HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1983.08.04 - 11410GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE
/
-
August 4th, 1983
REPORT
By: General Government Committee - John E. Olsen, Chairperson
In re: Resolution #83184, Michigan House of Representatives
Bill #4448 (Family Subsidies for the Severely
Impaired Child)
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The General Government Committee having reviewed
Resolution #83184, reports with the recommendation that this
resolution be adopted with the following deletion:
"with the modification as recommended by the Oakland
County Community Mental Health Services Board that the
approval of a Family Subsidy be contingent upon a
clinical review of the case by Community Mental
Health and a determination that living with the
parents is in the best interest of the severely
impaired child."
MR. CHAIRPERSON, on behalf of the General Government
Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report.
Miscellaneous Resolution ,83184 Julie 23, 1983
BY: HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - F. Gosling, Chairperson
IN RE: MICHIGAN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BILL NO. 4448
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the proposed Michigan House Bill 4448 would establish a system of
"Family Subsidies" to be paid by the State to parents of minor children
when these children live at home but are severely mentally impaired, severely
Multiply impaired or autistic in the terminology of the public schools; and
WHEREAS the purpose of the Family Subsidy is to cover some of the special
expenses which families of severely impaired children incur; to encourage
the families to keep their children at home rather than place them into foster
care, or to encourage families who have impaired children in foster care to bring
those children home; and
WHEREAS the approximate cost of the Family Subsidy of $2,500 per year is much
less than the cost to the taxpayers of maintaining a severely impaired child in a
foster care facility; and
WHEREAS Michigan House Sill 4448 would designate the County Community
Mental Health Services program as the agency responsible for certifying families
as eligible for the State subsidy under the terms of the Bill, but the subsidy would
be paid directly by the State; and
WHEREAS Michigan House Bill 4443 would serve the important social goal of
maintaining the natural family unit in situations where this effort has become an
exceptional financial burden of the parents for which reason the Oakland County
Community Mental Health Services Board has endorsed the Bill.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
hereby support and urge the adoption of Michigan House of Representatives Bill 4448
with the modification as recommended by the Oakland County Community Mental Health
Services Board that the approval of a Family Subsidy be contingent upon a clinical
review of the case by Community Mental Health and a determination that living with
the parents is in the best interest of the severely impaired child.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Health and Human Resources Committee, I
move the adoption of the foregoing resolution.
What is a Family uoport Subsidy?
A5 defined in this Act, the family support subsidy provides financi,-7 sflpp7t
families with severely impaired children living in the family home. The idv is
intended to be used to meet the special needs of the family and thus pre'
institt.eAation or eeoeoeity placement of family members, or in
Family me7ters home from cc 'unity residential or institutional care.
subsidi , will be paid on behalf of children to their families who plan to contie‘
their ee -nirment to caring for their severely hand ieeee child in their homes.
subsi 1 -an be beneficial to the child and to the feoili and at the same time
tax doll. -s.
Hoy F3rnily Support Subsidies meet the -eeei .7,1 needs of severely impaired chi'
families?
'._verely impaired children require 24 hour care. This may create tension in the
fcmily and strain family relationships to the degree that the disabled child mast be
away from the home. Family income does not all :: v eligibility for most ex
' JpL, L services. The family support subsidy will a:- 1,--t the range of services
nded to alleviate sr - of the stresses these fam;li-_ face. it is not intended to
sDplant family rescro..'bility for basic care of the c'ild nor is it inten&ad to force
f, ilies to care for their children when they are unable to do so. Th ° itself
noC be suffi-cient to meet all the special needs of the family.
Who qualifies for subsidies?
—
This act is limited to Michigan families who apply and docuioeot their chile .
have been clas s ified as severely mentally impaired (SMI) and severe: ..dipl
(SW by the sro:eiel education system, or diagnosed as autistic impaired and
speciai educaee services in a classroom specifically desiTeed for autistF27
The ,/ be under the age of 18 and living in the family hooe. This relati
sever:ly impaired population is most in danger of institutioeelizico or v7
out-side the family home. A family may be headed by a biological legal eo-o -
or adoptive parent who is not receiving a medical subsidy under the Adoptive Sue - • - . cr.
A special provision in this law would provide an advance payment to a family in
anticipation of the return home of the eligible family member who is residing
public or private institution or who is in residential care.
H(..) is the amount of the subsidy est7•!7.1ished?
The subsidy payments are patr After the federal Supplemental Security Incomo
frit (SSI). SSI has an already eo.-lished level of support for a disaLl:' adult
living in the home of another that is periodically updated to refle: cce:.: of li
At the SSI level of payment, as of April, 1983, the annual subsid
$2,5072) a year.
