HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1982.09.21 - 13971MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 82293 September 21, 1982
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, G. WILLIAM CADDELL, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: COMPUTER SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEW AND 1983-1985 MASTER PLAN
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Finance Committee has reviewed the proposed 1983-1985
Computer Services Department Master Plan as prepared by the Department
of Computer Services; and
WHEREAS the Computer Users' Advisory Committee (CUAC), after extensive
examination, has recommended Option I Master Plan for application develop-
ment for 1983-1985; and
WHEREAS the Master Plan details the services provided by the Computer
Services Department for the period 1983-1985; and
WHEREAS the Master Plan details the establishment of the Office Systems
Methods and Procedures unit to obtain further savings through work simplifica-
tion and a comprehensive and coordinated use of office automation technology;
and
WHEREAS the Master Plan outlines the combined Oakland County and SCT
staffing levels, and reallocation of staff; and
WHEREAS CUAC has recommended Option II merged staff; and
WHEREAS the Master Plan includes limitations on budgetary growth for the
Compute,: Services Department for 1983-1985 period.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the Finance Committee approves the attached
1983-1985 Master Plan for the Department of Computer Services
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that CUAC shal.1 be responsible for further de-
tailing of the Master Plan and establishing project priorities within given
resource and cost-benefit analysis procedures adopted by CUAC and the Finance
Committee.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fina
of the Office Systems Methods and Procedu
nee Committee approves the creation
res unit in the Computer Services
Department as outlined in the Master Plan; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Committee recommends Option II
Merged Staff for Professional Services, and reallocation of staff as outlined in the Master
Plan,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Oakland County intends to gradually replace the
outside vendors staff with Oakland County recruited personnel.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the specific level of resources for the Department
of Computer Services be reviewed and approved during the appropriate annual budgeting
process.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move the adoption of the
foregoing resolution.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
J nn
BACKGROUND
• STABILIZATION
Go REDUCED USER SERVICE REQUEST BACKLC
• APPLICATION-CAUSED NETWORK FAILURES
REDUCED
Go MANAGEMENT CONTROLS
1981 DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT
Go COST/BENEFIT
cie SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METH
1982 IMPLEMENTATIC
o* PRODUCTIVITY GAINS
se 3 MAJOR DATA BASE SYSTEi
Gol RESOURCE SHARING
O Erj7ZP:Ci.:;' to the 7: of the Court Systerin resulting t
1 rtty rrw
wide mcnznition.
O The
to be In late 1982.
• f4urneieus I
• The devel
Syst7m.
• O4 c,ces5
greatly
t-d d!w!.'21(.•prr,Ny: of Probate Court and District Court S
,ent in th-z., Ch.-cult Court and-Electhp7 Systems.
„TA Mtn ta t 011 of a Court A d At-orney
into Law Eriforcz,Tmnt files for the Prosecutors office has
e the to track cri,minals.
• The
CLEtvi77
o The
an4 of a cornprehensIve new
IT:npiem.7t.tio3. of the Sheriff's Booking Systern.
stabilization e 17,IN
• The Implfslmi,k --;:j7,,ain of the Or;Jury System.
6 of a Federal 3ury se lection system which is mow
o, em
o
Prop.arty
ted a system for on-line Personal
611 and icnci,l,..!rn ,erkti.::ti6n of the Land Records System,
o Raj, to the Equalization Reporting System were made to
keep p:-ze 'with Lezislation.
• Completely revised all Property Systems to handle Equalization by use
end replace 1 u.aiization by zone.
Roadway Geometric System and modified the County's
Lir*
o Numinous ch;
with Statt I.
Delinquent Tax System were made to keep pace
o Census zeo7rz:..c.,l-,y was added to the Lend File t :7:1 .ist the Planning
Der :n7:7"
V4,
e The implementation of CP
Coiripreh -,77. th ;71,nd Via:-1ern,2nt system, a Database system.
• The ceavcr.:;:ton of various computer applications from the Systems 32 to
the main 'computer.
o Th2 design, deveirTm.5:.nt and implementation of a Health and Food
ten System. Insfec
V. -
• The on-line Treasurers Fund Mana.gernent Syst em (TFMS) was installed
resulting, in substantially more income for Oakland County.
