Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1974.07.11 - 15110Miscellaneous Resolution 6762 July 11, 1974 By Mr. Lennon IN RE: OPTIONAL UNIFIED FORM OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS there is substantial dis-agreement among the members of the Oakland County Board of Commissioners as to whether a County Executive in Oakland County should be elected or appointed; and WHEREAS there is never less substantial agreement that Option Unified type of County Government as allowed by Public Act 139 of 1973 would be improving County Government whether the executive be appointed or elected, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners goes on record as urging a yes vote on the proposition of adopting the Optional Unified type of County Government pursuant to Public Act 193 of 1973 to appear on the August 6, 1974 Primary Ballot. Mr. Chairman, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Bernard F. Lennon, County Commissioner - District #18 Wilbur V. Brotherton County Commissioner - District #27 Moved by Lennon supported by Walker the rules be suspended for immediate consideration of the resolution. AYES: Douglas, Dunleavy, Gabler, Lennon, Mathews, Moffitt, Montante, Nowak, Olson, Pernick, Quinn, Walker. (12) NAYS: Hoot, Kasper, Vogt, Wilcox. (4) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion failed. The Chairman referred the resolution to the Committee on Organization. Mr. Kasper objected to the referral. The Chairman stated those in favor of sustaining the objection vote "yes" and those opposed vote "no". AYES: Coy, Dunleavy, Lennon, Mathews, Moffitt, Nowak, Olson, Pernick, Quinn, Walker. (10) NAYS: Hoot, Kasper, Vogt, Wilcox. (4) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion failed. Mr. Walker requested another roll call vote be taken. AYES: Douglas, Dunleavy, Lennon, Nowak, Olson, Pernick, Quinn, Walker, Brotherton. (9) NAYS: Coy, Gabler, Hoot, Kasper, Vogt, Wilcox. (6) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the resolution was not referred.