The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolutions - 1978.10.10 - 12943TE THE FOREGOING RESOLUT! ayei Miscellaneous Resolution 8665 October 10, 1978 BY: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE - Henry William Hoot, Chairman IN RE: YCCIP FY79 Projects' Budgets TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners by Miscellaneous Resolution #6546 applied for and was granted the designation as Prime Sponsor by the U. S. Department of Labor to administer the provisions of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973; and WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners by Miscellaneous Resolution #8613 made a pre-application for Youth Community and Improvement Projects (Title III, Subpart 2) and WHEREAS the Youth Community and Improvement Projects have been submitted to and approved by the Youth Planning Council on September 28, 1978: and the FY79 plan for the Youth Community and Conservation Improvement Program he approved for $394,612, and an additional $156,770 in carry forward balance for a total of $551,382 to be expended between October 1, 1978 and September 30, 1979. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the attached YCCIP budgets for $551,382 be approved. The Public Services Committee, by Henry William Hoot, Chairman, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE EVALUATION PROCESS 1. Twenty-eight projects were submitted for funding. 2. Twelve projects received prelimary approval by the Youth Council for consideration for funding. Approved projects totaled $1,170,437. (see attachment) 3. $551,382 Available for funding this program 27,569 Prime Sponsor administrative costs (5%) $523,813 Available for projects 4. Projects ranked by the Youth Programs Supervisor according to enclosed evaluation schedule and ranked for funding according to quality of program as evidenced in the ranking system, (attached) 5. Funding was available for the four highest ranking projects and for most of the fifth ranked project. The fifth project would receive $93,805 of a $121,946 budget. 6. As you can see, with the exception of Birmingham (whose program budget was cut by the Youth Council), all budgets are near $100,000. It has been the Prime Sponsor's experience that the larger projects are more successful and offer more benefits to both the community and the parti- cipants. 7. Because 10% of each project budget can be used by the intake agency for administrative costs, the selected agencies can add one staff person (about $10,000) to properly maintain the extensive reporting and moni- toring requirements. Projects that are significantly smaller in size do not have the administrative dollars to adequately service the project. FERNDALE 1. School District of Ferndale Fix Up and Beautification ,OAK PARK 2. Oak Park School District Conservation and Improvement - 3. City of Oak Park Beautification and Upgrading BERKLEY 4. City of Huntington Woods Public Facilities Conservation Program WALLED LAKE 5. Walled Lake Consolidated Schools Repair and Renew TROY 6. Rochester Community Schools LEAF -BIRMINGHAM 7. School District, City of Birmingham Birmingham Nature Center 8. Common Ground Community Ecology Project FY79 YCCIP PROJECTS YOUTH COUNCIL EVALUATION SEPTEMBER 28, 1978 YOUTH PLANNING LABOR SPECIAL VOTED VOTED COMMUNITY PARTICIPANT INTENSIVE SUPERVISION SUPERVISORS ASSUR. APPROVED DISAPPROVED Tangible I Work Habits 65% Money Level of Skills Consent Output 1 Skills Participant 1:12 Experience Measurable Academic Wages & Fr. Benefits Credit X X X 1:2 X X X x x x 1:3 X X X X X X 1:9 X X X• X 12 X X I X X X N . 