HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1979.09.13 - 12538vrks
br
September 13, 1979
Miscellaneous Resolution # 9127
By: Public Services Committee, Henry William Hoot, Chairman
In re: Modified Jury System Grant Application
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS, P.A. 11 of 1978 mandates the implementation of a modified jury selection
procedure so as to broaden citizen participation and reduce the length of the term of juror
service; and
WHEREAS, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (LEAA) has monies available to
fund the establishment of such a program; and
WHEREAS, the total grant being applied for is $50,513.00, of which $47,987.35 or
95% is to be federally funded, and $2,525.65 or 5% is to be funded by the County; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that if this grant is accepted, the County portion will be
available in the 1979 Non-Departmental Federal Project Match line item; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Committee has reviewed the proposed program.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
authorize the filing of the grant application consistent with the attached program summary and
budget.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners be and is hereby authorized to sign the grant application.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that written quarterly progress reports shall be presented
to the Public Services Committee.
The Public Services Committee, by Henry William Hoot, Chairman, moves the adoption
of the foregoing resolution.
PUBLIC SfRVICES COMMITTEE
11013-1.- 41116k
•T, A9' AN n11, Y WILLIAM HO
Y APPROVE THE FOR7GO!NG RESOLUTtON
Funding Sources
County
i'41/1-r
FederaL____
TOTAL
$3,105.00
$2,263.00
450.00
1200.00
525.00
88.00
•oTAL $50,513.00
OAKLAND COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT
MODIFIED JURY SYSTEM PROGRAM
September I, 1979 - June 30, 1980
Program Budget
as Applied For
Salaries
Operating
Professional Services for Data 37,000
Processing Development of:
Project Plan
System Definition
System Design
Software Development
Testing & Installation
System Documentation
Data Processing
Installation cost
2 Terminals, 1 Printer
1,000
5,000
6,200
9,250
13,050
2,500
105
1340.00 for 6 ups-.
-17-1#94-per month
•
1-674480
1-6;867 -
50,513
Witeit
V
570 2,525.65
4-05g-
95% 47987.35
-26 ;933-
53,867 -
50,513
Contactual Services
Videotape preparation
Equipment
19" Portable TV
3/4" video cassett recorder
Mbbile cabinet
URF adapter
STATE OF
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL
Second Floor. Lew
Leming. Mich
?1 ,1,4(1.) SC rl y'r.1
CE 'PROGRAMS
Btolding n
11 fk8E109rd
GRANT APPLICATION
LEAVE BLANK — FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
CONTROL NIAIIIR CATE Ik!(
I. 0( t. P 101111 hr. V./1 Tir.O:st
co mi lvsi '!"
SP AL I sr
CLASS or WIGRAMT
r_711 [-J I, wi0,
Com‘eni
rAar..Rri
ApDliCat;Gr. I. 1-1Vrt!b; for i4.,,W ,-1,511,401t(14C-fIFIC
COM:rO; ALL 3.21irgacrcy
Prvi:ntion Act) ;,,c,ant ard for te purpoes sct
forth io :his appficatio.
Stat. luy I;
local cosy,
r o w rundi
7
N.
I. Appficant (Name and Address)
Oakland County Circuit Court
1200 North Telegraph Road
Pontiac, Michigan 48053
Federal Employer Identification #
2. Implementing Agency (Name and address)
Oakland County Circuit Court
1200 North Telegraph Road
. g-g 4 ;is iik6i=ni, it-lie. address and telephone)
Fred N. Nester, Court Administrator
1200 North Telegraph Road
Pontiac, Michigan 48053
(313) 858-0344
3 Authorizing Official (Name, title, address and telephone)
Commissioner Wallace F. Gabler, Jr.
Oakland County Board of Commissioners
1200 North Telegraph Road
Pontiac, Michigan 48053
(313) 858-0100
Signature
5. Financial Officer (Name, title, address and telephone)
Thomas Duncan
Oakland County Accounting Dept.
1200 North Telegraph Road
Pontiac, Michigan 48053
(313) 858-0379
Dale
Signature
01 Application 7 Program Under Which Application is Made
A VD Original
B 0 Continuation of Previous Grant
C 0 revision ol Earlier Application
II B or C previous
Control Number
M.1n1. •n••n nnn• 41n
Program Number and Name:
V -.Judicial Processing
ProLect Type Number and Naire
131 - Functional Court Improvement
Plan Year
L98 0
8 .Protect Start Dale (Estimated)
January 1, 1980
ti, Name of Proiecl (must not exceed 25 characters, including spaces)
Modified Jury System
13.
WIli Othcr rcdcrel Supp-ort bc Available for Any Part of This Project? 0 11S (CuJc I) c:j Ho (Cod's 2) If yes, Identify and expialn.
10. Total Project Duration (In Months)
12 months
12, Support iv:petted
s 47,987.35
2,525.65
1 50,513.00
9. Project Ending Date (Estimated)
December 31, 1980
AppLicJLIon Val alive
.I'age . 1
1. Problem
For many years the courts have been concerned with the burden of
jury service to the public, taking into account the inconvenience and
economic hardship as opposed to the overwhelming reliance of our system
of justice on a jury of ones peers. This has resulted in the decreasing
of terms of jury service from periods as long as one to three months
to, in Oakland County,a couple of weeks. Still the inconvenience exists.
The state legislature has taken a positive step towards solving the prob-
lem by enacting Public Act II of l97.8 which requires courts throughout
the state to implement modified jury selection procedures. Although
the specific procedure is subject to Supreme Court approval, and although
the act is aimed towards a one day/one trial system, the particular
method by which the clearly stated goals of the act are met are left to
the jurisdiction. This is where the problem arises.
In order to shorten the term of service, it is necessary to increase
the number of people pulled from the voter's registration list to be
processed. To decrease the term enough to make jury service convenient,
or at the least palatable, would create a fantastic amount of paper work,
manual processing,and fee and mileage accounting. A jury system that
is twice as convenient, but four times as costly is not a public service.
The added personnel and operating costs necessary to process these added
jurors would create such a situation. The problem, then, is to dpeet the
stated federal,state, and local goals without creating a baby bureaucracy.
As stated in the project summary, Wayne County has responded to
the problem with the one day/one trial system. This could now be called
Appiicati n Narrative
Fage,2
a trend in large caies where 'llous"nds of jurors are called in every
week. Such a system would not be as beneficial in a suburban or rural
setting where fewer jurors are required because the courts have fewer
Judges. Oakland County is the largest county in Michigan after Wayne
and has the highest volume of Circuit Court activity after Wayne, but
even in Oakland a one day system would not be cost-effective. There is
a need for an alternative to the one day system that will meet the stated
goals without the extreme, resulting costs. Such a program does not
exist in Michigan at this time and the need is obvious, as pointed out
by the fact that Wayne's "adaptable",system has not been adapted anywhere.
Oakland County is the perfect target population because it is the
largest; the greatest number of people will benefit from the project
at the outset and the result will be the most adaptable system for the
remaining,large counties in Michigan.
Currently,Oakland County Circuit Court employs a two week jury term.
