HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1989.08.17 - 17303Miscellaneous Resolution 89203 August 17, 1989
BY: HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE -Susan G. Kuhn, Chairperson
RE: PROBATE COURT-OAKLAND COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND BUDGET 1989-90
TO: THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS, Pursuant to provisions of Act 280 of the Public Acts
of 1975, as amended, Oakland County is required to develop and
submit a plan and budget for the provision of funding of foster care
services to the Office of Children's and Youth Services, Department
of Social Services annually; and
WHEREAS, The Oakland County Probate Court, County of Oakland,
and the Oakland County Department of Social Services have developed
the attached foster care services budget for the State's fiscal
year, October 1, 1989 through September 30, 1990; and
WHEREAS, The Health and Human Services Committee has reviewed
this budget and recommends its submission to the State Office;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Oakland County Board
of Commissioners authorize submission of the 1989-90 Oakland County
Child Care Fund Budget to the State Office of Children and Youth
Services, Department of Social Services.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the. Board of Commissioners
be and is hereby authorized to sign said budget.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Health & Human Services Committee, I
move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. _
. ,
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
EV APPROVE 74F FOREGOING RESO
CHILD CARE FUND
1989 -1990
PROPORTIONATE. AMOUNTS & PERCENTAGES OF GROSS EXPENDITURES
GROSS EXPENDITURES: $12,982,628 CAP LEVEL; $7,835,499
1. INSTITUTIONS (CV, CO, PRIVATE = $11,605,800 (89.4%)
A. C.V. (J, J-2, A -S) = $3,417,435
(B, A, G) = $3,710,358
(H, A-N) = $2,636,307
84.1% of Total
Inst. Gross Exp.
B. C.O.
C. Private
= $1,346,800 11.6% of Total
Inst. Gross Exp.
= $ 494,900 4.3% of Total
Inst. Gross Exp.
2. IN-HOME CARE = $617,143 (4.8%)
A. Alternatives to Se:ur• Detention = $177,479
- B. Early Offender Prozram = $27-1,361
C. In-Home Family Treatment = $ 89,762
D. Intensive Counselimg = $ 46,591
E. In-Home Detention = $ 31,950
.3. .FAMILY FOSTER CARE = $7E9,685 (5.9%)
A. Court Supervised = $420,650
B. Court Placed (Private Agency) = $231,920
Supervised
C. DSS Supervised and Purchased =.$107,115
COUNTY PORTION OF GROSS EXPENDITURE (85.6%) = $11,110,900
COURT PORTION OF GROSS EXPEN:ITURE (13.6%) = $ 1,764,143
DSS PORTION OF GROSS EXPENDKURE (.008%) = $ 107,115
GRCES EXPENDITURE $12,982,628
JMM:slm
8-2-89
ANTICIPATED EXPENDiTURES
rss COURT COM5IN ED
759,685 652,570
11,605,800 11,605,800
617,143 617,143
, County 5096/State 50%
COST SHARING RATIOS County 50-10096/State 0-5096*
'State reimbursement dependent upon state CCF I
Mance at end cd !lace) yeas.
II. CHILD CARE FUND
Foster Care During Release Appeal
Period
0 0
•
.11,penger.K.P.Milf.n
COUNTY CHILD CARE BUDGET SUMMARY:
Michigan Department of Social Services .\
For the Office of Children and Youth Services
Ciny
Oakland
Fi,carenor
POtober . 1 1989 to Septeinber 30, 1990
TYPE OF CARE
I. CHILD CARE FUND
A. Family Foster Care .........
Court Cootact Per.,on Ta4nphono Number '
Cynthia A. Harper 858-0256
Ems Cornact Person Telophono Numbnf
Jeanne 1A":.-.1ter 858-1481
107,115
B. Institutional Care
C. In Home Care
D. Independent Living ........
0
NOTE: DO NOT INCLUDE
H. AND I. IN THE
TOTAL EXPENDI-
TURE LINE_
E. SUBTOTALS
F. Revenue ......... ... —
G. Net Expenditure ..... „
107,115
0
12,875,513
2,098,528
5,310
12,982,628
2,098,528
10,884,100
7,835,499
3,048,601
5,310
H. Capped Expenditure Level
I. Net Expenditure Over Cap
COST SHARING RATIOS County 096/State 100%
III. JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES FUND
Basic Grant ...... ....... 0
County'0%/State 100%
$15,000.00 Maximum COST SHARING RATIOS
10,889,410 IV. TOTAL EXPENDITURE
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION
THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THE PROGRAM BUDGET PRESENTED ABOVE We certify
tat the budget submitted above represents an anticipated gross expenditure for the fiscal year October 1, 19 thru
September 30, 19
Presiding
County
C-riairparson, Board
38S.21:91(Pavr.8- Previous; edition obsokne.
The Department of Social Sorvicoa will not cVact-Inunsta agairtatterfirt4tvIclual
or group b*C2078. Of faCo, SOX religion, age, mason./ ongin. gloa,
status', handicap, or political beliefs-
*71..•.< •
• a :
' , • —
for,scame:
7-
;11,4;;;414,-
44,0
v..140", 1.7.•A-7...N.,-,:;,7•7trl -
• - -*Ow
Anticipated
.Days Care
Annual
Gross Cost
(Combined total
anticipated expense)
652,570 37,000
** 231,920 5,000
103/106 3,377
107,115 3,642
:759,685 40,642
County Child Care: Budget Detail
Page 1
lho DLIPTIM01%1 PI Social SeivicoS will !MI thscrirninale agaumi
any individual tn group bocauso tI taco, sux, rel[giun, ago, naliulia
oligin, color, marital slalus, handicap, or pohlical b6els,
AUTHORITY: Ac! 87, Paho Ads or 1978,
As Amended,
COMPLETION; FlequIred,
PENALTY; Slab e reinibursemeffl wilt be
withheld Dom local governmenl,
COUNTY CHILD CARE — DETAIL BUDGET
Michigan Department of Social Services
For the Office of Children and Youth Services
F.Y. October 1, 19.89 — September 30, 19_9D
County Oakland
Date Submitted
CHILD CARE FUND
TYPE OF CARE
A. FAMILY FOSTER CARE .
1. Court
a, Court Supervised
Foster Care Payments
b. Court Placed (Private Agency)
Foster Caro and Administrative
Rate Payments
Court Subtotal
2. County DSS
a. County HS Supervised
Foster Care Payments
b, County DSS Placed
Foster Care and Administrative
Rate Payments
County DSS. Subtotal
COMBINED FAMILY FOSTER CARE TOTAL
* Includes 34,650 Nonscheduled Cost
** Includes 10,590 Nonscheduled Cost
055 2052 trier 6 85j Nevioils edittons tanaltle.
* 420,650 32,000
4,015 ' 265
c. County DSS Placed In-State
Foster Care Payments
b. County DSS Placed Out-of-State
Fos ter Care Payments
County Child Care: Budget Detail
Page 2
Annual Anticipated
TYPE OF CARE Gross Cost Days Care .
B. INSTITUTIONAL CARE . ,
1. Private Institution
a. Court Placed In-State * 494,900 4,029 Foster Care Payments
b. Court Placed Out-of-State , 0 - 0
Foster Care Payments
494,900 4,029 Court Subtotal
0 County ()SS Subtotal 0
494,900
COMBINED SUBTOTAL PRIVATE INSTITUTION
* Includes 15,810 Nonscheduled Cost
IISS flv MI Nevinus !o flIflI e.
Anticipated Number
of Children for Anticipated
In-Home Care Service Days Care.
617,143 3,311
617 /143 3 ,311
1 0 •
0
0
0
0
0
Annual
Gross Cost
(Combined total
anticipated expense)
0
0
0
0
0
County Child Care: Budget Detail
Page 3
TYPE OF CARE
Annual
Gross Cost °
(Combined total
anticipated expense)
Number Anticipated
of Beds Days Care
2, Court Operated Institutions (county Executive)
a. Detention CV Bldg. "J" (1&2) & "A—South" •
b. Group Care Facility CV Bldg . "13," "D J,"
c.• Shelter Care Facility CV Bldg. "B ," "A—North"
d. Other Camp Oakland
Subtotal Court Operated . Institutions
3. County DSS Operated Facilities
a. Group Care Facility
b. Shelter Care Facility
c, Other
Subtotal County °SS Operated Facilities
COMBINED INSTITUTIONAL CARE TOTAL
3,417,435 73 26,645
3 /710,358 80' 29,200
2,636,307 60 20,805
1,346/800 36 13,140
11,110/900 249 89,790
o 0 0
Q .
O 0 0
11/605,800 249 93 /819
TYPE OF CARE
C. 1N-HOME CARE SERVICE COMPONENTS
1. Court Subtotal
2. County DSS Subtotal .
COMBINED TOTAL IN-HOME CARE
D. INDEPENDENT LIVING
1. Court
a. Court Supervised Foster Care Payments
b. Court Placed Foster Care and
Administrative Rate Payments
Court Subtotal
2. County DSS
a. County DSS Supervised Foster Care Payments
b. County DSS Placed Foster Care and
Administrative Rate Payments
County DSS- Subtotal
COMBINED TOTAL INDEPENDENT LIVING
Annual
Gross Cost
12,875,513
' 107,115
(Combined total
anticipated expense)
12,982,628
Anticipated
Days Care
130,819
3,642
134,461
473,328 . Parent Reimbursement
220,500
1,404,700
2,098,528
Social Security and Veterans
CV per diem / State aid .& School meals
0
0
0
0
2,098,528
. 10,884,100
6
134,961 10,889,410
County Child Care: Budget Detail
Page 4
TYPE OF CARE
E. 1. COURT SUBTOTAL A THRU
2. COUNTY DSS SUBTOTAL A THRU D ,
COMBINED SUBTOTAL GR0Sk COST . A THRU D
F, ANTICIPATED REVENUE
1. Court
a. Net Probate Court Ordered Collections
(75% of Gross)
. b. Gove'rnment Benefit Collections (100% of Gross)
C. Other Receipts (100% Of Gross)
Court Subtotal
2. County OSS
a. Probate Court Ordered Collections
(100% of Gross) 0
b, Government Benefit Collections (100% of Gross) 0
Other Receipts (100% of Gross)
County DSS , Subtotal
COMBINED TOTAL , REVENUE, •
G: SUBTOTAL COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND NET EXPENDITURES
(Subtract Revenue from E. Combined Subtotal Gross Cost)
Capped Net Expenditure Level , 7,835 / 499 • Do not Include in
3,048,601 the TOTM. COUNTY
. . Net Expenditure Over CAP CHILD CARE Line.
11. FOSTER CARE DURING RELEASE APPEAL PERIOD
III. COUNTY BASIC GRANT
1. Court Subtotal
2. County DSS Subtotal
COMBINED TOTAL COUNTY BASIC GRANT
IV, TOTAL COUNTY CHILD -CARE I THRU M
oss ?cm ouv 6 66) rlevinus rAtirms Atolaln,
5/310 500
County
Oakland
Fiac-al Year
October 1, 1989 to Septefaber 30, 1990
• Court Contact Ponsaa Ta4ephona Number .
Cynthia A. Harper 88-0296
D.SS Contact Patton Te4aptvyle Numb43,r
Jeanne Walter 858-1481
!RES TYPE OF CARE ANTICIPATED EXPEND
COURT
652,570
11,605,800
Ca'a
107,115
COMBINED
759,685
11,605,300
107,115
D. Independent Living —
E. SUBTOTALS • 0 0 ° ° • 0 • CO • 12,8751513 ) 12,982,628
NOTE: DO NOT INCLUDE
1-1. AND L IN 11-1E
TOTAL EXPENDI-
TURE UNE.
F. Revenue ............... — — —
G. Net Expenditure
0 2,098,528 2,08,528
10,834,100
-. County 50%/State 50%
COST SHARING RATIOS County 50-100%/state 0_50%*
*Stubs retrnbureettient dependent upon state COI'
balance at end of ftecia year.
H. Capped Expenditure Level .. —
I. Net Expenditure Over Cap .....
7,835,499
3,048,601
5,310 5,310
10,889,410
COUNTY CHILD CARE BUDGET SUMMARY
Michigan Department of Social Services
For the Office of Children and Youth Services
I. CHILD CARE FUND
A. Family Foster Care
B. Institutional Care —
C. In Home Care . _ ....... 617,143 617,143
IL CHILD CARE FUND
Foster Care During Release Appeal
Period ....... ..... —
COST SHARING RATIOS County OolYState 100%
III. JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES FUND
Basic Grant . — 0 0
County -0%/State 100%
$15,000.00 Maximum COST SHARING RATIOS
IV. TOTAL EXPENDITURE 0 Go • ° 0 • 0 • • • 0 • • • • ° ° • .1. • 0 • • ° • 0 O• e• • 0 • • 0 0 •• • • • • • • 0 la 0 e • • 0
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION
THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THE PROGRAM BUDGET PRESENTED ABOVE We certify
that the budget submitted above represents an anticipated gross expenditure for the fiscal year October 1, 19 thru
.3eptember 3f), 19
emidin
County Df
Content4K:1%m Signature i'24-eirper3041, &lard
County Executive S4gnature
OR
3SS-20,21(Flav..¢3-8S) PrevioLta edition obsolete. The Digignirpect of Sociaf SafVf•Cel teiti nof apeltirainate ge4net in7 irOtvirfted or group because of recie, sea. recei, age. neataneli origin, =her, aternai
ale" handicap, Or politats1
AUTHORITY: Att Pulaticulon ai da JAMMIZId.
COMPLETIOtt Recyglavt.
PENALTY: State todeabuntannotn W,1 hi; VdirrtVg•frt frefer
loud government_
August 17, 1989
FISCAL REPORT (misc.89203)
FINANCE COMMITTEE, DR. G. WILLIAM CADDELL, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: PROBATE COURT - OAKLAND COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND BUDGET 1989-90
TO TEE OAKLAND comry BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Finance Committee having reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #
reports as follows:
1) The Child Care Fund application is for the period October 1, 1989
through September 30, 1990;
2) The Michigan Department of Social Services requires this
application be submitted by September 1, 1989, necessitating
Board of Commissioner approval before that dead line;
3) Application is necessary to be eligible for Child Care Fund
reimbursement, the figures provided are estimates based on
current available data and may not reflect the eventual adopted
budget and/or actual expenditures for this program;
4) The application reflects $12,982,628 in gross expenditures and
$2,098,628 in offsetting revenues, with net expenditures
estimated at $10,884,100;
5) Indications by the state, is that the 1989/1990 Child Care Fund
expenditure cap will be $7,835,499 (of which the County recieves
50%), the save amount as the 1988/1989 cap;
6) Should the application he approved by the State as submitted,
Oakland County will exceed the cap by $3,048,601, resulting in an
effective reimbursement rate of 36%;
7) Submittal of this application will not affect our lawsuit
regarding the Child Care fund cap.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move the
adoption of the foregoing report.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
tit
TS -frprobate
Resolution # 89203 August 17, 1989
17th this . August , 1989
LYNN/D. ALLEN, County ClerkL
Regifster of Deeds -
day
Moved by Susan Kuhn supported by Gosling the resolution be adopted.
AYES: R. Kuhn, S. Kuhn, Luxon, McConnell, McPherson, Moffitt, Oaks, Olsen,
Pappageorge, Pernick, Price, Rewold, Skarritt, Wolf, Aaron, Bishop, Caddell,
Calandro, Chester, Crake, Ferrens, Hobart, Johnson. (23)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal,
do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of the attached
resolution adopted by the _Oakland County Board of Commissioners at their regular
meeting held on August 17, 1989
with the original record thereof now remaining in my offic.e, and
that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the
whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, f have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan
F. Revenue
0, Net Expenditur e ........ a
Court Gordect Pervcri
Cynthia A. Harper
USS Contsct Person
Jeanne Walter
757-3-171 5,310
0 0
10,889,410
neWairlimitanviavel.a
Da"7 ,9Y
Dot*
Da
COUTY CHILD CARE BUDGET SUMMARY
Department of Social Services
For the Office of Children and Youth Services
ic_ounty -
[ Oakland
FcJ Year
October 1, 1989 to Septe4ber 30, 1990
TYPE OF CARE
CHILD cratt7.. RAID
A_ Family Foster Care „ .........
B. ln,stitutional Care . ...........
G. In Home Care ........... , „
a Independent Living ..
E. SUBTOTALS
NOTE PO NOT INCLUDF
AP !, K4 'I HE
TOTAL E]<PENDI-
TURE UN.
.
County 50%/State 50%
COST SHARING RATIOS County 50-100%/State 0-50%*
-9-h-t1 reimbursement dependent upon state CCr
helence st end of Itrost peer. —
IL CHILD CARE FUND
Telephone Number
858-0256
Telephone Number
858-1481
ANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES
COURT COMBINED
107,115 652,570 759,685
/
11,605,800 11,605,800
617,143 617,143
107,115 12,875,513 12,982,628
0 2,098,528 2,098,528
0,884,100
H. Capped Expenditure Level .. — 7,835,499
I. Net Expenditure Over Cap 3,048,601
Foster Care During Release Appeal
COST SHARING RATIOS I County 0%/State 100%
ID. JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES FUND
BasicGrant ... _ . _ ......... ......
County 0%/State 100%
$15,000.00 Maximum
IV. TOTAL EXPENDITURE „ .... _ — ........... ...... .....................
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION
THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THE PROGRAM BUDGET PRESENTED ABOVE We certify
-.hat the budget submitted above represents an anticipated gross expenditure for the fiscal year October 1, 19 thru
3eoternber 31. 19
i'renidIng Jui belie Court, Juvanile? inion,
1 •
Chairperson, Elorird Commiasipinara Signature
COST SHARING RATIOS
County Ct
AND/
OR
County Eseeillive SIgnsture Dote
r-Tho Dailararteril el Social Serviced!. will rini iiiticrirranatei a.gainsl any individual or group became-a of rata sea, milginn, age, noppyin, of tg i ri, cafor, rmutbo
status, handicap, or poRlical belief&
Awn-torn-ft Act el, PuberstionDi 19713, anttondexi
COMPLEIlOtt Rewire& PERALTY: Suite vairnbuninraent will Pa witalvtild trtan
IOCRJ gOViirlinant.
DS9-20P1(rie,...e-ae Previous ed/Son obsolete
IN-HOME CARE CERTIFICATION
Fund Restrictions and Program Requirements
In-Home Care program expenditures are restricted to new or expanded programs •
that are alternatives to out-of-home institutional or foster care. MC funds may
not be used to duplicate servies.
A. ELIGIBLE CLIENTS/STAFFING
1. Children under the jurisdiction of the court, as an alternative to removal
from the child's home, provided that:
a. such care is an alternative to detention or other out-of-home care
and:
a written complaint has been received and accepted by the .
court,
* the expenditures are not for judicial costs,
the caseload size or services are intensive,
* non-scheduled payments are not made to pay for basic family
needs otherwise available through public assistance programs,
the parent(s) and the youth have agreed in writing to receive
lo-Horne Care services, or a temporary order has been entered
pending an adjudication hearing; or
b. such care is provided to children who at the dispositional hearing
are ordered into in-Home Care as an alternative to foster care or
other out-of-home care, and:
* the expenditures are not for judicial costs,
* the services are intensive, and
* non-scheduled payments are not .made to pay for, basic family
needs otherwise available through public assistance programs.
2. The In-Home Care early return option may be used to accelerate the
early return of a youth from family foster care, institutional care, or
other out-of-home care when the case plan identifies an early return
goal and the services are provided to members of the child's family.
The case plan should identify the family strengths and deficiencies
which, if corrected, would permit the youth to be returned home early.
In-Home Care Services would typically be provided to the family during
the time that the youth is in out-of-home care and, if necessary, for a
period of time after the youth has returned to the family.
—32--
3. The county Department of Social Services may provide In-Home Care
services if the juvenile court orders care and supervision of a court
ward.
4. The county Department of Social Services may provide In-Home Ca -re
services from its sub-account for substantiated Protective Serves cases,
provided that
such In-Home Care services prevent the need to petition the juvenile
court for removal or prevent placement in voluntary foster care, and
* non-scheduled payments are not made to cover basic family needs
otherwise available through public assistance programs.
5. In-Home C are funds shall not be used to meet the court staff-to-youth
population ratio of 1 to 6,000 as specified in the Juvenile Court
Standards and A dm inis fro five Guidelines for the Care of Children.
Court staff hired after 4/30/85, who are responsible for ease plan
development and monitoring must meet the qualifications established in
the juvenile Court Administrative Guidelines . for the Care of Children.
The following positions are included:
* Supervisory Personnel
* Probation Officers
* Counselors
County Department of Social Services staff and supervisory staff
providing direct In-Home Care services must meet the standards set
forth in Rules 400.6124, 400.6126 and 400.6128 of the Administrative
Rules for Child Placing Agencies.
8. County Department of Social Services staff and supervisory staff
providing direct In-Home Care services must be state civil servants
assigned to classifications and levels equivalent to staff and supervisors
in the state foster care program.
9. In-Home Care reimbursements for program and administrative office
• space, county purchased supplies, salaries and wages for county
employees who provide direct services or support for these services are
subject to the same restrictions as reimbursements in county operated
institutions.
—33—
DATE:
DATE:
Pre.siditit
juve.nile iJivisiorz
Probate Court
7-4).
In-Home care funds and services are subject to state review and audit and
noncompliance with the above restrictions and requirements may result in
withholding or repayment of state reimbursement.
The county must have all In-Home Care Contracts processed trough the
county's format contract approval procedures.
The signatures below certify that In-Home Care policy stated in this
document have been reviewed. It is understood that these are conditions for
claiming hi-Home Care fund reimbursement.
