Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1982.07.22 - 13880July 22, 1982 Miscellaneous Resolution # 82210 By: Public Services Committee - James E. Lanni, Chairperson In re: TARGET GROUPS FOR FISCAL YEAR '83 OAKLAND COUNTY CETA PRIME SPONSOR TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners by Miscellaneous Resolution Nos, 6546 and 8883 applied for and was granted the designation as Prime Sponsor by the Department of Labor to administer the provisions of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 and the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act Amendments of 1978; and WHEREAS the Department of Labor has conducted an E,E.0, assessment of the CETA Program after each business quarter. As a result of these assessments, questions con- cerning target groups and placement rates have been raised by the Department of Labor; and WHEREAS the last assessment indicated a tower placement among minorities; and WHEREAS the Prime Sponsor has established both an M. 1,5. system and a Corrective Action Plan for Fiscal Year '82. This Corrective Action Plan is in place and may be described as a self-monitoring system; and WHEREAS it now appears that stronger measures will be required to satisfy the Department of Labor. While more stringent measures cannot be instituted for this Fiscal Year it is recognized that the Fiscal Year '83 plan is presently being formulated. To comply with the Department of Labor's request, a revised method of established target group goals has been formulated for Fiscal Year '83; and WHEREAS this revised method of establishing target groups allows the Prime Sponsor to establish an overall goal based on the combined group goals of the proposed applicant services subcontractors for Fiscal Year '83, This method allows the transition from a monitoring" system system to the establishment of a centralized E.E.O. monitoring network; and WHEREAS the Fiscal Year '83 Significant Segment Plan was presented to an approved by the Oakland County Employment and Training Council, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves the proposed Fiscal Year '83 applicant service subcontractor target groups as attached as representing the most in need of CETA services in each community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the target group objective for each service area will be a predominate factor in awarding remedial and motivation classes to prepare most disadvantaged clients for unsubsidized employment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the approved target group goals be summarized and incorporated into the Master and Annual Plans for Fiscal Year '83 along with an explanation of variances from the base data of the area . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a written quarterly report on the achievement of the referenced goals be submitted to the Public Services Committee and the Oakland County Board of Commissioners. Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE 11-83 SIGNIFICANT SEGIENT PLIN * COUNTY EMPLOYMENT A-ND TRAINING ADMINUTRATION Ti t: • I 113 , c, VI I Titles IV A • 7/..?"82 16-7-1711 f 13 Cate- .!:.go.117 - 11 10 17 IPREJ . 0 Pontiac rkley Ferndal SaDJARY ENROLLMENT ::•.!A RAN per INTAKE AGENCIES 6 ; 7 • 8 Hazel Oak Park Park OAKLAND MINTY 3 4 CETA Eligible Clientsi in Oakland :aunty Ref: ME8C-ART FY--83 ro1.4 2 .27cographic , Total Male FeimIc 14-15 CIESA !--- 100% " :.1.00%1 . , South- _ ! !Lroy field ; -- .!„--- Walled I Water- Lake ! ford f 04 100% 1 100% 56% i 50% 34,387 1100%l1 100% !loop% Ix% ao% 100% IL; 100% i 100% ! 100% 50% I .