HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1994.09.22 - 24286September 22, 1994
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #94268
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, JOHN P. MCCULLOCH, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY - COURTS AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (CLEMIS)
LONG-TERM FINANCIAL SUPPORT
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Courts and Law Enforcement Management
Information System (CLEMIS) was formally established by Misc.
Resolution #5986 adopted April 11, 1972; and
WHEREAS CLEMIS is a cooperative governmental effort
sponsored by Oakland County for the benefit of law enforcement
agencies throughout Oakland County, providing individual patrol
officers with immediate access to criminal and vehicle
information throughout the United States and Canada; and
WHEREAS the purpose of this resolution is to establish a
long-term policy reinforcing the County's intention to continue
to support CLEMIS to the extent of its present commitment of $1.4
million per year; and
WHEREAS the County Executive recommends implementation of a
funding plan that would achieve the aforementioned long-term
policy by adopting the following proposed CLEMIS user fee
structure:
- Effective January 1, 1994 and for the immediate future,
continue charges to local units of government sufficient to
generate total revenue equivalent to the 1993 level of
$193,500.
- At such time total costs exceed the combined financial
support of the County and local units ($1,593,000), due to
either inflationary increases or new program development,
the additional expense shall be defrayed by increased fees
to CLEMIS users, including the Sheriff's Department.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board
of Commissioners establishes a long-term policy of continuing
financial and operational support for the Courts and Law
Enforcement Management Information System (CLEMIS) to the extent
of its present commitment of $1.4 million per year.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners
authorizes adoption of the following CLEMIS fee structure to
accomplish the foregoing policy objective:
- Effective January 1, 1994 and for the immediate future,
continue charges to local units of government sufficient to
generate total revenue equivalent to the 1993 level of
$193,500.
- At such time total costs exceed the combined financial
support of the County and local units ($1,593,500), due to
either inflationary increases or new program development,
the additional expense shall be defrayed by increased fees
to CLEMIS users, including the Sheriff's Department.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners fully
supports and agrees to the CLEMIS operating agreement as detailed
in the attached August 31, 1994 communication entitled CLEMIS
Financing, Operating and Board Organization Summary.
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move
adoption of the foregoing resolution.
T117
FINANCELCOMMITTEE
CLEMIS FINANCING, OPERATING AND BOARD ORGANIZATION SUMMARY
OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN
August 31, 1994
On July 20, 1994, a meeting was held between representatives of
the Board of Commissioners, police chiefs and the County
Executive's staff. At this meeting, the County's proposed CLEMIS
operating and financing structure was provided to the police
chiefs. This structure was requested to be codified and the
County was requested to provide additional information to the
police chiefs.
Over the next several weeks, various proposals were prepared
involving CLEMIS operations and financing. Subsequent to each
proposal were discussions between Mr. William Dwyer, CLEMIS
Chairman (Chief of Police for the City of Farmington Hills),
Robert Daddow, Director of Management and Budget, Paul Funk,
Director of Information Technology, and others. The proposals,
which were submitted to Chief Dwyer, covered the following
subject matter:
* August 8, 1994 letter - proposal covering financing, CLEMIS
Advisory Board, MDT operations, projected five year CLEMIS
expenses assuming no service level changes (see Exhibit A),
and other issues.
* August 12, 1994 letter - the CLEMIS Advisory Board
recommendations included in the above proposal were
unacceptable to the police chiefs. This letter accepts the
present status of the CLEMIS Advisory Board composition.
* August 26, 1994 letter - this letter addresses a concern as
to the appointment of the Board members and operating roles
and responsibilities of the County Executive and the
Advisory Board.
The "CLEMIS Financing, Operating and Board Organization Summary"
(Summary) document has been assembled from the above letters.
This Summary represents the revised final agreement and addresses
the following subjects:
* Proposed operating budget for 1994 (presently these costs
are included within the overall operating budget of the
Department of Information Technology).
* Organizational structure of the CLEMIS Advisory Board,
including appointments to the Board.
* MDT operations.
OPERATING BUDGET AND FINANCING OF CLEMIS OPERATIONS
A summary of the County and CLEMIS Advisory Board operating
budget and financing responsibilities follow:
* The County will provide $1.4 million annually for CLEMIS
operations starting January 1, 1994. The funding base of
$1.4 million would remain the same in future years. As
noted in Exhibit A involving the attached five year
analysis, the projected 1994 funding of CLEMIS operations
would be approximately $1,444,000.
