HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1984.11.29 - 17339A
November 29th, 1984
Miscellaneous Resolution 84307
BY: PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE - ANNE M. HOBART,CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: SEWER, WATER & SOLID WASTE DIVISION
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT 641 GRANT FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
PLANNING - FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 & CONSULTING ENGINEERING CONTRACT
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS, Act 641 of Public Acts of 1978, Solid Waste Management Act,
offers for local units of government the opportunity to develop and implement
solid waste management plans; and
WHEREAS, a plan was approved by this Oakland County Board of Commis-
sioners and by the requisite number of municipalities in the county; and
WHEREAS, the Director of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources
approved the County plan on July 28, 1983; and
WHEREAS, Act 641 provides for 80% state matching payments for plan
preparation and implementation to the extent state funding is available; and
WHEREAS, approximately $49,076 in state funds is available to Oakland
County for fiscal year 1984-85; and
WHEREAS, the County of Oakland, in the process of implementing the
plan needs certain consulting engineering services as outlined In the attached
work program; and
WHEREAS, the County of Oakland will need to supplement the state grant
for activities described in the work program with 20% in local funds; and
WHEREAS, the County of Oakland must execute the attached Contract with
the State Department of Natural Resources not later than December 1, 1984 to re-
ceive fiscal year 1984-85 state planning funds.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commis-
sioners hereby authorizes the Oakland County Executive to execute the necessary
contract between the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the County of
Oakland to receive fiscal year 1984-85 grant funds as provided in the Solid
Waste Management Act 641 of Public Acts of 1978.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Executive is further
authorized to make reasonable changes to the work program during the course of
the study or if required for state approval.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon State approval Of the contract
between the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the County of Oakland
and also the work program, the Oakland County Executive is hereby authorized
and directed to execute the attached Agreement for consulting engineering ser-
vices by and between the County of Oakland and Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the maximum fee for these consulting
engineering services shall not exceed $59,845.00.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committe,
I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution.
,
f i
PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE
I HERESY APPROVE THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION
4
REPORT TO PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, DR. G. WILLIAM CADDELL, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: SEWER, WATER AND SOLID WASTE DIVISION
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
STATE GRANT OFFER - FISCAL YEAR 1984-85
The Finance Committee has reviewed the subject Solid
Waste Management Plan - State Grant Offer for Fiscal Year
1984-85 and finds:
1) Act 641 of Public Acts of 1978, Solid Waste
Management Act, provides for 80% state match-
ing payments for plan preparation to the extent
state funding is available;
2) Approximately $49,076 in state funds is
available to Oakland County for Fiscal Year
1984-85;
3) The County of Oakland, in the process of prepara-
tion and implementation of the plan, will expend
monies which more than meet the 20% match
requirement of $12,269 for Fiscal Year 1984-85;
4) The County of Oakland must enter into an agree-
ment with the State Department of Natural
Resources prior to December 1, 1984, to receive
Fiscal Year 1984-85 state planning funds;
5) Application or acceptance of this grant offer does
not obligate the County beyond September 30, 1985.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I
recommend acceptance of the foregoing report and referral of the
information contained therein to the Planning and Building
Committee in accordance with Miscellaneous Resolution #8145,
revised Federal and State Grant application procedure.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
29th d ay o f November 19 84
ALLEN
4
#84307 November 29, 1984
Moved py Hobart supported by Rewold the resolution be adopted.
Moved by Kuhn supported by Gosling the resolution be amended in the
NOW THEREFORE SE IT RESOLVED paragraph and also the BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph
by adding "and Chairman of the Board" after "Oakland County Executive".
A sufficient majority having voted tnerefor, the amendment carried.
Vote on resolution, with Fiscal Note attached:
AYES: Caddell, Calandro, Doyon, Foley, Fortino, Gosling, Hobart, Jackson,
R. Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, McPherson, Moffitt, Moore, Nelson, Olsen, Page, Perinoff,
Pernick, Price. Rewold, Wilcox, Aaron. (24)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution, with Fiscal
Note attached, was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
1, Lyon D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal,
do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of
Miscella d of Commissioners
with the orginial record thereof now remaining in my office, and
that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the
whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of said County at Pontiac, Michigan
this
County Clerk/Register of Deeds
November 1, 1984
a
COUNTY OF OAKLAND, MICHIGAN
Summary
of
Work Program
for
Act 641, Public Acts of 1978 Grant Funds
for
Fiscal year 1984-85
1. Work Program for The Determination of Solid Waste Generation
Rates in Conjunction with the Implementation of the Oakland
County Solid Waste Management Plan, consulting engineering
activities to be performed by Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc.
of Detroit, Michigan.
$59,845.00
2. Peer Match, one person attended European Resource Recovery
Study Tour for Michigan Officials, October 1984, visited 8
incinerators/resource recovery facilities in Belgium, Ger-
many, and Netherlands.
$ 1,500.00
Total = $61,345.00
80% State Grant = $49,076.00
20% County Match = $12,269.00
. •
A WORK PROGRAM FOR THE
DETERMINATION OF
SOLID WASTE GENERATION RATES
IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
OAKLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
OCTOBER 1984
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE
DETROIT, MICHIGAN
SECTION PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BACKGROUND 1
PURPOSE 2
INTRODUCTION
TASK I LITERATURE SEARCH 4
TASK 2 INITIAL DETERMINATION OF UNIT
ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA 5
TASK 3 CALIBRATION OF INITIAL UNIT
ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA 6
TASK 4 CONDUCT VERIFICATION PROGRAM 7
4.1 Interview Waste Generators 7
4.2 Interview Waste Haulers 9
4.3 Monitor Waste Collection 10
4.4 Waste Weighing Program 11
TASK 5 FINAL DETERMINATION OF UNIT
ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
TASK 6 APPLICATION OF UNIT ASSIGNMENT
- CRITERIA TO OAKLAND COUNTY 13
2
BACKGROUND
Oakland County, Michigan has successfully completed its planning respon-
sibilities to comply with State Act 641, which requires all counties in
the state to assure the proper disposal of solid waste. The proposed
plan, the Oakland County Solid Waste Management Plan, has received
approval from the Citizens' Solid Waste Advisory Committee, the County
Board of Commissioners, more than two-thirds of the municipalities in
the County, and the State Department of Natural Resources.
The County, therefore, is currently in the implementation phase and'is
proceeding to finalize the basic components of the plan. The commitment
of waste to the project by the participating communities will be
achieved through the voluntary signing of contracts with the County.
These contracts assure the County control of the waste so that bonds can
be sold to raise the construction and financing costs. The waste will
be delivered by haulers to either landfills or resource recovery facili-
ties. These facilities will all charge the same cost/ton, close to the
current landfill disposal cost. This method of charging provides no
incentive to the truck drivers to not deliver their waste to the
designated facility.
The cost for the resource recovery facilities, however, will be higher
than the landfill cost, so these monies will be collected directly from
the municipalities as a "system charge." A problem arises in that there
is no current system of measuring the amount of waste a municipality
generates, which the County must know to determine the total "system
charge." Nor is there a method of determining how much waste each
commercial, institutional, or industrial establishment generates, which
the municipality must know to charge the business.
-1-
41008A
PURPOSE
The purpose of this work program is to describe the tasks required to
approximate the waste generation rates from residential, commercial,
institutional, and industrial establishments in Oakland County. This
information will be used to determine the amount of waste generated by
each municipality that will participate in the Oakland County Solid
Waste System. This waste quantity will be used in the determination of
the "system charge."
INTRODUCTION
This work program has been developed to build on existing waste genera-
tion rate information and provide for additional efforts to further
quantify the data. The first effort (Task I) will be a literature
search and telephone survey for similar information that may have been
produced for some other municipality in the United States. Next (in
Task 2), we will prepare a revision of estimates of the generation rate
and expand initial categories if necessary for residences and commer-
cial, institutional, and industrial businesses. The waste generated by
a typical residence is about 1.5 tons per year and is defined as one
unit (therefore one unit 1.5 tons of waste). This initial determina-
tion of unit assignments will be calibrated (in Task 3) by applying it
to two communities. The results will be compared to the original gross
estimates from the Phase lA Data Base report that are, for the most
part, based on per-capita generation rates. Then (in Task 4) the
results will he verified by interviewing waste generators and waste
haulers, monitoring waste collection, and possibly conducting a weighing
program. A final adjustment to the unit assignment criteria will be
made (in Task 5) from information gathered during the verification
program. There is a possibility that industrial waste generators, and
other waste generators, should be measured on the basis of volume and
not weight. This decision will be based on the work done in Task 4.
-2-
41008A
Finally in Task 6), there will be a discussion of how the unit assign-
ment criteria can be universally applied to all the participating munic-
ipalities. Additional verification if necessary and estimates of effort
will be made in this task.
-3.-
41008A
October 1984
TASK 1.0: LITERATURE SEARCH
The purpose of this task will be to review existing data
to make use of any previous work. The first effort will
be to review COM's previous projects and experience of
our current personnel to determine if we have accom-
plished this type of work in the past. Next, computer
data base systems will be accessed to determine if there
are reports, papers, books, etc, on this subject. If
other municipalities or engineers have done similar
work, we will contact them and ascertain the results.
This will include a telephone survey of these municipal-
ities and industries.
We will review all available literature and data and
extract all information that is applicable to this
project.
PRODUCT: Relevant information from work done on previous projects
by CDM and others.
INPUT: Existing literature
OUTPUT: To Task 2.0
SCHEDULE TIME: 1 week
START DATE: Month 1
FINISH DATE: Month 1
LOE: 4 days
-4-
41008A
October 1984
TASK 2.0:
PRODUCT:
INPUT:
OUTPUT:
SCHEDULE TIME:
START DATE:
FINISH DATE:
LOE:
INITIAL DETERMINATION OF UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
The available information and data generated in Task 1,0
will be used to determine the initial waste generation
rates for approximately 40 categories of nonresidential
waste generators. The number of categories may be
expanded if the results of the literature search and
telephone survey indicates more identifiable waste
generators. The generation rates will be presented in
the form of waste units per variable. For example, the
waste from a movie theater might be dependent on the
number of seats, so the initial unit assignment criteria
would be in waste units per year per seating capacity.
This initial effort will result in 40 to 50 categories
of waste generators. Some of the initial work will be
based on actual work done previously by other munici-
palities, while some will be based on estimates.
Initial set of unit assignment criteria based on waste
generation rate data from existing sources.
From Task 1.0
To Task 3.0
1 week
Month 1
Month 1
4 days
-5-
41008A
October 1984
TASK 3.0: CALIBRATION OF INITIAL UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
The initial unit assignment criteria developed in Task
2.0 will be applied to two typical municipalities in
Oakland County. The purpose of this task is to deter-
mine how accurate the initial unit assignment criteria
are by comparing the total units calculated by applying
the unit assignment criteria, to the gross quantity of
refuse produced, as determined from the Phase 1A Data
Base (see Table 111-6). The values for waste generation
and the number of categories will be updated to reflect
the new information obtained as output from tasks 1.0 to
2.0.
.•
The two typical communities will be selected based on
the availability of data on nonresidential facilities;
usually this data is contained in the assessment
records. These records will be reviewed and each non-
residential facility "fitted" to one of the initial
criteria.
The results of this effort will determine if the
division of nonresidential facilities into only 40 or 50
categories is adequate, or if a more detailed breakdown
is required. Also, the correlation of waste quantities
between the two methods will determine how rigorous the
Task 4.0 subtasks must be. For example, the institu-
tional quantities may correlate well and indicate little .
field work is necessary. The industrial quantities,
however, may not correlate, which would indicate that
Task 4.0 efforts should concentrate on the industrial
sector.
PRODUCT: Calibration of the initial unit assignment criteria to
determine the emphasis of the Task 4.0 efforts.
INPUT: From Task 2.0
OUTPUT: To Task 4.0
SCHEDULE TIME: 2 weeks
START DATE: Month 1
FINISH DATE: Month 1
LOE: 11 days
-6-
41008A
October 1984
TASK 4.0 CONDUCT VERIFICATION PROGRAM
The Task 4.0 series will verify the method of unit
assignments for the commercial, institutional, and
industrial system users. Based on initial efforts in
Task 3.0, the work outlined for this series of tasks
will be further defined. Verification of the waste
generation rates and collection methods will be per-
formed. Interviews with waste generators and waste
haulers and review of their records will be the initial
efforts of the Task 4.0 series. The information ob-
tained from these interviews and the results of Task 3.0
will determine which waste haulers and waste generators
will be monitored through field investigations. It :is
possible that the generation of waste by industries, and
others, may best be quantified by volume and not weight.
This decision will be determined during these Task 4
efforts. The final results of the Task 4.0 series will
be the confirmation of the unit assignment criteria.
TASK 4.1 INTERVIEW WASTE GENERATORS
Nonresidential waste generator categories that were
identified in Task 3.0 as requiring field verification
of their unit assignment criteria will be interviewed
for this task. The categories of waste generators that
are expected to be consistently defined by a common
criteria will be verified through interviews and field
measurements of their waste quantities and characteris-
tics. Those categories of waste generators that do not
have a consistent waste generation rate, correlated to a
commonly obtainable criteria (building area, seating
capacity), will be interviewed to establish a separate
category for waste generation or determine a new cri-
teria from which their waste generation could be
measured.
Historical records of waste quantities and characteris-
tics from the waste generator will be reviewed. The
frequency and method of waste removal will be deter-
mined. On-site treatment or recycling of waste will be
identified. The corresponding economic incentive for
on-site treatment and recycling also will be identified.
The economic incentives for recycling and conservation
must be ensured through implementation of the operation
plan and will be identified during these interviews.
Commercial and industrial entities must not be penalized
for these practices.
-7-
41008A
October 1984
The efforts of this task will result in verification of
waste unit assignment, the establishment of new waste
generator categories, or the establishment of new waste
generation criteria.
PRODUCT: Verified waste unit assignments and waste generation
rates for those waste generators identified in Task 3.0.
