HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2016.08.18 - 22487MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION # 16188
BY: Commissioner Helaine Zack, District #18
IN RE: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS — PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM —
MULTIPLE YEAR PROJECT PLAN REQUIRING THE ROLL OVER OF COMMUNITY ALLOCATION —
CITY OF FERNDALE — RESURFACING OF VESTER STREET
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS from the City of Ferndale has submitted a Local Road Improvement Program application with
a multiple year project plan requiring the roll-over and accrual of the City's maximum county contribution
authorized in the current year's approved distribution formula; and
WHEREAS the proposed budget for the identified project, the resurfacing of Vester Street, requires the
accrual of three (3) years maximum county contribution at the current distribution amount for the City of
Ferndale of $25,237; and
WHEREAS the Board of Commissioners established policies and procedures for the Local Road
Improvement Program with the adoption of Miscellaneous Resolution #16103; and
WHEREAS MR #16103 authorized the Local Road Improvement Subcommittee to establish policies and
procedures regarding the limited roll-over and accrual of a municipality's allocation for projects plans that
require additional county funding; and
WHEREAS the Local Road Improvement Subcommittee has adopted a policy authorizing a municipality
to submit a multi-year plan for projects that require the accrual of the municipality's allocation for a
maximum of three (3) years; and
WHEREAS approval of multiple year plan and accrual of a municipality's allocation is subject to approval
by the Board of Commissioners; and
WHEREAS a project multi-year plan is to be utilized solely for planning purposes and does not obligate
Oakland County in any way to funding a project; and
WHEREAS roll-over and accrual of a municipality's allocation is subject to the continuation of the Local
Road Improvement Program, which has been established as a pilot program; and
WHEREAS a municipality's allocation is subject to change from year to year based upon the factors
utilized in current distribution formula and amendments to the distribution formula approved by the Board
of Commissioners; and
WHEREAS the Local Road Improvement Subcommittee has reviewed the plan submitted by the City of
Ferndale for the resurfacing of Vester Street and is recommending that the Board of Commissioners
authorize the City of Ferndale's 2016 and 2017 allocations roll-over for consideration of the project in
2018, contingent upon continuation of the program; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners authorizes the City of Ferndale
to roll-over their allocation under the Local Road Improvement Program for 2016 and 2017 for the
purpose of the City to submit an application for the resurfacing of Vester Street in 2018, contingent upon
the continuation of the program..
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Clerk is requested to forward copies of this
resolution to Oakland County Fiscal Services and the City of Ferndale.
Chairperson, I move the adoption of the foregoing Resolution.
Commissioner Helaine Zack
District #18
Resolution #16188 July 20, 2016
Commissioner Middleton, Acting Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee. There
were no objections.
RETURN TO AGENDA
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
1200 N. Telegraph Road
Pontiac, MI 48341-0475
Phone: (248) 858-0100
Fax: (248) 858-1572
2016 APPLICATION FORM
LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PILOT PROGRAM
Background: Oakland County has established a Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Pilot
Program for the purposes of improving economic development in Oakland County cities and villages.
The County intends this Program to assist its municipalities by offering limited matching funds for
specific, targeted road maintenance and/or improvement projects on roadways under the jurisdiction
of cities and villages.
Project Policies and Guidelines: The Oakland County Board of Commissioners and the Local Road
Improvement Subcommittee has established policies, procedures and guidelines for project
consideration. These documents have been included as Attachment "A".
Available Funding: Oakland County's maximum contribution for projects in eligible cities or villages
has been established within the distribution formula included as Attachment "B",
Required Matching Funds: A city or village participating in the Local Road Improvement Matching
Fund program shall match any funds authorized by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners in
an amount equal to a minimum of 50% of the cost of the total project award. Funding shall be utilized
to supplement and enhance local road maintenance and improvement programs. Funding is not
intended to replace existing budgeted local road programs or to replace funding already committed to
road improvements.
REQUESTING LOCAL GOVERNMENT
MUNICIPALITY
City of Ferndale
CONTACT PERSON
Loyd Cureton, DPW Director
Scott Ringler (Giffels Webster)
TELEPHONE NUMBER
248-546-2514
248-852-3100
STREET ADDRESS
City Hall
300 East Nine Mile
UPI/ZIP
Ferndale, MI 48220
E-MAIL ADDRESS
dpwdirector@fernalemi.com
sringler@giffelswebstercom
PROJECT INFORMATION
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Vester Resurfacing
ROAD/ROAD(S) TO BE IMPROVED
Vester (Woodward Avenue to Bermuda)
DESCRIPTION
Asphalt resurfacing of Vester from Woodward to Bermuda.
PROJECT BUDGET
FUNDING REQUESTED LOCAL MATCH TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Please see Optional Multi-Year Project Plan for description of expenditures
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF PROJECT
The Local Road Improvement Pilot Program has been established under MCL 123.872, the Gifts of Property Act, which
provides that 'A county may grant or loan funds to a township, village, or city located within that county for the purpose
of encouraging and assisting businesses to locate and expand within the county."
DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS THE STATUTORY REQUIRMENT OF ENCOURAGING AND ASSISTING BUSINESS TO LOCATE AND
EXPAND IN THE COUNTY
The Vester Avenue resurfacing project would be a benefit to the community and the existing
businesses located on Vester by allowing existing and potential customers to reach the targeted
businesses which has shown to increase patronage to businesses.
Vester Avenue has seen a resurgence in business activity with the recent opening of Valentine
Distilling and the IVI-Brew. The City is targeting other businesses to relocate to this commercial and
retail strip. Resurfacing the road and including additional on-street parking will enable the City to
market this street as a viable location for new business or expansion of an existing business.
OPTIONAL MULTI-YEAR PROJECT PLAN
The Local Road Improvement Program has been expressly established as a pilot program. There is no guarantee the
program will be continued from year to year. The Local Road Improvement Program Subcommittee recognizes that the
allocation authorized for local governments may not provide adequate funding in a single year to allow a project to
move forward. Local governments shall be offered the opportunity to submit project plans that would necessitate the
accumulation of multiple years of the community's allocation amount to fulfill the County's share of a project budget. A
multi-year proiect plan submittal shall not exceed three years in duration. The allocation amount available to each
community is subject to change annually based upon the factors utilized in the distribution formula. Consideration of
multi-year project plans does not obligate Oakland County in any way to fund any project or program in the future.
These plans are meant to be utilized for planning purposes and for consideration by the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners to authorize a limited carryover of a community's allocation year to year.
DESCRIPTION OF MULTI-YEAR PLAN INCLUDING ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET AND CARRYOVER PERIOD OF COMMUNITY'S
ALLOCATION
The City wishes to include the Vester Avenue Resurfacing project as a multi-year project plan in
order to accumulate sufficient allocated funds for the work to be constructed in a single construction
season.
Funding Requested: 2016 = $23,257, 2017 = +/- $23,257, 2018 = $23,257 Total = +/- $69,777
Local match: 2016 = $23,257, 2017 = +/- $23,257, 2018 = $23,257 Total = +/- $69,777
Total Project Budget: estimated at $250,000
Proposed Project Expenditures: Project expenditures would include construction work required for
resurfacing / repairing the existing road to include pavement removal and replacement, new curb
and gutter, cold milling and resurfacing of the road.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Local Road Improvement Program Subcommittee of the Finance Committee of the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners has been tasked with managing this program and making recommendations for project approval. Please
supply any additional information you believe may be helpful in the consideration of your application.
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The work that would be performed on Vester would be a continuation of the City's successful
resurgence of Downtown Ferndale including East and Nine Mile resurfacing and streetscape
projects that have proven to be a great success and catalyst to encouraging and assisting
businesses to locate or expand within the City.
REPORT FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT
MCL 123.872 requires that the grant or loan contract made by a county shall require a report to the county board of
commissioners regarding the activities of the recipient and the degree to which the recipient has met the stated public
purpose of the funding".
I, on behalf of the City of Ferndale , have been provided with a copy of the
Policies and Procedures of the Local Road Improvement Program (Attachment "A") and agree to comply with these
terms and conditions.
I, on behalf of the City of Ferndale ,understand and agree to comply with the
requirement to provide the Oakland County Board of Commissioners with a report following the completion of an
approved project outlining the degree to which the project met the stated purpose of the funding.
07/08/2016
Signature of Authorized Party Date
Justin Lyons, City Planner
Printed Name and Title
Please return completed application to: Local Road Improvement Subcommittee
Oakland County Board of Commissioners
1200 N. Telegraph Road
Pontiac, MI 48341-0475
A pdf copy of application can be emailed to: Chris Ward, Senior Analyst wa rcicc@oa 1<gov.com
Questions regarding the application and approval process should be directed to Chris Ward at the email address above
or by phone at (248)858-0111
Attachment "A"
PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PROGRAM
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Oakland County Government recognizes that Michigan law places the primary responsibility for road
funding on the State and non-county local units of government. However, the County also recognizes
that the law does permit a limited, discretionary role for the County in assisting a road commission and
local units within a county by supporting some road maintenance and improvement efforts.
Accordingly, for many years Oakland County has voluntarily provided limited assistance to its cities,
villages and townships (CVT's) and to the Road Commission of Oakland County (11C0C) by investing in a
discreVonary Tr-Party Road Program. Authorized under Michigan law, the County's tri-party funding
contributions primarily facilitate safety improvement projects on CVT roads under the jurisdiction of the
RCOC. By law, tri-party funds cannot be used to fund projects on roads solely under the jurisdiction of
CVT's.
Recognizing a continuing need to better maintain local CVT streets and roads, yet being ever mindful of
the County's limited responsibility for and jurisdiction over non-county roads and streets, Oakland
County Government wishes to pilot a discretionary program that is more flexible than the current Tr-
Party Road Program, one that will allow Oakland County to assist its cities and villages with maintenance
and safety projects on non-county roads.
Not being the funding responsibility of County government, local CVT roads generally cannot be
maintained or improved using county funds because doing so would be considered to be the "gifting" of
County resources. However laudable the purpose, Michigan law generally forbids the gifting of
government resources. To avoid application of the constitutionally-based gifting restriction, the state
legislature must, and in this arena has, determine that a public benefit results from a taxpayer
investment, one that provides a quid pro quo sufficient to avoid application of the gifting prohibition.
Here, the legislature has determined that the economic development benefit presumed to accrue to a
county as a result of local street and road investments can provide a sufficient quid pro quo to county
taxpayers justifying a discretionary county investment in a non-county road, a benefit that constitutes a
fair exchange for value and not a gift.
This legislative determination is set forth in 1985 P.A. 9, which amended 1913 PA, 380, by adding a new
section 2, which in pertinent part provides:
"(1)...A county may grant or loan funds to a township, village or city located within that county
for the purpose of encouraging and assisting businesses to locate and expand within the
county...
(2) A loan or grant made under subsection (1) may be used for local public improvements or to
encourage and assist businesses in locating or expanding in this state, to preserve jobs in this
state, to encourage investment in the communities in this state, or for other public purposes."
Cornmunitiel; that wish to attract, retain and grow business, retain jobs and encourage community
investment, needs a safely maintained road infrastructure. This road infrastructure must include both
residential and commercial roads as workers and consumers need to get to and from work, shopping,
schools and recreation. In a fiscally prudent and limited manner, the County wishes to help its cities and
villages accomplish this objective by test-piloting a new local road improvement matching fund program.
Any such program must be mindful of the limits imposed under Public Act 9, One important restriction
Public Act 9 imposed on grants or loans made pursuant subsection 2 of the Act is the mandate that, "A
grant or loan under this subsection shall not be derived from ad valorem taxes except for ad valorem
taxes approved by a vote of the people for economic development." This means that funding for an
expanded local road assistance program cannot utilize proceeds from any of Oakland County's ad
valorem tax levies since no levy has been approved by voters specifically for economic development.
Given this limitation, it appears that the state statutory revenue sharing appropriated to the County can
provide a non-ad valorem source of funds that legally can be used to support the pilot program.
Competition for those funds, which are limited in amount, Is fierce and their yearly availability is subject
to the state legislative process. In the recent past, the State stripped all of those funds away from
Michigan counties, Understanding that reality, it shall be the policy of the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners that the Board shall riot appropriate any county funds for a local road improvement
matching fund program for non-county roads in any year where the State of Michigan fails to
appropriate statutory revenue sharing funds to Oakland County in an amount sufficient to allow the
County to first prudently address its core functions.
Act 9 imposes additional conditions on grants and loans. These include requirements that the loan or
grant shall be administered within an established application process for proposals; that any grant or
loan shall be made at a public hearing of the county board of commissioners and that the Board shall
require a report to the county board of commissioners regarding the activities of the recipient and a
report as to the degree to which the recipient has met the stated public purpose of the funding.
Understanding all of the above, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners hereby establishes the
following Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program:
PROGRAM SUMMARY
The Board of Commissioners establishes a Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program for
the purposes of improving economic development in Oakland County cities and villages, The County
intends this Program to assist Its municipalities by offering limited matching funds for specific, targeted
road maintenance and/or improvement projects on roadways under the jurisdiction of cities and
vii lages.
A city or village participating in the Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program shall match any
fund authorized by the Board of Commissioners in an amount equal to a minimum of 50% of the cost of
the total project award. County participation shall be limited to a maximum of 50% of the cost of the
total project budget. Funding shall be utilized to supplement and enhance local road maintenance and
improvement programs. Funding is not intended to replace existing budgeted local road programs or to
replace funding already committed to road improvements.
PROJECT GUIDELINES
Program funding shall be utilized solely for the purposes of road improvements to roads under the
jurisdiction of local cities and villages. Road improvements may include, but not be limited to, paving,
resurfacing, lane additions or lengthening, bridges, or drainage as such improvements relate to road
safety, structure or relieving congestion.
Program funding:
May be utilized to supplement a local government's matched funding for the purposes of receiving
additional federal transportation funding;
May not be utilized to fulfill a local government's responsibility to fund improvements to state
trunklines;
Shall be limited to real capital improvements to roadways and shall not be utilized for other purposes,
such as administrative expenses, personnel, consultants or other similar purposes;
Shall not be utilized for non-motorized improvements, unless these improvements are included in a
project plan for major improvements to a motorized roadway;
Shall be utilized for projects that will result in a measurable improvement in the development of the
Focal economy and contribute to business growth. Recipients shall be responsible for providing an
outline of the economic benefits of the project prior to approval and for reporting to the Board of
Commissioners after the completion of the project on the benefits achieved as a result of the projects.
ADMINISTRATION
Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program projects may be appropriated by the Board of
Commissioners in compliance with the County budget process. The amount of funds to be dedicated for
the Pilot Program shall be determined by the Board of Commissioners on an annual basis. Program
funding may be reduced or eliminated based upon the ability of the County government to meet
primary constitutional and statutory duties. The Board of Commissioners expressly reserves the right to
adjust the County matching funds share at any time based upon County budget needs.
In accordance with MCL 123,872, funds dedicated to the Local Road Improvement Matching Fund
Program shall not be derived from ad valorem tax revenues. Program funding shall be limited to funds
derived from the County's distribution from the Michigan General Revenue Sharing Act. Reduction or
elimination of the County's distribution of revenue sharing funds may result in the elimination or
suspension of the program.
Funding availability shall be distributed based upon a formula updated annually. The formula will consist
of:
1, A percentage derived from the number of certified local major street miles in each city and
village divided by aggregate total of certified local major street miles of all cities and villages in
the county.
2. A percentage derived from the population of each city and village as determined by the last
decennial census conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau divided by the aggregate total
population of cities and villages in the county,
3. A percentage derived from the three year rolling total of the number of crashes on city and
village major local streets divided by the aggregate three year rolling crash numbers for all city
and village major local streets. The crash data will be supplied by the Road Commission for
Oakland County using data from the Traffic Improvement Association.
Each city and villages percentage allocation shall be determined by adding each factor percentage and
dividing that total by three. The amount of funds available for match shall be determined by the total
amount of funds allocated by the Board of Commissioners added to an equal amount representing the
match provided by local cities and villages.
The Chairman of the Finance Committee of the Board of Commissioners shall establish a Subcommittee
on the Local Road Improvement Program. This subcommittee shall consist of three members, with two
members representing the majority caucus and one member representing the minority caucus. It shall
be the responsibility of the Subcommittee to direct the administration of this program, receive
applications for program funding and make recommendation of acceptance to the Finance Committee
and Board of Commissioners. The Subcommittee may consult with county departments, staff and the
Road Commission for Oakland County in the conduct of its business.
DISBURSEMENT
The Subcommittee shall forward recommendations for approval of Local Road Improvement Matching
Fund Program projects to the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners. This recommendation shall
include a cost participation agreement between the County and participating municipality. Minimally,
cost participation agreements shall include: responsibility for administering the project, the project
location, purpose, scope, estimated costs including supporting detail, provisions ensuring compliance
with project guidelines, as well as disbursement eligibility requirements, The cost participation
agreement shall also require the maintenance of supporting documentation to ensure compliance with
the following provisions:
1. Any and all supporting documentation for project expenditures reimbursed with appropriated funding
shall be maintained a minimum of seven years from the date of final reimbursement for actual
expenditures incurred.
2. The Oakland County Auditing Division reserves the right to audit any and all project expenditures
reimbursed through the program.
Upon receipt of recommendation of project approval from the Subcommittee, the County
Commissioner or Commissioners, representing the area included in the proposed project, may introduce
a resolution authorizing approval of the project and the release of funds. Resolutions shall be forwarded
to the Finance Committee of the Board of Commissioners, who shall review and issue a
recommendation to the Board on the adoption of the resolution. The Chairperson of the Finance
Committee shall schedule a public hearing before the Board of Commissioners prior to consideration of
final approval of the resolution.
The deadline for projects to be submitted for consideration shall be established by the Subcommittee.
The Subcommittee may work with participating municipalities to develop a plan for projects that exceed
that municipality's annual allocation amount. This may include a limited plan to rollover that
municipality's allocation for a period of years until enough funding availability has accrued to complete
the project, subject to funding availability.
Upon completion of project plans and execution of the local participation agreement by the County and
governing authority of the local municipality, the participating municipality shall submit an invoice in
accordance with the terms and conditions included in the agreement. The Oakland County Department
of Management and Budget Fiscal Services Division shall process payments in accordance with policies
and procedures as set forth by the Department of Management and Budget and the Oakland County
Treasurer,
In the event an eligible local unit of government chooses not to participate in the Local Road
Improvement Matching Fund Program, any previously undistributed allocated funding may be re-
allocated to all participating local units of government in accordance with the formula included in this
policy.
At the completion of each project, the participating local government shall provide a report to the Board
of Commissioners regarding the activities of the recipient and the degree to which the recipient has met
the stated public purpose of the funding as required by MCL 123.872,
LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE, OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Provision regarding existing funded local road programs and proiects. The standard project agreement
shall require participating municipalities to acknowledge that the Local Road Improvement Program is
meant to supplement and to not replace funding for existing road programs or projects.
Fulfillment of economic benefit provisions of MCL 123.872. The Pilot Local Road Improvement Program
has been established by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners under the authority granted by
MCL 123.872, which provides that "A county may grant or loan funds to a township, village or city
located within that county for the purposes of encouraging and assisting businesses to locate and
expand within the county". It shall be the responsibility of the municipality to outline the extent to
which the project included in their application will meet these standards. The Subcommittee shall only
consider projects that meet the standards provided in MCL 123.872. The standard project agreement
shall include a provision requiring the participating municipality to fulfill the statutory requirement
included in MCL 123.872 that, "the grant or loan contract made by county shall require a report to the
county of board of commissioners regarding the activities of the recipient and the degree to which the
recipient has met the stated purpose of the funding."
Multi-year projects. The Local Road Improvement Program has been expressly established as a pilot
program. There is no guarantee the program will be continued from year to year. The Subcommittee
recognizes that the allocation authorized for local governments may not provide adequate funding in a
single year to allow a project to move forward. Local governments shall be offered the opportunity to
submit project plans that would necessitate the accumulation of multiple years of the community's
allocation amount to fulfill the county's share of a project budget. A multi-year project plan submittal
shall not exceed three years in duration. The allocation amount available to each community is subject
to change annually based upon the factors utilized in the formula. Consideration of multi-year project
plans does not obligate Oakland County in any way to funding any project or program in the future.
These plans are meant to be utilized for planning purposes and for consideration by the Oakland County
Board of Commissioners regarding authorizing a limited carryover of a community's allocation year to
year.
Completion of projects and submittal of post-project report. The standard cost participation agreement
shall include a provision requiring the municipality to complete the project and submit the required
post-project completion report prior to the end of the next calendar year following the date of project
approval. An alternative schedule may be approved for a project by action of the Board of
Commissioners, upon recommendation of the Subcommittee.
PRELIMINARY D1STRUBUTION FORMULA Attachnieilt OAKLAND COUNTY LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PILOT PROGRAM 2.80% 236 134% 2.99% 559,753 $29,8771 !Auburn Hills 32.33 4.82% 21,412 t l Berkley 15.63 2.33% 14,970 1.96% 55 0.31% 1.53% 530,683 - $15,342 ;Beverly Hills 10.99 1.64% 10,267 1.24% 40 0.23% 1.07% $21,398 510,6991 i Bingham Farms 1.02 0.15% 1,111 0.15% 54 0.31% 0.20% $4,025 $2,013 Birmingham 21.87 3.26% 20,103 2.63% 580 3.29% 3.06% $61,196 _.. 5 30.5 98 ' Bloomfield Hills 8.83 132% 3,869 0.51% 235 1.33% 1.05% $21,039 $10,520 ! l Clarkston 1.48 0.22% 882 0.12% 37 0.21% 0.18% 53,640 $1,820 [Claw50n 9.62 144% 11,825 1.55% 134 0.76% 1.25% $24,960 512,4801 ; Farmington 736 1.10% 10,372 1.3F.% 183 1.04% 1.16% $23,284 $11,642 Farmington Hills 58.36 8.71% 79,740 10.43% 1955 11.08% 10.07% $201,492 $106,746 Ferndale 20.99 313% 19,900 2.60% 219 1.24% 2.33% $46,513 $23,257 Franklin 4.34 0.65% 3,150 0.41% 48 0.27% 0.44% $8,878 $4,439 L Hazel Park 17.12 2.55% 16,422 2.15% 188 1.06% 1.92% $38,445 $19,223 Holly 7 1.04% 6,086 0.80% 83 0.47% 0.77% $15,421 $7,711 Huntington Woods 6.95 1.04% 6,238 0.82% 58 0.33% 0.73% $14,533 $7,267 Keego Harbor 1.93 0.29% 2,970 0.39% 80 0A6% 0.38% $7,547 $3,774 Lake Angelus 0 0.00% 290 0.04% 22 0.12% 0.05% $1,084 $542 Lake Orion 2.74 0.41% 2,973 0.39% 123 0.70% 0.50% $9,980 $4,990 Lathrup Village 7,36 1.10% 4,075 0.53% 185 1.05% 0.89% $17,867 $8,934 Leonard 2,34 0.35% 403 0.05% 4 0.02% 0.14% $2,827 $1,409 Madison Heights 21.5 3.21% 29,694 3.89% 745 4.22% 3.77% $75,431 $37,716 Milford 7.3 109% 6,175 0.81% 108 0.61% 0.84% $16,716 $8,358 Northville* 0.8 0.12% 5,970 0.78% 109 0.62% 0.51% $10,110 $5,055 Novi 39.52 5.90% 55,224 7.23% 1313 7.44% 6.86% $237,104 $68,552 Oak Park 18.35 2.74% 29,319 3.84% 275 1.56% 2.71% $54,220 $27,110 Orchard Lake 1.8 0.27% 2,375 0.31% 120 0.68% 0.42% $8,397 $4,199 Ortonville 3.21 0.48% 1,442 0.19% 40 0.23% 0.30% $5,962 $2,981 Oxford 6.01 0,90% 3,436 0.45% 107 0.60% 0.65% $13,006 $6,503 Pleasant Ridge 3.59 0.54% 2,526 0.33% 145 0.82% 0.56% $11,254 $5,627 Pontiac 70.21 10.47% 59,515 7.79% 1264 7.16% 8.48% $169,507 $84,754 Rochester 8.59 1.28% 12,711 1.66% 245 1.39% 1.44% $28,879 $14,440 1Rochester Hills 38.61 5.76% 70,995 9.29% 1945 11.02% 8.69% 5173,830 $86,915 Royal Oak 63.96 9.54% 57,236 7.49% 1083 6.14% 7.72% 5154,461 $77,231 South Lyon 4.43 0.66% 11,327 1.48% 144 0.81% 0.99% 519,717 59,859 Southfield 64.71 9.65% 71,739 9.39% 2452 13.90% 10.98% $219,625 $109,813 Sylvan Lake 2.58 0.38% 1,720 0.23% 66 0.38% 0.33% $6,574 $3,287 Troy 57.34 8.55% 80,980 10.60% 2343 13.28% 10.81% $216,211 $108,106 Walled Lake 5.34 0.80% 6,999 0.92% 153 0.87% 0.86% $17,212 $8,606 Wixom 10.49 1.56% 13,498 1.77% 408 2.31% 1.88% $37,628 $18,814 Wolverine 3.69 0.55% 4,312 0.56% 57 033% 0.48% $9,598 $4,799 TOTAL 670.29 100.00% 764,251 100.00% 17,639 100.00% 100.00% $2,000,000 $1,000,000
FISCAL NOTE (MISC. *16188) August 18, 2016
BY: Finance Committee, Torn Middleton, Chairperson
IN RE: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS — PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM — MULTIPLE
YEAR PROJECT PLAN REQUIRING THE ROLL OVER OF COMMUNITY ALLOCATION — CITY OF
FERNDALE — RESURFACING OF VESTER STREET
TO: The Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution
and finds:
1. On May 18, 2016, the Board of Commissioners (BOC) approved Miscellaneous Resolution *16103
which designated $1,000,000 in fund balance for the Local Road Improvement Matching Program for
the purposes of improving economic development in Oakland County cities and villages.
2. Local Road Improvement Subcommittee has adopted a policy authorizing a municipality to submit a
multi-year plan for projects that require the accrual of the municipality's allocation for a maximum of
three (3) years.
3. The proposed budget for the identified project, the resurfacing of Vester Street from Woodward to
Bermuda, requires the accrual of three (3) years maximum county contribution at the current
distribution amount for the City of Ferndale of $25,237.
4. The Local Road Improvement Subcommittee and Board of Commissioners has reviewed the multi-
year plan application submitted by the City of Ferndale and authorized to roll-over the 2016 and 2017
allocation amounts for the purpose of the City to submit an application in 2018 for the Vester Street
resurfacing project.
5. The 2016 and 2017 roll-over allocation amounts for the City of Ferndale under the Local Road
Improvement Program will be retained in the Local Road Improvement Matching Program Assigned
Fund Balance (GL account *383465) and will require a separate resolution anticipated in 2018 to
appropriate funding for the Vester Street resurfacing project; contingent upon continuation of the
program.
6. The funding will be contingent upon the County's distribution from the Michigan General Revenue
Sharing Act. Reduction or elimination of the County's distribution of revenue sharing funds may result
in the elimination or suspension of the program.
7. No budget amendment is required at this time.
FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Long absent.
‘4,1
I HERM'? APPOIVE tHIS RESOLUTION
CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE
ACTING PURSUANT TO MCL 45.559A (7)
Resolution #16188 August 18, 2016
Moved by Fleming supported by Quarles the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent
Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
AYES: Dwyer; Fleming, Gingell, Hoffman, Jackson, Kochenderfer, Kowall , Long, McGillivray.
Middleton, Quarles, Scott, Spisz, Taub, Weipert, Woodward, Zack, Bowman, Crawford. (19)
NAYS: None, (0)
A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent
Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted).
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and
accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on July 20, 2016,
with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at
Pontiac, Michigan this 20th day of July, 2016.
Lisa Brown, Oakland County
1/4/1