Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1993.10.21 - 23856/ October 21, 1993 MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #93237 BY: Commissioners Shelley Taub, Mariiynn Gosling, Charles Palmer IN RE: (Oppose) Mental Health Code Revisions To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS, there are currently proposed revisions to the State Mental Health Code which include and encourage the creation of a "Separate Governmental Legal Entity", upon approval of the Board of Commissioners, and would eliminate any governance of mental health services by the elected county board of commissioners, including the approval of the County Mental Health's annual plan and budget, and WHEREAS, these proposed revisions to the State Mental Health Code severely undermine the good faith negotiations of our County with the State for the Full Management Contract, and in fact, some of the proposed revisions punish Full Management Counties by allowing those counties which form the newly proposed "Separate Governmental Legal Entity", SGLE, to carry forward to the next fiscal year up to 5% of unexpended funding, and WHEREAS, these revisions while limiting local match to a flat fee equal to its appropriation in the fiscal year preceding the establishment of the SGLE or FY 1992-93 whichever is greater, do not allow for other source funds to be included in the computation of local match, WHEREAS, the consequence of these proposed revisions, particularly the creation of SGLE's, appear to be a reduction of the state's financial obligation to care for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled adults and children, and a shift of those costs to the counties while concurrently reducing the counties' authority to manage the mental health care programs for its citizens. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners does hereby oppose all of the proposed revisions to the State's Mental Health Code which deal with the establishment of "Separate Governmental Legal Entities", which shift state financial obligation to counties and which violate the spirit and intent of the Full Management Agreement. Mr. Chairperson, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. /1