• Personal Prty was added to the Delinquent Tax System thus
simplifying the reparation of tax hills.
VL
O implemented on-lint functions for all financial transactions in the
Accounting office.
o Irnp4::Tnnt..?.d a position control system tO provide budgetary control over
the of
• Irrp.•rivinted an automated Accounts Pa.y.ble System.
•Dcs.tr.-z-1, .17)pit.td and began installation of Employee History and
Trarzaction P.,porting System.
• De$ign,e,d,Jeped and t.,.:zza implementation of a Reimbursement
System for the Courts.
• Reviewed the current Payroll System and made numerous changes and
enh.u.icernents to reflect the current heeds of Collective Bargaining
• Agrenments and Administrative Po!ides.
• EntA c:;pahility to forecast the long range . cost of various
adralnistrative changes in the pay pier).
rd developed and implemented an internal, Job Accounting System
r.proved the User Invoicing System.
comprehensive curriculum for in-houso staff training.
Produced various reports from the Census file for distribution throughout
the County
• LIstailation of 2 J1T7i 4343.5 associated upgrades to software and
peripheral hardware.
• The implementation of a source program management system
PAN VALET.
• The implemz,ntation of a tape library management system.
• The imp!ornotatation of a remote link to Washte_naw County using state of
the art techoiegy for data communications.
O The upgrade of disk capacity by 115% over three year period and the
as.sociated implementation of that capacity.
• The implementation of a Database Management System (iDms) to
nrvice tht requirements of various applications such as CLE,M, Land
Records, e.:nd CHAMPS.
O TN!: irnp!-7mentat Ian of new data entry equipment to improve
productivity and expand the functions which can be performed by data
entry.
O The expansion of the on-line computer network activity by 400% over
three years.
LONG RANGE PLA
MAJOR EMPHASIS
: o SERVICE TO OAKLAND'S CUSTOMERS
• DATABASE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT
o COMPUTER INFORMATION CENTER
RESOURCE SHARING
e COST BENEFICIAL SYSTEMS
o STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
0 TECHNOLOGY EXPLOITATION
PUBLIC SAFETY
FD. INFO SYST
EMS INFO SYST
111 1 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111 1111
OPTION I
QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR I QTR2QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
LAW ENFORCEMENT
CLEMIS PHASE II
PROPERTY REGIST 2222 2222 2227
M -OSEARCH - WI 1W I 2222 7222
ARSON 1111 1111 1111 1111
LEIN REWRITE 2222
COMPUTER-AIDED DISPATCH
POLICE. 1111 1111 1111 1111
FIRE 1111 1111 1111 1111 .
EMS 1111 1111 1111,
JAIL MANAGEMENT 2222 2222 2222
CRIME ANALYSIS
GRAPHICS
MANPOWER UTIL.
SYSTEM SUPPORT
TECHNICAL
LIAISON
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 2222 2222 2222 2222
3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333
TOTAL 10 9 9 9 10 8 9 10 9 7 7 6
2222 2222
1111
1111 2222 3333 3333 4444 4444
nn
ein'ION1
7W-Mile.....11.11191,11,... 9,2 . amosea....evecern....1
QTR.! QTR 2 Q1R3 Q1R4 QTR1 Qt1 QT13 QTR 4 QTRI QTR2 QTR 3 QTR4
COURTS
DISTRICT COURTS 1111 n
rizonATE SYSTEM flU
PROM1S ENHAINSE. 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
BIND OVER SYSTEM 1111
CIRCUIT COURT CALENDARING 2222 2222 .
BOND CONTROL 1111 1111 1111
VOTER REG. UPG'RD. 1 -11"1
PROBATION SYSTEM !Ili 2222 . .
JUVENILE COURTS 1111 1111 1111 1111
INTERPOL INTE.RF.
