HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1979.06.21 - 12364Miscellaneous Resolution # 8991 May 17, 1979
BY: PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - John J. McDonald, Chairperson
IN RE: SUBMISSION OF CHANGES IN MERIT SYSTEM RULES 2, 3, and 4
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS Section IV., Subsection A. of the Merit System Resolution
requries that all changes in the rules and regulations of the Merit System
shall be submitted to the Board of Commissioners at a regular meeting of
the Board and shall become effective thirty (30) days after such meeting
unless objection is received in writing by the Chairperson of the Board of
Commissioners, in which case the objection shall become a matter of business
at the next meeting of the Board; and
WHEREAS it has become desirable to make certain changes in the
wording of Rules 2, 3, and 4, as spelled out in the attachments to this
resolution; and
WHEREAS your Personnel Committee has reviewed and approved these
changes at its meeting of May 9, 1979,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the reading of this notice and
the distribution of this notice and the attached document labeled "Proposed
Changes in the Merit System Rules" to all Commissioners present and absent
to be considered as the official submission to the Board of Commissioners,
of the described changes in Rules 2, 3, and 4.
The Personnel Committee, by John J. McDonald, Chairperson, moves
the adoption of the foregoing resolution.
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
4 :44a0.1e5,0C
//John . McDonald, Chairperson
t
PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE MERIT SYSTEM RULES
PROPOSED WORDING
RULE/SECTION CURRENT WORDING - CHANGES SHOWN IN BRACKETS [1
1. Rule 2 Department Heads, Deputy [Department Directors and Division
Section X.A.1. Department Heads and Managers] are excluded from this defini-
Assistant Department tion.
Heads are excluded from
this definition. _-
2. Rule 2 The first payday of each [None. Language should be deleted as
Section XII.a. year is the third Friday it is not always the case with our
of January. current system.]
3. Rule 3 The Personnel Department The Personnel Department shall respond
Section II.A.4.b. shall respond within 30 within 30 calendar days [after receipt
calendar days of receipt of the request from the department head]
of the requested classi- regardless of whether or not a study is
fication study regardless warranted...
of whether or not a study
is warranted...
4. Rule 3 None [e. The Personnel Department shall
Section II.A.4.e. complete the classification study within
120 days of the date the position
questionnaire completed by the employee
is returned to the Personnel Office.]
5. Rule 3 None [f. If the classification study results
Section II.A.4.f. in a determination that the employee's
position is reclassified upward the re-
classification will be effective on the
beginning of the pay period closest to
the date the employee returned the
completed questionnaire to the Personnel
Department.]
6. Rule 3 ...up to five calendar ...up to five [work] days after receipt
Section III.A.1. days after receipt of of the notice.
the notice...
7. Rule 3 ,None [3. The Personnel Committee shall hold
Section III.A.3. classification appeal hearings within
30 days of the notification by the
Director of Personnel of the appeals.]
PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE MiRIT'StSTEM RULES (CON I T.)
CURRENT WORDING
Such appointments should be
made only in those circum-
stances where permanent part-
time help is required on a
year around basis for the
most effective and efficient
utilization of Personnel.
RULE/SECTION
8. Rule 4
Section IX
-.2-
PROPOSED WORDING
- CHANGES SHOWN IN BRACKETS[1
Such appointments should be made only
In those circumstances where permanent
part-time help is required on a year
around basis for the most effective
and efficient utilization of personnel
[and where it is anticipated employment
would be for more than 520 hours in a
calendar year.]
#8991 . My 17i 1579
Mr. McDonald requested a Public Hearing be held on June 21, 1979 at
10:00 A. M. There were no objections.
#8991 • June 21, 1979
Moved by Kasper supported by Perinoff that Resolution #8991 be adopted.
AYES: Peterson, Roth, Wilcox, Aaron, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Dunaskiss, Fortino,
Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Kasper, Kelly, Moffitt, Montante, Moxley, Page, Patterson,
Perinoff. (19)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, Resolution #8991 was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
1, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and
having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of
Miscellaneous Resolution #8991 adopted by the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners at their meeting held on June 21, 1979
with the original record thereof now remaining in my
office, and that it is a true and correct transcript
therefrom, and of the whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan
1 9.32 this 21st day of June
Lynn D. Allen Clerk
By Deputy Clerk