Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1980.05.01 - 120619395 MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION May 1, 1980 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, DENNIS MURPHY, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: 1980 EQUALIZATION TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Equalization Division of the Department of Management and Budget has examined the assessment rolls of the several townships and cities within Oakland County to ascertain whether the real and personal property in the respective townships and cities has been equally and uniformly assessed at true cash value; and WHEREAS based on its findings, the Equalization Division has pre- sented to the Finance Committee the 1980 Equalization Report which equalizes the aforementioned valuations by adding to or deducting from the valuation of the taxable property in the several townships and cities an amount as, in its judgment, will produce a sum which represents the true cash value thereof; and WHEREAS the Finance Committee in accordance with Rule XA8 of the Board of Commissioners adopted January 11, 1979, has reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Equalization Division and conducted hearings to provide for local intervention into the equalization process; and WHEREAS the Equalization Factors listed on the attached report are the result of the foregoing process and are for information purposes only . NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commis- sioners adopts the 1980 Equalization Report and authorizes its certification by the Chairperson of the Board and further that it be entered on the County records and delivered to the supervisor of the proper township or city. Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution, FINANCE COMMITTEE 4 1980 OAKLAND COUNTY EQUALIZATION REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS EQUALIZATION REPORT . . RESOLUTION . . . - TABLE OF CONTENTS 01,00 OOM ',COM 40-* tOPB1.0 4.e0.04.7 0 V e, 4,1S 0.0ii 1980 ASSESSED AND EQUALIZED VALUES OF REAL PROPERTY, SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL EQUALIZED VALUES BY TOWNSHIPS, ALSO EQUALIZING FACTORS (Not required by Statute) AND THE AMOUNTS ADDED OR DEDUCTED . . . . . 1980 ASSESSED AND EQUALIZED VALUES OF REAL PROPERTY, SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL EQUALIZED VALUES BY CITIES, ALSO EQUALIZING FACTORS (Not required by Statute) AND THE AMOUNTS ADDED OR DEDUCTED . . . . . . . 2 1980 ASSESSED AND EQUALIZED VALUE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY, SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL EQUALIZED VALUES BY TOWNSHIPS, ALSO EQUALIZING FACTORS (Not required by Statute) AND THE AMOUNTS ADDED OR DEDUCTED . . . . . . . . . 3 1980 ASSESSED AND EQUALIZED VALUES OF PERSONAL PROPERTY, SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL EQUALIZED VALUES BY CITIES, ALSO EQUALIZING FACTORS (Not required by Statute) AND THE AMOUNTS ADDED OR DEDUCTED . . . . . . . 