Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2016.01.20 - 22169MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #16006 January 20, 2016 BY: Planning and Building Committee, Philip Weipert, Chairperson IN RE: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS - RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROVISIONS OF A BROWNFIELD PLAN FOR THE 2100 SOUTH OPDYKE - CITY OF PONTIAC PROJECT To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the Brownfield Redevelopment Financing Act, being Act 381 of the Public Acts of the State of Michigan of 1996, as amended (the "Act"), have established a redevelopment of Brownfields Redevelopment Authority and Board (OCBRA) to facilitate the cleanup and redevelopment of Brownfields within Oakland County's communities; and WHEREAS the 2100 South Opdyke site in The City of Pontiac (the "Property") is an environmental hazard, a 'facility" under state statute and a non-producing parcel; and WHEREAS a Brownfield clean up and redevelopment plan (the "Plan") has been prepared to restore the environmental and economic viability to a portion of this parcel, which is split out from its parent parcel; and WHEREAS pursuant to OCBRA by-laws, a local committee has been appointed, participated in discussions regarding the proposed plan and project, reviewed the plan, and recommends its approval; and WHEREAS the City of Pontiac has reviewed the Plan, and has been provided a reasonable opportunity to express views and recommendations regarding the Plan in accordance with Sections 13 (13) of the Act, and has concurred with the provisions of the Plan; and WHEREAS the OCBRA, pursuant to and in accordance with Section 13 of the Act, has approved a resolution (attached) adopting the Plan, and recommends the adoption of the Plan by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners to be carried out within the City of Pontiac relating to the lnalfa redevelopment in the City of Pontiac. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners does hereby adopt the Brownfield Redevelopment Plan to be carried out within the City of Pontiac, relating to the 2100 South Opdyke redevelopment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a public hearing on the adoption of the Brownfield Plan approved by the Oakland County Brownfield Redevelopment Authority for the 2100 S. Opdyke redevelopment in the City of Pontiac shall be held on January 20, 2016 at 7:00 PM in the Oakland County Board of Commissioners' Auditorium, 1200 North Telegraph Road, Pontiac, Michigan, Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning & Building Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. LANNING & BUILDING COMMITTEE PLANNING & BUILDING COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Crawford absent. ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMITTEE FOR ME 2100 SOUTH OPDYKE BROWNFIELD SITE NOVEMBER 30 2015 WHEREAS, per the Oakland County Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (BRA) Bylaws, Article II Section 9. Not less than sixty days prior to the submittal of any proposed Brownfield redevelopment plan to the BOC pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Act, by resolution the Board shall appoint a committee for any such proposed plan to allow for input of the city, village or township involved. The committee shall consist of a minimum of one or more of the Directors of the Board, as well as one elected official, or his/her designee from the affected city, village, or township. The committee so appointed shall make recommendations to the Board, which shall include or address any changes to the Brownfield redevelopment plan sought by the city, village or township, as well as any other significant concerns or issues raised by the city, village or township. WHEREAS, Dan Hunter (Oakland County BRA) and Deidre Wateiulan, Mayor City of Pontiac have been designated to serve on the Local Host Committee since November 19, 2015 for the 2100 South Opdyke project. WHEREAS, all parties involved with this project and the specific persons nominated for this cominittee have meet about this project on November 23, 2015: and, THEREFORE, be it resolved, to approve and ratify the appointment of Dan Hunter, Oakland County BRA along with Deidre Waterman, Mayor City of Pontiac to serve on the 2100 South Opdyke project committee. Yeas- Williams, Wilson, Hunter, Lerminiaux, Trigger, Webster Nays- Abstained- Absent- a—ri Hunter Secretary, Oakland County Brownfield Redevelopment Authority RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE 2100 SO-UTH OPDYKE BROWNFIELD PROJECT NOVEMBER 30, 2015 WHEREAS, 2100 South Opdyke in the City of Pontiac has been a environmental hazard, a "facility' under state statute, and a non-producing parcel for many years; and, WHEREAS, a clean up and redevelopment plan has been established to restore the environmental and economic viability of a split section of the 2100 South Opdyke parent parcel as outlined in Exhibit A of the Brownfield plan; and, WHEREAS, the local host committee consisting of Mayor Waterman from the City of Pontiac and Mx. Hunter from the OCBRA have met and have recommended the approval of the Brownfield plan; and, WHEREAS, the BRA Board has reviewed the proposed plan; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Brownfield Plan for the 2100 South Opdyke project was approved by the OCBRA on November 30, 2015 by a majority vote of 5 yeas to 0 nays, provided that: 1. the Brownfield plan is also approved by the City of Pontiac State appointed Transition Advisory Board at their meeting on December 16; and, 2. a legal description be provided to the OCBRA once closing occurs; and 3. the plan reflect tax increment financing capture starting in 2017; 4. the plan reflect a capture of local site remediation revolving loan and administrative fees to be set forth in a reimbursement agreement; and 5. the listing of personal property identified in section "A" is stricken; and 6. there will be a local work plan review process initiated by the OCBRA in the event the State rejects all or a portion of the requested eligible activities or declines to participate in the project. In such case the work plan is subject to the review and approval of the OCBRA and/or its consultants and the work plan shall include written justification for slab removal, if any, from the site. 7. Approval by the OCBRA of a mutually acceptable reimbursement agreement. 8'. The phrase "at this time" be added to the end of the sentence appearing under Section IIIM of the plan on page 6. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, to recommend the adoption of this plan by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners, and its Planning & Building Committee. Yeas- Williams, Wilson, Hunter, Lerminiaux, Webster Nays- Abstained- Trigger Ab_sent- / al Hunter Secretary, Oakland County Brownfield Redevelopment Authority City of Pontiac Receivership Transition Advisory Board Minutes Tuesday, December 15, 2015 1:00 pm Pontiac City Hall Council Chambers — 2nd Floor 47450 Woodward Avenue Pontiac, MI 48342 Members Present Staff Present Edward Koryzno Robert Widigan, Treasury Keith Sawdon. Joseph Sobota, City of Pontiac Robert Burgess I. CALL TO ORDER A. Roll Call — All presetit Mr. Koryzaio called the meeting to order at 1:00 pm. Let the record show that all Board Members are in attendance B. Approval of Agenda Motion made (Sawdon) and supported (Burgess), the Board unanimously approved the RTAB agenda with the addition of Featherstone Bridge Project under City Administrator Items and Grant Application for the CNI.j Congress Legacy Project Program under Mayor Items. C. Approval of Minutes Motion made (Burgess) supported (Sawdoia), the Board unanimously approved RTAB minutes of November 18, 2015 with noted corrections. II. OLD 13USIASS NONE Da. NEW BUSINESS A. Approval of 2016 RTAB Meeting Schedule Motion made (Sawdon) supported (Burgess), the Board unanimously adopted the 2016 RTAB Meeting Schedule as presented. B. Approval of Resolutions & Ordinances for City Council Meetings 1. November 12, 2015 — Regular Meeting 2. November 19, 2015— Regular Meeting 3. November 23, 2015 — Regular Meeting 4. December 3, 2015 — Regular Meeting Motion made (Burgess) supported (Sawdon), the Board unanimously approved all ordinances and resolutions from the November 12, 2015 Regular City Council Meeting, November 19, 2015 IZegular City Council Meeting, November 23, 2015 Regular City Council Meeting, and the December 3, 2015 Regular City Council Meeting. C. City Administrator Items 1. Application for 2016 Community Development Block Grant Funds Motion made (Sawdon) supported (Burge'ss), the Board unanimously approved the submission of the application for 2016 Community Development BloCk Grant Funds. 2. Temporary Hiring Authority. Motion made (Sawdon) supported (Burgess), the Board unanimously approved the hiring of three temporary part-time employees for the purpose of salting and plowing streets to end April 1, 2016. Not to exceed $20,000.00. 3. Brownfield Request— 2100 Opdyke Road Redevelopment Project /OCBRA Motion made (Sawdon) supported (Burgess), the Board unanimously approved the Brownfield Plan for the 2100 Opdyke Road Redevelopment project. 4. Brownfield Request — 225 Columbia Motion made (Sawdon) supported (Burgess), the Board unanimously approved the Brownfield Request for 225 Columbia be reviewed by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners. 5. Repeal of EM Order 5481 Motion made (Sawdon) supported (Burgess), the Board unanimously approved sending a recommendation to the State Treasurer to approve the repealing of EM Order S-181 to accommodate the 2100 Opdyke project. 6. Featherstone Bridge Resolution Motion made (Sawdon) supported (Burgess), the Board unanimously approved the amended contract between the City of Pontiac and MDOT for the Featherstone Bridge project in the amount of $1.2M. D. Mayor Items 1. Phoenix Center Development: Case Study Recommendations from the Mayor's Institute for City Design. — InfounatiOnal Only 2. Authorization to apply for CNU CongresS Legacy Project Program Motion made (Burgess) supported (Sawdon), the Board unanimously approved authorizing the City to apply for CNU Congress Legacy project Program. TV. NON ACTION ITEMS A. Financial Report - September 2015 Report was received and filed. B. City Administrator Report A verbal report was given by the City Administrator, Mr. Sobota spoke on HB 4462, C. Mayor Report A verbal report was given by the Mayor, The Mayor spoke on HB 4462, OPEB mediation, economic development, and the FY 16/17 budget. V. PUBLIC COMINiENT Linda Hasson Billie Swazer Gottfried Brieger VI. BOARD COMMENT VII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, meeting adjourned at 1 :5 6 PM. OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BROWNFIELD PLAN FOR: inalfa North American Headquarters Project 2100 S. Opdyke Rd, Pontiac, Michigan Oakland County Brownfield Redevelopment Authority 2100 Pontiac Lake Road, Pontiac, Michigan Contact Brad Hansen (248-858-8073) Prepared with the assistance of: SME November 23, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 41 A. PLAN PURPOSE 1 B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1 C. BASIS OF ELIGIBILITY 1 D. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. GENERAL DEFINITIONS AS USED IN THIS PLAN 2 III. BROWNFIELD PLAN 2 A. DESCRIPTION OF COSTS TO BE PAID WITH TAX INCREMENT REVENUES AND SUMMARY OF ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES 2 B. ESTIMATE OF CAPTURED TAXABLE VALUE AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUES 3 C. METHOD OF FINANCING PLAN COSTS AND DESCRIPTION OF ADVANCES BY THE MUNICIPALITY 3 D. MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF NOTE OR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS 3 E. DURATION OF BROWNFIELD PLAN 4 F. ESTIMATED IMPACT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ON REVENUES OF TAXING JURISDICTIONS 4 G. LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY MAP, PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY 4 H. ESTIMATES OF RESIDENTS AND DISPLACEMENT OF FAMILIES 4 I. PLAN FOR RELOCATION OF DISPLACED PERSONS 4 J. PROVISIONS FOR RELOCATION COSTS 4 K. STRATEGY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH MICHIGAN'S RELOCATION ASSISTANCE LAW 4 L. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE OF LOCAL PROPERTY REM EDIATION REVOLVING FUND (LSRRF) 5 M. OTHER MATERIAL THAT THE AUTHORITY OR GOVERNING BODY CONSIDERS PERTINENT 5 0 2O55ME InalphaBP.+073234,60+11/23/15 i APPENDIX A ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES COST SCHEDULE APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AND REIMBURSEMENT OF ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES APPENDIX C ALTA SURVEY DESCRIBED IN SECTION III(G) OF THIS PLAN APPENDIX D PROJECT CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS 0 2015 SME lnalphaBP+073234.00+11/23r5 ii I. INTRODUCTION A. PLAN PURPOSE The Oakland Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (Authority; OCBRA), duly established by resolution of the Oakland County Board of Commission, pursuant to the Brownfield Redevelopment Financing Act, Michigan Public Act 381 of 1996, MCLA 1251651 et. seq., as amended (Act 381), is authorized to exercise its powers within the limits of the Oakland County. The purpose of this Brownfield Plan Amendment (the Plan), to be implemented by the OCBRA, is to satisfy the requirements of Act 381 for including the eligible property described below, designated as a portion of 2100 S. Opdyke Road, Pontiac, Michigan (the "Property"), in the County's Brownfield Plan. The Property consists of one parcel of land, split from a larger parcel, that is a "facility" as defined by Part 201 of Michigan's Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (1994 P.A. 451, as amended). The Property is located within the boundaries of the City of Pontiac. The project is referred to as the lnalfa North American Headquarters Project, to be constructed on a portion of the site of the former General Motors Corporation's Pontiac East Assembly Plant. This Plan allows the OCBRA to use tax increment revenue to reimburse the developer, Irian Roof Systems, inc. (Inalfa), for the costs of eligible environmental and non-environmental activities required to prepare the Property for safe redevelopment and reuse (see Section Ill). Inalfa's proposed redevelopment will only be economically viable with the support and approval of the local and state brownfield redevelopment incentives. B. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Property consists of one parcel of land occupying approximately 35 acres of land at the southwest corner of South Opdyke Road and Centerpoint Parkway. The parcel is being split from an approximately 120-acre parent parcel with parcel identification number 19-03-200-020 and address 2100 South Opdyke Road, Pontiac, Michigan. The Property will be assigned a new address and parcel identification number after it is split from the parent parcel. C. BASIS OF ELIGIBILITY The Property is eligible for inclusion in this Brownfield Plan in accordance with MCL 125.2652(n) because the Property is in the City of Pontiac, a qualified local governmental unit, and is considered "blighted" as defined by 1994 P.A. 451, as amended. D. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The parent parcel for this redevelopment is the former General Motors Corporation Pontiac East Assembly (PEA) Plant The PEA plant was built in 1971, expanded multiple times, and operations at the plant were terminated in 2009. The plant produced medium and light duty trucks. The PEA plant site was sold to the MMP Group-Assembly, LLC in 2011. Hazardous materials and petroleum products were removed from the building, the building was subsequently demolished, and open pits and trenches were filled in preparation for redeveloped. Only the original concrete floor slabs and pavements remain. The Property will be the southeastern 35-acre portion of the parent parcel, which is currently occupied by approximately 800,000 square-feet of concrete floor slabs and foundations and approximately 250,000 square-feet of paved driveways and parking areas. The Property location is ideal for redevelopment for large-scale manufacturing operations. However, the redevelopment of the Property is hindered by the environmental and site preparation challenges created by the presence of residual floor slabs, foundations, buried pits and trenches, utilities, pavements, and other remnants of the previous 0 2015 5ME Inalpha5P+073234.00+11/23/15 1 manufacturing facility and legacy environmental issues from the historic use of large quantities of paints, solvents, oils, and fuels on the site. InaIfa will redevelop the 35-acre Property into its North American Headquarters offices and 512,000 square-foot manufacturing facility. The redevelopment will take an unsightly manufacturing plant remnant at a prominent road and convert it to a productive, modern, and functional office and manufacturing complex. The project will continue the repurposing of one of General Motors largest, abandoned manufacturing campuses by demonstrating the viability of redevelopment of the former PEA plant site for modern manufacturing. Conceptual design drawings for the project are provided in Appendix D. The total anticipated investment for the industrial project is approximately $35 million; creating 484 new full time manufacturing jobs in Oakland County and over 1,100 new jobs in the City of Pontiac. The project will add significant tax base to the City of Pontiac, as well as stimulate commercial development and economic activity in the area serving Inalfa employees and employees of the adjoining Challenge Manufacturing plant. II. GENERAL DEFINITIONS AS USED IN THIS PLAN Al] words or phrases not defined herein shall have the same meaning as such words and phrases included in Act 381. III. BROWNFIELD PLAN A. DESCRIPTION OF COSTS TO BE PAID WITH TAX INCREMENT REVENUES AND SUMMARY OF ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES I nalfa will be reimbursed for the costs of eligible non-environmental and environmental activities necessary to prepare the Property for redevelopment. The costs of eligible activities included in, and authorized by, this Plan will be reimbursed with incremental local and school operating tax revenues generated by the Property after redevelopment and captured by the OCBRA, subject to any limitations and conditions described in this Plan, approvals of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and Michigan Strategic Fund (MSF) for school operating tax capture, and the terms of a Reimbursement Agreement between Ina'fa and the Authority (the "Reimbursement Agreement"). Administrative expenses of the OCBRA will be reimbursed through capture of incremental local taxes. No personal property taxes are projected to be captured by this Plan at this time, but if incremental personal property taxes are generated by this Plan in the future, they will not be captured. The estimated total cost of environmental and non-environmental activities eligible for reimbursement from tax increment revenues is $8,394,750. The eligible activities are summarized in Table 1 in Appendix A. The costs of environmental and non-environmental activities eligible for reimbursement are estimated and may increase or decrease depending on the nature and extent of unknown conditions encountered. The OCBRA and inalfa shall be governed by the terms of a Reimbursement Agreement. No costs of eligible activities will be qualified for reimbursement except to the extent permitted in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Reimbursement Agreement and Section 2 of Act 381 of 1994, as amended (MCL 125.2652). The Reimbursement Agreement and this Plan will dictate the total cost of eligible activities subject to payment, As long as the total cost limit described in this Plan is not exceeded, line item categories and costs of eligible activities may be adjusted by without Plan amendment after the date of this Plan, to the extent the adjustments do not violate the terms of Act 381. 0 2015 SVP InalphaBP+073234.00+11/23/15 2 B. ESTIMATE OF CAPTURED TAXABLE VALUE AND TAX INCREMENT REVENUES The estimated 2015 taxable value of the Property is $236,000, which is the initial taxable value for this Plan. This value was based on dividing the parcel split acreage (approximately 36 acres) from the total parent parcel acreage (approximately 120 acres) and multiplying that ratio by the current taxable value of the parent parcel ($945,250). The anticipated taxable value at project completion is $8,620,830, based on 25% of estimated development costs. For planning purposes, the taxable value for tax year 2017 is assumed to be 50% of the full taxable value, with the full value for tax year 2018. The actual taxable value will be determined by the City Assessor. The OCBRA will capture 100% the incremental local tax revenues generated from real property to reimburse lnalfa for the costs of eligible activities under this Plan and OCBRA operating costs in accordance with the Reimbursement Agreement. The OCBRA will capture 100% of the incremental school operating tax revenues generated from real property to reimburse the costs of eligible environmental and non-environmental activities pursuant to work plans approved by the MDEQ and MSF, respectively. Estimated taxable values, tax increment revenues to be captured, impacts on taxing jurisdictions, and eligible activities reimbursement cash flows are presented in Table 2 (Appendix B). The actual annual incremental taxable value and captured tax increment revenue will be determined by the County and City of Pontiac. The actual increased taxable value of the land and all future taxable improvements on the Property may vary. It is the intent of this Plan to provide for the proportional capture of all eligible tax increments in whatever amounts and in whatever years they become available until all eligible costs described in the Plan are paid or 30 years, whichever is shorter. If the MDEQ and MSF elect not to participate in this Project, the portion of capture related to their proportionate share will be assumed by, made whole by, and become the responsibility of the other taxing entities to the extent allowed by Act 381. C. METHOD OF FINANCING PLAN COSTS AND DESCRIPTION OF ADVANCES BY THE MUNICIPALITY lnalfa is ultimately responsible for financing the costs of eligible activities included in this Plan. Neither the OCBRA nor the City of Pontiac will advance any funds to finance the eligible activities. All Plan financing commitments and activities and cost reimbursements authorized under this Plan shall be governed by the Reimbursement Agreement. The inclusion of eligible activities and estimates of costs to be reimbursed in this Plan is intended to authorize the OCBRA to fund such reimbursements. The amount and source of any tax increment revenues that will be used for purposes authorized by this Plan, and the terms and conditions for such use and upon any reimbursement of the expenses permitted by the Plan, will be provided solely under the Reimbursement Agreement. Reimbursements under the Reimbursement Agreement shall not exceed the cost of eligible activities and reimbursement limits described in this Plan, unless it is further amended. D. MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF NOTE OR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS Not applicable. 2015 SME C) InalphaBP+073234.00+11/23115 3 E. DURATION OF BROWNFIELD PLAN The duration of this Brownfield Plan for the Property shall not exceed the shorter of the following: reimbursement of all eligible costs, cumulatively not to exceed $8,394,750, or 30 years tax capture after the first year of tax capture under this Plan. The date for beginning tax capture shall be 2017, unless otherwise amended by the OCBRA. F. ESTIMATED IMPACT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ON REVENUES OF TAXING JURISDICTIONS Incremental local and state tax revenues generated by the Inalfa North American Headquarters Project will be captured by the OCBRA until all incurred eligible brownfield redevelopment costs are reimbursed. The impact of the OCBRA incremental tax capture on local taxing authorities is presented in Table 2 (Appendix B). G. LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY MAP, PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY The property consists of a 35-acre portion of a single parcel with current address 2100 South Opdyke Road, Pontiac, Michigan. A legal description of the Property and boundary survey of the Property have not been created, but will be created prior to acquisition of the Property by Inalfa. An ALTA survey and legal description of the parent parcel from which the project parcel will be split is included in Appendix C. H. ESTIMATES OF RESIDENTS AND DISPLACEMENT OF FAMILIES No occupied residences are involved in the redevelopment, no persons reside at the Property, and no families or individuals will be displaced as a result of this development Therefore, a demographic survey and information regarding housing in the community are not applicable and are not needed for this Plan. I. PLAN FOR RELOCATION OF DISPLACED PERSONS No persons will be displaced as a result of this development; therefore, a Plan for relocation of displaced persons is not applicable and is not needed for this Plan. J. PROVISIONS FOR RELOCATION COSTS No persons will be displaced as result of this development and no relocation costs will be incurred; therefore, provision for relocation costs is not applicable and is not needed for this Plan. K. STRATEGY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH MICHIGAN'S RELOCATION ASSISTANCE LAW No persons will be displaced as result of this development; therefore, no relocation assistance strategy is needed for this Plan. 0 2015 SME InalphaBP+073234.00+11/23115 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED USE OF LOCAL PROPERTY REMEDIATION REVOLVING FUND (LSRRF) The OCBRA has decided to capture incremental revenues for their LSRRF for this Plan. M. OTHER MATERIAL THAT THE AUTHORITY OR GOVERNING BODY CONSIDERS PERTINENT There is no other material that the OCBRA or governing body considers pertinent at the time of the plan approval. 0 2015 5ME InalphaBP+073234,00+11/23/15 5 APPENDIX A ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES COST SCHEDULE 0 2015 SME Table I - Brownfield Eligible Activities Cost Summary inalfa North American HQ Redevelopment Pontiac, Michigan SME Project No: 073234.00 11/23/2015 ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES TOTAL ELIGIBLE COST INCREMENTAL TAX CAPTURE ELIGIBLE NON-ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIE 1) LOCAL STATE Demolition $ 3,850,000 $ 2,055,515 $ 1,794,485 Site Preparation $ 1,500,000 $ 800,850 $ 699,150 Infrastructure Improvements $ 375,000 $ 200,213 174,788 Work Plan12} $ _ 15,000 $ 8,009 $ 6,992 Subtotal Non-Environmental Activities 5,740,000 $ 3,064,586 $ 2,675,414 Contingency (15%) $ _ 858,750 $ 458,487 400,263 Total Non-Environmental Activities 6,598,750 $ 3,523,073 $ 3,075;677 ELIGIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIE§1) LOCAL STATE BEA Activities $ 40,000 $ 21,356 $ 18,644 Due Care Activities $ 1,500,000 $ 800,850 699,150 Additional Response Activities $ - $ - $ - Work Plan (2) $ 15,000 8,009 $ 6,992 Subtotal Environmental Activities 1,555,000 830,214 $ 724,786 Contingency (15%) $ 231,000 $ 123,331 $ 107,668 Total Environmental Activities , $ 1,786,000 $ 953,545 $ 832,454 BROWNFIELD PLAN") LOCAL STATE Brownfield Plan $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - TAkEL.IG1134E ACTIVITIES- „;04,750: . , ... 4446361i . -90.f.t,.1,31 MILLAGES AVAILABLE FOR CAPTURE BY BRAI3) TOTAL % TOTAL State Millages 24.0000 46.61% Local Millages 27.4917 53.39% ' Total Millages 51.4917 100.00% Notes: {1) Lump sum cost estimates are based on engineering, contractor, or developer estimates or consultant experience. (2) These costs are not included in the contingency calculation. {3) See Table 2 for a breakdown of available local and state millages available for capture. APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING AND REIMBURSEMENT OF ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES CO 2015 SME ,...,...,»-. V.11 M-,41.ri (;?..ar -,; .. A .. • ha _ E !I 1 .-;,.. .. g '4; P a!, ._ g I" p :1 .. E '4:4 , as 1 .- g :ii 1 gR . ., - ... E ''.t .. E p. a .. .. E I-.4 .. E kt 1 at .. 5 11 .. g 1! 5 .z- i 1! .. ilt a"' F=q .-,. ... 5.5 1 " ':11 '''' „.. ZSi 2,,, ... R'it ugg ., 5 .- ,U 5 .» RZ' ma ... SiS kkk 0..it M. FIR -5 UI .. ... ... ... ... ... igil;t55EM, "- - - PISSOInik -7- Sgiqq13M1 - --- Vq;Mag,q '--- wok4RkSNER: 5-22;25 ul-RvwSSUk m-8--.4 '.1- r45 -tralnli rAk1:055;;IV.= RAtkaItniikkR -n ..e...m tkogtpunt Itittgtmtli Rtkqq5SISSII g--,..„, 011151m13 1 igUMIgHl P.NiSMPN ...... Wiii ilgt5i . . R :- q;;E,q a g_26 um ill111 prn RH ;11111 iliPIS Mt qw. inill 111III MI! WM AA: gs: 11 ri .. II. .. iii FL:: _.T. .., =:k! 51!. .. HI ... 5p ... p2 .-ag .., !!! „,_ m ... III . ... ill ... H5 Ii! ... ,.„ f.11 ! Ni ..„ m .. til .1 k;!S 'Jr .. Ri' - .. th ... pl .. I ..= .. r! .. m. .. 0 .. iii .. 0';' il . 1 .. .1 .. . 2 .. 4 2 .. . . . ,i . , . . . . ' '1 1 _ 1 . . . S - 2 . t - , . R 2 . t , i . g 2 , - t2 ;6 :. F- V i -7 ._ 1 il .. _ .. . -i 2,. . f a , — ! ! . . 1 ! 1 E . 5 „ . E . g ! k ! . E 1 _ E ! . - A41 ;26 W in . . , 5,1! -- Nt ip „„. Pi '4. .. PE ,- !ii - 'V .' .1 'S ... ... ».. .., ... .., .. w2k211111.2g ; g-, .n . . - tglag§g5g!' ,. _ imak:HE . . . 11gkitilm5 PVi Mq ,IR5 plalipml„ ..... ...... . PililiNFM ;USSPILFW HiMilll5g - -,- PPan"H" 4:III5Mil E ".'. = 2 1 ; tilli MI; ninE ..... 8ig: Wil; 1!;P 1-I - 5-IN .. ... , .. ... ... 111 ... PT :11 HI .„ . ... ... ... ... ... 1Si .., n1 III I2i . .. .. .. Eu ., 1 'i , ' . . , _ ,i. _ 1 i ... ... .. 5 - .. k, a H .. 11 .. 51 55 .. .k „ i „ - .. .. 1 lAu ...1 1FFW- .511 vOri ,__g g inf . 4- I 5 R / N4g -.. IR ut Eli 2 1 - _ : A22EnUililk4 i .16 fi . : i g i I 5 g 3 ri 1 itie 5 - 1111 ! II.: 'Tr IOW bA W2 1 I 3 ii - 6 ,ii lill 11 1 I t .6] 5I Al '1°. I • . 1 1 4 I 6 - 61 & li W11 '' Him ' ; .,, 13111 iilLi ffo lim 2. "11 AI 1 4 1 li„ . 1 E ...1 41 1 I t I , ,;_ 1 1 . , - 1 ; .,_ lit 11 APPENDIX C LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIBED IN SECTION III(G) OF THIS PLAN 0 2015 SMF AO T -0.7.1111 .1 EU"E99a 11 Ck 11N {1-171,11 DeD2.1", LC2 F-F10! TWOS n.rlirlIn111 SIL1,9Z-5o Vt.] (dm FFyvy. v., ,uvuv,=. PLZ4vi'rv, a. V, 11 ••• .11.1 ... ....A. A. 1.1.2 4 ▪ 1, ••••• .4 a 1..U. r Maw: HIT 12•1171.1,(1 • 1.• • V.,. an. jou 11..a .1113:70Ier "=2 AVA., 1.114171217•11/' MOM= 11.414.. hv [WU., mrr .ho....D.DrolieD -mpg I • ,L,L J.9...76 ,lacrale - tupg. 1.••• Fr+ An -.14a4,717/11.Lii ffrry"", "tr.," 1741"="altrooVetle","== '4;1 a..larroarr•ra'...D2 'RC • vrt...Cr.r,',17,, ML.TOZ SM. NIS 7.1...1.11.2 rtmri L. , moiami&AwinigizrumagEr"-744. taa Porl liSOY/141.1V .1.11,11 Fn. 'P.a....7 L. •Iva ewe 1.1n11,5,11 1.14.1.11 `OE 11 ..E.1.11•11 V..., • 11.]iiLiIFNNFPt.4á.4N • WS 1.1-41 LnSI, 1,n.a• v.., • lama, "at h•E] ymap 1•111, Y. •••n ow y you,, uakun, Awl on ••n•.. • "I.., •••••. • ...{.•1 1.41 !NW .415JAS VI... V... WIC /I agr4.11:4 1=417.1:111.1= :12It 11 .n••1 1..11 •-• +•••••••num • nusi r...a 1...7 11 L•Rr,:L ^.11.4 A val.- n•MI Mt :11= alrrAerra ',41=4"4:4WrZ17.77.= vx t 1.1.7 v•Vt1.10.1 - ....a .41 SD,2 arra rtr, "'""oaPa=7,-":"Alon.*M•11ISPIT," .1310112.1. ,,amoviwor P.M) OS di "UMW 1111 V4;1.1 `1, 1=4.'•:7744"...i.Dreavr:rianrair.I."ZAVT.:7 ▪ rt^.7. Fild11 •11.111 .. "h...▪ .D.. D., rarnitI arm Do J... I 01 .".14111 .13d • .1 ,11:141-117,4•443147:1Z- ir.141.411E.Vai-17,14 ;1.1 41,017=1, 1=11,741&[1. 1,11 V "In...W.1M ,111111. %OM, 1. 1.411L 1,1717=1; 1 1.11 '"" '71* ,;444-0.1.1}.414.411acr4l..41.1,1.7 ma, V. prv. •"•n•• ••••n• n:...w.i_trair rAza4te,....v.kr w wft• 1•••••• ". '11 /1171711,1'... VIZ.?, .'"6.1.• 217 .1, I. • "..7.7.717.;"Zir ' - "'",P°7- •111 -VW17.7771=."77•70;r1 ,E14...41.11„.1..... -1 1.• araa'. • "...V....L..... . .•••ftlIrjrd 4;1 mu. 'W11-= rA1 .111L1 LOBEILYIELO 41k1 afliyrIcIEJ ror. '=-L-47.-17E47.7.41.1:riFa .1-111NIXI 2.01.-E1 17,Yel 041116.2. Irth wllIVrFfPiOalSPOSEFf UOVC - 1.01. el A IMO] "aar:Voran"P•raW "4.1.441."Aa.". riZt.7.! Aqcoony 1.3 M.c1 • dW11 /71.7.1 RIM 43 • ;or .n1L 7:••=6:6rm• .1 v.......?:n=rAV:14:12 SE ^ [9.111.11•I•M: -Fee .01 40.44 DITKNINOMS.L.A3u4ka sevel Amax= wn maaacdan -won Tr.rra.4•471r•ra-V.rn VV.= ••••••• ...I...3 oda =74;M, t Li,▪ ",n••••7,74 • .• p• ,▪ L•n :•Jr A .1.11=earliYi A ;NI W47.1 4174 1......1.4.7•tr.114.14rat 1.1 VI V, Wm win so .174.11 .14.1.: yr.-a cis tr. z. ru A y vuiry, rx,funt,• -1 11.0 P11.04 C1111111.1101:111 A.M. IR -LT rg".4'4111:1274"W"..'747k..4"53.fr=7:.e.'"1,Z • 7.7.7=‘, W=.7• .1..rht= 7.411:=.71.1t.* 71F4, lora, 7"`.... • •••61. 14'4 oz.." " • -4 IN On. VV. UV V ••• V4,==.= .-"••••4•41.74i: •=1....L.(7.141.7=,...r, =dr/ r. 1-1 to .1. tem..... It "."'"":7-%^""•";1 rIT,;""1•71`-'4"27,"•=7n4.1.7r4=1"Wa; To".1 14.7".2 Fr, 411 DooaLo 40.10 pigyou thonip R9T-Hv tirfivuoli# . nem 1-N1AL 51119. ,11114Poilr[46101CL ISQ-EtEaY4 "ra 111441CI1rt7 VOS-LtEtt 7YLINCi 'PAY CRLYMC IDDM tag SOMIAVIAOH ... Am, ...A.+. • SXINNVILi CLNY1 SIICIUMITIS CNN"' SILUNIDN 1A-1D 3)12 RNID NR -Tarim:Y*2-7:- -4ilt647-47t,47,17-' 447:4'W":4-97fATE: 7-1117-..117..-1"-21:44-‘74-7 = - ,21.:Ft.•=..1.-4v..--r272-41;-:71.-.7-7-•-714--."1... 7.÷.1 ▪ -74,= r::=4M41^"J4 N9P'Zil"r4 011111211.1.1.1.0114 tri III owro,...m. MIMI AO Oa 101.= LON. 3 .01.111/1.1.1, APPENDIX D PROJECT CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS ©2O5 SME MO= 119,==. CHALLENGE \1UFACTURI \1G 1:11=1 CI= bal=7- 1U111:L/1411.1441U11AU4A1UHAUIAILAPIWIKUltli 0111101111011i10111-0 0111[0111101111011110 011110111101111E11110 0 0 1 0 0 011110111101111311110 011110111101111011110 0 864' 41.0 ACRES 1077' DETENTIOND POND 11111111W11111111111i111A1111114111i14 34.1 ACRES L.111.70°' fir. Mi=g4RRILLANI-rimroormi nourttinr-firvirtirou urimg IPA KIV,i1V,N*Allin Inikorot II" r " olliimpAllatimuumg; 1111KOMMIIIIMILMIIIMMEIT1 111111•EMLNIEN.mLWELIEF" NURIPREqUISOCUEIDEVA18 111 111 11B U • In !HIM I lie 11-sposnuill Uffillilllik..11141U1111U1A1U141U11AU1A1U1IPO kialL1 0 11101111011110 [11-0 01111011110 1]101111011110 01[11 110 011{1011H111101i110 011110111101H101HICh140 9+8 if11111111111(311€11111WilllItlifili111111111IIIIIIIIIWINIlllifIllifflifE aa. 1.50.0.4f1 IEREIEgr BURGER KING Table 2- Impact to Taxing JuftsdictiOn8 Summary knife North American HQ Redevelopmeni Portia; Michigan WE ?reject No: 073234.00 11/2412015 2017 (Y1) 2010 raj 7019 (09) 2020 [Y4) 2021 .(1.6) 2022 (06) 2023 ly7) 2024 (YII) 2025(09) 2026 1010) 2027 (Y11) 2020 (Y12) 202l 1Y13) 7030 (Y141 2031 IY13) Initial Taxable Value $ 230560 $ 10242,840 TaxebleVulue after IMprovemento, 2 4500003 $ 9,000,909 $ 9,096000 2 9,186900 $ 9272,709 5 9,3135538 if 9,459,09U 0 9,553,681 $ 9,549,215 $ 9,745,710 $ 9,843,167 $ 9,941,539 0 10,041015 $ 10,141525 Total Capturable Taxabie Value $ 4,264,000 $ 0,764,000 $ 8,854,000 0 6,9,14,900 S 9,036,709 2 4,120,435 if 9,225090 $ 9,317,001 $ 0,413,215. $ 9,509,710 $ 0,607,167 $ 9,706,599 $ 9,805,015 S 9,905,425 0 10,026540 State Taxon - Millarma $ 59,433 $ 02541 State 61105e/ion Tax (SET) 60000 S 25.5134 0 52554 $ 53,124 5 53,659 2 55,220 5 54,777 5 55,339 0 55,000 5 58,470 5 57,058 $ 57,543 $ 50235 0 51530 1136123 School Operating 100020 0 76752 g 157,752 0 159,372 $ 161,000 5 102,561 if 164,330 5 166016 0 167,718 $ 166430 $ 171,175 5 172,929 3 174,701 $ 170,490 $ 178,298 0 Total State Mllages Available for Capture by BRA 245000 $ 102,335 5 216338 0 217,436 $ 21413T/ 0 210,001 $ 210 107 $ 221,355 $ 223524 0 225,917 $ 228,233 $ 730,672 $ 232 935 0 236320 $ 237,731 $ 245,104 Looal Taxes - ffillIages 120151 40,513 $ 46920 County Operotrng 4.0930 0 17,440 $ 35,845 g 35,213 0 35555 5 36,980 9 37,339 $ 37,722 0 30,109 2 98,509 $ 36295 $ 39.203 3 35,696 g 40,103 2 01S A/located 0,1099 $ 952 0 1,752 0 1,770 $ 1,768 $ 1,805 5 1,1325 0 1,344 4 1,663 0 1,082 5 1591 5 1,920 8 1540 0 1500 g. 1,900 5 2,000 31,656 015 Voted 3.1534 5 135139 0 27,724 $ 26009 S 20205 5 25,537 0 28,880 if 29,175 5 29,476 3 29,770 5 30,000 0 30,391 5 30,705 0 31,017 $ 31,335 $ $ 15,830 OCC Poled 1,5819 g 0,745 0 13504 5 14005 5 141511 $ 14,295 0 14,442 0 14,590 $ 14,740 0 14,891 $ 15,043 5 15,19B $ 15,353 5 10511 5 15,659 $ 112514 CVT Operations 11.2737 0 48571 $ 98,803 .5 95017 5 100,942 3 101,877 3 102,923 $ 103,978 $ 105,6919 $ 100,122 $ 107,210 $ 105308 0 103513 0 110,539 $ 111,571 5 14,101 CAP IMP 1.4001 $ 5500 $ 12.349 $ 12578 if 12,604 5 12,734 $ 12,054 0 12,996 2 13.130 g 13264 2 13,400 $ 13,637 $ 13,875 5 13,1316 5 13558 Sanlefion 2,8153 0 12,917 5 24,70,3 $ 24,953 3 25209 $ 25.4513 g 25,729 0 25593 $ 26,260 if 26,529 0 26,1301 $ 27,076 5 21,353 $ 27,633 2 27,916 $ 26295 10507 Library 1.0000 $ 4264 5 8,764 $ 8,054 5 8,945 $ 9,637 0 9,129 $ 9,223 $ 6318 if 9513 5 9,510 if 9,007 5 9,706 $ 68115 0 9,905 0 5,500 Seniors SBNiCtS 05000 $ 2,132 $ 4,382 5 4,427 $ 4,472 $ 4,518 $ 4,565 3 4,512 y 4,659 $ 4.707 $ 4,755 $ 4,104 $ 4,853 $ 4.903 $ 4,953 $ 2,412 County Puts and Rea 02410 $ 1,025 $ 2,112 $ 2,134 g 2,158 0 2,1713 $ 2,200 $ 2,223 $ 2245 9 2,269 9 2202 $ 2,215 $ 2,339 0 2,383 $ 2,3137 3 2,147 HCMA 62146 $ 515 $ 1,8131 0 1,900 $ 1,920 $ 1,939 $ 1,259 $ 1,070 $ 2,000 $ 0,220 9 2,041 $ 2,002 $ 2,033 $ 2,104 9 2,126 9 12,005 OGPTA 0.99913 9 4,263 $ 4,752 5 0,952 $ 8,943 9 0,055 5 0,129 5 0,221 5 9,318 5 9,411 $ 9,505 9 9,505 $ 9,704 0 9,002 $ 9,003 3 Total Local ?Alleges Available for Captare by BRA 27,4917 9 117,224 $ 240,0100 $ 243,411 $ 045,910 $ 248,454 $ 260,953 $ 351,557 $ 255,192 $ 258,786 $ 261,459 $ 264,116 $ 266,024 $ 259,$57 $ 272,510 0 275,105 Total Available Tax Capture by BRA (Losal*State M11109es) 54.4317 $ 219560 $ 451,274 $ 455,037 $ 400,587 $ 485,316 $ 470,090 S 474,012 $ 479,785 $ 484,703 § 489,872 $ 194,605 $ 409,759 $ 504,577 $ 610,047 3 515,269 City administrative local 01451 $ 10,000 5 19,000 0 10,030 $ 10,0130 $ 10,000 0 10,000 5 10,000 0 10,030 3 12,0130 5 50.400 $ 33,000 $ 12.002 $ 10,502 $ 10,059 6 00,000 Stale Revolving Fund (3 tolls) $ 12,702 $ 26,292 $ 213,552 $ 26,835 $ 27,110 $ 27,369 5 27,870 $ 27,953 $ 28,240 $ 28,529 $ 25,822 9 29,117 5 29,415 $ 29,717 $ 30,221 Annual State Incremont Capture. by BRA for Reimbursement $ 89,544 $ 104,044 $ 185,934 $ 187,042 $ 189,771 $ 531,710 5 103,885 $ 195,671 $ 197,677 $ 109,704 $ 201,750 0 703,813 $ 255,905 $ 208,014 S 9 210,143 255,105 Amami Lneal Increment Caplufe by BRAfer Reimbursement $ 107,224 $ 230,938 0 233,413 $ 235,518 $ 230,434 0 240,963 5 243,557 $ 245.152 $ 245,785 3 251,439 $ 254,118 $ 258,824 $ 259,557 $ 202,316 Total Annual Increment Capture by SRA for Relrebursemene' $ 196,755 § 414,962 $ 410,345 $ 423,762 $ 4213,205 $ 432,701 9 437,245 $ 441,032 1 445,463 I 451,14$ $ 4$0,955 $ 400,642 $ 459,427 $ 470,330 $ 476,240 Nen-Environmental Costs State Tax Reimbursement $ 70,471 $ 144,943 9 146,329 § 147,531 $ 149,348 $ 100,003 $ 152,429 $ 153,595 $ 155,571 $ 157,166 $ 150,776 $ 102,404 5 152,049 $ 183,705 g 565,3131 Local Tau Reimbursement 9 04,003 3 101,747 $ 183,693 $ 100,557 $ 137,040 $ 109,052 $ 101,579 $ 196723 0 195,793 5 197,8131 S 109,98E1 $ 202,119 $ 204,270 0 2105,441 $ 208,535 Unrelmbursed Noe-Environmental Costs $ 5,598,759 $ 9,440,004 $ 5,117,300 $ 5,787,283 $ 6463,792 $ 5,115,741 $ 4,778,264 $ 4,432,157 9 4,004,437 $ 3,733,073 $ 3,375525 $ 3,010,262 9 2,555,723 $ 2,280,423 $ 1,920,276 $ 1,549,759 Environmental Costs $ 44,762 State Tax Reimbursement $ 10.073 $ 39,202 $ 30,805 $ 42,331 $ 40,422 $ 40,337 $ 41,200 9 41,579 $ 42,106 $ 42,535 $ 42.074 6 43,414 9 43,150 0 44,300 Local Tax Reimbursement $ 22,330 $ 45.193 0 49,719 $ 50,252 $ 30,708 $ 51,331 $ 53,879 0 52,434 9 52,903 $ 53,550 $ 54,128 $ 54,705 9 55,287 0 55,1375 0 60.469 Unrelinbursed PnVinanmentel Costs 0 1,7855913 $ 1,744,087 5 1,655,684 $ 5,566,371 $ 1,474,110 $ 1,384,900 $ 1,292,732 $ 1,199,597 S 1,195,4134 $ 1,010,395 9 914,299 $ 817,187 5 710,050 $ 019,022 $ 519,739 5 410,000 Brownfield Plan Costs Local Tax Reimbursement $ - $ - - $ - 0 , $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 9 - $ - $ Unrelinbursed Brownfield Costs $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,1300 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,060 5 10,00 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 15000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 5 10,030 $ 10,00D Annual Reimbursement lo !Developer $ 196.790 $ 414,502 $ 419,345 0 423,762 $ 420,205 $ 432,701 $ 437,242 $ 441,833 $ 445,453 $ 451,143 $ 455,666 0 450.042 5 465,462 $ 070,335 $ 476,249 2032 (715) . 2n33 717 2034 (Y10) 2035 10191 2036 (y20) 2037(721) 2055)732) 2930(5231 2040 (Y24) 2041 1075) 2042)555) 2043 (077) 2044 (Y219) 500 (020) 2045 (220) Inillei7mble Value TaXable Value after imprevemear 3 2360651 0 10,345,265 5 10,442,731 10,712,731 0 3 10,553,208 16311,2153 0 5 10,656,743 10,422,740 0 5 10,706327 10,529,327 5 3 13572,901 10,534,501 5 5 10,981,710 10,745,710 0 3 11,651,527 19,055,537 0 9 11,202,442 10,966,443 0 3 11,314,457 11,0713,157 5 5 11,427,512 11,191512 5 $ 10,541583 11,305,888 3 3 11,657,307 11,421,397 0 9 11,7735130 11,537,800 9 9 11,801,810 11,655,519 . Total Capturable Taxable Wire 3 10,101,298 3 State Taxes - Villages 59,227 3 95,534 State Lducation Tex(SET) 3.02010 5 50,656 3 51,276 $ 61,903 0 52,538 0 03,575 3 63,822 $ 94,474 9 65,133 9 55,709 0 55,471 0 67,150 5 57535 0 50,520 9 School Operelino 100200 5 151,967 0 303,820 0 105,710 0 107,509 9 189,528 $ 191,405 0 103.453 5 195,359 9 197,398 9 100,412 9 201549 $ 201,593 5 255,5134 0 237,502 0 209,801 Total State 01111a4e0 Available for Capture by DIRA 24.1)001) 5 242,823 3 246,150 3 247,013 5 250,145 3 202,704 9 250,000 3 251,051 3 260,532 9 363,195 5 355,853 9 268,599 5 271,241 9 374,112 $ 276509 3 270,735 1ootil Taxes - 71115550 12030) ... 47,100 9 47,571 County Operating 4.0500 3 41,347 9 41,770 5 42,157 5 42,020 9 43,055 9 43,505 5 43,950 5 44,350 8 44,053 0 45,311 0 45,774 9 45,241 7 46,713 0 015 Allocated 0.1599 9 2,021 9 2,042 5 2,052 $ 2.004 9 2,105 0 2,126 9 2,140 9 2,170 5 2,192 0 2,215 $ 2,237 5 2,283 3 2,203 9 2,308 0 2.330 019 Voted 3,1634 0 31560 $ 22,327 5 32,817 5 34,511 5 33,308 5 33,045 9 33,593 $ 04,340 9 34,891 0 30,740 0 35,424 9 35,765 $ 39,130 0 36,499 5 30,071 OCC Voted 1.5819 5 15,922 3 15,155 5 19.321 5 16,488 5 30,530 5 10,527 9 16,909 0 17,172 9 11.040 0 17,525 5 17,754 9 17,885 5 18.007 0 15,252 5 15,438 GVT Operators 11.2737 3 113,063 0 115,135 9 115,313 5 117,503 3 110,704 7 115.918 5 121,144 0 122,333 3 123,032 9 124,205 5 120,171 5 127,459 3 128,763 5 133,075 9 131,402 18,424 CAP 1101° 1.4091 5 14.245 5 14,391 0 14,538 5 14,087 9 34,037 5 14,860 5 15,142 0 15,207 0 15,453 9 10.015 2 15,770 9 15,931 5 16594 9 16,25B $ San-flagon 2.6103 9 20.451 3 213,783 3 24,557 5 29,374 5 29,675 3 29,978 3 30,255 9 30,554 0 30,305 9 31,222 3 31,541 $ 31,853 5 32,185 9 32,517 0 32,940 Library 1.0030 5 10,109 3 10,213 3 10,317 7 10.423 5 10,529 0 10.637 9 167413 5 10,1358 9 10,060 5 11,078 0 11,192 3 11,305 5 11,421 5 11,550 1 11,910 Seniors Services 65000 5 5,055 9 5,105 9 5,159 5 5,211 9 5,265 $ 5,318 9 5,373 9 5,428 5 5,493 0 5,539 5 3,595 9 5,053 0 5,711 0 5,769 0 513213 County Parks and Rex 0.2410 5 2,438 3 2,461 9 2,485 5 2,512 5 2,5313 9 2,554 0 2,500 0 2,015 S 2.043 9 2,670 $ 2,557 9 2,725 5 2,755 0 2,751 5 2,809 IPCMA 0.2146 4 2,160 9 2,192 3 2,214 5 2,237 5 2,200 $ 2,203 g 2,308 0 2,330 9 2,353 0 2,377 S 2,402 5 2,425 5 2,451 9 2,475 3 5 2,501 OGPTA 06908 5 15,107 9 13,211 9 10,315 3 10,421 5 10,327 7 10,635 0 10,744 9 10.050 0 10,984 9 11,2713 0 11,309 5 11,304 0 11,410 9 11,538 11,653 Total Local Millages Available for Capture Idy BRA 27.4917 0 777,521 5 007,795 5 353.530 0 289,640 3 2139,469 5 282,429 9 294,420 0 2913,437 9 301,486 5 304,90 5 387.557 5 210.010 5 313,001 0 317,107 5 320,432 Total Avallable Tax Capture by BRA (Local-, State MIllan914 51.4517 S 520,544 5 525,972 9 631,245 5 030,550 5 542,173 5 547,717 9 553,317 S 080,955 9 084,680 5 010,446 3 579,279 3 582,159 5 509,103 3 694,136 5 600,157 City administrathde (local only) $ 10,003 $ 10,009 $ 10,003 $ 10,005 $ 10,000 $ 10,050 S 10,000 § 10,003 $ 10.000 g 10.000 $ - $ - $ - 3 - 5 State Revolving Fund (3 mifia) $ 30,328 $ 30,838 $ 30,952 $ 31,2813 $ 31,588 $ 31,911 $ 32,237 $ 32,357 $ 32,5130 $ 33,235 $ - $ - $ - 9 - $ - Annual Stale Increment Capture by BRA for Reinbursernent $ 212,295 $ 514.487 $ 216,601 $ 218,877 $ 205,511 $ 130,020 3 150,200 3 100,003 $ 330,000 $ 100,030 s - $ - 9 - 0 - 0 Annual Luca/ Increment Capture by BRA tot Reimbursement 9 257,521 $ 270,757 $ 273,836 $ 199,332 $ 100,000 $ 120,030 5 135,000 $ 703.003 $ - 0 - $ - $ - 9 - 3 - $ Total Annual Frionunoat Capture by BRA for Reirnburseinene $ 490,210 5 486,254 0 490,297 $ 415,409 5 358,031 1 240,000 .$ 230,000 $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 190,000 $ - $ - $ - - $ Non-mum. Non-Environmental Costs - 3,075,677 State Tax Reimbursement $ 167,075 $ 159,714 $ 170,511 $ 172,255 $ 157,578 3 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5 $ - $ - $ $ LutelT015Rabbursernent $ 250,852 $ 213,092 $ 215,352 $ 70,462 $ - $ - $ - $ - 9 - 9 - $ - $ - $ - 9 - 3,001o073 $ Linreimbureed Non-Environmental Costs $ 1,168,332 $ rfasAss 5 400,599 $ 157,675 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - - $ - $ - 3 - $ - 509110- Envlronmental Costs Slate-fax Reimbursement s 45,220 $ 45,393 9 45,150 $ 46,622 $ 42,733 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 9 - $ - - 832,454 Local Tex Reirnbuireament $ 57,059 $ 57,875 $ 00,006 $ 15,373 $ - $ - 0 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 953,043 Unreleibursed Environmental Costs $ 016,510 9 212,551 $ 108,425 9 42,733 $ - 5 - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 7 - $ - Brownfield Plan Brownfield Nan Costs Local Tax Reimbursement $ - $ - $ - $ 10,009 $ - $ - $ - $ - 9 - $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 $ 10,000 Unreimbursed Brownfield Cos's $ 10,900 $ 19,000 $ 15000 $ - $ - $ - 3 - $ .. $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ TOTAL Annual Reimbursement to Developer $ 460,216 $ 405,234 $ 496,297 $ 310,409 $ 206551 $ - $ - 0 - § - $ - s - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0294,749 1.5R9F Lace! Sae Remedlallon Fund il_SREIF1131 $ sosoco Slate Tex Contribution 5 - $ $ - 3 - $ - $ 102,200 $ 100,000 $ 100,057 $ 130,020 g 106,030 $ - 9 - $ - $ - $ - LonA Tax nordributIon $ - $ - S - 9 105000 $ 100,000 $ 100,003 $ 100,0510 0 107.756 $ - $ - $ - * - $ - s - $ 000.050 Total LSRFF Contribution 3 - $ - $ - 5 105000 $ 100,6100 $ 200,000 $ 207,069 0 505.000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4 1,000,0011 Ol Assumes 50% taxa Ile value by December of ths first year of con Auction 120 8). Taxable value growth estimated at 1% per year after fat value is reached by December 2017. i4Thla projection does not nelude personat property lax due to the muerte* of availabilly; however, if available personal orooenv tax %alba captured '''The capture for the LSRRF volt AO once sufficient local or state taxes are availabla to fund at $100,00 0 annually UR 5 consecuhVe years. City of Pontiac Building & Safety Department 47450 Woodward Avenue Pontiac, Michigan 48342 (248) 758-2800 Blight Determination The Following Premises meet the State of Michigan Definition of Blight and are recognized to be in a "Blighted condition: Address: 2100 Opdyke PIN: 19-03-200-020 Under Act 381 (Michigan's Brownfield Statute) "Blighted" means property that meets any of the following criteria as determined by the governing body: (iv) Has had the utilities, plumbing, heating, or sewerage permanently disconnected, destroyed, removed, or rendered ineffective so that the property is unfit for its intended use. (vii) Has substantial subsurface demolition debris buried on site so that the property is unfit for its intended use.. PREMISES: A lot, plot or parcel of land, easement or public way, including any structures thereon. Michael J. Wils6n, Building Official City of Pontiac, Michigan 11/30/2015 Date Resolution #16006 January 20, 2016 Moved by Kochenderfer supported by Quarles the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Fleming, Gershenson, Gingell, Gosselin, Hoffman, Jackson, Kochenderfer, KowaII, Long, McGillivray, Middleton, Quarles, Scott, Spisz, Taub, Weipert, Zack, Bowman, Crawford, Dwyer. (20) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). k I IrVIEBY APPROVE THIS RESOLUTION CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE ACTING PURSUANT TO IvICL 45.559A (7) STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on January 20, 2016, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 20th day of January, 2016. .-d1-61522- Lisa Brown, Oakland County