HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1990.09.27 - 18349Miscellaneous Resolution # 90229 September 27, 1990
BY: Roy Rewold
Commissioner, District #16
RE: OAKLAND COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
DEPARTMENT OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Madame Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS, implementation of the Oakland County Solid Waste
Management System (System) has previously been structured to
proceed as a single integrated series of projects (a Household
Hazardous Waste collection program, Composting sites, Recycling
facilities, Landfill sites and a Waste-to-Energy facility) at such
time as all Oakland County municipalities had considered the
Intergovernmental Agreement and after all basic System contracts
and permits were in place; and
WHEREAS, delays are occurring in the process for the issuance
of the required Air Quality Permit for the System Waste-to-Energy
(WTE) facility and it will not be possible to meet the originally
envisioned System schedule which, in part, called for the
municipalities to conclude their consideration of the
Intergovernmental Agreement by November 1, 1990; and
WHEREAS, similar delays are occurring in the Air Quality
Permit process for issuance of the SOCRRA WTE permit; and
WHEREAS, the ultimate size of the proposed System WTE project
cannot be firmly established until the Air Quality Permit process
has been concluded for both the System and SOCRRA WTE projects, and
the extent of SOCRRA participation in the System known (that is, no
participation, participation limited to the System handling of
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) that cannot be processed at SOCRRA
facilities, or full participation should the SOCRRA permit be
denied); and
WHEREAS, should the implementation of the Oakland County Solid
Waste Management System be deferred until all such matters are
resolved, implementation may not commence until at least late 1991;
and
WHEREAS, such a delay would be intolerable in starting Oakland
County's municipalities on the way to meeting the aggressive Volume
Reduction Goal of 50% through source reduction, reuse, composting
and recycling by the year 2005.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Intergovernmental
Agreements are to be modified to provide that System implementation
will occur in two phases with Phase I including a household
hazardous waste collection program, composting sites, recycling
facilities and a sanitary landfill; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Phase I of the System
implementation will commence when municipalities having a combined
total MSW stream estimated to be at least 1,000 tpd of 1990 waste
have signed the Intergovernmental Agreements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Phase II of the System
implementation will include the System WTE facility and related
appurtenances at such time as municipalities having a combined
total MSW stream estimated to be at least 2,000 tpd of 1990 waste
have signed the Intergovernmental Agreements, (2,000 tpd being of
sufficient size to provide for the construction of a 1,500 tpd WTE
facility, which in the year 2005 will fully allow for achievement
of the 50% Volume Reduction Goal through source reduction, reuse,
composting and recycling); and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the System Finance Team is
herewith directed to restructure the existing Intergovernmental
Agreement providing for the System implementation phasing outlined
above and detailed below and to bring that document back to the
full Board of Commissioners (on an accelerated schedule) at their
next regularly scheduled meeting for final approval; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the target dates shown below will
be included in the revised document; and
IGA Approval, Phase I February 1, 1991
Source Separation / Flow
Control Ordinance Adoption March 1, 1991
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Solid Waste Board and its
Executive Committee will be established at the point in time when
at least 1,000 tpd is enrolled to guide and advise the System
management on implementation matters; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the initially established Solid
Waste Board will hold open two regionally selected seats on the
Executive Committee to be filled by representatives of SOCRRA
municipalities, should they choose to join the System, as outlined
below. Should SOCRRA not choose to join the System, the remaining
two regional seats on the Executive Committee will be selected by
the Solid Waste Board members on the first anniversary of the Board
formation; and
Roy Reword
Commissioner, District *16
v Arum. 1VE THE FOREGOING RESOI,LITION
Daniul 1. Mucotly,‘CturIty
ate
I HE
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an additional enrollment period
will be provided, without penalty, for Oakland County
municipalities to consider the Intergovernmental Agreement after
the SOCRRA Air Quality Permit public hearing has been concluded
with the target dates shown below; and
IGA Approval, Phase II
Source Separation / Flow
Control Ordinance Adoption
60 days after SOCRRA
Air Quality Permit Hearing
90 days after SOCRRA
Air Quality Permit Hearing
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that once the SOCRRA municipalities
have indicated their preference for System membership (none, bypass
MSW only, or full), that the System Executive Committee and the
System management will jointly recommend to the Board of
Commissioners the final sizing of the System Waste-to-Energy
facility for implementation; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that should the delays on the SOCRRA
WTE permit process become lengthy and if sufficient tonnage has
already been committed from other Oakland County municipalities
such that the System WTE project may proceed (and after an
additional, without penalty, enrollment period to be jointly
determined by the Executive Committee, System management and the
Board of Commissioners), even if at reduced tonnage from that
presently contracted for, that such facts will be reported to the
Board of Commissioners along with appropriate recommended actions;
and
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that whether or not sufficient 1990 MSW
tonnage is committed to trigger Phase II of the System as provided
in this resolution, that the Executive Committee and System
management will be responsible to continuously analyze the MSW
stream, the actual volume reductions being achieved and to
formulate recommendations on the implementation of other volume
reduction technologies in such manner and at such time as they deem
to be appropriate.
Madame Chairperson, I move the adoption of the foregoing
resolution.
, , 2005 DAILY WASTE STREAK-;H H. 2005 DAILY WASTE STREAK 1 (If 1950 generation patterns cantinuel .(With achievement of 50% V.R. Goals)
1990 2005 Source Plus 2010 Total Total Reduction Compost i 50% to Process Total Total
MSW Res. Ind. Comm. WSW i Reuse Recycling WTEM Residue WTE/LF MSW COMMUNITY
7.2
81,3 16.1 19.8 55.7
13.9 3.0 31.4
22.5
Addison Twp,
Auburn Hills
Bingham Farms
Bloomfield Hills
Bloomfield Twp.
Brandon Twp.
Clarkston
Commerce Twp.
Farmington
Farmington Hills
Franklin
Grove land
Highland Twp.
Holly Twp.
Holly Village
Independence Twp,
Reega Harbor
Lake Angelus Lake Orion
Leonard
Lyon Twp,
Milford Twp.
Milford Village
Novi City
Novi Twp, Oakland Twp.
Orchard Lake
Orion Twp.
Ortonville
Oxford Twp,
Oxford Village Rochester Rochester Hills
Rose Twp,
Sleuth Lyon
Southfield City
Southfield Twp.
Springfield Twp.
Sylvan Lake
Walled Lake
Waterford Twp.
White take Twp,
Wixom Wolverine Lake
W. Bloomfield Twp.
Basic System Total
9.2 12.5 0.5 1.3 14.3 1.4 5,7
83.1 30.5 38.0 94.2 162.7 16,3 65.1
19.9 1.7 0.8 29.6 32,1 3.2 12.8
33,2 7,2 4.6 27.7 39.5 4.0 15,8
97.1 69.6 5.4 36.5 111.5 11.1 44.6
18.5 24.2 1.6 2.0 27.9 2.8 11,2
6,7 1.5 0.0 4.4 6.0 0,6 2.4
54.6 35.9 14.8 12.1 62.7 8.3 25.1
45.5 17.7 8.3 19.0 45.0 4.5 18.0
242.9 118.3 72.4 166.7 357.3 35,7 142.9 17
5.7 3.9 0.3 2.0 6.2 0.6 2.5
8.1 12.5 0.2 0.2 12.5 1.3 5.1
39.8 13.4 5,3 7.0 55.6 5,6 22.3 2
7.3 7.3 1.1 0.7 9.0 0,9 3.6
16,0 9.1 2.9 8.0 10U 2.0 8.0 1
14.3 45,1 2.4 9.5 57,0 5.7 22.8 2
6.6 4.2 0.3 2.0 6.5 0.6 2,6
0.6 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.3
10.7 4,1 2.2 5.7 12.0 1.2 4.8
1.6 0.5 0.8 0.1 1,5 0,1 0.6
23,4 21.5 4.9 3.4 28.8 2.1 11.5 1
28.5 10.5 15.9 8,1 34.8 3.5 13.9 1
14.1 8.1 2.3 5.8 16.2 1.6 6.5
104.5 55.2 32.3 46.0 133.6 13.4 53.4 6
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0
16.9 23,9 1.4 1.6 26.9 2.7 10.8 1
3.2 3.2 0,0 0,7 3.9 0.4 1,6
64.3 42.1 22,5 14.2 78.9 1.9 31.6 3
4.4 1.9 0.0 2,2 4.2 0.4 1,7
25.5 22.1 10.1 2.8 34.9 3,5 14.0 1
10.6 4.1 3.6 1.2 11.9 1,2 4.8
44.9 13.6 8.9 19.4 41.8 4,2 16.7 2
118.6 109.1 21.5 50.5 181.5 18.1 72.6 9
8.9 13.5 0.2 0.3 14.0 1.4 5,6
18.1 11.0 1.0 10.1 22.1 2.2 8.8 1
449.5 137.1 84.9 296.4 518.4 51.8 207.4 25
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0
19.8 23.3 2.0 3.7 29.0 2.9 11.6 1
4.2 2.9 0.4 1.1 1.4 0.4 1.8
28.8 8.7 13.6 11.8 34.1 3.4 13.6 1
133.2 107.1 5.5 11.3 143.8 14.4 57.5 7
45.2 44.5 2,5 7.5 54.9 5,5 22.0 2
37.1 22,8 19.7 3.9 45.4 4.8 18.6 2
7,5 7,3 0.0 0.2 7.5 0.7 3.0
55.7 83.9 5,8 28,6 118.3 11.8 47,3 5
.6 7.7 16.0
.5 87.9 189.1
.3 17,3 36.2
.6 21.4 41.7
.5 60.2 116.3
.1 15.1 31.0
.2 3,2 5.7
.5 33.9 65.4
.8 24.3 44.8
.7 1 ,3 193.0 395.5
.1 .2 3.4 6.1
.1 .5 6.9 14.1
.8 .2 30.0 60.9
.5 .4 4.9 5.6
.0 .8 10.8 21.3
.5 .3 31.8 61.2 .2 .3 3.5 6.4
.3 ,0 0.4 0.7
,0 .5 6.5 12.4 .7 .1 0.8 1.5
.4 .2 15.5 30.6
.4 .4 18.8 36.9
.1 .6 8.8 17.0
.8 .3 72.1 143.2
.0 .0 0.0 0.0
.5 .1 14.5 30.3
.0 .2 2.1 4.2
.4 ,2 42.6 83,7
.4 .2 2.3 4.1
.5 .4 18.9 38.1
.0 u.S 6.4 12.3
.9 1.7 22.6 40.8
.7 1.3 98.3 202.5
.a 0.6 7.5 15.7
.0 1.9 11.9 23.4
.2 20.7 279.9 541.4
.0 0,0 0.0 0.0
.5 1.2 15.7 32.1
.2 3.2 2.4 4.4
.0 1.4 18.4 35.8
,9 5.8 77,7 147.4
.5 2.2 29.6 58.1
.2 1.9 25.1 49.5
.7 0.3 1.0 7.4
.2 4.1 63.9 125.9
2,058.7 1,226.1 421.0 983.6 2,630.6 263.1 1,052.3 1,315.3 105.2 1,120.5 2,821.3
Berkley 41.1 24.4 3.3 12.3 40.1 4.0 16.0 20.0 1.6 21.8 39.7
Beverly Hills 21.7 16.3 1,4 4.1 21.8 2.2 8.7 10.9 0.8 11.8 21.8
Birmingham 80.3 31.5 6.1 40.4 78.0 7.8 31.2 39,0 3.1 42.1 77.2
Clawson 36.4 18,5 3.9 9,8 32.3 3,2 12.9 16.1 1.3 17.4 30.9
Ferndale 85.4 36.5 26.0 23.3 85.8 8.6 34.3 42.9 3,1 46.3 85.9
Hazel Park 45.5 26.9 5.9 8.5 41.4 4.1 16.6 20.7 .7 22.3 40.0
Huntington Woods 12.3 9.3 0.2 1.9 11.4 1.1 4.6 5.7 0.5 6.2 11.1
Lathrup Village 14.4 7.3 1.9 5,6 14.8 1.5 5.9 7.4 0.5 8.0 14.5
Madison Heights 132.2 46.6 48.6 36.2 131.5 13.1 52.6 65.7 5.3 71.0 131.2
Oak Park 99.4 49.1 21.5 33.1 104.1 10.4 41.6 52.0 1.2 56.2 105.6
Pleasant Ridge 7.0 4,3 0.8 1.5 6.6 0.7 2.6 3.3 0.3 3.6 6.4
Royal Oak City 187.2 99.9 18.4 63.5 181.8 18.2 72.7 90.9 1.3 98.2 180.0
Royal Oak Twp. 15.8 9.5 1.8 6.4 17.7 1.8 7,1 8.8 .7 9.6 18.3
Troy 424.6 131.1 141.7 260.4 533.2 53.3 213.3 286,6 21.3 287.9 569.4
SOCRRA Totals 1,203.3 511.1 281.9 507.3 1,300.3 130.0 520.1 651.2 52.0 702.2 1,332.7
Pontiac 414.8 109.3 217.0 101.9 431.2 43.1 172,5 215.6 17.2 232,8 436.6
1,846.4 919.9 1,595.8 4,362.1 436,2 1,744.8 2,181,1 174.5 2,355.5 4,590.5 Grand Totals 3,676.8
1,421
What size should Oakland's SysteM .WTE'fa'cility be?
Depends upon which Municipalities join the System!
Amount of MSW directed to Landfills & WTE Facilities (tons/day)
Year 2005
With With Without
All of Pontiac SOCRRA WTE Pontiac
Oakland Without & With Without or
County Pontiac SOCRRA WTE Pontiac SOCRRA
Basic System 1,421 1,421 1,421 1,421
SOCRRA 702 702 249 249
Pontiac 233 0 233 0
Total 2,356 2,123 1,903 1,670 1,421
09/24/90
07:34
Amount of System MSW directed to Landfills (tons/day)
If System WTE Design Capacity
is set at.... (see Note)
3,000 tpd (2,266) (2,266) (2,266)
Amount landfilled 90 (143) * (363) *
2,500 tpd (1,889) (1,889) (1,889) (1,889) (1,889)
Amount landfilled 467 234 14 (219) * (468) *
2,000 tpd (1,511) (1,511) (1,511) (1,511) (1,511)
Amount landfilled 845 612 392 159 (90) *
1,500 tpd (1,133) (1,133) (1,133) (1,133) (1,133)
Amount landfilled 1,223 990 770 537 288
Note: Operating Capacity is equal to 85% of Design Capacity
with values additionally adjusted for waste stream Btu
content corrected for 40% composting and recycling.
* Denotes the amount of merchant wastes that would have
to be brought in from non-System municipalities to
operate WTE facility at Operating Capacity level.
Resolution # 90229 September 27, 1990
Moved by Rewold supported by Pappageorge the rules be suspended for
immediate consideration of the resolution.
AYES: Price, Rewold, Skarritt, Wolf, Aaron, Bishop, Calandro, Chester,
Crake, Ferrens, Gosling, !imntoon, Jensen, Johnson, R. Kuhn, S. Kuhn, Luxon, McConnell,
McCulloch, McPherson, Moffitt, Oaks, Olsen, Pappageorge, Pernick. (25)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion to suspend the
rules carried.
Moved by Rewold supported by Ferrens the resolution be adopted.
'Discussion followed.
Moved by Bishop supported by Johnson the resolution be amended in the
last BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph by deleting all the words after 'reduction
technologies" and insert the words "and report to the Board as to the technologies
available and their recommendations."
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried.
Vote on resolution, as amended:
AYES: Rewold, Skarritt, Wolf, Aaron, Bishop, Calandro, Chester, Crake,
Ferrens, Gosling, Huntoon, Jensen, Johnson, R. Kuhn, S. Kuhn, Luxon, McConnell,
McCulloch, McPherson, Moffitt, Oaks, Olsen, Pappageorge, Pernick, Price. (25)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor e the resolution, as amended, was
adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County
Board of Commissioners on SelytemOer 27. 1990
with the original record thereof now remaining in my o fice.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set py hand and affixed the seal of the aunty
f, of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 27th day o Le.ixtember ',00: 19 91! /
-
Lynn . Allen, County Clerk