HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1982.09.09 - 13950!
= "T
11
iscellaneous Resolution: 82276 September 9, 1982
BY: HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE - Marilynn E. Gosling, Chairperson
IN RE: OAKLAND COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND BUDGET FOR 1982-83
TO: THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS pursuant to provisions of Act 280 of the Public Acts of 1975,
Oakland County is required to develop and submit a plan and budget for the
funding of foster care services to the Office of Children and Youth Services,
Department of Social Services, annually; and
WHEREAS the Oakland Camnty Probate Court, Juvenile Division and the
Oakland County Department of Social Services have developed the attached foster
care services bu --,;et for the State's fiscal year, October 1, 1932 through
September 30, 1983; and
WHEREAS the Health and Human Resources Committee has reviewed this
budget and recommends its submission to the State office.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of
Cc71missioners authorize submission of the 1982-83 Oakland County Child Care
Fund Budget to the State Office of Children and Youth Services, Department of
ciai Services.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Health and Human Resources Committee,
move the adoption of the foregoing resolution.
Mat`-flynnai. Gosling, ChairpersoD,1
Health and Human Resources Comrattee
OAYLAND COUNTY
FISCAL YEAR 1982-83
PROGRAM PLAN AND BUDGET CONTACT PERSON
COURT: E. KOONCE
PHONE: 856-0256
Court, Division Juvenile Probate
COUNTY CHILD CARE BUDGE
DSS: J. wAurim
PHONE: 33-121:81
TYPE OF CARE
I. FAMILY POSTER CARE
II. INSTITUTIONAL CARE
III. IN-HOME CARE
IV. INDEPENDENT LIVING
V. ADOPTIVE SUBSIDY
VI. STATE WARD CHARGEBACK
VII. BASIC GRANT
A. County Program
B. County Share of Joint Program
SUBTOTAL
ANTICIPATE: CREDITS (Subtract from Subtotal)
ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURE/CREDIT
436,626.
7,400,769.
160,097.
13,665.
7,374.
811,025.
0.
a.
8,829,556.
1,194,307.
TOTAL COUYIY CHILD CARE $ 7,635,249.
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION
The er-signed have participated in developing the program budget presented
Presidinz Judg6 of
/
SignetC
Co6i7Ity Director l of S0CiEIIT Services
I certify that the budget submitted above represents an anticipated gross
expenditure for the fiscal year October 1, 19 thru September 30, 19 .
Signed
Chairperson, Board of Commissioners !
DSS-2091 (Rev. 5-79) Previous edition obsolete
Date
OAKLAND
8-18-82
347,986.
25,534.
45,524
15,512,
816.
1,300
19,898. 2,494
500.
/1.'16,626.
26,116.
247-
2,523
County Child Care: Budget Detail
Page 1
TYPE OF CARE
COUNTY CHILD CARE-DETAIL BUDGET
For Office of Children and Youth Services
F.Y. October 1, 1982 - September 30, 1983
County
Date Submitted
Annual (total antici- Anticipated
Gross Cost Rated exp.) . Days Care
L FAMILY FOSTER CARE
A. Directly Supervised
1. Court Supervised
-Foster Care Payments
-Non-Scheduled Payments
2. County DSS Supervised
-Foster Care Payments
-Non-Scheduled Payments
B. Private Agency Family
Foster Homes
1. Court Placed
-Foster Care and Administrative
Rate Payments
-Non-Scheduled Payments
2. County DSS Placed
-Foster Care and Administrative
Rate Payments
-Non-Scheduled Payments
FAMILY FOSTER CARE TOTAL
3,895 $ 224,805.
$ 219,954.
731.
3,770
0
4,120. 125
0 0.
County Child Care: Budget Detail
PaGe 2
Annual Gross Anticipated
Cost Days Care TYPE OF CARE
II. INSTITUTIONAL CARE
A. Private Institution
1. Court Placed in State
.-Foster Care Payments
-Non-Scheduled Payments
2. Court Placed Out-of-State
-Foster Care Payments
-Non-Scheduled Payments
3. County DSS Placed In-State
-Foster Care Payments
-Non-Scheduled Payments
4. County DSS Place Out-of-
State
-Foster Care Payments
-Non-Scheduled Payments
Subtotal Private Institution
4
:MS-2092 Rev. 5-79)
1. De Vyricy ciig. & "A" Bldg.)
2 ' Gr(WM!litYgd Other CV)
3, Shelter Care Facility
4. Other
Subtotal Court Operated
Institutions
1,715,650.
4,954,582,
505,732.
7,175,964.
28,835
67,270
14,564
312 110,669
73
1.95
44
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
(,)unty Child Care; Budget Detail
rage 3
YYPE OF CARE
Annual Cross (total antici , Number
Cost pated exp.) of Beds
Anticipated
Days Care
B. Court Operated Institutions
C. County D.S.S. Operated Facilities
1. Croup Care Facility
2. Shelter Care Facility
3. Other
Subtotal County D.S.S.
Operated Facilities
INSTITUTIONAL CARE TOTAL $7,175,964.
DSS-2092 (Rev. 5-70)
Annual Gross
Cost TYPE OF CARE
160,097.
1,095 13,665,
0
0
0
0
7,374 . 56 children: 1,260 days of care
7,374.
811,025.
o.
8,829,556.
toaransalaussameamitarse
941.
X. TOTAL COUNTY CHILD CARR
(subtract credits from Grand Total) ,2092 (Rev. 5 -79) 7,635,249.
AnLicip?:IL(A
(total antic!- Number of Children Anticipated
Dated exp.) in Care/Service Days Care
III. IN-HOME CARE SERVICE COMPONENTS
TOTAL $ 160,097.
TOTAL IN-HOME CARE
IV. INDEPENDENT LIVING (Court)
V. ADOPTION SUBSIDY (Pre-adoptive care)
A. Support
260
B. Medical
C. Foster Care/Appeal Period
TOTAL ADOPTION SUBSIDY
VI. STATE WARD CHARGEBACK
VII. COUNTY SHARE OF JOINT
COUNTY BASIC GRANT
SINGLE COUNTY BASIC GRANT
TOTAL BASIC GRANT
VIII. GRAND TOTAL I thru VII
IX. ANTICIPATED CREDITS
Telephone-Camp Oakland
Veterans Administration
Social Security
Per Diem Receipts
Governmental Grants
Parent Pay
State School Aide
TOTAL CREDITS 1,194,307.
160,097
160,097
I)
C)
D)
E)
F)
Subtotal IHC - Court
Subtotal IHC DSS
TOTALS INC
• K_701 C.wvieNsig inn nhsr.)9ete
County
IN-HOME CARE SUMMARY
OAKLAND
List all service components which make up the IHC program and specify the
requested informetion for each. , I
CCF Other Put- Gross
TOT CO
(Service Component) (adm. unit) ExpenditurE lic Funding Expenditure
A) AL ST Juvenile Court 160,097 l NOKE 160,097.
IL For service component listed above, complete a separate IN-HONE CARE
BUD7 DETAIL, (DSS 2094) filling in the appropriate budget items.
(function)
Supervisor
(hrs./wk.)
40
4-Child Welfare Worker 11 Casework 85,656. 160
41,857.
155,45.
:Ffice Srplies ?-. tir-
3. 7'her Cam=niee=ions
Men-be,--sht:, Dues &Publ.
(basis
(total cost)
1,000.
- 75.
2UT
1,323.
140.
110,
1,690.
114.
Total Program Support 4,652.
IN-HOME CARE BUDGET DETAIL
Service Component
A. PERSONNEL (Employeesof Court or DSS)
I. Salary and Wages
(name)
1-Child Welfare Worker/
Administrative Unit: DSS Tri Court ri
(total cost)
27,932.
