HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2018.05.02 - 23490MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #18154
BY: Commissioner Bill Dwyer, District #14
IN RE: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS — PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL
YEAR 2018 APPROPRIATION — CITY OF FARMINGTON — REPAIR AND RESURFACING OF LOCAL
ROADS — PROJECT NO. 2018-24
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Oakland County Board of Commissioners has authorized the Pilot Local Road Improvement
Program to assist Oakland County's cities and villages with the construction, maintenance and repair of
roads under the supervision, direction and control of cities and villages; and
WHEREAS Miscellaneous Resolution #16103 provides that any Oakland County appropriation in support
of the Pilot Local Road Improvement Program shall be distributed only after completion of all of the
following:
1. The municipality has fully completed and returned the standard project application form approved
by the Local Road Improvement Program Subcommittee; and
2. The municipality has submitted a statement detailing that the project will fulfill the requirement of
encouraging and assisting businesses to locate in the county, as required in MCL 123.872; and
3. The municipality has agreed to comply with the provisions of MCL 123.872 that require that a report
shall be submitted to the Board of Commissioners outlining the project activities and the degree
that the municipality has met the stated purpose of the project; and
4. The municipality has agreed to comply with policies and procedures of the program as approved
by the Board of Commissioners including supplementary policies approved by the Local Road
Improvement Program Subcommittee; and
5. The Local Road Improvement Program Subcommittee of the Finance Committee has reviewed and
recommended approval of the application; and
6. The Commissioner(s) representing the city or village requesting the project submits a resolution
authorizing the appropriation of the County's maximum 50% share of the project from the General
Fund Assigned Fund Balance for Pilot Local Road Improvement Program. The resolution shall be
approved by the Finance Committee and the full Board; and
7. A public hearing on the proposed project is conducted during a meeting of the Board of
Commissioners; and
8. The municipality has approved and executed a cost participation agreement prepared by
Corporation Counsel in accordance with requirements provided in the policies and procedures of
the program as approved by the Board of Commissioners including supplementary policies
approved by the Local Road Improvement Program Subcommittee; and
9. The municipality submits an invoice to the county in accordance with the conditions included in the
cost participation agreement; and
WHEREAS the City of Farmington has identified a project and submitted an application detailing the goals
and outcomes of the project; and
WHEREAS the City of Farmington has demonstrated that it has available funding equal to a minimum of
50% the project costs; and
WHEREAS Oakland County's share of the Fiscal Year 2018 authorized amount of the Local Road
Improvement Program funding for Project No. 2018-24 in the City of Farmington is $18,325; and
WHEREAS a public hearing regarding the project has been held before the Board of Commissioners in
accordance with the requirements of MCL 123.872; and
WHEREAS upon review of the project application, the Board of Commissioners has determined that the
completion of the project will encourage and assist businesses to locate in Oakland County.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners hereby approves
the project submitted by the City of Farmington and authorizes the release of Local Road Improvement
Program funds from the Oakland County Assigned Fund Balance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute
the cost participation agreement with the City of Farmington prepared by Corporation Counsel for the Pilot
Local Road Improvement Program Project No. 2018-24.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Clerk is requested to forward copies of this
resolution to Oakland County Fiscal Services and the City of Farmington.
Chairperson, I move the adoption of the foregoing Resolution.
Commissioner Dw, er
District #14
LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PILOT PROGRAM
COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Repair and Resurfacing of Local Roads
City of Farmington
Board Project No, 2018-24
This Agreement, made and entered into this day of , 2018, by and between the
Board of Commissioners of the County of Oakland, Michigan, hereinafter referred to as the
BOARD, and the City of Farmington, hereinafter referred to as the COMMUNITY, provides as
follows:
WHEREAS, the BOARD has established the Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund
Program, hereinafter the PROGRAM, for the purposes of improving economic development in
Oakland County cities and villages. The terms and policies of the PROGRAM are contained in
Attachment A. The BOARD intends the PROGRAM to assist its municipalities by offering limited
funds, from state statutory revenue sharing funds, for specific, targeted road maintenance and/or
improvement projects on roadways under the jurisdiction of cities and villages; and
WHEREAS, the BOARD shall participate in a city or village road project in an amount not
exceeding 50% of the cost of the road improvement, hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT, and
also not exceeding the Preliminary Distribution Formula as it relates to the COMMUNITY,
(Attachment B); and
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY has identified the PROJECT as the Repair and Resurfacing of
Local Roads, as more fully described in Attachment C, attached hereto, and made a part hereof,
which improvements involve roads under the jurisdiction of and within the COMMUNITY and are
not under the jurisdiction of the Road Commission for Oakland County or state trunk lines; and
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY has acknowledged and agreed to the BOARD's policies regarding
the PROGRAM, Attachment A, and further acknowledge and agree that the PROJECT's purpose
is to encourage and assist businesses to locate and expand within Oakland County and shall
submit a report to the BOARD identifying the effect of the PROJECT on businesses in the
COMMUNITY at the completion of the PROJECT. In addition, the COMMUNITY acknowledges
that the program is meant to supplement and not replace funding for existing road programs or
projects; and
WHEREAS, the COMMUNITY has acknowledged and agreed that the PROGRAM is expressly
established as a pilot program and there is no guarantee that the PROGRAM will be continued
from year to year. The COMMUNITY further acknowledges and agrees that if the PROJECT is
a multi-year road improvement project, the maximum number of years for the PROJECT funding
is two (2) years. The BOARD anticipates that most PROJECTS funded under the PROGRAM
will be completed by the end of calendar year 2019. There is no obligation on behalf of the
BOARD to fund either the PROJECT or the PROGRAM in the future; and
WHEREAS the COMMUNITY has acknowledged and agreed that the COMMUNITY shall
assume any and all responsibilities and liabilities arising out of the administration of the PROJECT
and that Oakland County shares no such responsibilities in administering the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the estimated total cost of the PROJECT is $1,904,791; and
WHEREAS, said PROJECT involves certain designated and approved Local Road Improvement
Matching Funds in the amount of $18,325, which amount shall be paid to the COMMUNITY by
the BOARD; and
WHEREAS, the BOARD and the COMMUNITY have reached a mutual understanding regarding
the cost sharing of the PROJECT and wish to commit that understanding to writing in this
Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and in conformity
with applicable law and BOARD resolution(s), it is hereby agreed between the COMMUNITY and
the BOARD that:
1. The BOARD approves of the PROJECT, and in reliance upon the acknowledgements
of the COMMUNITY, finds that the PROJECT meets the purpose of the PROGRAM.
