Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1997.11.06 - 25165REPORT (Misc. #97228) November 6, 1997 BY: General Government Committee, Kay Schmid, Chairperson IN RE: MR #97228 - Board of Commissionrs - Electric Restructuring Legislation To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The General Government Committee, having reviewed the above-referenced resolution on October 27, 1997, reports with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted with the BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph amended to read as follows: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this resolution be sent to all State Legislators, Detroit Edison, Consumers Energy, THE OAKLAND LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICE AGENCY, THE AREA AGENCY ON AGING 1-B, ALL OAKLAND COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES, THE MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES ORGANIZATION THE MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ASSOCIATION and the county's legislative lobbyists. Chairperson, on behalf of the General Government Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report. GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION 197228 BY: Nancy Dingeldey, District #11 RE: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS-ELECTRIC RESTUCTURING LEGISLATION TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS, the electric utility industry is being restructured on the federal and state levels from one that is highly regulated to one in which there is significant competition; and WHEREAS, many states have already passed legislation to give individuals, businesses, and governments the ability to choose among a variety of power sources; and the State of Michigan is considering such legislation; and WHEREAS, restructuring the delivery of electricity will affect counties in many areas including the cost of electricity for county facilities, residences and businesses, revenue generation from taxes and franchise fees, rights of way and a variety of other impacts; and WHEREAS, improper restructuring poses a threat to Oakland County's job force and economic development; and WHEREAS, the Oakland County Board of Commissioners is charged with the well being of low income individuals and families in both rural and urban settings; and WHEREAS, the cost of electricity, the health of small businesses, and the social and physical environment have an immediate and long range impact on all families in the area; and WHEREAS, competition in the electric utility industry should be implemented to benefit all consumers equitably, and should not advantage one customer group to the detriment of another. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners supports the following principles in any attempts to restructure the delivery of electricity: • Customer Choice: whether electricity customers should be allowed to select the electric power supplier of their choice should be determined by state legislation, not federal law; • Consultation: county and local governments must be partners in any plans to restructure the electric industry; * Transition: any transition to a competitive electricity generation market should provide sufficient time, consistent with the magnitude of change to be achieved, for counties to adapt to new structures and to avoid disrupting services to the public, and adjust to potential changes in tax revenues; * Reliability: the U.S. Department of Energy and state utility commissions should continue their important role in ensuring that all consumers can count on the long-term integrity, safety and reliability for electricity service; * Revenue Authority: no federal or state action should preempt or interfere with county revenue authority; * Social Impacts: deregulation In the electric utility industry should be implemented in a manner that supports, rather than jeopardizes, existing social policies and programs currently being provided by utilities; * Equitable Benefits: any restructuring program should result in all rate payers - large and small - equitably sharing in the benefits of a restructured environment; • Environmental Impacts: all market participants should contribute Nancy DingAldiY, Ustrict # equitably to accomplish public policy objectives, such as support for energy efficiency and conservation, environmental standards, renewable energy sources and alternative energy efforts; • Stranded Costs: any restructuring should include a transition period during which legitimate stranded costs can be recovered in a just and reasonable manner, as determined by state law • Reciprocity: Michigan companies should be allowed to sell power in the home states of companies that sell power in Michigan; • Market Power: any restructuring proposal should include additional protections against the establishment and abuse of market power, particularly for the protection of small business and residential customers; • Disclosure: retail consumers should be given a written disclosure on overall cost of service prior to selecting a power provider. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that certified copies of this resolution be sent to all State Legislators, Detroit Edison, Consumers Energy and the County's legislative lokbbyists. 2 Resolution #97228 October 23, 1997 The Chairperson referred the resolution to the General Government Committee. There were no objections. • Resolution #97228 November 6, 1997 Moved by Schmid supported by Dingeldey the General Government Committee Report be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted. Moved by Schmid supported by Dingeldey the resolution be adopted. Moved by Schmid supported by Devine the resolution be amended to coincide with the recommendation in the General Government Committee Report. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Vote on resolution, as amended: AYES: Devine, Dingeldey, Douglas, Garfield, Holbert, Huntoon, Jacobs, Jensen, Johnson, Kingzett, McCulloch, McPherson, Millard, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Pernick, Powers, Schmid, Taub, Amos, Coleman. (22) AYES: None. (0) ABSTAIN: Wolf. (1) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution, as amended, was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on November 6, 1997 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 6th day of November 1997. Lynb,D. Allen, County Clerk