County Director of Social Services
—35—
In-Home care funds and services are subject to state review and audit and
noncompliance with the above restrictions and requirements may result in
withholding or repayment of state reimbursement.-
The county must have all In-Horne Care Contracts processed through the
county's formal contract approval procedures.
The signatures below certify that in-Home Care policy stated in this
document have been reviewed. It is understood that these are conditions for
claiming In-Home Care fund reimbursement.
DATE: =,-? ?;
. _ ,../.----
Presiding/Jude'of Probate Court
Juvenile' Division
/
" /L2
County Director of social Services
DATE:
—35—
COUNTY CHILD CARE - DETAIL BUDGET
Michigan Department of Social Services
For the Office of Children and Youth Services
AUTHORITY: Act 07, Public Acts of 1978,
As Amended.
COMPLETION: Required.
PENALTY: Stale reimbursement wttl be
withheld horn local government.
Annual
Gross Cost
Anticipated
Days Care
(Combined total
anticipated expense)
** 231,920 5,000
652,570 37,000
')Ac a, County DES Supervised
Poster Cars Payments, 4,015 •
3,377
3,642
b. COUrtLV PiaCed
Foster Care and Administrative
Rate Payments
County DSS Subtotal
103,100
' 107,115
County Child Care: Budget Detail
Page 1 1 Tile Department of Social Services will flOi discriminate against
any individual or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national
origin. color, marital status, handicap, or political beliefs.
F.Y. October 1, 19 89 - September 30, l9_9
, County Oakland
Date Submitted
I, CHILD CARE FUND
TYPE OF CARE
A, FAMILY FOSTER CARE
1. Court
a. Court Supervised
Foster Care Payments
b. Court Placed (Private Agency)
Foster Care and Administrative
Rate Payments
Court Subtotal
2, County DES
* 420,650 32,000
COMBINED FAMILY FOSTER CARE TOTAL
* Includes 34,650 Nonscheduled Cost
** Includes 10,590 Nonscheduled Cost
IiSS 2552 (Rev 5-85j Previous edikons obsckte
40,642 759,685
0
4,029
County Child Care: Budget Detail
Page 2
TYPE OF CARE
B. INSTITUTIONAL CARE
1. Private Institution
a. Court Placed In-State
Foster Care Payments
b. Court Placed Out-of-State
Foster Care Payments
Court Subtotal
c, County HS Placed In-State
Foster Care Payments
b. County DSS Placed Out-of-State
Foster Care Payments
County 058 Subtotat
COMBINED SUBTOTAL PRIVATE INSTITUTION
Annual Anticipated
Gross Cost Days Care
* 494,900 4,029
494,900
0
494,900
„
4,029
0
* Includes 15,810 Nonscheduled Cost
D5S•2092 1114w G 85) Prvii rIihoi obsoMe.
Annual (Combined total Number Anticipated
Gross Cost anticipated expense) of Beds Days Care
3,417,435 73 26,645
3,710,358 80 29,200
2,636,307 60 20,805
1,346,800 36 13,140
11,110,900 249 89,790
0
O 0 0
O 0 0
O 0 0
11,605,800 249 93,819
Anticipated Number
of Children for Anticipated
In-Home Care Service Days Care
617,143
617,143
Annual
Gross Cost
(Combined total
anticipated expense)
3,311
3,311
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
-
C
0
County Child Care: Budget Detail
Page 3
TYPE OF CARE
2. Court Operated Institutions (County Executive)
a. Detention CV Bldg. 'V" (l&2) & "A—South"
b. Group Care Facility CV Bldg. "B," "D," "G"
c. Shelter Care Facility cv Bldg. "8," "A—North"
d. Other Camp Oakland
Subtotal Court Operated, Institutions
3. County DSS Operated Facilities
a. Group Care Facility
Ii Shelter Care Facility
c. Other
Subtotal County 055 Operated Facilities
COMBINED INSTITUTIONAL CARE TOTAL
TYPE OF CARE
C. 1N-HOME CARE SERVICE COMPONENTS
1. Court Subtotal
2. County DSS Subtotal
COMBINED TOTAL IN-HOME CARE
1-;. INDEPENDENT LIVING
1. Court
a. Court Supervised Foster Care Payments
b. Court Placed Foster Care and
Administrative Rate Payments
Court Subtotal
2. County DSS
a. County DSS Supervised Foster Care Payments
b, County DSS Placed Foster Care and
-Administrative Rate Payments
County DSS. Subtotal
COMBINED TOTAL INDEPENDENT LIVING
Annual
Gross Cost
12,875,513
107,115
(Combined total
anticipated expense)
12,982,628
Anticipated
Days Care
130,819
3,642
134,461
473,328 Parent Reimbursement
220,500
1,404,700
Social Security and Veterans
CV per diem, State aid & School meals
2,098,528
0
0
0
0
2,098,528
County Child Care: Budget Detail
Page 4
TYPE OF CARE
E. 1. COURT SUBTOTAL A THRU D
2. COUNTY DSS SUBTOTAL A THRU D
COMBINED SUBTOTAL GROSS COST A THRU D
F, ANTICIPATED REVENUE
1. Court
a. Net Probate Court Ordered Collections
(75% of Gross)
. b. Government Benefit Collections (100% of Gross)
c. Other Receipts (100% of Gross)
Court Subtotal
2. County DSS
a. Probate Court Ordered Collections
(100% of Gross)
b. Government Benefit Collections (100% of Gross)
c. Other Receipts (100% of Gross)
County DSS Subtotal
COMBINED TOTAL REVENUE
0
SUBTOTAL COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND NET EXPENDITURES .
(Subtract Revenue from E. Combined Subtotal Gross Cost)
Capped Net Expenditure Level 7,835 1 499 Do not include in
3,048,601 Ihe TOTAL COUNTY
Net Expenditure Over CAP CHU CARE Line.
'OSTER CARE DURING RELEASE APPEAL PERIOD
CDUNTY BASIC GRANT
. . Court Subtotal
2. County DSS Subtotal
COMBINED TOTAL COUNTY BASIC GRANT
IV, TOTAL COUNTY CHILD CARE I THRU It
• 10,884,100
5,310 500
0
10,889,410 13,4,961
pss p062 rFle.v 85) PIEVIMISnIiIrcu06sniale.
CHILD CARE FUND
AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT
(IX?iime(j by ,Jurveniie Division of Probate Court)
MiLhigan Department of Social Services
Office of Children and Youth Ser/ices
Section / and ill are required from all courts as part of the Annual Plan and Budget process. Section IV, A & B is required from all courts which administer
In-Home Care and/or Basic Grant prc,oram. Column 4, (Difference,) is to be computed in each section that applies. Detailed instructions are contained in
the Annual Plan and Budget Guideline.
S See reverse side for detailed instructions.
PRIOR YEAR THIS YEAR DIFFERENCE
(12 Month Period) (Most Recent 12 Months) (Totals)
FRO : FROM:
REPORTED ITEM 1/1/87 1/1/88 PERCENT COST
TO: TO:
12/31/87 12/31/8g /
Detinq. Neglect Total Deting. Neglect Total ( + or - + or -) Each 4 91017% is required Information Abuse Abuse
I. JUDICIAL (For All Youth Served)
* 1. Number of Youth Having 1...tItk,..nat Wi Men Complaints Filed 8,751 490 9,241 7,925 468 8,393 (-)9%
* 2. Number of Youth Having Petitions Authorized 1,686 272 1,958 290 1,979 (+)1%
Total hearings held
* 3. Number of Youth Adjudicated .7'.! 2 r i ng year 5,482 3,267 8,749 6,373 2,963 9,336 (+)7%
__.
4. Rumber of Youth VVith PlaceoN iclikrdicationsiDisposilions Not Avai abl e Not Avai able
,...,
* 5. Number of Court. Wards at Beginning of 12 Month Period 629 863 1,492 573 925 1,498 (+) .4% ;..„
* 6. Number of Court Wards at End of 12 Month Period 573 925 1,498 627 951,578 (-05% .....
',1-..t:t::-:x•-!
* 7. Number of State Ward Commitmenis ACt -150 & 220 60 64 124 45 60 105 ( )15% :.
I. PLACEMENT AND COST DETAIL (Child Care Funded Only as
Reported on OSS-207 Reports)
...
A. Foster Care .-.•
1. Total Number of Day's of Care 30,046 -)26%
2. Total Cost's (Exclude nOn•scheduled payments) 381,612 293,058 (-)23% 88,554 _
3. Average Cost Per Day 12.70 13.12 (+).4% .42 ........„ ..._.-
B. Residential
1. Number of Days Detentiot Own Facility 20,755 21,587 (+)4%
2. Number ot Days Detention Purchased 4 0 (-)100W.:,
Capp Oakland 12,189 18,240 (+)50%
3. Number of Days 'Treatment 0.6vri Facility CV 38,095 40,351
.::-:.:::::::::::::::"-:-:•:- Private 4. Number of Days Treatment Purchased 10,506 8,754 _ institutions _
5. Total Days Residential Care 81,545 88,932 (-09%
_ _
6. Total Cost 9,895,970 10,368,947 (-05% 472,977 _. ------ _
7.Cost Per Day 121 117 (-).3%
C. Independent Living
1, Total Number of Days Care
2. Total Costs
3. Average Cost Per Day ____........
Each item is required information.
The Drrp Irred of Sonia! Service; will r.o,t. ,.fiscriminnte a gainst any individual or group
because o.f race, sex. o n c o!or, fn Pita! sta lus, handicap, or political beliefs.
then. 12-a7} Previous ediVorr obsolete.
AUTHORITY: PA Si of 1978.
COMPLETION: Is required.
CONSEQUENCE ..CF1 NONCOMPLETION: Child care fund will not be reirsbur.sed.
Please continue on reyerse skip.
MOOR YEAR THIS YEAR DIFFERENCE
(12 Month Period) (Most Recent 12 Months) (Totals)
REPOPTED HEM FROM: . FROM:
1/1/87 1/1/88 PERCENT COST
TO: TO:
Each * item is reqkiirect Information 12/31/87 12/31/88 (+ or-) (+or- __ ..-. 1 f. TO Al (Child Care Funde.d Only as Reported on
EISS- 207 Reports) . ,.,.•.•...
A. Court Wards Foster home, CIT,CO, Private . .-= 1. Total Number Outof-Horne Days Care institutions 111,591 111,266 (-) 3%
10,277,582 10,955,063 (+)7% 677,481 * 2. Total Out-of-Horne Costs (Exclude Nonschsd:.:0,3 rEvm er_itsi
,,*,3. A:k.rerne cost Per r.),u OutTbl-Ho ,7-rr, (" , 92 98 (+)7% - _—
B. State Wards (Act 150 or 220)
1. Number at Beginning of 12 Month Period 87 103 (+)18% 16
2. Number at End of 12 Month Peciod 103 110 (+)7% .
•3. Total Cost 1,453,071 1,835,445 (+)26% 382,374
IV, A. IN-tiOME CARE (If Applicable)
_
a 1. Number of Youth Se:rre.d 1,284 (+)23% _ 1,577
2. Total Cost's (As Reported on I.H.C. Addendum) 421,532 450,934 (+)796 29,402
a 3. Avera e Cost Per Yo 328 286 (-)13% 42 -
B. Basic Grant (If Applicable)
* 1. Number of Youth/Families Served - -
* 2. Total Cost's (As Reported on B.G. Addendum)
* 3., Average Cost Per Youth/Family
iNSTRUCTIONS:
a Begin on other side.
s SECTION I - 4. Each court w111 define the adjudications which are generally placed out-of.-house, he., felonies against people, repeated properly
felonies, etc.
0 SECTION 11 -R II. The r.ount of day's care and rArth in a county's own facility would be ONLY the county's own wards and would exclude State
wards or other county's ward's.
II - 8 3.4. Treatrnrmt would include at residential care exclusive of detention.
a SECTION IV - A and B required information if In-House Care/Rasie Grant program(s) are operational.
NOTE: Additional detailed instructions are contained in the Annual Plan and f3uclget Guidelines.
DSS-4472 (Rev. 12-8r) (Back)
cuiLD CARE FUND
F, AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT
3y County Department of Social Services)
Department of Social Services
Gific,R of Chiidren and Youth Services
Sections and III are required all county Dep;“•itnerlis having Child Care Fund Sub-Accounts as part of the Annual Pin;
and Budget process, Section IV, A & B is required from County Departments which administer In-Home Care and/or Basi
Grant Programs. Column 4, (frilei ,.Nlee) is to be computed in each section that applies. Detailed instructions are containe ,
in the Annual Plan and Budget 9uidelines• --
PRIOR YEAR THIS YEAR DIFFERENCE
(12 Month Pen.-t) (Most Recent 12 Months)
FROM FROM:
REP on-rFn IrEm io —1 -87 10-1--88 PERCENT cosT
_ - To:Project-6T-
r Each
-Item Is required Inf,:yrnraVn 9 -30 -8B 9-30-89- +or-) ( +or-)
I, CPS, PETITION, Atli) ,ALD,ItiDicI,YFIONS -...-
*1. Number of CPS Corrf'laints Investigated This 3836 _.. • ..•.•......._
• .-...•:::::-:.:-
*2. Number of Substantiated CPS Casos Data 1534
*3. Number of Petitions Filed Not _ .
*4. Number of AdiudicRliC93 Av ai I I- 202 _ -.. ....,......, ._
it. PLACEMENT AND CO I`:1: rib All (Child Gam Funded 01
as Repoited on DrIP;• P.;18R Repori.P.)
A. Foster Care
I. Total l'-i mbar of Cl; of Care
2, Total Cost's (Exclude Non-Soheduled Payments)
3. Average Cost Per Day
• ..,... ..,...... .,...,.. .,
13, Residential Care
1. Total Number of Days Own Faoility I .., ,-,•...,. - , ....._
2. Totai iqurnbor of Days Purchased reatmentiShelter) _ . .-.
3. Total D Residen ays tial Care _ ...._, ,...._ ___
4. Total Cost ......._.„.. .___.
5. Cost Per Day .. ,. .,. .. „ „..... . „..... ...., .. ,, .,. ,_ .._ . ...
C. Independent Living
1. Total NI/flit-Jar of Day5 _..-- — — _
2. Total Costs , _
3. Avmage Cost Per Day ......., .,, _ ..... .,.. , , . ... . .
111, -I cSVALS/SUMMARY (Ctiiirti Caro Princiod Only
From OSS-206R) ___......._......._ ,',:..,,..-, . .,,,.
*1. Total Number of Youth otl3eoinaing of \lath 1.8 14 —22%
*2_ Totai Number of Youth at End of Year 10 .....,.„, ,........._ ., _..
*3, Total Number of Days Out-of-Horno. Care 2976 3468 4-16.5% .f.- Li i-
*4. TotalOut- --of-Home Costs $66 ,779 $97,152 +45% r -- _ ,9.
*5, Average Cost Per Day Out-of-Homo Care $22.44 $28. 01. +25% 1-....F.5--
___ „..,...._
F
—
The poottrtrrntot of SOCIM SCI,f1C713 Win not d'itcriminate agtlitmt nny inclividuel or group Atill-IORtrt PA 87 of 197a
bet7ttuso of Mra, SA47., F80.50 NI, fi-.. n011,41111 ,',dgin, color, rnItritrg mrstuta, Nano:fit:xi", OT r,t,itictol boqoftt. COMPLETIOtt :s rtKtuired.
C.,ONSEOUE5--orittON-CONIFtETIOrt Chikl cant fund will not be minitntoted.
oss-4l73iFwv. 12-87} rutYlotm ooWtol obtttgmtrt. Continue on reverse if
lin YEAR.
ci 12 Lionitm)
MOM:
DIFFERENCE
REPORTED ITEM
Each * Item is required information
ERC,ENT
-)
COST
IV. A. IN-HOME CARE (If Applicable)
*1. Number of Youth Served
2. Total Cost's (As Reported on IHC Addendum)
*3. Average Cost Per Youth
este Grant (If Applicable)
1. Number of Youth/Families Serried
2. Total Cost's (As Reported on BG Addendum)
3. Average Cost Per Youth/Family
PS-5.4473 (F15v. 12-87) (Buck)
A)
B)
C)
0)
E)
F)
IN-HOWIE CARE SUMMARY
Michigan Department of Social Services
FOR THE OFFICE OF C1-111_01tEN AND YODTH SERVICES
County 0A.KLAND
1. List all service components which make up the 111C program and specify the requested information for
each.
,
CCE Other Public Gross
[Service Component) (Adm. Unit) Expenditure Funding Expenditure
, Alternates • Secure 0 ti_Q* $177,479.
Early Offender pro ject 271,361
In-Horne Fami 1 y Tre a tment 89,762 _
Intensive ...cowl, f.L-' ng 46,591
In-Home Detention!
Intensive Monitoring 1,950 _ ,,.. . ._
_
Subtotal i HC - Court $617,143
Subtotal I HC - DSS
TOTALS 11 --1C $617,143
II. For each service component iisted above, complete a separate 1N-HOME CARE BUDGET DETAIL,
(DSS-2094) filling in the appropriate budget items.
AUT-flITY: Act 17, Public Acts at 1978. as amended.
faquirecf
PENALTY: State f,millIOrSC,Ilnir will be ft.ithheict from local
NOTtCE:: Act ]33 of 1982 ir'.u.1”,,,OrK Red.Ct tern) quires tbal
lire s,te cu,.trut duplicate ififormation collection bY State
a<reciui. If this tOf et.4511",.it S nnfoftnation teat you have already
subfr,,P,t, In .)flf?ffief itlea9e seed ccnues of the forms or
u.unes auct hum mirobef-vtitts, to file state F unns
Arj,uir,,1 rat (re-. 1 flts "I PA<VF,719,15FICRE antit RU11(1E:ft, One
30026. ±_.10.0,f9, M .111VU)-1.
rn i 11,-M.; '11,1 1;31,149 111.1t y.,te licruti tumti 11. rtmll,IVISI
11,1% r,.s.."
1 lie 1:,t,tartm.Ynt of `...ocfal Services will not ji5Cf htlIn at e acjafest
auy trc,vRiiitl or q, 'up because of race, sex, relhlion, age,
atlorW origin, color, "oarit al status, nandicae. or political beliefs.
L,S5-2093 flay. $.54 0715 edit iou ottsofeic,
Annie Bonds I Caseworker
Dolores Calhoun
Larissa Jitianu I Caseworker
40
Caseworker I 24
16
45,210
$168,139
(rate/unit)
(rate/mile)
$ .25
(est. # miles)
9600
420
200
$ 9,340
Total Program Support
_2,740
2,33 -0
180
1, individual Consultants or Providers
(name) (rate/unit) (total units/contract)
DSS-2094 (Rev. 5-64) pr,.:-...*7.t.t1 eolt!0,1 onsofete.. Ses reverse sicte ror PA 133 ItsfortnetToe
and norrv•ilscrIminatTert statement.
IN-HOME CARE BUDGET DETAIL
Michigan Department of Soc..al Services
FOR THE OFF WE 01 CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES -
Service Component "A' ALTERNATIVES TO SECURE DETENTIO
(EARLIER -STATUS OFFENDER PROJECT )
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of Court or DSS) Administrative Unit: DSS Li Court n
1. Sala? y and Wages
(name) (function) (#hrs.Iwk.) (total cost)
a . 16 $ 16,-295
Judy Dowda.1 Caseworker 40 37,541
2. Fringe Benefits (specify) Life Insurances FICA,. Ref i re-
merit , Ho sp t ali zat i on Insurance , VI7orkmen 1 s
Compensation, Disability, Dental, Optical &
Un.erni oyme.nt Insurance
Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Employees identified in "A" above)
1. Travel
(purpose)
Personal Mileage
Travel & Conference
2, Supplies and Materials
Postage
3. Other
(specify)
Copier Machine Rental
Print ing
Building . Space Al loc.
Telephone
Equipment Rental (answering machine)
C..- CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
36,150
21,273
11,670
(total cost)
2,400
300
600
170
2. Coo tracting Organization
a. Closed-end contracts
(name)
(rate/unit)
b. Per unit contracts
(name) (est. # purchased units)
Total Contractual
(source) (purpose) (amount)
-RCHEDUr ED PA-MIEN"
anumpat-1,1 average cost (type of setvice) # units to be of each (total cost)
provided service unit —0—
_
$ 1 7 7 , 4 7 9 Total Non-Scheduled
E. Add Totals for A, B, C, & D above
Total Service
Component Cost
F. if you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue (including other
Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies), specify the following:
Total Public Revenue
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost
NET ANTICIPATED IHCMATCHABLEEXPENDITURE $ 177,479
AUTHORITY: Act 87 Platallc ActS of 1978. as arrsendecl.
• COMPLETION: Ft es:tarred
PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local
lovernrnent,
NOTICE: Act 133 Of 1982 {Paperwork Re,tauctlort) requires that
the Slate coritrol duplicate Information collection by State
agencies. 0 MB form utqwnts Information that you have aireacy
-,Orn!ttvd to anotm,r agency.. please send tonic's of the forms of
oepartment names and form ruarnberspitle% to the State Forms
AtiminfstTator, Department of Manayement and Budgcs. Box
3002S, Lansing, NI: 48909,
,iori4i cloes not mean mat you clonl neno to cornoiata
this form,
Tins Department of Social Sorrices will not discriminate asp:J-1st
any inctividnat orgroop lancause of race. sox, reitetran, age,
national Origin, color, marital Status. handica a, or political bellets.
055-2094 (Rev, 5-34) (Back)
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of Court or DS-S. Acministrative Unit: 111155 Li Court Li
Dave Monroe •
Gary UonLes ti
Mike Ams,hay
Caseworker L 40
Caseworker
(total cost)
$24,442
36,534
37,952
36,625 40
1. Salary and Wages
(name)
Palmer Sest 1(60%
(function) (#brs.1w1<.)
