe Benefits (Specify) $ - $ - S S $ OM Total Personnel B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above) 1. Travel Rate/Mlle Estimate No. of YEARLY COST Miles $ , 2. Supplies and Materiels (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed YEARLY COST $ 1 https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Total Contractual $22,131.00 Page 2 of 8 2094-Budget Summary Report ajolt_1iveccNIJOLT12094.htm) $ $ $ 3. Other Costs (DescriptIon/Exampies) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit YEARLY COST $ $ $ $ « Must comply with the definitions OM and limits Tata Program Support listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund handbook. C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UNITS/ NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST ,. $ $ $ , 0 2. Closed End Contracts Oakland County Wraparound $22,131.00 — $ $ $ 1 D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS TYPE OF SERVICE {Description) Anticipated No Units To be Provided Average Cost of Each Service Unit YEARLY COST hrtps://ijott.famearemetigerifunc.exe 8/3/2010 Page 3 of 8 . 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_liveleeLLIO1IL2094.htm) $ $ $ $ i $ $ i . $ $ , $ $ $ $ . SCI.00 Total Non-Scheduled E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT (Add Totals for A, B. C. and D above) Total Service Component Cost 822,131.00 If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following: F. PUBLIC REVENUE: SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST $ $ $ Total Public Revenue $0.00 0. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F) TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE (Gross Costs Less Other Revenue) 822,131.00 AUTHORITY' Act 87, Public Acts of 1978. as amended. COMPLETON: Is Required. PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from locar Oovemment DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may be used MS Word-97 The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion. age. national origin, color, marital status, poNtical beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing. etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act. you are invited to make your needs known to an OHS office in your county. IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471) REPORT/REQUEST Michigan Department of Human Services One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Horne Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ivelccEBOLT_2094.htm) Page 4 of 8 Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Ye& or proposed for next fiscal year as a new. revised, or continued component. - Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered F IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU: Wraparound Services r BASIC GRANT October 1,2010 through September 30, 2011 .. Component Manager Name Administrative Unit ' Telephone Number Davis, Pamela (63) F COURT r DHS (248 1 858-0247 I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply. 1. COMPONENT STATUS CONTINUED F r TERMINATED 7 REVISED 7 NEW 2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DEUNOUENT 7 NEGLECT B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court r WRITTEN COMPLAINT F CPS category I, a or III 7 21-grEN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE 3, AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Cheek primary area(s) only.) A REDUCTION IN: 1— Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention 1 r Number of Youth Petitioned 1— Number of Days of Shelter Care 1 F Number of Adjudications F Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care r Number of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 2201 4. SERVICE FOCUS F Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home Effect early return from foster or institutional care /I. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR: INSTRUCTIONS: • In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and costs (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete). • In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and oasts pro)ected for the next fiscal year. Time Period Reported Oct. 1 thru Sept. 30 Tune Period Reouested Oct. 1 thru Sept 30 5. 6. ACTUA- 7. ACTUAL COST 8. 9. PROJECTED COST NUMBER PROJECTED NUMBER .., A. Number of Youth/Family Served 15 s 15 $ B. Number of Service Units (Define service unit-A day = 1 unit ) 5.235 $ 6236 $ C Total Component Cost $22,131.00 022,131.00 https:filiolt.fameare.netigerifuric.exe 8/3/2010 Page 5 of 8 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_liveleeNJOL112094thipt) it i $4.23 s4.23 D. Average Cost Per Un E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family I 1 _ , $1,475.40 $1,476.40 III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components arid should correspond to areas of intended identified in Section 1.3. , 10, NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS 1 DAYS A. Youth Petitioned $ — B. Adjudications 8 2,160 $16,056.00 C. Days of Family Foster Care $ D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention $ E. Days of Shelter Care $ F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 12 3,240 s547,560.00__ G. State Wards Committed $ IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION: For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed 13. Assess strengths. weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results. Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served by this component II. SERVICE & COST INFORMATION 5.B. Service Units are defined as one calendar day of in-home care. Average length of service per case is 349 days. 6. Actual Number A. Number of service units: B. 349 (days per case) x 15 (# of youth served) = 5,236 7. Actual Cost (Projected through 9-30-2011) C. 5,235 (total # of units) x 4.23 (average cost per unit) = $22,131.00) D. Average Cost per Unit: $22,131.00/ 6,235 = $4.23 E. Average Cost per Youth: $22,131.00 151= $1,475.40 III. IMPACT EVALUATION httpsAjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 813/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ivelccfAJOL.T_2094.htm) Page 6 of 8 B. Reductions in Adjudications FY 2008-2009 The population of youth served by these highly individualized, intensive services is at very high risk for recidivism. Our research suggests that 87% of this population would re-offend in the absence of intervention. As we served 18 youth, it would be expected that 13 would recidivate. Actually, only 5 of the 15 youth served were re-adjudicated, and statistically, we predicted a total of 13. Therefore, a reduction of 8 adjudications was realized. At an average length of stay in residential placement of 270 days / per youth, a total reduction of 2,160 days in residential Care is realized (8 x 270 = 2,160). Additionally, a cost of $2007* per youth is incurred for each adjudication, for a total of $16,056 in cost savings (8 x $2007 = $16,056). (*It should be noted that each new adjudication costs $2007 to process through the court system from the signing of the petition through the entering of a new disposition.) F. Reductions in Days of Residential Care FY 2008-2009 Historically, 100% of the youth in the targeted population would be placed out of the home as part of their treatment. Therefore, it was expected that all 15 youth would be placed in residential treatment for a period of 4,050 days (16 x 270 average days is residential placement= 4,050). Actually, only 3 of the 15 youth served were placed in a residential facility for a period of 270 days. Therefore, a reduction of 12 youth who were not placed in residential treatment was realized. Therefore, a reduction of 3,240 days in residential care was achieved (12 x 270 = 3,240). The average cost of residential care available locally is $169/day. (3,240 x $169 $547,560 in cost savings) IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION: Based on outcomes for the 2009-2010 fiscal year, 248 children who were assessed by a panel of cross- disciplined professionals to be at the highest risk for removal from their homes and placed in detention, psychiatric, or residential treatment facilities received services from Oakland County Wraparound. 89.7% of these children remained placed in their homes following participation with the Wraparound program. Referrals come from all of the community partners, and cases are accepted on a weekly basis. In order to be considered for acceptance to the program, a child must be involved with at least two formal "systems" in Oakland County. These formal systems include the Court, special education, mental health, and the child welfare system. Children who are involved with the mental health system are represented in 92% of those referred to the program. Children who are involved in the court system are represented in 70% of the referrals, while children who have family involvement with protective services or foster care are reflected in 87% of those open to Wraparound. Children who are eligible to receive special education services are seen in 90% of the referrals to the program. Due to the continued positive effect Wraparound has had on reducing or eliminating out of home and out of school placements for high-risk students, funding to Oakland Schools for this program was increased by an additional $87,000. This increase from Strong Families/Safe Children and Child Protection Community Partners is designed to increase staff so that more high-risk students may be served. Children with active court cases, High-risk students from all 28 districts participate in Wraparound to eliminate barriers for educational success. There are currently five full-time Wraparound facilitators assigned to the program., but enough referrals waiting to more than double the program. The rough estimate is $3600.00 per child per year on an administrative basis. This cost is based upon the 248 children served last fiscal year by Oakland County Wraparound. This does not include the flexible funds that are provided by Easter Seals to accommodate the specific needs identified by children and families in Working toward family Stability. (E.g. A bike for a teen that wants to get a summer job.) https://jjolt. famearemetigenfune.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (ijoltiiveloefOOLL2094.ht,m) Page 7 of 8 The length of stay in the program varies based on the severity and complexity of the needs of the children. The average has dropped from three and a half years to 12 to 18 months currently. Program statistics indicate that during FY 2009 and FY 2010, an average of 70% of the Wraparound cases opened had some type of Court involvement. These statistics lend support in the decision to request program funding for FY 2009-2010. The data recorded in Section ll (Actual Number/ Actual Cost) for FY 2009 through FY 2010, represents the number of children placed on Intensive Probation who have received Wraparound services, as they are most likely to have been placed in residential care in the absence of intervention. Strengths: Wraparound is proven to be a highly successful intervention across the state of Michigan. Wraparound is key in facilitating the planning and delivery of individualized services and supports. By brining the child, his/her family, and all service agencies (schools, DHS, CMH, therapeutic agencies, etc.)to the table, the Wraparound facilitator ensures congruency in planning and encourages healthy communication between all service providers. In addition to the above, Wraparound Facilitators: Configure a child and family team with each family Facilitate the meetings of the child and family "team", and makes adjustments for the culture and comfort level of the individual team members Assist the child and family team in developing an individualized service and support plan, which is culturally relevant and includes crisis and safety plans Identify community resources and makes recommendations regarding their usefulness, given the specific needs of the child & family, including 'basic needs' Facilitate