HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1989.05.25 - 17061May 25, 1989
Miscellaneous Resolution 8,9126
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, Dr. G. William Caddell, Chairperson
IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS - SOLID WASTE - 1989 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BUDGET AMENDMENT
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the county is involved in an ambitious integrated Solid Waste
Program; and
WHEREAS the program includes an update of the countywide Act 641 Plan,
as required by law, the development of a 1,500 ton per day Resource Recovery
Facility, Material Recovery Facilities, Composting Facility and the siting of a
forty year life landfill; and
WHEREAS the county has under contract Bishop, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds
as project coordinator and negotiator; _Camp, Dresser & McKee as engineering
consultant; Public Financial Management as financial advisor; Dickinson, Wright,
Moon, Van Dusen & Freeman as legal advisor and Rogers, Golden & Halpern, Inc. as
landfill siting consultant; and
WHEREAS the scope of work has increased dramatically from what was
anticipated in the 1989 budget; and
WHEREAS the implementation costs are ultimately recoverable from the
issuance of bonds; and
WHEREAS current effort anticipates a total commitment in 1989 for
Professional Services of $5,264,233 as presented in the attachment; and
WHEREAS currently the Oakland County Board of Commissioners has
authorized $2,462,768 for these efforts, leaving a balance of $2,801,465 needed
for the 1989 effort; and
WHEREAS the Department of Management and Budget has identified certain
sources of funds to cover these costs, specifically $904,619 from Special
Contingency for Solid Waste, $288,132 from the Solid Waste Designated Fund balance
and $1,608,714 to be advanced from the Capital Improvement Program.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners hereby authorizes the transfer of $904,619 from the Special
Contingency designated for Solid Waste (4-10100-909-01-00-9912) and the transfer
of $288,132 from the Solid Waste Designated Fund Balance and $1,608,714 to be
advanced from the Capital Improvement Program, Building Section to the Solid Waste
Unit for Professional Services (4-10100-141-15-00-3128) consistent with the
attachment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all contracts for the expenditure of these
funds must be approved by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move the adoption
of the foregoing resolution.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
RESOLUTION # 89126 May 25, 1989
Moved by Caddell supported by Crake the Planning and Building Committee
Report be accepted.
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted.
Moved by Caddell supported byCrake the resolution be adopted.
AYES: Wolf, Aaron, Bishop, Caddell, Chester, Crake, Ferrens, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Johnson, R. Kuhn,S. Kuhn, Law, McConnell, McCulloch, McPherson, Moffitt, Oaks,
Pappageorge, Pernick, Price, Rewold, Skarritt. (24)
NAYS: none. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal, do
hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of the attached resolution,
adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners at their regular meeting
held on May 25 , 19 89 with the original record thereof now remaining
on file in my office, and that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom,
and of the whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal
of said County at Pontiac,Michigan this 25th day of May , 1989
D. ALLEN, County Clerk
Register of Deeds
May 4, 1989
Daniel T. Murphy, Oakland County Executive
Milton W. Handout, PE, Director
COUNTY MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Oakland County is actively proceeding with the update of the county's Act 641 Solid Waste
Management Plan and the implementation of a Material Recovery Facility (MRF), Composting
Facility (CF), 1,500 TPD Resource Recovery Facility (RRF#1) and the siting of a fiarty year
life landfill. The county has hired:
Bishop, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds (BCPR) - Coordinator and Negotiator
Camp Dresser & McKee (CON) - Technical Advisor
Public Financial Management (PEN) - Financial Advisor
Dickinson, Wright, Moon, Van Dusen & Freeman (DWMVF) - Legal Advisor
Resource Recycling Systems, Inc. (RRS) MRF Advisor
Rogers, Golden & Halpern, Inc. (RGH) - Landfill Siting Consultant
to assist in the Plan Update and implementation program. Additional consultants will be
hired for the purpose of negotiating an energy contract with Detroit Edison, the
purchasing of facility sites, performing geology and hydrology studies, surveys, etc,, for
the implementation of the program.
As of April -, 1989, the county has contracts with BCPR, CDM, PFM, RGH, RRS and DWMVF. To
continue with the planning and implementation of the solid waste program, these contracts
will have to be amended to reflect additional work scope beyond what was originally
authorized.