Supervisor. 24
Caseworker .• 40
(rate/uniE)
650
4,000
1,000
3,150
-470
2. • Supplies and Nilateriars •
Postage
3. Other
(specify)
Client • Motivation
Restitution •
Brdg.--Space Aliecaflen
•Telephone
Copier-
1. individual Consultants or Providers
(rate/unit) (total units/contract) (total cost) (name)
OSS.,2094 5 ,,, OC,;(3h1710. sk.):: Tor PA 1,33 .inforcriatfoo
rind di): 31Cr11)iflri[Idfl strr,ernent.
HOME CARE BUDGET DETAIL
Mich473ri Department of -Social Secvicus
Foif TOE OEF ICE QI Ciiii.DHEN AND YOuTH StfiviCeS
Service Component "BILLARLX OFFENDVR PAOJECT
: (-EARLIER— • ROJECT)
2. Fringe Benefits (specify) RIGA, Retirement, Hospitalizati4n
Insurance, Life Insurance, Workmen's CompenT
Qta , p s ab i I i_ty dentaiOpiica, &Unem-
pio v rne.nt Insurance
Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Employees Identified in "A" above)
1. Travel
(purpose) (rate/mile)
Personal Mileage $25
Travel & Conference
1 . (total cost) 17,500
300
(est. t- miles)
70,000
Total Program Support
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2. Contracting Organization
a. Closed-end contracr::.
(flame)
E. Add Totals for A, B, C, & D above
• Total Non-Scheduled
Total Si-vice
Component Cost $271,361
(purpose) (amount)
.Total Public Revenue
271,361
re-
b, Pet unit contracts
- (name) •
Local Onivei-Siti
(See Attached De
(rate/unit) I (est. # purchased units)
a I Is)
Total Contractual
(total cost)
$ 40,770
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
(tYpe of service) , anticipated
# units to be
provided
• average cast
of each
service unit
(total cost)
F. I f you plan to fund any portion of this servicecomponent with other public revenue •(including other
Child Care Funds or Basic Gant mohics), specify the following:
(source).
Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost
NET ANTICIPATED !HQ MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE
AUTHORITY: Act a7 Public ActS of 1978, as xmended.
COMPLETION! Reoulred
PENALTY: State trelmtiurSmerit will be w`ltrtheld from Foca
ii0vernmerit.
NOTICE: Act 133 of -1982 (Paperwork Reduction) requiros that
the State control diintIcate Infoimation c0 4ectIon by State
a9inciue If this form teptiests intorMatIon that yorthave already
luhruPtel tri RhOther agency, please send copes of the forms sa
harneS and form rhuhher5ftltles le the Stale Forms
Adm.nlciratc.,rp Deerlttrhellt of roamailernent and Budget, Sox
30026, Lansing, MI .48909.
5r.,111,) rhatur/at (loci not intian that you don'r need to corhDlere
th13 tor 711,
rile De r,artninni. Sucl.t1 Sur Aces. witI hot 0,4,-,rirrffriat a .1,31-r.S1
21.5' InCt,1,11.1411 or ',irk]. 1.1 bucause Of race. we, rell910,, age .
nellnhr.uI origin. color, niaritai statul, handtcap., or 900tR4t belIeu
055-2094 (Rev. 5 4.14) (Back)
IN -HOME BUDGET DETAIL - COMPONENT "B"
B. 1. Personal Mileage
3 caseworkers x 800 miles per month
5 interns x 800 miles per month
Supervisor 200 miles per month
G. 2.b.
4 intern/monitors - 1040 hours each at an average of $5.26/hour
Total $21,882 + 10% administrative cost = $24,070
2 advanced degree interns ($16,700) on a contractual basis with
university, generally
An hourly increase, from $6.00 to $6.50/hour, to attract interns, iE
requested
40 weeks x 32 hours/week, or
50 weeks x 25.5 hours/week, both at the rate of $6.50/hour = $16,640,
or $16,700
Total $40,770
This is the first increase for these interns in three years and will assisi
in stimulating placement acceptance.
6-16-89
Administrative Unit:
(#hrs.lvvk.)
A. PERSONNEL (Employees f Coelt or DSS)
Salary and Wages
(name)
USSEi - Coui
(total cost
Total Personnel
PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Ern:-.4oyees Identified in -A" above)
1. Travel
(purpose) (rate/mite)
2. Supplies and Materials
(est. # miles) f (total cost)
3. Other
(specify)
Total Program Support
4. Con cracting Organizatior
a. Closed-end con tracil
1. Individual Consultants o --7oviders
(name) (fate/unit) (total units/contract) I (total cost)
ialviE CARE BUDGET DETAIL
Department of So6a1St:evic.c.:s
F-OA ',FL, Orr /CE Qi eln...OHEN..Atqo YOUTH SEFI'VICE.:S • • •
Srvcc
•
Component : • " IN-HOME-FAMILY: TREATMENT
- Fringe Benefits (specify)
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
(name)
Judson Center In-Home Family Treatment Service 1 $89,762
[
- —
1'",,, r.,,,,, 11,-_::1 lor PA 133 10forcr,tip,-1
,[1.-3 rt.,,,I;:,,rin-unAnan '..!;::':',,,,r't.
, ,
ft Per uflit COCit.f _ . •
.(ra tefuni c).• (est,--# purchased units) - (total , (name) r
! NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
(type of. servke)
anticipated : • ai.erage cost' 1
units- to be . of each -
provided- : • service unit
:_.,..,,......
(total cost)
E. Add-Totals for A, B, C, &.D azdve
'Total Non-Scheduled
Total Ser,Fice
Component Cost $89,762
- . (source) (amount
$89,762 Total Contractual
.,
F. If you plan- to fund any pofTion of this .service component with other public revenue -(including other
. . Child Care Funds or Basic monies), specify the- following:
Total Public Revenue
G. Subtract Total PuhIicReveni from Total Seivice Component Cost
NET ANLCIPATED lyiç MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE 89,762
Is,t)THS »IT Yr Act 87 PottlIc Acts of 1978„ aS
• Reedutcod
State relrnhurseenent wilt be vettnneicE from boa
govern— eq.
NOT IC:: Act 133 of 1982 (Paperwork Re-cluctaan) renulfes that
Itto coutiol duplicate Inforo IbOfi comectiOn by State
agencet, If fills form requests Inforrhattor, that you have akeady
u_staff,-.-e: to .1,,Ctf ,,,n-r agency. please -send copies of the form, at
cloomt—,..t names and lorrn nufnheersititlet to the State FOrrol
Adrn.,-.7-4 tor, Os, rn,,n1 of MA,...94,-.-ent and 13uPgcs. Boa
30(12C _Losing, mi 489119.
trla o0e5 not 171(J3s1 that you don't oced 1,3 cOnt01,te
ro$
5,C1.11 SdiACtal, win VIOT aqaInst
SUM qi-Oksp 0e0Ai31. at tacit, saa , ,C3/91,t)fl, aya. ozno.-.„ n1.7r11...11,tatus...riannigen. 0 unnillicat
os5-205.1 rte.,. 5 -.la Llacis
(function) (# hrs./wk.) (total cost)
12,976
$42,466
(rate/mile) (est. # miles) (total cost)
$ .25 9600 $ 2,400
75
125
8
Total Program Support
4,125
11\1-1-10ME CARL BUDGET DETAIL
Michigan Department of Social Services
FOR rHE OFFICE OV CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERvICES
Service Component "D" INTENSIVE COUNSELING
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of Court or DS-S) Administrative Unit: DSS El Court El
1. Salary and Wages
(name)
Jul ie Til lotson j Caseworker 40 $29,490 •—
2. Fringe Benefits (specify) FICA, Retirement, Hospi. tal i z a-
t ion Insurance, Life Insurance, Workmen s Com-
pena.t ion, Disability, Dental, Optical, & Unern-
proymer11-7 I n s e
Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Employees Identified in "A - above)
I. Travel
(purpose)
Personal
2. Supplies and Materials
Post age
3. CaOr. e r Rental
• (specify) (rate/unit)
Bldg. Space Alloc.
To
Mileage
fl±LtL & Trave
725
650
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Individual Consultants or Providers
(name.) (rate/unit) (total units/contract) (total cost)
2. Contracting Organization
a. Closed-end contracts
(name)
055-2094 (Rev.. 5-1 PrIo,,-9c1Ition .nbsotete, See reverse side for PA 133 InforrnatIon
and non-discrimInzrtion statement.
(source) (purpose) (amount)
b. Per unit contracts
(name) (rate/unit) (est. # purchased units) I (total cost)
Total Contractual
...c11-4 Fri H Fr PAYMPNIT
anticipated average cost - (type of service) 7
# units to be of each (total cost)
provided service unit
Total Non-Scheduled -0-
E, Add Totals for A, B, C, gt D above
Total Service
Component Cost
F. If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue (including other
Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies), specify the following:
Total Public Revenue
Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost
NET ANTICIPATED I He MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE $
AUTHORITY: Act 87 FubliC Acts of 1978. as amended..
compi_F...riomi Required
rErfAL-ry state reimbursement will de withheld from local
gOvernment.
NOTICE! Act 133 Of 1982 (Paoervvork Reduction) requires that
the State controf duplicate InfonmatIon collection by State
agencies, if this form requests information that you have already
submitted to another agency. please send ce-oies of the tormS szE
iloptment names end form nomberSttitlel to the Stale Forms
Administrator, Department of Management and eudget. Box
30026, Lanling, MI 48909.
51,1(Prril rmitqflal dOeS not moan that yOu doel need to complete
this fOr IL
The Departoient pi Social Services will not discrirpinate against
any indlyionai or group because or rate, sex, religion, age,
national Orh)in, color, marital status. handicap, or political beliefs.
055-2094 (Rev. 5-84) (flack)
D.
(function)
Total Personnel
(total cost)
$7,200
200
3. . Other
(specify) (rate,'Unid
480
$7,880
(total: units/contract) I (total cost) (narne)
OS5-.304 (Rev, 5-8-1, hey rover;.e slit:: for PA 1.33 toto ,,ParAor,
<O -1crrIrr,PV)fl stalement.
IN HOME CARE BUDGET- D..1TAIL
Mich“jan Department of Soda. SurvIcr
FOR IHE OEf ICE OC CriiWEIEN AND YGL Tri SERVICES
Service Component ±J " IN—HOME DETENTION!
INTEISIVE MONITORING
PERSONNEL (Employees of Court or DSS) . Acministrative Unit: 053 LI • Court- n
Salary and Wages
(name)
2. Fringe Benefits (specify)
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Employees Icioltified in "A" above)
1. Travel
(purpose) (rate/mite) (est.
Mileage
415:17Lag_c_1 ients) $.25 i 57,600
2. Supplies arid Materials - •
TelfLuhone Call8 I tIO/Monthfintern
Total Program Support
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Individual Consultants or F.oviders
2. Contracting Orgnization
a. Closed-end contracts
(name)
(fate/unit) (total cost)
$24,070,
b. Per unit contracts
. . (name)
Universities
(See At tachmerit
Total Contfactua $24,070
D. , NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
(type 61- servk..e)
, anticipated ayerage cost
# units to be of each
provided service unit
(total cost)
(amount)
Total Public Revenue
G. Subtract Total Public'Reveriu•:•.. from Total.Service Component Cost
(source) (purpose)_
E. Adci Totals for A, B, C, 84D above
Total Non-Scheduled
Total Service
Component Cost $31,950
F. If you plan to fund any portion of this .service component with other public revenue (including other
• Child Care Funds or Basic Gra7it monies). specify the following:
NET ANTICIPATED RIC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE $ 31,950
Y: Act 87 Pubic iNctS of 1978,as art-ler-Wed,
COMPLEHON: Reqtatrerl
PEP,ipt_TY:.. State retrnbursedient will las •Wlitdrield from toca
NOTICF:: Act 133 of 1982 (Paperworh iteducLkin) requires that
the State, control dupTIcate tntormatidn cod.---clltan by State
agertr-te.:_ if this C01-1-11 r8qtp15(s Information that you tiñve already
SUbrob-7-u-1 to anntntsr Agency. please send copies ht the forms LH
natneS and torrn nUmb-e,silltlt,s to tne State Forms
ra-ach-uirratcr. Oeraattrheut or Management aoo budget, Bon
3002E,, _In5l,t9,, MI 48909.
,lenrue, ,nateriat doi,s not mean that you don't ,daest to eOrntalete 1.1-}€1. try-
rtrt: Irriervt sot.isccis cr,Itl not 131,:ritulnate agaitaSt
or group hit-cat..iso or race. 3.03 . reltrtiOn. ago. • !girl culur. marital Status. OUtititat belletS.
055-2594 (Vtav. 5-4 4 ) jeact<1
• C.2b. COMPUTATIONS - IN-HOME DETENTION/INTENSIVE MONITORING
4 Monitoring Staff (Contractual with Oakland University)
20 Hours/Week
To-
52 Weeks
4,166- Hours/Year
x 5.26/Hour
A- 2,188 10% Administrative Cost
B.1, MILEAGE:
600 Miles/Month x 12 Months = 7200 x 4 Interns = 28,800 Miles
x$25/Mile = 7,200
B.3 TELEPHONE
$10/Month/Intern
014-110ME CAPE
[1 REVISED
L:Z Number of Days of Shelter Care
5:1 Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
0 Number of State Wards Committed(Act 150 & 220)
0 C-rifdren likErr to come Und n court (Basic Grant Only)
IUM .-10W.2.(,ARE PROGRAM COMPONENT
REQUEST
Michiciari 1.7)e.par1inent of Social Seriices
One of thew forms must be com.picted for EACH Basic Grant/In-Horne-Care Service component
which is being 1.7.yoposed for next fiscal year as a New, Revised, or a Continued program.
__„....
ALTERNATIVES 10 SECURE DEJR1111 ION
W,r,,, p, .<.::--"--- —
Oct 1. 79 ...._13 9 ..rrt, =19 _90 0 CCX/RT
FROhk 71-41411,
AdmInf;tratrre, throi Comei;vtat lit!a
C-'orr:n7tvv,t !..17,-,10-r. Name iTelemeve Number
( 313 MeFarland/Sesti
OSS
858°0247
:. PR m nmr OGRA srEac oil MA 114,2tINL. Cb.-.. 'x aAi that aody .__ ... _____ - , 1. PflOGRIVA TYPE 1 1 -1 • 1 _ _
-, 2. C11F1POP-2T STATUS
Ull tiEW
• . . . . 1 TAriGEr FOPI.H..NnOWS) S.E.7.Val ..
tfr:it,!uriaatptioa
1-7-1 CIELIP-W.g„?Elir C-1 NEGLECT . - .
ft chik.P-1,7 MOT Ur.d,.ss
WOt 11 Elf COMPLA3 Tr
4, AR E.'4!".-S) or n ICED IMPACT
A REDUCTION
Number of Yositil Petitioned
rY1 Number of Adjudications
Number of Days -of Family r°091.r.- Care
FA Number of Days of Out-Oi•licrao f:)etantion
5_ sEavtc_s Focus
[Xi Provide cariy iiitervention to treat within the chi'es borne
L.1 Eifeel early return from foster or institutional cars
IL SERVICE AND COST 111Q -..if7 C-1 IONS FOR NEW FV,..;CAL YEAR:
Time period of request from Qc laber 1, 19 _19 Huy September .:30, 19 - 90
r. et
micuraA no PROJECTED
NUMBER COST -
k Number of YOLith .9. eiVed 1 , 350 $17 7 „. 4 7 9
(In-Homs Care)
B. Number of Days of in-H fi om Care 15,025
,
C. Number of Service Nuits (1 i.lriit -, 15 , 325 . .. .. . , _ ..
a To Component Cost $ I 7 7 , 479
E Average Cast Per Day or Unit . 11 58 ,.. —
-
Er-AUTHORITY: PA 37 of 1978. comPLE-riQR r”quirr.7-cl.. -
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCI,NA P LET 7,71' bn calm Nutted_
-..S.S-00-1A 0-7-87) ObmC4TWAV
Th ()apartment of $-Ocial SITViCMS will not disriminafa againai any
individual or group bap-aunt:, of race. 2,ex, rol;gion, qg,„ oat€onal origin,
lo-r. marital status. handlcao. or pol-rdcat baiitqa,
—SEE OVER —
134c.A) 055-4471A 112-43 —
USE inTS ..1S NEEL Ul
DESCRIPTION: Address the following items which apply in snort narrative paragraphs.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
9. Problem statement — What caused the need for this request and what were the :,-atermining factors leading to the regtiest.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
10. Explain items 3, 4 & 5 from the reverse side.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
11. Describe how the project will be administered, the services to be provided end by whom. In cl octal:he relationship between the court am
DSS, and the Contractor if services are purchased.
FOR REVISED COMPONENT: .
12. Changes-- Describe changes that are planned in existing pro ya Ms for the cc
delivery number of staff, increase or decrease in Costs, etc.
-,`),;, yeer i.fr Inigjet V) OA tiOIL type Of 5ervic.:4-t, method 01
* *
REQUEST
ALTLATIVES TO SECURE DETENTION
II. A. Humber of Youth Served
We anticipate the following caseload:
700 "Intake" cases
350 Diversion cases
60 Authorized cases
200 Preliminary hearings on non-status offenders
40 In-Home Detention cases
II. B. The number of In-Home Care days is slightly less than service units
because snIP of the authorized cases will remain in Shelter Care in
spite of our interventions,
II. C. Humber of Service Units (Caseload days)
-700 Intake Cases x 0.05 = 35
350 Diversion Cases x 42 days - 14,700
60 Authorized cases x 7 days = 420
200 Preliminary Hearings x 0,05 . 10
40 111-110TIQ Detention cases x 4 -- 15,325
Total = 15,325
Please note that the number of authorized cases is a 50% drop from the
number authorized during the 1988-'89 project year, and represents a Unit
goal.
REQUEST
ALTERNATIVE TO SECURE DETENTION
III. 9&12
As a result of the .1.988 0.C-Y.S, on•site audit, we are making several procedural
changes. This has resulted in a change in record keeping and some new definitions for the
Unit work load. it also impacts some of our statistical accounting for our 194-'89 report.
As of June 1, 19S9, the first day of 1989-'89 statistical year the following
procedures and definitions were in operation:
Intake and Referral - Despite the fact that this role does not easily qualify for matching
funds, we feel this unit is best placed through experience and contacts to handle
informational calls, make the quick interventions and referrals, and channel people to the
proper step, Including follow up, these contacts would average 30 minutes, or 0.05 case
lead day). This function also begins our diagnostic phase. Those cases that might further
penetrate the Court system are written up as P.C.'s (possible cases) and are available to
any project staff getting futher inquiries or making further interventions.
Crisis Interventions - Face-to-face, reality based interventions with runaways and their
lam-flies are the cornerstones of our diversion. Police officers, school counselors, and
mental health professionals utilize this program to intervene with families in crisis. An
average intervention, including referrals and follow-up, would last four hours. To comply
with 0.C.Y.S. audit guidelines, in mid year we began taking complaints on c.f.'s, having
them accepted and logged at Intake and then adjourned for 42 days. In addition,
Acceptance of Service forms are signed by parents and child. The process has been
gradual. We learned that not all parents will sign a complaint, nor will all parties--
particularly the youngsters, formally accept services. This changes, slightly, the numbers
and kinds of families with whom we can "legally' work. This client group becomes our
Under Advisement cases which we will monitor and offer services to during the abeyance
period. Unless authorized, after the 42-day period, these successfully diverted cases
become "unofficial closed" at the Intake level.
Authorized Cases - This Unit becomes a conduit for all those home truancy cases that
must be authorized. In effect, it is this staff that make a judgment that diversion has not
or cannot be successful, and that the youngster's best interests calls for Formal Court
intervention. In these cases, Unit staff will participate in any preliminary hearings, work
to either maintain the youngster at home, find some non-Court living situation, or, if
placed in Shelter Care, seek ways to make the placement as short as possible. Once staff
has intervened fully in the placement decision, the case is transferred to an area
caseworker. Average length of intervention on authorized cases is seven days.
In-Home Detention - For the past three years we have utilized the Alternative to Secure
Detention staff to screen non-status offenders for consideration of In-Home Detention.
Youngsters admitted to Detention through the night intake process are reviewed,
background material sought, and when deemed appropriate, a recommendation is made at
the preliminary hearing. If placed on in-home detention, staff completes a behavioral .
contract, sets in place a monitoring agreement and transfers the case to the intensive
-2-
In-Home Detention (Contrd.)
monitoring interns. Those cases placed on in-home detention represent a four-day
unit work load -- the average time for transfer to be effected., Each detained
youngster screened represents 0.0.5 work day time commitment.
The vast majority, at least 90% of the Unit's work load, is now conforming to Child
Care Fund regulations. By accepting complaints and signing acceptance of service
forms, our diversionary efforts fully qualify. Our work with authorized cases has
never been open to question. The Intake function constitutes a very small "piece of
the action."