* New development efforts (such as mugshot and fingerprint
applications) would require specific funding beyond the base
of $1.4 million. The CLEMIS Advisory Board through the
Department of Information Technology would investigate the
project's proposed cost, project benefits, and funding
alternatives. Because the $1.4 million is directed at
covering the CLEMIS operations, it is unlikely that much of
it can be used for funding of new initiatives. The funding
issue (who covers the costs) must be resolved prior to the
initiation of development efforts.
* Future economic (inflationary) increases in base costs will
be borne by the County and the local governmental units.
Since the Sheriff's Department and other County departments
represent approximately one-half of the CLEMIS transactions,
communities would be required to fund the remaining one-half
of the economic increase. The determination of responsible
share of future economic increases will be based upon
transaction volumes.
* In 1993, local governmental units were invoiced $193,500 for
their share of the CLEMIS operations. In 1994, a similar
amount would be invoiced to the local governmental units.
The CLEMIS Advisory Board should recommend the allocation,
between the local governmental units prior to billing.
To the extent that local governmental units have paid
amounts in excess of the rates used in 1993 (or less than
amounts owed), credits would be provided to the local
governmental units in the fourth quarter of 1994 (or
invoices sent).
* The County will establish a separate operating fund such
that CLEMIS revenues and operating costs can be segregated
from other Information Technology operations. Because the
County formally closes its accounting records only on a
calendar quarter, the financial information for the first
nine months of CLEMIS operations will be segregated based
upon a financial analysis to be completed by mid-November
1994. In future years, CLEMIS operations will be segregated
and financial information provided to the CLEMIS Advisory
Board on a quarterly basis.
1994 1995 1996
The above may be explained by way of examples. The following
example assumes that the CLEMIS Advisory Board takes no action to
increase its local revenues to CLEMIS and that there is no
expansion of service levels. The 1995 and 1996 operating budgets
for CLEMIS have yet to be discussed by the CLEMIS Advisory Board.
The financial information in Exhibit A has been used for
illustrative purposes. The projected CLEMIS operations for 1994,
1995 and 1996 would be (in thousands):
1994 1995 1996
Revenue - County
Revenue - Local
Total revenue
Expenses (Exhibit A)
Net income
Fund equity - opening
$1,400.0
193.5
1,593.5
(1.444.0)
149.5
$1,400.0 $1,400.0
193.5 193.5
1,593.5 1,593.5
(1.491.9) (1.532.7)
101.6 60.8
149.5 251.1
Fund Equity - Dec. 31 S 149.5 5 251.1 ,1_111.2
The 1994 ending equity of $149,500 in the CLEMIS operating fund
would be carried forward into the 1995 calendar year in a newly
established fund and would assist in the funding of future
development projects. The CLEMIS Advisory Board would recommend
the use of these funds to the County Executive's staff for
approval. To the extent necessary, the recommendations will be
proposed to the Board of Commissioners.
By way of a further example of how economic increases would
affect the CLEMIS operating fund, assume that the CLEMIS Advisory
Board recommends an increase of $50,000 in the overall rates
charged to its users for 1995 and another $50,000 increase in
1996. Assume also that the service levels do not change. Then,
the effect on operations of the proposed increases follow:
Revenue - County
Revenue - Sheriff
Revenue - Local
Total revenue
Expenses (Exhibit A)
Net income
Fund equity - opening
$1,400.0
193.5
1,593.5
(1.444.0)
149.5
$1,400.0 $1,400.0
25.0 50.0
218.5 243.5
1,643.5 1,693.5
(1.41.9) (1.532.7)
151.6 160.8
149.5 301.1
Fund Equity - Dec. 31 S 149.5 S 301.1 S 461.9
Since rate increases would affect the County departments using
CLEMIS and adjust the County's operating budget, the County
Executive would have to recommend the matter to the Board of
Commissioners for further action.
While the local governmental units are funding a portion of the
CLEMIS operations, the ownership of CLEMIS has been and will
remain vested in the County.
CLEMIS ADVISORY BOARD
The CLEMIS Advisory Board's voting composition, which is
unchanged from the current composition, is noted below:
* Nine police chiefs / public safety officials.
* Sheriff, or his designee.
* Prosecutor, or his designee.
* Circuit Court Administrator.
* Director of Information Technology, or his designee.
* Two Administrators of the District Court, or their
designees.
Non-voting representation would also remains unchanged, as
follows:
* Three advisor representatives of the Department of
Information Technology.
* Corporation Counsel, or his designee.
Concerns were raised by several police chiefs involving the
potential interference by County Executive L. Brooks Patterson in
the approval process relating to the nine police chief Board
members. It is critical to understand that the County Executive
cannot. even if desired. delegate operating authority to the
CLEMIS P4Kisory_Board. Statutes do not permit the delegation of
operating authority or responsibility to occur to a body not
vested with that authority. The County Executive has the
authority and responsibility for all operating departments not
otherwise under other elected officials or as identified in
enabling legislation (primarily P.A. 139 of 1973). The
Department of Information Technology is an operating department
reporting to the County Executive. The CLEMIS Advisory Board's
primary role is to provide recommendations as to CLEMIS operating
and budget matters to the County Executive's staff.
Notwithstanding the above, the concerns involving the
interference by the County Executive in the appointments to the
Board are unfounded. There is no intention of the County
Executive to reject appointments recommended to him from the
police chiefs. The County's goal, which the County Executive and
criminal justice system mutually support, is to provide an
effective mechanism to assist in the fight against crime.
Accordingly, this issue has little or no substance.
At the August 31, 1994 CLEMIS Advisory Board meeting, discussions
were held by the members to formally change its name from 'CLEMIS
Policy Committee' to the CLEMIS Advisory Board. The matter has
been referred to the bylaws subcommittee of the CLEMIS Advisory
Board for further consideration and action.
LENGTH OF AGREEMENT - TWO YEARS
The County has, at the request of the police chiefs, changed the
CLEMIS resolution to evaluate whether the operations and
financing arrangement is functioning as described at the end of
the 1995 calendar year.
MDT FUND
The police chiefs have inquired as to the financial status of the
MDT Fund. This financial information was contained in a
memorandum dated May 2, 1994 and has been presented as Exhibit B.
In addition, concerns were raised as to whether the MDT costs
would be included in new CLEMIS operating fund.
Because the County has been segregating the MDT operations since
the late 1980s and these operations are under separate contracts
with local governmental units, they will remain separate. Future
MDT financial and operating information would be made available
to the CLEMIS Advisory Board on a quarterly basis.
EXHIBIT A
CLEMIS EXPENSE - 5 YEAR PROJECTION
$2,835 $2,835
12,257 12,333
$15,092 515,168
49% 49%
$7,395 $7,432
$1,429 $1,472
12,454 12,679
13,883 $14,151
49% 49%
$6,803 $6,934
Devices assigned to Police Agencies
Note 6
Note 6
Devices assigned to Police Agencies
Note 6
Note 6
ma 1224
equipment & personnel)
$592,675 $598,346
111,640 112,708
252,533 255,008
606,884
266,087
75,370
306,938
$2,212,127
33%
$730,002
535,930
266,087
75,370
306,938
$2,150,387
33%
5709,628
$79,182 545,318
$809,184 $754,945
Note 7
Note 1
Note 2
Note 3
Note 8
Note 9
Note 9
Note 9
Note
Note 8
CLEWS EXPENSES: 5 YEAR PROJECTION
DIRECT CLEWS COSTS;
System Support Personnel
Administrative Overhead
Facilities Cost
LEIN Access
Laser Printed Reports
Microfiche
Printing
Delivery Vehicle
SUBTOTAL
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
ACTUAI pROJECTErt pROJECTEQ PBOJECTEQ pROJECTFQ pROJECTEQ PROJECTED
$731,268 $394,234 $413,946 $434,843 $456,375 $479,194 $503,154