How will the subsidy_be used?
The Act recognizes that each family has differing and unique needs and will use
the didy to meet those needs. Possible uses of the subsidy payments might
pu - - of special equipment, special diets, paper diapers, unique transport.
in -hc 2 pecialized care, respite care, family counseling, support groups and
remodeling to accommodate the needs of the impaired child.
save
e cost of the subsidy pro to the State?
Estimates of the maximum total annualized cost of the subsidies 1 $4.8 m111
if applications are accept,!cl from all the eligible families with an chiiu
their home and 10% of with im--'r -d children in state instituti,,, (.,nd commu
facilities. For each in :t_tional:, ] returned home or prevented from ente,
the institution, the anni A savings 1-r child would be about ^— 000. St
savings will also be realized by lengthening the ber of yr amil
their child at home. The cost of the subsidy -r , is onl , a :.tion of
of institutions and community residential care an is a better us_ of privaLe cis4
dollars. An appropriation would be necessary to i-p:ement this A.
the subsidy pr,w7m be ;a;!m 7 :-i5tered?
Th.
,
" :7-rtment of Mental Health would be with administrTti -7. -1thority
to Art because it has statutory r :-cibility for tL.. _1 being Q •
dev ,- dis .aoled children. In addition, .1,,aartment of Her Iealth
to t logical icy for services to families < . lopmentally c - led pQr',on
thr •.h the community mental health system. The Depa tment has made ) commitment to
avoid mstitutionalization and other placements outside the home ' tver possible and
to reove children from institutions who do not need to be there.
II] we know if the subsidy program is working?
This Act requires an annual evaluation to provide the Governor and Legislature
with information on:
- Impact of the program on those persons in institutions
- Reo ,nns for non-participation by families
- 1-c.-y of the subsidy payments and availability of services
- Promotion of the program
- Utilization throughout the State
to further assist the - Recommendations for programmatic or Legislativ action
family providing care for the severely handici7-1
I - , 0
It
SZE SENt
"r'n., • /
n14°
74,
'$ STA
IVA‘m.,..\••••n
OW
.;
DEbBlE
SUBSTITUTE FOR
HOUSE BILL NO. 4448
A bill to,amend sections 302 and 308 of Act No. 258
Public Acts of 1974, entitled as amended
'1 Menta1 health code,"
tg sections 330.137 and 330.1308 of the Michigan C -- d
; and to add sections 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, --d 161.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
S .f7tion 1. Secti=s 307 and 308 of Act No. 258 o -
2 Public Acts of 1974, being sections 330.1302 ant 330.130_ of the
3 MI,chigan Compiled Laws, are amended and sections 155, 156, 157,
4 158, 159, 160, and 161 are added to read as follows:
5 SEC. 155. AS Uc :D IN THIS SECT"?' SECTIONS 156 TO 161:
6 (A) "FAMILY" MEANS A FAMILY MEMBER AND HIS OR HER PARENT OR
Y LEGAL GUARDIAN.
(B) "FAMILY MEMBER" MEANS A PERSON LESS THAN la Y7A7S OF AGE
9 WHO IS IDENTIFIED THROUGH A DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION 7F=72MED
, 01267'83 ,(H -2) * CPID
1 PURSUANT TO RULES PROMULGATED BY THE DEF.ELIT OF EDUCATION
2 UNDEP TEE SCHOOL CODE OF 1976, ACT NO. 451 OF THE PUBLIC ACTS OF
3 1976, BEING SECTIONS 380.1 TO 380.1852 OF THE MICHIGAN COMPILED
4 LAWS, AS BEING 1 OF THE FOLLOWING:
5 (t) SEVET,Y MENT= IMPAIRED.
6 (ii) SEVERELY MULTIPLY IMPAIRED.
7 (ii) 'AUTISTIC IMPAIRED, AND WHO RECEIVES SPECIAL EDUCATION
8 SERVICES IN A CLASSROOM DESIGNED FOR THE AUTISTIC IMPAIRED.
9 (C) *LEGAL GUARDIAN' MEANS A PERSON APPOINTED BY A COURT OF
10PETENT JURISDICTION TO EXEL= POWERS OVER A FAMILY MEMBER.
11 (D) •*PARENT" MEANS A BIOLOGICAL OR ADOPTIVE PARENT.