INPUT: Waste generators and waste generation categories
identified in Task 3.0.
OUTPUT: Identification of waste generators participating in the
waste weighing program to be conducted in Task 4.4.
Identification of corresponding waste haulers that will
be interviewed in Task 4.2. Identification of waste
generators that will be involved in the waste collection
monitoring program conducted for Task 4.3. Input to
Task 5.0 for final unit assignment criteria.
SCHEDULE TIME: 1 month
START DATE: Month 2
FINISH DATE: Month 2
LOE: 15 days
-8-
41000A
October 1984
TASK 4.2: INTERVIEW WASTE HAULERS
PRODUCT:
INPUT:
The purpose of this task is to interview the waste
haulers and identify their procedures for scheduling and
routing collection; quantify waste generation rates for
specific categories of waste generators; and determine
the billing methods employed by the waste haulers.
These procedures will be used to establish a methodology
for the individual municipalities or the County to
accurately assess a user fee on the commercial and
industrial entities within the County system.
The waste haulers corresponding to waste generators
identified in Task 3.0 will be interviewed during this
task. Additional waste haulers identified independently
from Task 3.0 and Task 4.1 also will be interviewed to
review their waste quantification and billing
techniques.
Waste quantification techniques, truck scheduling
methods, and billing procedures will be reviewed for
incorporation into the operations plan.
Waste haulers and relevant issues will be identified
during waste generator interviews conducted for
Task 4.1.
OUTPUT: Waste haulers to be involved in the Waste Weighing
Program conducted in Task 4.4.
SCHEDULE TIME: I month
START DATE: Month 2
FINISH DATE: Month 2
LOE: 5 days
-.9-
41008A
October 1984
TASK 4.3 MONITOR WASTE COLLECTION
Waste haulers identified in Task 4.3 will be requested
to participate in a waste monitoring program to be con-
ducted during this task. The characteristics of the
waste collected at commercial and industrial sites
identified in Task 4.1 will be determined. The waste
hauling truck will be monitored to observe the number of
stops; type, amount, and density of waste; the time re-
quired for collection; the type of building and its use;
and an estimation of the costs associated with collec-
tion.
An observer will ride with the truck crew or follow. the
truck to document the necessary data outlined above.
The reliability of the information obtained in Task 4.2
through interviews with the haulers will be verified and
documented. The methodology for municipal billing of
system users will require this verification and documen-
tion of the collection process and correlation of waste
characteristics with the building type and use.
If this task begins to generate large amounts of usable
data, then the duration of this task will be extended
and the duration of the weighing program (Task 4.4) will
be reduced.
PRODUCT: Verification of the waste collection process and the
proposed methodology for municipal user fee collection.
INPUT: From Task 4.2
OUTPUT: To Task 4.4 and Task 5.0
SCHEDULE TIME: 2 months
START DATE: Month 3
FINISH DATE: Month 4
LOE: 28.5 days
-10-
41008A
October 1984
TASK 4.4 WASTE WEIGH7NG PROGRAM
Weighing the waste collected at predetermined waste
generators will be performed during this task. The unit
waste assignment for the selected waste categories can
then be verified with these field measurements. Waste
generation rates will then be correlated to the type of
activity and to a pertinent and easily identifiable
criteria associated with the particular industrial or
commercial application.
Trucks will be weighed with portable scales purchased
for this work scope. Compaction trucks will be weighed
after every collection stop by the consultant. Trucks
equipped to haul roll-off containers will be weighed
before and after dumping by the hauler at the disposal
site if possible, otherwise by the consultant.
The duration of this task is indicated to be 2 months.
If the information produced in Task 4.3 is determined to
be both useful and accurate, then the extent and dura-
tion of this task can be reduced.
PRODUCT; Waste generation rates for select commercial, institu-
tional, and industrial enterprises will be verified
through field measurements.
INPUT: From Task 3.0 and Task 4.1
OUTPUT: To Task 5.0
SCHEDULE TIME: 2 months
START DATE: Month 3
FINISH DATE: Month 4
LOE: 34.75 days
-1 1-
41008A
October 1984
TASK 5.0 FINAL DETERMINATION OF UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
The Task 4 series will identify those commercial, insti-
tutional, and industrial entities that required refine-
ment of their unit assignments. The results of the
field investigations will provide the necessary data and
documentation to more accurately assign waste unit pro-
duction rates and therefore provide a methodolgy for a
user fee program. The unit assignment criteria written
during this task would be based on the results of other
documented unit assignment systems and original data
obtained from the field studies conducted for the Task 4
series.
PRODUCT: A unit assignment criteria based on data from Oakland
County commercial, institutional, and industrial
entities.
INPUT: Tasks 4.1 through 4.4
OUTPUT: Task 6.0
SCHEDULE TIME: 2 weeks
START DATE: Month 5
FINISH DATE: Month 5
LOE: 13 days
12-
41008A
October 1984
TASK 6.0 APPLICATION OF UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA TO OAKLAND
COUNTY
A user fee assessment methodolgy will be written for
this task. This methodology will provide the munici-
palities with a verified system of assigning waste units
to commercial, institutional, and industrial entities.
The municipalities then can determine the unit assign-
ments for all generators within their boundaries.
PRODUCT: A methodology for assigning waste units for the purpose
of collecting user fees.
INPUT: From Task 5.0
OUTPUT: Methodology for municipalities to assign waste units to
commercial and industrial entities.
SCHEDULE TIME: 2 weeks
START DATE: Month 5
FINISH DATE: Month 5
LOE: 23.25 days
-13-
41008A
TASK No. and DESCRIPTION
113.?
04,104:VoNOVSW6440040i
''''0'041504601°A000,4"?4,
OAKLAND COUNTY DETERMINATION OF SOLID WASTE GENERATION RATES
MONTHS
I LITERATURE SEARCH
2 INITIAL DETERMINATION OF
UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
CALIBRATION OF INITIAL
UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
4 CONDUCT VERIFICATION PROGRAM
4.1 INTERVIEW GENERATORS
4.2 INTERVIEW WASTE HAULERS
4.3 MONITOR WASTE COLLECTION
4.4 WASTE WEIGHING PROGRAM
5 FINAL DETERMINATION OF
UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
6 APPLICATION OF UNIT ASSIGNMENT
CRITERIA TO OAKLAND .COUNTY ' *
29
IS
0(10021
Edit Nord -
fog. II processor Drafting
$12.00/hr 019.00/hr 112.00vhr
4
Dettoil N. Mimeo D. Child
lotal Vito Pres. NJ. Le,.
WW1 $32.31/h? $25..75/hr
32
28
432 84
12 10
72
120
40
225
270
79
137
0 0649.64
3 $1004.61
0 $3627.00
25 01240.60
44 12344.15
'Miasma stall.
0 105 (4760.21
11.00 1649.00 5
$57.99 1)061.64 20.5
$152.00 W79.C3 14.75
1499.21 1172842 1)
0046.21 13210.36 21.25
927,424 16685.674 0i8.3
timitlasimssameilsiaisiltil
Boston
To ii?
Hools
4
16
11.00 1493.10
1541.20
11426.40
11295.60
4
4
4
11
$76.00
16 $334.00
11/.90
10.00
484Pa
S0.90
Via.-
R. Hauser P. Stoller
Eng. 14 Env IV
119.90/hr $19.07,hr
Detroit Doston Task Total
$ total $ total 1 iSECi NAM
1491.10
1465.20
41122.40
1079530
3
.24
11,p14
124762.25 61923.42 11E685-67 11653.00 WOE 60.00
12
87
19
16 32 16 8
26 ea 16
32
16 41 160 8
20 40 200
20 24 10 24
40 54 10 24
Detroit 03C's Total $8508.88 Toil 40990.00
Irglefl Sowell% Direct Labor
Dvrrhead t 1591 t
ree t 14%
°tear Dkroct Calls $
14762.25
23471.90
5357.71
8580.08
Dittct labor
Overhead 8 1543
Fee • 141
Caw: Direct Costs $
1921,42
3056.24
417.43
1490.00
7661.10 Ottrtit Total 0 e 52125.90 Boston Total 1 •
1166115.97
S26530.22
$6053.23
$10570.88
multaxas
159845.00
EXHIBIT B
wooleu 1, 1904
OAKU441 MAP
PROJECTt SOLID NAST( W. Parket 1. Hurdle I. paaken
6ENEKATIO4 OATES Rol. MT. PTO. Kit. tr III
Task Descriptions 642.001h, 125.10/hr 514.69/hr
TASK 1: LITERAIGRE
SEARCH
YASX 2i 1114/1
ASSIGNMENT
TASI 31 CALIBRATION
URIT ASSIGN.
TASK 4.1: MEM&
GENERATORS
TASK 4.2: INIENtEir
HAILERS
TASK 4.1: MIOTOR 1
COLUCTIEN
IASI 4.1: 41621NG 2
MUM
TASK 5: FINAL U411
ASSlitMENT
IASI ir APPLICATION
156 346
42 25.1 14.025
Total Andont
L Othor Dilect Costs
'dial Knurl
Labor tate
0 3003 2 8 o
12 32.212 25.75
10.09 164.42 1206.00 $0.00 0210.00 $3915.60 14052.65 14944.00 $040.00
Dirt to Bost
Detroit
Detroit
Boston
1460.10
$20.00
$50.00
175.00
$0.10
12.00
924.110
120.00
300.00
600.00
90.011
60.00
4." .88
6010.00
A3,14,0t
Tax11
Awe !wall
Lodirn, and waist
hearts:
'telephone:
Ccoouttr Osf:
2 roundiripo
6 trips
6days
6 days
1000 tales
10 ;hone
tolopeter
misc. 4 scales
146040 Total 1 *
$20.00 Total 1 •
150.00 Total $ *
1111.00 Total •
11.10 local $ •
12.00 Total $ 4
Total $ *
Total 1 •
liaXISOSAATIOMV
Bost 14 Dot 1 rowndttios
Boston 3 trips
Detroit 3 days
Detroit 1 days
530 pages
25 phont
commit.,
oRISC.
Total 0 •
Total .1 •
Total $ •
Total 1 •
Total $ •
Total $ *
Total $
T0141 $
Boston COC's
3300.90
60.00
150.00
225.90
50.00
50.00
50.00
25.00
•nn•• =ma=
COM Stiomatits CCM lobo,
UM OVERHEAD 119%
COM FEE
ODC's
SA
Total 8
t deen
NI CHI GM DEPART/ ENT OF HATUnAL ESOURCES
and
County of Oakland, Michigan
This contract becomes effective upon signing by both parties and shall remain
in force until the duties and responsibilities described herein and in Act 641
and the rules promulgated thereunder are completed or until the contract is
extinguished because of a violation of the contract by the contractor or in
accordance with clauses 1(c) and 2. Hereafter, County of Oakland,
Michigan shall be known as Contractor, and the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources shall be known as the State.
Whereas the Contractor has been found by the Michigan Department of Natural.'
Resources to be eligible to receive funding for Solid Waste Management Planning
for Oakland County pursuant to the Solid Waste Management
Act, Act 641, Public Acts of 1978, as amended, and the rules promulgated thereunder.
The Contractor under the terms of this contract, Act 641, and the rules pro-
mulgated thereunder, will cooperate and assist in the development and preparation
of the Solid Waste Management Plan, as described in%the work program, with the
State. The Contractor hereby agrees and stipulates to undertake or participate
in the duties and responsibilities described herein and in the rules promulgated
under Act 641. The Contractor and the State agree to the following conditions:
1. General
A. The Contractor shall perform the services required of a grantee by Act 641
and the rules promulgated thereunder.
B . The Contractor shall secure the necessary personnel to perform the
services required by Act 641 and the rules promulgated thereunder and all
personnel shall be employees or shall be under the direct supervision of the
Contractor. The Contractor shall accept responsibility for and make payments
as required by law for workers , compensation insurance, social security, income
tax deductions, unemployment compensation, and any other taxes or payroll
deductions as required by law for its employees. The above shall be the
responsibility of any firm or individual employed under a sub-contract.
-2-
•
C. As compensation for services relidered'in the conduct of this cooperative
program, and in order for the contractor to effectively carry out the planning
responsibilities designated under Act 641 and the rules promulgated thereunder,
financial assistance is available to eligible counties under a grant program
established under Act 641. Grants under this program will be awarded for County
Solid Waste Management Planning as detailed in Part 8 of the rules.
The total grant awarded to the Contractor, the grantee for Oakland
County, for Fiscal Year 84-8 is $ 14,076.0Q
Payments will be made quarterly after the contract arid its terms have been
accepted by the Contractor, as described in Part 8 of the rules.
•
Quarterly reimbursement will be substantiated by documents consistent with
generally accepted accounting practices. The reimbursement will be made on the
submission and approval of the "Request for Payment" form establishing expend-
itures for the quarter indicated. .
This contract is subject to change or termination in the event of legislative
or executive action relating to this appropriation.
D. The Contractor's representative for this contract is Daniel T. Murphy,
County Executive The Contractor's representative may appoint other personnel
to act in his/her behalf in the completion of serVide to be performed under this
contract only with approval of the State. The State's representative for this
contract is the Chief of the Community Assistance Division, Department of
Natural Resources.
2. Termination
A. This contract may be terminated by the State in the event that the
Contractor fails to fulfill its obligations under this contract.
This contract may be terminated by the State upon request of the Contractor.
Within 30 days, the State shall notify the Contractor of the effective date of
termination.
B. Upon termination pursuant to paragraph A above, the State may take over
the work and prosecute the same to completion by- agreement with another party or
otherwise. The Contractor shall not be Tesponsible for expenditures incurred by
the State in completing the work following termination of the agreement as des-
cribed herein.
3. Remedies
Except as may be otherwiseprovided in this agreement, all claims, counterclaims,
disputes and other matters in question between the State and the Contractor
arising out of or relating to this agreement or the breach thereof will be decided
by administrative hearing. If the matter is not resolved by administrative hearing,
legal remedies may be pursued.
4. Audit: Access to Records
A. The Contractor shall maintain books, records, computer records, dociments
and other evidence directly pertinent to performance of work under this contract
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and practices- The
Contractor shall also maintain the financial information and data used by the
Contractor in the preparation or support of the cost submission. The State or .
any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access to such books,
records, documents and other evidence for the purpose of inspection, audit and
copying. The Contractor will provide proper facilities for such access and
inspection.
This clause shall be included in all subcontracts.
B. The Contractor's representative indicated in this contract or his/her
duly authorized representative shall have access to all State records pertinent to
the program identified in the contract for the purposes of Inspection and copying.
Such access shall include access to facility files and records, manifest records
and enforcement records. The Contractor shall not have access to materials deemed
confidential under the Freedom of Information Act. The State shall provide proper
facilities for such access and inspection.
5. Subcontracts
Any subcontractors and outside associates or consultants required by the Contractor
in connection with the services covered by this contract must be specifically
authorized in writing by the State during the performance of this agreement. Any
substitutions in or additions to such subcontractors, associates, or consultants -
will be subject to the prior written approval of the State.
6. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY .
In accordance with State laws, the Contractor agrees that he will not dis-
criminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race,
religion, color, sex, age, or national origin.
7. UTILIZATION OF SMALL AND MINORITY BUSINESS
In accordance with State policy, the Contractor agrees that qualified small
'and/or minority business enterprises shall have the maximum practicable opportunity
to participate in the performance of this contract.
This clause must be included in all subcontracts.
8. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES
The Contractor warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed
or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding
for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona-fide
employees. For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the
right to annul this contract without liability or in its discretion to deduct from
the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full .mount of such
commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee.
.9. GRATUITIES
(A) If it is found, after notice and hearing, by the State that gratuities
(in the form of entertainment, gifts, or otherwise) were offered or given by the
Contractor, or any agent or representative of the Contractor, to any official,
employee or agent of the State with a view toward securing a contract or securing
favorable treatment with respect to the awarding or amending, or the making of
' any determinations with respect to the performance of this contract, the State
may, by written notice to the Contractor, terminate the right of the Contractor . •
to proceed under this contract and/or may pursue such other rights and remedies
provided by law or under this agreement PROVIDED that the existence of the facts
upon which the State makes such findings shall be in issue and May be 'reviewed in
proceedings pursuant to the Remedies clause of this contract.
(B) In the event this contract is terminated as provided in paragraph (A),
the State shall be entitled Cl) to pursue the same remedies against the Contractor
as it could pursue in the event of a breach of the contract by the Contractor,
and (2), as a penalty in addition to any other damages to which it may be entitled
by law, to exemplary damages in an amount (as determined by the State) which
shall be not less than three nor more than ten times the costs incTarred by the
Contractor in providing any such gkatuities to any such officer or employee.
10. PATENTS
If this contract involves research, developmental, experimental, or demon-
stration work and any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course
of or under this contract, the State shall retain sole authority to patent or
license.
This clause shall be included in all subcontracts.
11. COPYRIGHTS AND RIGHTS IN DATA
The Contractor agrees that any plans, drawings, specifications, computer
programs, technical reports, operating manuals, and other work submitted or which
are specified to be delivered under this contract or which are developed or
duced and paid for under this contract are subject to the rights of the State of
Michigan and the State shall retain an irrevocable license to reproduce, publish
and use in whole or in part and to authorize others to do so.
This clause shall be included in all subcontracts.
'In ASSIGNABILITY
The Contractor shall not assign any interest in this agreement and shall not
transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without the
prior written consent of the State; provided, however, that claims for money due
or to become due to the Contractor from the State under this agreement may be
assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such
approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly
to the State.
13. OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT
No member of or delegate to Congress, or resident Commissioner shall be
admitted to any share or part of this contract or to any benefit that may arise
therefrom; but this provision shall not be construed to extend to this contract
if made with a corporation for its general benefit..
14. LIABILITY
The Contractor and the State of Michigan and its agents and employees
shall be jointly and severally liable for all claims, damages, losses and expenses
'including court costs arising out of or.resul„ting from the performance of the
work, which includes all labor, material and equipment required to provide ser-
vices required by this contract provided that any such claim, damage, loss or
expense: (1) is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease or death,
or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself).
including the loss of use resulting therefrom, and (2) is caused in whole or in
part by any negligent act or omission of the contractor, any subcontractor,
anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose
acts any of them may be liable.
15. SUBCONTRACTOR'S LIABILITY INSURANCE
(A) Any subcontractor shall purchase and maintain such insurance as will
protect him from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the
subcontractor's operations under the contract, whether such operat1ons be by
himself or by anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of then, or by anyone
for whose acts any of them may be liable.
(1) Claims under workers' compensation, disability benefit and other similar
employee benefit act. A nonresident Contractor shall have insurance for benefits
payable under Michigan's Workers' Compensation Law for any employe*e resident of
and hired in Michigan; and as respects any other state the Contractor shall have
insurance or participate in a mandatory state fund to cover the benefits payable
to any such employee.
(2) Claims for damages because of bodily injury, occupational sickness or
disease, or death of his employees.
(3) Claims for damages because Of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or
death of any person other than his employees, subject to limits of liability of
not less than $300,000 each occurrence, and when applicable, $300,000 annual
aggregate, for nonautomobile hazards and as required by law for automobile hazards.
(4) claims for damages because of injury to or destruction of tangible
property including loss of use resulting therefrom, subject to a limit of liability
of not less than $50,000 for each occurrence for nonautomobile hazards and as
required by law for automobile hazards.
(5) Insurance for subparagraphs (1) and (4) nonautomobile hazards on a
combined single limit of liability basis shall not be less than $300,000 each
occurrence and when applicable, $300,000 annual aggregate.
(B) The insurance shall be written for not less than any limits of liability
herein specified or required by law, whichever is greater, and shall include con-
tractual liability insurance as applicable to the Contractor's Obligations under
Approved as to form .
-7-
the Save Harmless clause of the contract.
STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF OAKLAND, MICHIGAN
Contractor
Signature Signature Daniel T. Murphy
County Executive
Title Title
Date Date
(Optional)
Signature
Title
Date
Federal I.D. #
AGREEMENT BETWEEN
OWNER AND ENGINEER
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FOR THE DETERMINATION OF
SOLID WASTE GENERATION RATES
IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
OAKLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made as of the _ day of
in the year Nineteen Hundred and Eighty-Four by and between the County
of Oakland, Michigan (hereinafter called OWNER) and Camp Dresser &
McKee, Detroit, Michigan, a Michigan Partnership (hereinafter called
ENGINEER).
OWNER wishes ENGINEER to perform professional engineering services, to
serve as OWNER's professional engineering representative, and to provide
professional engineering consultation and advice for a professional fee
(as set forth below) in connection with preparation of a set of unit
assignment criteria for refuse generation in Oakland County, that when
applied to a municipality's residential, commercial, institutional, and
industrial refuse generators, will result in an estimate of the total
refuse produced by that municipality (the "Assignment").