77,973 81,872 85,965 90,264 94,777
96,224 97,985 99,798 101,666 103,590
19260 19,838 20,433 21,046 21,677 22,328
3,587 3,695 3,805 3,920 4,037 4,158
10,634 10,953 11,282 11,620 11,969 12,328
1,412 1,454 1.498 1,543 1,589 1,637
1,599 1,647 1,696 1,747 1,800 1,854
$599,501 $625,730 $653,214 $682,014 $712,196 $743,825
137,746 74,260
199,399 94,515
18,660
6,025
18,627
1,962
1,604
$1,115,291
REFERENCE
C Note 1
N Note 2
N Note 3
C Note 4
C Note 4
C Note 4
C Note 4
C Note 5
145 Terminals
Maintenance
Depreciation
Subtotal - Terminals
84 Printers
Maintenance
Depreciation
Subtotal - Printers
Training Room
Equipment Cost
Building Space, Room 0114
Subtotal
Percentage Used for CLEMIS
Subtotal - Training
$10,962
18,850
$29,812
$29,635
22,680
$52,315
$10,962
18,850
$29,812
$29,635
22,680
$52,315
$11,291
18,50
$30,141
$30,524
22,680
$53,204
511,630
18,850
$30,480
$31,440
22,680
$54,120
$11,979
18,850
$30,829
$32,383
22,680
$55,063
$1,516
12,911
$14,427
49%
$7,069
$12,338
18,850
$31,188
$33,354
22,680
$56,034
$1,561
13,150
" ITI,771
49%
$7,208
$12,708
18,850
$31,558 C
$34,355
22,680
$57,035 C
$1,608
13,396
$15,004
49%
;7,352 C
DIRECT CLEMIS COSTS $1,204,813 $1189,080 8715,878 $744,748 $774,975 $808,628 $839,770
INDIRECT CLEMIS COSTS;
MAINFRAME COSTS (exdudes non-related
Support Personnel
Administrative Overhead
Facilities Cost
Depreciation
Maintenance
Equipment Rental (modems)
Operating Software
Subtotal
Percentage Used for CLEMIS
Subtotal - CLEMIS Mainframe
Indirect Cost (11.04% of Salaries)
INDIRECT CLEMIS COSTS
TOTAL CLEWS EXPENSE
1996 1997 1998 1999
$628,264 $659,678 $692,662 $727,295 5763,660
118,343 124,261 130,474 136,997 143,847
259,620 264,370 269,262 274,301 279,492
533,175 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
274,070 282,292 290,761 299,484 308,469
77,631 79,960 82,359 84,830 87,375
316,146 325,630 335,399 345,461 355,825
$2,207,249 $2,236,191 $2,300,917 $2,368,368 $2,438,668
33% 33% 33% 33% 33% C
$728,392 $737,943 $759,303 $781,561 $804,760
547,584 549,963 $52,461 $55,084 557,838 N Note 10
$775,918 $787,908 $811,764 $836.645 8862,598
2 013 997 $1,444,006 $1,586,739 $1,643,271 1 702 368 1.702.368
C Controllable expense. This is a function of volume (usage).
N a Non-controllable expense. This is a function of rates.
Prepared by Budget - km 07/22/94
EXPLANATION OF LINE ITEMS
CLEMIS EXPENSES AND 5 YEAR PROJECTIONS
July 22, 1994
DIRECT CLEMIS COSTS
NOTE 1 - SYSTEMS SUPPORT PERSONNEL
Systems support personnel includes salaries for individuals who
are specifically devoted to CLEMIS operations. In addition,
fringe benefit rates included in this line item represent those
rates used for the entire County; roughly 50% of salaries. A
salary and fringe benefit rate increase of 5% has been used over
the 5 year period.
NOTE 2 - ADMINISTRATIVE OVERHEAD
Administrative overhead represents the administrative salaries
and related costs of the Department of Information Technology
(DIT) management allocated to the CLEMIS operations. These costs
have been developed based on the applicable cost pool allocated
for DIT management. They have been allocated based on direct
CLEMIS salaries. Because the most significant component of this
cost pool is salaries and fringe benefits, a 5% increase in rates
has been used over the 5 year period of time.
NOTE 3 - FACILITIES COSTS
Facilities costs represent the allocation of heat, light, power,
janitorial, maintenance, depreciation of the DIT facility and
other facility costs allocated on a square footage relating to
the personnel assigned to CLEMIS. Because a significant
component to the cost pool is depreciation, which is fixed, the
cost increases over the 5 year period is a composite 1.8%.
NOTE 4 - VARIOUS
The LEIN access, laser printed reports, microfiche and printing
costs have been included based upon vendor invoices for these
services. These represent actual costs, increased at a rate of
3% for the 5 years.