COURTS INTEGRATION
SYSTEM SUPPORT
TECHNICAL 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222
LIAISON 111/ 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
TOTAL 7 6 Z 9. 8 7 7 1 6 6 7 7
1111
OPYZON I
:1 1TR3
1 1 11 ,
1333 3333 7:171
ACCTG
E.* :1';;,1 471 S Tit A TION
67.7....ONTIROL
2222
aut i1ii 2222 2222
2223 1111 1111
3333 3333
1111 /111 2222 2222 2222 2222
111 1 1111 1111
1DSTRIB FIN FUNC.
Ws-ram :--„uPPORT
UNISON
TOTAL
1111 111/ 1111 1111 1111 1111
3333 2222 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 2222 2222 2222 2222
1111 nu nu nu tin nu tut w 1111 1111 1111 1111
7 g 9 g 9 10 g 10 9 9 g g
a.
1111 1111 1111
2222 2222 2222 2222 2222
OPTION 1
TREASURER QTRI QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR 1 QTR2* QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
ROAD COMM. SPEC. ASSESSMENT 1111 1111
ANIMAL LICENSES 1111 2222 2222
ACCOUNTS REC
TF MS/DATABASE ENHANSE..
SYSTEM SUPPORT 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 WI
TOTAL 2 3 3 3 2 2 • 3 3 3 3•
OPTION I
QT111 Q114.2 OWQTW QTR1 QT QT1U, QTR 4 QTR1 QT22 QTR4
LAND laCORDS ,.;YSTEM ENHANS. 1111 11H
MAS:aR APPRAISAL UPGRADE
EQUALIZATION DISTRIB. FUNCT.
TAX BILLING REWRITE
DELINQUENT TAX REVAMP
SYSTIZM SUPPORT
TECHNICAL
LIAISON •
1111 1111 2222 2222 2222 2222
1111 1111 2222 2222 2222 2222
1111 1111 1111 2222
1111 1.11/ 1111 2222
2222 222Z 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 -22n 2222 2222
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
TOTAL 6 6 6 7 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 3
een ...... aman.0.1..waellmslas...x 9 8
HUMAN SERVICES
CHAMPS
COMMON INTAKE
PROGRAM UNIQUE
ACTIVITY REPTG
ASSESSMENT
EVALUATION
MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
OPTION 1
SYSTEM SUPPORT
TECHNICAL
LIAISON
QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 /WV OTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
1111 1111 1111
1H1 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111 1111 1111
111 1
1111 1 111 1111 111 1 11 11 1111 1 111 1111 11 11 111 1 1111 1 111
1111 1111 111 1 1111
1111
TOTAL •4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4
OPTION 1
1[1,17
()TM QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
SPECIAL PROJECTS
DOCUMENT CONTROL AND RETRIEVAL 1111 1111 2222 2222 2222 2222
RESEARCH AND STATISTICS 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 H11 2222 2222 222? 2222 1111 1111
BILLING EN1-1ANS. 1111 1111
INTEGRATED GBF
COMPUTER GRAPHICS
TRAINING
1111 •111 1 1111 1111
I II 1 1 111
HH HH HH 1111 HH HH HH HU MI 1111 HH H11'
TOTAL
OPT ION 1
1903 1984 1985
1 Q2 Q3 0% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 0I 02 03 04 TOT
LE 10 9 9 9 10 8 9 10 9 7 7 6
CIS 7 6 8 9 8 7 7 7 6 6 7 7
7 8 9 8 9 10 8 10 9 9 8 8
Ut 2 3 3 3 2 2 .2 3 3 3 3 3
PD 6 6 6 7 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4:4 4 4 4 4 4
SP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3
TOTAL 40 40 43 44 43 41 39 44 40 38 37 36 40 AVE
str.,u:tT
TECHNI CAL 10 10 11 11 11 10 10 134 11 11 11 11
LIA I SON 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
OPT ION 2
QUARTERLY m.r-LPoER EsT:rmATE
• 1933 1964 1985
01 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 TOT
LE 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
CTS 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
FIN 7 7 8 8 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 3 ,
TR 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
PD 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
HS . 4 4 4 4 4•4144 4 4 4 4
SP 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
TOTAL 35 36 37 37 34 35 35 36 37 37 37 31 36 AVU
SUPPORT
TECHNICAL IC) 10 0 10 10 10 10 11 10 10 11 11
LIAISON 7 7_ 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
1 3 OUnTERLY i. EST/H•.
