HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1998.11.19 - 25469e,
---- GENERAL GO RNMENT COMMITTEE
REpowr (Misc. #98262) November 19, 1998
BY: GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE, NANCY DINGELDEY,
CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: MR #98262 — ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
DISBURSEMENT POLICY
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The General Government Committee, having considered the above-
referenced resolution on November 9, 1998, reports with the
recommendation that the resolution be adopted with all title
references changed from "Environmental Infrastructure Fund" to
"Environment and Infrastructure Fund".
Chairperson, on behalf of the General Government Committee, I
move acceptance of the foregoing report.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE VOTE:
Motion carried on a roll call vote with Taub and Dingeldey voting
no and Wolf absent.
November 19, 1998
REPORT (Misc. #98262)
BY: PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE
CHARLES E. PALMER, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: MR #98262. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
DISBURSEMENTS POLICY
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Planning and Building Committee, having reviewed the above-referenced resolution
on November 10, 1998, reports with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted with the
following amendments:
Delete the ninth WHEREAS paragraph in its entirety;
In the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED paragraph, line I, following the
word "projects", insert the words --as authorized by law--;
same paragraph, lines 2 and 3, following the word "Fund," delete the comma (,) and
the words --subject to the approval of the Board of Commissioners, and--;
same paragraph, subparagraph 3), line 2, insert a period (.) after the word
"established" delete the remainder of the sentence which reads --and subject
to the approval of the Board of Commissioners.--;
same paragraph, subparagraph 4), line 2, insert a period (.) after the word
"council" and delete the remainder of the sentence which reads --through its
respective County Commissioner(s) to the Board of Commissioners.--;
same paragraph, delete subparagraph 6) in its entirety;
same paragraph, subparagraph 7) line 2, delete the words --Board of
Commissioners.--
Mr. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee, I move acceptance
of the foregoing Report.
PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE
Committee Vote:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Johnson absent.
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION # 98262 October 29, 1998
BY: General Government Committee, Nancy Dingeldey, Chairperson
IN RR: ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND DISBURSEMENTS POLICY
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS Oakland County has experienced tremendous growth in industrial,
commercial and residential development during the past ten years; and
WHEREAS the population in Oakland County has increased from 396,000 in 1950
to 1.2 million in 1998, and is projected to be 1.3 million in 2020; and
WHEREAS this phenomenal growth in population and employment has placed a
strain on existing infrastructure and created a need for improvement to
infrastructure; and
WHEREAS this development within Oakland County has contributed to combined
drain and sewer overflows, flooded basements, and potentially hazardous
conditions affecting public health, and the environment; and
WHEREAS the County will continue to work with the federal and State of
Michigan governments to increase the County's share of dollars flowing into
infrastructure projects for the County and cities, villages and townships (CVTs);
and
WHEREAS the National Association of Counties estimates that nationally CVTs
will be required to spend $138 billion over the next 20 years to comply with
federal mandates involving clean water and stormwater safety requirements; and
WHEREAS the County of Oakland has pledged the transfer of $5.0 million
annually for five years into an Environmental Infrastructure Fund from the
County's Delinquent Tax Revolving Fund to assist CVTs in their local
environmental infrastructure needs; and
WHEREAS the allocation to each CVT of the annual appropriation has been set
through the annual General Appropriations Act passed by the Board of
Commissioners; and
WHEREAS definition of the types of eligible environmental infrastructure
projects for reimbursement and the process for seeking approval from the Board
of Commissioners of those projects has yet to be established.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the projects which are eligible for
reimbursement from the Environmental Infrastructure Fund, subject to the approval
of the Board of Commissioners, and are limited to physical improvements and that
the following process will be followed in seeking that approval:
1) The Environmental Infrastructure Fund is established and shall be
maintained by the Fiscal Services Division as a separate fund for the
purpose of enhancing the County's ability to improve the quality of life
in the rural and urban areas of the County, and to help ensure that the
public health of the County's residents is addressed.
2) Projects eligible for reimbursement from the Environmental Infrastructure
Fund are limited to environmental remediations or improvements relating
to ground and surface water, water supply, and sewer and drainage systems.
3) CVTs may enter joint projects with adjacent communities that promote the
public welfare based on the criteria established and subject to the
approval of the Board of commissioners.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE VOTE:
Motion carried on a roll call vote with Taub voting no and Garfield absent.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE
•
4) Each CVT request shall be accompanied by a resolution by the applicable
legislative board or council through its respective County Commissioner(s)
to the Board of Commissioners.
5) The Fiscal Services Division shall maintain accounts within the
Environmental Infrastructure Fund for each CVT based on the amounts
deposited annually through the County Board of Commissioners appropriation
and amounts disbursed therefrom. Periodically, but no less than annually,
the Fiscal Services Division shall report the equity of the Environmental
Infrastructure Fund to the Board of Commissioners by CVT.
6) Under the authority and, in conjunction with, the Board of Commissioners,
the Fiscal Services Division shall twice annually (by January 31 and July
31), request that each CVT prepare a formal request for project approval
by the Board of Commissioners. At a minimum, the project request shall
state the purpose of the project, projected costs, request for
Environmental Infrastructure Fund reimbursement and such other information
as may be requested by the Fiscal Services Division and / or the Board of
Commissioners to ensure compliance with Board policies established for the
Environmental Infrastructure Fund fiscal maintenance.
7) Periodically, the CVTs will request reimbursement of amounts expended by
the CVT for Board of Commissioner approved projects. The CVT shall
provide appropriate support for reimbursement necessary to ascertain that
the expenditure requested complies with Board of Commissioners approved
policies for the Environmental Infrastructure Fund.
8) The Environmental Infrastructure Fund shall not be used for CVT bonding.
9) All unexpended amounts under the Environmental Infrastructure Fund are
carried forward into the following fiscal year to the credit of the
applicable CVT until expended in a subsequent year by the CVT for an
eligible environmental infrastructure project. At the conclusion of the
5-year commitment period, the CVTs will have one year in which to complete
their environmental infrastructure projects. Any unexpended amounts after
that one year time period subsequent to the 5-year commitment period will
be returned to the Delinquent Tax Revolving Fund.
Chairperson, on behalf of the General Government Committee, I moye the adoption
of the foregoing resolution.
(SECTION REGARDING INFRASTRUCTURE FUND)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND
FISCAL YEAR 1999 BUDGET
PROPOSED GENERAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT
21. Direct expenditure and/or transfers of any unencumbered balance or any portion thereof in
any appropriation for transfer account to any other appropriations account may not be made
without amendment of the general appropriation measure as provided for in this resolution,
except that transfers within and between budgeted funds and departments may be made by
the Fiscal Officer in the following instances:
(g) Annually, from FY 1999 through FY 2003, $5,000,000.00 will be transferred from
the Delinquent Tax Revolving Fund to the General Fund to allow for the establishment of an
Environmental Infrastructure Fund (#263). These funds will then be allocated and transferred from
the General Fund Operating Transfer account (#90-310000-41000-8001) to the Environmental
Infrastructure Fund. The allocation of the Environmental Infrastructure Fund to locifaffeTcrir —i ages
and townships (CVTs) will be based upon criteria established by the Board of Commissioners. The
total allocation, however, to any approved CVT will coincide with an allocation that is based 50%
on the percentage each CVT's state taxable value (STY) to the County's total taxable value for the
most recently completed assessment year, and 50% on the percentage of each CVT's population, to
the County's total population based on the most recently completed Census. Finally, any final
expenditure and transfer shall be done in conformance with state law.
OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
VILLAGES & TOWNSHIPS
Taxable
Value
Percent Tax Value Based
of Total _Distribution.
1990 Percent Population-Based
Population _ of Total Distribution
50-50 Hasid-
Total
ADDISON
VILLAGE OF LEONARD
111 AMMFIELD
BRANDON
VILLAGE OF ORTONVILLE
COMMERCE
VILLAGE OF WOLVERINE
GROVELAND
HIGIILAND
HOLLY
VILLAGE OF HOLLY
INDEPENDENCE
LYON
MILFORD
VILLAGE OF MILFORD
NOVI
OAKLAND
ORION
VILLAGE OF LAKE ORION
OXFORD
VILLAGE OF OXFORD
ROSE
ROYAL OAK
SOUTHFIELD
VILLAGE OF BEVELRY HILLS
VILLAGE OF BINGHAM FARM
VILLAGE OF FRANKLIN
SPRINGFIELD
WATERFORD
WEST BLOOMFIELD
WHITE LAKE
182,196,741
9,066,960
2,538,783,130
2.74,312,149
28,699,806
1,012,872,700
106,255,840
151,581,879
454,886,971
90,076,170
82,109,579
871,922,600
313,175,640
370,156,346
156,927,805
6,410,330
543,010,835
1,062,537,960
71,566,800
286,969,569
79,017,711
143,878,995
56,679,050
6,271,040
388,347,914
153,214,120
167,540,060
361,289,392
1,716,653,302
2,607,391,858
664,869,122 . .