1980 DISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSED, EQUALIZED AND TRUE CASH VALUES, BY TOWNSHIPS . . 5 1980 DISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSED, EQUALIZED AND TRUE CASH VALUES, BY CITIES . . 6 1980 ASSESSED AND EQUALIZED VALUE SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE TOTAL EQUALIZED VALUE . FOR REAL PROPERTY BY TOWNSHIPS IN OAKLAND COUNTY PAGE 1 REF. Na. ASSESSING DISTRICT VALUATION AS ASSESSED AMOUNT ADDED OR DEDUCTED VALUATION AS EQUALIZED EQUAL IZED PERCENTAGES 1 980 EQUALI ZING FACTOR 2 3 4 5 • 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 $ $ ADD! SON TWP AVON T BLOOMF I ELD TWP BRANDON TWP COMMERCE TWP GROVEL AND THP HIGHLAND TWP HOLLY TWP INDEPENDENCE TWP LYON TP MILFORD TWP DV' T WP OAKLAND TWP .0 R ION TWP OXFORD TWR PONT JAG TP ROSE T WP _ ROYAL OAK TWP SOUTHF IELD TWP SPRINGFIELD TWP WATERFORD TWP WEST BLMFLD TWP WHITE LAKE TWP 48,114,700 464,019,000 721,396,640 •71 ,780,97.5 208,778,612 44 ,49.2 ,900 141 /699 ,450 59,664,550 2 03 ,056,3 00 66,802,203 106 .990,1 50 2 ,254350 103 ,92 7,300 183,2 55,9 50 87 7 796 ,600 I O5553 ,.325 44,463 1 400 29 9 1 86 p2 2 53,2 15,600 73,415,740 536,353,100 652,5451,850 172 ,2I3 ,300 S 0 $ 48,114,700 $ 0 .. 464,019, 000 $ 36.567,597 $ 807, 96 4/237 $ 8,613,717 $ 80, 394, 692 $ 2505394'13 $ 233, 832. 045 $ 0 $ 44, 492,900 $ 0 $ 141,699, 450 • $ 0 $ 59,66 4.550 $ 0 5 203,0569300 $ 0 $ 66, 802,200 $ 0 $ 1069990,150 $ 45,097 $ 2,299,437 $ 0 $ 103,927,300 $ 0 5 183,2551950 $ 0 $ 87, 7961600 $ 0 $ 105, 5532325 $ 0 S , 44, 463,400 $ 0 . $ 29, 186, 200 $ 0 $ 2 53,275,600 $ 0 $ 73,415,740 $ 0 $ • 536/ 553,100 $ 0 $ 652, 545,850 $ 0 $ 172,213,800 0.45330 4.37165 7.61205 0.75742 2.20299 0.41918 1.33499 0,56212 1.91305 0.62936 1,00798 0.02166 0.97913 1472650 0.82716 0.99445 0.41890 s 0.27497 2.38613 0.69167 5.05313 6.14781 1.62247 1.00 1.00 1,12 IOU 1.12 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 TOTAL TOWNSHIPS $ 4,3 81 s036 ,692 120279934 $ 4,501,316,526 42.40812 0 0 0 44,140,0 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,603,591 0 0 0 0 0 $ 118, 464,300 342, 576,700 144, 892,900 120, 243, 582 122, 991, 770 696, 693,000 147, 648, 400 107, 917,300 73,073, 800 17,714, 400 57,763,275 27 6, 769,000 29,993 1 771 320, 265,700 207, 416,560 43, 299, 200 28, 431p 600 447, 338,000 O $ 78, 122, 300 0 $ 542, 32 4,100 O $ 1,003,9911050 O $ 35,833,700 O $ 22, 1221950 - 0 $ 992,832, 510 O $ 38, 250,250 12,520,175 $ 95, 988, 005 $ . 