1c2; '1985
01 02 03 04 01 02 03 04 01 02 03 04
LE . 10 9 9 9 10 8 9 10 9 7 7 6
CTS . 7 6 7 8 7 7 7 8 7 7 7 7
FIN 7 8 9 8 10 9 10 10 10 10 8 8
TR 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
PD 6 6 6 ' 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5
HS 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 . 4 4 4
SP 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 . 4 4 3 3
*RIOS 4 4 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 4
TOTAL 44 44 47 49 49.46 47 50 48 46 45 40-
SUPPORT
TECHNICAL 10 10 10 10 1010 10 10 11 11 11 11
LIAISON 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6
*MANYAGEMENT 1NFff 1sATIO4 AND RESOURCE SHARING
1983, 1984 1935
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q/1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
OPT 1 40 40 42 43 43 40 42 45 43 41 38 36
'OPT 2 35 36 37 38 37 37 36 37 37 36 36 36
OPT 3 44 44 47 49 49 46 47 50 48 46 43 40
RESOURCE SHARING
Q BACKGROUND
o SERVICE OFFERINGS
o BENEFITS
o ISSUES
VISION OF OUTSIDE SERVICES HAS EVOLVED OVER Pa OCCS
TIME
PR
BACKGROUND - RESOURCE SHARING
• •EXAMPLES OF SERVICES - !
CLEMIS - POLICE DPARTMENTS
_cm TAX ACCOUNTING - CVT'S
ee JURY SELECTION - FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS
so TRAFFIC STATISTICS - TIA
ea COURT MANAGENENT DISTRICT COURTS
o RATI O
0 DEVELOP COUNTY WIDE DATA BASES TO SUPPORT
LAV ENFORCEMENTJ TRAFFIC IMPROVEMETT J ETC
co .OUTSIDE USERS NOT ONLY RECEIVING SERVICES BUT
- MAINTAINING DATA NEEDED BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS
Go GENERATION OF REVENUE TO PAY FOR CUNTY CONPUTING
RESOURCE
SERVICE OFFERINGS - POTENTIAL
o BROAD RANGE OF SERVICES TO 4RISDICTI0N
to WASHTENAW
es OTHER NEARBY COUNTIES AND CVT'S
o SPECIFIC APPLICATION UTILIZATION
oo FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT - ADDITIONAL FUNCTIONS
oo CLEMIS - EXPANSION TO OTHER POLICE DEPARMENTS
oo CHAMPS - OTHER HEALTH DEPARTMENTS
o ADDITIONAL UT SERVICES (EX: MITINGTON WOODS, BEVERLY, ETC.)
ee ACCOUNTING, FINANCIAL MANA=NT
ee PAYROLL, PERSONNEL
09 TAX RECEIVABLES
es CODE ENFORCMENT
o OTHER AGENCIES
OLSHA
es CONSULTING, TRANSFER ASSISTANCE
BENEFITS
e INCREASE IN REVENUE FOR USE OF EXISITNG RESOURCES
(SPARE CPU, OPERATIONS)
0 COMMON APPLICATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND PAID
FOR BY OUTSIDE AGENCIES ARE USEFUL FOR COUNTY
CUSTOMERS
o COST CONTAINMENT - REDUCTION IN COST TO CURRENT
CUSTOMERS BY HAVING GREATER CUSTOMER BASF
o EXPERIENCED STAFF CAN BE HIRED BY OCCS FROM OUT-
SIDE REVENUE
• STAFF EXPERIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BASE KEPT CURRENT
o OAKLAND COUNTY IN LEADERSHIP ROLE IN MICHIGAN DEVELOP-
MENTS CLEMIS, CHAMPS)
