HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2011.11.30 - 18813November 30, 2011
REPORT (misc. #11287)
BY: Human Resources Committee, John A. Scott, Chairperson
RE: Circuit Court — 2012 Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (Adult Treatment
Court) Grant Agreement
TO: Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Human Resources Committee having reviewed the aforementioned
resolution on November 9, 2011 reports with the recommendation the resolution be
adopted.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Human Resources Committee, I move the
acceptance of the foregoing Report
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE VOTE
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Bosnic, Nuccio and Greimel absent
November 30, 2011
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #11287
BY: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE ; COMMISSIONER RUNESTAD, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT - 2012 MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM (ADULT TREATMENT COURT)
GRANT AGREEMENT
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Circuit Court applied for a grant with the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), Michigan Drug
Court Grant Program with a granting period of October 1,2011 through September 30, 2012; and
WHEREAS the SCAO grant award, plus PA 511 Community Corrections contributed funds, Local Cash, and
General Fund support make up the total program funding for FY 2012; and
WHEREAS the court intends to continue the Adult Treatment Court to deal with the problems of increasing
recidivism, increasing use of alcohol and illegal drugs, rising systems costs, and the increase in jail days ordered; and
WHEREAS the Adult Treatment Court has a budget of $224,429 which includes a SCAO grant award $36,000,
PA 511 Community Corrections contributed funding of 8100,000, Local Cash Contributions of $54,177 which includes
$18,940 from the Restore Foundation, and General Fund support of $34,252; and
WHEREAS two positions are partially funded by the Adult Treatment Court Grant, which include: one (1) Special
Revenue (SR) full-time eligible (FTE) Youth and Family Casework Supervisor position (3010402-09712) and one (1) SR
FTE Technical Assistant position (3010402-10677); and
WHEREAS these positions also support the Juvenile Drug Court and the remaining of their cost is offset by Juvenile Drug
Court program funds (Child Care Fund); and
WHEREAS this program also provides funding for drug testing supplies and kits, contractual services for
individual and family treatment, and transitional housing; and
WHEREAS the grant agreement has been reviewed and approved through the County Executive's Contract
Review Process and the Board of Commissioners' Grant Acceptance Procedures,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners accepts the 2012
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (Adult Treatment Court) Grant Agreement in the amount of $36,000 from the State
Court Administrative Office (SCAO) for the period of October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012.
BE IT FURTHER RESOVED that the Board of Commissioners authorizes the Board Chairperson to sign the grant
agreement for the total program amount of $224,429, which includes the S.C.A.O. grant award of $36,000, PA 511
Community Corrections contributed funds of $100,000, Local Cash Contributions of $54,177 which includes $18,940 from
the Restore Foundation, and General Fund support of $34,252.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant is conditioned upon the continued interpretation of the
contract consistent with the February 6, 2001, letter from the Michigan Supreme Court, State Court Administrative Office,
providing that assurance #3 of that grant application shall not be construed as a mandate for future funding of the program
from the funding unit, said letter attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no expenditures are authorized until a grant agreement is fully executed with
the County's obligation limited to the grant funding period.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that continuation of the positions (3010402-09712 and 3010402-10677) associated
with this grant is contingent upon continuation of state funding, and receipt of additional funding sources.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute the
contract and that the chairperson may approve amendments and extensions up to fifteen (15%) percent variance from the
award, consistent with the original agreement as approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future
commitment.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move adoption of the foregoing resolution.
PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE
Public Services Committee Vote:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Runestad absent
John Cooperrider
From: Piir, Gala <piirg@oakgov.com>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:19 PM
To: 'Cooperrider, John': 'Davis, Pamela': 'Falardeau, Nancy'
Cc: 'Agacinski, Karen'; 'Plotkowski, Andrea'
Subject: GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF - Circuit Court - FY 2012 Michigan Drug Court Grant Program
(Adult Treatment Court) - Grant Agreement
Attachments: C06 ADULT Revised.pdf; Grant Accept sign off pkg.pdf
Please Note: The requested contract modifications have been made and are included in the attached revised agreement. This
version of the agreement should be included in all Board of Commissioner packets.
GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Circuit Court
GRANT NAME: FY 2012 Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (Adult Treatment Court)
FUNDING AGENCY: State Court Administrative Office (SCAO)
DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Pamela Davis /John Cooperrider 80247 / 80256
STATUS: Grant Acceptance
DATE: October 28, 2011
Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #01320, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant
review. Below are the returned comments.
The captioned grant materials and grant acceptance package (which should include the Board of Commissioners Liaison
Committee Resolution, the grant agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal Note, and this Sign Off email containing
grant review comments) may be requested to be place on the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for
grant acceptance by Board resolution.
DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Department of Management and Budget:
Approved;— Laurie Van Pelt (10/19/2011)
Department of Human Resources:
Approved. — Karen Jones (10/19/2011)
Risk Management and Safety:
Approved per FY2012 amended contract. —Andrea Plotkowski (10/27/2011)
Corporation Counsel:
There appear to be no unresolved legal issues that require action at this time. — Karen Agacinski (10/26/2011)
COMPLIANCE
The grant agreement references a number of specific federal and state regulations. Below is a list of the specifically
cited compliance related documents for this grant.
2011 PA 63
1
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT
STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM
2012
GRANT CONTRACT
Start Date: 10/01/2011 ,• End Date: 9/30/2012
,.;t..:M.im-..,.._::.:,,,-?:,.,,, '1 ,.,!7, , ,1'.:n.N] ii._:'
Grantee Name
6th Circuit Court , Adult
Federal ID Number
38-6004876
Grant Amount
$36,000
Effective January 1, 2005, Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL) 600.1060 et. seq. authorizes
the creation of drug treatment courts in circuit and district courts and the family division
of circuit courts in Michigan. In addition, 2011 PA 63, effective June 21, 2011, provides
funding for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (MDCGP) for 2012. Administered
by the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), the purpose of the MDCGP is to
provide funding assistance to operational drug treatment courts and drug treatment courts
in the planning stage. The grant agreement is designated as a subrecipient relationship.
Funds from the MDCGP are awarded based upon the Grantee's agreement to comply
with MCL 600.1060 et. seq., the policies and procedures set forth in the application
assurances and administrative requirements for the program, and this contract.
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 1
C. The Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws,
rules, and regulations.
D. The Grantee agrees that funds awarded under this grant will not be used to
support any inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious
instruction, or proselytization. If the Grantee refers participants to, or
provides, a nonfederally funded program or service that incorporates such
religious activities: (1) any such activities must be voluntary for program
participants, and (2) program participants may not be excluded from
participation in a program or otherwise penalized or disadvantaged for any
failure to accept a referral or services. If participation in a nonfederally
funded program or service that incorporates inherently religious activities
is deemed a critical treatment or support service for program participants,
the Grantee agrees to identify' and refer participants who object to the
inherently religious activities of such program or service to a comparable
secular alternative program or service.
6. Assignments and Subcontracts
All provisions and requirements of this contract shall apply to any subcontracts or
agreements the Grantee may enter into in furtherance of its obligations under this
contract. The Grantee shall provide copies of all subcontracts for services funded
in whole or in part by this grant to the SCAO.
7. Human Subjects
The Grantee must submit all research involving human subjects conducted in
programs sponsored by SCAO, or in programs that receive funding from or
through the State of Michigan, to the Michigan Department of Community
Health's (MDCH) Institutional Review Board (IRB) for approval prior to the
initiation of the research.
8. Confidentiality
Both SCAO and the Grantee shall assure that medical services to, and information
contained in medical records of, persons served under this contract, or other such
recorded information required to be held confidential by federal or state law, rule,
or regulation, in connection with the provision of services or other activity under
this agreement shall be privileged communication. It also shall be held
confidential, and shall not be divulged without the written consent of either the
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 3
use or disclosure of protected data and information received by the
Grantee from SCAO or any other source.
10. Independent Contractor Status
A. Both parties to this contract will be acting in an independent capacity and
not as an agent, employee, partner, joint venturer, or associate of one
another. The employees or agents of one party shall not be deemed or
construed to be the agents or employees of the other party for any purpose.
B. The Grantee understands and agrees that all persons furnishing services
pursuant to this contract are, for purposes of workers' compensation
liability or other actions of employee-related liability, not employees of
SCAO or the Michigan Supreme Court. The Grantee bears the sole
responsibility and liability for furnishing workers' compensation benefits
to any of its employees for injuries arising from or connected with services
performed pursuant to this contract.
11. Liability
All liability to third parties, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs,
or judgments arising out of activities, such as direct service delivery, to be carried
out by the Grantee in the performance of this contract shall be the responsibility
of the Grantee, and not the responsibility of the SCAO, provided that nothing
herein shall be construed as a waiver of the governmental immunity that has been
provided to the Grantee or its employees by statute or court decision.