ALTERNATIVES TO SECURE DETENTION
cFariand/Sesti
Tirmt Period C.'{
PROT, 88
Oct 1. 19 —
THiRth 89
—
AdaniniloratiYe Urat
th COURT
Tologocche Numboc
D.S.S
L PRO AM SPECIFIC ATio•ri.?. all that apofy, APO
1:7 1.4.3 r77e
REPORT
repartinent of Social Services
One of these forms must. be cortil:dctr:'d for EACH Basic Grant/In-Home-Care Service component
for which them was State Reimbursement during Fiscal Year completed (being completed),
( 313 ) 858-0247
`-• - 1, PPOGRANI TYPE
-
11 BASIC: (=PANT 1P4--1-1C ME CAPE
2. CO4F°01,1P4T T1AT119 I
CREASED
. ,
1.,..1.^.11'17-T P"r"' '.'7714.17 .`1.71A,TLD _ . — A. t,:1,'.1,.. •:;.4-
DEUNCY'F-Cr Li t.4GLEc-r . __... i CYO:1-m NOTT51,0;--"Jur;cA,tp 01 Cou r4
W warrnal comm. A ! r-rr - Li stiasTANTIAT-E.,...) c.p.s. (055) 0 Children ills 'n corne under jurimliction of this court (13.a.sio Gr nr Only)
4. ...9, An OF itILITIME,' !1.1)1..tiL
AM.-MI.1cl I'D'
RI Number of yo, on 177,,,ziticii-Id El Number of pays of Shelter Care
10 l`bdilb9r of Acludloarions D Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
T Number of Days of Family Foiter Cate 0 Number of State Wards Comrnitted(Act 150 & 220)
RI Number of Days of Out-ON lorne Detention
---- --- - ti.v.,wicF-OC.33
- V, Provide early intarvention to treat --NOtlin the d -liid's home
ki Effect early return from foster or institutional care -
IL SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION. FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED (BEING COMPLETED):
INSTRUCTIONS:
In o--..,)funins 7 & 3 enter the nmtibr.rtt and costs proiected at the beginning of the fiscal year.
0 In oolinnns 8 & 9 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections If fiscal year is not complete).
Time period of report from October 1,19 88 thru September 10, j989
. 7. 9. 10.
PR(115eTT.in PROJECTED ACTUAL ACTUAL
- 7/4.9.495.".A COST NUMBER oasT
A. Number of YouthServed 1,320 $169,159 1,433 $169,159
(In-Horne Care) 4,210 4,030 a Number of Days of In -Homo Care
C. Number of Service Units (I Unit = 4 r 210 4,55.5 169,159 _ ,
D_ Iota/ Component Cost
. . -,..
a Average Cost Per Day or Unit 4 . I 839.30 _ .,...... ,_.
AUTHORITY: PA ST of 1979.
COMPLETION: is
CONSEQUENCE FOR NO NCO M PLETIorq: Chik,tc,Arekind2 not „he reirribiir,
3-1.4718 112-37)
The Oeipartmeor of Social Services wilt not dincriminate gainat any
inchridtml or raup becatine of race, srix, reiigion, age, national origin, =tar, mauitaf aotm , handicap, or political heilerla.
— SEE OVER —
EVALIJki rON Hni I/inning or ending component.
aSS-4-4718 02-171 (9.mcil USE ADOMONAL V1Et 1.5 AS NEEDED.
I ----- -
* DRaElcsUCT-101IS
_
I_
.. if: I IV, l'' ,lt, (7,',T
11. Number'
or
12_ costs --..r.
A. Youth Petitione-d
226 _
R. Adjudications 281 $318,935
C. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Horne Detention 315 37 /800
E. Days of Shelter Care 650 78,000
F. Days of Residential Troalinrifit Care . 4,860 $479,520
... . _....
G. State Words CornirtMed
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSIVIENTI7VAI,LIATIONz _ . . .
For ALL Components in effect during The meld rt-corit fiscal year: •
13. Assess strengths, weakness' and problem sreas of this component Assess t-e intended impact areas and results. Explain the
reason(s), or cause(s) for the dlflomnce between the projected No's and cost an me actual.
IL Youth Petitioned
We hypothesize that 596 of telephone interventions and 50% of our crisis
interventions would have been petitioned without intervention.
675 x 0.05 = 34 385 x CS= 192 = 226
III. Adjudications
B. We hypothesize that 95% of the authorized cases would have been adjudicated from
the above category. Also, 75% of the under advisement cases wourd have been
adjudicated.
226 x .95 = 215 88 x .75 = 66
215 + 66 =281
The minimum cost for processing a case from authorization to disposition -is $1,135.
281 x $1,135 = $318,935
D. Out-of-Home Detention
For our In-Home. Detention cases we consider this Unit's involvement for the first
seven days, with the remaining days "credited" to our intensive monitoring interns.
45..x 7 = 315
The per diem at Children's Village is $120.
315 x $120/day = $37,800
E. Days of Shelter Care
Just based on actual authorized cases, S.O.P. intervention and supervised
placements in noninstitutional settings have saved 650 days. If even a small
percentage of the "adjudications saved" had to be maintained in shelter care, the
number swells quickly. This is conjecture and obviously self-serving, but it is
certain that the deeper a home truant penetrates the system, the more likely
out-of-borne care will be used. 650 x $120/day = $78,000
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care
It is a fact of "system" that non-status offenders in detention until disposition tend
to be placed in Children's Village program. Assuming even 20% of our successful 45
in-home detention youngsters were placed, the savings are
9 youngsters x 180 days x $120/day = $194,400
42 authorized status offenders were returned home prior to disposition. Past
practice indicates that half of -them would have been placed at disposition. Building
in a 10% return rate, we estimate the S.O.P. intervention prevented 18 out-of-home
placements. Of those placed, we hypothesize 9 placed in Children's Village.
9 x 180 days x $120/day = $194,400
9 placed privately - 9 x 360 days x $83/day = $285,120
-2--
REPORT
ALTERNATIVES TO SECURE DETENTION
A. Number of Youth Served
675 Telephone Intervention/Referrals
95 Cases Authorized
385 Crisis Interventions
145 Preliminary Hearings Covered (non-status offenders)
45 In-Home Detention Cases
88 Under Advisement Cases
1,433
Case Load Days
Number of Case Load Days
This year's request documents a midyear shift in procedure and record keeping. The
largest change ha_s been the accepting of a complaint, a serVice plan, and a .42-day
abeyance period on all home truancy crisis interventions. This not only keeps us in
compliance with child care fund regulations, but more accurately reflects our
aggressive diversion effort. This year's In-Home Care Days will be computed based
on last year's formulas unless explained.
1) Telephone Intervention/Referrals - including follow-up and logging:
675 x 0.1 = 67.5 units
2) Authorized cases would average 14 days from filing through initial hearing.
95 x 14 = 1,330 units
3) Crisis interventions, including follow-up and logging average four hours or 0.5
in-horne care days. 385 x 0.5 :7 192.5
4) Preliminary hearings for non-status offenders average 0.1 days
145 x 0.1 = 14.5 case load days
5) in-Home Detention cases are held approximately 7 days until fully transferred •
and picked up by intern monitors.
45 x 7 = 315 case load days
6) Average under advisement periods were 30 days.
88 x 30 = 2,640 days
Total days -= 4 3559.5
B. Number of In-Home Care Days
These days are less than case load days because of three factors:
1) intake and telephone interventions do not qualify
2) not all prelims covered result in home detention releases
3) in spite of efforts, some authorized cases spend time in shelter care
C,
IV, Program A ssessrnentiEvaluation
Our changes in record keeping and procedures will help us more adequately reflect
work load. We are concerned that the numbers of authorized cases continues to rise
slightly. Our goal during the next reporting period is to reduce authorizations. To
do so we will work even harder with our abeyance cases, looking for creative
alternatives to formal court interventions. Staff skill level will be up to it.
The In-Horne Detention concept remains viable. The vast majority of offenders
p l ace d a t home pending adjudication and disposition succeed.
6-20-8.9
minnuENT "B"
EARLY OFFENDER PROGRAM
TlrrivPnod Covrirsd
ER011.t 89
Oct. 1, 19
7,-ett 90 Sect 30. 19 -
Unit
6 COURT
Tebaponcra AltImbeT
( 313 )
MS
858-0247
Crrnpocrem PAP1MgItc Nan-ol
McFarland/Sharp
BAsIc 0-RANT
;a.c--ImPor /FYI-STATUS'
fLi NEN
IIt.-HOME CAPE:
(Yi FleASED RVIVERMIFONISO
BAC GRANT/al , ;10ME-CARE PROGRAM COMPONENT
REQUEST
Michigan Department of Social Serc-
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Basic Grant/In-Horne-Care Service component
which is being proposed for next fiscal year as a New, Revised, or a Continued program_
PriaGrum spEartc TrOrtfA.AflOU ellecr., all that 0.nciv. •- recorwl
Ties
3_ TARGET POPJLK1107ArS) SERVED -
A_ aliJAIrm ilmInfJc,efirKilcrwl of Cour/
DELMIC..,)bENT NEG!...!_7r
(.71IFidz.,,,,,
suF-5z.-A7,91.AT:L cr5. rtss)
,x,RE.A(S1 OP R4TE.-eD
A REDLIC:110t4
El. Number of Youth Petitioned
Number of Actiodications
EJ Number of Days of Family Foster Cara
Number of Days of Cut-Of-Flotne Detentiori
5. SETWFCE FOCUI
LI Provide_ earty intervention to lieut witilin the ohlkfts home
Efteot early return from foster or institutional care
Cilr',.)ildrqn likely. 15 camo underr !urisci clan of tie ex7t.srt itiasic Grant Only)
0 Number of Days of Shelter Care
Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
El Number of State Wards Committed(Act 150 & 220)
IL SERVICE AND Cosi Pria,JEcTIONS FOR NEW FiSCAL, YEAR:
Time period of request from October 1,19 Jo tbru September 30, 19 90
& 7.. &
PROJECTED PROJECTED
Nr..,MDER COST
75 .
A. Number of Youth Se
.
rved $271, 361
(In-Horne Care)
. . 12,900 a Number Qf Days of in-Home Care 1 12,900
,
C Number of Servioe Uni-t3 (1 Unit --- I 13,500
,
.
. Total Component Cost .... 271, 361 .. ,..,.,•-.6.:,..- _
E. Average Cost Per Day or Unit 2 0 . 1 0 .------------------
AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 of 1978.
COMPLETIOft Ei reinimd.
CONSEQUENCE FOR Noncome LFROCI: Child care turldn b•rs r-eirnburs4!,d_
=..-4471A (12-7) 43b1 055-4471.
The Denali:mom of Social Solvicas Will not dlscrirninote against any
Individual or gmura because of race, sex, religion, at notarial
calor. marital smalt handcar), or political bniinfs_
— SEE OVER —
USE ADDITSONAL. SilLE14 AS NEEDED.
PROGRAM Acithess the following items which apply in s,.ort narrative paragraphs_ _
FOR NEW OR REVIS.F.D
9. Problem sIntemeriI--- uPF1',.".d the ne-ed for this request and what were the :...eterrnining factors leading to the request
FOR t•/Ew P9.EVISED COMpoNENT:..
10. Explain items 3.4 & 5 tn2ra the reverse side.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
11. Describe how the project will be administered, the services to be provided and by
053, and the Contractor if services am purchased.
m_ Include the relationship between the court and
. .: . . _ . FOR REVISED COMPONENT; - . - - . .
12. Chances -- Describe changes that are planned in existing programs for the corning year, Le_ target population, type of service, method of
delivery number of staff, increase or decrease in costs, etc,
-5:5S-4ut7/A (12-37)-(1-1-gcb)—,
COMPONENT "V
EARLY OFFENDER PROGRAM
REQUEST
II, B, We anticipate using some 250 days of short-tem detention as a program strategy
with selected cases, In addition, we are builing in some 350 7days on certain
cases where out-of-home placement is necessary and continuity of planning by
program staff assures maxIITIUM client benefit. This would largely consist of
those youngsters for whom private placement Nther than Children's Village is
the recommended disposition, 13,500 - 250 - 35C = 12,900 days of in-home care.
C. With average intervention with each client bein3 13+ months, we feel comfortable
using six months - 180 days as being the average case length during the
reporting period, 75 cases x 180 days = 13,500 case load days.
6-14-89
• 17 .71
Adminivrea:•,e
ThRU 2 9 1:21 °SS
Frnv
COMPONENT "B"
EARLY OFFENDER PROGRAM
.P.Argrtt,j,-
En COURT
Telephone Hui-stair
114,71.„' 011 VI
Li NEG.LEC-.1
r • U suBsrAtrrA TED C.P.5.-11:1-ss)
f r
'oini.-17..7.• I
A.. A qE,,,711.1FIN ..„Tr.v.7.9;,.q —e,..7.7
CkN-HONIECAg.E
DREVISal
came under jurisdiclorf of the court iBasic Giant Cray)
REPORT
l',..partrile.nt of Soda! Sendces
One founr,uut be cow -Dieted for EACH Basic G.rantlIa-Florne-Care Service component
for which tiice wa Stpse Rf::::t.nburserucn.t. during Fiscal Year completed (being completed).
( 313 ) 858-0247 McFatiancl/Sha.rp
PRO( P-1 U4FORtflAlf011; all that nEVy.
1. Pfl.P.AM Tyre • , Li BASIC GP,4441.'
2- CMIP,71-tr.-NT STAT,,!-.1
I Li CO if PA Err:rj.) 1.....J TETWitml-----1 „--------------_ ---__
•rAnGET PC: P
A REPIICr1t:ir7
Nur-iibl. of ih Pclitione:d
L.4 I'luinher ofAdludic:Itions
111 Number of Days of Family- Fo.ster Care
flititter of Days of Out-Of-Home Detention
SEPNICE FCCUti
Provide enyliitervenlicri to tm.M within the chds home
Effect early return -ficiti fotiter or institutional cafe
Li Number Clays of Shelter Care
Number rf Days of Residential Trestment Care
Number of State Wards Committed(Act 153 & 220)
SFF37.fiCE. AND CC-)Sf :N•9ATiON FOR Fl$CAL, YEAR COMPLETED (BEING COMPETED):
INSTRUCTIONS:
J n Qolumns 7 & 8 enter tf-ie nrftot coO costs prOjeCted at the beginning of the fiscal year.
A'Th MAIMI13 8 & 9 enter ft-I?, rtooi ntitither and cost's (year-to-date and proecbons if fiscal year is not complete).
Time riesiod of report from !9 .ttint September 30, 19 9°•
I 6.
• Nuivie,--.9
a.. PRO,IEC= fa90.1.ECT
NUMI3/31
16.
COST
6.
ACTUAL ACTUAL I
7-
_ .._ ... COST
A. rliinlf.3r f..4 Youth Servw.i 72 $252,151 75 $252,151
; r.`79 Carp) -------
(In-H
; a rlurrif-:;”,' of Days of in•--/-ico (...,ate 12660 13,050 ,
___ •• — ....._..... ......4.1.:....z.:..T.:z..,,.......—.._,..:::„.- •:.....- - _
.: C. Nurrlf..;,7r of S9i-vir:M Unit-7 (-I ..init --,...., 12,960 1,99 2 13,500 252,151 __..........._ .. --,,. .-_-.-...-...,...
: D. Total (1.",rin-iron9nt Cant ...._ 252,151 252,151 ...........
. ,.. ,. ...:..._ L__. - - • :-..,...::::::::::::
• EL. Averaga Cost Per Day (Jr Unit 19.32 ..... . ..„..4. ......--
AUTHORITY: P.A• gi of 1978,
• COMPLETION: i rocuirad,
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONC.0 MPLETION: Child care fu nrfs nthn roirar..1i-asd.
s.7.--4.4 71 a (12-el) Chs.s.ksiss
The Oopersr,st of Socfal Services rriP not diserirainett e against any
indfvidtlal or 7cup bar...aims of race, sax, raiIgioa, age, national
color, sea -Ifni s:sois, handicap, or poiItic,a1 t!--nd(rit5i
— SEE OVER —
IDSS-4-471 (12-87) (amd.,) 1JSE ADDITKNAt, SHEt S AS Plealca.
--- 4 ',-"rj ,-nr,`7-1,.1 c:-00 ,1ii=7-,',.T.1 C-1 components.
Al-017_76' OF 1711.'.-M71 ____ REDUCTIONS
, vi. Numtw't cif Dayn 1 12 Colds
A. YOLiih Pctiticrie,-.1
B. itcijudiczationc, 52 $58,920
C. Days of Family Foster Care
a Days cif Out-of-Horne Detrmtion 642 77,040 _
B. Days of Shelter Care
F Days of Residential rrefltment Cara 7,020 692,640
[
____....._
a state warrig committed See narrat.1 e
PrfiArl _
For ALL Component-A effeict c4'..!Otvg fritr,74 yeen •
13. ASSeSS51.rengths, 71711 aln2 ,:.:3 of this component_ Assess intended impact areas and results. Explain the
reasen(s), or cause(s) for the rliffernoce herweren the projected Nors and cost and :le actual.
COMPONENT "B"
EARLY OFFENDER PROGRAM
REPORT
II. B.9. C.9
For reporting purposes, a 6-1-88 to 5-31-89 year is being used to collect statistics
and measure impact This permits us to accommodate our timetable fo'r local decision
making and gives an accurate as possible assessment of program interventions.
II. C.
As for each budget year a service unit is defined as a caseload day. Within this
project, Child Care Fund days will be less than caseload days for two reasons:
1. We anticipate and build in some 300 days of short-term detention used in a
planned way as a deterrentr
2. In some cases where a decision has been mace that out-of-home placement is
necessary, staff will keep the case until placement is made. This assures
continuity of planning and service and, with the relationship already developed,
maximizes the benefits of the placement.
Page 2
III. B. Adjudications
Our research shows that, according to past practice, 87% of the caseload would have
been readjudicated during the project year. We would, therefore, expect 65 new
adjudications - 75 x 87% =65.
In the reporting period we had 13 readjudications for a reduction of 52. Based upon
the Court's minimum expense per adjudication of $1,135, the savings totaled $58,920.
$1,135 x 52 - $58,920.
This is a conservative estimate on two fronts. First, we are not taking into account
multiples -- youngsters that would have been readjudicated two or more times during
the project year. Second, experience tells us youngsters facing a second or third
adjudication are very likely to protract the process through pre-trials and contested
hearings. They are almost always represented by counsel -- often court appointed.
This significantly raises the minimum cost of adjudication:
D. Out-of-Home Detention
From the anticipated new adjudications, we estimate that 50% would be temporarily
detained at the preliminary hearing stage, or by revocation of temporary release
pending readjudication. Forty-two days is an average duration from entry into
Children's Village until disposition. Children's Village per diem is $120.
52 x 50% x 42 days = .1,092 days,
From these days we subtract _150 days used as short-term detention, We also must
subtract 300 days for those youngsters for whom immediate dispositional placement was
delayed. We choose, as a program, to offer services in most cases until that
placement is finalized. By doing so we offer a continuity of decision making and
maximum buy in to placement.
1,092 days - 450 days x $120 = $77,040.
L Days of Residential Treatment Care
According to past practice, 74% of our youngsters would have been placed in County or
private placement as a disposition during their court "careers." . Since we are
working with 12, 13 and 14 year olds and can't "assure" their outcomes as 15 and 16
year olds, we can only go by past success and current estimate. Conservatively, we
are maintaining or have maintained 26 youngsters during this reporting period who, by
past practice, would have been placed outside the home. Some working assumptions:
• one-half (13) would be placed privately; one-half (13) would be placed in
Children's Village.
. average length of stay in private placements is 360 days at $88 per day.
• average length of stay in Children's Village is 130 days at $120 per day.
Thirteen youngsters x 360 days x $83/day = $411,840
Thirteen youngsters x 180 days x $120/day = $280,800
Total savings = $692,640
Page 3
G. We haven't, to date, reported project impact on state wards committed. We know,
by past practice, a significant number of project youngsters .would end up being
committed to the state on DSS 150 orders. We view this disposition as a last
resort and used after Children's Village or private placement failed, and
ordinarily with younsters who had had multiple readjudications.• As we enter our
fifth year, our "alumni" are turning 17. An initial outcome study indicates
that only two program youngsters have been placed with D.S.S. on Act 150
commitments. if we can even remotely replicate these results through the coming
years, the impact is staggering, It appears that even those youngsters placed
do not return for multiple and more restrictive placement. Even those
youngsters readjudicated do not continually return to court. With our average
D.S.S. commitment costing $25,300, annual savings of $250,000 to $500,000 are
realistic.
1V, Program Assessment/Evaluation
Were enclosing an initial Outcome Study documenting the Project's first 50 cases.
We speak specifically to results and dollar savings within the intended impact areas.
In addition, the Early Offender Program will be eyaluated by an outside evaluator
during the last half of 1989. Results and recommendations will be shared in next
year's report.
6-14-89
EARLY OFFENDER PROGRAM
Preliminary Outcome Study
With the project nearing the end of its fourth year, we felt that we could examine
the results of intervention, Some of the youngsters initially served are now 17 years of
age. Others are still within the age of juvenile Court jurisdiction.
METHODOLOGY
The first 50 cases serve-- by the Project were selected for examination. They
represent roughly those cases accepted into the unit during the first 15 months of
operation April 1, 198.5 thi .ou:h :Lune 30, 1986. Of the 50 files, 48 were available for
review. Those files were pullet and examined. Seven (7) of the 48 files were not included
in the study because the cases were either dismissed without adjudication or were held
under abeyance with no servbes offered. Therefore, the following figures represent
preliminary outcomes on 41 ca.s..2s. The 41 cases do not significantly differ from the cases
used in the recidivism study ser ---7:ng as a control.
C-OALS OF INTERVENTION
The Oakland County juvaile Court Psychological Clinic completed a recidivism
study in 1983. Two birth years were selected, and based upon the correlation of some 20
variables, we were able to id-a:itify a client group, that by past practice, was at the
highest risk ...for committing ne -=.- offenses. In addition, this client group proved to be a
tremendous drain on placer-nen-, :.esources. Simply stated, Project goals were to reduce
both recidivism and out-of-honi-7, placements by one-third. The following are the specific
outcomes of youngsters within the Early Offender Program compared with the "past
practice" or Control group.
-1-
100%
75 %
50 %
25 %
100%
100%
75 96 .
50 %
25 %
CONTROL E.O.P.
GOALS OF INTERVENTION continued
RECIDIVISM - The percentage of cases readjudicated after initial jurisdiction.
100% of the Control group were found guilty
of new offenses after initial jurisdiction. (16)
of (41) Project youngsters were found guilty of
39%
;
C 0 NT ROL,
Recidivism within the fit 12 months.
new offenses.
