Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2017.05.25 - 22958REPORT (MISC . #17155) May 25, 20'17 BY: Philip J. Weipert, Chairperson, Planning and Building Committee IN RE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES COMMISSIONER — NOTICE OF GRANT AGREEMENT AWARD AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN OAKLAND COUNTY AND THE US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE- NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (USDA-NRCS) To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Planning and Building Committee, having reviewed the above referenced resolution and supporting documents on May 16, 2017, reports with the recommendation that the County enter into the agreement with the U.S. Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service. The Committee further recommends funding for the total County share of the LiDAR Data in the amount of $45,350 split equally between the Water Resources Commissioner's Office and the Department of Information Technology be approved. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report. Commissioner Philip J. Weipert, District #8 Chairperson, Planning and Building Committee PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #17155 May 25, 2017 BY: Commissioner Thomas Middleton, Chairperson, Finance Committee IN RE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES COMMISSIONER — NOTICE OF GRANT AGREEMENT AWARD AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN OAKLAND COUNTY AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (USDA-NRCS) To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the USDA-NRCS has been awarded grant funding for cost sharing associated with the acquisition of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data under the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 3D Elevation Program (3DEP); and WHEREAS quality level 2 (QL2) LiDAR data will provide communities with the data to produce hyper accurate topographic contours for geographic information system (GIS) mapping and analysis; and WHEREAS QL2 LiDAR data has significant benefits for planning, floodplain mapping, wildlife and habitat management, recreation, flood modeling, site planning and many other uses; and WHEREAS the USDA-NRCS is contributing $1,816,972 for the program; and WHEREAS roughly 30 counties in Southern Lower Michigan will benefit from the program; and WHEREAS the broad support between the federal agencies and local units of government will allow Oakland County to acquire LiDAR data at roughly 40% of the cost necessary to acquire the data; and WHEREAS the County's cost to acquire the data and leverage the federal agency's contributions will be $50 per square mile plus boundary overlap for a total of $45,350 for Oakland County; and WHEREAS the total County contribution of $45,350 will be split equally between the Department of Information Technology and the Water Resources Commissioner's Office; and WHEREAS the acquisition of LiDAR data will provide an important data tool for the County's GIS at a much reduced cost; and WHEREAS the grant agreement has completed the Grant Review Process in accordance with Board of Commissioners Grant Acceptance Procedures. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners supports inclusion and authorizes participation in the USDA-NRCS's 2016 LiDAR Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board Chairperson is hereby authorized to enter into the attached grant agreement with USDA-NRCS in the amount of $45,350 to fund the 3DEP Program for the County of Oakland. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board Chairperson is hereby authorized to execute the attached Notice of Grant and Agreement Award, on behalf of the County of Oakland which will facilitate the reimbursement of funds to the USDA-NRCS. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant agreement does not obligate the County to any future commitment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the County's contribution of $45,350 is included in the FY 2017 budgets for the Department of Information Technology Fund (#63600) professional services account in the amount of $22,675 and the Water Resources Commissioner General Fund (#10100) contracted services in the amount of $22,675. Therefore, no budget amendment is required. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Commissioner Thomas Middleton, Chairperson, Finance Committee FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Woodward and Crawford absent. PLEASE NOTE: A revised agreement is attached that includes changes requested by Corporation Counsel. GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Information Technology and Water Resources Commissioner GRANT NAME: 2016 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) FUNDING AGENCY: USDA NRCS DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Anita Campbell 858-2388 STATUS: Acceptance DATE: April 26, 2017 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #13180, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The captioned grant materials and grant acceptance package (which should