HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1995.05.25 - 24559MIPMMI! 1n1•11111nn
CAMANEW L
RECEIVV2 1,41:
. BROOKS PATTERIAYAKI.M156CtirkeWEXECUTIVE -
COUNTY MICHIGAN
'95 JUN -6 P3:33
VETO WITHDRAWAL if
I'EF UT Y COUNT Y CLERK
On June 1, 1995 I vetoed Misc. Resolution 95-146 which calls
for an immediate $3.5 million expansion of the Oakland County Jail.
I vetoed that Resolution to make a point: that we, as government,
must approach the budgetary process as a whole. We cannot spend
$3.5 million to build and operate new jail facilities and then
without fanfare, a month or so later, vote $1 million in additional
subsidies for Sheriff's Department contract rates that benefit only
a few communities. Since there is a limited amount of money
available, all of our actions must be taken with regard to the
total budgetary consequences.
Since my June 1, 1995 veto, I have been contacted by several
Commissioners who have urged me not to tie jail expansion to
Sheriff's Department contract rates. I have been assured by those
Commissioners that the contract rates proposed by the Public
Services Committee are not the final rates, that the rates will be
changed and made more fair. There will not be $1 million in
additional subsidies for the nine townships and one city at the
expense of the remainder of the County.
It is clear that I have accomplished my goal. Too often
things happen in government behind the scenes. What appear to be
routine budgetary matters in committees often times escapes the
public's and the media's scrutiny. It was my intent to focus
attention on the upcoming issue of inadequate and underfunded
contract rates that benefit only the few. I have accomplished that
objective.
The County Executive's veto power is designed to guard against
the passing of bad laws through haste, inadvertence or design.
Overly generous contract subsidies are bad public policy and cannot
be tolerated. I stand firm in my objection to the proposed
contract subsidies. I will veto any attempt to set rates that
unfairly benefit the few at the expense of the many. Fairness to
taxpayers demands nothing less.
Since I have accomplished my goal, and have received
assurances that the Board will revisit the contract rate issue, I
hereby withdraw my veto of Misc. Resolution 95-146.
DATED; JUNE 6, 1995 L. BROOKS ATTERSON
OAKLAND COUNTY EXECUTIVE
EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING * 1200 N TELEGRAPH 90 DEPT 409 • PONTIAC MI 48341-0409 • (810) 850-0484 • FAX 0310) 42-9215
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 95-146 VETO MESSAGE
As Chief Administrative Officer of Oakland County,
the Uniformed Budget and Accounting Act mandates that I,
as County Executive, have final responsibility for budget
preparation and for controlling expenditures under the
Budget and General Appropriations Act. Further, in
situations where revenues are less than authorized
expenditures, the law requires that I present to the
Board of Commissioners proposals that will prevent
expenditures from exceeding revenues.
With these obligations in mind, I have vetoed Misc.
Resolution 95-146.
This Resolution appropriates $1.348 million for the
construction of new jail facilities and creates 26 new
Sheriff's Department employee positions to operate the
new jail. The operational costs for the jail expansion
will be at least $1.9 million per year going forward. In
addition, it is important to note that the Board of
Commissioners has already approved new labor contracts
for the Sheriff's Deputies that include 3 percent wage
increases in 1996 and 1997.
The County's ability to pay the ongoing operational
costs for jail expansion and for the Deputy Sheriff's
salary increases has been compromised by the recent
action of the Public Services Committee of the Board of
Commissioners. On Tuesday, May 30, 1995, that Committee
voted to recommend to the full Board Sheriff's Department
law enforcement services contract rates for the years
1996, 1997 and 1998. The Public Services Committee,
under the Chairmanship of Commissioner Lawrence A.
Obrecht, Lake Orion, deliberately proposes to set the law
enforcement contract rates at a level far less than the
actual cost incurred for providing the services; at a
level that will cost the County's General Fund some $1
million over the next three years. The proposed rates
will not even cover the increased salary costs for Deputy
Sheriffs already approved by the Board!
Veto Message
Misc. Resolution 95-146
Page Two
Such an outright gift of services to the nine
townships and one major city which contract with the
Sheriff's Department is not only of questionable
legality, but is dangerous public policy. Clearly, at
some point the underfunding becomes an unconstitutional
grant of county credit to local units. Additionally,
while certainly making the contracts more attractive to
the few communites that benefit, pricing Sheriff's law
enforcement services contract rates at far less than
actual cost unfairly penalize those communities who fund
their own police departments. Their taxpayers will have
to make up the difference between the actual cost of the
County providing law enforcement services and the rates
proposed to be charged. It also unfairly penalizes the
operations of the remaining departments of county
government: the Clerk, the Treasurer, the Prosecutor, the
Drain Commissioner, the Courts, and the Executive
departments who clearly must share the burden of paying
for the local bonuses.
These rate bonuses are even more unfair when one
considers the fact that the State Equalized Value of
property in the nine townships and one major city
contracting with the Sheriff's Department grew an average
of 11.6 percent in 1994, while the remainder of the
County grew at only 5.4 percent. Orion Township,
Chairperson Obrecht's home community, grew a staggering
25.1 percent.
There is simply no reason not to charge fair value
for law enforcement contract services, especially for
communities whose State Equalized Values are growing at
twice the rate, and for some, like Orion Township, at
almost five times the rate, of the remainder of the
County.
There is not enough revenue to fund both the jail
expansion contemplated in Misc. Resolution 95-146 and to
provide law enforcement services at the rates proposed by
the Public Services Committee. These issues must be
addressed together.
Veto Message
Misc. Resolution 95-146
Page Three
Accordingly, fiscal responsibility and my duties
under the law dictate that I veto the Jail Expansion
Resolution and hold the issue until we know with finality
the cost to the General Fund of the law enforcement
contracts. We can then responsibly address the issue of
the scope of the jail expansion.
The Michigan Court of Appeals noted that the purpose
of the County Executive's veto power is to guard against
the passing of bad laws through haste, inadvertence or
design.
I believe that the underfunding of law enforcement
contract services, while expanding jail operations, is
bad law, and for that reason I have exercised this veto.
L. BROOKS PATTERSON
OAKLAND COUNTY EXECUTIVE
1996
1997
1998
$12,208,345
$12,696,644
$13,204,480
$96,268
$295,257
$624.635
$12,112,077
$12,401,387
$12,579,845
Total Additional County Tax
Funding Required
$1,016,160
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE CONTRACTS
PROJECTED REVENUE
ADJUSTED FOR DIFFERENT ASSUMPTIONS
Executive
Recommendation
(Covers 3% Negotiated
Salary Increase)
Public Services
Committee Proposal
(Does Not Cover
Negotiated Salary increase)
Additional Tax
Dollars Required
To Cover Negotiated
Salary Increase
The Projected Revenue is based on the proposed rates multiplied by the number and types of
Law Enforcement Services Contracts approved by the Board of Commissioners as of June 1, 1995.
Prepared by: Budget Division 06/01/95
AMOUNT PERCENT
10.3%
11.7%
19.6%
7.8%
10.3%
5.7%
10.0%
25.1%
12.6%
53%
11.6%
5.4%
6.5%
COMPARISON OF CHANGES IN STATE EQUALIZED VALUE
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES CONTRACTED COMMUNITIES
1993
STATE
EQUALIZED
VALUE
1994
STATE
EQUALIZED
VALUE
ADDISON TOWNSHIP
BRANDON TOWNSHIP
COMMERCE TOWNSHIP
HIGHLAND TOWNSHIP
INDEPENDENCE TOWNSHIP
LYON TOWNSHIP
OAKLAND TOWNSHIP
ORION TOWNSHIP
SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP
ROCHESTER HILLS
TOTAL CONTRACT COMMUNITIES
ALL OTHER
TOTAL COUNTY
$139,668,510
221,463,205
806,349,450
339,918,050
640,966,300
237,812,278
341,958,400
693,468,900
243,411,780
1,892,574,200
$5,557,591,073
$25,622,668,557
$31,180,259,630
$154,100,066
247,393,984
964,001,600
366,332,790
707,024,000
251,420,605
376,070,830
867,253,100
274,202,030
1,993,262,750
$6,201,061,755
$27,011,875,140
$33,212,936,895
$14,431,556
25,930,779
157,652,150
26,414,740
66,057,700
13,608,327
34,112,430
173,784,200
30,790,250
100,688,550
$643,470,682
$1,389,206,583
$2,032,677,265
Prepared by: Budget Division
, May 25, 1995
REPORT (Misc. #95146)
BY: FINANCE AND PERSONNEL commrrrEE, JOHN P. McCULLOCH, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT - ADDITIONAL INMATE HOUSING AND THE CREATION OF
TWENTY-SIX (26) POSITIONS - MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #95146
TO TEE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
(hairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Finance and Personnel Committee, having reviewed the above
referenced resolution, recommends its adoption with the following amendments:
s. Add the following paragraphs before the "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED"
paragraph:
"WHEREAS of additional inmate housing is a t rary solution to
an immediate problem, there are larger questions trt answered
concerning the operations of the entire criminal justice system in
Oakland County particularly as it relates to the problem of jail
overcrowding; and
WHEREAS current resources, allocated to divert individuals from
the jail, have not been used to the maximum extent, contributing, in
part, to the current overcrowding, specifically the under utilization cf
Community Correction's Probation Rnmdential Centers which may result in
the return of $.5 million to the state, as well as the underutilization
of the Sheriff's boot camp; and
WHEREAS the prudent use of taxpayer dollars requires that before
further jail expansion is considered, the elected officials and
departments who participate in the criminal justice system study the
current system to develop a strategic plan utilizing the current
resources to the maximum extent possible, reducing Oakland County's
future dependence on jail facilitates; and
WHEREAS such a study should include, at minimum:
-research into the development of a computerized integrated
justice system through the assistance of the National Center
for State Courts,
-discussions with all courts in the County, particularly the
50th District Court in Pontiac, encouraging them to utilize
the County's Community Corrections Programs and services,
-a study of the sentencing patterns used in the County
providing judges with vital information to develop
consistent sentencing and encourage the use of Community
Corrections Programs and alternative sentencing practices
such as boot camp,
-review of the County's physical plant to he certain that
jail space is used in the most effective manner, including
the possibility of new construction,
-a study as to the effect on the general jail population of
the housing of local ordinance violators and other non-
violent offenders; and
WHEREAS the Community Corrections Advisory Board (CCAB), which is
charged with coordinating jail diversion and alternative sentencing
programs should he involved in such a study; and
WHEREAS since the scope of this study is beyond the charge of the
CCAB, and since the Termination Agreement entered on the County as a
result of past jail overcrowding required the County to maintain a jail
use planning committee, the Board of Commissioners should formally
establish a Jail Task Force (UT!') to work with the CCAB in conducting
the study and continue as the jail use planning committee; and
WHEREAS the use of outside experts, independent of the Oakland
County criminal justice system, to assist the CCAB/JTF study committee,
in gathering necessary information and obtaining independent suggestions
is recommended; and
WHEREAS the CCAB has some funds available to contract for this
service; and
WHEREAS the Department of Information Technology is investigating
data processing requirements for the new facility and will report back
to the Finance and Personnel Committee regarding equipment recommendations."