12 (E) "SUPPLENTAL SECURITY INCOME' MEANS THE PROGRAM AUTHO-
13 RIZED UNDER TITLE . XVI OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 42 U.S.C. 1381
14 TO 1385.
15 SF:C. 156. THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMZZ7 SHALL ESTABLISH A
16 FAMIL7 SUPPORT SUBSIDY PROGRAM PUPSUANT TO SECTIONS 155 TO 161.
17 THE PURPOSE OF THE FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDY PROGRAM IS TO FAM-
18 ILIES ToGETanis BY FACILITATMG THE RETURN OF FAMILY MEM17 FROM
19 CUT OF HOME PLACEMENTT TO THEIR FAMILY HOMES, AND BY PREVENTING
20 OR DELAYING TEE OUT OF EOME PLACEMENT OF FAMILY. MEMBERS WHO
21 -.E5'IDE IN TEEIR FAMILY HOMES.
22 SEC. 157. (1) THE DEPAFTT SHALL PROMULGATE RULE.:: 77
2 EMENT SECTIONS 155 TO 161,'ORSUANT TO TEE ADMINISTRAI:V
24 l'77,CEDURES ACT OF 1969, ACT NO. 306 OF THE PUBLIC ACTS OF 1969,
25 3EING SECTIONS 24.201 TO 24.315 OF THE MICHIGAN COMPILED !77.
26 THE RULES SHALL INCLUDE AN ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF THE STANDARDS
27 AND CRITERIA USED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION IN TEE
01267'83 (H-2) *
155(B)„ 1 IDENTIFICATION OF FAMILY MEMBERS AS SET FORTH IN SECTI
T'rT: DEPARTMENT SHALL ALSO CONSULT WIT 7 THE DEPAR=77 OF EDUCA-
ON THE IMPLEMENTATION AND COORDINATION OF THE 7AMILY SUPPOr(T
4 SUBSIDY PROGRAM.
5 (2) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CREATE APPLI —TION FORMS - SHALL
6 MAKE THE FORMS 7 1 ILA5LE TO THE COUNTY COM— ITY MENTAl IIALTH
7 PROGRAMS FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY OF APPLICANTS.
8 FORMS SHALL REQUIRE AT LEAST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, ;;.IH
9 CONSTITUTES THE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR RECEIPT OF A FAMIL
10 SUBSIDY; •
11 (A) A STATEMENT TEAT THE FAMILY RESIDES IN THIS STATE.
12 (B) VERIFICION THAT :FE F.TAILZ xEmazn
13
IN SECTION 155.
14 (C) A STATEMENT THAT THE FAMILY MEMBER RESIDES, OR IS
15 --7:CTED TO RE:77 -, WITH HIS OR HER PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN OR
16 ON A =7-MARY bAIS, WITH ANOTHER RELATIVE OF THE FAMILY
17 MEMBER.
18 (D) A STATEMENT THAT THE FAMILY IS NOT RECEIVING A MEDICAL
13 SUBSIDY FOR THE FAMILY MEMBER UNDER SECT7ON 115F OF THE SOCIAL
20 WELFARE ACT ACT NO. 280 OF THE PUBLIC ACT :L OF 1939, BEING SEC-
21 TION 400.115F OF THE MICHIGAN COMPILED LAWS.
22 (E) VERIFICATION THAT THE TAXABLE INCOME FOR THE FAMILY
23 THE YEAR IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING THE DATE OF APPLICATION DID NOT
24 EXCEED $75,000.00, UNLESS IT CAN BE VERIFIED THAT THE 7:-XABLE
25 INCOME FOR THE FAMILY FOR THE YEAR IN WHICH THE APPLICATION IS
26 MADE WILL BE LESS THAN $75,000.00.
01267'83 (11-2)
I' IN ITION
1 SEC. 158. (1) IF AN APPLICATION FORA FAMILY SUP
7 -5SIDY IS APPROVED BY TEE COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALT!...
3 PROGRAM:
4 (A) A .' I7Y SUPPORT F7r7IDY SHALL BE PAID TO =' 7".PENT OR
5 LEGAL GUA iN ON BEHALF OF A FAMILY MEMBER, AND
6 ERED A BEN'.. TO THE FAMILY MEMBER.
7 (B) ,7'r FAMILY SUP77 7T SUBSIDY SHALL BE USED TO MEET THE SPE-
8 CIAL NEEDS OF THE FAMILY.
9 (C) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 160(B), A FAMILY SUPPOi
10 SUBSIDY SHALL BE IN AN AMC7NT EQUIVALENT TO THE MONTHLY MAXIMUM
11 E:PPLEMENCAL SECURITY INCC PAYMENT AVAILABLE FOR AN ADULT
12 RECIPIENT Lr:17,-; IN THE HOUSEHOLD OF ANOTHER, AS PROVIDED BY FED-
13 ERAL REGULA13 "ADDITION, THE PARENT OP LEGAL GUARDIAN OF A
14 FAMILY MEMBER WHO IS rN AN OUT OF HOME PLAC:MENT AT THE TIME OF
15 APPLICATION MAY RECEIVE A 1-TIME, LUMP-SUM PAYMENT OF -WICE TEE
16 MONTHLY FAMILY SUBSIDY AMOUNT FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEET.. THE SPE-
17 CIAL NEEDS OF THE FAMILY TO PREPARE FOR IN-HOME CARE.
18 (2) A COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM riAY
19 wITH THE DEPARTMENT FOR SERVICES WHICH PROVIDE FOR THE 77-ENT OF
. 20 FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDIES THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT.
21 (3) THE PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN WHO RECEIVES A FAMILY SUP-
22 PORT SUBSInY SHALL REPORT AT LEAST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION TO
23 THE COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM:-
24 (A) NOT LESS -7 7- ANNUALLY, A ST7,T=NT THAT THE FAMILY SUP-
25 FORT SUBSIDY WAS UF 7 ") TO MEET THE SPECIAL NEEDS OF THE FAMILY.
26 (B) IMMEDIATELY, THE OCCURRENCE OF ANY EVENT II IN
27 SECTION 159.
01267 °83 (H-2) *
5
1 (C) IMMEDT,;v7ZLY, IF THE PARENT OR LE7U GUARDIAN REQUEa.TS
2 TERMINATION OF THE FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDY.
3 SEC. 159. (1) THE FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDY SHALL TERMF:
4 EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING OCCURS:
5 (A) THE FAMILY 1477.73ER DIES.
6 (B) THE FAMILY NO :ONGER H T7E ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA IN
7 SECTION 157(2).
8. .(2) IF AN APPLICATION FOR A FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDY IS DENIED
9 OR A'fAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDY IS TERMINATED BY A COUNTY COMMUNITY
10 MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM, THE P.7=N: OR LEGAL GUARDIAN OF THE
11 AFFECTED FAMILY MEMBER MAY DEI1AM, IN WRITING, A HEARING BY THE
12 COUNTY COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM. THE HEARING SHALL F7
13 CONDUCTED IN THE SAin7 'mANNER AS PROVIDED FW. CONTESTED CASE .AR-
14 INGS UNDER THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT, ACT NO. 306 OF TEE
15 PUBLIC ACTS OF 1969, BEING SECTIONS 24.201 TO 24.315 OF THE
16 MICHIGAN COMPILED LAWS.
17 SEC. 160. .(1) FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDY PAYMENTS SEK E PAID
18 FROM ACCOUNTS AS APPROPRIATED BY TEE LEGISLATURE.
19 (2) THE DEPARTMENT, AFTER NOTIFYING THE CO'. AND THE
20 HOUSE AND SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEES, MAY ADJUST TEE
21 AMOUNTS AVAILABLE FOR FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDIES BY EQUAL APPOR-
22 TIONMENT IN TEE EVENT AVAILABLE REVENUES ARE INSUFFICIENT TO
23 COVER THE OBLIGATIONS. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL NOT -
24 AMOUNT OF THE MONTHLY PAYMENT BY MORE THAN AN AGGRE ATE C 25 IN
25 1 FISCAL YEAR WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE
26 -":1-',OPRIATIONS COMMITTEES.
01267'83 (E-2) *
1 SEC. 161. DEAj2TME IN CONJUNCTION WITH CO:
2 COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH PROC,Y7 .77, SHALL CONDUCT ;V:NI:;.
3 FORWARD TO THE GOVERNOR AND 77E HOUSE AND SENATE
4 CMMITTEES AN EVALUATION OF THE FAMILY E:7,-,?n3RT SUBSII
5 WHICH SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, ALL OF
.• 6 FOLLOWING:
7 (A) OF THE FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDY PRAM UPON ,
. 8 CHILDREN CAZ. BY THIS ACT IN INSTITUTIONS AND RESIDENTIAL CARE
9 PROGRAMS INCLUDING, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, SAMPLE CASE REVIEWS
10 OF FAMILIES WHO Cf:OSE NOT TO PARTICIPATE.
11 (B) CASE REVIS OF FAMILIES WHO VOLUNTARILY TI:INATE PAR-
12 TICIPATION IN TEr:. FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDY PROGRAM FOR ANY REASON,
13 PARTICULARLY WHEN - THE FAMILY MEMBER IS PTACED OUT OF THE FAMILY
14 Fan, INCLUDING THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE TEP7RTMENT AND COUNTY COM-
.-JNITY MENTAL WEALTH PROGRAMS IN OFFERING SUITABLE ALfr:E.ATIVES.
