Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1984.02.23 - 16190Miscellaneous RLIsolution 84036 February 23. 1984 BY: HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE -M arilynn Gosling, Chairperson IN RE: COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT PLANNING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATICN - MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH (KELLOGG FOUNDATION) TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Health Division has moved forward in the development of a Comprehensive Health Analysis Management Planning System (CHAMPS) to enhance its service capability and accountability; and WHEREAS the Oakland County Health Division, in consort with Oakland County Computer Services Department, has undertaken this development within its limited : resources; and WHEREAS certain aspects of CHAMPS are becoming operational while the timely devilopment of other aspects require additional resources; and WHEREAS CHAMPS has been identified by the Michigan Department of Public Health (MDPH) as one component of a statewide public health data reporting system; and WHEREAS funding is available through the Kellogg Foundation to assist in the .development of such a prototype system; and : WHEREAS the Oakland County Health Division projects multi-year funding in the amounts of $85,000 for FY 83/84, $250,000 for FY 84/85, $250,000 for FY 85/86 and $165,000 for FY 86/87 will be needed from the Kellogg Foundation to insure the appropriate development of CHAMPS; and WHEREAS the development of CHAMPS is a joint venture between the Oakland County Health Division and Computer Services Department; and WHEREAS other health jurisdictions have demonstrated considerable interest in sharing CHAMPS technology; and WHEREAS this grant application has been reviewed by the County Director of Federal and State Aid. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approve the Co:.oprchensive Health Analysis Management Planning System development grant application as part of the proposed statewide public health data reporting system. Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Health and Human Resources Committee, I move the adopt;on of the foregoing resolution. HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE REPORT TO THE HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE BY: FINANCE COMMITTPE, DR. G. WILLIAM CADDIFLL, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: 1984-85 CIIMITEBENSIVE HEALTH ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT PLANNING SYSTEM (DAMPS) DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION The Finance Committee has reviewed the proposed grant application and finds: 1. This is a new grant and covers the period March 1, 1984 through February 28, 1985, 2. The application is to the Data Management Project, Michigan Depart- ment of Public Health; the funding source is the Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek Michigan, 3. The application is for $85,000, comprised of $68,800 for Data Proces- sing Programming; $15,221 for Salaries and Fringe Benefits; and $979 for Indirect Cost. The detail is shown on the attached schedule, 4. Any grant funds received for CHAMPS development will accelerate the completion of the system and reduce future County expenditures, 5. All personnel changes will require Personnel Committee approval, 6. Application or acceptance of the grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment. Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report, and referral of the information contained therein to the Health and Human Resources Committee, in accordance with Miscellaneous Resolution #8145 - revised "Federal and State Grants Application Procedures." FINANCE COMMITZEE OAKLAND COUNTY HEALTH DIVISION GRANT REQUEST . FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CHAMPS The Oakland County Health Division respectfully requests funding from the Kellogg Foundation, through the Data Management Project of Michigan Department of Public Health for development of a third generation public health information management system entitled CHAMPS. This acronym stands for "Comprehensive Health Analysis Management Planning System." It is a : comprehensive system in that it is structured to handle any given program- ', matic aspect within the realm of public health practice. It is an integrated ' system since it meets the needs of all types of public health personnel including doctors, nurses, sanitarians, health educators, nutritionists, technicians, pharmacists, managers, planners, and administrators. ,Basically, the system is driven by a problem-oriented process Which lends to the primary purpose of the system, that is, case management. Appropriate case management is enhanced by a user friendly guidance subsystem which .informs and educates in regard to up-to-date approaches to the client problems encountered. Given adequate, individual case management for each - client, the system will then accumulate any set of clients whether they be persons, facilities, or