9
2.: Fringe Benefits (specify) (36.857 of salary cost)
Total Personnel
B. PROAM SUPPORT (For Employees Identified lin
I. Travel (Transpertation)
. (purpose) (rate/mile),
See clients .25
Travel & conference
2. Supplies and Materials
Postage
"A" above)
(est. # miles)
4,000
& rate)
C. S7RVIC 7 S
Tndividual Consultants
name)
or Providers
(rate/unit) 1(total units/contract) (total cost)
0
2. Contracting Organization
a. Closed-end contracts
(name)
0
purchased units)
160,097
Mi2gMlifilWAWIEWAMVX
b. Per unit contracts
(name) krateiuniti (est,
D.
Total Contractual
rik.).., II LUUL L 4, 1 1-1 I i FL1 1 4 J anticipated avurciye LUST.
(type of service) # units tobe of each (total cost)
provided service unit
Total Non-Scheduled
Total Service
Component Cost E. Add Totals for A, B, C, & D above 160,097
F. If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public
revenue (including other Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies), specify
the following:
(source) I (purpose) (amount)
Total Public Revenue . 0
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost
NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE
DSS-2094 (Rey. 5-79) (Back)
32. n,*a Family Care:
00 - 05
07 - 12
13 lq
S5,95
$7.35
$110.00
•$170.00
$245.00
$45.00
$73.00
$91.00
OAKLAND COUNTY .DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
1982-83 Budget, Child Care Fund Q.S.S. Sub-Account
SECTION VI, General Narrative
27. N/A
28, N/A
29. N/A
30, N/A
31. Nf=1,
Schedule (State Rates) Foster
AGE rPr)UP PER DIEI1RATE
MAXIMUM INITIAL SEMI-ANNUAL CLOTHINC
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE WHERE APPLICABLE
Indeper:tent Living Rate (State Rate)
$9.70 Per Diem
33,
JW:ac
6-25-82
Oakland County Probate Court, Juvenile Division
Child Care Fund
Narrative 1982-83 Budget
VI. General Narrative
27. Given the current availability or lack of services and resources
that benefit children in your county (or multi-county area), what
are the most serious service needs of children within the county
area? To what extent does the Child Care Fund meet the needs of
children already within or in jeopardy of coming within the "juv-
enile justice system" in the county or multi-county area?
If In-Home Care and/or Basic Grant programs are budgeted in the
county's (les') annual Child Care Fund plan, how do these programs
dovetail into out-of-home Child Care Fund activities? To what
extent doe these programs fill "juvenile justice service" gaps
within the county (ies) or area?
In Oakland County local resources are provided for foster care of
children through both public and private auspices. Child Care
Fund expenditures in the County are controlled through the Juven-
ile Court. Detention, shelter care, treatment programs and foster
care homes for children are provided.
Under In-Home Care, the Juvenile Court provides programming for
Status Offenders. The purpose of the program is to reduce the
number of status offenders requiring detention pending hearing and
reduce the length of out-of-home placement.
28. If you are currently operating programs funded by Child Care Fund
monies and grants from other governmental or private sources,
state the percentage of funding from each source.
Not applicable.
If you are currently funding programs with other than Child Care
Fund monies, but are anticipating the use of the Child Care Fund
to continue funding such prograMs in the future; or, if a program
described under item 28 above is not included in your narrative
for In-Home Care or Basic Grant, provide a description of such
programs. Attach such descriptions to this document. Your
response to this request willi allow the office to determine
whether the future funding of such programs meets In-Home Care or
Basic Grant requirements.
Not applicable.
-2-
30. If your county operates any institutional facility (treatment,
secure detention, non-secure detention, group or attention homes,
multi-purpose facility, etc.) describe the services provided in
each. Please state the bed space capacity of each.
Presently, the court operates an active foster care and adoptions
unit, the Oakland County Children's Village with (1) a detention
facility (capacity 73 beds, 52 beds in Bldg. "J" and 21 beds in
Bldg. "A" South for girls' detention), (2) a Shelter Care facility
(capacity 44 beds) and (3) five other units which would be util-
ized for what more commonly would be called group care facilities,
and are referred to here as rehabilitation units. These rehabili-
tation units, combined with the programs at Camp Oakland of Boys'
Ranch, Girls' Ranch, Adams HOse and Work Education, provide an
additional bed capacity for 195: children. It is not uncommon for
youngsters to move from detention or shelter care into one of
these treatment or rehabilitation programs.