NOTE 5 - DELIVERY VEHICLE
CLEMIS reports are delivered through a County-owned vehicle. The
costs of CLEMIS delivery has been estimated at 6% of the entire
vehicles' usage. Future increases are 3%.
NOTE 6 - TERMINALS AND PRINTERS
The terminals and printers represent the maintenance and
depreciation for these items in the criminal justice system. The
depreciation has been treated as a fixed charge of $18,850 and
$22,680 for terminals and printers (respectively) over the entire
5 year period despite certain of the equipment becoming fully
depreciated. It is impossible to determine anticipated
replacements and upgrades of this equipment over the next 5 years
without an extensive effort. By including these amounts in the
cost analysis, this should provide a provision for nominal
replacements in the future for the criminal justice system.
NOTE 7 - TRAINING ROOM
The first floor training room is used quite extensively for
CLEMIS purposes. The facility cost relating to this room, times
the estimated usage for CLEMIS training, has been reflected in
the analysis.
INDIRECT CLEMIS COSTS
NOTE 8 - MAINFRAME COSTS
Most of the indirect cost elements are similar to the direct
charges noted above, with similar assumptions for economic
increases in the future. As with the depreciation associated
with the terminals and printers, the actual amounts will trail
off in the later years. The cost analysis has continued to
include a provision in future years to hold the criminal justice
system harmless for most future upgrades and / or replacements of
mainframe equipment.
The 33 9s represents an allocation of the mainframe costs based
upon transaction volumes. Presently, CLEMIS represents one-third
of all transactions of mainframe operations.
NOTE 9 - MAINTENANCE, EQUIPMENT RENTAL AND SOFTWARE
These costs are based upon vendor invoices and increased at a 3%
rate.
NOTE 10 - INDIRECT COSTS
Indirect costs have been allocated to the CLEMIS operations on
the basis of the County's overall indirect cost allocation plan
which has been approved by the federal government.
EXHIBIT B
MDT FINANCIAL STATUS
OAKLAND, L. BROOKS PATTERSON, OAKLAND COUNTY EXECUTIVE
COUNTY M1CHIG AN
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Robert J Daddow, Dreclor
TO: CLEMIS Task Force Police Chiefs
Larry Obrecht
Larry Crake
John Grubba
Paul Funk
Laurie Van Pelto,e0/
FROM: Bob Daddow dpr
SUBJECT: Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) Financial Information
DATE: May 2, 1994
Requests were made for financial information relating to the MDT Fund and
CLEMIS in connection with the CLEMIS Task Force meeting held on April 22,
1994. The attached financial information, which was derived from the County's
audited financial statements, represents the response to the MDT Fund
information.
BACKGROUND
The MDT Fund operations arose from the desire to link patrol cars with the
State's LEIN system in the mid - 1980s. The terminals allowed communications
car to car as well as with the local law enforcement base. By 1988, the
County had requests from numerous County law enforcement agencies to establish
this form of operation. Acquisition of the MDT terminals and base station
became an issue.
In 1988, the first set of terminals and the base station were acquired through
a capital leasing transition through Board of Commissioners Miscellaneous
Resolution No. 88175. The initial 70 terminals cost approximately $3,000 each
with the one required base station approaching $319,000. All of the equipment
was acquired by a capital leasing arrangement through the County. In turn,
the terminal users, which included the Sheriff's Department, were assessed
$1,000 annually for the costs associated with the financing of the terminals
and operations. The County acquired the base station through an 'operating
subsidy' provided to the MDT Fund through 1993.
Agreements were signed between the County and the local governmental units
(agreement is through December 31, 1997). The title to the equipment remains
in the County's name through the end of the agreement. However, the local
governmental units may acquire the equipment for $1.00 at the conclusion of
the agreement.
The equipment began to be depreciated over a 7 year useful life. At this
time, the operations were accounted for within the County's overall Computer
Services Funds. Because of concerns expressed by the local law enforcement
agencies, most of the operations were transferred to a separate MDT Fund in
1990, with a nominal amount of funds ($47,653 as noted in the attached
financial information). Since 1990, the County has separately accounted for
the financing and operations of the MDT activities.
By the early 1990s, the MDT operations had been linked into CLEMIS.