In an attempt to properly budget for this work, BCPR and the county have prepared the
following budget for the next 10-12 months work program. It must be pointed out that this
is a flexible budget since additional major policy decisions will be made by the Board of
Commissioners during the next ten months which will effect the budget.
Listed below are explanations of the various programs within the county's Solid Waste
Program. Immediately following this explanation is the current funding status for
Professional Services and recommended funding sources to fully fund the efforts as
explained (Attachment A). Also attached is a summary detailing a consultant's effort for
a program, estimated amount of completion at the end of 1989 and the anticipated date of
completion for the consultant's contribution to this phase of the program (Attachment 8).
Finally, the last attachment is a detailed summary by consultants and a program including
the county's financial effort with a detailed scope of work and estimated budget for those
efforts (Attachment C). Finally, this budget reflects the scope of work at the county's
current pace. A delay could cause these estimates to be expended in subsequent years
rather than in 1989.
1989 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BUDGET
Act 641 Solid Waste Management Plan
Act 641 requires the designated county planning agent to update the county Solid Waste
Management Plan every five years. The Oakland County Solid Waste Planning Committee
(SWPC) is presently working on the Update and anticipates to complete the preparation of
the Plan Update by June 1, 1989. After the committee has approved the draft of the Plan,
it will be released for a ninety day review period which includes a public hearing. The
SWPC will review the public comments, approve the Plan and present it to the Board of
Commissioners.
One Public Works Drive * Pontiac, Michigan 48054-1695 (313) 858-0160 FAX No. (313) 858-1066
-2-
The Plan must then be approved by the Board of Commissioners and 67% of Oakland County
municipalities before final submission to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
The Plan Update must be completed and approved by the end of 1989. To complete this
effort, the anticipated Professional Services budget is $161,000.
Material Recovery Facility (MRF)
The county will be requesting RFIVRFP's for a MRF for the purpose of processing source
separated or co-mingled recyclable materials. The MRF will receive, process, store and
ship the following recyclable materials:
Newspapers
Office Papers
Computer Paper
Corrugated Paper
Ferrous Metal
Aluminum
Glass Containers
Plastics
White Goods
Batteries
Used Oil
Other Recyclables
The county will evaluate the RFO/RFP's to qualify vendors, negotiate a contract, receive
bids and select the successful vendor by January 1990 for the first MRF. During this
period, the county shall select the site for the facility, obtain necessary bond
financing, initiate land procurements and necessary due diligence. The Professional
Services budget to perform this effort is $712,000.
It is anticipated the planning and implementation effort for a second MRF will be started
in 1989. The 1989 Professional Services budget to perform this effort is $150,000. The
total 1989 Professional Services budget for both MRF's is $862,000.
Composting
The county had hoped to have a composting facility available by the summer of 1989 and,
therefore, had budgeted $1 million in the County Capital Program for the construction of
the 300 TPD facility. This facility is proposed to be owned and operated by the county.
Due to the negative response regarding the site of this facility, the county is in the
process of negotiating a contract with RRS for preparing the siting criteria and selecting
a site. It is anticipated this process could take up to six months. The Facility
Engineering Division will prepare the necessary drawings and specifications with technical
support from an outside engineering firm once the final site has been selected. It is
hoped the facility will be operational by the summer of 1990. The 1989 Professional
Services budget is $50,000.
Resource Recovery Facility #1 (RRF #1)
On March 20, 19897-ihe county and Westinghouse Electric entered into a contract to
construct and operate the first 1,500 TPD resource recovery facility. The bid price is
fixed for one year before adjustment factors effect the price. In the next ten months,
the county has to finalize the selection of the site, enter into service agreements with
municipalities to ensure the delivery of waste to the facility, obtain the necessary
permits, pursue state legislation for financing the project, execute energy contracts for
the sale of steam and electricity and process the sale of bonds. The 1989 Professional
Services budget is $1,648,000.
-3-
Southeast Oakland County incinerator Authority (S.O.C.I.A.)
The county had an initial meeting with S.O.C.I.A. and presented the Westinghouse Resource
Recovery Facility contract. We expect additional meetings to be held with the Authority
to evaluate the county's RRF versus the rehab of the Incinerator Authority's facility.
The 1989 Professional Services budget for these analysis could amount to $310,000.