the development of transition strategies Advocate for the child and his/her family Assess training needs and arranges training of key individuals Monitor the provision of services and supports Provide data to collaborative agencies so that they can monitor outcomes of wraparound services Weaknesses 5 Wraparound facilitators manage a caseload of 15 to 20 high-risk families at any given time, usually I averaging 42 to 46 cases per year. Cases that are Court-involved comprise approximately 70% of all referrals to the Wraparound program. in addition to the Court, referrals are generated from schools, the Department of Human Services, Easter Seals/Community Mental Health and a small percentage of referrals come directly from the community (law enforcement). Unfortunately, there are never enough ' resources to provide services to all children requiring them. Historically, there has been up to a 3-month waiting list for Wraparound services. Staff constantly monitor referrals to ensure that those requiring immediate attention are prioritized; however, additional funding to increase the number of full-time https.,//jjoh.famcare.netigenfurio.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livelceNJOLT_2094.htrn) Page 8 of 8 facilitators is always sought V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year (Narrative may be attached) V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Increasingly, youth with serious emotional disturbances are referred to the Court for formal intervention as a result of delinquent conduct that is secondary to having a psychiatric disorder. These youngsters are typically identified in early childhood as having multiple adjustment problems. They receive services from a variety of agencies, often without coordination. Through a partnership with the Department of Human Services, Oakland County Schools, Oakland County Community Mental Health, and other service organizations, a large number of these youth can be maintained in their own homes. Youth in this special, high-risk population have significant rates of recidivism if left untreated. Through appropriate intervention, which includes weekly face-to-face contacts with youth and families, we anticipate reducing the number of new adjudications and maintaining these selected youth in the community, with no new criminal offenses. By maintaining these youth in their homes rather than in residential placement, we achieve a substantial cost savings. AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978. COMPLETION: is required. CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will not be reimbursed. The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing, etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS office in your county Notes Edit Date Saved By Comments https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfune.exe 8/3/2010 Service Component (Full Title/Name) Psychological Clinic Services Check One In Home Care Basic Grant A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit r- DHS F Court Page 1 of 7 • 2094-Budget Summary Report (jolt jivelecf\BOLT_2094.htm) IN-NOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094) Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 1. Salary and Wages NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST Vacant Senior Psychologist 443 $82,293.00 Gabe Martinez (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $31,421.00 - Kathy Spadafora (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $31,421.00 Amanda Durand (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 031,421.00 _ Kristi DiGiola (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $31,421.00 _ Gorda Mah-Mills (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 031,421.00 Katy Conti (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $31,421.00 Cristovao Carreira Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $31,421.00 (ptne) Vacant (ptne) Ct. Clinical Psychologist 20 $31,421.00 Kristin Meekhof Clinic Services Coordniator ao p65,355.00 Pamela Davis Manager Court Services 115 Salary 8 $20,019.00 Lori Hale Office Assistant II 40 $36,215.00 2. Fringe Benefits (Specify) Vacant $49,428.00 Gabe Martinez $1,298.00 Kathy Spadafora $1,298.00 lutps://jjolt.fameare.net/genfune.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjoltiive\cc1'UPLT_2094.htm) Page 2 of 7 Amanda Durand $1,298.00 Kristi DiGiola $1,298.00 Gerda Mali-Mills $1,298.00 Katy Conti $1,298.00 Cristovao Carreira $1,298.00 1 Vacant $1,298.00 Kristen Meekhoff $39,904.00 Pamela Davis 0,126.00 Lori Hale $14,984.00 $579,076.00 Total Personnel B. PROGRAM SUPPORT {For employees identified in "A" above) 1. Travet , , Rate/Mile Estimate No. of YEARLY COST Miles Personal Mileage .55 ; 1000 $550.00 2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet it Needed* YEARLY COST Testing Materials $25,000.00 Indirect Cost (14.26% x $455,250) $64,918.00 Printing $2,108.00 $ 3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* ' Rale/Unit YEARLY COST • $ • $ , $ https://jjolt ,farneare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Total Program Support $92,676.00 2094-Budget Summary Report (ijolt_1ivelcoNJOLT_20941pn) Page 3 of 7 * Most comply with the definitions and limits listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbook. C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES _ 1. Unit Rates UNIT TOTAL UNITS/ NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST Psychological Consultants . 