80% of the Control group were readjudicated
within the first 12 months. 22% of the E.O.P.
youngsters were rea.djudicated within the first
12 months.
-2-
_CONTROL E.O..P
29%
50 %
25 %
100%
75 %
96
-6-674fR-617---E,76:13-74
GOALS OF INTERVENTION continued
Average number of new adjudications after initial ju:isdiction.
The Control group averaged 3.1 new
adjudications after initial jurisdiction. E.O.P.
youngsters averaged 0-5 new adjudications
after initial jurisdiction. More specifically of
the 16 recidivists, 12 had 1 new adjudication; 3
had 2 new adjudications and 1 had 3 new
adjudications.
Youngsters placed outsicf.- of the home as an initial disposition.
29% of the Control group were placed out of
the home as an initial disposition. None (0) of
the E.O.P. youngsters were initially placed
outside the home.
-3-
100%
75 %
50 96
25 %
5%
CONTROL E.O.P.
65%
GOALS OF INTERVENTION continued
Youngsters placed into a Children's Village program or private placement facility as
a disposition at some point in their temporary wardship.
8096 of the Control group were eventually
placed out of the home as a disposition. 32%
of the E.O.P. youngsters, 13 out of 41, were
placed out of the home. Of that 13, 7 were
placed in Chitdren's Village, 4 were placed on
ACD-F orders, 2 were placed in private
agencies..
Youngsters eventually ec:nn-titted to D.S.S. Act 153 as a disposition.
65% of the Control group were committed to
D.S.S. for planning. Only 2 out of 41 E.O.P.
cases have been committed.
CONCLUSIONS
Since not all the youngsters studied have reached their seventeenth birthday, some
of these results may be tempered. However, file reviews indicate that in most instances,
recidivism is less likely to occur, the closer an individual comes to his seventeenth
birthday„ it is apparent that Project. intervention has resulted in significant reductions in
both recidivism and out-of•home care. We will continue to use this and other data to
refine services.
EARLY 01-1-ENDER PROGRAM
Preliminary Outcome Study
Realized Savings
A key to any program assessment is cost effectiveness—are there savings realized
by the particular intervention st:ategy. We offer the following data.
A. Project youngsters have averaged 0.5 new adjudications for those youngsters in the
recidivism study. Even if the average of the Project youngsters rises to 0.8 as a function
all youngsters reaching their 17th birthday, this is a savings of 2,3 adjudications per child.
The minimum processing lee per adjudication according to 1987-83 figures is $1,080.
41 youngs ters x 2:3 adjudications x $1,080 $101,844
B. Per past practice we word have anticipated 80 percent or 33 youngsters to have
been placed outside the home as a disposition at some point in their Court career. Even if
the Project's actual 16 placeme:-,:s increase to 19 as a function of all youngsters reaching
their 17th birthday, we will have seen a reduction of 14 placements.
Past experience tells us that one half of the placements would be in Children's
Village. Average Children's VK:age placements are 180 days at a per diem of $115.33
(1987-88 figure).
7 youngsters x 180 days x...":',15.33/da.y $145,315.80
The other one half of the placemenTs would be made privately. Average private
placements are for 360 days at a ?er diem of $87 (1987-88 figure),
7 youngsters x 360 days x $219,240
The Project utilized 139 days et Children's Village as short-term consequences for 15
youngsters in the study. This rnat be subtracted from the above savings.
139 days x $115.33/day = $16,030,87
-1-
EARLY OFFENDER PROGRAM
Preliminary Outcome Study - Realized Savings, continue ,::
- Total savings, with the above, conservative constru:ts —
$101,844 + $1 145,315.80 + $219,240 - $16,030-87 =;)L50,368,33.
„- Not factored into this sayings figure is the dramatic drop in commitifients to D.S.S.
It can he argued that our Cour -z utilizes D.S.S. commitmerris as a last resort--usually after
other County or private commitments and their resulting costs are probably in addition to
not instead of, other placemerr.:s.
Without grasping at stzaws, it is apparent that the Early Offender Program
dramatically impacts costs. The current Early Offender Program with its per diem of
$19.46 is effective in reducIng recidivism and insti tutional care within its target
population
Time Period C.-rye-red
FROM:
Oct 1,19 89 Scn3O. 19 OSS
LOMPONENT ''•G"
JUDSON CENTER.IN —HOME FAMILY TREATMENT
r•
James f!il McFarland
pEcinc- NFO TAI1 Check all That apply.
•
N. Cowl,- •
Tetephene •Chernter
(313 ) 858-0247
GRA
7.
PROJECTED
ii' 'urns
PROJECTED
COST
! A. Number of YouttiServed
•
(1n -Home Care)
B. Number of Days of In-Horns Care
C. Number of Service Units (1 Unit
D. Total Component Cost
E. Average Cost Per Day or Unit
$89,762
$89,762
iOMF- G1-LC CO MPON ENT
r•:).1 I:2:n! I
,
Micincan () Sociat Se.[N•• •
Cue of..theSe forms . iou be compktzid for EACH Basic C rant/ Scryice cornpont
•. which is being -proposed fornext liscaf year as a New, Revisf:-:1,- or a Continued program:
_
pRoGRAm TyPE_ 1
. . L_ Li BASIC GRANT Ed IN-HomE pARE . - [ 1. COMOprirra ,STATUS '
1 LI NEVV - dorr-iiiruar REVISED , ,-- _ -_,,,—,,,.. —
I
9 TARGET POPUL/1n17.1. W=1 SERVEC! , .
A. chile,i, tincit- ,li.,ristliCti'.., of Cr:,,,11
, 0 DELINQUENT Li NEGLECT-
a Ch,tr,en NOT I We, -1.,1•3:2F711,-,, et Ce. et.
1.1 WRITTEN CONIELANT Li SOBS F.Af 151 E:,.1 C.P.S [DSS) LIG 1 tdren ti I} D cothe underfurisdction el the cowl (ea.lic Giant Only)
4 AREALF: OF INTENF.F.D IMPACT
A REDUC.TION IN:
Li Number of Youth Potitioned LI Number of Days of Shelter Care
Li Number of AC1; f diC,2,1110rTS . El Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
- Ei Number of Days of Family Fo ,-t,er.c.iie 0 Number of State Wards Conirnitted(Act 150 & 220)
El Nuaiber of Days of Out-Of-11 ,:ivne ete.rition
f. se.RvicE. FOCUS 1
1
Ei Provide early lute erdicti .(3 treat wiliiin the c.1-1i7r. , horn ,17.-
— Effect early return from foster or /ristitutionai eF.:-.:.
H. SERVICE AND COST 1")ROJECIIONS FOR NEW FISCAL YEAR:
Time period of request from October 1, 19 89 Dire E.eoternber 30, 19 90
PROGRAM DES(:RIP -1 lON: leins- which apply in riarrative paragraphs.- . ..... .....
FOR NEW OR REVISED COi,-,'IPONI7.;'lf:
9. Problem stal{-2.-m-..,J-it eS 1. a rid VI hfi:',1 e hS -....-;efrnininc .Iactors lending to the request.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONEN
10: Explain items 3, 4 8, 5 from the reverse side.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT: . . . . .
1 .1, Describe how the pi ejert will he ;,(1ministere-..:2., the services to be provided and b_, whom. Include the relationship between the court and
DSS, and the Con ti actor if services are purc:lased.
FOR REVISED COIVIPONENI . -
.12. changes— Describe changes that are planned in existing programs tor the coming year, i.e. target population, type of service, method o
delivery number otstaff, incren-e or decrease in costs, etc.
-
DSS-4471A (12 El){8,101 • USE Abcroor.k1 SHEETS A S • _.
Art,InIsTreiren Unit
Lz.-23 COURT '
Tpho tfurnbr.er
)
LI DSS
D RE.VLSE0
H L1(7- H.
REPORT • . •
• Department of Social Ser',/ :es •
One of these forms must be compkteci for .EACH.fia..sic Grant/ ILTHome-Care.Service component
for vaiC her-Lc:was (being completed). :
Cemponen# 1 Ina' • • — —7- • f lirne Pericd Covered
. = " C1 1 CONTRACT •FROM:
- SUDS ON CEIAl:Fil?, --ILOIAK.-1.:AM,I_L=L_TREA.T. Mithi'' 19 88
C-enerrlMnrInger /ere() — -
:Tames M. McFarland
1. PROMMNI SPECIFIC INF.NI.PI,:r.,,TIO11: Cher,* all that apply. . _ 1. PROST:P.M TYPE
El. SAM GRANT • • IN-HOME C.A.EEL
5recr.. 30.19 8 9 .
D WRITTEN r;01,irtit, -1 D vvR1TTEN COMPLAINT q;STAULIATF.D.C.P.S (TS)
El.-. CONTNUED
3. 1-3,1453FT PCPULATIOP4n SI 3. TAFTGFT PCPULATIOPIn SEMI'S:3
L2
-...COMPOIITCIAT STATIJS
A. Children Under-Juriedi-JI
El DELINQUENT
A. Children Under Judediclien Crn.#d
• El DELINQUENT
13. Children HOT Under .J.:;;; ChIldren floT Under .J.Jri,..dirtIonc,1 Court • •
LI LLE_GL.ECT
LI C1-tiWren fikeL!,. con? jurisdiclion 01 the co.urt LBic Grant Only)
4. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT
A REDUCTION IN:
ri tt,:urt;el• of Youth
LII Number of Adleditc„•=ns •
Li Number of Days of FarnOy Foster Care
LI Number of Days of Out-Of-Home Detention
[cy d She;,,:i•r Cai-e
El Number cif Days of-Residential Treatment Care
LI Number of State Wa;ds Cernmitted(Act 150 & 220)
St:-TIV17,E FOCUS
g Provide eady intervention to treat within the ch;ds home
Effect •ezny return from foster or institutional c._2 -.E
IL SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED (BEING COMPLETED):
I NSTIV,ICT •
e - In columns 7 & B . enter the nttrnhert,3 and -costs 'projected at the beginning of the- fiscal year.. . . .
colunirls 8 & 9 enter tfie rr.11.11 nurilb ,1: and cot's (year-to-date and protections if fiscal year is not complete).
Time period of report from October 1, '19 8.J _jtuu:,.t:pternb.er 30, 19 8 9 — 7. • 3. g. 10_
PROJECTED - PROJECTED . ACTUAL. ACTUAL
#3. JTASE1 COST NUMBER COST — _
A. Number of Youth Served 3 2 3 1 0 -.:. .,
J .1 r.,
(trt-Home..Care) .
B_ Number.of Days of In-Home Care 2 , 229 2 , 187 .._.
C. Number of Service 1..51/its (1 Unit = : _ ------.-r.:-:-.---
D. Total Component Cost $ 8 6 , 310 $._8 2 • 2-10...._._
E. Average Cost Per Day or Unit -. 3 8 7 .2. .: 37 . .. . • . . . .
A. 'Yok_i111 Pelitfoned••
I B. Adjudications
---
11 C. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Oul-of-Home Detention
E Days of Shelter Care
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care
G. State Wards Committed
USE AUniTiONAL SHESTS AS NEEDES
l;,fl'ACT EVALUATION Complete kir contift_ting or ending components_
P,REAS OF IMPACT REDUCTIONS _
11. Number's or Days 12. C-0.sts.
V. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL CQTY1p0110053 in offset during the rnc..st rectentfisel year,
13. Assess strengths, and plel,lem areas of this corrtOonent. Assess s-Le interidd impact areas and resifts. Explain the
reason(s),•or cause(s) foi the t'01.;.nan the projr°7-teri No's and cost and ne actual.
COMPONENT "G"
II. ACTUAL - 10-1-87 thru 4 -30-89: 1,269
The program has been filled quite regularly this year We project the
rest of 1989 as 918 days:
1269
+ 918
2187 Days Service
Assuming neglect average of 1.6 youth per case:
2,187
1.6
.3---;-5-65 child Care Days Saved
If I would have been in foster homes:
1,750
x$ 11/day average
_ 19,246
1 in residential iustit .ction;
1,750
x$ 120/ day
S210,000
$ 19,246
$210,000
$229,246
GRANT/Ttl-HOME-CARE PROGRAM COMPONENT .o"
REQUEST
Michigan Department of Social Services
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Basic Grantiln-Flotne-Care Service component
- which is being proposed for next fiscal year as a New, Revisd, or a Continued program
cm'n761r0 li ENT "0" L F-110.1dt 90 In -rcAtt on
Aamirlissrative Unit
INTENSIVE COUNSELING
Tim/ Pqrices Ocrrerecl r
0c2.1.19 L' '7 Sum 30.19 ;""'' CA =Oar 0 OSS
Cc-rrponmit fArv.,17,t-I-Mr-m, Tmnpncrrer NUMNJC
McFa.r1 andiSesti ( 313 ) 853-0247
PROGRA SPECIFIC It:Proilrl,vi rilf,t,c all that apply,
i. PR(GRAM! TYPE
- ', 0 BASIC GRANT ' - Dit1-1-+OME cAPIE .. .
7. COI, gPONENT STATUS
111 NEW U l`,".'"5NT1l',It.lE13 OnEvrsEn .
2..TARGET TUFVIAT1Ctlf.5) SUWER
A. (Th414Tre, 4inct4t ...N.thulIctfou of Court. I
natticoerr LI it RIZ...EC-I-
S. C,ItterIll PP"Vilin,-..,,r iori.-17.-":4.x, cf O.riorz
Ei WRJT TEN CO! Li S1.IFS rArrr t,-,E-2). GI'S. if-T-Sz.'7) 0 c7iiid liker Vs c ma under itithdiclou of tha COult (Basic Grant Onty)
. , .
4.. AREAq. OF lutET-MED 114T-AM*
. n A REDUCTION IN: ,
0 Number of Youth Petitioned 0 Number of Days of Shelter Care
ER Number of Adjudications U Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
Li Number of Days of Family FosteF ("'„re . 0 Number of State Wards Commitied(Aot 150 & 220)
0n Number of Days of Out-Of-Horne Detention .
S. SOTAC'E FOrl-IS
OR Provide eeriy inter,,ention to bent within tile chii,d's home
0 Effect early return from foster or institutional care
SERVICE, AND CO -5T PROJECTIONS FOR NEW FISCAL YEAR:
ime period of request from October 1, 19_ j9 -September 30, 19 90 , 7. 8.
ActfUECMER PROJECTED NUMBER COST
A. Number of Youth Served 1
20 46 , 5 9 1
(in-Home Care)
a Number of Days of In-Nome Care 3,500 ,3,500 -
3,600 C. Number of Service Units (1 Unit = -
O. -Forel Component cost 46,591 -- ."----.:::::::::::::::::::•::::::
E.. Average cost Per pay or Unit ...., „...... ... . .-.•.-., 1 2 . 94
AN-MORIFY: PA 87 of 1913.
COMPLETIOft la mquirTd-
CONSEOUFNCE Ff.',11 NC NCOM P LETiON: Child czara fu ruin wi+ -c-t be. roimbornArt
SS-4471A (S2417) Obaoterkasi 093-4471.
TrIe, DIVA Oi Social Se'rViCtr'S win not cflItcriminat arjainat any
individual or grt.-up bacauta ofraca, 54M, religion. a9m. nal-Jot:ea
marital 2m2rs, ruandicao, or pollrie d bf
— SEE OVEFL,-,----
UL PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Address the following items whirt.h apply in snort narrative paragraphs.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
9. Problem statement — What caused the need for this request and whet were -the --r.f,rmining factors leading to the request
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
10. Explain items 3,4 & 5 from the reverse side.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
11. Describe how the project will be administered, the servirtes to be provided and by nom. Include the relationship between the cowl and
DSS, and the Contractor if services are purchased..
• - . .
12. Changes — Describe changes that are planned in existing programs forth wiling year, iargotpnpulation, type 01service, method of -
delivery number of staff, increase or decrease in costs, etc.
FOR REVISED COMPONENT:
MS-4 471 02-81) Mack) USE ADVATICAAL SI WI-15 AO uEEDED.
mr
INTENSIVE COUNSELING
CC,1"17,0,,1,01 M7krInc,f 14.4.17,-sr
McFall and/Sharp
Tiro* PT.,-,1 C4°,
FRONt 88
octl.
reitti 89
Sieve. 30. 19 —
AtcrtorrzirsaM,v Urrrt
CQUFIT
Teiapecne Num
( 313 ) 858-:,247
HOME CARE
REVISED
=no un itirfrIr-j=f on of tl1f3 czmut
Number .7,-f Days of Shelter Care
c(1.1 Number Days of Residential Treatment Care
0 Number cf State Wards Committed(Act 150 & 22c:'?
f3ASIG GRAN17111110ME-CARE PROGRAM COMPONENT
REPORT
mic.;„,g an Dr:partment of social sewices
One of these forms must -be con2r,letcd for EACH Basic Grant/in-force--Care Service cotuponcaz
for which thci-e was Stale Reimbursement during Fiscal Yea:- completed (bein g completed),
L PROGRAM SPECIFIC 111r.011 rt, Pii0G1119,1 TYPE •
0 f3,41•SiC GRANT
2. -60/4111.)fief I' STATUS
(....1 cc...40-u.lum .-
Check. all that
r.j.) IEnMmATEJ
TARGET F-OPULAT'irii,(s; S'ESWED
1.1nerat Jumviltlr.:Y4 er C11
Devracuarr
cniiderr Vial- Urine, Jon seiciMs
Li woil.76.4 COMM.AINT
) OF lrirENDEt.) Imppx:x
A REJ3JC1-£011
Li Number of Youth Petitioned
Number of Adjudications
Li Number of Days of Family Foster Care
Number of Days of Cut-Of-Home Uetention
[1, NEGLECT
° 111 TED C.. .P.S. 1-1)551
•SEV1?1-: F-1.:CLPS
.0 Provide early T-1-,3;-; to ITUO t;„;71..n the coilds harrie
eady return froat foster or instihrtiona( caoe
U. salvicE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAH COMPLETED (BEIN(' COMPLETED):
INSTTINCTIONS:
.0 In columns 7 & 8 enter the wirnbaTs and casts projected at the beginning of the fiscal year.
hi t_iSF1,1TI171S 8 & 9 enter the au:nal number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not cornpfet -'.
Time period of report from October 1,1932 thrs September U. 19 fI0 — _ - -- - - - — — 7. a. 1
PRIDJECI ACTUAL
cosi- 1MBE
. . _ coaT
A.. Number of Youth -Silivild 20 $40,660 21
.1
$40, -',,30
i {tn-Home Care)
B. Number of Days of In-Hems Care 3,500 3,510
; C. Number of Service Unit3 (-1 Unit = 3,600 3,780 .;-...50
1
. D. Total Component Cost 40,660 40,E50 — .
FL
Average Cast Per Day or Unit 1 1 r)Ft
AUTHORITY: P.A. Si nf 1978.
ComPLEPOII: tT renuired_
CONSEO UENCE FOR NON(omPLaTioN: cnod fund r t•s
"2-424118 4 17-417) Gt.rtaostes aSS-14
The Dep ants _ant of Sndat Services will not discriminate? B."171172.1. 0.-!`f
ilICNidt.18.1 :1.,tf:rup br1,1.13rreof faC:e. 5ert, ago.
=ice, m'mta owic rtallgicno, poFftfc-.1.1 be•ii eta.
— SEE OVER —
In.IMPACT EVALUATION — Complete for continuing or ending components_
flEDU1loH5
- - - AREAS OF IMPACT - - ... .. _. it ittimb.e of Days 12_ Caztx
. _ . A. Youth Petitioned
i
a Adjudications 9 -Th, 10 , 215
C. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention 0" 35 , 280
_
E Days of Shelter Care .
__ ..
F. Days of Residential Treatreent Care 1 , 080
/ $129,600
State Wards Commftted
_.... _ ...._ ,........._ _ ._....._,.... ________.. ___. ._,
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the moat recant fiscal year •
13. Assess strengths, weakness' and problem areas of this component Assess t•":e intended impact areas and results. Explain the
reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No's and cost and e actual.. -
uSS-1471B (12-8-n USE Aly).rriOt.0.1...S14F.,ET'S S EST ED.
REPORT
IN-HOME CARE PROGRAM
COMPONENT
INTENSIVE COUNSELING
To meet internal budget approval guidelines and to eliminte "projected figures,"
statistical information is based on the time period from 6-1-88 to 5-31-89.
II . C,
A service unit equals one caseload day. With jurisdiction averaging over one year in
the target group, we feel comfortable using 180 days as the average for cases being
under jurisdiction during the statistical year.
B.
In-Home Care days will be slightly less than service units because some of the cases
were assigned with the youngsters already placed in detention by preliminary hearing.
Intensive counseling was the reason for return to the community.
1IL B.
From this population we would expect a 75% recidivism rate within their - court
careers. Most of those would have been readjudicated within the first 12 months.
Instead of the anticipated 12. new adjudications, we experienced 3. At the court,
minimum processing costs of $1,135 per case (from authorization to disposition), the
savings are $1,135 x 9 $10,215.
III. D.
Of the nine fewer readjudications, past practice indicates that at least seven of the
youngsters involved would have been temporarily detained at Children's Village.
42 days is the average length of time from preliminary hearing through
disposition.
Children's Village per diem is $120.
Seven youngsters x 42 days x $120/day - $35,280.
F. Conservatively, looking at case dynamics and interventions, we feel that we are
or have maintained six youngsters in their community that would have been placed
in a County or private facility. Using Children's 'Village lengths of stay and
per diems, savings are:
Six youngsters x 130 days x $120/day - $129,600.
IV, As numbers have built up, we see that the family intervention and intensive
counseling model can be and is effective with 10-12 clients.