62,268,3 15 120,279,834 182,548,649 $ 6, 11219 63,123 $ 4, 501,316, 526 $ 10,614,2791649 TOTAL TOWNSHIPS . $ TOTAL REAL PROPERTY $ 4,381 ,036,692 10,431 ,731 ,000 TOTAL CITIES $ 6,050,694,308 1980 ASSESSED AND EQUALI ZED VALUE SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE TOTAL EQUALIZED .VALUE FOR REAL PROPERTY BY CITIES IN OAKLAND COUNTY PAGE 2 R EF, NO ASSESSING D IS TR IC T VALUATION AS ASSESSED AMOUNT ADDE D OR DEDUCTED VALUATION AS EQUALIZED EQUAL 'ZED PERCENTAGES 1980 EQUALIZING FACTOR 1 BERKLE Y CITY 2 BIRMINGHAM CITY 3 BLMFLO HILLS CTY 4 CLAA SUN CITY 5 FARM IN GTON CITY 6 FARMNGTN HL S C TY 7 FERNDALE CITY . • 3 HAZEL PARK CITY 9 HUNTNG TN WO S C TY 10 K E EGO HARBOR C TY 11 LATHRUP VLG CITY 12 MADISON HOTS C TY 13 NORT HV ILLE CITY 14 NOVI CITY 15 OAK PARK CITY 16 ORCHARD LAKE CTY 17 PLEASANT ROG C TY 13 PONTIAC CITY 19 ROCHESTER CITY 20 ROYAL OAK CITY 21 SOUTHFIELD CITY 22 SOUTH LYON CITY 23 SYLVAN LAKE CITY 24 TROY CITY 25 WALL ED LAKE CITY 26 WIXOM CITY 113,464 ,3 $ 342 ,576,7 00 144,892,900 76,103,533 122 9 991 1770 696 ,6 98,000 147,648,400 1 07,917,3 00 73,073,8 00 $ 11,7 .14,400 57,763,275 276,769,000 24,385,180 320,245,700 207,416,5 60 43 :2 99,2 00 $ 28,431,600 447,333 1 000 78 1422,3 00 542 1 324/10J $ 1,003,951 , 050 35,833,700 22 0 122 1 9 50 992 ,832 ,510 38,250,250 83 14671330 1.11608 3.22751 1.36507 1.13285 1.15874 6.56378 1.39104 1.01672 0.68845 0.16689 0.54420 2.60752 0.28253 3.01731 1.95413 0.40793 0.26786 4,21449 0.73601 5.10938 9.45887 0.33760 0.2 0843 9.35374 0.36037 0.90433 57,59183 42.40812 100.00000 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.58 1.00 1,00 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 14 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.15 ASSESSING DISTRICT VALUATION AS ASSESSED AMOUNT ADDED • OR DEDUCTED VALUAT ION AS EQUALIZED EQUAL IZED ERCENT AGE S 1983 EQUALIZING FACTOR R NO 7,430, 100 33, 263, 450 20, 973, 665 3, 865,900 23 1 809, 900 4,146, 500 6,119,900 4, 584, 480 10,769,800 7,456,400 15,115,082 84,550 .4, 607, 700 13,0 74, 700 9, 446,423 7,491, 968 3, 133, 2 50 3,492,200 3,352,100 8, 296, 600 32, 552, 400 14, 419, 525 7, 221, 850 0.71638 3.20712 2.02219 0.37273 2.29565 0.39979 0.59006 0.44202 1.03338 0,71892 1.45133 0000622 0.44426 1.26061 0.91079 0.72235 0.30253 0..33670 O. 612 44 0.79992 3,13857 1.39027 0.69630 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1. 00 1.00 1 .03 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.03 1 .00 1.00 1 .00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 247, 693, 443 23.88158 1980 ASSESSED AND EQUAL I7ED VALUE SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE TOTAL EQUALIZED VALUE FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY BY TOWNSHIPS IN OAKLAND COUNTY PAGE 3 $ .$ ADDI SON TWP 2 AVON TV4P 3 BLOOMF IELD TWP 4 BRANDON TWP 5 COMMERCE TWP 6 GROVEL AND TWP 7 HIGHLAND TWP 3 HOLLY TWP 9 INDEPENDENCE TWP 13 LYON TWP 11 MILFORD TWP /2 NOVI T 13 OAKLAND Ti' 14 . OR ION TWP 15 OXFORD TWP 16 PONT IA C TW*P 17 ROSE T 18 'ROYAL OAK TWP .19 SOUTHF IELD TWP 20 SPR INGF IELD TWP 21 WATERF-OPD IMP 22 WE ST :3LMFLD TWP 23 WHITE LAKE TWP TOTAL TOWNSHIPS 5 7 1 430,1 00 331263,450 • 20,973 ,665 ,865,900 23,809,900 4,146,5 00 6,119,900 4,534 p430 10,769 ,800 7,456,.0O 15,115 0382 64,550 4,6 07,700 _13,074 ,7 00 $ 9,446,423 7 ,491 .963 3 ,138,2 50 ,492,200 6,352,1 00 $ 3,2 96 ,600 32 ,552 ,400 14,419,525 7,221 ,850 