o MAXIMIZES AND AMORTIZES COUNTY INVESTMENT OVER
ADDITIONAL CUSTOMERS
ISSUES
• INCRE17:TAL PLAN TO DELIVER SERVICES TO OUTSIDE
.CUSTOMRS NEEDED TO PHASE IN CUSTOMERS WITHOUT
IMPACTING CURRENT USERS
0 MODEL CONTRACT VEHICLE NEEDED TO LIMIT AND PROTECT
COUNTY
9 COST ACCOUNTING/BILLING FOR SERVICES IN PLACE TO
CAPTURE mivIrum REVENUE FROM OUTSIDE CUSTOMERS
O CUSTOMER LIAISON STAFF AND PROCEDURES MUST BE
DEVELOPED TO ENHANCE OUTSIDE SERVICE DELIVERY
e STRATEGY DEVELOPED TO BRING ON OUTSIDE USERS
WHICH HAVE GREATEST R.0.1, FOR COUNTY, (NEW
SYSTEMS, SERVICE WITH NO NEW STAFF, USE OF
EXISTING CAPABILITIES)
CO
Se
17r:;CFnURFS
PE7IEVAL
ON COUNiY-WIDE STAIIS1ICS-
UC STUDIES
F STATISTICA!_ TOOLS (LIKE SPSS)
C INFORMATION CENTER
oe USER TRAINING IN COMPUTER LITERACY
CLASSROOM TRAINING
COLTER LAB
, HIGH LEVEL LANGUAGES
se DIRECT USER QUERIES TO THE SYSTEM
Go HMS ON STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE USERS
oct HEURISTIC SYSTEMS DESIGN - PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT,
MODELING
az
EVALUATION OF SMALL COMPUTERS AS AN ALTERNATIVE
TO LARGE SCALE INTEGRATED SYSTEYS
eo TRAINIA OF IN-HOUSE STAFF
7/79 - 12/79
1S81
1U2
583,000
1,095,000
793,000
775,000
SCT
JULY 1979 -TTEER 1982
TOTAL 3,251,000
o HIGHLY PRODUCTIVE STAFF
oo EXPERIENCED
oo MOTIVATED
oo WILLING TO 1:ORK
00 'PROFESSIO,AL'
oo DEDICATED
oo APPLICATION EXPERTISE
oo CREATIVE
o INVESTMENT IN STAFF KNOWLEDGE
oo APPLICA -ION KNOWLEDGE
oo USER SENSITIVITY
oo DATA BASE
o MORE ADMINISTRATIVE FLEXIBILITY
o MArCE• EXPERTISE
oo fl ff..OVED PLATN73 AND CONTROL
oo DEVELOPMENT OF 0,C, STAFF
o ACCESS TO CORPORATE-WIDE SUPPORT
oo APPLICATION SOFTWARE
• oo RESOURCE EXPERTISE AS NEEDED
o IT'S WORKING -- KEEP A GOOD THING GOING --
WHY THROW AWAY SOMETHING THAT WORKS
o ACCOUNTABILITY
o CORE CATALYST STAFF - IS SETTING A GOOD EYLTLE --
RAISING PRODUCTIVITY
- A .CM:71 AT THIS TIME WO
CURRENT PRODUCTIVITY
MADTTMG CAPABILITY F
oo WASHTENAW
• oo OTHERS.
LD BE DISRUPTIVE TO THE
ZATION
INFLATION 6% - .8%
WORK LOAD INCREASE 15% - 20%
TOTAL COST INCREASE 21% - 23%
PRODUCTIVITY GAINS 8%
NON-GENERAL FUND REVENUE 6%
POTENTIAL COST REDUCTION lq%
TOTAL COST P:7,EASE 21% - 28%
TOTAL COST 7.717,1 ,TT I ON iIt\'%
ene*LepElouter...n
NET COST .1 7 •,7EXI 7% - 14%
2,395,977
2/233,799
162,178
TOTAL 3 YEARS OPTION II
TOTAL 3 YEARS C:PTION I
1983 198[1 171::
5,951,902 1 6,309,06
COUNTY GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES FOR
CEPUTER SERVICES DFPARTMENT SHALL NOT
EXCEED E. A YEAR FOR 1985J 1934 AND
1985 FASTY: PLAN PERia 1.922 BUDGET
FOR COFPUTE SERVICES DEPARIMIT SHA L L
BE THE BASIS FOR CALCULATICN OF 6%
INSPEr A YEAR FOR THE COUNTY GENE'.
