HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1980.02.14 - 11891-
Miscellan e ous Resolutin_a= February 14, 1980
the Board of Commissioners feels that th i s policy places on undue A WHERE
month next following the month in which he attains 65 years," nn.eI:jr;s1 to read-;
BY: James A. Doyon, County Commissioner-District #10
RE: A mendment to the Oakland County Employ ees' Retirement S tem r ?
TO THE OAKLAND couN -ry BOARD OF COMM VSSTOMERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
VIHEREAc, the Board of Commi ssioners on June 15, 1979 -
Resolution #8504, thusmoving the "Mandatory" retirement age of Oatdand C:>r‘ty
employees from 65 to 70; and
WHEREAS, the current rules of the Oakland County Fmcloyee.sf Retirement System
prohibit employees from earning retirement credit beyond 1h7 age o f 65, and
hardship on and discriminates against County employees between the ages or. 65 and 70,.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Retirement System Rules, which
currently read: "Determination Date for a member shall be. the first day of the calendar
"Determination Date for a member shall ho the First day of calendar month next-
following the month in which he attains 70 years."
Mr. Choirperson, we move the adoption of the foregoing resc4ution,
February tt, 1980 .
rr.C4 ,r,-7
The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Personnel Committee and
the Oakland County Employee Retirenent.-Reared. '
Mr. Murphy objected to the rtjerral.
The Chairperson stated it takes 14 votes to sustain the objection.
AYES: Gabler, Hobert, Moffitt, Murphy, Page, Roth, Caddell. (7)
NAYS: Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gorsline, Hoot, Knsw2r, Kelly, Leand.
McDonald, Montante, Moore, Mox.les,, Patterson, Perinoff, PrflicL, Peterson,
Wilcox, Aaron. (18)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor the objection was not
sustained and the Resolution was referred