0.47% $23,322
0.02% 1,161
6.50% 324,981
0.70% 35,114
0.07% 3,674
2.59% 129,654
0.27% 13,601
0.39% 19,659
1.16% 58,229
0.23% 11,530
0.21% 10,511
2.23% 111,612
0.80% 40,089
0.95% 47,382
0.40% 20,088
0.02% 821
1.39% 69,509
2.72% 136,012
0.18% 9,161
0.73% 36,734
0.20% 10,115
0.37% 18,417
0.15% 7,255
0.02% 803
0.99% 49,711
0.39% 19,612
0.43% 21,446
0.92% 46,247
4.39% 219,743
6.68% 333,763
•1..70%
4,785 0.44%
357 0.03%
42,473 3.92%
10,799 1.00%
1,252 0.12%
22,156 2.04%
4,727 0.44%
4,705 0.43%
17,941 1.66%
3,257 0.30%
5,595 0.52%
23,717 2.19%
8,828 0.81%
6,624 0.61%
5,500 0.51%
0 0.00%
8,227 0.76%
21,019 1.94%
3,057 0.28%
9,004 0.83%
2,929 0.27%
4,926 0.45%
5,006 0.46%
0.00%
10,610 0.98%
1,001 0.09%
2,626 0.24%
9,927 0.92%
66,692 6.15%
54,516 5.03%
12 677 2.09%
$22,079
$1,647
$195,982
$49,830
$5,777
$102,234
$21,812
$21,710
$82,785
$15,029
$25,817
$109,437
$40,735
$30,565
$25,379
so
$37,962
$96,988
$14,106
$41,547
$13,515
$22,730
$23,099
$0
$48,958
$4,619
$12,117
$45,806
$307,736
$251,552
_$104,638
522,701
$1,404
$260,41112
$42,4172
$4,725
$ 1 15,944
$17,707
$20,685
$70,507
$13,280
$18,164
5110,524
$40,412
$38,974
$22,733
$410
$53,735
$116,500
$11,633
$39,140
$11,815
$20,574
$15,177
$401
$49,334
$12,116
$16,782
$46,027
$263,739
$292,658
$94,873
TOTAL VILLAGES & TOWNS $14296026722474 _ 38.30%_ $.4915 064 3842_933 35.52% $127762 190 $1,845.627
Program Evaluation 09/08/98 2TNSREV.WK4
50-50 Based
Total
$104,061
60,304
118,462
48,783
4,419
49,972
43,245
368,880
82,630
59,628
27,713
10,683
3,227
18,167
131,137
15,848
191,503
99,712
20,211
11,597
218,677
37,452
294,483
246,831
348,073
26,507
8,585
424,527
24,134
54.925
$3,154,373
TOTAL COUNTY $39,06025011498 . 100.00% $5,000,000 11083092 100,00% $50_300,000 $51000
CITIES
Taxable
Value
Percent Tax Value Based
of Total Total
1990
Population
Percent
of Total
Population-llased
Distribution_
AUBURN HILLS
BERKLEY
BIRMINGHAM
BLOOMFIELD HILLS
VILLAGE OF CI.ARKSTON
CI .A WSON
FARMINGTON
FARMINGTON I IILLS
FERNDALE
HAZEL PARK
IILINTINGToN WOODS
KEEGO HARBOR
LAKE ANGELUS
LATHRUP VILLAGE
MADISON HEIGHTS
NORTHVILLE
NOVI
OAK PARK
ORCHARD LAKE
PLEASANT RIDGE
PONTIAC
ROCHESTER
ROCHESTER HILLS
ROYAL OAK
SOUTHFIELD
SOUTH LYON
SYLVAN LAKE
TROY
WALLED LAKE
WIXOM
TOTAL CITIES
1,010,330,140
330,840,230
1,130,033,106
607,621,820
32,818,055
280,651,350
,309,065,980
3,073,823,680
386,819,170
208,858,157
201,600,590
61,219,130
38,595,990
127,795,580
888,334,940
126,237,930
1,797,180,635
459,626,790
233,375,420
81,156,507
852,391,493
328,140,035
2,374,563,912
1,498,683,574
2,707,964,479
180,596,049
65,141,050
4,005,628,273
150,773,329
549,961,730
2.59%
0.85%
2.89%
1,56%
0.08%
0.72%
0.79%
7.87%
0.99%
0.53%
0.52%
0.16%
0.10%
0.33%
2.27%
0.32%
4.60%
1.18%
0.60%
0.21%
2.18%
0.84%
6.08%
3.84%
6.93%
0.46%
0.17%
10.25%
0.39%
1.41%
$129,329
42,350
144,652
77,780
4,201
35,925
39,562
393,470
49,515
26,735
25.806
7,836
4,941