2. The BOARD approves of a total funding amount under the PROGRAM for the
PROJECT in an amount not to exceed $18,325. The COMMUNITY shall submit an invoice upon
execution of this Agreement to the COUNTY in the amount of $18,325.
a. The invoice shall be sent to:
Lynn Sonkiss, Manager of Fiscal Services
Executive Office Building
2100 Pontiac Lake Road, Building 41 West
Waterford, MI 48328
3. Upon receipt of said invoice, the BOARD shall pay the COMMUNITY the sum of
$18,325 from funds available in the PROGRAM.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and date first
written above.
OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
By:
Its:
COMMUNITY
By:
It's:
Attachment "A"
PILOT LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PROGRAM
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Oakland County Government recognizes that Michigan law places the primary responsibility for road funding on
the State and non-county local units of government. However, the County also recognizes that the law does
permit a limited, discretionary role for the County in assisting a road commission and local units within a county
by supporting some road maintenance and improvement efforts.
Accordingly, for many years Oakland County has voluntarily provided limited assistance to its cities, villages and
townships (CVT's) and to the Road Commission of Oakland County (RCOC) by investing in a discretionary Tri-
Party Road Program, Authorized under Michigan law, the County's tri-party funding contributions primarily
facilitate safety improvement projects on CVT roads under the jurisdiction of the RCOC. By law, tri-party funds
cannot be used to fund projects on roads solely under the jurisdiction of CVT's.
Recognizing a continuing need to better maintain local CVT streets and roads, yet being ever mindful of the
County's limited responsibility for and jurisdiction over non-County roads and streets, Oakland County
Government wishes to pilot a discretionary program that is more flexible than the current Tr-Party Road Program,
one that will allow Oakland County to assist its cities and villages with maintenance and safety projects on non-
County roads.
Not being the funding responsibility of County government, local CVT roads generally cannot be maintained or
improved using County funds because doing so would be considered to be the "gifting" of County resources.
However laudable the purpose, Michigan law generally forbids the gifting of government resources. To avoid
application of the constitutionally-based gifting restriction, the state legislature must, and in this arena has,
determined that a public benefit results from a taxpayer investment, one that provides a quid pro quo sufficient
to avoid application of the gifting prohibition. Here, the legislature has determined that the economic development
benefit presumed to accrue to a county as a result of local street and road investments can provide a sufficient
quid pro quo to county taxpayers justifying a discretionary county investment in a non-county road, a benefit that
constitutes a fair exchange for value and not a gift.
This legislative determination is set forth in 1985 P.A. 9, which amended 1913 P.A. 380, by adding a new section
2, which in pertinent part provides:
"(1)..,A county may grant or loan funds to a township, village or city located within that county for the
purpose of encouraging and assisting businesses to locate and expand within the county...
(2) A loan or grant made under subsection (1) may be used for local public improvements or to encourage
and assist businesses in locating or expanding in this state, to preserve jobs in this state, to encourage
investment in the communities in this state, or for other public purposes."
Communities that wish to attract, retain and grow business, retain jobs and encourage community investment,
needs a safely maintained road infrastructure. This road infrastructure must include both residential and
commercial roads as workers and consumers need to get to and from work, shopping, schools and recreation.
In a fiscally prudent and limited manner, the County wishes to help its cities and villages accomplish this objective
by test-piloting a new local road improvement matching fund program.
Any such program must be mindful of the limits imposed under Public Act 9. One important restriction Public Act
9 imposed on grants or loans made pursuant to Subsection 2 of the Act is the mandate that, "A grant or loan
under this Subsection shall not be derived from ad valorem taxes except for ad valorem taxes approved by a
vote of the people for economic development." This means that funding for an expanded local road assistance
program cannot utilize proceeds from any of Oakland County's ad valorem tax levies since no levy has been
approved by voters specifically for economic development.
Given this limitation, it appears that the state statutory revenue sharing appropriated to the County can provide
a non-ad valorem source of funds that legally can be used to support the pilot program. Competition for those
funds, which are limited in amount, is fierce and their yearly availability is subject to the state legislative process.
In the recent past, the State stripped all of those funds away from Michigan counties. Understanding that reality,
it shall be the policy of the Oakland County Board of Commissioners that the Board shall not appropriate any
County funds for a local road improvement matching fund program for non-County roads in any year where the
State of Michigan fails to appropriate statutory revenue sharing funds to Oakland County in an amount sufficient
to allow the County to first prudently address its core functions.
Act 9 imposes additional conditions on grants and loans. These include requirements that the loan or grant shall
be administered within an established application process for proposals; that any grant or loan shall be made at
a public hearing of the county board of commissioners and that the Board shall require a report to the county
board of commissioners regarding the activities of the recipient and a report as to the degree to which the
recipient has met the stated public purpose of the funding.
Understanding all of the above, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners hereby establishes the following
Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program:
PROGRAM SUMMARY
The Board of Commissioners establishes a Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program for the
purposes of improving economic development in Oakland County cities and villages. The County intends this
Program to assist its municipalities by offering limited matching funds for specific, targeted road maintenance
and/or improvement projects on roadways under the jurisdiction of cities and villages.
A city or village participating in the Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program shall match any fund
authorized by the Board of Commissioners in an amount equal to a minimum of 50% of the cost of the total
project award. County participation shall be limited to a maximum of 50% of the cost of the total project budget.
Funding shall be utilized to supplement and enhance local road maintenance and improvement programs.
Funding is not intended to replace existing budgeted local road programs or to replace funding already committed
to road improvements.
PROJECT GUIDELINES
Program funding shall be utilized solely for the purposes of road improvements to roads under the jurisdiction of
local cities and villages. Road improvements may include, but not be limited to, paving, resurfacing, lane
additions or lengthening, bridges, or drainage as such improvements relate to road safety, structure or relieving
congestion.
Program funding:
May be utilized to supplement a local government's matched funding for the purposes of receiving additional
federal transportation funding;
May not be utilized to fulfill a local government's responsibility to fund improvements to state
trunklines;
Shall be limited to real capital improvements to roadways and shall not be utilized for other purposes, such as
administrative expenses, personnel, consultants or other similar purposes;
Shall not be utilized for non-motorized improvements, unless these improvements are included in a project plan
for major improvements to a motorized roadway;
Shall be utilized for projects that will result in a measurable improvement in the development of the local economy
and contribute to business growth. Recipients shall be responsible for providing an outline of the economic
benefits of the project prior to approval and for reporting to the Board of Commissioners after the completion of
the project on the benefits achieved as a result of the projects.
ADMINISTRATION
Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program projects may be appropriated by the Board of Commissioners
in compliance with the County budget process. The amount of funds to be dedicated for the Pilot Program shall
be determined by the Board of Commissioners on an annual basis. Program funding may be reduced or
eliminated based upon the ability of the County government to meet primary constitutional and statutory duties.
The Board of Commissioners expressly reserves the right to adjust the County matching funds share at any time
based upon County budget needs.
In accordance with MCL 123.872, funds dedicated to the Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program shall
not be derived from ad valorem tax revenues. Program funding shall be limited to funds derived from the County's
distribution from the Michigan General Revenue Sharing Act. Reduction or elimination of the County's distribution
of revenue sharing funds may result in the elimination or suspension of the program.
Funding availability shall be distributed based upon a formula updated annually. The formula will consist of:
1. A percentage derived from the number of certified local major street miles in each
city and village divided by aggregate total of certified local major street miles of all cities and villages in
the County.
2. A percentage derived from the population of each city and village as determined by
the last decennial census conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau divided by the
aggregate total population of cities and villages in the County.
3. A percentage derived from the three-year rolling total of the number of crashes on city and village major
local streets divided by the aggregate three-year rolling crash numbers for all city and village major local
streets or most recent data available. The crash data will be supplied by the Road Commission for
Oakland County using data from the Traffic Improvement Association.
Each city and villages percentage allocation shall be determined by adding each factor percentage and dividing
that total by three. The amount of funds available for match shall be determined by the total amount of funds
allocated by the Board of Commissioners added to an equal amount representing the match provided by local
cities and villages.
The Chairman of the Finance Committee of the Board of Commissioners shall establish a Subcommittee on the
Local Road Improvement Program. This Subcommittee shall consist of three members, with two members
representing the majority caucus and one member representing the minority caucus. It shall be the responsibility
of the Subcommittee to direct the administration of this program, receive applications for program funding and
make recommendations of acceptance to the Finance Committee and Board of Commissioners. The
Subcommittee may consult with County departments, staff and the Road Commission for Oakland County in the
conduct of its business.
DISBURSEMENT
The Subcommittee shall forward recommendations for approval of Local Road Improvement Matching Fund
Program projects to the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners. This recommendation shall include a cost
participation agreement between the County and participating municipality. Minimally, cost participation
agreements shall include: responsibility for administering the project, the project location, purpose, scope,
estimated costs including supporting detail, provisions ensuring compliance with project guidelines, as well as
disbursement eligibility requirements. The cost participation agreement shall also require the maintenance of
supporting documentation to ensure compliance with the following provisions:
1. Any and all supporting documentation for project expenditures reimbursed with appropriated funding shall
be maintained a minimum of seven years from the date of final reimbursement for actual expenditures
incurred.
2. The Oakland County Auditing Division reserves the right to audit any and all project expenditures
reimbursed through the program.
Upon receipt of recommendation of project approval from the Subcommittee, the County Commissioner or
Commissioners, representing the area included in the proposed project, may introduce a resolution authorizing
approval of the project and the release of funds. Resolutions shall be forwarded to the Finance Committee of the
Board of Commissioners, who shall review and issue a recommendation to the Board on the adoption of the
resolution. The Chairperson of the Finance Committee shall schedule a public hearing before the Board of
Commissioners prior to consideration of final approval of the resolution.
The deadline for projects to be submitted for consideration shall be established by the Subcommittee. The
Subcommittee may work with participating municipalities to develop a plan for projects that exceed that
municipality's annual allocation amount. This may include a limited plan to rollover that municipality's allocation
for a period of years until enough funding availability has accrued to complete the project, subject to funding
availability.
Upon completion of project plans and execution of the local participation agreement by the County and governing
authority of the local municipality, the participating municipality shall submit an invoice in accordance with the
terms and conditions included in the agreement. The Oakland County Department of Management and Budget
Fiscal Services Division shall process payments in accordance with policies and procedures as set forth by the
Department of Management and Budget and the Oakland County Treasurer.
In the event an eligible local unit of government chooses not to participate in the Local Road Improvement
Matching Fund Program, any previously undistributed allocated funding may be reallocated to all participating
local units of government at the discretion of the Subcommittee on the Local Road Improvement Program.
At the completion of each project, the participating local government shall provide a report to the Board of
Commissioners regarding the activities of the recipient and the degree to which the recipient has met the stated
public purpose of the funding as required by MCL 123.872.
LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT SUBCOMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE, OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Provision regarding existing funded local road programs and projects. The standard project
agreement shall require participating municipalities to acknowledge that the Local Road
Improvement Program is meant to supplement and to not replace funding for existing road
programs or projects.
Fulfillment of economic benefit provisions of MCL 123.872. The Pilot Local Road Improvement
Program has been established by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners under the
authority granted by MCL 123.872, which provides that "A county may grant or loan funds to a
township, village or city located within that county for the purposes of encouraging and assisting
businesses to locate and expand within the county". It shall be the responsibility of the municipality
to outline the extent to which the project included in their application will meet these standards.
The Subcommittee shall only consider projects that meet the standards provided in MCL 123.872.
The standard project agreement shall include a provision requiring the participating municipality
to fulfill the statutory requirement included in MCL 123.872 that, "the grant or loan contract made
by county shall require a report to the county of board of commissioners regarding the activities
of the recipient and the degree to which the recipient has met the stated purpose of the funding."
Multi-year projects. The Local Road Improvement Program has been expressly established as a
pilot program. There is no guarantee the program will be continued from year to year. The
Subcommittee recognizes that the allocation authorized for local governments may not provide
adequate funding in a single year to allow a project to move forward. Local governments shall be
offered the opportunity to submit project plans that would necessitate the accumulation of multiple
years of the community's allocation amount to fulfill the county's share of a project budget. A multi-
year project plan submittal shall not exceed two years in duration. The allocation amount available
to each community is subject to change annually based upon the factors utilized in the formula.
Consideration of multi-year project plans does not obligate Oakland County in any way to funding
any project or program in the future.
These plans are meant to be utilized for planning purposes and for consideration by the Oakland
County Board of Commissioners regarding authorizing a limited carryover of a community's
allocation year to year.
Completion of projects and submittal of post-project report. The standard cost participation
agreement shall include a provision requiring the municipality to complete the project and submit
the required post-project completion report prior to the end of the next calendar year following the
date of project approval. An alternative schedule may be approved for a project by action of the
Board of Commissioners, upon recommendation of the Subcommittee.
LRIP DISTRIBUTION FORMULA Attachment "B" 2018 .1i1P114:ia Jr--`'It'=-AgrAnt4t714=00119tIVraiMi•%Pihrlik,:ieTAPA .-4E4)=). 0'14-:"1101_0 2.99% ,VP,W411061111.19J-1 $89,579 M:141D.I/VALnqrrl?ai) $2,144 lal.ltiMitlafil..illiZB 46,534.00 Auburn Hills 32.33 4.82% 21,412 2.80% 236 1.34% Berkley 15.63 2.33% 14,970 1.95% 55 031% 1.53% $46,018 $1401 24,110.00 Beverly Hills 10.99 1.64% 10,267 1.34% 40 0.23% 1.37% $32,068 5757 16,801.00 Bingham Farms 102 0.15% 1,111 0.15% 54 0.31% 0.20% $6,061 $145 3,176.00 Birmingham 21.87 3.2534 20,103 2.63% 580 3.29% 3.06% $91,782 $2,196 48,087.00 Bloomfield Hills 8.83 L32% 3,869 0.51% 235 1.33% 1.05% $31,623 $757 16,569.00 Clarkston 1.48 0.22% 882 0.12% 37 0.21% 0.18% $5,498 $132 2,881.00 Clawson 9.62 1.44% 11,825 1.55% 134 0.76% 1.25% $37,497 $E97 19,646.00 Farmington 7,36 110% 10,377 136% 183 1.04% 1.17% $34,975 $837 18,325.00 Farmington Hills 58.36 8.71% 79,740 10.43% 1955 1108% 10.07% $302,234 $7,233 158,350.00 Ferndale 20.99 3.13% 19,900 2.60% 219 124% 2.32% $69,716 $1,668 36,526.00 Franklin 434 0.65% 3,150 0.41% 48 0.27% 0.44% $13,321 $319 6,980.00 Hazel Park 17.12 235% 16,422 2.15% 188 1.07% 1.92% $52,658 $1,380 30,209.00 Holly 7 1.04% 6,086 0.80% 83 0.47% 0.77% $23,105 $553 12,106.00 Huntington Woods 6.95 1.04% 8,238 032% 58 0.33% 0.73% $21,888 $524 11,468.00 Keego Harbor 1.93 0.29% 2,970 0.39% 80 0.45% 0,38% $11,335 $271 5,939.00 Lake Angelus o 0.00% 290 0.04% 22 0.12% 0.04% $1,135 $27 585.00 Lake Orion 2.74 0.41% 2,973 0.39% 123 0.70% 0.50% $14,973 $358 7,845.00 Lathrup Village 7.36 1.10% 4,075 0.53% 185 1.05% 0.89% $26,788 $641 14,035.00 Leonard 2.34 0.35% 403 0.05% 4 0.02% 0.14% $4,227 $101 2,215.00 Madison Heights 21.5 3.21% 29,694 3.89% 745 4.22% 3.77.% $113,236 $2,710 59,328.00 Milford 7.3 1.09% 6,175 0.81% 108 0.61% 0.84% $25,123 $601 13,163.00 Northville* 0.8 0.12% 5,970 0.78% 109 0.62% 0.51% $15,179 $363 7,953.00 Novi 39.52 5.90% 55,224 7.23% 1313 7.44% 6.86% $205,737 54,924 107,793.00 Oak Park 18.35 2.74% 29,319 3.84% 275 156% 2.71% $81„390 $1,948 42,643.00 Orchard Lake 1.8 0.27% 2,375 0.31% 120 0.68% 0.42% $12,603 $302 6,604,00 Ortonville 3.21 0.48% 1,442 0.19% 40 0.23% 0.30% 58,968 $215 4,699.00 Oxford 6.01 0.90% 3,436 0.45% 107 0.61% 0.65% 519,566 $468 10,251.00 Pleasant Ridge 359 0.54% 7,526 0.33% 145 0.82% 0.55% $16,920 $405 8,865.00 Pontiac 70.21 10.47% 59,515 7.79% 1264 7.17% 8.48% $254,259 $5,05 133,215.00 Rochester 8.59 1.28% 12,711 1_66% 245 139% 1.44% $43,290 $1,036 22,631.00 Rochester Hills 38.61 5.76% 70,995 9.29% 1945 1103% 8.69% $260,767 $6,241 136,625.00 Royal Oak 63.96 9.54% 57,236 7.49% 1083 6.14% 7.72% $231,698 $5,545 121,394.00 South Lyon 4.43 0.66% 11,327 1.48% 144 0.82% 0.99% $29,564 $708 15,490.00 Southfield 64.71 9.65% 71,739 9.39% 2452 13.90% 10.98% $329,410 $7,833 172,588.00 Sylvan Lake 238 0.38% 1,720 0.23% 66 0.37% 0.33% $9,842 $236 5,157.00 Troy 5734 8.55% 130,980 10.60% 2343 13.28% 10.81% $324,331 $7,762 169,928.00 Walled Lake 5.34 0.80% 6,999 0.92% 153 0.87% 0.86% $25,874 $619 13,555.00 Wixom 10.49 1.56% 13,498 1.77% 408 2.31% 1.88% $56,431 $1,350 29,566.00 Wolverine TOTAL 3.69 670.79 0.55% 100.00% 4,312 ,M1 _ 764 0.56% 100.00% 57 17,639 0.32 100.01% 0.48% 100.00% $14,331 $3,000,00o $343 $71,795 7,509.00 1,571,795.00 2018
ATTACHMENT C
Pilot Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Program
Repair and Resurfacing of Local Roads
City of Farmington
Board Project No. 2018-24
Crack sealing, joint replacement, and full slab replacement, as well as mill & fill asphalt
roads, and improve pedestrian crossings.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
Construction/Engineering Estimated Costs $ 1,904,791
Total Estimated Project Costs $ 1,904,791
COST PARTICIPATION BREAKDOWN
COMMUNITY
_
COUNTY TOTAL
FY2018 LRIP Program $18,325 $18,325 $36,650
Contribution $1,868,141 $0 $1,868,141
TOTAL SHARES $1,886,466 $18,325 $1,904,791
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
1200 N. Telegraph Road
Pontiac, MI 48341-0475
Phone: (248) 858-0100
Fnx: (248)858-1572
2018 APPLICATION FORM
LOCAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT MATCHING FUND PILOT PROGRAM
Background: Oakland County has established a Local Road Improvement Matching Fund Pilot
Program for the purposes of improving economic development in Oakland County cities and villages.
The County intends this Program to assist its municipalities by offering limited matching funds for
specific, targeted road maintenance and/or improvement projects on roadways under the jurisdiction
of cities and villages.
Project Policies and Guidelines: The Oakland County Board of Commissioners and the Local Road
Improvement Subcommittee has established policies, procedures and guidelines for project
consideration. These documents have been included as Attachment "A".
Available Funding: Oakland County's maximum contribution for projects in eligible cities or villages
has been established within the distribution formula included as Attachment "B".
The maximum county share for 2018 program proiects in Farmington has been set at $18,325.
Required Matching Funds: A city or village participating in the Local Road Improvement Matching
Fund program shall match any funds authorized by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners in
an amount equal to a minimum of 50% of the cost of the total project award. Funding shall be utilized
to supplement and enhance local road maintenance and improvement programs. Funding is not
intended to replace existing budgeted local road programs or to replace funding already committed to
road improvements.
REQUESTING LOCAL GOVERNMENT
MUNICIPALITY
City of Farmington
CONTACT PERSON
Charles J Eudy
TELEPHONE NUMBER
248/473-7250
STREET ADDRESS
33720 W. 9 Mile Road
CITY/ZIP
Farmington 48335
E-MAIL ADDRESS
ceudy@farmgov.com
PROJECT INFORMATION
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
To improve local and major roads within the City of Farmington, by crack sealing, joint
replacement, and full slab replacement, as well as mill & fill asphalt roads, and improve pedestrian
crossings.
ROAD/ROAD(S) TO BE IMPROVED
Potential roads could include Chesley north of 8 Mile Road, Brittney Hill Street south of Grand
River, Lilac north Grand River, Flanders Street east of Farmington Road, Gill Road intersection at
Freedom Road, Gill Road intersection at Grand River,
DESCRIPTION
All Concrete Maintenance and HMA projects would include:
AudioNideo inspection of route prior to reconstruction. Erosion control as specified by Oakland
County Water Resource Commissioner. Barricading per MDOT and/or RCOC standards. Full
depth pavement removal, including curb and gutter where applicable. Sub-grade undercut as
needed and instructed from engineers as soil conditions dictate. Repair or reconstruct storm water
collection system as needed. Repair or reconstruct sanitary collection system as needed. Improve
water distribution system as outlined in or 2014 Water Reliability Study. Pedestrian crossing
improvements which may include rapid flashing beacons similar to the one located at Farmington
Road & State Street, pedestrian safe zone where crossing multiple lanes of traffic. Detectable
warning surface at pedestrian crossings as needed. Turf establishment and timely closeout of
Oakland County Soil Erosion Permit.
PROJECT BUDGET
FUNDING REQUESTED
$18,325
LOCAL MATCH
$18,325
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT EXPENDITURES
Please see attachments
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF PROJECT
The Local Road Improvement Pilot Program has been established under MCL 123.872, the Gifts of Property Act, which
provides that "A county may grant or loan funds to a township, village, or city located within that county for the_purpose
of encouraging and assisting businesses to locate and expand within the county."
DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT OF ENCOURAGING AND ASSISTING BUSINESS TO LOCATE AND
EXPAND IN THE COUNTY
In fall of 2014, the City of Farmington Engineers established a priority list of road maintenance
projects. The targeted locations are highly visible and on the major arteries entering the
community. The City of Farmington Capital Improvement Committee meets monthly to review
progress and evaluate proposed road improvement and infrastructure projects.
Grand River to the east falls outside of our Downtown Development Authority; our vision is to
extend the quaint shopping district of the downtown from the Farmington DDA boundaries to
Farmington Hills as this area meets the Eight Mile Boulevard. This would expand our shopping
district and could ultimately bring more people to our community.
To our souther border with Wayne County, Chesley Drive at Eight Mile Road is a gateway to our
largest commercial district in the City of Farmington. Improvements in this area would draw a
distinct line between Wayne and Oakland Counties, welcoming people to both our county and our
Farmington community.
Grand River, being the City of Farmington's major thoroughfare and a MDOT Route, must always
be maintained as an alternate route when road construction or traffic emergencies occur on 1-696.
Any traffic that is re-routed -through the City of Farmington is an opportunity for the community to
show that it is a family-friendly destination with a lot to offer. Downtown Farmington consist of
many boutique-type businesses. Traffic is crucial to their success.
A key focus of Farmington City Administration is to make the community a year-round destination.
The downtown now includes an outdoor public ice rink in the winter months, summer concerts in
the park and a farmers market. Business recruitment is another component to the viability of the
community. It is critical to the success of the community that its gateways and pathways are in
keeping with the quality of the downtown, and that they are safe.
As a walkable destination, pedestrians look for a safe environment to work, play and visit local
businesses. If pedestrians do not feel safe crossing major roads, they will likely travel elsewhere.
If road surfaces are deteriorated motorist will find a different route to their destination, thus
bypassing a small town community. Existing local businesses will endure the higher cost of
deliveries, due to the fact if the roads are failing, this causes increased vehicle maintenance cost,
which are passed down to the consumer.
Pedestrians, motorist, deliveries, and businesses entering the community will see the direct efforts
of reinvestment into the community by the Local and County government's.
OPTIONAL MULTI-YEAR PROJECT PLAN
The Local Road Improvement Program has been expressly established as a pilot program. There is no guarantee the
program will be continued from year to year. The Local Road Improvement Program Subcommittee recognizes that the
allocation authorized for local governments may not provide adequate funding in a single year to allow a project to
move forward. Local governments shall be offered the opportunity to submit project plans that would necessitate the
accumulation of multiple years of the community's allocation amount to fulfill the County's share of a project budget. A
multi-year project plan submittal shall not exceed two years in duration. The allocation amount available to each
community is subject to change annually based upon the factors utilized in the distribution formula. Consideration of
multi-year project plans does not obligate Oakland County in any way to fund any project or program in the future.
These plans are meant to be utilized for planning purposes and for consideration by the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners to authorize a limited carryover of a community's allocation year to year.
DESCRIPTION OF MULTI-YEAR PLAN INCLUDING ESTIMATED PROJECT BUDGET AND CARRYOVER PERIOD OF COMMUNITY'S
ALLOCATION
OPTIONAL INFORMATION FROM COMMUNITY: NOT A MULTI-YEAR PLAN
The City of Farmington began annual Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER) system in
2013. In August this year (2018), will be our sixth (6) year of collecting the PASER data. We have
already determined our initial projections of the road maintenance program are not sufficient.
Following this year's collection of the PASER system, we will be able to provide our residents an
updated Road Program.
Earlier this year, the Farmington City Council opened a discussion to re-establish a
roads/infrastructure capital improvements program and schedule. The capital improvements
program will require DWRF, SAW Grants, and possible bonding.
The City of Farmington generates nearly $350,000.00 annually through ACT 51 funds, Local Road
Millage, and other funds. We are determining how aggressive we need to be to meet our goals of
improving our local and major roads. This program must be a continuing effort, not just a 3 year
plan. City Council is also considering to increase the local road millage, which would increase the
annual funds to $492,000.
The third year of plans will be the crack sealing of multiple streets in selected subdivisions, and
total reconstruction of one local street. Our 2018-19 budget includes up to $600,000 allocated for
this Fiscal Year.
The third year projects will begin the major reconstruction efforts of infrastructure renewal and road
replacement. By the fourth year, we will have our full reconstruction plan in order with funding
established. This is when the City could begin to address the $1,904,791 of targeted projects.
The City has established a 5 year capital improvements plan with targeted roads and infrastructure
improvements. The City will continue to evaluate the roads using the PASER system and taking
into consideration residents/business complaints of road condition. The capital improvement plan
will only be successful if the infrastructure is addressed during a road improvement project.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Local Road Improvement Program Subcommittee of the Finance Committee of the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners has been tasked with managing this program and making recommendations for project approval. Please
supply any additional information you believe may be helpful in the consideration of your application.
OPTIONAL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
See Multi-Year Plan Box - not all the information would fit in this space.
REPORT FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT
MCL 123.872 requires that "the grant or loan contract made by a county shall require a report to the county board of
commissioners regarding the activities of the recipient and the degree to which the recipient has met the stated public
purpose of the funding".
City of Farmington I, on behalf of , have been provided with a copy of the
Policies and Procedures of the Local Road Improvement Program (Attachment "A") and agree to comply with these
terms and conditions.
City of Farmington I, on behalf of , understand and agree to comply with the
requirement to provide the Oakland County Board of Commissioners with a report following the completion of
an approved project outlining the degree to which the project met the stated purpose of the funding.
Charles J. Eudy DIIIII Iy.,,[i by ch.k. I. rud,
GM 0,01,1.1 E Fmomimpra,uPuhll, ScIVICE, umaii.reudy.farinuxv.c.rn,
c.,15
x.1,114.17 06,1:35.91W April 17, 2018
Signature of Authorized Party
Charles J. Eudy
Printed Name and Title
Date
Please return completed application to: Local Road Improvement Subcommittee
Oakland County Board of Commissioners
1200 N. Telegraph Road
Pontiac, MI 48341-0475
A pdf copy of application can be emailed to: Michael Andrews, Senior Analyst andrewsmb@oakgov.com
Questions regarding the application and approval process should be directed to Michael Andrews
at the email address above or by phone at (248)858-5115
OPINION OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
ORCHARD, FULTZ & McCLIMENT, INC.
34090 Plymouth Road, livonta, Michigan, 48150 Telephone: (734)522-0711 FAX: (734)522-8427
PROJECT: 2518/2015 Road Projects
LOCATION: City of EanningIon
WORK:
DATE: December 18,2017
PROJECTS: 0111-15-0040
ESTIMATOR: ERS
CHECKED BY: JUT
CURRENT ENR: ERS
ITEM CODE DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT PRICE COST
CATEGORY 'I -0A(<LAND_ST
1047051 Mobilization, Max, 5%, Oakland LSUM 1. $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00
1077051 Audio Video Route Survey BUM 1 5 2,000.00 $ 2,000,00
1077051 Traffic Maintenance and Control LSUM 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000,00
2040020 Curb and Gutter, Rem Ft 777 $ 12,50 $ 9,712.50
2040050 Pavt, Rem Syd 1729 $ 7.00 $ 12,103,00
2040055 sidewalk, Rem Syd 81 $ 9,50 $ 769.50
2047001 Sawcut Pavement Full Depth Ft 68 $ 1.50 $ 102,00
2047050 Sign, Salvage Ea 6 $ 50.00 $ 300.00
2057002 Station Grading Sta 4,2546 $ 3,000.00 $ 12,763.80
3027031 Aggregate Base, 21AA (Limestone) Ton 627 $ 23,00 $ 14,421.00
4017001 Sanitary Sewer, Rem, 12 inch Dia or Less Ft 11 $ 250.013 $ 2,750.00
4027001 Sanitary Sewer Repair, SOB 26 PVC, 8 inch, Tr Del A Ft 11 $ 300,00 $ 3,300.00
4027001 Suraury Service Lead, SDR 26 PCV, 6 inch, Tr Det A Ft 7 $ 300.00 $ 2,100.00
4027050 Sanitary Structure Cover, Ad] Ea 2 5 800.00 $ 1,600.00
4030280 Dr Structure, Ad], Add Depth Ft 3 $ 150.00 $ 450,00
4037050 Structure, Ad] Ea 5 $ scam $ 4,000.013
5010002 Cold Milling HMA Surface Syd 102 5 2.50 $ 255,00
5017031 MOOT HMA 13A, Leveling Course Ton 127 $ 95.00 $ 12,065,00
5017031 MOOT IIMA 13A, Wearing Course Ton 127 $ 95.00 $ 12,065,00
5017031 HMA Approach, MOOT 13A Ton 10 $ 95,00 $ 950.00
8010005 Driveway, Nonreint Cone, 6 inch Syd 41 5 40.00 $ 1,640,00
8027001 Curb and Gutter, Cone, 4-Inch, Mountable, 24 inch Ft 776 5 22.00 $ 17,072,00
8030036 Sidewalk Ramp, Cone, 6 inch Sft 63 $ 7.50 $ 472,50
8030044 Sidewalk, Cone, 4 inch Sft 73 $ 5.00 $ 365.00
8037010 Sidewalk, Cone, 8 inch Sft 541 $ 5.50 $ 2,975.50
8037010 Sidewalk, Cone w/curb, 6 inch Sft 72 $ 5.00 $ 360.00
8107010 Sign, Type Ill B, Permanent Sft 30 $ 15.00 $ 450.00
8110024 Pavt Mrkg, Ovly Cold Plastic, 6 inch, Crosswalk Ft 51 $ 2.50 $ 127.50
8147011 Topsoil, Seed and Mulch, 3 inch Syd 1100 $ 2,50 $ 2,750,00
8237001 Water Main, Rem Ft 414 $ 4,00 $ 1,656.00
8237001 Water Main, Class 54, DI, 6 inch, Tr Dot A Ft 19 $ 80,00 $ 1,520,00
8237001 Water Main, Class 54, DI, 8 inch, Tr Dot A Ft 399 $ 85,00 $ 33,915.00
8237050 1-1/2 inch Curb Stop and Box Ea 2 $ 400,00 $ 800.00
8237050 3/4 inch Curb Stop and Box Fa 2 $ 350,00 $ 700.00
8237050 Connection to Existing Water Main Ea 2 $ 2,500,00 $ 5,000.00
8237050 Water Service, Jumper Connect, 3/4 inch Ea 1 $ 42.00 $ 42.00
8237050 Lower Proposed Water Main Ea 1 $ 1,700,00 $ 1,700.00
8237050 Water Service, Jumper Connect, 3/4 inch Fa 1 $ 42.00 $ 42.00
8237050 Water Service, Type K Copper, 3/4 inch, Short Ea 1 $ 35.00 $ 35.00
8237050 Fire Hydrant Assembly Ea 1 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
8237050 Gate Valve and Well, 8 inch Ea 1 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00
Oakland St General Subtotal
Sanitary Subtotal
Water Subtotal
Contingency (20%)
CE Services (15%)
Design (10%)
Materials Testing (3%)
OAKLAND ST TOTAL COST=
$ 92,035.76
$ 9,750.00
$ 78,243.54
$ 36,005.86
$ 27,004.40
$ 18,002.93
$ 5,400.88
$ 266443,36
CATEGORY 4 -LILAC_ST
1047051 Mobilization, Max, 5%, Lilac LSUM 1 $ 3,300,00 $ 3,300,00
1077051 Audio Video Route Survey LSUM 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
1077051 Traffic Maintenance and Control LSUM 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
2040020 Curb and Gutter, Rem Ft 368 $ 12.50 $ 4,600.00
2040050 Pavt, Rem Syd 609 $ 7.00 $ 4,263.00
2040055 Sidewalk, Rem Syd 21 $ 9.50 $ 199.50
2057021 Subgrade Undercutting, Type II (Modified) Cyd 63 $ 30.00 $ 1,890,00
2057021 Subgrade Undercutting, Type II (Special) Cyd 32 $ 40,00 $ 1,280.00
2087051 Erosion Control LSUM 1 $ 1,000,00 $ 1,000,00
3027031 Aggregate Base, 21AA Ton 300 $ 23,00 $ 6,900.00
4030005 Dr Structure Cover, Ad), Case 1 Fa 1 $ scam $ 500.00
6020106 Conc Pavt, Nonreinf, 9 inch Syd 609 $ 65,00 $ 39,585,00
8030036 Sidewalk Ramp, Conc, 6 Md.] Sft 105 5 7.50 $ 787.50
8030044 Sidewalk,Cone, 4 inch Sft 53 5 5.00 $ 265.00
8037050 Detectable Warning Surface Fa 2 5 40,00 $ 80.00
8167002 Turf Establishment Sta 2 $ 1,600,00 $ 3,200,00
Lilac St General Subtotal $ 71,850,00
Contingency (20%) $ 14,370.00
CE Services (15%) $ 10,777,50
Design (10%) $ 7,185,00
Materials Testing (3%) $ 2,155.50
LILAC ST TOTAL COST = $ 106,338,00
CATEGORY 5 -FREDERICK_ST
1047051 Mobilization, Max, 5%, Frederick LSUM 1 $ 40,200.00 $ 40,200,00
1077051 Audio Video Route Survey LSUM 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00
1077051 Traffic Maintenance and Control LSUM 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000,00
2040050 Pavt, Rem Syd 5526 $ 7.00 $ 38,682.00
2057002 Station Grading Eta 14,5 $ 3,000.00 $ 43,500,00
2057021 Subgrade Undercutting, Type II (Modified) Cyd 164 $ 30.00 $ 4,920.00
2057021 Subgrade Undercutting, Type II (Special) Cyd 164 $ 40,00 $ 6,560,00
2080020 Erosion Control, Inlet Protection, Fabric Drop Ea 9 $ 115,00 $ 1,035,00
3027031 Aggregate Base, 214A Ton 1046 $ 23,00 $ 24,058,00
4037050 Structure, Ad) Ea 13 $ mom $ 10,400,00
6027011 Cone Pavt, Norreinf, 8 Inch, With Integral Curb, Cone, Det F4 Syd 4924 $ 65.00 $ 320,060,00
8010005 Driveway, Nonreinf Cone, 6 inch Syd 602 5 40.00 $ 24,080.00
8230091 Hydrant, Rem Ea 1 $ 350.00 5 350.00
8237001 Water Main, Rem Ft 1403 $ 4.00 $ 5,612,00
8237001 Water Main, Class 54, DI, 8 inch, Tr Det A Ft 1403 $ 85.00 $ 119,255,00
8237001 Temporary Water System Ft 1497 $ 12.00 $ 17,964.00
8237050 Curb Stop Box, Copper Fa 43 $ 600,00 $ 25,800,00
8237050 Temporary Water Connection Ea 2 5 800.00 $ 1,600.00
8237050 Gate Valve and Well, Rem Ea 2 $ 600,00 $ 1,200,00
8237050 Connection to Existing Water Main Ea 2 $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00
8237050 Water Service, Jumper Connect, 3/4 inch Fa 21 $ 42,00 $ 882,00
8237050 Water Service, Jumper Connect, 3/4 inch Ea 21 $ 42.00 $ 882.00
8237050 Water Service, Type K Copper, 3/4 inch, Short Fa 22 $ 35,00 $ 770,00
8237050 Fire Hydrant Assembly Ea 2 $ 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00
8237050 Gate Valve and Well, 8 inch Fa 2 $ 3,500,00 $ 7,000,00
Frederick Sr General Subtotal $ 371,666.43
Water Subtotal $ 339,143.57
Contingency (20%) $ 142,162.00
CE Services (15%) $ 106,621.50
Design (10%) $ 71,081,00
Materials Testing (3%) $ 21,324.30
FREDERICK ST TOTAL COST = $ 1,051,998.80
SUBTOTAL FOR CATEGORY 1 -OAKLAND ST $ 266,443.36
SUBTOTAL FOR CATEGORY 2 -FLANDERS_ST $ 402,804.94
SUBTOTAL FOR CATEGORY 3 -CHESLEY DR $ 77,20642
SUBTOTAL FOR CATEGORY 4 -LILAC_ST $ 106,338.00
SUBTOTAL FOR CATEGORY 5 -FREDERIC K_ST $ 1,051,998.80
TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST= $ 1,904,791,52
I
Resolution #18154 May 2, 2018
The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee. There were no objections.