16 (C) SAMPL7 ASSESSMENTS OF FAMILIES RECEIVING FAL:1;!.
17 SUBSIDY PAYME1T7 INCLUDING Z=C:CY OF SUBSIDY AND NEED F
18 ICES NOT AVAIL:ABLE.
19 (D) TE7 EFFORTS1O .ENCOURACE PROGRAM PARTICIPATION OF ELIGI7
20 BLE FAMILIES.
21 (E) THE GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF FAMILIES RECEIVING S
22 F:.IDY PAYMENTS AND, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, FAMILY MEMBERS PRE-
23 SUMED TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDY PA::NTS.
24 (F) PROGRAMMATIC AND 77=7.7,LATIVE FECON777DA770 -NS TO FU2THZ
25 ASSIST FAMILIES IN PROVIDINC CARE FOR FAILY
26 (G) PROBLEMS THAT ARISE IN IDENTIFYING FAMILY MEME*77
27 THROUGH DIT7CTIC EVALUATIONS PERFO7EC, PURSUANT TO iwLes
l.ONS
71GRAM
R SERV-
01267'83 (H-2)
3
7
131,GATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, AS SET FORTH IN
v.:ION 155(B).
Sec. 302. (1) Except as ia- otherwise provi,
AND IN SUBSECTION (2), a county shall be finalic.ially
.e for 10% of the net cost of any service, exclding a secv-
6 ice provided to an individual 'under criminal sentence to a state
7 prison, that is provided by the department, directly or by con-
ct, to a resident of that county.
THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE FAMILY SUPPORT SUB-
ES ESTABLISHED UNDER SECTIO11 156.
11 Sec. 308. (1) Except as io otherwise provided in
12 chapter AND SUBSECTION (2), and subject to the constraint
13 funds actually appropriated by the -e-tte- legislature for suc
14 purpose, the state shall pay 90% of the annual net cost of a
15 county community mental health program that is establied and
16 administered in accordance with chapter 2.
. 17 (2) THE STATE SHALL PAY THE FAMILY SUPPORT SUBSIDIES ESTAB-
la LISHED UNDER SECTION 156.
01267'83 (H-2) * Final page.
I
' FAMILY SUPPORT Se'3STDY ACT
OjESTIONS AND AN.E7'..: ON HB 4448
S A F;-,1ILY SUPT SUBSIDY?
°vides fin cial :.port to
The subsidy
and tnus preven
cases return
e for
Jdren
rents held
gives
e4port subsidies
but are benefic
who
the
encoura -
==LcAl .
Yet, t.=,
e .
pla
FAZLY FS'MEET- THE SP AL NEE 7 IMPAIRE OF
own.
As ned ir this Act, • the family support subsidy
s eeverele rn-eaired children living in
te meee ee epecial neeee -T,ef the fami:
br commün placement,,
lic=zj'rcm comity or -'.estjeutional care..
°lies
..0 be- .e
ey
Ibers
- :eat beg r,e to t-i Lf a gap in fundi
eedk...up. of !,1'.,77ttvn if
n?: provide fbr rer=is o'C
ig and.specil
,:are for other people's Thildren.-
t to keep their own children al:
H cost-effective than these.odi-o
and family. •.• •
. a
verely imeaireu children e,-;.e.eut eat, Walke dress or talk on th
:ire 24-hour care. This may create tens -:en in the family e -
relationships to the degree that the disabled child must be p -
--±-re. the home. Family income does not allow eligibility for most exi!
'7es that might help the family.
-.evere
Families with se eeeely ei -abled children
have. Oe eetal Health er
many 0: ...;ting out-.of-
the rTe financial res•uee
e-ial
e..te .-,e was rated as one
,At least 50 families a year
:ley can no longeeeo
that normal families
Mental Heeee - •••port
!Id not ha -r-:
-vey done in '=7Linty,
most helpfui
'!ent from Macomt Re-
eeir eeir
recognizes .that each family has -differtee. and uhi
met by specific agencyevices. Pciple uses o
the purchase of special .rquipment, tci diets, 7.eeee paper
ansportation costs, -pecializ2e care, respite -si
counseling, support groups id home remodeling to accor,,:o
impaired-childe ee,
QUALIFIES. FOR SUBSIDIES?
