HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1981.04.01 - 13974Miscellaneous Resolution 81121 April 2, 1981 Date
BY: PUBLIC SERVICES MAUMEE - James E. Lanni, Chairperson
IN RE: FY' 81 TITLE IV SUMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (SYEP) PRELIMINARY PLANNING
ESTIMATES
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS:
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners by Miscellaneous Resolutions'
No. 6546 and 8883 applied for and was granted the designation as Prime Sponsor by the
U.S. Department of Labor to administer the provisions of the Comprehensive Employment
and Training Act of 1973 and the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act Amendments
of 1978; and
WHEREAS Oakland County expects to receive an estimated FY'81 Title IV Summer
Youth Employment Program allocation of $2,780,000; and
\WHEREAS the Youth and Manpower Planning Councils have approved the method of
selection and subrecipients identified in Attachments 2 and 3 to this resolution; and
WHEREAS this resolution was voted on and approved unanimously by the Youth and
Manpower Planning Councils on March 19, 1981.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
approve planning estimates as identified in Attachments 2 and 3.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, if the Prime Sponsor's actual FY' 81 SYEP funding
is at or exceeds $2,780,000, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorizes the
Employment and Training Administration to contract with the subrecipients in accordance
with the attached budget summary and percentage formula outlined in System A (Attachment 2
BE IT IR RESOLVED that, if the Prime Sponsor's FY'81 SYEP funding is less
than $2,780,000, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorizes the Employment and
Training Administration to contract with the subrecipients in accordance with the attached
budget summary and percentage formula outlined in System B (Attachment 3).
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move the adoption
of the foregoing resolution.
PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITIIE
ATTACH I
EMPLOYMENT & TRATNINC ADMINISTRATION
FY '81 StIrIER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROCRAM
Allocation Process
1. Thirteen bids were received for the fiscal year 1981 Summer Youth
Employment Program. Our planned funding level was stated as
$2,500,000.
2.. The bids were independently reviewed by three members of the Emp'o
and Training Youth. staff. In addition, the bids were reviewed by t
members of the Youth Council.
3. Eleven bids were accepted for funding and two were unanimously re-
jected for funding.
4. The Youth staff and Youth Council committee agreed that the accepted
bids would be funded in relation.. to each individual bid's percent of
the total of the combined approved bids. This represents System A.
5. System B, developed by the Youth staff, provides an additiorl alterna-
tive in the event that we receive less funding. In this allo-
cations of past SYEP subcontractors would be based on the sLz. of each
agency's FY'80's authorized expenditure and CY -n,ged into a percent of
the total expenditure. As a result, performance would play a greater
part in the funding process in System A.
6. Recommendation to Youth Council, Manpower Planning Council, and Public
Services Committee:
That both Systems A and B be approved. That the Employment and Training
Division be authorized to make allocations of the FY'81 SYEP funding
amount, on a percentage basis as reflected in System A (sme or addi-
tional funding), or System B (for lesser funding). In ar'iLtion, a
maximum of ten percent of the total funding amount woul us ,2osignated
for a planned carry forward balance and prime sponsor •,,H*listration.
1. Berkley
2. Brandon
3. Ferndale
4. Hazel Park
5. Oak Park
6. OLHSA
7. Pontiac
8. Southfield
9. Troy
10. Walled Lake
11. Waterford
130,000
36,555
190,000
180,000
170,615
741,375
215,000
186,632
202,204
184,710
125,372
5.5027
1.5474
8.0425
7.6192
7,2219
31,3814
9.1007
7.8999
8.5590
7.8185
5.3068
13. Holly 77,873 0
ATTACH 2
*SYSTEM A •
FY' 81 77MER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROCPAY
FUNDINC RET',—=DATIONS 07 PRIME SPONSOR
and
YOUTH COUNCIL EVALUATION SUBCOMMITTEE
Recommended for funding:
AMOUNT 07 % OF TOTAL
BID ACCEPTED BIDS
2,362,462 100.0000
Not recommended for funding:
12. Bloomfield Hills 100,000 0
*Based on new funding level at least as high as FY I 80.