16,359
113,713
16,159
230,051
58,835
29,874
10,389
109,112
42,004
303,960
191,841
346,637
23,1171
8,338
512,747
19,300
$3,084,936
17,076 1.58%
16,960 1.57%
19,997 1,85%
4,288 0.40%
1,005 0.09%
13,874 1.28%
10,170 0.94%
74,614 6.89%
25,084 2.31%
20,051 1.85%
6,419 0.59%
2,932 0.27%
328 0.03%
4,329 0.40%
32,196 2.97%
3,367 0.31%
33,148 3.06%
30,468 2.81%
2,286 0.21%
2,775 0.26%
71,136 6.56%
7,130 0.66%
61,766 5.70%
65,410 6.04%
75,745 6.99%
6,479 0.60%
1,914 0.18%
72,884 6.73%
6,278 0.58%
8,550 _ _ 0.79%
698,659 64.48%
$78,793
78,258
92,272
19,786
4,637
64,019
46,927
344,290
115,745
92,521
29,619
13,529
1,513
19,975
148,561
15,536
152,954
140,588
10,548
12,805
328,242
32,900
285,006
301,820
349,509
29,896
8,832
336,307
28,968
_3914_52
$3,223,810 $24,099,829,124 61.70%
Sources: Oakland County Equalization, SEMCOG
Program Evaluation 09/08/98 I 2TNSREV.WK4
VILLAGES & TOWNSHIPS
ADDISON
VILLAGE OF LEONARD
OLOOMFIELI)
BRANDON
VILLAGE OF ORTONVILLE
COMMERCE
VILLAGE OF WOLVERINE
GROVELAND
HIGHLAND
HOLLY
VILLAGE OF HOLLY
INDEPENDENCE
LYON
MILFORD
VILLAGE OF MILFORD
NOVI
OAKLAND
ORION
VILLAGE OF LAKE ORION
OXFORD
VILLAGE OF OXFORD
ROSE
ROYAL OAK
SOUTI1FIELD
VILLAGE OF BEVI3LRY HILLS
VILLAGE OF BINGHAM FARM
VILLAGE OF FRANKLIN
SPRINGFIELD
WATERFORD
WEST BLOOMFIELD
WHITE LAKE
1990 Percent Population-Based
Population _ of Total Distdbution___
4,785 0.44%
357 0.03%
42,473 3.92%
10,799 1.00%
1,252 0.12%
22,156 2.04%
4,727 0.44%
4,705 0.43%
17,941 1.66%
3,257 0.30%
5,595 0.52%
23,717 2.19%
8,828 0.81%
6,624 0.61%
5,500 0.51%
0 0.00%
8,227 0.76%
21,019 1.94%
3,057 0.28%
9,004 0.83%
2,929 0.27%
4,926 0.45%
5,006 0.46%
0 0.00%
10,610 0.98%
1,001 0.09%
2,626 0.24%
9,927 0.92%
66,692 6.15%
54,516 5.03%
22,677 2.09%.
$22,079
$1,647
$195,982
$49,830
$5,777
$102,234
$21,812
$21,710
$82,785
$15,029
$25,817
$109,437
$40,735
$30,565
$25,379
$0
$37,962
$96,988
$14,106
$41,547
$13,515
$22,730
$23,099
$0
$48,958
$4,619
$12,117
$45,806
$307,736
$251,552
$.104,638
_ .
50-50 Based
Total
$22,701
$1,404
$260,482
$42,472
$4,725
$115,944
$17,707
$20,685
$70,507
$13,280
$18,164
$110,524
$40,412
$38,974
$22,733
$410
$53,735
$116,500
$11,633
$39,140
$11,815
$20,574
$15,177
$401
$49,334
$12,116
$16,782
$46,027
$263,739
$292,658
$1 845
OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
Taxable
Value
182,196,741
9,066,960
2,538,783,130
274,312,149
28,699,806
1,012,872,700
106,255,840
15.1,581,879
454,886,971
90,076,170
82,109,579
871,922,600
313,175,640
370,156,346
156,927,805
6,410,330
543,010,835
1,062,537,960
71,566,800
286,969,569
79,017,711
143,878,995
56,679,050
6,271,040
388,347,914
153,214,120
167,540,060
361,289,392
1,716,653,302
2,607,391,858
664,869,1_22
Percent
of Total
0.47%
0.02%
6.50%
0.70%
0.07%
2.59%
0.27%
0.39%
1.16%
0.23%
0.21%
2.23%
0.80%
0.95%
0.40%
0.02%
1.39%
2.72%
0.18%
0.73%
0.20%
0.37%
0.15%
0.02%
0.99%
0.39%
0.43%
0.92%
4.39%
6.68%
1.70% . _.