individuals by which epidemiologists, managers, and edmieiQtreters can make correct judgments and inferences in regard to subsets of the population or that as a whole. hhile it is recognized that such functions as reporting and third-party billing are important, these entities are more a byproduct of the system than a primary function. CHAMPS is aimed mainly towards the professional staff rather than the administrative -staff. It is being developed to assist those who deliver services to carry out their assignments in a way that insures completeness and quality while at the same time reducing the paper- , -work that is attendant to it. The coneeptuel model on whidi CHAMPS is based resulted from a detailed and e. lengthy interactive process among representatives of all disciplines within . the Oakland County Health Division. This concept and its application was thoroughly enalyzed and tested through data flow diagrams to arrive at a logical model by staff of the Oakland County Computer Services Department. The systems analysts recomonded an iterative, modular approach to the ,development of C1-1..V,PS so that it would be both within practical and econumic reaCh. -2- Since Oakland County had a large mainframe to call upon, the central computer prototype with interactive, terminals was selected as the most appropriate hardware Choice. In addition to the hardware, Oakland County Computer Services Department also has data-base software systems available to it, a necessary resource to manage both the high volume of data elements and required interrelationships between those elements. The process of conception and arriving at the functional spPoifio.qtions is Well documented in a published manual that is available from the Health Division on request. Following this documentation of the process, a cost benefit analysis was developed showing that substantial resources could be diverted from the current clerical record-keeping process in order to increase the professional service staff. The cost benefit document is also -',available on request. Oakland County undertook the development of the system with an estimated completion time for all the modules being five years. The three main com- ponents of the system are as follows: Service Management Administration The decision was made to develop the service component first for the following reasons: 1. Development of a Data Base The information needed to do any type of analysis for any of the following: administrative practice, planning, evaluation, or reporting, would come from the data collected on clients and the services rendered to them. 2. Establishing the Routes for Data Communication Ti the data were to reach the top in summary form, it would have to begin at the intake of each client who was accepted or mandated for service. In addition, the sharing of common data on clients across program lines needs to be in place early in order to take advantage of this efficiency. 3. Iterative Methodology The methodology of building the data base can be best developed at the program level on a program-by-program basis. In this way, priorities can be established by the organization on the basis of cost-benefit or critical need. 4. Project Organization Beginning with the service-delivery or case-management level, allows more _Health Division staff to be involved early on; and at the same time, allows Oakland County Computer Services personnel to become more familiar with the work of public health. As the two disciplines mesh their fields of knowledge, the components of the system can be constructed with logical prerequisite ordering. This service component will have five modules that will apply to 104 program clenents. These five meddles are as follows: Common Intake Unique Data Problem List Plans and Actions Evaluation program element is a discrete functional unit, a listing for Which can be found in Appendix A. The modules that will apply to the management and administrative components can be found in Appendix B and C respectively. These modules will generally %be developed after the data base has been established through the service comnonont. Some modules such as the time study and order-entry module ray be -developed simultaneously should it be found desirable to do so. The first module worked on was the Common Intake module. It has been analyzed and is in various stages of programming, testing, and implementation There are 12 functions handled by this module. Each function may have up to four actions (add, display, modify, delete). An additional two functions are being made available through other computer systems. Name Search - Implemented 04/81 (Display) This fnnction allows retrieval of clients on file by name. Used as a verification prior to adding a client to the system. Pricy Demographics - Implemented 04/81 (Add, modify, display) Client name, location address and other basic demographic data may be collected. Secondary Demographics - Implemented 06/82 (Add, 7.T1dify, display) This function collects additional data consisting of mailincl, address, employer, school and insurance information. Family Relationships - Implemented 10/82 (Ada, modify, delete, display) Family relationship function will link together each of the family or organization members. Alias/Roster - Implemented 02/83 (Add, display, modify, delete) Each client may have as many alias names as desired. Roster entries are used with head of household to identify other family Or organization members that arc not currently receiving service. The alias/roster names will be searched when using the name search. function. Alias/Roster/Relationship - (Disnlay) Thi:F, function will display along with alias names and Implemented 02/83 all members of a family or organization roster entries for the entered client. -4- - Units - Implemented-04/83 , (Add, modify, delete, display) Units function identifies all the organizational areas that are providing service to a client. It also allows for the entering of the client record location. Cross-Reference - User Testing Estimated Implementation Date 01/84 (Add, modify, delete, display) This fonetion assigns alternate keys to a client. This key may then be used by the cross-reference search function to retrieve clients. Events - User Testing Estimated Implementation Date 01/84 (Add, modify, delete, display) Events are a chronological list of referral and brief free form description data relating significant happenings to the client. Address/Sidwell Cross-Reference - User Training Estimated Implementation Date 02/34 (Display) Sidwell numbers identify parcels of land. This function will allow terminal operator to obtain this number by entering an address. Subdivision Lot/Sidwell Cross-Reference - User Training Estimated Implementation Date 02/84 (Display) Knowing the subdivision name and lot number this function can cross-reference to a sidwell number, Chronological Events - Not Started Estimated Start Date 03/84 (Display) Chronological events will display all events by date for a client across organizational areas. Cross-Reference Search - Writing Detailed Specifications Estimated implementation Date 03/84 (Display) Cross-reference will retrieve client number, name and address information based on assigned cross-reference keys. These keys are assigned to a client through the cross-xeference maintenance function, Client Relationships - Not Started Estimated Start Date 01/85 (Add, modify, delete, display) This will allow each of the different client types (facility, individual, group, incident) to be related to each other. „7he operational functions are currently being utilized by a variety of progrools (Personal and Preventive Health, Environmental Health and Health Education and Nutrition) for entering of active clients. We currently have 51,000 clients. This work is being accomplished on the 30 terminals currently installed. Termioals are being installed at a Tate of one per month with an expected total of 58 to be installed by the completion of C'EXTS. - 5- Some adjustments to the Common Intake software are being made as experience shows that a particular feature needs to be or is desirable to modify. The remaining four modules of the service component are currently being analyzed simultaneously so that data entry can begin on all phases of case leanagement. The first program elements to be applied will be certain maternal and child health pro :.,Iram elements. Money was obtained to hire a programmer through the Jobs Dill te work on this aspect. 'Oaklancl County has committed itself to this project in the following ways: 1. The tjue.e of an interdisciplinary Health Divisien group to conceptualize the system. 2. The time of systems analysts to develop the functional specifications for the system. 3. The time of Health Division personnel to work side by side with the analysts/programers in analyzing, programming, testing, and implementing each module and the functions attendant to them. 4. Two full time eligible analysts/programmers have been assigned from Oakland County Computer Services. 5. Oakland County has picked up the cost of machine time for programming and testing. 6. Oakland County Health Division has paid for the cost of training and data entry on the current caseload. 7, Oakland County Health Division has paid for the cost of the terminals and operational machine time. To date, the cost to Oakland County for development of CHAMPS has been calculated at SS14,S43.59. The projected cost for development of the entire system is $2,335,000. At the rate of financial input that Oakland County can afford, the system will not be completed until 1992. We are desirous to finish the development of OfnIPS for three reasons. First, the sooner each module is in place the more efficient the system becomes. This allows for greater benefit of the initial investment. Secondly, the product derived will be extremely useful to other health departments in Michigan as they gain experience and .sophistieation in the utilization of electronic data processing. Thirdly, • the ,Lichiear. Department of Public Health will have tested methodologies for the eeliection of a broader range of data as well as epidemiologic and envirermental health interfaces than exists currently. In order to sherten the developmental process it will be necessary to seek outside resources to supplement the yearly financial input that Oakland County can afford. Once the entire system is up and running, Oakland County is capable of maintaining it. -6- Our kenediate need rests in three areas/ It is our request that the Michigan Department of Public Health.seek an interim grant from the Xellogg Foundation as soon as is possible for the following support: 1. A computer programer to concentrate on. environmental health related programs. 