Landfill
The county is in the process of selecting a forty year life landfill site. RGH, working
with the Landfill Siting Advisory Committee (LSAC), plans to make a recommendation of a
site by Fall, 1989. The Board of Commissioners will then proceed to purchase the property
and enter into contracts with the necessary consultants for the development of documents
to select a vendor to construct and operate the facility. The 1989 Professional Services
budget for this effort is $907,000.
Remaining Solid Waste Program
There are a number of other efforts which have to be started to complete a total solid
waste management program. Investigation and study regarding the proper disposal of
incinerator ash, household hazardous waste, infectious medical waste, construction debris
and special industrial waste.
Also, there are a number of efforts that interrelate between the different facilities.
For instance, the coordination of the total program, education and financing. The 1989
Professional Services budget for these efforts is $860,000.
Expenses Invoiced in 1989 for Work in 1988
CDM, PFM and BCPR performed work in 1988 that was expensed in 1989. The funds for these
expenses were carried forward from the 1988 budget to the 1989 budget by Miscellaneous
Resolution 89074. The total of these expenses was $466,233.
TOTAL 1989 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUDGET
Act 641 Solid Waste Management Plan Update
Material Recovery Facility
Composting
Resource Recovery I
Resource Recovery II
Landfill
Balance (Coordination, Education & Financing)
Previous Expenses
$ 161,000
862,000
50,000
1,648,000
310,000
907,000
860,000
466,233
$5,264,233
Milton W. Handorf, P.E.
Director, Dept. of Public Works
Larry Fox
Bishop, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds
MWH/mah
Attach.
$1,374,185
62,940
150,000
150,000
$1,737,125
$2,462,768
Attachment A
oAELAw camy, MICEICAN
DEPARIMMT OF PUBLIC I',ORES
1.989 SQUID WASTE PROFESSICrAT SERVICES
FWD).NG STATUS
In the 1989 Budget, the Cakland County Board of Camissioners allocated
$725,643 (including $300,000 from a Michigan D;M.R. grant for a. Resource
Recycling Facility) for Professional Services in the Solid Waste Unit.
Curing 1989 the Board of Cciffnissibners has amended this budget, adding
$1,737,125 as detailed belaw. The ma -ior portico. of this $1,737425, was
the carryforward of funds allocated but not spent in 1988. To accomodate
the request for a total 1989 funding - of $5,264,233, it is recumended that
funds he transferred from; the special contingency designated for Solid
Waste by Miscellaneous Resolution #89074; the Solid Waste Designated Fund
Balance; and the Capital ImproNerent Program as outlined below. It should
te pointed out that for the funds to be e‘wided the Board of
Comnissioners will have to authorize the contracts. Finally, this budget
anticipates completing various phases of the program. Should any delay
occur, those costs would be incurred not in 1989, but in subsequent years.
Description Amunt
1989 Professional Service Adopted Balget $ 725,643
BalgetAneriduents
1988 Appropriation Carry Forward
Appropriation. for C.D.M. - Act 641
Appropriation for P.F.M.
Appropriation for Dickenson Wright
Total of all ants
Total 1989 Professional Service Amended Budget
Additional Resources Requested
Special Wotingency (as anended)
Transfer from Designated Fund Balance
Transfer from. Capital InT=A4fent Program
$ 904,619
288,132
1,608,714
Total Additional Realitces $2,801,465
Total 1989 Program Request $5,264,233
Prepared by
Budget Division
May 2, 1989
Consultant
C.D.M.*
B.C.P.R.*
Dickinson, Wright
Ittal
M.R.F. #2 -0- 150,000 June 1989 On Going
Total $862,000
Engineering Consultant
Resource Reycling
Total
Attachment B
Page 1 of 3
Per 641 gaLID WASTE PLAN UPDATE
Expenses Percentage of
Incurred 1989 Task Complete Starting Ending
Prior to 1989 Request @ End of 1989 Date Date
$165,787 $119,000 100.00% Dec. 1987 Nov. 1989
32,000 100.00% Jan. 1989 Dec. 1989
7,708 10,000 100.00% Jan. 1988 I. 1989
$161,000
* Eisting Contract
Consultant.