2. Add the following after the final "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED" paragraph:
"BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners establish a Jail Task Force (JTF) consisting of the
following-members:
Chief Judge of the 6th judicial Circuit Court (or designee)
Chief Judge of the 52nd District Court (or designee)
Oakland County Sheriff (or designee)
Oakland County Prosecuting Attorney (or designee)
Member of Board of Commissioners Public Services Committee
Member of Board of Commissioners' Planning and Building Committee
Member of Board of Commissioners' Finance and Personnel Committee
Director of the Department of Management and Budget (or designee)
Director of the Department of Facilities Management (or designee)
Director of the Department of Personnel (or designee)
Chief Probation Officer - Oakland County Circuit Court Probation
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the appointments shall be made by the
Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Commissioners charges the
Community Corrections Advisory Board (CCAB)and the Jail Task Force (JTF)
with forming a joint committee to conduct a study of the Criminal
Justice System in Oakland County at minimum covering the areas of
concern listed above in this resolution, and that the joint committee
provide the Board of Commissioners and the County Executive with
reruill=idaticzas as to systematic changes that can be implemented to
reduced County dependence on the main )ail.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the :oint committee is authorized to
utilize CCAE resources to contract with outside experts, through the
established Purchasing Practices, to conduct a portion or all of the
required study.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that those elected officials and
departments participating in the joint committee provide the committee
with the information it requires to develop a thorough study including,
but not limited to:
-number of inmates in the jail system by location (simplification
of jail track system);
-irientifirAtinn of inmates by charge and district court;
-length of sentence;
-remaining time to be served;
-notification of release by District Court.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the joint study be completed and
reported back to the Board of Commissioners before further jail
expansion is initiated."
Chaizperson, on behalf of the Finance and Personnel Committee, I move
acceptance of the foregoing report.
FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
REPORT (Misc. #95146) May 11, 1995
BY: Planning and Building Committee, Charles Palmer, Chairperson
RE: Sheriff-Inmate Housing and the Creation of 26 Positions
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
rhairpPrnn, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Planning and Building Committee, having reviewed the
above-referenced Public Services Committee resolution on May 2,
1995, reports with the recommendation that the resolution be
adopted.
rhAiTTPrqnr, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee,
move acceptance of the foregoing report.
Planning and Building Committee
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #95146 May 11, 1995
By Public Services Committee, Lawrence A. Obrecht, Chairperson
IN RE: SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT - ADDITIONAL INMATE HOUSING AND THE CREATION OF
TWENTY-SIX (26) POSITIONS
To The Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS the Oakland County Jail, including satellite facilities, has been
at capacity for over a year with new inmates being committed on a daily basis;
and
WHEREAS the Sheriff is already utilizing approximately 130 beds in other
County facilities to keep the Oakland County Jail system within rated capacity,
there is little opportunity to expand the use of out-County facilities; and
WHEREAS the crowded conditions in the jail have led to the filing of a
number of lawsuits and increased the danger of a jail emergency having to be
declared; and
WHEREAS efforts have begun to reduce the jail population including
expansion of community corrections programs, however, these efforts will not
provide significant jail population reduction in the near term; and
WHEREAS the Department of Facilities Management is soliciting architects
to design a permanent structure increasing available jail beds, however should
a new structure be recommended actual occupancy will be several years away; and
WHEREAS the Sheriff has requested the construction or lease of structures
to provide increased inmate housing to meet the immediate need while alternatives
are reviewed and discussed; and
WHEREAS to meet this immediate need, the Department of Facilities
Management recommends that a work project be created to erect two masonry block
buildings at the Trusty Camp, housing 200 inmates in total, estimated work site
and construction cost equals $1,348,000 including a 156 contingency; and
WHEREAS the new structures will also include facilities for a Trusty Camp
laundry; and
WHEREAS both in-house staff and outside contractors will be utilized to
perform project work activities; and
WHEREAS in order to erect theses structures in a timely manner, the
Director of Facilities Management, or his designee, will function as the
construction manager for this project and will work with the Purchasing Division
to obtain the necessary services and materials; and
WHEREAS the Sheriff requires 26 positions to staff these facilities on a
24 hour, 7 day a week basis including one (1) Sergeant, eleven (11) Deputy II,
twelve (12) Deputy I. one (1) Clerk III positions and one (1) Inmate Caseworker;
and
WHEREAS five (5) Deputy II and five (5) Deputy I positions can be used
immediately to cover inmates housed at D Building, which is currently being
covered by overtime, these positions can be transferred over to the new
structures once they open; and
WHEREAS the remaining positions would begin 30 days before the scheduled
opening of the new structures; and
WHEREAS annual operating cost are estimated to be $1.9 million; and
WHEREAS funds are available in the non-departmental account entitled
"Reserve for Future Jail Operations" and in the 1995 Capital Improvement Program
to cover the construction and capital cost, as well as operating cost for the
balance of 1995.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
approves the construction of two masonry block buildings at the Trusty Camp to
increase inmate housing_
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a work project be created in the amount of
$1,348,000 to provide for the required site work and construction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following full time eligible, governmental
funded positions be created in the Sheriff's Department, Corrective Services
Satellite Division, in a new unit entitled "Pre-Trial Housing" (#434-10):
one (I) Sergeant
eleven (11) Deputy II
twelve (12) Deputy I
one (1) Clerk III
one (1) Inmate Caseworker
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that five (5) Deputy II and five (5) Deputy I
positions are authorized to begin immediately, the remaining positions will begin
30 days prior to scheduled occupancy.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move adoption
of the foregoing resolution.