600.00 evaluation 410 $246,000.00 Psychological Consultants 400.00 evaluation 50 $20,000.00 , $ $ 2. Closed End Contracts C — $ 6 — $ $266,000.00 Total Contractual D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of (Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST $ $ $ C $ $ . $ $ $ $ $ $ $0.00 haps://jjolt.fameare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 1. COMPONENT STATUS CONTINUED TERMINATED r REVISED NEW 2094-Budget Summary Report (jolt Jive\ecCTJOLT 2094.htm) Page 4 of 7 Total Non-Scheduled E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT (Add Totals for A. B, C. and 0 above) Total Service Component Cost s937,652.00 If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the following: F. PUBLIC REVENUE: SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST $ $ $ OM Total Public Revenue G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F) TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE (Gross Costs Less Other Revenue) $937,652.00 AUTHORITY: Ad 87, Public Acts of 1978. as amended COMPLETION: Is Required. PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local government_ DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous edition may be used. MS Word-97 The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual Or group because of race, sex, religIon. age, national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading, writing, hearing, etc.. under the Americans with Disabilities Act you are invited to make your needs known to an DI-IS office in your county. IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471) REPORT/REQUEST Michigan Department of Human Services One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State eimbursernent durina the oast Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new. revised, or contin Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered F IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU: Psychological Clinic Services I— BASIC GRANT October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 Component Manager Name AciminIstrative Unit Telephone Number Davis, Pamela (63) F COURT r DHS 248 ) 858-0247 I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all tnat apply. 2. TARGET POPULATION(6) SERVED A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court DELINQUENT NEGLECT B. Children NOT Limier Jurisdiction of Court https://jjoltfamcare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT – (Check primary area(s) only .I A REDUCTION IN: Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention 7 Number of Youth Petitioned Number of Days of Shelter Care E F, Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care Number of Adjudications Page 5 of 7 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_livelccf\JJOLT 2094.htm) r WRITTEN COMPLAINT CPS category I Ii or III 1— CHILDREN LIKELY 70 COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE I COURT F. Number of Days of Family Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220) 4. SERVICE FOCUS For Provide early intervention to treat withir the child's home F Effect early return from foster or institutional care SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR: INSTRUCTIONS: ▪ In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete). • In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year. Time Period Reported Oct. 1 thill Sept 30 Tine Period Requested Oct. 1 rru Sept. 30 5. 6. ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 8 9. PROJECTED COST PROJECTED NUMBER NUMBER A. Number of YouthiFamlly Sewed 730 s 800 $ B. Number of Service Units (Define Service untt=Referrals ) 822 $ 900 $ C Total Component Cost $1,154,369.00 $937,652.00 D. Average Cost Per Unit $1,404,34 $1,041.84 E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family $1,581.33 $1,172.07 III, IMPACT EVALUATION – Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified in Section 1.3. 10. NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS DAYS A. Youth Petitioned s B. Adjudications S C. Days of Family Foster Care 464 50040 $3,002,400.00 D. Days of Out,.of-Home Detention $ E. Days of Shelter Care $ https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfune.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\cLUOLT_2094.htni) Page 6 of 7 F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 266 19080 s3.434.4001)0 G. State Wards Committed IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION: For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed 13. Assess strengths. weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results. Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served by this component. For 2008-2009, it had been estimated that the psychological clinic would perform 1,600 evaluations, 1,400 of which are for youth and family involved in neglect or delinquency matters. In actuality, the clinic will have performed 822 evaluations representing 730 evaluations on delinquient or neglect minors and families. Our experience and research tells us that 40% of the dispositional recommendations coming from the evaluations or delinquent youth are for in-home services and 60% of the disposition& recommendations coming from the neglect population are for in-home services. Thus, calculations for reduction of days and costs for residential treatment and family foster care are as follows: Delinquent Populations 266 youth x 40% = 106 youth x 180 days (avg. Neglect Populations 464 youth x 60% = 278 youth x 180 days (avg. length stay) = 19,080 days x $180/day $3,434,000 length stay) = 50,040 days x 660/day = $3,002,400 Strengths and Weaknesses: The psychological clinic uses standard psychological interview and testing methods to assess the mental status and treatment needs of a particular youth or family. Specific interventions are recommended to address the needs of youth and are geared toward maintaining the least restrictive environment and preserving the family. In doing psychological evaluations early on in the case, appropriate services are identified and provided early and therefore the likelihood of out-of-home placement is reduced. The evaluators have knowledge of local services available and make recommendations that are realistic and can be easily implemented. The information in the reports is used to develop interventions and parent-agency agreements which avoid or reduce the need for out-of- home placements. All clients coming through the court are not referred to the clinic, and therefore their needs may not be identified as early as