1:1 X X X X X •1:10 X X X • X X 1:71/2 X NO X X X X 1:2.6 X X X 1 BIRMINGHAM (Cont.) 9. Village of Beverly_Hills Community Conservation Corps. • Village of Beverly Hills Park Maintenance WATERFORD 11. Waterford School District Community Improvement & Training Project ROYAL OAK 12. School District of Royal Oak Community Aide Project SOUTHFIELD 1. Southfield Comm. Pl. (Sub. to P.S. 1 hour late) Community Service & Improvement BERKLEY 2. American Youth Hostels Outdoor Workshops WALLED LAKE 3. City of Walled Lake, MI Community Beautification & Improvement Project FY79 YCCIP PROJECTS YOUTH COUNCIL EVALUATION SEPTEMBER 28, 1978 1 YOUTH PLANNING DUNLIL_ LABOR SPECIAL . VOTED VOTED 'COMMUNITY 'PARTICIPANT INTENSIVE SUPERVISION SUPERVISORS ASSUR. APPROVED DISAPPROVED' Tangible Work Habits 65% Money Level of Skills Consent Output Skills Participant 1:12 Experience Measurable Academic. Wages & Fr. Benefits' 'Credit X X X 1:8 X X X X X X- 1:2 X X X X X X 112 X X X X X X 1:7 X NO X 1:5 Prob. Hire ! X X X 1:10 ADegree Per. X X NO NO X 1:4 X X X NO NO X 1:10 To be Hired X X WALLED LAKE (Cont.) 4. Commerce Township Parks & Environment Improvement TROY 5. Neighborhood House Rochester Neighborhood Day Care Center 6. Boys/Girls Club of Troy Model Programs 7. City of Troy Parks & Recreation City of Troy Building & Grounds Improvement 8. City of Troy Parks & Recreation Troy Clerical Assistance 9. Troy School District . Landscape/Groundskeeper Comm. Improvement Project BIRMINGHAM 10. Community House Updating Mailing Files 11. Community House Maintain & Preserve Comm. House Building 12. Jewish Community Center of Metro Detroit Fitness and Outdoor Education Center FY79 YCCIP PROJECTS YOUTH COUNCIL EVALUATION SEPTEMBER 28, 1978 YOUTH PLANNING UNOZ, LABOR SPECIAL VOTED VOTED COMMUNITY PARTICIPANT INTENSIVE SUPERVISION SUPERVISORS ASSUR. APPROVED DISAPPROVED , Tangible Work Habits 65% Money Level of Skills Consent Output Skills Participant 1:12 Experience Measurable Academic Wages & Fr. Benefits Credit Part. to be !Hired. No I , X NO X 1:6 'Specs. Given X , i, F NO NO X 1:6 '1•() be Hired X X NO NO X 1:6 To be Hired X X X X X 1:5 X X I X NO X X 1:1 X K X , Subm tted 3 days -te to Intak4 Agency on S4pt, 25, 1978 X I NO NO X 1:2 NO X X NO NO X 1:2 NO X X NO NO X 1:8 NO X X BIRMINGHAM (Cont.) 13. Bloomfield Hills Schools Improvement of School Farm & Nature Center 14. Bloomfield Hills School District Landscaping and Site Improvement WATERFORD 15, Brandon School District Clerical Aides 16. Alternative Lifestyles, Inc, Youth Community & Improvement Project FY79 YCCIP PROJECTS YOUTH COUNCIL EVALUATION SEPTEMBER 28, 1978 YOUTH PLANNING COUMIL LABOR SPECIAL VOTED VOTED COMMUNITY , PARTICIPANT INTENSIVE SUPERVISION SUPERVISORS ASSUR, APPROVED DISAPPROVED Tangible Work Habits 65% Money Level of Skills Consent Output ' Skills Participant 1:12 Experience Measurable Academic Wages & Fr,1 Benefits Credit _ NO NO X 1:1 NO X X X X X 1:6 NO X X NO X X 1:1 X X X NO X X 1:1 X X X 1 I 1 YCCIP PROJECT RANKING POINT AWARD AGENCY PROJECT 1 85 Troy LEAF 2 80 Birmingham Common Ground 3 70 Walled Lake Repair & Renew 4 65 Birmingham Birmingham Nature 5 60 Ferndale Fix Up & Beautification 6 50 Oak Park Conservation & Improvement 7 40 Waterford Community & Improvement 8 35 Berkley Conservation Program 9 35 Birmingham Community Conservation 10 35 Birmingham Park Maintenance 11 30 Royal Oak Community Aide 12 25 Oak Park Beautify & Upkeep RANK (1) (2) AGENCY NEED RESOURCES 0-25 1 0-15 1 (5) INNOVA- TIVENESS 0-15 TOTALS 10 85 10 1, Rochester Community Schools LEAF 1 20 I 15 1 15 $135,141/13@$10,3951 15 20 10 15 .2. Common Ground Community Ecology Project 15 1 10 $47,837/4@$12,000 10 80 5 10 15 70 15 1 10 $149,270/15@$9,951 $121,946/12@$11,086 15 (Reduce by $28,141 t $93,805) 15 0 10 10 60 5 10 10 65 TITLE III YCCIP FOR FY79 (YOUTH COMMUNITY CONSERVATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) PRIME SPONSOR EVALUATION RANKING EVALUATION CRITERIA (3) (4a) PROGRAM (4b) COST EFFECTIVENESS