Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1999.07.15 - 25758July 15, 1999 REPORT (Misc . #99171) BY: PERSONNEL COMMITTEE, THOMAS A. LAW, CHAIRPERSON RE: Oakland County Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant Acceptance (JAIBG) To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Personnel Committee having reviewed the above referenced resolution on July 7, 1999, recommends to the Oakland County Board of Commissioners the resolution be adopted.: Chairperson, on behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Personnel Committee Vote: Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote with Galloway absent. / REPORT (Misc. #99171) Jukr15,1999 BY: PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE CHARLES E. PALMER, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: OAKLAND COUNTY JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) ACCEPTANCE TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Planning and Building Committee, having reviewed the above-referenced resolution on July 15, 1999, reports with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building Committee, I move acceptance of the foregoing Report. PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE Committee Vote: Motion carried on a roll call vote with Palmer voting No. Chairperson, on behalf of the Public Services Committee, I move acceptance of the foregoing Report. PUBLIC SERVICES CO FUEFIWT (Misc. #99171) BY: PUBLIC SERVICES COMMI11EE FRANK H. MILLARD, CHAIRPERSON July 15, 1999 IN RE: OAKLAND COUNTY JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAJBG) ACCEPTANCE TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Public Services Committee, having reviewed the above-referenced resolution on July 15, 1999, reports with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. Public Services Committee Vote: Motion carried on roll call vote with Moffitt, Causey-Mitchell, Schmid, Dingeldey, Galloway, Patterson and McPherson voting yet Millard voting no • • 7 MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION #99171 July 15, 1999 BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON IN RE: OAKLAND COUNTY JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) ACCEPTANCE To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies, and Gentlemen: WHEREAS Oakland County submitted a multi-departmental grant application under the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant program to the Michigan Family Independence Agency for assistance in increasing the accountability of juvenile criminal offenders; and WHEREAS the Michigan Family Independence Agency approved the application and awarded Oakland County a federal pass-through grant totaling $502,921 of which $452,629 is from the State, as a Federal pass-through, and the balance, $50,292 is the County's match amount; and WHEREAS the grant award provides funding for the creation of four (4) new positions which include one (1) SR Probation Officer I position for the Prosecutor's Teen Court Program, one (1) SR Pretrial Services Investigator II position, one (1) SR Pretrial Services Investigator I position and one (1) Typist I position for Community Correction's In-Step Program; and WHEREAS the award also provides funding for operating, construction and capital expenses as detailed in Schedule A; and WHEREAS the County Match is available from funds allocated to the non-departmental Tax Tribunal Appeals account which is no longer required due to a reduction in activity; and WHEREAS acceptance of this contract does not obligate the County to any future commitment; and WHEREAS the contract has been approved by the County Executive's Contract Review Process. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners accepts the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant (JAIBG) in the total amount of $502,921, $452,629 from the State and $50,292 as the required County Match for the period of June 1, 1999 through May 31, 2000, once insurance and indemnification provisions acceptable to the County have been negotiated. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Oakland County Board of Commissioners authorizes the creation of one (1) SR Probation Officer I position for the Teen Court program , in the Juvenile Unit of the Prosecutor's Office. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Oakland County Board of Commissioners also authorizes the creation of one (1) Pretrial Services Investigator II position, one(1)Pretrial Services Investigator I position, and one (1) Typist I position for the In-Step Program in the Court Community Services Unit of the Community Corrections Division. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the 1999 Adopted Budget be amended as follows: Grant Funding Sources 17-305001-70500-0171 Grants-State $452,629 17-402220-70111-2872 Grant Match 50.292 $502,921 Grant Appropriations Children's Village 16-xxxxxx-25001-2556 16-xxxxxx-25001-4100 Community Corrections 17-305002-70500-2001 17-305002-70500-2075 17-305002-70500-2556 Construction 86,667 Expendable Equipment 17,426 In-Step Program Salaries 77,445 Fringes 34,290 Construction 32,052 Finance Committee Vote: Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote. / 17-305002-70500-3324 Printing 1,500 17-305002-70500-6675 Telephone Communications 2,660 Juvenile Court 34-800200-40012-3348 S.T.A.R.T. Program 116,077 34-800200-40013-3348 JAMS Program 75,000 Prosecuting Attorney Teen Court Program 41-270001-221001-2001 Salaries 37,102 41-270001-221001-2075 Fringes 14,564 41-270001-221001-4100 Expendable Equipment 3,142 41-270001-221001-6637 Info Tech Equipment Rental 2,336 41-270001-221001-6675 Telephone Communications 2,660 $502.921 Grant Match Transfer General Fund 90-211000-21000-9009 Tax Tribunal Appeals $(50,292) Grant Fund 17-402220-70111-2872 Grant Match 50.292 $______Q BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners is authorized to execute the contract agreement and to approve amendments and extensions up to fifteen (15%) percent variance from the award, consistent with the original agreement as approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that future level of service, including personnel, will be contingent upon the level of funding available from the State for this program. Chairperson, on behalf of the Finance Committee, I move the adoption of the foregoing resolution. FINANCE COMMITTEE xf26,-.1 $86,667 17,426 $104,093 Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant (JAIBG) Schedule A Children's Village Cs.:“—uction Expendable Equipment Total Children's Village Community Corrections In-Step Program Salaries 77,445 Fringes 34,290 Construction 32,052 Printing 1,500 Telephone 2,660 Total Community Corrections 147,947 Juvenile Court START Program JAMS Program Total Juvenile Court 116,077 75,000 191,077 Prosecuting Attorney Teen Court Program Salaries 37,102 Fringes 14,564 Expendable Equipment 3,142 Info Tech Equipment 2,336 Telephone 2660 Total Prosecuting Attorney Total Grant 59,804 $502,921 REPORT BY: Personnel Committee, Thomas A. Law, Chairperson RE: Prosecutor's Office/Circuit Court Family Division/Community Corrections Division - Oakland County Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant Acceptance To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen: The Personnel Committee, having reviewed the above referenced resolution, reports with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. Chairperson, on behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE /3 6, REQUEST Community Corrections/Court Community Service Unit 1) To create one (1) full-time Pretrial Services Investigator II. one (1) Pretrial Services Investigator I position, and one (1) part-time non-eligible Typist I position Prosecutor's Office/Juvenile Court Unit 1) To create one (1) full -time Probation Officer I position BOARD/COMMITTEE ACTION Public Services 7/06/99 Personnel Committee 7/07/99 Finance Committee 7/08/99 Board of Commissioners 7115/99 PROPOSED FUNDING Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant OVERVIEW The Michigan Family Independence Agency approved the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant to provide financial resources for the Prosecutor's Office and the Community Corrections Division as they become more involved with implementing programs that help youth develop productive lives. The Juvenile Justice system in Oakland County is making a collaborative effort to reclaim delinquent youth with effective intervention strategies. These strategies provide for a wide array of sanctions and services for offenders and their families, to include a "One-Stop-Shop" pilot program called In-Step. The Waterford community has agreed to participate in In-Step, enhancing services to the courts, communities, and families as the program becomes a unique central diagnostic and treatment provider. In-Step emphasizes strict surveillance and offers housing assistance, educational assistance, on- site drug testing. on-site diagnostic testing for mental health disorders, counseling, on-site psychiatric medication review, computers for learning, parent education classes, and case management services for families with multiple needs. The program will operate Monday through Friday with evening hours Monday through Thursday, to accommodate participants. This program is proposed as a pilot, if successful, it may be implemented in other areas of Oakland County. COUNTY EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDATION: Recommended as Requested / 3 1 Annual Cost Remainder of Fiscal Year Cost (7/17/99-9/24/99) PERTINENT SALARIES 1999 I Class I Gr. I Period _ Base 1 Year :2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S Year , Pretrial Annual, $33.350 $35,363 $37,378 $39,391 $41,401 $43,412 Services 10. Bi-wk 1,282.71 1,360.12 1,437.60 1,515.05 1,592.34 1,669.71 Investigator II Pretrial 9 Annual $30,334 $32,163 $33,996 $35,829 $37,660 $39,490 Services Bi-wk 1,166.71 1,237.03 1,307.54 1,378.02 1,448.46 1,518.86 Investigator I Probation 9 Annual $30,334 $32,163 $33,996 $35,829 $37,660 $39,490 Officer I Bi-wk 1,166.71 1,237.03 1,307.54 1,378.02 1,448.46 1,518.86 .. ' Typist I 2 Annual $19,780 $21,023 $22,271 $23,516 $24,763 $26,004 PINE Bi-wk 760.78 808.59 856.57 904.46 952.43 1,000.17 - Note: Annual rates are shown for illustrative purposes only. SALARY AND FRINGE BENEFIT COST Create one (1) SR Pretrial Services Investigator II Salary at 1 yr step $35,363 $6,800 Fringes @ 39% 11791 2.652 Total $49,154 $9,452 Create one (1)SR Pretrial Services Investigator I Salary at 1 yr step $32,163 $6,185 Fringes @ 39% 12.543 2,412 Total $44,706 $8,597 Create one (1) SR Probation Officer I Salary at 1 yr step $32,163 $6,185 Fringes @ 39% 12.543 2.412 Total $44,706 $8,597 Create one (1) SR Typist I FTNE Salary at 1 yr step Fringes a 9.7% Total cost for creation of positions $21,023 $4.040 2.0.2 391 $23,062 $4,431 $161,628 $31,077 REVISED a APPLICATION COVER SHEET FOR JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY INCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) 1. Date Submitted 1A1BG Grant Number April 30, 1999 2. Date Received by State OCRS Number 3. Applicant Information Applicant Name: County of Oakland, Michigan Address of F.ccal Agent address. cit. sate. arid zip code, Oakland County DM&B Executive Office Bldg. 34–E 1200 North Telegraph Rd.' Pontiac MI 48341 4. Type of Application Contact Person -Name. title, telephone number (give area code) & E- mail address of the person to be contacted on matters involving this application Greg Givens, Grants Writer 248/858.4057 giveng@co.oakland.mi.us 5. Type of Applicant (enter appropriate letter in box) 1.77 kVA' EContinuation 0Revision A. County C. Township E. Indian Tribe B. Municipal D. Village F. Coalition (Combination of A - E) If Revision. specify reason below: 6. Award Dates: 7. Congressional Districts of: 8. Employer Identification Number min Start Date End Date 7a. Applicant 7b. Project , . June 1.1999 May 31,2000 9th 9th 3 8 0 0 48 7 6 — ._ — 9. Purpose Areas of your Projects - Check all appropriate boxes below (See Enclosure A for complete listing of purpose areas) Construction of Juvenile deten- igt. Accountability-based sanctions 03• Hiring of judges. probation tion or correctional facilities, programs. officers, and defenders A: pretrial including training of personnel. services. 04. Hiring of prosecutors •5. Funding of prosecutor-led drug, 06. Provision of technology, gang and violence programs equipment., and training programs for prosecutors. /". Probation programs 08. Gun courts 09• Drug courts 0 10. Information sharing system 011. Accountability-based programs 1l2.* Implementing a policy of con- designed to protect students and trolled substance testing for school personnel from drug, appropriate categories of juveniles gang. and youth violence, within the juvenile justice system. , * A policy for substance abuse testing is required to be eligible for a JAIBG Award. 10. Funding Totals: Federal Share $452,629 Local Match $50,292 Total Budget Amount $502,921 Issued 2199 / 31 348,139- it le WA. a. • Schools • R...vard, Waterford School District J.kISC APPLICATION COVER SHEET (CONTINUED) : R:gional Coa:iticns Rational Coalition Award Release (Erictositte C) must be completed ay each unit Or local erntnent within he coalition. except for the fiscal agent. and included with the application .; If '.au a:: torntatnLng multiple awards and forming a tcgional coalition, list the awardees within the ::?.iona caalition ar.d the ainount of :heir individua! ra.-.ts eicv+.• A.n :rite: l Amount of Grant I 3eve7 1 v iii,lis Village 35,220 white Lake Township 5,324 Farmington Ells I 28,338 .. Birmingham I 9,257 I I I [Total Amount 12. Juvenile Crime Enforcement Coalition (JCEC) (List the members & the titles below): ** Sgt. Bob Kowalski, Troy Police Department Police Capt. Mike McCabe, Oakland County Sheriff's Department Sheriff Lisa Halushka, Prosecutor's Office Juvenile Section Prosecutor Paul 3aker, Attorney Public Defender t ?am Howitt, Ph.D., Probate Cur: Probation Services Robert 3inghatt, Court Administrator, Probate Court Jvinemile Court Dan Cojanu, Prosecutor' Office — Victim Witness Victim Services Rev. Dow Jones, Welcome Ba.ist Church Reli ion David Callowa?, Master Clean Laundry Business 13. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct, the document has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the applicant certifies that the programs proposed meet the requirements of the Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant and all applicable federal laws. a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative John P. McCulloch d. Signature of Authorized Representative b Title Chair, Oakland County Board of Commissioners C. Telephone number (include area code) 248/858.0100 Date Signed Issued 2/99 Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant The Oakland County Regional Juvenile Crime Enforcement Coalition COORDINATED ENFORCEMENT PLAN Revised June 1. 1999 1. Problem to be Addressed a. identify the scope of the existing juvenile crime problem in your jurisdiction. Juvenile crime and delinq&ncy do not result from one event or action in a young person's life. Rather juvenile delinquency stems from a series of events, each of which presents an opportunity for intervention and prevention of further problems. Looking at the problems to be addressed in Oakland County as a continuum of need, the regional Juvenile Crime Enforcement Coalition is focusing on four areas of opportunity to increase accountability for juvenile criminal offenses and increase accountability in the juvenile justice system within the larger existing juvenile justice needs continuum. These four areas include: Juvenile Diversion, Juvenile After Care, Juvenile Probation, and Juvenile Facilities Improvement. Juvenile Diversion: Local statistics suggest Oakland County mirrors the rest of Michigan in juvenile crime statistics. While crimes by teens have declined in recent years, the percent of students reporting such activities as illicit drug use and other anti-social behaviors have increased substantially between 1992 and 1996. Of those juveniles typically committing crimes, 75-80% are found to use or were using drugs during the commission of the crime. Juvenile delinquency issues are reflected in the following Oakland County statistics: 1) use of inhalants among youth in Oakland County is growing and is currently more than twice the national average (Michigan Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey - 1995); 2) thirty-six percent of children in Oakland County enter foster care because of parental substance related abuse and neglect (Michigan Department of Social Services - 1996); 3) the 'past month' data for use of marijuana among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders in Oakland County is twice the national average (Michigan Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey - 1993); and 4) the Oakland County Protective Services estimate the number of their referrals where juvenile delinquency was present currently range from 65% to 80% (Oakland Family Services - Empowering Children Study 1997). Negative youth peer relations including gang involvement and poorly formed adult coping interaction, which appears to precipitate drug use, are currently seen as an important component in Oakland County juvenile delinquency statistics. The legislative mandate to deal with this concern is that each juvenile coming within the jurisdiction of the court receives the care, guidance. and control, preferably in their own home, conducive to the juvenile's welfare, and the interest of the community. Juvenile diversion requires that emphasis be placed on accountability in terms of community protection when making disposition decisions. Research and experience to date indicates that for a juvenile delinquency prevention and f.41/ accountability strategy to be effective, the strategy must deal with the individual youth's need for acceptance and approval by a significant number of his peers. To achieve this, a balance restorative justice model in dealing youth accountability is finding excellent results nation-wide. Juvenile After Care: According to prominent experts in the field of juvenile justice, two of the most troubling deficiencies in the system today involve: the limited attention devoted to adequately preparing youth for return to the community while they are in confinement; and the failure to monitor and reinforce the skills developed in treatment, once the youth are released (see for example Altschuler and Armstrong, 1999; Fagen 1990; Springer, 1991). These systemic problems coupled with the existence of certain identifiable risk factors among the population of juvenile delinquents, have contributed to an alarming rate of recidivism among previously placed youngsters. Nationally, estimates run as high as 60% and local statistics suggest that up to 50% of the youngsters completing a Oakland County Children's Village (a residential facility for children) treatment program are subsequently re-adjudicated. While many youngsters manage to re-enter community living without significant disruption, research indicates that subgroups are likely to have serious adjustment problems. Moreover, an examination of Oakland County records reveals that most recidivism occurs between four and nine months post-release. This is consistent with findings in other jurisdictions ( Fagan, 1990). Currently, youth released from Children's Village treatment programs receive 60 days of aftercare follow-up from institutional staff per Child Care Fund guidelines and limitations. The court has attempted to supplement these efforts by extending probation supervision to those youth who need more intensive and/or longer term services in order to successfully transition back to their communities. It is clear, however, that we have insufficient resources to provide the services in the volume and intensity needed. Juvenile