31. If your county operates a facility that is used for Child Care
Fund reimbursed and non-Child Care Fund reimbursed services (e.g.,
to house probation staff or courtrooms), describe the formula that
is used to prorate the costs of operating the facility (e.g.,
fuel, rent, electricity, maintenance).
The Adopt:cns and Foster Care unit is located in the Administra-
tive Win; of the Oakland County Children's Village. The county's
1982 assessment is $4.52 per square food for the office area of
4400 square feet, at a total amount update of $ 19,888.
This rente° rate incorporates costs for maintenance, fuel, elec-
tricity, sec. As was noted last year, there is a concern by the
court trse provisions should be made for the inclusion of these
and other administrative costs for operations of the Foster Home
unit in eee Child Care Fund budget. The primary goal of the unit
is to provide non-institutional care for children who are unable
to remeeir, in their own homes, consistent with present day de-
emphasis on institutional care.
Attach a schedule of regular rates paid for family foster care and
Hying. If State rates are used, please indicate.
State rates for foster care and independent living are used,
unless exeeptional rates are approved in those cases requiring
special care.
If a county wishes to establish a group or shelter home program in
a licensed family foster home, a program description, subsidy
amount, what costs the per diem pays, must be submitted with the
annual plan and budget. When the program is reviewed and
approved, individual case documentation for approval of special
rate foster care provided in these homes will not be needed. The
following program elements should be described:
I. How the family foster care licensed group-shelter home pro-
gram fits into the total foster care delivery system.
H. A Administrative B. -Staff C. Parent
Intake and Release Criteria.
IV, Program Description.
V. Financial.
A. Per Diem - Detailed
B. Subsidy - Detailed
C. Copy of Contract
Not applicable
111.
IN-HOME CARE AND BASIC GRANT NARRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS
VII. IN-HOME CARE AND BASIC GRANT NARRATIVE !INSTRUCTIONS
For each in-home care or basic grant service component described the
following:
34. The purpose of each service component includes:
a. What the problem is and how the court or DSS is measuring the
extent of the problem and the needs:
The court recognizes the national concern raised from the
placement of children who come to the attention of the court on
status .offenses (home and school truancy and home and school
incorrigibility). This national concern culminated in the 1974
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. As a result
of this act in 1978 through 1980 the Oakland County Juvenile
Court received federal funds to try to divert status offenders
from detention. Since August of 1980 the Oakland County
Juvenile Court has received matching funds throuh the Child
Care Fend In-Home Care component to continue some services in
this recard. This proposal requests continuation the efforts
to avoid detention as well as an effort to reduce a number of
states offenders placed on a full order out of their home.
The eceet views the detention and placement of status offenders
out of eome as a problem because it produces a burden on court
resoeeees. When families approach the court for status
offenses rhey're usually seeking an immediate solution for
these very stressful home situations.
The court feels that if we do not limit the detention of status
offenders we will increase request for court involvement. If
we increase the request for court involvement we increase the
possibility that the child will be removed from home. It
cc ears also that when this type of an offender is removed from
home the length of their out of home stay can be longer than
that of a youngster coming to the attention of the court on a
delinquent type offense, basically because the bond between the
parent and child has been broken or severly strained.
In the addendums to this report you will find a graph
demonstrating the number of status offenders detained from 1975
through the end of 1980. It is easily observed from the trends
illustrated in the graph that the number of status offenders
detained has fallen significantly since 1978, the inception of
our alternative programs for the detainable status offender.
they develop into major crisis. This approach therefore
allows more reality pragmatic issues to be used to
motivate change.
8. Will force the bond between the parent and child. it will
produce commitment and reduce abandonment. The ultimate
objective is to establish or re-establish a level of
mutual responsibility found in a relationship.
c. What the goals and objectives are for each service component:
The general goal of the Status Offender Alternative Program is
to avoid an out of home placement whether at the point of
detention or at the point of disposition. If the status
offender is detained, our objective is to reduce the length of
that detention. More specifically our objectives are:
1. To maintain the level of detention no greater than 79% of
the 1975 rate. That is 125 detentions annually.