SECTION 1. BASIC SERVICES OF ENGINEER
1.1 ENGINEER shall perform the following professional services:
1.1.1 Consult with OWNER to clarify and define OWNER's require-
ments relative to the Assignment and review available data.
Page 1 of 5
41029A
1.1.2 Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER's providing or
obtaining from others special services and data required in
connection with the Assignment (which services and data
ENGINEER is not to provide hereunder but on which ENGINEER
may rely in performing services hereunder), and act as
OWNER's representative in connection with any such services
of others.
1.1.3 Prepare a letter report of ENGINEER's findings and recom-
mendations, furnish 10 copies to OWNER and present it in
person and review it with OWNER.
1.2 The duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER described above are
supplemented and amended as indicated in Paragraph 1 of Exhibit A
"Further Description of Basic Services, Duties of Owner, Method of
Payment and Related Services," which is attached to and made a part
of this Agreement.
1.3 Additional professional services (Special Services) related to the
Assignment will be performed by ENGINEER on request of OWNER for an
additional professional fee as the parties may subsequently agree.
1.4 The ENGINEER shall maintain books, records, computer records, docu-
ments and other evidence directly pertinent to performance of work
under this contract in accordance with generally accepted account-
ing principles and practices. The ENGINEER shall also maintain the
financial information and data used by the ENGINEER in the prepara-
tion or support of the cost submission. The State or any of their
duly authorized representatives shall have access to such books,
records, documents and other evidence for the purpose of inspec-
tion, audit and copying. The ENGINEER will provide proper facil-
ities for such access and inspection.
1.5 In accordance with State policy, the ENGINEER agrees that qualified
small and/or minority business enterprises shall have the maximum .
practicable opportunity to participate in the performance of this
contract.
1.6 If this contract involves research, developmental, experimental, or
demonstration work and any discovery or invention arises or is
developed in the course of or under this contract, the State shall
retain sole authority to patent or license.
1.7 The ENGINEER agrees that any plans, drawings, specifications,
computer programs, technical reports, operating manuals, and other
work submitted or which are specified to be delivered under this
contract or which are developed or produced and paid for under this
contract are subject to the rights of the State of Michigan and the
State shall retain an irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and
use in whole or in part and to authorize others to do so.
Page 2 of 5
41029A
SECTION 2. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
OWNER shall:
2.1 Provide all criteria and full information as to OWNER's require-
ments and designate a person with authority to act on OWNER's
behalf on all matters concerning the Assignment.
2.2 Furnish to ENGINEER all existing studies, reports and other avail-
able data and services of others pertinent to the Assignment, and
obtain additional reports and data as required; and ENGINEER shall
be entitled to rely upon all such information and services in
performing services hereunder,
2.3 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter
upon public and private property as required for ENGINEER to per-
form services hereunder.
•
2.4 Perform such other functions as are indicated in Paragraph 2 of
Exhibit A l'Further Description of Basic Services, Duties of Owner,
Method of Payment and Related Services."
SECTION 3. PERIOD OF SERVICE
ENGINEER shall start performing services hereunder upon execution
of this Agreement and will complete such services and submit a
report by five (5) months after written Notice to Proceed. Addi-
tional requirements as to the timing of ENGINEER's services in
relation to the services of others or the happening of events
beyond ENGINEER'S control are set forth in Paragraph 3 of Exhibit A
"Further Description of Basic Services, Duties of Owner, Method of
Payment and Related Services."
SECTION 4. PAYMENT
4.1 OWNER shall pay ENGINEER for services rendered hereunder as indi-
cated in Paragraph 4 of Exhibit A "Further Description of Basic
Services, Duties of Owner, Method of Payment and Related Services."
4.2 ENGINEER shall submit monthly statements. The OWNER shall make
monthly payments in response to ENGINEER's monthy statement within
thirty (30) days of receipt of invoice.
4.3 ENGINEER's above charges are on the basis of prompt payment of
bills rendered and continuous progress of the work on the Assign-
ment until submission of the letter report.
Page 3 of 5
41029A
SECTION 5. COST CONTROL
5.1 OWNER's budgetary requirements and considerations in respect of the
Assignment are set forth in Paragraph 5 of Exhibit A "Further
Description of Basic Services, Duties of Owner, Method of Payment
and Related Services."
5.2 Opinions of probable construction cost, financial evaluations,
feasibility studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions and
utilitarian considerations of operations and maintenance cost
prepared by ENGINEER hereunder will be made on the basis of
ENGINEER'S experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER's
best judgment as an experienced and qualified design professional.
It is recognized, however, that ENGINEER does not have control over
the cost of labor, material, equipment or services furnished by
others or over market conditions or contractors' methods of deter-
mining their prices, and that any utilitarian evaluation of any
facility to be constructed or work to be performed on the basis'of
the letter report must of necessity be speculative until completion
of its detailed design. Accordingly, ENGINEER does not guarantee
that proposals, bids or actual costs will not vary from opinions,
evaluations or studies submitted by ENGINEER to OWNER hereunder.
SECTION 6. MISCELLANEOUS
6.1 All documents prepared by ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement are
instruments of service in respect of the facility that is to be
constructed. They are not intended or represented to be suitable
for reuse by OWNER or others in extensions of the facility beyond
that now contemplated or on any other facility. Any reuse by OWNER
without written verification or adaption by ENGINEER for the speci-
fic purpose intended will be at OWNER's sole risk and without
liability or legal exposure to ENGINEER.
6.2 The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may
be terminated (a) by OWNER with or without cause upon ten (10)
days' written notice to ENGINEER and (b) by ENGINEER for cause
upon ten (10) days' written notice to OWNER. In the event of any
termination, ENGINEER will be paid for all services rendered to the
date of termination, all reimbursable expenses and termination
expenses.
6.3 OWNER and ENGINEER and the respective partners, successors, execu-
tors, administrators, assigns and legal representatives of each are
bound by this Agreement to the other party to this Agreement and to
the partners, successors, administrators, assigns and legal repre-
sentatives of such other party in respect of all covenants, agree-
ments and obligations of this Agreement.
6.4 The OWNER reserves the right of final approval over the selection
of the ENGINEER's subconsultant(s).
Page 4 of 5
41029A
cordon R, Wyllie
Assistant Corporati:pn7Counsel
Page 5 of 5
6.5 Nothing herein shall be construed to give any right or benefits
hereunder to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER.
6.6 This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the State of
Michigan.
6.7 This Agreement (consisting of 5 pages) and Exhibits A, B, and C
(consisting of 21 pages), constitute the entire Agreement between
OWNER and ENGINEER and supersede all prior written or oral under-
standings between them in respect of the subject matter covered
hereby. This Agreement and said Exhibits A, B, and C may only be
amended, supplemented, modified or cancelled by a duly executed,
written instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
OWNER ENGINEER
WUNTY QF QARLAND,. MICHIGAN CAMP, DRESSER & McKEE
Algichigan Partnership
DANIEL T. -MURPHY, COUNTY 'EXECUTIVE
Date Date
Approved as to form
41029A
EXHIBIT A TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
OWNER AND ENGINEER
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FOR THE DETERMINATION OF
SOLID WASTE GENERATION RATES
IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
OAKLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
FURTHER DESCRIPTION OF BASIC SERVICES, DUTIES OF OWNER,
METHOD OF PAYMENT AND RELATED SERVICES
This is an exhibit attached to and made a part of the Agreement dated
, 19 between the County of Oakland, Michigan (OWNER)
and Camp Dresser & McKee, Detroit, Michigan, a Michigan Partnership
(ENGINEER) for study and report professional services.
