Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1975.11.20 - 14829Novenber 20, 1975 Miscellaneous Resolution 7348 BY: PERSONNEL coillturrEE — Paul B. Kasper, Chairman IN RE - ST''"7-rSTON Or fl'AS TN NERTrn SY3T7i PUr 7 c, TO filE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMSSTONERS Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: ',777.1T5\5 Section TV, Subsection A of the Merit System 'Resolution requires that co?les of all changes in the rules and regulations of the -7erit System shall ';:i7 2 'ct ,..7,d to the Board of Commissioners at a regular mectinr -, of ti-e Board and shall "hccome effective thirty days after such meeting unless objection is in writing by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners, in which case the objection shall become a matter of business at the next meeting,of the Board; and ITIEUAS it has become desirable to make certain charges in the wording of Rule 24, as spelled out in the attachment to this resolution; and WILM:AS your Personnel Committee reviewed and approved these changes at its meeting of November 7, 1975, NOW THEREFOaE let the reading of this notice npd the d 4 strihtltion of this notice and the attached forms labeled 'Proposed Change in Nerit System :111e., to all the Commissioners present and absent, be considered as the official submission, to the Board of Commissioners, of the described changes in Rule 24. The Personnel Committee, by Paul E. Kasper, Ch.-:J:rmon, moves the adoption of the Foregoing resolution. PERSONNEL CCI lIJITTEE RULE NUNBER RULE TITLE REASON FOR CHANGE See attached statement Change Submitted b y Personnel Depaltment County Executive: [i] Approved Approved [I] Disapproved 1 Commissioners! Date: 1/20/75 Disapproved by DateUila/74 ;late: 1117/75 Committee' Date: 111 71 75 Personnel Committee: Introduced to Board of Oakland County Merit System PROP.OSED CHANGE IN MUM . SYSTEM MY ON PACED. OF M SECTION TO BE CHANCED SECTION TV-USE OF SICK LEAVE-SUBSECTION C PRESENT WORDING . Employees should, whenever possible, notify their Department Head that they will be unable to work before their normal work day begin, in any case, not later than one-half hour after the working day begins. PROPOSED WORDING . Employees should notify their Department Head that they will be unable to work no later than one-half hour before their normal work shift begins in departments where the Department Bead or his designated representative is normally on duty to receive such calls. Employees in Departments where the Department Head or his representative is not normally on duty prior to the beginning of the nozwal work shift shall notify their Department Head Or his representative at the beginning of the normal work shift or, in any case, no later than one-half hour after the work shift begins, Section IV Subsection A of Merit System Resolution Copies of the rules and regulations developed by the Personnel Committee and all future changes in such rules and regutations shall be submitted to the Board of Commssioners at a regutar meeting of the Board of Commissioners and shall become effective thirty days after such meeting unless objection is received in wrz7ting by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners, in which case the objection sh ,77.1 become a matter of business at the next meeting of the Board of Commissioners RULE 24 - SICK LEAVE SECTION C REASON FOR CHANGE: Departments operating on a 24-hour basis are extremely hard pressed to find replacements in an emergency. This often times necessitates working staff overtime sometimes for an entire additional shift, due to lack of time allowances for advance planning. The result is additional unnecessary overtime expenditures and inadequate coverage of critical work. stations. This change was originally presented to the Committee in September, 1974, and the Board of Commissioners on October 3, 1974. Objection was raised at one of the following Board meetings to the entire set of rules presented to the Board on October. 3, 1974, Objections were aimed primarily at the changes recommended in Maternity Leave Rules; however, the changes recommended here in Rule 24 went down in the process. Our records indicate no specific objections to the changes in Rule 24 as originally recommended.