REASON- PART- ICOMMUNITY ABLENESS EFFECTIVENESS* BENEFIT , BENEFIT 0-15 0-15 1 0-15 TROY BIRMINGHAM WALLED LAKE 3. Walled Lake Consolidated Schools Repair and Renew BIRMINGHAM 4. School District, City of Birmingham Birmingham Nature Center 15 FERNDALE 5. School District of Ferndale Fix Up and Beautification 1 10 15 1 15 1 10 $97,760/7@$13,966 5%= 27,569.00 Prime Sp 523,813.00 Projects OTAL $551,382.00 nsor Administration *$9,1800 average per participant to permanent job, etc. 0-15 points RANKING EVALUATION CRITERIA Each approved application will be reviewed against the evaluation criteria established by the Prime Sponsor. Each will be assigned a numerical score based on the application's acceptability in each factor. Maximum score is 100 points and grants will be awarded in descending order to those agencies who receive the highest ratings. As many grants as YCCIP funds permit will be awarded. Any proposals not funded will be kept aside and reconsidered later for funding if more YCCIP monies become available. The evaluation criteria and points assigned are: 1. NEED. The offeror should provide information which clearly justifies the project and shows how it will meet a public service need. 2. AGENCY RESOURCES. The staff, background of the organization s experience of the organization, equipment on hand, and other factors the offeror brings to the project operation. 0-15_points 3. COST. The reasonableness and cost effectiveness of the proposed project. 0-15 points 4. PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS. The application will be rated on its potential ability to provide useful, effective and timely services to the project participants and to the community. There are two parts to this factor: a. Benefit to Project Participants. What benefits the participant will receive from his participation in the project other than simple employment, i.e., a certificate, advanced skill training as a part of the job, transition b. Benefit to the Community. How this project will benefit both the community at large and specific population groups in the community, i.e., provision of transportation service to the elderly benefits both the community's transportation system and the elderly persons using the special service. 0-15 points 5. INNOVATIVENESS. The proposal will be rated on the extent that it represents and clearly shows that the task is new and not an expansion of on-going services. 0-15 points YCCIP APPROVAL PROCESS 1. September 9, 1978 YCCIP Project infolmation to ten intake agencies on September 9, 1978 for publication by each agency. 2. September 22, 1978, 5:00 PM Bids accepted by each intake agency. 3. September 26, 1978, 500 PM Bids accepted by Prime Sponsor from intake agencies. 4. September 28, 1978 Approval of projects by Youth Planning Council. 5. October 3, 1978 Approval by Public Services Committee 6. October 10, 1978 Approval by Oakland County Board of Commissioners. 7. Final approval by Youth Planning Council. 8. October 17, 1978 Projects start. PUBLIC NOTICE Oakland County anticipates receiving from the U.S. Department of Labor a funding allocation of $551 9 382 under the CETA Title III Youth Community Conservation and Improvement Projects Program (YCCIP). This program will enroll out-of-school unemployed Oakland County _ _ youth, ages 16 through 19 into community service projects where they will be trained in a marketable skill so that they may find. employment upon project completion. Oakland County intends to con-- tract with qualified agencies to operate the projects. Neighborhood and community based organizations of local demonstrated effective- .. hess in youth employment and training will receive primary consid- eration in the project solicitation and approval process. Other non-profit public service agencies may