1. The Basic Services of ENGINEER as described in Section I of said
Agreement are amended and supplemented as follows:
-
The detailed scope of basic and special services is indicated in
Exhibit B.
The portable truck scales and other equipment purchased will be
transferred to the OWNER at the completion of the Scope of Basic
Services indicated in Exhibit B.
2. The responsibility of OWNER as described in Section 2 of said
Agreement is amended and supplemented as follows:
a. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifica-
tions, proposals and other documents presented by ENGINEER.
b. Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities
having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and
consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the
Project.
3. The time period.; for the performance of ENGINEERS's services as set
forth in Section 3 of said Agreement are amended and supplemented as
follows:
Page 1 of 2
The OWNER mky extend the ENGINEER's time of service provided that
the cost upper limit is not exceeded. The ENGINEER shall not be
required to perform services beyond the cost upper limit.
4. The method of payment for services rendered by ENGINEER shall be as
set forth below:
For the Services performed under Section 1, the OWNER agrees to pay
the ENGINEER as follows:
a. For work done by the ENGINEER, at the direct labor cost plus 159
percent of the direct salary cost for indirect labor costs and
overhead. Additionally, a fee will be paid based on 14 percent
of the direct labor, indirect labor, and overhead cost.
b. Direct expenses are defined as those expense costs other than
salary costs that are incurred during the progress of the work.
The actual out-of-pocket expense costs include: air fare,
automobile rental if required, mileage charges, parking, tolls,
taxi, meals, lodging, telephone, printing and reproduction
costs, and other miscellaneous costs incurred specifically for
this project.
c. For work done by others, at the actual cost to the ENGINEER of
such services plus 8 percent fee.
d. The computer charges will be as indicated in the attached
computer services pricing schedule, Exhibit C.
The total cost of all Services under Section 1 shall not exceed
$59,845.00.
5. OWNER has approved the following budget for the project:
Direct Labor $16,685.61
Overhead and Indirect Costs 26,530.22
Other Direct Costs 10,578.88
Fee 6,050.23
TOTAL $59,845.00
Per mutual agreement, the line items in the budget may be adjusted
to suit the actual conduct of the work without changing the total
project cost.
Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT B
A WORK PROGRAM FOR THE
DETERMINATION OF
SOLID WASTE GENERATION RATES •
IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
OAKLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
ie
0
rl 1/4
ifk% ier e
‘11)
til A% OCTOBER 1984 Y
Y 17 A\ 1 cz
e ,c -xkP
19 A‘b
CAMP DRESSER & McKEE
DETROIT, MICHIGAN ç5
OAKLAND COUNTY DETERMINATION OF SOLID WASTE GENERATION RATES
MONTHS
TASK No. and DESCRIPTION [ I ! 2 I 3 1 4 i 5 1
I LITERATURE SEARCH
2 INITIAL DETERMINATION OF
UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
3 CALIBRATION OF INITIAL
UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
4 CONDUCT VERIFICATION PROGRAM
4.1 INTERVIEW GENERATORS
4.2 INTERVIEW WASTE HAULERS
4.3 MONITOR WASTE COLLECTION
4.4 WASTE WEIGHING PROGRAM
5 FINAL DETERMINATION OF
UNIT ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
6 APPLICATION OF UNIT ASSIGNMENT
CRITERIA TO OAKLAND COUNTY
1111
MEM
r73
1111111111111111111111
ill11111111111111
11111
1E1
D1STLIS DETROIT X zzzzzzzzzz xxXX12[2aVir4410XXXXXXXX
4 211
4
32
21
72
120
40
225
270
79
13,0
1003
8 16
16 32 14
16 00 16
8 32
4
16
3 16 1
20 2
24 20 1 1
40 160
40 201
24 10 24
1 24 1 48 54 10 32
XXV} XXXXXXxxxxxxxxxxxlml.
0 •7 • I 1
19 12
2 8
32.212 25.75
346 412 14
14.171 12 20
156
42 25.2
IASI 1; LI1ERATURE
SEARCH
TASI 2; UOT
ASSURE/4
TASK 14 CALIBRATION
WIT ASSIGN.
IASI 4.1: INTERvIER
GENEAATE'S
TA SI 4.2: INTERVIEW
MILERS
TASI 4.3: MINIM
COLLECTION
!AS( 4.4: NEIGHING
PIM"
TASK 1: f/NAL LMT
MINIM
TASK 6: APPLICATION
legal Pours
tabor fate
0 1493.10 10.00 1413.14 4
4 1465.20 136,00 1541,20 4
16 11122.40 11304.00 11421.40 11
0 11795,60 10,00 11795.60 15
1 1649.60 110.00 1641.60 5
83004.641 157.00 11141.64 21.5
0 13627.00 1152.00 01773,00 34.75
25 11240.60 1400.21 11721.81 13
49 $2364.15 1846.21 13210.16 ZJ 75
115 14762.25 1123.424 16601.6:14 1t.: 5
UX2X22.7.X. MXXXV2 ZZZZZZ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxstxXX*46XXXX ZZ I ZZZZZ X.XXXXxxxX .XIX*4401.41S
lotal Amount
Other Direct Casts
2222222222 22 1,21.1111.2 IiiiX1P MX .XXXXX ZZ X ZZZZ
Detroit ODC's Total $1588.08 lidS1011 WE'S 1o111 11990.00
Anion Sommaries
030 Summaries
Direct tabor $ 1923.42
Overhead 1 159$ 1 3150.24
Fos 114$ $ 697.43
Other Direct Costs $ 1910.00
%WO Total 1 • 7649.10
CtM Labor 114485.67
CENEUE1100 1591 126138.22
COM fff 1141 16150.23
CDC's 110571.18
iSPPXXXXXX
Total • $59045.00
0:rivet Labor $ 14762.25
Overhead 1 1591 1 214/1.90
Fee 1 141 $ 5352.79
Other Direct Costs 1 8580 18
mug
Detroit 141.1 i • 52175 90
EXHIBIT B
•
W. Parker R. Mode
Ise. Met. Prot. Mgr.
142.00/hr $25.10/hr
MOOD 1, 1984
OVUM COLICI
PROJECT: SOLID 141STE
GE)(1.41101 RATES
Task Oirscriptions
I Al
I. Eimakon Etht Word- Detroit W. Niessen O. Child
Eng. III EAg. 11 processor traftsme Talal Vice Pies, Prot. Eng,
114M/hi 112.101h, 130.00/hr 112,00/hs holds 112.31/hr 125.75/hr
R. Wauser P. Stoller
tag. VI Eng IV
119.00/hr $19.17/hr
lasts.