Juries are not scheduled on Wednesdays, which are set aside as miscel-
laneous motion day,so,the term is actually only eight days long. A
code-a-phone operated call-in system effectively cuts down the average
number of days actually spent in service to approximately five.
The purpose of this subgrant request is to seek a workable alter-
native which complies with the statutory goals set forth above and pro-
vides smaller suburban and rural counties with an alternative to the
one day system. As with the Wayne County system this proposal i based
on a computerized mailing, scheduling, and payment system which would
increase efficiency without increasing personnel. The length of the
jury term would only be cut to one week, but the computer would allow
Application Narrative
, Page 3
the Court to provide alternative service dates to make jury duty more
convenient. The one trial rule and Oakland County's call-in system
would further improve this modified system. Further, such a computer
system would allow for an alternative to the one day system and yet
provide for greater utilization, less juror inconvenience, and more
public involvement in the justice system. Also, such an automated system
will allow for a single mailing of questionnaire and summons which will
cut mailing costs.
At the present time an orientation is held the first morning of the
term when a Judge speaks to all the jurors. With the new system, jurors
will not report to the courthouse until they are needed for jury selection,
so a videotape program for orientation each morning will be used.
2. Priorities
A. This project is consistent with Objective 3, page 66 of the
1980 Comprehensive Criminal Justice Plan for Oakland County.
B. This project is seen by the applicant agency as being of the
utmost priority in that movement in this direction has been
mandated by the Michigan Legislature.
3. Goals and Objectives
A. Increase convenience to citizens serving as jurors;
B. Increase through automation the efficiency and effectiveness
of court activity;
C. Reduce the length of juror service without incurring increased
personnel and operating costs.
Applicatiwi Narrative
Page 4
4. Methods and Procedures
The court will contract with the Oakland County Computer Services
to develop a system that will:
1. Provide computer draw as required from the Oakland County Voter
Registration List.
2. Provide automated questionnaire preparation for jurors selected
from the list.
3. Provide processing capability for postponed jurors.
4. Maintain an excused list.
5. Provide file update capability for selected jurors.
6. Prepare payment vouchers for jurors.
7. Provide lists of jurors.
8. Provide summary reports of:
Trial activity by Judge for each term.
Daily Utilization for each term.
Juror Activity for each term.
Expenditures
Yearly Summary.
The Court will develop a videotape program for orientation of new
jurors each morning of the term.
The following workplan will be adhered to:
1. Establish Oakland County Computer Services project development
term and prepare a detailed project plan to guide the system de-
velopment effort from 1/1/80 to 1/31/80.
2. Prepare a system definition which defines the Jury Clerk's
selection procedures and the requirements to automate these
procedures to meet one week/one trial objectives and obtain
Application Narrative
. .
Pqge 5 .
Project Leader and Jury Clerk approval of system definition from
2/1/80 to 3/31/80.
3. Prepare detailed design of the system and obtain Jury Clerk
approval from 4/1/80 to 6/30/80.
4. Prepare the system computer programs from 6/1/80 to 8/31/80.
5. Test system to ensure requirements are met; perform system
acceptance test to ensure Jury Clerk and Project Leader satis-
faction; Install system from 7/1/80 to 12/31/80.
6. Prepare all system documentation from 3/1/80 to 12/31/80.
5. Evaluation
Evaluation of this project will be the responsibility of the Project
Director. The project will be evaluated in light of its ability to meet
the stated goals and objectives. Evaluation instruments will be devel-
oped capable of measuring convenience to jurors, efficiency and effec-
tiveness of court activity, length of juror service, and personnel/
operating costs resulting from this program.
Project activities will be closely monitored in order to assure that
the project is on schedule. Quarterly reports will be submitted per sub-
grant conditions citing progress seen with respect to these activities.
ADMINISTRATIVE RESOLUTION RE:
Modified Jury System
.4 t
0,-rrluHU tuJI
_Crhoiria! Justice
Corgdiroting Cow wo
•
C 1
[1
/11 -
•
•
;VLBERT
S T A -7' E 0.F. 1.1ICHI C; A W
IN THE CIRCUIT CURT FOR THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND
Present the Honorables:
STEVEN N. ANDREWS,
Chief Judge,
WILLIAM J. BEER,
FREDERICK C. ZIFM,
JAMES S. THORBURN,
FARRELL E. ROBERTS,
ROBERT L. TEMPLIN,
RICHARD D. KUHN,
JOHN N. O'BRIEN,
ROBERT B. WEBSTER,
ALICE L. GILBERT, and
FRANCIS X. O 'BRIEN,
Circuit Judges.
;
At a session of said Court, held in the
Courthouse, in the City of Pontiac, County
of Oakland, State of Michigan, on the 11th
day of Decmmber, 1978.
It appearing to the Court en banc that 1978 Public Act
mandates the implementation of a modified system for jury
selection; and .
It further appearing that a one day/one trial system is
unacceptable in this Circuit due to the high personnel and
operating expenses which it would necessitate;
The Court Administrator is hereby ordered to develop
and implement a plan for a modified jury system that will lessen
the inconvenience to citizens serving as jurors, broaden citizen
participation, increase through automation the efficiency and
effecLiveness of court activity, and reduce the lengthodof the term
n of service of a juror without incquing increas d personnel and
operating costs. C I TA
7--i
A . A
P\q
STEVEN1 -N) ANDREWS, Chief Judge
//
,,1 igk7 ,1 -)7 -. (R,, - :
, 4_
-,/.7--- ,
JUDGE RICHARD D. KUJN
1 ,/
--7(- '
.4(, te•AW-1 V' -____-._ ir lA JUDGE FREDERTVR C. ' LEM n \ (32)4.7: JOHN N. 0 ',.,12.,RIEN /,/
JUIA;E JAMES S. TiCURBURN 6iA: 'ibiii_itq .i.ii.
11
U GL' U-(<7.Akle-431r{:,ce4
, r
% /A 5( A
/./
/
_
JUDGE-ALICE L.
Li .00C ,1:1; .131:1
2. FRINGE BENEFITS SUBTOTAL
/.
Retirement at
c. Hospitalization: S
d. Other Insurance: $
. Average per Employee per month
. Average per Employee per month
STATE OF MICHIGAN
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAMS
. Second Floor, Lewis Cass Buildin g
Lansin g, Michi gan 48913
dItLji
GRANT APPLICATION Pa9e2
•
In ;ode 'he est/m.11•d cusi V.11%le r), jii resources necessetry tu umiertake
the tproject Round ii.) itii rdIPS1 511)0, .110 CP,115
15. DoIdiho
A. PERSONNEL lEmployeell
1. SALARIES AND WAGES
Position Salary To of Timm Freviouely
Name of Employee Title Rate Devoted Employed At
,
J
i
. .
I
_1
NEW
CASH
COSTS
a. FICA at
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL PERSONNEL
B. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES (Itemize)
'I. Individual Consultants. Limited to Reasonable Rate not Exceeding $16.8 7/hour or $135/d ay .
- . . name i-krimation Sr pe co ait y nate lime 1
unknown Unknown .-Videotape $135. 23 days
_preparation
3,105.00 •
2. Contracting or Service Organizations and Association. Competitive Bidding Procedure Required to
Establish Reasonable Rate.
