Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Resolutions - 2017.07.19 - 23023
Commissioner sINP; -r, District #14 MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #17206 July 19, 2017 BY: Commissioner Bill Dwyer, Chairperson, Public Services Committee IN RE: SHERIFF'S OFFICE — 2017 LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM ACCEPTANCE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Sheriff's Office has been awarded $47,770.75 from the Michigan Department of Treasury, Michigan Justice Training Fund for January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2018; and WHEREAS the funds will be used for criminal justice in-service training of eligible law enforcement officer training costs; and WHEREAS the $47,770.75 payment is the first of two disbursements the Sheriff's Office will receive for 2017; and WHEREAS this grant award has completed the Grant Review Process in accordance with the Board of Commissioners Grant Acceptance Procedures. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners accepts the grant funding from the Michigan Department of Treasury, Michigan Justice Training Fund, in the amount of $47,770.75 with no county match required for January 1,2017 through December 31, 2018. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute the grant agreement and to approve any grant extensions or changes, within fifteen percent (15%) of the original award, which are consistent with the original award as approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that acceptance of this grant does not obligate the County to any future commitment and continuation of the grant program is contingent upon future levels of grant funding. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. Chairperson, Public Services Committee PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Tietz absent. GRANT REVIEW SIGN OFF — Sheriff's Office GRANT NAME: 2017 Law Enforcement Distribution Program FUNDING AGENCY: Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (M.C.O.L.E.S.) DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON: Cheryl Robbins (248) 858-4990 STATUS: Acceptance DATE: June 19, 2017 Pursuant to Misc. Resolution #13180, please be advised the captioned grant materials have completed internal grant review. Below are the returned comments. The captioned grant materials and grant acceptance package (which should include the Board of Commissioners' Liaison Committee Resolution, the grant agreement/contract, Finance Committee Fiscal Note, and this Sign Off email containing grant review comments) may be requested to be placed on the appropriate Board of Commissioners' committee(s) for grant acceptance by Board resolution. DEPARTMENT REVIEW Department of Management and Budget: Approved. — Laurie Van Pelt (6/14/2017) Department of Human Resources: HR Approved (No Committee) — Lori Taylor (6/14/2017) Risk Management and Safety: Approved by Risk Management. — Robert Erlenbeck (6/16/2017) Corporation Counsel: Approved by Corporation Counsel. — Steve Rideout (6/16/2017) CO Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards Public Act 302 of 1982, as amended 2016 LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION GUIDELINES STATE OF MICHIGAN Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards 106 West Allegan, Suite 600 Lansing, MI 48909 January 2016 Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards 2016 Law Enforcement Distribution Guidelines TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 Statutory Authority 1 Executive Order 1 IL PURPOSE 1 III. ELIGIBILITY 2 Determinations 2 Non-Discrimination 3 Non-Compliance 3 IV. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES 3 Annual Reporting Requirements 3 Allowable Costs 4 Ineligible Costs 5 Travel Regulations 6 Schedule of Travel Rates 7 Select Cities 8 Disposition of Equipment 9 V. SPECIAL USE REQUESTS 8 Out of State Special Use Requests 8 Equipment Special Use Requests 10 Special Use Request Approval Process 10 APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS 11 Contact Information For assistance with the guidelines, contact Gina Rosendall-Saucedo at: rosendail-saucedog©michigan.gov or (517) 322-5617 I. INTRODUCTION Statutory Authority The Michigan Justice Training programs are regulated by state law, administrative rule, and executive order. Public Act 301 of 1982, created the Michigan Justice Training Fund. This revenue is generated through fine assessments which are levied and collected by the courts and submitted to the Michigan Department of Treasury for deposit in the Justice System Fund. A percentage of Justice System Fund revenue is then transferred to the Michigan Justice Training Fund on a monthly basis. Both the Justice System Fund and the Justice Training Fund are interest-bearing accounts. interest is posted to each account quarterly. The Michigan Justice Training Fund is a restricted fund. These funds may be used only for the criminal justice in-service (active duty) training of eligible trainees or such purposes as designated by legislative mandate. Public Act 302 of 1982 created the Michigan Justice Training Commission (MJTC) and set forth the responsibilities of that Commission. Section 3(a) of the Act directs the Commission to annually distribute 60% of the Justice Training Fund to eligible entities under the law enforcement distribution, and in Section 3(b), the Commission is required to annually distribute, through a competitive grant process, the balance of the fund after administrative costs have been deducted. These two funding programs are referred to as the Law Enforcement Distribution (LED) and the Competitive Grant Program, respectively. This document addresses the Law Enforcement Distribution. The administrative rules that prescribe the procedures by which the Commission shall distribute money from the fund were developed under the authority conferred on the Commission by section 3 of 1982 PA 302, by section 9 of 1965 PA 380, and by Executive Reorganization Order 2001-2, MCL 18.423, 16.109, and 28.621. With Executive Order 2001-5, Governor John Engler ordered the merger of the Michigan Justice Training Commission with the Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (COLES) to form the new Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) and transferred the responsibilities of P.A. 302 to the MCOLES. Executive Order 2001-5 also directed the Commission to focus its activities in order to accomplish the following objectives involving law enforcement organizations and officers: • increase professionalism, • increase the number of law enforcement organizations that offer formal in-service training and increase the number of law enforcement officers who receive formal in-service training, • institute law enforcement in-service training standards applicable to all law enforcement in- service training in Michigan, • implement a Web-based information system that will allow the Commission to accomplish its goals and communicate with Michigan law enforcement organizations in a more efficient manner. II. PURPOSE As mandated by the Act, the purpose of the LED program is to annually distribute Justice Training Funds to eligible agencies for in-service criminal justice training of their MCOLES licensed law enforcement officers. - 1 - For the purposes of the LED program, in-service criminal justice training means a criminal justice educational program presented by an agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to the Act or by a contractual service provider hired by the agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to the Act, including a course or package of instruction provided to an eligible trainee for the payment of a fee or tuition, or education or training presented through the use of audiovisual materials, which program, education, or training is designed and intended to enhance the direct delivery of criminal justice services by eligible employees of the agency or entity. Ill. ELIGIBILITY Any Michigan city, village, township, county, junior college, community college, state supported college or university, or the Department of State Police is eligible to receive LED funding. Only MCOLES licensed law enforcement officers, employed by an eligible entity, are eligible trainees under this program. The Act also requires that an eligible agency shall submit an annual registration to establish or maintain eligibility to receive a distribution of justice training funds. Annual eligibility is determined by several factors. 1) Registration: A complete and accurate registration shall be submitted, in the manner prescribed by the Commission, on or before the established deadline. 2) Re0011 of Expenditures: A complete accounting of expenditures, charged to LED funds during the prior calendar year, shall accompany the annual registration in the manner prescribed by the Commission. You must register your expenses regardless of whether funds were used or not. 3) Maintenance of Effort (MOE): It is the intent of the Act to provide supplemental funding, not replace local funding, for in-service criminal justice training. To ensure compliance with this intent, the amount of local funds budgeted annually by the local unit of government for in- service training shall be equal to, or greater than, the amount budgeted for in-service training on October 12, 1982, or the first year of program participation. 4) Roster of Officers: The law enforcement agency shall employ a minimum of one full-time equated (FTE) officer for the calendar year prior to which the registration is submitted. Effective with the 1995 registration, a roster of licensed officers shaft be provided in a manner prescribed by the Commission. 5) Two-year Expenditure Period: Effective with the 1990 distribution, recipient agencies are required to expend their entire annual distribution within two calendar years of the year of distribution. For example, LED funds received during 2014 must be expended prior to December 31, 2016. If the distribution is not expended within this time frame, the agency will be ineligible to receive any additional LED funding until the balance is expended and reported to the Commission. Licensure is issued by the Commission under 1965 P.A. 203, as amended. Any officer found not to be in compliance with the requirements shall be ineligible for the law enforcement distribution. Therefore, it is the law enforcement agency's responsibility to verify that each law enforcement - 2 - officer registered for the law enforcement distribution meets the requirements of Act 203 in one of the following manners: • election to the office of sheriff; • employment by a law enforcement agency as a fully empowered law enforcement officer prior to January 1, 1977, with no break in employment in excess of two years, since January 1,1977; or • employment by a law enforcement agency as a fully empowered law enforcement officer after January 1, 1977, having complied with all the selection, employment, training, or waiver of training standards of Public Act 203 of 1965, as amended, which were in place at the time of initial employment, and with no break in employment in excess of the time periods permitted under section 9 of Act 203. Non-Discrimination Government units receiving money distributed under the Act, and any person or contractor performing services funded by such money, shall not discriminate against an employee or applicant for employment with respect to hire, tenure, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, or a matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, or marital status in violation of Act 220 of the Public Acts of 1976, as amended. Upon certification of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission that a violation of these nondiscrimination requirements has occurred, a government unit's right to receive money under the Act may be suspended, terminated, or conditioned in any appropriate way that is consistent with the circumstances of the case. Non-Compliance Non-compliance with the provisions of these guidelines shall result in a forfeiture of law enforcement distribution funding. IV. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITIES All recipients of LED funds agree to maintain records documenting annual calendar year LED expenditures in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, to permit inspection of these records, and to cooperate with any audit requested or authorized by the local unit of government or the Commission. An agency receiving funds under this Act shall report annually to the Commission on the forms and in the manner prescribed by the Commission. Failure to report the required information shall result in ineligibility to receive LED funds. A separate accounting of LED funding and expenditures independent of local in-service training funds, must be maintained and reported for each calendar year. Beginning with the 1990 distribution, amendments to the Act require that each agency expend the entire annual distribution within two calendar years of the year of distribution. Therefore, training costs, supplies, and equipment purchases shall be assigned to the oldest funds available regardless of the year expended. - 3 - The amended Act requires that if funds remain unexpended after the end of the second calendar year, the agency shall be ineligible for future funds until the remaining balance has been expended and reported. Agencies must report closure or consolidation initiatives to MCOLES for close out processing. Current expenditures will be processed and if required, an invoice for unutilized funds will be created to return the funds to the Michigan Justice Training Fund for re-distribution. The following expenditures are eligible for LED funding in accordance with the mandate, effective January 1, 2004, requiring that all training courses being provided to in-service law enforcement officers in Michigan be registered in the MCOLES Information and Tracking Network prior to the training being conducted, whether being provided by a Michigan based or out-of-state private or public vendor, as well as training offered by an agency for specific, in-house agency purposes. Allowable: • Hourly salaries of instructors for the actual time spent preparing and presenting training, subject to the supplanting restrictions. • In-state travel expenses for training programs outside of a 50 mile radius from the worksite or home (whichever is closer). 0 Meals, lodging and mileage are approved at Civil Services rates during the year of expenditure. (further travel regulations are outlined on page 7) • Expenditure of LED funds for tuition costs for out-of-state training courses is allowable provided that the requesting law enforcement agency submits an Out-of-State Special Use Request to the Commission and the course was MCOLES registered through the MCOLES Information and Tracking Network prior to the training dates. • Expenditure of LED funds for registration only for out-of-state conferences or conventions providing the requesting law enforcement agency submits an Out-of-State Special Use Request to the Commission and is granted approval prior to attending the conference or convention. All other costs associated with the conference or convention must be covered by other funds. • A consortium fee for law enforcement training attended. Consortium fees paid shall be reported per year. • The reasonable rental costs for the use of a training facility for in-service training, if facilities owned or occupied by an eligible entity are either not available or are inappropriate due to the nature of the training. • The actual cost of purchasing or leasing training materials used to assist trainees in understanding in-service training topics. Items such as: training manuals, tests, evaluations. • The reasonable rental cost or the purchase price of equipment used exclusively for the direct delivery of in-service training; however, expenditures for purchase shall not be more than the total of 10% of the annual distribution, nor may any single item be more than $5,000.00, without prior approval of the Commission. Equipment costs less than $300 shall be reported as a Supplies and Operating expense. -4- o The Equipment Special Use Request form is available on-line. (further equipment information is outlined on page 7) • A flat rate or tuition paid to a contractual training provider hired by an eligible entity. The payment shall be in compliance with policies established by the Commission. • Web-based programs, CDs, DVDs, or other such instructional media that are based upon passive or interactive learning. Funding is limited to $1,000 or 10% of the annual distribution, whichever is less. • Automated firearms training systems that simulate deadly force decision-making circumstances. Ineligible: 1. Expenditures for salaries of trainees. 2. Meal and lodging for expenditures in excess of the per diem meal expenditures authorized for civil service employees. In cases where charges for meals and lodging exceed the allowable rate, the grantee may utilize other funding sources to cover the additional charge. o The Commission will not authorize the use of justice training funds for travel costs to participate in criminal justice training unless the criminal justice training program is for the sole purpose of training or offers not less than 6 hours of qualifying training within any 24-hour period. 3. Criminal justice training not located in this state, unless the training event has first been approved by the Commission and is registered in MTN, as noted above. 4. Criminal justice training in another country. 5. The purchase of firearms. 6. Purchase of alcoholic liquor. 7. Purchase of refreshments. 8. The publication of a newsletter. Travel Regulations: Mileage Restriction: Travel expenses shall not be charged for mileage or lodging where training occurs within 50 miles, by standard mileage charts, of the home or work site, whichever is closer. An exception may be allowed for those persons who work or reside within a radius exceeding 25 miles of the training site when a minimum of two hours of training occurs thllowing the evening meal. Air Travel : The use of commercial airlines is permitted when it is advantageous based on comparative travel costs and the time of the traveler. Justice training funds may not be used to purchase first-class airfare. Vehicle Mileage: Mileage expenses will be allowed at a rate not to exceed the maximum allowable rate specified in the current Rate Schedule. Toll Charges: Toll charges and bridge fees are allowable. Taxi: Necessary taxicab fares between the work station, terminal and meeting site are allowable. Parking: Parking charges, at the most economical rate available, is allowable. Meal Allowance: Lodging and meals shall conform to the published rates of the Commission as provided by the Act. In those cases where charges for lodging and meals exceed the allowable rate, the grantee may utilize other funding sources to cover the additional charge. The maximum daily meal allowances are indicated in the current Rate Schedule. Trainee meals will only be allowed when training occurs both before and after the meal, or the trainee is otherwise eligible for meals due to lodging. Lodging Rates: The maximum daily lodging allowances are indicated in the current Rate Schedule. Actual lodging expenses paid, not to exceed the maximum, plus any applicable sales or use tax, are reimbursable. Tips: Tips are allowable only where porter service is regularly provided and necessary to handle multiple bags and equipment. All other fees and tips to waiters, porters, and bellboys, charges for cleaning and pressing clothing, and similar personal expenses are not allowable as reimbursable expenses. Select Cities: Specific travel rates have been established for "select" cities. Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards Law Enforcement Distribution Schedule of Travel Rates Effective January 1, 2016 Michigan Select Cities Breakfast Lunch Dinner Lodging In-State All Other Cities Breakfast Lunch Dinner Lodging Out-of-State Select Cities Breakfast Lunch Dinner Lodging Out-of-State All Other Cities Breakfast Lunch Dinner Lodging Group Luncheons Conferences and Conventions Meals Lodging $10.25 $10.25 $24.25 $75.00 plus tax $8.50 $8.50 $19.00 $75.00 plus tax $13.00 $13.00 $25.25 $125.00 plus tax $10.25 $10.25 $23.50 $102.00 plus tax $11.50 See appropriate category above Actual cost plus tax Standard Mileage Rate $.360 per mile SELECT CITIES MICHIGAN SELECT CITIES AND COUNTIES CITIES COUNTIES Ann Arbor Detroit Holland Mackinac Island Pontiac/Auburn Hills South Haven All of Wayne All of Oakland OUT-OF-STATE SELECT CITIES STATE SELECT CITY OR COUNTY STATE SELECT CITY OR COUNTY Arizona Phoenix Nevada Las Vegas Scottsdale California Los Angeles (Los Angeles, Orange New Mexico Santa Fe & Ventura Counties, and Edwards AFB), Monterey, Palm Springs, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Monica, South Lake Tahoe, Truckee, Yosemite National Park New York New York City (comprised of the boroughs of, Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, and Staten Island) Colorado Aspen, Telluride, Vail Riverhead, Ronkonkoma, Melville, Suffolk county, Tarrytown, White Plains New Rochelle Connecticut Bridgeport / Danbury District of Columbia Washington DC (also the cities of Alexandria, Falls Church and Pennsylvania Bucks County, Pittsburgh Fairfax, and the counties of Arlington and Fairfax, in Virginia; and the counties of Montgomery and Prince George's in Maryland) Rhode Island Bristol, Jamestown, Middletown, Newport (Newport County), Providence Florida Boca Raton, Delray Beach Jupiter, Fort Lauderdale, Key West Texas Austin, Dallas, Houston LB. Johnson Space Center Idaho Sun Valley, Ketchum Utah Park City (Summit County) Illinois Chicago (Cook and Lake counties) Louisiana New Orleans Vermont Manchester, Stowe (Lamoille County) Maryland Counties of Montgomery and Prince Georges, Baltimore City, Ocean City Virginia Alexandria, Falls Church, Fairfax Massachusetts Boston (Suffolk), Burlington, Cambridge, Burlington, Woburn, Martha's Vineyard Washington Seattle Minnesota Minneapolis! St Paul Hennepin & Ramsey County - 8 - Disposition of Equipment For the purposes of LED funding, to be defined as "equipment" an item shall: 1) be directly involved in the delivery of in-service criminal justice training; 2) be personal property (as distinguished from real property) such as machines, audio/video and computer hardware, etc.; 3) have a normal useful life of more than one year; 4) not become a fixed part of a building or structure; and 5) have a purchase price of $300 or more. Equipment purchases approved by the Commission may be retained by the recipient agency as long as the equipment is used for the provision of in-service criminal justice training. When equipment is no longer used for the provision of in-service criminal justice training, the recipient agency shall notify the Commission to request disposition. The Commission may select one of the following actions: a. Transfer of the equipment to another training program. Costs of the transportation of the equipment will be borne by the receiving agency. b. Approve the sale of the equipment, with the arrangements for the sale to be made by the agency possessing the equipment. The agency will be allowed to retain 10% of the receipts from the sale; the remainder shall be returned to the Justice Training Fund. c. Dispose of the property in any other manner consistent with the purposes of the Act, as amended. V. SPECIAL USE REQUESTS Out-of-State Special Use Requests The Act contains specific mandates relative to the expenditure of Justice Training Funds for out-of- state training, The intention is, of course, that justice training funds be expended primarily within the state of Michigan to purchase services and materials from Michigan vendors whenever possible. The policy states that the Commission will not fund any out-of-state criminal justice training program, unless all reasonable efforts to locate a similar training program in this state have been exhausted, and the Commission is satisfied that a similar training program is not available in this state. It is the eligible entity's responsibility to make every reasonable effort to locate a Michigan based provider. At a minimum, the applicant shall contact a statewide provider (e.g., the Michigan State Police or the Michigan Municipal League), local or regional providers (e.g., community colleges or universities), and consult the MCOLES Schedule of Training Courses. The Schedule contains information about in-service criminal justice training programs offered in Michigan and is published on the MCOLES web site (www.michigan.gov/mcoles). • Agency Approval. An individual agency requests approval to send eligible trainees to out-of- state training to provide the training. These requests will be acted upon individually. • Blanket Approval. The Commission will give blanket approval, when requirements are met, for attendance by all agencies at annual conferences, e.g., NSA, and !ACP. It is the responsibility of the Commission staff to publicize these approvals, and to monitor compliance with the policy - 9 - regarding the 6:24 ratio for actual hours of training. These approvals will be for the payment of registration fees only. All other costs associated with the conference or convention must be paid by other funds. Equipment Special Use Requests The Administrative Rules for Public Act 302 of 1982, as amended, state that the expenditure of funds under this Act for the purpose of equipment purchases must be approved by the Commission when total equipment purchases exceed 10% of the agency's annual distribution, or when the purchase price of a single equipment item equals or exceeds $5,000. Special Use Request Approval Process The forms used to request Commission approval for the special use of LED funds, as outlined above, are the Out-of-State Special Use Request (MJT-511) and the Equipment Special Use Request (MJT-512). These forms are available on the MCOLES web site. Both types of requests require PRIOR approval. Written notification of Commission action will be returned to the requesting agency. Each approval is assigned a unique special use request processing number. This number is noted on the written notification and is also required as proof of approval on the annual LED expenditure report. All host approval numbers are published for reference on the MCOLES web site. Definitions Conference - A prearranged formal meeting of a group of people from an organization, association or profession, for the purpose of discussion or consultation of a specific topic. Convention - A prearranged, periodic assembly of a group of people from an organization, association or profession, for the purpose of exchanging information Group Meeting - A prearranged meeting of a group of people for the purposes of conducting training, workshops, or seminars. APPENDIX A - DEFINITIONS "Act" means Act No. 302 of the Public Acts of 1982, as amended. "Commission" means the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES). "Criminal justice education program" means a learning experience produced through reading, listening, observing, performing problem-solving, or interacting with others, the object of which is the introduction or enhancement of knowledge, skills, and judgment related directly to the performance of professional criminal justice tasks currently assigned or assignable. "Direct delivery of criminal justice services" means the execution of the duties of line law enforcement officers provided to the general public (e.g., traffic enforcement, first aid, investigation, or community policing and problem solving) and the execution of administrative tasks which enhance the abilities of line officers to provide direct delivery of criminal justice services. "Distribution" means the amount distributed to law enforcement agencies, in two payments, from the Fund within one calendar year, under the provisions of Section 3(a) of the Act. "Equipment" means, for the purposes of the Act, an item that is used only for the delivery of in- service training, and is personal property (as distinguished from real property), such as machines, audio/video and computer hardware, etc., and has a normal useful life of more than one year, and has a purchase price of $300 or more. "Fund" means the Michigan Justice Training Fund. "in-service criminal justice training" means a criminal justice educational program presented by an agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to this act or by a contractual service provider hired by the agency or entity eligible to receive funds pursuant to this act, including a course or package of instruction provided to an eligible trainee for the payment of a fee or tuition, or education or training presented through the use of audiovisual materials, which program, education, or training is designed and intended to enhance the direct delivery of criminal justice services by eligible employees of the agency or entity. "Law enforcement officer" means an individual who is continuously employed and paid by a police force as a law enforcement officer who is responsible for the prevention and detection of crime and empowered to enforce all of the general criminal laws of this State. "MCOLES licensed officer" means a person who has met all of the selection, employment, training, or recognition of prior training and experience standards of Public Act 203 of 1965, as amended, and who is licensed by the Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards. "Paid" means monetary compensation at not less than the federal minimum wage established in the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended; 29 U.S.C. §206. "Report period" means the calendar year, beginning January 1, through December 31, during which reported activity occurred. Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Law Enforcement Distribution Summary Distribution Period: Spring 2017 Court Revenue: Cash Earnings: Carryover from Previous Distribution: Refunds: Less Special Payments: Available LED Revenue $1,422,510.52 $2,966.42 $56.56 $4,900.00 $0.00 $1,430,433.50 Per Capita Payments: Per Capita Amount Number of Agencies Number of FTEs Per Capita Distribution: Minimum Payments: Officer Cutoff Number of Agencies Number of FTEs Minimum Distribution Total Distribution: Carry Forward to Next Distribution: $8455 445 16,775 $1,418,326.25 3 48 76 $12,000.00 $1,430,326.25 $107.25 MCOLE-S WI,O.Cwre.q10,40Lt.t issniir. Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 1 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Report Period: Spring 2017 Recipient Agency ADRIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ADRIAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT AKRON POLICE DEPARTMENT ALBION DPS ALCONA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ALGER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ALLEGAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ALLEGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT ALLEN PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT ALMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ALMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT ALPENA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ALPENA POLICE DEPARTMENT ANN ARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT ANTRIM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ARENAC COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ARGENTINE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT ARMADA POLICE DEPARTMENT AUBURN HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT BAD AXE POLICE DEPARTMENT BANGOR POLICE DEPARTMENT BARAGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE BARAGA POLICE DEPARTMENT BARODA-LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT BARRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE BARRY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT BATH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT BATTLE CREEK POLICE DEPARTMENT FTEs Distribution 27 2,282.85 2 250.00 1 250.00 16 1,352.80 13 1,099.15 9 760.95 58 4,903.90 8 676.40 38 3,212.90 14 1,183.70 8 676.40 19 1,606,45 16 1,352.80 118 9,976.90 21 1,775.55 13 1,099.15 7 591.85 5 422.75 49 4,142,95 12 1,014.60 5 422.75 6 507.30 1 250.00 4 338.20 29 2,451.95 2 250.00 12 1,014.60 105 8,877.75 MCOLES whoroZzn,,440o4K14.04,or.K M0"1..a4 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 2 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency BAY CITY DPS BAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE BEAVERTON POLICE DEPARTMENT BELDING POLICE DEPARTMENT BELLE VILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT BELLEVUE POLICE DEPARTMENT BENTON HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT BENTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT BENZIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE BERKLEY DPS BERRIEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE BERRIEN SPRINGS-ORONOKO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT BEVERLY HILLS DPS BIG RAPIDS DPS BIRCH RUN POLICE DEPARTMENT BIRMINGHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT BLACKMAN TOWNSHIP DPS BLISSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT BLOOMFIELD HILLS DPS BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT BOYNE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT BRANCH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE BRECKENRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT BRIDGEPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT BRIDGMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT BRIGHTON POLICE DEPARTMENT BRONSON POLICE DEPARTMENT BROWNSTOWN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT Distribution 4,227.50 2,874.70 250.00 676.40 591.85 253.65 1,860.10 1,775.55 1,268.25 2,113.75 6,510.35 760.95 1,944.65 1,437.35 422.75 2,705.60 2,705.60 422.75 1,944.65 5,833.95 591.85 1,268.25 250.00 760.95 422.75 1,437.35 422.75 2,451.95 FTEs 50 34 2 8 7 3 22 21 15 25 77 9 23 17 5 32 32 5 23 69 7 15 1 9 5 17 5 29 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 3 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution 13 39 15 88 2 4 81 2 3 7 6 4 4 33 4 16 1 21 20 8 15 20 9 11 2 39 6 17 BUENA VISTA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT BURTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CADILLAC POLICE DEPARTMENT CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE CALUMET POLICE DEPARTMENT CAMBRIDGE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CANTON TOWNSHIP DPS CAPAC POLICE DEPARTMENT CARLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT CARO POLICE DEPARTMENT CARROLLTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CARSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT CASEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT CASS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE CASSOPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT CENTER LINE DPS CENTRAL LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT CHARLEVOIX COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE CHARLEVOIX POLICE DEPARTMENT CHARLOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT CHEBOYGAN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE CHEBOYGAN DPS CHELSEA POLICE DEPARTMENT CHESANING POLICE DEPARTMENT CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CHIKAMING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CHIPPEWA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 1,099.15 3,297.45 1,268.25 7,440.40 250.00 338.20 6,848.55 250.00 253.65 591.85 507,30 338.20 338.20 2,790.15 338.20 1,352.80 250.00 1,775.55 1,691.00 676.40 1,268.25 1,691.00 760.95 930.05 250.00 3,297.45 507.30 1,437.35 MCOLL=S AikbilmCurv.401,,,,a,‘..V4soorse,a*.n)witi Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 4 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution 5 31 17 16 6 29 4 90 7 16 2 7 3 5 4 4 7 15 6 2 7 18 76 187 4 6 14 4 CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CLARE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE CLAWSON POLICE DEPARTMENT CLAY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CLAYTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CLINTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE CLINTON POLICE DEPARTMENT CLINTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CLIO POLICE DEPARTMENT COLDWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT COLEMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT COLOMA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT COLON POLICE DEPARTMENT COLUMBIA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CONSTANTINE POLICE DEPARTMENT CORUNNA POLICE DEPARTMENT COVERT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT CRAWFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE CROSWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT CRYSTAL FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT DAVISON POLICE DEPARTMENT DAVISON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT DEARBORN HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT DEARBORN POLICE DEPARTMENT DECATUR POLICE DEPARTMENT DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS DELTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE DENTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 422.75 2,621.05 1,437.35 1,352.80 507.30 2,451.95 338.20 7,609.50 591.85 1,352.80 250.00 591.85 253.65 422.75 338.20 338.20 591.85 1,268.25 507.30 250.00 591.85 1,521.90 6,425.80 15,810.85 338.20 507.30 1,183.70 338.20 MCOL..e=S WhOoNf...,11,irs a, lop Not.,r49•Aniwtf Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 5 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution 232 46 2,136 6 15 14 13 5 8 7 26 5 55 36 37 72 7 1 14 5 2 24 14 29 7 2 23 102 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT DEWITT POLICE DEPARTMENT DEWITT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT DICKINSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE DOWAGIAC POLICE DEPARTMENT DRYDEN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT DUNDEE POLICE DEPARTMENT DURAND POLICE DEPARTMENT EAST GRAND RAPIDS DPS EAST JORDAN POLICE DEPARTMENT EAST LANSING POLICE DEPARTMENT EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT EASTPOINTE POLICE DEPARTMENT EATON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE EATON RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT EAU CLAIRE POLICE DEPARTMENT ECORSE POLICE DEPARTMENT ELK RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT ELKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT EMMET COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE EMMETT TOWNSHIP DPS ESCANABA DPS ESSEXVILLE DPS EVART POLICE DEPARTMENT FARMINGTON DPS FARMINGTON HILLS POLICE DEPARTMENT 19,615.60 3,889.30 180,598.80 507.30 1,268.25 1,183.70 1,099.15 422.75 676.40 591.85 2,198.30 422.75 4,650.25 3,043.80 3,128,35 6,087.60 591.85 250.00 1,183.70 422.75 250.00 2,029.20 1,183.70 2,451.95 591.85 250.00 1,944.65 8,624.10 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 6 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution FENNVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT FENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT FERNDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY DPS FLAT ROCK POLICE DEPARTMENT FLINT POLICE DEPARTMENT FLINT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT FLUSHING POLICE DEPARTMENT FLUSHING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT FORSYTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT FOWLERVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT FRANKENMUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT FRANKFORT POLICE DEPARTMENT FRANKLIN POLICE DEPARTMENT FRASER DPS FREMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT FRUITPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT GAINES TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT GARDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT GAYLORD POLICE DEPARTMENT GENESEE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION GENESEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GENESEE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT GERRISH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT GIBRALTAR POLICE DEPARTMENT GLADSTONE DPS GLADWIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GLADWIN POLICE DEPARTMENT 250.00 1,183.70 3,212.90 1,099.15 1,437.35 8,539.55 3,128.35 1,014.60 676.40 760.95 507.30 760.95 253.65 845.50 2,959.25 591.85 930.05 250.00 2,282.85 676.40 1,521.90 10,484.20 1,606.45 591.85 676.40 760.95 1,268.25 507.30 1 14 38 13 17 101 37 12 8 9 6 9 3 10 35 7 11 2 27 8 18 124 19 7 8 9 15 6 .....NACO LES `..•.4.,"0"*111k, q'S E.Sneer.10,Pon)001. Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 7 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution GOGEBIC COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GR FORD INTNATL AIRPORT POLICE DEPARTMENT GRAND BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT GRAND BLANC POLICE DEPARTMENT GRAND BLANC TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT GRAND HAVEN DPS GRAND LEDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT GRAND RAPIDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE GRAND RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT GRAND TRAVERSE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY DPS GRANDVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT GRANT POLICE DEPARTMENT GRATIOT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE GRAYLING POLICE DEPARTMENT GREEN OAK CHARTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT GREENVILLE DPS GROSSE ILE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT GROSSE POINTE DPS GROSSE POINTE FARMS DPS GROSSE POINTE PARK DPS GROSSE POINTE SHORES UPS GROSSE POINTE WOODS POLICE DEPARTMENT HAMBURG TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT HAMPTON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT HAMTRAMCK POLICE DEPARTMENT HANCOCK POLICE DEPARTMENT HARBOR BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,268.25 1,352.80 338.20 1,268.25 3,128.35 2,621.05 1,352.80 1,014.60 24,434.95 5,326.65 1,521.90 2,029.20 250.00 2,536.50 422.75 1,268.25 1,352.80 1,437.35 1,775.55 2,621.05 2,874.70 1,437.35 2,451.95 1,437.35 760.95 2,451.95 760.95 338.20 15 16 4 15 37 31 16 12 289 63 18 24 1 30 5 15 16 17 21 31 34 17 29 17 9 29 9 4 CC3LES 1:5:mktfilt un Lt.* fitorisowi Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 8 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency HARPER WOODS POLICE DEPARTMENT HART POLICE DEPARTMENT HASTINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT HAZEL PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT HESPERIA POLICE DEPARTMENT HIGHLAND PARK DPS HILLSDALE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE HILLSDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT HOLLAND DPS HOLLY POLICE DEPARTMENT HOUGHTON COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE HOUGHTON POLICE DEPARTMENT HOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT HUDSON POLICE DEPARTMENT HUNTINGTON WOODS DPS HURON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE HURON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT IMLAY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT INGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE INKSTER POLICE DEPARTMENT IONIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE IONIA DPS IOSCO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE IRON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE IRON MOUNTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT IRON RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT IRONWOOD DPS ISABELLA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Distribution 2,621.05 422.75 1,099.15 2,874.70 338.20 2,790.15 2,113.75 1,099.15 4,650.25 930.05 1,944.65 760.95 1,352.80 422.75 1,437.35 1,860.10 1,775.55 591.85 7,778.60 2,198.30 1,944.65 1,437.35 507.30 845.50 1,014.60 338.20 845.50 1,775.55 FTEs 31 5 13 34 4 33 25 13 55 11 23 9 16 5 17 22 21 7 92 26 23 17 6 10 12 4 10 21 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 9 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution 8 51 44 4 134 211 31 9 16 3 8 221 66 5 17 3 2 5 15 1 3 6 2 13 185 14 49 20 ISHPEMING POLICE DEPARTMENT JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE JACKSON POLICE DEPARTMENT JONESVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT KALAMAZOO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE KALAMAZOO DPS KALAMAZOO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS KALKASKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE KALKASKA D PS KEEGO HARBOR POLICE DEPARTMENT KENT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE KENTWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT KEWEENAW COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE KINGSFORD DPS L'ANSE POLICE DEPARTMENT LAINGSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT LAKE ANGELUS POLICE DEPARTMENT LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE LAKE LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT LAKE ODESSA POLICE DEPARTMENT LAKE ORION POLICE DEPARTMENT LAKEVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT LANSING COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT LANSING POLICE DEPARTMENT LANSING TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT LAPEER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE LAPEER POLICE DEPARTMENT 676.40 4,312.05 3,720.20 338.20 11,329.70 17,840.05 2,621.05 760.95 1,352.80 253.65 676.40 18,685.55 5,580.30 422.75 1,437.35 253.65 250.00 422.75 1,268.25 250,00 253,65 507.30 250.00 1,099.15 15,641.75 1,183.70 4,142.95 1,691.00 1VICOLES Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 10 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution LAURIUM POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 LAWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 LEELANAU COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 20 LENAWEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 39 LENNON POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 LESLIE POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 LEXINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 LINCOLN PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT 39 LINCOLN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 LINDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 LITCHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 LIVINGSTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 67 LIVONIA POLICE DEPARTMENT 130 LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 LUDINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 14 LUNA PIER POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 MACKINAC COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 12 MACKINAC ISLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 MACKINAW CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 28 MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 249 MADISON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT 44 MADISON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 MANISTEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 16 MANISTEE POLICE DEPARTMENT 13 MANISTIQUE DPS 8 MARENISCO TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 MARINE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 338.20 422.75 1,691.00 3,297.45 250.00 253,65 253.65 3,297.45 845.50 422.75 253,65 5,664.85 10,991.50 591.85 1,183.70 250,00 1,014.60 591.85 422.75 2,367.40 21,052.95 3,720.20 338,20 1,352.80 1,099.15 676.40 250.00 422.75 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 11 of 19 MCOLES information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution 3 24 33 15 14 20 12 2 22 22 2 16 16 37 5 1,780 81 10 40 47 9 17 1 15 74 39 6 24 MARLETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT MARQUETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MARQUETTE POLICE DEPARTMENT MARSHALL POLICE DEPARTMENT MARYSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT MASON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MASON POLICE DEPARTMENT MAWILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT MECOSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MELVINDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT MENOMINEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MENOMINEE POLICE DEPARTMENT MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT METAMORA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT MICHIGAN STATE POLICE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY DPS MIDLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MIDLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT MILAN POLICE DEPARTMENT MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT MILLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT MISSAUKEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MONROE POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTAGUE POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTCALM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 253.65 2,029.20 2,790.15 1,268.25 1,183.70 1,691.00 1,014.60 250.00 1,860.10 1,860.10 250.00 1,352.80 1,352.80 3,128.35 422.75 150,499.00 6,848.55 845.50 3,382.00 3,973.85 760.95 1,437.35 250.00 1,268.25 6,256.70 3,297.45 507.30 2,029.20 MCOLES WthisweCrowom0..40 larefstrwma42sors*O1 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 12 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution MONTMORENCY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MONTROSE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT MORENCI POLICE DEPARTMENT MORRICE POLICE DEPARTMENT MOTT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS MOUNT MORRIS POLICE DEPARTMENT MOUNT MORRIS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT MOUNT PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT MUNISING POLICE DEPARTMENT MUSKEGON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE MUSKEGON HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT MUSKEGON POLICE DEPARTMENT MUSKEGON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT NAPOLEON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT NASHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT NEW BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT NEW BUFFALO POLICE DEPARTMENT NEW LOTHROP POLICE DEPARTMENT NEWAYGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE NEWAYGO POLICE DEPARTMENT NILES POLICE DEPARTMENT NORTH MUSKEGON POLICE DEPARTMENT NORTHERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT NORTHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT NORTHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT NORTHVILLE TOWNSHIP DPS NORTON SHORES POLICE DEPARTMENT NORWAY POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,183.70 760.95 338.20 250.00 2,113.75 422.75 2,282.85 2,451.95 338.20 4,565.70 1,268.25 6,341.25 1,352.80 338.20 253.65 1,352.80 591.85 250.00 2,198.30 507.30 1,352.80 676.40 1,606.45 845.50 1,014.60 2,282.85 2,367.40 507.30 14 9 4 2 25 5 27 29 4 54 15 75 16 4 3 16 7 1 26 6 16 8 19 10 12 27 28 6 MCOLE7S AR poCero.)40 ca Us, fAV,:ge.rt Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 13 of 19 MCOLES information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution NOVI POLICE DEPARTMENT OAK PARK DPS OAKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE DPS OAKLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OAKLAND UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT OCEANA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OGEMAW COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OLIVET POLICE DEPARTMENT ONTONAGON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ONTWA TOWNSHIP-EDWARDSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT ORCHARD LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT OSCEOLA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OSCODA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OSCODA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT OTISVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT OTSEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OTSEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT OTTAWA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE OWOSSO POLICE DEPARTMENT OXFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT PAW PAW POLICE DEPARTMENT PENTWATER POLICE DEPARTMENT PERRY POLICE DEPARTMENT PETOSKEY DPS PINCKNEY POLICE DEPARTMENT PINCONNING POLICE DEPARTMENT PITTSFIELD TOWNSHIP DPS PLAINWELL DPS 63 5,326.65 49 4,142.95 24 2,029.20 565 47,770.75 21 1,775.55 20 1,691.00 17 1,437.35 2 250.00 6 507.30 6 507.30 9 760.95 20 1,691.00 12 1,014.60 9 760.95 1 250.00 11 930.05 6 507.30 139 11,752.45 18 1,521.90 6 507.30 8 676.40 3 253.65 5 422.75 19 1,606.45 5 422.75 2 250.00 37 3,128.35 8 676.40 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 14 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution 6 15 27 1 50 1 52 4 2 12 3 4 1 54 4 2 6 7 3 9 22 23 21 10 6 6 a 39 PLEASANT RIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT PORT AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT PORT HURON POLICE DEPARTMENT PORT SANILAC POLICE DEPARTMENT PORTAGE POLICE DEPARTMENT PORTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT PRAIRIEVILLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT PRESQUE ISLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE QUINCY POLICE DEPARTMENT RAISIN TOWNSHIP DPS READING POLICE DEPARTMENT REDFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT REED CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT REESE POLICE DEPARTMENT RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP DPS RICHFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT RICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT RIVER ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT RIVERVIEW POLICE DEPARTMENT ROCHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT ROCKFORD DPS ROCKVVOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT ROGERS CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT ROMEO POLICE DEPARTMENT ROMULUS POLICE DEPARTMENT 507,30 1,268.25 2,282.85 250.00 4,227.50 250.00 4,396.60 338.20 250.00 1,014,60 253.65 338,20 250.00 4,565.70 338.20 250.00 507.30 591.85 253.65 760.95 1,860,10 1,944.65 1,775.55 845.50 507.30 507.30 676.40 3,297.45 MCOLES ad 4,0 00"411r. ,A• Dientonwt Seandms Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 15 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency ROOSEVELT PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT ROSCOMMON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ROSE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT ROYAL OAK POLICE DEPARTMENT SAGINAW COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SAGINAW POLICE DEPARTMENT SAGINAW TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE SALINE POLICE DEPARTMENT SAND LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT SANDUSKY POLICE DEPARTMENT SANILAC COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SAUGATUCK-DOUGLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT SAULT STE MARIE POLICE DEPARTMENT SCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE POLICE DEPARTMENT SCHOOLCRAFT COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SCOTTVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT SHELBY POLICE DEPARTMENT SHELBY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT SHEPHERD POLICE DEPARTMENT SHIAWASSEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE SILVER CREEK TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT SOMERSET TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT SOUTH HAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT SOUTH LYON POLICE DEPARTMENT SOUTH ROCKWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT SOUTHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT Distribution 676.40 2,113.75 250.00 5,749.40 6,341.25 5,580.30 4,650,25 3,466.55 760.95 1,099.15 250.00 338.20 2,198.30 676.40 1,860.10 1,183.70 253.65 253.65 591.85 5,157.55 250.00 2,367.40 250.00 250.00 1,691.00 1,352.80 338.20 10,146.00 FTEs 8 25 1 68 75 66 55 41 9 13 1 4 26 8 22 14 3 3 7 61 2 28 1 2 20 16 4 120 Vtglit**Cerr.:tItevAl‘vtvol.?..m$ro'4..4ta NICOLE'S krf LAY.00nrit 51,01.0, Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 16 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution SOUTHGATE POLICE DEPARTMENT 36 SPARTA POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 SPRING ARBOR TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 SPRINGPORT TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 ST. CHARLES POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 ST. CLAIR CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 ST. CLAIR COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 80 ST. CLAIR SHORES POLICE DEPARTMENT 80 ST. IGNACE POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 ST. JOHNS POLICE DEPARTMENT 10 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 24 ST. JOSEPH DPS 15 ST. JOSEPH TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 11 ST. LOUIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 STERLING HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT 149 STOCKBRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 STURGIS POLICE DEPARTMENT 19 SUMPTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 13 SYLVAN LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 5 TAYLOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 75 TECUMSEH POLICE DEPARTMENT 12 THETFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 THOMAS TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 THREE OAKS POLICE DEPARTMENT 3 THREE RIVERS POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 TITTABAWASSEE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 TRAVERSE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 28 TRENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 33 3,043.80 591.85 250.00 250.00 253.65 591.85 6,764.00 6,764.00 338.20 845.50 2,029.20 1,268.25 930.05 591.85 12,597.95 250.00 1,606.45 1,099.15 422.75 6,341.25 1,014.60 250.00 591.85 253.65 1,268.25 591.85 2,367.40 2,790.15 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 17 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution 97 7 24 2 3 4 9 58 19 13 58 39 5 1 6 33 14 195 144 54 4 5 103 21 626 20 54 73 TROY POLICE DEPARTMENT TUSCARORA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT TUSCOLA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE UBLY POLICE DEPARTMENT UNADILLA TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT UNION CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN DPS UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DPS UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT DPS UTICA POLICE DEPARTMENT VAN BUREN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE VAN BUREN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT VASSAR POLICE DEPARTMENT VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT VICKSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT WALKER POLICE DEPARTMENT WALLED LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT WARREN POLICE DEPARTMENT WASHTENAW COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE WATERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT WATERVLIET POLICE DEPARTMENT WAYLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY DPS WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY WAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE WAYNE POLICE DEPARTMENT WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY DPS WEST BLOOMFIELD TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT 8,201.35 591.85 2,029.20 250.00 253.65 338.20 760.95 4,903.90 1,606.45 1,099.15 4,903.90 3,297.45 422.75 250.00 507,30 2,790.15 1,183.70 16,487.25 12,175.20 4,565.70 338,20 422.75 8,708.65 1,775.55 52,928.30 1,691.00 4,565.70 6,172.15 Mcg-E.5 Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 18 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Recipient Agency FTEs Distribution WEST BRANCH POLICE DEPARTMENT WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT WESTLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT WEXFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE WHITE CLOUD POLICE DEPARTMENT WHITE LAKE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT WHITE PIGEON POLICE DEPARTMENT WHITEHALL POLICE DEPARTMENT WILLIAMSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT WIXOM POLICE DEPARTMENT WOLVERINE LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT WOODHAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT VVYANDOTTE POLICE DEPARTMENT WYOMING POLICE DEPARTMENT YALE POLICE DEPARTMENT YPSILANTI POLICE DEPARTMENT ZEELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT 4 338.20 30 2,536.50 80 6,764.00 22 1,860.10 3 253.65 25 2,113.75 4 338.20 9 760.95 6 507.30 19 1,606.45 6 507.30 27 2,282.85 31 2,621.05 84 7,102.20 7 591.85 26 2,198.30 10 845.50 MCOLES kWKI.n1110. Lne fAevortt.rtaa4priat Michigan Commission On Law Enforcement Standards Page 19 of 19 MCOLES Information and Tracking Network Semi-Annual Law Enforcement Distribution Report Summary Totals Available LED Revenue Per Capita Payments Per Capita Value Number of Agencies Number of FTEs Per Capita Distribution 1,430,433.50 84.55 445 16,775 1,418,326.25 Minimum Payments Number of Agencies 48 Number of FTEs 76 Minimum Distribution 12,000.00 Total Disbursed 1,430,326.25 Total Number of Agencies 493 Total Number of FTEs 16,851 FISCAL NOTE (MISC . #17206) July 19, 2017 BY: Commissioner Thomas Middleton, Chairperson, Finance Committee IN RE: SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2017 LAW ENFORCEMENT DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM ACCEPTANCE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed the above referenced resolution and finds: 1. The Sheriff's Office has been awarded $47,771 from the Michigan Department of Treasury for the Michigan Justice Training Fund. This is the first of two disbursements the Sheriff's Office will receive with the second disbursement to be accepted in a separate resolution. 2. There is no matching obligation or additional positions required with this award. 3. The grant period is from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2018. 4. Funding will be used for in-service criminal justice training of Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards (MCOLES) licensed law enforcement officers. 5. The FY 2017 budget is to be amended as follows to recognize the first disbursement of program funding: CRIMINAL JUSTICE TRAINING GRANT #27340 GR #0000000144 Bud Ref: 2017 Activity: GLB Analysis: Type GLB FY2017 Revenues 4030501-110110-615571 State Grants $ 47,771 Total Revenues $ 47,771 Expenditures 4030501-110110-731304 Officer Training Total Expenditures $ 47,771 $ 47,771 Coi-nmissioner Thomas Middleton, District #4 Chairperson, Finance Committee FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote, Resolution #17206 July 19, 2017 Moved by Crawford supported by Quarles the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda be adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). AYES: Crawford, Dwyer, Fleming, Gingell, Hoffman, Jackson, Kochenderfer, KowaII, McGillivray, Middleton, Quarles, Spisz, Taub, Tietz, Weipert, Woodward, Zack, Berman, Bowman. (19) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted in favor, the resolutions (with fiscal notes attached) on the Consent Agenda were adopted (with accompanying reports being accepted). RESOLUTION I HEREBY APPROVETHIS CHIEF DEPUTY COUNTY EXECUTN E ACTING PURSUANT TO MU 45.559A (7) STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lisa Brown, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on July 19, 2017, with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 1 9 day of July, 2017. Lisa Brown, Oakland County