apply as well as local edu- cational agencies and governmental -agencies. Oakland County, as Prime Sponsor for CETA programs, will reim- burse project operators for participant wages and fringe benefits. Project operators may use up to 10 percent of their grant allocation for administrative costs, and a total of 25 percent of their funds for worksite supervisor wages and fringe benefits. Project shall mean a "Community Conservation and Improvement Project" which provides constructive work conducted by youths, Un - der the guidance of skilled supervisors, which (1) results in tan- __ gible outputs or a specific product; (2) benefits participants_ in _ terms of work habits, skills, and attainment of academic credit where applicable; and (3) will be completed within a definable_ pe- -- _ nod of time not to exceed twelve months. Potential project operators must be able to provide necessary management information and accounting systems required by the U.S. Department of Labor and the Prime Sponsor. This means that they must have the capabilities of operating- their program on a. reim- bursement basis and must be able to submit participant and financial .reports as often as required* Oakland County has contracted with 'Cii/e./4/cY to act as an intake agency to recieve YCCIP project applications trom eligible agencies. project may acquire an application by contacting; -ec K /14074 -- Applications will be judged against federally established cri- teria by the intake agency, Prime Sponsor; and the Youth and Plan- ning Councils of Oakland County. Approved projects will be ranked by Oakland County on a point system, 0-100 points possible. Points will be awarded based upon the projects' need, agency resources cost effectiveness, benefits to participant and community, and in- novativeness. Grants will be awarded in descending order of priority to those agencies receiving the highest scores. In order to be con- sidered, applications must be returned to the intake agency no later than September 22, 1978 at 5:00 P.M. OMR Approval Ho. 2Sk-f.:02; - -- • - -- --- --....,- 0 riAiTiER 3. STATE 11.. ?(InARER 'FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 2. .A.PPLl. ' cAurs AP FY-79 APPLICA- .. - --. ------ T{ON z• 1"'"Pz-r D PREVPIICATION APPL1• b. DATE 6OZNTi- . DATE rr-ar tnordl. eel, OF CATION ACTION El ANIMA-1103 r ch, tray 19 'I V CT'i "ER AssulTiEo 19 YA=7404t al›- 0 NOTiSCATMli OF ifiTENT (Ctt-q-} Leave grorpx;;r14'1° D PEFORT OF FEDERAL ACTION igura4 . 4. LEGAL APPLICANT/REC.IP 3ENT 5-. FEDER DENTFCM1O tIC- la. ApplIt-trat liorA : Oakland County 01386004876 t7, OrgillAr0;3,11 kian ,. Employment & Training Adrdn. ., & e. Strsql/P.O. E3•DA , 2370 Pontiac Lake Rd. PRO- a. VLIMIIM ......... ...j :Vie I '/13 1 91 . , Q. coonv : Oakland cRAm b. 7111E cl. CIty . Pontiac Mi. f rropa 4 8 0 54 CETA - YEDPA IL stzto : 8, zip coda: F.,e,... . Cantact rti501-4 eA.* Mr. H. McKay coseo,) . 4 & tel., phors1 No. , Title-Ill YCCIP a 7.„ TITLE AND DESCRIPT ON OF APPLICAtirs pRojEc-; 8. TYPE OFAPP !CAW/RECIPIENT A-Stals- 14---torrurmnitp Attic,/ Az“Ity /3-lptsmt.14. I--- Hightf Edu4alian•al th51.,Mim - CETA Title Ill YCCIP FY-79 C-Stistani .t•ItKliailrisiba• Disttic.4 ifp-Oth•V: t..9p a6717). ' 11.-Cc-nri,ty E-Citi Annual Plan F....sarA Dliirld •C,--Spazial Porro-m ' District Ado' tzpprop-rto to. IgItur risii __.,...,.... . , TYPE OF ASSISTANCE fr-fl”le Gs-Int ET--1r4i1rn-z4. - la.-Supplarrit-fttal Grant E--Othr Erder app7r, te----'1 C-LIArn • pl.-into le tie- r(e) LA i - ID REP. OF PROJECT IMPACT (2'.7smen of ciatt, cog74;..a.p., 11. ESTIMATED NUM. 12.. TIFF. OF APPLICATION Mateo...4:0.Y in:Ft OF. PEES-0Na ',New C..-ntehion E.--Auilrontp,TIon . VENEN.T1No. • .1T-Rtsynx-4 D-bantiquxtion. • Oakland County Michigan I- 100 ---. . -. ..:. .. ErA,-, app-r o pr 'ILO Z-1 re rtsrr Iii , 13. raoPosEo-FtNONqt; -4... CONGnzsztomAL ots.Trztc-T.5 OF: . 