Oakland. County Computer Services
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
( '1
GRANT APPLICATION
.5. B lidijet
3
C. TRAVEL
Transpof tatton and Sdbsistence of Project Persomtel Only.
Commit-ant Travel to be Included in 1131
Meals Mileaiie Description Lodging
NEW
CASH
COSTS
D. CPEi-lATING EXPENSE
Direct Costs ExpldrIJIFOrl Monthly Rate
Tr?lephone
Supplies
4-
E. EQUIPMENT Itemize/
Deg./410cm
SOURCE Of- FUNDS Percentail.. Amount
95.1
2„525,65 TIiiI
Ileder4
2 —Stdj flijy lii -For Loc.iI Subgrants
3 Local CHOI MdIch
4. SIdIr Calls ApEronithilon
STATE OF MICHIGAN •
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAMS
.4-6F, Second Floor, Lewis Cass Building..
17— Lansing, Michigan 489X) -.4e&
TOTAL TRAVEL
Postage
1
2 Terminals/1 Printery nperatlng Costs " _ 1,3 40.00
.„
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
Rent
2 Terminal s /1 Printer 15 nn
8040.00
S 8145.00
If Applicable,
Monthly
Lease Rate
19" Portable TV
Video Cassette
Recorder 1
Mbbile cabinet
URF adapter
Quantity I
Puprchase
rice
;'
1 $450 00
-
$1200.00
1 525.06—
' 1 88.00
S 450,00
120.00
52500
_88.00
F.
1
TOTAL EQUiPMENT
CONSTRUCTION
1 Remodeling
2. New Construction
TOTAL CONSTRUCT ION
TOTAL PROJECT
S 2,263.00
TOTAL FUNDS $50,513.00 10U%
_
41,•
------ •
r
-lb
Second Hoar, Lewis Cass Building
Lansing, Michigan 11E3909
1.3udget Narrative:
1 :,.girl .below and add as many continuation pages as
necessary to rotate the items budgeted to project
, activities, and to complete the required justification
and explanation of the project budget.
A. Personnel
Because of the number and variety of job responsibilities, funds are not budgeted
for specific positions dedicated to this project.
B. Contractual Services
The variety of skills necessary to complete this project make it likely that, a
number of professional employees from the Oakland County Computer Services Division
will dedicate time. It is also anticipated that employees of a consulting firm .
having a long-term management contract with the County of Oakland will also be
dedicating time to this project. In order to insure project completion and its
integration into Oakland County governmental operations at the least cost and on
schedule, the project itself has been defined in terms of a number of products.
The following products, making up the entirety of the project, will be delivered
by the Oakland County Computer Services . Division.
1. $1,000 is budgeted for preparati:on of a detailed project plan to be
submitted to the Oakland County Court Administrator for approval.
2. $5,000 is budgeted Cor development of an acceptable definition of
the system to be used in managing the one week/one jury program.
3. $6,200 is budgeted for development of a detailed system design.
4. $9,250 is budgeted for development of system software.
5. $13,0501s budgeted for testing and instalintion of the software
terminals and printer.
6. $2,500 is budgeted for preparation of system documentation.
Within the Oakland County Computer Services Division, funds are budgeted and a work
plan developed each year for research and development. Funds have not been set aside,
nor does the workplan include the Modified Jury System, Activities relating to this
project will be conducted in addition to those already budgeted and planned. Con-
sequently, funding of this project will not supplant local efforts,
C. Travel
No funds are buLgeted for travel expenses.
D. Operating Exnenses
A total of$8145,00 has been budgeted for the install2tion and monthly operating
costs for two terminals and one printer as detai3ed in the grant apPlication.he
equipment will le purchased on a competitive bid basis through the Call Td County
Purchasing Division. Operating charges are consistent with those developed by
Oakland County Computer Services Division for similar equipment.
'dot Detail, History & Narrative
epared By: (Name, Address, and Phone):
rif Budget prepared by other than Fiscal Officer, the •Fisc.,;1"-Offi-ce-r-
; certify here as to 1he accuracy and approving budgot js suhunitfrsd.
bite: -Signature: gnature:
(1)
(2)
11 ;la
steer ur mICHICAN
OFrICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAMS
Second Floor, Lewis Cass Building
Lansing, Mich' 941^ 48909
Attachment A
Standard Suberant Conditions
Standard Subgrant Conditions - Applicant understands and agrees that a subgrant received
as a result of this application shall be subject to and Incorporate the following condi-
tions of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and the Michigan Dffice of Criminal
Justice Programs.
Assurance of Compliance with Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. Subgrantee agrees
to comply with and insure compliance by its contractors with Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1974, and all requirements Imposed by or pursuant to regulations
of the Department of Justice (28 CFR Part 42) issued pursuant to that title, to
the end that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, creed, or national
origin, be excluded from participation in, he denied the benefits of, or be other-
wIrre subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant
receives Federni financial assistance from the Department of Justice. The subgranree
further will comply with and insure compliance by its contractora with Justice Depart-
ment equal employment regulation in Federally assisted programs (28 CRY Part 42,
subpart D) to the end that employmeitt. diecrimination in such programs on the grounds
of race, color, creed, or national origin, shall be eliminated. The subgrantec
recognires the right of the United Staters to eeek judicial enforcement of the foregoing
convenanto against diecrimination, and will include a similar covenant assuring the
right of the United States to seek judicial enforcement in its contracts. As required
by Section 518 (b) of P.L. 90-351, this grant condition shall not be interpreted to
require the imposition of any percentage ratio, quota system, or other program to
achieve racial balance or eliminate racial imbalance in a law enforcement agency.
Assurance of Compliance with the Michigan State Fair Employment Practices Act. The
subgrantee and any of his contractors agree not to discriminate against any employee
or applicant for employment, to be employed in time performance of the contract, with
respect to his hire, tenure, terms, conditinus or privileges of eriployment, or any
matter directly or indirectly related to employment, because of race, color, religion,
national origin, age, or sex. Act no. 251, Public Acts of 1955, being § 423.304 C.L.
1948; Act No. 344, Public Acts of 1965, being § 423.304a C.L. 1948, ae amended. The
subgrantee recognizes the right of the State of Michigan to ecek admInietrative or
judicial enforcement of the foregoing covenants against discrimination, and will
include a similar covenant assuring the right of the State of Michigan to seek
administrative or judicial enforcement of its contracts.
Accounting Requirements. Suhgrentee agrees to maintoin accounting records following
generally accepted eccounting procedures eed expend subgrant feeds for purposes
identified in the approved eubgrant application and in com'aliaece with LEAA Guideline
M7100.IA Financial Management for Plannieel eeelid Action Grants. All revenue amid
expenditures must be recorded in a fund or arcouut separate from the subgrantee's
other or general revenue and expenditures. Continuation suhgrants must be separated
from any previous subgrant. All charges must be direct ecrets (actual) unless an -
alternative costing method receives prior OCJP approval. Adequate umeenditure documen-
tation, approved by the subgrant project director, must be maintained for all subgrant
coats which includes the following:
The subgrautee agrees that OCJP may disallow any expenditure which is apt adequatel iy
documented or is not in accordance with the approved application and LRAA Guideline
M7100.1A.