possible. Therefore, agencies may not be able to plan for their clients as thoroughly as they can when they have the benefit of a report prepared by the psychological clinic. V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be attached) Hearing officers make decisions regarding the out-of-home placement of youth who are involved with the Court. The role of the psychological clinic is to prepare psychological evaluations to assist the Court in making decisions regarding disposition or continued Jurisdiction in delinquency and neglect cases. These clinic reports help the hearing officer in determining early whether out-of-home placement is needed or should be continued. The clinic uses standard psychological interview testing methods to assess the mental status of the treatment needs of a particular youth or family identified as disturbed or highly dysfunctional. The evaluator recommends specific interventions to address the needs of the youth/family geared toward maintaining the least restrictive environment and preserving the family. In doing psychological evaluations early on in the the case, appropriate services are provided early and therefore the likelihood of out-of-home placement is reduced. The evaluators have knowledge of local services available and can recommend local community services, including those offered by the Court and local agencies. The information in the report is used to develop Interveintions and parent-agency agreements which avoid https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfune.exe 8/312010 Page 7 of 7 2094-Budget Summary Report ajolt_1ive\ccEJJOLL2Q94ittm) or reduce the need for out -of-home placement. The psychologists employed (or contracted) by the psychological clinic have limited or full censure in the state of Michigan. They report to the Chief of Clinical Services. The clinicians have specific expertise In evaluating individuals involved with the Court and in making recommendations which help the Court in makinu their determinations. AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978. COMPLETION: Is required. CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will not be reimbursed The Department of Human Services will not dlsorirninate against any individual or group because of race sex, religion, age, national origin. color, marital status. political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DHS office in your county. Notes Edit Date Saved By Comments https://jjolt.fameare.nei/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Service Component (Full Title/Name) Juvenile Reentry Program : Check One F In Home Care Basic Grant DNS A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court) Administrative Unit 17, Court 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1ivelcePQLT,2094.htm) Page 1 of IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (2094) Michigan Department of Human Services (DHS) Bureau of Juvenile Justice October 1.2010 through September N, 2011 1. Salary and Wages NAME(S) FUNCTION No. HOURS/VVEEK YEARLY COST Youth Assistance 27 Youth Assistance Caseworker 270 $365,252.00 Caseworkers 11 Positions Youth Assistance 3 Youth Assistance Casework 30 $54 377.00 Casework Supervisors Supervisor Positions Joanna Papiez Youth Assistance Secretary I 10 $9,533.00 Youth Assistance 1 FfT & 1 PfT Office Assistant!! 15 $12,598.00 Support Staff Positions Mary Schusterbauer Youth Assistance Chief 10 $20,274.00 , Youth & Family 22 Youth & Family Caseworker II 88 $136,570.00 Caseworkers Positions Youth & Family Casework 3 Youth & Family Casework 12 $22,080.00 Supervisors Supervisor Positions Youth & Family Casework 2 PfT Office Assistant II 4 s2,836.00 Support Staff Positions 2. Fringe Benefits (Speedy) Youth Assistance Caseworkers $230,987.00 Youth Assistance Casework Supervisors $22,958.00 , Youth Assistance Support Staff $6,929.00 , Joanna Papiez, Youth Assistance Secretary $7,205.00 Mary Schustorbauer, Youth Assistance Chief $8,674.00 Youth & Family Caseworkers $79,613.00 4 Youth & Family Casework Supervisors $11,521.00 https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfune.exe 8/3/2010 0118.00 0991,425.00 Page 2 of 9 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\coNJOLT309.4.h1 :trx) Youth & Family Casework Support Staff Total Personnel B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above) 1, Travel Rate/Mile Estimate No. of YEARLY COST Miles S 2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Shee1 if Needed* YEARLY COST $ , $ $ r $ 3. Other Costs (Description/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* Rate/Unit YEARLY COST $ $ $ $ * Must comply with the definitions a0.00 and limit5 Total Program Support listed for court operated facilities in the Child Care Fund Handbook C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1. Unn Rates UNIT TOTAL UNITS/ NAME(S) RATE (Describe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST S , $ , $ 1 - $ , 2. Closed End Contracts $ https://jjolt.fameare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 $0.00 Total Contractual (Add Totals for A, B, C and D above) Total Service Component Cost $991,426.00 Page 3 of 9 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_1iveloef,J,i01:::112094.htm) • D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of (Description) To be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST $ $ , , $ $ , $ $ I I $ $ , , , , , $ $ i $ $ Total Non-Scheduled $0.00 E. SERVICE COMPONENT — IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care Funds o Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the F. PUBLIC REVENUE: following: SOURCE To be Provided YEARLY COST , S , $ S — $0,00 Total Pulxic Revenue _ G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (ET) TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED 1HC MATCHABLE $991,425.00 https://jjoit.famcare ,rietigertfunc.exe 813/2010 Page 4 of 9 2094-Budget Summary Report (ijoh_livelccfUJOLT_2094.111m) EXPENDITURE (Gross Costs Less Other Revenue AUTHORITY: Act 87. Public Acts of 1978, as amended. COMPLETION Is Required PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local government. DHS-2094 (Rev. 11-99) Previous ealtion may be used. MS Word-07 The Department of Human Services will not discriminate against any individual or group because of race, sex. religion, age. national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing. etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an OHS office in your county. IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT (4471) REPORT/REQUEST Michigan Department of Human Services One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was State Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new. revised, or continued component. Component Title CHECK ONE Time Period Covered F IN HOME CARE FROM: THRU: Juvenile Reentry Program ,— BASIC GRANT October 1, 2010 through 1 September 30, 2011 Component Manager Name Administrative Unit Telephone Number Davie, Pamela (63) F COURT r OHS (248 ) 858-0247 I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply. 1, COMPONENT STATUS E CONTINUED r TERMINATED r REolSED F NEW , 2. TARGET POPULATION(3) SERVED A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court F DELINQUENT r NEGLECT B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court r VVRITTEN COMPLAINT r CPS category I. II or III r glt-DINIF3EN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURSIDICTION OF THE 3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT — (Check primary area(s) only.) A REDUCTION IN: r Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention r Number of Youth Petitioned r Number of Days of Sheller Care r Number of Adjudications F Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care r Number of Days of Famiry Foster Care r Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220) 4. SERVICE FOCUS F Provide early intervention to treat within the chikl's home r Effect early return from foster or institutional care SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR: INSTRUCTIONS: • In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is rot complete). • In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year. https://jjoh.farneare.netigenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report ajolt_1ive\ccNIOL;F t_2094.htm) Page 5 of Time Period Reported Oct 1 thru Sept 30 Time Period Requested Oct. 1 thru Seat. - 3C 5. 6 ACTUAL 7. ACTUAL COST 8. NUMBER PROJECTED 9' PROJECTED COST NUMBER A Number of Youth/Family Served $ 270 8 B. Number of Service Units (Define Service unit=Calendar Days ) 8 24,300 8 C Total Component Cost $ s991,425.00 D. Average Cost Per Unit $0 $40.80 E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family $0 $3,671.94 III. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond to areas of intended identified in Section 1.3. 10. NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR 12. COSTS DAYS , A. Youth Petitioned $ B Adjudications 6 C. Days of Family Foster Care $ ! I D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention $ .1 E. Days of Shelter Care $ , F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 270 33,480 85.691,600.00 • G. State Wards Committed $ IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION: For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed 13. Assess strengths. weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas arid results. Explain the reason(s). or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No. s and cost and the actual. Account for all youth served by this component 1N-HOME BUDGET DETAIL REPORT A. Personnel Youth Assistance Salaries & Fringe Benefits Salaries Fringes YA Caseworkers (27) $365,252.00 $230,987,00 VA Supervisors (3) $ 54,377.00 $ 22,958.00 VA Secretary (1) $ 9,533.00 $ 7,205.00 YA Support Staff (2) $ 12,598.00 $ 6,929.00 YA Chief (1) $ 20,274.00 $ 8,574.00 1-Ittps://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 • 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_liveceNJOLT 209,4.htra) Page 6 of 9 Youth & Family Casework Salaries & Fringe Benefits Salaries Fringes Y&F Caseworkers (22) $136,570.00 $ 79,613.00 Casework Supervisor (3) $ 22,080.00 $ 11,521.00 Casework Support Staff (2)..$ 2,836.00 $ 118.00 TOTALS FOR YA & CASEWORK: $623,511.00 $367,905.00 B. Program Support - N/A C. Contractual Services - N/A D. Non-Scheduled Payments - NIA E Service Component TOTALS FOR VA & CASEWORK: $623,511.00 $367,905.00 (See I.A for salaries/fringes detail) F. Public Revenue - N/A G. Total Cost TOTAL PROJECT REQUEST $991,425.00 IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT REPORT/REQUEST As this is a "new" program request, the following are projections for FY 2010-2011 (October 1,2010 through September 30, 2011) IL SERVICE & COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR BEING REQUESTED A. Project number of Youth Served: 270 Youth Assistance and Casework would assume the monitoring and supervision of those youth placed in the Re-Entry initiative. Services for the program will be extended to only those youth exiting Children's Village or Crossroads for Youth (County-sponsored detention & residential facilities) and those exiting the following: 1. Youth on Intensive Probation 2. All youth in private placement facilities 3. Youth at home while awaiting placement 4. Youth on bond (similar to pre-trial services for adults) lAccording to our 2008 statistics, approximately 321 youth fell into one of the above categories. We are anticipating that at least 270 of these youth will be served by this initiative, as these are youth exiting the system presenting with severe problems (e.g. mental health, substance abuse, etc.) and multi- system involvement. It is anticipated that each of the 27 YA Caseworkers will coordinate services along with 22 Casework (Probation) staff, serving the 270 youth an average length of 90 days of service per I ease. B. Number of Calendar Days of In-Home Care (FY 2010 - 2011): 24,300 https://jjolt.famcare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (jjolt_live\ccIVIOL3_2094.htm) Page 