6:$
P C SERVICES COMMITTEE ,
6.AdVeLt,"Tt, 4 c
n:\budget\sheriff\temphos.mr
• • May 25, 1995
FISCAL NOTE (Misc. #95146)
BY: FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMrriEE, JOHN P. McCULLOCH, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT - ADDITIONAL INMATE HOUSING AND THE CREATION OF
TWENTY-SIX (26) POSITIONS - MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #95146
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-G of this Board, the Finance and Personnel
Committee has reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #95146 and finds:
1. In order to meet an immediate need for additional inmate housing,
the Department of Facilities Management recommends the
construction of two (2) buildings on the Trusty Camp ground,
holding 100 inmates each.
2. One-time costs including construction and purchase of capital
equipment equals $1,662,026 as detailed on the attached schedule.
3. In order to properly staff the new facilities, the Personnel
Department recommend twenty-six (26) new positions be created,
including one (1) Sergeant, eleven (11) Deputy II, twelve (12)
Deputy I, one (1) Clerk III and one (1) Inmate Caseworker.
4. Five (5) Deputy II and five (5) Deputy I positions are recommended
for immediate creation to staff the "D Building" operation, which
is currently operating on an overtime basis. These ten (10)
positions would be transferred to the new facilities as they are
occupied.
5. The remaining positions will be fill approximately thirty (30)
days prior to occupancy of the new facilities.
6. Operating cost for the balance of 1995 equals $704,618, operating
cost for 1996 are estimated to be $1,883,926.
7. Funds are available in the non-departmental account entitled
"Reserve for Future Jail Operations" and in the 1995 Capital
Improvement Program to fund the one-time cost and 1995 operating
cost. Operating cost for 1996 will be incorporated into the
1996/1997 Biennial Budget Recommendation.
8. The 1995 Budget should be amended, as specified below, to cover
the cost of the additional inmate housing:
Dcenditures
4-10100-909-01-00
4-10100-434-10-00
4-10100-434-10-00
4-10100-434-10-00
4-10100-432-01-00
4-10100-439-10-00
4-10100-431-01-00
4-10100-434-10-00
4-10100-434-10-00
4-10100-434-10-00
4-10100-434-10-00
4-10100-433-35-00
4-10100-434-10-00
4-10100-434-10-00
4-10100-434-10-00
-3080 Future Jail Operations
-1001 Salaries
-1002 Overtime
-2070 Fringe Benefits
-3774 Uniform Replacement
-4820 Deputy Supplies
-6735 Liability Insurance
-6310 Building Space
-6331 Housekeeping Supplies
-3452 Laundry and Cleaning
-6610 Leased Vehicles
-3128 Food Services
-5665 Equity Trns. Vehicles
-8404 Work Project
-9998 Capital Outlay
$(1,986,644)
303,700
54,928
169,011
12,624
11,668
21,189
26,875
19,981
5,213
3,848
75,581
13,100
1,218,000
5.926
0
9. The $380,000 budgeted in the 1995 Capital Improvement Program be
used to cover the balance of the construction cost on this
project.
FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMIT.LEE
Total Sources 52,366.644 $1.683.92$
ESTIMATED IMPACT ON 1995 AND 1996 BUDGET
RELATED TO OPERATION OF 200 BED STRUCTURES
AT THE TRUSTY CAMP
Lone - Item
;Phase I (eat start May 27)
Aawual Cast for Cost for
Cost Balance of 1995 1996
Staffing
Deputy 11-5 5253,470 5146,233 $261,072
Deputy I - 5 172.360 99.438 ill 533
$425,830 $245,671 5438,605
Phase II (est. start August 26) I
Staffing . ,. Sergeant - 1 $67,532 522.078 $68,796
Deputy ll -6 304,164 99,438 313,286
Deputy I - 7 241,304 78,886 248,547
Inmate Caseworker 50,387 15,473 51,898
Clerk III 31 .089 10.184 32,022
5694,476 5227,040 $714,549
Overtime $120,720 $54,928 $124,342
Total Staffing $1,241,026 $527,639 $1,277,496
.Phase III (eat start Oct 1)
Operating
Uniform Expense $12,624 $12,624 $12,624
Deputy Supplies 11,688 11,668 11,658
Liability Insurance 46,416 21.169 46,416
Building Spaae 107,500 26.875 107,500
Housekeeping Supplies 79,925 19,981 79,925
Bedding and Linen 9.730 0 9,730
Laundry and Cleaning 20.850 5.213 20,850
Leased Vehicles 15,392 3,848 15,392
Food Contract 302.32 75.5131 302.325
Total Operating $606,450 $176,979 $606,430
Total Annual Cost $1.847.470, $704.61a 51.883.924
One-Time Charges
Purchase of Van $13,100
Purchase of Beds and Linens 50,926
Laundry Facility 250,000
Construction 1,348.000
Total One-Time Charges $1.662.02§,
1995 Cost $2,366,644, $1,083,9261
Sources of Funding
Non-Departmental Account $1,986.644 $154,123
Capital Improvement Program 380.000 0
General Fund Appropriation 0 1,229,803
Out-County Housing CI 500.000
Prepared by Budget Division 05/17/95
f the the seal
L eroAs Pkterson, Coenty Otecutve / \Date
Resolution 495146 May 25, 1995
Moved by Obrecht supported by Powers the Finance and Personnel and Planning
and Building Committee Reports be accepted.
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the reports were accepted.
Moved by Obrecht supported by Powers the resolution be adopted.
Moved by Obrecht supported by Powers the resolution be amended to coincide
with the Finance and Personnel Committee Report.
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried.
Moved by Kingzett supported by Obrecht the resolution be amended, as
follows:
* in the title, change the word "ADDITIONAL" to read "TEMPORARY"; and
• in the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph, change the words "to
increase" to read "as temporary".
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried.
Discussion followed.
Moved by Jacobs supported by Pernick to table the resolution.
The Chairperson stated a "YES" vote would table the resolution; a "NO" vote
would not.
AYES: Pernick, Quarles, Holbert, Jacobs, Kaczmar, Kingzett. (6)
NAYS: Law, McPherson, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Powers, Schmid, Taub,
Wolf, Amos, Crake, Devine, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Huntoon, Jensen,
Johnson. (18)
A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion failed.
Discussion followed,
Vote on resolution, as amended:
AYES: McPherson, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Powers, Schmid, Taub, Wolf,
Amos, Crake, Devine, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Huntoon, Jensen, Johnson,
Kaczmar, Law. (19)
NAYS: Pernick, Quarles, Holbert, Jacobs, Kingzett. (5)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution, as amended,
was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
If Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners on May 25, 1995 with the original record
thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixe
County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 25th daykot2May 1
I HEREBSVPPF?OVE TWOREGOING\ROOLUTION II HERdpiM VETO 7NE FonF130ING REF
L. Brooka Patteson. County Executive Date