MATERIAL FECMEVY FACILITIES
Expenses Percentage of
Incurred 1989 Task Complete Starting a]ding
Prior to 1989 Pequest @ End of 1989 Date Date
M.R.F. #1 - Planning effort
B.C.P.R. • -0-
Engineering Consultant -0-
-0-
Resource Recycling -0-
Dickinson Wright -0-
Other Consultants * -0-
Sub-Total *
$265,000 90.00% Jan. 1989 Feb. 1990
187,000 100.00% May, 1989 Co Going
45,000 100.00% June 1989 Dec. 1989
90,000 June 1989 On Going
25,000 100.00% June 1989 Co Going
100,000 75.00% Oct. 1989 Dec. 1989
$712,000
* This schedule is only the planning- effort and does not include construction.
For M.P-F. #1. ether consultants are for preliminary land procurennt
preparation. M.R.F. #2 is for prelimirary planning efforts.
CYJEC6T1V3 FACILITY
Consultant
a--;penses Percentage of
incurred 1989 Task Complete Starting Ending
Prior to 1989 Request @ End of 1989 Date Date
-0- $ 20,000 50.00% June 1989 Nay, 1990
-0- 20,000 50.00% Sept 1989 Aug, 1990
-0- 10,000 50.00% June 1989 Sept 1990
$ 50,000
This current program plans on the County's Facility Engineering Division
preparing the drawings and specifications.
r r 111C1
Date
$100,000
155,000
50,000
5,000
C.D.M.
P.F.M.
lAckenson Wright
Attachment B
Page 2 of 3
PILCNERY FACILITY #1
Consultant:
EXpenses
Irurred
Prior to 1989
Percentage of
1989 Task Complete Starting Ending
Bequest @ End of 1989 Date Date
B.C.P.R.
P.F.M.
Dickinson Wright
Other Consultants
$347,000
273,439
186,997
40,000
-0-
• $345,000
950,000
93,000
100,000
160,000
90.00%
90.00%
90.00%
90.00%
90.00%
Sept 1988
1987
Aug. 1988
1988
June 1989
Feb. 1990
Cn Going
Feb. 1990
Feb. 1990
Feb. 1990
Total • $1,648,000
This scope of work is pp to authorization to proceed with construction.
93CIA NFECTIATICN
Consultant
Expenses Percentage of
incurred 1989 Task Complete Starting
Prior to 1989 Peqpest 0 End of 1989 Date
Ittal $ 310,000
Preliminary contact has begun. This bWget allows for beginning planning
anl negotiation should SOCIA decide to become integrated, with the county systam
LANDFILL
Consultant
Expenses Percentage of
Imirred 1989 Task Complete Starting
Prior to 1989 Request 0 End of 1989 Date
Ending
Date
B P,R,
Dickenson VI-ight
-0- $ 10,000
83,423 867,000
0 , 25,000
-0- 5,000
5.00% Aug. 1988 July 1991
25.00% July 1988 Cn Going
5.00% Sept 1988 May, 1991
5.00% May, 1989 July 1991
TOtal $907,000
This Scope of WUrk is for the planning effort for one site only.
Aug, 1988 Jan, 1993
Pending Pending
100.00% Jan, 1989 Aug, 1989
Attachment B
Page 3 of 3
BALANCE OF PBOGPAM
Consultant
Expenses Percentage of
Incurred 1989 Task Complete Starting adirg
Prior to 1989 Pe-quest @ End of 1989 Date . Date
B.C'.P.R.
Engineer - C-47TL Applic.
Engineer - Household
Hazardous Waste -
Engineer - Infect. waste
Engineer - Duro Waste
ireer - Indust- Waste
Dickinson Wright
Other Consultants
Total
-0- $630,000
-0- 10,000
-0- 55,000
-0- 50,000
-0- 5,000
-0- 5,000
-0- 5,000
-0- 100,000
$ 860,000
Total 1989 Program Scope of Work
Invoices E4ensed in 1989 for Wbrk
Completed in 1988
31 C.D.M.
2) P.F.11-
3) B.C.P.R.