247,693,443 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1980 ASSESSED AND EQUALI TED VALUE SHOWING THE PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE TOTAL EQUALIZE) VALUE FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY BY CITIES IN OAKLAND COUNTY PAGE 4 R EF. NO. ASSESSING DISTRICT VALUATION AS ASSESSED AMOUNT ADDED OR DEDUCTED VAL UAT ION AS EQUALIZED 1980 EQUALIZED EQUALI ZI NG PERCENTAGES FACTOR $ 1 BERKLE Y CITY 2 -BIRM IN GRAM CITY 3 BLMF LO HILLS C TY 4 CLAW SON CITY 5 FARM IN GTON CITY FARANG TN HL S C TY 7 FERNDALE CITY HAZEL PARK CITY - 9 HUNTNG TN WDS C TY 13 KEE'S° HARBOR C TY 11 LATHRUP VLG CITY 12 MADISON HOTS °TY 13 NORTHV ILLE CITY NOVI CITY 15 OAK PARK CITY 16 ORCHARD LAKE C TY 17 PLEASANT ROG C TY 13 PONT IA C CITY 19 ROCHES TER CITY 20 ROYAL OAK CITY 21 SOUT HF- IE-LD CITY 22 SOUTH LYON CITY 23 SYLVAN LAKE CITY TROY CITY 25 WALLED LAKE. CITY 26 WIXOM CITY TOTAL CITIES TOTAL TOWNSHIPS 5,766,300 14 ,6 86 ,200 4,928,050 6,987,625 7 1 056,080 44,985,000 24,031 ,100 9,635,000 1,267,200 847,500 21124,965 56,159,000 535,090 25,223 p400 261718,620 1,058,8 110 1,851 ,4 50 1 71,744 ,1 00 8,934,900 45 ,7C8 ,6 00 148,252,650 3 5090,100 966 9 0 0 131 1277,010 5,694,650 39,949,900 789,480,190 247,693,443 0 $ 5,7.669300 O $ • 14, 686, no O $ 4,928,050 0 1, 6, 987, 625 0 $ 7, 056, 080 O $ 44,985,000 O $ 24, 031,100 O $ 9,635,000 O $ 1,267,203 , 0 $ 347,500 O $ 2,124,965 3 $ 56,1.59,003 O $ 535,090 O $ 25,223, 400 O $ 26,718,620 0 $ 1,053, 800 O $ 1, 851, 450 O $ 171,744,100 O S 8,934,900 O $ 45, 708 7 600 3 $ 148,252,650 0 $ 3,090, 100 O $ 9.66,900 0 $ 131, 27 7,010 3 $ 5, 694, 650 O $ 3-9,949,900 3 $ 789, 480,190 247,6 93g 443 0 1, 037,173, 633 0.55596 1.41593 0.47514 0.57372 0.68032 4.33727 2.31698 0.92897 0,12213 0.08171 0.20483 5.41462 0.05159 2.43194 2.57610 0.10209 0.17851 16.55886 0.86147 4.40703 14.29391 0.29793 0.09322 12,55719 0,54905 3,85180 76.11842 23.88158 100.00000 TOTAL PEPSUNAL PRUP.$ 1,037,173,633 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 •,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PAGE 5 TRUE CASH VALUE PERSONAL PROPERTY 7, 430,100 33, 263, 450 2.0,973, 665 3 9 865, 900 23, 809, 900 41 146, 500 6, 119,900 4,584, 4E0 10, 769, 000 7, 456, 400 15,1159 082 64,550 4,607, 700 13, 074, 700 9,446 1 423 . 7,491, 968 3,133,250 3,492, 200 6,352,100 8,296, 600 32 9 552, 400 14, 419, 525 7,221, 850 TOTAL 55,544,800 497,282,450 828,9379902 841260,592 257,641,945 48,639,400 147,819,350 64,249,030 213,826,100 749253,600 122,105,232 2,363,987 108 1 535,000 1969330,650 97,2439023 113,045,293 47,601,650 32,678,400 259,627,700 81,712,340 568,905,500 666,965,375 1791435,650 TOT AL 111,039,600 994,564,900 1,657,875,4 1682521,134 515 97927 g 295 p6:.' C:50 128 9 498 , &C) 427,652 ,2 148 ,517 244 ,210 4 ,727,q74 217,070,000 392 v661,300 194 9486 045 226 p090 95 v203,300 65 ,356 1 800 519 ,255 9 400 163 ,424 ,680 1131 9811 ,000 1,333,930,750 358,871 ,300 1980 DISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSED, EQUALIZED AND TRUE CASH VALUES BY TOWNSHIPS TN OAKLAND COUNTY VALUATION AS EQUAL IZ ED VALUATION AS ASSESSED ASSESS INS DISTRICT ADDISON TWP AVON TWP BLOOMFIELD TWP . ORANDON TWP COMMERCE TWP GROVELAND TWP HIGHLAND TWP HOLLY TWP INDEPENDENCE TWP LYON TWP MILFORD TWP • NOVI TWP OAKLAND TWP OP ION TWP OXFORD TWP PONTIAC TWP ROSE TWP • ROYAL OAK TWP SOUTHFIELD TWP SPRINGFIELD TWP WATERFORD TWP WEST BLMFLD TWP WHITE LAKE TWP REAL PERSONAL REAL ESTATE PROPERTY TOTAL ESTATE 469114,700 . 79430,100 55,544,800 48,114,700 464,019,000 33,263,450 4 9 79284,450 464,019,000 721,396 1 640 20,973,665 742,3709305 807,964 9 2 7 71,780,975 39865,900 75,646,375 809394,692 203,778,612 23,809 9 900 . 232,583 9 512 233032,045 44,492,900 4 /146,500 43,639,400 449492,900 141 ;699 9 450 6,119 9 900 147,819,350 1 4 1,699,450 59,664,550 4,584,480 64 9 249,030 599664,550 203,056,300 10,769,800 213026,100 .203,056,300 66,802,200 7,456,400 7492539600 66,302,200 1061990,150 15,115 9 082 122;105,232 106,990,150 2,254,350 64,550 2,313,930 2,299,437 103,927 9 300 4,607,700 1039535,000 103 9 927,300 183,255,950 13,074,700 196,330 1 650 183 1 255,950 879796 /600 9,446,423 97 9 243 9 023 97,796,600 105,553 9 325 7,491,968 113,045,293 105,553,325 44 9 463,400 3,138,250 47,601,650 44,463 9 400 29,186,200 3,492,200 32,673,•30 29,136,200 253,275,600 6,352 9 100 259-,627,700 283,275,600 739415,740 8,296 7 600 91,7129343 73 9 415,740 536,353,100 32,552,400 558,905,500 5'3613539100 652,.545,850 14,419 p52 5 666 9965 ,375 6' 52,545 9 850 172 1 213, 800 7,221 p850 179 9435 16 50 172,213,300 TOTAL TOWNSHIPS 4,381 9 036,692 247,693,443 4,6281730,135 4,50 1 9 316 9 526 24 7, 693, 443 4,749,009,969 9 ,498 9 019 /938 BY CI TIES IN OAKLAND COUNTY VALUATION AS ASSESSED VALUATION AS EQUALIZED 1980 DISTRIBUTION OF ASSESSED, EQUALIZED AND TRUE CASH VALUES ASSESS ING DISTRICT BERKLEY CITY B I kMINGHAM CITY BLMFLD HILLS CTY CLAWSON CITY FARMINGTON CITY F,ARMNGIN HLS CTY FERNDALE CITY HAZEL PARK CITY • HUNINGIN W DS CTY KEEGC HARBOR. CTY • L AIHRUP VLG CETY MADISON HGTS CTY NORTHVILLE CITY - NOVI CITY OAK PARK CITY ORCHARD LAKE CTY PLEASANT ROG CTY PONT I AC CITY ROCHESTER CITY PCY AL OAK CITY SOUTHFIELD CITY - SOUTH LYON CITY SYLVAN LAKE CITY TROY CITY WALLED LAKE CITY W IXOM CITY TOTAL CITIES TOTAL TOWNSHIPS TOT AL COUNTY REAL ESTATE 113,4E4,300 342,576,700 144,892,900 76,103 1 533 122,991,770 696,698,000 147,64,400 107,917,300 73,073,800 17,714,400 57,763,275 276,769,000 24,385,180 • 323,265,700 207,416,560 43,299,200 28,431,600 447,338,000 78 10122, 300 542,324,100 1,003,991,050 35'833,700 22,122,S50 9'92,832,510 38,250,250 83,467,830 6,050 ,694, 303 4,381 1 036 9 692 10, 4319731,000 PERSONAL PROPERTY 5,766 0300 14,6is6 F200 4,923 ,050 6,987 9625 7,056,080 44,985 P 0 00 24 3 C3.I. F 1 00 g 5 g000 1 267 ,2. 