2. To reduce the length of detention for cases detained.
3. To avoid out of home placements in at least half the
status offenders referred to this program as an
alternative for disposition.
35. The effect that the desired changes will have on the county's other
Juvenile Justice Services, (for example a measureable reduction in
foster care as a direct result of in-home care programming).
a. Oakland County will continue to contribute to the state's goal•
of reducing the detention of status offenders and therefore
assisting the state achieving compliance to the 1374 Juvenile
Justice Delinquency Prevention Act.
b. Program will reduce Children's Village placements.
c. By removing status offender cases when out of home placement
was considered as part of a dispositional order, current
probation staff will be able to concentrate on more serious
delinquent type offenders.
d. Since a high percentage of status offenders coming to the
steert:on of the court are females, the primary program effect
wMi be on Children's Village Programs for females.
e. An effective program component will allow further adjustments
in Children's Village pregramming and will reduce such
adjustment problems as Children's Village truancies and
intraprogram transfers.
f. An effective program component will reduce further legal
actions that would require more hearings, attorney fees, and
inconveniences to parents as well as to the legal system.
The second table was developed from the rates of detention in
1975. This table suggests how many days in detention would
have occurred based upon the 1375 rate if it was not for the
efforts made.
Although the previous effort has been on the detention of
status offenders the number of status offenders admitted from a
court hearing to Children's Village facilities has also seen a
substantial decline. As pointed out in a proceeding paragraph
the decline in placements from a court hearing are probably
related to the court's de-emphasizing itself as a source for
immediate relief from the problems created by status offenders.
Even with the noted decline the court feels that it needs to
increase services to the population being placed out of the
home so that an even further reduction will occur.
b. How needs of the target population will be effected by the
service component:
Based on our experience with status offenders, the underlying
probleMs bringing them to the attention of the Juvenile Court
rest within the family interactions. in some instances the
breakdowns can be seen in the initial socialization process.
In the majority of these cases the breakdown seems more related
to crisis situations brought on by family changes, that it is
death, divorce, separation or adoption or developmental issues.
Based pn our position in this we feel the service component
will have the following effects on the parent/child
relationship.
I. Will keep parent and child i n volved in the planning
-eceec=, and in control of their own destiny.
2. provide an opportunity to increase problem solving
aez-eaches. This means reduced controlling epproaches,
e-reeets or unhealthy emotional tactics.
3.Will work to keep the responsibility for the problem
resolution on the family.
4. Will provide a realistic view of what one can and cannot
control. It will remove the notion that problems can be
seived by magical solutions through the court, through a
therapist or through a boyfriend or peer group.
5. Will eliminate feeling S of helplessness for parents and
hopelessness for the child. The services will be aimed to
providing support for the child and parent.
6. Will assist families to get the most appropriate community
resources for their problems.
7. Will provide more access to third party involvement so
that there is some objectivity to sort out problems before
36. The specific services that will be delivered which will remedy or
reduce the problem:
a. Crisis intervention will be the primary intervention technique
used to provide services at all case levels. To avoid the
detention of the detainable status offender, it will be in most
instances the primary source of service. When cases are
referred to the in-home care component as a dispositional
alternative, it will be an available approach to both child and
family to reduce stress, to provide support, to demonstrate to
families and children that we can grow from problems. There is
a commitment to work problems out.
b. intensive casework support.
This service will be available at a pre-adjudicative level if
the complaint on the child is authorized for official court
action. The program continues to maintain a high priority in
avoiding the authorization of complaints. It is felt that the
intensive casework support be more readily used in the group of
children served as a dispositionai alternative to out of home
care. By intensive casework support we mean no less than two
face-to-face meetings with family on a weekly basis. Where
possible we would also like to include student interns to
provide more direct service to a child and the regular program
staff concentrate on the family interactions.
c. Famil eounseling.
For those children served as a dispositional alternative to out
of home care, staff will establish a minimal bi-weekly meetings
where the child and parents will meet to discuss issues and
improved aommunications. Emphasis on the family meetings is to
improve problem solving skills.
e. Group counseling.