$4,798,000
$198,228
186,197
81,808
Total Program Request for 1989 $5,264,233
AIM= aRRAID IRDIOA NTEDAORE
NCSNINDING apalmi
APEald SAIVEICSFOD
Wara
lArd°c1
OL9'OLZ"S$
-----
OSO I T80'
0001 76$
000'0$
On'OTL IT$
000'L8$
000'-a1-7"Z$
000 1 SZT
000'L98$
000 1 SST$
000'0S6$
000'0F.$
000 1LE$
000"6IT$
0L9'at$ 000 1 09E$ 000'0S1$ 0001 00T$ 000'8C$ 000 I LLYT$
OSO'TEZ 000'00T 000'S 0 0
0001 ST$ 0$ 000'S$ 0$ 000'SZ$
0001 0E$ 000'S$ 0001 0S$
O9'Z9$ 000 1 09T$ 000 1 001$ 0$ 000'E6$
000'LC$ 0$ 0$ 000'01$ 0$
000'LE6$ 000'L$
000'£6T$ 000'Zg$
ONV8D
HVAECadJ rcrIVE
MIACINTI
NOLI1II090\14IaS
AIIMOVa LdlaCCGd 22011062H
=OVA CNUISOMWOD
LIFIT3,V,4 TH2ACORH TEAGEWN
avaza mna T9 OV
000'00T$ 000 1 SZ$ 000'06$ 000'0L$
000'0T$
000d 0C9
0000T$
000'00T$
000'SK$
000'0g$
000 1 0K$
000'7,E$
MIMS
S 0T -abed
3 qua3Ilo2-4417
ACT 641 PLAN UPDPLE
ALLachnent C
Page 2 of 5
SCOPE OF WORK
1_ Engineering Update *
2. Presentation (3 meetings)
Taw.,
RESOURCE DICKINSON
C.D.M. P.F.M. RECYCLING 'cABIGET OTHER COUNTY TOTAL
$113,100 $23,000 $8,000 $23,000 '$167,000
5,900 9,000 2,000 9,000 25,900
$119,000 $32,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $132,000 $193,000
* 1) These amounts are currently under contract.
2) The county portion is the operating and salary costs which were authorized in the 1.989 Budget.
KAMRIAL RBOOVERY FACILITY #I
EICINEERITIZ.
SIVE a' WORK oasuizt-LT REEOURCE
P.F.M. PEL'YCLII\Z
DICKINSW
INTICalT OTHER °OWN TOTAL
Material Recovery Facility #1
1. Policy Statement $3,149 $230,000 $3,200 $25,000 $2,310 $263,659
2. PFP/PFQ 19,953 5,200 770 25,923
3. Vendor Neg & Sal 59,020 5,800 12,320 77,140
4. Day. Fin. Permit 66,789 4,170 70,959
Mtg. & Public Hearing
5, Siting 10,000 25,430 25,430 6. in Evaluation 5,800 5,800 -). Education 80,000 80,000
8. Land Procurement Prep. 100,000 100,000 9. Escrow-Financing 25,000 25,000 50,000 10. ale Dillicance (Talr) 7,000 10,000 40,000 57,000
1 ', .T,-caJaaauort 0
12. Diner Direct CL-4.:zs 31,089 31,089
$187,000 $265,000 $45,000 $90,000 $25,000 $100,000 $75,000 $787,000 g'Sa--912TAL
MATEF:IAL RECOVERY FAC. #2
TOTNIJ *
50,000 75,000 25,000 150,000
$237,000 $340,000 $70,000 $90,000 $25,000 $100,000 $75,000 $937,000
* 1) Unless indicated the other direct expenses are included in the task estimates.
2) The county portion is the operating and salary costs vklith were authorized in the 1989 Budget.
COMPOSTING FACILITY
.Attachtent C
Page 3 of 5
10,000
1. Tedh. Assist. & Review $8,020 $20,000
2. Siting
3. Engineering *
4. Land Procurement Prep. $10,000
5. Other Direct Costs 1,980
$17,000 $45,000
10,000
20,000 20,000
10,000
1,980
PEI RESOF6KE FAMLTTY
SCOPE CF VCR<
ENGINEERING
CONSULTANT B.C.P.R.
DICKINSON
ItiBIGHT OTHER COUNTY TOTAL
RESOUR2i
R -YOLING
$251,800
10,030 41,030
60,000 20,850 136,725
11,550 11,550
11,550 250,550
160,600
8,640 574,040
$100,000
$0 $100,000 $160,000 $62,620 $1,710,620
122,100
2,850
22,275
12,100
100,000
25,000
$100,000
SCOPE CF INOW
ENGINEERING RESOURCE DICKINSON
CONSULTANT BCPR PFM. FECYMING W9,1GHT OTHER COUNTY TCTAL
TOTAL $20,000 $20,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $37,000 $87,000
* 1) Facility Engineering will provide the drawings & speoificaticns for the facility.
