HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1995.10.12 - 246026)
C SERVICES—COMMITTEE
Miscellaneous Resolution #95245 September 21, 1995
BY: Public Services Committee, Lawrence A. Obrecht, Chairperson
IN RE: CIRCUIT, PROBATE AND DISTRICT COURTS - JUDICIAL SALARIES FOR 1996
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS Public Act 438 of 1980 established salary ceilings of 92% of the annual
salary of a Supreme Court Justice for Circuit Judges and 88% of the annual salary of a
Supreme Court Justice for Probate and District Judges; and
WHEREAS the maximum allowable total annual salary for Circuit Court Judges for
1995 is $106,075, for Probate Judges is $101,463, and for District Judges is $101,463;
and
WHEREAS the 1995 State-paid portion for Circuit, Probate and District Judges is
currently $63,412 for Circuit Judges, $57,071 ($51,071 and $6,000 statutory obligation of
local funds toward each Probate Judge salary) and $57,071 for District Judges; and
WHEREAS the State provides standardization payments to local units of
government to reimburse the local units for their contributions to judicial salaries; and
WHEREAS 1995 judicial standardization payments have been established at
$38,397 for each Circuit Judge, and $39,953 for each Probate and District Judge.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the County supplemental salaries for
Judges be increased retroactive to January 1, 1995, to the maximum local supplement
permitted by law of $42,663 for Circuit Judges, $44,392 for Probate Judges, and $44,392
for District Judges.
OCTOBER 12, 1995
FISCAL NOTE
BY: Finance and Personnel Committee, John P. McCulloch, Chairperson
IN RE: CIRCUIT, PROBATE AND DISTRICT COURTS - JUDICIAL SALARIES FOR 1995,
M.R. #95245
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-G of this Board, the Finance and Personnel Committee has
reviewed Miscellaneous Resolution #95245 and finds:
1. The resolution recommends that Circuit, Probate, and District Judges
salaries be increased to correspond to the maximum local supplement
allowed by law. See attached schedule.
2. Maximum salary allowed by law is $106,075 ($63,412 State, $42,663
local) for Circuit, $101,4.53 ($51,071 State, $6,000 local statutory,
and $44,392 local) for Probate and $101,463 ($57,071 State, $44,392
local) for District.
3. Standardization payments, which reimburse the local units a portion of
their contribution to judicial salaries, have been increased to $38,397
for Circuit, and $39,953 for Probate and District.
4. Expenditure increases for Circuit Court are $21,114 for Salaries and
$5,416 for Fringes which is partially offset by a $19,500 revenue
increase. The net cost increase is $7,030.
5. Expenditure increases for Probate Court are $12,644 for Salaries and
$824 for Fringes which is partially offset by a $12,000 revenue
increase. The net cost increase is $644.
6. Expenditure increases for District Court are $12,930 for Salaries and
$3,314 for Fringes which is partially offset by a $12,250 revenue
increase. The net cost increase is $3,994.
7. The total cost increase to the County is $11,668 and is available in
each Courts' budget. No additional appropriation is required.
B. The 1995 Adopted Budget be amended as follows:
Revenue-Non-Departmental 3-10100-
903-0.-00-931l Circuit Sf-anelardizatinn Payment $19,500
903-01-00-9303 Probate Standardization Payment 12,000
903-01-00-9312 District Standardization Payment 12,250
$43,750
Expenditures 4-10100-
311-05-00-1001 Circuit Court Salaries $19,500
341-01-00-1001 Probate Court Salaries 12,000
322-01-00-1001 District Court- Salaries (Novi 3,675
323-01-00-1001 District Court-Salaries (Clarkston) 1,225
324-01-00-1001 District Court-Salaries (Rochester) 3,675
325-01-00-1001 District Court-Salaries (Troy) L-225
$43,750
$ , 0
Finance and Personnel Committee
JUDICIAL SALARY CHANGE & INFORMATIONAL UPDATE
1994 JaliCIAL -
SALARY DATA
Effec. 111/94
CIRCUIT COURT /RECORDER'S
1995
Eff. 1/1/95
State
Local
Standardization Payment
DISTRICT
State
Local
Standardization Payment
PROBATE
Statutory (1)
Local
Standardization Payment
$102,986 Annual Maximum - 92%
61,565
41,421
37,279
$98,508 Annual Maximum - 88%
55,409
43,099
38,789
$98,508 Annual Maximum - 88%
55,409 (49,409 State + 6,000 Local)
43,099
38,789
106,075
63,412
42,663
38,397
101,463
57,071
44,392
39 953
101,463
57,071 (51,071 + 6,000 Local)
44,392
39,953
(1) MCL 600.821(2);MSA 27A.821(2).
(2) MCL 600_822;MSA 27A.822.
(3) Amount based upon 1994 SOCC recommendation
(4) MCL 600.822; MSA 27A.822 et. seq., as amended by 389 PA 1994, effective 12/29/94.
Matyncia
Resolution #95245 October 12, 1995
Moved by Obrecht supported by Wolf the resolution be adopted.
Crake, Devine, Dingeldey,
Johnson, Kaczmar, Kingzett,
Pernick, Powers, (25)
AYES: Quarles, Schmid, Taub, Wolf, Amos,
Douglas, Garfield, Holbert, Huntoon, Jacobs, Jensen,
Law, McCulloch, McPherson, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
I HEREBY THE FOREGOiNG RESOLUTION
/0/2!_khm
L. Broas Patternr,..n, Cr,P.ret..y
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners on October 12, 1995 with the original
record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, = have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 12th daykgbólOctob
h D. Allen, County Clerk