115, TYPE OF CHANGE (FLA^ .Y.to t,•,- ..r.e.a) ..%-/t:croll,, Dollirilt F-011-.o.- (.37p):- • rEDERA, - 3971,6i2 :op a- AMU:A.-NT b. PRO.P.:- . F-3-Dr,ra.-tv DMIkm ____„___ 9.__ 18,19 D-4-arrn.."14. Duratkno la. APP1.11L'ANT J1,3 1217 18 1 • - nuilAtkra • . co 3.. VPO_IHC-i. START 17. Vc0JEDT ez. STATE • LIATE: Y.--4'r ,-,4a.y, , DURK' ION Eia....-r. npprel- 6.. LOCAt 781 10/ 1 - I 12 .._ . . orf 1,1-.. ESTIMATFO DATE TO Year 5.monr.4.- evy ysi. 'EX:STING FEDERAL_ !DF,NTWtCATION tlt.P.,ttff:D. b. OTHER ° •• B=E: SLI.P.A.74T-TED TO - •11-0,1•1- $. .4- 612 • -t FEDERAL AGE...r.tCY 74- ----, - M. FEDERAL AGENc...T To- RECEWE REQUEST 1,1,..7rirrt, Ci:z Ste. toi ZIP co...o -"' 2t- REMARKS ADDED No- . U. S. D.O.L. ETA 230 S. Dearborn, Chicago III 60604 22_ D-.. .Y0 th3 b,nl of mY l li t . TS riwliaired iy P.E.3 Cirt,..qn, A-95 this at.,n1,-ws- was roJbmitt..-a, pursuln to in- .F.rc, re- E:ca;,,,rr_til- -i.,..„ v.:F._ prv,,tA,,,linnfj-7,tf. Ar.s. r,...,--adia,-1-s, thl-,t4-D,t:a- a^,r441i-43.... OWATia0::,17-... Pod DR 5itachZ-d: g.7,-7..of;ft uttk.e. Fi- TRE trtrY P.:it-I-Et, Os. dmo-P*,...t. t, A t b'e'll 1 .- " APPLICANT euTy tuthori:1Z by. no- ro,•.....rpin !.-a.ly 41j Michigan Dept. of Labor ET il- l: cuff-int-Ls thD apDlIt. rvoi 0:-. nE.vir-* ,,,,i!i o'er:D.1y' 0) . r's THAT ii, with 1.11 s.7.-:nn..td zn.9?Inc-Aei if thl roki.-Al t41 SETO G El b - Kim= i.. pp.p,rcy-4. 43) AFSCT a 0_ ,.. _ ...... TYPED U.P.US„ AND TITLE ., SIGNATURE . DATE Slal-IED g CERTI FYI NG Wallace Gabler Jr. 11.iti,„,17 )726,- 8,00- r,-, .. recir TramfT, ' 3..j, REPRE- 14 SENTATIVE. Chairman Oakland County ig I ,orrrinissioners 2. APPLICA- A'cr .o.wsSI-.,- eay 24. AGENCY p A •_ TION RECEIVEIY 19 26, ORCAnIZA,TtONAL UNIT :-Z7. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 2[1.„ FEDERAL APPLIC",..110i-, IDENTIFICATiON - 29. PDPRESS 30. FEDEfiht C1z.'NT WENTIFICAIIDNI ri tt E:a. ACTION TAKEN 32- FUNDINCA roar 1,-“...hiT). et,..1, 34.„. roar IA tr.skfls ctay STARTING a. AWARDED P_ l EOF.RAL %. __ _ AN') n. P C1101-4 DATE )-- 19 DATE 19 `.-. -- ___ .00 I :".. CONTACT roR fam,--rt:-.)-NAT_ ttaFor2MA- 36. D b. PEJECTr_ri b. APPLIci,Hr Yeor varma arr4p YlOt4 (NPiml cr,t-t 1,:trpht.,n4 1-,34/nbcr) ENCANC; El .c. PZYURNED FOR c. :STAT.': .00 tz PNErtro-5:,:r . 1.ce.A.. .ori 37. REMAR1'.!.3 ADDED fi D d. l'..I.1--A9F,D .t. 0T1-1'.,-.R .P0 -T .______ _in 0 YON. 0 Nu r, 0 ,.._ LvITHDT.C.Xli If. T.WAt. '''' _____ _____ -* 3CI... a. ia 0.'5407 r•No,", r=lloo• 1...--- .-o-0°"°11 P-"1 .--?: from f.-1 r;o?:,•ot,rrv -e-s, ft c--n- i b. F i7.1)f illo n£NCY A-95 OFFICIAL 51et;,13. II 1 :‘-'c4 rt'?",111'01"" P7-4^; prn-r+/-.,n3 c: P:rt ). cr-ta (-3 .0,,T P:-/;-5, (H,,,,,.-ai t,t,2h(NI-ta r.o.) • FEDERAL .AG=Ncy it L-.0 /VW! PI itt 1,..n. m,l'3. A--9.5 ADTION _I - • STANDARD FORM 4•4 PAGE 1 (10----if) - • f:3A- V.4.Fra #8665 October 10, 1978 Moved by Hoot supported by Simson the resolution be adopted. AYES: Kelly, Lanni, Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Pernick, Peterson, Price, Simson, Wilcox, Aaron, Daly, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Fortino, Gabler, Gorsline, Hoot, Kasper. (19) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of Miscellaneous Resolution #8665 adopted by the Oakland County Board of 0.09000 CO Owe ......... ..... •••••n •••mm•••••••••••••••••••••60O•00OOr Commissioners at their meeting held on October 10, 1978 ...................... ........ .414 n•n .......... oo e00•00.00.•• ...... • •••-•0 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office, and that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the whole thereof. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan ...... .day Lynn D. Allen.............. ...... ..Clerk By Deputy Clerk