Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1975.02.06 - 14557The Public Services Committee, by Resolution NG. 6 959 . be adopted, ames W. Dunleavy , Chairman, reports Miscellaneous , with the recommendation that the resolution February 6, 1975 REPORT Mr, Dunleavy IN MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #6959 - C.E,T o A, GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: BY PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE James W. Dunleavy, Chairman 6959 January 23, 1975 Miscellaneous Resolution REFOLtrriC.)N PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE so'N James W. Dunleavy, Chairman "Y AP PROVE er!V BY: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE - James W. Dunleavy, Chairman IN RE: C. E. T. A. GRIEVANCE PROCEDU RE TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners has applied for and been designated Prime Sponsor to administer the provisions of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973; and WHEREAS C.E.T. A. Regulations require the Prime Sponsor to develop a Grievance Procedure for applicants and enrollees of all C.E.T. A. funded programs; and WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners by Miscellaneous Resolution #6930 resolved to establish a C.E LA, Appeals Board. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Services Committee recommends to the Oakland County Board of Commissioners the adoption of the attached C.E.T.A. Grievance Procedure. The Public Services Committee, by James W. Dunleavy, Chairman, moves the adoption of the foregoing resolution. OAKLAND COUNTY MANPOWER DEPARTMENT CRIPREHENSIVE EMPLOYPIFNT AND TRAINING ACT APPLICANT / PARTICIPANT 'GRIEVANCh. PROCEDURE The government of Oakland County has been designated as the Prime Sponsor to coordinate the distribution of funds undey . the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973, and in accordance with Section 95.37 of the Act, a procedure for filing a complaint or grievance on the part of any applicant or participant in any CETA program shall be adopted. . The Prime Sponsor supports and subscribes to an orderly method of resolving complaints and to this end, the applicant or participant should first bring his/her proble to the attention of his/her immediate silpervisor (counselor or instructor) who shall attempt to resolve the complaint informally. If the grievance is not settled inforifially, the following shall apply: Within five (5) business days of the stated grievance, it shall be reduced to writing, signed by the and submitted to his/her immediate supervisor aggrieved p'a, (counselor Or instructor) with a duplicate copy sent to the Oakland County Manpower Department (Prime Sponsor). Ia. In the event that the aggrieved party is an applicant for or an enrollee of a CETA funded public service job involving a local unit of government (city, village, township, school district or state agency) or a private non-profit agency : which operates with a formal grievance procedure as set forth in either (1) civil service system (2) merit system Labor Contractor (4) other contractual grievance procedures, the aggrieved party must adhere to and exhaust the administra -.7 tire remedies of the employing agency involved. In such cases the Oakland County CETA Appeals Board shall have no (3) hare jurisdie- Oakind County CETA Where tho employing at ITaining aincy lacks a. fon:l.al ance procedure . as set fo-rLh inscotiOn 3. a , the tion to re.view and Tule upon the aggrievO.d party petition. Where the employing or training agency lacks a formal civil service or merit system grievance procedure, the Oakland County Department of Manpower Programs shall__ within 1.0 business days of receipt of the copy of the written grievance review, inveStigate, evaluate the aggrieved party's claim and with-the cooperation of the training/employing agency effectuate an administrative - remedy. Said decision shall be forwarded in writing to both the aggrieved party and the training/employing agency along with a description of next steps in the CETA appeals _ process. The aggrieved party may subsequently appeal the .Manpower Department's Administrative remedy to the CETA 'Appeals Board. If the grievance is not resolved to the satisfaction of the aggrieved party and where the Oakland County CETA Appeals Board is the next highest authorized jurisdictional body/ he/she must within five (5) business days after receipt of the Prime Sponsor's registered letter, request in writing , a hearing before the CETA Appeals Board. The CETA Appeals Board will meet at the earliest possible date- and the aggrieved party shall be notified by registered letter at least five (5) days in advance of the hearing. Within five (5) business days from the date of the hearing, the CETA Appeals Board will notify the aggrieved party of its decision by registered letter.. In addition, the written decision of the CETA Appeals Board understand what I have to do to file a grievance if this becomes,- . necessary. Applicant Soc. Sec, shall include a description of the next stens in sho CETA Appc-al process availWole to the a.g -rievcd party . /f tn :1:ricved paty is onit siLh-Jicd 1A'lth the decisioil of the CLTA Ar)pi2nlls abard, Or the jorindictiom0 ho.dy provided: for nr!dc:T Setition 12, h.e/5he inny et 0 TCViCW Of his/hcz - ease bv •ritin .;:; to the Rniona Wirctor Of Thpower (ARD), Chi.cago, 4. If the aggrieved party is not satisfied with the decision of the ARDM, he/she may file his complaint in United States District Court. Any grievance not appealed within the time specified in any step nit/ and including Step 3 of the grievance procedure shall be considered settled on the basis of the last decision except as provided for in step number 4. This is to acknowledge that the grievance procedure for CETA applicants- : and participants has been explained to me on this date and I #6959 Moved by Dunleavy supported by Douglas the resolution be adopted. AYES: Hougbten, Kasper, Lennon, McDonald, Moffitt, Montante, Nowak, Olson, Page, Patterson, Perinoff, Pernick, Price, Roth, Wilcox, Wilson, Aaron, Button, Daly, Dearborn, Douglas, Dunleavy, Fortino, Gabler. (24) NAYS: Hoot. (1) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) • COUNTY OF OAKLAND)- I, Lynn D. Allan, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of - resolution #6959 adopted by the OaklardCounty Board of Commissioners at 00.00 ..... • • D. .0 0 004.0 •00 ............. 000040000000000 0.600. •e0Pa 00 0000. their meeting held on February 6, 1975 009000000004e.. 0.0•000.0•4 00b 0 000 0 0000 0 000 0 • 000 P ...... ••*0000 00 0 ego 0•00 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office, and that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the whole thereof. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and. affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan this 7th day of .F.e.bruary Lynn D. Allen........ ........ ..... Clerk By ...........,........ ...... ..... ,Deputy Clerk -#6959 The Chairman announced pursuant to Rule XI-E the matter shall be laid over to the next regular Board meeting.