Expenditureri reported to OCJP should be in agreement with costs reflected on the
•uhgreetee's expenditure accouet established to record sullgrant coste. Financial
racerde end supporting documentation must be retained and available for audit purposes
for three years or until a Federally approved audit is completed. (See paragraph 9,
chapter 2 of LEAA Guideline M7100.1A.)
A. Personnel - Dereimeetstieu must be in actor -donee with paragraph BlOh of
Appendix 1, Attachent ii (OMR Circular A-87, pages 13 and 14) of LEee Guideline M7I00.1A
which stet's: "Amounts charged to grant programs for personnel services, regardless
of whether treated as direct or indirect ennui, will be based on payrolls documeeted
and approved in serer-dance with generally accepted practice of the stare or local agency.
Payrolls must be Supported by time end attendance or equivalent records for individual
employees.' For fringe benefits, the documentation must show a breakdown of actual
coat by fringe beuefit item and individual.
(3)
3
I ' •
? 1 .
•••
4
i -3'.
(10) Inspection and itedit. The State Office Administrative Services, OCJF, LEAA,
and the State Auditor General, or any of their duly authorized repreneetatives, shall
have access for purpose of audit and examinations to any books, documents, papers,
and recorda of the subgrantee and contractors, as provided in Section 321 of the
Crioe Control Act of 1976.
(11) Expenses not Allowable. Subgrant funds may not be expended for (a) items not generally
a part of the approved budget or aepaeately approved by OCJP; (b) purchase of land;
(e) purchase of buildings or improvemente thereon, or payment of real estate mortgages,
or taxes, unlesa specifically provided for in the approved application; (d) dues to
organizations or federations; (e) entertainment; (f) purchase of automobiles or other
automotive vehicles unless provided for in the approved aoplication; or (g) indirect
coats. Expenditure of funds in excess of the approved budget detail for any budget
category will be permitted only with OCJP approval. Fonda should not be used for
items not included in the application without documentation of suberant approval from
OCjP.
(12) Suhgrant Adjustments - Project Change. Subgrantee must obtain written approval from
OCjP for major project changes.
(13) Copyrights. Where activities supported by this suhgrant produce original books,
films, or other copyrightable material, the subgrantec may copyright such, however,
LEAA and OCJP reserves a royalty-free, n.ai-exclusive and irrevocable license to
reproduce, publish, and use such materiels, and to authorize others to do so.
(14) Patents. If any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of or
as the result of work performed under the subgrant, the subgrantee shall refer the
discovery or invention to LEAA and OCJP, which will determine whether or not patent
protection will be sought, how many rights therein, including patent rights, will be
disposed of and administered, and the necessity of other action required to protect
the public interest in work supported with Federal funds, all in acczndance with the
Presidential Memorandum of October 10, 1963, on Government Patent Policy.
(15) Publicatioas. The subgrantee may publish, at its own expense, the resnits of subgrant
activity without prior review by OCJP provided that any publication (written, oral,
or visual) contains an acknowledgement of LEAA/OCJP sabgranlee supdott and follows
the format in LEAA Guideline G1432.2. This Guideline is availuble threngh OCJP.
A copy of ouch publication must be furnished to OCJP. Publication of documents or
reports with subgrant funds beyond quaatitica required to meet stuadard report
requirements must be provided for in anroved project plans or budgets or olhetvlse
approved by OCJP and, for large quantity publication, manuscripts must be submitted
in advance to OCJP.
(16) Third Party Participation. No contract or agreement may be entered into by the sub-
grantee for execution of project activities or provision of servictis to a subgrant
project (other than purchase of supplies or standard commercial or maintenance
services) which is not incorporated in the approved application. Any such arrangements
shall provide that the subgrantee will retain ultimate control and responsibility for
the project and that the contractor shall be bound by these conditions as well as the
subgrantee.
(17) Competitive Bid Process. Major itentsof equipment must be purchased according to
standard purchasing procedures. A. formal bid process must be followed in acquiring
items of equipment exceeding $2,500 gross coat. (Refer to Chre'.ter 3, paragraph 49
of LEAA Cudeline M7100.1A). Consulting services and other outside services must be
controlled by a formni contract procedure. Contractual agreements must specify
service tn be performed, negntintad rate, and payment tine schedule. Contracts
exceeding s2,5113 nuqt almo be derived by following a formal bid prQccss. In all cases,
the rubgrantee !aunt justify the final doeleion in choosing cure distributor over another
or -one contractor over Another. Contractors must submit billings in Accordance with
specificationu of the contract.
(10 Relocation Assistance. The subgrantee assures that for those projects which displace
individuals from homes, brialness or farms, resources ore available to pay moving
expenwea And relocation costs. and to craslat the displaced individuals in relocating.
The auligrantee •hnuld include the relocation costs in the budget.
(19) Public Avaliability or t,romntion. The eubgruntee and contractors agree to make
available to the public identifiable records of other documents thnt are pertinent to
the receipt or expenditure of subgrnnt funds. Public announcements, requests for bids
or prens re Jeanne reaulting from the suhgrant or project activity shall Identify the •
Office of Criminel iumtice Proerama no the State ugeocy responsible for Administering
the Federal funds made available by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administratioa of
the Federal Department of Justice.
.. S
-...
STATF OF HipIGAN
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,F;ROGRAYIS
Second Floor. Lewis Cass Building—
Lansing, Michigan 48909
AT-Kilt/if C
STATEMff CF CrIsISENT
1 The undersigned hereby affirms and states as follows In regard to the grant application
submitted by (Name of Applicant)
entitled
(l) that said unit of general local government recognizes that the Crime
Control Ac n of 1976 and the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974,
as amended, requires the Office of Criminal Justice Programs to make a variable por-
tion of the Part C block grant funds and the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Pre-
vention Act funds it receives available to units of general local government, or
combinatiov thereof;
12) that said unit of general local government recognizes that this consent
authorizes the Office of Criminal Justice Programs to charge the amount of funds Indi-
cated below, from the share of Part C block grant action funds or the Juvenile Justice
Delinquency Prevention Act funds available to units of general local government, or
combinations thereof;
(3) that said unit of general loLal government recognizes that this consent
authorizes the Office of Criminal Justice. Programs to consider the amount of funds
indicated below, as having been made directly to said local unit of government;
(4) That said unit of general local government understands that this consent
does not restrict in any way Its right to apply for funds for any other project,
including those for the same or similar purposes;
(5) that said unit of general local government recognizes that the Office of
Criminal Justice Programs will consider this consent as evidencing a priority project
for said wilt of general local government.
The amount to be charged to the share of the Part C block grant action funds or the
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act funds shalt be:
5 (enter the federal dollars requested only} as set forth
in the application for funding.
Signature of Local Authorizing Officer
Name of Local Authorizing Officer
Title
Name of Local Unit
To be used for application by universities, public school districts end other units of g
government that tire not "General" in nature. To be uaed by private non-profit agencies,
for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Funds.
1t1/79
Attachment B
Certificate of Maintenance of Fiscal Effort
FEDERAL REQUEST CONTROL NUMBER
STATE OF MICHIGAN
• OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAMS .
Sacorxi Floor, Lewis Cns Building
Lansing, Michigan 48909
APPLICANT
Oakland County Circuit Court
1200 North Telegraph
Pontiac,MI 48053
PROJECT NAME:
Modified Jury System
It is necessary to provide adequate assurance that the grant funds will not be used to supplant or replace funds that would normally
be available. This certificate is to be signed by the agency's budget director or treasurer. It should also be supported by expenditure
statements for the last two preceding fiscal years and the current year's budget. For local units of government, a CPA audit statement
or Michigan Department of Treasury audit statement should be made available as requested. When a private agency is contracting
with the Unit of General Local Government, the application must include a CPA audit statement. A separate form must be supplied
with each application; however, if supporting audit statements, budgets, expenditure reports or other documents have been made
available on previous applications, these may be referred to as previously submitted.
AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT
EXPENDITURE AND BUDGET DATA
• 1 Expenditures
• 2 Expenditures
• S Budget {Excluding Grant Request)
Average
FY 19_77
FY 19_78
FY 19 79
$ 2,220,434
$ 2,385,317
$ 3,223,862
$2,609.871
% Increase 7 .43
% Increase 35 .15
% Incises. 17.54
— 1Must be supported by attached certified audit statements, expenditure reports or budget documents.
Indicate by check mark the type of report and if attached. If such support hes been submitted previously, please
indicate this by a check mark.
Previously 0
1. Expenditure report El Certified Audit statement attached 0 submitted
Previously
2. Expenditure report 0 Certified Audit statement attached 0 submitted
Previously 0
3. Budget statement ta Attached ID submitted
CERTIFICATION
In accordance with the provisions of Title 1 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, the applicant
hereby certifies that Federal funds will not be used to supplant or replace funds or other resources that would citherwise
have been made available for Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
The applicant further certifies that expenditures for Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice {excluding Federal funds) will
be at least as great as the preceding fiscal year plus the average annual increase calculated above.
Date:
Thomas Duncan, Director
Accounting Division
Signature of agency budget director, treasurer or Type name and title
_ finainciat director
3-73
CC: I FIPU 1_,
Applicant Federal Request Control Number
STATE OF MICHIGAN •
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAMS
Second Floor, Lewis Cass Building
Lansing, Michigan 48909
ATTACIIINT II
CERTIFICATE OF FRLUJEJICY SUPPORT
Project Name
The applicant agency(ies) is/are authorized to operate
base station(s) and
mobile units on the
assigned frequency(ies) of
Should this application be funded, the requested equipment will not exceed the
frequency capabilities of our authorization. We herewith offer our assurance
that the agency is presently authorized to operate such equipment and that the
1
Additional equipment can be utilized without requesting additional frequency
support.
(Signature of Project DirectOi)
Project Director
7itle
Agency
R 1/79
Hio ,L J1JS7TII -11(0f;PANS
Second Floor, Lewis Casc Building
Lansing ., Michigan 48313
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
. GUIDELINE COMPLIANCE
Subgrantee Subgrant Amount
Project Name
Control Number
OCJP
LEAA
All recipients of federal funds under Title 1 of the Omnibus Crime Control and
Safe Streets Act of 1968, Public Law 90-351, 82 Stat. 197, as amended, are
required to certify compliance with Title 28, Chapter 1, Subpart E of Part 42
of the Code of Federal Regulations as it applies to the implementing criminal
justice agency. (Complete item #1 or P2 below, whichever is apnlicable.)
STATUS OF COMPLIANCE
1. I (Authorizing Official) certify
that the (Criminal Justice Agency)
has formulated an equal employment opportunity program in accordance with
28 CFR 42.301, et. seq., Subpart E, and that it is on file in the office of
(Name) (Address)
(Title, for review or audit by officials
of the cognizant state planning agency or the Law Enforcement Assistance
Administration as required by relevant law and regulations. 28 CFR 42.305.
2. I (Authorizing nfficial) certify that the
(Criminal Justice Agency) in conformity
with the terms and conditions of 28 CFR 42.301 am not required to file an
equal opportunity program for this jurisdiction.
Signature of Authorizing Official (Da-iTe-T-
NOTE: Failure to return the executed document will prevent the Office of
Criminal Justice Programs from authorizing the release of funds.
28 CFR 42.305
R10/74
cr 711 uf- crKETwo
EJ0GET CUST-BUDGET
(
1979
10119'29
I (
855361
37576
50413
-3-46-17-;
3'7.7'5!)
149.1)1
571
165
151951
E07,0
2235
1117
1139768
127238 763200
1‘430
318
49955 291500
5921. 33730
3948 47700
1590
206445 1244036
"
.
3Ib
2911i.00
21730
(750 .0
47730
1590
1232038 1
740 32 2030
13000
45000
23800
1500
100
3500
2120
137)0
2120
13760 6'354
147165
79394
12332
155
87
2120
T7D00
13700
47700
.1E5'68
301F8
1590
106
4035
3380
27560-
1 C
47700 47700 j
:,:Yn EE --------3C557,-
2S.22a 25222
1590 15(,0 C
IC6 106
4377
68733
• 20569 3
7
16
2
12
59
6
152S6
1195
79
-3 -255
3 I F,0
3710 3710 1
3120 _ 3100 3120
1275 2725
219 492
3229 3000
.50a7 -- 7:6;m0
26
7
2750 —275f -0
265C 26!•0
1C000 1.-!600
9,512-7 t
2650
11600
2-4-3Z‘.)/
2169 3346 2500
- 3629 6096 10000
2-73-C85 161-00-2-1-6-B-9-6-6
T S“-PATEPNITY CASES
TTIL ,7,7-2n7t7 -7-t-TT,7CATFOITT Fi E
CLPJEk MAChINE RENTAL
cn -u, PPL,CESS!G GEV. - CLEMIS
E..!%74 PROCESSING
SF.,--177:0L Pk NT
E u Pi'NT RENTAL
P viLNT REPA IRS & MA IN I.
LiJtL', CLEAN IN; RENCVAT I NG
Ir4T E A r, C.E.D EP'AR-Tti,ENT- C
MEN11EISf'IP DUES & PU3L ICAT IONS
!-IISCELLLNEOUS
Pr-zINIING
REFUNC CF PRIOR YEARS REVENUE
ANSPOR TAT ILN
TR AVEL 1, CCNFERENCE
650
1405
3815
35
12
—2:5
2069
192
00
658
732
11.709-
JUC I C 1 AL
L.; MS T i-74T
ACCOUNT
NAME
1576 1977
EXPENDITURE EXPENDITURE
1978
APPRCP X SPENT EX2z
CEPT 1 CIRCUIT COURT
OR
REQUEST
BUD -C,ET
RECCX.
ADOPTED
eUDGFT
S AL 4R ES
S41_ AR TES - REGCLAR 677395
CVE'mT 1ME 43-5t
}- CL AY 24352
LEAVE 23375
L I C ?
.S 1Cs LAVL 1242-2.
CT hER C:1 SC. )
SERVICE INCZ EMENT 12836
5t.1.'11.1 -ELP 2826
EER3L Li 64C-2-
KEN1 S CU-1P.