Presently, CLEMIS operations, which are separate from the attached financial
information, are accounted for within the County's Computer Services Fund.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING • 1200 N TELEGRAPH RD DEPT 409 • PONTIAC MI 48341-0409 • (313) 858-0490 • FAX (313) 452-9215
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Comments concerning the attached financial information follow:
* The net income over the period 1.991 through 1.993 is derived largely from
the subsidy received from the County's General Fund. By 1993, the MDT
Fund had become self-sufficient and the County's subsidy (which largely
covered the acquisition of the original base station) was unnecessary.
* In 1993, the County paid-off the capital lease obligation with funds
advanced from the Delinquent Tax Revolving Fund. This action should
reduce the amounts otherwise paid to the finance company by $33,085 over
the life of the loan as the interest rate charged by the Delinquent Tax
Revolving Fund is substantially lower than that of an outside finance
company.
• In 1994, the fees are expected to be sufficient to cover the annual
costs of operation and continue to increase the liquidity of the MDT
Fund.
* While the 1993 balance sheet has approximately $365,000 of cash and
accounts receivable (which should be collected shortly after December
31, 1993), these funds are expected to liquidate $278,300 of obligations
at December 31, 1993 and provide working capital in 1994. No balance
sheet information as of December 31, 1994 can be projected.
Should anyone have questions concerning this information, please feel free to
contact me.
1992 1991
MDT FUND FINANCIAL INFORMATION
OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN
April 25, 1994
1993 1994
Balance Sheet:
Cash
Due from govt.
Due from funds
Equipment
Acc. Dep.
TOTAL ASSETS
Accts pay.
Due to other funds
Cur. port. LTD
Cap. lease oblig.
long-term port.
Long-term advance
Retained earnings
LIABILITIES / R.E.
Operating Statement:
Revenues:
Local units
Sheriff
County subsidy
Other
Expenses:
Personnel
Contractual
Depreciation
Interest
Other
Totl. Exp.
Net income
Ret. earn, beg. year
Transfers in
$ 18,015 $ 48,010 $ 292,054
92,000 94,000 38,000
38,433 29,247 34,735
148,448 171,257 364,789
. 1,708,027 1,826,712 1,841,312
( 502,242) ( 753,713) (1,021,728)
1 ,95,785 1,072,999 819,584
$1,354,233 $2,244,256 $1,184,373
$ 5,292 $ 568 $ 10,001
9,603 6,037 268,266
211,182 228,711
226,077 235,316 278,267
744,656 515,945
259,896
383,500 492,995 646,210
,$1,354 1 233 $1,244,256 $1,184,373 N/A
$ 349,000 $ 373,000 $ 383,000 $ 381,000
74,000 74,000 74,000 76,000
148,234 124,789 105,176
19 ,411
590,645 571,789 562,176 457,000
32,033 34,432 36,943 40,810
113,786 62,844 20,345 35,096
243,881 251,471 268,015 262,147
95,520 79,334 68,555 42,827
40
680 34,213 L 15,103 42,500
525,900 462,294 408,961 423,380
64,745 109,495 153,215 33,620
271,102 383,500 492,995 646,210
47,653
NIA
RETAINED EARNINGS $ 383,500 $ 492,995 $ 646,210 $ 679,830
The above financial information for the calendar years ended December 31, 1991
through 1993 has been extracted from the County's audited financial
statements. Presently, KPMG Peat Marwick is completing the 1993 audited
financial statements and that information has been extracted from the draft
copies. The 1994 financial information represents the budget approved by the
Board of Commissioners on December 9, 1993 for the 1994 calendar year.
Resolution #94268 September 22, 1994
Moved by McCulloch supported by Obrecht the resolution be adopted.
AYES: Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Gosling, Huntoon, Jensen, Johnson,
Kaczmar, Kingzett, Kramer, Law, McCulloch, McPherson, Newby, Oaks, Obrecht,
Palmer, Powers, Schmid, Taub, Wolf, Crake. (22)
NAYS: Pernick. (1)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
HEREIV-IPPRoy4acTBE,FtREGorv P7oLu-noN
L. Brooks Patterso)z(Coi.mty Executive Date
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners on September 22, 1994 with the original
record thereof now remaining in my office.
/6
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and fixed the seal of the
County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 22nd day o epteaber 19,9„,14..4.471
• '.„;,:,—
4.). Lnf' f 4' -".- ,1
Ly44 D. Allen, County Clerk