Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1982.04.29 - 13772MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION # 82088 MARCH 18, 1982 BY; MR. PAUL KASPER IN RE: COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES TO SEMTA SERVICE TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS, Miscellaneous Resolution #8408 of April 20, 1978 established the Oakland County Board of Commissioners' concern about the lack of an equitable share of public transportation in Oakland County; and WHEREAS, the Southeastern Michigan Transportation Authority (SEMTA) was established to operate public transportation services in Oakland County and the region; and WHEREAS, SEMTA has not been providing an adequate level of service to meet the transportation needs of county residents; and WHEREAS, SEMTA implemented service reductions on March 8, 1982 which cut large linehaul bus service miles by 20%, reduced small bus service hours by 27% and commuter rail service by 25%, and further, even greater service cutbacks are being contemplated; and WHEREAS, the County of Oakland has a responsibility to provide for the transportation needs of its citizens in the most cost effective manner; and WHEREAS, with these transportation needs not being met by the services provided by SEMTA, the County has the responsibility to explore alternative options available to meet such needs, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners has determined that public transportation is a vital public service and there is a need to examine alternatives to the County's participation in SEMTA, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners select a consultant to explore and develop feasible alternative public transit service options for Oakland County, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution, #82088 April 29, 1982 Moved by Jackson supported by Cagney the report be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried. Moved by Jackson supported by Whitlock that Resolution #82088 be adopted. Discussion followed. Moved by Lanni supported by Aaron the resolution be referred to the Finance Committee. AYES: Perinoff, Pernick, Aaron, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Fortino, Geary, Moore. (8) NAYS: Patterson, Peterson, Whitlock, Caddell, Cagney, Calandro, Gabler, Gosling, Jackson, Kasper, Lanni, Moffitt, Montante, Olsen, Page. ("5) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion failed: Moved by Moore supported by Kasper the resolution be amended by adding a 2nd NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph to read: "NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the request for proposal be developed and reviewed by the Planning and Building Committee prior to the consultant be selected." A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Moved by Fortino supported by Kasper the rules be suspended to act on the resolution and that a cap of $10,000 be added to, the resolution. Discussion followed. Mrs. Fortino withdrew her motion. Moved by Fortino supported by Whitlock the resolution be amended to put a $10,000 cap on the resolution. AYES: Peterson, Whitlock, Aaron, Caddell, Cagney, Calandra Fortino, Gosling, Jackson, Kasper, Lanni, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Olsen. (15) NAYS: Perinoff, Pert-tick, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Gabler, Geary, Moore, Page, Patterson. (9) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Moved by Jackson supported by Whitlock the resolution be amended to add an additional BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph to read: "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the study be completed within ninety (90) days from the time of selection of a consultant." A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Moved by Fortino supported by Cagney the rules be suspended for immediate consideration of the resolution. AYES: Peterson, Whitlock, Caddell ; Cagney, Calandro, Doyon, Fortino, Gabler, Gosling, Jackson, Kasper', Lanni, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Olsen, Page, Patterson. (18) NAYS: Pernick, Aaron, DiGiovanni, Geary, Moore, Perinoff. (6) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the mOtton carried, Moved by Gabler supported by Lanni the resolution be amended to have the $10,000 come from the Contingency Fund of the County General Budget." A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the amendment failed. REPORT April 29, 1932 BY PLANNING & BUILDING COMMITTEE-Anne M Hobart, Chairperson RE: Miscellaneous Resolution ff82088, County Public Transportation Alternatives to SEMTA Service TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Planning and Building Committee by Anne M. Hobart, Chairperson, having reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution fl82088, reports with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted with the addition of a second BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED paragraph, that the study be completed within ninety (90) days from the date of selection of a consultant."' Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report, PLANNING & BUILDING COMMITTEE Anne M. Hobort;Cnairperson 29th day of 1982 ALLEN Clerk/Register of Deeds LY Cour Vote on resolution as amended: • AYES: Peterson, Whitlock, Caddell, Cagney, Calandro, Doyon, Fortino -, -Gabler, Gosling, Jackson, Kasper, Lanni, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Olsen, Page, Patterson. -(18) NAYS: Aaron, DiGiovanni, Geary, Perinoff, Pernick, (5) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, Resolution #82088 as amended, was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) •1, Lynn D, Allen:, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of MjIas,L1,aae.aus_Ees.cd.s.I.Lim113.2.S____Jadap_t_e_d_b_y_thz....Dzkland County BoRrd_of f:orsdonors qt their meeting beldD_AaLU2JB2 with the orginial record thereof now remaining in my office, and that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the whole thereof. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan this