HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1987.06.25 - 17801I HEREB)r,Ä:PPRC/
ivw!
G RESOL{ MON:
Oat, r-
Misc. #87131 May 28, 1987
By Planning and Building Committee
IN RE: Department of Public Works
SELECT SITE FOR LOCATION OF RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Oakland County Solid Waste Management Plan adopted locally and
approved by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources in July of 1983
provides for the construction of Resource Recovery facilities; and
WHEREAS the County of Oakland entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement
with 28 municipalities on Februry 13, 1986, providing for the creation of a
Municipal Solid Waste Board and implementation of a portion of the Oakland
County Solid Waste Management Plan; and
WHEREAS the Oakland County Solid Waste Management Plan calls for a
resource recovery facility to sell steam to the County Service Center and
adjoining areas and to also sell electricity to an electrical utility; and
WHEREAS the Municipal Solid Waste Board requested the Oakland County Board
of Commissioners to select the site for the resource recovery facility because
of their better knowledge of existing needs and future planning for the County
Service Center; and
WHEREAS Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Consulting Engineers for the county
solid waste program have made a Resource Recovery Siting Analysis report dated
May 11, 1987; and
WHEREAS Camp, Dresser, and McKee recommends that Site 4, bounded on two
sides by railroad property and on the other two sides by Oakland Avenue and West
Boulevard be the location of the proposed resource recovery facility.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the County
of Oakland that it concurs in the recommendation of Camp, Dresser, and McKee and
it selects Site 4 for the location of the proposed resource recovery facility.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee, I move
the adoption of the foregoing resolution.
PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE
Anne M. Hobart, Chairperson
#87131 May 28, 1987
Moved by Hobart supported by Crake the resolution be adopted.
Moved by Price supported by Rowland the resolution be referred to the
Planning and Building Committee so a meeting can be held with the host community
to discuss the proposal.
Discussion followed.
AYES: Perinoff, Pernick, Price, Rowland, Aaron, Doyon, Angus McPherson,
Ruel McPherson. (8)
NAYS: Page, Rewold, Skarritt, Wilcox, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling,
Hobart, Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson. (16)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion failed.
Mr. Price stated that in accordance with Board Rule X, the resolution
should be reviewed by the General Government Committee. Moved by Price supported
by Doyon the resolution be referred to the General Government Committee as the
rule, require .
The Chairperson stated the resolution was properly before the Board.
Mr. Price requested a legal opinion of Corporation Counsel.
Chairperson Rewold stated Corporation Counsel has said the Board should
vote on the ffig1Q11 t.9, refer and if fails, then the Board should vote on the
resolution.
Discussion followed.
The Chairperson stated he would go with the opinion of Corporation
Counsel to vote on the motion to refer first, and if that fails, vote on the
'reStilUtion.
Mr. Price appealed the ruling of the Chair.
Mr. Rewold stated a "yes' vote would sustain the ruling of the Chair; a
"no" vote would not sustain the ruling, and it takes 3/5 oftthe votes to overrideAbe Chair.
AYES: Rewold, Skarritt, Wilcox, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page. (17)
NAYS: Perinoff, Pernick, Price, Rowland, Aaron, Doyon, Angus McPherson,
Ruel McPherson. (8)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the ruling of the Chair was
sustained.
Vote on Mr. Price's motion to refer to General Government:
AYES: Pernick, Price, Rowland, Aaron, Doyon, Angus McPherson, Ruel
McPherson, Perinoff. (8)
NAYS: Rewold, Skarritt, Wilcox, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page. (17)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion to refer
failed.
Moved by Rowland supported by Price that the Board postpone consideration
of the resolution for thirty (30) days.
AYES: Price, Rowland, Aaron, Doyon, Ruel McPherson, Perinoff, Pernick. (7)
NAYS: Rewold, Skarritt, Wilcox, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page. (17)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion to postpone
action failed.
page #2 - Resolution #87131
Discussion followed.
The Chairperson stated in accordance with Board Rule #XXIII, (Limitation
of Debate), Mr. Doyon had exceeded his time.
Mr. Price continued the debate and requested George Schutte address the
Board and answer several questions he has regarding the Incinerator.
George Schutte addressed the Board.
Discussion followed.
The chairperson stated that Mr. Price has exceeded his time allowed and
he closed the debate.
Mr, Page moved the previous.question. Seconded by Nelson.
Moved by Perinoff supported by Ruel McPherson the Board adjourn.
The Chairperson called for a vote on the motion to adjourn.
AYES: Rowland, Aaron, Doyon, Angus McPherson, Ruel McPherson, Perinoff,
Pernick, Price. (8)
NAYS: Rewold, Skarritt, Wilcox, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page. (17)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion to adjourn failed.
Vote on calling the previous question:
AYES: Skarritt, Wilcox, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling, Hobart, Jensen,
Richard Kuhn, susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page, Rewold. (17)
NAYS: Rowland, Aaron, Doyon, Angus McPherson, Ruel McPherson, Perinoff,
Pernick, Price. (8)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the previous question was
called.
Mr. Price stated in accordance to Board rules, he can continue to speak.
The Chairperson ruled that debate be closed.
Mr. Price appealed the ruling of the Chair to close debate. Seconded
by Doyon.
AYES: Skarritt, Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell, Calandra, Crake, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page,
Perinaff, Rewold, Rowland. (20)
NAYS: Doyon, Angus McPherson, Ruel McPherson, Pernick, Price. (5)
The Chairperson voided the roll call, and stated a vote would be taken
on appealing the ruling of the Chair. A yes vote will sustain the Chair and a
no vote will not sustain the ruling of the Chair.