2. Substitute clerks to relieve our full-time clerks on an alternating basis so that they can be trained in the use of the system. 3. Data entry clerks to help load the system with active records. Our system will be far more efficient when we are able to abandon the current written record system and use only our electronic files. The cost of this initial step will be $85,000. A breakdown of this cost will be found in the attached budget pages (Appendix D). It is our understanding that the Michigan Department of Public Health will be submitting a statewide Data Management Project request to the Kellogg Foundation prior to the Foundation's September cycle. It would be • appreciated if Oakland County's request for a three-year grant would be included in that proposal. The sum to be requested for the 1984-85 and • 1985-36 years would be in the amount of $250,000 each. The request for the 1986-87 year would be for $165,000. These suns would be used as follows: 1. Continue the employment of the personal and preventive health services programmer currently being supported by the Jobs Bill money through September 30, 1984. 2. Continue the employment of the programer whose main emphasis is on environmental health that was obtained through the interim Kellogg Foundation Grant. 5. Employ a programmer whose main area of emphasis would be on health education and nutrition. 4, aploy a programer whose main emphasis would be in epidemiology and administrative modules. 5. The four grant programmers along with OUT analyst and 1.5 programmer would collaborate on development of the management modules. 6. All above personnel would lend_ assistance to other counties, especially Washtenaw County which contracts with Oakland County and other counties belonging to the Southeastern Michigan Health Association, in adopting those modules of the GIMPS system that are applicable and desirable to them. 7. Provide advice, consultation, and assistance to the Michigan Department of Public Health in developing systems to collect, store, and analyze data from local health departments. -7- 8. Continue training of stuff to get the most use out of the system. Funds would be used to hire part-time help while full-time staff were in training. 9. Continue to hire part-time data entry clerks to load the system with the active records that have been accumulated. In summary, the total developmental cost of CHAMPS is projected to be $-2,335,000 of which $750,000 is being requested from the Kellogg Foundation. As noted earlier, Oakland County has expended nearly $515,000 as a minimum contribution on CII.A.\TS development to date. Our intention is to continuo this extensive com7aitment as an inkind contribution at the same rate until project caTletion. 'APPENDIX A SERVICE COMPON7NT PROGRAM ELDIENTS immnleation for Preventable Diseases of Childhood Venereal Diseases Tuberculosis Heart Hypertension Vascular Dental I-lealth Dic,estive Renal Disease Reproductive System Disease Diabetes Other Metabolic Scoliosis Arthritis Muscular/Reletal Cervical Cancer Breast Cancer Oral Cancer Other Cancer Endocrine Disease Blood Disease Ear/Hearing Eye/Vision Speech Other Neurological/Sensory Skin and Subcutaneous Disease Pulmonary Disease Family Planning Antepartum Postpartum High-risk Infant Cononital Anomaly Genetic_ Diseases Child Health Conference Normal Growth and Development Prnject Head Start M.antal Health/Mental Illness 1\:ental Retardation Accident/Poisoning/Violence Nursng Homo Patient Evaluation E=gency r.eclical Services Child Passen ,4er Safety (CPS) Sehool I 1c lth Cul-riculum (SaP) Preventin ::, Alcohol-Related Accidents (PAZ‘) Fetal Alcohol SvnJrome (FAS) Senior Citi:on 'Substance Abuse (SCSA Public .Information - Other Consumer/Community Education - Other Patient Education - Other Consultation/Technical Assistance - Other Co7nunity Health Planning Comunity Organization - Other Orientation Staff Eduction Student Training Ctmmunity Nutrition Women, Infants, Children (WIC) Heads tart Project Consultation Program Substance Abuse Control Services AMpient Air Quality Shelter Air Quality Fixed Food Service Temporary Food Service Establishments Mobile Food Service Establishments Vending Machines Retail Food Stores Food Manufacturers Type I Supplies Type II-A 'Supplies (Community) Type II -B Supplies (Non-community) Type III Supplies (Other Public) Private Supplies Bathing Beaches hl Swimming Pools Nursery School/Day Care Centers Educational Institutions Mobile Home Parks Foster Care Facilities Residential Housing Transient Housing Nonresidential Housing Land Use and Planning Toxic and Hazardous Vaste Management Refuse Management Sewage Disposal Systems Cemeteries .:1)PE Campground.; D55 Campgrounds CNS Infections Enteric Tru7octions Hepatitis Rabies P\ah Illness Respiratory infections Vaccine Preventable Diseases of Childhood Oth er Class I Infections Other Class IT Infections or Infectioa Related Diseases 00:j.lroJk Investigation Special Projects - Chronic Disease Data Collection Eisinterment/Reinterment Permits APPENDIX B MANACDINF COMPONENTS Activity Reporting Tille Study Interface Guidance Support Tool Scheduling Order Entry Laboratory Incident Tracking Standard Reporting APPENDIX C ADMINISTRATIVE COMPONENTS State interface Inventory Administrative Reporting -Standard -Ad hoc .` APPENDIX D HO t :.•-•• ; 7 I 8,JTJE Per.uu I Dale Prel,ster. 3/1/84 1-02/28/85 1 12/23/33 CW2S revelopmon falk1in(1. Cou:Itv Hcalth Division I .13 1-Ligat.; r Bud:3.21. I Re.. s Number LUC-11 Ay: n• AGREEi.:ENT 1:31.1DGET II LOCAL F.t..11.)G ET CATEGORY TOT/V._ I CURET YEAR Sl_P:i...0'-1 E%-:- 1 C!...1 JT P"'"Irs=— 1 ' 51.EQU=NT t....,,s...._i 1 PCI,P,TIO% YEAR FORTIO% YEAR 19_ YEAR 19_ 1 ' Sn:3ries & '...":: :es 14,20C 1 1 I 2 Frtr,[3:;‘. Senek.E. 1,021 .1 3 Travel II . I 4 Suoores & I 51Contract --).-11 C-C.-ontrz:cts.) 6! Equipment Other 7 Expenses; 68,800 I ; 1 i 1 , i 1 ..._ SI TOTAL DI RECT 84,021 1 979 ., 10! TOTAL EV- II:`,..,`.1 .1.uES 85,000 . ! , 11 Less: Fees .1:. Cr.Wecti.,J-,-, - -- I 121 iRt_t%DS 71. ECf_.11 I1 ED SS.00O I-.. ----. FO O D SO1P.CTS 1 . 1 13 State Aree.mcnr, 1 85, 000 1 , 1•1 State Forml..:J 1' P1-13 314 t- '1 , 1 I 11,1 t,'.&C,11 1 I I 17 Fecleral .. ' 1C Lc d; I; I - 1 1 I I 1 i ' 20!I TOTAL ruüoo 35 ,',x0 1 1.11.1:1:_:.n. represents cot.t t C1 I a:- o yr1 or of 111,'-' for tt; L'jr! (-_,;--t7t:-)0 of the tO :irrOD.r)17. 311 refloirLfl DATE: NA': ii Progr.,n Cri-LALPS Develonment BuZ2,,et P.:*tod ..)71/84 To 2/28/85 pare P-.Nnia,eu 12/23/8 COde Tot.11 Dir,!ct Time (hours) Ore Man Year (hours) Man Years DIRECT AN YEAFIS SUPPORT VIAN YEARS Program AdministratIon and Support Time Man Years PROGRAM BUDGET - POSITION SCHEDULE PIN-1 14 L.11 Oakland Cointy Hcalth Division STAFFING ANALYSIS Re.,10,:i NurritreT Ortginai Budge/ cri TOTAL MAN YEARS REQUIRED i I POSITIONS ANNUAL TOTAL POSITION DESCRIPTION x SALARY COMMENTS 1 REQUI RED • SALARY Several P.T. Non-Eli .. PersorA Typist II .993 14,295 14,200 , _ , .. 1 1 1 1 1 i - I 1 . . , i..... 1 1 I 1 i ...., .1-1M -1- Al Q (211 -'-'-s->.<'''''' I 1 A ?MI I 1---1-10C.711 BUDGT - COST 0 7-TAIL SCHEDUL ro-) 3 :1'1.1 1 S .74 CiAA)S Developmc= titia ,s[ Period 3/1/34 2/23/85 (3,11.4P,rodr.4-0 12/23/33 Cilt!i Flavyt,<1 Bucry=t m A C; c c_akland Cunt7 Health Division Reu,sion Numbw _ 818 161 979 21 ESC R I PTIO N 1TE7.11 DTL SUB•CATEGOR'( CATEGORY TOTAL QUAIITITY :A.L.NCE Attachme7,+ I OTHER EXPENSES Data Processir:g Programm.7:ng for Environmental Health Programs -1,673 Hours @ $41.00/Hour INDIRECT COSTS 6.9% of 1934 Salary of S11,361 6.9 of 1985 Salary of S 2,339 NOTE: The 1953 indirect cost rate of 6.9% was used in the computations as the 1984 proposed rate has not .e.en approved by Oakland County's Federal Cogni=ant Aency. When the 1934 rate has been appr5.Ve:1, that rate will be used for the portion of sa laries that are used in 1D8-4. Likeisc, the 1955 rate will be used when -approved, 1,021 68 )800 ALVVS Development FRINGE BENEFITS GRANT FISCAL YEAR 3/1/84 TO 2/2S/SS I :':le Corn- l':.-,:., Hosp. Life.Ins, Ret -Irc. Social 1 Salary Unemp. Dental Totalr ' putcd Co'..-:..). (Actual/Yr. (.4:1G', oi R.InJ Sco',Ar.Ity Contin- Ips. Actual/ Salary (From Ths,,Dd on Sal;lry) (17:49°, (7.n of uation (..529 Ycar 72.cneCit the first (.1.41 5,, of based on Costs Wer..,:. Current 0 L r Coo. l':ontly Salary) $37,800) of Salary) Current Sched.) 1.11.0.$) Salary) n ',olithly 67/mo. Rates' -$2-,.6.17/=. l-17.70/mc. 3-$231.41/mo. 3-$50.18/mo. 771-7---- - - ,200 '2 k") qS $994.00 __ -- __ . I 0) , _.- , - , , _ ---- -- , 1 .. 1 _. , #84036 February 23, 1984 this 23rd day of rev .11, 1984 (14(1416 (RIM 1- ALLEN Moved by Gosling supported by Susan Kuhn The report be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion carried. Moved by Gosling supported by Susan Kuhn the resolution be adopted. AYES: Olsen, Per inoff, Pernick, Price, Rewold, Wilcox, Aaron, Calandro, Doyon, Foley, Fortino, Gosling, Hobart, Jackson, R. Kuhn, S. Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, McDonald, McPherson, Moffitt, Moore, Nelson. (24) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of Miscellaneous Resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners at their meeting held on February 23, 1984 with the orginial record thereof now remaining in my office, and that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the whole thereof. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan County Clerk/Register of Deeds