Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1994.08.18 - 23997MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #94226 July 28, 1994 BY: PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - MARILYNN E. GOSLING, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: PROSECUTING ATTORNEY - RECLASSIFICATION OF ONE (1) PRINCIPAL ATTORNEY POSITION TO A NEW CLASSIFICATION OF CHIEF - LEGAL OPERATIONS - PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OFFICE TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Prosecuting Attorney's staff and operations have increased to maintain pace with judicial growth and to meet Oakland County's changing law enforcement needs; and WHEREAS the increased complexity of day-to-day operational responsibilities of the Prosecutor's Office has diluted the Chief Assistant Prosecutor's ability to perform essential management responsibilities such as strategic planning, development of department policies and procedures, and controlling department productivity; and WHEREAS the Prosecuting Attorney has requested that a new classification of Chief - Legal Operations - Prosecuting Attorney Office be created within Executive Staff as third in command with general control over the department on a day-to-day basis, approval of case strategy and dismissal decisions, oversight of specialty units, and approval of departmental expenditures and personnel matters; and WHEREAS to reduce the costs of this request, the Prosecuting Attorney has identified an existing Principal Attorney position to be reclassified to the new classification; and WHEREAS all attorney positions in the Prosecutor's Office are excepted from the Merit System Rules, as per Rule 1, and the proposed new classification will also be excepted. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the classification of Chief - Legal Operations - Prosecuting Attorney Office be created with the following salary range: Base 1 Yr. 2 Yr. 3 Yr. 4 Yr. 5 Yr. 0/T $72,177 $73,490 $74,806 $76,121 $77,435 $78,750 No BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the classification of Chief - Legal Operations - Prosecuting Attorney Office be excluded from Merit System coverage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Principal Attorney position # 41101-01126 be reclassified to Chief - Legal Operations - Prosecuting Attorney Office. Chairperson, on behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE FINANCEPTOMMITTEE ( August 18, 1994 FISCAL NOTE (Misc. #94226) BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, JOHN P. MCCULLOCH, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: PROSECUTING ATTORNEY - RECLASSIFICATION OF ONE (1) PRINCIPAL ATTORNEY POSITION TO A NEW CLASSIFICATION OF CHIEF-LEGAL OPERATIONS-PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OFFICE TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to Rule XI-G of the Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #94226 and finds: 1) The Prosecuting Attorney has requested that a new classification of Chief-Legal Operations-Prosecuting Attorney Office be created to oversee the department's day-to-day activities, specialty units, departmental expenditures, handle personnel matters and make case strategy and dismissal decisions. 2) An existing Principal Attorney position (#41101-01126) is to be reclassified to the new classification and be excluded from Merit System coverage. 3) The total cost of the requested reclassification is $3,116 for the remaining balance of 1994 and $8,103 for 1995. 4) It is recommended that a budget amendment be made to cover the cost by transferring funds from the Classification and Rate Change Account to the Prosecuting Attorney's budget as follows: FROM: 1994 1995 4-10100-909-01-00-9902 Class & Rate Change ($3,116) ($8,103) TO: 4-10100-411-01-00-1001 Salary - Reg. 2,286 5,934 4-10100-411-01-00-2070 Fringe Benefits 830 2,128 Total $ -0- $ -0- Reclass.fn D. Allen, County Clerk 6V Resolution #94226 August 18, 1994 Moved by Gosling supported by AYES: Moffitt, Newby, Oaks, Taub, Wolf, Crake, Douglas, Garfield, Kingzett, Kramer, Law, McCulloch, Mc NAYS: None. (0) Newby the resolution be adopted. Obrecht, Palmer, Pernick, Powers, Schmid, Gosling, Huntoon, Jensen, Johnson, Kaczmar, Pherson. (23) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. ialmillmi6m01/10.1"mMERMI•n•••••n11610111•110500.franm161•11M•611AIMMOIMMOIMIIIIIM11.611 In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and irafifixçgthe seA1 .499 the In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and HEREBY E FOREGOING RESOLUTION 4111lw L Brooks P, ers. , .unty Executive Date STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on August 18, 1994 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office.