All liability to third parties, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs,
or judgments arising out of activities to be carried out by the SCAO in the
performance of this contract shall be the responsibility of SCAO, and not the
responsibility of the Grantee, provided that nothing herein shall be construed as a
waiver of the governmental immunity that has been provided to the SCAO or its
employees by statute or court decision.
12. Debarment and Suspension
The Grantee may not contract with or make any award of the SCAO drug court
grant funds at any time to any party that has been debarred or suspended or is
otherwise excluded from, or ineligible for, participation in federal assistance
programs under Executive Order 12549, "Debaillient and Suspension."
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012
constitute a material breach of this contract upon which the SCAO may
cancel, terminate, or suspend this contract.
D. The Grantee's accounting system must maintain a separate fund or
account that segregates MDCGP contract receipts and expenditures from
other receipts and expenditures of the Grantee.
14. Accountability for Michigan Drug Court Grant Program Funds
The Grantee agrees that it will not expend funds obtained under this contract for
any purpose other than those authorized in the administrative requirements
specified in the application and revised approved budget for the Michigan Drug
Court Grant Program, and will expend grant funds only during the period covered
by this contract unless prior written approval is received from SCAO.
15. Program Review and Monitoring
The Grantee shall give SCAO and any of its authorized agents access to the drug
court at any reasonable time to evaluate, audit, inspect, observe, and monitor the
operation of the program. The inspection methods that may be used include, but
are not limited to onsite visits; interviews of staff and drug court participants; and
review of case records, receipts, monthly/quarterly statistical reports, and fiscal
records.
16. Reports
The Grantee agrees to provide reports as identified in the application assurances
and administrative requirements for the MDCGP to SCAO as follows:
A. Financial Reports: Financial quarterly reports are due by January 20,
April 20, July 20, and October 10. The financial report form template can
be located on the Specialty Courts website at
http:/courts.michigan.gov/scao/services/SpecialtyCourts/FormsReports.ht
m. Please refer to Attachment A for allowable and disallowable expenses
pertaining to your MDCGP grant.
B. Progress Reports: Progress reports are due semi-annually. The reports
are due April 30, and October 30. The progress reports will list the drug
court program's goals and objectives, detail the status of accomplishments
for each goal and objectives, discuss any changes in the program's goals
and objectives as set forth in the application for grant funding, and
describe program activities during the reporting period. The final report
Michigan Drug Court Grant Prop-am — FY 2012
17. Grant Funding Reallocation
SCAO retains the right to reallocate grant funding if ongoing progress is
not being made toward achieving the program's goals and objectives
and/or in the implementation of the drug court grant project as defined in
the approved grant request. Reimbursement for grant costs and/or future
funding may be withheld or denied if any of the required reports in this
section are received forty-five days past their due date.
18. Reimbursement
A. Reimbursement from SCAO is based on the understanding that SCAO
funds will be paid up to the total SCA° allocation as agreed to in the
approved budget.
B. The Grantee must sign up through the online vendor registration process
to receive all State of Michigan payments as Electronic Funds Transfers
(EFT) Direct Deposits. Registration infoiniation is available through the
Depaitment of Technology, Management. and Budget's website at:
http://www.cpexpress.state.rni.us .
19. Budget Modification
Adjustments in expenditures up to $1,000 within line item categories in the
approved budget and transfers up to $1,000 between line item categories in the
approved budget may be made without the prior written approval of SCA°.
Requests for adjustments in expenditures within line items and between line item
categories exceeding $1,000 must be made using a Contract Adjustment Request
form, which can be obtained from the Specialty Court website. Note, changes to
the Mental Health Services line item of the approved budget are prohibited.
20. Funding Hold or Termination
SCAO may place a funding hold on contracted amounts not yet disbursed, or
terminate this contract if it concludes that the Grantee is not in compliance with
the conditions and provisions of this contract, the application assurances, and
administrative requirements, or the budget requirements of the MDCGP. SCAO
may extend an opportunity for the Grantee to demonstrate compliance.
Notification of a funding hold or termination will be in writing.
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 9
25. Entire Agreement
This contract contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes
any prior written or oral promises and representations. No other understanding,
oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this contract exists to bind either
of the parties.
26. Amendment
This agreement may be amended only upon written agreement of the parties.
Authorized by:
State Court Administrative Office Date
Acceptance by Grantee:
Authorizing Official (Signature and Title) Date
Authorizing Official (Please Print Name and Title)
Chief Judge (Signature) Date
Chief Judge (Please Print Name)
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 11
documented with copies of Travel Vouchers/Expense Reports. All travel must
adhere to the most recent approved Michigan Supreme Court Standardized Travel
Rates for the Judicial Branch.
http ://co urts.m ic hi gan .gov/scao/resources/other/ffc. htm#trave I
E. Miscellaneous: Lobbying, honorariums, unreasonable costs, and costs not
directly related to the operations of the drug court are not allowable.
Notes:
A. If an item is NOT listed as allowable. SCAO considers it disallowed.
B. All grant costs and billings will be reviewed by SCAO to ensure that they reflect
costs generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the drug
court and reflect market prices for comparable goods or services. Additionally,
grant expenditures must be for goods and services that are or will be utilized for
the grant period or fiscal year (October 1 to September 30). Billings for goods,
and services (i.e., purchase of gift cards, bus tokens, library materials, drug testing
supplies on September 24) that could not reasonable be used up prior to
September 30 will be denied for reimbursement.
C. MADCP registration will only be reimbursed if attendance at both days of the two
day conference is verified by sign-in sheets.
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 13
FY (..ii,tfiUDGET DETAIL VVOR$SFIL E I
A. Personnel
COMPUTATION Other Grant or MDCGP Award Byrne JAG Award OHSP Award Local Cash Local In-Kind Name/Position (hours worked on project X (SCAO) (ARRA) (SCAO) Byrne JAG Award (SCAO) Funding Source TOTAL
Contributions Contributions
hourly rate) (12 in budget summary)
Jackie Howes Evanson, Supervisor $ $ 17,000 $ - $ 17,000 ..
Candace Sereno, Technical Assistant 6,000 - $ - $ 6,000
Colleen O'Brien, Circuit Judge - $ - $ $ 3,355 $ 3,355
Joan Young, Circuit Judge - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,355 $ 3,355
College intern and Office Assistant II $ $ $ $ - $ - $ 22,000 $ 22,000
Personnel Total $ 23,000 - - $ 28,710 $ 51,710
B. Fringe Benefits
ntage,%•..: _ Item 1- erdntagg: Itc.rn . ' t . - Pi.-.1-ce•nt,i,j. . .._..__ ... .... ... .-
U employer FICA 8% Vision Insurance 0% U Other 0%
Retirement 30% LI Unemployment 0% D Other 0%
Hospital Insurance 16% LI Worker's Compensation % 0 Other 0%
0 Dental Insurance 1% LI Life Insurance 0% 0 Other 0%
COMPOSITE RATE 56
MDCGP Award Byrne JAG Award OHSP Award Other Grant or Funding Contributions
Byrne JAG Award (SCAO) (ARRA) (SCAO) Sources (specify) TOTAL
SCAO Cash in-Kind
Fringe Benefit Total 3,000 $ 5,542 18, 42
, "-:'.1 75 S. . 7412 .
Total Personnel and Fringe Benefits 5 35 NO „.n
Item
Defense Attorney Fees
Supplies
Incentives
Drug Screenings
Transportation
Total Supplies/Operating
I COMPUTATION MDCGP
(Cost Per Unit X Award
Number of Units) (SCAO)
Byrne JAG
Award (SCAO)
Other Grant or
Funding Source (12
in budget summary)
Byrne JAG
Award (ARRA)
OHSP Award
(SCAO)
-1 $
Local Cash
Contributions
5
Local In-Kind
Contributions TOTAL COST
21,819
13,418
2,150
4,550
3,780
45.717
EIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII MilIMEW=LIIIIIIIMIll
EIIIIMIIIIIIIII s - MIMI $ - NOIMUNI111111111111M1111111111
$ milm $- Eill11111111 li= $ EIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIII $ - IBIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIII $
$ - s - $ - $ - 45,717
2,150
4,550
3,780
E. Travel (mileage for participant purposes and/or MADCP registration)
COMPUTATION
(Cost Per Unit X
Number of Units)
MDCGP
Award
(SCAO)
Byrne JAG
Award (SCAO) Type of Travel Expense TOTAL COST
Total Supplies/Operating
Byrne JAG
Award (ARRA)
OHSP Award
(SCAO)
Other Grant or
Funding Source (12
n budget summary)
Local Cash
Contributions
-1$ -1$
D. Supplies / Operating
Act No. 177
Public Acts of 2010
Approved by the Governor
September 30, 2010
Filed with the Secretary of State
September 30, 2010
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 30, 2010
STATE OF MICHIGAN
95TH LEGISLATURE
REGULAR SESSION OF 2010
Introduced by Senators Switaiski, Cherry and Bishop
ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 1354.
AN ACT to amend 1961 PA 236, entitled "An act to revise and consolidate the statutes relating to the organization
and jurisdiction of the courts of this state; the powers and duties of the courts, and of the judges and other officers of
the courts; the forms and attributes of civil claims and actions; the time within which civil actions and proceedings may
be brought in the courts; pleading, evidence, practice, and procedure in civil and criminal actions and proceedings in the
courts; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state governmental officers and entities; to provide remedies and
penalties for the violation of certain provisions of this act; to repeal all acts and parts of acts inconsistent with or
contravening any of the provisions of this act; and to repeal acts and parts of acts," by amending sections 1062 and 1068
(MCL 600.1062 and 600.1068), section 1062 as amended by 2006 PA 620 and section 1068 as added by 2004 PA 224.
The People of the State of Michigan enact:
Sec. 1062. (1) The circuit court in any judicial circuit or the district court in any judicial district may adopt or
institute a drug treatment court, pursuant to statute or court rules. However, if the drug treatment court will include
in its program individuals who may be eligible for discharge and dismissal of an offense, delayed sentence, or deviation
from the sentencing guidelines, the circuit or district court shall not adopt or institute the drug treatment court unless
the circuit or district court enters into a memorandum of understanding with each participating prosecuting attorney
in the circuit or district court district, a representative of the criminal defense bar, and a representative or representatives
of community treatment providers. The memorandum of understanding also may include other parties considered
necessary, such as any other prosecutor in the circuit or district court district, local law enforcement, the probation
departments in that circuit or district, the local substance abuse coordinating agency for that circuit or district, a
domestic violence service provider program that receives funding from the state domestic violence prevention and
treatment board, and community corrections agencies in that circuit or district. The memorandum of understanding
shall describe the role of each party.
(2) The family division of circuit court in any judicial circuit may adopt or institute a juvenile drug treatment court,
pursuant to statute or court rules. However, if the drug treatment court will include in its program individuals who may
be eligible for discharge or dismissal of an offense, or a delayed sentence, the family division of circuit court shall not
adopt or institute a juvenile drug treatment court unless the family division of circuit court enters into a memorandum
of understanding with each participating county prosecuting attorney in the circuit or district court district, a
representative of the criminal defense bar specializing in juvenile law, and a representative or representatives of
community treatment providers. The memorandum of understanding also may include other parties considered
necessary, such as any other prosecutor in the circuit or district court district, local law enforcement, the probation
departments in that circuit, the local substance abuse coordinating agency for that circuit, a domestic violence service
provider program that receives funding from the state domestic violence prevention and treatment board, and community
corrections agencies in that circuit. The memorandum of understanding shall describe the role of each party. A juvenile
drug treatment court is subject to the same procedures and requirements provided in this chapter for drug treatment
courts created under subsection (1), except as specifically provided otherwise in this chapter.
(3) A court that is adopting a drug treatment court shall participate in training as required by the state court
administrative office and the bureau of justice assistance of the United States department of justice.
(78)
. .
. . 248,•305-S747 P.02 •
4172732ln - ' • T-42D P.i4A2 J0,-71
,,zeb -06 -Ca 01216P mackanzia
FES-05-01 2:47 ram:V.A0 CENTRAL ,, •
1/11 Supreme Court
state Coi;xt Aftdrtistratrire .0face
Ea la= soma - •
Laming, TiAthipsh 43409.
- • none (517)=41.30 • :
jakta. Porrg.jo, Erna Court Adusintist0000r
*4 & 2001
H000rable hd°
SZ6 District CoUrt
42 1.50 Graztel Rive t.A.Eve.
Novi, M1483744222,
Dear Judge Macicrisaiet
•
PursuaattO o rlxmhis regerdiztg the Nikhittea 1>n:tit Court Gnat
Program, I arn providing informati'an ecra=zing Assurance #4 in tlie applicstion materials.
The assurances included in the Watt Drag Court Ctrant application ram:ries arc the
Sasne as the as=ances required to 'apply for and =opt 1=3=1 program &acting for drug court
progrims. AP..surance #4 calls for the applicara to provide assurance of a program's h2s2 to
=Minus funding whether that be ••••• kcal-. other state, or federal sources of fundin,g. The
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program i propriefsed progism funded with E2:site:1 suLeral
fund dollen. The fonding is intended to assist in developing and irraplem,enting new programs
and providc limited' support to =taming i:Inugrzuni. It is, however, the program's responsibility
to eventually =cicada :1=a =UMW of funding. This. ehr‘iiIrl nut be eaustrued gs a mandate for
fUthe fielding of program from the fundiag unit • • •
Ityou have ay further questions, plc= coma= -
Daw.n A. Monk • •
Deputy Stax.c Ctrart. Aarnimistravar
'Len,
FISCAL NOTE (MISC. #11287) November 30, 2011
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, TOM MIDDLETON, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT - 2012 MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM (ADULT TREATMENT COURT)
GRANT AGREEMENT
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and
finds:
1. The Circuit Court has received a grant award from the State Court Administrators Office (SCAO),
Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (MDCGP), for the Adult Drug Court, in the amount of $36,000 for the
period of October 1,2011 through September 30, 2012.
2. The total program budget is for $224,429 which includes an award from SCAO of $36,000; PA 511
Community Corrections contributed funding of $100,000, Restore Foundation donations of $18,940 per
MR #11015, and General Fund support of $69,489 ($34,252 personnel support and $35,237 operating
support). The attached Schedule A details the analysis for the current FY 2012 Adult Drug Court
Program and Schedule B details the historical analysis for the Adult Drug Court Program.
3. There are two (2) full-time eligible positions that are partially funded by the Adult Drug Court totaling
$36,000. These positions are funded as follows:
- One (1) special revenue, full-time eligible Youth and Family Casework Supervisor (3010402-09712)
- One (1) special revenue, full-time eligible Technical Assistant position (3010402-10677). These positions
also support the Juvenile Drug Court and the remaining cost is offset by the Juvenile Drug Court program
funds (Child Care Fund).
4. The General Fund personnel support is estimated to be $34,252 for FY 2012. This amount is derived by
estimating Judges time and Support staffs' time spent on the drug courts. Please note the Judges
salaries are reimbursed by the State. The General Fund personnel support is included in the FY 2012
Adopted Budget.
5, Operating costs for the Adult Drug Court Program are $154,177 of which, $100,000 is PA 511 Community
Corrections contributed funding, $35,237 is General Fund budgeted operating support and $18,940 is
Restore Foundation donations (per MR #11015) and are allocated as follows: Professional Services
$100,000 (PA 511 Community Corrections funding), Drug Screenings $4,550 (General Fund Operating
Support), Defense Attorney Fees $21,819 (General Fund operating support), Supplies $13,418 ($8,868 is
General Fund Operating Support and $4,550 is from Restore Foundation Donations), Private Institutions
- Residential $8,460 (Restore Foundation Donations), Incentives $2,150 (Restore Foundation
Donations), and Transportation $3,780 (Restore Foundation Donations) all of these allocations are
included in the FY 2012 Adopted Budget.
6. A budget amendment is recommended to the FY 2012 Special Revenue Fund to reflect funding from the
SCAO Circuit Court Adult Treatment grant award:
Special Revenue Fund 27130
Project #GR0000000233 Activity A, Analysis Type GLB
Revenue
3010301-121200-615571 Grants State
Total Revenue Adj
FY 2012
Adopted
$10,000
$10.000
Amendment FY 2012
Amended
$26,000 $36,000
$25,000 $36,000
Expenditures
3010301-121200-702010
3010301-121200-722750
3010301-121200-722760
3010301-121200-722770
3010301-121200-722780
3010301-121200-722790
3010301-121200-722800
3010301-121200-722810
3010301-121200-722820
3010301-121200-722850
Salaries $ 6,500 $16,500 $23,000
Workers Compensation 43 32 75
Group Life 15 43 58
Retirement 2,038 5,500 7,538
Hospitalization 1,051 3,595 4,646
Social Security 268 150 418
Dental 56 95 151
Disability 11 35 46
Unemployment Insurance 5 25 40
Optical 3 25 28
Total Expenditure Ad] $10,11)00 $26,000 _$36,000
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and Runestad absent.
Resolution #11287 November 30, 2011
Moved by Weipert supported by Quarles the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent
Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
AYES: Covey, Crawford, Dwyer, Gershenson, Gingell, Gosselin, Greimel, Hoffman, Jackson,
Long, Matis, McGillivray, Middleton, Nash, Nuccio, Potts, Quarles, Runestad, Scott, Taub,
Weipert, Zack, Bosnic. (23)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent
Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Bill Bullard Jr., Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true
and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on November
30, 2011, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at
Pontiac, Michigan this 30th day of November, 2011.
R)La 0,Q4
Bill Bullard Jr., Oakland County