7 of 9 - We anticipate that the average length of stay in the program will be 90, with a minimum of 30 days and maximum of 160. Therefore, 24,300 (90 x 270) days of care are expected. C. Total Component Cost: $991,425.00 D. Anticipated Average Cost Per Unit: $40.80 E. Anticipated Average Cost per Youth/Family: $3,671.94 III. IMPACT EVALUATION Of the 321 youth between the ages of 12 and 17 released from residential care in 2008 (excluding permanent Court Wards), 45.9% recidivated between their release date and 12131109. This number includes those who were in detention (treatment services) & residential treatment programs. This number does not include youth who committed technical Violations of Probation, Violations of Court Order or those who were charged with new status offenses. It is anticipated that by providing a continuum of care afer release from placement, this recidivism rate will be lowered by 50% or to 22.95%. If we apply this percentage to the anticipated number served by this project, It would be expected that of the 270 youth served, 124 would recidivate. We expect that only 62 will actually recidlvate after release, during FY 2010 - 2011. Additionally, the average length of stay in placement (detention or residential facility) Is 270 days per youth. Therefore, 72,900 days of out of home placement would be expected for the 270 youth served in this project. However, per our anticipated 50% decline in recidivism, we anticipate only 33,480 days of residential treatment care for those involved in this project. Finally, as the per diem for out of home placement is $170,00, it is anticipated that $5,691,600.00 will be saved in residential treatment care. IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION Strengths: It is anticipated that this program component will impact the recidivism rates for number of youth served who are exiting residential treatment facilities by 60%. It will provide a continuum of care after the release from residential placement, offering needed services within their respective communities, and afford the youth/family the best opportunity for success upon re-integration to his/her community. As Youth Assisstance offices are located within 26 school districts and are already integrated into the community (schools, municipalities, etc), treatment plans will be designed to offer families bridge services and referral sources that they can call upon even after completion of the project. Additionally, if successful, the project will save the County millions of dollars in out of home placement costs. Weaknesses: Given the severity of the cases that are currently Court-involved, it is unknown as to whether resources are available in every community to meet the needs of this difficult population. However, we will utilize to the best of our ability all services available to provide the best referral sources for each project recipient and their families. As stated, it is anticipated that this project will serve 270 youth during FY 2010 -2011, beginning 10/1/10 and ending 9/30/10. Average caseloads will not exceed 10 per Caseworker. We anticipate that we will Impact the recidivism rates, days of out-of-home placement and cost for services based on per diem by 60%. haps:// ji olt.fameare.netigertftinc.exe 83/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report(jjolt_live\ccATJOLT 299=1,,, htp) Page 8 of 9 V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION — Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative may be attached) Re-entry Project Narrative Circuit Court Family Division (Delinquent) Data Local Statistics The target population to be served by this project are youth, aged 12-17, who are involved with the Oakland County Juvenile Justice System, committed their offenses prior to their 17th birthday, and are currently placed out of home (County-sponsored detention and residential treatment facilities or private placement). In 2009, there were 959 youth involved in the juvenile justice system in Oakland County. As of December 31, 2009, 170 youth were placed in Children's Village (County-sponsored detention, secured or otherwise specified residential facility), 58 were placed in Crossroads for Youth (County- sponsored residential non-secured facility) and 93 were placed at other residential and/or secure facilities, for a total of 321 youth. The racial make-up of youth in the Oakland County juvenile justice system during this period was 52% White, 41% Black, 2% Hispanic, 1.5% Asian, 3% other race, and .5% were of unknown race. 68% of the youth were male and 32% were female. With a mean age of 15.4, 8% of the youth were 13 years of age or younger, while 20% were age 17 or 18. The Role of the Youth & Family Caseworker (Juvenile Probation Officer) The Casework (or Juvenile Probation) Unit under mandatory statute, is responsible for all delinquency cases authorized for Court by the Intake department, and assists cases through the adjudication process when necessary. Upon adjudication, the Casework Unit is responsible for preparation of the social history report (including any corroborative information) which takes into account both the special needs of the child/family and the protection of the community. From this report, recommendations regarding disposition are generated and forwarded to the Court. During post-disposition, the Casework Unit assists in implementing Court orders, including the monitoring of probation, restitution, community service/ restorative justice, parent education and counseling. The unit is also responsible for reporting to the Court regularly and making further recommendations when necessary. Under the re-entry component, 10% of their time will be spent working with youth involved in this program. Probation Officers will assist in discharge planning by attending all planning meetings at the placement facility. They will assist the placement staff in gathering all necessary documentation and help to ensure that all