Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolutions - 2014.11.19 - 21608
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 014272. November 19, 2014 BY: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE, BILL DWYER, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT — 2015 MICHIGAN MENTAL HEALTH DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM — ACCEPTANCE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Circuit Court applied for and was awarded a grant with the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO), Michigan Mental Health Court Grant Program (MMHCGP), with a grant period of October 1,2014 through September 30, 2015; and WHEREAS the total program funding is $60,000, with no required grant match; and WHEREAS this is the 7th year of grant acceptance for this program; and WHEREAS this award would allow the Adult Treatment Court (ATC) to create the capacity to treat offenders with co-occurring disorders (mental health and substance abuse); and WHEREAS the award will be used to purchase contractual services from Community Mental Health in the form of a Court Liaison position which is expected to serve and assist the ATC Team via assessments, court testimonies, consultations, progress updates, crisis intervention, community referrals, and coordinate care throughout Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority's (OCCMHA) network of Core Provider Agencies (CPA), and bridge the gaps between the Court and Mental Health systems. It will also be used to provide drug screens and bus passes for clients; and WHEREAS the grant agreement has been processed through the County Grant Review Process in accordance with the Board of Commissioners Grant Acceptance Procedures; and WHEREAS this grant is conditioned upon continued interpretation of the contract consistent with the July 31, 2014Ietter from the SCAO, providing that assurance #3 of this year's grant application and agreement shall not be construed as a mandate for future funding of the program from the funding unit, said letter attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners accepts the 2015 Michigan Mental Health Court Grant Program (MMHCGP) from the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) in the amount of $60,000 for the period of October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute the grant agreement and to approve any grant extensions or changes within fifteen percent (15%) of the original award, which is consistent with the original agreement as approved, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution, PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Bosnic absent. GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Circuit Court GRANT NAME: FY 2015 Michigan Mental Health Court Grant Program (MMTICGP) FUNDING AGENCY: State Court Administrative Office DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Jackie Howes-Evanson / John Cooperrider 2-2154 / 8-0256 STATUS: Grant Acceptance DATE: October 16, 2014 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #13180, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The captioned grant materials and grant acceptance package (which should include the Board of Commissioners Liaison Committee Resolution, the grant agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal Note, and this Sign Off email containing grant review comments) may be requested to be place on the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution. DEPARTMENT REVIEW Department of Management and Budget: Approved. — Laurie Van Pelt (10/8/2014) Department of Human Resources: P02_ Approved (No Committee) — Lori Taylor (10/8/2014) Risk Management and Safety: Approved by Risk Management — Robert Erlenbeck (10/8/2014) Corporation Counsel: There appear to be no unresolved legal issues that require action at this time. — Carmen Lyon (10/16/2014) COMPLIANCE The grant agreement and assurances reference specific federal and state regulations. Below is a list of the specifically cited compliance related documents for this grant. The Essential Elements of a Mental Health Court https://www.bja.gov/Publications/MHC Essential Elements.ncif Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (42 CFR Part 2) 1-n-tp://www.access.wo.ovinara/cfr/waisidx 02/42cfr2 02 .1 -itml Michigan — Conflict of Interest - Contracts of Public Servants with Public Entities — "Act 317 of 1968" http ://www.legi slaturc.mi.gov/(uq3 I xgeltmrj5z55z2uiwv451/mile .asnx?nage=gctobject&objectnaine—rncl-Act- 317-of-1968&queryid=14761946 Michigan — Standards of Conduct for Public Officers and Employees (Act 196 of 1973) 5- 341 From: To Cc: Subject: Date: VanPet Laurie West, Catherine )ulie 5econtine; Lori Taylor, Pat Davis; CooDerrider. John:, <hoviresevansoni(klakoov.com >; Falardeau, Nancy Re: GRANT REVIEW: Circuit Court - 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program Acceptance Wednesday, October 08, 2014 4:43:45 PM Approved. Sent from my iPhone On Oct 8, 2014, at 10:52 AM, "West, Catherine" <westca@oalcgov.corn> wrote: GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt — Lori Taylor—Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Circt.lit Court 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: October 17, 2014 GRANT INFORMATION Date: October 8, 2014 Operating Department: Circuit Court Department Contact: John Cooperrider or Jackie Howes- Evanson Contact Phone: x80256/x22154 Document Identification Number: N/A REVIEW STATUS: Contract Funding Period: October 1, 2014 through September BO, 2015 New Facility / Additional Office Space Needs: N/A IT Resources (New Computer Hardware / Software Needs or Purchases): N/A MWDBE Requirements: No Funding Continuation/New: Continuation Application Total Project Amount: $60,000 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Taylor, Lori "West, Catherine"; "Julie Secontine"; 'Laurie VanPelt"; "Pat Davis" "Col:mei-rider, John"; howesevansoniftoa gov,com; "Falardeau, Nancy" RE: GRANT REVIEW: Circuit Court - 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program - Acceptance Wednesday, October 08, 2014 12:22:11 PM HR Approved (No Committee) Lori Taylor Manager-Human Resources Recruitment & Workforce Planning Oakland County Michigan 2100 Pontiac Lake Road Waterford, MI 48328 taylorlo@oakgov.com www.oakgov.com/jobs Phone: 248-858-0548 Fax: 248-858-8391 From: West, Catherine [mailto:westca©oakgov.com ] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:52 AM To: Julie Secontine; Laurie VanPelt; Lori Taylor; Pat Davis Cc: Cooperrider, John; howesevansonj©oakgov.com ; 'Falardeau, Nancy' Subject: GRANT REVIEW: Circuit Court - 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program - Acceptance GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt — Lori Taylor —Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Circuit Court 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: October 17, 2014 GRANT INFORMATION Date: October 8, 2014 Operating Department: Circuit Court Department Contact: John Cooperrider or Jackie Howes- Evanson Contact Phone: x80256/x22154 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Erlenbeck, Robert "West, Catherine"; "Julie Secontine'; "Laurie VanPelt"; "Lori Taylor"; ''Pat Davis" "C000errider. John"; nowesevansonjPoakgov,cuni; "Falardeau. Nancy" RE: GRANT REVIEW: Circuit Court - 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program - Acceptance Wednesday, October 08, 2014 4:42:07 PM Approved by Risk Management. R.E. 10/08/14. Robert Erlen beck, Risk Management Office. 248-8584694 Cell: 248-421-9121 Office schedule: Monday through Thursday 7:00 to 5:30 From: Easterling, Terri [mailto:easterlingt@oakgov.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 2:25 PM To: 'West, Catherine'; 'Julie Secontiner; 'Laurie VanPelt'; 'Lori Taylor'; 'Pat Davis' Cc: 'Cooperrider, John'; howesevansonj@oakgov.com ; 'Falardeau, Nancy' Subject: RE: GRANT REVIEW: Circuit Court - 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program - Acceptance Please be advised that your request for Risk Management's assistance has hen assigned to Bob Erlenbeck, (ext. 8-1694), If you have not done so already, please forward all related information, documentation, and correspondence. Also, please include Risk Management's assignment number, RM14-0351, regarding this matter. Thank you. From: West, Catherine [mailto:westce@oakgov,coml Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:52 AM To: Julie Secontine; Laurie VanPelt; Lori Taylor; Pat Davis Cc: Cooperrider, John; howesevansonj@oakgov.com ; 'Falardeau, Nancy' Subject: GRANT REVIEW: Circuit Court - 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program - Acceptance GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt — Lori Taylor—Julie Secontine— Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Circuit Court 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: [von, Carmen I W - ; "Julie Secontine"; "Laurie VanPelt"; "Lori Taylor; "Pat Davis" "CooDerrider, John"; howesevansonj40a Dov,com; "Falardeau, Nancy" RE: GRANT REVIEW: Circuit Court - 2915 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program - Acceptance Thursday, October 16, 2014 3:07:52 PM There appear to be no unresolved legal issues that require action at this time. Thank you, Carmen Lyon • OLNDF N MICHICAN Carmen Lyon Assistant Corporation Counsel Department of Corporation Counsel 1200 N. Telegraph Road, Bldg. 14 East Courthouse West Wing Extension, 3rd Floor Pontiac, Ml 48341 Phone Number: (248) 858-4097 Fax Number: (248) 858-1003 E-mail: lyonc@oakgov.com PRIVILEGED AND CONHDENTIAL — ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION This e-mail is intended only for those persons to whom it is specifically addressed. It Is confidential and is protected by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. This privilege belongs to the County of Oakland, and individual addressees are not authorized to waive or modify this privilege in any way. Individuals are advised that any dissemination, reproduction or unauthorized review of this information by persons other than those listed above may constitute a waiver of this privilege and is therefore prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you have any questions, please contact the Department of Corporation Counsel at (248) 858-0550. Thank you for your cooperation, From: West, Catherine [mailto:westca@oakgov.corni Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:52 AM To: Julie Secontine; Laurie VanPelt; Lori Taylor; Pat Davis Cc: Cooperrider, John; howesevansonj@oakgov.corn; 'Falardeau, Nancy' Subject: GRANT REVIEW: Circuit Court - 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program - Acceptance GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt — Lori Taylor —Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Circuit Court 2015 Michigan Mental Health Drug Court Grant Program State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE MICHIGAN MENTAL HEALTH COURT GRANT PROGRAM FY 2015 CONTRACT Grantee Name: 6th Circuit Court - Adult Federal ID Number: 38-6004876 Contract Number: 2515 Grant Amount: 560,000 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.01 This contract is made between the State Court Administrative Office, Lansing, Michigan (SCAO) and the 6th Circuit Court. 1.02 This contract incorporates the Grantee's approved grant application request and most recently approved budget. 1.03 This contract is for the Michigan Mental Health Court Grant Program. 1.04 In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants in this contract, and the benefits to be derived from this contract, the parties agree as follows: 2. TERM OF CONTRACT 2.01 This contract commences on 10/1/2014 and terminates on 9/30/2015, at 11:59 p.m. 3. RELATIONSHIP 3.01 The Grantee is an independent contractor, and it is understood that the Grantee is not an employee of the SCAO. No employee, agent, or subcontractor of the Grantee is an employee of the SCAO. 3.02 No liability or benefits, including, but not limited to, retirement benefits or liabilities, pension rights or liabilities, insurance rights or liabilities, fringe benefits, training, holiday pay, sick pay, vacation pay, or such other rights, provisions, or liabilities arising out of an agreement of hire or employer-employee relationship, either express or implied, shall arise or accrue to either party as a result of this contract. The Grantee is not eligible for, and will not participate in, any such benefits. 3.03 The Grantee is responsible for payment of all taxes, including federal, state, and local taxes arising out of the Grantee's activities in accordance with this contract, including, but not limited to, income taxes, social security taxes, unemployment insurance taxes, and any other taxes or fees. 3.04 The Grantee understands and agrees that all parties furnishing services pursuant to this contract are, for purposes of workers' compensation liability or other actions of employee- related liability, not employees of the SCAO. The Grantee bears the sole responsibility and liability for furnishing workers' compensation benefits to any of its employees for injuries arising from or connected with services performed pursuant to this contract. 3.05 The Grantee does not, and shall not, have the authority to enter into contracts on the SCAO's behalf. 4. SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.01 Upon signing of this contract, the SCAO agrees to provide funding from the Grant in an amount not to exceed the amount of this contract. In no event does this contract create a charge against any other funds of the SCAO or the Michigan Supreme Court. 4.02 The Grantee, and the Grantee's employees or subcontractors, shall devote such time, attention, skill, knowledge, and professional ability as is necessary to most effectively and efficiently carry out and perform the services as described in this contract and in any amendments to this contract. 