Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2013.03.06 - 20722MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #13043 March 6, 2013 BY: PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE, JIM RUNESTAD, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION — SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR A 2013 MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT GRANT FOR A UNIVERSALLY ACCESSIBILE SMALL BOAT LAUNCH AT INDEPENDENCE OAKS COUNTY PARK To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has been notified by the Department of Natural Resources that application for cost sharing grants from the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Grant Program may be submitted by April 1, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has identified and established priorities for improvements within the adopted 2013-2017 5-Year Recreation Plan and the adopted FY 2013-2015 Capital Improvement Program Budget Plan; and WHEREAS, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission recommends the filing of the following application to the Department of Natural Resources for $37,700 (75% of total project costs) from the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Program with a local match of $12,600 (25%) from the Parks and Recreation Fund; and WHEREAS, the grant agency requires a resolution from the Governing Body in support of the application. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorizes and approves the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Grant Program development grant application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners directs its Chairperson or designee to execute said application on behalf of the County of Oakland. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PLANNING & BUILDING COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. PLANPdING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Parks & Recreation GRANT NAME: 2013 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Department of Natural Resources DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Melissa Prowse 248 249-2801 STATUS: Grant Application • DATE: January 30, 2013 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #01320, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The captioned grant materials and grant application package (which should include an application Report from Fiscal Services to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners, the grant application, and this Sign Off email containing grant review comments) may be submitted to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners for review and signature, with informational copies to the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s). DEPARTMENT REVIEW Department of Management and Budget: Approved. — Laurie Van Pelt (1/28/2013) Department of Human Resources: Approved. — Karen Jones (1/28/2013) Risk Management and Safety: Approved by Risk Management. — Julie Secontine (1/28/2013) Corporation Counsel: The above-referenced grant application is approved. — Jody S. Hall (1/30/2013) DNR USE ONLY Application Number Federal ID Number (required) 38-600-4876 County Oakland Title Business Development Representative Telephone ( 248 )858-4630 FAX ( 248 858-1683 E-mail prowsern@oakgov. . corn U.S. Congressional District 9 ZIP 48348 1City, Village or Township of site Independence Township 4ddress of site 9501 Sashabaw Road s the application for site development or land acquisition? I4 Development or fl Acquisition ection A2: Project Funding IMPORTANT: PLEASE ROUND ALL AMOUNTS TO THE NEAREST $100.00 SOURCES OF MATCHING FUNDS PROJECT COST AMOUNTS a. General Funds or Local Restricted Funds (Applicant's own cash) 12,600.00 00,00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 12,600.00 37,700.00 50,300.00 25 % Page 3 of 12 PR5750 (Rev 01/07/2013) Michigan Department of Natural Resources - Grants Management MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND 2013 GRANT APPLICATION This information is requested by authority of Part 19 of Act 451 of 1994, to be considered for a recreation grant, A large print version of this application is available upon request. Region Number Please refer to Chapter 3 of 2013 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Application Guidelines booklet for information on completing this form. legtion At, oplicalifli" it, Pr6j-ect Identification Name of Applicant (Government Unit) Oakland County Name of Authorized Representative (responsible for application day-to-day) Melissa Prowse Address 2800 Watkins Lake Road City, State, ZIP Waterford, MI 48328 State House District IState Senate District 43 126 County in which site is located Oakland ark Name Independence Oaks County Park 1Town, Range and Section Numbers of site location (REQUIRED) T4N , R9E , Sec. 3,4,9,10,15,16 Proposal Title Accessible Small Boat Launch Proposal Description Installation of a universally accessible kayak/canoe launch on Crooked Lake in Independence Oaks County Park. j. b. Force Account Labor/Materials (Applicant's own paid labor or materials) c. Federal or State Funds (other than MNRTF) d. Cash Donations e. Donated Labor and/or Materials f. Donated Land Value (acquisition applications only) g. Total Match h. Grant Amount Requested (round to nearest hundred dollars) i. Total Project Cost Percentage of match commitment (Must be at least 25% of total project cost) ection A3: ProjectlYtitails — Land Acquisition Application riterest acquired will be (check all that apply) Fee Simple Easement fl Other Vhat are the current land uses that exist on the parcel? (check all that apply) ] Undeveloped/natural land El Agricultural Residential El Commercial (including timber extraction) ] Recreational El Other (describe) ,ny encroachments or boundary disputes with neighbors? LII No r] Yes Any buildings on the site? LI No LI Yes 00.00 00 . 00 00.00 Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Parcel 3 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 TOTALS 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 rOlect = ails -Development ApplicationstiNtY ecti 2 El 0 0 E ri ^ ri- g) &.o\- IS SCOPE ITEM OF UNIVERSAL DESIGN? NO YES E] 0 Z SIZE OR QUANTITY 1 50 linear feet L 0 1,600,0 4,400.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 500.00 200.00 43,700.00 6,600.00 50,300.00 Page 4 of 12 PR5750 (Rev. 01/07/2013) Parcel information Table Itemize estimated cost information for each parcel. For phased projects, the parcels and dollar amounts provided should include all phases. LANDOWNER STATE EQUALIZED VALUE ACREAGE (SEV) (1) ESTIMATED APPRAISED VALUE ($) (2) ESTIMATED RELOCATION COSTS ($) (3) ESTIMATED INCIDENTAL COSTS Prorated Taxes Recording Fees Transfer Tax Title Insurance Appraisal Fees Closing Fees Environmental Assessment Costs TOTAL 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.(Jo TOTAL ACQUISITION COSTS $ 00,00 Total Acquisition Costs must match item i. of Section A2 of this form TOTAL APPRAISED VALUE (1) $ TOTAL RELOCATION COSTS (2) $ TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS (3) $ bnpplicant's current control of the site: Fee Simple fl Lease 1:1 Easement El Other fl Age of Park El Acres Development Project Cost Estimate Table IMPORTANT! PLEASE ROUND ALL kMOUNTS TO THE NEAREST $100.00 SCOPE ITEMS Limit each item description to 25 characters. Do Not Abbreviate. t kayak/canoe boat launch 2. Access route Additional accessible parking 1 spots 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9, 0. Permit Fees MNRTF Sign SUBTOTAL ENGINEERING (These fees may not exceed 15% of subtotal) $ TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ Total Estimated Cost must match item i. of Section A2 of this form COST -.;ontact Name for Administering Agency Telephone Amount Amount ;ontact Name for Administering Agency ype of Funds EGrant funds awarded ;Telephone {( - action AS: Explanation of Match Sources Complete only if you entered a value for any or all of items c, d, e, or f in Section A2 of this application. c. Federal or other state funds - Provide the information requested below for each federal or state program from which matching funds will be provided. 1)Program Name Administering Agency Iype of Funds [1] Grant funds awarded Date grant funds approved I1] Grant funds applied for, not yet approved Estimated approval date [1] Appropriated funds Date appropriated fl Other, explain Is documentation containing the scope of work and budget for the other grant funds included with application? Is documentation (such as a grant approval letter) that verifies the availability of funds included with application? 2)Program Name 'Administering Agency LIINo OYes ENo DYes Date grant funds approved OGrant funds applied for, not yet approved Estimated approval date DAppropriated funds Date appropriated 00ther, explain Is documentation containing the k.,ope of work and budget for the other grant funds included with application? END liYes Is documentation (such as a grant approval letter) that verifies the availability of funds included with application? E1N0 E]Yes d. Cash Donations - List the individual sources and the amounts to be donated below. SOURCE AMOUNT 00.00 OD.00 00.00 Is a letter of intent from each donor included with application? ElNin EIYes e. Donated Labor or Materials - Include each item to be donated, the source, dollar value, and how the dollar value was determined. ITEM SOURCE DOLLAR VALUE VALUATION METHOD 00.00 00.0 0 00.00 Is a letter of intent from each donor included with application? EN° EiYes f. Donated Land Value - Describe how the value of the land donation was determined. Is a letter from the landowner committing to the donation of a portion of fair market value and any conditions placed upon their commitment included with application? El No El Yes Page 5 of 12 PR5750 (Rev. 01107/20131 ection C: teftrdsAli '67)Af.).'111111[ , MOM l2r601i NO YES LI 0 E LI LI Z Z 0 E LI LI LI E E Z 22,933,010 500 Page 6 of 12 PR5750 (Rev. 01/07/2013) _ ection*P. Justification of Need If you are submitting multiple acquisition or development applications, what is the priority for this application? (1 = highest) What page(s) of your recreation plan is the need for the proposed project discussed? What was the date(s) of public meeting to discuss submission of the grant application? Did you gather public input from individuals with disabilities, their families, or advocates? Are you the primary provider of recreation services to any surrounding communities, as documented in your recreation plan? List communities: N, A February 6, 2013 E No i4Yes No Ell Yes Was the application developed through collaboration with adjacent communities or school districts? Z No El Yes (If yes, need to submit supporting documentation.) Is applicant financially solvent to complete the acquisition transaction without any third party assistance (i.e. loans, lines of credit, same day closings, etc.) until partial reimbursement and final audit is completed (approximately 180 days after closing)? Not applicable If yes, please provide documentation that supports this. Has applicant received DNR recreation grant(s) in the past? If yes, does applicant currently have an open, active grant? Has applicant closed, sold, or transferred any parkland or recreation facilities in the past 5 years? Does applicant have a known unresolved conversion of grant-assisted parkland? (a conversion is a change from public outdoor recreation use to some other use) Does applicant have a "residents only" policy for this park or other parks or recreation facilities? Do you now or do you intend in the future to charge an entrance fee to the project site? If yes, fee schedule and policy for reduced entrance fees for low-income users included with application? What is the applicant's current year budget for parks and recreation? What are the estimated operation and maintenance costs associated with the project? ection :site Conditions Complete the following property checklist on the environmental conditions at the project site and adjacent areas, using information from the past ten years or longer, as appropriate. If you answer YES or UNKNOWN to questions 1-15, you are required to prepare an environmental report. See page 26 of the 2013 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Application Guidelines for guidance. . Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that any portion of the property is or has been used for industrial purposes, including manufacturing and/or minerals' processing or extraction (sand, gravel, oil, or gas) at this time or in the past? Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that any portion of the property is currently being used or has been used in the past for a gas station, motor vehicle service or repair facility, commercial printing facility, dry cleaners, photo developing lab, junkyard, landfill, waste treatment, storage, processing or recycling or disposal facility? Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that any of the following are or have in the past been stored, discarded, or used on the property — automotive or industrial batteries, pesticides or other chemicals used in agricultural practices, paints, industrial waste, or other chemicals in drums or other containers? NO YES UNKNOWN E LI El Z LI El Z 4. Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that fill dirt or other fill material of unknown origin is on this property or has in the past been placed on the property? El El 6. Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge of any evidence of leaks, spills, or stains from a substance other than water at this time or in the past? 6. Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that there are or have in the past been waste disposal pits, lagoons, or ponds on the property? 7. Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that there are at this time or have in the past been registered or unregistered storage tanks on the property? El 8. Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that contaminated groundwater lies below the property? 9. If there is a water well on the property, does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that contaminants have been identified in the well that exceeded legal standards or has the well been identified as contaminated by a governmenta yeiR..y? LJ 0. Has the landowner been notified about any current violations of environmental laws pertaining to activities on the property or does applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge about past violations? 1. Has the landowner been notified of any environmental assessments of the property that identified a) the presence of hazardous substances, petroleum products, or contamination; or b) the need for further assessment? 2. Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that any hazardous substances, unidentified waste materials, tires, or automotive or industrial batteries have been dumped above ground, buried, or burned on the property? 3. Is the property listed on any federal or state list of contaminated sites, including the site of a leaking underground storage tank? Does the applicant, landowner, or others have knowledge that any of the adjoining properties are currently being used or have been used in the past for the purposes listed in the previous questions 1-13? Z E Has an environmental assessment been completed for the site? If yes, provide the most current. 0 3. Are permits required for the development of the site? If yes, complete the following table: TYPE OF PERMIT PERMITTING AGENCY EFFORTS TAKEN TO OBTAIN PERMIT OR DETERMINE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS Joint permit MDEQ Will apply for permit prior to bidding & construction LI Page 7 of 12 PR5750 (Rev 01/07/2013) Dune and swale complex o Boreal forest 0 Type unknown (Wet meadow) 15 Section El: Natural Features of the Project Site To the best of your knowledge, does the project site include: Great Lakes shoreline or Great Lakes connecting water frontage? Z No 1:1 Yes Great Lakes connecting waters are defined on page 13 of the 2013 Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Application Guidelines booklet. If yes, name of Great Lake or Great Lakes connecting water How many linear feet of shoreline or frontage? Inland lake frontage? H No Yes If yes, name of water body Crooked Lake ; Upper Bushman Lake What is the size of the total water body in acres? 68; 31 How many linear feet of frontage are on site? 11,932; 9,080 River and/or tributary frontage? E No Yes If yes, name of water body Clinton River tributary How many linear feet of frontage? 13,425 Is the river or tributary a state natural river or a federally dedicated wild and scenic river? El No Yes Wetland acreage or frontage? — No n Yes If yes, please list the number of acres of the type(s) of wetland(s) on site Marsh 81 Prairie 0 Fen 16 Bog o Forest 353 Shrub 15 Is documentation of type and quality provided with application? El No Z Yes Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations for Independence Oaks, Lyon Oaks, and Rose Oaks, Oakland County Parks, If yes, source of information Report 2006-04; March 31, 2006 Other water acreage or frontage? No E Yes If yes, name of other water body Hidden Beach Pond Is the entire water body completely within the site boundaries? No El Yes How many linear feet of frontage or acres of water are on site? 2 acres Sand dunes? XI No If yes, list the number of acres of sand dunes on the site Critical Not designated as critical, or designation unknown ___ Is documentation of type and quality provided with application? EINo OYes If yes, source of information Dedicated state or federal listed wilderness or dedicated natural area or Pigeon River Country State Forest land or inholding? Z No E Yes If yes, name of area How many acres on site? Rare species or any other significant feature as defined by the Michigan Natural Features Inventory? No Yes If yes, list species or feature and status. If too many to list here, include in the application narrative. See attached Population/range locations denoted on site plan or other map? Ej No Z . Yes Yes Page 8 of 12 PR5750 (Rev. D1/072013) 'ecti. 1-i.. 4fmr. - ourstattlitecreatioryetp...11440itier:. Yes No El Section E2: Wildlife Values of the Project Site e proposed park or park development: Protect wildlife habitat (for example, breeding grounds, winter deeryards, den sites)? El No — Yes If yes, list species How many acres of habitat does the site provide? Act as a wildlife corridor between existing protected areas or buffer an existing protected area? I No 111 Yes If yes, name the existing park(s) or protected area(s) How many acres are currently in protected status? Is documentation of the ecological value of adjacent protected areas and/or the ability of the project site to act as a corridor/buffer provided with application? 0 No 0 Yes If yes, source of information Will the proposed park or park development provide new or additional: Water recreation opportunities? fl No Yes Motorized recreation opportunities (ORV and/or Snowmobile)? Hunting opportunities? No El Yes If yes, what seasons will be available? (for example, deer/firearm) How many acres will be available for hunting? Fishing opportunities? El No Z Yes If yes, what type of fishing opportunities will be provided? (species/methods) Largemouth Bass and Bluegill(better than average fishing); Bullhead, Black Crappie, Yellow Perch, Northern Pike (fishable populations present)/ all methods allowed per DNR fishing regulations; electr_o boat motors only Bird watching or other nature viewing opportunities? . No Z Yes If yes, what species can be viewed? See attached checklist Nature interpretation or education opportunities? No El Yes If yes, how are the interpretation or education opportunities provided? (check all that apply) 0 Interpretive signage LI Interpretive brochures [1:1 Nature center El Part time or volunteer naturalist 11 Full time naturalist Have you formed a partnership with another organization to provide interpretive/educational services? n No Pi Yes If yes, name of organization Provide examples of interpretive materials, descriptions of classes, and other documentation on the interpretive/educational services provided with application WON E4: Public Access Opportunities Will the site be open to the general public? 0 No Yes 1/2 hour before sunrise to 1/2 hour after sunset year List the hours open to the public round How will the public be reasonably able to access this site? (check all that apply and show on site plan) Automobile 0 Boat 0 Public Transportation LI Motorized Trail 0 Non-Motorized Trail Sidewalk/Pathway 0 Other (describe) _ Page 9 of 12 PR5750 (Rev 01/0712013i 0 CTION E5' TtniIs If the proposed project is a trail, answer the following questions: Who is the primary intended user? (Check one) ft. sidewalk ft. bituminous (paved), ft. other hard surface. Page 10 of 12 PR5750 (Rev 01107/2013) 0 Hikers/Pedestrians 0 Road Bicyclists 0 Equestrians 0 Mountain Bicyclists 0 Cross-Country Skiiers El Snowmobilers 0 Other motorized vehicle users fl Other Who are the secondary users? 0 Hikers/Pedestrians Cross-Country Skiiers 0 Road Bicyclists LI Snowmobilers 0 Equestrians 0 Mountain Bicyclists 0 Other motorized vehicle users El Other Is the trail connected to another trail(s) or part of a larger trail network? Di No El Yes If yes, what is the name of the network? How long is the trail? linear feet, including ft. boardwalk (if applicable), What is the width of the trail? ECTION F: Certification ;A44 IIMEN1111111111111211111111EIIIIM I hereby certify that I am an official of the applicant agency and am empowered to make the necessary commitments to apply for this grant I also certify that I understand all of the commitments and responsibilities listed in the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund 2013 Application Guidelines (IC1905). Printed/typed name of authorized agent Title of authorized agent Signature (must be a community official) Complete all information, sign, and mail to: OVERNIGHT or EXPRESS MAIL to: Date GRANTS MANAGEMENT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PO BOX 30425 LANSING MI 48909-7925 GRANTS MANAGEMENT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 530 W ALLEGAN LANSING MI 48933 Mailed applications must be postmarked by the US Postal Service no later than 11:59 PM April 1, 2013. DO NOT FAX APPLICATION Section El: Natural Features of the Project Site Rare species or any other significant feature as defined by the Michigan Natural Features Inventory: , Species or Natural MNFI/ DNR Feature Ranking* Documentation Notes MNFI Special Animal Occurrences indicated on map inserts; Burn Blandings Turtle SC Survey Forms, dated Units 1 & 2 are located north and south of 4/10/2011 and 4/12/2011 the Wint Nature Center, respectively Annual observation during emergent season Eastern Recorded observations for SC Massasauga 2007 —2010 provided on (March-November) documented by Brittany Bird, Natural Resources Planner, Oakland Rattlesnake Map 1 County Parks and Recreation Commission Surveys to Determine 2011 survey found the species at locations Presence of Tamarack Tree northeast and south of Upper Bushman Cricket (Oecanthus 'arils) Tamarack Tree Lake, labeled TTC1 through 11C4 in figures 3 SC at Upper Bushman Lake in Cricket and 5; location also mapped on MNF1 Independence Oaks County Element Occurrence Locations as Provided Park, Report 2011-20; to Oakland County Parks, 2012 (Map 2) December 8, 2011 MNF1 Element Occurrence Locations as Provided to Red -shouldered Last observed during a Christmas Bird Count Threatened Oakland County Parks, Hawk Survey December 12, 2012 2012 (Map 2) Seen in 2012 within "Priority 2" map unit Documented by Brittany Bird, Natural Grasshopper SC located on Independence Resources Planner, Oakland County Parks , Sparrow Oaks Grassland Bird Survey and Recreation Commission (Map3) Seen in 2012 within "Priority 2" map unit Documented by Brittany Bird, Natural SC Dickcissel located on Independence Resources Planner, Oakland County Parks Oaks Grassland Bird Survey and Recreation Commission 1 (Map3) Page 11 of 12 PR5750 (Rev 01/07/2013) Section El: Natural Features of the Project Site (continued) Rare species or any other significant feature as defined by the Michigan Natural Features Inventory: Species or MNFI/ DNR Community Type Ranking* Documentation Notes Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations Location mapped on MNFI Element for Independence Oaks, Lyon Bog Bluegrass Threatened Oaks, and Rose Oaks, Oakland Occurrence Locations as Provided to County Parks, Report 2006-04; Oakland County Parks, 2012 (Map 2) March 31, 2006 Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations Purple Twayblade for Independence Oaks, Lyon Location mapped on MNFI Element Sc Occurrence Locations as Provided to Orchid Oaks, and Rose Oaks, Oakland County Parks, Report 2006-04; Oakland County Parks, 2012 (Map 2) March 31, 2006 Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations for Independence Oaks, Lyon Labeled "D" on Figure 7, page 10 of Oak Barrens S1G2 Oaks, and Rose Oaks, Oakland report; see also Table 5, pages 17 & 18 for further explanation County Parks, Report 2006-04; March 31, 2006 Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations Labeled "F" on Figure 7, page 10 of Wet Mesic Prairie for Independence Oaks, Lyon 52G2 Oaks, and Rose Oaks, Oakland report; see also Table 5, pages 17 & County Parks, Report 2006-04; 18 for further explanation March 31, 2006 Page 12 of 12 PR5750 (Rev. 01/0712013) Universally Accessible Kayak/Canoe Launch at Independence Oaks County Park PROJECT 'JUSTIFICATION AND SUPPORT The Oakland County Park system was created in 1965 and has acquired more than 6,700 acres of public land, including significant and rare natural areas, and developed thirteen public parks. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority (HCMA) have also acquired and developed regional park and recreation facilities in Oakland County and elsewhere in SE Michigan. With 1.2 million people calling Oakland County home and 4.7 million people living in SE Michigan, the numerous parks and recreation areas, both those mentioned and the parks owned by the communities within the county, ensure adequate public access without overuse of the resources and recreation opportunities they desire. Following decades of steady population growth, there has been a leveling off in southeastern Michigan since the 1970s, According to US Census data from 2000 to 2010, the total population of SE Michigan declined by 2.7 percent. Oakland County saw a slight growth of 0.7 percent. However, the population of people aged 65+ in the area increased by 7.7 percent and, according to projections made by the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG), is expected to double from about 0.6 million in 2010 to 1.2 million by 2035. Meeting the recreational needs of this aging population will present new challenges for park and recreation providers. Chief among them will be the renovation and/or construction of facilities that meet or exceed the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act as aging Baby Boomers demand equal access to the natural areas and recreation opportunities they enjoy. This project proposes to improve and increase the access to boating and fishing at Independence Oaks Park by installing a universally accessible canoe/kayak boat launch on Crooked Lake. Independence Oaks Park is located in Independence Township, in the north central region of the county. According to NRPA guidelines', regional parks such as Independence Oaks draw from a service area of about one hour's driving time. Given its location close to 1-75, this area includes a large part of southeastern Michigan, including the cities of Detroit, Pontiac, Flint, Livonia, and Brighton, as well as areas in between (driving time information obtained from www.bing.com ). Of course, other factors influence people's choices of where to recreate, including the existence and proximity of other parks. In addition to Independence Oaks, other regional parks—Indian Springs Metropark, Pontiac Lake State Recreation Area, and Waterford Oaks and Orion Oaks County Parks—are also located in or near north central Oakland County. Indian Springs Metropark, Pontiac Lake State Recreation Area Recreation, Park, and Open Space Standards and Guidelines, National Recreation and Park Association, 1995, 1 2/14/2013 and Orion Oaks County Park also offer natural resource-based recreation opportunities. However, none, to our knowledge, offers a universally accessible-kayak/Canoe boat launch. Public Support The boat launch project is included in the current recreation plan (2013-2017) and is a part of the "Boathouse—Dock Replacement" item listed on the capital improvement plan (CIP) for construction in 2016 (Attachment 1). All public input requirements were met when developing both the 5-year recreation plan and the CIP. During the 30-day comment period for the 5-year recreation plan, numerous comments were received (see Chapter 8 of the plan) and most were positive. There were no comments indicating opposition to the small boat launch. According the U.S. Census Bureau, approximately 11% of the population in Oakland County has a hearing, vision, cognitive, ambulatory, or self-care disability. To help ensure that recreation opportunities are available to all residents, regardless of ability, we are seeking out the advice and comments from the disability community regarding this proposal, as well as for the other two grant proposals being submitted this year. We have scheduled an open house on February 19th and are advertising by means of Facebook, the Destination Oakland website (Attachment 2), and an eblast to more than 2000 people who have expressed an interest in accessibility issues at Oakland County parks. All comments and suggestions will be given serious consideration and those of merit will be incorporated into the proposals to the extent feasible. PRO D ESC, RIFF" N LocThon o k'roiect Independence Oaks Park was chosen as the park site for this project because of the high usage of the existing boat launch facilities and boat house. In addition, Independence Oaks hosts a number of events each year that are planned specifically for persons with disabilities and their families. As stated above, are no other universally accessible kayak/canoe boat launches in north-central Oakland County. Within the park, the boat launch area has a flat terrain and is already served by a large parking lot. By putting the proposed small boat launch at the existing boat launch (for trailered boats), the proposed launch would be away from the busy activity of the boat house rental area, but near enough (and connected by an access route) to use the public restrooms there and even to rent a kayak or canoe that could be moved by staff to the small boat launch for boarding. De-sign Choices/Universal Design The proposed kayak/canoe launch is a unique boat launch system that was conceived and put into production by a number of recreation professionals who were inspired by the Access to Recreation Initiative (Attachment 3). To our knowledge, it is the best existing design to maximize accessibility to small boats for people with disabilities. However, OCPR will seek out other universally accessible launch systems to insure fairness, best price, and the product that best provides access. 2 2/14/2013 To ensure that there is access to the boat launch system, OCPR will construct the following as part of this project: • A seven to ten-foot wide dock connecting the launch to the access route; • Transition plate from the access route to the launch dock; • Four additional accessible parking spots in the existing parking lot; • Level, hard-surface access route (8 feet wide) to the launch dock; and • High contrast signage to alert people to its location. Environmental Sustainability Because the road way, parking lot, and launch area have already been developed, placing the accessible small boat launch at the same location greatly reduces the need to clear or otherwise alter other, undisturbed sites within the park. The boat launch dock is made of polyethylene with hollow sections for floatation. The beige color allows sunlight to filter through and will not release chemicals into the water. Compared to wood, the materials are long-lasting and virtually maintenance-free, thus preventing environmental impact and saving cost from cleaning, painting, replacement, and employee time. The couplers for the dock/launch system are constructed of at least 90% post/pre- consumer recycled recycled tire rubber (Attachment 4). OCPRC uses helical piers as a standard practice to install docks and piers. Helical piers are less disruptive to the area where they are installed, as no heavy equipment disturbs the bottom of the lake and the piers are "screwed" in, which is less disruptive than digging and filling a hole. At the small boat launch area, the parking lot and access routes will be surfaced with aggregate (meeting all accessibility requirement„ including slope and width) to prevent surface water runoff into the lake. In addition to the sustainable features of the facility proposed in this application, Oakland County Parks has already established the following green initiatives: • Recycling programs for patrons at all campgrounds, waterparks, golf courses and day use parks are being established. • Parks employees recycle paper, plastic, metals, batteries, lights and ink cartridges in special collection containers. f.:-/vcts • All park facilities now utilize "green" cleaning products that are low in volatile organic compounds, reducing the amount of toxins in the air. HinJ -pie/ • All parks' equipment runs on bio-diesel fuel. • All parks use bio-lubricants for cleaning and lubricating equipment. 3 2/14/2013 Lund & Water • All parks now have designated "no mow zones," which will decrease the amount of gas and energy used in maintaining park property and allows for natural plant progression. • Integrated Pest Management principles have been established system-wide to reduce the use of chemical pesticides. • Efforts are being made to propagate native plant material in Oakland County Parks' newly acquired greenhouses, for use on park property. • An exemplary storm. water management project has been installed at Waterford Oaks County Park to protect water quality in the Clinton River Watershed. • As parking lots at the parks are renovated, bio-swales are installed to collect storm water and help protect streams and tributaries within the watershed. Energy Conservation • Energy audits have recently been conducted at facilities to identify improvements for efficiency. These audits have provided valuable roadmaps for upgrades that will be done as funding sources allow. • Lighting changes funded through energy conservation grants have reduced energy consumption. • Employees participate in energy management procedures to eliminate the use of personal electronic devices at the workplace. • Energy management of HVAC systems is conducted at all park facilities through a computer program. • Equipment replacement with Energy Star Equipment is practiced. To further OCPRC's commitment to environmental sustainability, in 2012 we initiated within the park system a Green Initiative grant program. In the first round, OCPRC staff submitted nine proposals, and five were chosen for funding. It is anticipated the program will continue on a yearly basis. One of the awarded projects will make recycling containers available at special events at all the parks, including Independence Oaks (Attachment 5). Communications and Marketing The parks system's Communications and Marketing Unit functions as an in-house agency providing communications, marketing, promotions, advertising, media relations, photography, videography, design, printing, signage, and website content development for the county's thirteen parks and golf courses. 4 2/14/2013 Information is communicated via the system's award-winning portaI 2, DestinationOakland.com , Facebook, Twitter, news releases, magazines, newspapers, and 300+ outside websites, including Travel Michigan. Community Connections Initiative, a quarterly newsletter, is emailed to all of Oakland County's cities, villages and townships and is posted on DestinationOakland.com (Attachment 6). Additionally, e-marketing messages are sent to more than 91,000 individuals who have opted in to receive information on parks, programs, special events and discount offers. In 2011, a print campaign was initiated with The Oakland Press, a daily newspaper with a Sunday circulation of 72,000 and 3.5 million page views. The Special section focuses on outdoor recreation, including camping, golf, waterparks, and more. Four-color brochures are distributed twice annually at local libraries, Great Lakes Crossing Mall, real estate offices, boy/girl scouts, sports shops, city/village/township offices, recreation departments, chambers of commerce, and Oakland County offices. Oakland County has developed a very strong tie to the people it serves who have a disability. Our partnerships with more than 30 non-profit agencies, schools, and disabled sports organizations enable us to cooperatively provide and advertise unique recreation options. Two certified therapeutic recreation specialists and one special education teacher coordinate programs and assist individuals in participating in all programs. Inclusion services are offered to encourage and enhance opportunities for people with varying abilities to participate in programs and events hosted by Oakland County Parks. Oakland County Parks encourages and supports the participation of individuals with disabilities in all programs. r)r- evention Independence Oaks County Park has a large entrance sign that is standard to the park system. The park is fenced around its entire perimeter to prevent trespassing both into and out of the park onto private property. There are directional signs on all major roads near the site and continue on to direct travelers to the entrance. The entrance is monitored by means of a contact station, which is open during park hours every day from Memorial Day until Labor Day and on weekends the remainder of the year. Park hours are clearly posted. In addition, Oakland County Sheriff Officers patrol the park regularly. 2 Recognized as an "Outstanding Agency Website" by the national organization, the Center for Digital Government, in 2010. Websites were judged on innovation, functionality, and efficiencies. 5 2/14/2013 Most of the nature trails within the park are west of Stewart Lake, away from the park roads. The 2.5 mile River Loop crosses the park road at only one, well-marked location. All but short spur trails are looped. NATURAL 11P,',OLIP,..CE ACCESS AND pRoTEurtoN Along with Addison Oaks Park, Independence Oaks County Park was named one of the top 10 best family-friendly places to hike by MetroParent Magazine in 2012 (Attachment 7). Recreation opportunities at the park include swimming, boating, fishing, picnicking, baseball, volleyball, hiking, playgrounds, nature study—over 150 species of birds have been identified at the site—and the winter activities of cross country skiing, ice skating, and ice fishing. There are 12 miles of hiking trails, including 2.5 miles of paved trail. It is the natural features of the park that enhance the visitor experience, and Oakland County Park and Recreation staff is actively engaged in the management and conservation of its natural features. For example, in May 2011 staff from the DNR Fisheries Division conducted a lake fisheries survey and found high catch rates and above-average sized game fish, including bluegill, pumpkinseed sunfish, largemouth bass, and northern pike in Upper Bushman Lake. However, they also determined that the lake has a limited spawning habitat and had little-to-no fishing pressure historically. Therefore in April 2012, the Fisheries Division proposed a Catch- and- Release Only Special Designation for Upper Bushman Lake. The order was approved by the DNR Director and the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission, and has received letters of support from the Michigan Bass Federation, Clinton River Watershed Council, Oakland County Bass Anglers, and Ducks Unlimited. Fishable populations of fish are found in Crooked Lake, including largemouth bass and bluegill- with better than average fishing—and bullhead, black crappie, yellow perch, northern pike— with fishable populations present (Attachment 8). Other natural features of the park are listed in Section El of the application, and the supporting documentation is enclosed. The maintenance of the boat launch will be incorporated into the grounds maintenance budgets of the park. Staff anticipates that the current costs for overall operation and care of facilities within the park system will not significantly increase following the completion of this project. A copy of the maintenance budget for 2013 is enclosed (Attachment 1). OTHER. 11.N()RIVIATION l'aFk Fa 11 CC Fees Vehicle entrance fees are as follows for Addison Oaks, Groveland Oaks, Highland Oaks, Independence Oaks, Lyon Oaks, Orion Oaks, Red Oaks Dog Park and Nature Center, and Rose Oaks county parks. There are no entrance fees at Springfield Oaks, Waterford Oaks, Red Oaks VVaterpark, Glen Oaks, or White Lake Oaks county parks. $5 per car per day: Oakland County residents 6 2/14/2013 • $10 per car per day: non-residents • $4 per car per day: Seniors 62+/People with Disabilities/Active Military Bus/Van (12 passenger or larger) fees are: • $1/person (min. $8) Oakland County residents (persons riding Oakland County Parks buses get in free) • $2/person (min. $10) non-residents • $12/bus (max.) Seniors 62+/ People with Disabilities /Active Military Youth Groups or Walk-ins/Bike-ins at Groveland Oaks County Park only (walk-ins/bike-ins are free at other county parks): 6 $1 per person/per day: Oakland County residents • $2 per person/per day: non-residents Annual Vehicle Permit fees: • $30 Resident o $22 Seniors 62+/ People with Disabilities /Active Military • $46 Non-resident o $30 Seniors 62+/ People with Disabilities /Active Military • $48 Parks Perks Pass (Parks Perks Pass valid at Oakland County parks plus 13 Metroparks) Please note that reduced rates are offered to seniors, people with disabilities, and active military personnel. Recreation Assistance Progt .ani Oakland County Parks and Recreation recognizes and provides assistance to people in communities in Oakland County who do not have the means to easily access Oakland County Parks. Since 1982, the County's Recreation Assistance Partnership Program (RAPP) has provided bus transportation to Oakland County Parks. One of the buses is fitted with a lift system for accessibility. OCRPC also brings recreation facilities and programs to communities in the form of mobile stages, bounce houses, and other transportable recreation equipment. These services are available to any community in the county for a cost, but communities may apply for a grant to help offset the cost for their residents. Most recently, the Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission approved $150,000 to support the 2013 program, demonstrating the strong support this program has from the commission. With the RAPP program, people who might not otherwise have the means to visit Oakland County parks or enjoy the programs and services we offer are able to do so at reduced cost and greater convenience. 7 2/14/2013 PAR Independence Oaks DNR Grant Application Small Boat Launch 3 Oakland County Parks and Recreation 2800 Watkins Lake Road Waterford, MI 248-858-0906 FISCAL NOTE (MISC. #13043) March 6,2013 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, TOM MIDDLETON, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION — SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR A 2013 MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT GRANT FOR A UNIVERSALLY ACCESSIBLITY SMALL BOAT LAUNCH AT INDEPENDENCE OAKS COUNTY PARK TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The Oakland County Parks and Recreation Commission has been notified by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources that applications for cost sharing grants from the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund Grant Program are to be submitted by April 1, 2013, 2. A grant application in the amount of $37,700 (75% of total project costs) will assist to install a universally accessible canoe/kayak boat launch on Crooked Lake. 3. A grant match of $12,600 (25% of total project costs) is budgeted in the Oakland County Parks and Recreation FY 2013— FY 2015 Capital Improvement Program. 4. A budget amendment is not required. FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. Resolution #13043 March 6, 2013 Moved by Bosnic supported by Quarles the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Dwyer, Gershenson, Gosselin, Hatchett, Hoffman, Jackson, Long, Matis, McGillivray, Middleton, Quarles, Scott, Spisz, Weipert, Woodward, Zack. (18) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). I HEREBY APPROVET141Ei RESOLUTION CHEF DEPUTY COUNTY • OUTIVE ACTING PURSUANT TO r ,5%A (7) / 3 STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on March 6, 2013, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 6th day of March, 2013. Lisa Brown, Oakland County