A grouD approach with parents and children will be considered
when the population of both is sufficient to implement this
maahod. The group will serve as a support system for the
parent and the child, an opportunity to educate families and an
opportunity to practice what has been learned.
a Use cf community services.
The program will strive to better utilize all existing
community services. For the pre-adjudicated population served,
the objective is that the, community services will meet the
needs of the family and child and therefore avoid official
court involvement. For the child served as a dispositional
alternative to out of home placement, anticipated community
services will provide folloW-up services after cases have been
terminated from the in-home are component.
In general the services listed above will be available to all
cases served by this component. The length and the intensity
of the services will be determined by the legal status of the
case.
The staff assigned to this unit will be available to provide
services beyond the Monday through Friday schedule and beyond
the 8:30 to 5:00 time frame. All staff will have a minimum of
a Bachelor's Degree and have already have had several years
experience in serving youth.
37. The operating procedures for each service component include:
a. Client selection process and client eligibility criteria.
Children served by the Status Offender Alternatives are
children in risk of being Irernoved from home because of the
intensity of the family conflicts as apposed to the seriousnes
of the offense. This criteria would include children involved
in court strictly for status offenses as well as some children
involved in court on a non-status charge but where the home
condition is a primary factor determining the need for an out
of home placement.
Children served by this unit can be at a different level of
legal involvement in the court process. Services will be
provi d ed as long as a childi comes under a court order. Cases
acceotee - in the in-home component will have had as a minimum a
preliminary hearing verifying that if it were not for this
component said child would have been placed outside of the
home.
b. Recoee eeeping requirements.
Proceam component staff will keep records of all children
scree -eo for the service. Children accepted into the program
will eequire initial contact forms, copies of complaints, and
copies of legal reports. The program will use state quaterly
reports to document specific objectives and progress towards
these ocectives. The various forms for use in this component
are ava:;able at request for review.
EesiCes documenting cases Served, the program staff maintain
daily records describing a variety of community contacts
requesting services.
Provide a contract and monitoring mechanisms.
Not applicable at this time.
,-L Case review. procedure. Including frequency, progress
indicaters, client termination criteria and follow-up
procedure.
C ,
Cases will be reviewed by program supervisor at opening and
monthly after the opening. A case staffing approach will be
utilized by staff on a monthly basis for cases presenting
particular problems. Supervisor will also work with staff on a
more immediate basis when need requires this.
At closure all cases will be carefully reviewed by supervisor.
The review includes a reading of all reports and follow-up
summaries. Supervisor also keeps track of cases in regard to
detention, court involvement, and where the child resides at
closure.
Progress in achieving objectives will be indicated by the
following behaviors in the report:
1. The amount of interaction between parent and child.
2. The amount of open communication between parent and child
end the worker.
3. The reduction in avoidance behavior such as running away
from home.
4. The commitment between parent and child to continue
working on the problems.1
5. The identification by parent and child of their role in
t'a conflicts within their home.
6. The voluntary participation of the family in community
agencies.
7. The development by the family of specific steps to achieve
their objectives.
A child will be terminated from the in-home care project when:
Parents and children have developed a plan that can be
implemented without the need for court intervention.
2. Child is returned to court and is placed out of home.
Child and parent, after having been served by the
i-,:ensive services, have demonstrated improvement and
ability to relate, communicate and solve problems. The
child at this time will be placed on a regular probation
order or dismissed from court.
/sb
7/22/32
38. The criteria that will be used to evaluate the program's ability to
address the problems and purpose stated in 34 above. The criteria
should be measureable examples for criteria is x number of clients
served, the measure would be how many clients are actually served.
a. The program will assist the court in maintaining the detention
rate at 75% of the 1975 figures.
b. Based on 1981 referrals, the program will provide services to
200 children eligible for detention or pre-adjudicative.
1. At this detention level our objective is to avoid
detention, throughout our contact with the cases for 140
of the 200 cases proposed to be served.