necessary parties are in attendance at meetings (e.g. Parents, Easter Seals/CMH, YA Caseworkers, etc.). Upon release from the placement facility, Probation Officers will continue to monitor re-entry eases for a period deemed appropriate by the discharge team and ultimately, the hearing officer or Judge. Additionally, prior to discharge from Court jurisdiction, Probation Officers (Court Caseworkers) will hand off case management duties to the assigned Youth Assistance Caseworker. Probation Officers are still responsible for monitoring each case and ensuring Court compliance. The Role of Youth Assistance Using a decentralized approach, VA Caseworkers work with a board of volunteers to identify and address each community's needs. They also provide family-focused, need-based casework services and short-term counseling and referral services to at-risk youth and their families. Community-based referral sources include substance abuse and mental health treatment, parenting and family education, skill and self-esteem building, mentoring, recreation programs, and youth recognition. Each of the 26 local Youth Assistance programs is co-sponsored by the Oakland County Circuit Court, school districts and municipalities therein. Each of the offices is located in the community to ensure that local resources are accessible for each family. https://jjoit.famcare.nevgenfunc.exe 8/3/2010 2094-Budget Summary Report (ijolt_1ivelecfqQL,Tz_2094.htrn) Page 9 of 9 Under the re-entry component, 26% of their time will be spent working with youth Involved in this program. It is expected that Youth Assistance Caseworkers will be involved in the discharge planning process for each youth released from placement. Additionally, YA Caseworkers will assume responsibility for casework services after the youth has been discharged from court jurisdiction. YA Caseworkers will ensure that re-entry participants and their families are linked with the necessary resources within their community in an effort to satisfy the provisions of the discharge plan. Under this project, staff will be responsible for referring youth/families for the following services: , 1. Alcohol and other drug treatment ' 2. Alcohol and other drug testing 3. Therapeutic interventions 4. In-home counseling services if necessary 5. Wrap-around services to support substance abuse and other treatment 6. Substance abuse and needs assessments for participants and families 7. Case management services 8. Program coordination with the Court and other agencies 9. Parenting groups and conjoint therapy for parents 10.Sibling groups and individual therapy for siblings 11. Trasportation Services when available AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978. COMPLETION: is required. CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION• Child care funds will not be reimbursed. The Department of Human Services will not diScriminate against any individual or group because of race. sex, religion, age. national origin. cokr, marital status. political beliefs or d4ability. If you need help with reading. writing, hearing, etc„ under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to a DNS office in your county. Notes Edit Date Saved By Comments https://jjolt.fameare.net/genfunc.exe 8/3/2010 Resolution #10219 September 1, 2010 The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee. There were no objections. • * V FISCAL NOTE (M.R. #10219) September 23, 2010 BY: Finance Committee, Tom Middleton, Chairperson IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT- FAMILY DIVISION - OAKLAND COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND BUDGET 2010- 2011 To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. Under the provisions of Act 280 of the Public Acts of 1975, Oakland County is required to develop and submit a plan and budget for funding foster care services to the Child and Family Services Office of the Bureau of Juvenile Justice, Department of Human Services annually. 2. The Circuit Court/Family Division and the Oakland County Department of Human Services have developed the foster care services budget for the period covering October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011. 3. The application reflects $35,440,638 in gross expenditures and $2,300,000 in offsetting revenues, leaving a net expenditure of $33,140.638. The Child Care fund reimburses 50% for all Child Care Fund eligible expenditures of 533,140,638, rendering a State reimbursement of $16,570,319 should the State approve the budget, and the County expends all funds listed in the application. 4. The application reflects an approximate .56% decrease from last year's application, totaling $186.973. 5. The figures provided are estimates for State Child Care Fund budgeting purposes only, based on current available data, and may not reflect the eventual adopted budget and/or expenditures for this program. The application expenditures exceed the FY 2011 Finance Committee Recommended Budget by approximately 9,72% or $1,611,620. 6. If necessary, a budget amendment will be recommended at the time of contract agreement, FINANCE COMMITTEE FINANCE COMMITTEE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Coulter absent. 4 lir Resolution #10219 September 1, 2010 Moved by Middleton supported by Hatchett the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Burns, Capello, Coleman, Coulter, Douglas, Gershenson, Gingell, Gosselin, Greimel, Hatchett, Jackson, Jacobsen, Long, McGillivray. Middleton, Nash, Potts, Runestad, Schwartz, Scott, Taub, Woodward, Zack, Bullard. (24) NAYS: None, (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal note attached) on the amended Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). 11.mM I RID' APPROVE THJ FOREGOING RESOLUTION STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Ruth Johnson, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on September 23, 2010, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 23rd day of September, 2010, eat Ruth Johnson, County Clerk