Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2015.07.29 - 21944REPORT (MISC . #15201) July 29, 2015 BY: Human Resources Committee, Michael Spisz, Chairperson IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS — MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND GRANT APPLICATION FOR FY 2016 To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Human Resources Committee, having reviewed the above referenced resolution on July 22, 2015, reports with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. Chairperson, on behalf of the Human Resources Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report. HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Spisz and Zack absent. MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #15201 July 29, 2015 BY: Public Services Committee, Bill Dwyer, Chairperson IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS — MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND GRANT APPLICATION FOR FY 2016 Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the State of Michigan offers funding to local communities under PA 511; and WHEREAS this funding is targeted to divert non-violent offenders from prison into local jail or sentencing alternatives; and WHEREAS Oakland County has been receiving Community Corrections funds since 1994; and WHEREAS the application has been completed and is requesting funding in the amount of $1,830,339 for plans and services for the grant period October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016; and WHEREAS a total appropriation of $1,717,143 is requested for probation residential services, which the State now pays directly to the Probation Residential Centers since they hold the contract for all residential services; and WHEREAS the grant application seeks full-time eligible funding for positions 7425, 7426, 7429, 7432, 7433, 9243, 9247, 9291, 9295, 9648, 9649 and PTNE funding for positions 9292 and 9397 within the Community Corrections Division; and WHEREAS the grant application also seeks funding for positions 7834 and 9396, whereby the State will fund 50% of the costs, and the County will match 50% of the total costs for these two (2) positions in the Community Corrections Division; and WHEREAS the grant application seeks full-time funding for positions 7419, 7420, 7418, 7421, and PTNE funding for position 7417 within the Sheriff's — Correction Services Division; and WHEREAS the grant application seeks additional funding to create a new one (1) Special Revenue full- time eligible Community Corrections Specialist I position within the Community Corrections Division; and WHEREAS any programs created through these funds become part of the County's Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan; and WHEREAS PA 511 of 1988 requires that the "County Board or Boards of Commissioners of the County shall approve the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by their advisory board." NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the application to request $1,830,339 from the State Office of Community Corrections for the purpose of continuing programs contained within the Office of Community Corrections FY 2016 grant application for offenders who meet PA 511 eligibility is hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves the $1,717,143 allocation for probation residential services to be administered by the Michigan Department of Corrections / Office of Community Corrections. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves the proposed comprehensive plan prepared by the Community Corrections Advisory Board. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Spisz absent. GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Community Corrections GRANT NAME: FY 2016 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Department of Corrections — Office of Community Corrections DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Barb Hankey 248 451-2306 STATUS: Application — Resolution required DATE: June 26, 2015 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #13180, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The captioned grant materials and grant application package (which should include an application Report from Fiscal Services to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners', the grant application, and this Sign Off email containing grant review comments) may be submitted to the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners for review and signature, with informational copies to the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s). DEPARTMENT REVIEW Department of Management and Budget: Approved. — Laurie Van Pelt (6/17/2015) Department of Human Resources: FIR Approved (Needs HR Committee) — Lori Taylor (6/18/2015) Risk Management and Safety: Application approved by Risk Management. — Robert Erlenbeck (6/18/2015) Corporation Counsel: There are no unresolved legal issues that require action at this time. —Karen P. Agacinski (6/25/2015) From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Van Pelt Laurie M West, Catherine A 5econtine, Julie L; Taylor. Lot l)avis, Patricia Q; J-lankev. Barbara M; Elgrably Kimberly K; firockmilier. Tern 5; Scalt—Benniel Re: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY16 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan - Grant Application Wednesday, June 17, 2015 4:39:41 PM Approved Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 17, 2015, at 4:12 PM, West, Catherine A <westca@oakgov.com > wrote: > GRANT REVIEW FORM > TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt —Lori Taylor— Julie Secontine — Pat Davis > RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Community Corrections > FY16 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application > Michigan Department of Corrections - Office of Community Corrections > Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. > Time Frame for Returned Comments: June 24, 2015 > GRANT INFORMATION > Date: June 17, 2014 > Operating Department: Community Corrections > Department Contact: Barbara Hankey > Contact Phone: (248) 451-2306 > Document Identification Number: > REVIEW STATUS: Application — Resolution Required > Funding Period: October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016 > New Facility / Additional Office Space Needs: no > IT Resources (New Computer Hardware! Software Needs or Purchases): no > Will you issue a sub award or contract: yes, contracts with Holy Cross Family Services, Common Ground, Home Confinement and House Arrest Services > Funding Continuation/New: continuation > Application Total Project Amount: $1,830,339 for Plans & Services and $177,025 for residential beds for Substance Abuse Residential beds which will be held by the State and not recorded as income > Prior Year Total Funding: $1,734,003 and $177,025 for residential; total of $1,911,028 > New Grant Funded Positions Request: 1 new Community Corrections Specialist I > Changes to Current Positions: 7421, 7425, 7426, 7429, 7432, 7433, 7834 (.5), 9243, 9247, 9291, 9292 (PTNE), 9295, 9648, 9649, 9396 (.5), 7417 (PTNE), 7418, 7419, 7420, 9397 (PTNE) > Grantor Funds: $2,007,364 > Total Budget: $2,117,691 > Match and Source: $110,327 GP/GE for the .5 of 7834 & 9396 > PROJECT SYNOPSIS > This is the application for the annual MDOC grant for Community Corrections programs. A resolution approving From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Taylor. Lon West. Catherine A; Secontine, Julie L; vga221t,_Ligrig,n; Davis, Patricia G Han key. Barbara M; FUrablv. Kimberly K; Brockmiller. Tern S; Scalf, Bonnie L RE: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY16 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan - Grant Application Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:14:52 AM HR Approved (Needs HR Committee) From: West, Catherine A Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 4:12 PM To: Secontine, Julie L; Van Pelt, Laurie M; Taylor, Lori; Davis, Patricia G Cc: Hankey, Barbara M; Elgrably, Kimberly K; Brockrniller, Terri S; Scalf, Bonnie L Subject: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY16 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan - Grant Application GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt —Lori Taylor— Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Community Corrections FY16 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application Michigan Department of Corrections - Office of Community Corrections Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: June 24, 2015 GRANT INFORMATION Date: June 17,2014 Operating Department: Community Corrections Department Contact: Barbara Hankey Contact Phone: (248) 451-2306 Document Identification Number: REVIEW STATUS: Application — Resolution Required Funding Period: October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016 New Facility / Additional Office Space Needs: no IT Resources (New Computer Hardware / Software Needs or Purchases): no Will you issue a sub award or contract: yes, contracts with Holy Cross Family Services, Common Ground, Home Confinement and House Arrest Services Funding Continuation/New: continuation Application Total Project Amount: $1,830,339 for Plans & Services and $177,025 for residential beds for Substance Abuse Residential beds which will be held by the State and not recorded as income Prior Year Total Funding: $1,734,003 and $177,025 for residential; total of $1,911,028 New Grant Funded Positions Request: 1 new Community Corrections Specialist I Changes to Current Positions: 7421, 7425, 7426, 7429, 7432, 7433, 7834 (.5), 9243, 9247, From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: frlenbeckr Robert C West, Catherine A; Secontine, Julie L; Van Pelt, Laurie M; Taylor, Lori; Davis, Patricia G Hankey, Barbara It Elgrably, Kimberly K; Brockmiller, Terri 5; 5calf. Bonnie t s RE: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY16 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan - Grant Application Thursday, June 18, 2015 11:55;24 AM Application approved by Risk Management. R.E. 6/18/15. From Easterling, Terri [mailto:easterlingt@oakgov.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 5:09 PM To: West, Catherine A; Secontine, Julie L; Van Pelt, Laurie M; Taylor, Lori; Davis, Patricia G Cc: Hankey, Barbara M; Elgrably, Kimberly K; Brockmiller, Terri S; Scalf, Bonnie L Subject: RE: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY16 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan - Grant Application Please be advised that your request for Risk Management's assistance has been assigned to Bob Erlenbeck, (ext. 8- 1694). If you have not done so already, please forward all related information, documentation, and correspondence. Also, please include Risk Management's assignment number, RM15-0237, regarding this matter. Thank you. From: West, Catherine A Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 4:12 PM To: Secontine, Julie L; Van Pelt, Laurie M; Taylor, Lori; Davis, Patricia G Cc: Hankey, Barbara M; Elgrably, Kimberly K; Brockrniller, Tern S; Scalf, Bonnie L Subject: GRANT REVIEW: Community Corrections - FY16 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan - Grant Application GRANT REVIEW FORM TO: REVIEW DEPARTMENTS — Laurie Van Pelt —Lori Taylor— Julie Secontine — Pat Davis RE: GRANT CONTRACT REVIEW RESPONSE — Community Corrections FY16 Comprehensive Community Corrections Plan and Application Michigan Department of Corrections - Office of Community Corrections Attached to this email please find the grant document(s) to be reviewed. Please provide your review stating your APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATION, or DISAPPROVAL, with supporting comments, via reply (to all) of this email. Time Frame for Returned Comments: June 24, 2015 GRANT INFORMATION Date: June 17, 2014 Operating Department: Community Corrections Department Contact: Barbara Hankey Contact Phone: (248) 451-2306 Document Identification Number: REVIEW STATUS: Application — Resolution Required From: To Cc: Subject: Date: ,gacinski. Karen P Secontine,3ulie L; Van Pelt, Laurie M; 1 -loliver, Suzanne; Taylor, Lori; West. Catherine A Egrably. Kimberly K; Falardeau. Nancy M; Metrick, Tammy A Grant Review: Friend of the Court -- FY 2015 Access and Visitation Grant -- Amendment 1 Thursday, June 25, 2015 5:59:01 PM GRANT INFORMATION Operating Department: Friend of the Court Department Contact: Suzanne Hollyer Contact Phone: 248-858-0431 Other ID Number: SCAO-2015-024 Funding Period: October 1, 2014 — September 30, 2015 Original source of funding: Federal, Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, CFDA 93.597 Will you issue a sub award or contract: Yes, Impact Consulting New Facility / Additional Office Space Needs: None IT Resources (New Computer Hardware / Software Needs or Purchases): None Funding: Continuation Application Total Project Amount: $18,500 Prior Year Total Funding: $17,700 New Grant Funded Positions Request: 0 county positions Changes to Current Positions: None Grantor Funds: $18,500 Total Budget: $18,500 Match and Source: no requirement for matching funds PROJECT SYNOPSIS The Supervised Parenting Time Program goal is to provide safety for children and victims of violence while court-ordered parenting time is facilitated. This grant provides direct services to parents who require supervision in order to spend time with their children. Additional funding often becomes available when certain counties cannot spend their entire grant. That has happened this year and an additional $6,500 has become available to Oakland County. No county money is committed to this project. REVIEW STATUS: Amendment to current contract over 15% — Requires Resolution There are no unresolved legal issues that require action. Thank you, Karen P. Agacinski, Assistant Corporation Counsel Department of Corporation Counsel 1200 N. Telegraph Road, Bldg. 14 East Courthouse West Wing Extension, 3 rd Floor Pontiac, Ml 48341 Phone Number: (248) 858-8677 Fax Number: (248) 858-1003 E-mail: agacinskik@oakgov,corn PRIVILEGE1)..ANOFIDENiTIAL — ATIQRNEY,CLIENT..COMMUNKATIQN This e-mail is intended only for those persons to whom it is specifically addressed, It is confidential and is protected by the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine. This privilege belongs to the County of Oakland, and individual addressees are not authorized to waive or modify this privilege in anyway. Individuals are advised that any dissemination, reproduction or unauthorized review of this information by persons other than those listed above may constitute a waiver of this privilege and is therefore prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, If MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Reentry Administration "Help Make Things Right" Office of Community Corrections Community Corrections Plan and Application Fiscal Year 2016 CCAB Name: Oakland County Application Type: Annual/Full Email the application to: DUE DATE: June 1, 2015 1. MDOC-OCC@michigan.gov 2. Grant Coordinator Page 1 of 12 SECTION I. INTRODUCTION Name of CCAB: oakidnd County Federal 1.D. Number: 63-386004876 A: General Contact Informa ion: Name: Contact Person (Manager) Barbara Hankey Manager's Direct Supervisor Mark Newman Title: I Manager Address: 250 Elizabeth Lake Rd. Ste 1520 City: I Pontiac State: I MI Director Public Services Circuit Court Judge 2100 Pontiac Lk Rd 1200 N. Telegraph EOB Dept. 409 Waterford Pontiac MI MI Director Management & Budget 2100 Pontiac Lk Rd EOB Dept. 409 Waterford MI Zip: I 48341 48328-0409 48328 48328-0409 Phone: I 248 451 2306 248 858 1074 248 858 0339 248 858 2163 Fax: I 248 452 2330 Email: I hankeyb@oakgov.com newmanm@oakgov.com mcmillenp@oakgov.com vanpeld@oakgov.com Type of Community Corrections Board: County Advisory Board Counties/Cities Participating in the CCAB: Oakland Date application was approved by the local CCAB: May 28, 2015 Date application was approved by county board(s) of commissioners (and city council): July 7, 2015 Date application was submitted to OCC: June 1, 2015 CCAB !Membership _ _ _ _ _ _ Representing: Name 1 Email County Sheriff: Lt. Dorothy Hall halid@oakgov.com Chief of Police: Tom Lindberg tlindberg@Milfordpolice.com Circuit Court Judge: Hon. Phyllis McMillen mcnnillenp@oakgov.com District Court Judge: Hon. Kelley Kostin kostink@oakgov.com Probate Court Judge: Rebecca Schenlz schenlzr@oakgov.com County Commissioner(s): Shelley Taub taubs@oakgov.conn Service Area (Up to 3): Christina Nichols nicholasc@occmha.org County Prosecutor: Paul Walton waltonp@oakgov.com Criminal Defense: Jack Holmes Jackholmesjratt@aol.com Business Community: Communications Media: Circuit/District Probation: Brock Deitrich DietrichB@michigan.gov General Public: Hon. Fred Mester (ret) judge@judgemester.com City Councilperson: N/A Workforce Development: Mon DeFransico modefran@hotmail.com Does your CCAB have Bylaws? Yes If yes, have they been revised within the last 2 years? (Please send copy) No Describe the contact and frequency of contact between the CCAB Manager and the Probation Supervisor: Mr. Brock Deltrich was just promoted to Area Manager in April 2015. However regular communication is already taking place. Page 2 of 12 ._ . C Summary - Briefly summarize the key points of your Community Corrections Plan: _ . (all fields permit carriage returns) 1. What programs, practices and policies contribute to a reduction of (or maintenance of low) prison commitment rates: Programs specifically designed to reduce or maintain our low PCR are the Thinking Matters Cognitive Program (jail and community), jail reentry, Step Forward including targeted group interventions of a Youthful Offender group and Mental Health assessments, OUIL III delayed sentence, Pretrial Services, pretrial supervision and our residential substance abuse placement program. These programs along with their corresponding intake units identify and target straddle cell offenders (offense group 2) and probation violators for programming. All of these programs utilize EBP and target criminogenic risks / needs which offer offenders from returning to antisocial behaviors or illegal activities. a. How do they contribute to reduced/maintained PCRs? The Thinking Matters, OUIL III delayed sentence, Step Forward including targeted group interventions of a Youthful Offender group and Mental Health assessments, jail reentry and Probaiton Residential Centers target straddle cell offenders thereby reducing the likelihood that they will be sent to prison. All programs targets criminogenic needs through a standardized risk / needs assessment tool. Addressing criminogenic needs has been shown to reduce recidivism rates by as much as 60%. This significantly reduces the chance that the offender will return to criminal behavior in the future thereby reducing the number of violations, both new arrest and technical, and keeping the PCR low in those categories. The Pretrial Services and Pretrial Supervision programs help to recduce / maintain the PCR as research shows that defendants detained for their entire pretrial period are over four times more likely to be sentenced to jail and over three times more likely to be sentenced to prison. Sentences for those remaining in custody are also significantly longer — nearly three times as long for defendants sentenced to jail and more than twice as long for those sentenced to prison. By identifying low and moderate risk defendants for release or pretrial supervision the prison commitment rate can be affected. The deferred sentence program will allow judges the ability to fashion a sentence for the offender dependent on their progress and motivation during the treatment phase. This will include the option of jail rather than prison for the straddle cell offenders. . Explain what data/measures show your PA511 funded programs have contributed to reductions in your PCR: The OMNI PCR rates for the various SGL categories will be the main indicators of reductions to the PCRs. Oakland has been able to maintain its PCR rate to 20.4% overall, 31.2% for straddle cells and to 20.6% for OUIL III. These are good indicators that our programs are targeting the right • populations and that they are working. . What programs, practices and policies contribute to improved recidivism as defined by the State Corrections Board? The Thinking Matters Cognitive Program (jail and community), Step Forward including targeted interventions of a Youthful Offenders group and Mental Health assessments, OUIL ill delayed sentence, Pretrial Services, pretrial supervison, jail reentry and our residential substance abuse placement program funded programs target criminogenic needs through the COMPAS risk / needs assessment. Addressing criminogenic needs has been shown to reduce recidivism rates by as much as 60%. Addressing the criminogenic needs through a structured supervision plan reduces the chance that the offender will return to criminal behavior in the future thereby reducing the number of violations, both new arrest and technical, and keeping the PCR low in those categories. a. How do they contribute to improved recidivism? The programs contibute to reduced recidivism by targeting criminogenic needs. Addressing crinninogenic needs has been shown to reduce recidivism rates by as much as 60%. Addressing the criminogenic needs through a structured supervision plan reduces the chance that the offender will return to criminal behavior in the future thereby reducing the number of violations, both new arrest and technical, and keeping the PCR low in those categories. The Pretrial Services and pretrial supervision programs improve recidivism as research shows that the Page 3 of 12 longer a low-risk defendant is detained before trial, the more likely he is to commit a new crime within two years of case disposition. Low risk defendants held for 8-14 days are 51% more likely to recidivate than defendants who are detained less than 24 hours. Identifying and releasing low risk defendants through pretrial services does improve recidivism. b. Explain what data/measures show your PA511 funded programs have contributed to improvements in local recidivism: The data measures set forth by the State Board including probation violators who return to prison on either a new arrest or a technical vioaltion will be te main indicators. However, Oakland County will also be capturing retuns to jail for technical and new arrest violators. This will be further analyzed by program so that we may determine which programs are producing harm reduction and which ones may need additional refining. SECTION II: ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC PLAN A INTRODUCTION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR STRATEGIC PLAN Page 4 of 12 Strategic Issues, Goals, and Priorities have been established by the Office of Community Corrections in accordance with Public Act 511 and Key Performance indicators. CCAI3s will be required to establish Objectives and Strategies based upon OMNI Felony Disposition, JP15, CCIS and local data that will support State Goals and Priorities. Strategic Issues are identified as Felony Dispositions Recidivism and Local Priorities. OCC will provide the CCABs with OMNI Felony Disposition and JPIS data. CCABs shall analyze this data along with local CCIS data (reports run locally from Case Manager) and develop Key Objectives and supporting Strategies that will lead toward attainment of Goals and Priorities established by the State Board and OCC, as well as local objectives and priorities promoted in the comprehensive plan. A thorough review of the data should include: • Overall PCRs, rates within sentencing guideline ranges, PCRs within Group 1 and Group 2 offense categories, status at time of offense and technical probation violation PCIls Reference to changes in PCRs compared to prior years Other changes in your CCAB/area that influence changes (new stakeholders, policies, emerging crimes, offender characteristics, etc) Review your past OCC funding proposals for ideas Example: For the Strategic Issue of Felony Dispositions, consider the stated Goal and Priority as outlined on the following pages and complete an analysis of your county's prison commitment rate data provided by OCC. Establish objectives related to prison commitment rates. For example: 1. Reduce PV commitment rate from 32% to 25% 2. Reduce the Group 2 Straddle rate to from 43% to 35% Under each OBJECTIVE outline in bullet form those STRATEGIES (steps) to be taken, including continuing, new and revised programs, or established and revised policies or practices, that will support the attainment of the objectives you have specified. Identify if these are "new", "continuations," or 'modifications," or for short term (this fiscal year) or long term implementation. Keep in mind that all of the programs for which you are requesting PA511 funding should be identified as strategies. Additionally, policies and practices you propose (such as targeting specific populations or characteristics) are also strategies. Strategies may apply to more than one objective and should be repeated under each objective as appropriate. For Example, the objective of 'Reduce PV rate from 32% to 25%" may have the following strategies: 1 Initiate structured sentencing with jail followed by RS followed by community Cognitive Behavioral Treatment program that targets probation violators. (New, FY 2014) Target PVs as priorities for Residential Services. (Continuation) The same strategies (with modifications) would be appropriate for the objective of reducing the PCR of Straddle Cell offenders. Further OMNI data analysis may support an additional strategy of: 3. Target ORP eligible straddle cells, especially those from Group 2 without M.DOC status, for local sanctions including B: Felony Disposition Analysis (NOTE: Regional -CCABs should complete nalysiS for, gaelitp0Oty4E,:q00.i0g0tOtOrp$Arg -pgrrylittOilriMli..$:$00101,): Page 5 of 12 Strategic Issue: Felony Dispositions Public Act 511 of 1988 stipulates that counties shall develop a community corrections comprehensive plan and provide an explanation of how the county or counties' prison commitment rate will be reduced by diverting non-violent offenders, and promote recidivism reduction while public safety is maintained. The Act is intended to encourage the participation in community corrections programs of offenders who would likely be sentenced to imprisonment in a state correctional facility or jail, who would not increase the risk to public safety, have not demonstrated a pattern of violent behavior, and do not have a criminal record that indicates a pattern of violent offenses. Goal: Reduce demand for prison resources and related budgetary requirements. Priority; Reduce prison commitment of offenders who can be safely and effectively sanctioned and treated in the ---community by following the principles of effective intervention (Le.i.risk - need, responsivity). Your analysis forms the basis for your objectives and stratedies. A weak connection between data analysis, objectives and proposed proarammina (strategies) may result in denial or conditional approval of your plan. . - . . .B 1 Using OMNI Felony Disposition data supplied by ()CC for FY 2OU and FY 2014; .: . 1. Are felony dispositions increasing, decreasing, or stable? Decreasing 2. Describe changes within SGL categories. Report rates with detailed explanation: The number of felony dispositions has decreased by 7.7% or 436 offenders. Each category saw a decrease in the total number of felons, however the overall prison commitment rate still increased by .4% from 20% to 20.4%. This is mainly due to the increase in the number of presumptive prison offenders receiving prison sentences. There were an additional 36 offenders in this category who received prison sentences in FY14 over FY13. This caused the prison commitment rate in this category to jump by 5.1% from 87.7% to 92.8%. The presumptive category is not a target population for Community Corrections. It should also be noted that 39 less offenders within the straddle cell category received prison sentences lowering that prison commitment rate by .8% to 31.2%. In particular the straddle cell Group 2 PCR was reduced from 31.7% to 30.1%. While this category did see a decrease in the overall number of felons from 326 to 286, the number of felons receiving prison sentences was still less than the overall decrease causing the reduction in the PCR. This category is a target of Community Corrections. 3. Can you attribute any changes to strategies/programs in your comprehensive plan? There hasn't been any major changes to our plan in the past year, rather the programs working together to keep the overall prison commitment rate low. 4. Describe any changes in criminal justice system stakeholders that may have contributed to changes in rates: As previously noted Brock Dietrich has been promoted as the new area manager. Prosecutor Cooper has also recently agreed to send Chief Prosecutor Paul Walton to the CCAB mebers as her representative. 5. Describe any changes in felony populations that warrant a change in your plan: None 6. Provide additional analysis you feel necessary to explain your prison commitment rates: None B.2; Felony Analysis Key 0 jectives and Strategies Five objectives are not required; objectives should be measurable and provide sufficient detail so progress can be monitored. Each objective should be followed by at least one strategy (step, action, policy, and program) that will help you achieve your objective. Your objectives and strategies should be supported by the analysis above. If you did not provide analysis for a PV or Group 2 population, you wouldn't develop an objective related to that population. Keep in mind that all programs for which you are requesting funding are considered strategies, Be sure to clearly identify them as strategies. Page 6 of 12 1. Objective #1 is intended to impact the overall prison commitment rate — please state the Objective: Lower the PCR to no more than 20% Programs in support of Objective #1 (number and separate strategies by using carriage return [enter]): 1) Use Probation Residential Centers as part of a structutred sentencing (jail followed by PRC) in lieu of prison 2) Through the use of a Pretrial risk assessment tool, Pretrial Services, will identify those defendants who can be safely released into the community thereby reducing their liklihood of receiving a sentence of incarceration, and reducing the risk of post sentence recidivsm. 3) Use Probation Residential Centers through Pretrial Supervision for those defendants who have substance abuse addictions rather than detention in jail. Defendants who do well on pretrial supervision are less likely to receive sentences of incarceration 4) Use Pretrial supervision options including electronic monitoring for those defendants whose risk can be safely managed in the community through electronic monitoring or other supervision strategies rather than detention in jail. Defendants who do well on pretrial supervision are less likely to receive sentences of prison. 5) Continue to assess OUIL Ills offenders for placement into the delayed sentence program which is a combination of jail and treatment in lieu of prison 6) Continue the use of OWL III specific Step Forward case managers to address the unique characteristics of this poulation. 2. Objective #2 is intended to impact the Group 2 Straddle Cell rate — please state the Objective: Reduce the Group 2 straddle cell PCR from 30% to29% Programs in support of Objective #2: 1) Target Straddle Cell Group 2 offenders with scores of 5 or higher on COMPAS for Step Forward to address criminogenic behaviors 2) The Youthful Offenders group for high risk, gang affliated offenders 3)Mental Health assessments for those offender who may be engaging in antisocial or criminal behavior due to an undiagnosed or untreatnnent mental health disorder. 4) Use Probation Residential Centers as part of a structutred sentencing for Group 2 offenders in lieu of prison 5) Encourage the use of Thinking Matters—jail for straddle cell offenders in lieu of short prison sentences 6) Use probaiton residential centers for techincal probation violators 7) Use probaiton residential centers for new arrest probaiton violators 8) Use Step Forward and Thinking Matters for new arrest and techinal probtion violators 9) Use the Jail Reentry program to target criminogenic needs of straddle cell offenders serving time at OCJ B-3: Assessment Use OMNI data to track changes in prison commitment rates that were identified as objectives. Monitor and report on changes in local circumstances or offender populations/characteristics that prevent attainment of your objectives. Use CCIS data to determine the utilization of your programs by your targeted populations. What steps will you take if you find that you are not meeting your objectives or your strategies are not being implemented as planned? The PCR numbers are reviewed at CCAB meetings and we will continue to do so. If objectives are not being met through the strategies, we will discuss how those strategies will need to change to meet our objectives. There may also be separate meetings with the Area Manager and other supervisors / stakeholders to address specific deficiencies. JailData Analysis: . Using JPIS or focal snapshot data, please provide informat ion pertaining to the well as the ADP % of housed inmates for each of.the -categories below. Page 7 of 12 (NOTE: Regional CCABs should complete analysiS fcir each -count:y.4 , . Regional should - . Current Jail Utilization. . • Felon Popkilation 720 Sentenced Prior to Admission Sentenced After Admission Unsentenced Fel.......... o . . •:•••• • . . . •••:.. Misdemeanant Population --Sentenced Misdemeanants-. --Sentenced -Prior . to Admission 375 454 'Sentenced . . . After Admission Unsentenced Misdemeanants 1 1. Does your county have a written county jail population management plan per PA 139 of 2007? No 2. In FY 2014, did your sheriff initiate a reduction in population because the jail exceeded 95% of RDC for 5 consecutive days per Public Act 140 of 2007? Yes. If YES, explain how this was carried out: A Circuit Court liaison prepares a list of eligible inmates, then sends the list to the Chief Circuit Court Judge for approval. Once approved, the list sent to Booking for final release review and preparation. 3. In FY 2014 how many times did the county declare an official (in writing) jail overcrowding state of emergency (over 100% of RDC for 7 consecutive days) per Public Act 140 of 2007? None 4. Does your jail submit WIS data? Yes If not, please provide a rationale for not submitting PIS data: We are submitting data but it is not being read properly. We have spent several month working with various vendors trying to clean the data so it is readable. As of May 22, ido not have a definitely time line from our IT departmant as to when this might be completed. 5. What vendor or jail management software is used to report jail utilization? Intellitech Ustrig JPIS tlatalor Iota' data as avallablej ,pitvide ariatialySis.ciflocal jail utilizationinClUdingthe average dailY -- populations/lengths of -stay of iail. populations including felon.and.misdemeanant:Ptiiilation, sentenced and - • ,. :.. -unsentenced populations, partially sentenced populations, boarders, an d . d offense categories (Regionals use carriage. Page 8 of 12 92 return [Enter] to separate information by jail) 1. This application uses Local Snapshot Data 2. Are bookings up, down, or stable? Up 3. Describe changes in ADP or AvLOS for the population groups reported above: The felony and misdemeanor populations are 67% and 33% respective to the total population. This is a slight change from FY13, with the felony populaitondecreasing by 3% and the misdemeanor population increasing by the same amount. The unsentenced population is at 28% of the total population with 20% of that being misdemeanors and the remaining 80% being felons. The sentenced population stands at 72% of the total population with 33% being misdemeanors and the remaining 67% being felons. These numbers represent a good split of the population and are within the ranges we like to see. The ALOS for these populations are hard to determine. The JPIS data is still not loading properly and the Sheriff's Office only has an ALOS report by facility. This will be addressed in the coming fiscal year by requesting new ADP and ALOS reports through the data warehouse for our various populations. 4. Provide additional information to explain your jail utilization here including changes in stakeholders, law enforcement priorities, bed closures, etc.: The bookings have risen steadily over the past 2 years. For FY14 bookings were 18,809 which is a significant increase from FY13. This may be due to the Sheriff's Office taking over police functions for the city of Pontiac. CtZ 'pes.cobe:ppliciesand practices that influeric:jail 0:0010 Iiiiit 1. Does the jail have a "bed allocation plan"? No 2. Does the county have a "jail task force" in place to address jail utilization issues? No 3. How are sheriffs good time and trustee credits awarded / forfeited? Sheriff's good time is one day for every six days served and forfeited only for major disciplinary infractions upon recommendation of the Hearing Sergeant. Trusty good time is based on one day for every 12 days served and can be forfeited for the same reasons as Sheriff's Good Time. 4. Is the jail "closed" to certain types of offenses/offenders/warrants? Yes 5. Does the jail accept boarders from other counties? Nolf YES, what is the daily rate charged for a boarder? N/A 6. Does the jail have a county-imposed cap on local bed utilization to provide space for boarding? No If YES, report number of boarders and the % of the RDC for all boarders. N/A 7. Does the jail accept Parole Violators on MDOC detainers? Yes 8. Does the jail accept MDOC or Federal boarders under contract? No If YES, what is the daily rate charged for MDOC and/or Federal boarders? N/A 9. What was the revenue from boarders for CV 2014? 0 10. What was the revenue from County Jail Reimbursement in CV 2014? $1,691,975 11. Does the jail operate a work release program (offenders leave the jail to work and then return to the jail)? No If YES, how many beds (number and % of RDC) are work release beds? N/A How much are offenders charged to be on work release? N/A. 12. Does the jail accept weekend sentences? No If YES, approximately how many weekenders book in each weekend? N/A 13. Provide additional analysis you feel is necessary to explain your jail utilization: The jail still provides a "virtual" work release option. However offenders do not return to that jail and no beds are allocated for this program. All work release inmates are monitored through a GPS tether which tracks their movements and whereabouts. D.: Recidivism Analysis The 2014 updated Public Act 511 mandates that CCABs "Provide improved local services for individuals involved in the criminal justice system with the goal of reducing the occurrence of repeat criminal offenses that result in a term of Page 9 of 12 ii 0 176 D-2 . Using OMNI FelOnitDisposition data supplied by OCC for FY .201.3:and FY 2014; 185 incarceration or detention in jail or prison." As such CCABs are required to address recidivism within their comprehensive plan, with a specific emphasis on how the plan is intended to impact the local recidivism rates. The State Board has defined recidivism as 'Probation Violations, either technical or new sentence, resulting in prison, and has identified Probation Violators as being indicative of performance in this area Male Probation Violators with a new felony conviction resulting in a prison sentence Female Probation Violators with a new felony conviction resulting in a prison sentence iii. Male Technical Probation Violators resulting in a prison sentence iv. Female Technical Probation Violators resulting in a prison sentence Please use the following table to report the number of Probation Violators that resulted in a prison disposition for each listed category. See the table for an example of how this should look You may delete the sample data to insert your _local-data. Regional CCABs should list the Probation Violation Data for each County separately and provide a total, regional rate at the end of each row. **PLEASE NOTE** If you do not have a tracking process for probation violations you may use ONINI Disposition Report #3 for Probation Violation New Sentence data. Using OMNI -Felony Disposition data supplied by OCCfOr FY 2014; 20141:Recidivism Ratei. Probation Violation - New Sentence to Prison Probation Violation Technical t0:::Prisaii 1. Are Probation Violations increasing, decreasing, or stable? Decreasing 2. Describe changes within the Probation Violation data from FY 2013 to FY 2014. Report rates with detailed explanation: The number of offenders who received a prison sentence while under the supervison of MDOC decreased from 232 offenders in FY13 to 176 offenders in FY14. However, due to the decrease in total felony dispositions the violation rate for FY14 (29%) is actually higher than that of FY13 (24%). . Can you attribute any changes to strategies/programs in your comprehensive plan? no 4. Describe any changes in criminal justice system stakeholders that may have contributed to changes in rates: none S. Describe any changes in Probation Violation data that warrant a change in your plan: n/a 6. Provide additional analysis you feel necessary to explain your recidivism rates: Through new reports beign requested this year, it is hoped that by next grant cycle the above information will be readily available. Page 10 of 12 NOTE: • Five objectives are not required; objectives should be measurable and provide sufficient detail so progress can be monitored. • Each objective should be followed by at least one strategy (step action, policy, and program) that will help you achieve your objective. • Your objectives and strategies should be supported by the analysis aboveKeep in mind that all programs for which you are requesting funding are considered strategies. Be 'sure to clearly identify them as strategies. 1. Objective #1 is intended to impact recidivism by targeting: Probation Violators with a new sentence State the Objective: To reduce the number of new sentence violators by 5% from 176 to 167. Programs in support of Objective #1: Thinking Matter -Jail, Jail Reentry, Thinking Matters - Community; StepFroward Intake, Step Forward, Mental Health Intake 2. Objective #2 is intended to impact recidivism by targeting: Technical Probation Violators State the Objective: To reduce the number of technical violators by 10% from 185 to 166. Programs in support of Objective #2: Thinking Matters -Jail, Jail Rentry, Thinking Matters - Community; StepFroward Intake, Step Forward, Mental Helath Intake 3. Objective #3 is intended to impact recidivism by targeting: Technical Probation Violators State the Objective: Programs in support of Objective #3: 4. Objective #4 is intended to impact recidivism by targeting: Technical Probation Violators State the Objective: Programs in support of Objective #4: 5. Objective #5 is intended to impact recidivism by targeting: Probation Violators with a new sentence State the Objective: Programs in support of Objective #5 : 6. Objective #6 is intended to impact recidivism by targeting: Choose an item. State the Objective: Programs in support of Objective #6: E COMPAS Crirninogenic Needs Profile Please list the top 3 needs scales as identified within the COMPAS Criminogenic Needs and Risk Profile provided by OCC. Additionally, present both the local and OCC strategies that will impact the identified needs scales: Substance abuse was the highest need score at 61%, followed by Vocation/ Education at 33% and non-compliance at 31%. These also mimic the top three needs on a statewide basis. The elimination of the SGL score to drive placement into a PRC will help in placing more offenders in substance abuse treatment. We are also exploring the possiblity of having a marijuana education / prevention class at Step Forward. MDOC agents have indicated they must respond to all positive tests with a treament recommendation. Most marijuana users do not qualify for resiential placement but may benefit from a class such as this. In order to address the vocational needs, Step Forward has recently added an employment group called Career Connections. This group is based on the program used by the Federal Government 'workforce development". It utilizes the Holland code assessment and helps the offender to create a long term career goal and not just "get a job." The non-compliance need is a bit more difficult to attack. However the Step Forward program has begun training using the Briefcase Series by Mark Carey. This training series is designed to reinforace EBP skills on the part of line staff. One of the modules is "Effective Responses to Non-Compliant Behavior". This module deals with a variety of noncompliance issues and helps line staff to develop techinques in order to redirect Page 11 of 12 F Other Local Strategies Present any local priorities such as development of criminal justice coordinating councils, Specialty Courts, public education, etc., which have not been identified in the above sections, but have an impact on the performance indicators: In FY15 we held an Open House for all MDOC Probation Agents. We had over 40 agents attend and received a lot of positive feedback. The purpose of this event was to educate the agents about the services available to them through Community Corrections. There has been much turnover in the agents and many were not aware of all the programming offered. We hope to make the open house a yearly event. Page 12 of 12 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS FY 2016 FUNDING PROPOSAL for OAKLAND COUNTY Comprehensive Plans & Services ..j •Funding Request j Approved Funding Reserved Funding Community Service Placement Work Crew - Inmate Work Crew - Community Sub-Total Group-Based Programs Education Employment .Life Skills Cognitive Domestic Violence Sex Offender Substance Abuse Other Group Services Sub-Total Supervision Programs Day Reporting Intensive Supervision Electronic Monitoring Pretrial Supervision Sub-Total Assessment Services Actuarial Assessment Pretrial Assessment Sub-Total Gatekeeper Jail Population Monitor Gatekeeper Sub-Total Case Management Substance Abuse Testing Other . Program To al Administration Total 227,089 25,500 252,589 49,223 138,310 187,533 68,373 361,594 429,967 487,370 1357,459 196,316 Total Comprehensive Plans & Services 1,553,775 0 BOO E315 1316 CO1 COS COG G18 GOO Drunk Driver Jail Reduction • Total Funding • Recommendation Assessment & Treatment Services 5-Day In Jail Housing Residential Servcices •Total Funding Recommendation Program Cade Funding Request Approved Funding Reserved Funding 201 209,355 ZO2 67,208 203 177,025 Totals 453,588 Summary of Program Services For: OAKLAND COUNTY Fr ogiarn Code Program & Service Type Name of Program Projected Enroliments • . CoritinuationS Total in Program Administration Administration Administration n/a ri/a n/a CO1 Cog 'rive Thinking Matters - Jail 260 50 310 COI. Cognitive Thinking Matters - Community 378 116 494 D08 Electronic Monitoring Pretrial Supervision EM 457 150 607 F23 Pretrial Supervision Pretrial Supervision 3228 665 3893 F22 Pretrial Assessment Pretrial Services Assessment 9278 0 9278 122 Actuarial Assessment Step Forward Intake 985 0 985 124 Community Based Case Management Step Forward 907 407 1314 122 Actuarial Assessment Step Forward Mental Health Intake 116 0 116 GOO Other 6.4p,rp.Service . .. ._. .... ..- .. ... Young Mens Group Drunk Driving Screen and Assessment 70 90 18 2 88 92 201 DDJR Assessment &Treatment Services 202 DDJR In Jail Assessment 5 Day Housing 309 3 312 203 DDJR Residential Services Residential Services 40 40 124 Community Based Case Management Jail Rentry 260 50 310 -- -- 0 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 0 -- 0 -- 0 _ _ 0 -- 0 -- 0 . _ FM- • . • .. • 1,001".". 7080,00 Program Cost Descriptions For: OAKLAND COUNTY apryAlivagq..c0Sts.:.. Position 'I :Title: Manager Name of Individual: Barbara Hankey NeM3cr.Of.tiourSWori5Usi Per ,40r.. (Fell Tirce•Is • . • 2080.00 FTE E.quivalord:1 1.00 Program Code/Name. CPS • Foldifig burcei Rs Cost Alliscatien LeCalfOther7T-Fee ReVerUms Totals - -patios arid Reaperisibilitlei Administration 178,167 178,167 Responsible for managing all aspects of the CC Division. Completes all required reports. Develops and maintains the budget for both the State MDCC grant and the county CF/CF. Cultivates relationships between CC and its partners on the local, state and federal levels. -0 Totals 178,167 178,167 Position 2 Chief Of Operations Namo of individual; Larry Doyle *Mho!' of Hours Worked•Per Your.. Illna is 2.,008) • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • •• • Equive'.ent: 1.00 runaing sour.ces a con opcation Program Cede CPS 0018 I Local/other' I • Fe.a.ReWiliki!.• Tutalu PU1144 gs(d.ROMPOPil.sliltle* Administration 123,346 Responsible for overall day to day operations. Trouble shoots problems, 123,346 staffing Issues and provides proposed solutions to the Manager for handling such matters. Attends meetings or other functions as necessary and acts In the capacity of Manager In her absence. Totab 123,346 123,346 Position 3 . Title; User Support Specialist II Name of Mrkvidual: Diana Carver pullet end Responaibilitiee FleidIng &suites $4•Cust AllucatIcin. DM Local/Other Fee Revenue Administration 47,995 47,995 Responsible for maintaining and updating all databases within 98;390 Community Corrections, sends monthly CCIS data to OCC and maintains the Integrity of the data. Updates all brochures, newsletters, and other pi-kilted information for the Division. - - Totals 47,995 47,995 . 95,990 Position .4 • • . . • . • : T.111 Supervisor Community Corrections ••Narne of Individual. . .. . .. . . . • . . Eric Schmidt, Karon Peterson, Dana O'Neal, Lisa Smith Nimt.ar of Roars Werks PVI' Year. (Fiki time 2,084 . • i • H20.00 FTE• • • • •• • • Equivalent! 4.0', "..Foritilng.5000eS•i$, 'cost Mo.catIon • . Program Code... CPS . AD1R . I-0001,01Ru . Fee Revenue • • Totals • 31,166 .. Mlles sod ROIIpOnsibthli“... The Step Forward supervisor oversees day to day operations of the Step Forward Program. Responsible for procedures, employee issues and works as a liaison between OCC staff, M DOC staff and Administration. Also carries a small caseload of special needs clients & transfer cases. Administration 31,166 124 - Step Forward 31,166 62,332 93,498 F22 - Pretrial Services Assessment 124,679 124,679 There is one supervisor for both the District Court and fail staff. The supervisors handle staffing issues, conduct work evaluations, draft policy and fill staffing gaps as needed. 123 - Pretrial Supervision 124,730 124,730 The supervisor is responsible both the supervision as and EM units. She is responsible for procedures, staff issues and performance appraisals. Also provides coverage as needed. Administration 122,770 122,770 Responsible for the Weekend and Weekend Alternative for Misdemeanants programs. Also coordinates all PA511 placements form the jail for MDOC and for the misds. • Totals 62,332 - 434,511 496,843 Position 5 'Title: Office assistant .. :..• ,. 1 , • •., POMO of mow dual, • . . Dodie LaMarle, Kathryn Bodi. Arnie Hamm, Arhia Lindsay, Chalyn Gallop, Windy . Marion, .. ... Numbor of Hcitrs Worked Per Y*ar..". Mill Jim', it :ohm. • . • • • • • • • 1 ,t c:;o.o( FYI.: • • • • • • • • fiquIvaionu. 5,C 0 . Funding sources & Cost Alteration • Program Code . • • CPS. . . 1)D1R• . • Loaalmther". .Fee Revenue . ... : I Ofais•• .- • 'guiles and RespopsibilitieS . •• • Administration 151,206 151,206 Acts as administrative assistant to the Manager, also completes payroll, personnel requisitions and billing duties. F23 - Pretrial Supervision 75,404 75,404 Sorts and enters supervision cases as they are received. Secures and enters next court dates from the courts or other databases, Sends letters and performs other general clerical duties as needed. 124 - Step Forward 63,292 67,169 130,461 Assists in data entry to C *Star for CCIS data, sets up appointments for clients, tracks referrals, answers phones, sorts mail. Other general Clerical Duties, There is 1. FTE In each of our 2 locations Totals 63,292 293,779 - 357,071 Position 6 • .. Title: Community Corrections Specialist III • • Nome of individual . .. . . . Beatrice Stitt, Jill Hadley, Kim Hassinger, Michelle Dennis, Barb Bari!, Aimee Soya, Angel Braden, Linda Muiter-Carmean Number of Heins Wffiked Per YeAr,. (Full "fime .s 4080 • 16640,00 FTE • • • • • • • Equivalent- 8.00 • •• • kidding Sources &custAllocation• • . • . • . • ' . Progeam Code • CPS' DEM 'Local/Other' • • Fee Relitinue • • • • Toasts • • • males and Responsibilities' F23 - Pretrial Supervision 108,827 108,627 Responsible for the day to day operation of Me unit and the Offender Link system. Responsible for all new enrollees and those that may be rejected by the system due to incomplete Information. Monitors the case loads of line staff to ensure work is being completed In a timely fashion, and also oversees the EM staff, F22 - Pretrial Services Assessment 99,824 • 95,824 supervises the day to day activities of the Community Corrections Specialists lis. Sets priorities according to available resources, checks work, acts as a Raison 124 - Step Forward 176,494 176414 To conduct Intake assessments (COMPAS) on all referred offenders into the Step Forward program. Provides non-eligible clients with appropriate referral CO1 - Thinking Matters - Community 44,124 44,124 Each lead staff is responsible for running at lease 1 group a week, They also conduct audits of the groups of other staff to be sure of fidelity to the program. 122 - Step Forward Intake 100,296 100,296 Responsible for day to day operation of unit and staff. Carries a smaller caseload but Is also responsible for making sure groups are covered, helping line staff with difficult clients and acts a liaison with outside agencies providing services at Step Forward. • . Totals 529,565 - 529,565 Position 7 . • Tile Community Corrections Specialist II • • • • • .Name.ot individual: - • • • • • . . • Escobedo, Rogers, Finley, Stoops, Rector,Yosick, Dutcher, Falls,Sornmervilie, Allen, Barna. Rielly, Steinhebel, Gallon, Mickley. Stacker, Marlin Nurniw of Heim. Worked Pei Year, (Ed Time is 2,1181,1) .• • - • 3536000 FTE • • Eguivelent: . • . 17.0n ...pundlng Sources. & Cost AllecatIOO. Program Cade CPS DDJR . Leeefiother • Fee savdnue . :Totals • . . . Duties and Responsibilities • Monitors pretrial defendants on supervision for compliance with conditions of bond ordered by the court. F23 - Pretrial Supervision 138,310 329,501 467,811 DOE - Pretrial Supervision EM 34,223 34,223 Also responsible for defendants placed on EM. Staff is responsible for offender whereabouts, scheduling, monitoring Of alarms, and responding to violations. F22 - Pretrial Services Assessment 361,594 828,512 1490406 Interviews in custody defendants and complies a bond report in accordance with MCR 6.106. sail recommendations are made using the pretrial risk assessment tool, the Praxis. All information is verified through third parties as often as .1 ...tJ . Totals 534,127 - 1,158,013 1,662,140 poSitiOn 8 1 HIS : • • Community Corrections Specialist II • . Name IndiVic" ak hi I lou n. le, Miles, Short. Poisso Dellison, Kitchen. Sharp, Jensen, Fanning, I •rvomey, Antwen, Dean Wake! or Nom Worked Far year, • Old brne is2,0821 : . 22880.00 itTE• • • • • :Equivalent; 11.00 . . •. sending Sources & Cost AlloCattoo. i. • • •. • .: Program Code • CPS • DM oonothor •. :Po Reyonito • Totois . 122,361 Duties and Reeponalhililiee • Each case manager conduct at least 2 sessions of the Thinking matters groups per week. Responsible for running the group, checking homework and reporting progress. CO1 - Thinking Matters - Community 55,274 67,087 24 - Step Forward 221,098 268,349 489,447 Case managers have caseloads of about 70, for which they coordinate treatment and supervision plans using the COMPAS and Carey OUldes„ Staff Is responsible for communicating with agents / courts regarding progress or lack thereof. There are 2 FTE case managers paid for through the 0055. 122 - Step Forward intake 28,973 105,141 134,114 To conduct Intake assessments (COMPAS) on all referred offenders into the Step Forward program. 201 - Drunk Driving Screen and Assessment 196,601 196,601 Conducts comprehensive assessments including drugs and alcohol for offender referred Into the OUIL III delayed sentence program. The DOSS case managers have cuit. Iv comes Only. These case mangers visit all clients prior to being released from the PRC to establish a rapport With the offender. 942 523 Totals 305,345 195,601 440,577 Position 9. . TII.10: Inmate Caseworker Narne Ot lifcliyick0 Roberta Rice, Jodi Barriger, Paula Goocman, Sanora Ballard Number of I lotus Worked Par Year. • (Full lime is ?„ospj . • • 7280.00 • FTL • • • Equiya-ent: ... 3.50 • •• Funding sources&tost Alkn3t1011 . . ' Program Code •c.:P • DDJR Local/Other • Fee Revenue : Totals . Duitioltand Fiesperteikallties CO1 - Thinking Matters -Jail 171,815 171,815 Facilitates all sessions of the Thinking Matters in the fall. 124 -Jail Sentry 171,814 171,814 Meets Individuallay with all offenders enrolled in the Thinking Matters program. Develops rentry plans which provide referrals and aftercare ilia vs. ' Totals 343,629 - - 343,629 Position 10 . . Tire: Inmate screener • Name OrlOcliv.Ititrat: Bonnie WalendzIk :Name of Provider: Oakland County information Technology • iSkvictni Pim:deli: Computers, support, development of all IT applications and phone lines; Support and rental of phone, and fax lines $1,738/ quarter or $6,952/ year for computer rental and $10,00 for development; $2,200 for phone usage, $50/month for 4ax/copler/scanner maintenance and repairs Funding Sources & Cost Allocation CPS. . DIMR 19,752 • j4d..•-rO5a.1 19,712 LooallOther 1 Pea itavonuo Totola 19,752 19,752 Administration - - o Terrns of Reimnumement; Holy Cross is reimbursed on a per group basis. There Is a flat fee of $250 per group, this includes all materials for group participants. Funding SourceS 43.COst Allocation : CPS 25,500 Sub 'Total 25,500 600- Young Mens Group LossifOlher Fee Revenue Totals 25,500 25,500 • • Funding Seurces & Cost Allocation • • DDIR Lobar/01W • • Fee Reveries I To • Oldies and Responsibilities Conducts COMPAS assessments on all misdemeanor offenders entering the jail. Responds to "kites'' form inmates regarding program eligibility, requests resentencing into programs for Inmates that may be eligible for 82,196 PA511 programming but were not sentenced to an alternative, and tracks suspended sentences. This person will be responsible for tracking recidivism on all offenders completing PA 511 funded programs. Administration 82,196 TOO'S 82,196 82,196 1 Salary8, Wage Totals :••• 1?.1..8.,916 .•1 196,601 ••3;205,953 Contractual Service Contract 2 Name 0f Provider: Holy Cross Counseling Service? Provided; Group for Youthful Offenders Contract 3 Name of Provider: Oakland County Facilities, Maintenance and Operations SerVicen Provided: Building space rental TOM:is:0F fielmboradmont:1$11.00 / aq two foot X 837 feet of space Funding Samoa Os Cost Alioration Program Code cPp : DNS •Loire&Olflør .P00 . ,r0441 • . Administration 9,207 9,207 9,207 Services Provided ltvlental Health assessments, referrals, and short solution focused individual counseling Funding Sc.illifces gi Cost Allocatlen Program Cods cPs CiD4 Ft LoeallOthar : 1: Fee nevem* 122 - Step Forward Mental Health Intake 37,000 nub Fatal 37,000 pu.ticlIng.Sou4s & Coat AlloOtliin CPS D0111 LaeakiCither 1 Fee Reveries 1 • Totals 2,400 2,400 2,400 2400 Program Code 122 -Step Forward Intake Sub;- Total Program Code 201 - Drunk Driving Screen and Assessment DO8 - Pretrial Supervision EM Sub - Total Funding Sources & Cost Allocation ' .. 'OMR .1 :Lotai/Othor 1:• fee Revenue. I. •.Totals • : 12,754 12,754 15,000 12,754 27,754 15,000 15,000 DaIR Leech OtherFee Revenue t Totals 67,208 67,208 Program Code CPS Z02 - 5 Day Housing Su 'Total 67,208 67,208 Fee eve .11..doallottte Et 'WAR. 177,025 Program Code CPR 203 - Residential Services 177,025 SeNices PrOvided Residential services • Terms of Reimbursement: up to $48.00 per day funding Sources & Cost Allocation : Ott Fetal 177,025 177,025 erms of Reimbursement: Contract 5 Nf11116 of PrWid.pr: ADE, INC 'Services Provided: NEEDS assessments for offenders that require a substance abuse assessment according to COMERS and/or the T CU . "forms of Roimb.irsomont:1$6.00 per test Contract 6 Name of Provider: Rancililo &Assoc, -louse Arrest, & G45 Sei vices Premikled; Electronic Monitoring services for pretrial defendants who are unable to pay. •.Terini .of.kelinburSeMeni Average cost $12.00/day plus $100 hook up fee. Contract 7 Name cif PrOvider. Oakland County Sheriff's Office " :Services Provided: Housing for DUlL Ill offenders TOMiR cf Relintnirsement: $4300 per day up to 5 days. Funding Sources IA Cost Allocation Contract 8 Wow of Provider; Residential Services Contract 9 Name of Provider: Funding SourUei a test Allocation Program Code CPS DM Una*Other Fee Revenue Totals Contract 10 • Name of ProvIder. • Service ProsilOed: .Torms of RoiMbiiretneny: Program Code Funding SourcesA Cost Allocation .. . cPs • at.IR Local/Other.' I :Fee Revenue • I • : Totals . Sub - Total Equipment Total 108,850 255,087 105,44.: • Program Code :CPS • DD.IR • 1:Peai/Othei. Fee.Ft4,19nue Totals Dekaption.. Administration Total Sup Ilea: Nevem Code Administration DEUR . ocsloOthar. Pee keveniie Totals .. : Description' . Travel Totall Prograintode. • CPS. • •DDJR Local/Other Fee iteventie totals' Description Administration 2,000 2,000 2,000 2000, jotal 2,0001 Beard Expenses :PrOgg'are Code cps . LoeallOthet Fee keirenkio Totals DecrIPtion Ad ministraticn 1,000 Total 1,000 Other Program Code CPS • OD,lia • •LocallOther• Fee Revenue: Totals Description. Administration 1,000 1,000 Total LOU CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 Select the Program c);) e and complete with t e local prd04ni,nanie. Clearly describe any acronyms. (Yo u do notineedtollit Residential Services Program 1: COi - Cognitive — Thinking Matters - Jail Program 2: CO1 - Cognitive — Thinking Matters - Community Program 3: 008 - Electronic Monitoring —Pretrial Supervision EM Program 4: F22 - Pretrial Assessment —Pretrial Services Program 5: F23 - Pretrial Supervision - Program 6: GOO - Other Group Services — Young Mens Group Program 7: H20-01 - DaIR 5 Day Housing - Program 8: 122 - Assessment —Step Forward Intake Program 9: 122 - Assessment —Step Forward Mental Health Program 10: 124 - Community Based Case Management — Step Forward Program 11: ZOO - Other—Drunk Driving Assessment Program 12: 124 - Community Based Case Management —Jail Reentry Program 13: Choose an item. Program 14: Choose an item. Program 15: Choose an item. Program 16: Choose an item. Program 17: Choose an item. Program 18: Choose an item. Program 19: Choose an item. Program 20: Choose an item. Page 1 of 1 FY: 16 CCAB: Oakland County Administration — Administration is defined as those activities and related costs that have been incurred for the overall executive and administrative functions of the local office or other expenses of a general nature that do not relate solely to the operation of a specific program as defined/approved within the local plan. They are costs that by their nature are administrative in support of the overall duties and functions of the local OCC. This category must also include its allocable share of fringe benefits, costs, operation and maintenance expenses, and if applicable, depreciation and interest costs. NOTE: A SUPPLY has a life expectancy of less than a year (paper, toner, folders, urine testing supplies, etc.) while EQUIPMENT has a life expectancy of more than a year (fax machine, PBT, leaf blower). I OVV4C41(91.,'40.000Piedr.1 ; RINV40110150 s a. Name and title of CCAB manager: Barbara Hankey, Manager Community Corrections b. Name(s) and title(s) of clerical and/or administrative support staff: Diana Carver, User Support Specialist c. Is there a request for funding of administrative or support personnel such as IT, human resources, etc.? NO d. How frequently are CCAB meetings held? Monthly e. Describe what is done to prepare/prepare board members for CCAB meetings and who (manager, clerical, etc.) does what: with the exception of the summer months f. Do your CCAB meeting agenda include the following items (please remember to forward agenda and meeting minutes to our office): yes i. Review of prison commitment rates/recent sentencing trends: Yes ii. Jail utilization/state of crowding: Yes iii. Program utilization in general and by targeted populations: Yes iv. Status of contractual conditions (if applicable): Yes v. Status of contractual objectives: Yes vi. Correspondence from Lansing Office of Community Alternatives: Yes vii. Expenditures and reimbursements to date: Yes viii. What other items are typically on your meeting agenda? These items may not be discussed at every meeting but as they are appropriate. Typical agenda items include: Public Comment; Approval of Minutes; Manager's Report which covers most of the items in i-vii; Program Updates; Other Business; and Adjournment. g. Describe how expenditure reports are processed and forwarded to OCC in Lansing: All expenditures are tracked within the Oakland County financial management system. Each expenditure requires a funding code (identifies it as being a grant), division code (identifies it as a Community Correcitons exp), a program code (tracks expenditures by program; pretrial services for example) and line item code (the type of expenditure; Page 1 of 4 supplies, salaries, etc). Reports can be generated by fund, program or type of expenditure. The fiscal analyst assigned to Community Corrections runs these reports and groups the expenditures within the cooresponding grant line item. The monthly expendiutres are transferred to the FSR which is then forwarded to the Manager with the necessary backup via email. A hard copy of the FSR follows in the mail with the analyst's signature. The FSR is reviewed by the Manager for any inconsistencies, overages, or potential problem areas and then signed. A copy is sent via email to MOCA for reimbursement. h. How often does the manager meet with, visit, and evaluate contracted programs? As needed Explain: All vendors of residential services for Oakland County are audited at least yearly. Even though the state now holds the contracts for the felony offenders, we still have contracts for misdemeanor offenders. We have contracts with two providers, Common Ground and Holy Cross, who perform their duties within the Community Corrections building. Therefore we have directly contact with these providers several times per week. Our other vendors (for electronic monitoring) are evaluated almost daily, as we are constantly reviewing alarms, etc. for accuracy. i. Answer the following two questions only if PA511 funds support the CCAB manager's salary: i. How many staff does the manager directly supervise? There are 47 FTEs and 20 PTNEs within Community Correcitons. Direct supervision for the manager includes the Chief, and the four Supervisors. ii. How much time is spent training, evaluating or disciplining staff? It depends. Most training is conducted by the Supervisors and lead staff. Evaluations of line staff are conducted by the supervisors and approved by the Manager. All formal discipline actions must be approved by the manager, however in the initial stages issues will be handled by the supervisor and Chief. j. How often does the manager meet with probation supervisors/officers? no set schedule Explain: If there are issues to discuss that is done on an as needed basis. There are talks about scheduling anualy or biannual training for new agents. k. How often does the manager meet with the prosecutor? as needed Explain: The prosecutor has just agreed to send a representative to the CCAB meetings. However she has indicated a willingness to meet whenever necessary. I. How often does the manager meet with judges? as needed Explain: There is no set interval although I speak with many of the judges on a fairly regular basis. m. How often does the manager meet with the sheriff/jail staff? as needed Explain: The jail administrator is on the CCAB, I talk with her as needed sometimes weekly, sometimes everyday. It just depends on the issues. n. How often does the manager meet with financial support staff? Quarterly to review forecasts Explain: As the manager, I have full access to financial information and reports for my Division. I am able to run any report I need at any time. o. How often are CCIS data reports run and reviewed for accuracy? The reports are run, reviewed and submitted on a monthly basis Explain: The accuracy of the reports are also reviewed against our own database. We have developed an additional CCIS report which further breaks out the 122s and COls so a differentiation can be made between in- jail and community programs. Page 2 of 4 -0111-% tr 11 [04ii1011 p. How much time is spent reviewing OMNI and jail data? It depends Explain: During grant application, mid year and end year, I may spend a significant amount of time analyizing data. During other times of the year I may just look at the PCR or percentages. This information is reviewed on a regular basis as it helps us to gauge how we are doing, to identify areas that might need improvement or that are targets of contractual conditions. q. How much time is estimated to be spent developing the plan and application? up to 40 hours Describe when and how the plan is developed: The plan and application is developed by the Mangaer and presented to the CCAB for approval. It involves reviewing the midyear numbers to estimate projections for the coming year. Reviewing salary forecasts and expenditure information for budget and reviewing objectives from the previous year to determine where changes might be needed. r. Describe the involvement of other stakeholders or subcommittees in data analysis or plan/program development. There really is no involvement on the part of the stakeholders in the data analysis as that is seen as the responsilibity of the Manger. However analysis of the data is shared with the stakeholders to support plan development, changes, etc. When a new program is implemented or changes in an existing program are needed, there is involvement on the part of the respective stakeholders. s. How are utilization and expenditures monitored? The expenditures are monitored through the monthly FSR and back up is provided by fiscal services to the Manager. Reports that have the ability to drill down expenditures by program are also available to the manager if needed. Utilization is reported by the respective progam Supervisors via their monthly reports (generated from C*Star) and that is checked against the CCIS. t. What actions are taken when programs are under- or over-utilized? Actions may include meetings with the appropriate stakeholders, appearance at staff meetings, reminder emails, development of promotional materials, etc. Serious and repetitive underutilization may result in the termination of a contract or closing of a program and reassignement of monies elsewhere. Data analysis and trends are also used to determine root causes of under / over utilization. u. Who develops the subcontracts for CPS funded services? Oakland County uses a standard contract. The Manger develops a scope of work which is then included within the contract. All contracts must be secured through the purchasing department and are subject to RFT, and /or other rules. v. Who calculates jail bed days saved and how much time is devoted to that task? Within the C*Star database there is a field which captures direct jail days saved for each client per program enrollment. This is actual days saved from a 25% reduction or from an early release / structured sentence. This field is queried and summed by program code to give a total jail days saved for each program. The manager calculates indirect jail beds saved. Given our automation this task takes very little time. w. What specific tasks are assigned to clerical support and what is the frequency and amount of time dedicated to those tasks? The user support specialist is paid 50% under the grant and is responsible for the maintaining the integrity of the C*star data. She acts as the liaison between the staff and IT, and has administrative rights to the database. She also generates all needed reports for the Manager from C*Star, Page 3 of 4 including midyear and year end numbers. She is responsible for CCIS data and COMPAS issues. She produces all public education material, referral forms and templates for all Communtiy Corrections programs. If there is no clerical support, describe clerical tasks/frequency and time demands if performed by the manager: x. Does the county have procurement or purchasing policies for contractual services, supplies, and/or equipment? yes Describe: Oakland County has comprehensive procurement and purchasing policies that are available upon request or through the county website. y. Please describe the county's policies on travel expense reimbursement (mileage, meal allowance, etc.): The county has comprehensive travel and reimbursement policies that are available upon request or through the county website. z. Does your county have the facilities to host training (such as for cognitive programs or application training)? YES How many can your facilities comfortably accommodate? Oakland County has several different training facilities; there is a computer training lab, and lecture space for large or small groups. Each facility has a different capacilty so the type of training needed would dictate the space availability. aa. Does your county have a computer lab available for computer-based training? YES How many can your computer lab comfortably accommodate? 20 Would you be interested in hosting training? YES Page 4 of 4 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 For OCC Use Only: Approved CCiS Code: Approved Projected Enrollment: Budget Recommendation; Conditions: Coordinator: Local Program Name: Thinking Matters - Jail Service Provider: Oakland County Sheriff's Office CCIS Service Type: C01 - Cognitive Programming Projected Enrollment: 260 Projected Length of Stay: 42 days Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OWL 3rds are projected? Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: CO Residential: • Community: • Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING — • This form is for program activities delivered primarily through a group or class-type structure. • When developing eligibility criteria think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. • Use of individual sessions should be described when asked for. • New CCIS codes have been established to identify the specialized nature of some programs and their populations. • Cognitive, Substance Abuse Treatment, Sex Offender Treatment, Employment, Life Skills, and Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form. • G18 — Substance Abuse Outpatient: Counties should exhaust all other funding resources (i.e. Medicaid) before utilizing P.A. 511 funding. • 600 is an option for "other" group-type programming not specifically identified here (discuss with your coordinator first). • In the future cognitive programs may have separate CCIS codes based on a beginning, intermediate or intensive program design. • It will be recommended that CCABs receive a memorandum of understanding from local school districts, substance abuse coordinating councils, community mental health agencies, etc., clarifying what services are or are not available for your targeted populations under their existing funding and why/why not PA511 funds are required for these services. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING 'NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM. Copy the objective(s) from your felony and/or designed to address: a. Group 2 Straddle Cell Objective Which state(s): Reduce the Group 2 straddle cell PCR from 30% to29% b. Recidivism Objective Which state(s): To reduce the number of technical (and new arrest) violators by using a combination of cognitive behavioral tharpy (Thinking Matters) and jail reentry programming for straddle cell offender serving jail sentences c. Choose an item, Which state(s): Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? ail analysis (Part 0 that this program Page 1 of 5 Male and female Inmates in the Oakland County Jail who are convicted of a non-assaultive felony, and based on the COMPAS assessment score a 3 or above in Risk scales or 3 or above in a minimum of two needs scales: criminal personality, criminal thinking, criminal involvement, and/or cognitive behavior; Probation Violators are eligible regardless of score. Misdemeanors(male or female) that are sentenced to more than 50 days in jail and have been sentenced into the program by the judge so that a time cut can be awarded. Misdemeanors would need to score probable or highly probably on the COMPAS cognitive behavior scale as well. 3. Describe the program: a. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Include requirements for assessments and assessment results. Eligibility will be determined using the same charge eligibility criteria in use for all Oakland County Community Corrections programs. These generally exclude assaultive type charges, or charges that pose a threat to public safety. An offender will have to be sentenced to a term of incarceration in the Oakland County Jail to be eligible to be assessed for placement into the program. COMPAS assessments of participants will be reviewed for a high need score on cognitive thinking and will be given priority for participation. If the session is not filled, offenders who score in the mid range in this area will be considered next and then those who score low. b. Assessment (not screening) is the foundation of evidence-based practices. Referrals to treatment programs should be based upon assessed needs. Please describe your assessment practices below: i. Is a risk and/or need assessment (includes substance abuse or mental health assessment) required prior to referral or admission to this program? YES, Prior to Admission ii. If an assessment is used, identify the tool: COMPAS assessment iii. Who completes the assessment? A copy of the COMPAS assessment completed by MDOC will be obtained. iv. Does the substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of treatment per American Society of Addition Medicine (ASAM) criteria? NA v. Is there a process to ensure that offenders receive the recommended level of treatment per the assessment? NA c. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? Sometimes it depends on the probation agent Are required assessments completed prior to the recommendation? YES d. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? Offenders can be sentenced into the program by the courts, reviewing the jail population for eligible candidates may also find possible candidates that will be forwarded to the court for the possibility on an amended sentence. Additionally offenders can make requests to participate in the program through caseworkers working within the jail. e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process. The eligibility is confirmed by a staff of the OCSO who works closely with the program. f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility. If Page 2 015 1 -.01;•r4i:t.11 -1701 an offender is sentenced to the program by the courts on an ineligible charge the offender is notified, and a letter is sent to the court informing the judge that the offender is ineligible for this program. These offenders may be eligible for other non- community corrections funded programs offered within the jail by Sheriff's Office Program Services staff. g. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? Information on admissions and completions are compiled and then entered into the C*Star database. Program information is stored under program code C01. We can query the database at any time for the number of CO1s completed that day or within a specified time period. All required CCIS information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to NorthPointe. h. Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be delivered primarily through a group or class structure): i. Name of curriculum (if applicable and please spell out abbreviations). Thinking Matters ii. Is the group open or closed? Open iii. What is the minimum/maximum number of participants per group, as identified in the curriculum? There is a minimum of 3 and maximum of 15 iv. What is anticipated number of groups that will be conducted during the fiscal year? There are 3 separate open ended groups being run (2 male, 1 female). Each of these groups meet at least 6 times a week. The group is open ended several participants are completing the program weekly. As such it could be stated that 900+ groups will be run during the fiscal year. v. How many sessions will be completed per group? 36 vi. What is the length of each group session? 90 minutes, an additional 30 minutes is needed for transport of inmates to and from group backt o their respective cells. vii. Identify what skills are taught in this program: The Thinking Matters curriculm and information on being able to identify anti-social thinking patterns that lead to repeated, illegal, negative, or destructive behaviors and to develop new thinking patterns that establish new core attitudes and beliefs through thinking reports and role rehearsals. viii. identify if/how participants transition between various phases or treatment locations (jail/residential/community) as applicable to your program: Modules are self contained within one week series. Offenders may enter the program at the start of a new week and complete the modules in any order. ix. Are individual sessions part of the program? YES x. If individual sessions are part of the program and billed separately, how many individual sessions are anticipated per participant? Individual sessions will occur but not be billed separately. xi. On what basis would individual sessions be used? If additional assistance is noted within the group sessions the offender will be met with individually to ensure completion of the module. Additional sessions can also be offered in a higher score is indicated on the offender COMPAS. i. Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her to provide this service: Caseworkers have received training in the Thinking Matters Page 3 of 5 (-Tr- 1 -:):11):1 iv r id P programming. Additionally they have received local training in Motivational Interviewing. j. How are delivered services and offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? All inmates participating in the program are entered into C*star where their enrollment and completion information is stored. The staff also maintains an individual client folder containing class and progress notes. There are no billing issues as Sheriff's Department staff positions are paid by the grant to deliver this program. k. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. The MDOC agent will be notified when an offender completes the progam as it often affects the offender's out date. I. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: A prerequisite for participation in the Thinking Matters Program is approval from the Courts. With this approval and upon completion the offender receives a 25% reduction off their jail sentence. The actual number of jail days saved is entered into C*Star and can be queried at any time. A program must meet at least one of the following objectives and there should be consistency between the objectives and strategies identified in Part I of yourapplication, your targeting and eligibility noted above and your response here.- - - a. Will this this program reduce prison commitments? YES i. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Group 2 Straddle Cell PCR ii. Clearly describe how this program will impact the PCR: Inmates placed into the program are required to have straddle cell sentencing guidelines. These are inmates that could have potentially been sentenced to prison. The Court opted to have them serve their sentence in the County Jail and complete the class rather than prison. The program is cognitive behavioral in nature and is effective in addressing several of the criminogenic factors that contribute to redicivism. b. Is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES i. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Probation Violators with a new sentence ii. Clearly describe how recidivism will be impacted: The program is cognitive behavioral in nature, CBT has been shown to be effective in addressing several of the criminogenic factors that contribute to redicivism. Research shows that addressing criminogenic needs can reduce recidivism by up to 30%. Targeting high risk, high need offenders for this program will reduce the likelihood of reoffending either with a new crime or for a technical violation. Recidivism will be measured by II of inmates who successfully complete the program but are returned to jail within a 12 month period. This measurement is possible through the criminal justice datawarehouse. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the Page 4 of 5 • Ir.) ilV 0:d . . . status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: Track the successful funsuccessfutdischarge from probation for -program coMpletions/failures. OCC recommends that 75% of 13A511. funded program enrollees are from this program primary target population, This discourages net widening and focuses on populations in support of your objective(s). .:Track the changes:ln:P.CR.5;.:.•ADP:.andior.:.1:05.•:baSed.:-..0pOn .VOUrprOgrabv.objettiV.OS per:. • • ..•••• •••.• ••••• •:•••.•••••••••• ••••••••••••.•:••......••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••...•.... ........••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•,.......• ••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••• •••••• • :•Paeti....This.Will:reflect.StatOSitoWardi:athieVerneht.sof yoar Obi ................. Track jail bed days saved if-applicable to yOur program design. Track successful and unsuccessful terminations from the program. • Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as newly acquired or improved skills, tests passed, pre/post test results, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 5 of 5 Copy the objectives) from Your felohYarld/or jail analysis 1Parti) that this program designed to address: a. Group 2 Straddle Cell Objective PCR from 30% to29% b. Recidivism Objective Which state(s): To reduce the number of techincal violators (and new arrest) by using a combination of cognitive behavioral therapy (Thinking Matters) and case management services aimed at addressing the offender's criminogenic needs while on probation through the Step Forward program c. Choose an item. Which state(s): Which state(s): Reduce the Group 2 straddle cell CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 .For act uso oniy, Approved CCIS Code: Approved Projected Enrollment: Budget Recommendation: conotions: coordinator: Local Program Name: Thinking Matters - Step Forward Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: CO1 - Cognitive Programming Projected Enrollment: 378 Projected Length of Stay: 91 Days Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: • Residential: El Community: • Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING — • This form is for program activities delivered primarily through a group or class-type structure. • When developing eligibility criteria think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. • Use of individual sessions should be described when asked for. • New CCIS codes have been established to identify the specialized nature of some programs and their populations. • Cognitive, Substance Abuse Treatment, Sex Offender Treatment, Employment, Life Skills, and Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form. • G18 — Substance Abuse Outpatient: Counties should exhaust all other funding resources (i.e. Medicaid) before utilizing P.A. 511 funding. • GOO is an option for "other" group-type programming not specifically identified here (discuss with your coordinator first). • in the future cognitive programs may have separate CCIS codes based on a beginning, intermediate or intensive program design. • It will be recommended that CCABs receive a memorandum of understanding from local school districts, substance abuse coordinating councils, community mental health agencies, etc., clarifying what services are or are not available for your targeted populations under their existing funding and why/why not PA511 funds are required for these services. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR1PROGRAM. Based on your objective(s), what is your target population Page 1 of 5 Male and female offenders, either felony or misdemeanor, enrolled in the Step Forward program who based on the COMPAS assessment score a 3 or above in Risk scales or 3 or above in a minimum of two needs scales; criminal personality, criminal thinking, criminal involvement, and/or cognitive behavior; Probation Violators regardless of score. Describe the program: a. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Include requirements for assessments and assessment results. All particpants will have been been assessed with the COMPAS prior to being placed in the program. Offenders must have scored probable or highly probable in the following areas on the COMPAS in order to be enrolled in the Thinking Matters program; cognitive behavioral, criminal opportunity, criminal personality, criminal thinking self report, negative social cognitions, substance abuse, social environment, criminal associates, or socialization failure. . Assessment (not screening) is the foundation of evidence-based practices. Referrals to treatment programs should be based upon assessed needs. Please describe your assessment practices below: i. Is a risk and/or need assessment (includes substance abuse or mental health assessment) required prior to referral or admission to this program? YES, Prior to Referral ii. If an assessment is used, identify the tool: The COMPAS is used as stated above iii. Who completes the assessment? Currently the Step Forward intake staff complete the COMPAS. Once an arrangement whereby the COMPAS assessment completed by MDOC can be electronically accessed that assessment will be used. iv. Does the substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of treatment per American Society of Addition Medicine (ASAM) criteria? NA v. Is there a process to ensure that offenders receive the recommended level of treatment per the assessment? NA c. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? YES Are required assessments completed prior to the recommendation? YES . How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? Offenders are placed into this group (and others) based on their COMPAS needs. Offenders must be a participant of Step Forward, the idea of Step Forward is to create a comprehensive supervision / treatment plan that addresses the offender's needs and to track the progress of that plan. Not every offender is ready to start with the Thinking Matters group, some may need to address other needs first, like housing or substance abuse. Some offenders may not need to attend the Thinking Matters group at all. Having Thinking Matters a a part of Step Forward rather than a stand alone program, helps to ensure that the offenders are receiving the appropriate intervention at the appropriate time. e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process. The Step Forward intake staff, eligibility questions can be referred to a supervisor if necessary. Page 2 of 5 f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility. Correspondance is always sent to the probation agent or judge indicating if someone is not eligible for service. g. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? Information on admissions and completions are compiled and then entered into the C*Star database. Program information is stored under program code Col - community. We can query the database at any time for the number of C01-communitys completed that day or within a specified time period. All required CCIS information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to NorthPointe. h. Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be delivered primarily through a group or class structure): i. Name of curriculum (if applicable and please spell out abbreviations). Thinking Matters ii. Is the group open or closed? Open Hi. What is the minimum/maximum number of participants per group, as identified in the curriculum? There will be a maximum of 15 per group and a minimum of 3 iv. What is anticipated number of groups that will be conducted during the fiscal year? There are 8 groups per week at out Pontiac location and 5 per week at out Troy location for a total of 13 per week or 676 sessions per year. v. How many sessions will be completed per group? Each offender will complete an average of 12 weeks. This is an average as each offender will only move on based on his or her grasp of the program concepts. vi. What is the length of each group session? 90 minutes vii. Identify what skills are taught in this program: being able to identify anti-social thinking patterns that lead to repeated, illegal, negative, or destructive behaviors and to develop new thinking patterns that establish new core attitudes and beliefs through thinking reports and role rehearsals. viii. Identify if/how participants transition between various phases or treatment locations (jail/residential/community) as applicable to your program: Offenders will be able to transition form the jail Thinking Matters program into the Step Forward Thinking Matters program. Offenders will be able to continue with their situations as both programs use the same database for tracking purposes. ix. Are individual sessions part of the program? NO x. If individual sessions are part of the program and billed separately, how many individual sessions are anticipated per participant? N/A xi. On what basis would individual sessions be used? N/A i. Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her to provide this service: Instructors are case managers of the Step Forward program and have attended the facilitator training for Thinking Matters, many hold MSWs or master's degrees. j. How are delivered services and offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? All offenders participating in the program are entered into C*star where their enrollment and completion information is stored. The staff also Page 3 of 5 maintains an individual client folder containing class and progress notes. There are no billing issues as Step Forward staff positions deliver this program. k. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Referring agents receive rmonthly progress reports on the status of each of their offenders. In addition agnets may access the C*Star database at anytime to see how clients are doing. I. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: :ikOrOgrarn:rnuStMeet at least.Eone :OfithefalloWing.objectiveS and:i thereShoOldibe:sconsistency i: betWeen:the:ObjectiVe•S:and strategies identified::m:Part I:Of your application ; your targeting and : :eligibility noted above and your response here a. Will this this program reduce prison commitments? YES I. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Group 2 Straddle Cell PCR ii. Clearly describe how this program will impact the PCR: Many of the offenders coming intop Stpe Forward and enrolled in this group are probation violators. Addressing the criminogenic behaviors that led to the violation reduce the likelihood of repeat behavior and therefore the likelihood of a prison sentence. b. is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES i. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Technical Probation Violators ii. Clearly describe how recidivism will be impacted: The program is cognitive behavioral in nature, CBT has been shown to be effective in addressing several of the criminogenic factors that contribute to redicivism. Research shows that addressing criminogenic needs can reduce recidivism by up to 30%. Targeting high risk, high need offenders for this program will reduce the likelihood of reoffending either with a new crime or for a technical violation. Recidivism will be measured by # of offenders who successfully complete the program but are returned to incarceration (jail or prison) within a 12 month period. This measurement is possible through the criminal justice datawarehouse. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: ()CC:recornerendS that 75% of PAST1 funded program enrollees are from this program's primaryitarget::popplapOn :ThisdiSCOpragesiriet-widenintand focuseibet:popUlations,:in: support of Track the Changes in PCRS;::ADR and/Or i:PS:based:OPori::VOUr:prograrn objectives per Part I; This :willEreflect:statusitowa rd :achievement of your objective(s) Track jail days Saved i:if applicable to your program design" Track successfuland:unsUcceSsfulilerMinatiOns'frOM :sthe::prOgraM:.::, Track the 5OCcesSf.01./unsOCCestf01 discharge:frOn;(probation:k4::otogeathr: completions/failures. 4 Page 4 of 5 6. Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as newly acquired or improved skills, tests passed, pre/post test results, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 5 of 5 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 Local Program Name: Pretrial Services Supervision Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: 008 - Electronic Monitoring Projected Enrollment: 457 Projected Length of Stay: 86 days $pprovecl.:CCIS.:Code ::..40610d OtO/We.a.:rOttillitieht -Copy the objective(s) from your felony and/or jail analysis (Part)) that thts.program is designed to address; a. Overall PCR Objective Which state(s): Lower the PCR to no more than 20% b. Choose an item. Which state(s): c. Choose an item. Which state(s): Based on your objective(s), what is your target population?' The target population for Electronic Monitoring is felony or misdemeanor defendants on pretria release that require more restrictive/intensive supervision based on the Okaland County Praxis. Defendants who have a risk score of 5 or more on Grid 2 (non-violent felonies and high severity misdemeanors) or have a risk score of 4 or more on Grid 3 (violent felony) on the Praxis. Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: n Residential: LI Community: IZ Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: SUPERVISION SERVICES — • Supervision programs include Day Reporting, Electronic Monitoring, Intensive Supervision and Pretrial Supervision. • It may be proposed that Day Reporting be eliminated as a program type since service typically delivered under DR could be funded under Case Management or Intensive Supervision. • PA511 funds can not be used to provide Electronic Monitoring Services for MDOC probationers unless it is for pretrial supervision of a probationer with a new charge (call your grant coordinator for exceptions). • When developing eligibility criteria, think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to addressing PCRs or recidivism that the program is intended to address. • Supervision programs are not intended to simply provide access to substance abuse testing absent other supervision activities. • Costs associated with Substance Abuse Testing may be incurred as "supply" costs in this program's budget if testing is part of the program design. • OCC requires that an objective pretrial assessment be used before defendants are referred for pretrial supervision. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM. Describe the program: Page 1 of 5 a. Is an assessment or screen required to determine eligibility? Assessment b. If an assessment is used then provide the name of the assessment tool: The Praxis is used to determine the most appropriate level of supervision. However, the judicial officer always has the option of rejecting the recommendation or ordering a defendant to EM who has not scored for EM according to the Praxis. c. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Be sure to include assessment scores if applicable. In order to be eligible for EM the defendant must have EM ordered as a condition of bond. Defendants who have a risk score of 5 or more on Grid 2 (non-violent felonies and high severity misdemeanors) or have a risk score of 4 or more on Grid 3 (violent felony) on the Praxis are eligible. d. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? NO e. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? Defendants are referred to the program via the Bond Recommendation by the Pretrial Services Unit and ultimately through an order by the judicial officer. f. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process? All EM cases are handled between 1.5 case managers who are responsible for ensuring a court order has been recieved. The case managers receive a faxed copy of the court order. They review the court order to ensure the defendant has been ordered to EM and for any restrictions, schedule, etc. The case managers coordinate all aspects of the EM from scheduling hook up at the jail to daily reviewing of points, vioaltions and alarms. g. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility. If there is a judicial order requiring a defendant to receive EM services even though he does not meet the eligibility criteria, we will still supervise the defendant. h. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? All supervision cases are entered into our C*Star database. It operates in a similar fashion as case manager, in that each enrollment requires a program code. Our codes mimic the CCIS codes. Therefore when an EM enrollment is generated it is saved as an D08. We can query the database at any time for the number of D08s completed for that day or within a specified time period. All required COS information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to NorthPointe. i. Are offenders supervised through (select all that apply): Office Visits: • EMS: • TX Reporting: • TX System (e.g. OffenderLink): • Field Contacts: 0 Other (describe): j. If using electronic monitoring or other technology (including phone systems) answer and clearly explain the following (use NA if not applicable to your program). NOTE: The MDOC charges $6.50 per day for radio frequency or Sobrietor units with monitoring, or, $7.75 per day for both. i. What kind of equipment/system: We use a variety of equipment; mostly GPS and transdermal alchol devices. We do not use RI expect in extreme cases of 24 hour lock down. ii. Vendor for equipment/service: Sentinel (formerly G4S), Rancillio Home Confinement, and House Arrest Services Page 2 of 5 iii. Cost assessed by the vendor per unit/offender/day (clearly describe): The costs associated with the electronic devices are mostly incurred by the defendant. There is a line item for defedants who qualify for EM under the Praxis but can not afford it. If the cost hinders their release then Community Corrections will pay. Per Diem rate ranges from $6.00-$14.00 per day based on equipment. Costs associated with the automated telephone reporting system are paid by Oakland County Community Corrections, the cost is $3.00 per month per defendant regardless of the number of inbound reporting calls. iv. Who does the equipment installation/retrieval? Installation/retrieval of electronic monitoring equipment is the responsibility of the vendor. v. Who sets up schedules and/or monitors compliance? Compliance is monitored by both the vendor and Oakland County Community Corrections personnel. A defendant's compliance with schedules, travel restrictions and equipment issues (ie. Battery charging, downloading) is continuously monitored by the vendor. OCCCD personnel review all alarms and violation to ensure the vendors are following established protocol. k. What is the frequency of reporting/contact with the offender? The frequency of reporting is once per week at a minimum. However due to alarms, schedules changes, etc., the case managers may have more contact with these defendants than once per week. I. How is frequency of reporting/contact determined? All defendant's on any electronic monitoring device are considered "intensive" and are therefore placed on a high level of supervision. The frequency of contact established by our judges(as part of our differential levels of supervision) for "intensive" supervison is once per week. m. What happens during a typical "report" and how long is it estimated to take? A typical "report' is a 3 minute automated telephone call that is designed to specifically review the defendant's conditions of bond and provide notification of next appearance. Additionally, defendants are contacted periodically by their case manager to review specific EM requirements, violations or alarms. n. Does the program design include collateral contacts with family, employer, school, treatment provider, etc.? yes, if employment, education, and/or treatment is ordered as a condition of release, the program does include collateral contacts with these agencies. Additionally, if victims are involved, victims are contacted. o. Does the program assist offenders with securing identification and/or refer to additional social or supportive services? Yes If Yes, how? YES the program is designed to assist the defendant (and family members if necessary) with referrals to community agencies for supportive services (ie. Victim services, alcohol/drug support services, mental health services). p. Does the program monitor for new criminal activity? Yes If Yes, how? q. This program Monitors drug/alcohol testing. r. Explain involvement in `p' above including the frequency/cost of testing if provided: If drug testing is a condition of bond, the casemanagers will make referrals to a testing program and monitor the defendant's compliance. Compliance is then reported to the court trhough progress reports. s. How are delivered services and offender progress and participation documented by the Page 3 of 5 service provider? A defendant's compliance with his / her reporting schedule as well as all conditions of supervison are tracked in the C*star database. Since Community Corrections staff provide this service there is no billing. If a defendant has no income, is on a fixed income, or is being detained simply because he can not pay for the EM device and this has been verified by the court or supervision Community Corrections may pay for the device. The vendor will send an invoice to Community Corrections, the invoice contains the defendnats's name, and dates of of provided EM service. This is checked against our database for accuracy before being approved. t. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Prior to each court date an updated progress report detailing the defendant's compliance with conditions of bond is sent to the court However in the instance of a positiove drug screen, rearrest or other egregious technical violation an immediate bond revocation / hearing is sent to the court. The court decides how to proceed from there. Progress reports are also sent to the district court and MDOC probation agents prior to sentencing to add to their PSI reports. All documentation is also available to them through our C*Star database. u. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: The automated system also makes outbound, court reminder telephone calls to the defendant. Research has shown that reminding defendants of their court date is the single most effective thing a program can do to reduce failures to appear. 4 A program must meet at least one of the following objectives and there should be consistency between the objectives and strategies identified in Part I of your application, your targeting and . _ eligibility noted above and your response here. a. Will this this program reduce prison commitments? YES 1. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Overall PCR ii. Clearly describe how this program will impact the PCR: A recent study from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation indicates that defendants who spend as little as two days in pretrial detention have significantly higher rate of post- conviction recidivism than defendants not held in custody. Individuals who do well on supervision are less likely to receive sentences of incarceration or may receive less severe sentences. b. Is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES 1. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Probation Violators with a new sentence ii. Clearly describe how recidivism will be impacted: Many of the EM options work to reinforce behavior modification learned in treatment settings. For instance an EM curfew will help to encourage changing a criminal lifestyle or antisocial leisure activities. Changing a defendant's behaior patterns and thinking are the first steps in moving them away from a criminal lifestyle into a more socially acceptable one. The intense supervision associated with EM does not allow most defendants the opportunity to reoffend. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT; - At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the Page 4 of 5 Status of tho:ftiliciwirig..KeyPerform4ngeilndic•atprs;....at a minimum: a. • , •• • • • • •;:••••• ••••• . . • • recommends . a of PA53.1.funde ..program. enrol lee s are from this program 's • . • primary target pOpolatiow.:.:E i Thig.....discourages:netwideningand:f0Cuses..OwpopalatiOnsin :upport.of.your'objective(s)..::. 7raCk:E.the ..changesiwPCRS:-..:ADP.::and-..Or:LO. ••••••••based..:opowyouts.program•-objectivesrper ..Part:L.:..ThlswilLreflect .status:toward....aellieveniant....pf..POr 0 .1;ijectiV.e.$), :•1.ratk:.:Jairbed2..daVs..:avectilapplicabla.:.to..your::program.... ::Tratic.$0•Ccessful.iand..:Orisucoe$.sfol.A0tthination*.frprniffiptOgranL:. _............... ..... ............................... qtatii.:the ...!..stitcesSf011onsticceSSA1.1.:diScharge.:from.:probatioh.:for program: completions/failures. Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as securing of identification, completion of other monitored programs and conditions, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 5 of 5 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 For OCC Use Only Approved COS Code Approved Projected Enrollment: OUdget Recommendntion: Conditions: Coordinotor: Local Program Name: Pretrial Services Service Provider: Oakaind County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: F22 - Pretrial Assessment Projected number of assessments (enrollment): 9278 Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: 1M Residential: D Community: II Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Modification If a modification, describe here: Requesting funding for an additional pretrial investigator for the Royal Oak 446 District Court. If apporved, the utilization would be expected to increase by at least 500. List projected enrollment by member county: ASSESSMENT SERVICES - Provides for thorough assessment of offender needs: • COMPAS or other objective, commercial risk/need assessment • Assessment for substance abuse, mental health, or pretrial services eligibility • Assessments provided by different service providers will require separate program description forms • Funding under assessment also includes the task of using results to develop treatment plans and/or recommendations for available services • Assessment for entry into pretrial programming ANS1NER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APP !CABLE TO THIS PARTICUIAR PROGRAM . Copy the objective(s) from your felony and/or recidivism analysis (Part I) that this program is designed to address: a. Overall PCR Objective Which state(s): Lower the PCR to no more than 20% b. Choose an item, Which state(s): C. Choose an item, Which state(s): , Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? All in-custody misdemeanor and felony defendants who are arrested and pending arraignment at the Oakland County Jail or at one or fourteen different district court lock ups. Describe the program: a. Describe eligibility criteria, including exclusionary criteria, for an assessment: Under MCR 6.106 all defendants are entitled to bond, therefore no charges are excluded from the assessment process. Pretrial assessments will be conducted on all in custody defendants charged with a misdemeanor or felony offense, including those dendants who are already serving a sentence, have been brought to Oakland County on a writ, or on those who have an MDOC detainer. We will not assess defendants arrested solely for a violation of probation or bench warrant for failing to pay fines and costs. b. What programs (PA511 and/or locally funded) require this assessment to determine eligibility? A pretrial assessment is not required to determine eligibility for Oakland Page 1 of 4 County's locally funded programs. However, the risk assessment does determine the level of supervision for the pretrial supervison unit if the defendant is ordered to supervised release. c. What assessment instrument is proposed? The Praxis d. Is the assessment completed during the presentence investigation period (prior to sentencing)? YES e. How are offenders identified and/or referred for an assessment? Defendants are referred to pretrial services by virtue of being arrested. Defendants lodged at the Oakland County Jail are identified via daily database searches. Defendants in local police jurisdictions are identified via daily telephone inquiries to the local lockups. Defendants may also be referred by defense counsel or directly from the bench. f. Is this service contracted to a vendor or does local community corrections staff complete the assessment(s)? Community Corrections staff complete all pretrial risk assessments. g. Describe the training, certification process, or credentials of the person(s) doing the assessment(s) which qualify him/her to do them — include dates of training/certification and who conducted the training: Community Corrections Specialists who are conducting pretrial assessments are trained by their Supervisor and Lead staff on interviewing techniques, verification methods, criminal history checks, bond statutes, and standards of pretrial release published by multiple organizations. (National Association of Pretrial Services, National District Attorneys Association, American Bar Association, Federal Criminal Code Title 18.) Each staff member is a certified LEIN operator, has completed assessment training, and is a certified Pretrial Services Professional Level One Practitioner via the National Association of Pretrial Services (NAPSA). h. What is the cost of the instrument itself, per use? It was developed as a public domain tool, therefore there is no per use cost. i. How much time is anticipated to complete one assessment (not including subsequent development of a recommendation or plan)? Assessments on each individual defendant vary based on multiple factors. The assessment with the defendant takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete, the verification and criminal record checks required to complete the assessment process may take up to an additional 30-90 minutes. Additional time may be required to enter all information into the database, depending on the length of the criminal history, etc. j. is the assessment completed through an interview with the offender or would the offender fill out a questionnaire for later scoring? Each pretrial risk assessment includes a face to face interview with the defendant. k. Is subsequent verification of information required prior to making a recommendation or determining eligibility? YES all information provided by the defendant is verified through a third party for accuracy. The verification of information is required to score the Praxis correctly. I. Is the recommendation written? YES m. How much time is it estimated to take to put all information into a recommendation? 10- 30 minutes Explain your response. This time frame has been shortened significantly with the introduction of our new automated report. In the past the staff Page 2 of 4 wrote a 2-3 page summary of all the defendant's information. Now the computer generates most of the report, highlighting those factors that are significant to pretrial failure. The staff now only add narrative that supports the recommendation or requests an override. n. Does a substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of care per ASAM criteria? Not Applicable o. How is the information gained from the assessment used in sentencing recommendations? Probation Agents both MDOC and local, have access to the pretrial assessment and can review information about a defendant that is relevant to that defendant's adjust and progress while on supervision. In some instances, a defendant may plead guilty to a misdemeanor offense and the judicial officer will immediately sentence him / her. The pretrial assessment provides information to the judicial officer much like a PSI would. The pretrial assessment captures information about the defendant that would not otherwise be available to the judicial officer. A pretrial assessment can assist agents in their PSI process by providing historical information about the defendant's prior convictions, SGL score, prior supervision compliance, any violations of probation or parole, failure to appear history, substance abuse information, treatment history, mental health concerns, employment history, education level, and housing status. It really is a starting point for the PSI. p. How is completion of assessment documented by the service provider? Pretrial assessments are created electronically and saved in the Oakland County Community Corrections web-based database C-Star. No invoicing is required. q. How is information about the number of completed assessments entered into Case Manager and tracked for CCIS purposes? All pretrial assessments are generated through our C*Star database. It operates in a similar fashion as the COMPAS case manager, in that each enrollment requires a program code. Our codes mimic the CCIS codes. Therefore when a pretrial bond report is generated, it is also saved as an F22. We can query the database at any time for the number of F22s completed for that day or within a specified time period. All required COS information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to NorthPointe. r. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Defendants who are unable to post bond and remain at the jail are eligible for our "second look" program. Pretrial staff try to dertermine if any circumstances have changed (reduced charges, verified address, employment) that may impact the release/ detetion decision. A amended report will be sent to the court advising of these changes. If the person remains in custody they are referred to for consideration! review for other jail programs. . PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: . OCC recommends that 75% of I3A511 funded program enrollees are from this program's primary target population. This discourages net-widening and focuses on populations in support of your objective(s). . Track the changes in PCRs, ADP and/or LOS based upon your program objectives per Part I. This will reflect status toward achievement of your objective(s). Page 3 of 4 Track the percentage of assessments that result in placement in programming based on assessed risk and/or need. • Develop additional performance indicators based on your program as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 4 of 4 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 Local Program Name: Pretrial Services Supervision Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: F23 - Pretrial Supervision Projected Enrollment: 3228 Projected Length of Stay: 85 days Appfiiile..1.4irojeC4tdi-EntoilinO.oi;!: dqet RecomrnndoLion. CondiLloos Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: 0 Residential: 0 Community: El Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Choose an item. If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: SUPERVISION SERVICES — • Supervision programs include Day Reporting, Electronic Monitoring, Intensive Supervision and Pretrial Supervision. • It may be proposed that Day Reporting be eliminated as a program type since service typically delivered under DR could be funded under Case Management or Intensive Supervision. • PA511 funds can not be used to provide Electronic Monitoring Services for MDOC probationers unless it is for pretrial supervision of a probationer with a new charge (call your grant coordinator for exceptions). • When developing eligibility criteria, think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to addressing PCRs or recidivism that the program is intended to address. • Supervision programs are not intended to simply provide access to substance abuse testing absent other supervision activities. • Costs associated with Substance Abuse Testing may be incurred as "supply" costs in this program's budget if testing is part of the program design. • OCC requires that an objective pretrial assessment be used before defendants are referred for pretrial supervision. ikNSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING 'NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM. Copy the objective(s) from your felony and/or jail analys designed to address: a. Overall PCR Objective Which state(s): Lower the PCR to no more than 20% b. Choose an Rem. Which state(s): c. Choose an item, Which state(s): Based on your objective(s), what is your target population Misdemeanor or felony defendants that have a risk score of 4 or higher on Grid 1 (misdemeanors) 3 or higher on Grid 2 (nonviolent felons and high severity misdemeanors) or 2 or more on Grid 3 (violent felons). Describe the program: a. Is an assessment or screen required to determine eligibility? Assessment Page 1 of 5 b. If an assessment is used then provide the name of the assessment tool: The Praxis is a Pretrial risk assessment tool built for Oakland County by Luminosity. It is based on the Virginia model risk assessment c. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Be sure to include assessment scores if applicable. Misdemeanor or felony defendants that have a risk score of 4 or higher on Grid 1 (misdemeanors) 3 or higher on Grid 2 (nonviolent felons and high severity misdemeanors) or 2 or more on Grid 3 (violent felons), are recommended for pretrial supervision. d. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? NO e. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? Defendants are identified for the program via the Bond Recommendation made by the Pretrial Services assessment through the Praxis. Ultimately defendants are placed on pretrial supervision through an order by the judicial officer. f. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process? Eligiblity is confirmed through the Praxis. Overrides to the Praxis' level of supervision require a Supervisor's approval which is handled on the Pretrial assessemnt side, when the report and recommendation is completed. Cases that have not been scored through the Praxis due to unavailability; weekend arraignment, housed in the clinic, etc., are funneled to one case manger within the supervision unit who scores all the cases. Once the level of supervision has been determine, the case is assigned to the appropriate case manager. g. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility. If a defendant is ordered to supervision but does not meet the above eligibility criteria the defendant is simply placed on a "monitoring only "caseload. This caseload receives court reminder phone calls but nothing else. The pretriaol superviison unit honors all court orders requiring a defendnat be supervised. h. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? All supervision cases are entered into our C*Star database. It operates in a similar fashion as COMPAS case manager, in that each enrollment requires a program code. Our codes mimic the CCIS codes. Therefore when a supervision enrollment is generated it is saved as an F23. We can query the database at any time for the number of F23s completed for that day or within a specified time period. All required COS information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to NorthPointe. i. Are offenders supervised through (select all that apply): Office Visits: iii EMS: • TX Reporting: Ei TX System (e.g. OffenderLink): E Field Contacts: IL Other (describe): j. If using electronic monitoring or other technology (including phone systems) answer and clearly explain the following (use NA if not applicable to your program). NOTE: The MDOC charges $6.50 per day for radio frequency or Sobrietor units with monitoring, or, $7.75 per day for both. i. What kind of equipment/system: Automated telephone reporting ii. Vendor for equipment/service: Offender Link by Fieldware iii. Cost assessed by the vendor per unit/offender/day (clearly describe): The cost Page 2 of 5 is $3.00 per defendant per day. For outbond reminder calls only the cost is $1.50 for successful notifications (usually 2 ) and .25 for unsuccessful notifications. iv. Who does the equipment installation/retrieval? N/A v. Who sets up schedules and/or monitors compliance? The frequency of call-ins is part of the differential supervision model and the schedule is established through the automated system. Compliance of reporting is a feature of the automated telephone reporting system as well. Non-compliance is reported via a dashboard for each case manager. Case managers deal with noncompliance on an indidivual basis with each defendant. The sytem also tracks compliance with conditions of bond. The compliance, or lack thereof, is reported by case managers to the court at each scheduled court event. k. What is the frequency of reporting/contact with the offender? Differential levels of reporting are used in order to keep the EBP risk principle. Reporting is scheduled once per month for standard supervision, twice per month for intermediate supervision and once per week for intensive supervision. I. How is frequency of reporting/contact determined? Frequency of reporting is determined by the Praxis risk score m. What happens during a typical "report" and how long is it estimated to take? A typical "report" is a 3 minute automated telephone call that is designed to specifically review the defendant's conditions of bond and provide notification of next appearance. A defendant may at any time be connected with a case manager should there be a crisis or questions. n. Does the program design include collateral contacts with family, employer, school, treatment provider, etc.? YES If employment, education, and/or treatment is ordered as a condition of release, the program does include collateral contacts with these agencies, This may range from telephone calls for verification, to pay stubs, to progress reports or other written notification. o. Does the program assist offenders with securing identification and/or refer to additional social or supportive services? Yes if Yes, how? The program is designed to assist the defendant (and family members if necessary) with referrals to community agencies for supportive services (ie. Victim services, alcohol/drug support services, mental health services). p. Does the program monitor for new criminal activity? Yes If Yes, how? q. This program Monitors drug/alcohol testing. r. Explain involvement in 'p' above including the frequency/cost of testing if provided: If drug testing is a condition of bond, the casemanagers will make referrals to a testing program and monitor the defendant's compliance. Compliance is then reported to the court through progress reports. s. How are delivered services and offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? A defendant's compliance with his / her reporting schedule as well as all conditions of supervison are tracked in the Offender Link database. Since Community Corrections staff provide this service there is no billing. t. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of Page 3 of 5 reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Prior to each court date an updated progress report detailing the defendant's compliance with conditions of bond is sent to the court. However in the instance of a positiove drug screen, rearrest or other egregious technical violation an immediate bond revocation / hearing is sent to the court. The court decides how to proceed from there. Progress reports are also sent to the district court and MDOC probation agents prior to sentencing to add to their PSI reports. All documentation is also available to them through our C*Star database. u. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: The automated system also makes outbound, court reminder telephone calls to the defendant. Research has shown that reminding defendants of their court date is the single most effective thing a program can do to reduce failures to appear. 4 A program must meet at least one of the following objectives and there should be consistency between the objectives and strategies identified in Part I of your application, your targeting and eligibility noted above and your response here.. a. Will this this program reduce prison commitments? YES i. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Overall PCR II. Clearly describe how this program will impact the PCR: A recent study from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation indicates that defendants who spend as little as two days in pretrial detention have significantly higher rate of post- conviction recidivism than defendants not held in custody. Individuals who do well on supervision are less likely to receive sentences of incarceration or may receive less severe sentences. . Is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES i. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Probation Violators with a new sentence ii. Clearly describe how recidivism will be impacted: Pretrial Supervision monitors defendants closely to ensure they adhere to the bond conditions and appear for court appearances until they are sentenced. The conditions are designed to mitigate the risk of reoffendeing while addressing criminogenic needs which also leads to a reduction in recidivism. Defendants that are not doing well under supervision may be directed for additional services or may be recommended for a bond hearing. The hearing could result in dentention prior to the defedant cornmiting a new criminal act. Pretrial supervision will measure recidivism as a function of rearrest during the pretrial supervision period. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT:- At Midyear and Year end you are 'required: to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum a. OCC recommends. that 7.5% of PA511- funded program enrollees are from this P ro g ram' s primary target population - This discourages net,widening :and focuses on populations in support of your Objective(s),. Track the changes in PQRs; ADP. and/or LOS based upon your prograM-objeCtiVeS.per .Part I. This will reflect status toward achievement of your ol3jective(s)--... Track jail bed days saved if applicable to your.prograrn -desi Page 4 of 5 Tracksuccessful and u nsuccessfulitertytihatiptisfit ilfth .prOgratm: Track the successful /unsuccessful discharge from probation for program completions/failures. 6. Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as securing of identification, completion of other monitored programs and conditions, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 5 of 5 Copy the objective(s) from your felony an:. /or jail analysisPart !).that this program designed to address: Gl.1-(..) LI ptCli D•e 10 ri Ill•11 -1 i 11 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 For OCC Use Only Approved COS Code: Approved Projected Enrollment: audget Recommendation: conditions: Coordinator , Local Program Name: Step Forward Young Mens Group Service Provider: Holy Cross CCIS Service Type: 600 - Other Group Program Projected Enrollment: 70 Projected Length of Stay: 150 Does this program also use DaIR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: • Residential: iil Community: 0 Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: GROUP/CLASS DELIVERED PROGRAMMING — • This form is for program activities delivered primarily through a group or class-type structure. • When developing eligibility criteria think about what behavior or characteristic in addition to addressing PCRs or jail utilization that the program is intended to address. • Use of individual sessions should be described when asked for. • New CCIS codes have been established to identify the specialized nature of some programs and their populations. • Cognitive, Substance Abuse Treatment, Sex Offender Treatment, Employment, Life Skills, and Domestic Violence programs are all programs that would use this form. • G18 — Substance Abuse Outpatient: Counties should exhaust all other funding resources (i.e. Medicaid) before utilizing P.A. 511 funding. • GOO is an option for "other" group-type programming not specifically identified here (discuss with your coordinator first). • In the future cognitive programs may have separate CCIS codes based on a beginning, intermediate or intensive program design. • It will be recommended that CCABs receive a memorandum of understanding from local school districts, substance abuse coordinating councils, community mental health agencies, etc., clarifying what services are or are not available for your targeted populations under their existing funding and why/why not PA511 funds are required for these services. ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS -USING•i•NA" IF.NOT•AP.PL1CABLETO. THIS •PARTICULAR . PROGRAM. a. Recidivism Objective Which state(s): To reduce the number of techincal (and new arrest) probation violators by using a combination of cognitive behavioral teharpy (Thinking Matters) and case management services aimed at addressing the offender's criminogenic needs while on probation through the Step Forward program b. Group 2 Straddle Cell Objective Which state(s): Reduce the Group 2 straddle cell PCR from 30% to29% c. Choose an item. Which state(s): • ::••• •:••:. • • ••••••••• • • .••• .• .••• • •-• • • • • •• •••• ••• •••••••••• • ••• •::•.••••.•:•• ••:.: .• •• ••. ••••• ; •• ••• • • •••••:. • . . • ,:•••::Ba$pd on:yourobjective(s),..WhOtlyiNr itarget:pcmp!appp?.,...:•.,•:••• Page 1 of 5 G 1-(5.up s s 1) e Male participants of Step Forward who score 5 or higher on Violence or Recidivism scales. Must be between the ages 17-26 and have high criminogenic scores for any of the following criminal thinking, criminal opportunity, antisocial peers, substance abuse, Leisure and Recreation, Social isolation, Substance Abuse, Anger, Cognitive Behavioral. Clients that have known gang affiliations or associate with known gang members and have antisocial peers as a crimnogenic driver are a priority. Describe the program: a. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Include requirements for assessments and assessment results. Male participants of Step Forward who score 5 or higher on Violence or Recidivism scales. Must be between the ages 17-26 and have high criminogenic scores for any of the following criminal thinking, criminal opportunity, antisocial peers, substance abuse, Leisure and Recreation, Social Isolation, Substance Abuse, Anger, Cognitive Behavioral. b. Assessment (not screening) is the foundation of evidence-based practices. Referrals to treatment programs should be based upon assessed needs. Please describe your assessment practices below: Our assessment practice includes the use of an acturail risk / needs assessment tool, COMPAS. All referrals are assessed using this instrument. From the assessment a supervision and treatment plan is built around the offenders identified risks and criminogenic needs. i. Is a risk and/or need assessment (includes substance abuse or mental health assessment) required prior to referral or admission to this program? YES, Prior to Admission ii. If an assessment is used, identify the tool: COMPAS iii. Who completes the assessment? Step Forward Intake staff. This is subject to change due to availability of the COMPAS assessment completed by probation. iv. Does the substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of treatment per American Society of Addition Medicine (ASAM) criteria? NA V. Is there a process to ensure that offenders receive the recommended level of treatment per the assessment? NA c. Are recommendations for the program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? NO Are required assessments completed prior to the recommendation? NA d. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to the program? All potential clients are referred to the intake unit. Defendants are referred either as a condition of bond or offenders are referred by the Probation Department to fulfill their probationary obligations. Referrals may come directly from the bench or defense counsel as well. Page 2 of 5 e. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process. The intake staff is responsible for confirming eligibility based upon their criminal history and COMPAS scores from the intake and assessment. Questions on eligilbilty are referred to the Supervisor for resolution. f. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility. If a client is not eligible for Step Forward the court and/or Agent is notified immediately after the intake has been completed via phone and/or in writing. Additionally, the offender is provided a list of community resources that may be able to meet their needs on a less intensive basis. g. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? Once the client has been deemed eligible for Step Forward, they are entered into our C*Star database. It operates in a similar fashion as COMPAS case manager, in that each enrollment reuires a program code. Our codes mimic the CCIS codes. Therefore when a Yothful offender enrollment is generated it is saved as an GOO under the P& S funding. We can query the database at any time for the number of GOOs completed for that day or within a specified time period. All required CCIS information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to NorthPointe. h. Describe the program design (programs using this description form should be delivered primarily through a group or class structure): i. Name of curriculum (if applicable and please spell out abbreviations). Strategies for Self-Improvement and Change (SSC) by Wanberg and Milkman ii. Is the group open or closed? Open iii. What is the minimum/maximum number of participants per group, as identified in the curriculum? There is a minimum of 3 and maximum of 15 iv. What is anticipated number of groups that will be conducted during the fiscal year? 2.3 groups will be able to be completed at each location per year, for a total of 4.6 groups v. How many sessions will be completed per group? 102 sessions per year (22 sessions per group). vi. What is the length of each group session? Each session is 2 hours in length vii. Identify what skills are taught in this program: The SSC model focuses on assisting offenders in developing new thinking skills that will help them to reorganize drug related beliefs and automatic thoughts that promote criminal conduct and substance abuse. viii. Identify if/how participants transition between various phases or treatment locations (jail/residential/community) as applicable to your program: This program is only available in the community. ix. Are individual sessions part of the program? NO x. If individual sessions are part of the program and billed separately, how many individual sessions are anticipated per participant? N/A xi. On what basis would individual sessions be used? N/A i. Identify the training or credentials held by your service provider qualifying him/her to provide this service: Holy Cross Services is one of the largest private, not-for-profit providers of children's services in Michigan. The service portfolio includes residential campuses and group homes, charter schools, foster care homes, supervised Page 3 of 5 G r(-Arip CIL'Icr, -D0:1] v et e:(.1 P ro r1I1I11i independent living programs, day treatment and a variety of community-based services. They have been in business for over 60 years. They have worked with a variety of courts and funding sources (MDOC, Pontiac Parole, Oakland County Circuit Court, and Office of Substance Abuse Services). They have been providing CBT treatment to parolees and other criminal justice clients since 1993. The current facilitator is a CADC-M and has been trained in Stages of Change, Motivational Interviewing, Trauma Informed Services, and Toxic Relationships. j. How are delivered services and offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? Progress reports are submitted after every group to the Step Forward case managers on client's participation. k. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. The Step Forward case managers report back to the probation department and/or the court monthly on the offender's participation or lack of progress. A telephone or email contact is made if immediate attention is required due to inadequate progress. I. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Holy Cross is reimbursed on a per group basis. There is a flat fee of $250 per group, this includes all materials for group participants. A program must meet at least one of the following objectives and there should be consistency between the objectives and strategies identified in Part I of your application, your targeting and eligibility noted above and your response here, a. Will this this program reduce prison commitments? YES I. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Overall PCR ii. Clearly describe how this program will impact the PCR: Individuals referred to this group are clearly headed to prison if their criminal behavior continues. This groups is Cognitive behaviorally based and is designed to interrupt that thinking, help offenders with new thinking patterns that will lead them away from criminal behaviors. b. Is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES i. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Technical Probation Violators ii. Clearly describe how recidivism will be impacted: The program is a cognitive behavior program. These program have been shown to reduce recidivism by up to 30%. Targeting high risk, high need offenders for this program will reduce the likelihood of reoffending either with a new crime or for a technical violation. Recidivism will be measured by # of offenders who successfully complete the program but are returned to jail within a 12 month period. This measurement is possible through the criminal justice datawarehouse. 'PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance indicators -, at a minimum: a. OCC -recommends that 75% of PA511funded.program enrollees are from this program's primary target population. This discourages net-widening and focuses on populations in support of your objective(s). Page 4 of 5 Dv.c r erd P í ö ti, t. 01:111 Track the changes in PCRs, ADP and/or LOS based upon your program objectives per. Part I This will reflect status toward achievement of your objective(s), • Track jail bed days saved if applicable to your program design. ci Track successful aridunsuccessful terminations from the program. Track the successful /unsuccessful discharge from probation for program completions/failures. . Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as newly acquired or improved skills, tests passed, pre/post test results, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 5 of 5 a Ill 1,-Y jAil loini D))1B1)11 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 Far CoLC., the Only: Approved Projected Enrollment: Budget Recommendation: Conditions: Coordinator: CCIS Code: H20-01 Projected number of eligible DDJR offenders: 309 List projections by member county: Drunk Driving Jail Reduction/Community Treatment Program: 5-Day housing is only available to those CCABs that still have DDJR funding available to them. Eligibility is: • Convicted of OUIL 3rd • Intermediate sanction cell, or, Straddle cell with a PRV of less than 35 • You may bill for 5 days of jail housing post conviction at a rate of $43.50 per day • 5 days of housing is valued at $217.50 per offender • *NEW FOR FY 2016* - If program is utilized, all CCABs MUST verify that an appropriate assessment is completed while clients are incarcerated AND all program enrollees MUST be referred to a follow-up program based on the assessment results. NSW ER Pk1.117101YS COMP LETE Describe the program: a. What is your DIDJR/CTP maximum available for programming? $453,588 b. How many OUIL 3rd offenders do you project to bill for this fiscal year? 309 c. Calculate your H20-01 budget: Projected OUIL 3 11 309 X $217.50 = 67,208 d. How are OUIL 3 rd offenders identified for reimbursement? OUIL III offenders are identified through the criminal data warehouse which combines OMNI data with Jail data. e. Who determines/confirms eligibility? The County has a fiscal analyst assigned to this task. He is responsible for reviewing the report and checking to make sure all offenders meet the criteria. When he has completed the invoice it is sent to Community Corrections. Each ffender is enrolled in C*Star for tracking and as a double check of the eligibility. f. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? All OUIL III cases are entered into our C*Star database. It operates in a similar fashion as case manager, in that each enrollment reuires a program code. Our codes mimic the CCIS codes. Therefore when a OUIL III DDJR enrollment is generated it is saved as an H20-01. We can query the database at any time for the number of H20-01s completed for that day or within a specified time period. All required CCIS information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to NorthPointe. g. Identify who is completing the assessment and when: The assessment is being completed by a member of the Sheriff's Office inmate caseworker staff. h. What assessment instrument is used? NEEDS by ADE, Inc PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following, at a minimum: a Number of offenders documented as eligible and billed under DM 5-day housing, , Number of eligible OUIL 3'd offenders actually assessed for treatment or case Page 1 of 2 management within the 5-day housing period PCR for Milt 3 rd offenders ADP and LOS in jail for OUIL 3 ftl offenders and changes if impacted by DDJR funded programming. Subsequent CPs/RS/DDJR. funded program participation by Olw OftellOqrs. Page 2 of 2 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 For OCC Use Only: Approved CCIS Code Approved Projected Enrollment: Budget Recommendation: Conditions: Coordinator: Local Program Name: Step Forward Intake Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type : 122 -Assesstnent Projected number of assessments (enrollment): 985 Does this program also use DDJR funding? YES If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? 180 Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: El Residential: D Community: a Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: ASSESSMENT SERVICES - Provides for thorough assessment of offender needs: • COMPAS or other objective, commercial risk/need assessment • Assessment for substance abuse, mental health, or pretrial services eligibility • Assessments provided by different service providers will require separate program description forms • Funding under assessment also includes the task of using results to develop treatment plans and/or recommendations for available services • Assessment for entry into pretrial programming IANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM . Copy the objective(s) from your felony and/or recidivism analysis (Part I) that this program is designed to address: a. Group 2 Straddle Cell Objective Which state(s): Reduce the Group 2 straddle cell PCR from 30% to 29% b. Recidivism Objective Which state(s): To reduce the number of (techincal and) new sentece violators by using a combination of cognitive behavioral teharpy (Thinking Matters) and case management services aimed at addressing the offender's criminogenic needs while on probation through the Step Forward c. Choose an item. Which state(s): . Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? The target population is non-violent felony and misdemeanor offenders who are at high risk for reoffending (score 5 or higher on the COMPAS). Offenders may or may not exhibit substance abuse and/or co-occurring disorders. The offenders referred are in need of intensive case management services and specialized groups that will address specific criminogenic needs. Probation violators or offenders who were not successful in less intensive programs are a priority population. Describe the program: a. Describe eligibility criteria, including exclusionary criteria, for an assessment: Participants must not be charged with an ineligible offense, nor can they have a conviction for one of these offenses within the past 5 years. The intake process is to determine if the offender will meet the additional more specific Step Forward Page 1 of 3 eligibiltity criteria. b. What programs (PA511 and/or locally funded) require this assessment to determine eligibility? The Step Forward program requires an assessment to determine eligibility into the program c. What assessment instrument is proposed? The COMPAS and NEEDS are used as the assessment tools. The COMPAS is administered to all offenders referred and the NEEDS is admisnitered to those clients where substance abuse may be a risk / need. d. Is the assessment completed during the presentence investigation period (prior to sentencing)? YES e. How are offenders identified and/or referred for an assessment? Defendants are referred either as a condition of bond or offenders are referred by the Probation Department to fulfill their probationary obligations. Referrals may come directly from the bench or from defense counsel as well. f. Is this service contracted to a vendor or does local community corrections staff complete the assessment(s)? Community Corrections staff are responsible for performing the assessments. However depending on the electronic availability of the COMPAS from MDOC this process may undergo some change. g. Describe the training, certification process, or credentials of the person(s) doing the assessment(s) which qualify him/her to do them — include dates of training/certification and who conducted the training: All staff have a minimum of a bachelor's degree in sociology, psychology, social work or criminal justice. Staff were trained in motivational interviewing and they received extensive training on how to administer the COMPAS and NEEDS. h. What is the cost of the instrument itself, per use? There is no cost by the department for the COMPAS. The NEEDS costs $6.00 per assessment i. How much time is anticipated to complete one assessment (not including subsequent development of a recommendation or plan)? The COMPAS and NEEDS each take approximately 30-45 minutes per assessment to complete. Appointments are scheduled for 90 minutes. j. k. Is the assessment completed through an interview with the offender or would the offender fill out a questionnaire for later scoring? The COMPAS is mailed to the client to review and compile answers prior to attending the interview. We have found this helps the client with recalling information they may have at home, but not in the interview; such as dates and locations of treatment episodes. The client brings the completed paperwork to the scheduled intake. The intake staff reviews all the questions and answers with the client and then enters the answers into the COMPAS. Once the COMPAS has been computed, the intake staff will conduct an interview with the offender to verify information and focus in on any crirninogenic needs that have been flagged as high so that more detailed information can be gathered. The NEEDS is administered at intake if it is determined that a DSM-IV diagnosis or ASAM level is needed as part of their treatment. I. Is subsequent verification of information required prior to making a recommendation or determining eligibility? NO m. Is the recommendation written? YES Page 2 of 3 n. How much time is it estimated to take to put all information into a recommendation? 45 minutes Explain your response. Once the COMPAS has been entered, the intake staff and offender go through the assessment to verify the answers provided. Additionally, a series of questions are asked about each criminogenic need in order to determine the "driver" criminogenic need and where the treatment should be focused. o. Does a substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of care per ASAM criteria? YES p. How is the information gained from the assessment used in sentencing recommendations? All information gathered from the COMPAS and NEEDS assessment along with the personal interview is shared with the probation agent that is writing the PSI. q. How is completion of assessment documented by the service provider? N/A r. How is information about the number of completed assessments entered into Case Manager and tracked for CCIS purposes? The clerical staff assigned to the Step Forward program enters the referral into C*Star. Once the intake has been completed the clerical staff enters the enrollment and termination dates and codes. All COMPAS assessment information is available through a link on C*Star. s. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: There are some logistical aspects of this program that may change due to the MDOC probation agents conducting full COMPAS assessments. We currently do not have the access to the OMNI database and therefore no way to access the assessments conducted by MDOC. We are in talks with our local MDOC office about receiving copies of the COMPAS questionnaire. Due to the fact that Community Corrections is totally automated, receiving a copy of the complete COMPAS would be of no use. We need to have the information digitally in order for it to be pulled into our C*Star data base. This drives the entire supervision plan. If we receive the questionnaire we could re- enter the answers and generate an identical COMPAS assessment. However, at this time we are still hopeful that MDOC will be able to assist us in retrieving COMPAS information electronically so that reentry is not necessary. . PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: a. OCC recommends that 75% of PA511 funded program enrollees are from this program's primary target population This discourages net-widening and focuses on populations in support of your objective(s). b Track the changes in PCRs, ADP and/or LOS based upon your program objectives per Part I. This will reflect status toward achievement of your objective(s). . Track the percentage of assessments that result in placement in programming based on assessed risk and/or need. 5. Develop additional performance indicators based on your program as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 3 of 3 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 for RCC Ltsg Only: jApproved COS Code Approved Projected ertipl1MeN: j Conditions: :coomii3aton: : Local Program Name: Step Forward Service Provider: Common Ground ipudget Recommendation: : CCIS Service Type: 122 - Assessment Projected number of assessments (enrollment): 116 Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: • Residential: • Community: r1 Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: ASSESSMENT SERVICES - Provides for thorough assessment of offender needs: • COMPAS or other objective, commercial risk/need assessment • Assessment for substance abuse, mental health, or pretrial services eligibility • Assessments provided by different service providers will require separate program description forms • Funding under assessment also includes the task of using results to develop treatment plans and/or recommendations for available services • Assessment for entry into pretrial programming ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM! . Copy the objective(s) from your felony and/or recidivism analysis (Part I) that this program is designed to address; a. Recidivism Objective Which state(s): o reduce the number of new sentece violators by using a combination of cognitive behavioral teharpy (Thinking Matters) and case management services aimed at addressing the offender's criminogenic needs while on probation through the Step Forward b. Choose an item. Which state(s): c. Choose an item Which state(s): . Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? Clients of Step Forward, who exhibit signs of possible mental health issues . Describe the program: a. Describe eligibility criteria, including exclusionary criteria, for an assessment: Participants must be a Step Forward client so they must meet PA 511 eligibility criteria as well as score a 5 or greater on the Violence Recidivism or General Recidivism. This allows us to focus on the higher risk offenders. . What programs (PA511 and/or locally funded) require this assessment to determine eligibility? Access to services provided by the Oakland County Community Mental Health Authoirty require this assessment. c. What assessment instrument is proposed? LOCUS- The Level of Care Utilization System for Psychiatric and Addiction Services Adult Version 2010 through the Page 1 of 3 American Association of Community Psychiatrists. This instrument is mandated by the State if a client is found eligible to receive Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority services (OCCMHA). d. Is the assessment completed during the presentence investigation period (prior to sentencing)? NO e. How are offenders identified and/or referred for an assessment? Clients are referred by the case managers directly for an assessement. The client may have scored high in this area on the COMPAS, been previously diagnosed as having a mental health issue, or may be exhibiting behaviors associated with mental health issues. f. Is this service contracted to a vendor or does local community corrections staff complete the assessment(s)? It is contracted to Common Ground who also has the contract through OCCMHA to preform all mental health assessments in the county. g. Describe the training, certification process, or credentials of the person(s) doing the assessment(s) which qualify him/her to do them — include dates of training/certification and who conducted the training: The person performing the LOCUS holds a Michigan Master's Ltd. Psychologist h. What is the cost of the instrument itself, per use? There is no cost for the instrument i. How much time is anticipated to complete one assessment (not including subsequent development of a recommendation or plan)? Appointments are scheduled for 1.5 hours j. Is the assessment completed through an interview with the offender or would the offender fill out a questionnaire for later scoring? The assessment is completed through a face to face interview with the client. k. Is subsequent verification of information required prior to making a recommendation or determining eligibility? YES, the client's insurance needs to be verified as well as if the client is an existing concurner of CMHA services or has been in the past. 1. Is the recommendation written? YES m. How much time is it estimated to take to put all information into a recommendation? 45-60 minutes Explain your response. When a client is found eligible for OCCMHA services, documentation and criteria has to be established to justify the referral to the core providers to begin care. There is a large amount of computer entry and paperwork that must be completed due to working in a dual system. n. Does a substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of care per ASAM criteria? Not Applicable o. How is the information gained from the assessment used in sentencing recommendations? This information is usually not completed prior to the sentencing recommendation. However, all results are shared with the Step Forward case manager as well as the referring agent so that amendments to the treatment plan or order of probation can me made if necessary. p. How is completion of assessment documented by the service provider? Client appoinments are set through the Step Forward clerical. Therefore there is a record of all appointments in C*Star. The results of each assessment are forwarded to the case manager. The Step Forward supervisor receives a monthly report detailing all activity for all referrals. This is not a fee for service by rather a flat fee contract. q. How is information about the number of completed assessments entered into Case Page 2 of 3 Manager and tracked for CCIS purposes? The clerical staff assigned to the Step Forward program sets the appointment and enters the referral into C*Star. Once the intake has been completed the clerical staff enters the enrollment and termination dates and codes. Therefore number of mental health assessments can be queried like any other program. r. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: This assessment process is really part of the Step forward program and not a stand alone program. The mental health worker has an office in our facility so referrals are quick and contained. It allows for a much streamlined process to CMHA services. In addition this person is also provding short term solution focused counseling to a small number of clients that do not qualify for CMHA services. . PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: a, OCC recommends that 75% of PA511 funded program enrollees are from this program's primary target population. This discourages net-widening and focuses on populations in support of your objective(s). . Track the changes in Pais, ADP and/or LOS based upon your program objectives per Part I. This will reflect status toward achievement of your objective(s) Track the percentage of assessments that result in placement in programming based on assessed risk and/or need. . Develop additional performance indicators based on your program as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 3 of 3 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 rnli OCC (6e Oniy Approved CC6 rode Appi oped Proina-M FnrOlment• Local Program Name: Step Forward Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: Community Based Case Management — 124 Bridget inCid-d-nPndat ion Condalfin.s. (-nor dinutnr : Projected Enrollment: 1314 Projected Length of Stay: 178 Does this program also use DDJR funding? YES If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? 150 Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: • Residential: CI Community: 02 Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: CASE MANAGEMENT — • Only Community Based Case Management uses this form. Jail Population Monitor and Gatekeeper use a different form (Case Management is more of a SERVICE while JPM and Gatekeeper are more of a FUNCTION). • Proposed definition of Case Management: o Problem-solving activity for specific populations to address barriers to successful completion of probation characterized by advocacy, communication, and resource management; promotes reduction of barriers to success and improved outcomes. • Since this sounds suspiciously like "probation" or possibly "intensive supervision", proposed use of this program should be for very specific populations (targets) and very closely tied to your objective(s). • You will be asked to clearly explain why additional case management beyond what is provided by probation supervision is necessary to help achieve your objectives. • Case Management is not used to simply do data entry for offender enrollment and termination. • If you have questions about what form to use or if your program really is "case management" please contact the OCC program section manager or your grant coordinator. N.WIERAL.L"AU ESTIP1111 USING: 714A7.:IF:14.prAPPL CAOWT.p. THIS PARTICULAR pRpe.RAm 1. Copy the ob active(s) from your felony and/or jail analysis (Part I) that this program Is designed to address a. Recidivism Objective Which state(s): To reduce the number of (techincal and) new sentece violators by using a combination of cognitive behavioral teharpy (Thinking Matters) and case management services aimed at addressing the offender's criminogenic needs while on probation through the Step Forward b. Group 2 Straddle Cell Objective Which state(s): Reduce the Group 2 straddle cell PCR from 30% to29% c. Choose an iteili. Which state(s):_ Based ori your objective(s), what -is.youti tarp .popuiatjoh? The target population is non-violent felony and misdemeanor offenders who are at high risk for Page 1 of 5 reoffending (score 5 or higher on the COMPAS). Offenders may or may not exhibit substance abuse and/or co-occurring disorders. The offenders referred are in need of intensive case management services and specialized groups that will address specific criminogenic needs. Probation violators or offenders who were not successful in less intensive programs are a priority population. estribe the program: a. Is an assessment (not screening) required to determine eligibility? YES all referrals require an assessment prior to enrollment into Step Forward. The assessment is used to determine eligibility and to determine a supervision plan and is conducted by the Intake staff . Is assessment (not screening) part of the case planning process? YES The case managers receive the COMPAS results and bio/psych/social narrative from the intake staff, this assessment is used to create the treatment plan for the offender. We are using a case planning section within our Cstar database which assists in a seamless transition from intake to case planning to meet the offender's needs. c. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Be sure to include assessment scores if applicable. Clients must meet PA511 eligibility. In addition the client must score a 5 or greater on the Violence Recidivism or General Recidivism OR if they have 7 or more areas in which the score is "probable" or "highly probable" under Criminogenic Need Scales on the COMPAS. . Are recommendations for this program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? YES e. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to this program? All potential clients are referred to the intake unit. Defendants are referred either as a condition of bond or offenders are referred by the Probation Department to fulfill their probationary obligations. Referrals may come directly from the bench or defense counsel as well. f. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process? The intake staff is responsible for confirming eligibility based upon their criminal history and COMPAS scores from the intake and assessment. Questions on eligilbilty are referred to the Supervisor for resolution. g. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility. If a client is not eligible for Step Forward the court and/or Agent is notified immediately after the intake has been completed via phone and/or in writing. Additionally, the offender is provided a list of community resources that may be able to meet their needs on a less intensive basis. . How is CCIS data gathered/entered? Once the client has been deemed eligible for Step Forward, they are entered into our C*Star database. It operates in a similar fashion as COMPAS case manager, in that each enrollment reuires a program code. Our codes mimic the CCIS codes. Therefore when a Step Forward enrollment is generated it is saved as an 124 under the P& S funding. We can query the database at any time for the number of 124s completed for that day or within a specified time Page 2 of 5 period. All required CC1S information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to NorthPointe. i. Does Case Management include goal/task setting? YES If yes, explain how goals/tasks are established and monitored: The case manager establishes a supervision plan with each client based upon the COIVIPAS assessment. The case managers will focus on the four highest RISK/NEED categories and add goals, tasks and activities which will address those RISK/NEEDS. The supervision plan is reviewed on a monthly basis during 1-1 sessions or as needed. If changes occur in the offender's life then the treatment plan will be adjusted so that this 'change' will be addressed. j. If referrals are made to other programs, they are both PA 511 and non-PA 511 funded. k. What is the frequency of reporting/contact with the offender? The case managers meet with the offenders at a minimum of one time per month. However, this can be increased based upon the offenders RISK/NEEDS. Additionally, offenders attend groups 1-3 times per week while in the Step Forward program. I. How is frequency of reporting/contact determined? The frequency is based upon the offender's initial screening and their RISK/NEED level. Initially, meetings with their case manager may be more frequent however; the more compliant the offender becomes the less they may need to report. Case managers will reduce the reporting requirements as an incentive for compliance or increase it if warranted. m. What happens during a typical session with an offender and how long is it estimated to take? During a typical session with a case manager the supervision plan is reviewed and any adjustments are made at this time. The offenders are assigned any appropriate groups, a start date and provided rules of the program. In subsequent meetings the case managers assist the client by linking them with services in the community (housing, employment etc). The case managers also target the needs of the offender and work with them on a 1-1 basis by using the Carey Guides aimed at specifc crinninogenic areas. n. Does the program design include collateral contacts with family, employer, school, treatment provider, etc.? YES the case managers work with the offenders on issues relating to their family relationships, employment, referrals to educational institutions and linking them with additional treatment providers in the community if required. The case managers and the providers in the community communicate so that they can effectively share information and incorporate the progress, or areas of concern, into the offender's supervision plan. o. Does the program assist offenders with securing identification and/or refer to additional social or supportive services such as health care or clothing assistance? YES case managers connect the offender to any services in the community that they need in order to be successful. The referrals range from obtaining birth records, social security cards, State ID or their Driver's License, Additionally, the case managers utilize community agencies that have clothing assistance, food pantry's, or to a free clinic for medical services. p. Does the program monitor for new criminal activity? YES Pretrial investigators in the field will contact the Step Forward program if someone who is enrolled in the Step Forward is rearrested. This enrollment information is kept on C*Star and is readily Page 3 of 5 available to all our staff In addition case managers ask clients during sessions about new criminal activity. After termination from the program, clients are tracked periodically to determine if any rearrests have occurred. . This program monitors drug/alcohol testing. r. Explain involvement in 'q' above including the frequency/cost of testing if provided as part of this program: The frequency of testing is primarily based upon the offender's drug of choice, assessment at intake, length of clean time and input from the referring agent. Cost of testing is deferred to the offender. Not all clients are required to test. s. How are delivered services, offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? All client participation, progress and notes is tracked within our Cstar database. t. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Referral sources receive an intake status report as well as copies of the treatment plan and COMPAS assessment. They are also provided monthly progress reports from the case managers. Additionally, the referral source receives a completion/termination reports and are notified promptly if the offender is non-compliant. u. Why can probation officers not provide this level of service? Probation Agents are not able to meet with the offenders at this level of intensity primarily due to high caseloads. The case managers at Step Forward are able to focus strictly on completing activities related to the offender's criminogenic needs. They are able to tie what is being discussed within the various groups into the offenders 1-1 sessions. v. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: Case managers have caseloads of about 70 offenders for which they coordinate supervision plans. Case mangers are also required to facilitate 3 groups per week and work at least 2 evening shifts (until 7:30pm). This allows them to see their clients even more frequently and allows them to build into their 1-1 sessions lessons from the group. The DM case managers have OUIL III cases only. These case manger visit all clients prior to being released from the PRC to establish a rapport with the offender. A program must mee at least one of the followm objectives and there should be consistency between the objectives and strategies identified in Part I of your application, your targeting and eligibility noted above arid v0 response here. a. Will this program reduce prison commitments? YES 1. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Group 2 Straddle Cell PCR ii. Clearly describe how prison diversions will be accomplished: High risk offfenders are often referred to the Step Forward program as a condition of probation, or as a result of a technical violation. Having them referred to Step Forward reduces their criminal activity by targeting criminogenic needs. This significantly reduces the chance of addition violations or new criminal behavior that could result in a prison sentence. Page 4 of 5 . Is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES L. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Technical Probation Violators ii. Clearly describe how recidivism will be impacted: The Program will impact recidivism by targeting offenders (violators) that are high risk high need and developing case plans based on COMPAS criminogenic needs. Research shows that targeting crirninogenic needs will reduce recidivism by up to 30%. The COMPAS contains an assessment review that may be conducted every 6 months to determine if the programming is in fact having an affect on the risks and needs. Recidivism will be measured by # of clients who successfully complete the program but are returned to jail within a 12 month period. This measurement is possible through the criminal justice datawarehouse. 'PERFORM— KNCE liii"tiAttilligibiTi-.1 At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: a. OCC recommends that 75% of PA511 funded program enrollees are from this program's primary target population. This discourages net widening and focuses on populations in support of your objective(s) Track the changes in PCRs, ADP and/or LOS based upon your program objectives per Part L This will reflect status toward achievement of your objective(s) - %I. . _ - Trackl Ilt:fel days saved if apP 'Cable to your program design, -- e Track successful and unsuccessful terminations from the program, e. Track the successful /unsuccessful discharge from probation for prograin coji5Ietic nsiallOii,' , iv. Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as completion of other monitored programs and conditions, improved family or community stability, improved assessment scores, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 5 of 5 CCAB: Oakland FY: 16 For OCC Use C)t))1/' Approved CC'S Codo. Approved Projerud EuronMent• Budget Recorornendutiorr: Conditforis• coo refilliiMr, Local Program Name: Jail Reentry Service Provider: Oakland County Sheriff's Office CCIS Service Type: Community Based Case Management —124 Projected Enrollment: 260 Projected Length of Stay: 42 days Does this program also use DDJR funding? NO If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: • Residential: • Community: • Program Status (new, modification, continuation): New initiative If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: CASE MANAGEMENT — • Only Community Based Case Management uses this form. Jail Population Monitor and Gatekeeper use a different form (Case Management is more of a SERVICE while JPM and Gatekeeper are more of a FUNCTION). • Proposed definition of Case Management: o Problem-solving activity for specific populations to address barriers to successful completion of probation characterized by advocacy, communication, and resource management; promotes reduction of barriers to success and improved outcomes. • Since this sounds suspiciously like "probation" or possibly "intensive supervision", proposed use of this program should be for very specific populations (targets) and very closely tied to your objective(s). • You will be asked to clearly explain why additional case management beyond what is provided by probation supervision is necessary to help achieve your objectives. • Case Management is not used to simply do data entry for offender enrollment and termination. • If you have questions about what form to use or if your program really is "case management" please contact the OCC program section manager or your grant coordinator. I‘NSIIVER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" IF NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAM. Copy the objective(s) from your felony and/or jail analysis Part 1) that this program is designed to addrOSt , a. Recidivism Objective Which state(s): To reduce the number of new sentence violators by 5% from 176 to 167, and, To reduce the number of technical violators by 10% from 185 to 166. b. Group 2 Straddle Cell Objective Which state(s): Reduce the Group 2 straddle cell PCR from 30% to29% c. Choose an item. Which state(s): , 2 Based on your objective(s), what Is your target populat on? I I , Using the COMPAS assessment, 3 or above in Risk scales or 3 or above in a minimum of two needs scales: criminal personality, criminal thinking, criminal involvement, and/or cognitive behavior. Page 1 of 4 Probation Violators regardless of score. 3.DeScribe the Program a. Is an assessment (not screening) required to determine eligibility? YES Offenders must meet the PA 511 criteria for Oakland County. An assessment is needed for placement into program using COMPAS assessment. b. Is assessment (not screening) part of the case planning process? YES The COMPAS is reviewed with each offender individually to determine a reentry plan c. Based on what your program is intended to address within your targeted population, what are your eligibility (including exclusionary) criteria? Be sure to include assessment scores if applicable. The program excludes assaultive type charges, or charges that pose a threat to public safety. An offender will have to be sentenced to a term of incarceration in the Oakland County Jail to be eligible to be assessed for placement into the program. COMPAS assessments of participants will be reviewed for a high need score on cognitive thinking and will be given priority for participation. If the session is not filled, offenders who score in the mid range in this area will be considered next and then those who score low. d. Are recommendations for this program made in the PSI or PV sentence recommendation? YES Sometimes it depends on the probation agent e. How else are offenders identified and/or referred to this program? Offenders can be sentenced into the program by the courts, reviewing the jail population for eligible candidates is also done to find possible candidates Potential candidates are forwarded to the court for the possibility of an amended sentece for participation. Offenders can also make requests to participate in the program through caseworkers working within the jail. f. Identify who is responsible for confirming eligibility and describe the process? This process is completed and confirmed by staff of the OCSO who directly works with the program. g. Describe your process for addressing referrals not meeting program target/eligibility. If an offender is sentenced to the program by the courts on an ineligible charge the offender is notified, and a letter is sent to the court informing the judge that the offinder is ineligible for the program. These offenders may be eligible for other non- commnity corrections funded programs offered within the jail by Sheriff's Office Program Services staff. h. How is CCIS data gathered/entered? Information on admissions and completions are complied and then entered into the C*star database. Program information is stored under program code C01. We can query the database at any time for the number of COls completed that day or within a specified time period. All required CCIS information is captured as a comma delineated file and send to NothPointe i. Does Case Management include goal/task setting? YES If yes, explain how goals/tasks are established and monitored: Goals are discussed and addressed during one on one contact with each participant. Tasks and goals are established based on participant's needs, and COMPAS information. j. If referrals are made to other programs, they are non-PA 511 funded. Page 2 of 4 . What is the frequency of reporting/contact with the offender? Each offender is required to attend 6 group sessions per week and a minimum of 2 individual sessions during the 6 week program. How is frequency of reporting/contact determined? Due to the short amount of time we have the offenders, the frequency of reporting is the same for all. m. What happens during a typical session with an offender and how long is it estimated to take? One on one session will include, social, family, employment, educational, medical, substance abuse and mental health history. A plan is discussed with the participant based on needs and requirements that will be needed upon release. A follow up contact will be conducted to give referrals and specific information based on needs. Re-evaluation of goals and tasks to be accomplished upon their re-entry into the community. Total time meeting with individuals on one on one basis dring their time in the program is 60 - 75 minutes. n. Does the program design include collateral contacts with family, employer, school, treatment provider, etc.? YES Based on goals, tasks and needs, additional contacts for information may be completed by caseworker. Gathered information would be given to participant in 2nd follow up contact session. o. Does the program assist offenders with securing identification and/or refer to additional social or supportive services such as health care or clothing assistance? YES Limited ID verification can be provided upon request if needed. Health and Mental Health service referrals are given if needed and required based on need. If participant is open with the Mental Health Provider for the county ,an appointment is coordinated thourgh OCSO liaison. Healthy Michigan information is given to participant. Educational information is also given upon need for GED classes. Employment resources are also given at this time. p. Does the program monitor for new criminal activity? YES After termination from the program, clients are tracked periodically to determine if any rearrests have occurred. . This program does not address drug/alcohol testing. r. Explain involvement in 'q' above including the frequency/cost of testing if provided as part of this program: N/A s. How are delivered services, offender progress and participation documented by the service provider? Documentation is detailed in IMACS Program Services Database (Sheriff's Office information system), and a hard copy file is also kept. Offender enrollment and termination dates, codes are tracked in C*star Database. t. How is offender progress/participation reported to the probation officer or referral source? Include frequency of reporting positive and negative progress and types of reports provided such as intake, monthly, termination, etc. Probation is notified of participant completion of program so that outdates may be adjusted. u. Why can probation officers not provide this level of service? Probation does not attach until the offender is released from jail. This is a jail based program and as such the offenders are a "captive" audience and therefore can participate in groups 1 to 2 times per day. Program Services staff has a close working relationship with OCSO personnel which is required for participant placement, transport and release into the community. Page 3 of 4 v. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: ----- f the fP110'wl arn rnUst Meet at east. one ,o , _ g 1560t . ,c Ives and there should be cppststency between the objectives and strate J.S._ detittfled in Part I of your application, your targeting and eligibility noted above and opr re P1Pse' J fr a. Will this program reduce prison commitments? YES I. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Group 2 Straddle Cell PCR II. Clearly describe how prison diversions will be accomplished: Having offenders participate in the Jail Reentry program reduces their criminal activity by targeting criminogenic needs. This significantly reduces the chance of additional violations or new criminal behavior that could result in a prison sentence. b. Is this program intended to impact recidivism? YES i. If YES, by targeting which Key Performance Indicator? Probation Violators with a new sentence ii. Clearly describe how recidivism will be impacted: Having offenders participate in the Jail Reentry program reduces their criminal activity by targeting criminogenic needs. This significantly reduces the chance of additional violations or new criminal behavior that could result in a prison sentence. iii. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance IndItors, ata rYllOrilWtr: a. t-Cr commends that 75% of PA511 funded program enrorlees are from this prograrns Primary targepopulation, This discp,unages -net- widening and focuses on populdLionsin suppor,t pf yo no )0 thr,e(s). b. Track the rhanesth PcRs, A P'and L S based 'tippripqr,pfogrann objectives per Part I. This will reflect status toward achievement of your objective(s) h- Trackijall bed days isaved If applicable to y our -051 n rj Track successful and unsuccessful termlnatiOnS from the pr4rarrn Track the successful unsuccessful discharge from probation tar PrCgratItgirA*0111$NOMPA , iv. Develop additional performance indicators based on your program design such as completion of other monitored programs and conditions, improved family or community stability, improved assessment scores, etc., as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 4 of 4 CCAB: Oakland County FY: 16 FOr OCC Use Oniy: Approved COS Code Approved Projected Enrollment: Budget Recommendation: COnditions: Coordinator; Local Program Name: Drunk Driving Screen and Assessment Service Provider: Oakland County Community Corrections CCIS Service Type: 122 - Assessment Projected number of assessments (enrollment): 90 Does this program also use DDJR funding? YES If YES, how many OUIL 3rds are projected? 90 Program Location (select all that apply): Jail: El Residential: • Community: Z Program Status (new, modification, continuation): Continuation If a modification, describe here: List projected enrollment by member county: ASSESSMENT SERVICES - Provides for thorough assessment of offender needs: • COMPAS or other objective, commercial risk/need assessment • Assessment for substance abuse, mental health, or pretrial services eligibility • Assessments provided by different service providers will require separate program description forms • Funding under assessment also includes the task of using results to develop treatment plans and/or recommendations for available services • Assessment for entry into pretrial programming ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS USING "NA" 1F NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS PARTICULAR PROGRAIVIO . Copy the objective(s) from your felony and/or recidivism analysis Part I) that this program Is designed to address: a. Overall PCR Objective Which state(s): Lower the PCR to no more than 20% b. Choose an item. Which state(s): c. Choose an item. Which state(s): 2. Based on your objective(s), what is your target population? Offenders who have been adjudicated for OUIL III and have an SGL score in the intermediate or straddle cell range with a PRV of greater than 35. Describe the program: a. Describe eligibility criteria, including exclusionary criteria, for an assessment: Offenders who have been adjudicated for OUIL III and have an SGL score in the intermediate or straddle cell range with a PRV of greater than 35. . What programs (PA511 and/or locally funded) require this assessment to determine eligibility? Placement into a PRC that is residentially licensed requires an assessment. c. What assessment instrument is proposed? The NEEDS and the COMPAS will be used along with a psycho-social interview. All assessments will also include a MAPS review. MAPS stands for Michigan Automated Prescription System and it is the prescription monitoring program for the State of Michigan. Prescription monitoring programs are used to identify and prevent drug diversion at the prescriber, pharmacy and patient levels by collecting Schedule 2-5 controlled substances prescriptions dispensed by Page 1 of 3 pharmacies and practitioners. Collection of this prescription information allows physicians, dentists, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician's assistants, podiatrists and veterinarians to query this data for patient-specific reports which allow a review of the patient's Schedules 2-5 controlled substance prescription records. This enables the practitioner to determine if patients are receiving controlled substances from other providers and to assist in the prevention of prescription drug abuse. This is an invaluable system for anyone conducting assessments. d. Is the assessment completed during the presentence investigation period (prior to sentencing)? YES e. How are offenders identified and/or referred for an assessment? Offenders will be referred directly from the judges courtroom for assessment at the time of plea. The offender will be immediately scheduled for an assessment and given a return date to court in 1 week. f. Is this service contracted to a vendor or does local community corrections staff complete the assessment(s)? Community Corrections staff g. Describe the training, certification process, or credentials of the person(s) doing the assessment(s) which qualify him/her to do them — include dates of training/certification and who conducted the training: This person has her Fundernentals in Alcohol and Other Drugs (FAODP), and is a Certified Criminal Justice Professional (CCJP). She has been conducting drunk driving assessments for a number of district courts and meets all requirements under the state's Designated Screening and Assessment Agency (DSAA) rules to conduct assessments. h. What is the cost of the instrument itself, per use? There is no cost for the COMPAS, there is a $6.00 fee per NEEDS instrument used. i. How much time is anticipated to complete one assessment (not including subsequent development of a recommendation or plan)? All assessments are scheduled for 1.5 hours. j. Is the assessment completed through an interview with the offender or would the offender fill out a questionnaire for later scoring? The NEEDS will be given to the defendant while in the courtroom by the Judge's clerk. This questionnaire will be collected and forwarded to Community Corrections so that it may be scored and available at the defendant's assessment. The assessment is completed with a face to face interview with the offender. k. Is subsequent verification of information required prior to making a recommendation or determining eligibility? NO I. Is the recommendation written? YES m. How much time is it estimated to take to put all information into a recommendation? 30 minutes Explain your response. Once the interview & assessment process is complete the remaining information can be pulled into a written recommendation in aobut 30 minutes. n. Does a substance abuse assessment result in a recommended level of care per ASAM criteria? YES o. How is the information gained from the assessment used in sentencing recommendations? The defendant is given a 90 days delayed sentence. The assessment results are turned into bond conditions and monitored by Community Page 2 of 3 Corrections. The defendant is required to return for periodic reviews (every 2 weeks) in fromt of the Judge. The defendant's progress will determine the length of jail time as well as if he / she will be granted work release. At the end of the delayed sentence the treatment plan (built from the assessment) becomes conditions of probation. p. How is completion of assessment documented by the service provider? The service is provided by Community C orrections staff so an invoice isn't neseccary. q. How is information about the number of completed assessments entered into Case Manager and tracked for CCIS purposes? The referral is entered into C*Star as soon as it is received. Once the assessment has been completed the enrollment and completion data is entered by the assessor. C*Star operates in a similar fashion as COMPAS case manager, in that each enrollment requires a program code. Our codes mimic the COS codes. Therefore when a OUIL III assessment enrollment is generated it is saved as an 122 under the DDJR funding. We can query the database at any time for the number of I22s completed for that day or within a specified time period. All required CCIS information is captured as a comma delineated file and sent to NorthPointe. r. Review your answers above. Summarize other aspects of the program not specifically identified above that you feel are critical to understanding this program: The assessments are also available to the Step Forward staff through C*Star should the offender be referred to that program. . PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT: At Midyear and Year end you are required to report on the status of the following Key Performance Indicators, at a minimum: a. OCC recommends that 75% of PA511 funded program enrollees are from this program's primary target population. This discourages net widening and focuses on populations in support of your objective(s). . Track the changes in PCRs, ADP and/or LOS based upon your program objectives per Part I. This will reflect status toward achievement of your objective(s). . Track the percentage of assessments that result in placement in programming based on assessed risk and/or need. . Develop additional performance indicators based on your program as you deem appropriate. Contact your grant coordinator for assistance if necessary. Page 3 of 3 CCAB: Oakland County How many DDJR funded residential beds do you have: io :.. 1 Oniiili.0.1).ity....":. Solutions to .._:.: Programs Inc ge.icoyery.:; • " • . .,.,.,:,,, . .: . .....:....,..: lioling:polrrt Point New sha•....:-:-:: ....: .:..f. 22 30 20 6 9 Programs Inc .::Becovery:.: Community .: .: Solutions to .-' •••......:-.....'.777'.." '.. ' :TAO jtt :POinit New Paths Shot. 2 3 2 2 1 Are offenders assessed for type of residential placement (substance abuse treatment v. half-way house) prior to order/referral to the program? Explain: As placement is often part of a structured sentence recommendation an assessment is not always completed prior to an order into the program. Probation does not conduct objective SA assessments but rather use their judgement / experience as to as to who would qualify for treatment. Even though an assessment is not always conducted prior to placement, an assessment is required for all clients entering a licensed treatment facility. Are referrals to residential processed by the local manager/staff or do probation officers make direct referrals to the program? Explain: Program placement is a function of the Community Corrections Division. Staff track all offenders sentenced to a treatment facility or who has been given a suspended sentence. Based on projected out dates Community Corrections sets up transportation of the offenders to the programs, and works on clearing outstanding warrants or holds if possbile. Community Corrections is responsible for entering all placements into C*Star which will allow for easy tracking of LOS, bed Page 1 of 2 Revised 09/13 allocation numbers, and reporting of CCIS data. Probation Agents may still directly place offenders who are not in custody into programs as deemed necessary. Is residential enrollment captured in Case Manager? It is not captured in Case Manager but it is captured in our database C*Star. We still require that copies of all monthly billings be sent to us. This information is entered into C*Star under the appropriate CCIS code. This allows us to track prior placements, number of days utilized and overall program utilization. Describe any use of CPS funds in your plan to support non-core services at residential programs. Clearly describe at which RS vendor and type of non-core service: N/A How is non-core service enrollment captured in Case Manager? N/A Do you count bed days saved for participation in residential programs? YES If YES, clearly describe how jail credit is awarded and documented for residential participation. Most often the use of PRS is in conjuction with a structured or suspended sentence. If the offender enters treatment some portion of their sentence is suspended. Jail credit is counted by the number of days suspended from the sentence. Page 2 of 2 FISCAL NOTE (MISC. #15201) July 29, 2015 BY: Finance Committee, Tom Middleton, Chairperson IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES/COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS — MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICE OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND GRANT APPLICATION FOR FY 2016 To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The State of Michigan offers funding to local communities under PA 511 targeted to divert non- violent offenders from prison into local jail or sentencing alternatives. 2. Oakland County has been receiving Community Corrections funds since 1994. 3. The Oakland County Community Corrections Division has applied to the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) requesting funding in the amount of $1,830,339 for plans and services for the grant period of October 1, 2015, through September 30, 2016. 4. The FY2016 application is $96,336 more than FY2015 award. 5. Michigan Department of Corrections holds the contracts for all residential services, the State is responsible for the payment and billing of the Probation Residential Centers in the amount of $1,717,143, which will be paid directly to the residential centers. The County is responsible for requesting the allocation and tracking the costs. The remaining amount of $1,830,339 is the County's responsibility as detailed on Schedule A. 6. The grant provides funding for positions in the Community Corrections Division and the Sheriffs Office. 7. The grant seeks funding for the following Community Corrections Division positions: ten (10) FTE Community Corrections Specialist Ils (positions 7425, 7426, 7429, 7432, 7433, 9243, 9247, 9291, 9648, 9649, one (1) FTE Office Assistant II (position 9295), one-half (.50) FTE Community Corrections Support Specialist (position 7834), one half (.50) FTE Supervisor-Community Corrections (position 9396), one (1) PINE Community Correction Specialist I (position 9397) and one (1) PTNE Community Corrections Specialist II (position 9292). 8. The grant will continue to fund the following Sheriff's Department positions; three (3) FTE Inmate Caseworkers (position 7418, 7419 and 7420), one (1) FTE Inmate Substance Abuse Tech (position 7421), and one (1) PTNE Office Assistant II, (position 7417). 9. The grant application seeks additional funding to create one (1) new SR full-time eligible Community Corrections Specialist I position within the Community Corrections Division. 10. No County match is required with this grant; however, it should be noted that the FY2016 Budget of this grant application seeks funding for two (2) General Fund/General Purpose FTE positions (7834 and 9396) whereby the State will fund 50% of the costs, and the County will match 50% of the costs. 11. No budget amendment is required at this time. FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long, Crawford and Zack absent. Resolution #15201 July 29, 2015 Moved by Spisz supported by Jackson the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Dwyer, Fleming, Gingell, Gosselin, Hoffman, Jackson, KowaII, Long, Matis, Middleton, Quarles, Scott, Spisz, Taub, Weipert, Zack, Bowman, Crawford. (18) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). -77.2/7/A) I HEREBY APPRN IS RESOLUTION CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE ACTING PURSUANT TO MCL 45.559A (7) STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on July 29, 2015, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 29th day of July 2015. Lisa Brown, Oakland County