Total Demist Boston Task Total
Hours 1 total 1 total I total Mandm
$210.00 13915.60 14852.65 14944.00 1040.00 10.00 164.42 1206.00 81.00 11613.00 WOO 10.00 WOO 11.10 114762.25 11923.42 116685.67
At, I; et
lari
At reatal:
Lodging arid meals;
Repo:1st
Tel coos';
Compyter that
Ott to Sost
Cults
botrost
last S.
Bost to Oft
Botts.
Detroit
Oat, sit
2 royadtrips $461.11
6 trips 121.00
404y5 $51.01
6 days $100.01
1001 pages 10.10
30 shone $2.411
computer
atsc. 6 stales
Total $ • 120.10
Total $ • 121.01
Total $ • 310.01
Total 1 • 601.01
Total $ • 100.01
Total 1 • 60.00
Total $ • 488.88
fatal $ • 4000.00
3 romadtrtas $461,00 Total $ • 1380.18
3 trips 121.11 To al I • 60.10
3 days $50.00 Ts 41 $ • 150.10
3 days 175.00 To al 1 • 225.00
500 pages 10.10 To al $ . 50.00
25 phone $2.00 Ts at $ • 50.00
computer Ts a1 $ • 50.00
mssc, Total $ • 25.40
EXHIBIT C
Camp Dresser McKee Inc,
Computer Resources Price Schedule
August 22o 1?64
DECSYSTEM 2060
1, Computer Sksstem Usage
$.05 per CPU second
2. Terminal or Batch Swstem Use
$9.00 per hour connected
3. On-Line Storage
$.02 per storage 'Page (2560 ASCII characters) per daw
based on storage retained overnight •
4. Line Printer Charges
$.05 per paae printed for standard forms
5. Cards Read
$.01 Per card
6. TaPe Usage
$2.00 Per mount
$15.00 per hour for drive assignment
7. Remote Batch
$.0008 Per inPut 'card' (1 record)
$.05 per output 'page' (approx. 66 records)
S. Program Usage
Special Program usage charge where applicable
Prices on this schedule subject to change upon 30 das
notification.
JAY S.7": UNIVERSITY
Comoouting Services Center Effective July 1. 1904
Processing Time (per CPU minute)
Disk Storage (per rage-day)
Cards Punched (Per 1000)
$29.72
.0041
12.00
$5.75
4.00
8.00
9.00
4.20
$2.00
0.00
7.30
4.50
RATE SCHEDULE
********* PRIORITIES *********
MT9_(Michigan_Termina1_Svstem_--Amdahl_470V/8) NORMAL LOW DEFERRED
Processing Time (per CPU minute)
Virtual Storage (Per Page-hour)
Terminal Elarsed Time (per hour)
Disk Storage (per Page-day)
Tare Drive Occupancy (per hour)
Tape Mounts (per mount)
Cards - Punched (per 1000)
- Read (Per 1000)
Plotting - (Per hour)
Typesetting - (Per hour)
- Set UP (Per job)
RJE Dial-UP 2400 Baud
RJE Dial-UP 4800 Baud .
$37.16 122.30 $13.00
11.148 6.690 3.90
2,85 1.71 1..00
.0041 .0041 .0041
10.16 6.10 3,56
1.00 1.00 1.00
12.00 12.00 12.00
2.50
18.46 18.46 18.46
77,16 77.16 77.16
8.50 8.50 - 8.50
6.50 6.50 6.50
8.00 8.00 8.00
PRIORITIES
(EDT, EST)
NORMAL 700 AM - 500 PM MondaY through Friday
500 PM - Midnight Mondaw through Fridav
7:00 AM - 4:30 PM Saturdav
Batch LOW Priority - SPecify PRIO--7LOW on signon.card.
DEFERRED 12101 AK - 7:00 AK Tuesday through Saturday
4:30 PM Saturdav - 7:00 AM Monday
Patch DEFERRED priority SPecifv PRIO=DEFERRED on signon card.
CMS_(Conversational-Monitor_59stem_•_IBM_4381)
LOU
Network_Charges
Hour Rate Kilopacket Rate
Telenet
- Prime time (700 AM - 7:00 PM, Mon. - Fri.)
- Non-prime time
- Alaska
- Hawaii
Minimum monthlu charge per project
Project aPPlication fee
$20.00
10.00
$10.10
10.7 0
8.00
7.70
6.25
21.00
.20
nn
.DC' -ackets A packet can be up to 128 characters.)
-4 , •
4 e
MVS_(MultiP1e_VirtuaI_Storagep_OS/VS2_-_Amdah1..470/V6)
Processing Time (Per CPU + SPB minute)
TeleProcessing (Per 1000 units)
Disk Storage (Per track-month)
Cards Punched (per 1000)
Job Scheduling (per job)
$52.37
• 23.50
.5723
12.00
.50
Printing
Printing (MTS, CMS, MVS SYSOUT)
- Page Printer Images (Per 1000)
- Line Printer Lines (Per 1000)
Printing (MVS SPOOLED)
- Page Printer Images (Per 10009 1st coPy)
(per 10009 each additional coPy)
- Line Printer Lines (Per 1000)
- Page and Line Printer Set UP (Per job)
$37.50
1.30
37.50
6.00
1.30
1.50
PaPer_and-Cards_(Per_10009_unless_noted)
Page Printer Paper 8 1/2 X 11
Line Printer Parer 14 7/3 X 11 (1 part)
Line Printer Paper 11 3/4 X 0 1/2 (1 part)
Line Printer Paper 8 1/2 X 11 (1 Part)
Card Stock
- IBM Cards
- Postcards
Plotter Paper (per foot)
Tupesetter Parer (per foot)
•OL •
Labels..(per_1000_sheetsr_ouantitv_(—))
1 UP - 3 1/2 X 15/16 (12.000)
2 UP - 3 1/2 X 15/16 (24.000)
3 UP - 3 1/2 X 15/16 (36.000)
$27,60
55,20
82.80
Software_Surcharges
CONFER (CNFR) (Per minute of elaPsed time) $0.15
D/SSPLA and TELLAGRAF (per 1000 vectors) 1.60
IMSL (per subroutine call) .14
ASPEX 200.0% of Program use charges
AUTOTAD 600.0% of program Cpl., charges
MICRO 26.5% of Program use charges
OGERT 2540% of Program use charges
SAS 27.5% of program use charges
SCSS 25.0% of program use charges
SLAM 25.0% of program use charges
SPSS and SPSSX 25.0% of program use charges
SYMAP 100.0% of Program use charges
O th er_S er vi ces_an d_Sup Plies
Data Entry (per hour)
Tabulate. Burst and Decollate (Per hour)
Analysis and Programming Services (per hour)
Magnetic Tare Residence (Per day)
Magnetic Tae Purchase (2.400 feet)
ShiPping (outrut, tapes and documentation)
File Restoration by the CSC (per file)
$17.00
17.00
45.00
.n 4
22.00
Shipping Cost + 2.00
10.00
Prices Subject to Change Clii