This act is limited to Michigan families who apply and document that their
children have been classified as severely mentally impeired ee
multiply impaired (SXI) hy the special education sy -t, or di•vose
and receivino seeHal education services 7 1 :,src;i:Joi de e e:eee 'ee• Lhe
;`..stic or severely itTaired. They must be under eee a(:c: of 18 and - 'h
family home. Family taxable income may not exceed emount is
This
eeds that often
subsidy payments
Oiaper
thb
WhO
d on Michigan's income limit for property tax relief
the total maximum I
m2 ,4,48
,
ively small severely impaired populatie is mc:t in danger 0 -c
a,eltion or placement outside the famil) Lee,. emily may t eeee.
0 . - ee ical parent, legal guardian, ce- adopt %e par:- 7. who is not rece
me..-1 subsidy under 4te Adoptior F,-eeidy Act. A :7ecial provisior
wc 'd provide ao advaeT -eyment 7,1ily in ae: _ipation of the
of the eligible family .bee who is re cling in a , ,blic or priva
or who is in-,residentia'
IS THE Y.T OF THE SUBSIDY'r
4.
;his
nor-
nsti tut -
trie federal Supplemental
etablished level of support fee
living in thE ef anothee H..,t is peclically update,: to re:
cc cf living. At' SSI level of peee:J1, of April 19C?, 'he an
•ec:.e, be about $2,,fle: e. year. Th'is is 're _ee, :* that the chile /rill
he/she turns 18 old. Disabled ch!ree- e•.:ee 18 do not cr-Jify f
lese their family meets low ineee standard -. .
APF THERE OTHER STATES VT.1".' 7AMILY SUPPORT PROGUY,7?
„ :eel states now peee -e eeme type of support to families caring for the
eildren in their ceqn homes. Thirteee states -- Connecticele
, Illinois, Mnresota, Montana, Nevada, 4-e,,e York, North Dakota,
, Rhode Isleed, South Carolina, and Wa7Meeton -- have family
erograms. Of these, all but New York and ',,ash'ington prr,v
T idies. Minnesota, in 1975, was the first to provide direct
nesota's program had a significant effect on preventing out-
for 76 percent of those'served. -
"Florida fenwet its program to be significantly meree cost effecter:7.
tional plac, e - :eH::eee 2
FT:m -yeT:eeeert subsidy and services have been pi'
eetour years in Michigan. In a small
, ten out-of-home placements were averted
natural homes.
MUCH WILleeTHE SUBSIDY PFTeee. ("1ST?
rding to Depert7e7eit of Mental Health -7
fei:Thes with thir ildre cerrently at IT.
in out-of-home p7a ,7
If all 2,000 families with their children at home and 1.7e: of those with children
in out-of-home placements participate, the cost will be approximately $5.0 million
for one year.
ents are patterned
SSI h - an alread
1.7 4:tu-
in four pro
7 subsidy
chi'i
ms oper_eing
am in MdC(=:-.,
eturned ee
e;, based '7n 77 parec -,)ation of
! I (1% of children
cost W11 be .Se,f, lillion.
ee
AIS/MR residential care
_ Intensive fc,st..:,r
Group foster care .
mic
men
;
HOW WILL WE KNOW IF THE SUBSIDY PROGRAMIS WORKINGi'
This Act requires an annual evaluation to provide the Governor and
with information on:
' -.impact of the prcram or
.:.Reasons for non-':r ;. fa;7,7.s
L'Adequacy of the subsidy rrt c ibility of
- Problems in identifyi' milyer: .eith special ion criteria
.Her assist
residents pay a tree .1,:;us cost for 1,400 children in out-of-home place-
ild, per day.*
, . „ •
Institutions _for c1,7v77...ally disabled . . .
Family foster care . .
,
per child, per day cost of .drop:.1.ed famffy support subsidy program in corn-.
:arison is . . . _ „ ,
if only one child returns home dri1stitutidr is prevented from entering
institution, the savings per proxima': 145,000.
WILL THE SUBSIDY PROGRAM BE
Department of Mental Health be vested with nistrate authority to
emr7t this Act because it 'tatutory responsibility for th being
of all 7.!velopmentally disabled and has made a commitment to avoid
ir7.'*'Ationalization and other outside the h.c. 'ill
be :=ted and certified through Cunity Mental HeaL:c, Boards.
Utilization throughout the Stat
Recommendations for progratic or legislative action
the family providing care tr the severely hanc-cdp
FY 1983 Average Gross Per Diem Costs
tate PUrPJ-
ure of the
received L.:
for TM.'. expendity LO
.Pi4)propri,.-..2(ions, by Rep. Chair, reported
:218,
or the of and ot state
r t: fj 1 yc.,.tr ending ,i3,,.4-,,t.,:•riber
by Rep. Jacobetti. Chair, reported
were referred thc order
ar ..trposes
ohu for ci ifne
by ce:o.:oL ,t;
.1.nd f..he
,,lading of.