Page 2
Project families are extremely dysfunctional and the high risk of •recidivism for the
youngsters is 'real. Success seems to be attributable to the counseling skill of
staff and the intensity available because of limite-J, caseloads. This component is
nicely complemented by Early Offender Program procedures including staffing, group
activities and some borrowed intern time.
6-14-89
90
Time Ptoc.a. Corefewl
FROM: 89 oct I, 19 _ OSS
C.-1:1112OrtO01 MMO2Igq1,Nama
Coo,00rfyrt nit COMPONENT "E"
IN–HOME DETENTION/INTENSIVE MONITORING
McFarland/Auten
Actmoserer.-0 Unrt
tU COURT
Tsi-eopriorre Nurnioat
( 313 ) 858-0247
prioGnAm SFECIFIC INFORMATION: Che-cR all that apply,
1. P P.0-0 PA M TYPE
0 BASIC GPANT M IN-ROME
P.F../ISED
i.acorfroNENTsTATTJS
0 NEW
O Number of Days of Shelter Care
19 Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
o Number zf State Wards Committed(Act 150 & 220)
. BASIC CAHANT/M-HOME-CARE PROGRAM COMPONENT
REQUEST
Michigan Department of Social Ser.ces
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Basic Grant/In-Home-Care Service component
which is being proposed for next fiscal year as a New, Reised, or a Continued program.
3. - • TARGET- POPULADON(S) SERVED •
A, Ct. -,1k1,no +..indt,i-..1t.grir.,f11.71too CollF1
M.---111•101JCIF Li
'5 /MT Undr,r.1oo,f.
1 El yips-I-FE:A comruour El suasTAN.11A7-= C.IAS. (DSSI Cnildren-10 corns Und(1,11 iuriadiCa0n of the court (Basic Grant Only) • •-• ••••••• • • • ••• ••••• •
ARES)OF iscrewies IMP ,NCT
A REDUCTION IN:
Li Number of Youth Petitioned
Li (...lumber of Adjudications
El Number of Days of ,Family Foster Coro
CIF-lumber of Days of Out-C.>i -Hems Detention
5..5E1:31/1CEtOCUS
Provide en.rly inteAverition to treat within the rshi;c.".3 home
F.7ot early return from foster or insti-tutional (Tani •
IL SERVICE AND COST PROJECTIONS FOR NEW FISCAL YEAR:
Time period of request front October 1, 19 89 thus September 30, 19 9°
7. &
PROJECTED PROJECTED P4UMBER COST
'. - 1 '-' - '' - H
y, yn,, .n... v
bAl Number of Youth served 152 I $31 , 9 5 0
(In-Home Care)
6,084 B. Number of Days of In-Home Care . - ----.--.-.
C. Number of Service Units (1 Unit L 6,384 ... ..
. D. 'Total Component Cost _$31,950 • _ .. l.l.l
E Avera ge Cost Per Day or Unit 5.00
AUTHORITY: PA 87 of 197a_
I COMPLETION: Is recuifed.
CONSEQUENCE FCC N014COMPLETION: Child care funds wil' •-ci5 i ,!,,imbursed..
:SS-A471A (12-37) 01-44:4-rAn O53. 4.471.
Ths Depar.--iant of Social Sareicea will not discriminate against any
ind[vicluat or group betauSrs of race. sx. reilgion, ago, national origin,
color. rhari, rattia, handicap, or political b4iets.
— SEE OVER —
Il.t_ PEIGGRAM DESCRIPTION: Address the following items which aPply in s.-.-ort narrative paragraphs.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
9. Problem statement— What caused the need for this request and what were the -...-etermining factors leading to the request
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
10. Explain items 3, 4 & 5 from the reverse side.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT;
11. Describe how the project will be administered, the services to be provided and L7:'..r-hom. In c.iod the relationship between the court and
DS-S, and the Contractor if services are purchased.
FOR REVISED COMPONENT:
12, Changes — Describe changes that are planned in existing programs for the c -,c)rnivL;year, Le_ forget pop k#Ifiti on, type cif servic nt.hod of"
delivery number of staff, increase or decrease in costs, etc.
MS-4471A CI 2-87) Mack) USE AD13,71DakL Si IE.M AS EEDM.,
IN --HOME LTENTION/INTENSIVE MONITORING
COMPONENT "E"
REQUEST
A. Number of Youth Served
Our experience over the last year indicates tha: 4 intern monitors pairing
casework can and have provided the intensive intervention wiith high risk
delinquents. Referral numbers do not justify asking for our original request for 8
paraprofessionals.
We expect an average caseload of 6 youngsters with a six-week turnover. Based on
a 50-week, 1,000 hour year per intern, that translates into 38 cases each.
38 cases x 4 interns = 152 cases
C. A service unit equals a caseload day.
In all categories of cases assigned to this staff we anticipate and will work toward a
42-day average involvement,
152 cases x 42 days = 6,384 service units
B. Days of In-Elome Care
We estimate that 300 days of short-term detention will be used as an intervention
strategy with this population, Therefore, the number of in-home care days will be
less than the number of service units.
6,384 days - 300 days 6,084 days
We are enclosing a procedural review of this component. It was developed midyear
with an eye to maximizing intern use and project impact.
6-20-89
CUT-ONE:1T
IN-ROME . DETENTION /INTENSIVE iOIf.OEdN
MCFaciand/Sharp
Tim* Pasiod
FMK
Oct, 1, E 9 88 89 19 —
Mrrkinivnxiiiro
couar
Tek.pnorn: 1,1,.1111bff
313 858-0247
111 05$
Got,mottENTSTA1119
• CONT3NUED TERN411--lik REVISED
-
REPORT
Mm De[Klutruertt of Social DrViCeS
0 fie of these forms must be com.E.1cI•. for EACH Basic Grantilp-Home-Care Service component
for which there was State Reli'abursemcut during Fiscal Year completed (being completed).
L PflOGRATel SP -- i_PROGRA,A TYPE
O CASK.; GRANT
OTINIATI Oft, Ched all that apply,
L.1 IN-4-40M E CA5rzr.
TARGEr POri,ILATioNn
A. G1-0141--ca Unolw -of cOtirt
lJ DELINQUev.
MilldriEn 1401 Qf Cowl
vvrirriar COMPLANT
0 NE:r3r..rer
Li SUBSTANTW:7 C_P„S- fDSS1 0 Culdren likely r come under jurietitclon of the court (Balic Graffi Only)
4„.,AP.F.An OF Ith173.40 ../73 lt,tP,r‘ctr
A nunt.iCl"ION
LII • Nrifnber of Youth Petitioll-sA
of Adjudications
El tint-H.1er of Days of Family Foter Cars
14r:1.n-it:or of Days of Out-Of-i-fr)ine DetontiOn
s.sarrocziTocus
0 Number of Days of Sheller Care
M Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
D Number of State Wards Comrnittert(Aot 150 & 220)
-4,•1e early intanionlion to treat ii We h.,7„
Effect early return from foster or institutional
1, SET1V1',74-:: AND COST It4FORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED (BEING COMPLETED):
• in cclumns 7 & 8 enter the numbers and proje-cied at the be ginning of the fiscal year.
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the a.ctual nurntr".- cosrs (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete).
lroe period of report from Odobor 1, 19_, 88 Jhui Eif171ef 30, 19 89 _ r. a. s. la
---Fc.sEcTED PROJECTED ACTUAL ACTTJAL
,1,:m 5.E... 013ST NUMBER COST
A. Number of Youth Serz-ncl 290* $63, 696 128 $2 8 , 780
(In -l-tome Care) ,,,..,
a Number cf Days of in-l-lamo C e 12:580 4,483
-- — -
C. Number of Service tinfts (I Unit -7°- )1 2,180 $63 , 6 9 6 6,153
--- ._ , .
-. D. Total COMpOnent CO I SI . $ 6 3 ,. 6 9 6 $ 2 8 , 7 8 0 -- _......._ ----.7 ....—... ---•.
EAverage Cost Per Day or Unit $ 5 . ? . 4 , 67 ........ — —
AUTHORITY-. Co Ti of 1973.
COMPLION:
CONSEOUENC F.: FOR NONCOMF't_ETION: Child Cal e !undo
Cr.aS-- A-4 71.
The 71.,i,t-i,Ertrile.,-,7 of Soc-led S,iirrices will no rrnm,Igainzi any
or rO ID-C-9.1..i1-9 of race, nex, rongion. age. ne6onal rirtrio.
C-OkJf. Marital oo.n. handicaP. or
— SEE OVER —
DS.s.-4-4718 (12 -87) USE Avo4no,-1,...L.s1
ti . IIVIFACI E.VALUAllUN -- Co!'... - for cf..)miniling or ondino cc.)mponents_ _
REDUCTIONS
A5; OF 17......r...,%...-f 1 -1. Nurnbef's or Days . .. _
A. Youth Petitioned
B. Actjudivations 39 44;265
C. Days of Family Foster Care
O. Days of Out-ol-Home Detanticm 1,450 174,000
E. Da.ys of Shelter Care
— - -
F. Days of Residential Treatinent Care 4/500 540,000 _ . _ .
G. State kVaids Cornmilted
IV. PROGRAM ASSF.1.".43.74EilrfEtin,i..i.lATION:
For ALL Component! in ()tient ritlit.T.ij tttq re•f.mt R3rcal
13..
Assess strengths., weakitT-3-s -,' and prOhlern areas of this component. Assess intended impact areas and results. Explain the
- reason(s), or cau_se(s) for the di ,.-7erarice betwet the projected No's and cast and "..-ore actual.
_re
II. B. Days of In-Home Care
The probation cases are not likely to qualify for matching funds and their
assignment has been discontinued.
6,163 - 1,680 = 4,483 In-Home Care days
III. B. Adjudications
At least 90% of those probation cases Where monitoring was used if lieu of a
violation would have been readjurlicated. Six of the nine status offender under
advisement cases would likely have been authorized and adjudicated. The minimum
cost of processing a case through disposition is $1,135.
(37 x 90%) + 6 x $1,135 = $t;4,265
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention
This unit's credited with 35 of the 42 days average length of time from preliminary
hearing through disposition for In-llorne Detention cases. Per diem at Children's
Village is $120.
4.5 cases x 35 days = 1,575 days
We must subtract 125 days for those cases who .had to be returned for violation of
the in-home detention contract.
(1,575 - 125) x $120 = $17-t,000
F. We estimate that at least J of the In-Home Detention., temporary release and
violation of probatio:i cases would have been placed outside the home ds a
-disposition were it no: for the intervention by the intensive monitoring staff.
Using Children's Villaze as the probable placement, that equates to
(45 + 23+37) x 180 OYS x $120/day = 540,000
IV, Program Assessment/EvaL:,ition
This reporting period has 5eert our .first full year of operation, With procedures,
youngster selection and re-cord keeping in place, we are beginning to realize the
Unit's potential. Basicall .:-, the interns give casework staff another weapon between
probation and Children's Vi.:lage that, when judiciously applied, allows us to provide
meaningful short-term consequences. The added information provided by
intern/monitors permits ra to make sounder dispositional recommendations based on
actual . ybungster and far-.:ifiy behavior. Even the "failures" aren't. We know that
those -'Youngsters placed out of the home do not have the strengths to make it in
their community.
-2-
IN-HOME DETENTION/INTENSIVE MONITORING
COMPONENT "E"
REPORT
11. A. Number of Youth Served
* The 220 figure was based on 8 intern/monitors as was the projected cost figure.
In actuality, only four interns were approved and hired. The following
represents case load luern June 1, 1983 to May 31, 1939.
- .12 probation cases bere interns performed a primary casework function.
These cases were used as training devices with our first crew and will not be an
ongoing assignment practice.
- 45 In-Harne Detention cases assigned from preliminary hearings.
- 23 temporary release cases assigned from casework staff either as a disposition
or pending disposition.
- 37 probation cases where increased monitoring, community service and
restitution are used instead of a violation, Mid reporting year, we instituted
the actual filing of a halation with Intake with a set abeyance period to better
comply with Child Ca-e Fund regulations.
2 under advisement cases from the Status Offender Program, In these cases we
felt that intern inves=ent was critical to our efforts to divert.
deemed critical to - 2 high risk neglect cases where additional monitoring was
maintaining youngsters in the community.
Total cases 123
C. Number of Service 1.! One unit equals one case load day.
- Probation cases averazed 140 days
12 cases x 140 days., :,680
- In-Home- Detention cases -from preliminary hearing to disposition average 42
days, The. Alternall -,-..-s to Secure Detention Program (S.O.P„) is credited with
the first seven days.
45 cases x 35 days =].57.5 days
/ - .Ifitensive monitoring temporary release cases average 42 days.
23 cases x 42 days = ii6 days
Intensive monitoring 1 lieu of violation of probation averages 42 days.
37 cases x 42 days ==..554 days
9 under advisement crLies for S.O.P. averaged 42 days
9 cases x 42 days = 3i days
- 2 neglect were super tor a
Total Service U nits
otal of 110 days_
THIS IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY . IT IS DESIGNED FOR OUR UNIT STAFF, BUT
INCLUDED SO THAT YOU MAY SEE OUR COMPLIANCE WITH YOUR 1989 AUDIT
R EGOMMENDA T I ONS
INTERN/MONITOR PROGRAM
PROCEDURAL REVIEW
As originally dra.fted, the Casework Intern/Monitor component included eight
interns, two for each casework area. This package was accepted by the Office of
Children and Youth Services (o.c..y.s.,) as qualifying for Child Care Matching Funds in
October of 1987, and renewed in October, 1988. The Oakland County Board of
Commissioners approved the grant in April of 1988, but in a modified version allowing
only four interns. Casework supervisors decided to assign The four interns, two each to
Areas Ill and IV. By doing so, we hoped to give the intervention concept a better chance
to succeed than would have occurred with only one intern per area. Interns were hired
beginning in May of last year.
_ With a June deadline for seeking a continuation grant, we need to assess compliance
with State Child Care Fond guidelines, make necessary modifications, and collect the data
necessary to buttress our request to the Board of Commissioners for all eight interns.
The annual. grant approval process and the every-other-year case audit conducted by
O.C.Y.S. are based on the following State of Michigan guidelines;
1) Are the services intensive?
Is there a specific intervention plan for each youngster?
3) Is the population served either at risk f or being placed outside the home, or able
to be rieturned home early?.
Is the intervention cos: effective? Is it impacting child care days?
Analyzing our work to date:
Intern/Monitor services easily meet State criteria for intensity. Intern use of
Contact/Progress Repec ..r5 provide solid documentation.
q)
1)
Intern/M onit
March, 1989
Page 2
11-Procedul Review Report
2) We probably need to incorporate a more complete, case-specific
intervention plan when utilizing an Intern/Monitor. Informal staffings when
.- workers make an assignment cover the required information but nothing is
documented in the file. Some form or memorandum focusing on intervention
strategy, areas of behavior to be monitored, and, perhaps most important, what
will determine success or failure of the intervention, is necessary.
3) Program design as 'veil as Stale guidelines clearly define our population.
— those youngsters on temporary release from a
Temporary Detentipn Order clearly qualify. The Temporary Release
contract combined with Contact/Progress Reports meet documentation
requirements ,.
Temporary Release as a disposition Interns can help the Court
determine if thE youngster and family have the strengths to succeed in
the community. A timefrarne, perhaps four to six weeks, should be
. utilized for intea5.ive Intern investment. Ideally, a Supplemental Order of
Probation wont( follow for successful cases. If this is not workable, then
the case could r .,:eert to standard supervision levels while under the same
order. This catz-.:)t'y also meets State guidelines.
Intensive in oni t c.,ring in lieu of a violation of probation — Caseworkers
may choose to --...z.hten restrictions,. add Y.C_S. hours or restitution or, in
other ways imps:: their probationer‘' instead of violating the youngster's
Page 2
Intern/NA mitor Program-Procedtlral Review Report
March, 1989
Page 3
probation. To comply with State guidelines of "being at risk for
"detention", a supplemental petition would have to be written and "statued
at Intake, with it being held open for up to 4-2 days. Again, specific
intervention plan should be developed.
d) Intensive monitoring pending a disposition — our interns might be used to
provide focused supervision to help the Court decide if out-of-horne
placement is ne-zessary. This could occur between adjudication and
disposition of a first offense but, perhaps, more often pending
.adjudication and disposition of a violation.
This is not meant to be an all-inclusive list. Other creative uses of the
Intern/Monitors is encouraged. Certain neglect situations might. be applicable.
Intensive aftercare, when necessary, is a possibility. The keys are, -7 is there a
documentable risk of detention,. and can the intent of the intervention be carried out
within a four to six-week framework?
Statistics collected fcc our annual report already demonstate the effectiveness
of the intensive monirc-cing approach. Adherence to the above procedures will
inalit the "justificato71" process that much easier. Current statistical forms
and anecdotal record keeping will supply the necessary information. One
"caveat"-failure of a 1,-oungster on In-Horne Detention or Temporary Release
does not equate to failure of the project. It is as important to know who can't
succeed as who can. !.t ore important is our increased ability to monitor cases
Page 3
Intern/
March,
Page t).
miter Pror,vayn-Procedural Review Report
989
and collect information. Bottom line, if we are succeeding in too many cases
we aren't taking big enough risks.
Together with critical analysis, we are at the point where creativity is important.
How can we do it better? Should there be a different way of assigning cases and
tasks? What are other "colzsequ.ences" that we can develop short of return to court
or placement outside of the home? As we prepare for the 1989-'90 budget request,
your suggestc:os ave welcome_
RS/pah
Page 4
COUNT Y MICHIGAN Daniel T. Murphy, Oakland County Executive
DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS
AND HUMAN SEHVICLS
July 20, 1989
Mr. Joe Jerome, Program Consultant:
Child Care Resources Division of
Children's and Youth Services
Michigan Department of Social Services
300 S. Capitol
P.O. Box 30037
Lansing, MI 48909
Dear Mr. Jerome:
I am enclosing the packet of information sent to you on February 6, 1989
regarding Children's Village at the request of Cindy Harper of Oakland
County Probate Court. As of this date, the only change would be in the
per diem which has changed from $115,33 in 1988 to $120.00 in 1989.
Please feel free to contact re if you desire any additional information.
Sincerely,
C .
Michaele K. Worrell, Manager
Oakland County Children's Village
MKW/fm
enclosure
cc: Tim Soave, Budget Analyst
Oakland County Department of Management and Budget
C.V. Management File
CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
Michaele K. Worrell, Manager
1200 North Te.egraph Road ;7-ontiac, N/6chigan 48053-10B7 (313) 85a-1150
COUNTY MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT 01 INSTIIRTI 0 1.4S
AHD HUMAN SERVICES
Daniel T. Mmphy, Oakland Ccionly Executive
CHILDRENS VILLAGE
Michaele K. Worcett, Manager
February 6, 1989
Mr, Joe Jerome, Program Consultant
Child Care Resources Division of Children's And Youth Services
Michigan Department of Social Services
300 S. Capitol
P.0_ Box 30037
Lansing, MI 48909
Dear Mr. JeYoille:
•I learned, last Friday, that you are seeking information
regarding the number of licensed beds and program descriptions
of the Oakland County Children's Village. Apparently, you had
requested said information from Mr. Earl Koonce, Oakland County
Probate Court. It is unfortunate that nobody referred you to
me, as your request would have been expedited had someone done
so_ Enclosed, however, is a package which outlines the services
and delivery of same of the Village_
Children's Village is a division of the Oakland County
Department of Institutional and Human Services, under the
auspices of the Oakland County Executive; i.e, it is part of
the executive branch of county government. The facility has
three operating licenses issued by the Division of Child Welfare
Licensing, Department of Social Services: Bureau of Regulatory
Services.
The Shelter Care/Transitional Services Program is licensed under
provider number: CA 63390, and the beds:lace capacity is for 60
boys and girls from the ages of birth to 18 years. The
licensing rules which regulate this phase of our operation are
the Rules For Short-Term Institutions, as outlined in Public Act
116 of 1973; Licensing Rules For Child Caring Institutions_
The Secure Detention Program is under provider number: CA 63306,
also regulated in the rules for short-term facilities in P.A.
116. This program is licensed for a total of 73 boys and girls, -
ages 12 to 18 years.
\
V,‘:\ ‘,,Gc
'S 0--th-
05);'Yk
1200 North lelegrapti Road Pontiac, Michigan 48053-1087 (313) 858.1150
Mr. Joe Jerome, Program Consultant, Child Care Resources
Division of Children's and Youth Service:;., Michigan Department
Of Social Services, continued:
February 8, 1989
Page 2
The Long-Term Residential Treatment Pro3ram of the Village is
under provider number: CA 63391, a1s0outlined in the Rules For
Residential Treatment Facilities in P.A. 116. The licensed
capacity of the residential treatment procram is for 80/Loys and
girls, ages 12 to 18 years, who have been committed to the
facility via dispositional findings of the courts.
Thus, this three-fold approach to residential care, delivered in
eight program sites on one campus has a total licensed capacity
of 213 youngsters. With the aforementioned sketch of the
Village and, the enclosed descriptions, I am confident you will
gain most of the information you are seehing. Please feel free
to contact me at your convenience should you desire any
additional insight of Children's Village.