$2,576,486 = total FY 1 80 SYFP funding. This would leave
$214,023 for planned carry forward balance and/or prime
sponsor administration.
ATTACH 3
*SYSTEM B.
FY 81 SUMMER. YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
BASED ON BID/PERFORMANCE
Recommended for funding in bid process:
AMOUNT OF
BID
FY 80
AUTHORIZED
EXPENDITURES 7, OF TOTAL
1. Berkley
2. Brandon
3. Ferndale
4. Hazel Park
5. Oak Park
6. OLHSA
7. Pontiac
8. Southfield
9. Troy
10. Walled Lake
11. Waterford
130,000
36,555
190,000
180,000
170,615
741,375
215,000
186,632
202,204
184,710
125,372
2,362,463
98,580
(no contra
165,286
124,844
200,373
734,123
193,800
134,412
116,063
131,727
166,338
4.6896
1.7390
7.8629
5.9390
9.5320
34.9233
9.2193
6.3942
5.5213
6.2664
7.9130
**2,102,101 100.0000
Not recommended for funding in bid process:
12. Bloomfield Hills
13. Holly
*If a smaller allocation than FY'80's were received, FY'80's authorized
expenditures would be used for allocations for accepted. bids.
**Includes Brandon. bid
ATTACH 4
FY'810 SUMMER YOUTH EMPL0'•11-77 PROGRAM
SUBRECIP TENT EXPENDITURL SUMMARY
AGENCY ALLOCATION TOT EXPENDITURE_ OVER EXPENDITURE 7,7)FIR Eyp-TnITURE
1. Berkley $ 98,580 $115,611 $17,031 117% $ ---
2. Ferndale** 109,679 165,286 55,607 151% ---
3. Hazel Park 124,844 143,234 18,390 115% ---
4. Oak Park 200,373 273,473 73,100 137% ---
5. OLHSA 811,911 734,123 --- 77,788 1C -
6. Pontiac 195,000 193,800 --- 1,200 1%
7. Royal Oak 37,335 35,797 --- 1,538 4%
8. Southfield 138,417 134,412 --- 4,005 '..i
9. Troy 116,063 118,131 2,068 10270 ---
10. Walled Lake 131,727 149,702 17,975 114% ---
11. Waterford** 126,287 166,338 40,051 132% ---
*Includes admin. expenditures
**Made formal requests for additional funds
ATTACH. 5
FY '81 SYEP BUTTET SUMMARY*
% TOTAL
COST CATEGORY AMOUNT ALLOCATION
Participant Wages and Fringe Benefits
Client Services (minimum)
Administration (maximum)
) *
Prime Sponsor Administration)
1,772,250
472,600
118,150
417,000
2,780,000
63.75
17.00
) *See Footnote
100.00
*Not to exceed 19.25%
*Based on an anticipated estimated funding allocation. of $2,780.000.
#81121 April 2, 1981
Moved by Lanni supported by Peterson the resolution be adopted,
AYES: Gosling, Hobart, Jackson, Lanni, McDonald, Moffitt, Moore, Murphy, Olsen,
Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Pernick, Peterson, Price, Whitlock, Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell,
Cagney, DiGiovanni, Doyon, Fortino, Gabler. (24)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
•
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and
having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of
Miscellaneous Resolution #81121 adopted by the Oakland County Board of
era<190aree ecsame•011 08.00e••••••••••'•••••••n ••••••••••nn •••••n•••••••••n•eeeeemee
Commissioners at their meeting held on April 2, 1981
*0••••••••n6608n 0•00....Vem“..aosoompaeoaan otaa06,0 n 00".."“ &ism..< 7••••••••n••••
with the original record thereof now remaining in my '
office, and that it is a true and correct transcript
therefrom, and of the whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan
2nd April 81 —
Lynn D.
By.................................Deputy Clerk