HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1992.12.10 - 19886December 10, 1992
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #92286
BY: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE, JOHN MCCULLOCH, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: PROSECUTING ATTORNEY - ACCEPTANCE OF 1992/1993 OAKLAND
COUNTY NARCOTICS TASK FORCE GRANT
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS Miscellaneous Resolution #89105 requires liaison
committee review of grant acceptances that vary more than fifteen
(15) percent from original grant applications; and
WHEREAS the Oakland County Office of the Prosecuting Attorney
applied for funding of the second year of the Oakland County
Narcotics Task Force grant under authority of the Anti-Drug Abuse
Act of 1988 for the period October 1, 1991 through September 30,
1992 in the amount of $1,077,285 (State - $646,371, County -
$430,914); and
WHEREAS the State of Michigan, Department of Management and
Budget, Office of Criminal Justice has awarded Oakland County a
grant of $211,315, which requires County match of $140,895 (40%)
for a total program of $352,210 as detailed in Schedule A; and
WHEREAS the objective of the Narcotics Task Force will be the
investigation and prosecution of large scale drug conspiracies
operating in Oakland County; and
WHEREAS the grant continues funding for one (1) Assistant
Prosecutor IV, one (1) Legal Secretary and three (3) Assistant
Prosecutor III positions through September 30, 1993; and
WHEREAS the attached contract has been approved by the County
Executive's Contract Review Process.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners accepts the Prosecuting Attorney's 1992/93 Narcotics
Task Force grant in the amount of $211,315 with a county match of
$140,895 for a program total of $352,210 as shown on Schedule A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that future level of service, including
personnel, will be contingent upon the level of funding available
through the State for this program and acceptance of this grant
does not obligate the County to any future commitment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of
Commissioners is authorized to execute the grant agreement and to
approve amendments and extensions up to fifteen (15) percent
variance from the award, consistent with the agreement as
originally approved.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee,
I move adoption of the foregoing resolution.
I:\DAVE\PROS\NFT9293.MR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMITTEE
//117
Positions * 14 5 (9)
Schedule A
OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Oakland County Narcotics Task Force Grant
1992/93 Acceptance
Variance
1992/93 1992/93 Increase/
Application Award (Decrease)
Salaries $634,237 $241,114 ($393,123)
Fringe Benefits 279,065 105,608 ($173,457)
Total Personnel Cost $913,302 $346,722 ($566,580)
Operating:
PersOnnal Mileage $3,600 $0 ($3,600)
Deputy Supplies 4,150 0 ($4,150)
Travel & Conference 4,650 0 ($4,650)
Building Cost 16,218 5,152 ($11,066)
Leased Vehicles 32,000 0 ($32,000)
Equipment Rental 2,340 336 ($2,004)
Stationery Stock 10,640 0 ($10,640)
Telephone Communications 13,832 0 ($13,832)
Insurance $0
Total Operating Cost $87,430 $5,488 ($81,942)
Capital Outlay
Furniture $22,313 $0 ($22,813)
Pagers 2,240 0 ($2,240)
Police Radios (4) 20,000 0 ($20,000)
In-Car Radios (4) 28,000 0 ($28,000)
Mobile Phones (5) 3,500 0 ($3,500)
Total Capital Outlay $76,553 $0 ($76,553)
GRANT TOTAL $1,077,285 $352,210 ($725 (075)
Funding Source:
Grant Funding
County Match
646,371 60% 211,315 60% ($435,056)
430,914 40% 140,895 40% ($290,019)
TOTAL $1,077,285 $352,210 ($725,075)
Staffing Level
Principal Attorney 1 (1)
Asst. Prosecuting Atty IV 1 1 0
Asst. Prosecuting Atty II 6 3 (3)
Legal Secretary 1 I 0
Investigator Analyst 1 (1)
Investigators 4 (4)
TOTAL 14 5 (9)
w:\dave\pros\narc93ac.wkl 16-Nov-92
ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACT
LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANTS
and
DRUG-FREE SCHOOLS - GOVERNOR'S DISCRETIONARY FUNDS
D.A.R.E. GRANTS
APPLICATION
OFFICE OF DRUG CONTROL POLICY
1st Floor, Grandview Plaza
P.O. Box 30026
Lansing, Michigan 48909
(517) 373-4700
By authority of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988
., and the Governor's Discretionary Fund.
Submission of this application by the due ODCP-701
- date is required to participate in this program. REV2/92
OFFICE OF DRUG CONTROL POLICY
ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACT
GOVERNOR'S DISCRETIONARY FUNDS
APPLICATION
INSTRUCTIONS
The information in the application is necessary and essential for Office of Drug Control Policy grant
administration and for completion of the federal reporting requirements. Review the following
instructions and the Application Guidelines and Program Instructions carefully before completing this
Application.
A. Applicant Summary.
1. Agency Identification. Enter the name and address of the applicant agency.
2. Implementing Agency. Enter the name of the agency responsible for implementing the
project.
3. Federal ID Number. Enter the Federal IRS Employer ID number for the applicant agency.
4. Project Title. Enter a descriptive title for this project, not to exceed two lines of 30
characters each. Use the same title from the previous year's grant if this is a continuation
application.
5. Application Status. Check the appropriate box. If this is the first time this project has
been funded to this applicant, check "New". If this project has been funded to this applicant
previously, check "Continuation" and complete items 5a and 5b.
5a. Check the box which identifies the year of funding of this application.
5b. Enter the ODCP project number from the preceding year of funding.
6. Project Period. Enter the start date and end date of the project covered by this proposal.
The project period for each grant is limited to 12 months.
7. Program Area. Enter the title of the Program Priority Area described in the Anti-Drug
Abuse Act Application Guidelines under which this application is made. Each program priority
area requires a separate application.
8. Civil Rights Contact Person. Provide the name, title, agency address and telephone
number. Attach certification that a current Equal Employment Opportunity Plan which meets
federal and state requirements is on file in the Office of Drug Control Policy. Submit a copy
of the applicant EEO Plan if the certification cannot be made.
9. Project Contact Person. Provide the name, title, project address and telephone number.
This person reports to the Project Director, is on-site and has responsibility for the day-to-day
implementation of the project. The project contact should be familiar with the details of the
project budget. This information is to be provided only if the Project Contact is a person other
than the Project Director.
ODCP-701
REV 2/92
10. Certification. The Project Director, Financial Officer and Authorizing Official must certify,
by signature, that the information presented in the application is correct and that the applicant
agency agrees to comply with all the provisions of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act and Governor's
Discretionary Fund program.
Project Director Identification. Provide the name, title, address and telephone number of
the individual who will be directing this project.
Financial Director Identification. Provide the name and title, address and telephone number
of the individual who is fiscally responsible for this project.
Authorizing Officer Identification. Provide the name and title of the individual authorized
by the applicant agency to enter into this agreement.
Office of Drug Control Policy prohibits the same person from signing as both the Project
Director and the Financial Officer.
11. Jurisdiction. Name the county(ies) in which this project will operate. Identify the
Michigan Senate District(s), Michigan Representative District(s), and U.S. Congressional District(s)
that will be served by this project. Provide the population (number of people) to be served by
this project, i.e., statewide, county, city and provide population count.
12. Service Impact. Check the appropriate box. Provide the total fiscal year drug enforcement
budget for the two years requested. Indicate all major sources of funding in the categories
provided (Federal, State, Local/Public or Private). Include the federal funds that you are
requesting in the Federal source for the current year.
13. Budget Summary. Transfer the budget category totals from the Budget Detail to the
appropriate category line in the Budget Summary. Be sure the amounts total down and across.
B. Budget Detail. The purpose of the Budget Detail is to assist the applicant in developing a
financial plan for their project and to provide the Office of Drug Control Policy with the
projected costs required to implement the project. Cost projections must be reasonable and relate
directly to the goals and objectives of the project. USE WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY. Budget
projections should be only for the period covered by this proposal and may not exceed twelve
months. Costs are subject to review and approval by the Office of Drug Control Policy.
Please use the following definitions to determine the source of funding for each item in the
budget detail.
Federal Funds. Funds provided through Anti-Drug Abuse Act funding and Governor's
Discretionary Funds from the Office of Drug Control Policy to the applicant agency.
Grantee Match. Cash match appropriated by the applicant specifically for this project. No
match required for Governor's Discretionary Funds.
Total Funds. The combined total of federal funds and grantee match.
C. Budget Narrative. This section should describe budget costs not fully explained in the budget
detail.
ODCP-701
REV 2/92
D. Program Narrative. There are five separate sections to the Program Narrative. Prepare each
section according to the individual instructions provided. Limit your narrative to the pages
provided.
E. Assurances. The Assurances detail the conditions of the Agreement between the Office of Drug
Control Policy and the applicant agency for Anti-Drug Abuse Act and Governor's Discretionary
Funds funding if an application is approved. Review the Assurances carefully and understand
that these requirements will become part of the grant contract when an award is made.
F. Certifications. Review and have the Authorizing Official sign the Certifications of Debarment,
Lobbying, Non-Supplanting of funds, and Equal Employment Opportunity Plan.
G. Submission. Detach the Instructions and submit the original Application and three copies by 5:00
p.m., March 27, 1992, to:
First Class Mail
Office of Drug Control Policy
1st Floor, Grandview Plaza
P. 0. Box 30026
Lansing, MI 48909
Express Mail
Office of Drug Control Policy
Grandview Plaza
206 E. Michigan Avenue
Lansing, MI 48933
Telephone : (517) 373-4700
ODCP-701
REV 2/92
OFFICE OF DRUG CONTROL POLICY
ANTI DRUG ABUSE ACT
GOVERNOR'S DISCRETIONARY FUNDS
ASSURANCES
1. The applicant assures that it will comply with the provisions of 28 CRF applicable
to grants and cooperative agreements including Part H, Applicability of Office of Management
and Budget Circulars; Part 18, Administrative Review Procedure; Part 20, Criminal Justice
Information Systems; Part 22, Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and Statistical
Information; Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems Operating Policies; Part 30,
Intergovernmental Review of Department of Justice Programs and Activities; Part 42,
Nondiscrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Procedures; Part 61, Procedures
for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act; and Part 63, Floodplain Management
and Wetland Protection Procedures.
2. The applicant assures that it will comply with the provisions of the Office of Justice
Programs' "Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants", M7100.1C.
3. The applicant assures that it will comply, and all its contractors will comply, with the
non-discrimination requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; Title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; and the Department of Justice
Nondiscrimination Regulations 28 CRF Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G.
4. The applicant assures that in the event a Federal or State court or Federal or State
administrative agency makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the
grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex against a recipient of funds, the
recipient agency will forward a copy of the finding to the Office of Civil Rights Compliance,
Office of Justice Programs.
5. The applicant assures that it will formulate an Equal Employment Opportunity
Program (EEOP), in accordance with 28 CRF 42.301 et. seq., and submit a certification to the
state that it has a current EEOP on file which meets the requirements therein.
6. In accordance with the Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act and the Michigan Handicappers
Civil Rights Act, a grantee or contractor must not discriminate against any employee or
applicant for employment, with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of
employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment, because of race, color,
religion, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, height, weight, marital status or handicap. Failure
to comply with this requirement is cause for cancellation of the grant.
7. In accordance with Executive Directive 1979-4 and Michigan Department of Civil
Rights Standards and Procedures for Civil Rights Compliance in State and Federal Contracts,
a grantee or contractor must have an established policy of equal employment opportunity
without regard to race, color, religion, national original, age, sex or handicap. The grantee
or contractor must take steps necessary to correct any underrepresentation and achieve a
reasonably representative work force at all levels of employment. In addition, the grantee or
contractor must:
ODCP-701
REV 2/92
a. state in all recruiting materials and advertisements that all applicants will receive equal
consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, age,
sex or handicap, and
b. post in conspicuous places notices setting forth the law on equal opportunity in
employment and public accommodations. (Posters are available from the Michigan
Department of Civil Rights.)
8. A grantee or contractor must inform the Office of Drug Control Policy of any federal
or state actions, taken against the grantee or contractor, pertaining to equal employment
opportunity requirements.
9. A grantee or contractor is required to keep employment or other records, used in
preparation of the Minority-Female-Handicapper Status Report, Work Force Utilization Analysis
and EEO Plan, six months beyond the life of the grant or contract to permit access by the
Office of Drug Control Policy, Michigan Department of Civil Rights or other authorized
persons as may be necessary to ascertain compliance.
10. The award of a grant is subject to acceptance of the required reporting forms and
EEO Plan and a determination of compliance with Equal Employment Opportunity
requirements by the Office of Drug Control Policy or the Michigan Department of Civil
Rights.
11. A grant recipient must not furnish finished products to the State originating or
manufactured in the Republic of South Africa; must not sell goods or services to the South
African military, Department of Cooperation and Development, or national, provincial or local
police or prison agencies, unless the grant recipient is a signatory of the Sullivan Principles
and is in the two highest categories of progress; must not be controlled by a South African
firm; and must not enter into a subcontract with an entity that does not comply with the
conditions outlined above.
12. The project must be operational within 60 days of the original starting date of the
grant period. The grantee must submit documentation to the Office of Drug Control Policy
explaining the reasons for any delay, the steps taken to initiate the project, and the expected
starting date. If the project is not operational within ninety (90) days of the original starting
date of the grant period, the grantee must submit further documentation explaining the delay.
The Office of Drug Control, Policy may at this time cancel the project, or extend the
implementation date.
13. The applicant must comply with the data collection and reporting requirements
established by the Office of Drug Control Policy. Failure to comply will result in ODCP
action to withhold the release of funds.
14. Expenditures incurred prior to the effective date of the grant will be ineligible for
funding.
15. No grant funds will be used for indirect administrative costs.
16. The applicant assures that anti-drug abuse grant funds made available under the Anti-
Drug Abuse Act and Governor's Discretionary Funds will not be used to supplant state and
local funds that would otherwise be available to verify that such charges are accurate.
ODCP-701
REV 2/92
17. The applicant assures that fund accounting, auditing, monitoring, and evaluation
procedures shall be provided to assure fiscal control, proper management, and efficient
disbursement of funds received under the Act.
18. Accounting procedures shall provide for accurate and timely recording or receipt of
funds by source, or expenditures made from such funds,and unexpended balances. Controls
must be adequate to ensure that expenditures charged to grant activities are for allowable
purposes and documentation is readily available to verify that such charges are accurate.
19. The applicant will maintain records to include copies of purchase orders and invoices
of the purchase and rental of property approved by the Office of Drug Control Policy as
allowable costs. The applicant will promptly notify the Office of Drug Control Policy when
any property approved under the grant can no longer be reasonably used for the purposes
stated in the application.
20. The applicant will comply with the audit requirements as specified in OMB Circular
A-128, Audits of State and Local Governments, or 01VIB Circular A-110, Grants and
Agreements with Non-Profit Organizations, and OMB Circular A-122, Cost Principles for
Non-Profit Organizations.
21. If an audit report disallows costs, the grantee will forward the amount of the
disallowed costs to the Office of Drug Control Policy within ninety (90) days of such
notification. Failure to do so will result in such deficiency being reported to the Department
of Treasury.
22. Funds awarded by the Michigan Office of Drug Control Policy may be terminated at
any time for violation of any terms and requirements of this agreement.
23. The applicant assures that anti-drug abuse funds shall be used only to provide drug
enforcement activities.
24. The applicant certifies that neither the agency or its officers are presently debarred,
suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from
participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency and agrees to sign the
Certification regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion.
25. The applicant assures that all income (forfeitures) generated as a result of the grant
project shall be deemed project income and must be used for the purposes of and under the
conditions applicable to the use of grant funds.
26. The applicant assures that all funds forfeited and funds seized but not legally forfeited
as a result of this grant project shall be kept in separate trust accounts.
ODCP-701
REV 2/92
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER
Certification Regarding
Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion
Lower Tier Covered Transactions
(Sub-Recipient)
This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and
Suspension, 28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510, Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published
as Part VII of the May 25, 1988 Federal Aegister (pages 19160-19211).
(BEFORE COMPLETING CERTIFICATION, READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE'
(1) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither It nor Its
principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency.
(2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certifi-
cation, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Larry Crake, Chairperson - Board of Commissioners
Name and Title of Authorized Representative
Signature Data
County of Oakland
Name of Organization
1200 North Telegraph Road, Pontiac, Michigan 48341
Address of Organization
04111 FO•IA A011tri AV/ 2391 Pay.ous echtworla are ocaoista.
OFFICE OF DRUG awmaL POLICY
CERTIFIED ASSURANCE
The County of Oakland hereby assures and certifies
(govarmiumaipmlictim)
that Anti-Drug Abuse funds or Governor's Discretionary Funds will not be used to replace or
supplant state, local, and other non-federal funds that would, in the absence of Anti-Drug
Abuse Act funds and Governor's Discretionary Funds, be made availabe for law enforcement
programs.
Larry Crake, Chairperson
Board of Commissioners
AUTHORIZING GOVERNMENTAL OFFICIAL
ADDRESS: county of Oakland
1200 North Telegraph Road
Pontiac, Michigan 48341
DATE
ODCP-701
REV 2/92
OFFICE OF DRUG CONTROL POLICY
CERTIFICATE OF
EQUAL EMPLOYMEN7' OPPORTUNITY PLAN
The County of Oakland here by certifies that a current Equal Employment
Opportunity Plan which meets federal and state requirements is on file at the Office of Drug
Control Policy.
Larry Crake, Chairperson
Board of Commissioners
AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL DATE
ADDRESS: County of Oakland
1200 North Telegraph Road
Pontiac, Michigan 48341
ODCP-701
REV 2/92
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
Each person shall file the most current edition of this certifica-
tion and disclosure form, if applicable, with each submission that
initiates agency consideration of such person for an award of a
Federal contract, grant, or cooperative agreement of $100,000 or
more; or Federal loan of $150,000 or more.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which
reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.
Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or
entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31,
U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification
shall be subject to a civil penaltf of not less than $10,000 and
not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
The undersigned certifies, to the hast of his or her knowledge and
belief, that:
(1)No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid
to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an
officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee
of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of
any Federal contract, the making' of any Federal grant, the
making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any
cooperative agreement, and thla extension, continuation,
renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract,
grant, loan or cooperative agreiment.
(2)If any non-Federal funds have been paid or will be paid to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an
officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee
of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal
contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the under-
signed shall initial here and complete and submit
Standard Form # LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities", in
accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this
certification be included in the award documents for all
subawards'at all tiers and that all subrecipients shall
certify and disclose accordinglf.
County of Oakland
Name and Address of Organization Name of Authorized Individual
Signature and date
92—DB—CX-0026 OFFICE OF DRUG CONTROL POLICY
Application No. Name of OJP Agency
Rev.1/90
—1—
OFFICE OF DRUG.0 ()NTROL POLICY
ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACT AND GOVERNOR'S DISCRETIONARY FUND
1992 APPLICATION
APPLICANT SUMMARY
L APPLICANT ODCPMMIECTNUMBER(ODCPUSEONLY)
Oakland County
ADDRESS J. APPLICATION STATUS 5A.
[ ] NEW [ ] FIRST [J SECOND
1200 North Telegraph Road [N] CONTINUATION [ ] THIRD [A OMER
CITY ZIP .;B. PREVIOUS ODCP PROJECT NUMBER
Pontiac 48341 70286-1K91
2. IMPLEMENTING AGENCY ,i. START DATE END DATE
Oakland County Prosecutor's Office October 1, 1992 September 30, 1993
3. FEDERAL ID NUMBER '7. PROGRAM AREA
38 -6004876W Prosecution
4. MOJECTTRZE(MAXIMUM0F2LMTS/30CHARACIERSEACH)
Oakland County Narcotics Task Force
8. CIVMRKIHTSCONTACTPERSONINAPPIACANTAGENCY TELEPHONE
Eunice Williams EEO Officer (313)858 -0539
ADDRESS
Oakland County Personnel Department
1200 North Telegraph Road, Pontiac, MI 48341
9. PROJECT CONTACT (IF OTHER THAN PROJECT DIRECTOR) TITLE
Lawrence J. Bunting
ADDRESS TELEPHONE 1200 North Telegraph Road
Pontiac, Michigan 48341 (313)858-5558
10. CERTIFICATION We certify that the projcct proposed in this application meets applicable
requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 and ;:iovemor's Discretionary Fund, that all information
presented is correct, and that the applicant will comply with the provisions of the Act and all other
applicable federal laws. _
PROJECT DIRECTOR (NAME AND TITLE) SIGNATURE DATE
Richard Thompson
Prosecuting Attorney
ADDRESS CRY ZIP TELEPHONE
1200 North Telegraph Road Pontiac 48341 (313)858 -0644
FINANCIALOFFICER(NAMEANDTR1E) SIGNATURE DATE
Fred Poinsett
ManaRer, Accounting
ADDRESS crry ZIP TELEPHONE
1200 North Telegraph Road Pontiac 48341 (313)858 -0379
AUTHORTZMIGOFFICIAL(NAMEANDTITLE) SIGNATURE DATE
Larry Crake
Board of Commissioners
,
A.
By authority of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 and
Governor's Discretionary Fund.
Submission of this application by the due date
Is required to participate in this program.
ODCP-70 I
REV 2/92
11c. REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT(s)
20, 24, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64
65, 66, 67, 68. 69
lie. POPULATION TO BE SERVED
1,083,592
11. JURISDICTION
ha. COUNTY(ies) IN WHICH THE PROJECT WILL OPERATE
Oakland County, Michigan
11b. SENATE DISTRICT(s)
8th, 15th, 16th, 17th
11d. U.S. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT(s)
6th, 7th, 14th, 18th
12. SERVICE IMPACT
IF AWARDED, THESE FUNDS WILL [ ] CREATE A NEW PROGRAM
D(1 ENHANCE OR EXPAND AN ON-GOINGSROGRAM
sum OF FUNDING - FISCAL YEAR BUDGET PRIOR YEAR CURRENT YEAR
FEDERAL - (Specify)
$211,316.00 $ 211,315.00
STATE - (Specify)
$ - 0 - $ - 0 -
LOCAL - (Specify)
$140,875.00 $ 140,895.00
TOTAL BUDGET $352,191.00 , $ 352,210.00
3. BUDGET SUMMARY
CATEGORY FEDERAL AMOUNT MATCH AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT
PERSONNEL $ 208,033.00 $138,689.00 $ 346,722.00
CONSULTANT/CONTRACTUAL $ $ $
TRAVEL $ $ $
SUPPLIES/OPERATING $ 3,282.00* t 2,206.00* $ 5,488.00
EQUIPMENT
TOTAL $ 211,315.00 $140,895.00 t 352,210.00
*To equal $211,315 Federal Amount, $11.00 deducted from Supplies/Operating Federal
Amount and added to Match Amount
SQURCE/AMOUNT OF CASH MATCH AMOUNT
$ 140,895.00
$
$
TOTAL MATCH i 140,895.00
ODCP-701
REV 2/92
L FRINGE BENEFITh
TOTAL
DESCRIPTION AND CA ONAV..That AMU FED eR_C1
APA IV 16,432.00 10,954.00 27,386.00
APA III (3) 41,300.00 27,533.00 68,833.00
FRINGE BENEFI KNEFITS SUBTOTAL 105,608.00
346,722.00 TOTAL PERSONNEL
B. BUDGET DETAIL
PERSONNEL,
(USE WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY)
• on441^4. . .....
HOURLY OR DAILY PERCENTAGE I I TOTAL
NAME AND POSITION TITLE SALARY RATE OF TIME FEDERAL AMOUNT MATCH AMOUNT = _PROJECT AMOUNT
$ $ $ $
APA IV 62,526.00 100% 37,516.00 25,010.00 62,526.00
APA III (3) 157,152.00 100% 94,291.00 62,861.00 157,152.00
Legal Secretary 21,436.00 100% 12,862.00 8,574.00 21,436.00
$
SALARIES 6, WAGES SUBTOTAL 241,114.00
Legal Secretary 5,633.00 3,756.00 , 9,389.00
HOURLY OR DAILY I HOURS OR DAYS
SALARY RATE I DEVOTED
1 TOTAL
MATCH AMOUNT = PROJECT AMOUNT NAME/AFFILIATION FED
B. BUDGET DETAIL
CONSULTANT/CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
(USE WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY)
TOTAL CONSULTANT/
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TRAVEL
(USE WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY)
COST PER 1 1 TOTAL
DESCRIPTION MILE LODGING MEALS FEDERAL AMOUNT + MATCH AMOUNT = PROJECT AMOUNT
$ $ $ $ $ $
TOTAL TRAVEL $
PURCHASE 1 TOTAL
B. BUDGET DETAIL
SUPPLIES/OPERATING EXPENSES
(USE WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY)
. MONTHLY LEASE 1 1 TOTAL
ITEM EXPLANATION SR UNIT ?RICE FEDERAL AMOUNT + MATCH AMOUNT = PROJECT AMOUNT
$ $ $ $
Office Space 106 ft 2 x 3 Offices @16.20 ft/yr 3,091.00 2,061.00 5,152.00
Pager - Air
Tower Charge $21/quarter x 4 pagers @84.00/yr 202.00 134.00 336.00
TOTAL SUPPLIESJOPERATINC EXPENSES .$ 5,488.00
EQUIPMENT
(USE WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY)
ITEM 1 OUANTITY I PRICE I FEDERAL AMOUNT MATCH AMOUNT = PROJECT AMOUNT
TOTAL EOUIPMENT
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
(USE WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY)
1 1 TOTAL
FEDERAL AMOUNT + BATCH AMOUNT = PROJECT AMOUNT $
1 $ 1 $
211,315.00 140,895.00 352,210.00
—5—
C. BUDGET NARRATIVE
BUDGET NARRATIVE
I. BUDGET NARRATIVE. Describe the overall plan for your budget, and describe
budget costs not fully explained in the budget detail.
The attached budget detail sets forth the budgetary items requested by the Task Force.
All costs are self-explanatory.
The funding for this unit will be provided by the County of Oakland and the state grant
dollars. The project director and financial officers are responsible for overseeing the
administration of the budget as detailed in the attached budget detail. All costs are self-
explanatory.
-6- ODCP-70 1
REV 2/92
D. PROGRAM NARRATIVES
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
I. PROBLEM STATEMENT. Describe the problem exactly as it exists in your
community. Define the nature and magnitude of the problem to be addressed through your
proposal. Analyze the causes of the problem. Document statements with valid, current
statistical data to clearly demonstrate why the problem exists. Identify the source and date
of your information. If your project has been previously funded, describe present and past
achievements and impact on the drug/violent crime problem in your community.
OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S NARCOTICS TASK FORCE
The problem in Oakland County is the existence of major drug distribution networks which continue their
large scale operations despite the best efforts of existing law enforcement agencies. The members of these
networks are repeat drug offenders who engage in foreseeable patterns of serious drug activity.
Multi-jurisdictional "concept teams" are able to arrest and prosecute low level street dealers utilizing the
primary investigatory technique of "undercover buys." However, this traditional law enforcement effort is not
suitable for the successful penetration of the major distribution networks because street level dealers prosecuted
for the possession or sale of small amounts of drugs receive lenient sentences and return to their illegal activities
within a short period of time. Arrest and prosecution for these individuals is merely a cost of doing business.
The criminal justice system operates a revolving prison door with no deterrent effect. Studies indicate that high
echelon dealers deal with only a few people known to them, thereby insulating themselves from traditional
''undercover buys."
Moreover, little, if anything, has been done to systematically identify or target major drug offenders and
distribution networks. Concept teams suffer from structural weaknesses which prevent them from pursuing major
distribution networks. These structural flaws include: a lack of permanent trained personnel; a continuing
pressure for statistical success; a lack of unity of command; and pressures to respond to local "street problems''
faced by local contributing police departments. These structural weaknesses prevent concept teams from
conducting an effective "war on drugs." The Oakland County Sheriff's Department submitted a 1991 Application
for Anti-Drug Abuse Act Grant. The Sheriff's Department Application stated:
According to the Narcotics Enforcement Team annual reports, the budget and manpower
allocation for narcotics enforcement has experienced a significant increase over the past five
years, yet the number of Class I and Class II dealers arrested and charged have actually
decreased. One can conclude that traditional buy teams have no effect on major narcotics
traffickers.
The magnitude of the problem is easily understood by reference to the results of grand jury efforts over
the past thirty (30) months in Oakland County. From September 1989, to March 1992, the grand jury has
indicted 93 members of formerly secret, major drug organizations operating in Oakland County. The largest
organization was dealing in approximately $1,000,000.00 of cocaine at the wholesale level weekly. The
ringleader of the smallest organization was arrested by police while preparing to flee the jurisdiction in
possession of nearly $600,000.00 in currency and gold which he had accumulated by drug dealing.
-7- ODCP-701
REV 2/92
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Outline clearly in detail your overall project. Include a
chronological plan of your goals (exactly what the project will achieve). Explain how project
activities will attain these goals and impact on the problem stated. Include a description of
project activities and position description of all positions to be funded by federal and match
funds.
The goal of the Narcotics Task Force is to target and destroy major drug distribution networks
operating in Oakland County through effective use of a specially designated cadre of prosecutors
assigned to work with a citizens grand jury and local law enforcement organizations.
Through the assignment of four assistant prosecutors to the Task Force, all Class I, II, and Ill
drug violators will be identified and prosecuted.
Existing no plea policies will continue to be enforced. The Task Force will vertically prosecute
all cases in which Level I, II, and ill are identified.
The Task Force will be established as a separate unit within the Prosecutor's Office. It will be
established to operate as though on a permanent basis. Utilizing an electronics communications system
(pagers), a Task Force prosecutor will be available twenty-four hours a day to advise and assist law
enforcement officers during any stage of investigations.
POSITION DESCRIPTION
I. CRIMINAL PROSECUTORS
Four prosecutors will conduct grand jury investigations and vertically prosecute major controlled
substance cases developed by the grand jury or otherwise presented to the task force by criminal
investigative units.
II. SECRETARY
One legal secretary is needed to perform clerical and typist functions for the Task Force.
-8- ODCP-701
REV 2/92
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
III. PROGRAM OBJECTIVE. Objectives are specific, quantified indicators of expected
results of the project. The objectives must be described in terms of measurable events that
can be realistically expected under time constraints and available resources utilizing quantitative
data. Objectives must be related to the problem. Describe who will do what, by when and
why.
The performance of the Narcotics Task Force will be measured by objective achievement. The
expected results are that, by selectively targeting repeat and career drug offenders, the unit will:
1. Increase the number of Class I, II, and III violators identified, prosecuted
and convicted;
2. Increase the number of Class IV and V violators who are identified,
prosecuted, and convicted;
3. Decrease the time between arrest and disposition of criminal drug unit
cases;
4. Increase forfeitures of drug related assets.
The objective for the Narcotic's Task Force will be the investigation and prosecution of
large scale drug conspiracies operating in part in Oakland County, as well as all Class I, II, Ill,
IV, and V violators identified.
-10- ODCP-701
REV 2/92
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
IV. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND EVALUATION. State exactly how each
objective will be measured and accomplished. Performance indicators (activities which
evaluate and document your program's effectiveness), should be matched to your specific
objectives. Specify the criteria and procedures to be used. Indicate how the project will
demonstrate accountability and a measurable impact on the drug/violent crime problem.
Identify the person responsible for the evaluation of this project.
The performance and goal attainment of the Narcotics Task Force will be measured by
evaluating:
1. The number of full-time prosecutors assigned to the unit;
2. The number of cases identified and investigated as meriting investigation
by the Narcotics Task Force;
3. The number of defendants charged;
4. The number of defendants convicted;
5. The average time from charge through conviction of a defendant;
6. The number of Class I, II, and III defendants identified and convicted;
7. The number of Class IV and V defendants identified and convicted;
8. The number of individuals incarcerated;
9. The amount for drug related assets forfeited.
The project director shall be responsible for conducting the quarterly evaluations. These
evaluations shall be given to the Office of Criminal Justice quarterly and will be utilized to refine
case selection and development of prosecution techniques for future investigations.
-1 1- ODCP-701
REV 2/92
PROGRAM NARRATIVE
V. PLANS FOR PROJECT PICK-UP WITH LOCAL FUNDS. Please describe the effort
which will be made for local assumption/retention of the project after federal funding has
expired. Specify the length of time this project will require federal funds.
Utilizing demonstrated success, it is anticipated that
county funding will be available to continue drug unit
operations beyond the expiration of ADAA funding. Successful
reduction of drug offenses will prove its value by creating an
overall crime growth rate reduction which should be measurable.
-12- ODCP-701
REV 2/92
2
4
9
I:\DAVE\PROS\NFT9293.MR
FINANCE COMMITTEE
A/,./2
December 10, 1992
FISCAL NOTE (Misc. 92286)
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, DR. G. WILLIAM CADDELL, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: PROSECUTING ATTORNEY - ACCEPTANCE OF 1992/1993 OAKLAND
COUNTY NARCOTICS TASK FORCE GRANT - MISCELLANEOUS
RESOLUTION #92
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XI-G of this Board, the Finance Committee has
reviewed above named Miscellaneous Resolution and finds:
1) The Office of the Prosecuting Attorney applied for
initial funding of the Oakland County Narcotics Task
Force grant under authority of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of
1988 for the period October 1, 1992 through September 30,
1993 in the amount of $1,077,285 (State - $646,371,
County - $430,914).
The State of Michigan, Department of Management and
Budget, Office of Criminal Justice has awarded the County
a grant of $211,315, which requires County match of
$140,895 (40%) for a total grant program of $352,210 as
detailed in Schedule A, attached to the resolution.
3) The grant award continues funding for one (1) Assistant
Prosecutor IV position, three (3) Assistant Prosecutor
III positions, and one (1) Legal Secretary position,
through September 30, 1993.
County match requirements of this grant program are
continued at 40% and is included in the 1992/93 Biennial
Budget.
8) State guidelines do not allow grant funding for indirect
administrative costs for this program, which equal
$12,056.
The Office of the Prosecuting Attorney's 1992/1993
Biennial Budget Narcotics Task Force Grant Budget was
based on the 1991/1992 Grant Award as detailed on
Schedule 1.
10) The Prosecuting Attorney Department's 1992/1993 Special
Revenue Budget is amended as detailed on Schedule 1
Positions
(4-27394-411-01-00)
1001 Salaries
2074 Fringe Benefits
Total Personnel Cost
Operating:
3574 Personal Mileage
3752 Travel & Conference
5998 Misc. Cap. Outlay
6310 Bldg. Space Cost Alloc.
6640 Equipment Rental
6670 Stationery Stock
6735 Liability Insurance
6750 Telephone Communications
Total Operating Cost
GRANT TOTAL
60%
40%
Positions
(4-27394-411-01-00)
1001 Salaries
2074 Fringe Benefits
Total Personnel Cost
$3,000
3,900
2,183
8,566
720
3,800
1,420
6,440
$30,049
$352,277
Operating:
3574 Personal Mileage
3752 Travel & Conference
5998 Misc. Cap. Outlay
6310 Bldg. Space Cost Alloc.
6640 Equipment Rental
6670 Stationery Stock
6735 Liability Insurance
6750 Telephone Communications
Total Operating Cost
GRANT TOTAL
($3,000) $0
(3,900) 0
(2,183) 0
(3,434) 5,152
(384) 336
(3,800) 0
(1,420) 0
(6,440) 0
($24,561) $5,488
($67) $352,210 .===
60% (51)
40% (16)
($67)
Funding Source:
Grant Funding
County Match
GRANT TOTAL
Prepared By:
Budget Division
$211,366 60%
140,911 40%
$352,277
$211,315
140,895
$352,210
11/16/92
Schedule 1
OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Oakland County Narcotics Task Force Grant
1992/93 Acceptance
1992/93
1992 1992 Award
Budget Amendment (Amended Budget)
5 0 5
$225,389 $15,725 $241,114
96,839 8,769 105,608
$322,228 $24,494 $346,722
3,000 ($3,000) $0
3,900 (3,900) 0
2,163 (2,183) 0
8,586 (3,434) 5,152
720 (384) 336
3,800 (3,800) 0
1,420 (1,420) 0
6,440 (6,440) 0
$30,049 ($24,561) $5,488
$352,277 ($67) $352,210
Funding Source:
Grant Funding
County Match
GRANT TOTAL
$211,366 60% ($51) $211,315
140,911 40% (16) 140,895
$352,277 ($67) $352,210
1992/93
1993 1993 Award
Budget Amendment (Amended Budget)
5 0 5
$225,389 $15,725 $241,114
96,639 8,769 105,608
$322,228 $24,494 $346,722
w:\dave\pros\narc93ac.wkl 16-Nov-92
Resolution # 92286 December 10, 1992
Moved by McCulloch supported by Wolf the resolution be adopted.
AYES: Johnson, McConnell. McCulloch, McPherson, Millard, Moffitt, Obrecht,
Olsen, Palmer, Pappageorge, Schmid, Skarritt, Wolf, Bishop, Crake, Gosling, Huntoon,
Jensen. (18)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County
Board of Commissioners on December 10. 1992
with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County
of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 10th day 21
LynrI/D. Allen, County Clerk