include the Board of Commissioners' Liaison Committee Resolution, the grant agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal Note, and this Sign Off email containing grant review comments) may be requested to be placed on the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution. DEPARTMENT REVIEW Department of Management and Budget: Approved. — Laurie Van Pelt (4/13/2017) Department of Human Resources: HR Approved (No Committee) — Lori Taylor (4/13/2017) Risk Management and Safety: Approved by Risk Management. — Robert Erlenbeck (4/17/2017) Corporation Counsel: I asked the USDA to make a few revisions to the original Grant Agreement regarding the amount that will be reimbursed by the County and applicable statutes/regulations. The USDA agreed to the revisions and the attached grant agreement contains those revisions. There are no unresolved legal issues with the attached grant agreement, thus, it has my APPROVAL. — Robert Rottach (4/26/2017) U.S. Department of Agriculture NRCS-ADS-093 Natural Resources Conservation Service 7/2012 NOTICE OF GRANT AND AGREEMENT AWARD 1. Award Identifying Number 68-5D21-17-105 2, Amendment No. 3. Award/Project Period Date of final signature - 1213112017 4. Type of Award Instrument Reimbursable 5. Agency: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (Name and Address) USDA NRCS 3001 Coolidge Road, Suite 250 East Lansing, MI 48823 6. Recipient Organization: (Name and Address) County of Oakland 1200 N TELEGRAPH RD, DEPT 470 ,PONTIAC, Ml, 48341-1036 DUNS: 136200362 EIN: 386004876 7. NRCS Program Contact: Daniel Vasher, 517-324-5248 dan.vasher@rni.usda.gov 8. IsIRCS Administrative Contact: Aileen Anderson, 315-221 -5884 aileen.anderson@wdc.usda.gov 9. Recipient Program Contact: Anita Campbell, 248.858.2388 campbella©oakgov.com 10. Recipient Administrative Contact: Anita Campbell, 248.858.2388 campbella@oakgov.com 11. CFDA Number 12. Authority 31 USC 6505 13. Type of Action New Agreement 14. Project Director 15. Project Title/Description: To facilitate Lidar acquisition in Oakland County, Michigan for public use. 16. Entity Type: Profit Nonprofit Higher Education Federal x State/Local Indian/Native American Other 18. Accounting and Appropriation Data Financial Code Amount Fiscal Year Treasury Symbol 17. Select Funding Type: Federal 1 Non-Federal $45,350.00 2017 Original Funds Total: $45,350.00 Additional Funds Total: Grand Total: $45,350.00 19. APPROVED BUDGET Personnel $ Fringe Benefits $ Travel $ Equipment $ Supplies $ Contractual Construction $ Other $ Total Direct Cost\ $ Total Indirect Cost $ Total Non-Federal Funds $ 4535000 1 Total Federal Funds Awarded $ Total Approved Budget $ 45,350.00 In accepting this award or amendment and any payments made pursuant thereto, the undersigned represents that he or she is duly authorized to act on behalf of the awardee organization, agrees that the award is subject to the applicable provisions of this agreement (and all attachments), and agrees that acceptance of any payments constitutes an agreement by the payee that the amounts, if any found by NRCS to have been overpaid, will be refunded or credited in full to NRCS. Page 1 U.S. Department of Agriculture NRCS-ADS-093 Natural Resources Conservation Service 7/2012 (Continuation) NOTICE OF GRANT AND AGREEMENT AWARD Award Identifying Number 68-5D21-17-105 Amendment No. Award/Project Period Date of final signature - 12/31/2017 Type of Award Instrument Reimbursable Name and Title of Authorized Government Representative Garry Lee, State Conservationist Signature Date Name and Title of Authorized Recipient Representative MICHAEL GINGELL, Chairperson Signature Date NONDISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT •The above statements are made in accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974(5 U.S.C. Section 552a). Agreement No.: 68-5D21-17-105 STATEMENT OF WORK FOR THE REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND AND THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE I. AUTHORITIES 31 USC 6505 II. PURPOSE The purpose of this agreement is to facilitate the public provision of Michigan LIDAR data. This data will be made available to the public through The National Map, which is coordinated by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). III. OBJECTIVES The County of Oakland and Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) are partnering for the acquisition of LIDAR and derivatives required to meet USGS Lidar Base Specification Version 1.2, November 2014 Quality Level 2 (QL2). Once approved and acquired, this data will be published through The National Map as maintained by USGS, making it accessible to the W. RESPONSIBILI HES OF THE PARTIES a. County of Oakland will: a. Reimburse the NRCS in the amount of $45,350.00 after the County of Oakland is provided with the Oakland County LIDAR data described in this Agreement and the NRCS sends the County of Oakland an invoice for the reimbursement amount. b. NRCS will: a. Provide Oakland County LIDAR data for inclusion in The National Map. b. Ensure LIDAR data collected and derivatives produced meet the requirements of USGS Lidar Base Specification Version 1.2, November 2014 QL2, ensure that the data passes USGS QA for inclusion into The National Map, and correct any deficiencies found. V. EXPECTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND DELIVERABLES Oakland County LIDAR — Prior to the end of the agreement period, LIDAR data and derivatives meeting the requirements of USGS Lidar Base Specification Version 1.2, November 2014 QL2 will be found acceptable to be included in The National Map as determined by USGS. VI. RESOURCES REQUIRED Page 1 of 3 Agreement No.: 68-5D21-17-105 a. The County of Oakland will: a. Provide financial reimbursement to NRCS up to the amount specified in this Agreement. b. Provide the following contacts: Technical Anita Campbell GIS Business Analyst Oakland County Information Technology 1200 N. Telegraph Rd., Bldg. 49W Pontiac, MI 48341 Phone: 248.858.2388 Email: campbelIa@oakgov.com Administrative Anita Campbell GIS Business Analyst Oakland County Information Technology 1200 N. Telegraph Rd., Bldg. 49W Pontiac, MI 48341 Phone: 248.858.2388 Email: campbellagoakgov.com b. NRCS will: a. Provide all resources necessary to provide the deliverables, including the following contacts: Technical Daniel Vasher USDA NRCS MI Design Engineer 517-324-5248 dan.vasher@mi.usda.gov Administrative Aileen Anderson USDA NRCS Grants Management Specialist 315-221-5884 aileen.anderson@wdc.usda.gov VII. MILESTONES • Acquisition of LIDAR data for Oakland County will occur in the winter/spring of 2017 • Submittal of LIDAR data and derivatives to USGS for QA prior to December 31', 2017. • Delivery of Oakland County L1DAR data to the County of Oakland prior to December 31st, 2017. Page 2 of 3 Agreement No.: 68-5D21-17-105 • All deficiencies corrected and LIDAR data and derivatives accepted by USGS to The National Map by end of the agreement period. Page 3 of 3 US Geological Survey Broad Agency Announcement for 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) Gl5PS00558 Full Proposal Submission instructions: Enter text or value. Press TAB to register the entry in other parts of the submission tool. U.S, Dept. of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Organization: Service Date: 4/29/16 Organization DUNS Number: Are you a small Business: LI Yes MI No PDC First Name: Garry Last Name: Lee Title: State Conservationist Street Address: 3001 Coolidge Rd., Suite 250 City: East Lansing ' State: Ml Zip Code: 48823 , Email Address: garry.lee@mi.usda.gov Phone: (517)324-5277 Additional Details or Clarifications: Project Title: (300 characters The United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation maximum) Service (USDA-NRCS) 2016 MAR Project G1513S00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 1 G15AS00123 Project Summary: Please provide a summary of your project, Summary should include purpose and (3000 characters justification of proposed acquisition and relationship of project to existing, in- maximum) work, or planned acquisitions. USDA-NRCS is pleased to provide the USGS with this final proposal for Quality Level 2 (QL2, based on USGS Lidar Base Specification 1.2) LiDAR data products in Michigan. As the lead agency for contractual and administrative partnership with the USGS, USDA-NRCS intends to submit a final proposal on behalf of 2 Michigan counties. Approximately fifty percent of the land area included in the project area has no historic Lidar at all, with the other fifty percent having QL3 data acquired within the past five years. It is important to note that the project area also includes priority areas for the NRCS, USGS, FEMA, NOAA, & the USACE, Funding has been contributed by multiple levels of government, showing the collective desire to acquire, analyze and utilize these data. The acquisition of the product will be procured through the Michigan Statewide Authoritative Imagery & MAR (MiSAlL) program. The MiSAIL program utilizes The Sanborn Map Co. Data collected and Processed under the MiSAIL contract has been reviewed and approved for acceptance for inclusion to the National Elevation Map 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) for 0,L2. USDA-NRCS has been working closely with the Michigan Department of Technology, Management, and Budget (DTMB) , who administers the MiSAlL contract, as a partner in preparing this potential project. The project area encompasses 18,947 square miles in South and mid-Michigan. The data will be primarily used to improve an understanding of the hydrology and agriculatural potential of the area, supporting county Drain Commissioner's and USDA-NRCS's rural conservation practices. The partnership will also support management of forested lands. Many of these communities drain into waters that are Areas of Concern within the Great Lakes, and the information will support good decision making in funding restoration projects as part of the Great Lakes Restoratioh Initiative (GLRI). The project data would be acquired in fall through early winter in 2016 and likely late winter through early spring in 2017, upon favorable award, contract and weather conditions. The data would be acquired, processed and delivered in accordance with USGS Lidar Base Specifications for QL2 Data, LAS 1.2 (or version specified as appropriate). G15PS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 2 Gl5AS00123 Project Synopsis: (1000 characters maximum) Acknowledgement required; please read and check box The USGS releases a list of projects receiving funds from the 3DEP Please provide a short synopsis of your project suitable for publication should your project be selected for award. The United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS) is the leading partner along with one other federal agency (USGS) and 2 counties (Oakland and Wayne) to acquire QL2 LiDAR in the fall of 2016 and spring of 2017. USDA-NRCS working in collaboration with federal agencies and county governments have raised funding to deliver 18,947 square miles of area in Mid & Southern Michigan. LiDAR has been identified as desirable for federal agencies, county staff, surveyors and drain commissioners. Many of the communities drain into waters that are Areas of Concern within the Great Lakes, and the information will support conservation efforts throoughout by providing dramatically more information on the watershed including supporting the management of these sources across agricultural, forest and urban landscapes. This will support good decision making for watershed restoration and protection projects ZI The applicant agrees to the release of this project summary should this proposal be selected for award. G1SPS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 3 GBAS00123 GEOGRAPHIC EXTENT OF PROJECT State(s): Michigan Geographic Extent: , • Please specify: Oceana, Ogemaw, losco, Mason, Gladwin, Arenac, Isabella, Midland, Huron, Tuscola, Sanilac, Ottawa, Clinton, St. Clare, Barry, Eaton, Ingham, Oakland, Macomb, Calhoun, Jackson, Washtenaw, Branch, Hillsdale, Lenawee, Monroe . a County(ies) Kent, Ionia, ., . Livingston, Wayne, Li Watershed Please specify: E Other Please specify: Square Miles: 18947 Note: Please hit TAB after entering square miles to autopopuiate "Square Miles" field in project finance tables. . Project Diagram: Insert a jpeg or other picture by copy (CTRL-C)/paste (CTRL-V). clicking on the center of the image box below or by using - MI-chlgan Ck12,LiderPrlor4FesApdi 2S, 201e -;-n Y.6.." ..•., : -._ A. 23 -`.. n:4.. n4 a. . Project GIS File: Acknowledgement required; please read and check box A vector GIS file defining the location and coverage area of your project is required for proposal submission, Your project area must be represented by a polygon in shapefile or KML/KMZ format. The file name should use the following naming convention: ST_Geographic Description where: ST= State Abbreviation (ex. AL. or (iT); AND Geographic Description (ex. Blue_Arrowilliddle_Counties or EasternUtakfi_Counties) Note: Minimum shapefile components required are: .shp, .sbx, .dbf, .prj, , A project vector GIS file with proper file name and format has been iN submitted as a part of the proposal submission package. Additional Details or Clarifications: G15PS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 4 Gl5AS00123 PROPOSED TIMELINE Acquisition: (Select Only One Option) Additional Details, or Clarifications: 0 Spring 2016 El Fall 2016 /Winter 2017 Other: 19 Counties are planned to have data acquired in winter 2017 and spring 2017 Should USDA-NRCS be awarded the grant, to include matching funds, the LiDAR data would be acquired as soon as feasible in 2016. LiDAR will be collected leaf . - off. Fall 2016 -and Winter 2017 data collection priority will be for the folloWing 11 counties: Huron, Tuscola, Sanilac, St. Clare, Macomb, Oakland, Wayne, Monroe, Lenawee, Hillsdale, and Branch. The remaining 19 counties will have data acquisition occurring in Winter 2017 and Spring 2017. DATA SPECIFICATION Data must adhere to the USGS Lidar Base Specifications v1.2. In addition to the requirements outlined in the USGS Base Lidar Specification v1.2, lidar data and derived products must meet the current definition of Quality Level 2 (QL2). Upgrades to QL1 are allowed but the cost of the upgrades is the responsibility of the applicant. Project will he collected to: (Select Only one Option) rx 0L2 (Use QL2 Project Costs Table) LI QL1 (Use QL1 Project Costs Table) QL1 / QL2 combination (Provide details and/or delineate QL1 and QL2 Areas 0 on project graphic) (Use 01.1 Project Costs Table) 0 Other: Additional Details' or Clarifications: Gl5PS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 5 G1SAS00123 DATA DELIVERABLES Standard 3DEP deliverables are defined in the USGS Lidar Base Specification v1,2 Standard period of performance for lidar acquisition projects is 12 to 24 months. Project deliverables are required at the end of the performance period. The applicant agrees to provide all project deliverables to the USGS without RI use restrictions upon final acceptance of the project deliverables from applicant's contractor. Final Project Deliverables: Acknowledgement , required; please read and check box Additional Products Additional products and services are available. The cost of additional products is and Services: the responsibility of the applicant (Select Only One Option) El The applicant does not require any additional products or services The applicant anticipates the need for additional products and services. For those applicants proposing to use the Geospatial Products and Services contracts, additional products may be selected after award during the task order estimation process. The costs of the products will be identified at that time and if the applicant requires these products, the cost of the products will be added to their funding agreement. For applicants proposing to manage their own contract for data acquisition, the cost of these products should not be included in your 3DEP funding request G1SPSOO538 Attachment B FY1S/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 6 G1SAS00123 APPROACH TO DATA ACQUISITION Mechanism: (Select Only One Option) Technical Approach (Cooperative Agreement): (3000 characters maximum) USGS Geospatial Products and Services Contract (GPSC) Applicant enters into agreement with the USGS GPSC to procure data. The USGS National Geospatia I Program's preferred method of data acquisition is through the GPSC, a multiple award acquisition vehicle that is designed to utilize the teams of firms on the contract for services needed to accomplish 3DEP data acquisition. Cooperative Agreement Applicant manages data procurement (detail technical approach below). Please provide a qualifications statement describing your proposed technical approach for acquiring and performing quality assurance of lidar data and derived products. Include information on your approach to selecting a vendor. If a vendor has already been selected please provide a brief summary of the vendor's experience and past performance as related to the acquisition and processing of lidar data that meets USGS Base Lidar Specification v1.2 El USDA-NRCS will utilize The Sanborn Map Company (Sanborn) through the State of Michigan's DTMB MiSAIL program. Sanborn has extensive experience in collecting and processing of lidar data that meets USGS Base Lidar Specification v1.2. Data (data was collected under specification v1.0) from Sanborn was submitted to USGS, with Berrien County being the only county to have USGS QA completed so far, but it was determined that Berrien County could be accepted into the National Map for QL2 data. DTMB also provides QA on the data gathered through the MiSAIL program. G15PS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool G1.AS00123 Page 7 Cost per square mile I Costs Total project area Cost of 3DEP base data (QL2) for project area 3DEP will consider cost share on this portion of the project costs I 18947 I $5,399,895.00 • $2,387,322.00 (Use one Estimate Option Only) Estimate using the 3DEP average base price I 18947 I $285 PROJECT FINANCES Project Costs If- To calculate your project costsiugle EITHER the 0L2 Project Costs table OR the QL1 Project Costs table. For projects that contain a coyfibination of QL1 and QL2 use the QL1 Project Costs table. QL2 Project Costs 3DEP uses an aver5 e figure of $335.00 per square mile (QL2) to estimate the cost of lidar collection over the Unite "States. This average cost includes data acquisition, processing, 3DEP quality asstonee-/-0airty rqrol as well as project/contract management (including 5% assessment for the use o he USGS GPSC). ollection, processing and Contract management costs represent about 85 percent 85 per squaremile) of the total cost for QL2 data. It is important to note that as this is an average cosi>rsomeleographic areas of the country the price will be higher, and for some the cost to acquire the data will be lower. Applicants may choose to use this $285 figure to estimate their project acquisition, processing and assessment cost or alternately they may provide another cost estimate and provide an explanation of ,how the cost estimate was derived to enable evaluation of the costs. For applicants proposing to use the services of the USGS GPSC, the final cost of your project will be determined post award during the task order estimation process. However, applicants may contact the USGS GPSC (gpsc@usgs.gov) prior to full proposal submission for a preliminary estimate specific to your proposed A01, This option is available to all but must be requested no later than 10/01/15 to meet the 10/23/15 deadline for project submission. Ckl. over entire Project Area: (Select Only One Option) The applicant is using the average 3DEP QL2 acquisition, processing and El contract management cost of $285 per square mile to estimate project costs. The applicant is using an alternate QL2 figure to estimate project acquisition and processing costs, Please provide explanation of how estimated cost was derived: 1) Knowledge of economy of scale in collection of large volumes of airborne lidar data G-15PS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 8 G15AS00123 G15PS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 9 Gl5AS00123 Square 3DEP Average Cost Costs miles per square mile Total project area Total project costs (both QL1 and QL2 areas) 18947 (Use One Estimate Option Only) Estimate from Other source QL1 Project Costs QL1 Project Costs vary significantly by geographic area. For applicants proposing to use the Geospatial Products and Services Contracts for data acquisition, please contact the GPSC team (gpsc@usgs.gov ) to obtain a cost estimate for your proposed project. This option is available to all but must be requested no later than 10/01/15 to meet the 10/23/15 deadline for project submission. For those applicants proposing to manage their own data acquisition, please provide an explanation sufficient to enable evaluation of how the cost was derived. 3DEP will evaluate an applicant's proposed cost share based on the average 3DEP QL2 acquisition and processing cost of $285 per square mile over the project area. Upgrade costs (the difference between QL1 and QL2) are the responsibility of the applicant. Q12 Base Data with QL1 Data over selected areas or QL1 Data over • entire area (Select Only one Option) O QUAL2 The applicant requires QL1 data over at least a portion of the project area and has received a cost estimate from the GPSC team for the total cost to acquire and process both the QL1 data and the QL2 data components of their project area. LI QL1/Q12 The applicant requires QL1 data over at least a portion of the project area and has used an alternate (non GPSC) source to estimate project costs. *Please provide explanation of how estimated cost was derived: Cost of 3DEP base data (QL2) for project area 3DEP will consider cost share on this portion 18947 $285 of the project costs Applicant responsible for the full cost of this (upgrade to QL1) portion of the project $5,399,895.00 ($5,399,895.00) G15PS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 10 G1SAS00123 Proposed Funding Applicant shall enter the proposed funding partners, the amount each partner proposes to contribute to the project and the total funding available from partners. The applicant is also asked to provide the certainty of each partner's contribution. Each proposed funding partner must complete Attachment E — Validation of Funding Partner. The attachments shall be included as part of the submission package. Total Estimated Project Cost (from previous page): $2,387,322.00 % Cost Certainty of Share for Contribution 3DEP Base (Guaranteed, Data over Pending) area if funding is Pending- (not yet guaranteed); note date (mmm YYYY) when funding decision will be final. Funding Partner(s) Proposed Contribution Amount USDA--11IRCS $1816972.00 Guaranteed Oakland County $45350.00 Pending Wayne County $25000.00 Pending $ Choose One $ Choose One $ Choose One $ Choose One $ Choose One $ Choose One $ Choose One Funding Partner Totals (from above) $1,887,322.00 79% Cost of NEP, base data (C1L2) for project area (from previous page) 3DEP cost share calculated on this portion of the project costs . $2,387,322.00 _ 21% .___ . Funds Requested from 3DEP $500,000.00 G15PS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 11 Gl5ASQ0123 PAST PERFORMANCE Past Performance (of primary applicant ) (750 characters maximum) Please provide a summary of the applicant's history of managing large data acquisitions with multiple funding partners Each year USDA-NRCS partners with federal, state and local agencies, in complex, multi-stakeholder contractual arrangements. - ADDITIONAL PROJECT DETAILS OR CLARIFICATIONS (1500 characters maximum) USDA-NRCS intends to lead the grant submittal process, and manage the partners in this task, so that USGS will deal with one point of contact when contracting this work. USDA-NRCS is committed to - ensuring that the whole state is ultimately covered with public domain QL2 data. This proposal emphasizes cooperation throughout, with very high societal benefit. The data will be used in mulitple ways but one of the first uses will be the improvement of the understanding of the hydrology, through improvement of the NHD and the use of this data for practical applications by the County Drain Commisionerls. USDA-NRCS will utilize this data for for planning, technical assistance, and wetland delineation work on private lands in Michigan. Of note: Wayne County project area (500 sq ml) excludes the City of Detroit. G15PS00558 Attachment i3 FY15/16 BAA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 12 G15AS00123 Gl5PS00558 Attachment B FY15/16 I3AA Full Proposal Submission Tool Page 13 Gl5AS00123 Resolution #17155 May 25, 2017 Moved by Dwyer supported by Bowman the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Crawford, Dwyer, Fleming, Gershenson, Gingell, Hoffman, Jackson, Kochenderfer, KowaII, Long, McGillivray, Middleton, Quarles, Spisz, Taub, Tietz, Weipert, Woodward, Zack, Berman, Bowman. (21) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the amended Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). I HEFIEBY APPROVE THIS RESOLUTION CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTIVE ACTING PURSUANT TO MCL 45,569A (7) I HEREBYAPPROVE THIS RESOLUTr, CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTv ACTING PURSUANT TO STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on May 25, 2017, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 25th day of May, 2017. Lisa Brown, Oakland County fr/kait---/