2) The county proportion is the operating and salary costs which were authorized in the 1989 Budget.
1: Siting (Oak. or Orion) * $71,800 $80,000
2. Municiple Serv. Agree. * 31,000
3. Detroit Edison Contracts* 41,600
4. Steam Contract *
5. Air Quality Contract 239,000
6. Health Risk Assessment 152,000 8,600
7. Enviromental Permitting 399,000 $160,000 6,400
8. Financing * 15,600 80,000 26,500
9. Leg. - Regulation 2,650
10. Financial Documentation 22,275
11_ ZOO.- InEuTano,, 12,100
Engr. FP;-)9ibi1ity .
13. !Escrow Financing 25,000
14,275
$950,000 $345,000 $93,000
* Existing Contracts
The county portion is the operating and salary costs which were authorized in the 1989 Budget.
P±Itaci.IlentC
Page 4 of 5
SOCIA INIEGOTIATICN
ENGINEERING RESOURCE DICKINSON
SCOPE OF WOCK CONSULTANT B.C.P.R. P.F.M. RECYCLING 'WIGHT OTHER CCUNTY TOTAL
FLR..F. Analysis 155,000 100,000 50,000 5,000 30,000 340,000
TOTAL $155,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $30,000 $340,000
LANDFITT,
ENGINEERING RESOIRCE DICKLNKN
SCOPE OF A,13Mc CONSULTANT B.C.P.R. P.F.M. RECYCLING WRIGHT OTHER 00UNIY TOT.M,
1. Siting * $367,000 $10,000 $5,000 $15,000 $397,000
2. Engineering Evaluation 500,000 500,000
3. Financing $25,000 25,000
TOTAL $867,000 $10,000 $25,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $15,000 $922,000
* Eisting Contracts
The county portion is the operating and salary costs which were authorized in the 1989 Budget.
BALANCE OF PROGRAM Page 5 of 5
SCOPE OF TZBK.
1. GPANT APPLICATIONS *
A. Data Collection
B. Application Prep.
C. Processing & Admin.
D. Other Direct Costs
6. EDUCATICN-PRCMOTION
A. Education
B. Promotion
$100,000 $115,000 $215,000
$ 35,000 $ 35,000
ENGINEERING RDSOURZE DICKINSON
CONSULTANT B.C.P.R. P.F.M. PTCYMING 'VNPIGET OTHER COUNTY . TOTAL
3,000 3,000
5,650 5,650
$3,250 3,250
1,350 1,350
SUB,TOTAL $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,250 $13,250
2. HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS VASTE
A. Policy Statement $15,000 $5,000 $13,000 $33,000
B. Data Collection 2,700 2,700
C. Design Implementation • 20,750 20,750
D. Implementation 7,400 7,400
E. Other Direct Costs 9,150 9,150
SUB-TOTAL $55,000 $0 . . . $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $13,000 $73,000
3. METUICUS WASTE
Policy Statement & Data Coll. $50,000 $25,000 $13,000 $88,000
4. ITECLITION 1,.,A,ETE
Policy Statement & Data Coll. $5,000 $5,000 $6,200 $16,200
5. LNEUSTRIAL SPECLU,IWEE
Policy Statement & Data Coll. $5,000 $5,000 $6,200 $16,200
saB-KTRL $O c'10 $0 (zo,
,,,,
cZA
--, $200,000 $150,000 $250,000
7. MISZELLANMJS
A. Coordination $270,000 $9,200 $279,200
s. M.S.W.B. 6,650 8,650
C. Ash Handling $100,000 100,000
D. S.W. Administration 11,550 11,550
B. Financing Pate Stca.7ture 75,000 75,000
F. Legislation'-St. & Fed 100,000 100,000
G. Miscellaneous 50,000 50,000
SUB-ICTAL $0 $595,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,400 $624,400
TCTAL BALANCE OF PROGRAM • $125,000 $630,000 $0 $0 $5,000 $100,000 $221,050 $1,061,050
The county portion includes additional resources for education and. promotion. A detailed request for
additional resources (staff and oderating) will be.provided to the Board in rAd-suumer.