DEATH LEAVE 310
TOT AL 767667
748470
736—
1S546
29706 •
1093
--1-C750
5745
12728
3386
-TYE=
293
854071
846892 15 12E958 965960
6-0 -100- 60
37234 27 10205 42434
49934 7 3955 56954
3C16 3 141 4466
-14-268 4 1410 3'108-5
3c-116 113 4436 4466
14642 13 2041 14991 ,
boo()
1959
979 16
1001970 ' 15
255361
37576
50433
555
3555
14591
1579
S89
1011529
.. Pc_RSONAL SERVICES
CF::--%S.E ATTNEY FEES 836665 704978 720000 17
I =--LoJPr:L1_Tt: 85.< raD-Lb, 15,-770 17 ._,::, 'ITNESS FLES C MILEAGE -; ICC 350 . 330
.13rt- FEES & MILEAGE 2E3637 283653 275000 18
Pc/OFESSICNAL SERVICES 14815 14461 20500 28
+.7RTE-F -E-s-re-wc-.7-S ER V ICES 51-6-C- 2-5-731 2500-0 25
TkANS.CRIPTS ON APPEALS 48325 • 24311 45000 8
WITNESS FEES & MILEAGE 85 913 1500 ,
TGTAL 1314808 1126934 1162300 17
- CCNTRACTURAL
763200
—7 ') 3 C-
318
2'31500
21730
Z=0-1
47700
1590
1232C38
COMMOCITIES ,
CUuNTY OF CTKETND 1/78 BUDGET . 05MR
CUST-2UDGET
_.?J=_CIAL
. DEPT 1 CIP.CUIT COURT
A 40;11NIS1kATIVE
C8J ACCCUNT 1976 1977 1978 ORIGluAL 'BUDGET ACCPTED
CLDE NAME EXPENDITURE EXPENDITURE PPROP % SPENT. ExP. REaJEST RECCM. DUDGET
JP 4 - COmOCITIES
_1'32 ErA_GCCT5A.S13±qN_G 417 2193 1500 3 59 1590 1590 1590
894 :ICk,iFILmlNG & REPRUDuCTIONS <304 388( 400-0 11 60 4240 42-40 4-247-
bcs CF-F1:E SUPPLIES 43298 42772 38200 3 1327 41090 40490 40490'
909 P0S1AGE 1000 194 1949 4060 1060 1050
:.. 1CTAJ, 44620 48853 44700 9 4027 50 ()80 4738C 47390
jp 5 - cApiTAL CUTLAY
c91 miSC (APIT4L OuTLAY 29572 2000 89410 2120 2120
7'. Tut -1-.7- 2-C-5-7-2 200-0 89410 11.ZU Lf2J
TOTAL 2401282 2220434 2379958 15 375133 2767513 247C279 2470279
""177.4.777717-
;),(
3:1 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES $1,162,300.00 $1)182,143.91 $ 19,843.9 , 19,843.9
2,000.00
13,000.00
45,000.00
38,588.00
23,800.00
1,500.00
100.00
3,500.00
3,000.00
26,000.00
2,500.00
10,000.00
$ 168,988.00
$ 1,742.50 $
9,736.66
86,952.95
32,098.67
25,292.00
1,248.88
100.49
1,141.72
3,365.55
565.50
1,059.66
33,518.55
165.00
3,188.90
4,801.09
$ 204,978.12 $
257.5(
3,263.34
41,952.9
1,492.0(
251.12
.4()
1,141.72
134.45
565.50
1,940.34
7,518.55
165.00
688.90
5,198.91
35,990.12
$ 1,500.00 $
4,000.00
23,770.00
15,430.00
1,937.73 $
4,156.34
28,565.30
16 205.58
437.73
156.34
4,795.3C
775.58
117
County of Oakland - General Fund
Statement of Appropriations & Expenditures - Estimated & Actual
For the Year Ended December 31, 1978
Budget
rDICIAL
:IRCUIT COURT
ADMINISTRATIVE
SALARIES
i
5: PERSONAL SERVICES:
5,i Defense Attorney Fees
9.f Defense Attorneys - Appellate
Expert Witness Fees & Mileage
3.1 Juror Fees & Mileage
Professional Services
Reporter & Stenographic Services
34 Transcripts on Appeals A Witness Fees & Mileage
Expenditures
Including
Adjustments
$ 763,322.70 $
74,737.00
325.00
251,818.26
27,305.00
37,736.37
26,784.58
115.00
Over* or
Under
Budget
75,371.F
43,322.;
263.n
25.0
23,181.7
6,805.0
18,215.4
1,385.0
$ 720,000.00
75,000.00
300.00
275,000.00
20,500.00
25,000.00
45,000.00
1,500.00
$1,007,603.43 $ 932,231.62,
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
Blood Tests - Paternity
Cases
Copier Machine Rental
Data Processing
Data Processing - Development
Equipment Rental
Equipment Repairs & Maintenance
Laundry, Cleaning & Renovating
Maintenance Department Charges
Memberships, Dues & Publications
Miscellaneous
Printing
Publishing Court Calendars
Refund of Prior Years Revenue
Transportation
Travel & Conference
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES:
Dry Goods & Clothing
Microfilming & Reproductions
Office Supplies
Postage
TOTAL COMMODITIES 44,700.00 $ 50,864.95 $ 6,164.95
500.00 $
i000. 00 _
496.00 $ 6
000,
3,500.00 $
37,000.00
38,588.00
16,000.00
1,-825.00
1,000.00
6,657.00
135.00
2,500.00
1,440.00
20,500.00
1,200.00
5,099.34 $
48,537.04
15,037.58
15,616.31
917.75 1
6.9g
6,657.00
145.00
99.41
18.55
2,772.75
1,698.28
19,187.01
961.42
1,599.1
11,537:
23,550.-
383:
907.
993,
145.
35.:
18.:
272.
258.:
1,312.1
238.:
1,500.00 $ 496.00 $ " 1,004'
100.00
16,000.00 $
25 960.00
7,897.45
25,558.81
$ 100.
8,102.
401.
42,060.00 $ 33,456.26
$ 33,456.26 $
I (
t4;.. A
118
County of Oakland - General Fund
Statement of Appropriations & Expenditures - Estimated & Actual
For the Year Ended December 31, 1978
JUDICIAL (Cont'd)
CIRCUIT COURT (Cont'd)
ADMINISTRATIVE (Cont'd)
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE
Expenditures Over*
Including Under
Budget Adjustments 131-252-1 -q..
11,547.40 $ 15,098.65 $
$2,395,138.83 $2,385,317,25 $ 9,82.