- 43% • 59% - _ t 57% •45% I 46% 15,698 18,689 5 9% 48%1 46% 54`!//0 (2%)j 55% i 540/ 1 70% .44% /0 5 A 77: -72-17:0/1 • 2% 38% 14% 6% i 5% 16-19 20-91 22-44 45-54 55 & Over 1 s - 32%. 26,306 2,5›15 24% . . 5585 0% 6% 5% 76% 9% 4% 90% 2% ) e:r (2:.;) 38% -.4% 39% 10% .1(1/0. ROY 44 /0 00 R " !white 27,210 • P!. C 94% 1 96% 88% 41% 6,126 79%1 407, !, 789 1% 79% 13% 2% Hispanic . Indian/Al. Nat. Asian . ...... . . . . . . . 1.....PMi ay, ! 2%1 0% 1 _ 0%1 r/0 1W _547 50 0-A :! 0% A 212 I i 1% . t -'-'6,5 -----1--- . 3,439 - T'll- 10%! 12% 3,095 I 941 9% 1% 0% 10% a% 0% 1% 1% a% • T FP ndic-nned A 49% 1 Q07_ 5% lo% g% %Jr II 0 16% 8,253 1 24n 18% 7 9 I LE/ (5%) 22% 31$ ! Veteran Dronout ! Of fen der 15% T% 10% 1 3% 10% 28% 1 1 50% ! 29% 20% 23% 11% 11% 6% 15% ..LJ2EL-1,g2j. - - I 1 36% 5,502 Single Parent 8c/,! (3%) (r) 9,628 i 28-,..,f_..'; 28% ; 1,032 j 1% ----_-- - "4 1,719. i 554 4% Older Worker r 2,751 r ' 1 i 85! 7% ! , 5% i 5,502 16% 16%16% , ----..-. Nan-Enczlish 3% 1 1% 2% 5% 3% J 1% 1% 1 _oi (I'S) ,c1/9 2% 4%, I 5c,,.!.; 1 10 5 13.741. 1;''; SIGNATURE: percentage weighted upon actual allocation of monies upon the completion of the R.P.P. SIGNIFICANT. „ST,..G11NT PT_AN * 0.AKI„„L'\'‘D C(7._INTY LV Sa'RAT C.I\T SDEARY E1ROI,T21.[INT 1-71 Titles 1113, C, VII Titles IV A DATTE:70/82 17P n.y,-.T.:AND COUNTY UN REE 6 5 6 10 j U. ; 12 .1-13 1 14 1.1 1_5 I 1.6 Var, AnEA PLAN per IINTAX11, AGENCIES , 7 - 8 i 9 , , i Hazel Oak Ferndale Pontiac i Park Park , ' 70 =A Eligible Clients1 • of d33 i.,orkley r in Cals: and COUnt .!y,-s,3 - Q1: WWater- ford I CEHSA South- I Tro I Walled field Y Lake ::160%0 4, Cato- golT Grou,,..)s ! To t a 100% 1 100% 100% 100%100% 55% i zv') 52% hell 46% r-- 1 45% 1 -74e--; 48% 49% 54% ,11,.%__L100% _5_0% .1 • 40% 50% 4 10 5 X 1 e ; z1 7 "' ! 3,769 31)40%.11, 100% i 100% 100% 'i 100% ---- 1,734 467(4 49% 1 52% , i ' 46% 1 53% t , , 2,035 •.• 5470i 51% 48a; 54% , ,. ro 1 --, ,--- 52 1—rici, 374 1% 5%- (5%) 2% ( f,-2 Q01 2 `) -21.4 1% F20% 0% 90% 153% : 78% / 9% ; 27% 22% ( .6-19 . 0% 82% 1 8 % 26T4 44% [e1 ,77,-54 • „De ; ihite LElack LI - ndicae (77 : Offender Sgle Parent r, 0 , Cider 2,978 79%i' 78% ,•...-.,,,, , J_ 93% : 53% 1 35% 678 1,8,.$ 18% 42,,/.. 3% 47% t.. 159%-. i 75 :. 2%,1 • 2% 2% , 2% 0% - 1 3% 0 0 — ; , 5k 1% 0% , 2%L 1 0% 0% , 38 1% I% , : 5% i r% 0% i 3% 188 cre,,, . 5e 5% ; 6% : 20% : 20% ! il J,7-% i ; 0 0%, 9% ; 9% _ 942 , 25%' 25% 18% , 2% , t , • 5% 1---i-.7% i ,---------------,-----------1 188 ' 5%: 5% 5% 0% 3% 2% i . 1 0% 13% 1 30% 1 24% i 3570 40% , . ,.„. . . . .i. --'-'''' , . ! ii,„-20 1 1 I _ 0(;;:1•i, 0% , 2% , 0% 1% ; 0% ,I e--,u• r,-,-/ '/0 5 afc, i ,Jio '-,70 I • 71.1 79% 2r'r .3 1 0% c% , g (2%) I 10% 10% 20 30% (4%) iI SIGNATURE; percentage weighted pn actual allocation of -i!Dnies upon of the R,F.P. e completion 82210 July 22, 1982 this , 22nd day of 1 982 • -e,,,c--- AC-1. (,I,;( [N N J . ALLEN, County Clerk/Register of De.c ul Moved by Lanni supported by Jackson the resolution be adopted, AYES: Doyon, Fortino, Gabler, Geary, Gosling, Hobart, Jackson, Lanni, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Olsen, Patterson, Perinoff, Price, Whitlock, Wilcox, Calandro, DiGiovanni. (20) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted, STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of Miscellaneous Resolution #82210 adopted by thejIakland County Board of Commissioners at their meeting held ot with the original record thereof now remaining in my office, and that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the whole thereof. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan