Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2011.11.30 - 18813November 30, 2011 REPORT (misc. #11287) BY: Human Resources Committee, John A. Scott, Chairperson RE: Circuit Court — 2012 Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (Adult Treatment Court) Grant Agreement TO: Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Human Resources Committee having reviewed the aforementioned resolution on November 9, 2011 reports with the recommendation the resolution be adopted. Chairperson, on behalf of the Human Resources Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing Report HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE VOTE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Bosnic, Nuccio and Greimel absent November 30, 2011 MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #11287 BY: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE ; COMMISSIONER RUNESTAD, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT - 2012 MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM (ADULT TREATMENT COURT) GRANT AGREEMENT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Circuit Court applied for a grant with the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), Michigan Drug Court Grant Program with a granting period of October 1,2011 through September 30, 2012; and WHEREAS the SCAO grant award, plus PA 511 Community Corrections contributed funds, Local Cash, and General Fund support make up the total program funding for FY 2012; and WHEREAS the court intends to continue the Adult Treatment Court to deal with the problems of increasing recidivism, increasing use of alcohol and illegal drugs, rising systems costs, and the increase in jail days ordered; and WHEREAS the Adult Treatment Court has a budget of $224,429 which includes a SCAO grant award $36,000, PA 511 Community Corrections contributed funding of 8100,000, Local Cash Contributions of $54,177 which includes $18,940 from the Restore Foundation, and General Fund support of $34,252; and WHEREAS two positions are partially funded by the Adult Treatment Court Grant, which include: one (1) Special Revenue (SR) full-time eligible (FTE) Youth and Family Casework Supervisor position (3010402-09712) and one (1) SR FTE Technical Assistant position (3010402-10677); and WHEREAS these positions also support the Juvenile Drug Court and the remaining of their cost is offset by Juvenile Drug Court program funds (Child Care Fund); and WHEREAS this program also provides funding for drug testing supplies and kits, contractual services for individual and family treatment, and transitional housing; and WHEREAS the grant agreement has been reviewed and approved through the County Executive's Contract Review Process and the Board of Commissioners' Grant Acceptance Procedures, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners accepts the 2012 Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (Adult Treatment Court) Grant Agreement in the amount of $36,000 from the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) for the period of October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012. BE IT FURTHER RESOVED that the Board of Commissioners authorizes the Board Chairperson to sign the grant agreement for the total program amount of $224,429, which includes the S.C.A.O. grant award of $36,000, PA 511 Community Corrections contributed funds of $100,000, Local Cash Contributions of $54,177 which includes $18,940 from the Restore Foundation, and General Fund support of $34,252. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant is conditioned upon the continued interpretation of the contract consistent with the February 6, 2001, letter from the Michigan Supreme Court, State Court Administrative Office, providing that assurance #3 of that grant application shall not be construed as a mandate for future funding of the program from the funding unit, said letter attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that no expenditures are authorized until a grant agreement is fully executed with the County's obligation limited to the grant funding period. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that continuation of the positions (3010402-09712 and 3010402-10677) associated with this grant is contingent upon continuation of state funding, and receipt of additional funding sources. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute the contract and that the chairperson may approve amendments and extensions up to fifteen (15%) percent variance from the award, consistent with the original agreement as approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Public Services Committee Vote: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Runestad absent John Cooperrider From: Piir, Gala <piirg@oakgov.com> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:19 PM To: 'Cooperrider, John': 'Davis, Pamela': 'Falardeau, Nancy' Cc: 'Agacinski, Karen'; 'Plotkowski, Andrea' Subject: GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF - Circuit Court - FY 2012 Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (Adult Treatment Court) - Grant Agreement Attachments: C06 ADULT Revised.pdf; Grant Accept sign off pkg.pdf Please Note: The requested contract modifications have been made and are included in the attached revised agreement. This version of the agreement should be included in all Board of Commissioner packets. GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Circuit Court GRANT NAME: FY 2012 Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (Adult Treatment Court) FUNDING AGENCY: State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Pamela Davis /John Cooperrider 80247 / 80256 STATUS: Grant Acceptance DATE: October 28, 2011 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #01320, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The captioned grant materials and grant acceptance package (which should include the Board of Commissioners Liaison Committee Resolution, the grant agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal Note, and this Sign Off email containing grant review comments) may be requested to be place on the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution. DEPARTMENT REVIEW Department of Management and Budget: Approved;— Laurie Van Pelt (10/19/2011) Department of Human Resources: Approved. — Karen Jones (10/19/2011) Risk Management and Safety: Approved per FY2012 amended contract. —Andrea Plotkowski (10/27/2011) Corporation Counsel: There appear to be no unresolved legal issues that require action at this time. — Karen Agacinski (10/26/2011) COMPLIANCE The grant agreement references a number of specific federal and state regulations. Below is a list of the specifically cited compliance related documents for this grant. 2011 PA 63 1 MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM 2012 GRANT CONTRACT Start Date: 10/01/2011 ,• End Date: 9/30/2012 ,.;t..:M.im-..,.._::.:,,,-?:,.,,, '1 ,.,!7, , ,1'.:n.N] ii._:' Grantee Name 6th Circuit Court , Adult Federal ID Number 38-6004876 Grant Amount $36,000 Effective January 1, 2005, Michigan Compiled Laws (MCL) 600.1060 et. seq. authorizes the creation of drug treatment courts in circuit and district courts and the family division of circuit courts in Michigan. In addition, 2011 PA 63, effective June 21, 2011, provides funding for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (MDCGP) for 2012. Administered by the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), the purpose of the MDCGP is to provide funding assistance to operational drug treatment courts and drug treatment courts in the planning stage. The grant agreement is designated as a subrecipient relationship. Funds from the MDCGP are awarded based upon the Grantee's agreement to comply with MCL 600.1060 et. seq., the policies and procedures set forth in the application assurances and administrative requirements for the program, and this contract. Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 1 C. The Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, and regulations. D. The Grantee agrees that funds awarded under this grant will not be used to support any inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization. If the Grantee refers participants to, or provides, a nonfederally funded program or service that incorporates such religious activities: (1) any such activities must be voluntary for program participants, and (2) program participants may not be excluded from participation in a program or otherwise penalized or disadvantaged for any failure to accept a referral or services. If participation in a nonfederally funded program or service that incorporates inherently religious activities is deemed a critical treatment or support service for program participants, the Grantee agrees to identify' and refer participants who object to the inherently religious activities of such program or service to a comparable secular alternative program or service. 6. Assignments and Subcontracts All provisions and requirements of this contract shall apply to any subcontracts or agreements the Grantee may enter into in furtherance of its obligations under this contract. The Grantee shall provide copies of all subcontracts for services funded in whole or in part by this grant to the SCAO. 7. Human Subjects The Grantee must submit all research involving human subjects conducted in programs sponsored by SCAO, or in programs that receive funding from or through the State of Michigan, to the Michigan Department of Community Health's (MDCH) Institutional Review Board (IRB) for approval prior to the initiation of the research. 8. Confidentiality Both SCAO and the Grantee shall assure that medical services to, and information contained in medical records of, persons served under this contract, or other such recorded information required to be held confidential by federal or state law, rule, or regulation, in connection with the provision of services or other activity under this agreement shall be privileged communication. It also shall be held confidential, and shall not be divulged without the written consent of either the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 3 use or disclosure of protected data and information received by the Grantee from SCAO or any other source. 10. Independent Contractor Status A. Both parties to this contract will be acting in an independent capacity and not as an agent, employee, partner, joint venturer, or associate of one another. The employees or agents of one party shall not be deemed or construed to be the agents or employees of the other party for any purpose. B. The Grantee understands and agrees that all persons furnishing services pursuant to this contract are, for purposes of workers' compensation liability or other actions of employee-related liability, not employees of SCAO or the Michigan Supreme Court. The Grantee bears the sole responsibility and liability for furnishing workers' compensation benefits to any of its employees for injuries arising from or connected with services performed pursuant to this contract. 11. Liability All liability to third parties, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out of activities, such as direct service delivery, to be carried out by the Grantee in the performance of this contract shall be the responsibility of the Grantee, and not the responsibility of the SCAO, provided that nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of the governmental immunity that has been provided to the Grantee or its employees by statute or court decision. All liability to third parties, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out of activities to be carried out by the SCAO in the performance of this contract shall be the responsibility of SCAO, and not the responsibility of the Grantee, provided that nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver of the governmental immunity that has been provided to the SCAO or its employees by statute or court decision. 12. Debarment and Suspension The Grantee may not contract with or make any award of the SCAO drug court grant funds at any time to any party that has been debarred or suspended or is otherwise excluded from, or ineligible for, participation in federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549, "Debaillient and Suspension." Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 constitute a material breach of this contract upon which the SCAO may cancel, terminate, or suspend this contract. D. The Grantee's accounting system must maintain a separate fund or account that segregates MDCGP contract receipts and expenditures from other receipts and expenditures of the Grantee. 14. Accountability for Michigan Drug Court Grant Program Funds The Grantee agrees that it will not expend funds obtained under this contract for any purpose other than those authorized in the administrative requirements specified in the application and revised approved budget for the Michigan Drug Court Grant Program, and will expend grant funds only during the period covered by this contract unless prior written approval is received from SCAO. 15. Program Review and Monitoring The Grantee shall give SCAO and any of its authorized agents access to the drug court at any reasonable time to evaluate, audit, inspect, observe, and monitor the operation of the program. The inspection methods that may be used include, but are not limited to onsite visits; interviews of staff and drug court participants; and review of case records, receipts, monthly/quarterly statistical reports, and fiscal records. 16. Reports The Grantee agrees to provide reports as identified in the application assurances and administrative requirements for the MDCGP to SCAO as follows: A. Financial Reports: Financial quarterly reports are due by January 20, April 20, July 20, and October 10. The financial report form template can be located on the Specialty Courts website at http:/courts.michigan.gov/scao/services/SpecialtyCourts/FormsReports.ht m. Please refer to Attachment A for allowable and disallowable expenses pertaining to your MDCGP grant. B. Progress Reports: Progress reports are due semi-annually. The reports are due April 30, and October 30. The progress reports will list the drug court program's goals and objectives, detail the status of accomplishments for each goal and objectives, discuss any changes in the program's goals and objectives as set forth in the application for grant funding, and describe program activities during the reporting period. The final report Michigan Drug Court Grant Prop-am — FY 2012 17. Grant Funding Reallocation SCAO retains the right to reallocate grant funding if ongoing progress is not being made toward achieving the program's goals and objectives and/or in the implementation of the drug court grant project as defined in the approved grant request. Reimbursement for grant costs and/or future funding may be withheld or denied if any of the required reports in this section are received forty-five days past their due date. 18. Reimbursement A. Reimbursement from SCAO is based on the understanding that SCAO funds will be paid up to the total SCA° allocation as agreed to in the approved budget. B. The Grantee must sign up through the online vendor registration process to receive all State of Michigan payments as Electronic Funds Transfers (EFT) Direct Deposits. Registration infoiniation is available through the Depaitment of Technology, Management. and Budget's website at: http://www.cpexpress.state.rni.us . 19. Budget Modification Adjustments in expenditures up to $1,000 within line item categories in the approved budget and transfers up to $1,000 between line item categories in the approved budget may be made without the prior written approval of SCA°. Requests for adjustments in expenditures within line items and between line item categories exceeding $1,000 must be made using a Contract Adjustment Request form, which can be obtained from the Specialty Court website. Note, changes to the Mental Health Services line item of the approved budget are prohibited. 20. Funding Hold or Termination SCAO may place a funding hold on contracted amounts not yet disbursed, or terminate this contract if it concludes that the Grantee is not in compliance with the conditions and provisions of this contract, the application assurances, and administrative requirements, or the budget requirements of the MDCGP. SCAO may extend an opportunity for the Grantee to demonstrate compliance. Notification of a funding hold or termination will be in writing. Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 9 25. Entire Agreement This contract contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior written or oral promises and representations. No other understanding, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this contract exists to bind either of the parties. 26. Amendment This agreement may be amended only upon written agreement of the parties. Authorized by: State Court Administrative Office Date Acceptance by Grantee: Authorizing Official (Signature and Title) Date Authorizing Official (Please Print Name and Title) Chief Judge (Signature) Date Chief Judge (Please Print Name) Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 11 documented with copies of Travel Vouchers/Expense Reports. All travel must adhere to the most recent approved Michigan Supreme Court Standardized Travel Rates for the Judicial Branch. http ://co urts.m ic hi gan .gov/scao/resources/other/ffc. htm#trave I E. Miscellaneous: Lobbying, honorariums, unreasonable costs, and costs not directly related to the operations of the drug court are not allowable. Notes: A. If an item is NOT listed as allowable. SCAO considers it disallowed. B. All grant costs and billings will be reviewed by SCAO to ensure that they reflect costs generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the drug court and reflect market prices for comparable goods or services. Additionally, grant expenditures must be for goods and services that are or will be utilized for the grant period or fiscal year (October 1 to September 30). Billings for goods, and services (i.e., purchase of gift cards, bus tokens, library materials, drug testing supplies on September 24) that could not reasonable be used up prior to September 30 will be denied for reimbursement. C. MADCP registration will only be reimbursed if attendance at both days of the two day conference is verified by sign-in sheets. Michigan Drug Court Grant Program — FY 2012 13 FY (..ii,tfiUDGET DETAIL VVOR$SFIL E I A. Personnel COMPUTATION Other Grant or MDCGP Award Byrne JAG Award OHSP Award Local Cash Local In-Kind Name/Position (hours worked on project X (SCAO) (ARRA) (SCAO) Byrne JAG Award (SCAO) Funding Source TOTAL Contributions Contributions hourly rate) (12 in budget summary) Jackie Howes Evanson, Supervisor $ $ 17,000 $ - $ 17,000 .. Candace Sereno, Technical Assistant 6,000 - $ - $ 6,000 Colleen O'Brien, Circuit Judge - $ - $ $ 3,355 $ 3,355 Joan Young, Circuit Judge - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,355 $ 3,355 College intern and Office Assistant II $ $ $ $ - $ - $ 22,000 $ 22,000 Personnel Total $ 23,000 - - $ 28,710 $ 51,710 B. Fringe Benefits ntage,%•..: _ Item 1- erdntagg: Itc.rn . ' t . - Pi.-.1-ce•nt,i,j. . .._..__ ... .... ... .- U employer FICA 8% Vision Insurance 0% U Other 0% Retirement 30% LI Unemployment 0% D Other 0% Hospital Insurance 16% LI Worker's Compensation % 0 Other 0% 0 Dental Insurance 1% LI Life Insurance 0% 0 Other 0% COMPOSITE RATE 56 MDCGP Award Byrne JAG Award OHSP Award Other Grant or Funding Contributions Byrne JAG Award (SCAO) (ARRA) (SCAO) Sources (specify) TOTAL SCAO Cash in-Kind Fringe Benefit Total 3,000 $ 5,542 18, 42 , "-:'.1 75 S. . 7412 . Total Personnel and Fringe Benefits 5 35 NO „.n Item Defense Attorney Fees Supplies Incentives Drug Screenings Transportation Total Supplies/Operating I COMPUTATION MDCGP (Cost Per Unit X Award Number of Units) (SCAO) Byrne JAG Award (SCAO) Other Grant or Funding Source (12 in budget summary) Byrne JAG Award (ARRA) OHSP Award (SCAO) -1 $ Local Cash Contributions 5 Local In-Kind Contributions TOTAL COST 21,819 13,418 2,150 4,550 3,780 45.717 EIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII MilIMEW=LIIIIIIIMIll EIIIIMIIIIIIIII s - MIMI $ - NOIMUNI111111111111M1111111111 $ milm $- Eill11111111 li= $ EIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIII $ - IBIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIII $ $ - s - $ - $ - 45,717 2,150 4,550 3,780 E. Travel (mileage for participant purposes and/or MADCP registration) COMPUTATION (Cost Per Unit X Number of Units) MDCGP Award (SCAO) Byrne JAG Award (SCAO) Type of Travel Expense TOTAL COST Total Supplies/Operating Byrne JAG Award (ARRA) OHSP Award (SCAO) Other Grant or Funding Source (12 n budget summary) Local Cash Contributions -1$ -1$ D. Supplies / Operating Act No. 177 Public Acts of 2010 Approved by the Governor September 30, 2010 Filed with the Secretary of State September 30, 2010 EFFECTIVE DATE: September 30, 2010 STATE OF MICHIGAN 95TH LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION OF 2010 Introduced by Senators Switaiski, Cherry and Bishop ENROLLED SENATE BILL No. 1354. AN ACT to amend 1961 PA 236, entitled "An act to revise and consolidate the statutes relating to the organization and jurisdiction of the courts of this state; the powers and duties of the courts, and of the judges and other officers of the courts; the forms and attributes of civil claims and actions; the time within which civil actions and proceedings may be brought in the courts; pleading, evidence, practice, and procedure in civil and criminal actions and proceedings in the courts; to provide for the powers and duties of certain state governmental officers and entities; to provide remedies and penalties for the violation of certain provisions of this act; to repeal all acts and parts of acts inconsistent with or contravening any of the provisions of this act; and to repeal acts and parts of acts," by amending sections 1062 and 1068 (MCL 600.1062 and 600.1068), section 1062 as amended by 2006 PA 620 and section 1068 as added by 2004 PA 224. The People of the State of Michigan enact: Sec. 1062. (1) The circuit court in any judicial circuit or the district court in any judicial district may adopt or institute a drug treatment court, pursuant to statute or court rules. However, if the drug treatment court will include in its program individuals who may be eligible for discharge and dismissal of an offense, delayed sentence, or deviation from the sentencing guidelines, the circuit or district court shall not adopt or institute the drug treatment court unless the circuit or district court enters into a memorandum of understanding with each participating prosecuting attorney in the circuit or district court district, a representative of the criminal defense bar, and a representative or representatives of community treatment providers. The memorandum of understanding also may include other parties considered necessary, such as any other prosecutor in the circuit or district court district, local law enforcement, the probation departments in that circuit or district, the local substance abuse coordinating agency for that circuit or district, a domestic violence service provider program that receives funding from the state domestic violence prevention and treatment board, and community corrections agencies in that circuit or district. The memorandum of understanding shall describe the role of each party. (2) The family division of circuit court in any judicial circuit may adopt or institute a juvenile drug treatment court, pursuant to statute or court rules. However, if the drug treatment court will include in its program individuals who may be eligible for discharge or dismissal of an offense, or a delayed sentence, the family division of circuit court shall not adopt or institute a juvenile drug treatment court unless the family division of circuit court enters into a memorandum of understanding with each participating county prosecuting attorney in the circuit or district court district, a representative of the criminal defense bar specializing in juvenile law, and a representative or representatives of community treatment providers. The memorandum of understanding also may include other parties considered necessary, such as any other prosecutor in the circuit or district court district, local law enforcement, the probation departments in that circuit, the local substance abuse coordinating agency for that circuit, a domestic violence service provider program that receives funding from the state domestic violence prevention and treatment board, and community corrections agencies in that circuit. The memorandum of understanding shall describe the role of each party. A juvenile drug treatment court is subject to the same procedures and requirements provided in this chapter for drug treatment courts created under subsection (1), except as specifically provided otherwise in this chapter. (3) A court that is adopting a drug treatment court shall participate in training as required by the state court administrative office and the bureau of justice assistance of the United States department of justice. (78) . . . . 248,•305-S747 P.02 • 4172732ln - ' • T-42D P.i4A2 J0,-71 ,,zeb -06 -Ca 01216P mackanzia FES-05-01 2:47 ram:V.A0 CENTRAL ,, • 1/11 Supreme Court state Coi;xt Aftdrtistratrire .0face Ea la= soma - • Laming, TiAthipsh 43409. - • none (517)=41.30 • : jakta. Porrg.jo, Erna Court Adusintist0000r *4 & 2001 H000rable hd° SZ6 District CoUrt 42 1.50 Graztel Rive t.A.Eve. Novi, M1483744222, Dear Judge Macicrisaiet • PursuaattO o rlxmhis regerdiztg the Nikhittea 1>n:tit Court Gnat Program, I arn providing informati'an ecra=zing Assurance #4 in tlie applicstion materials. The assurances included in the Watt Drag Court Ctrant application ram:ries arc the Sasne as the as=ances required to 'apply for and =opt 1=3=1 program &acting for drug court progrims. AP..surance #4 calls for the applicara to provide assurance of a program's h2s2 to =Minus funding whether that be ••••• kcal-. other state, or federal sources of fundin,g. The Michigan Drug Court Grant Program i propriefsed progism funded with E2:site:1 suLeral fund dollen. The fonding is intended to assist in developing and irraplem,enting new programs and providc limited' support to =taming i:Inugrzuni. It is, however, the program's responsibility to eventually =cicada :1=a =UMW of funding. This. ehr‘iiIrl nut be eaustrued gs a mandate for fUthe fielding of program from the fundiag unit • • • Ityou have ay further questions, plc= coma= - Daw.n A. Monk • • Deputy Stax.c Ctrart. Aarnimistravar 'Len, FISCAL NOTE (MISC. #11287) November 30, 2011 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, TOM MIDDLETON, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT - 2012 MICHIGAN DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM (ADULT TREATMENT COURT) GRANT AGREEMENT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The Circuit Court has received a grant award from the State Court Administrators Office (SCAO), Michigan Drug Court Grant Program (MDCGP), for the Adult Drug Court, in the amount of $36,000 for the period of October 1,2011 through September 30, 2012. 2. The total program budget is for $224,429 which includes an award from SCAO of $36,000; PA 511 Community Corrections contributed funding of $100,000, Restore Foundation donations of $18,940 per MR #11015, and General Fund support of $69,489 ($34,252 personnel support and $35,237 operating support). The attached Schedule A details the analysis for the current FY 2012 Adult Drug Court Program and Schedule B details the historical analysis for the Adult Drug Court Program. 3. There are two (2) full-time eligible positions that are partially funded by the Adult Drug Court totaling $36,000. These positions are funded as follows: - One (1) special revenue, full-time eligible Youth and Family Casework Supervisor (3010402-09712) - One (1) special revenue, full-time eligible Technical Assistant position (3010402-10677). These positions also support the Juvenile Drug Court and the remaining cost is offset by the Juvenile Drug Court program funds (Child Care Fund). 4. The General Fund personnel support is estimated to be $34,252 for FY 2012. This amount is derived by estimating Judges time and Support staffs' time spent on the drug courts. Please note the Judges salaries are reimbursed by the State. The General Fund personnel support is included in the FY 2012 Adopted Budget. 5, Operating costs for the Adult Drug Court Program are $154,177 of which, $100,000 is PA 511 Community Corrections contributed funding, $35,237 is General Fund budgeted operating support and $18,940 is Restore Foundation donations (per MR #11015) and are allocated as follows: Professional Services $100,000 (PA 511 Community Corrections funding), Drug Screenings $4,550 (General Fund Operating Support), Defense Attorney Fees $21,819 (General Fund operating support), Supplies $13,418 ($8,868 is General Fund Operating Support and $4,550 is from Restore Foundation Donations), Private Institutions - Residential $8,460 (Restore Foundation Donations), Incentives $2,150 (Restore Foundation Donations), and Transportation $3,780 (Restore Foundation Donations) all of these allocations are included in the FY 2012 Adopted Budget. 6. A budget amendment is recommended to the FY 2012 Special Revenue Fund to reflect funding from the SCAO Circuit Court Adult Treatment grant award: Special Revenue Fund 27130 Project #GR0000000233 Activity A, Analysis Type GLB Revenue 3010301-121200-615571 Grants State Total Revenue Adj FY 2012 Adopted $10,000 $10.000 Amendment FY 2012 Amended $26,000 $36,000 $25,000 $36,000 Expenditures 3010301-121200-702010 3010301-121200-722750 3010301-121200-722760 3010301-121200-722770 3010301-121200-722780 3010301-121200-722790 3010301-121200-722800 3010301-121200-722810 3010301-121200-722820 3010301-121200-722850 Salaries $ 6,500 $16,500 $23,000 Workers Compensation 43 32 75 Group Life 15 43 58 Retirement 2,038 5,500 7,538 Hospitalization 1,051 3,595 4,646 Social Security 268 150 418 Dental 56 95 151 Disability 11 35 46 Unemployment Insurance 5 25 40 Optical 3 25 28 Total Expenditure Ad] $10,11)00 $26,000 _$36,000 FINANCE COMMITTEE FINANCE COMMITTEE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long and Runestad absent. Resolution #11287 November 30, 2011 Moved by Weipert supported by Quarles the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Covey, Crawford, Dwyer, Gershenson, Gingell, Gosselin, Greimel, Hoffman, Jackson, Long, Matis, McGillivray, Middleton, Nash, Nuccio, Potts, Quarles, Runestad, Scott, Taub, Weipert, Zack, Bosnic. (23) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Bill Bullard Jr., Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on November 30, 2011, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 30th day of November, 2011. R)La 0,Q4 Bill Bullard Jr., Oakland County