2. At this detention level our objective is to reduce the
length of detention to no longer than the second
preliminary hearing in 40 of the 60 cases detained or
about 2/3 of the cases.
c. The program will provide services to 60 cases as an alternative
to out of home disposition.
1. Our objective for cases served as a dispositional
alternative to out of home placement is to ultimately
avoid the placement in at least 30 or 1/2 of the cases
served.
The service delivers (agency or individual who could best provide
the services to meet the program and clinic goals and objectives)
Not applicable.
40. Submit copes of all contracts that are private or public providers
once they ere assigned.
Not applicable.
If a contract calls for the purchase of services on a unit basis
explain the method used to determine the unit cost.
Not applicable.
If this is an ongoing program, indicate the previous source and the
amount of public funding and the Use, if any are private funds.
Status Offender Program was previously funded by Child Care Fund,
In-home Care Program. Prior to the inception of Child Care Funds
similar services were provided through a grant under the 1574
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act.
1st 1st 1st
ADDENDUM I
PREADJUD1CATED ADMISSIONS TO CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
OF STATUS OFFENDERS BY QUARTER
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1st
1975
Alternative to Secure
Detention is implemented
1st 1st 1st
1976 1971 1978 1979 1'111(1 HI11 , 1982
1st
ADDENDUM il
Expected vs Actual Days of Detention for 1981
The expected days in detention was established from the actual pre-adjudicated
detention of status offenders in 1975. The days in detention were categorized
by the length of the detention from one, to thirty days. Any detention beyond
30 days was placed in the "30 Day" category because lengthier detentions
usually included children waiting placement after adjudication.
To establish the expected number of children for each category, the number of
children in each category was divided by the total number of pre-adjudicated
detentions (418) in 1975. Therefore, 48 children were detained for one day,
divided by 418 equals the rate of detention for this category at 11.5%. For
1981 program year, the 11.5% was multiplied by the total number of children
served, 219. The expected number of children for one day would be 25.
The following table describes the expected days in detention compared to the
actual days. The actual days was accumulated at the closure of our cases.
Length of Percentage No. of Children Expected Actual No. Actual
Days in of Population Expected Based on Days in of Children Days in
Detent:on 2E_LLIatiy Pop. of 219* Served Detention in Detention Detention
1 11.4 25 25 12 12
2 15.0 33 66 20 40
3 8.1 18 54 13 39
4 8.5 19 76 5 20
5 c .- .)R
21 105 13 65
6 8.6 19 114 5 30
7 8.8 19 133 1 7
8 2.1 5 40 3 24
9 2.4 5 45 0 0
10 .., 1 10 0 0
11 .7 1 11 0 0
12 1.2 3 36 0 0
13 .5 1 13 1 13
14 1.2 3 42 0 0
15 1.7 4 60 0 0
16
1.9 4 64 2 32
17 2.4 5 85 1 17
18 2.1 4 72 1 18
19 1.2 3 57 1 19
20 .' 1 20 0 0
21 2.1 4 84 0 0
22 a
...., 2 44 2 44
23 1.2 3 69 1 23
24 .7 1 24 0 0
25 .2 1 25 0 0
26 .5 1 26 0 0
27 - .7 1 27 1 27
28 .2 1 28 1 28
29 .5 1 29 0 0
30 + 4.5 10 300 25 750
106% 219 1,784 108* 1,208
*From the 219 children served, 111 children were not detained and are not excluded in
the coluTn, "Actual Number of Children in Detention."
ALLEN -
T County Clerk/Register of Deeds
#82276 September 9, 1982
Moved by Gosling supported by Fortino the resolution be adopted.
AYES: Calandra, Doyon, Fortino, Gabler, Geary, Gosling, Hobart, Jackson,
Lanni, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Moore, Olsen, Page, Perinoff, Pernick, Price,
Whitlock, Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell, Cagney. (23)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
i, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal,
do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of
Miscellaneous Resolution ft 82276 adopted by the !Oakland County Board of Commissioners
at their meeting held on September 9, 1982
with the orginial record thereof now remaining in my office, and
that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the
whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan
this 9th day of Sept2=m1Der /—) 19 82