847,500 2,124,365 56,159 9000 52,5,090 2.5,223 T400 26,718 ,62 1 ,058 ,800 1,851 ,450 • 171,744,100 3,934,900 45, 7C3,600 143,252,6.50 3, 090 p100 cos ,900 131,277,010 5,694 ,650 39,949,900 789,480,190 247, 693,443 1,037,173 ,633 TOTAL ,230 ,600 357 ,262 g 900 149 y820 9950 33 ,091,15S 130 2 047 ,850 741 •,633 ,000 171 ,67; ,500 117 74 ,341 ,000 .13 1,561 ,900 59 ,886 ,2 40 332 9 928 ,000 24,920,270. 3•45 2 489 ,100 234 ,135 ,130 44 t358 y000 30 1 283 y050 613,032,100 37 ,057 g 200 533 032 1700 1 /152 ,243 9700 33 9923 ,300 23.,089,850 1 ,124 ,109 ,520 43,944 s900 123 1 417 ,730 )840 ,174 ,493 4 ,628 ,730 ,135 11,0463 ,904 g633 RE AL EST AT E .118,464,300 3 42,5 76,700 144,892, 900 10,24.3,582 - 172 ,9 91,770 6°6 ,693,000 .147,548,400 107,9 11,300 73,0 73,300 17,714,400 7,76.3, 275 276,769,000 23 ,933, 771 323 ,255, 700 207,416, 560 43 2 -9, 200 28,431, 630 447,3 33,000 73,1229300 542,324,100 1,003,991,050 35,333,700 22 p122,950 92 ,332, 510 38,250,250 P5 , 3 05 6,112,963,123 4,591,316,526 10,614,279,649 PERSONAL PROPERTY 5,.766., 300 14 9 686, 200 4; 928, 050 6, 987, 625 7,055, 080 44, 985., 000 24,01, 100 9,635, 000 1,257, 200 847,500 2,124,965 56,159, 000 5 -35, 090 25,223,400 .26,7 18, 620 1,053,300 I, 851, 450 1 71, 744,100 8, 934, 900 45,708,600 148, 252, 650 3,090, 100 966, 900 131,27 7,010 5,694, 650 39,949,9.00 789,480,190 247,6 93,443 1,O31 173, 633 PAGE 6 TOTAL 124,230,600 357,2 62, 900 149,3201950 1 2702 31, 2C7 130, 047,850 741, 687, 000 1 71 1 6 75,50.0 117, 552,300 74, 341 000 189561,900 591888,240 332,928,000 . 302528, 861 345,489,100 2 34,135,1 80 44,3 58,000 30,2 83,050 619,032,100 87,057,200 588,032,700 1 1 1 52,2 43, 700 38,923, 800 23,089,850 1,12 4,109020 43,944,900 135,937,905 6,902,443,313 4,749 1 309,969 11,651, 453,282 TRUE CASH VALUE TOTAL 248 ,461 g200 714 ,•25 ,800 299 9641 g903 ylr:,4•14 26.0 1 ,433 343 ,359,000 235,104,600 148 ,682 9 000 37912318'A 119 ,776 1430 665,856000 .. 61 9057 9 722 690 y978,2 0.0 468 ,27 0,360 88 971.6 1000 60,566 ,100 1,238,164,200 174,114 ,400 p176 ,065 p400 2 ,304,437,•400 77 9347,600 45,1 79,700 2924892192040 87,889,800 271 ,875,810 13 y 804 9886,626 9 9 498,019,938 23,302,906,564 #9395 May 1, 1980 Moved by Murphy supported by Gorsline the resolution be adopted. AYES: Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kasper, Kelly, Lewand, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Pernick, Price, Roth, Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler. (26) NAYS: Peterson. (1) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. 'STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of Miscellaneous Resolution -#9395 adopted by the Oakland County Board of .• • .......... • • • 0 • • • • ...... ...... ................... 6e. a elor•o•••••ea &eel. Commissioners at their meeting held on May 1, 1980 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office, and that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the whole thereof, in Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affig?d the seal of said Co-.au at May 80 ......... . , . . .. By DeputY Clerk