Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1984.02.23 - 16238February 23, 1984 Miscellaneous Resolution 84041 BY: PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE - ANNE M. HOBART, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: AUTHORIZATION TO RECEIVE BIDS - PROSECUTOR'S RECORD STORAGE TO: THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mr. Chairperson, Ladies, and Gentlemen WHEREAS, the Prosecutor's Office has 36,225 active cases on file many of which require almost daily access; and WHEREAS, the storage and retrieval of these files can be most efficiently handled by a mechanized filing system; and WHEREAS, because of the combined weight of the records and equipment, the only safe place to install the system is on a basement floor; and WHEREAS, the purchase of the system has already been budgeted in the Prosecutor's miscellaneous capital outlay; and WHEREAS, installation of the system is estimated to cost $40,200; and WHEREAS, funding for this project is available from the Miscellaneous Remodeling line item of the 1984 Capital Program. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Department of Central Services be and is hereby authorized to receive bids for the Prosecutor's Record Storage and a report thereon be made to this Board after receipt and tabulation of such bids. Mr. Chairperson, on behalf on the Planning and Building Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE Anne M. Hobart, Chairperson $ 1,000 1,500 OAKLAND.COUNTY EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL SERVICES FACILITIES ENGINEERING'DIVISION PROSECUTOR'S RECORD STORAGE Project 84-14 February 16, 1984 As part of the 1981 Courthouse remodeling project, the first floor of the West Wing was completely devoted to the Prosecutor's operation. Part of that remodeling was a centrally-located file and records room of approximately 900 square feet. In addition to file cabinets, the room also contains 10 workstations for file clerks. The clerks keep the files updated and retrieve them as needed. In order to make efficient use of the available space, a mechanized storage/retrieval system was proposed and budgeted. The system makes use of the entire floor to ceiling distance and allows retrieval at the push of a button. The cabinet itself measures 24 feet long by 11 feet deep by 10 feet high and has a place for the operator to sit in front. Because of the sheer volume of records capable of being stored, the system unfortunately taxes the structural capability of the building. The purchase and installation of the system was delayed accordingly until a suitable location could be found. At present, there are files in Record Retention which, although necessary, do not have to be retrieved very often and could be relocated to a nearby area. The space thus created in the West Wing basement could then be used for the installation of the Prosecutor's file storage/retrieval system. A connecting dumbwaiter would then allow fast, efficient transportation of the needed files to assistant prosecutors on the first floor. Remodeling to allow installation of the system (excluding the cabinet itself) is estimated to cost: I. GENERAL BUILDING TRADES A. Dumbwaiter B. Cutting and Patching C. Finishes $15,000 3,000 3,000 $21,000 2. MECHANICAL TRADES A. Rework HVAC System 3. Fire Protection $ 2,500 3. ELECTRICAL TRADES A. Power for Cabinet and Dumbwaiter $ 4,000 B. Lighting 1,000 $ 5,000 Prosecutor's Record Storage- Project 8444 February 16, 1984 Page 2 of 2 4. RELOCATING FILES A. Record Retention Files B. Prosecutor's File $ 3,000 4,000 $ 7,000 CONSTRUCTION SUB-TOTAL $35,500 5. CONTINGENCY 3,500 6. CONSULTANT'S FEE 500 7. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 700 TOTAL PROJECT COST $40,200 Funding is available in the Miscellaneous Remodeling line item of 1984 Capital Improvement Program. At this time, authorization to prepare the necessary bidding documents, advertise, and receive bids is being requested. • . ebrt.iary 23, 1584 . #84 o41 Moved by Hobart supported by Gosling the resolution be adopted. AYES: Doyon, Fortino, Gosling, Hobart, Jackson, R. Kuhn, S. Kuhn, Lanni Law, McDonald, McPherson, Moffitt, Nelson, Olsen, Perinoff, Pernick, Price, Rewold, Wilcox, Aaron, Calandro. (21) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY or OAKLAND) I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of Miscellaneous Resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners at their meeting held an February 23, 1984 cr ,7.ini2! ticir In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan this ---ZsLday of 19 84 Countly C:crkiku,l;sLer oVwed.L,