Sincerely,
7 ' •
Michaele K. Worrell, Manager
Oakland County Children's village
MKW/cc
Ms. Laurie VanPelt, Budget Analyst:
Oakland County Department of Management and Budget
C.V. Management File
Encl.
cc:
OAKLAND COUNTY CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
1200 N. TELEGRAPH ROAD
PONTIAC, MICHIGAN 48053
TELEPHONE: (24 HOURS) 858-1150
OFFICE HOURS: 8:30 AM-5:0O PM. MOND.1.Y-FRIDAY
INTAKE HOURS: 24 HOURS
DIRECTOR: MICHAELE K_ WORRELL, MANAGER
CLIENT ELIGIBILITY: MALES AND FEMALES, AGES BIRTH TO 18 YEARS
/-
SERVICES PROVIDED: A division Di the Department of
Institutional and Human Services, Children's Village is the
County of Oakland's tesidential facility for children and youths
who have been referred by the Oakland County Probate Court-
Juvenile Division, District Courts, Circuit Court, Office of the
Prosecuting Attorney, various Juvenile Courts- throughout
Michigan and the State Department of Social Services. The
facility presents a unique tri-dimensional approach to
residential care and treatment for youngsters awaiting the
adjudicative and/or dispositional phases of the court process as
well as those committed by dispositional orders for the purpose
of residential treatment_ The Village maintains 213 beds in
multiple living units located on a campus setting adjacent to
the County Service Center. The Children's Village School,
accredited by the North Central Association of High Schools and
Colleges, completes the self-contained/one location feature of
the facility, allowing for regular and special education
programs for grades K-12,
PROGRAM FEATURES:
RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PROGRAM.: for youths, ages 12 to 18
years, committed by court order for rehabilitative treatment
services; such services delivered in open (i.e., non-secure)
settings_ Treatment program capacity is for 60 boys and 20
girls, located in four _ cottage-like units, utilizing a
milieu-therapeutic approach with group, individual and
family counseling, individualized treatment-service plans
and 60 day aftercare period_ Length of stay is open-ended,
based upon individualized assessment of needs and treatment
objectives_
SHELTER CARE/TRANSITIONAL SERVICES: for children, ages
birth to 18, temporarily removed from their own homes for
reasons of parental neglect, dependency or who have beeli,
involved with court for home or school difficulties_
Capacity is 60 boys and girls, who may be awaiting
reunification with family, foster care, placement with other
agencies or placement in Village residential treatment
program. Children reside in either of two open (non-secure)
units and receive short-term treatment services, Length of
stayt
process.
30 days, or less; but, may exceed due to court
OAKLAND COUNTY CHILDREN'S VILLAGE (continued):
SECURE DETENTION SERVICES: as an alternative to jail for up
to 56 boys and 17 girls, residing in two secure (i.e.,
locked) units, who are awaiting court process or placement
in Village treatment program or with other agencies, and
have been deemed to be a risk to community and/or self.
Receive short-term treatment services including crisis
intervention_ Length of stay: 30 days, or less, but may
exceed due to court process, or problematical behaviors.
11;Z0.0-0
Current per diem: -173: Actual cost/on ability
to pay basis, as determined by Oakland County Reimbursement
Division.
INTAKE PROCEDURE: By Court order, or referral by Department of
Social Services_ Contact Chief: Children's Village Intake Team,
or on-duty supervisor_ Intake services 24 hours a day, every
day.
USE OF VOLUNTEERS: Individuals or groups, minimum 18 years of
age, as screened and approved by administration and in
compliance with state licensing regulations. Foster grandparent
program in conjunction with Catholic Social Services. Volunteer
activities include recreational, vocational, tutoring and
companionship.
FUNDED BY: County of Oakland.
CLIENT FEES
OAKLAND COUNTY CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
OVERVIEW
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
TO YOUTHS
AND
THE COMMUNITY
COVHT ECUTV I
L r- DiREGTOR;
DEPARTLIENr OF
fNSTITLITIoNA.L.,.A.NO
HumAN sF.SVcaq
tAATIV'E
A-S$457.i.htf:
} C. V. OPERATCH$
AC-I1C-tAANA4ERI
41;CAL
SI.,19qc-R8
oHict
WPC avtSost
Et/PWYEE
ALCO4OS sPtcfAtisr
P000 SER,e's
IBLCC.,
av/CE
SUP'ERVia7.1R
R ECR E ATIC0,1 pECti..LIST
FR-E7.7N-71117.71 ./ExuN Z I
CONTRACTED prior E TLSPi•IM,
Stri Mt,
PSYCHIATRISTS
PSYCHIATRIC MASON
'HORKE
PEDIATRICIANS
CHILDREN'S
SUPERVISORS I.
CHILDREN'S
SUPERVIS3RS-4D
CL.ERICAL IR 1.04: E
1
—TF mAJNINNA.NCEF---
;
CLERKS.
; FISTS
ouNu.t.onsi I moaAA14 1 nycni,00lsra,
RKERS1 •
1 CCIJN2ELOAS 1 PCIOGR m.4 I.„----.:.- SUR•Evnaris I
•
cHILORENs vri..LA(iEt
C. V. I
iHrAKE TAI
A, J. H ,
CENTRAL, GARAGE
1 , I S.ECTIE VARY L
CHILDREN%5
SUPERWSORS
CH'S, vv. NIS
SuPERVISOK,'
r 5PECIA4. SERVIC:3
RAJNI1A3ik YJLWAT (:34 I
L 35TE IIn.rrE11,-,-5,
St 4Y'CE
S
Cxic.„r 0, V.
PR ()GA TE,4-1,4
tst.oc,S. , C 0,
t
CIF7:71.1:71
1
" SAE TV OivLsiCki — RA010 SERI/ICES
OAKLAND COUNTY CHILORWS VILLACZ ORGANIZATIONAL CHART (5/57)
PROGRAM STATEMENT: OAKLAND COUNTY CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
Children's Village presents a unique and comprehensive
tri-dimensional approach to residential care and
treatment. Pre-adjudicated and/or pre-dispositional
children and youths receive initial treatment services
under the auspices of either the Shelter Care Program, for
children who have been temporarily assigned to the
facility for reasons of neglect or abuse; or in the Secure
Detention Program, for youths who have been identified as
posing a risk to the community or themselves.
Youths who are committed to the facility by dispositional
order receive long-term treatment and rehabilitative
-services through the Residential Treatment Program.
The presence of the Children's Village School on the
campus completes the self-contained/comprehensive approach
to residential care and provides an educational program
spanning the grade levels of Kindergarten through 12th
Grade. Consequently, residents are provided with an
educational program tailored to meet their needs; and to
receive grades and credits which are transferable to their
community schools.
Children's Village believes in the inherent abilities and
rights of individuals to effect positive changes in their
lifestyles and value systems that would result in a more
successful adaptation to community living_ We believe
that by providing a continuum of care in a treatment
oriented milieu, utilizing the least restrictive setting
necessary; that these aforementioned changes will be
facilitated and reinforced_ We further believe that the
focus of such treatment services is with. the client and
the client's family and that service delivery is aimed at
achieving the earliest and most reasonable return of the
client to the community; while, at the same time, keeping
in mind the safety and welfare of the community_
OAKLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN SERVICES
CHILDREN'S VILLAGE DIV:S1ON
OVERVIEW:
Children's Village is the County of Oakland's residential child
and youth facility. Licensed, by the State of Michigan under
Act 116 of the Public Acts of 1973 (Licensing Rules F5,),r Childv
Caring Facilities), the Village maintains 213 beds for
youngsters between the ages of 0 to 18 years, who are referred
to the facility by the local juvenile court (Oakland County
Probate Court) as well as various other juvenile courts and the
Department . of Social Service's throughout Michigan_ The
facility consists of nine buildings on a single campus located
adjacent to the main Oakland County Service Center.
Children's Village offers a unique tri-imensional approach to
residential care, allowing for:
(1) Sc:_c.1.33.:e. detention (as an alternative- to jail) for boys and
girls who have been identified as being a risk to the community
or themselves.
(2) Shelter Care for youngsters who have had to- be temporarily
removed from their own homes for reasons of parental neglect
and/or abuse; or those who have presented problematical
behaviors in their own homes.
(3) Residential treatment and rehabilitative services for
youngsters who have been committed by court order to the
facility; such services being rendered in open (i.e., non-
secure) cottage-type buildings.
The key feature of this comprehensive approach to residential
care is that it provides the opportunity for residents of
Oakland County (who are deemed to be in need, of out-of-home
care) to receive such services within Oakland County and, thus,
close to home This feature, therefore, allows for the parents
or guardians of those children placed in the Village to be able
to travel to the facility with relative convenience in terms of
time and distance_ The close proximity enhances and
facilitates the care and treatment of the resident-clients, as
parental involvement is considered a desirable and integral
component of such care and treatment_
The presence the Children's Village School on the campus
completes the self-contained/one-location feature of the
facility; thus. allowing for an on-site edUcational program
ranging from kindergarten through 12th grade_ Consequently,
while youngsters of school age are in residence at Children's
Children's Village Division
Overview - Page Two
Village, they have the opportunity to continue with their
education in a school program which is tailored to meet their
needs; and to receive grades and credits which are then
transferrable back to the clients' community schools.
Professional and par-professional practitioners at (5hildren's
Village include:
(l) CHILD-CARE STAFF (Children's Supervisors) who are trained
in the multitude of residential child-caring practices needed
to become effective practitioners_ T'ne Village adheres to a
ratio of no less than I child care worker for each 10
youngster's, during the awake hours of the day, thus enhancing
the capability for individualized atterstion. The child-care
staff assist residents in their adjustment to group living in a
residential setting as well as daf.-Iy living skills and
socialization/interpersonal skills_ utilizing the
PrOgrammatical structure, the child-care staff establish fair
and consistent behavioral limits and provide external controls
for the residents and reinforce positive efforts on the part of
residents; thus, playing a key role in the overall treatment
process.
(2) CHILD-CARE STAFF SUPERVISORS The overall management of
each resident site is -under the direction of the assigned
Program Supervisors_ These individuals are responsible for the
day-to-day operations in their assigned buildings and involve
such duties as 'ensuring sufficient staffing of child-care staff
on a 24-hour basis; immediate supervision of on-duty child-care
staff; coordination of service delivery and ensuring that the
desired quality-of-life for residents is maintained. Assisting
the Program Supervisors are the Children's Supervisors - Level
III, who prOvide immediate supervision of child-care staff
and quality assurance during the evening and midnight hours and
on weekend -s.
(3) COUNSELIN 1.3 STAFF (Child Welfare Workers) who assist the
residents and their families in a variety of ways, including
functioning as the liaison person for residents, the court, the
family and the facility; establishing treatment goals and
service pla n s ; and providing individual and group counseling.,
services for residents and parents_ Each resident building in
the facility-has an assigned, fulltime counselor and,
therefore, each resident has the availability of an on-site
counselor-
Children's Village Division
Overview - Page Three
(4) CLINICAL STAFF-PSYCHOLOGICAL (Social Workers, Psychologists
and Psychiatrists) - Each residential. bnilding in the facility
also has an assigned fulltime therapist.' These clinicians aid
in the development of individualized treatment plans; provide
crisis-prevention and intervention services; group therapy;
individual psychotherapy via referral process; family/therapy;
and assessment and diagnostic services aimed at facilitating
the most ideal course of treatment within the facility_ The
clinical staff team plays a major role in identifying high-risk
youth upon admission to the facility and assisting staff at all
levels in how to best manage these youngsters_
Children's Village. also has two contracted consulting
psychiatriSts and, a psychiatric liaison worker on staff- These
individuals receive referrals from the counseling-clinical
staff in order . to further assess and treat youngsters who are
deemed to be in need of psychiatric interventions.
(5) CLINICAL STAFF-MEDICAL (Nurses, Pediatricians, Dentists,
Dental Hygienists) - The Village has a cadre of fulltime
registered nurses who are stationed in the Medical Unit portion
of the complex. The nursing staff become involved with all
residents upon admission to the facility. They perform
"follow-up" admission tasks related to obtaining significant
medical information and histories and identify priority cases
for the pediatrics and dental staff_ The nursing staff
services residents who are referred directly to the Medical
Unit and, in addition, make routine rounds into each of the
residential buildings_ This is viewed as a most important
concept within the Village operation as it enables the nursing
staff to see children in the milieu and to consult directly
with the child care workers_
Children's Village enjoys the services of three pediatricians
who are under contract to the agency. All residents receive
physical examinations within one week of the time of admission
and follow-up care as needed. These services are performed at
the Village, thus enabling the physicians to see the children
in the residential environment and allowing the opportunity for
dialogue with staff members_ This concept also serves to
minimize disruptions for the residents and reduces the anxiety
often associated with the patient having to travel to the
doctor's office.,
The Oakland County Health Division provides dental services for
Village residents_ Dental patients are seen in the Village's
Children's village Division
Overview - Page Four
Medical Unit, in most cases,. and at the Health Division's
Dental Clinic in some instances_ A dental hygienist is
available to administer cleanings and preliminary dental
examinations_ Following that process, the Health Division
dentists then administer necessary treatment.
An expanded service available through she Health Division is
that of providing x-rays for residents who would be in need of
same_ These services are rendered at the Oakland County
Medical Care Fe'cility.which is located in the main County
complex_
(6) EDUCATIONAL STAFF - Children's Village School, located on
the Villag4 campus, is part of the Waterford Township School
District_ There is a full complement of teachers with an
average class size of 11 students. Waterford Township Schools
provides the services of a shared-time school psychologist and
school social worker who aid the faculty in assessments and the
development of individualized educational plans_ There is a
significant array of special education and remedial services as
well as vocational testing resources in the school program.
Children's Village School is accredited by the North Central
Association of High Schools and Colleges_
(7) FOOD SERVICES STAFF - A central kitchen building on the
Village campus provides for the dietary and nutritional needs
of the Village residents. The food services staff are trained
and certified in food management and food service sanitation
programs as well as other related dietary and nutritional
concepts. The staff are also assisted by certified dietitians
from the Oakland County Health Division. The food program is
monitored by the Department of Agriculture and the Michigan
Department of Education,
(8)RECREATION SPECIALIST - This individual assists each
building's supervisory and child-care staff in the area of
recreational programming development Each residential unit is
responsible for planning and implementing a written-weekly
activities schedule which integrates with the specific
clientele and mileau of each building. The residents and
child-care staff work together in developing these schedules.
The Recreation Specialist coordinates this effort and assists
each buildingLs staff team in the area of logistics and
instruction. As an extension of this role, the Recreation
Specialist facilitates special events and recruits and trains
recreational interns and volunteers,
Children's Village Division
Overview - page Five
SPECIAL SERVICES
(1)PROPESSIONAL NETWORKING-CONTINHITY OF CARE - It is not
uncommon for youths who enter Children's Village to have
previously received the services of other -agencies,
institutions and practitioners, The Children's -Village
-professional staff, in order to design and deliver the most
comprehensive and meaningful treatment services possible,
strives to obtain all pertinent and relevant information from
such sources. If warranted and practicable, non-Village
practitioners are invited to work in concert with Children's
Village counselors and clinicians in order to co-deliver
therapeutic counseling services, or to assist in the
development of treatment planning via consultation. Identified
needs for' ongoing and supportive treatment services are
translated into referrals by Children's Village staff to
community-based agencies prior to a youngster's discharge from
the Village. Thus, continuity of care is addressed by means of
professional networking, consultation and referrals..
(2) SUBSTANCE ABUSE THERAPY - Via arrangement with the Oakland
County Health Division's Office of Substance Abuse, a substance
abuse therapist is based at the • Village. This clinician
services youngsters who are referred by the Village counselors
for reasons of suspected or known chemical abuse_ In
conjunction with Children's Village treatment personnel, the
therapist provides didactic programs, assessment services,
group, individual and family counseling_
(3) -FAMILIES IN TRANSITION' - Selected youths in the treatment
program receive the support services of this non-profit
community-oriented agency which provides group counseling
services at the Village for the children of divorced parents
and those children experiencing difficulty in adjusting to an
out-of-home placement. F_I.T. therapists utilize art and play
therapy, role play, pencil-paper exercises and guided
discussions as a means of facilitating individualization and
participation within the •group setting. F.I.T. therapists,
also, participate in Children's Village weekly treatment team
meetings in order to provide the team members with suggestions
as to intervention strategies that would best suit an
individual child within the program.
(4) PARENT-EDUCATION (Step-Teen) - Parent Education is a direct
service provided by the Children's Village counselors and
clinicians to the parents of residents. The program that is
presented is the Systematic Training for Effective Parenting of
Children's village Division
Overview - Page six
Teens (Step-Teen). The meetings are scheduled on a weekly
basis for seven weeks. • The program is 'designed to assist
parents in the development of stronger parenting skills_ the
specific areas that the program focuses on are family
communications, understanding emotions, listening skills,
personality dynamics, adolescent self-esteem, appropriate
limit-setting and discipline, as well as individualized problem
solving.
(5) CLERGY STAFF/CHAPLAINS - All residents admitted to
Children's Village are able to participate in religious
services, Residents and parents can, upon request, have their
local minister visit and counsel with the youth. In addition
we are forliuuate to have a fulltime_ Chaplain in our detention
units as well as Saturday and Sunday services provided in our
Rehabilitati o n Programs and Shelter Care_ To ensure a
coordinated, effective program, a Religious Service
Interdenominational Council has been .implemented at Children's
Village that meets on a quarterly basis.
(6) YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM - Residents who are in need of
employability training can take advantage of a number of jobs
that are located either on campus or on the Oakland County
Service Complex. Youth are able to increase their
employability skills by learning how to fill out job
applications, how to be interviewed and the importance of
maintaining a job. In addition, youth are able to increase
their job skills through on-the-job training in such areas as
stock work, receptionist, clerical and food services. Funding
is made available through several federally funded programs.
(7) HEALTH EDUCATIOU Residents can take advantage of the many
health education v.-raining workshops provided by the Oakland
County Health Division. Firsthand knowledge about, and.
prevention of, communicable diseases, sexually transmitted
diseases, as well as dietary/nutritional issues are provided by
highly trained professional Public Health nurses. The Public
Health nurses also provide confidential counseling on the
above.
(a) FOSTER GRANDPARENT PROGRAM - Residents have a special
opportunity to relate in a personal, caring way to one of our
many foster gra-ndparents. The Foster Grandparent Program adds
a very important addition to our programs. Foster
grandparents provide an extra bit of nurturance and empathy
that might otherwise be absent without them. The smell of
Children's Village Division
Overview - Page Seven
freshly baked cookies and the insight gained through their
accumulated experiential years encourages an atmosphere of
openness and wisdom. Catholic Social Services .Foster
Grandparent Program has become a valuable addition to our many
spectrums of services provided to our residents.
(9) INTERNS Children's Village capitalizes on the
opportunities that students can bring into our facility.
Students from local universities as well as universities
outside of the metropolitan area provide their complement of
assisting residents in their related field of social work,
psychology, criminal justice, human services and recreation
therapy. Both graduate and undergraduate field training is
.provided in counseling, administration, social work,
recreation, psychology and child care work.
(10) STAFF TRAINING AND PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS - All staff
at Children's Village increase and fine tune their skills
through training seminars provided by such acclaimed
organizations as Michigan Judicial Institute, Michigan Juvenile
Detention Association and the Michigan Alliance of Children's
Agencies. In addition, a number of our staff are trainers
utilized by training organizations as guest speakers.
Children's Village staff also are field instructors in Social
Work, Psychology, Guidance and Counseling and Criminal Justice.
Our staff are also affiliated with a variety of professional
associations such as the National Association of Social Work,
American Correctional Association, Children's Charter of
Michigan and The American Psychological Association.
Children's Village is an agency member of The Michigan Juvenile
Detention Association, American Correctional Association,
National and Michigan Recreation and Parks and Michigan
Alliance of Children's Agencies.
(11) CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COUNCIL - The gonmunity, i.e., Oakland
County, is most supportive of programs for youth_ This is
reflected in the many civic organizations, individual and group
donors and volunteers who lend their financial support and
personal time, energy and talents to the residents of
Children's Village. An outstanding example of this community
support is found in the form of the Oakland County Children's
Village Advisory Council_
children's Village Division
Overview - Page Eight
The "CVAC" is comprised of citizens who have expressed and
demonstrated an active and vested interest in the welfare of
the youth . who reside in the facility_ • The council's by-laws
focus on mobilizing community skills, interests . and forces on
behalf of children and provides an _advisory service, which may
be used by the staff of the village, towards the develZpment of
improved services, The main objectives of the "CVAC" are: (1)
to maintain a cooperative relationship with agencies and groups
geared towards meeting the needs of youth and their families
within the residential child Care facility; and (2) to guide
children toward a more healthy life and becoming responsible,
contributing members of society.
The Advisory Council functions as a public relations arm of the
Village, as a vehicle for snstaininq continuing community
Support and awareness, as well as expaading these areas. This
advocacy role is a most appreciated and welcomed effort and has
served to move the facility beyond that of an abstract and/or
obscure agency in the eyes of the public_
Children's village Division
Overview - Page Nine
RESIDENTIAL SERVICES: ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
The unique array of residential prograns at Children's Village
allows for youngsters to be housed and cared for in specific
programs which are designed to deliver services that_coincide
with their individual needs_ Those in need of sliort-term
secure detention or shelter care are located in either the
boys or girls' detention units or zhe Shelter Care Unit.
Post-dispositional residential treatment is available in the
separate set of buildings known as the rehabilitation-treatment
units.
Because of this capability for providing such a continuum of
care, the ,residential service component is divided into two
teams: the Intake Team and the Progran Team. Each of the two
teams is administered by a team Chief. All personnel within
each team are responsible to their respective Chief.
INTAKE TEAM
This team is comprised of the staff of the buildings described
as follows:
RECEPTION CENTER (I-1)
Secure detention, licensed capacity: 36 males, ages: 12
through 17_ Intake site for boys Pending court hearings
through dispositional phase, who have been deemed to be a risk
to community, or self, and there is sufficient reason to
believe would flee if in a less restrictive setting.
Anticipated stay in this unit is 30 days, or less. Due to
nature of some court cases, some may be held longer.
INTENSIVE TREATMENT/INTERVENTION (J-II)
Secure detention, licensed capacity .: 20 males, ages: 12
through 17. Provides short-term secure services for post-
dispositional youth (as well as some adjudicated, but pre-
dispositional youth) who are awaiting placement in (or return
to) a less restrictive setting_ Serves as a transitional site
focusing on orientation related to intended treatment program;
counseling and treatment by program unit counselors and
therapists aimed at reducing potential for failure in target
program. Anticipated stay: 30 days, or less.