FUND UPENTATnES
ON TINE
C1CS TRANSACTIONS
EXPRESSED IN MILLIONS OF TRANSACTIONS
1V1 1981 _ 1 22
L 21 1980 XXXX _____ L 20 XXXX
1 9 XXXX XXXX
O 8 XXXX XXXX
N 7 XXXX XXXX
$ 6 XXXX XXXX
'
5 XXXX XXXX
O 4 XXXX XXXX
F 3 XXXX XXXX
2 XXXX XXXX
I 1 1978 XXXX XXXX
R 0 XXXX XXXX
A 9 XXXX XXXX XXXX
N 8 XXXX XXXX XXXX
S 7 XXXX XXXX XXXX
A 6 1978 XXXX XXXX XXXX
C 5 XXXX XXXX XXXX
T 4 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
I 3 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
O 2 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
N 1 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
TOTAL OF PRODUCT ION
JOBS PROCESSED
I. -1980-- ---1981--- -1979-
NUMBER, 07 PACES PRINTED
SPECIAL FORMS AND :STOCK PAPER
1979, 19E0,1951
12,000,000
11,000,000
10,000,000 9,275,400
9,000,000 S P
TA
8,000,000 0 P
6,805,100 C E
7,000,000 K R
S P
6,000,000 T A
O P
5,000,000 C E
K R _
4,000 ,000 S F S F
• P0 P0
3,000,000 S F E R E R
P0 CM CM
2,000,000 E R I S I S
CM A A
1,000,000 I S
A
0 t,
10,788,775
SP
TA
O P
CE
K R
May
Jua Auo
DDS DATC jf,;BS -2,,,OCESSED
July Jan
Feb.
19C1
Apr
Jan Mar(1)
Feb •Apr
19S2
Nov
Dec
(1) naed oa Karch Actual
SOURCE STATNTS
IN THE
982
900,000 1.1 million 1.5 million
1982
1.2
1.1
1.0
.9
.8
.7
,s
.5
.,4
.03
.2
.1
1960
0 SYSTEM SUPPORT PROGRAMMERS
PER 100,000 SOURCE !STATEMENTS
(EXCLUSIVE OF NEW DEVELOPMENT)
In 1952 thcr arc more E-,our6e code lines and. fewer systclu.„
v.Tport pre::grammers avail01) to support them.
19'79 TA.:!.1.0-1
• n1in network increased 36% to a current iev1 of 320 terminals and
• On-line transaction volume has increased 400% to 3,300,000 transactions
per month.,
0 Total production batch jobs have increased 75% to 2,100 per month
resulting in over 20 million pages of output.
O Disk storage capacity has increased 115% to 13.1 gega bytes
(13,100,000,000).
• The computer program library is growing lay 00% per year or 50,003 new
lines of code per month.
O Average data entry key stroke rate has grown by 25% to 14,000 key
strokes per hour. •
O Over 2,000 reuc...:s for new programs or changes from the users have
been completed by user services.
0,0 MEN 440 an. eare
,t r
ea. .90
L
cailo gos a 4%? sam. raft taip oak. tip 11. 11. a
'
t 0;:
C 4 a a .1fi o
.4 „L 0 A A t
7.4ea0.0352,117.1/2,..rdm2....zz
.1.7.::.9c„mont4
-MMINFENtZNIRSIMMIMS1=4;,,,,,,M=M"Dell.
-.•5:
4it, y r
t.,..,'-ramfee2v17m vt.r VAC,It'S.I.ntMe4 'Mee?
AZ.
z#41,-*ozTa
--CURREN1-7— --PROPOSED--
ArALYS71PRC.,GRT:T,Is'IZR I! (6)
"ftMleanangevASEMmear.r.tIsm-rnewnwomemearogY .twarmaxtremon,
P10.9...nianestama.,
REALLOCATION F
") ANALYST', ROQ(Q-,,;til-h 1 (6)
PROGRAMER 1 (3)
> DATABASE A NALYST 1 (3)
°RD''"ER I (2)
DATrA7 ANALYST II (2)
PROJECT A NA LYST (2)
-7> PROGR.WER III .!4)
DATABASE ANALYST (1II)
--i›. DATABASE UlINISTRATOR (1)
1111
PUBLIC SAFETY
RD. INFO SYST
EMS INFO SYST
WI 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111
CRIME ANALYSIS
GRAPHICS
MA NPOWER UT1L.
