Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1998.02.12 - 25353MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #98006 February 12, 1998 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET/PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT FOR GRANT WRITING SERVICES TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: WHEREAS Oakland County has historically demonstrated a commitment to enhancing law enforcement capabilities within and across its borders; and WHEREAS the County has several initiatives underway or contemplated, including implementation of the new Courts/Law Enforcement Information System (CLEMIS), Mobile Data Terminals (MDTs) for patrol vehicles in the Sheriff's Department and local police departments; and WHEREAS the costs associated with the aforementioned initiatives aggregates to an amount in excess of ten million ($10,000,000) dollars; and WHEREAS the County and its local municipalities are faced with the imperative of upgrading its sewage disposal system in the Twelve Towns Drainage District at a cost in excess of $100,000,000; and WHEREAS the County is desirous of supplementing local funding with grant funding to help defray the significant dollar outlay required for enhancement of law enforcement services and environmental protection efforts; and WHEREAS current County in-house grant writing resources are fully committed to other program initiatives, having written proposals for project funding of almost $3 million and secured funding in excess of $1.6 million, and WHEREAS contracting with a professional grant writing firm would offer several strategic advantages, including: 1) upgrade funding competitiveness and improve return of federal/state grant writing efforts, 2) establish integrated funding and program planning process, 3) implement an electronic grant research and tracking system, and 4) provide full range of grantsmanship services, i.e., program design, research, technical writing, collaborative development, proposal writing and submission, and follow-up with grantor agencies; and WHEREAS the Department of Management and Budget has issued an Invitation to Bid (#ITB 000195) for Grant Writer Consulting Services and received five (5) proposals which have been evaluated by a management team composed of representatives of the Sheriff's Department, Information Technology, and Management and Budget; and WHEREAS the management team respectfully recommends the selection of Griffin Grant Writing & Consulting, Inc.(GGW&C), of Mill Valley, CA. as the preferred vendor to perform grant writing services on behalf of Oakland County; and WHEREAS GGW&C's proposal guaranteed a minimum of $1,000,000 in successful grant awards to Oakland County during the nineteen month contract period in return for an $80,000 retainer (refundable if minimum performance is not achieved) and an eight (8t) percent contingency fee up to a maximum of $425,000, with additional reimbursable costs for copying, faxing, and postage not to exceed $5,000; and WHEREAS funding for this proposal is available from the $6.4 million appropriation previously approved by the Board of Commissioners for implementation of the CLEMIS Project; and WHEREAS acquisition of a professional services contract for grant writing services to enhance funding for law enforcement services is recommended by the County Executive. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners approves the selection of Griffin Grant Writing & Consulting, (GGW&C) Inc. under a professional services contract to perform grant writing services for the County in the area of law enforcement and environmental protection from the effective date of this resolution through September 30, 1999. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the implementation of this resolution is contingent upon GGW&C accepting a counter-offer of a $75,000 retainer fee and a six (6*) percent contingency fee up to a maximum of $425,000, plus additional documented expenses not to exceed $5,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned fees be paid from the previously approved CLEMIS appropriation (Account #90-210000-21000-6362) and that recommendations for additional funding be brought back to the Board of Commissioners for approval. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move approval of the foregoing resolution. FINANCE COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 4, 1998 REPORT (Misc. #98006) BY: IN RE: STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE - DENNIS POWERS, CHAIRPERSON BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS - SELECTION OF GRIFFIN WRITING & CONSULTING AS OAKLAND COUNTY'S OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL GRANT WRITER TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE: Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Strategic Planning Committee, having reviewed the attached memorandum dated February 4, 1998, from Jeffrey C. Pardee to Robert J. Daddow, reports with the recommendation that it approves the concept of selecting Griffin Writing & Consulting as Oakland County's outside professional grant writer under the terms and conditions to be determined and approved by the Finance Committee. Chairperson, on behalf of the Strategic Planning Committee, I move acceptance of the foregoing Report. STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE 019A/yvyt4"4 1-1/ 004*.mn4 MEMO To: Robert J. Daddow. Director -Department of Management & Budget From: Jeffrey C. Pardee, Deputy Director Subject: - -RecOmmeruiation for Grant Writini4i.Stant Date: February 4, 1998 On January 13, 1998, the Purchasing Division issued the attached Invitation to Bid (IT#000195) for the purpose of acquiring grant writer consulting services in the Criminal Justice Program Area. The following five firms submitted proposals by the January 29, 1998 deadline: Michele L. Gullet PO Box 47519 Oak Park, MI 48237 Grant Search 39 Ames Avenue Marshfield, MA 02050 David 0. Cummings 111 Oakdale Drive Palatka, FL 32177 Griffin Grant Writing & Consulting 655 Redwood Highway, Suite 241 Mill Valley, CA 94941 Robert J. Miller & Associates, Inc. 124 Delaware Street Tonawanda, NY 14150 The following evaluation team was established to review the subject proposals for purposes of recommending the preferred vendor: Jackie Nyovich, CLEMIS Development Systems Supervisor Department of Information Technology Captainchiel McCabe, Administrative Services Sheriff Detpartment Jeffrey Pardee, Deputy Director Department of Management & Budget Greg Givens. Grants Writer Fiscal Services Division An evaluation tool was developed with the following components and weights: Qualifications (4). Fee Structure/Cost (2), Staffing/Personnel (2), and General (2). Qualifications included experience serving similar clients in the Criminal Justice Program Area. Fee Structure/Cost included low relative cost for nineteen month contract period and fee amounts beyond retainer (Fee summary is attached). Staffing/Personnel included number, experience and research capability of assigned project team. General considerations included financial strength, track record and guarantee of success. Attached is a summary of the evaluations supported by individual evaluations which are also attached. RobertJ. Daddow, Director Page 2 February 4. 1998 Recommendation: . The Evaluation Subcommittee recommends that Griffin Grant Writing & Consulting be selected,aartaldand County's outside professional grant writer, that appropriate notification to the Strategic Planning Committee and the Finance Committee be given, and that contract negotiations be undertaken immediately in order to expedite the grant writing process for grants that are becoming available. Oakland County - RFP Evaluation Report - IT 000195 SUMMARY SCORES Firms_tabe Evaluated: 1) Michel Gullet, 2) Grant Search, 3) GGW&C, 4) David Cummings, and 5) Robert Miller. Firms are scored from 0 (lowest corresponding match to the evaluation statement) to 3 (highest corresponding match to the evaluation statement). Each score is multiplied by the weight of the Evaluation Criterion for each evaluation statement. Each team member evaluates each firm, and the scores are totaled for firm rank. Below are the weighted total scores from each evaluator. Firms to be Evaluated [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Mr. Pardee [14 (12] [231 (12] [201 Capt McCabe (2] [4] [30] (2] [16] Ms. Nyovich. (2] [ 2 ] (30] (0] [12] Mr. Givens (10] (16] (30] (4] [28] TOTAL COMPOSITE SCORE 28 34 118 18 76 Pi (41 A Date 1- \3 Evaluator's Score TO AL Evaluator's Signature - Oardand County -RFP Evaluation Regort - ff 000195 ;47= Selection Team: Jeff Pardee, Deputy Director for Management and Budget, Jackie Nyovich, Supervisor for Information Technology, Capt Michael McCabe, Administrator for the Sheriff's Department, and Greg Givens, Grants Writer. for Fiscal Services Division. Evaluation Criteria: Qualifications, Fee Structure/Cost, Staff/ Personnel, and General Firms to be Evaluated: 1) Michel Gullet, 2) Grant Search, 3) GGW&C, 4) David Cummings, and 5) Robert Miller. Firms are scored from 0- (lowest corresponding match to the evaluation statement) to 3 (highest corresponding match to the evaluation statement). Each score ii multiplied by the weight of the Evaluation Criterion for each evaluation statement. Each team member evaluates each firm, and the scores are totaled for firm ranking. Firms to be Evaluated Qualifications (weighted value = 4) Criminal Justice Technology - Large I* of similar projects. High of discretionary grant proposals. Worked with a governmental agencies as a client - Written proposaLtoMS Doi or other Federal agencies High award amounts in the area of criminal justice Grant writing consultants maincourse of work Fee Structure/Cost (weighted value =2) Low relitive cost for 18 month retainer contract Additional successful grant award cost basis above retainer, offer a low percent. Large estimate person hours used in retainer Additional cost mahrlections available Staffing/ Personnel (weighted value ma 2) Large number of firm staff Research capability - provides grant availability notice Personnel experience in federal applications [1] [2] [3] [41 [5] ( I l ES1 [ 01 131 21 (2 1 (3 1 1 1 (31 t It General (weighted value = 2) Submitted financial statement. ( [3 ] (0 1 [3] High success rate Offers guarantees for success [1] [2] [3] [4] • [5] 111 131 111 (./J fitl (/1 ttl EA] 131 - 11.1 131 /1 1A1• TOTAL (81 [/iz] vri Vel C41-03/4------ Due 2/.///f/ Oakland County. RFP Evaluation Report - ff 000195 [draft 212/94 Selection Team: Jeff Pardee, Deputy Director for Management and Budget, Jackie Nyovich, Supervisor for Information Technology, Capt Michael McCabe, Administrator for the Sheriff's: Department, and Greg Givens, Grants Writer for Fiscal-Services Division. • — Evaluation Criteria: Qualifications, Fee Structure/Cost, Staff! Personnel, and General Firms to be Evaluated: 1) Michel Gullet, 2) Grant Search, 3) GGW&C, 4) David Cummings, and 5) Robert Miller. Firms are scored from 0 (lowest corresponding match to the evaluation statement) to 3 a. (highest corresponding match to the evaluation statement). Each score is multiplied by the weight of the Evaluation Criterion for each evaluation statement Each team member evaluates each fkm, and the scores are totaled for firm rabking. Firms to be Evaluated Qualifications (weighted value =4) Criminal Justice Technology - Large # of similar projects. High # of discretionary grant proposals Worked with a governmental agencies as a client.. Written proposal to-US Doi or other Federal agencies. High award amounts in the area of criminal justice - Grant writing consultants main course of work Fee Structure/Cost (weighted value =2) Low relitive cost for IS month retainer contract. Additional successful grant award cost basis above retainer; offer a low percent Large estimate person hours used in retainer Additional cost meN•selections available • Staffing/ Personnel (weighted value = 2) Large number of firm staff Research capability - provides grant availability notice Personnel experience in federal applications General (weighted value =2) Submitted financial statement. (Il /l / / High success rate Offers guarantees for success Evaluator's Score Evaluator's Signature [01 [el 131 101 ta.] , Selection Team: Jeff Pardee, Deputy Director for Management and Budget, Jackie Nyovich e Supervisor for Information Technology, Capt. Michael McCabe, Administrator for the Sheriffs - .„Vijitlinqat,,and Greg Givens, Grants Writer for Fiscal Services Division. Evaluation Criteria: Qualifications, Fee Structure/Cost, Staff/ Personnel, and General Firms to be Evaluated: 1) Michel Gullet, 2) Grant Search, 3) GGW&C, 4) David Cummings, and 5) Robert Miller. Firms are scored from 0 (lowest correspondin g match to the evaluation statement) to 3 .. (highest corresponding match to the evaluation statement). Each score is multiplied by the weight of the Evaluation Criterion for each n evaluatio statement. Each team member evaluates each firm, and the scores are totaled for &l a rklng Firms to be Evaluated [1] [2] (3] [41 [51 Qualifications (weighted value = 4) Criminal Justice Technology - Large # of similar projects. , • High # of discretionary grant proposals. ,•- Worked with a governmental agencies as a client YilittenPropOtal to- USDoi or other Federal agencies -High-Award amounts in the area of criminal justice •-,Grantsvriting consultants main course of work. •-Fee Structure/Cost (weighted value = 2) Low relitive cost for 18 month retainer contract [ 11 11 (31 [ 1] Ca.] Additional successful grant award cost basis . above retainer; offer a low percent. Large estimate person hours used in retainer -:Additional cost metilt rlections available . Staffing/ Personnet (weighted value = 2) Large number of firm staff [ 01 [11 31 101 (I [ Research capability - provides grant availability notice Personnel experience in federal applications • General (weighted value = 2) Submitted financial statement [01 [01 [3] [01 Eli High success