Children's Village Division
Overview - Page Ten
RECEPTIONCENTER (A-SOUTH)
Secure detention, licensed capacity: 17 females, ages: 12
through 17_ Intake and transitional site for girls pending
court hearings through dispositional pr:_ase, as well as those
who have habitually truanted from less restrictive Settings
within the Village. Provides secure services for those
identified as being a risk to community or self with high
potential for truancy_ Anticipated . stay is 30 days, or less,
with some exceptions due to court adjournments or barriers to
placement. Those girls identified for and awaiting transfer to
a treatment program building are assigned to the program team
counselor from the girls' treatment unit.
SPECIAL SERVICES (A-NORTU)
Non-secure setting, with behavioral management rooms, licensed
capacity: 20 boys (has capability for ro-ed setting up to 20
residents), ages; 10 through 17. Provides transitional
services for youths who are awaiting further placement within
or outside the Village. Residents typically have mental
health features related to their cases and may be pending
inpatient care or transitional move to Village treatment
programs. Anticipated stay is 30 days, or less, with some
exceptions due to barriers to placement in other units, or
hospital, or return to community. Those children identified
for and awaiting transfer to a treatment program building are
assigned to the counselors from the Program Team.
SHELTER CARE UNIT (BUILDING "H")
Intake site for children who have been removed from their own
homes due to neglect and/or abuse petil.ions. In some cases,
children may also be involved with the court as status
offenders_ Licensed capacity: 40 boys and girls, ages: 0
through 17 years. Anticipated stay is 30 days, or less, with
some exceptions due to court adjournments or barriers to
placement elsewhere. Provides temporary shelter care services
pending placement in either foster care, treatment program at
Village, placement in residential programs outside Children's
Village as deemed necessary by the referring agency and/or
return to own home.
The administrator immediately responsible for the delivery of
services in these buildings is the Chief: Children's Village
Intake Team_
Children's Village Division
Overview - Page Eleven
PROGRAM TEAM
The personnel which comprise the Program Team are the staffs of
the four rehabilitation"treatment prograa cottages, who provide
services under the direction of the Chief: Program Team. The
four buildings house a total of 80 youngsters between -12 and 18
years of age_ In addition, to providing services to the
residents of these cottages, the Program Team also serves those
youths who may be residing in intake buildings while awaiting
transfer to a treatment cottage. The four rehabilitation-
treatment cottages are:
REHABILITATION UNITS: "B", "C", AND "D"
Non-secure facilities which house up to 20 boys each. Open-
ended in terms of length of stay--i,e., length of stay is
contingent upon the amount of time necessary for each resident
and.parent to achieve their treatment goals and objectives as
outlined in the individualized treatment plans.
REHABILITATION UNIT: "G"
Non-secure facility which houses up to 20 girls. Open-ended in
terms of length of stay, as described ia preceding description
of boys units_
Program Team Treatment Components/Features Of Service Delivery
(1) Individual/family therapy.
(2) Substance abuse assessment and counseling_
(3) Group therapy_
(4) Individualized Treatment/Service Plans for resident and
family.
(5) Treatment Team approach to development and implementation
of Treatment Plans.
(6) Structured daily-living milieu therapy.
(7) Recreation _therapy.
(8) Counseling/casework services_
Children's Village Division
Overview - Page Twelve
• (9) Psychiatric consultant services. •
(10) Parent Education/counseling groups.
(11) Home visitations, as part of treatm.-:.:nt plan.
(12) Job training/employment opportunitis.
(13) Clinical approach. to therapy is reality-based;
utilizing modalities of Rationa1-Em3tive-Therapy, Reality
Therapy and eliminating self-defeating behaviors.
(14) Weekly ,resident-staff meetings.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE ZELIVERY
OAKLAND COUNTY CHILDREW:l. VILLAGE
INTAKE TEAM
PURPOSE:
To provide a safe and secure environment . and essential services
to boys and girls between the ages of C- and 18 who are in ne -,ed
of temporary shelter, secure detention or transitional care.
These services relate to the formal admittance of newfresidents
to the facility; and to the assessment of needs and subsequent
assignment to an appropriate • living unit as well as the
implementation of initial and/or interim treatment_
GOALS:
The primary goal of the Intake Team focuses on meeting the
immediate needs of the resident-clientele while keeping in mind
the welfare of the community_ In so doing, team members
consider the input of the referring agency or person (e.g.,
police department, Protective Services, parents or court staff)
as well as the nature of the offense and the emotional and
physical state of the client at the time of admission. This
assessment then leads to the decision as to where to first
house the child within Children's Village and to the initial
resident-management techniques that will be necessary for staff
to properly care for the youngster_ The primary objective of
this goal is to place the youth in the least restrictive
setting necessary to ensure the safety and well-being of the
resident as well as other youngsters, staff and the public.
This initial assessment of needs continues beyond the point of
admittance to the facility_ Follow-up tasks involve
determining needs related to physical health services and
initiating same. Assisting the resident and the family in
adjusting to the environment of group living in an
institutional setting and dealing with the fear of the unknown,
involves an ongoing effort by team aembers. Mental health
issues may surface and are then dealt with via appropriate
interventions-
Additional goals and objectives of the Intake Team are:
1) Assessing the needs for the resident to make desired-
behavioral changes, identifying same for the resident and then
guiding and monitoring the resident in terms of achieving
behavioral changes.
2) Providing feedback to the referring agency as to the
resident's adjustment, progress and unmet needs as they relate
to further casework/treatment planning_
INTAKE TEAM
Page Two
3) •Providing input to the Department of Institutional and
Human Services Screening Committee regarding case dynamics,
course of treatment and suitability for placement_
4) Providing interim/transitional services for those youths
who are:
(a) pending initial placement in an open residential
treatment setting within the Village.
(b) pending placement in a facility other than Children's
Village (e.g., Foster Home, State Department facility
or private placement)_
(c) in need of crisis intervention/intensive treatment
services prior to being returned to a less
re'strictive setting within the Village_ This
service is co-delivered by staff from the Intake
Team and the Program Team_
TYPES OF YOUTHS ADMITTED INTO CARE:
1) Ages 0 to 1B; male and female
2) Those who are temporarily detained by a juvenile court or
the Department of Social Services as being in need of either
shelter care or secure custody pending further court or
placement action, as provided for in the Michigan Juvenile
Code, specifically:
(a) those whose home conditions make immediate removal
necessary
(b) those who have run away from home or who are evading
authority having legal custody
(c) those whose offenses are so serious that release
would endanger public safety
(d) those who have a record of unexcused failures to appear
at juvenile court proceedings
(e) those who have failed to remain in a detention or non-
secure facility or placement in violation of a court
order
3) Those awaiting further placement—i.e., having the need
for interim/transitional services_
METHODOLOGY - DELIVERY OF SERVICES - ROLES OF STAFF:
A description of the delivery of services is best obtained by
chronicling the events that occur for the resident from the
time of admission to the facility to the time of departure from
an intake building. Admissions may occur at any hour of any
day of the week_
INTAKE TEAM
Page Three
INTAKE PROCESS:
1) Youth is brought to facility by parent, police or referral
source staff.
2) Intake person obtains from conveyor . the legal doCumentation
(i.e., court order, police complaint, Protective Services
complaint) necessary to enable the facility to admit the child
into care, as well as authorization to provide medical/dental
care and treatment.
3) Intake person interviews parties present in order to obtain
significant information relating to needs for proper care and
treatment of child.
(a) admission form
(b) medical data sheet
•(c) intake observation checklist
(d) release of confidential information forms
(e) accounts for and receipts personal property of youth
(f) secures contraband, if any; documents same and
provides for safekeeping of same.
4) Intake person compiles information and makes first-line
assessment as to:
(a) alerts (medical, psychological, behavioral and legal)
to receiving staff members
(b) identifies where child will be placed (e.g., secure
detention or shelter care) based on assessment
(c) identifies strategies/techniques necessary for child-
care staff to most effectively care for and manage the
you
(d) contacts parents, guardian or custodian (if not
present) in order to provide notification of child's
admission/provides information related to visiting,
name of counselor and condition of youngster.
If circumstances exist that suggest further assessment by
other team personnel (e.g., psychologist), the intake person
contacts that individual in order to gain further input as to
immediate placement and management of the resident_
5) All intake information is then .entered into the facility's
computer system in order to ensure record retention and quick
access by agency staff responsible for caring for the
• you
INTAKE TET\M
Page Four
6) Youngster is then assigned to a child-care staff person who
provides for:
(a) bathing/showering of resident
(b) issuing of clean clothing and storage of personal
clothing
(c) briefing the youngster as to rights and
responsibilities
(d) introducing resident to other staff members and
youths
(e) assigning the newly-admitted resident to the
designated building location, room, bed and
personal storage area
(f) in general, providing an orien -:ation and briefing
the new resident as to how to effectively cope
with behavioral expectations, rules and the
specifics of the resident-manac,Tement system
and program structure as it apglies to the youth.
7) Nursing staff then interview youth and complete a medical
history_ Youngster is examined in order to determine any
apparent injury, illness or significant medical or dental
problems_ Provided there are no obvious emergency medical
needs, the youth is then scheduled to see -the pediatrician for
a physical examination- This occurs within 3 to 7 days post-
admission.
Dental needs are tended to on a priority-referral basis.
However, even if the child has no dental treatment needs of an
emergent nature, he/she will be seen by the dental hygienist
within 30 days post-admission and scheduled for follow-up
dental treatment • if indicated.
8) The assigned counselor interviews the youngster within 48
hours post-admission in order to establish the need for care
beyond 48 hours, The counselor must establish that the
facility is an appropriate placement for the youngster to
remain beyond 48 hours. The counselor, with any necessary
assistance from other team members (e.g., .medical staff,
psychological staff or Chief: Intake Team) will determine if
there are any physical, emotional or legal reasons why the
child could net continue residing in the facility. If -
conditions exist that would contraindicate continued care
beyond 48. hours, the referring agency shall be formally
notified as to the need to relocate the child.
Within 7 days post-admission, the counselor will develop the
Preliminary Service Plan for each resident. This plan will
INTAKE TEAM
Page Five
include a written .assessment of the resident's immediate and
specific needs and the specific services that will be provided
by the Intake Team. A copy of this plan will be forwarded to
the referring agency.
If the youngster remains in the facility for 30 dAys after
admission, a written Resident Assessment will be completed by
the counselor. This document will include the reasons for
continued care; the plans for other placement and barriers to
other placement, as well as plans to eliminate those barriers.
This assessment shall also be forwarded to the referring
agency. For every 15 days in residence thereafter, an updated
assessment will be completed.
9) The newly admitted resident's. Educational needs get
attention beginning the next school day after admittance to the
facility. The younster is enrolled in the Children's Village
School and undergoes testing that determines functional grade
levels in reading and arithmetic_ The resident then receives
classroom work that coincides with his/her current functional
level.
10) During the entire stay, the resident is involved in a well-
structured daily agenda of school, work details, structured
recreation, free-time recreation and ether related activities
that are age-appropriate. In addition, there is a well-defined
system of rules for daily living and feedback from staff to the
resident as to how he/she is conforming to these expectations_
In the secure detention units, for example, the residents take
part in a token economy (point system) that provides them with
hourly feedback and reinforcement for positive effort.
Negative sanctions and consequences are explained and are based
on the yoUth's individual, capabilities and needs_ Child-care
staff maintain an individual log for each resident and record
their observations as to behavior, adjustment and real or
potential areas of difficulty that the resident may experience.
Supervisory personnel, counselors and clinical staff review the
logs frequently in order to refine or redefine the most
appropriate staff techniques in managing the youth and to
assist the resident in coping with the . institutional
environment_
Residents are also involved with team staff in periodic group
meetings throughout the week, focusing on social skills
development, resolving peer conflicts and information sharing.
11) Intake team staff meet weekly in order to review the
adjustment and progress of each resident. Those residents that
INTAKE TEAM
Page Six
a re identified as experiencing 'significant adjustment
difficulties may be .re-ferred for additional support services;
ncluding „psychological evaluations, psychiatric assessments
and/or individual psychotherapy or Crisis. counseling.
If the resident is ordered to remain at Children's Villlage for
longer-term residential treatment, the Intake Team staff (with
the counselor as the spokesperson) also assists the Department
of Institutional and Human Services Screening Committee in
identifying .treatment needs and the most suitable placement-
Finally,. when the youngster is discharce_d (i.e., released) from
an intake .site, the counselor prepares a written Discharge Plan
which documents the reason for discharge; the new location of
the child; brief summary of medical and dental services --
provided; and the name and official title ot. the person to whom
the child was released_
GOALS:
DESCRIPTION OF SERvIC: DELIVERY
OAKLAND COUNTY CHILDRE'S VILLAGE
PROGRAM TEAM
PURPOSE: _
To provide comprehensive treatment services in .a residential
setting to youths who have been identified as being in need of
out-of-home placement_
To provide a structured treatment uilieu for dysfunctional
youngsters that will facilitate and promote psychological
growth via means of internalizing emotional controls, the
enhancement of self-esteem, an increased sense Of
responsibility and a heightened awareness of the rights of
others. HRecognizing that ultimate acaievement of this goal is
a continuous process that will extend beyond the client's
stay in the Village, the main objective of the Program Team is
to provide the degree and intensitv of services for the
resident and family that would enable the youth to move from
the facility to a less restrictive setting in the least amount
of time necessary to achieve the identified treatment goals_
TYPES OF YOUTHS ADMITTED INTO CARE:
The "typical" client admitted into treatment is a boy or girl;
age 12 through 17 years, who has been deemed unable to return
to the community at the time of placement; because there is
sufficient reason to believe that the youth will continue to
exhibit anti-social conduct without the intervention of out-of-
home care and treatment. Nevertheless, the Client who is
placed in one of the treatment buildings does have a reasonable
Prognosis for being able to function in a non-secure (i_e_,
unlocked) but structured setting_ In short, the youngster's
delinquent behaviors have not been so severe as to suggest - the
need for long-term treatment. in a secure (i_e_, locked)
setting_ Likewise, the client is not emotionally disturbed or
impaired to such a degree that would require psychiatric
hospitalization. Furthermore, the client is not physically or
developmentally disabled to a degree that he/she would require
special nursing care and placement in a barrier-free facility.
Finally, the referring agency and :he facility staff are in
agreement that placement in the Village treatment program is .a
necessary and realistic intervention that will provide the
youngster the opportunity to return to the community after
having derived positive benefits as a result of the
intervention_
The treatment candidate's history typically reveals that prior
attempts to maintain him/her at home have failed despite such
interventions as individual and family counseling, diversion
programs and probation_
PROGRAM TEAM
Page Two
The pathology may range from mildly ne=otic to the more severe
character or conduct disorders, but tfne common characteristic
will be that of a pattern of dysfunctional behavior that has
the likelihood of continuing.
RESIDENTS' PROFILE;
Residents of the treatment programs possess the following
characteristics in varying degrees of severity and are planned
for accordingly:
1) Learning disabled, academic a;-.d/or behavioral; has
experienced few academic successes. Actual 1.Q- ranges from
dull normal to above average,
needs 2) Inadequate development
external structure.
of iniernal controls;
3) Little self-confidence or self-esi.e.em; feels inadequate.
4) Inadequate development of social, recreational and daily
living skills; lacks discipline, empat'sy, manners and sometimes
even physical coordination.
5) Inadequate conscience development; displays antisocial
behaviors.
.6) Inadequate relationship skills; has authority problems,
displays attention-seeking behaviors, experiences peer problems
or has difficulty trusting others.
7) Inadequate familial support structure; comes from
dysfunctional family that evidences poor parental skills or
neglect/abuse or sometimes even criminality_
METHODOLOGY;
The treatment program focus es upon maximizing the social,
psychological, physical, educational and moral growth of each
resident_ This grow-th is measured in terms of goal attainment
or steps necessary to achieve progressively more advanced
levels. The treatment program counselor is provided with a
report from the Human Services Comprehensive Screening
Committee that identifies the basic t.reatment goals for each
resident, prior to the latter's entry into the targeted
pray-ram_
P ROG TEAM
Pag e Three
LEVEL I: OIUENTATION AND ASSESSMENT
Orientation staffing is held with parents or guardians and
resident as soon after admission as possible. At this staffing,
program mechanics, services, rules, standardized goaj-s, parent
and resident expectfations, policies and visita .rtions, are
explained.• Within the first week the resident is provided with
an .Assigned Staff, who will aid the resident in defining . and
working toward treatment objectives, intervene during crisis
situations and advocate for the resident during treatment team
meetings. Also, within the first week, the resident is
assigned, a senior resident from Level IV as an aide in
adjusting to the program.
Immediately upon entry, the resident is assigned to one of two
therapy groups, which meet on a weekly basis and are co-led by
the program clinician and program COUT:selor_ Child care staff
provide daily living milieu therapy and make daily log entries
on each resident, detailing strer.gths, weaknesses and
significant behaviors. These log eniries, along with input
from other treatment team' members (counselor, clinician,
program supervisor and any support service providers) will
serve as the basis for the develo'zment of individualized
treatment objectives for the resident_
within a few days of entry, achiev ,,,,.men71 tests are administered,
and an Individualized Educational Plan is developed for the
resident_ A recreational specialist plans activities aimed
toward. social and physical development of each resident.
Toward the close of 30 days, the program counselor holds an
initial Service Plan Conference for the onrpose of specifying
resident and family problems and corresponding treatment
objectives within the program's standardized goals, time frames
for achieving treatment objectives, indicators of this
achievement and persons responsible for aiding in this
achievement.
Persons involved in this meeting are: the resident, the
parent or guardian, the program counselor, the program ,
clinician, the referral source caseworker and the assigned
staff (whenever possible) By the close of this period, a
referral has been made to the program clinician on behalf of
the resident, if there is the need for individual and/or family
therapy_ The counselor may also determine that there is the
PPOGRAN TEAN
Page Four
need for substance abuse counseling, which is available on-
grounds through a supportive services provider, both group and
individual_ when the Treatment Team determines that the
resident has attained his individualized treatment objectives,
he may graduate to the next level.
„-
LEVEL II: PLANNING Al*D GUIDANCE
During this level, the resident and his family work toward
achieving the initial set of treatment objectives_ The parent
or guardian is encouraged to participate in on-grounds Parent
Education sessions. The Treatment -. Team considers the
advisability of home visits, their • freguenoy, and any necessary
restrictidns_ Usually, home visits are infrequent and closely
monitored during this level. Of course, all aforementioned
core services are in -place, and the resident's involvement is
expected to intensify.
If' 90 days have passed during this level, the program counselor
holds an Updated Service Plan Conference, which is aimed toward
identifying progress toward the achievement of treatment
objectives, specifying any modificati o ns in the Initial Service
Plan and delineating indicators and time frames for
achievement.
Present at this meeting are all afzrementioned persons who
were included in the Initial Service :,lan Conference_ When the
Treatment Team determines that the resident has attained his
individualized treatment objectives, he may graduate to the
next level.
LEVEL III: POSITIVE PRACTICE
During this level, treatment objectives are updated and become
more difficult, thus reflecting the resident's growth within
the program. The resident and his family work toward achieving
this updated set of treatment objectives, and the resident is
placed in more trust situations. If the family situation
al lows, home visitations are more frequent during this level.
All aforementioned core services are in place, and the
resident's commitment to self-growth, via the achievement of
his individualized treatment objectives, is expected to be in
place_
When the Treatment Team determines that the resident has
attained his updated individualized treatment objectives, he
may graduate to the next level.
arrangements for a community-based educational services
plan.
and
PROC;RAM TEAN
Page Five
LEVEL IV: INTERNALIZATION
A second updated Service Plan Conferef.:e is held at the start
of this level, and all persons from tme_ previous staffings are
included. During this level, treatmemlt objectives are updated
and become increasinly more diffic -,:lt, thus reflecting the
resident's growth within the program and his increasing ability
to handle trust situations and to serve as a positive role
model for other less .senior residen:s. The resident and his
family work toward achieving this 1:pdated set of treatment
objectives and emphasis is placed upon preparing the resident
for return':to his family or to a less restrictive placement,
if this is not possible.
All aforementioned core services are in place, and an
assessmentis made as to the possible need for home community-
based indiVidual and/or family therany services_ If so needed,
the family and resident are expected to begin participation in
these therapy services during the course of this level.
When the Treatment Team determines that the resident has
attained his updated individualized treatment objectives, he
may graduate from the residential part of the program into the
next level,
LEVEL V: AFTERCARE
This level begins with a Discharge Service Plan Conference
which involves all significant parties_ Issues discussed as
this conference are: any remaining treatment objectives that
the resident and his family need to work on, the specifics of
the actual discharge plan, the rules and conditions of
aftercare, any necessary referrals for community-based support
At the close of this conference, the discharge date is
finalized. Upon discharge the resident and his family receive
the bulk of supportive counseling services from a community-
based provider, although resident/family progress is monitored
by the treatment program counselor for a limited time period;
not to exceed sixty days
Thereferring agency's caseworker is an integral part of the
aftercare monitoring system as well_ The treatment program
counselor and the court caseworker work. cooperatively in
resolving any difficulties that may arise during the monitoring
PROGRAM TEAM
Page Six-
period_ ff these ef forts do not pronote a positive change in
behavior, the referring court is n-atified by the treatment
program counselor. If the court finds the resident in
noncompliance with the court order, he may be placed in the
Children's Village for assessment and planning.
If the Aftercare 3_evel is successfully completed, then the
responsibility for the resident is returned to the court of
origin.. The court_ will then consider such options as:
dismissal of the case or probation for the youth.