HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1999.08.19 - 25603July 15, 1999
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #99175
BY: Personnel Committee, Thomas A. Law, Chairperson
IN RE: DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL/HUMAN RESOURCES - CHANGE TO MERIT SYSTEM RULE 2.2
-- SALARY GRADE PLACEMENT REVIEWS AND APPEALS
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies, Gentlemen:
WHEREAS Section IV, Subsection A of the Merit System Resolution requires
that all changes in the rules and regulations of the Merit System shall be
submitted to the Board of Commissioners at a regular meeting of the Board and
shall become effective thirty (30) days after such meeting unless objection is
received in writing by the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners, in which
case the objection shall become a matter of business at the next meeting of the
Board; and
WHEREAS it has become desirable to make changes to Merit Rule 2.2 regarding
the appeals of salary grade determinations made by the Personnel Department as
spelled out in the attachments to this resolution; and
WHEREAS currently the rule does not specify any time frames for appeals of
these studies; and
WHEREAS this revision involves the addition of specific time frames of 21
calendar days from the date of the notice prepared by the Personnel Department
for submission of such appeals.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the reading of this notice and the
attached copies of the proposed changes to Merit Rule 2.2, to all Commissioners
present and absent, be considered as the official submission to the Board of
Commissioners of the described changes to Merit Rule 2.2.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move the adoption of
the foregoing resolution.
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
Personnel Committee Vote:
Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote with Galloway absent.
PROPOSED CHANGE IN MERIT SYSTEM RULE
RULE NUMBER
Current Wording
2.2.1.2.1 A department head may appeal the re-
evaluation results by notifying the Personnel
Department in writing, identifying the factors and
evaluations which are considered inappropriate and
stating the reasons.
2.2.2.3.1 If an employee wishes to appeal the results of
the re-evaluation, the employee must submit a written
request to the Personnel Department to have the appeal
forwarded to the Job Evaluation Review Panel and cite
reasons for the request. The Personnel Committee may
either forward the request or file it without further
action.
Proposed Wording
2.2.1.2.1 A department head may appeal the re-
evaluation results by notifying the Personnel
Department in writing, identifying the factors and
evaluations which are considered inappropriate and
stating the reasons. The appealing department shall
have up to 21 calendar days from the date of the notice
prepared by the Personnel Department in which to file
an appeal.
2.2.2.3.1 An employee may appeal the re-evaluation
results by notifying the Personnel Department in
writing, identifying the factors and evaluations which
are considered inappropriate and stating the reasons.
The appealing employee shall have up to 21 calendar
days from the date of the notice prepared by the
Personnel Department in which to file an appeal. The
Personnel Department shall place the appeal on the
agenda for the next meeting of the Personnel
Committee. The Personnel Committee may either
forward the request to the Job Evaluation Review Panel
or file it without further action.
Change Submitted By: Date:
County Executive: Approved Disapproved by: Date:
Personnel Committee: Approved Disapproved by: Date:
Introduced to Board of Commissioners Date:
Section IV Subsection A of Merit System Resolution
Copies of the rules and regulations developed by the Personnel Committee and all future changes in such rules and regulations
shall be submitted to the Board of Commissioners at a regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners and shall become effective
thirty days after such meeting unless objection is received in writing by the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners, in which
case the objection shall become a matter of business at the next meeting of the Board of Commissioners.
Resolution #99175 July 15, 1999
The Chairperson stated that by Statute, the resolution shall lay over for
thirty (30) days.
•
Resolution #99175 August 19, 1999
Moved by Law supported by Gregory the resolution be adopted.
AYES: Galloway, Garfield, Gregory, Jensen, Law, McCulloch, McPherson,
Melton, Millard, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Patterson, Schmid, Sever, Suarez,
Taub, Amos, Causey-Mitchell, Colasanti, Coleman, Devine, Dingeldey,
Douglas. (24)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners on August 19, 1999 with the original record
thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 19t4, day 9f August, 1999.
illiam Caddell, County Clerk