,.
djunior c 17
that che t.11 n?.;:.3..ding of Bills..
•
• IT.- L.; .01(
•
..nd ...hen pass.
:,..din . f
the sub.:;:t,..cf.:o
r,.7ferred 'a.) the
T • 7-7 urrr
Senate
ttti, Chair, rented
yar endin
6,
prograr
.1e, or°.
r inc.uroo vC
pas6.
T". bill al,H eferred to tne order ( u
s.ubstiti. . ferrerl
j, hair, reported
incorr ,: ls.)y the
the
A.7'17 •
LO
.e.porta,., of
The Con t: Rep, Jaccbetti, Chair, reported
Senate 12.:J
A.•:„
th
men( ti.. t the substitu. (1-7.1`, adopted and '--"1 then pass.
The Cornmitt.:-?. on by F -7, Jacobetti, Chair, repot-
Senate Bill
_.•,.,:•'trnent of hi.?.alth and ce
',.:t..q.ernber O, to provide for
"oy Rep. J..:J.o:,betti, The Co7-..rhi-..=,
House
A bill to A' the F ts e,
amended, 1)01 to of the
158, 159, 161.
amended
Laws, by a
of Bills. .ed to t
)f promulgating rules
:0.
a-ti WIS. by Re
No. 4217, enticrA.,,,,1
:wide loans to
dernrtrr.'.-.: of
• • ,y;
Chair, reported
terprises; to create
:be its rid ciuti,.:; accou:,
_ he ,„„:, duties agencies;
lious
A
it
.7'75, entitled • to create 4
to prescribf-.i. d
ns 6 and 7.
:ate Affairs.
orrimittee on State Affairs.
tier
,g report, subruH.,.,-d
Wednesday, June 15, 1963,
,
Dodak, Emerson, Harri
Sr., Ostling,
cnarci A. Young,
Richard A. Young.
1353 64] 1983 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE
imendation breviously recommended by the Committee on
.',rnittee further reco n. mendments to the substitute be adopte(1
he ass.
page 2.. 1,:,nc 1..A• a comma and
..:1) OR SEVI2:,..;
mend page 2, SOME OF Tiff
FAMIL
9
.IRAM
4, iine
IS SUBS. i
;:40CIAL SI: A
NMENTAL £R
line 11, after "AV
4, line 12, after "AS"
out "BY".
insertini: "AN APPROVE:::
bD.NTH COUNTY c:):::•L
APPLiC
E.NNA,
T:
by insertiii, "IN MIC A
riking out "PROVIDED BY" inserting "T.
4, line
foihs,,
4T "AP. V,'-`,.NCE,:".
COMliell7TrlE ATTENDANC
Di'the Con on Ai
Hood, Mahalak, :Mathieu,
,s received
Favorable Roll Calls
To
Hood, Kilpatrick, Mib:..1.1k, Mathieu, Maynard,
Dresk,.::.
4%4 "
No. 67) I Q11NAL OF THE
Sead Re.aling of :Bilis
P 1 ',.he ad OP I
ing vol. -anerril-da
0.
..doption of ; N-.)s. 1, 4
- 4 4
:a,a.,adrr,a.iito . 2 and
b Rep. Gilmer.
c..ing therefor.
1 y R4p.
Th
1471
House Ed: 7-7 ntitied
A bill to To 258 of CF.: 1--babid;
ended, being
17:7, 158, 159,
,,-;•zad a secor,,C
r
or .:'...;:brdpidi a,
1.
2. ...mend
• ,R,T1:2.EQb
•
.
Ca -
J.vi.
....mend the bill as foilbvd,-..
, `12. after the —.1d)GETHEIt" by
nd "IN
•,..0sectior (2).
I N A .J.L.• .A
.:LLY
"...AND TO
; 111 12 through 14.
Anena 4, brie 10. "..MOUNT'
T.7 L.,EGISLATIVE
• foIlowin.h ". by re‘., sula:d.:e[1‘.,.ri.
TI-rb
.JMBER OF BEDS REDUCED T STATE 1:::11.•`!
SEVERELY MENTALLY,
TEE (.1HILDREN RETURN HOME TO T1i.LIR.N.,:dd:d:L
• sul.......eVor (1:DI:sy .insecd ion •
ALL RY2
:77Y. ;If_ • IN SECTIO.:N'
')eing o; a,d0p.ticd: of
2.
3.
•
4.
of ate sentenc.:, and
er,
....ion (I) to read
`TTS BY
S.
siabe. , amend bill as follows:
abed e 1, before "BURSUANT" by
le 4, after "FOLLOWING" by b:1
-U 1131 . T THE WRITTEN REPORT
motion prev;d1.::.! add the amentin db. b.:
Stabenow if,ovk,...1 that the bill be -
:notion prevailed., a majority of LI
7'V THE MULTIDISC7LINARY ,
IED IN THE 7...EUOMME;b..L.,;ATION
SG LPLINAE d: AM".
,.dember,.
House
A Lail 1 and 2 of Act No. 180 of ubi0
prov.d..• of and good name (f
551.202 ad, comfb.
wa..; iecond -i.•;•;......:ments offered and
jourr al No. 48.)
question beinj of the amendments off. 7,ep, Engler,
Engler with(.,2-4
Rep. Nash moved am ,;.2id
1. Amend 2„ by inserting "TO A PERSON OF THE OPPOSITE
entitled
the day on IVLAy 1, se
Roll Call No; 362 *Yeas-79
Jondahl
Keith
Kilpatrick
Mahalak
..t•vlaCr,ieu
:PLcGee
Hillegonds
Johnson
Knight
Krause
Law
• ynard
eller
Stacey
Strand
Van Singel
Welberg
Wart&
Weeks
Brotherton
Busch
DeLang-
Geerlinl
(...noatke
Hayes
'AT 1ow
(V rig
o.w i riga,
Randall
Sparks
156, 157, 1;.-
The moti ,
The t:,'
mo 161.
was then agreed to,
4448k e
-:nd Act .;)-fth 01 e V 7.
iencied. t.•,,eingr to ,".4„,.0.21CA:
•
'Vile:: it
7, 158, 159, 160,
STA WOMAN 1.V75 r
Was rc hird time., an VC11;16Jti•n being its pas;3:.e,
Rep. („,. ler moved to ac.:•,-,;'fl as foow
Arr Vfl 1 I aftk.r
MIN P.
:7 ".kS OF JULY 1, 1986.
ISLATIVE APPROPRIA'.:
adopted, a majorit3
serving
The pass‘qc of thu.
After
Rep. 1\-1..i?, V previous quel,•,-
•
„
The
The quest:ain now be put?"
TV e previous
T.• , - _ Lion being on the p. d the bill,
The u: n passed, a rr Irity of the mc
Tj;erefi../,f-.
voti7_,7 V, 5:y yeas and nays
Allen
Alley
Barns
Bartnik
Bender •
Bennane
Bennett
Bern.
ullard, P.
Tr:ullard, W.
,:nerry
Ciaramitaro
lack
7 iiaussaert
,.a.rs
= ngham
B VV '-terty
1.)odak
Dressel
Dunaskiss
ers
Qtko
G,
Gagliardi
Gie
C'
Harryon
V
•
G V
J a c ob etti
Pridnia
Rocca
r. co
Sietsema
SitZ
Sra
Spa V
Sta. V
Sta'
Middaugh Sul..
:LVIurohy Terrell
Nasii Van Regenniorter
Nye Watkins
O'Neill Webb •
Oxender Young, J., Jr.
Padden vc.),rig. J., Sr,
Parrott `•••:,...ang, R.
Porreca
Power
Nays-27
The ques'::,;V ing on of the bill,
Rep. Suii ç moved V -.• -.Jo read as follows:
A bin to 302 and :3:C:6 of Aet Nu. 258 of the Public of 1974,
health cock, . • and 330.1308 of the rielig .,n La‘.;
ied
August 198_3
#83184 August 4, 1983
Moved by Gosling supported by McDonald the report be ace_
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried.
Moved by Gosling supported by McConnell the resolution be adopted.
Moved by Gosling supported by McConnelt -the resolution be amended with
the deletion recommended by the General Government Committee.
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried.
Vote on resolution as amended:
AYES: Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell, Calandro, Doyon, Geary, Gosling, Hobart,
Jackson, R. Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, McDonald, McPherson, Moffitt, Nelson,
Olsen, Page, Perinoff, Pernick, Price, Rewold. (23)
NAYS: Fortino, S. Kuhn. (2)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution, as amended,
be adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal,
do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of
Miscellaneous Resolution # 83184 adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
at their meeting held on August 4‘ 1983
with the original record thereof now remaining in my office, and
that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the
whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan
4th day of
D/TLLEN, County Clerk/Register 0f De
this