FRIEND OF THE COURT
SALARIES $ 647,103.70 $ 621,456.77 $ 25,64(
PERSONAL SERVICES:
Professional Services
Reporter & Stenographic Services
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
Copier Machine Rental
Data Processing
Data Processing - Development
Equipment Rental
Equipment Repairs & Maintenance
Extradition Expense
Grant Match
Maintenance Department Charges
Memberships, Dues & Publications
Miscellaneous
Printing
Radio Rental
Transportation
Travel & Conference
$ 130,345.00 $ 116,754.34 $ 13 590. TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
COMMODITIES:
Microfilming & Reproductions
Office Supplies
Postage
TOTAL COMMODITIES
,)
rtiR
JUDICIAL •
L A L'I Itrf:;ITATTVTE
CUST-8UD6ET
DEPT I CIRLUIT COURT
DATE
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE
AMZUNT--
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE
AMOUNT
TO TA L REPAINING
P--/C APpROP. BAMNCE -
ACCCurn- NAmE
PTC
-6251( -5 6415659
15 100 258
-207 -6 18703
2791 72 22711
35 1-7-82
1629 63 15142
-10498
-488 -37 7679
-48 -11 2471
151 , 100 892
75 100 445
35 -95-6-24
-18487 -17 625358
P I AL AR I ES
Es - REGUL AR
PER Tin, E-
LAY
r0 AL LEAVE
;L FDAY COMP
CK LEAVE
'HER VI IS C
:RV ICE INCREMENT
1MTE H1-LP
i!..--:RGE-.NCY SALARY
S COMP.
T H. LEAVE
Jr! eu ia.sEr•i8NT - sAL ARIE
I DIAL
421 469
151
75
105315 . 123802
15
3187 33C5
3670 1079
303
2580 951
10498
1309 1758
UP 2 - PERSONAL SERVICES
3-3T2 -37512 0 4036-
-668715 -21-8-A6 -3 11-118-1-17- 519441--
243 15 5 256 15
16143 2560 13 37831 21687
14156 7952 35 45937 31178
--9-1-5 866 48 3.-67-G2 , 2-6-86-
4876 10266 67 30625 '25748
10897 -1085/ -10897
1356 323 4 15538 8131
---4036 0 4036
2413 57 2 5000 2586
892 100 1803 1803
70 374 84 9C0 829 -8-7-647------7-7-77--------8------1-934-7a-----1-0562-5-=
642570 -17211 -2 1140204 497634
7500
1187 16565
2547 3-024
125 A9
8 9
28 54
333
250
2666
125
9.3
- 38033
1472
975
38033
618
2670
I L NE
iiTER 820j ANANSII REPORT
30, 1979 - 50 PCT. ELAPSED
YEAR TO CURRENT MONTH
•1
:FENS 7 ATTORNEY FEES
FENsE td-TuRNEYS - APPEL
pERr WITNESS FEES a MIL
mILEAbE
UFESSIONAL SERVICES
poRTER C STENO. SERVICE
ANscRIPTS ON APPEALS
TrTESs FEES t miLEAL,E
[CT AL
uP 3 - CONTRACTUAL
64166
6666
27
25166
1708
9558
2516
116093
59393
5703
51644
4175
1997 •
2456
1.37
111507
4772
963
27
-2466
7560.
459
1745-
4585
7 385000
14 40000
100 162
-144 10249
79 57350
15 17500
rr300 -
3 696562
402410
26883
-1-6-8J94
9259
24386
16909
648848
-17410
13116
, 162
990
32963
590
47714
. -4
32
100
---a
9
57
3
6
770000
80000
325
-35-0000
20500
74700
35000
1342575
367589
53116
325
11240
50313
18090
693/26
2833 2833
333 200 133
100 355 -255
2-76
CCIT;TING SERVICES
nCC TESTS-PATERNITY CAS
riMNILATIONS
p--1-rR-.77EA-L-FTN-E
IA PROCESSING OEV. - CL
TA PROCESSING
IA pPoCESS-DEvELDPMENT
JIp7T7N1 RE7i
JiPmENT REPAIRS C MAINT
JNERy, CLEANING C RENOV
It.i1ENANCE DEPARTMENT CH
uuEs E -PuBLIcm
CELLANFoUS
/NT1r,G. COURT cALENCAR
70-1\0 UT PR
vr-oFFICE SPACE
VISvIRTATION
AvEL 1 CONFERENCE
100 17000 17000 100 17000 17000
39 1999 2548 -548 -27 4009. 1452
-255 600 2366 -1766 -294 600 -1766
--27 6000 5061- 9-30 15 t-1500 643-8
7500 100 45000 66587 -21587 -47 9C000 23412
-15777 -1329 7125 29187 -22062 -309 14250 -14937
----4-77 -1-8 152.30 1-79-31 ------26-5-1 -17 29530 1-15-98-
76 60 750 99 650 d6 1500 1400
0 53 45 8 15 107 61
..-26 -92 3316 3338 -21 -0 3316 -21
-151 41. 2200 36-37 -1437 -65 4400- -762-
207 62 2000 1239 760 38 2000 760
156 62 1500 2076 —576 —38 3000 523
2666 10!) 1600J 16573 —573 —3 32000 15426
-220 2218 22-8-
0 228199 228198 0 456358 228199
654 58 8837 2769 6067 68 10175 7405
-1695 -173 5850 9957 -4107 -70 11205 1247
"-; 5 u50 9 ,357 L: .1 -I / J I . • V n 'n
- -70 11205 1247
TO
AC -IU AL VAR IANCE;
AMUUNT
TOTAL REVAI NI NG
P B-ACANCE -
YEAR CATE
101 AL 36 1 -3314 5 -760 63135 39-1392 -2968U - a 6-9-M2 299589
158
333
2633 1466
4591
2711 1752
413
98
333
-78
-285
—67
• 62
100
-2
-19
A.
ZU U U
93 2000
iur3
1873
116
126
10).
100
-6 303 CS6
-2250
-2250
285511
-2250
-2250
-17585
-27000
-27000
3223062
10+1
100
-1
9280 .
-27 003
-27000
1488081
!
•e.
__3_,JU D.JLL1kI. 1 ACm IN /S R AT IVE
ACCOUNT NAME
DIP 3 - CONTRACTUAL
UA K L AND—L7fIINTY MASTER BUDGET ANALYSIS REPORT
JLNE 30, 1979 - 50 PCT. ELAPSED
CURRENT MONTH
BAJDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE buDGET
AMOUNi P/C
1t1T j7 - C US T -ULDG ET
DEPT 1 CIRCUIT COURT
F.L-u 4 - COMMODITIES
P.Y GOODS a CLOTHIN G
" ILRCF ILMING& REPRODUCT iFF I CE SUPPLIES
J'iSTAC,E
OT
.t.:UP 5 - CAPITAL OUTLAY
I sC CAPITAL LJUTLAY
TOTAL
..UP 7 - ABATEMENT
'EIFIEdRsEMENT - OPERATING
TOTAL
TOTAL
949
1.999
15800
8799
Z7-5-49
151770.
15000
• -135..p)
-13500
1712682
698 1I)1 26
1578 421 21 4000 . 2421 - '
19475 -3675 -23 26600 7124
13497 -4697 -53 17600 4102
3-.52-5u . -7-7-07-------21-------5-0-1-0. 1-4-84-1977
17719 -2719 -18 27000
-13503
-13500 1735780 -23098
Attachrnalt F
Notification of Intent
O 0 O 0 0)
6. DATE MUD
Year mama ivy
19
25. APPLICA. Yaw ameatA rim
TION otervro to
FL FEDI RAL ArrL tCATIO lour ne.,Anon
$O. FEDERAL GRANT IDIBTIMAJ10,4
17. IkLalMII.3 ADDED .00
ADMINISTPATIVE OF7ICI
Yew yooatA Dee $4. Yaw amonta oiov
DTA/VYING
°ATI 19 .00 31. ACTION DATE
$4 CONTACT FOR ADDITIONAL IriFORMIA.