4.03 Commitment of state resources for the acquisition of goods and services, and execution of purchase orders, contracts, and similar agreements, shall remain the sole responsibility of the SCAO. 5. PERFORMANCE AND BUDGET 5.01 The SCAO agrees to provide the Grantee a sum not to exceed $60,000 for the court program operated pursuant to this contract. 5.02 Grantee equipment purchases are prohibited. 5.03 The Grantee agrees that it will not expend funds obtained under this contract for any purpose other than those authorized in the administrative requirements specified in the L]pp[idion and inot ve=ltly approved budget 161 the GI-ant, and will expend grant fund -, only during the period covered by this contract unless prior written approval is received from the SCAO. 5.04 The Grantee must sign up through the online vendor registration process to receive payments as Electronic Funds Transfers (EFT)/Direct Deposits. Registration information is available through the Department of Technology, Management, and Budget's website at: http://www.michigan.gov/budget/0,1607,7-157-13404_37161-179392--,00.html. 5.05 All reimbursements for the proper performance of the contract shall be made by the SCAO quarterly, upon submission by the Grantee of claims for approval by the SCAO. The claims shall include a specific amount of the hours worked, hourly salary, the detailed services provided by the Grantee or Grantee's staff, and/or the specific amount expended on supplies or operating costs necessary for program operation. 5.06 Requests for adjustments in expenditures within line items and between line item categories must be made using a Contract Amendment, within WebGrants, and approved by the SCAO. 5.07 The Grantee shall make reasonable efforts to collect 1st and 3rd party fees, where applicable, and report these as outlined in the SCAO's fiscal procedures. Any under-recoveries of otherwise available fees resulting from failure to bill for eligible services will be excluded from reimbursable expenditures. 6. CONDUCT OF THE PROJECT 6.01 The Grantee shall abide by all terms and conditions required in the application assurances, budget requirements, and the Grantee's approved program outline and most recently approved budget. 6.02 The Grantee agrees that funds awarded under this grant will not be used to support any inherently religious activities, such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytizing. If the Grantee refers participants to, or provides, a non-federally funded program of service that incorporates such religious activities: (1) any such activities must be voluntary for program participants, and (2) program participants may not be excluded from participation in a program or otherwise penalized or disadvantaged for any failure to accept a referral or services. If 2 participation in a non-federally funded program or services that incorporates inherently religious activities is deemed a critical treatment or support service for program participants, the Grantee agrees to identify and refer participants who object to the inherently religious activities of such program or service to a comparable secular alternative program or service. 7. ASSIGNMENT 7.01 The Grantee may not assign the performance under this contract to subcontract personnel except with the prior written approval of the SCAO. 7.02 All provisions and requirements of this contract shall apply to any subcontracts or agreements the Grantee may enter into in furtherance of its obligations under the contract. 7.03 The Grantee shall provide copies of all subrecipient subcontracts for services funded in whole or in part by this grant to the SCAO. 8, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 8.01 In order that the Grantee's employees or subrecipient subcontractors may effectively provide fulfillment of this contract to the SCAO, the SCAO may disclose confidential or proprietary information pertaining to the SCAO's past, present, and future activities to the Grantee. All such information is proprietary to the SCAO and the Grantee shall not disclose such information to any third party without prior approval from the SCAO, unless disclosure is required by law or court order. If disclosure is required by law or court order, the SCAO will be notified of the request before disclosure. The Grantee agrees to return all confidential or proprietary information to the SCAO immediately upon the termination of this contract. 8.02 Both the SCAO and Grantee shall assure that medical services to, and information contained in the medical records of, persons served under the provisions of this contract or other such recorded information required to be held confidential by federal or state law, rule, or regulation, in connection with the provision of services or other activity under this agreement, shall remain confidential. Such information shall be held confidential, and shall not be divulged without the written consent of either the patient or a person responsible for the patient, except as may be otherwise required by applicable law or regulation. Such information may be disclosed in summary, statistical, or other form, if the disclosure does not directly or indirectly identify particular individuals. 9. HUMAN SUBJECTS 9.01 The Grantee must submit all research involving human subjects conducted in programs sponsored by the SCAO, or in programs that receive funding from or through the state of Michigan, to the Michigan Department of Community Health's (MDCH) Institutional Review Board (IRB) for approval prior to the initiation of the research. 10. HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT, 42 CFR PART 2, AND MICHIGAN MENTAL HEALTH CODE 10.01 To the extent applicable, the Grantee assures and certifies that it is in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), 42 CFR Part 2, and the Michigan Mental Health Code, to the extent that this act and these regulations are pertinent to the services that the Grantee provides under this contract. These requirements include: A. The Grantee must not share any protected health or other protected data and information provided by the SCAO or any other source that falls within H[PAA, 3 42 CFR Part 2, and/or the Michigan Mental Health Code requirements, except to a subrecipient subcontractor as appropriate under this contract. B. The Grantee must require, in the terms and conditions of any subcontract, that the subrecipient subcontractor not share any protected health or other protected data and information from the SCAO or any other source that falls under HIPAA, 42 CFR Part 2, and/or Michigan Mental Health Code requirements. C. The Grantee must use protected data and information only for the purposes of this contract. D. The Grantee must have written policies and procedures addressing the use of protected data and information that falls under HIPAA, 42 CFR Part 2, and/or Michigan Mental Health Code requirements. The policies and procedures must meet all applicable federal and state requirements including HIPAA, 42 CFR Part 2, and/or Michigan Mental Health Code regulations. These policies and procedures must include restricting access to the protected data and information by the Grantee's employees. E. The Grantee must have a policy and procedure to report to the SCAO unauthorized use or disclosure of protected data and information that falls under HILPAA, 42 CFR Part 2, and/or Michigan Mental Health Code requirements of 1),cois F. Failure to comply with any of these contractual requirements may result in the termination of this contract in accordance with section 18. G. In accordance with HIPAA, 42 CFR Part 2, and/or Michigan Mental Health Code requirements, the Grantee is liable for any claim, loss, or damage relating to its unauthorized use or disclosure of protected data and information received by the Grantee from the SCAO or any other source. 11. RIGHTS TO WORK PRODUCT 11.01 All reports, programs, manuals, tapes, listings, documentation, and any other work product prepared by the Grantee under this contract, and amendments thereto, shall belong to the SCAO and are subject to copyright or patent only by the SCAO. The SCAO shall have the right to obtain from the Grantee original materials produced under this contract and shall have the right to distribute those materials. 11.02 The SCAO grants the Grantee a royalty-free, nonexclusive license to use anything developed in the course of executing this contract if the work product enters the public domain. 11.03 The SCAO shall have copyright, property, and publication rights in all written or visual material or other work products developed in connection with this contract. The Grantee shall not publish or distribute any printed or visual material relating to the services provided under this contract without the prior explicit permission of the SCAO. 12. WRITTEN DISCLOSURE 12.01 The Grantee and the Grantee's employees or subrecipient subcontractors shall promptly disclose in writing to the SCAO all writings, inventions, improvements, or discoveries, whether copyrightable, patentable, or not, which are written, conceived, made, or discovered by the Grantee or the Grantee's employees or subrecipient subcontractors jointly with the SCAO or singly by Grantee or Grantee's employees or subrecipient subcontractors while engaged in activity under this contract. As to each such disclosure, the Grantee shall specifically point out the features or concepts that are new or different. 4 12.02 The SCAO shall have the right to request the assistance of the Grantee and Grantee's employees or subrecipient subcontractors in determining and acquiring copyright, patent, or other such protection at the SCAO's invitation and request. 12.03 The Grantee represents and warrants that there are at present no such writings, inventions, improvements, or discoveries (other than in a copyright, copyright application, patent, or patent application) that were written, conceived, invented, made, or discovered by the Grantee or the Grantee's employees before entering into this contract, and which the Grantee or the Grantee's employees desire to remove from the provisions of this contract, except those specifically set forth by attachment hereto. 13. INSURANCE 13.01 The Grantee should carry insurance coverage or self-insurance in such amounts as necessary to cover all claims arising out of the Grantee's operations under the terms of this contract. 14. INDEMNITY 14.01 All liabilities, obligations, damages, penalties, claims, costs, fees, charges, and expenses (including, but not limited to, fees and expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses, and other consultants) resulting from claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out of activities or services carried out by the Grantee in the performance of this contract, shall be the responsibility of the Grantee, and not the responsibility of the SCAO. Nothing in this subsection is, nor shall be construed as, a waiver of governmental immunity. 14.02 All liabilities, obligations, damages, penalties, claims, costs, fees, charges, and expenses (including, but not limited to, fees and expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses, and other consultants) resulting from claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out of activities or services carried out by the SCAO in the performance of this contract, shall be the responsibility of the SCAO, and not the responsibility of the Grantee. Nothing in this subsection is, nor shall be construed as, a waiver of governmental immunity. 14.03 In the event that liabilities, obligations, damages, penalties, claims, costs, fees, charges, and expenses (including, but not limited to, fees and expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses, and other consultants) resulting from third party claims, demands, costs, or judgments arise as a result of activities conducted jointly by the Grantee and SCAO in fulfillment of their responsibilities under this contract, such liabilities, obligations, damages, penalties, claims, costs, fees, charges, and expenses shall be borne by the Grantee and the SCAO in relation to each party's responsibilities under these joint activities. Nothing in this subsection is, nor shall be construed as, a waiver of governmental immunity. 14.04 The SCAO is not responsible and will not be subject to any liability for any claim related to the loss, damage, or impairment of Grantee's property and materials or the property and materials of the Grantee's employees or subrecipient subcontractors, used by the Grantee pursuant to the Grantee's performance under this contract. 14.05 The Grantee warrants that it is not subject to any nondisclosure, noncompetition, or similar clause with current or prior clients or employers that will interfere with the performance of this contract. The SCAO will not be subject to any liability for any such claim. 14.06 In the event any action or proceeding is brought against the Grantee by reason of any claim due or claimed to be due to Grantee's performance covered under this contract, the Grantee will, at the Grantee's sole cost and expense, resist or defend the action or proceeding as the Grantee deems appropriate. The Grantee retains sole authority and discretion to resolve and settle any such claims. 5 15. ACQUISITION, ACCOUNTING, RECORDICEEPING, AND INSPECTION 15.01 The Grantee agrees that all expenditures from this contract, including the acquisition of personnel services, contractual services, and supplies, shall be in accordance with: (1) the standard procedures of the Grantee's funding unit, and (2) the administrative and budget requirements of the grant. 15.02 The Grantee agrees to maintain accounting records following generally accepted accounting principles for the expenditure of funds for the purposes identified in the approved grant request, most recently approved budget, and any applicable approved contract addendum and/or budget amendment. 15.03 The Grantee agrees that the Michigan Supreme Court, the SCAO, the local government audit division of the Michigan Department of Treasury, the State Auditor General, or any of their duly authorized representatives, including program evaluators and auditors, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any pertinent transaction, books, accounts, data, time cards, or other records related to this contract. The Grantee shall retain all books and records, including all pertinent cost reports, accounting and financial records, or other documents related to this contract, for five years after final payment at the Grantee's cost. Federal and/or state auditors, and any persons duly authorized by the SCAO, shall have full access to and the right to examine and audit any of the materials during the term of this contract and for five years after final payment. If an audit is initiated before the expiration of the five-year period, and extends past that period, all documents shall be maintained until the audit is complete. The SCAO shall provide audit findings and recommendations to the Grantee. The SCAO may adjust future or final payment if the findings of the audit indicate over- or under-payment to the Grantee for the period audited, subject to the availability of funds for such purposes. If an audit discloses an overpayment to the Grantee, the Grantee shall immediately refund all amounts that may be due to the SCAO. Failure of the Grantee to comply with the requirements of this section shall constitute a material breach of this contract upon which the SCAO may cancel, terminate, or suspend this contract. 15.04 The Grantee's accounting system must maintain a separate fund or account that segregates grant contract receipts and expenditures from other receipts and expenditures of the Grantee. 16. PROGRAM REVIEW AND MONITORING 16.01 The Grantee shall give the SCAO and any of its authorized agents access to the court at any reasonable time to evaluate, audit, inspect, observe, and monitor the operation of the program. The inspection methods that may be used include, but are not limited to onsite visits, interviews of staff and participants, and review of case records, receipts, monthly/quarterly statistical reports, and fiscal records. 17. REPORTS 17.01 The Grantee agrees to submit timely, complete, and accurate reports as identified in Attachment A. 17.02 The data for each participant who is screened and accepted into the program must be entered into the Drug Court Case Management Information System (DCCMIS). 17.03 The Grantee is responsible for the timely, complete, and accurate submission of each required report and data as outlined above. 17.04 If any report is thirty days past due, a delinquency notice will be sent via email notifying the Grantee that it has 15 days to comply with the reporting requirement. Forty-five 6 days past the due date, a forfeiture notice will be sent to the Grantee via the U.S. Postal Service notifying it that its funding award has been rescinded due to contract noncompliance. 18. TERMINATION OR FUNDING HOLD 18.01 Each party has the right to terminate this contract without cause by giving written notice to the other party of such termination at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. Reasons for termination may include, but are not limited to, failure to make ongoing progress toward the program's goals, or failure to submit reports in a timely fashion. 18.02 This contract may be terminated immediately without further financial liability to the SCAO if funding for this contract becomes unavailable to the SCAO. 19. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 19.01 The Grantee shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and codes of the federal, state, and local governments. 20. MICHIGAN LAW 20.01 This contract shall be subject to, and shall be enforced and construed under, the laws of Michigan. 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 21.01 The Grantee presently has no personal or financial interest, and shall not acquire any such interest, direct or indirect, that would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of this contract. 21.02 The Grantee and the SCAO are subject to the provisions of 1968 PA 317, as amended, MCL 15.321 et seq., MSA 4.1700(51) et seq., and 1973 PA 196, as amended, MCL 15.341 et seq., MSA 4.1700 (71) et seq. 22. DEBT TO STATE OF MICHIGAN 22.01 The Grantee covenants that it is not, and will not become, in arrears to the state of Michigan or any of its subdivisions upon contract, debt, or any other obligation to the state of Michigan or its subdivisions, including real property, personal property, and income taxes. 23. DISPUTES 23.01 The Grantee shall notify the SCAO in writing of the Grantee's intent to pursue a claim against the SCAO for breach of any term of this contract within seven days of discovery of the alleged breach. 23.02 The Grantee and the SCAO agree that with regard to any and all disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of or in connection with or relating to this contract; or any claim that the SCAO violated any local, state, or federal ordinance, statute, regulation, law, or common-law doctrine (including discrimination or civil rights claims); or committed any tort; the parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute through mediation. Selection of a mediator will be by mutual agreement of the parties. 23.03 The Grantee and the SCAO agree that, in the event that mediation is unsuccessful, any disputes, controversies, or claims shall be settled by arbitration. Selection of an arbitrator will be by mutual agreement of the parties. The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding on both parties. The award, costs, and expenses of the arbitration shall be awarded at the discretion 7 of the arbitrator. This agreement to arbitrate shall be specifically enforceable. A judgment of any circuit court shall be rendered upon the award made pursuant to submission to the arbitrator. 24. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 24.01 Except for Grantee's approved grant application, application assurances, and most recently approved budget, this contract contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior written or oral promises and representations. No other understanding, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this contract exists to bind either of the parties. 25. AMENDMENT 25.01 This contract may be amended only upon written agreement of the parties. 26. DELIVERY OF NOTICE 26.01 Written notices and communications required under this contract shall be delivered by electronic mail, regular mail, overnight delivery, or facsimile device to the following: A. The Grantee's contact person is Jacqueline Howcs-Evanson, 1200 North Telegraph Road, Pontiac, MI 48341. B. The SCAO' s contact person is Dr. Jessica Parks, State Court Administrative Office, Michigan Hall of Justice, P.O. Box 30048, Lansing, MI 48909. 8 27. SIGNATURE OF PARTIES 27.01 This contract becomes effective when signed by the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the SCAO and the Grantee have executed this contract: 6th Circuit Court— Adult By: Authorizing Official (Signature and Title) Authorizing Official (Please Print Name and Title) Date: Authorizing Official: Must be a person who is authorized to enter into ,a binding contract for the entity receiving funds. The authorizing official may not be a judge or other state employee. The authorizing official is normally from the Executive or Legislative Branch of the entity (e.g., City Manager, Mayor, Council President, Board Chairperson, Chief Financial Officer, etc.). STATE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE By: Date: Deputy State Court Administrator 9 ATTACHMENT A MICHIGAN MENTAL HEALTH COURT GRANT PROGRAM (MMHCGP) FY 2015 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015 DCCMIS DATA EXCEPTION REPORT DUE DATE NOTE February 15, 2015 Courts will be reviewing error reports reflecting data entered into DCCMIS for the time period of October 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. May 15, 2015 Courts will be reviewing error reports reflecting data entered into DCCMIS for the time period of January 1,2015, through March 31,2015. August 15, 2015 Courts will be reviewing error reports reflecting data entered into DCCMIS for the time period of April 1, 2015, through June 30, 2015. November 15, 2015 _ Courts will be reviewing error reports reflecting data entered into DCCMIS for the time period of July 1, 2015, through September 30, 2015. DCCMIS USER AUDIT REPORT DUE DATE NOTE January 31, 2015 Courts will be confirming user access to DCCMIS. CLAIMS REPORTS DUE DATE NOTE January 10, 2015 Courts will be reporting on expenditures from October 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. April 10, 2015 Courts will be reporting on expenditures from January 1, 2015, through March 31, 2015. July 10, 2015 Courts will be reporting expenditures from April 1, 2015, through June 30, 2015. October 10,2015 Courts will be reporting expenditures from July 1, 2015, through September 30, 2015. PROGRESS REPORTS DUE DATE NOTE April 30, 2015 Interim Report Courts will be reporting on progress made during the first half of the grant period - October 1, 2014, through March 31, 2015. October 30, 2015 Final Report Courts will be reporting on progress made during the second half of the grant period - April 1, 2015, through September 30, 2015. 10 Michigan stztoprovince Title: Email:" Address:* Address Line 2 Address Line 3 City* Phone:* Drug Treatment Court Supervisor howesevansonjgoakgov.com 1200 N. Telegraph Rd, Pontiac ow 248-452-2154 Phone 48341 Postal Codo/Zip at. weourants iviictugan Courts Page 1 of 20 AppI ication 02132 - Fiscal Year 2015 Michigan Mental Health Court Grant Program - Final 02515- FY 2014-MMHCGP- 6th Circuit Adult Treatment Court Michigan Mental Health Court Grant Program (MMHCGP) Status: Submitted Submitted Date: 05/1512014 4;04 PM Applicant Information Primary Contact: Name:" MS. Jacqueline Ann Howes-Evanson Salutation Hrst Name Man Name Last Name Organization Information Name:* 6th Circuit Court - Oakland County (COS) Organization Type: State Court Administrative Office Tax ID: Organization VVebsite: Address:* 8th Circuit Court, Courthouse Tower 1200 N. Telegraph Rd. Phone:" Fax: Pontiac City 248-452-2154 248-858-2006 Michigan State/Province 48341 Postal Code/Zip Ext. Application Information Program Capacity:" GO Number of Active Participants:* 58 http://mieourts.dullestech.net/getApplicationPrintPreview.do?documentPk=1 400160295921 6/2/2014 Web Grants - Michigan Courts Page 2 of 20 Do you have a Loco/Administrative Order (LAO)? Local Administrative Order (LAO) yes LAO # 2009-01 De you have a current Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)? Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)?" Effective Date: 06120/2013 Expiration Date: 05/01/2018 Applicant Contact Information Yes Select your court* People served' County to Receive the Grant Award" Date that the program accepted or anticipates first participant" Please pick your program type" Is your program operational?' Is your court a tribal court?' Courthouse name (example: Frank Murphy Hall of Justice) Courthouse street address' Room/Floor City" State* Zip code' Judge: First Name' Judge: Last Name" Title' Judge: E-mail Address* Judge: Phone Number' C06 Oakland Men, Women Oakland 05/20/2009 Adult Mental Health Court No Oakland County Sixth Circuit Court 1200 North Telegraph Road Pontiac MI 48341 Joan Young Judge youngMoakgov.com 248-858-5282 Ext. Judge's Mailing Address: Street* 1200 North Telegraph Road Judges MaiIing Address: Room/Floor Judge's Mailing Address: City' Pontiac Judge's Mailing Address: State' Judge's Mailing Address: Zip Code* Judge 2: First Name Judge 2: Last Name O'Brien Judge 2: Title Judge Judge 2: E-mail Address obrienc@oakgov.corn Judge 2: Phone Number 248-858-0368 MI 48341 Colleen Ext, http //role ourts _ dulle stech. netigetAppli cati onPri ntP revi ew. do?do c umentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 Vv CuTthJIL - ivliortigan k,ourts Page 3 of 20 Judge 2 Mailing Address: Street Judge 2 Mailing Address: Room/Floor Judge 2 Mailing Address: City Judge 2 Mailing Address: State Judge 2 Mailing Address: Zip Coda Judge 3: First Name Judge 3: Last Name Judge 3: Title Judge 3: E-mail Address Judge 3: Phone Number Judge 3 Mailing Address: Street Judge 3 Mailing Address: Room/Floor Judge 3 Mailing Address: City Judge 3 Mailing Address: State Judge 3 Mailing Address: Zip Code Judge 4: First Name Judge 4: Last Name Judge 4: Title Judge 4: E-mail Address Judge 4: Phone Number 1200 North Telegraph Road Pontiac MI 48341 Judge Judge Est. Ext. Judge 4 Mailing Address: Street Judge 4 Mailing Address: Room/Floor Judge 4 Mailing Address: City Judge 4 Mailing Address: State Judge 4 Mailing Address: Zip Code Judge 5: First Name Judge 5: Last Name Judges: Title Judge Judge 5: E-mail Address Judge 5: Phone Number Judge 5 Mailing Address: Street Judge 5 Mailing Address: Room/Floor Judge 5 Mailing Address: City Judge 5 Mailing Address: State Judge 5 Mailing Address: Zip Code Judge 5: First Name Judge 6: Last Name http://micourts.dallestech.net/getApplicationPrintPreview.do?docurnentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 WebGrants - Michigan Courts Page 4 of 20 Judge 6: Title Judge Judge 6: E-mail Address Judge 6: Phone Number Judge 6 Mailing Address: Street Judge 6 Mailing Address: Room/Floor Judge 6 Mailing Address: City Judge 6 Mailing Address: State Judge 6 Mailing Address: Zip Code Project Director (Main Program Contact): First Name Project Director: Last Name* Howes-Evanson Project Director: Title* Project Director: E-mail Address* Project Director: Phone Number* Project Director Mailing Address: Street' Project Director Mailing Address: Room/Floor 1200 North Telegraph Road Project Director Mailing Address: City* Pontiac Project Director Mailing Address: Ml State Project Director Mailing Address: 48341 Zip Code* Financial Officer: First Name"' Lynn Financial Officer: Last Name* Sonkiss Financial Officer: Title* Financial Officer: E-mail Address* Financial Officer: Phone Number* Financial Officer Mailing Address: Street* Financial Officer Mailing Address: Room/Floor 2100 Pontiac Lake Road Jacqueline as. Drug Treatment Court Supervisor howesevansonj@oakgov.com 248-452-2154 Manager, General Fiscal Services sonkissl@oakgov.com 248-858-0940 Financial Officer Mailing Address: City* Financial Officer Mailing Address: State"' Financial Office Mailing Address: Zip Code* Authorizing Official: First Name' Authorizing Official: Last Name Authorizing Official: Title* Authorizing Official: E-mail Address* Authorizing Official: Phone Number' Waterford MI 48328 Michael Gingell Chair, Oakland County Board of Commissioners gingelm@oakgov.com 248-858-0100 http://micourts.dullestech.net/getApplicationPrintPreview.do?documentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 w eourants micmgan upurts Page 5 of 20 Authorizing Official Mailing Address: Street" Authorizing Official Mailing Address: Room/Floor Authorizing Official Mailing Address: City" Authorizing official Mailing Address: State* Authorizing Official Mailing Address: Zip Code* 1200 North Telegraph Road Pontiac MI 48341 Ext. DCCMIS Contact Information DCCIVIlS Administrator (The person responsible for reporting data to SCA0): First Name DCCMIS Administrator: Last Name' DCCMIS Administrator: E-mail Address* DCCMIS Administrator: Phone Number* Candace Serene serenoc@oakgov.com 248-452-9690 Ext Program Goals (Required) Goal 1:* link ea% orpaiticipants to mental health services within 21 days of screening. UpOn completion of the screening/assessment, the CMH liaison, will schedule the MHC participant with th e n e a r e s t a v a i l a b l e appointment to their anticipated release date ( if in jail) or next available appointment if n o t i n c u s t o d y . Measurement: Staff will enter the dates of the mental health services appointments and track th e % o f p a r t i c i p a n t s t h a t m e e t t h e 2 1 day requirement during the reporting period. Goal 2:* 100% of participants will have remained substance free for SO days prior to graduation. ATC-MHC will accomplish this by requiring frequent random screens, alcohol monitoring, in conjunction w i t h i n t e n s i v e s u p e r v i s i o n w i t h AA/NA involvement. Our current program graduation requirements include four m o n t h s b e i n g f r e e o f p o s i t i v e o r m i s s e d screens in order to complete the program. Measurement: Staff will track the number of drug screens including all positive, negative and missed sceens ( whic h a r e a l s o considered positive) and/or confirmations and enter this data into the DCCMIS on a w e e k l y b a s i s . S t a f f w i l l t r a c k t h e % o f p a r t i c i p a n t s that graduate that have any positive or missed screens 60 days prior to their graduation ( d u r i n g t h e r e p o r t i n g p e r i o d ) . Goal 3:* 50% of participants will not be convicted of a new offense, including driving infractions, while in the Program. This decrease in recidivism will be accomplished by providing intensive community a n d j u d i c a l s u p e r v i s i o n , s u b s t a n c e a b u s e a n d mental health treatment as well as relapse prevention education. http ://micourts dullesteoh.net/getApplic ationPrintPreview. do ?do cumentP-1400160295921 6/2/2014 WebGrants - Michigan Courts Page 6 of 20 Measurement: Staff will enter and track any new offenses through the DCCMIS and track the % of any participants that have reoffended during the reporting period. Goal 4:" 100% &pal-arc/pants will have estabrished stable living arrangements for et least 90 days prior to graduation. The ATC-MHC will assist those participants that do not have stable living arrangements and put into place plans to obtain a stable place by the time they are in Phase 3 of the program; this includes providing funding for 3/4 housing until they can become self-sufficeint or achieving a shared living arrangement that is supportive of their recovery. Measurement Staff will track living arrangements and enter these into the DCCIV11S. During the reporting period, staff will track the % of graduates that have had stable living arrangemnts 91; days prior to their commencement. Goal 5: 60% of participants will be retained in the program for more than three quarters of the program's duration. By creating and maintaining individualized treatment plans and clilent focused programming, the participants will engage in the ATC/MHC programming for longer periods of time. Measurement: Track the % of participants that remain in the program for more than three quarters of the program's duration ( during mportIrg perlod). Goal 6:* 60% of partiCipants will be compliant with mental health treatment services. Staff will track/monitor weekly or hi-weekly reports from the CMH treatment providers as to our participants attendance/compliance, We will intervene with positive reinforcement for compliance and sanctions for noncompliance, Again, the treatment is client centered thus encouraging client participation. Measurement: Staff will track the % of participants that remain treatment compliant during the reporting period. Program Goals (Optional) Goal 7: List other goal specific to your regional mental health court here. No additional goals at this time. Goal 8: List other goal specific to your regional mental health court hare. Goal 9: http://miconrts.du11estech.nct/getApp1icationPrintPreview.do?documentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 T 1.1%._ I I aliLa 1.111%.41.1.gaLt LS Page 7 of 20 List other goal specific to your regional mental health court here. Goal 10: List other goal specific to your regional mental hea/th court here, Problem Statement Problem Statement* In a brief and concise manner describe, 1) How We case process in the jurisdiction has b e e n t w i l l b e a f f e c t e d a s a r e s u l t o f t h e m e n t a l h e a l t h c o u r t , 2 ) H o w t h e t i m e f r a m e for case disposition has been/will be affected as a result of the mental health court and 3) T h e d e g r e e t o w h i c h i n c a r c e r a t i o n / d e t e n U o n r a t e s have been/will be effected. I n 2 0 08 , the ATC team discovered that over 35% of the individuals admit t e d t o t h e p r o g r a m h a d m e n t a l h e a l t h c o n c e r n s o r w e r e diagnosed with an actual mental illness. While every effort was made t o e n g a g e p a r t i c i p a n t s i n t r e a t m e n t t h r o u g h b o t h t h e m e n t a l h e a l t h and substance abuse systems, having no partners at the table and few known r e s o u r c e s l e f t t h e t e a m a t a s e v e r e d i s a d v a n t a g e a n d outcomes for these participates were poor, Therefore, in May 2009, the A d u l t T r e a t m e n t C o u r t - M e n t a l H e a l t h C o m p o n e n t w a s established, adding a specialized mental health component to address the ne e d s o f t h o s e p a r t i c i p a n t s w i t h c o - o c c u r r i n g d i s o r d e r s . I n collaboration with the Oakland County Community Mental Health Authorit y , f u n d i n g w a s s o u g h t a n d o b t a i n e d t o c r e a t e a n d f i l l a M e n t a l Health Liaison to properly assess participants upon admittance to the ATC program. ley addressing t h e i r m e n t a l h e a l t h a s w e l l a s substance use disorders, and engaging the CIV11-1 system on the team a n d i n t h e p r o c e s s , c a s e p l a n n i n g h a s b e c o m e m o r e c o l l a b o r a t i v e and individualized and we have experienced better outcomes. Between January of 2011 and December of 2011, the length of time for Cir c u i t C o u r t c a s e d i s p o s i t i o n s i n c r i m i n a l m a t t e r s r a n g e d between 16 and 81 days. Prior to the implementation of the Adult Treatment Court ( A T C ) p r o g r a m , t h e l e n g t h o f t i m e b e t w e e n c a s e disposition and sentencing was as much as 165 days, with an average of 6 2 d a y s . H o w e v e r , i n 2 0 1 2 , t h e a v e r a g e l e n g t h o f t i m e between sentencing and admittance into the ATC program was only 13 days. D u r i n g t h e a b o v e t i m e f r a m e , c a s e s h a v e b e e n p r o c e s s e d at least 87% faster than cases without the benefit of the ATC. This percent a g e h a s b e e n c o n s i s t e n t s i n c e p r o g r a m i m p l e m e n t a t i o n i n 2001. The absence of a drug court would contribute to docket crowding, leading t o e x t e n d e d p e r i o d s o f c o u r t r o o m a p p e a r a n c e s u n t i l disposition, due to the possibirity of trials. Incarcerated defendants would b e h o u s e d f o r e x t e n d e d p e r i o d s o f t i m e a w a i t i n g c o m p l e t i o n o f trials and final dispositions. This necessitates the need for jail beds in an already o v e r c r o w d e d s i t u a t i o n . A d d i t i o n a l l y , j a i l s a n d p r i s o n s do not provide for adequate drug/alcohol treatment. One of the primary goals of the ATC is to use jail as a last sanction. Altern a t e a n d g r a d u a t e d s a n c t i o n s a r e a l w a y s t h e f i r s t c h o i c e , i n keeping with the function of the program. The total number of ATC graduates sinc e i n c e p t i o n i s 1 6 6 . T h e a v e r a g e l e n g t h o f s t a y f o r adults sentenced to jail in the criminal division is 160 days. However, the ave r a g e n u m b e r o f j a i l d a y s f o r a n A T C p a r t i c i p a n t i s 4 6 . T h u s , the ATC reduces the number of jail days by 114 or 71%. The cost for 1 day in jail i s $ 8 3 . T h e r e f o r e , t h e p o t e n t i a l s a v i n g s t o t a x p a y e r s i s $1,5706,892 (114x 166 x $83). 515 participants have been served throug h t h e A T C p r o g r a m . C o n s e q u e n t l y , i f n o t f o r t h e A d u l t Treatment Court, the potential costs to taxpayers could exceed $6, 839,200 (51 5 x 1 6 0 x $ 8 3 ) . Program Design pt.1 Target Population* What is the target population? A 'priority population" of nonviolent, felony offenders, whose co-occurrin g d i s o r d e r ( s u b s t a n c e u s e & m e n t a l h e a l t h ) l e a d s t o e i t h e r repeated criminal conduct with escalating sanctions or who have violated prob a t i o n a s a r e s u l t o f t h e c o - o c c u r r a n t d i s o r d e r s h a v i n g n o t http://mieourts . dull estech.net/getAppli cationPrintPrevi ew. do ?do cumentPk---1400160295921 6/2/2014 -WebGrants - Michigan Courts Page 8 of 20 been addressed. Screening and Eligibility* What am the clinical end legal eligibility criteria? Eligibility requirements for Adult Treatment Court clearly define those offenders who are eligible for consideration and acceptance into the program. Beyond residence in Oakland County, candidates must: have a repeat offender history, have a documented substance abuse history, meet PA511 guidelines regarding ineligible offenses that prohibit enrollment, meet sentencing guidelines, have reliable transportation or access to a bus line and have no history/pattern of violent behavior or have any firearm offenses. If otherwise eligible and sentencing guidelines are 0-6 or above, they may also be considered on a violation of probation. To be eligible for the MHC, in addition to meeting the criteria for the Adult Treatment Court, offenders must have been diagnosed with a serious mental illness which necessitates intensive clinical services They also must be willing to participate in the Mental Health Component of the Adult Treatment Court. Upon acceptance, the offender enters and completes four successive treatment stages. Each stage treats and challenges the offender in order to meet his/her needs while maintaining a high degree of public safety. Successful completion of the program affords the offender an opportunity to avoid jail or prison. Participant Identification* How are potential mental health court participants Wan tried? Candidates for ATC-Mental Health Component (ATC-MHC) are referred by numerous sources such as judges, attorneys, probation administrators and officers, based on the above eligibility criteria. After a referral is made, the core team members (Judges, Probation Officers, Defense Attorney, Community Corrections & Drug Court Supervisor) review the case to ensure that eligibility criteria is met. Judges and probation officers are continuously encouraged to consider ATC for those offenders who meet the eligibility requirements and whose histories indicate they have not been helped previously by traditional approaches. Legal Screening' At what point in the case process does orwill the legal screening occur? Who conducts the legal screening? Who determines eligibility? The initial screening of a candidate by the probation officer (ease manager) begins immediately after sentencing. An offender meeting the legal and eligibility requirements is then referred to the ATC-MHC team and providers. At that point, a screening is conducted by the Mental Health Liaison to determine the primary and secondary (if any) diagnosis. Once an offender has been approved and accepted by the team, they are welcomed to the program by the judge during a regular ATC-MHC session, asked if they understand the requirements they are about to undertake, and are asked to repeat a pledge as they begin a rigorous journey toward sobriety. The offender is then (if not already engaged) immediately referred to treatment based on level of care and identified diagnosis. Clinical Assessment' At what point in the process is the clinical assessment conducted? Who conducts the clinical assessment? What is the expected time frame for the clinical assessment to be conducted? What diagnostic tool Is used? Does the clinical assessment indicate the severity of the illness or the level of functional impairment? http://rnicourts.dullestechmet/getApplicationPrintPreview.do?documentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 vv ouuteuete iv.tuetugatt uourtS Page 9 of 20 At the initial screening of a candidatethe ATC probation officer (case manager) has author i t y t o d e t e r m i n e i f t h e o f f e n d e r s a t i s f i e s t h e baseline criteria for legal and statutory eligibility. Additionally, the core team members ( s e e a b o v e ) a l s o r e v i e w t h e c a s e f o r e l i g i b i l i t y . The mental health liaison assists the ATC probation officer in identifying those candidates wh o a r e s u b s t a n c e d e p e n d e n t a n d t h o s e w h o also have.an underlying mental illness. The result of the assessment determines the p a t h o f t r e a t m e n t . The mental health liaison is contracted by the Oakland County Community Mental Health A u t h o r i t y a n d i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r i d e n t i f y i n g participants with mental illness and substance abuse through the Mental Status Exa m , e v a l u a t i n g t r e a t m e n t n e e d s , a n d a s s u r i n g t h a t the participants are engaged in treatment expeditiously, The assessment usually occu r s a f t e r t h e c l i e n t h a s b e e n s e n t e n c e d t o t h e d r u g court, but often during the eligibility process, it is generally completed within a day or two o f t h e s e n t e n c i n g d a t e , b u t a l w a y s p r i o r t o the next session. The Mental Health Liaison identifies those candidates with substance use dis o r d e r s a n d t h o s e w i t h c o - o c c u r r i n g substance use and serious mental health disorders. The result of the assessment determi n e s t h e p a t h o f t r e a t m e n t . The ATC-MHC uses the Mental Health Status Exam, the same used by psychiatrists, as its tool t o d i a g n o s e m e n t a l i l l n e s s a n d substance abuse. ASAM criteria is used to determine the appropriate level of care after a d i a g n o s i s o f s u b s t a n c e d e p e n d e n c e h a s b e e n made, Program Design 0.2 Case Processing"' How will defendants enter mental health court (Le., pre-adjudication, condition of probation/sentence, ad j u d i c a t i o n , o r o n a d e l a y e d o r d e f e r r e d s e n t e n c e / a d j u d i c a t i o n ) . What procedures are in place for those participants who do not meet legal and clinical admission criteria or are not admitted to the mental health court program? The offender enters the Mental Health Component of the Adult Treatment Court (ATC-MHC) a s a s p e c i a l c o n d i t i o n o f p r o b a t i o n . T h e r e are no previsions for delayed or deferred sentencing. Treatment Continuum and Plan" Describe who will provide treatment services, what type of treatment will be provided, and what levels o f t r e a t m e n t are avnifatde, Include the types of services and levels of treatment for dually-diagnosed participants and what agency provides substance use disorder services, Oakland County Health Division Office of Substance Abuse Services (OSAS) has contracts wit h 1 1 o r g a n i z a t i o n s a b l e t o p r o v i d e a continuum of care including: medical detox, enhanced outpatient and outpatient therapy. P a r t i c i p a n t s i n t h e M e n t a l H e a l t h C o m p o n e n t of the Adult Treatment Court may be placed at either Solutions to Recovery, Commu n i t y P r o g r a m s Inc., Sequoia, etc. for resldiential SA treatment if they are assessed for this LOC. Both STR & CPI provide ID DI, DBT, CBT, and M R T . There are three CMH core provider agencies that provide mental health treatment in Oakl a n d C o u n t y ; T r a i n i n g a n d Treatment Innnovations (TTI) in Oxford, Easter Seals(ES) in both Pontiac and South f i e l d a n d C o m m u n i t y N e t w o r k S e r v i c e s ( C N S ) i n Waterford. Each provide a variety of services however, (all.except ES provide Integrated Du a l D i s o r d e r T r e a t m e n t ) , p s y c h i a t r i c s e r v i c e s including assessment and placement for hospitalization, Enhanced outpatient, Outp a t i e n t a n d c a s e m a n a g e r s e v i c e s . TTI also provides Dialectical Behavioral Therapy, SA Group, Solution Focused Brief Therapy, E m p l o y m e n t G r o u p , S e l f E s t e e m G r o u p , Independent Skills Group, Anger Management Group, Seeking Safety Group and Pee r S u p p o r t S e r v i c e s . Easter Seals provides Spanish Speaking groups, Women's and Men's group, Stage Groups ( m o t i v a t i o n f o r c h a n g e ) , R e c o v e r y i n A c t i o n group, Dual Recovery Anonymous (Dual Diagnosis ), Anger Management Groups, C o m p u t e r / G E D g r o u p s , I n d i v i d u a l i z e d P e e r s u p p o r t and group and Y'all Group (18-25 year-olds). And finally CNS provides Exposure Therapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Dialectical B e h a v i o r a l T h e r a p y , M o r a l R e c o n a t i o n Therapy,Substance Abuse Services/ Co-occurring (individual and group) and Individualized Pee r S u p p o r t . Additionally, Oakland County Community Corrections provides substance abuse treat m e n t , a n g e r m a n a g e m e n t a n d / o r d o m e s t i c violence programs that our MH participants can be referred to as well. C.C. provides case man g e r n e n t s e r v i c e s . The mental health screening, completion of standardized instruments, and clinical recom m e n d a t i o n s / r e f e r r a l s w i l l b e t h e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y of the ATC-MHC Liaison and Case Manager. The ATC-MHC Case Manager will be r e s p o n s i b l e f o r f o l l o w i n g t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f t h e mric Court Liaison, preparing the treatment plan (in cooperation with adjunct treatment, inc l u d i n g s u b s t a n c e a b u s e ) a n d i m p l e m e n t i n g http://micourts.dullestech.net/getApplication_PrintPreview.do?docurnentPk=.1400160295921 6/2/2014 WebGrants - Michigan Courts Page 10 of 20 the plan. The ATC-MHC Liaison also visits with offenders in jail to ensure that all Individuals identified with serious MH needs are given onsite services in the jail, and that linkage to community programs occurs quickly and effectively after the offender is released from jail. The primary distinction is that the ATC-MHC participant is thoroughly assessed by the ATC-MHC Liaison and placed according to need. Participant to Provider Matching" What is the process for matching participants to providers based on individual differences among participants? OCCMHA is the primary referral source for ATC-MHC participants and Abuse Services (OSAS) PACE Program. After the detailed assessment, these agencies act as an umbrella agency, monitoring programs and helping DDT certified treatment providers contracted through both agencies to offer a full range of therapeutic modalities, Including residential, intensive outpatient and standard outpatient treatment. Treatment providers, in cooperation with the probation officer, provide culturally responsive, developmentally appropriate and needs-based substance abuse treatment. Man Review Frequency" How often is each participant's clinical treatment plan reviewed? Individual client treatment plans are reviewed every two weeks by the therapist and by the entire ATC-MHC team at least monthly. Ancillary Services" What ancillary services are available to participants and haw are they made available (Le., vocationa( services, educational services, etc.)? In addition to the treatment services available, Michigan Works! also offers ATC-MHC participants services that may help to alleviate some of the barriers that convicted felons face when pursuing employment. There are nine, one-stop-shop, service centers In Oakland County that provide phones, fax machines, copiers, and computers. Service centers also have up-to-date career resources on interviewing, schools, companies, resume writing, and much more. All services are free of charge. Oakland Intermediate Schools offers a variety of adult education and GED classes to participants needing to complete high school or wish to obtain a GED. Program Design pt3 Program Length" Whet is the minimum and maximum length of the mental health court program? What factors were used In determining the program length? The ATC-MHC is a four phase program. The minimum amount of time to complete the drug court program is 15 months, with the maximum being approximately 22 months, The average time to complete the program Is 17 months. The length of the program was determined by utilizing the best practices of the drug court model and drug court implementation seminars that were attended by team members. Program length will of course vary, depending on each participant's level of progress through each goal, Phases" littp ://rnic ourts dullestech.net/g etApp licatio aPrintPrevi ew. do ?do cumentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 VY euurauis - ivilcillgan uourts Page 11 of 20 How many phases does the program have? What requirements must be met to complete e a c h p h a s e ? Case Management* Who is responsible for providing clinical case management and court case management? What is the approximate caseload per clinical and court case manager? The Probation Officer is primarily responsible for Case Management responsibiliti e s , i n c o o p e r a t i o n w i t h t h e A T C - M H C L i a i s o n , t o provide a contiuum of care. The average case load per Probation Officer i s 4 0 w i t h a m a x i m u m o f 6 0 . A p r o b a t i o n o f f i c e r w i t h a s t r o n g treatment orientation, and degree in the behavioral sciences, conducts the init i a l s c r e e n i n g i n t e r v i e w , r e v i e w i n g d r u g a n d a l c o h o l t e s t s and criminal history. Case Manager Responsibilities' What are the responsibilities of the case managers (clinical and legal)? The probation officer maintains client accountability by monitoring participant e x c h a n g e s w i t h t r e a t m e n t p r o v i d e r s , O p e r a t i o n N i g h t h a w k home visits, Community Corrections Step Forward day monitoring, and o t h e r i n v o l v e m e n t s , a n d s u b m i t s r e g u l a r r e p o r t s t o t h e t e a m . The probation officer has the discretion to contact offender, judge, OSAS or t r e a t m e n t p r o v i d e r i n a n e f f o r t t o a d d r e s s p r o b l e m s a s t h e y arise, Participant Contact Frequency* How frequently will the case managers have contact with the participants? Are the contact s d i r e c t ( f a c e t o f a c e ) o r i n d i r e c t ( p h o n e / e l e c t r o n i c a l l y ) ? The probation officer from the Michigan Department of Corrections wh o m e e t s d i r e c t l y ( f a c e - t o - f a c e ) w i t h a n d m o n i t o r s e a c h o f f e n d e r through all stages of the program. The PO meets with participants weekly o r m o n t h l y , d e p e n d i n g o n t h e p h a s e t h e p a r t i c i p a n t i s a c t i v e in, to coordinate services and to act as the central contact for all matters regarding p a r t i c i p a n t c o n d u c t . T h e o f f e n d e r i s i n t e n s i v e l y monitored through probation reporting and daily alcohol/drug testing. All def e n d a n t s m u s t a l s o a t t e n d A A a n d a w e e k e n d t r e a t m e n t program. Since The ATC-IViHC mandates twice weekly treatment attend a n c e , t h e o f f e n d e r i s f u r t h e r m o n i t o r e d t h r o u g h c o m p r e h e n s i v e treatment progress reports in addition to contact with the PO. Compliance* Who will work with the participants to ensure that they are in compliance with program cond i t i o n s ( i . e . . p r o b a t i o n , m e d i c a t i o n , t r e a t m e n t a p p o i n t m e n t s , e t c . ) ? The Probation Officer, acting as primary case manager, as well as the ATC- M H C L i a i s o n w i l l w o r k w i t h e a c h p a r t i c i p a n t t o e n s u r e compliance with all probation special conditions and treatment recomme n d a t i o n s . http ://rnic marts dullesteeh.net/getApplic ationPrintPreview. do ?do eurnentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 Web Grants - Michigan Courts Page 12 of 20 Program Design pt.4 Judicial Supervision' How frequently do the participants appear before the judge for status review hearings? Who, other than the judge and participant, participates in the status review hearing? ATC-MHC hearings/sessions are held bi-weekly. In addition to the Judge, the Drug Court Supervisor, Community Corrections, MDOC Probation Officer and both mental health and substance abuse treatment providers are present for each hearing and case conference session. Compliance with Federal Confidentiality Laws* • What are the mental health court program policies and procedures to assure compliance with federal confidentiality laws regarding treatment information? The Oakland County Circuit Court limits discussion of clinical information in open court and delegate the maintenance of clinical information to the Mental Health Court Liaison to keep the court record to a minimum. Oakland County Circuit Court MHC (Mental Health (mita) ensiires the early appointment of defense counsel which should further reduce these confidentiality problems by using i:.ourisol n=7.z tiltLE any patL:nti2.11,,, pi P.,iivrjod tron-nonl: infornrilino !he AFC-M11 C also abides by 42-Ci-R, F-11PHA and the Mental Health Code, which all govern the strict confidentiality of treatment and 'client' information. Staff Meetings Do staff meetings occur prior to status review hearings to discuss participants' progress? if not, explain Why. If yes, list who participates in the staff meeting. Staff meetings and/or case conferences occur approximately two hours prior to Court hearings. In addition to the Judge, treatment providers, the drug court supervisor, the defense attorney, probation officer and community corrections representative and Office of Substance Abuse Services(OSAS) representative also participates. The CMFI Court Liaison is obviously a key stakeholder present at the sessions. Drug/Alcohol Testing" Are all participants tasted for drugs and alcohol? if not, how do you determine who will be tested? ' As the Mental Health Component is an extension of the existing Adult [Felonyl Treatment Court, all participants must submit to random drug testing. Drug Testing Frequency* How frequently are participants required to submit for drug or alcohol testing? What types of testing tools are used? What drugs are they being tested for? Drug testing procedures are standardized, and all urine samples are observed by our various drug testing agencies. The MDOC Probation Department utilizes instant, 12-panel drug tests until a profile is established regarding the preference, however the 12- panel tests administered randomly thus offsetting the likelihood of a transfer of drug preference. Participants are randomly tested, one to 7 times per week, either at probation, through the Results division of the Oakland County Sherrif Department or the JAMS (Jail Alternatives for Michigan) agency locations. Alcohol monitoring occurs on a specific probation order, using both portable and on-site breathalyzers. The ATC uses a 12-panel test which includes: Cocaine, amphetamines, meth-amphetamine, THC, methadone, ecstasy, opiates, oxycotton, PCP, barbiturates benzodiazipine and suboxone. http://micourts.dullestech.net/getApplicationPrintPreview.do?docurnentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 rac13 OILV Drug Test Detaiis* Who is responsible for drug/alcohol testing? Who is notified of the results? Whet Is the lime frame o f n o t i f i c a t i o n ? Either the MDOC probation department staff or the JAMS or RESULTS personnel admini s t e r t h e d r u g t e s t s a n d s u p p l y r e s u l t s t o t h e treatment team. Drug test confirmations are collected by probation and/or JAMS a n d R E S U L T S . R e s u l t s a r e k n o w n w i t h i n 4 8 h o u r s and immediately shared with the treatment team. Random testing protocols are also f o l l o w e d f o r a l c o h o l t e s t i n g o n a n a s - n e e d e d b a s i s . Program Design pt.5 incentives and Sanctions* What incentives and sanctions are used? When end how are they used? The ATC-MHC uses graduated sanctions, which are applied from the least to most re s t r i c t i v e . L e v e l A : C L I E N T B E H A V I O R : ( 1 ) Dishonesty, (2) Missed drug tests, (3) Tampered drug test, (4) Unacknowledged positive t e s t , ( 5 ) A b s c o n d w i t h i n v o l u n t a r y r e t u r n . COURT RESPONSE: (1) Escalating Jail Time, (2) Project STOP 72 hours, (3) Daily R e p o r t i n g . T R E A T M E N T R E S P O N S E : ( 1 ) D e t o x , (2) Increased treatment (3) increased testing, (4) Increased treatment level. Level B: CLIE N T B E H A V I O R : ( 1 ) A c k n o w l e d g e d p o s i t i v e UA/PBT; (2) Abscond with voluntary return. COURT RESPONSE: Combination of r e s p o n s e s f r o m L e v e l A a n d C . T R E A T M E N T RESPONSE: (1) Detox; (2) Increased treatment Intensity. Level C: CLIENT BEHAVIO R : ( 1 ) M i s s e d a p p o i n t m e n t s , ( 2 ) M i s s e d c o u r t session, (3) Curfew violations, (4) Tardiness, (5) Failure to complete appropriate paperwork. ( 6 ) F a i l u r e t o s e e k o r m a i n t a i n e m p l o y m e n t or school In subsequent phases can result in one or more of the listed sanctions. COU R T R E S P O N S E : ( 1 ) W a r n i n g a n d admonishment from the bench in open court, (2) increased frequency of tests and court app e a r a n c e s „ ( 3 ) C o n f i n e m e n t i n c o u r t r o o m jury box, (4) Increased monitoring, (5) Fines, (6) Community Service, (7) Essays/journals, (8) Tether, (9) Community Corrections programs, (10) Day reporting. TREATMENT RESPONSE: (1) Increased Treatme n t I n t e n s i t y , ( 2 ) I n c r e a s e d t e s t i n g f r e q u e n c y , ( 3 ) Increased Treatment level. Graduation* Described in detail the requirements for successfully completing the program. To graduate, a participant must successfully complete all four stages of the ATC-MHC, as ou t l i n e d a b o v e . T h e p a r t i c i p a n t m u s t b e clean and sober for a minimum of four consecutive months, successfully complete all tr e a t m e n t g o a l s a n d c o m m u n i t y s e r v i c e assignments, must have paid all fees and fines, and must be enrolled in school or working. T h e y m u s t a l s o h a v e a n a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h a n aftercare-type support system. Graduation is considered commencement, a new beginn i n g . W h e n a p a r t i c i p a n t c o m p l e t e s a l l t h e requirements of the ATC program, he/she becomes eligible to graduate, but may s t i l l b e c o n t i n u e d o n p r o b a t i o n w h i c h s t i l l r e q u i r e s reporting and drug testing until their probation sentence has been fulfilled. They are al s o e n c o u r a g e d t o c o n t i n u e t o a t t e n d a l u m n i g r o u p meetings. Supervision After Program" Are participants continued on any form of supervision after successfully completing the program? If so. explain. Some ATO-MHC participants are continued on probation and ollnical monitorin g a f t e r c o m m e n c e m e n t ( d e p e n d i n g o n t h e i r s e n t e n c i n g requirements). Expulsion Criteria* Describe the criteria for terminating participants before they have completed the program. include the poli c y a n d l e n g t h o f t i m e g i v e n t o a b s c o n d e r s b e f o r e t e r m i n a t i o n . http://micourts.dullestechmet/getApplicationPrintPreview.do?documentPk=140016029592 1 6/2/2014 WebGrants - Michigan Courts Page 14 of 20 If during the period of participation in the program, a participant is charged with a new felony, demonstrates assaultive conduct, or refuses to enter or continue in a mandated treatment program or modality, the ATC-MIIC judge shall conduct a probation violation hearing to decide whether the participant may continue in the ATC program. After twice absconding from the program and being sanctioned, a participant may be given one further opportunity to be successful in treatment. Should the participant fail again, the participant shall be expelled from the program and his or her case will be scheduled before the ATC-MHC judge for a probation violation hearing. In the event the defendant has absconded, and fails to attend the next three consecutive court sessions, hefshe will be terminated from the program. if later apprehended, the defendant case will be brought before the ATC-MHC judge on a violation of probation and he/she will be sentenced to jail or prison according to guidelines. In the event that a participant is removed from the ATC- MHC program for other reasons, the case shall proceed before the ATC-MHC judge. Informed Consent' Described the procedures that are used to determine if participants have sufficient understanding to participate and comply with program requirements, Program requirements, including informed consent documents, are provided to the offender on at least 4 occasions; The first is with the ATC-MHC defense attorney. The program elements and procedures are explained and the offender has the opportunity to ask questions te ensure that he or she has full knowledge of program requirements. The ATC-MHC Liaison then interviews and provides a brief assessment, again reviewing program requirements. The Probation Officer speaks with the offender to ensure that he or she has a thorough understanding of the program. The defense attorney also provides materials about the program to the offender, and the necessary documents are signed. Finally, during the initial hearing at which time the offender is accepted into the ATC-MHC, the defense counsel again reviews the program policies, procedures and requirements. At any stage prior to admittance, the offender has the opportunity to deny program participation. Additionally, if he or she is unable to fully comprehend program requirements, he or she will not be allowed to participate in the program. Program Design pt6 Evaluation Plan' Describe the plen for conducting a process evaluation. If your pm gram has been opera:ma/ fore least one year, describe the plan for conducting an outcome evaluation of the mental health court. The Evaluation Plan for the ATC-MHC focuses primarily on program outcomes. Attention is given to outcome objectives and measurements and continues to use follow-up interviews with graduates and written surveys of participants and parents to capture process-related data, However, because independent assessment of process questions such as program satisfaction are also necessary, satisfaction and outcomes-related questions are also solicited on the surveys. Data is collected in a variety of ways, including the Circuit Court's Mainframe system, the DCCMIS and, as stated above, interviews and surveys completed by participants. Outcomes objectives to be measured include: recidivism of graduates; employment status of participants; participant attitudes toward drugs and alcohol, including relapses; program graduation/termination rates; and cost comparisons with other programs available. Process measures include: Identifying the characteristics of successful and unsuccessful program participants; tracking retention rates of participants; and client satisfaction with program. Additional outcomes are tracked through the 00CMHA to ensure quality services and a continuum of care. Sustainability" aplain the plan for addressing program needs (treatment needs, team members, clinical/legal criteria, target population, program design, and funding) that are required to sustain the program when/if grant funds are no IOnger available, Historically, program costs for the Adult Treatment Court have been low, based on our ability to utilize Community Corrections' PA 511 funding for substance use disorder treatment, Additionally, costs of staff are low, as we utilize Michigan Department of Corrections probation staff to supervise the offenders. Also, mental health services are provided for those deemed eligible through the Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority. However, as the needs of our target population continue to grow, additional funds are needed to continue providing drug testing, transportation and transitional housing for the indigent. These are all services in which dollars are limited through our traditional funding streams. Given the challenges above, the RESTORE Foundation, founded in 2009, was developed to assist in funding the drug court programs within the Circuit Court and eventually, throughout Oakland County. While still developing, the foundation has provided over $100,000.00 to the two drug courts (primarily the Adult Treatment Court) to assist with drug testing and transitional housing for our http://micourts.dullestech.net/getApplicationPrintPreview.do?docurnentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 WebUrants - Michigan Uoutts _rage I J CI .ZU indigent participants. The RESTORE Foundation has set forth a plan to increase their fund-raising efforts to sustain the programs, Due to these efforts, we are hoping that the programs can be self-sufficient at some point in the near future. Mental Health Court Team" Wen* key members of the mental health court team (i.e., titles, roles, end responsibilities). Judicial Supervision - The ATC judges maintain continuous client supervision by presiding over biweekly status review hearings. The jurists chair pre-hearing meetings, and host the monthly planning team meetings. In consultation with the treatment team, and consistent with the recommendations of the treatment providers and the Sanctioning Guide, the judges issue sanctions and rewards to participants as their progress merits, and determine when to allow stage advancement and graduation. Case Management - The probation officer conducts the initial screening interview, reviews drugs/alcohol tests, criminal history, arid meets regularly with each participant to coordinate services. The PO monitors participant exchanges with treatment providers, Operation Nighthawk home visits, Community Corrections Step Forward day monitoring, and other involvements, and submits regular reports to the team and judge. Mental Health Liaison - This person is contracted by Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority and responsible for assisting the probation officers in Identifying participants with serious mental illness, evaluating treatment needs, and.assuring that participants are engaged in treatment expeditiously. Drug Treatment Court Supervisor - The supervisor Identifies new ATC-MlIC candidates, schedules and attends meetings and review hearings, compiles and collects documentation concerning participant progress, develops and maintains a procedure manual, assists with communications among community stakeholders, supervises and trains staff, monitors bills submitted to the ATC-MI-IC, completes the grants and grant reports to the state. Defense Attorney-The defense attorney plays a key role in determining eligibility and providing informed consent during initial interview and in the first court session of the defendant, Further the defense attorney assists other attorneys in determining if their clients would be eligible for the ATC-MHC. Treatment Provider- OCCMH provides services vital to insuring appropriate mental health services to our ATC-MHC participants. Additionally, OSAS, provides centralized treatment services management. Both agencies conduct provider network reviews twice a year, consisting of site visits wherein case records are audited, and specific treatment plans and fiscal accountability are monitored. All team members attend case conferences and court sessions regularly. Communication* Describe the mechanisms for communication that are used by members of the mental health court team. Using a flattened management model, all treatment team members are insured a voice in the development of policies and procedures, and in the review and decision making regarding rewards and sanctions. Whenever possible, team members communicate simultaneously, through team meetings, broadcast e-mails or conference calls. The planning team (as distinct from the treatment team just described), meets monthly. It includes the ATC program director, Oakland County Coordinating Agency (OSAS) manager, a treatment provider representative from Community Programs Inc., the OCCC manager and Circuit Court Probation manager, and mental health liaison In addition to the treatment team members. This group provides input regarding ATC business functions. Data Entry* What members from the team Will be entering data into SCCAVOCCMIS? What information is each member responsible for entering? Probation Officer: Enters status reports for review hearings, drug screen results Treatment Providers: Enters treatment reports and drug screen results ATC-MHC Liaison: Enters treatment updates and reports ATC-M1-1C Intern: Enters drug screen reports, review hearing reports, demographics http://mic ourts .dulle stech.net/getA_ppli GationPrintPreview, do? do cumentP Ic .--1400160295921 6/2/2014 WebGrants - Michigan Courts Page 16 of 20 Business Analyst Has administrative rights and enters passwords, log-ins, etc. for new and existing ATC-MHC team members, and is responsible for analytics and other reports. Program Design pt.7 Monitoring Program Progress* Describe how the learn will monitor the degree to which the program is implemented and functioning as designed and described in this document. Indicate a description or each performance Indicator, how the performance Indicator will he measured, how often, and in what ways these measures will be used to monitor and improve the program's performance. Performance Measure 1: Reduce participant substance abuse by requiring frequent random drug screens and intensive supervision - The ATC has implemented an additional random drug screen, for which employed defendants are required to pay. Participants are also required to obtain an AA sponsor with whom they must maintain frequent contact. (Measure: The ATC team will continue to confirm attendance at substance abuse treatment sessions and AA/NA meetings by having participants submit weekly support group sign-in sheets, Additionally, the team will continue to monitor drug screens via receipt of reports from drug screening agencies. This information will be entered and monitored through the DCCMIS.) Performance Measure: 2: Decrease recidivism - intensive supervision and substance abuse treatment are core functions of the ATC. Bi-weekly sessions are conducted for all participants. Participants are also appearing before their probation officer as frequently as dafly, if necessary. The pall.inipants m#so part.loicate in vallous forms of substance abuse treatment throughout the course of the pi °grain td po:A.,gi&duaLjon. It' tEqdrii MI track 1,he U1Iijui ui 1-.Kr:w ucuaLuliuria by ul;i]zi .ig 0.T.I.S., OCCMIS and the Oakland County information systems). Performance Measure 3: Reduce the time between disposition and sentencing to the ATC. - The Sixth Circuit Court continues to place a priority on alleviating docket congestion. (Measure: The ATC team will continue to track the ength of time between disposition and sentencing to the ATC program. This information will be entered and monitored through the DCCMiS.) Performance Measure 4: Reduce jail/prison bed usage - The Sixth Circuit Court - ATC targets its priority population.(Measurement: The ATC team will continue to track the number of times that jail is used as a sanction by entering and monitoring through the DCCMIS.) Performance Measure 5: Increase the use alumni support group for graduates and those in the program - The ATC reestablished the alumni group, in December 2005, with ATC graduates as the principal leaders of the group acting with guidance from the drug court team. This has created a comfort zone amongst the participants in that they are communicating with others they are familiar and have common bonds with. (Measurement: The ATC team will continue to monitor alumni group participants by reviewing monthly sign-in sheets and monitoring participant/graduate attendance monthly.) Performance Measure 6: Track the cost of incarceration versus treatment -This will be measured through a cost analysis of the program as compared to the per diem rate for incarceration. (Measurment: The ATC will continue to annually conduct regular cost benefit analysis which tracks both the cost of incarceration and the per diem for jail.) Performance Measure 7: Compare the recidivism rates of ATC participants and graduates. Recidivism rates are defined as new convictions ONLY - (Measurement: Participants and graduates will be checked at 1, 2, and 3 year intervals through 0.T.I.S., DCCMIS and the Oakland County information systems — OakNet Mainframe). Program Income Will your court program earn program income as defined Yes above?* Program Income Sources: If yes, what are the program income sources and how much is charged for each program income source (e.g„ drug tests $5; participation tees 5250, etc)? Each Adult Treatment Court participant is charged $150.00 ATC participation fee once they are inducted into the program. http://rnic outts dull e ste ch.net/g etAppli cationPrintPrevi ew. d o?d o curnentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 rage i / ix zu Certification Form Authorizing Official By checking the box, I certify that the below referenced person is the Authorizing Official for the court program.* Authorizing Official Name:* Date:* Project Director By checking the box, I certify that the below referenced person is the Project Director for the court program:" Project Director Name:* Date:* Financial Officer By checking the box, I certify that the below referenced person is the Financial Officer for the court program:* Financial Officer Name:* Date:* By checking this box, I certify that the Chief Judge of this court supports our court applying for this grant opportunity.* Yes Michael J. Gingell, Chair of Oakland County 130C 05/15/2014 Yes Jacqueline Howes-Evanson, Drug Treatment Court Sup 05/15/2014 Yes Lynn Sonkiss, Manager of General Fiscal Services 05/15/2014 Yes Personnel Name Position Computation Request Other Grant Or Funding Sources Local Cash Contribution Local in-Kind Contribution Total 50.00_ $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Personnel Justification Personnel Justification* Justify personnel (7.e., wages) associated with the proposed project These personnel costs should tie back to the Budg e t R e q u e s t S u m m e r y a n d B u d g e t D e t a i l worksheet. N/A Fringe Benefits liTotall r Row !Percentage! Request I Other Grant Or Funding Sources Local Cash Contribution Local In-Kind Contribution http://micourts. dull estech.net/getApplic ationPrintPreview.do ?do cumentPk-1400160295921 6/2/2014 wetkirants Miciugan Courts Page 18 of 20 Employer FICA 0% $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Retlroment 0% $0.00 $0.00 moo moo moo Hospital Insurance 0% 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 00.00 $0.00 Dental lnsurance 0% $0,00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 Vision Insurance 0% $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 Unemployment 0% $0.00 00.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0,00 Worker's Compensation 0% $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Life Insurance 0% $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 00.00 $0,00 Other 0% $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other 0% 00,04 00.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Other 0% $0.00 $0.00 00.00 $0.00 00.00 Other 0% 40.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 Totals $0,00 00,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits Justification fringe Benefits Justification* Just*, fringe bonellt costs associated with the proposed project. These fringe benefits should tie back to the Budget Request Summary and Budget Detail worksheet. NIA Contractual Contractor Computation Services to be Provided Request Other Grant or Funding Source Local Cash Contribution Local In- Kind Contribution Total Subrecipient ContractorNendor Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority $54,000 for liaison position ($29/hour)- liaison position With Common Ground Comprehensive mental health screenings and assessments for ATC participants ..._ ., *,4 000.00 $0,00 50.00 $0.00 054,000.00 Oakland County Office Results Program $4320 for drug screens: $ 4a x ,, 90/month (30 participants x 3 months). - Random drug screening $4,320.00 00.00 00,00 $0.00 $4,320,00 $55,320.00 $0,00 $0,00 .$0.00 055,320.00 Contractual Justification Contractual Justification* Justify contractual costs associated with the proposed project. These contractual costs should fie back to the Budget Request Summery and the Budget Detail Worksheet The ATC treats offenders with co-occuring disorders (mental health and substance abuse). This money would be used to purchase contractual services from CMH in the form of a liaison position which would be expected tib serve and assist the ATC team via assessments, court testimonies, consultations, progress updates, crisis intervention, community referrals, and coordinate care throughout OCCMHA's network of Core Provider Agencies, (Cost of this postion/service $54,000) - (Intergovernmental Agreemenet for this service between the court and OCCMHA has been developed and is attached) This funding would also provide for drug screens of participants performed by an agency called Results, which is run by the Oakland http://inicourts.dullesteela ..net/getApplicationPrintPreview.do?documentPk----1400160295921 6/2/2014 WebUrants - Michigan Courts Page 19 of 20 county Sheriffs Department, $10/drug test plus $2/personal beatharyzer test. (Cost of this service $4,320) - (Memorandu m o f Understanding with the OCSD has been developed and is attached) Supplies Item I Computation j_equest Other Grantor Funding Source Local Cash Contributions Local In-Kind Contributions Total $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 Supplies Justification Supplies Justification* Justify supply costs associated with the proposed project These supply expenses should tie back to the Budget Request Summary and B u d g e t D e t a i l w o r k s h e e t N/A Travel Type of Travel Expenses Computation Request Other Grantor Funding Source Local Cash Contributions Local in-Kind Contributions Total Bus Passes 25s $56/pass $1,560.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,680.00 $1,680,00 . $0.00_ 50,00 $0.00 $1,600.00 Travel Justification Travel Justification* Justify travel costs associated with the proposed project, The costs should tie back to the Budget Request Summary and the Budget Detail worksheet. To provide bus passes for participants to get them to hearings and treatment. Other Sources of Funding Other Sources of Funding* N/A Personnel Summary Budget Category Request Other Grant Or Funding Source Local Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Cost Personnel Total 50,00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 60,00 http://micourts. dull esteehmetlgetApplicatio nPlintPreview.do?do eumentPle-1400160295921 612/2014 $0,00 $0.00 Supplies Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Budget Category Request Other Grant Or Funding Source Local Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Cost WebGrants - Michigan Courts Page 20 of 20 Fringe Benefits Summary I Budget Category Request Other Grant Or Funding Source Local Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Cost Fringe Benefits Total 1 $0,00 $0.00 50,00 $0.00 $0.00 Contractual Summary Budget Category Request Other Grant Or Funding Source Local Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Cost Contractual Total $58,320.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $58,320.00 Supplies Summary Travel Summary Budget Category Request Other Grant Or Funding Source Local Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Cost Travel Total $1,680.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,680,00 Total Budget Budget Category Request Other Grant Or Funding Source Local Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Cost Total 860,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $60,000.00 http://micourts.dullestech.net/getApplicationPrintPreview.do?docurnentPk=1400160295921 6/2/2014 Michigan Supreme Court State Court Administrative Office Michigan Hall of Justice P.O. Box 30048 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Phone (517) 373-0128 Dawn A. Monk Deputy State Court Administrator August 15, 2014 Honorable Nanci J. Grant 6th Circuit Court Courthouse Tower 1200 N. Telegraph Rd. Pontiac, MI 48341-0404 Re: FY 2015 Michigan Mental Health Court Grant Program Award Notification 6th Circuit Court - Adult Dear Chief Judge Grant: I am pleased to inform you that your court has been awarded a grant in the amount of $60,000 from the Michigan Mental Health Court Grant Program (MMHCGP) administered by the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO). This award is for the grant period October 1, 2014, through September 30, 2015. Your court's FY 2015 contract will be e-mailed to your project director, Jacqueline Howes- Evanson. The budget based on your court's actual award should be updated on WebGrants by September 19, 2014, and the original signed contract should be returned by mail to SCAO by October 17, 2014. Should you have any questions, please contact Jessica Parks at 517-373-6285, or by e-mail at parksj@courts,mi.gov , Since: /111/4"7-A-iwn A. Monk cc: Dr, Jessica Parks, Problem-Solving Courts Manager Ms. Deborah Green, Region I Administrator Mr. Kevin Oeffher, Court Administrator Ms. Jacqueline Howes-Evanson, Mental Health Court Project Director MICHIGAN MENTAL HEALTH COURT GRANT PROGRAM FY 2015 ASSURANCES 1. Applicants must provide assurance that there has been, and will continue to be, appropriate consultation with all affected agencies in planning and implementation of the mental health court program. Applicants are required to have a current Memorandum of Understanding that should include the local prosecuting attorney and/or city attorney, a public defense attorney, the ClVIHSP, the substance abuse coordination agency, as well as other parties considered necessary to successful planning and implementation. 2. Applicants must provide assurance that all treatment programs and providers used in the mental health court program are licensed and/or accredited by the appropriate state government or professional agencies. 3. Applicants must provide assurance of the intention of the jurisdiction to continue the program after funding from the Michigan Mental Health Court Grant Program (MIVIHCGP) has been exhausted. 4. Applicants must provide assurance that all recipients of funding under this grant program are required to comply with nondiscrimination requirements contained in various federal and state laws. Each applicant court should have a copy of their Equal Employment Opportunity plan on file and available for review by the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) upon request. 5. Applicants must assure that they and any subgrantees will not use funds from the MATHCGP for lobbying and that they will disclose any lobbying activities related to the M-MHCGP. 6. Recipients of funding under this grant agree that all expenditures, including personnel services, contractual services, and supplies, shall be in accordance with the standard procedures of their court. The granteee's accounting system must maintain a separate fund or account to support expenditures. Recipients of funding agree to maintain accounting records, following generally accepted accounting principles for the expenditure of funds for purposes identified in the budget and any budget amendments. 7. State funds may not be used to replace (supplant) funds that have been appropriated for the same purpose. NOTE: With regard to funding for CMHSP mental health treatment, these funds are intended to supplement CMHSP capacity for treatment services. As a condition of award, CMHSP must commit to use of these funds as last source after coordination of benefits (including Medicaid) and utilizing CMHSP funds for the treatment costs of participants that represent priority populations based on the mental health code. 8. Recipients of funding will assure that the Michigan Supreme Court, the SCAO, the local government audit division of the Michigan Department of Treasury, the State Auditor General, or any of their duly sworn authorized representatives shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any pertinent financial transactions, accounting records, or other fiscal records related to this grant. Such records shall be maintained for a period of five years after completion of the grant project or until all SCAO audits are complete for the fiscal period, whichever is later. Recipients shall provide quarterly reports on the funds expended by the mental health treatment court in the form required by the SCAO. 9. Applicants agree to collect and provide program and participant data in the form and manner required by the SCAO, and to participate in follow-up and evaluation activities. (). Applicants receiving awards from SCAO agree to utilize the Drug Court Case Management Information System (DCCM1S) to manage mental health court cases arid report all data to the SCAO. 11. Applicants who receive funding from the MMHCGP must plan, design, and operate their programs according to the Essential Elements of a Mental Health Court, 12. Applicants agree to participate in required training as scheduled and/or recommended by SCAO 13. The SCAO may suspend funding in whole or in part or terminate funding for the following reasons: a. Failure to comply substantially with the requirements of the grant program, which includes the submission of the required reports submitted within the time frames listed on page four. b. Failure to make satisfactory progress toward the goals or strategies set forth in this application. c. Failure to adhere to the requirements of the grant contract. d. Proposing or implementing substantial plan changes to the extent that the application would not have been selected for funding. e. Filing a false certification in this application or other report or document f. Other good cause shown. Michigan Supreme Court State Court Administrative Office Trial Court Services Division Michigan Hall of Justice P.O. Box 30048 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Phone (517) 373-4835 Jennifer Warner Director July 31, 2014 Commissioner Michael Gingell Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners 1200 N. Telegraph Rd, Bldg 12B Pontiac, MI 48341-0475 Dear Mr. Gingen: I am providing information about Assurance #3 in State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) grant application materials. The assurance states that applicants must provide assurance of the intention of the jurisdiction to continue program operations if funding through the S CAO is no longer available. This intention may include pursuing local funding, or other state or federal grant funds. This assurance is also required to apply for and accept federal program funding for problem-solving courts programs. This should not be construed as a mandate for future funding of a program through your funding unit. If you have questions, please contact me by telephone at 517-373-6285 or by e-mail at parksj@courtsani.gov . Sincerely, Jessica Parks MICHIGAN MENTAL HEALTH COURT GRANT PROGRAM ALLOWABLE • Mental Health Treatment, including • Personnel psychiatric and residential services • Contractual employee(s)/service(s) • Clinical assessment required for admission • Incentives (up to $25 per participant, per • Case Management • incentive) • Peer Support • Graduation award • Substance Use Disorder Treatment, including residential services • • Food/Beverage for graduation ONLY Transportation for participants, including • Cognitive behavioral services and programs bus passes, bus tokens, mileage for home checks and/or transporting participants • Drug testing to/from MHC related activities • Drug testing supplies • Handbooks • Monitoring devices: GPS/Scram/Tethers • Brochures • Medication: 60 day supply, directly related to mental health disorder (All insurance • Emergency housing: 5 days, per participant, per quarter options or other sources of funding must be exhausted prior to spending.) • Transitional Housing: up to 60 days per participant, per FY contract • Defense attorney fees-FOR ATTENDANCE AT STAFFING MEETING AND REVIEW • Mental health conference/training registration: pre-approval required by SESSION-NO INDIVIDUAL LEGAL SERVICE SCAO PROVIDED; not to exceed $100 per hour or $600 per month e Participant supplies (day planners, folders, etc.) • Defense attorney fees-assistance with • GED testing pending legal cases for active participants- • Dental expenses-MUST RECEIVE PRIOR MUST RECEIVE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM APPROVAL FROM SCAO FOR EACH SCAO INVOICE DISALLOWABLE • Prosecution fees • Lobbying • Evaluations or evaluator fees • Out of state travel • Rent • Management studies or research and • Any expense incurred prior to the date of development contract • Honorariums • Indirect costs/rates or indirect • Fines/penalties administration expenses (only direct costs • Costs in applying for this grant permitted) • Losses from uncollectable debts • Contributions and/or donations • Memberships and/or agency dues • Office equipment (computers, copiers, phones, printers, faxes, etc.) • • Software or maintenance fees Other costs not directly related to • Office supplies (paper, pens, folders, toner, etc.) operations of a mental health court CONDITIONS ON EXPENSES Costs must be reasonable and necessary. All grant costs and billings will be reviewed by SCAO to ensure that they reflect costs generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the problem-solving court and reflect market prices for comparable goods or services. Additionally, the grant expenditures must be for goods and services that are or will be utilized for the grant period or fiscal year (October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015). Purchasing goods and services (i.e., bus tokens, library materials, drug testing supplies on September 24) that could not reasonably be used up prior to September 30 will be denied for reimbursement. The following list of disallowable expenses is not exhaustive. Contact SCAO if you are not sure about an expense. If required by the parent agency, costs must be sustained by competitive bids. Individual consultant fees are limited to $450 (excluding travel, lodging and meal costs) per day, which includes legal, medical, psychological and accountant consultants. If the rate will exceed $450 for an eight-hour day, written approval is required from the State Court Administrative Office. Compensation for individual consultant services is to be responsible and consistent with that paid for similar services in the market place. NON-SUPPLANTING SCAO requires that funds not be used to supplant state, local or tribal funds. The grantee must assure that funds will not be used to replace or supplant state, local or tribal funds, but will be used to increase the amount of such funds that would, in the absence of grant funds, be made available for criminal justice activities. This means that if your court plans to: (a) Hire new positions (including filling existing vacancies that are no longer funded in your agency's budget): It must hire these additional positions on or after the official grant award start date, above its current budgeted (funded) level of positions; (b) Rehire personnel who have already been laid off (at time of the application) as a result of state, local, or tribal budget cuts: It must rehire the personnel on or after the official grant award start date and maintain documentation showing the dates(s) that the positions were laid off and rehired; (c) Maintain personnel who are (at the time of application) currently scheduled to be laid off on a future date as a result of state, local, or tribal budget cuts: It must continue to fund the personnel with its own funds from the grant award start date until the date of the scheduled lay-off (e.g., if the lay-off is scheduled for October 1, then funds may not be used to fund the personnel until October I, the date of the scheduled lay-off), and maintain documentation showing the date(s) and reason(s) for the lay-off. [Please note that as long as your agency can document the date that the lay-off would occur if the grant funds were not available, it may transfer the personnel to the grant funding on or immediately after the date of the lay-off without formally completing the administrative steps associated with a lay-off for personnel.] Documentation that may be used to prove that the scheduled lay-offs are occurring for local economic reasons that are unrelated to the availability of grant funds may include (but are not limited to) council or departmental meetings, memoranda, notices, or orders discussing the lay- off; notices provided to the individual personnel regarding the date(s) of the layoff; and/or budget documents ordering departmental and/or jurisdiction-wide budget cuts. These records must be maintained with your court's grant in the event of an audit, monitoring, or other evaluation of your grant compliance. FISCAL NOTE 011SC . #14272) BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, TOM MIDDLETON, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT -2015 MICHIGAN MENTAL HEALTH DRUG COURT GRANT PROGRAM - ACCEPTANCE To The Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The Circuit Court has received a grant from the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) in the amount of $60,000 for the period of October 1,2014 through September 30, 2015. 2. This is the seventh (7th) year Circuit Court has received this grant award. 3. The grant award of $60,000 will be used to fund drug screens, professional services and bus passes for participants. 4, The FY 2015 budget already reflects the $60,000 award; no budget amendment is required. FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Scott and Crawford absent. November 19, 2014 Resolution #14272 November 19, 2014 Moved by Spisz supported by Quarles the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Gershenson, Gingell, Gosselin, Hatchett, Jackson, Long, Matis, McGillivray, Middleton, Quarles, Runestad, Scott, Spisz, Taub, Weipert, Woodward, Zack, Bosnic, Dwyer. (19) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). t/f HEREBY APPROVE THIS RESOLUTION CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE ACTING PURSUANT TO MCL 45.559A (7) (STATE OF MICHIGAN) (COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on November 19th, 2014, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 19th day of November 2014. Lisa Brown, Oakland County