Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2014.07.16 - 21405MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #14163 July 16, 2014 BY: Public Services Committee, Bill Dwyer, Chairperson IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS — MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND APPLICATION FOR FY 2016 To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the State of Michigan offers funding to local communities under PA 511; and WHEREAS this funding is targeted to divert non-violent offenders from prison into local jail or sentencing alternatives; and WHEREAS Oakland County has been receiving Community Corrections funds since 1994; and WHEREAS the application has been completed and is requesting funding in the amount of $1,734,003 for plans and services for the grant period October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015; and WHEREAS a total appropriation of $1,947,275 is requested for probation residential services, which the State now pays directly to the Probation Residential Centers since they hold the contract for all residential services; and WHEREAS the grant application seeks full-time eligible funding for positions 7425, 7426, 7429, 7432, 7433, 9243, 9247, 9291, 9295, 9648, 9649 and PTNE funding for positions 9292 and 9397 within the Community Corrections Division; and WHEREAS the grant application also seeks funding for positions 7834 and 9396, whereby the State will fund 50% of the costs, and the County will match 50% of the total costs for these two (2) positions in the Community Corrections Division; and WHEREAS the grant application seeks full-time funding for positions 7419, 7420, 7418, 7421, and PTNE funding for position 7417 within the Sheriff's — Correction Services Division; and WHEREAS any programs created through these funds become part of the County's Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan; and WHEREAS PA 511 of 1988 requires that the "County Board or Boards of Commissioners of the County shall approve the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by their advisory board." NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the application to request $1,734,003 from the State Office of Community Corrections for the purpose of continuing programs contained within the Office of Community Corrections FY 2014 grant application for offenders who meet PA 511 eligibility is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves the $1,947,275 allocation for probation residential services to be administered by the Michigan Department of Corrections / Office of Community Corrections. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by the Community Corrections Advisory Board. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Community Corrections GRANT NAME: FY 2015 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Department of Corrections — Office of Community Corrections DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Barb Hankey 248 451 -2306 STATUS: Application —Resolution required DATE: June 23, 2014 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #13180, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The captioned grant materials and grant application package (which should include an application Report from Fiscal Services to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners', the grant application, and this Sign Off email containing grant review comments) may be submitted to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners for review and signature, with informational copies to the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s). DEPARTMENT REVIEW Department of Management and Budget: Approved. — Laurie Van Pelt (6/17/2014) Department of Human Resources: HR Approved (No Committee) — Lori Taylor (6/17/2014) Risk Management and Safety: Approved by Risk Management — Robert Erlenbeck (6/19/2014) Corporation Counsel: There appear to be no unresolved legal issues that require action at this time. — Carmen Lyon (6/23/2014) From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Y.artaduziurk "W.pst, Catherine"; "Julie Secontine"; "Lnrl Taylor"; "Pat Davis" "Hankey,..aarb"; elcrablykftalcoov,corm "Scalf, Bonnie" RE: GRANT REVIEW: community Corrections - PY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Grant Application Tuesday, June 1.7, 2014 10:36:20 AM Approved. From: West, Catherine [mailto:westca@oakgov.corn] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:22 AM To: Julie Secontine; Laurie VanPelt; Lori Taylor; Pat Davis Cc: Hankey, Barb; elgrablyk©oakgoy.com ; Ralf, Bonnie Subject: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Grant Application GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS Laurie Van Pelt—Lori Taylor—Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Community Corrections FYIS Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application Michigan Department of Corrections - Office of Community Corrections Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: June 24, 2014 GRANT INFORMATION Date: June 17, 2014 Operating Department; Community Corrections Department Contact: Barbara Hankey Contact Phone: 248 451 2306 Document identification Number: REVIEW STATUS: Application Resolution Required Funding Period: October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 New Facility / Additional Office Space Needs: No IT Resources (New Computer Hardware /Software Needs or Purchases): No WWBE Requirements: NO From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Tayier, Lori "West, Catherine"; "Julie Se-tontine"; "Laurie VanPer; "Pat Davls" "Hankev, Barb"; .11 ; "Scar. Bonnie" RE: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Grant Application Tuesday, June 17, 2014 4:21:37 PM HR Approved (No Committee) Lori Taylor Manager-Human Resources Recruitment & Workforce Planning Oakland County Michigan 2100 Pontiac Lake Road Waterford, MI 48328 taylOrloPoakgov.com www oakgov.cornijohs Phone: 248-858-0548 Fax: 248-858-8391 From: West, Catherine [mailto:westca@oakgov.com] Sent; Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:22 AM To: Julie Secontine; Laurie VanPelt; Lori Taylor; Pat Davis Cc: Hankey, Barb; elgrablyk@oakgov.com ; Scalf, Bonnie Subject: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Grant Application GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt —Lori Taylor—Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Community Corrections FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application Michigan Department of Corrections - Office of Community Corrections Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: June 24, 2014 GRANT INFORMATION Date: June 17, 2014 Operating Department: Community Corrections From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: .ErlenIzarl_aolzext "ViiegattLerine"; 'Lluk5esaratine'l; "Lau je VanPelt"; "Lori Taylor"; "Pat D.yls" "Hankev. Barb'; egrablvkoakdov,com; "Ralf. Bonnie" RE: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Grant Application Thursday, June 19, 2014 10:14:08 AM Approved by Risk Management, RE, 6-19-14. From: Easterling, Tern [mailto:easteriingt@oakgov.corn] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 2:51 PM To: 'West, Catherine'; 'Julie Secontine'; 'Laurie VanPelt'; 'Lori Taylor'; 'Pat Davis' Cc: 'Hankey, Barb'; elgrablyk@oakgov.com ; 'Scalf, Bonnie' Subject: RE: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Grant Application Please be advised that your request for Risk Management's assistance has been assigned to Bob Erlenbeck, (ext. 8-1694). If you have not done so already, please forward all related information, documentation, and correspondence. Also, please include Risk Management's assignment number, RM14-0212, regarding this matter. Thank you. From: West, Catherine [rnalltp:vvestca(aoakgov.com ] Sent; Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:22 AM To: Julie Secontine; Laurie VanPeit; Lori Taylor; Pat Davis Cc: Hankey, Barb; etgrablykoakgovcorm Scalf, Bonnie Subject: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Grant Application GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt—Lori Taylor—Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE— Community Corrections FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application Michigan Department of Corrections - Office of Community Corrections Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: June 24, 2014 . GRANT INFORMATION Prom: To Cc: Subject: Date: Lyon. Carmen. "West. Catherine; "Julie Secontine"; "Laurie VanPelt"; "Lori Taylor" "Hankey, Barb"; elarablvMoakciov.com ; "ScaIf. Bonnie" RE: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Grant Application Monday, June 23, 2014 2:32:42 PM There appear to be no unresolved legal issues that require action at this time. Thank you, Carmen Lyon QMIALINDF MtcHO a 0- Carmen Lyon Assistant Corporation Counsel Department of Corporation Counsel 1200 N, Telegraph Road, Bldg, 14 East Courthouse West Wing Extension, 3rd Floor Pontiac, MI 48341 Phone Number: (248) 858-4097 Fax Number: (248) 858-1003 E-mail: iyonc@oalcgov.com PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION This e-mail is intended only for those persons to whom it is specifically addressed. It Is confidential and is protected by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. This privilege belongs to the County of Oakland, and individual addressees are not authorized to waive or modify this privilege in any way. Individuals are advised that any dissemination, reproduction or unauthorized review of this Information by persons other than those listed above may constitute a waiver of this privilege and is therefore prohibited, If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, if you have any questions, please contact the Department of Corporation Counsel at (248) 858-0550. Thank you for your cooperation. From West, Catherine [malito:westca@cakgov.corn] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:22 AM To: Julie Secontine; Laurie VanPelt; Lori Taylor; Pat Davis Cc: Hankey, Barb; elgrablyk@oakgov.com ; Scalf, Bonnie Subject: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Grant Application GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS Laurie Van Pelt --Lori Taylor—Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Community Corrections FY15 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application Michigan Department of Corrections - Office of Community Corrections MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS "Expecting Excellence Every Day" Office of Community Corrections Community Corrections Plan and Application Fiscal Year 2015 CCAB Name: Oakland County Application Type: Annual/Full Email the application to: MDOC-OCC@michigan.gov and, Send one copy of the application to: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Office of Community Corrections P.O. Box 30003 Lansing, Michigan 48909 DUE DATE: June 2, 2014 NOTE: CCABs in a multi-year contract will need to complete SECTION I (A, B, C) as well as the new BUDGET form and program descriptions for any proposed program changes_ Page 1 of 11 skTioN I V-:-:1 1 i 100CTION, i ,. 1 i 1 1. Name of CCAB: Oakland County . . . Federal I.D. Number: 63-386004876 A: Gene[ral.COnikt.inforiTioPtiOri:. ERCII 11111/11111111111111Entil Contact Person (Menager)L :1i Barbara Han key ,, 'Fiscal Agent' 1' 4 I CCAB:Chairperson • Laurie VanPelt Phyllis McMillen I 1Ibi Manager Director Fiscal Services Circuit Judge Address: 250 Elizabeth Lake Rd. Ste 1520 2100 Pontiac Lk Rd EOB Dept. 409 1200 N. Telegraph 131 Pontiac Waterford Waterford EMCIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIO Zip: Michigan Mt MI 48431 48328-0409 48328 Phone: CMIIIIIIIIIM 248 451 2306 -- 248 452 2230 248 858 2163 248 858 0339 Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. illialn hankeybgoakgov.corn vanpeltl@oakgov.corn mcmillenp@oakgov.COM Type of Community Corrections Board: County Counties/Cities Participating in the CCAB: Oakland County Date application was approved by the local CCAB: June 5,2014 Date application was approved by county board(s) of commissioners (and city council): Tentative July 16, 2014 Date application was submitted to OCC: June 2, 2014 .B:..CCAB Metirliber5tro , , .1 . .. ,...IRepresenting :j ... . . 1 . ,i....411;11.:, 1'iNaine,,(andieniall,ifia0ilable):', 1, County Sheriff: ----------- Lt. Dorothy Hall haild@oakgay.corn Chief of Police: Chief David Malloy clmalloy@cityofnovi.org Circuit Court Judge: Honorable Phyllis McMillen mcmillenp@oakgoy.com District Court Judge: Honorable Kelley Kostin kostink@oakgov.com Probate Court Judge: Rebecca Schnelz dchnelzr@oakgov:corn — County Commissioner(s): Shelly Taub taubsgoakgcmcom _ Service Area: Christina Nicholas nicholasc@oakgov.corn County Prosecutor: Vacant Criminal Defense: Jack Holmes jackhoirnesfratt@aoLcorn Business Community: Mona DeFrancisco moriefran@hotmail.com Communications Media: Click here to enter text, Circuit/District Probation: Latrece Porter porterll@michigan.gov General Public: Fred Mester fuclgernester@yahoo.com City Councilperson: N/A , Does your CCAB have Bylaws? If yes, have they been revised within the last 2 years? (Please send copy) Our By-Laws are largely based on the PA 511 Act of 1988. It does not make sense to update our By-laws until after the PA 511 Act has been addressed. Does your CCAB have a "definition of a pattern of violence" that excludes offenders from any PA511 programming? If yes, please explain. NO, eligibility is dealt with in each program. Page 2 of 11 , :.'.'Suinrn*y ;., :.(611.frielc.k , : ri0fly:surnnrptiO'it e e points'D o .Dni uni prrog,tiipn - . 1 - . :!.;,, . i)er:Orlit[Ofrig61•;i.-a,iri',5)1.,1!• ,F 1,1 1. What programs, practices and policies.contribute to a reduction of (or maintenance of low) prison commitment rates: Programs specifically designed to reduce or maintain our low PCR are the Thinking Matters Cognitive Program, Step Forward, OWL ill delayed sentence, and our residential substance abuse placement program. These programs along with their corresponding intake units identify and target straddle cell offenders (offense group 2) for programming. All of these programs utilize ESP and target criminogenic risks/needs which offer offenders from returning to antisocial behaviors or illegal activities. in addition the practice of having a supervisor review all agent recommendations involving prison helps to ensure that all alternative options are considered prior to prison incarceration. I a. How do they contribute to reduced/maintained PCRs? . The Thinking Matters, OUIL Ill delayed 1 sentence and Residential substance abuse centers target straddle cell offenders thereby reducing the likelihood that they will be sent to prison. The Step Forward program targets criminogenic heeds . through a standardized risk! needs assessment tool. Addressing crirninogenic needs has been shown to reduce recidivism rates by as much as 60%. This significantly reduces the chance that the offender will return to criminal behavior in the future thereby reducing the number of violations, both new arrest and technical, and keeping the PCR low in those categories. The deferred sentence program will allow judges the ability to fashion a sentence for the offender dependent on their progress and motivation during the treatment phase. This will include the option of jail rather than prison for the straddle cell offenders. b. Explain what data/measures ShOW your PA511 funded programs have contributed to reductions in your PCR: The OMNI PCR rates for the various SGL categories will be the main indicators of reductions to the PCRs. Oakland has been able to maintain its PCR rate to 20% overall, 32% for straddle cells and to 23.3% for OWL ill. These are good indicators that our programs are targeting the right populations and that they are working. 2. What programs, practices and policies contribute to improved jail utilization? Improved jail utilization is achieved through the Pretrial Assessment and Supervision programs, the Thinking Matters program, Step Forward, and the PRC placement program a. How do they contribute to improved jail utilization? Making recommendations for personal bonds or . for conditional release on defendants who can be safely released, reduces the reliance on financial bonds thereby releasing more defendants and creating space in the jail. The supervision and EM units give judicial officers an option rather than incarceration for higher risk pretrial offenders thereby reducing jail admissions and crowding. The other programs all offer either time cuts or suspended sentences for program completions. b. Explain what data/measures show your PA511 funded programs have contributed to improvements in your jail utilization: Each program has specific measures that show their contributions to jail • management. However all programs capture jail days saved, and recidivism among their respective populations. _. , Page 3 of 11 .spq1-.1pro A: INTRODUCTION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR STRATEGIC PLAN Strategic Issues, Goals, and Priorities have beeri . established by the Office of Community Corrections in accordance with Public Act 511 and State Board priorities. CCABs will be required to establish Objectives and Strategies based upon .0MNI Felony Disposition, JPIS, CCIS and local data that will support State Goals and Priorities. Strategic Issues are identified as Felony Dispositions, Jail Utilization-and-Local Priorities. OCC will provide the CCABs with OMNI Felony Disposition and JP'S data. CCABs shall analyze this data along with local CCIS data (reports run locally from Case Manager) and develop Key Objectives and supporting Strategies that will lead toward attainment of Goals and Priorities established by the State Board and OCC, as well as local objectives and priorities promoted in the comprehensive plan. ' A thorough review of the data should include: . • Overall PCRs, rates within sentencing gUideline ranges, PCFts within Group 1 and Group 2 offense categories, status at time of offense and technical probation violation PCRs ' • Reference to changes in PCRs compared to prior years • Other changes in your CCAB/area that influence changes (new stakeholders, policies, emerging crimes, offender characteristics, etc.) ' o Review your past OCC funding proposal iS for ideas Exam*: For the Strategic issue of Felony Dispositions, consider the stated Goal and Priority as outlined on the following pages and complete an analysis of your county's prison commitment rate data.pcovided by OCC. Establish objectives related to prison commitment rates. For example: 1. Reduce PV commitment rate from 32% to 25% 2. Reduce Straddle rate to from 43% to 35% Under each OBJECTIVE outline in bullet form those STRATEGIES (steps) to be taken, including continuing, new and revised programs, or established and revised policies or practices, that will support the attainment of the objectives you have specified. Identify if these are "new", "continuations," or "modifications," or for short term (this fiscal year) or long term implementation. Keep in mind that all of the Programs for which you are requesting PA511 funding should be identified as strategies. Additionally, policies and practices you propose(such as targeting specific populations or characteristics) are also r strategies. Strategies may apply to more than dne objective and should be repeated under each objective as appropriate. For Example, the objective of "Reduce PV rate from 32% to 25%" may have the following strategies: 1. Initiate structured sentencing with jail followed by RS followed by community Cognitive Behavioral Treatment program that targets Level 2 and 3 probation violators. (New, FY 2014) 2. Target Level 2 and 3 PVs as priorities forResidential Services. (Continuation) The same strategies (with modifications) would be appropriate for the objective of reducing the PCR of Straddle Cell offenders. Further OMNI data analysis may support an additional strategy of: 3. Target CAP eligible straddle cells, especially those from croup 2 without MDOC status, for local sanctions including Page 4 of 11 I I 4' (NOTE :l Regional CCA13.s.;shouldlcoMplete..analysislforeach.1tounty,Carnage:returns ,are 1 l:ienllittedllin:this:sectiorr.)..., Strategic Issue: Felony Di spositions • ' ' Public Act 511 of 1988 stipulates that counties shall develop a community corrections comprehensive plan and Provide an explanation of how the county Or Counties' prison commitment rate Will be reduced by diverting non-violent offenders, and promote recidivism reduction While Public safety is ;maintained.. The Act is intended to encourage the participation in community corrections programs of offenders who would likely be sentenced to imprisonment in a state correctional facility or jail, who would not increase the risk to public safety, have,•not demonstrated a pattern of violent behavior, and do not have a criminal record that indicates a pattern of violent offenses. Goal: Reduce demand for prison resources and related budgetary requirements. Priority: Reduce prison comrnitmetitof offenders who can be safely and effectively sanctioned and treated in the community by following the principles of effective intervention (i.e., risk, need, responsivity). Your analysis forms the basis for your objectives and strategies. Aweak connection between data analysis, objectives • and proposed programming (strategies) may result in denial or conditional approval of your plan. i-i: Using OMNI Felony.sition."dataisuPj:illediby:OCfor'.11(.20.1Z'andlIP.,(g01 1. Are felony dispositions increasing, decreasing, or stable? Felony dispositions have continued to increase from 5,351 in Fyn, 5,500 in FY12 and 5,607 in FY13. This represents a 4.7% increase (256 offenders) in the past 2 years, Describe changes within SGL categories. Report rates with detailed explanation: There were two categories which increased from FY12 to FY13; Intermediate (173) and presumptive (35). Neither of these categories are actively targeted for PA 511 programming. Ironically even with the increase in the number of offenders within the presumptive category and the fact they are not a targeted group, the PCR was reduced from 92.5% in FY12 to 87.7% in FY13. The SUL N/A category stayed relatively the same and the straddle cell category experienced a decrease of 93 offenders (5.9%). This basically offset the increase of 91 offenders we saw in FY12, returning us to FY11 levels. However in FY11 our PCR for straddle cell offenders was at 26.5%, for FY 13 it is 32%. Oakland's overall PCR of 20% is still below the statewide average of 21.1% Can you attribute any changes to strategies/programs in your comprehensive plan? The comprehensive plan has not changed significantly changed in the past couple of years. The rise in the PCR for straddle cell offenders is mostly likely due to the inexperience of the probation agents. There are many, many new agents in Olcaland County. MDOC training on Community Corrections piogratnming will be a major focus for the coming year. 4. Describe any changes in criminal justice system stakeholders that may have contributed to changes in rates: A new Oakland County Regiaonl manager was finally assigned, Latrece Porter. The changes in administration at MDOC over the past18 months may have contributed to the rise In rates. However Ms. Porter has beenin place for several months now and things seems to be working a bit more smoothly. . Describe any changes in felony populations that warrant a change in your plan: There are no changes that warrant a change in the comprehensive plan. . Provide additional analysis you feel necessary to explain your prison commitment rates here: Click here to enter text. Page 5 of 11 NOTE: 0 Five objectives are not required; objectives should be measurable and provide sufficient detail so progress can be monitored. . . 0 Each objective should be followed by at least one strategy (step, action, policy, program) that will help you achieve your objective, 0 Your objectives and strategies should be supported by the analysis you did above. If you did not provide analysis for a PV or Group 2 population, you wouldn't develop an objective related to that population. 0 Keep in mind that all programs for which you are requesting funding are considered strategies. Be sure to clearly identify them as strategies. 1. Objective #1: Maintain the PC!? at no more than the statewide average Strategies in support of Objective #1 (number and separate strategies by using carriage return [enter]): 1)Continue to have MDOC supervisors review any cases in which the agent recommendation involves prison, 2)Promate all PA 511 funded programs through continued educationan training of the Probation agents and other key stakeholders such as defense counsel. 3)To continue to refine the use of EBP within all Community Corrections programs so that reductions in recidivism will be achieved thereby reducing recidivism and returns to prison. 2. Objective #2: To continue to decrease the number of offenders in straddle cell Group 2 not under MDOC who receive a prison dispositon. • Strategies in support of Objective #2: • .1) Continue to promote the use of Thinking Matters as part of a structured jail sentence for straddle cell offenders who are in need of cognitive programming according to COMPAS in lieu of a short term prison sentence, 2)Provicle the COMPAS assessments completed through the ClAU or Step Forward intake to MD0Cprobation agents through C*Star, so that the results may be used to determine appropriate'referruls for programming based on risk/ needs of the offender. 3)Educate the probation agents through printed materials or meetings that offenders not placed on probation may be eligible for PA511 programming too. 4,) Promote referrals to the Step Forward program for offenders who are high risk/high need with a focus on those offenders within the straddle cell category who have a Group 2 offense and were not under MDOC supervision at the time of the offense in lieu of a short prison term. 3. Objective #3: To continue to maintain, or reduce, the 19% PC!? for the N/A (Probation violator) category. Strategies in support of Objective #3: 1)Encourage the use of Step Forward for PV technical violators rather than return to prison, 2) Use PRS facilities for 30-.90 days for PVs with a technical violation for a 'positive" drug test. 4. Objective #4: To reduce the OWL Ill PC!? to no more than 20%. Strategies in support of Objective ilzi-: 1) Continue to use the Adult Treatment Court as an alternative for prison for OU1L 111 offenders with straddle cell or higher intermediate sanction cells, 2) Continue and expand the delayed sentence program for OU11.1115 (in particular intermediate sanction cell) offenders, 3) Use Step Forward case managers and intake unit to support the OUIL.111deferrecl sentence program 5. Objective #5: Click here to enter text. Strategies in support of Objective #5: Click here to enter text. 0 Use OMNI data to track changes in prison commitment rates that were identified as objectives. 6 Monitor and report on changes in local circumstances or offender populations/characteristics that prevent attainment of your objectives. Page 6 of 11 0 Use COS data to determine the utilization of your programs by ybur targeted populations. What steps will you take if you find that you are not meeting your objectives or your strategies are not being implemented as planned? The PCR numbers are reviewed at CCAB meetings and we will continue to do so. If objectives are not being met through the strategies, we will discuss how those strategies will need to change to meet our objectives. There may also be separate meetings with the Area Manager and other supervisors / stakeholders to address specific deficiencies. Page 7 of 11 1 C: JOiLUtilizOtioriAhalysis ., 1!.. .(NoTE: RegionalCCAUshbuiciCOrnpleteanalysis foreaCh'eoUrity:) i 1 Current Jail Utilization _ :Coup ,i, Oakland Click here to enter text, Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. RDC, , 1497 Click here to enter text, Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. ;Utilization as 1 N arlibC H 94.7% Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text Number 'of :offLlihe beds .,:l Click here to enter text, Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. 1. Does your county have a written county jail population management plan per PA 139 of 2007? NO . In CV 2013, did your sheriff initiate a reduction in population because the jail exceeded 95% of RDC for 5 consecutive days per Public Act 140 of 2007? YES if YES, explain how this was carried out: A Circuit Court liaison prepares a list of eligible inmates, then sends the list to the Chief Circuit Court Judge for approval. Once approved, the list sent to Booking for final release review and preparation. . In CV 2013 how many times did the county declare an official (in writing) jail overcrowding state of emergency (over 100% of RDC for 7 consecutive days) per Public Act 140 of 2007? None 4. Does your jail submit JPIS data? NO Since the implementation of the new jail management system in 2010 there have been problems with submit king the data. Hopefully this has recently been resolved and we will _. have data starting 2011 . What vendor or jail management software is used to report jail utilization? intellitech Strategic Issue: Jail resources should present a higher the demand for maintaining public Goal: Operate Jail Utilization be prioritized for use by individuals convicted of crimes against persons and/or offenders who risk of recidivism or risk to the public. Local comprehensive community corrections plans should reduce jail beds by diverting non-violent and lower-risk offenders, promote recidivism reduction while safety and reduce jail overcrowding. local jails at 90% or less of the rated design capacity which can reduce the costs and liability for the . jail utilization and reduce need to board inmates In other facilities; avoid releases under the overcrowding act; maintain jail below the rated design capacity. emergency county. PrioriW: Improve C-1: Using JPIS.data,(or, kocaLdata aS.available) provicle.an'analysis,Of jaii:utililationintlacling the aVerage daily populations/lengths'of stay OfjaiLpopulations including felon and Misdemeanant Utilization,:sOntenced .and'' =sentenced population;pi-4llysePt6nted'poliylations;'bparders, andioffense.categories. (RegiOrials:; use carriage return [Entedtb,SeParate information by jail) ' 1. This application uses local or snapshot data (we are using data from the jail management system and the county's data warehouse 2. Are bookings up, down, or stable? Combination of data. In FY12 jail admissions were 19,880, which was a significant increase from FY11 when they were 15,734. For FY13 they have dropped significantly below even the FY.11 levels to 12,828. 3. Describe changes in ADP or AvLOS for major population groups: The felony and misdemeanor populations are 70% and 30% respectively of the total population. The unsentenced population is at 28% of the total population with 20% of that being misdemeanors and the remaining 80% being felons. The sentenced population stands at 72% of the total population with 33% being misdemeanors and the remaining 67% being Page 8 of 11 felons. These numbers represent a good split of the population and are within the ranges we like to see. The ,4L05 for these populations are hard to determine, The JP'S data is still not loading properly and the Sheriffs Office only has an ALOS report by facility. This will be addressed in the coming fiscal year by requesting new ADP and ALOS reports through the data warehouse for our various populations. 4. Provide additional information to explain your jail utilization here including changes in stakeholders, law enforcement priorities, bed closures, etc.: There have been no bed closures since 2010. However there continues to be emergency releases on, almost a daily basis, , 0.1:.,I)e§CiibOlOolicigaiid:*'attieellikiriflii6ii.c6:Ibil .13604fatiCiii r: I I I 1. Does the jail have a "bed allocation plan"? NO 2. Does the county have a "jail task force" in place to address jail utilization issues? NO 3. How are sheriffs good time and trustee credits awarded / forfeited? Sheriffs good time is one day for every six days served and forfeited only for major disciplinary infractions upon recommendation of the Hearing Sergeant Trusty good time is based on one day for every 12 days served and can be forfeited for the same reasons as Sheriff's Good Time, 4. Is the jail "closed" to certain types of offenses/offenders/warrants? YES non assaultive misdemeanors are not accepted at the main fail until after arrciingment 5. Does the jail accept boarders from other counties? NO If YES,•what is the daily rate charged for a boarder? Click here to enter text, 6. Does the jail have a county-imposed cap on local bed utilization to provide space for boarding? NO If YES, report number of boarders and the % of the RDC for all boarders. Click here to enter text. 7. Does the jail accept Parole Violators on MDOC detainers? YES the agreement with MDOC is that parole violators are transferred out within three days. Daily rate paid is $4130 8. Does the jail accept MDOC or Federal boarders under contract? NO If YES, what is the daily rate charged for MDOC and/or Federal boarders? Click here to enter text, 9. What was the revenue from boarders for_cy 2013? N/A 10. What was the revenue from County jail Reimbursement in CY 2013? $1,691,975.00 11. Does the jail operate a work release program (offenders leave the jail to work and then return to the jail)? YES If YES, how many beds (number and % of RDC) are work release beds? There are no beds in the traditional sense, the work release program is operated through GPS electronic monitoring. Offenders return to their own homes each day. How much are offenders charged to be on work release? GPS tether is $10.00; GPS with VI-Cap(alcohol tether) is $16.00. 12. Does the jail accept weekend sentences? NO If YES, approximately how many weekenders book in each weekend? Click here to enter text. 13. Provide additional analysis you feel is necessary to explain your jail utilization here: Click here to enter text. -3 'Key Objectives and Strategies I I: NOTE: 6 Five objectives are not required; objectives should be measureable and provide sufficient detail so progress can be monitored. • Each objective should be followed by at least one strategy (step, action, policy, program) that will help you achieve your objective. Your objectives and strategies should be-supported by the analysis you did above. If you did not identify the LOS of misdemeanants in your analysis, you wouldn't develop an objective related to that population. • Refer to the most recent PIS data (or your local data/snapshot if you don't have JPIS). Keep in mind that all programs for which you are requesting funding are considered strategies Be sure to clearly identify them as strategies. . 1. Objective #1: Maintain or reduce the current unsentenced jail population through the use of the Pretrial Page 9 of 11. Services Praxis and differential supervision options. Strategies in support of Objective #1 (number and separate strategies by using carriage return): 1) Explore the use of the newly developed PSA -Court by the Arnold Foundation. It removes the financial recommends, and also has a violence flag. , 2)Continue to provide supervision services, including electronic monitoring for defendants who se risk of pretrial misconduct can be mitigated through the use of such tools, 2. Objective #2: Reduce the number of emergency releases required on a daily basis Strategies in support of Objective #2: 1)Target Straddle cell offenders who receive a jail only sentence for the Thinking Matters program. This results is a sentence reduction upon successful completion. 2) Continue to support and recommend the use of Probation Residential Centers as part of a structured sentence particularily for Group 2 straddle cell offenders. 3. Objective #3: Reduce the number of Group 2 felons and PV techs recieving jail sentences Strategies in support of Objective #3: 1)Continue to promote the use of Probation Residential Centers for PVs in lieu of jail 2)Encourage the use of Thinking Matters for PV techs through Step Forward 3) Use the COMPAS tool to assess offender's risk and needs and place them into interventions targeted at those needs to reduce violations. 4) Start the Jail Reentry Program which will help offenders be more successful upon release from jail so they do not return. 4. Objective #4: Click here to enter text. Strategies in support of Objective #4: Click here to enter text. 5. Objective #5: Click here to enter text. • Strategies in support of Objective #5: Click here to enter text. Assessinent .. Use J PIS data (or local snapshot ifJPIS isn't available) to track changes in jail utilization that were identified as objectives. Monitor and report on changes in local circumstances or offender.populations/characteristics that prevent attainment of your objectives. Use CCIS data to determine the utilization of your programs by your targeted populations. What steps will you take if you find that you are not meeting your objectives or your strategies are not being implemented as planned? The jail population is usually reviewed at CCAB meetings and we will continue to do this, if objectives are not being met through the strategies, we will discuss how those strategies will need to change to met our objectives. There may also be separate meetings with the jail administrator and other supervisors/stakeholders to address specific deficiencies. D: Local Priorities Present any local priorities such as development of criminal justice coordinating councils, jail expansion/repair, public education, etc., Which have not been identified in the above sections: Page 10 of 11 We have recently submitted for the BJA Second Chance Act Jail Reentry Grant. In addition a merger between Community Corrections and Pal Inmate Services is currently being reviewed. This merger would result in 21 staff being transferecl to Community Corrections and could provide for a more streamlined transition from jail to community services / programming. In an effort to assit the probation agents through the COMPAS transition we have created a one page two sided "cheat sheet". The page on one side contains a matrix which shows which community corrections programs address Which criminogenic needs. On the reverse side are several area referral sources and the critninogenic needs which they address. Page 11 of 11 • Summary of Program Services For — OAKLAND COUNTY . Program Code Program 8, Service Type N Flame of Program Projectedd ' Enrollments . . COntinuations . . Total In Program Administration AdnUnistration Administration n/a n/a n/a Cal Cognitive Thinking Matters . Jail 264 44 398 CO1 Cognitive Thinking Matters - Community 492 100 592. 208 Electronic Monitoring Pretrial Services Supervision 427 190 527 F23 Pretrial Supervision Pretrial Services Supervision 2496 590 2996 F22 Pretrial Assessment Pretrial Services Screen & Assessment 9487 0 9487 122 Actuarial Assessment Step Forward Intake 1025 0 1025 122 Actuarial Assessment Step Forward Mental Health Assessment 125 0 125 201 DDJR Assessment &Treatment Services Drunk Driver Screen & Assessment 116 0 118 125 Gatekeeper Central Intake and Assessment Unit 1040 0 1040 124 Community Based Case Management Step Forward 1015 400 1415' Z02 DDJR In Jail Assessment 5 Day Housing 313 4 317 GOO Other Group Service Youthful Offenders Group 130 20 150 2.03 DDJR Residential Services Residential Services 40 40 -- 0 _ . 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 — 0 -- 0 -- -- 0 0 0 0 , 0 , 0 __ 0 __ 0 _ _ 0 . . Number of Hours Worked Per Year. lPull Time Is :2,000) 2080,00 1.00 FTE Equivalent Number of Hours Worked Per Year, Pull Time Is 2050), ETE EquivaleM: 1.00 2000,00 Program Cost Descriptions For: . OAKLAND COUNTY .1ary.F4 Wage Position 1 Title: Manager None of Individual: Barbara Fiankey . Funding Sources.& Cost Allocation-. ..- Fragrant Code/Name - : CPS . ... DDJR • . , Eocal/Other ::• . Fee ReVenue • ': ' Totals ' - '. ,.. Dilies'aind Respensibilirties.•••: • , Administratlon 172,570 172,870 Responsible for managing all aspects of the CC Division. Completes all reoUired reports. Develops and maintains the budget for both the State M DOC grant and the county OP/SF. Cultivates relationships between CC and its partners on the local, state and federal tevels, . _ .._. - . •Totals - . ' 172,870 - 172,870 Position 2 • Chief of Operations Name of Individual: Larry Doyle Nunieer of Hours Worked Per Year. (FUR Time is 2,580) 2000.00 FTE Equivalent 1.00 ' Funding Sources &Cost Allocation • . Program Code cpa DDJR ' .Local/Other Fee'Revenue Totals •".• _:' ....Duties and ResponelbilitIes Administration 119,731 119,731 Responsible for overall day to day operations. Trouble shoots problems, staffing Issues and provides proposed solutions to the Manager for handling such matters. Attends meetings or other functions as necessary arid acts in the capacity of Manager in her absence. - - - - • • •TotalS . 119 ,731 - 119,731 ' Position 3 Community Corrections Support Specialist 1\le.m.e•of Individuel: Diana Carver • Funding Sources &Cast Allocation ' . . Program Code. ..• • 'CPS - . • - DDJR : • ' LocallOiher. . Pee Revenue Totals ' Duties andResponsibilities Administration 46,480 46,479 92,959 Responsibia for maintaining and updating all databases withln Community Cormat)ons. Sends monthly CCIS data to OCC and maintains the Integrity of the data. Updates all brochures, newsletters, and other printed Information for the Division. . ' _ 'Totals 46,480 - 46,479 - 92,959 Position 4 Supervisor Community Corrections Tit le; • • Narno of Individual: Karen Peterson, Dana O'Neal, Eri c Schmidt, Lisa Smith . . Number of Hours Worked PerYear. (Full Time is 2,080 . 8320.00 FTE • : Equivalent: 4.00 Funding Sources &Cost Allocation ' Program Code .L CPS ' • • DDJR :- Local/other - • Fee Revenue ....... Totals ' Dudes and Responsibilities .- Administration 30,224 60448 90,672 The Step Forward supervisor oversees day to day operations of the Step Forward Program.. Responsible for procedures, employee issues and works as a liaison between OCC staff, MDOC staff and Administration. Also carries a small caseload of special needs clients & transfer cases. 124 -Step Forward 30,224 30,224 F20 - Pretrial Services Supervision 120,895 120,895 The supervisor is responsible both the supervision as and EM units. She is responsible for procedures, staff issues and performance appraisals. Also provides coverage as needed, P22- Pretrial Services Screen & Assessment 120,840 120,840 There Icons supervisor fur both the District Court and Jail staff. The supervisors handle staffing Issues, conduct work evaluations, draft policy and fill staffing gaps as needed. Administration 118,987 113,987 Responsible for the Weekend and Weekend Alternative for Misdemeanants programs, Also coordinates all PA511 placements form theJall for MDOC and for the misds. Totals 60,448 .. 421,171 - 481,619 Position 5 Title: Office Assistant . Name of .individual: • - • . Docile LaMarte, Kathryn Sod!, Julio Entree, Arnie Hamm, Anita Lindsy, Berlins Yates . , . Number of Hours Worked Per Year, (Full Time Is 2,080) 10400.00 FTE Equivalent 5.00 FuncOng Sources & Cost Allocation. ,. ' Program Code • ' .• CPS .'' : . MAR ' .' Local/Other '" • 'Pee Revenue • : Totals , . Duties and Responsibilities ' Administration 78,515 78,519 Acts as administrative assistant to the Manager, also completes payroll, personnel requisitions and billing duties. F23 . Pretrial Services Supervision 73,054 . 73,054 Sorts and enters supervision cases as they are received. Secures and enters next court dates from the courts or other databases. Sends Letters and performs other general clerical duties as needed. 24- Step Forward 61,188 66,270 127,456 Assists in data entry to C.Ster for CC1S data, sets up appointments for clients, tracks referrals, answers phones, sorts mall, Other general Clerical Duties, There is 1 PIE In each of our 2 locutions 125 - Central intake and Assessment Unit 15,579 15,579 Assists with data entry and support of the unit, inputs answers from the COMPAS for scoring, general clerical duties _ - Totals 76,767 _ 217,847 - 294,614 Position 6 • Title: Community Corrections Spec ialist Ill Name of IndIvidual: • • Beatrice Stitt, Jill Hadley, Kim Hassinger, Michelle Dennis, Barb Bari!, Aimee Soya, Rosemary Wood, Linda Multer-Carrnean Number of Hours Worked Per Year, {FuliTime is 2,080) 16640,00 FTE '• - • • Equivalent: . 8,00 '- • . Funding Sources &Cost Allocation •• . Program Code' • • CPS' • • ' DDJR• Local/Other - : Fee Revenue : "Tblate : '-' Duties and Responsibilities • F22 - Pretrial Services Screen & Assessment 379,070 379,570 Supervises the day to day activities attire Community Corrections Specialists iis. sets priorities according to available resources, checks work, acts as a liaison between, jail, court and staff. F23 - Pretrial Services Supervision 100,692 100,552 Responsible for the day to day operation of the unit and the Offender Link system. Responsible for all new enrollees and those that rney be rejected by the system duets Incomplete information. Monitors the case loads of One staff to ensure work Is being completed In a timelyfashion, and also oversees the EM staff, Number of Hours Worked Per Year. (Full The is 2,080) 19760.00 Equivalent: 9.50 Responsible for day to day operation of unit and staff. Carries a smaller caseload but Is also responsible for making sure groups are covered, helping line staff with 122 - Step Forward Intake 92,461 92,461 diMcult clients and acts a liaison with outside agencies providing services at Step Forward, To conduct Intake assessments (COMPAS) on all referred offenders Into the Step 1 24 - Step Forward 165,193 165,193 Forward program, Provides son-eligible clients with appropriate referral sources. Such Lead staff is responsible for running at lease 1 group a week. They also CO1 - Thinking Matters - Community 41,298 41,298 conduct audits of the groups of other staff to be sure of fidelity to the program, : Totals - - 778,714 . 778,714 Position 7 TiIle: Community Corrections Specialist II "! .]'Jame of lnclMdual: Escobedo, Rogers, Finley, Stoops, Reotor,Yosick, Dutcher, Falls,Sommorville, Allen, Barrio, Melly, Steinhobel, Gullon, Mickfey, Stocker Number of Hours Worked Per Year:. (Foil Tyne is 2,0601 • • 55280,00 FTE EqUivalent: 16.00 Funding Sources & Cost Allocation Program Code • OPS .: . • • DEUR • • Local/Other Fee Revenue, • Totals- '-' Duties and Responsibilities . s F22 - Pretrial Service Screen & Assessment 275,497 740,837 1,016,334 Interviews In custody defendants and complies a bond report in accordance with MCR 6.105, 3alI recommendations are made using the Praxis. All Information Is verified through third parties as often as possible. Staff also calculates 5GLs for bond consideration P25- Pretrial Services Supervision 142,524 295,835 4"'559 Monitors pretrial defendants on supervision for compliance with conditions of bond ordered by the court. DO8 • Pretrial Services Supervision 4E095 48,995 Also responsible for defendants placed on EM. Staff Is responsible for offender whereabouts, scheduling, monitoring of alarms, and responding to violations. _ , - , --Totals 467,016 - 1,036,672 - 1,503,688 Position 8 Title: 'Name rof Individual: Houle, Miles, Short, Poisson, Denison, Eiirkholz,Sharp, Jensen, Fanning, Twomey, Antwan, Dean Funding Sources 8, Cost Allatitton Program Code . CPS ADJR, :. Local/Other :.", ree Revenue - .- :.- TOW'S .• -'• . Duties and Responsibilities - : C01 -Thinking Matters - Community 46,156 56,159 — 102,315 Each case manager conduct at least 2 sessions of the Thinking matters groups per week, Responsible for running the group, checking homework and reporting progress. 124 -Step Forward 104,622 224,686 403,238 Case managers have caseloads of about 70, for which they coordinate treatment and supervision plans using the COMPAS and Carey Guides,. Staff is responsible for communicating with agents / courts regarding progress or lack thereof. There are 2 FIE case managers paid for through the MM. 201 - Drunk Driver Screen & Assessment 196,514 288,514 Conducts comprehensive assessments Including drugs and alcohol for offender referred into the OUIL Ill delayed sentence program. The DOA case manager has CUL III cases only. this case manger visits all clients prior to being released from the FRC to establish a rapport with the offender. 122 -Step Forward Intake 26,887 78,515 105'422 To conduct intake assessments (COMPAS) on all referred offenders into the Step Forward program. - _ • Totala 211,509 106,514 303,151 - 711,174 Position 9 Title: Inmate Caseworker Nomeof Individual: Rice, Merrell, Kiewitt Number of Hours Worked Par Year: : lPull Time Is 2,085} , . • 6240.00 , FrE. • qglihiplent:- - 3.00 - -Funding Sources & CoSt Allocation - Program Code CPS • ODA • .. Locarather i r Fee Revenue., , . 'Totals • . Duties and Reaponsibladas .• CO1 - Thinking Matters -Jail 332,456 352,456 Facilitates all sessions of the Thinking Mattes In the Jell, also meets with all participants on a one-on-one basis to develop a post-release plan. Provides other lectures on topics Important for reentry. _ _ . . - . _ . • Totals 332,456 - . • 932,456 Position 10 . The: Inmate screener . Name of Individual; WaIendzik Number of HOWS Worked Per Year (Pull Time 152 030) . 2080.00 nE Equivalent ' _1.00 Funding Sources &Cost Allocation' Program code CPS 00211 ' Local/Other Poe Revenue • • Totals Duties and Rosponsligitias f25 - Central intake and Assessment Unit 79,554 79,554 • Conducts COMFAS assessments on all mtsdemeanor offenders entering the Jail. Responds to "kites" form inmates regarding program ellgibfifty, requests resentencing Into programs for inmates that may be eligible fro PA511 programming but were not sentenced to an alternative, tracks suspended sentences. . . - - - Totals 79,554 - - 79,554 Salary &Wage Totals 1,274,239 196,514 3,096,635 - 4,567,379 . . .. . . . . Contractual Services .: Contract 1 . Name of Provider: Oakland County Information Technology Services Provided: Computers, support, development of all IT applications and phone lines; Support and rental of phone, and fax lines ' Terms of Reimbursement .. - . : . . • . . • $1,738/ quarter or $6,952/ year for computer rental and $14,300 for development; $2,200 for phone usage, $50/Month for fax/copier/scanner maintenance and repairs rundi•g Sources & CostAltocation • Program Code CPS . DDJR Local/Other Feo Revenue Totals ' Administration 24,052 24,052 _ Sub - Total 24,052 - - 24,052 Contract 2. . , . .. Name of Provider; Holy cross counseling formerly Woodward Counseling Services Provided: Group for youthful Offenders Terms of Reimbursement: . Funding Sources & Cost Allocation Program Cede cps ' DDJR LocullOther Fee Revenue ' Totals GOO - Youthful Offenders Group 25 500 25,300 _ - _ _ - _ ' sub • Total 25500 - 25,509 Contract 3 ._ .... Name of Provider: Oakland County Facilities, Maintenance and Oper /tions . Sehrices•Provided: Building space rental ..Local/Other Fee Revenue.. -.:Tertois .7 9207, 9,207 Program Code AdmInIstratIon 9,207 Sub-Total 9,207 Terms of Reiritur'semehl.: $11.00 / square foot X 837 feet of space Ftinding Sources.& Cost AllocatZon.':..: Contract 4 Name of Provider: Common Ground Sendce5,0rovided: Mental Health assessments, referrals, and short solution focused individual counselin g Terme d ReirnDurSerneat: 2.5 days per week X $385 x 52 weeks Funding Sources & Cost Allocation Pro Jam Code :' CPS . . . DDIR. ' . . LocalfOiher Fee Revenue .: Totals . ' ' • 22-Step Forward Mental Health Assessment 50,000 IIIMIIIIIIIIIIII 50,000 1111=1111111111111111==11111111111111MMI Sub-Total 50,000 MEM - Millaill 50,000 Contract 5 Name of Provider: ADO, INC Services Provided: NEEDS assessments for offenders that re quire a substance abuse assessment accordin g to COMPA5 and/or the T CU, ' Terms of Reimbursement: $6.00 per test SOurtes &Cost Aliricaton • CPS • OMR . ' LocallOther ' Fee iRenue .• • FTetals . Program Cade 22-Step Forward intake Sub-Total Contract 6 2,400 2,400 2,400 2,400 Name of Provider: RagcliiiO & Assoc, House Arrest, & 045 Services Provided: Electronic Monitoring services for pretrial defendants who are unable to pay. : Terms of ReiranrSernent: Average cost $12.00/day plus $100 hook up fee. Funding Sources & Cost Allocation Is, 12,754 15,000 27,754 CPS ..:. 15,000 15,000 Name of ProvIcIr; Oakland County Sheriff's Office Program Code 001,- brunt Driver Screen & Assessment 008 - Pretrial Services Supervision Stib - Total Contract 7 Local/ether. Fee Revenue, : 12,754 12,754 ServicesProvided: Housing for OU1L Ill'offenders ' Terms of Reimbursement: $43.00 per day up to 5 days. . Funding Sources &test Allocation Program Code • CPS • 00111 : LocaLlOther Fee'llaVenue . ':• • TatillS H. 702 - 5 Day Housing 57,29S 67,235 Contract 8 Sub.- Total 67,295 67,295 . :Neme.Of PrOviden; Residential Services 366,1ces ProVided: Residential Services . Terms of Reimburs ement: LP to $45.00 per day Funding Sources 8c Cost Albs :attan Program Code GPO • DWI{ LocaUOther Fee Revenue Totals 203. - Residential Services Sub-Total Contract 9 .14prie of Provider: ServIces.Provded: Terms of Reimbursement: 177,025 177,025 177,025 177,025 Program Code CPs Funding Sources & Cost Allocation LocallOther Fee Revenue Totals 'Sub:: Total Contract 10 Name of Provider: Services Provided: Terms of Reimbursement: Program code ' Funding Sources & Cost Allocation • CPS 1 0010' • Local/Other. • Fee Revenue.. .Totals Sub - Total Total 126,159 257,074 383,238 EiiiAlprnent Program Code Administration CPS MAR Local/Other Fee Revenue Totals Description suoPties% Total • Program Code . 'CPS DEUR 'LcoallOthor Fee Revenue Totals • Description ' Administration 400 400 General Office supplies Total 400 400 Travel Program Code DCOR . Local/Other 'Fee Revenue Totals 'Description Administration Training 2000 Total' i 2,000 2,000 Travel within the state 2,000 CPS , ' • DD.IR LocallOthor • r Fee Revenue ' Totals, Description Training for NIDOC agneu and Community Corrections staff on programs, 4,895 etc Program Code Administration 4,895 Total 4$5 4$5 Board Expenses Program Code CPS DDJR Local!other Fee Revenue Totals. Description Administration 1,000 Food and beverage for noon CCA3 meetings Total 1,000 Other . Program Code CPS DDJR. 1 Local/Other Fee Revenue Totals Description • Administration 500 500 Membership and dues {APPA eta) Administration SOO 500 Public education (printed materials) P22 Pretrial Services Screen & Assessment 1,600 1,600 NAPSA organization membership Total 2,600 2,600 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FY 2015 FUNDING PROPOSAL for OAKLAND COUNTY Comprehensive Plans & Services Program Program Code Funding Request - • Approved Funding • • Reserved Funding • .Total Funding . Recommendation Community Service Placement • • Work Crew - Inmate " Work Crew- Community Sub-Total Group-Based Programs • Education Employment Life Skills Cognitive Domestic Violence Sex Offender Substance Abuse Other Group Services Sub-Total Supervision Programs Day Reporting. Intensive Supervision . Electronic Monitoring Pretrial.Supervision Sub-Total Assessment Services Actuarial Assessment " Pretrial Assessment . Sub-Total Gatekeeper Jail Population Monitor Gatekeeper . Sub-Total Case Management Substance AbiJseTesting Other • • A19' .'?-25 426 BOO '015 B16 . , • Cal .C.05 COG G18 GOO D04 D23 . DOS F23 122 F22 .123 125 . 124. • . 1517 ZOO _ - - - , 378,612 - _ 25,500 404,112 _ 63,995 142,524 206,519 79,287 277,097 356,384 - 95,133 95,133 276,034 - - - - _ - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - . „ - - „ - - - - Program Total 1,338,182 , - - Administration Total 119,258 - Total Comprehensive Plans & Services 1,457,440 0 0 0 Drunk Driver Jail Reduction Program , Program Code .Funding Request " Approved Funding Reserved Funding Total Funding Recommendation Assessment & Treatment Services 201 209,268 5-Day In Jail Housing Z02 67,295 Residential Servcices Z03 177,025 Totals 453,588 '0 • .0 0 FISCAL NOTE (MISC . #1.4163)_ July 16, 2014 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, TOM MIDDLETON, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS — MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND APPLICATION FOR FY2015 TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The State of Michigan offers funding to local communities under PA 511 and the funding is targeted to divert non-violent offenders from prison into local jail or sentencing alternatives. 2. Oakland County has been receiving Community Corrections funds since 1994. 3. The Oakland County Community Corrections Division has applied to the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) requesting funding in the amount of $1,734,003 for plans and services for the grant period of October 1, 2014, through September 30, 2015. 4. The FY2015 application is $33,215 more than FY2014 award. 5. Michigan Department of Corrections holds the contracts for all residential services, meaning the State is responsible for the payment and billing of the Probation Residential Centers in the amount of $1,947,275, which will be paid directly to the residential centers. The County is responsible for requesting the allocation and tracking the costs. The $1,947,275 will be paid by the State directly to residential centers. The remaining amount of $1,734,003 is the County's responsibility as detailed on Schedule A. 6. The grant provides funding for positions in the Community Corrections Division and the Sheriff's Office. 7. The grant seeks funding for the following Community Corrections Division positions: ten (10) FTE Community Corrections Specialist Ils (positions 7425, 7426, 7429, 7432, 7433, 9243, 9247, 9291, 9648, 9649, one (1) FTE Office Assistant II (position 9295), one-half (.50) FTE Community Corrections Support Specialist (position 7834), one half (.50) FTE Supervisor-Community Corrections (position 9396), one (1) PTNE Community Correction Specialist I (position 9397) and one (1) PTNE Community Corrections Specialist II (position 9292). 8. The grant will continue to fund the following Sheriff's Department positions; three (3) FTE Inmate Caseworkers (position 7418, 7419 and 7420), one (1) FTE Inmate Substance Abuse Tech (position 7421), and one (1) PTNE Office Assistant II, (position 7417). 9. No County match is required with this grant; however, it should be noted that the FY2015 Budget of this grant application seeks funding for two (2) General Fund/General Purpose FTE positions (1070403-7834 and 1070410-9396) whereby the State will fund 50% of the costs, and the County will match 50% of the costs. 10. No budget amendment is required at this time. FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Middleton absent. Resolution #14163 July 16, 2014 Moved by Weipert supported by Jackson the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Dwyer, Gershenson, Gingell, Gosselin, Hatchett, Jackson, Long, Matis, McGillivray, Middleton, Scott, Spisz, Taub, Weipert, Woodward, Zack, Bosnic, Crawford. (18) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). I EXAM APPROVE THIS RESOLUTION CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE ACTING PURSUANTTO MCL 45.559A (7) STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on July 16, 2014, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 16 th day of July 2014. ;•=14//..n Lisa Brown, Oakland County j