Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1996.03.20 - 24811MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION # 96065 - • , BY: GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE - KAY SCHMID, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: -(OPPOSE) THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE STATE CONSTITUTION SOM22 AND TO SENATE BILLS 873, 874, 875, 876, RE TRANSPORTATION ISSUES TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS the Michigan Legislature has historically recognized the interrelated functions of all public roads, regardless of jurisdiction, and has for decades funded all public roads primarily through the state gasoline tax and registration fees; and WHEREAS a proposal to amend the State Constitution and four Senate bills have been recently introduced which would drastically change the structure and funding responsibilities of roads and WHEREAS the proposed amendment to the constitution would abolish the Transportation Commission, and thus would politicize state highway project selection and endanger the completion of future multi year, major projects; and WHEREAS Senate Bills 874 and 875, which would allow for the abolishment of road commissions, is clearly an attempt to force local road funding onto local county yovernments and are not appropriate at this time; and WHEREAS Senate Bill 876, which allows for a local option gas tax, fails to provide an adequate funding mechanism due to the inability of any single county to raise a large amount by this means without impacting its own fuel sales, related tax revenue, and service station dealers' business; and WHEREAS Senate Bill 873 would repeal Act 51 and thus subject all road funding to an annual appropriations process which would make long-range planning impossible and would jeopardize future funding levels for local roads; and WHEREAS the property tax is not an equitable way to fund all road costs; and WHEREAS the statewide locally-shared gas tax is still the most equitable user fee available for funding roads. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners opposes the proposed amendment to the State Constitution and Senate Bills 873, 874, 875, and 876, and encourages the legislature and governor to work together with local uveLILIIILIL. to address the road funding and distribution issues. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be sent to the Governor, the Michigan AqPnniAtml of Counties, and al] of Michigan's state legislators. Chairperson, on behalf of the General Government Committee, I move adoption of the foregoing resolution. GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE Resolution 496065 March 21, 1996 Moved by Schmid supported by Obrecht the resolution be adopted. Discussion followed. Moved by 4ingzett supported by Jacobs the question be divided to vote on Senate Bills 874 and 875 separately from the rest of the package. Discussion followed as to how this could be accOmplished. Commissioner Palmer suggested isolating and voting on each issue as if it were separate resolutions. Moved by Palmer supported by Amos to amend the resolution in the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph by inserting the words "at this time" after "„.Commissioners opposes". Moved by Devine supported by Palmer to table the resolution, AYES: Law, Palmer, Powers, Devine. (4) NAYS: Holbert, Jacobs, Jensen, Johnson, Kaczmar, Kingzett, McCulloch, McPherson, Moffitt, Obrecht, Pernick, Quarles, Schmid, Taub, Wolf, Amos, Crake, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield. (20) A sufficient majority not having voted therefor, the motion to table failed. Vote on Palmei's amendment: A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Moved by Crake supported by Powers to amend the resolution in the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph to add "5JR22° after the words "...State Constitution". A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. The Chairperson stated a "YES" vote opposes; a "NO" vote does not oppose. Vote on State Constitution SJR22: AYES: Jacobs, Jensen, Johnson, Kaczmar, Kingzett, Law, McCulloch, McPherson, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Pernick, Powers, Quarles, Schmid, Taub, Wolf, Amos, Crake, Devine, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Holbert. (24) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Vote on Senate Bill 873: AYES: Jensen, Johnson, Kaczmar, Kingzett, Law, McCulloch, McPherson, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Pernick, Powers, Quarles, Schmid, Taub, Wolf, Amos, Crake, Devine, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Holbert, Jacobs. (24) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Resolution #96065 continued March 21, 1996 Vote on Senate Bill 874: AYES; Johnson, Law, McCulloch, McPherson, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Powers, Schmid, Taub, wolf, Amos, Crake, Devine, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Holbert, Jensen. (19) NAYS: Kaczmar, Kingzett, Pernick, Quarles, Jacobs. (5) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Vote on Senate Bill 875: AYES: Law, MCCulloch, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Powers, Schmid, Taub, Wolf, Amos, Crake, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Holbert, Jensen, Johnson. (17) NAYS: Kaczmar, Kingzett, McPherson, Pernick, Quarles, Oevine, Jacobs. (7) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Vote on Senate Bill 876: AYES: Kingzett, Law, McCulloch, MCPherson, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Pernick, Powers, Quarles, Schmid, Taub, Wolf, Amos, Crake, Devine, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Holbert, Jacobs, Jensen, Johnson, Kaczmar. (24) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. Moved by Douglas supported by Dingeldey the five (5) motions be combined into one resolution, (Commissioner Kingzett requested that each roil call vote be reflected on the representative copy.) AYES: McCulloch, Moffitt, Palmer, Powers, Quarles, Schmid, Taub, Wolf, Amos, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Johnson. (13) NAYS: Law, McPherson, Obrecht, Pernick, Crake, Devine, Holbert, Jacobs, Jensen, Kaczmar, Kingzett. (11) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the motion to combine the five (5) motions into one resolution carried and the resolution was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on March 21, 1996 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 21st day of March 1996. .-14in °D, Allen, County Clerk I _,'..i ..:,_.., tUVLduc