1111 1111 1111*
OPTION 2
---------1955-
QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
2222
LAW ENFORCEMENT
C:LEMIS PHASE H
PROPERTY REGIST
M-0 SEARCH
ARSON
REWRITE
2222 2222 2222
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
COMPUTER-AIDED DISPATCH
POLICE
JAIL MANAGEMENT
1111 1111 1111 1111
H11 1111 1111
111,1•1.111
.2222 2222 2222
SY:.-171 ,..'; SUPPORT
TECTrif‘,/ICAL •
LIAISON
TOTAL
HU 1111 nu HH nn nn nn HU nn 1111 nn nn
3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3313 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Work continues into 1985
1111 1111 1111 1111
11 11 1111 1111 1111
OPTION 2
--------1985--
QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
COURTS
DISTRICT COURTS 1111 1111
PROBATE SYSTEM 1111
PROWS ENHANSE. 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
BIND OVER SYSTEM 1111
CIRCUIT COURT CALENDARING
BOND CONTROL
VOTER REG. UPGRD. 1111 1111
P.ROBATION SYSTEM.... 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
JUVEr,,IILE COURTS 1111 1111 1111 1111 *
INTERPOL INTERF. 1111
COURTS INTEGRATION
SYSTEM SUPPORT
TECHNICAL 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 .2222 2222 2222 2222
A LIAISON 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111, 1111
TOTAL 6 6 6 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 3
1111 1111 1111 1111 11/1 1111 *
*Work continues into 1945
1111 2222 2222
1111 1111 2222 2222 1111
2222 2222 2222 2272 *
1111 11Ii 1111 Lill* •
1111 *
1111 1111 1111
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
3333 2222 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 3333 2222 2222 2222 2222
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
7 7 8 8 6 7 7 7 3 8 8 8
1111 2222 2222 2222 2222 1111 1111 2222 2222 2222 2222 1111
OPTION 2
FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL
PURCHASING
SUI' PLIES INV,
LABOR DISTRIBUTION
COST ACCTG AND GRANT ACCTG
SYSTEM INTEGRATION
REDESIGN
DEVELOPMENT
PERSONNEL, PAYROLL
EEOC ENHANS.
HUMAN RES. INFO
DISTRIB, FIN, FUNC.
SYSTEM SUPPORT
TECHNICAL
LIAISON
TOTAL
---------1983--- -----
QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
*Work continues into 1985
194- 411{4.11.4.1 4E2 oes wi• ms 1 985 taa se.
1111 1111 1111
2222 2222 2222 2222 2222
OPTION 2
TREASURER QTR!. QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTRi QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
ROAD COMM. SPEC. ASSESSMENT 1111 1111
ANIMAL LICENSES 1111 2222 2222
ACCOUNTS REC
TFMSMATABASE. E,NHANS.E.
SYSTEM SUPPORT HU HU 11H HH nu nu HU lin 11H nu HH 11H
TOTAL
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111
WI 1111 WI 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 11 11 1111 1111
TOTAL
*Work continues into 1985
OPTION 2
------
QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
SPECIAL PROJECTS
DOCUMENT CONTROL AND RETRIEVAL 1111 1111 2222 2222 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
RESEARCH AND STATISTICS
BILLING ENHANS.
INTEGRATED GBF
COMPUTER GRAPHICS
TRAINING
----------1983-- 985_
OPTION 2
PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT
LAND RECORDS SYSTEM ENHANS,
MASTER APPRAISAL UPGRADE
LAND USE TRACKING
EQUALIZATION DISTRIB. FUNCT.
PROPERTY TAX ACCOUNTS REC.
