HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1987.08.13 - 17963Miscellaneous Resolution 87207 _ August 13, 1987
BY: HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE -Susan G. Kuhn, Chairperson
RE: PROBATE COURT-OAKLAND COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND BUDGET 1987-1988
TO: THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS, Pursuant to provisions of Act 280 of the Public Acts
of 1975 as amended, Oakland County is required to develop and
submit a plan and budget for the provision of funding of foster
care services to the Office of Children and Youth Services,
Department of Social Services, annually; and
WHEREAS, The Oakland County Probate Court, County of Oakland,
and the Oakland County Department of Social Services have developed
the attached foster care services budget for the State's fiscal
year, October 1, 1987 through September 30, 1987; and
WHEREAS, The Health & Human Services Committee has reviewed
this budget and recommends its submission to the State Office;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Oakland County Board
of Commissioners authorize submission of the 2987-88 Oakland County
Child Care Fund Budget to the State Office of Children and Youth
Services, Department of Social Services.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Health & Human Services
Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution.
HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
Resol. # 872Q7
August 13, 1987
• MoVed by Susan Kuhn supported by Hobart the resolution be adopted.
AYES: Rewold, Skarritt, Wilcox, Aaron, Caddell, Calandro, Crake,
Doyon, Gosling; Hobart, Jensen, R. Kuhn, S. Kplin,-.Lanni, Law, Luxon,
McConnell, A. McPherson, R. McPherson, Moffitt, Nelson, Page ., Perinoff,
Pernick, Firice. (25) .
' NAYS.: None. . (0)
A Sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
),
COUNTY OF OAKLAND ,
I, Lynn D. Allen, Oakland County Clerk/Register of Deeds, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners on August 13 1987 with the original
record now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the, seal of the County
of Oakland, Pontiac, Michigan this 13th day of Aug Alb .
air
LLEN, Oakland County Clerk
1Cou..1C-000.41 Pan.,
I Earl L. Koonce 858-0256
COurolty
Oakland
1987-88
Tosqmone
858-1481
ass con.st Pats.
aeanne Walter
106,811 687,519 I 794,330
36 ,806 I 8,855,083 8,891,889
558,738 558,738
0 I 0
DSB COORT COMMOIM
143,617 10,191,34e
1,947,574
•eptember-.,a,Z 19 - •
Pftwatno .)1,77/ COur,
CAwrly Ps... of Sc.r.2.,Sen,4ee. S+scrutan.N.
I /-7 F
, (`7, raw (r.]
11V.3 I IJaILI..IIv
For the Office of Children and Youth Services
TYPE OF CARE
I. CHILD CARE FUND
A. Family Foster Care
E. Institutional Care
C. In Home Care
D. Independent LivMg
ANTICIPATED IDIPENDITURES
NOTE: DO NOT INCLUDE
H. AND L tN THE
TOTAL EXPENDI-
TURE LINE
COST SHARING RATIOS
E. SUBTOTALS
F. Revenue
CL Net Expenditure 1 43,617 _I 8,153,816
1986-87 ±dp'.6ped Expenditure Level — County 5046/State 5046
County 50-100%/State 0-50%* L Net Expenditure Over Cap •Sul. rarnowymnt ClOpe.r..0111P. VW.. CU
bt.tr.GS AS end tort.
0,244,957
8,297,433
7,885,310
412,123
II. CHILD CARE FUND
Foster Care During Release Appeal
Period
COST SHARING RATIOS County 0%/State 100%
III. JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES FUND
Basic Grant
I County 046/State 100% COST SHARING RATIOS S15.000.00 Maximum
9677 9577
8,207,110 IV. TOTAL EXPENDITURE
BUDGET DEVELOPMENT CERTIFICATION
THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE PARTICIPATED 1N DEVELOPING THE PROGRAM BUDGET PRESENTED ABOVE We certify
than the oudpet submitted above represents an anticipated gross expenditure for tne fiscal year October 1,19 trtru
ry ANDf tca
Os I
Wive 5,c.
D5S-2-0g104..¢.-a.5) SallalIIZ othtlon 47...740*.
I Tilt Cmnpartt.nt will not N.corwrgrual p.m/ ally u,Ohncuall
of W0.0 Odo.u. Cl Id.. WC, roLIpion. Po, ...I.:M.1 0.110.1., Scar. plwr31.1
1 annul, 11.11.61000, Cl pOMIcal
AVIMORtre. Sc B7, Put:1..1C0 18/L Cl .5r.
COWPIXTIO. itesuo0.
PENAL:r(f FM. rowkwrrnol vr.,1 0C .M.67 inw,
mei pougew,....
County r"1:1c1 riel
Dale Subnifited
Arctic
Days Care ,
(Combined [WA!
anticipated expense)
Annual
Gross Cost
County Chdd Care: Budget Detail
Page 1
ilic DroaFlmenn oi ScrthE SeEvrces arill nol chltrsrninate againv
any grd.,dual Or gnonia lx-caosc Dl race, 5tx. tlr9tetr, 000. .11-0,11
ang/n. cold .fasachll OdIOus.ilan/acaly, or poiiaKal arFettIS
A1311{0fillY Act Al. Pubhc DcI l ills.
As Amended
COMPI.E /1(1E4 Reqvged
PPIALTY S1ATe tganlymstmtni roll bo
y.n11,tseld Ernm local Qom Ivrtnt
COUNTY CHILD CARE - DETAIL BUDGET
Nlictitan Department of Social Services
For the Office ot Children and Youth Services
F.Y. October 1,19 67 - September 30, 19 aiR
I. CHILD CARE FUND
TYPE OF CARE
A. FAMILY FOSTER CARE
1." Conit
a. Court Sopnrvised
Foster Care Pilyrnents
Non Scheidilliid Cost
b. Court Placed (p r i vate A , en c y
Foster Care and Adminismai
462,193 * 31,836
Rate Payments 225,326 **
19r5lur cS.!-AFAilled 'Cast 687,51_9
2. County DSS
a. County OSS Supervised
Foster Care Payments 700
b. County OSS Placed
Foster Care and Administrauve
Rate Payments
County DSS Subtotat
commtlEn FAMILY FOSTER CARE TOTAL
055. 7092. !Rey 6 AS,O.mur1'om nrrnTrTr
* 30,845 Non Scheduled Expenses Included
.1 - .
96,495 3,185
106,811
794,330 40,785
Coenty Child Care: Rudge! Detail
Page 2
TYPE Of CARE
R. INSTITUTIONAL CARE
t Private Institution
a. Court Placed In-Slate
Foster Care Payments
Non Scheduled Cost
b. Court Placed Out-el-Stale
Foster Care Paymeut3
Court Subtotal
c. County OSS Placed In-Stale
Foster Care Payments
b. County OSS Phced Out-of-State
'Foster Care Pap -nenIs
County OSS Subtotal
MIMEO SOBTOIAL PRIVATE INSTITUTION
pss 7017 Rr a U tdop.1 avtq
*** 6602. Non Scheduled Expenses Included
Annugl Anticipated
Gross Cost Days Care
586,996 *** 5,328
23,537 360
610,533 5,688
36,806 360
0 0
36,806 360
647,339 6,048
County Child Care: ittidget Detail
Page 3
TYPE OF CARE
,Arinual
Gross Cost
(Combined total
anticipated expense)
Number Anticipated
ol Beds Days Corn
2. Court Operated lostitutione: (County Executive )
a. Detention CV—Didg j( 16,2 ) A South _2_,_6546 73 22,403
2,934,238 100 24,551 b. Group Care Facility chadrerirs vinaae
c. Sbeller Care Facility cy_akt 13, (1+2) 1,467,119 44 12,123
( d. 01 trer CarIP Corklan3 lt 188 407 35 12,775
Subtotal Court Uperated 8,244,550 252 71,85
3. County DSS Operated ilie
a. Group Care Facilrly 0 0 0 ,
b. Sbetter Care Facility 0 0 . 0 .. . - .
a. Other 0 0 0 . ,
Subtotal County 055 Operated Ea4ffre..5 0 0 0 ..._
CritAr.IINED INSTITU 8,891,889
TICNAL CARE TOTAL
Anticipated Number
of Chitdren for Anticipated
In-Home Care Service . Days Cart! TYPE OF CARE
C. 114-HOME CARE SERVICE COMPONENTS.
1. Court Subtotal
2. County ()SS Subtotal
C.C.kTINED TOTAL IN-HOME CARE
D. ltIDEPENDENT LIVING
I. Court
3. Court Supervised Foster C8fP NyrTICTItS.
b. Court Placed Foster Care arid
Administrative Rate Payments
Court Subtotal
2. County DSS
a. County DSS Supervised Foster Care CP.FIEMIS
b. County 053 Placed Foster Care and
Adrnirestrative Rate PayenentP,
County OSS Subtotal
COMr.3INED TOTAL INDEPENDENT LAVING
055 •"•. n5 951 h5.
(Combined total
anticipated expense)
558,738 1624
0
558,738
0
0
0
Annual
Gross Cost
1624
0
1,947,524
9,677 1200
0
8,307,110 119,685
0
0
641,945 (Atty. fees, state oallecticins (%), Pay)
181i 579 (Social. Sect7rity & Veteran's Bsnefits)
_]..1.124, 000 (C.V. & Calp. Oak. per diem, State aid, SthDal
0
0
roze1s)
10,1011340
143__, 617
Anticipated
Days Care
114,440
4,245 --
118,685
Annual
Gross Cost
(Combined total
antir.ii)atecf expense)
10,244,957
County Child Care: Ounrjet Detail
Page I
TYPE OF CARE
C.& C -
E. 1, COURTA SUBTOTAL A THOU 0
2. COUNTY DSS SUBTOTAL A THRU
COMBINED SUBTOTAL GROSS COST A THRU
F. ANTICIPATED REVENUE
1. Court
a. Nat Prn bate Court pri:feferi CothiTtions
(70% of Gross)
b. Government Penefil Collections (100% of Gross)
c. Other Receipts (100% of Gross)
Court Subtotal
2. County 055
a. Prothite Court OirCerriti thtliections
(100% of Gross)
b. Government Benefit Collections (100% of Gross)
c. Other Receipts (100% of Gross)
County DSS St/biota!
COMBINED TOTAL REVENUE .
G. SUBTOTAL COUlitri CHILD CARE FUND NET EXPENDITURES
(Subtract Flevcnue from E. Combined Siithatal Gross Cost)
Capped Net Exuniiiiture Level 7 / 885,310 On n,1 ic,,s in
the TOTA1_ cniinTY
Net Expenditure Over CAP 412,123 CHILD CARE Line.
P. FOSTER CARE DURING RELEASE APPEAL PERIOD
lit. COUNTY BASIC GRANT
1. Court Subtotal
County DSS Subtotal
COMBINED TOTAL COUNTY RAM GRANT
IV. TOTAL COUNTY CHILD CARE I THOU III
ire /WI ici 51 rf tvnevs ed1.5 obsolek
CHILD CARE FUND
JUDICIAL, PLACEMENT, AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY REPORT
(Completed by Juvenile Division of Probate Courtr
Michigan Department of Social Services
Office of Children and Youth Service
information is considered necessary Sc, assess the effect or impact of lit-
tine Cane and Basic Grant expenditures in county's which have programs.
mion IV, A & B are reqUired front all counties which achrlinitter In-Home
.re sod/or Basic Grant programs.. Becton I Ps III A are required from all
urts as part of the Annual Plan Ps Budgeting process.
oh rayarsa side for detailed instructions.
The Department of Social Sarylcos will not niscrminate against
any inahriocal or group because of race, sex, religion, age.
national origin, color, marital status, hanclicap, or politica: balim's.
AUTHORITY: PR. 37 of 1978.
COMPLETION: Is required.
CONSEQUENCE F,OR MONCOMPLETION: Child care luno will
not be reimbursed,
PRIOR YEAR THIS YEAR (12 Month Period( Most Recent 12 Months) DIFFERENCE
REPORTED ITEM FROM: FRomi
114/85 1/1/86 PERCENT COST
TO: To: { + - Each ' item is required information 12/31/85 12/31/86
4- or -) C or)
1. J€JDICIAL (For All Youth Served)
' I. Number of Youth Having Petitions/Written Complaints Filed 9001 9175 . +2%
o 2, Number of Petitions Authorized 1926 2149 +12% ..._
Total # of hearings held
* 3. Number of Adjudications during the veer 8742 8528 -2%
4. Number of Placeable Adjudications/Dispositions (cv) not available not available -
* 5, Number of Court Wards at Beginning of 12 Mounth,Period 1399 1450 +4%
o 6. Number of Court Wards at End of 12 Month Period 1450 1492 +3% Li:.;
' 7. Number of State Ward Commitments (Act 150 & 2201 76 88 +16% 1. .
1 PLACEMENT AND COST DETAIL (ChildCare Funded Only)
-
A. Foster Care (Court Foster Home)
r.
T. Total Number of Day's of Care 31,550 31,896 -1496
2. -Tota cost's 311,793 383,103 +23%
:f. Avurdge Cost Per Day 9.88 1201 +22% -
E. Residential
, - -H N,Jrnber of Days Detention Own Facility ( Epril.r. L 23 715 (CV) 21,748 (CV ) 8%
2. Numbe:- of Days Detention Purchased ( . , i_ 184 1 99%
Camp Oakland i I- , .D
3, Nurnb,:, of Days Treatment Own FacilitCil i 2. d re n ' s 36,579 36,674 -5%
Village
4. Number of Days Treatment Purchased (private mat) 7,069 11,915 +69%
5. Tots) Days Residential Care 82,629 83 i 564 +11
6. Total Cost 8,846,790 9,357,357 +6% .]
7. Cost Per Day 107 112 +5%
tO item It topuisto information.
-.5-4472 0-57) Please continue on rererse side.
_......... ----
PRIOR YEAR THIS YEAR DIFFERENCE
REPORTED ITEM 412 Month Period) Most Recent 12 Monttai
Fetohei FROM:
PERCENT COST
To: TO:
Each • item is required information ( + or • i 1 + 12/31/85 122 -4-1/86
-m. TOTALS/SUMMARY
.-
A. Court Wards (Rost . 0. ;
Home
Ch. Vlg ;Camp Oakland, 119,179. 115,460. +1% *1. Totai Number Out-of• Days Care pr iv. Instit )
° 2. Total Opt-of.Home Cost's 9,158,583 . 9,740,460. +6%
° 3. Average Cost Per Day Out.of-Home Care ......
B. State Wards (Act 150 or 2201
1. Number at Beginning of 12 Month Period 120
2. Number at End of 12 Month Period 146 169 +16%
3. Total Cost • • • ,
IV. A. 1N-HOME CARE (If Applicable)
° 1. Number of Youth Served 958 1046 +9%
* 2. Total Cost's Repeat Offender started 4/1/85 280,062. 331,254. +18%
° 3. Average Cost Per Youth 217. 317.
I3. easic Grant (if Applicable)
N/A N/A - -
• 1. Number of Youth/Families Served N/A N/A [ -
° 2. Total Cost's N/A N/A -
° 3. Average Cost Per Youth/Family N/A N/A - -
r4GTRtSCT IONS:
on other ride.
SECTION 1 Judicial a 1 and 2. The judicial information includes petitions and adjudication for both neginct and delinquent.
• 4. Each court will define the adjudications which are generally pieced out-of-house, i.e,, reionner against people, repeated property felonies., etc.
, SECT ION II • a 1,2, The count of day's care and youth iv F =Tardy's, own facility would be ONLY the county's own wards and would exclude State wards or
other county's ward's.
fl • 034, Treatment would include all reeidential care exclusive of detention,
SECTION IV - A and B required information if in-tiouso Cars/Basic Grant programi rsi are operational.
NOTE: Additional detailed inetructione are contained irt the Annual Finn and Budget Guidelines.
04r-4-472 -571 lascal
rt I I lUINIJ,LJLMtP • ANL! t.F.YD.NLA I t I
(Completed by County Department of Social 3ervices)
Michigan Department of. Social Services
Office of Children arid Youth Services
This infoii-mation Is considered necannary to eirefrOS the effect or Impact of In-Home Care and Esar3e Grant expenditures in county't which hew
sairogirems_ Section Pic A Pi 13 is required from Counties which aotrninistier In-Home Care and/or Besic Grunt Pro:worts, Section I and ill are
required from all Ciouni Departments havinci Child Care Fund Subeccounts asa pert of the Annual Pfeil end 6.1.16de -ring promise.. Detailed
in:in-rut-noels *re oarrt2ir144. in the Annual Pier, and Budget Guide-11nm..
PRIOR YEAR THIS YEAR
(12 Month Period) (Moir Recent 12 Months) DIFFERENCE
FROM: FROM:
REPORTED ITEM Oct. 1, 1985 Oct 1, 1986 PERCENT COST I
ra-citiirivd intbriolition Yept.. 30, 1986 .1'4t. 30, 1987 (4""r 'l 1 ("r "
C.P.S., PETITION, AND ADJUDICATIONS
_
". 1. Number of Substantiated C.P.S. Cases 1548 1330 -14.1%
' 7. Nurrb8r of Petitions Filed 240 230 - 4.2%
' 2. Number of AdiudIcations 216 -212 - 1,9%
, PLACEMENT AND COST DETAIL iChiid Care Funded Onl y)
...
A. Foster Care .
1. Total Number of Day 's of Care
2. Total Cart's
-.
3. Average Cost Per Da y
P. Residential Care
1. Total Number of Days Own Facility
2. Total Number of Days Purchased (Treatment/Shelter)
2. Total Da ys Residential Care
A. Total Cast 1
5. C.nst F'r Day ---,
. TOTALS/SUMMARY (Child Care Funded Only)
I. Totat Number of Youth at. Beginning of Year 12 21+75% .. . ...
t . --
1. 2. Teta! Number of Youth at End of Year 17 12 -29.4%
• ' 3. Tolzi Number of Days Out-of-Home Care 2345 2627 +12.0%
$
Toter Out-of-Home C-oats 553.664 160915 4.17 5"L',"„ j
ParC..Quof L_LusiL taiii____..,___.:L.,..1.1...../,...:
P. A. 11',N'ICME CARE If Applicable)
__ _1. Number of Youth Served
' 2. Total Cos-t's
° 3. Average Cost Per Youth
B. 73a.c Grant tif Applicable)
° 1 Number of Youth/Families Served
' 2. Total C-ostis
'
3. A-scram C.o.1,-t Per Youth/Family
Tlm tli.raioririarot Of riot discriminate eclairst
any inoreicuei or group tic-cause cf race, sex, reilelon, ape,
ostioroi toioy, rriarltai Statot, ObOOICAO
ALITHORITYT PA 87 of 1978,
CrOMPLETION,require6. corsisEoueNce FOR NONCOMF=SON: Chlla care tuncl will
riot be ritoolloOraisd.
(4-87)
VI. GENERAL NARRATIVE
A. County Operated Institutions
If your county operates an institutional facility
(treatment, secure detention, non-secure detention,
group or attention homes, multi-purpose facility,
etc.) describe the services provided in each. Please
state the bed capacity of each.
Presently, the Court and County operates an active
Poster Care and Adoption Unit, the Oakland County
Children's Village, with (1) a detention facility
with capacity for 73 beds; 56 beds in Building "J"
for boys and 17 beds in Building "A" South for girls'
detention; (2) a shelter care facility with capacity
of 40 beds; and (3) five other units which would be
utilized for what more commonly would be called group
care facilities, and are referred to here as
rehabilitation units. These rehabilitation units,
combined with the programs at Camp Oakland of Boys'
Ranch, Girls' Ranch, and Work Education, provide an
additional bed capacity for 151 children. It is not
uncommon for youngsters to move from detention or
shelter care into one of these treatment or
rehabilitation programs.
B. General Purpose County Facilities
If your county operates a facility that is used for
Child Care Fund reimbursable and non-Child Care Fund
reimbursable services (e.g., to house probation staff
or courtrooms), describe the formula that is used to
pro-rate the Child Care Fund costs for operating the
facility (e.g.= fuel, rent, electricity,
maintenance). If this situation does not apply to
your county, enter not applicable."
The Adoption and Foster Care Unit is located in the
Administrative Wing of the Oakland County Children's
Village. The County's 1987 assessment is $6.28 per
square foot for the office area of 4400 square feet
at a total amount update of $27,637.
C. Not Applicable.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. McFarland
FROM Ray Sharp R. $,
RE: In Home Care Certification
DATE: July 10, 1987
After careful reading of current In Home Care funding restrictions and program
requirements, I am confident that the Early Offender Project is in full compliance.
aslcijr
71 1 0/87
IN-HOME CARE CERTIFICATION
Fund Restrictions & Program Requirements
In-Home Care program expenditures are restricted to new or
expanded programs that are alternatives to out-of-home
institutional or foster care.
A. ELIGIBLE CLIENTS/STAFFING
1. Children under the jurisdiction of the court, as an
alternative to removal from the child's home, provided
that:
a. such care is an alternative to detention or other
out-of-home care and:
• a complaint has been received and accepted by
the court,
• the expenditures are not for judicial costs,
• the caseload size or services are intensive,
non-scheduled payments are not made to pay
for basic family needs otherwise available
through public assistance programs,
the parent(s) and the youth have agreed in
writing to receive In-Rome Care services, or
a temporary order has been entered pending an
adjudication hearing: or
b. such care is provided to Children who at the
dispositional hearing are ordered into In-Home
Care as an alternative to foster care or other
out-of-home care, and;
• the expenditures are not for judicial costs,
• the services are intensive, and
• nun-scheduled payments are not made to pay
for basic family needs otherwise available
through public assistance programs.