AYES: Wilcox, Caddell, Calandra, Crake, Gosling, Hobart, Jensen,
Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page, Rewold,
Skarritt. (17)
NAYS: Aaron, Doyon, Angus McPherson, Ruel McPherson, Perinoff, Pernick,
Price, Rowland. (8)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the ruling of the Chair
was sustained, The Chairperson stated the only ones that can speak now are the
ones who haven't spoken previously on the question.
Mr. Price stated he would like to offer an amendment. The Chairperson
ruled the motion out of order at this time.
Mr. Rowland appealed the ruling of the Chair. Seconded by Price.
#87131 - Page 3
The Chairperson stated a yes vote will sustain the ruling of the Chair,
and a no vote will not sustain the ruling.
AYES: Caddell, Calandra, Crake, Gosling, Hobart, Jensen, Richard Kuhn,
Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page, Rewold, Skarritt. (16)
NAYS: Aaron, Doyon, Angus McPherson, Rue] McPherson, Perinoff, Pernick,
Price, Rowland. (8)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the ruling of the Chair
was sustained.
Vote on resolution:
AYES: Caddell, Calandra, Crake, Gosling, Hobart, Jensen, Richard Kuhn,
Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page, Perinoff, Rewold, Rowland,
Skarritt, Aaron. (19)
NAYS: Doyen, Angus McPherson, Rue] McPherson, Pernick, Price. (5)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
Moved by Rowland supported by Price to reconsiderthe question and enter
it into the minutes.
The chairperson declared a 5 minute recess. The Board reconvened at
10:57 P.M.
Mr. Rewold stated he realizes this is a delaying tactic and he did not
have to recognize the reconsideration and he does not expect this sort of thing
at the next meeting; but the Board will set up a meeting with the persons involved
and the resolution will be placed on the agenda for the next meeting and at that
time they would vote on Mr. Rowland's motion to reconsider the question.
#87131 June 11, 1987
Moved by Rowland supported by Hobart the motion to reconsider
Miscellaneous Resolution #87131 be adjourned to until the next Board Meeting
to be held June 25, 1987.
Mr. Moffitt objected to the motion to adjourn reconsideration until
June 25th.
The Chairperson stated the motion to reconsider will be adjourned
until June 25, 1987 and placed on the agenda for that meeting.
The chairperson stated because of the objection, it would take a
roll call vote to adjourn the reconsideration motion until June 25th. A "yes"
vote will sustain his decision, a "no" vote would not place the reconsideration
on the agenda for the next Board Meeting.
AYES: Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Doyon, Gosling, Hobart, Jensen, Richard
Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Luxon, McConnell, McDonald, Rliel McPherson, Nelson, page,
Perinoff, Pernick, Price, Rewold, Rowland, Skarritt,11111cox, Aaron. (24)
NAYS: Moffitt. (1)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, Mr. Rewold's decision was
sustained and the motion to reconsider will be placed on the agenda June 25, 1987.
June 25, 1987
The Chairperson stated the motion for reconsideration of Resolution 87131
is before the Board for consideration.
Discussion followed.
Moved by Price supported by Rowland the Board extend reconsideration of
the resolution for 60 days so the County and the City of Pontiac can meet and try
to come to some agreement on the location of the incinerator .
Discussion followed.
The Chairperson stated a "yes" vote would extend reconsideration for 60
(sixty) days and a no vote will not extend reconsideration
AYES: Rowland, Doyon, Luxon, Angus McPherson, Perinoff, Pernick, Price.
NAYS: Skarritt, Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page,
Rewold. (18)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor the motion to extend
reconsideration failed.
Vote on reconsideration of the resolution:
AYES: Doyon, Luxon, Angus McPherson, Ruel McPherson, Pernick, Price, Rowland.
NAYS: Skarritt, Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Nelson,
Page, Perinoff, Rewold. (20)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion to
reconsider the resolution failed and the resolution was declared adopted.
(7)
(7)
day of 1 987
ALLEN
County Clerk/Register of Deeds
KESOLUTION # 871:11
June 25, 1987
June 25, 1987
The Chairperson stated the motion for reconsideration of Resolution 81131
is before the Board for consideration.
Discussion followed.
Moved by Price supported by Rowland the Board extend reconsideration of
the resolution for 60 days so the County and the City of Pontiac can meet and try
to come to some agreement on the location of the incinerator .
Discussion followed".
The Chairperson stated a "yes" vote would extend reconsideration for 60
(sixty) days and a no vote will not extend reconsideration
AYES: Rowland, Doyon, Luxon, Angus McPherson, Perinoff, Pernick, Price.
(7)
NAYS: Skarritt, Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, Moffitt, Nelson, Page,
Rewold. (18)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor the motion to extend
reconsideration failed.
Vote on reconsideration of the resolution:
AYES: Doyon, Luxon, Angus McPherson, Ruel McPherson, Pernick, Price, Rowland.
(7)
NAYS: Skarritt, Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell, Calandro, Crake, Gosling, Hobart,
Jensen, Richard Kuhn, Susan Kuhn, Lanni, Law, McConnell, McDonald, Moffitt, Nelson,
Page, Perinoff, Rewold. (20)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion to
reconsider the resolution failed and the resolution was declared adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland and having a seal,
do hereby certify that I have compared the annexed copy of
this Miscellaneous Resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioner's
t their meeting held on June 25, 1987
with the orginial record thereof now remaining in my office, and
that it is a true and correct transcript therefrom, and of the
whole thereof.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand. and affixed the
seal of said County at Pontiac, M i chigan
this 25th