'fax Value Based
Distribution_
$23,322
1,161
324,981
35,114
3,674
129,654
13,601
19,659
58,229
11,530
10,511
111,612
40,089
47,382
20,088
821
69,509
136,012
9,161
36,734
10,115
18,417
7,255
803
49,711
19,612
21,446
46,247
219,7431
333,763
85 ! 08
TOTAL VILLAGES & TOWNS ._$14 19602672r374 38.30% S1,915,064 384,933 35.52% $1 7761190
Program Evaluation 09/24/98 2TNSREV.WK4
1,010,330,140
330,840,230
1,130,033,106
607,621,820
32,818,055
280,651,350
309,065,980
3,073,823,680
386,819,170
208,858,157
201,600,590
61,219,130
38,595,990
127,795,580
888,334,940
126,237,930
1,797,180,635
459,626,790
233,375,420
81,156,507
852,391,493
328,140,035
2,374,563,912
1,498,683,574
2,707,964,479
180,596,049
, 65,141,050
4,005,628,273
150,773,329
549,961,730_
2.59%
0.85%
2.89%
1.56%
0.08%
0.72%
0.79%
7.87%
0.99%
0.53%
0.52%
0.16%
0.10%
0.33%
2.27%
0.32%
4.60%
1.18%
0.60%
0.21%
2.18%
0.84%
6.08%
3.84%
6.93%
0.46%
0.17%
10.25%
0.39%
1.41%
$24,099,829,124 61.70%
$39,060,504498 100.00%
crri ES
Taxable
Value
Percent Tax Value Based
of Total Total
1990 • -Percent Population-Based
Population _of Total Distribution
50-so
TOM_
AUBURN HILLS
BERKLEY
BIRMINGIIAM
BLOOMFIELD !BUS
VILLAGE OF CLARKSTON
CLAWSON
FARMINGTON
FARMINGTON HILLS
FERNDALE
I 'Ant. PARK
IIONTINGTON WOODS
KEEGO I IARBOR
LAKE ANGELUS
LATHRUP VILLAGE
MADISON HEIGHTS
NORTHVILLE
NOVI
OAK PARK
ORCHARD LAKE
PLEASANT RIDGE
PONTIAC
ROCHESTER
ROCHESTER HILLS
ROYAL OAK
SOUTHFIELD
SOUTH LYON
SYLVAN LAKE
TROY
WALLED LAKE
WIXOM
TOTAL CITIES
TOTAL COUNTY
$129,329
42,350
144,652
77,780
4,201
35,925
39,562
393,470
49,515
26,735
25,806
7,836
4,941
16,359
113,713
16,159
230,051
58,835
29,874
10,389
109,112
42,004
303,960
191,841
346,637
23,117
8,338
512,747
19,300
70 399
$3,084,936
17,076 1.58%
16,960 1.57%
19,997 1.85%
4,288 0.40%
1,005 0.09%
13,874 1.28%
10,170 0.94%
74,614 6.89%
25,084 2.31%
20,051 1.85%
6,419 0.59%
2,932 0.27%
328 0.03%
4,329 0.40%
32,196 2.97%
3,367 0.31%
33,148 3.06%
30,468 2.81%
2,286 0.21%
2,775 0.26%
71,136 6.56%
7,130 0.66%
61,766 5.70%
65,410 6.04%
75,745 6.99%
6,479 0.60%
1,914 0.18%
72,884 6.73%
6,278 0.58%
81_550
698,659 64.48%
1 083 592 100 00% 1 _ _
$78,793
78,258
92,272
19,786
4,637
64,019
46,927
344,290
115,745
92,521
29,619
13,529
1,513
19,975
148,561
15,536
152,954
140,588
10,548
12,805
328,242
32,900
285,006
301,820
349,509
29,896
8,832
336,307
28,968
_39,452
$3,223,810
$5,0001000.
$104,061
60,304
118,462
48,783
4,419
49,972
43,245
368,880
82,630
59,628
27,713
10,683
3,227
18,167
131,137
1.5,848
191,503
99,712
20,211
11,5971
218,677
37,452
294,483
246,831
348,073
26,507
8,585
424,527
24,134
54,92s
$3,154,313
_ SIAM"
Sources: Oakland County Equalization, SEMCOG
Program Evaluation 09/24/9$ I 21 NSR.E.V.WK4
Resolution #98262 October 29, 1998
The Chairperson referred the resolution to the General Government, Planning
and Building and Finance Committees. There were no objections.
Resolution #98262 November 19, 1998
The Chairperson referred the resolution to the Finance Committee. There
were no objections.