The In-Home Care early return option may be used to
accelerate the early return of a youth from family
.foster care, institutional care, or other out-of-home
care when the case plan identifies an early return goal
and the services are provided to members of the child's
family. The case plan should identify the family
strengths and deficiencies which, if corrected, would
2 .
Continued...
- 3 -
subject to the same restrictions as reimbursements in
county operated institutions.
B. USE OF THE IN-HOME CARE OPTION FOR NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENT
II all other In-Home Care requirements are met, budgeted
non-scheduled payments for services available to youth in
foster care may be provided to youth in their own home:
(Non-scheduled payments are defined in the Child Care Fund
Handbook).
C. CASE RECORD DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
Individual case record documentation is required for all In-
Home Care clients. As a minimum, case records must include
the following:
• family case assessment which identifies, by service
component, the problems and need for In-Home Care
services,
• date of intake,
type of complaint/allegation, supported as follows:
(1) delinquency -- a copy of the complaint or court
order, when applicable, placing the child in In
Home Care as part of a formal disposition,
(2) abuse/neglect -- allegation and substantiation
entered on the DsS-133 in Department cases;
• treatment plan which identifies the treatment,
objectives and the action steps which will be used to
reach the objectives,
• case plan changes as a result of supervisor/case worker
or contractee/contractor case reviews,
• quarterly progress . reports,
• dates, type and purpose of service contacts made with
the client,
• leg al status of youth and the family, and
• the living arrangement of the youth at termination of
In-Home Care services.
NOTE: Case record content for all foster care cases,
under . the supervision of a county Department of Social
Services, should be maintained according to Services
Manual Item 722(6a-9). It is suggested that all In-
Home Care material he kept in the first inside section
of the foster care file.
Continued...
IN-HOME CARE CERTIFICATION
Fund Restrictions & Program Requirements
In-Home Care program expenditures are restricted to new or
expanded programs that are alternatives to out-of-home
institutional or foster care.
A. ELIGIBLE CLIENTS/STAFFING
I. Children under the jurisdiction of the court, as an
alternative to removal from the child's home, provided
that:
a. such care is an alternative to detention or other
out-of-home care and:
• a complaint has been received and accepted by
the court,
• the expenditures are not for judicial costs,
the caseload size or services are intensive,
• non-scheduled" payments are not made to pay
for basic family needs otherwise available
through public assistance programs,
the parent(s) and the youth have agreed in
writing to receive In-Home Care services, or
a temporary order has been entered pending an
adjudication hearing; or
h. such care is provided to children who at the
dispcsitional hearing are ordered into In-Home
Care as an alternative to foster care or other
out-of-home care, and:
• the expenditures are not for judicial costs,
the services are intensive, and
non-scheduled payments are not made to pay
for basic family needs otherwise available
through public assistance programs.
The In-Home Care early return option may be used to
accelerate the early return of a youth from family
foster care, institutional care, or other out-of-home
care when the case plan identifies an early return goal
and the services are provided to members of the child's
family. The case plan should identify the _family
strengths and deficiencies which, if corrected, would
2 .
Continued...
permit the youth to he returned home early. In-8ome
Care services would typically be provided to the family
during the time that the youth is in out-of-home care
and, if necessary, for a period of time after the youth
has returned to the family.
3. The county Department of Social Services may provide
In-Home Care services if the juvenile court orders care
and supervision of a court ward.
4. The county Department of Social Services may provide
In-Home Care services from its sub-account for
substantiated Protective Services cases, provided that
Such In-Home Care services prevent the need to
petition the juvenile court for removal or prevent
placement in voluntary foster care, and
non-scheduled payments are not made to cover basic
family needs otherwise available through public
assistance programs.
5. in-Nome Care funds shall not be used to meet the court
staff-to-youth population ratio of 1 to 6,000 as
specified in the Juvenile Court Standards and
Administrative Guidelines for the Care of Children.
6. Court staff hired after 4/30/85, who are responsible
for case plan development and monitoring must meet the
gualificati ,,ns established in the Juvenile Court
Administrative Guidelines For the Care of Children.
The following positions are included:
• Supervisory Personnel
• Probation Officer
• Counselors
7. ':',ounty Department of Social Services staff and
supervisory staff providing direct In-Home Care
services must meet the standards set forth in Rules
400.6124, 400.6126 and 400.6128 of the Administrative
Rules for Child Placing Agencies.
8. County Department of Social Services staff and
supervisory staff providing direct In-.Home Care
services must be state civil servants assigned to
classifications and levels equivalent to staff and
supervisors in the state foster care program.
9. In-Home Care reimbursements for program and
odmini3trative office space, county purchased supplies,
• .sM.aries and wages for county employees who provide
direct services or support for these services are
Continued...
- 3 -
subject to the same restrictions as reimbursements in
county operated institutions.
B. USE OF THE IN-OOME CARE OPTION FOR NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENT
If all other In-Home Care requirements are met, budgeted
non-scheduled payments for services available to youth in
foster care may be provided to youth in their own home.
(Mon-scheduled payments are defined in the Child Care Fund
Handbook).
C. CASE RECORD DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
Individual case record documentation is required for all In-
Home Care clients. As a minimum, case records must.incIude
the following:
• family case assessment which identifies, by service
component, the problems and need for In-Home Care
services,
• date of intake,
• type of complaint/allegation, supported as follows:
(1) delinquency -- a copy of the complaint or court
order, when applicable, placing the child in In-
Home Care as part of a formal disposition,
(2) abuse/neglect -- allegation and substantiation
entered on the DSS-133 in Department cases;
• treatment plan which identifies the treatment,
obcctives and the action steps which will be used to
reach the objectives,
• case plan changes as a result of supervisor/case worker
or contractee/contractor case reviews,
• quarterly progress reports,
dates, type and purpose of service contacts made with
the client,
legal status of youth and the family, and
the living arran g ement of the youth at termination of
In-Home Care services.
NOTE: Case record content for all foster care cases,
under the supervision of a county Department of Social
Services, should be maintained according to Services
Manual Item 722(6a-9). It is suggested that all In-
Home Care materiel be kept in the first inside section
of the foster care file.
Continued.,
4 -
OR
Presiding Judge of Probate Court
Juvenile Division
• wear_ , 0
n t y Directbr of Social S e rvices
DA
In-Home Care services purchased from a private or public provider
requires a contract unless the service is supportive of a large
component; (i.e., clothing or dental work for a youth serviced
through an established In-Home Care program as for example,
intensive supervision). These non-scheduled payments do not
regu ire contracts.
In-Home Care funds and services are subject to state review and
audit and noncomplince with the above restrictions and
requirements may result in withholding or repayment of state
reimbursement.
The county must have all In-Home Care Contracts processed through
the county's formal contract approval procedures.
The signatures below certify that In-Home Care policy stated in
this document have been reViewed. It is understood that these
are conditions for claiming In-Home Care fund reimbursement.
rl 78/g
Total Contractual $82,200
(source) (purpose) (amount)
b. Per unit contracts
(name) (rate/unit) I (est. # purchased units) (total cost)
D. anticipate() average cost
(type of service) # units to be of each (total cost)
provided service unit
,—
Total Non-Scheduled 0
E. Add Totals for A, B, C, & C above
Total Service
Component Cost
F. If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue (including other
Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies), specify the following:
Total Public Revenue
Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost
NET ANTICIPATED IHO MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE S 82,200 NaMas....slaSffaeimwMftMas
AUTHORITY: Act, 37 Pectic Hen el 1578, ana meneaci
COMPLE1IC5Nt Recuired
PENALTY: Stare reirnoursament, will be vntnnaio from iocai
government.
NOTI-CE AC1 133 of 1902 (Pacenvorx Pepues)oni reclaim mat
no State Control dupitcate information epileptics cy State
Agencies. If tnis Form reactants into,manon test you have strearty
Pat:mitten to another agency, pleass 5000 cociei It Ina ppm, 2.4
oenartment names anC forrn trams:ens/till= to tne State Forms
Aorninistrator, DoportillorW of Management ane Soccer. Box
30025, Lansing, MI 48909.
Sending material noes not r MYR n that you 0001 n005 to cnrnOttie
tOO 10110.
Tee CADifirtlera of $ocial Services will not discriminate meatnst
any indivicuat Or grotto bateau. or flICA, 508, 103191011, age,
national origin. color. rnarq,31 status, handicap, or 0011.11.1- ttelian,
003•5094 t Rev. 544) (Baca.'
(function) (# hrs./wk..) (total cost)
2. Supplies and Materials
3. Other
(specify) (ratefunit)
IN-HOME CARE BUDGET DETAIL
Michigan Department of Social Services
FOR THE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES
Service Component
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of Court or DSS) Administrative Unit: DSS 0 Court 0
1. Salary and Wages
(name)
•
2. Fringe Benefits (specify)
Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Employees Identified in "A" above)
1. . Travel
(purpose) I (rate/mile) (total cost) (est. 4' miles)
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. Individual Consultants or Providers
(name) (rate/unit)
Total Program Support
(total units/contract)
0
(total cost)
0
$62,200
2. Contracting Organization
a. Closed-end contracts
(name)
Judson Center In—Home Family Treatment Service
See fever. stai"tor PA 1.33 Information
Inc non.d:scrhmination statement.
055,2094 (Raa, 5-4(1} ProviaLsa ealtkm Ob1.014te.
IN-HOME BUDGET DETAIL - COMPONENT
B. 1. Personal Mileage
3 caseworkers x 800 miles per month
5 interns x 600 miles per month
Supervisor 200 miles per month
B. 3. Telephone
Includes $10/month per intern to reimburse calls made from home
Total $600.
C. 2. b.
4 intern/monitors - 1000 hours each at an average of $4.75/hour
Total. $19,000 1- 10% administrative cost = $20,900.
2 advanced degree interns ($14,000) on a contractual basis with a
university generally -
40 weeks x 32 hours/week or
50 weeks x 25.5 hours/week
both at the rate of $5.47/hour = $14,000.
b. Per unit contracts
(name)
Local Universities
(total cost)
$ 34,900
(rate/unit) (eat. # purchased units)
(See attached detailh $ 34,900
E. Add Totals for A, B, C, & 0 above
Total Service
Component Cost
(source) (purpose) (amount)
D.
Total Contractual
,—. – anuctpatea average cost
(type of service) # units to be of each (total cost)
provided service unit
—
Total Non-Scheduled
F. If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue (including other
Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies), specify the following:
Total Public Revenue
Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost
NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE 5 233,189
AUTHORITY: ACT 87 Purr!lc ActE of 1978. at arnenoco.
COMPL.F.TiON: kepuiran
PENALTY: St.ata rennoursarnent wilt be v•AtritteIC from 10.1
grid Foment.
NOTICE': Act 155 of 2582 (Psoorwaf* ;rind...L.0.1°0 mooffes ma:
fl-ns State control OuoiTcatt In loan:lion collection by State
anoncw, if Inil Iowa reoualtr. InformatIon that you ha•ro cir005y
yubrillItera to another avancy, 010010 5000 CODIal Or TOP1 tOrrnS flf 0001rtrnalli narnerF son form nurnoorulftles to ti-to State. F0rn10
ACITIVIIStrAtOr, L?epartrhent Of 7.1..410,11411! 2.110 Bugg... Boo
50020, 1—anflog, Mi 40909.
Sunning rnatoriai cone not mean that You d.n't oPoo cc COMW.te
this larm,
rho Deoartr,,,,t of Socia: 5,arvfoes wilt not ttioorimlnttc eriuinot
any 1nOly.ovaI or group 316[11006 of race, sax, rtnglOR, ago,
hatfarlail oriptn, CORN', mould 1 status, hanOlcap, or poiltICAP buiiIIl
=5%0094 (Soy. 5-84y feaciti
(total cost)
16,800 -
300
650 2. Supplies and Materials
Postage
Lon
(rate/unit)
Total Program Support
(total units/contract)
100
3,000
1,000
8,215
2,995
450
$ 33,510
(total cost)
0
3. Other Client Motivation
(specify) Restitution
Building Space Allocat
Telephone
Copier
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1 individual Consultants or Providers
(name) (rate/unit)
11\14-10ME CARE BUDGET DETAIL
Michigan Department of Social Services
FOR THE OFF ICE OP CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES
Service Component "B"
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of Court or DSS) Administrative Unit: DSS 0 Court O
(name) (function) {Ai hrsiwk.) (total cost)
Ray Sharp (60%) Supervisor 24 hrs. 23,974
Dave Monroe Caseworker 40 hrs. I 31,428
Gary Contesti Caseworker 40 hrs. 33,276
Mike Amshay Caseworker 40 hrs. 32,040
) Fringe Benefits (specify) PICA, Retirement, Hospitalization Insurance, Life
Insurance, Workmen's Compensation, Disability, 44,061
Dental and Unemployment insurance, Optical Insuranc $ 164,779
Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Employees Identified in "A" above)
1. . Travel
(purpose) (rate/mile)
Personal Mileage .25
Travel & Conference
(est. # miles)
67,200
2. Contracting Organization
a. Closed-end contracts
(name)
Sea rewma lidnor PA, 13Z information 1
anC non-ailcrimination sid11.71.11. OSS.20g4 ie.. 5-841 ATINylat. fg3IttOrs prslotilte.
(source) I (purpose) (amount)
b. Per unit contracts
(name) (rate/unit) (est. # purchased units) (total cost)
Total Contractual
D. ,—.. --..------ ..... .,_._ ._ anticipatea average cost ,
(type of service) # units to be of each (total cost)
provided service unit 0
Total Non-Scheduled
E. Add Totals for A, B, C, & D above
Total Service
Component Cost
$ 152,273
F. If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue (including other
Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies), specify the following:
Total Public Revenue
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost
NET ANTICIPATED INC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE
AuTHO RITY1 Ad i 87 PuntIc Acts of 1978, a. amenaea,
COMPt...ET ION: Kt...duet.
PENALTY: State relmoursernant will Pe witheald tram local
government,
NOTICE: ACt 133 of 1907 (PaPerwore. Reduction, ft-outfit'. that
tee State Contra! O“Oltatite information coteectian ay State
agencies. if lei, form rocuerst% Information that you neve aiready
wurnit red to another agency, please send Caplet; or tee forms .21
°agar-art.t name% arm form nurnoorlititles to tee Stat. Form.
Aornkftlatfa[Or, Vepertment Cl Management one Sungot. EIrIM
30026. Lansing, MI 48909.
Sanding material ones not mean teat you 0001 need to complete
10c m,
no Oatatartrnofit of Sociei Servicm will not dif,CrIrninate 09010S7 ny Indivioust or group because el race. 'AK, religion, age,
ationei orfnin, color, marital status., riancecart, Of poiltzcat aellets„,.
152,273
Fameseiaosesamearegemelmeameteeme
0E5.2090 /Roe. 1-04) (ElaCe)
(total cost)
$ 1,800
300
2,220
8,210
Total Program Support
600
150
(rate/unit)
400
2,740
(total cost)
0
(total units/contract)
Telephone
C, CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
oss-niqk ( RON. 5-4J edition °Aso/eta. End ila.erfdr F.j 33 InforrnAtiann
and non-diNcrionination Slarrdnent.
IN-HOME CARE BUDGET DETAIL
Michigan Department of Social Services
FOR THE OFF ICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES
Service Component "A"
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of Court or DSS) Administrative Unit: ()SS 0 Court 0
Salary and Wages
(name)
_
(function) (# hrs./wk.) (total cost)
Re Sharp (40% Supervisor 16 hrs. 1
Judy Dowcial Caseworker 40 hrs . 33,876
James C. Smith Caseworker 40 bra. 27,596
Annie Bonds Caseworker 40 hrs. 28,089
2. Fringe Benefits (specify) Life Insurance,
FICA, Retirement, flospitaIiza.tion Insurance,
Workmen's Compensation, Disability, Dental and 38,519
Unemployment Insurance, Optical Insurance. 144,063
Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Employees Identified in "A" above)
1. Travel
(purpose) (rate/mile)
Personal Mileage .25
Travel & Conference
(est, # miles)
7,200
2. Supplies and Materials
Postage
3. Other Copier Machine
(specify) rental
Building Space Allocation
1. Individual Consultants or Providers
(name) (rate/unit)
2. Contracting Organization
a. Closed-end contracts
(name)
A)
a)
0)
E)
F)
IN-HOME CARE SUMMARY
Michigan Department of Social Services
FOR THE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES
County Oakland
I. List all service components which make up the IHO program and specify the requested information for
each
CCF Other Public Gross
;Service Component) (Adm. Unit) Expenditure Funding Expenditure
Status Of fender $152,273
Early Offender 233,159
In—Rome Family Treatment 82,200
Intensive Counseling 37,106
In—Rome Detention /Intensi e Monitoring 53,970
Subtotal IHC - Court 555,738
Subtotal IHC - DES
$558,738
TOTALS I 1-40
For each service component listed above, complete a separate IN-HOME CARE SUDGET DETAIL,
{DSS-2094) filling in the appropriate budget items,
AUTHORITY: Act 87, Public, Acts 01 1975, as arnencled,
COMPLETION: P.ecruiraci
PENALTY( State reimbursement will be wit bneirt from ioca(
governmerii.„
NOTICE: Act ISS 01 1952 (Paperwork ReduCtion) require-5 that
the State controt ouplic.ate inlOrniatiOn col/action DV State
aseinCies. if MIS form reseumls intiorolation trial you nave already
SUbrnitte'd to anOinei annual, Dicta. 9,end Cootei- of tne intim or
cleoarisnoill nitilet, and toren nurneoriftillet to the Z-Vait Forms
Administrator, Department of Management antl Bucgct. Boo
10026, Lansing, MI 45909.
Bombing material does riot mean that you don't need It) Complete
trOs toren.,
The Dadartment Di Social ServiCeS Will not OIScrlonnate against
any intliv-Iduai Of grotto becalaie Cit race, yen, religion, ago,
national origin, color, rnaritai statue, tiandlcap. Or 001711.1
055-2093 (Fib, 1-et•e( Pree(oos edition oblOinitt.
(total cost)
$ 2,400
75
(rate/mile)
25
(est. # miles)
9600
125
50
100
725
(rate/unit)
650
4,125
Total Program Support
(total cost) (total units/contract)
0552094 (Re, 5454) Provious sattion oqi.ataro. So* rweerso skii.for PA 1.33 information
anti n10n-diaCtInlisIZIIOn sLretment.
IN-HOME CARE BUDGET DETAIL
Michigan Department of Social Services
FOR THE OFF ICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES
Service Component "0"
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of Court or DSS)
Lary and Waces
Administrative Unit: DSS 0 Court 0
- , ...
(name) (function) (# hrs./wk.) (total cost)
Julie Tillotson Caseworker 40 hrs. $24,162
1. Fringe Benefits (specify)
FICA, Retirement , llospitalization Insurance, Life 8,819
Insurance, Workmen's Compensation, Disability, Dental
Optical ana Unemployment. —Insurance $32,981
Total Personnel
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Employees Identified in "A" above)
1. . Travel
(purpose)
Personal Mileage
Conference and Travel
2. Supplies end Materials
Postage
3. Other Copier rental
(specify)
Building Space Allocati
Telephone
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Individual Consultants or Providers
(name) I (rate/unit)
on
Contracting Organization
a. Closed-end contracts
(name)
(total cost) (rate/unit)
b. Per unit contracts
(name) (est. # purchased units)
E. Add Totals for A, B, C, & D above
Total Service
Component Cost
(source) (purpose) (amount)
Total Contractual
D. ._,....._ . _... _ anticipateo average cost
(type of service) # units to be of each (total cost)
provided service unit
Total Non-Scheduled
F. If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue (including other
Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies), specify the following:
Total Public Revenue
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost
37,106 NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE S
P.t.r71-1,0kITY: Act 87 bobEIC ActZ of 1975, az arritinna0,
Raboirai7
PENALTY: Statt tOIRIPurterldrit witF DO witnhafri iron, local
govarnmant„
NOTICE: AC'S 17Z al 15187 fPiiborwb-ri, naduCilOni f44blfz, mat
trio Slate contfoi boalicatt lniormation bniirotion by Strata
agancias. If mill form racitizzlz Information man 700 na.. AfratitlY
subinlitaal to 21101961 agency, Plaaza S.P,5 000101 Of Me torrP5
O001V1Ment ram01 and torrtt nennizaflitities ID -MC Slot. FO,P5
AP11,11133/110r, CitiOtiftrnant of M8n490rnent zna boagat, Flub
70026. Lansing, MI 45909.
Sanding Material naan not ranzan mat yaw ciOn't naza lb complania
Intl tofbn.
Tnn Deparimeof of Social StilViCtl$ will not alactiminatz againm
any inaiyiabal or group oa0201e of babe. yob, railibiOn i 094, national origin, 80305, Marliaf ItatUS, nanalcao , or orifittbal Dallafi„,„
055.7094 {Pa, 9441 1138141
(totacost)
$ 9,600
160
3. Other
(specify)
Building Space
Allocation I (rate/unit) 1,450
960
$12,170
Telephone
ii.V.114,1V14 hof-SCIC. OULJUD01 1.4.1
Michigan Department of Social Services
FOR THE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES
Service Component
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of Court or DSS) Administrative Unit: DSS 0 Court 0
1. Salary and Wages
(name) (function) (#hrs.„/wk.) (total cost)
2. Fringe Benefits (specify)
Total Personnel
0
E. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For Employees identified in "A" above)
1. Travel
(purpose) (rate/mile)
Mileage
2. Supplies and Materials
(est. # miles)
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. individual Consultants or Providers
(name) I (rate/unit)
Total Program Support
(total units/contract) (total cost)
2. Contracting Organization
a. Closed-end contracts
(name)
See roverw slcieT'Inf PA 133 IntarmatIon
InC rtor,discrimOsaidan statamont.
0515.2094 t Co, Provious .211100 obsoiet..
(source) (purpose) (amount)
b, Per unit contracts
(name)
Local Universities
(rate/unit)
See
lest. # purchased units)
ttachment
(total cost)
-$41,800
D.
Total Contractual
i n ,....1•1 vinna-1 . n ..... n .... anticipated - average cuss
(type of service) # units to be of each (total cost)
provided service unit
Total Non-Scheduled 0
E. Add Totals for A, B, C, & 0 above
Total Service
Component Cost $53;970
F. if you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue (including other
Child Care Funds or Basic Grant monies), specify the following:
Total Public Revenue
Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component COST
NET ANTICIPATED IHO MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE S 53,970
.2,3311=10:49
,O1JTHCRI7Y: Acf. 07 Pubifc ACts of 1078, ai arnenOaC.
COMP-LOTION, Rgooltan
PENALTY: Statn rairnbufSoroeot will On •ofitlInCILI from local
govetnment.
NOTICE.: ACt 133 of 1952 lPeogomorK fgeOtfotionp req./rioh that
toe State control Oupilcate Inform/Owl tolfectlon 07 State
egenclaS. If rots torn, recueStS Information shaf you hays sdre.soY
sonmitto3 SO another agency, OfeaSe send 00131.1 of thf, 107m5
oepa/trolent aoO form ournooevtillel to the 51.30, Funnies
AO,o0,01.,Or, ColparlIneult Of Mana0orti6OL aflO 5009.t., Sox
30026, Lansing, MI 05909,
SanclIng .1.611,1811 Sloes not moan that you clon.i need MCI:3010161k
this Son,.
The OaDd.rtnlant Of SoCiaf ServScos will not clIscrtininme Ag.slost
doY inolylau411 or crou0 OKA,. Of 0.11-Otr, sex, rellgiort, age.
national cfOgfn. Color. marital status, handicap, or onfit1.1 bones_
DSS-709ds (key. 5-841 figacuj
COST ANALYSIS
Based on current contractual figures with Oakland University, we
would anticipate the following costs for the eight intern
monitors:
Salary
Mileage
$41,800 1,000 hours per intern at $4.00 an hour
for the first 250 hours, $5.00 an hour
for the last 750 hours_ This would
total $4,750 per intern x 8 = $38,000
$3,800 administration fee-
$ 9,600 We anticipate an average of 400 miles
per month per intern. That would be
$100 a month or $1,200 annually x 8 -
$9,600.
Telephone Reimbursement
960 We expect to reimburse interns for phone
calls lmade to clients and caseworkers
from their home. $10.00 a month, $144 a
year x 8 = $960.
Stationery
160 We anticipate equipping monitors with
three ring binders, calendar appointment
books and the necessary pads and pens,
etc. $20.00 per person x 8 $160-
Other Costs/Office Space
$ 1,449 Although the greatest amount of intern
time will be spent in the field, We
propose a two desk, two telephone office
made available for the interns. That
office should be located in the casework
hallway on the ground floor. Space
currently exists if the floater position
is physically transferred to the Royal
Oak office. $8.52/sq. ft. x 100 sq.
ft./office = $852 Pontiac office; $5,97
x 100 = Royal Oak Office = $597.
:-.mmoonent 1M3e
Status Offender Program – Component A
Time Forma Crewed
F10m:10-1-8750: 9-30-8E3
AOrmAistr-aMos tint
El COURT D OSS
:omooncni Mamacee Name
McFarland/Sharp
Te..4.phone Number/
{ 313) 858-0247
,ROGRAM n•RE,
O BASIC GRANT cAR.,
COMPONENT sTaTus
O NEW M CONTINUED 0 TERMINATED
Time on no represented 10-1-87 9-30-88
1 Number of days of in-home care
(caseloa
Number of Units {1 Unit = dava
4500
4500 ! $152,273
Total Component Cost
P fa:QC:IT:ED
• NuMeEP,
PROJECTED
COST
From From Tm
Ntsmceii oi youth served 1200 $152,273
IO,
RCTIJAL
CODT
9. .ACTUAL
Falt.tEER
Michigan Department of Social Services
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Basic Grant/In-Home-Care Service component.
PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check at that apply.
TARGET 0001-1,-,TION,S1 SERVED
ChuOreo Unoer J.1.15,1C,196 01 C.1111
DELINOUENT 0 NEGLECT
C.71.i5ren NOT under MArmzucaon NI Court
WRITTEN COMPLAINT 0 SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. f0551
,RE_AISI 011 0155050 515005
A REDUCTION IN:
Number of Youth Petitioned
E Number of Adjudications
• Number of Days of Family Foster Care
E Number of Days of Out-Of-Home Detention
Children likely to some Linder jurisdiction of the coon (Basic Grant Crit,,
IS/ Number of Days of Shelter Care
El Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
Number of State Wards Committed(Act 150 &220)
E Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
E Enct early return from foster or institutional care
ii. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
a New Component — Complete Columns 7 & 8 Only
• Terminated Component — Complete Columns 7,6,9 F.,10
o Con tinuing Component (with or without change) — Complete Columns 7, 8,8 S., 10
AUTHOR:1-f PA. ET ol 1978.
COMPLETION: ii em.:med.
CONSZOIJENC-E FOR NONCOMPLETION: Chad tare funds will .ol Ce reientarsed.
r2.:_,•.4.1-7t 13.811
The Deparfrnent Of 500101 Servines will Oct discriminate a gainst any individual ,
group because of fact, sex, reegion, age, national origin, color, mariL9.1 stato
handicap, or politica! celiels.
— SEE OVER
CampoPens Title
Status Offender Program — Component A
Tone P mod Covere6
10/1/86. 9/30/87
AtMunnsuattva Unit
M COURT DSS
CornimnentUans6nr.Narrte
McFarland/Sharp
T64666,366 Nurn6.6r
{ 313 ) 858-0247
. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION; Check all that apply.
PROJECTED PROJECTED i 7. a. 0.
NUMPER , COST 1
L . ACTUA
NLIMEEP. ,—
I From:
6/1/86
To:
9/30/87
Frurn:
10/1/86
1200 1167 8145,096
AC 7L/AL
COST
To:
5/31/87
$145, 096
6
A. Time period represented
:F. Number of youth served
Number ct days of in-home care
Case ice 0. Numb of Units {1 Unit Davs
4500 . - . 4376
$145 p096 $145,096 437
5. Total Cornponert Cost $145,096
Average Cost Per Day
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Basic Grant/In-Home-Care Service component.
P60000I.5 ICYP6
O BASIC GRANT
2. COMPONENT STATUS
O NEW
3 rAnGET POPULATIONTSI SF.T.dED
• It4,, HOME CARE
[X CONTINUED 0 TERMINATED
Ac.c.mourser,huisthcaenorCoen
DELINQUENT 0 NEGLECT
• WRITTEN COMPLAINT SUBSTANTIATED C.R.S. 10551 0 Children likely to come unctar jurianiCtiOn of the court (Basic Grant Only)
a ,e,heAtSt .0V INTENDED IMPACT
A REDUCTION IN:
• Number of Youth Petitioned
M Number of Adjudications
• Number of Days of Family Foster Care
1.2 Number of Days of Out-Of-Horne Detention
SERVICE F-OCUS
M Number of Days of She) tar Care
• Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
O Number of State Wards Commited(Act 180 &VC)
Cg Provide eariy intervention to treat within the child's home
Effect early return from foster or institutional care
If. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
o New Component — Complete Columns? & 8 Only
o Terminated Component — Complete Columns 7, 8,9 8.10
O (;ontinving Component (with or without change) — Complete Columns 7. 8,9 & 10
AUTHOPIIY: PA At or 1570. The Department of Soclat Servicet will Oct discriminate against any individual
COP6A1,-L::710.F.:: is re5111200. 9rakap because o€ race. sex. religion, age, national oriqin, color. marital van
CONSEQUENCE, FOR NONCOMMLF:TIOft Child c?Ie Imrld6 will noi be reirrourzed, handIC-310,ITa' geiiele,
2253.4,7', S'S.! — SEE OVER —
REDucTioNS AREAS OF IMPACT I vi. Numboes or Days 12. Costa
A, Youth Petitioned I 156 cases
B. Adjudications 209 cases $225,720
a Days of Family Foster Care
0, Days of Out-of-Rome Detention
5. Days of Shelter Care 1750 $201,827.5
Oays at Residential Treatment Care 5833 $535,748
C. Stale Wards Committed
iv. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Address the following items which apply in short narrative paragraphs.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
13. Problem statement — What caused the need for this request and what were the determining factors leading to the request
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
14. Explain items 4 & 5 from the reverse side as you deem necessary.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT;
15. Describe how the project will be administered, the services lobe provided and by whom. Include the relationship between the court z:•
DOS. and the Contractor if services are purchased.
c-sR REVISED, CONTINUED OR TERMINATED COMPONENT::
Evaivation — Assess strengths, weakness and problem areas of this component Assess. the intended impact areas and results.
SEE ATTACHMENT
FOR REVISED COMPONENT:
I&L Changes — Describe changes that are planned in existing programs for the coming year, i.e. target population, type of service, metho,
delivery number of staff, increase or decrease in costs, etc.
15• 67) ifiacr.1 Liss AnorrIONAL SHEETS AS NEEC
STATUS OFFENDER/IN-HOME DETENTION
Accompanying Notes
Section II A. Columns 9 and 10
Because of the timing necessary to submit In-Home-Care Program
component request/report (DSS 4471), the twelve-month period used
to provide statistical data regarding actual number and actual
cost and the resultant savings, will be 6-1-86 through 5-31-87.
Section II C. and D.
Because of the varied approaches used, the work unit (II D.) is
defined as caseload days. For instance / families served through
telephone intervention and referrals in the statistical year
numbered 600. At an average of 45 minutes per intervention,
including logging and follow-up, each contact would be equal to
.1 (1/10) of a caseload day.
Similarly, each Crisis Intervention would average 4 hours or .5
caseload day.
Authorized Status Offenses would average 14 days from filing to
initial hearing.
Cases held under advisement average 30 days.
Cases placed on In-Home Detention average, 42 days from prelim
through disposition.
Based on these averages, we calculate both the number of In-Home-
Care days and the number of units as follows:
600 Telephone interventions x .1 =
316 Crisis Interventions x .5 =
72 Authorized Cases x 14 =
70 Under Advisement Cases x 30 =
25 Successful In-Home Detention Cases x 42.
Total Units
60 units
158 units
1008 units
2100 Units
1050 Units
4376 Units
This calculation, althoughh reflecting of the variety of services
offered, does not include the education, public relations or
liason with agencies that this unit performs.
Section II D. E. F Column 10
For actual cost we are using the approved bnudget for the 10-1-86
through 9-30-87 year. Although slightly different than the costs
incurred for the time period of 6-1-86 through 5-31-87 (the time
period used to collect case data), we felt that the impact on
computations would be minimal.
Page Two
Areas of Impact
A. We would anticipate that 5% of telephone interventions and
40% of crisis interventions would have been petitioned
without S.O.P. intervention.
600 x .05 - 30 316 x .40 = 126 126 x 30 = 156
B. In addition to the above number, 75% of our Under Advisement
cases would have been adjudicated.
156 (70 x 75%) = 209
The Court figures the minimum case cost for processing from
authorization through disposition as $1080.
209 x $1080 $225,720
E. Just based on those cases actually authorized, S.O.P.
intervention and supervised placement within the parental,
relative, or custodial home as an alternative to shelter
oasre has saved 700 "Institution" days. This incorporates
the time frame from prelim through disposition.
If we attempted to "guess" how many of the diverted youngsters
might have been detained, the day and cost savings would be both
subject to question and astronomical. To be sure, the further a
home truant penetrates the system, the more likely out-of-home
care will be used,
With In-Home Detention we use the following suppositions.
1. 12 days represents the average from first prelim to initial
hearing.
2. 30 days represents the average from initial hearing through
disposition.
Youngsters detained at preliminary hearing remain in
detention at least until dispositon.
Based on an 85% success ratio for In-Home Detention youngsters,
this program has saved 1050 child care days.
25 youngsters x 42 day average = 1050 days
105G days (In-Home Detention) x 700 days (S.O.P) x
$115.33/day - $201,827.50
Page Three
F. To calculate days of residential treatment days saved we
suppose the following:
1. Conservatively, 50% of those status offenders remaining in
care until dispositon, would have been placed outside the
home as a disposition. 40 youngsters were returned to
alternative placement prior to dispositon. 10% would
eventually return to placement. Per past practices, 1/2 of
the youngsters would have been placed in Children's Village,
1/2 in private placements.
By these figures
9 youngsters would have been placed in C.V. (6 months) at an
average coat of $21,070. = $189,630
9 youngsters would have been placed privately (12 months) at
an average cost of $26,752 = $240,768.
2. Conservatively, 20% of non-status offenders in detention
until dispositon, are placed in a Children's Village program
as disposition:
25 successful I.H.D. youngsters x 20% x $21,070 = $105,350.
16. EVALUATION:
S.O.P. has been successful in diverting truancy cases from the
Juvenile Justice system and minimizing out-of-home care for those
cases which must be authorized. We are planning a research
component for the July 1 through December 31 period to more
closely assess the characteristics of those client families whose
youngsters remain in shelter care and out-of-home placements. We
hope to devise an intervention strategy to further impact this
group.
Time Penal Cav,-teo I AOmnisr.tove unit
r.,,010-1-86 9-30-87 El COURT 0oss
TeWtono,f Numbef
(313 ) 858-0247
S. . ACT
2.
UAL
NUMBER
S.
PROJECTED
COST
AC
=ST
PROJE:TED
NUMBER
A. Time perod represented
U. Number of youth served
Prom
6-1-86
62
5-31-67
228,668
To
9-30-87 10-1-86
72 228,668
11,284 D. Number of Units (1 Unit = 12,500
U. Total Component Cost
F. Average Cost Per Day
228,668
228,668
$20.84
228,668
228,668
$18.74
Michigan Department of Social Services
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Bask Grant/In-Home-Care Service component.
f.on,nf
Component " B"
: :r.th' Offender Project (was Repeat Offender
.Project mdFarland/Sharp
PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check an that apply.
PROGRAM TYPE
O BASIC GRANT
co.pci,..NT STATUS
• NEW
I. 'fARGPT POPLRATICWSISERVED
KI IN-HOME CARE
• CONTINUED " 0 TERMINATED
A CAJloroo Unoer JonselcUort of Court
DELINOUENT
6. C n-r.orer-i NOT unocy .A.0.1.Co0r. 01 corm:
O WRITTEN COMPLAINT
• NEGLECT
O SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S.(DSS) O Children likely 10 COrhe tinder lurisdictron ol the court (Basic Grant Only)
• 00EA1510 0 INTENGEO IMPACT
A REDUCTION 114:
O Number of Youth Petitioned
0 Number of Adjudications
O Number of Days of Family Faster Care
• Number of Days of Out-Of-Home Detention
I. SERVICE FOCuS
• Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
O Effect early return train foster or institutional care
O Number of Days of Shelter Care •
J Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
El Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
4., New Component — Complete Columns 7 & 8 Only
.f Terminated Component — Complete Columns 7, 8,9 & 10
• Ccitirwing Component (with or without change) — Complete Columns 7,8,9 & 10
C. Number Of days a€ in-horne care 12,200 10,970
AuTHORITY PA 117 o! 197S.
COMPLSTTOII is reouilect.
CONS:EC UE NCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will not be reimbursed.
31.40)1 5013
The Department of Social Services will not tlisvirniriate againsi any individual
group because of face. sex, religion. age, national oricrn, color, marital stak.
handicap, or pciftical beliefs>.
— SEE OVER —
11. Number's. or ys 12, Cancre
: A. Youth Petitioned
Adjudications 45 , $ 48,600
C. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention 1009 days $116,367_97
E. Days of Shelter Care
_
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 6017 days $526,042
._
G. State Wards Committed
IV, PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Address the following items which apply in short narrative paragraphs.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
I 13. Problem statement — What caused the need for this request and what were the determining factors leading to the request
; FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
I 14, Explain items 4 & 5 from the reverse side as you deem necessary.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
15, Describe how the project will be administered, the services lo be provided and by whom. Include the relationship between the courtan.
DSS. and the Contractor if services are purchased.
- FOR RE.Vi -SED, CONTINUED OR TERMINATED COMPONENT::
I 16. EYBIULlii0t1 — Assess strengths, weakness' and problem areas of this component Assess the intended impact areas and results.
SEE ATTACHMENT
FOR REVISED COMPONENT:
18, Changes — Describe changes that are planned in existing programs for the coming year, i.e. target population, type of service, method c
delivery number of staff, increase or decrease in costs, etc.
ts-81-1!..c.k) USE ACCATIONAL 04551"3 4.3 t:EEIDEi
EARLY OFFENDER PROJECT - Accompanying Notes
Section II A. Columns 9-10
Because of the timing necessary to submit DSS 4471, the
twelve-month period used to provide statistical data regarding
actual number, actual cost, and the resultant savings will be
6-1-86 through 5-21-87.
Section II C. and D.
The work unit (D) will be defined as caseload days and will be
the aggregate of the number of cases times the number of days in
the project within the reporting period. In-Home care days (C)
will be somewhat fewer because those days certain youngsters
spent in Children's Village - either as a short-term intervention
strategy or as a condition at the time of transfer.
Areas of Impact
B. Adjudications - Research indicates that 87% of this group
would have recidivated withn 12 months. Therefore, we would
anticipate 54 new adjudications within the research year.
We experienced only 9. The reduction of (45) fewer
adjudications times the minimum processing cost of $1050
from authorization through disposition gives a cost savings
of $48,600.
D. Per past practice, 29% of our clients would have been placed
in county or private placements as an initial disposition.
Half of these would have been detained at a preliminary
hearing. From the anticipated new adjudications, a
significant number, perhaps 50%, would have been detained.
Using 42 days as the average length of time from prelim to
disposition, the projected number of days saved is 1322.
From this, we subtract the 314 days actually used by the
project. Total savings = 1009 days x $115.23 per day =
$116,368.
F. We know that, according to past practice, 74% of these
youngsters would have been placed in county or private
placement as a disposition during their court "career."
Since we won't be able to fully track these youngsters until
they turn 17, we can only make our best estimate. We feel
that our intervention has successfully maintained 22
youngsters in their community who would have been placed
outside the home were it not for our existence. We feel
that 11 would have been placed in Children's Village for an
average of 6 months - 11 would have been placed in private
institutions.
Page Two
Section IV 16- Evaluation
We continue to be impressed by the reduction in new adjudications
and the unit's ability to maintain high risk youngsters in their
homes. We continue to try creative new approaches. We have
devised a summer calendar of activities similar to a day camp
approach and are developing a "pre-school" concept for mid-August
attempting to get the school year off on a positive note.
Although having the expected annual turnover, the caliber and
productivity of the intern/monitors remains extremely high.
We are currently working on a 2-year evaluation of project
impact.
IN-HOME CARE
9.
• ACTUAL
NUMBER
ACTUAL COST
a. PACJECTE0
ws.t.
PROJECTED
N1.1/..n PEA
To: Proms
Time DeLtild represented
Tp,
I 9-30 -88
Bram:
10 -1-87
of -: 72 ! 82331189
.„ Michigan Department of Social Services .
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Basic Grant/In-Home-Care Service component.
Early Offender Project
T.i.asT Repeat Offender Project) Component II
M000001133-lne
'cParland/Sharp
Tune Percod Coverca ....,1141nMbVare Cell.
10-1-87 9-30-88 Fwnm To: COT COunT 0 CSS
Tmephone Number
( 313 ) 858-0247
PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply,
^'ROL.-FtAtA TYPE
El BASIC GRANT
COMPO,,,ENT ST.TUS
Li NEW
TAPGET ROPULATiCNiSISERVED
A Cnklafen Unaer.,,,,rucLlan 01Cour1
"1.0 DELINQUENT
El CONTINUED El TERMINATED •
E1 NEGLECT
D WRiTTEN COMPLAINT 0 SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. lOSS)
,RE0IS1 OR INTENDED IMPACT
A REDUCTION IN:
0 Number of Youth Petitioned
El Number of Adjudications
El Number of Days of Family Foster Care
El Number of Days of Out-Of-Home Detention
SERVICE r'CCUS
El Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
El Effect early return from foster or institutional care
El Children likely lIT COrne under jurisdiction ot the court (Basic Grant Only}
o Number of Days of Shelter Care
Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
Number of State Wards Committed(Act 15082201
SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
c New Component — Complete Columns 7 & 5 Only
c Terminated Component — Complete Columns 7,8,98.10
c Continuing Component with or withcui change) — Complete Columns 7,8,9 ET, 10
O. NUM Der ot days of in-home care
D. Number of Units (1 Unit r
E. Total Component Cost
12,200
) 12,500 $233,189
$233,169
Average Cost Per Day 919.11
AUTHORITY P507 cl IS78.
COMPLETION: is rechnrect.
C ON SECUE NCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care hinds will not be reimbursed.
:0-0171 15-571
The Department of Social Services will not discriminate a getnst any individual c
group because of race, sex. relics/on, age, national origin, color, marital stat,
handicao. or political hieliele.
— SEE OVER —
U. Hun';bet's or Dayz ' 12. COttt _ .... _ . A. Youth Petitioned
j D. Adjudications
1 C. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Horne Detention
I
l E Days of Shelter Care I
j F. Days of Residential Treatment Care
j G. State Wards Committed I
IV. PROG RAM DESCRIPTION: Address the following items which apply in short narrative paragraphs.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
13. Problem statement — What caused the need for this request and what were the determining factors leading to the request. .
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
1 14, Explain items 4 & 5 from the reverse side as you deem necessary.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
15. Describe how the proeot will be administered, the services to be provided and by whom. include the relationship between the court an
DSS, and the Contractor if services are purchased.
I FOR REVISED, CONTINUED OR TERMINATED COMPONENT::
tft. Ev2iusCon — Assess strengths, weakness' and problem areas of this component_ Assess the intended impact areas and results.
FOR REviSED COMPONENT:
18.. Changes — Describe chances that are planned in existing programs for the coming year, i.e. target population, type of service, method
delivery number of staff, increase or decrease in costs, etc.
USE ACICITI(NAL SMETS AS NUDE'
,,,,eat nue
:-Contract - Judson Center In-Horne Family Treatm
ames M. McFarland
Tune Pen.. Covered
l0/l/8E 0. 9/30/87
Adnurquu-A bye Une
Z) COURT 0 Das
enene Number
( 313 ) 858-0247
6. 7
PROJECTED
NLOAGF.R.
ACTUAL
COST
PROJECTED
COST
- ACTUAL
NUA7SER
A. Time period represented
NumOrCr of ,,,Quth served
.1 Number M days of in-home care
10/1/86
32
2229
Project 8ega0o,
9/30/87 t 2/1/87
522f71 c) * 8* $7E3,000
318 *
Michigan Department of Social Services 1 , .. ,
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Basic Grant/In-Home-Care Service component.
PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check at that apply.
PROCRAAA TYPE
O BASlC GRANT
comPoNeRT STATUS
O NEW
. TARGET ROPUTATIONrSISERvED
Cuuc-ren limner Junu.Sectunn CI Court
DELINQUENT
O WRIT-TEN COMPLAINT
PE IN-HOME CARE
EI CONTINUED 0 TERMINATED
N NEGLECT
O SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. (0551 0 Children fikeiy to come under fUIISeICIIOO of Zhe court (Basic Grant Orly
.AlIAS CA 1OT8NDED- IMPACT
A REDUCTION IN:
O Number at Youth Petitioned
O Number of Adjudications
Li Number of Days of Family Foster Care
O Number of Days of Out-OH-fame Detention
:.SERL.LCEROCL/S
O Number of Days of Shelter Care
[RI Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
• Number of State Wards Committeci(Act 150 & 220)
E. Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
trgl Effect early return from foster or institutional care
H. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• New Component — Complete Columns 7 & 8 Only
• Terminated Component — Complete Columns 7, 8, 9 & 10
• Conzinuing Component (with or without change) — Complete Columns 7, 8, 9 & 10
Number of LInits 13 Unit
6. Total Component Cost
Average Cost Per Day
$78 000
$34.99
$58,570
$43.00 **
AUTHORITY PA 81 of 1978,
COMPLETION: Is required.
CONSEOUENCE NOR NONCOMPLEMN: Cord care funds wI not be ,eirnturseci.
The Oesenmens of Soclai Services vrih not discriminate against any individeat oi
mous, because Cl race, sex. religion, age, national origin. =for. rnai ,i,Al 5151u 1
handicap, Sr political beliefs.
rosy • *as of 6/9/87 — SEE OVER —
',*Included costs to permit Judson to hire and start project
even though less kids were immediately available. Should
be cheaper per child in 1988
. H.11C....] .,,r ..,-.1 - 1. Numb or Days-1 — t2 costs ._
f‘. Youth Petitioned
R. Adjudications
C. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention
E. Days of Shelter Care 2009 $173,070
F. Days at Residential Treatment Care
G. State Wards Committed
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Address the following items which apply in short narrative paragraphs.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
73. Problem statement — What caused the need for this request and what were the determining factors leading to the request
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
14. Explain items 4 & Strom the reverse side as you deem necessary.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
15. Describe how the project will be administered, the services to be provided and by whom. Include the relationship between the court ar
DSS, and the Contractor if services are purchased.
FOR REVISED, CONTINUED OR TERMINATED COMPONENT::
IC Evaluation — Assess strengths, weakness and problem areas of this component Assess the intended impact areas and results.
SEE ATTACHMENT
FOR REVISED COMPONENT:
S.. Changes —Describe changes that are planned in existing programs for the coming year, i.e. target population, type of service, method
delivery number of staff, increase or decrease in costs, etc.
uu7r leacx) USE ADCMONAL SHEETS AS NEED:
16. Case A.
P.S. involvement for 11 years.
Kids no longer running the home.
They are less physically aggressive at school and among themselves.
The house is Cleaner.
Threetherapists split family and coordinated approaches.
Provided such more intensive service than court caseworker could
provide.
CaseB.
Parents become less hostile and more accepting of treatment.
Parents' relationship is better.
Child no longer lying and stealing.
Dismissal to be requested 6/11/87.
Court caseworker and agency staff wondered in beginning whether
child could ever go home.
Case C.
Mother understands child's needs better, spends more time with
child and is more appropriate in her relationship, she balances
time among the children better, uses Step Teen methods now.
Better family communications.
Child is opening up and the relationship with family members is
better
Zompontnt Tate
C—Contract —Judson Center In-Nome Family Treatm
Component kiAnner Npme
James M. McFarland
Time ffenod Covered
Rt.-. 10/1/87r. 9/30/88
Aommistrabve Untl
El COURT 0 CSS
Tesephorta Numnor
( 313 ) 858-0247
PROGRAM TYPE
BASIC GFIANT
ECOAPIRiENT STATUS
O NEW
NI IN-HOME CARE
at CONTINUED TERMINATEE)
PROJECTED . ACTUAL
COST NUMBER
TO_ ACTUAL
COST
fi 7.
PROJECT£0
Ntnuak
To:
32 P . Number of youth served $82,200
2229
$82,200
$36.88
Toia.I.Comoonent Cost
i F. Average Cost Per Day
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Basic Grant/In-Home-Care Service component.
PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
3 TARGET ROPULAMNIS)SERVED
Chr,Pren Under J.H5dnCItOS, of COUrt
O CELINCLJENT • NEGLECT
CAvorois NOT LionPerJur,pdoPon 01 Court
O WAirrtN COMPLAINT
AREALE3 ?NTENCEi., IMPACT
A REDUCTION IN:
O Number of youth Petitioned
O Number of Adjudications
O Number of Days of Family Foster Care
El Number of Days of Out-Of-Home Detention
5. SERvtCE FOCUS
• Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
• Effect earty return from foster or institutional care
O Number of Days of Shelter Care
Ei Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
• Number of State Wards Committed(Act 150 & 220)
O SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. (DSS) 0 Children likety 10 cOrne under jurisdiction of the court (Basic Gram' Only)
SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• New Component — Complete Columns 7 & 8 Only
• Terminated Component — Complete Columns 7, 8.9 & 10
• Continuing Component with or without change) — Complete Columns 7, 8,9 & 10
A. Time period represented
From: 10/1/87 To 9/30/88
C. Num tier- of days of in-home care
.0. Number of Units p Unit =
AUTHORITY PACT of 1978.
COMPLEITION: re required,
CONSBOUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Ched care lunds will nol be reimbursed.
555.5011 ,n.an
The Depanment 01 Social Services will not discriminate agairet any Incividual f
group because of race, sex, re-Egret% age„ national Origin. Corer, marital stalt
handicap, or poritcal beliefs.
—SEE OVER —
IN-HOME CARE
• 0 TERMINATED
pitoGRAm TYPE
F.] BASIC GRANT
COmOONENT STATUS
• NEW • cowriNuED
7. a. OfIOJECTED I AFCL;ECTED
hiLimaER COST
—
Fmm I To,
10-1 -8 7 9-30-88
10,
ACTUAL
COST
S.
ACTUAL
NUMBER
rOM
period represented
7. Total Component Cost
37,106
$37,106
":-.,60(7) D. Number of Units (1 Unit
E Average Cost Per Day $10.31
wucntgari „ervIces
One of these forms must be completed for EACH Basic Grant/in-Home-Care Service component.
From:1 0-1-87 Tit: 9-30-88
i TicrlaPm0G.W.red MMAistrotproUnd
10 -,4 -87 9 -30 -88 From: Tit: gi COtsIT
Intensive Counseling (Component "D")
:,,mo.nent Manager Name
McFarland/ Sharp
PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply,
COtsIT 0 05.5
iledepfloneNumber
( 313) 858-0247
; TASIGET POPULkTIONtSISZRVEL)
PCT,W,,,UPOcr-JurronolC...1
• DELINOUENT O NEGLECT
O WRITIEN COMPLAINT
AREA,S1 75 INTENLJEC. a/PACT
A REDUCTION IN:
O Number of Youth Petitioned
Ei Number of Adjudications
• Number of Days of Family Foster Care
X Number of Days of Out-Of-Home Detention
!:_5ERVECF, FOCUS
O Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
O Effect early return from foster or institulional care
SUBSTANTIATED C.P.5.1055I Li Cniidren tikely to borne under jurisdiction of the coon tP.osic Grant Onfyj
EI Number of Days of Sheller Care
5.0 Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
O Number of State Wards Committed(Act 150 & 220)
SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION:
IN
e New Component — Complete Columns 7 8. 8 Only
• Terminated Component — Complete Columns 7, 8, 9 & 10
• Continuing Component (with or without change) — Complete Columns 7, 8, 9 & 10
a Number of youth served
C. NUM Del of days of in-home care
20 I 37,106
3,500
AUTtiOPiTY. EA ST 011575.
renoireb.
.:.ONSEOLIENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Childcare funds will not be teinicursed.
15.d.71
The Deoanment of Social Services will not discriminate againsi arty individuai
group because al race. sex, religion, age, national origin. Color, marital ;tat,
handicap. ar politicol buffets.
— SEE OVER —
All4P. Ur Mir/AL.!
—IT Nurniier's or Daye'J 12-, costs -
A. Youth Petitioned
B. Adjudications
C. Days of Family Foster Care
0. Days of Out-of -.Home Detention
E. Days of Shelter Care
_
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care
G. State Wards Committed
P ROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Address the following items which apply in short narrative paragraphs.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
13. Problem statement — What caused the need for this request and what were the determining factors leading to the request
SEE ATTACHMENT
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
la. Explain items 4 & 5 from the reverse side as you deem necessary.
SEE ATTACHMENT
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
15. Describe how the project will be administered, the services to be provided and by whom. Include the relationship between the court al
DSS, and the Contractor if services are purchased.
SEE ATTACHMENT
FOR REVISED, CONTINUED OR TERMINATED COMPONENT::
6. Evaluation — Assess strengths, weakness' and problem areas of this component Assess the intended impact areas and results.
FOR REVISED COMPONENT:
15 Changes — Describe changes that are planned in existing programs for the corning year, i.e. target population, type of set-Ace, method
delivery number of stall, increase or decrease in costs. etc.
15-d 7) tascAl LISS ADDITIONAt. S.KSEIS AS NEED
INTENSIVE COUNSELING - COMPONENT "D"
DSS 4471 Accompanying Notes
Section II B. - Number of Youth Served
We anticipate a caseload of 10-14 youngsters at the funding start
date of 10-1-87. With an average case duration of 10-12 months
for those cases successfully maintained within the unit, we
expect to work with 20 youngsters within the funding year.
C. and D.
We will define a unit as a caseload day with the projected number
being the aggregate of the number of cases times the number of
days in the project within the reporting period. For purposes of
_projection, we will use an average of 180 days per youngster
during the reporting period.
20 x 180 = 3600
Number of days of In-Borne care will be slightly lower in
anticipation of short-term use of Children's Village as a
consequence for certain youngsters.
Section IV
13. Problem Statement
Our Court feels that we can predict risk of recidivism for
our clientele. Those youngsters served by the Early
Offender Project represent the highest risk group. The next
highest risk group - male, non-status delinquent,
adjudicated at 14 years of age with prior police contact -
according to past practices, are at 66% to 85% chance of
recidivism. Success achieved by the Early Offender Project
using a contact intense, front loaded intervention strategy
leads us to want to replicate this effort with the 14 year
olds.
We had hoped that we could try this approach using existing
staff, but workload has not permitted this. • This program
with its intensive caseworker was run as a pilot funded by
the Skillman Foundation in 1987 to test the efficacy of this
approach. This effort is in line with the overall Court
philosophy of matching services to client needs based on
risk of repeat offenders.
14- It is our intent to reduce new adjudications by one-third.
(75% risk of recidivism to 50%). If successful, we will
also reduce number of days in detention and in residential
treatment care by roughly one-third.
Page Two
3. That youngster who violates probation for whom an
immediate CV placement is not seen as necessary.
4. That youngster for whom the court is unsure of a need
for CV placement. The temporary release can be
considered added diagnostic time.
5. That youngster, perhaps the school truant, whom the
court feels could benefit from the structure available
through this approach.
6. That youngster temporarily detained at the Intake level
who presents an appropriately low risk in the community
pending adjudication and disposition (the current
in-home detention model).
7. That neglect or abuse youngster for whom intensive
monitoring offers an extra measure of control over the
parents.
15. Two intern monitors will be assigned to each court casework
area with a Child Welfare Worker Supervisor overseeinc their
work, assigning, coordinating, assisting, etc.
The interns will be Oakland Univeristy students. The court
will contract with the University who will pay them.
Our best estimate is that an average of 160 to 180
youngsters have met these basic criteria in each of the last
three years. It is also expected that the existence of this
program would likely increase recommendations and orders for
the temporary release in this category by 75%. Therefore,
we feel that some 300 youngsters would eventually utilise
this approach in a given year. Based an eight intern
monitors and an average case duration of eight weeks,
interns would carry a caseload of five or six youngsters at
any given time.
IMPACTS ANTICIPATED
The approval and implementation of this project will have
the following impacts on general court operations:
The court will have at its disposal another valid
dispositional alternative.
2. The project singles out a particular client group that
diagnostically and behaviorally warrants a higher level
of services than currently is offered.
3- The program offers a specific intervention strategy for
a designated population - an effort that is a
continuation of prior projects.
1.
Page Three
4. The project designs an array of alternatives short of
long-term commitment to a child care facility. That
matches the court's singular stance of maintaining as
many youngsters as possible in the community while
keeping that community safe from risk.
5. Those youngsters succeeding under the rigorous
temporary release monitoring are likely to represent a
significant savings in child care days.
6. Some youngsters currently placed on probation will be
placed on this program. The intensity of services will
likely keep some youngsters from violating probation
and being removed from home.
Those youngsters not succeeding and eventually placed
out of the home, are more likely to buy into placement
having a detailed rationale for their failure to
lmaintain themselves in the communitiy.
8. Anecdotal records kept by the monitors add to our data
base for making future hypotheses and program designs.
9. Casework unit will be better able to concentrate on
planning and professional intervention with the
assistance of the monitoring staff. Generally, it will
allow caseworkers to be more pro-active.
10. The court will maintain a greater visibility in the
community and will have a much greater capacitiy to act
on its own orders within this category of disposition.
11. The program will serve as a potentially valuable,
public relations tool. It is felt that police,
schools, county and local governments and the public in
general will perceive this program as useful and
innovative-
In 1987 the Skillman Foundation funded 2 intern monitors on a pilot
basis to assist with In-Home Detention as an alternative to
Out-of-Home Placement. Results of that effort are as follows:
A. With In-Home Detention we use the following suppositions:
1. 12 days represent the average from first prelim to
initial hearing.
2. 30 days represent the average from initial hearing
through disposition.
3. Youngsters detained at preliminary hearing remain in
detention at least until disposition.
Based on an 85% success ratio for In-Home Detention youngsters, this
program has saved 1050 child care days.
25 youngsters x 42 day average = 1050 days
1050 days (In-Home Detention) I- 700 days (S.O.P.) x $115.33/day =
$201,827.50.
This component is an expansion on the services of the In-Home •
Detention and the Early Offender monitoring approach.
13. PROBLEM STATEMENT
The key to effective implementation of the temporary release
is "frontloading" of services and high visibility. Although
casework is not and never has been an 8:30 to 5:00 job, we
are not currently capable of providing the early morning,
late evening, and weekend monitoring critical to these
higher intensity, higher risk youngsters. We are too
reliant on others to provide us information. That
information, if received, is often unreliable or too late to
be used effectively. Once a youngster or family senses the
court's relative inabilitiy to enforce the temporary release
contract, the entire concept loses validity. The longer the
situation continues, the less likely the temporary release
will be revoked for other than a new offense.
14. PROPOSAL
We propose to augment casework staff with two 20-hour-a-week
paid professional intern monitors for each of the four
casework areas. Fifteen months of experience in the Repeat
Offender Project has demonstrated the value of the paid
paraprofessional intern monitor. Working 20 hours a week
with minimal training, ongoing supervision and consultation
and good anecdotal record keeping permits interns to quickly
adapt to the monitoring demands of a small caseload, perhaps
five to seven youngsters. Strategic scheduling, utilizing
both planned and unplanned contacts immediately extends
court coverage into the early morning, evening and weekend
periods. Planned intern staffings with caseworkers and
supervisor, perhaps two hours a week, plus necessary
telephone contacts can assure that all work assignments and
case communications are accomplished.
IMPLEMENTATION - CLIENT POPULATION
All youngsters whose temporary release is viewed as a
long-term disposition are eligible for receiving monitoring
coverage. Some typical examples include:
1. An adjudicated youngster who is viewed as being at high
risk to reoidivate, the court wishes to be able to
swiftly demand consequences for future behavior.
2. That youngster that would likely benefit from
out-of-home placement but whose initial resistance and
refusal to own behavior makes immediate placement
unlikely to succeed.
......_.._ i LI. teursoca n si LI-ys ! 12. Ca s s _... ___.
' A. Youth Petitioned
B. Adjudications
C. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention
E. Days of Shelter Care
_
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care
G. State Wards Committed
IV. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Address the following items which apply in short narrative paragraphs.
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
13. Problem statement — Whet caused the need for this request and what were the determining factors leading to the request
SEE ATTACHMENT
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
14. Explain items 4 & 5 from the reverse side as you deem necessary.
SEE ATTACHMENT
FOR NEW OR REVISED COMPONENT:
15. Describe how the project-wilt be administered, the services to be provided and by whom. include the relationship between the court ar
DSS, and the Contractor if services are purchased,
ROP, REVISED, CONTINUED OR TERMINATED COMPONENT::
16. Evaluation — Assess strengths, weakness and problem areas of this component Assess the intended impact areas and results.
i FOR REVISED COMPONENT:
, 18.. Changes — Describe changes that are planned in existing programs for the coming year, i.e. target population, type of service, method
I delivery number of staff, increase or decrease in costs, etc.
355'.4_17-1 iS"...3711E,cky UBE ',DOI-TONAL SHEETS AS NEE-m
iGha.r.r mihE
Li BASIC GRANT
....i.,APONENT STATUS
L.-.) NEW
lie IN-HOME CARE
0 CONTINUED 0 TERMINATED
• Children likely to come under jurisdiction 01 the Mini-basic Grant Only)
O Number of Days of Shelter Care
Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
ED Number of State Wards Committed(Act 150 & 2201
D. io
AC.11.1AL ACTUAL
Niii•Mea COST
C. a,
PPCJECTED
COST
PF:10,1EGTFO
NIJMEA
Time period represented
From
10-1-87
To:
30 -ea From:
1 9 —
To.
Michigan Department Of bocial Services
One of these forms must be completed fur EACH Basic Grant/in-Home-Care Service component.
In —Home DetentiQn/Intensive Monitoring Component E
• --concio iacriager Name
James M. McFarland
Ame Penco Cmiarco
F,0,10-1-87.„ 9-30-88
kiimmorravveurik
El COURT El oss
Trireporkos Nornoriir
( 313 ) 858-0247
PR OGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
TAAG ET ULIISNISI SERVED
AChiiimenunom orioreourt
El DEUNOUENT 0 NEGLECT
C Croloren NOT Ocher karisot000n 01 Court
0 WRITTEN COMPLAINT 0 SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. IDSSI
• A,REAISn 00 INTENDED IMPACT
A REDUCTION IN:
El Number of Youth Petitioned
El Number of AdIudicatIons
El Number of Days of Family Foster Care
.171 Number of Days of Out-Of-hiome Detention
,LU itviCii FOCUS
2 Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
[N., Effect early return from foster or institutional care
SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION:
INSTRUCTIONS:
New Component — Complete Columns 7 & 8 Only
a Terminated Component -- Complete Columns 7, 8, 9 & 10
a Continuing Component (with or without change) — Complete Columns 7,89 & 10
0. Ni.IMIDE.Jr of youth served
C. Number of days of In-borne care
C. Number of Units (1 Unit
0. Tots Component Cost
250 to 300 $ 53,970
2920
$ 53970
= Average Cost Per Day $ 18 '48•
,kuTHop.iry pp, 87 of 7978,
COMPLETION: is reouireo.
CONSECUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Chid care lands will not be reimbursed.
—1471 ,r.5•87i
The Departmeng of Sroi.a.! Seryiceo will not decriminate against any individual- t
51000 becanSe et race. sex, reiigion, age, national origin. soder, mariLsi $10 1
handicap. Cr
— SEE OVER —
Page Two
15. This one-person unit will be loosely attached to the Early
Offender Project. The current staffing model will be
expanded to include "Intensive Counseling" youngsters. Some
intern/monitor time can be borrowed for specific cases.
Other courtwide resources, such as Youth Community Services
and the Psychological Clinic, will be utilized. Referrals
to public and private agencies will be done when
appropriate. The southeast part of the county - those
school districts served by our satellite office - will be
the quadrant served by the Pilot Project.
The Project caseworker, especially selected for her
counseling expertise and experience, will provide direct
services at least twice a week, to both youngster and
parent(s). She will maintain necessary liaison with schools
and others working with the family