rate Offers guarantees for success Evaluator's Score 6 TO_TAL 411 r3g [al (14 Evaluator's Signature ' . - (1 1 (21 (31 (41 (51 (01 t LL (O1 [ I Oakland County - RFP Evaluation Report - IT 000195 (draft-2/7J98pili=4"7- Selection Team: Jeff Pardee. Deputy Director for Management and Budget, Jackie Nyovich, Supervisor for Information Technology, Capt. Michael McCabe, Administrator for the Sheriff's Department, and Greg Givens, Grants Writer for Fiscal Services Division. - Evaluation Criteria: Qualifications, Fee Structure/Cost, Stag' Personnel, and General ( It.f S •r441- tif:fr A...1 Li Firms to be Evaluated: 1) Michel Gullet, 2) Gratf(gr-ari 3) GGW&C, 4) Daftieummings, and 5) Robert Miller. ...::. • s...- .... c 1,-47.4, - 3 : : , o 0 0 - .1... = :: Finns are scored from 0- (lowest corresponding match to the evaluation statement) to 3- (highest conesponcling match to the evaluation statement). Each score is multiplied by the weight of the Evaluation Criterion for each evaluation statement Each team member evaluates each firm, and the scares are totaled for firm .;1 Firms to be Evaluated Qualifications (weighted value =4) Criminal Justice Technology - Large8of similar projects High # of discretionary grant proposals Worked with a governmental agencies as a client. Written proposal to US Doi or other Federal agencies. High award amounts in the area of criminal justice Grant writing consultants main -course of work Fee Structure/Cost (weighted value = 2) Low relitive cost forl8month retainer contract. Additional successful grant award cost basis above retainer; offer a low percent. Large estimate person hours used in retainer Additional cost meriu selections available (I] to] is [ [/1 ••n•n•../ Staffing/ Personnel (weighted value = 2) Large number of firm staff [01 [ il [31 [ el [...II Research capability - provides grant availability notice • v- 6. . Personnel experience in federal applications (- 21 • -- - --- General (weighted value =2) Submitted financial statement [01 ( 01 [31 [01 (11 High success rate ---- (6-....: ' .L2.__,.. • Offers guarantees for success Evaluator's Score TOTAL (al BM (01 (/21- Evaluator's Signature /0" -- Date • • -. . saLam Sax 'adz. 2570 20 yes 100 no 110 no 41114MIINIM n••••n ••nnn••••nnnn•••Mi •••••••n •••nn••••••• TO: Jeff Pardee FROM: Bob Rhein RE: IT 000195 . Proposals for Grant Writing The results of this FIB are : NO RESPONSE Bridge Communications Amera Communications Resource Solutions Group RE Laws Inc. Keith Mcaanhan dba Facility Issues John Bailey & Assoc. Justice Planning & Management RETURNED BY POST OFFICE Proposal, Plans, & Competive Communications PROPOSALS RECEIVED -ORIGINAL & 5 COPIES Mani Michel Gullet Grant Search GGW&C David Cummings Robert Miller kat Sas !Isamu 60,000 -max 20 — 252,000-max var 21% NTE (42,000 expenses) 210,000* 80,000 — 8% NTE 425,000 5,000- min 100 1% NTE 5,000 38,000 Total Resolution #98006 February 12, 1998 Moved by Douglas supported by Law the Strategic Planning Committee Report be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted. Moved by Douglas supported by Law the resolution be adopted. Moved by Jensen supported by Powers the resolution be amended to add a BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph as follows: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all grant applications and acceptances be applied for and received in accordance with the County's adopted Grants Procedure. And further amend the resolution by substituting the following BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph for the last BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED paragraph in the resolution: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned fees be paid from the previously approved CLEMIS appropriation (#90-210000-21000-6352), and that no additional funds may be released without the prior approval of the Board of Commissioners. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the amendment carried. Vote on resolution as amended: AYES: Garfield, Holbert, Huntoon, Jacobs, Jensen, Johnson, Kaczmar, Kingzett, Law, McCulloch, McPherson, Millard, Moffitt, Obrecht, Powers, Schmid, Taub, Wolf, Amos, Coleman, Devine, Douglas, Fracassi. (23) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution, as amended, was adopted. I t HEREBY L Brooks p Executive Date rson, County Executive Date E FOREGOING RESOLUTION STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, Lynn D. Allen, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on February 12, 1998 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the C54116 County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 12th day f ebrualciK719 ( LynLD. Allen, County Clerk