No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1989.06.29 - 17000MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 89157 June 29, 1989 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, DR. G. WILLIAM CADDELL, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION -ONE ( ADDITIONAL VEHICLE TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS pursuant to Miscellaneous Resolution 117393 of December 8, 1975, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners adopted a "County policy on assignment of County vehicles"; and WHEREAS the policy for additional vehicles requires the affirmative recommendation of the Finance Committee; and WHEREAS Section G of this policy also states that the Finance Committee shall recommend to the Board of Commissioners an appropriation sufficient to cover the acquisition cost plus monthly charges for the balance of the current year; and WHEREAS the Oakland County Public Works Department, Facilities Engineering Division, has made a request to lease one (1) additional vehicle from the Oakland County Garage for one project engineer; and WHEREAS the purchase cost of the vehicle is $8,600 and said amount is in the Contingency Account to cover the acquisition cost; and WHEREAS the leased vehicle operating costs will be offset by a reduction in charges to personal mileage, therefore no additional appropriation is necessary for operations; and WHEREAS the County Executive recommends expansion of the County Car Fleet. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners authorizes an expansion of the County Car Fleet for the one (1) vehicle requested by the Public Works Department/Facilities Engineering Division. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $8,600 be transferred from the Contingency Account to the Facilities Engineering Division Budget to cover the acquisition cost of the one (1) vehicle as follows: From 4-10100-909-01-00-9900 Contingency $ (8,600) To 4-10100-148-01-00-8655 Engineering (Transfer to Motorpool) 8,600 -0-• Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. FINANCE COMMITTEE 1 HE,MY APPPO,VE THE FOR710ING RESOLUTION ASAP DATE NEEDED Re ai_nvep nP _ern ) DEPARTMENT HEAD. SIGNATUyzU 77/1/7, 31 6/06/89 REOUIS1T1ON FOR VEHICLE ASSIGNMENT DEPARTMENT _ Public Works/Facilities Engineering Date 6/06 /89 • Passenger Expected Monthly Mileage 1000 * * * * * * * * VEHICLE TYPE 1. Why Is this additional assignment necessaiTy? Construction cu_rently being made by the individual using his own car. freauency and nature Of the to use his own car as he feel the mileage rate does 2. Specifically, what additional work has created a need forthis assignment? Current work load requires trips to construction sites which are often eneral, not very conducive to inspections are aUe to not cover actual efficient vehicle o eration . . • 3. Now has this transportation problem been handled up to this time? Employee has used his own car but under the above-cited conditions is reluctant to continue. The County car would not be abused, it's just conditions. 4. Will this vehicle be assigned to a specific individual or will it be a pool vehicle It will be assigned to a specific person. If assigned to an individual, show his name and work classification. - Frank Doornweerd, Civil Engineer III • If assigned to amindividual, will the employee be allowed to drive the vehicle horn- et the end of the working day? No-not under normal circumstances.. 5. Explain why it would be better to assign a County vehicle rather than require the employee to use his private car, under a mileage reimbursement basis. See items 1, 2 and 3 above. I expect my mileage reimbursement to be , adjusted- downwara—angly. e It will be 6. WINI..±-erie.the.posnible rami4irAtiQes if this essianment is not made, difficult to visit some of the more remote job sites, i.e., County parks and airports. RESOLUTION # 891 57. June 29, 1989 Moved by Caddell supported by Pappageorge the resolution be adopted. AYES: Jensen, Johnson, R. Kuhn, S. Kuhn, Law, Luxon, McConnell, McPherson, Moffitt, Pappageorge, Pernick, Price, Rewold, Skarritt, Wolf, Aaron, Caddell, Calandro, Chester, Crake, Gosling, Hobart. (22) NAYS: McCulloch, Olsen, Bishop. (3) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lynn D, Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal, do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of the attached resolution, adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners at their regular meeting held on 1989 with the on record thereof now remaining on file in my office, and that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the whole thereof. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County at Pontiac,Michigan this 29th day of June , 1989 LYNYD. ALLEN, County Clerk Re0,5,tiar of Deeds