HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1972.04.11 - 156415979 Miscellaneous Resolution April 11, 1972
W. L. Mainland, Chairman
BY: PERSONNEL PRACTICES COMMITTEE - W. L Mainland, Chairman
IN RE: SALARY FOR CHIEF OF ORGANIZED CRIME PROSECUTION
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the classification of Chief of Organized Crime Prosecution applies to
one position which is paid from a Federal Grant; and
WHEREAS the salary set for this position on January 31, 1972 was kept low, for the
qualifications required in the position, because the County was then bargaining the salaries
of related Attorney positions in the Prosecuting Attorney's Office; and
WHEREAS the contract resulting from that bargaining is being presented to this
Board today; and
WHEREAS the position of Chief of Organized Crime Prosecution has been filled by
an experienced Attorney who left a higher paying State position in the same type of work
to return to the Prosecutor's Office; and
WHEREAS your Personnel Practices Committee has reviewed the situation and
determined that the salary recommended by the Prosecutor and originally called for in the
Federal Grant is appropriate for the duties and responsibilities involved;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the salary for the classification of Chief
of Organized Crime Prosecution be increased from the current salary range of $17,700 to
$18,700 to a new flat annual salary of $21,00(4
The Personnel Practices Committee, by W. L. Mainland, Chairman, moves the
adoption of the foregoing resolution.
PERSONNEL PRACTICES COMMITTEE
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
Moved by Mainland Su-pported by Aaron the resolution be adopted.
Discussion followed.
Moved by Dearborn supported by Richardson the resolution be
tabled until a report is presented by the Finance Committee,
AYES: Dearborn, Patnal,es, Richardson, Szabo, Wilcox. •(5)
NAYS: Aaron, Barakat, Burley, coy, Daly,. Doyon, Harrison, Horton,
Kasper, Kronenberg, Mainland, Mathews, Olson, Paholak, Pernick, Simson.- (16)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the'motion lost.
Vote on resolution:
A sufficient majority .having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
1. Lynn D. Allen, Clerk :of the County of Oakland and
having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of
..... ,Re,soiuti.onA979.adopted by .theKpaeklanc1. County,ppard.of.CoTmisjoners
at their April 11, 1972 meeting
00000 00 00 000-0•0000000•••0000•00• ........ 0000 00 000000000.0.0"00•0••••n 000
with the original record thereof now remaining in my
office, and that it is a true and correct transcript.
therefrom, and of the whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan
this....... day of Ap ril
Lynn D. All Clerk.....
BY0p0u00.0000. ........ ......... ...... ...Deputy Clerk