• DELINQUENT TAX REVAMP
SYSTEM SUPPORT
TECHNICAL
LIAISON
QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR 1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4
1111 1111
1111 1111 1111 2222 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111 1111 1111
1111 1111 WI *
1111 1111 *
1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222 2222
1111 1111 1111 1111 11.11 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
TOTAL 3 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5
*Work continues into 1985
Al 1111 1111 1 11 1
141.21/n•leaw....11.a.a...... I
- OPTION 2
QM!. QTR2 QTR3 QTR 4 QTRI QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTRI QTR2 QTR3 QTRA
HUMAN SERVICES
CHAMPS
COMMON INTAKE 1111 1111 un
PROGRAM UNIQUE HU nn HU HU nn 1111 1111 nn nu nu
ACTIVITY REPTG
ASSESSMENT 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111
EVALUATION • 1111 1111 1111 1111
-MANAGE--MENT SUPPORT 1111 1111
SYSTEM SUPPORT
TECHNICAL
LIAISON
UU UH nu nn nn nn nu nn nn HU 1111 nn
1111 1111 1111 1111
TOTAL 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
i PONT
(..„7//
r '1 - oa,) cr, '-neIr7.an
Board oE Commissioners /
O'Eyicn,j
. _
Tircalit Cout
return the enclosed form today. 3nd
OIXTM ur
6EW g*,C-1.0
At%
the
enlxy.!ci
to Oakl
Yow:
your 6M1.1
requiren.ant3.
71'vr77 rrTortecltt Yiehigen ranks
rccurned iro•i tbr.17.craL government.
-272 will allow Oal:land County to receive
the federal v;ove .rnmont for up to 757. of -
of the Friend of the Court and related
.ons. This ar,,ount's to a potential saving
taxpayers of $596,107.00.
request for enforce7o.nt rf.ist be on file with
t case in order to :(a .':isfy federal audit
Pe jQin the were than 8,474 . follow citizen who
have alry placed their signatre on file, You
repr'éseat a pc,tntial saving to Oakland County of
per year.
P1 ,7
It. H.7 Y
04
A g.
CO•ne
August 5 1 1982
1:11 taxpayers have realized a co7.1tion
es from the efforts of your der.T:;te
of those collections will go to th
(7,1
12
Pontiac t, I nS3
r Lee:
Th Fricimkd of
tet
tr-s
Court ;.:'ntly rceiv•7,d instructions
on how to 7,roc.:3ed with n e xt
note 'h.d.t this inforo
s after ne Friend of
tt w,..,u1d be
t-ions and that we
ejl ,:lf7er the September let
ion
Court
cuat alt7J:
of over 1,r3
1?,:zt year.
benefit
Pc:cmuse of :T
reln.d of
ip
1: he
14q5,
3„
copy
th.,A
1 Wt olnd
wouXe! like
inces th
is c,cr $500.
2. 171.7
,ir,75,s. years experience, the Cc..kland County
rI would like to request Son-
in which the intercepts are handled. T -cu:
our ffice will be a tape in the .1:1.)
Friend of the Court letter 82 .
ously been provided with To ac h ieve
following steps undertaken!
goinst the tape ending of 5-31-S1, and
'•lge, in case nu:.ber order, that
d the psyor's nJJ1le where the
is WIDC or M.50I and the arre,
er .oyOT of the Friend of the Court will then be taki that c„rd ,cviewing it 1nually.
#82293 September 21, 1982
Moved by Caddell supported, by patterSon the resolution he adopted-
.
AYES; Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell;'Cagney, DiCiovanni,-Doyon, Fortino,
Gabler, Geary, Gosling, Hobart, Jackson, Kasper McDonald, Moffitt, Montante,
Moore, Olsen, Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Peterson, Price, Whitlock, (24)
NAYS: Calandro, Lanni. (2)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal,
do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of
Miscellaneous Resolution # 82293 adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
at their meetins held on September 21, 1982
with the orginial record thereof now remaining in my office, and
that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the
whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan
21st day of 7 $eptemb_e_r_ 19 82
1,IN11,4. ALLEN
County Clerk/Register of Deeds
this