TION (Name n iit.pi.oserouber) Taor wealth rierr
ENDING
DATE 19
.00
n.ADVASSII
at. ACTON 1' NASA
o a. AVINVOI1)
o
o
b. REACTED
a. ILETIOUTIO
Ao1/0161XT
o A. OVUM
Wat4DAPAWN
F(DIR L AGENCY
I A-911 ACTION
32. FUNDING
s. 1101(KAL 1 0
b. APPt 6,4411
I. ref O. LOCAL
mai
D r.. Flo
I. FEDERAL AGFACY A....ts OPTION.
Wood ato4 tolopeolnoe so.)
sTAitoAmo roma 424 FADE 1 (10,-75)
PreareiterS GiA. Fooleral Meateammem Carowleur re-P
SIATf OF PICHICAN
OFFICE OF (AIMINAL JUSTICE PR 0 G RAM S* • I SeC(Ind Floor, traiN Cass Building t
1ans;r1t. Ric" g?rl 48909
4.LA/.. APPLIQUET/RICUMENT I. VEDEPLAIL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION MO.
a. Agallamt item :Oakland County Circuit Cour
b. tbaatatalka LW ,same
B.
a. 13014/1.13. In :1200 N. Telegraph Road a. WNW 1 1 1'1 1 1 i PRO.
ECW :Pontiac L 0,„,.,, , Oakland GRAM b. lriTU
.(rf466 II. aim :Michigan s. arcade 48053 7 diva
6- Ciwtost Pima Wined Fred N. Nester, (313) 858-0344 c.w.o.) Crime Control Act a ed...e...... No. / : ----....-----_--
7. TITLE ANO DitiCiarriOm Cl APP1JC.ANTS mg= O. TYPE Of AP'PLICANT/IRECIPIENT
A-Itchl 14-Dammolfty Actin Armor Modified Jury System - Automated selection, 11-intersteta 1- I=TIOAMMAM Inentablea
C-Sobeleat scheduling, and payment of jurors designed OrstrIct LON, 04•41/v)i o-Cmodo to facilitate shorter terms of service, E-Doly P-lebesi MOD greater public convenience, and greater 4-2=1 ?IV" Dater appropriate Wier Ej efficiency. - I. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE
A-teale tryout 11-11muoreem
11-4epplaruireal Goma 5-0thar E.t.a atrurre- DD
C-alavA prime looder(a)
10. MIA OF PROJECT IMPACT Wooled of 41:400. lamanadaa. 11. ESTIMATED NUM. 12. TYPE OF APPLICATION
Sberaa. NA) DER OF PERSON" /...,pool ci_aprogoe E-Aleasboveatlea
IIENLFITING 11-leseaol D-Cantleeetlea Oakland County 1,000,000 pu...., oppropriate leiter li
13. PROPOSED FUNDING 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT' OF 15. TYPE OF MANGE (Tor Jar re Jae)
A-tarnama Denary F-Otbia (11104444)1 1 4- form '47 , 98 / . 35 .00 6. Arrtie-mrt IL 11101ECT D-Clour OEM Neter.
IL AFTLIC.PIIT .00 19 C.-Invome OseMom C o un t y -w i d e D-0.drop. Goma.. _ f-OlmalOpi
a. "TATE ,0,3 14. PROJECT "TART 17. PROJECT
Z ht ..*M
E•g.•, •Irpro- =
d. kOCAL 2,525.65 .00 DATE YgIK7Tapirl•y
19 Jo U
DURA.IIpri apna3,4 Wu, ( a )
4. OVER .c.3 14 ESTIMATED DATE TO Year aaraga dew IL DUSTING FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NUMMI
of suomirrto TO
r. Tom s50 , 513 . 00 _co FEDERAL AGENCY ip. II
24 FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST 11110514 Citp SIM% Ilr *NW)
MI XL ON be
m I. T. D M.
O proapyliratkoierAleatlen are
a t et y iclorafty l ow
N
bast
1 1 THE
APPLICANT DEW arawriarra by De perrudeta be* al
true ae4 emoont, Do Oscremet4 Ina Mom
1 Currinis 66 womb* *ma Ste VIAMIA1 Irtil am*
7}4Ay Be waft Da Maas. mimuseus If on amIsb.
Gam la sulanayL
-
Rt.pRz.
LEAA Washington, D.C.
b. d Irma W ONO OIvA411 bootie* one lobreAtoi. pererall ts to. No •
wpreprlaba mai rroopermra NOMMIL 910000*
Yoe X Pla
aaahaaied
23. a. 7171D WM ADO TITL1 i Win,'" ' Fred M.Mester
samara Court Administratoi
a. TIM WM ADO TITL1
Fred M.Mester
Court Administrator
24. MILMCY NAME MIEJOCY NAME
2.11. ORC/ANIZATIONAL UNIT
.00
F. TvrAt. Is .00
I. In tallpg smog allow , Gal GODIPONFAS MOM I me astingIbbriel won doe -
4140r411. if 114Aef 1144404. is dos *Miss prwlelsesit FM 3. Oilo Game 1.44.
N Sas Imo r la Wog pima
424-101
BE IT RESOLVED that on Oakland County
Modified Jury System
(if available).
, OCJP #
STATE OF MICHIGAN F b
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JU5FICE PROGRAMS
Second Floor, Lewis Cass Building
Lansing, Michigan 48909
ATTAC1-1.1111- G
CASH 114TCH P,ESOLUTION
(date) (governmental agency)
appropriated $ , in cash as match for federal funds from the
Law Enforcement Administration for a project entitled
("§finature of Appropriate Certifying
Official)
(Date)
-Affix Official Seal-
R1/79
#9127 September 13, 1979
Moved by Hoot supported by Perinoff the resolution be adopted.
Moved by Murphy supported by Peterson the Finance Committee Report
be amended as follows:
Change 3) to read: This is a nonrecurring grant covering the twelve (12)
month period of January 1, 1980 through December 31, 1980.
Change the amount in 4) from $20,114 to $16,080.
Change the amounts in 5) so it reads: The total grant being applied for is
$50,513, of which $47,987.35 or 95% is to be Federally funded, and $2,525.65 or 5%
is to be funded by the County, as detailed by the attached schedule.
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried.
Vote on resolution as amended:
AYES: Dunaskiss, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hobart, Hoot, Kasper, Kelly,
Lewand, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Moxley, Murphy, Patterson, Perinoff,
Peterson, Price, Roth, Aaron, DiGiovanni, Doyon. (23)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution as amended, was
adopted.
4
STATE OF M:CHTGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and
having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of
Commissioners at their meetinl held on September 13, 1979
with the original record thereof now remaining in my
office, and that it is a true and correct transcript
therefrom, and of the whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan
this 13th day o f September 19.79
Lynn D. Allen Clerk
By Deputy Clerk