Probation: The family court provides delinquency services to over 3,300 youth each year. Service to this population is provided along a continuum of care beginning with consent probation at $3 per day through commitment to F.I.A. at a cost of $212 per day. We have identified the need for accountability based sanctions for youth receiving services in their own home. Youth under court supervision do not make changes simply because we now have a court order. The behaviors do not always measure up to the expectations the court has placed on them. They may engage in "technical violations", such as not making restitution payments, violation of school rules , not maintaining employment or other behaviors which are not criminal in nature but may not be in compliance with court orders. These behaviors are not serious enough to require a residential placement. A consequence short of residential is needed to hold youth accountable. We have few alternatives available to deal with these technical violations. We occasionally may place a youth in a residential facility for a weekend. These spaces are extremely limited and usually not available on a timely basis. A Program of daytime weekend days will fill the void in cost effective manner. The information presented will be designed to meet the needs of and promote changes in this at risk population. The parent of the youth will also be asked to participate where appropriate. Juvenile Facilities Improvement: In identifying the scope of the existing juvenile facilities' problems. two areas of improvements are needed to meet current safety standards and improve the space needs of the resident-clientele, while keeping in mind the welfare of the community. The first juvenile facilities problem is identified at the Oakland County Children's Village complex. The existing juvenile facilities' structure was constructed in the early 1970's. The structure was designed to Tontain a secure detention unit (housing 62 residents detained under secure conditions while awaiting trial and /or transfer from the facility) and a separate lobby/administrative offices area and a separate medical unit. The medical unit houses a dental clinic, with X-ray equipment, examination and treatment rooms, nurses station and dispensary. Youths in secure custody must (by virtue of the existing structural design) be escorted by facility staff through the public lobby in order to access the medical unit. Often this task causes detainees (who may require, for security reasons, being handcuffed and/or shackled) to be escorted in full view of citizens who are in the lobby. In addition to breaching confidentiality via having to travel through the lobby, there also exists an increased potential for escape in that the lobby is in the "non-secure" portion of the building. The scope of this existing juvenile facilities' structure problem is evidenced in the first two months of 1999, when there were 264 instances in which youths received physicians' services in the medical unit and another 79 occasions in which dental services were rendered. Simply utilizing this sample, we then can determine that there were 686 (264 + 79 X 2) trips through the public lobby as described above. The second juvenile facilities problem is identified to meet the space needs of Oakland County's newly initiated In-Step program. The In-Step program is a community-based central juvenile diagnostic and referral center in Oakland County to which families can be referred for comprehensive evaluation of juvenile offenders. Facility improvements are needed to provide the space needs for the program. b. Describe the existing programs to address the juvenile crime problem Prosecuting Attorney: The office of Prosecuting Attorney is created by the Michigan Constitution and its duties are prescribed by law. The Prosecuting Attorney represents the People of the State of Michigan in criminal matters pending before all courts in Oakland County. The prosecutor has the primary responsibility for the direction and control of criminal prosecutions in Oakland County. The basic provision regarding the role of the Prosecuting Attorney is found in statutes of the State of Michigan: MCLA 49.153, which provides: The prosecuting attorneys shall, in their respective counties, appear for the state or county, and ‘73 prosecute or defend in all courts of the county, all prosecutions, suits, applications or motions, whether civil or criminal, in which the state or county may be a party or interested. The prosecutor is the chief law enforcement officer of the county, charged with the duty to see that the laws are faithfully executed and enforced to maintain the rule of law. He is responsible for the authorization of criminal warrants and the prosecution of criminal cases on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan. He also provides legal advice to the various police agencies in the county concerning criminal matters and investigates suspected illegal activity when it cannot be adequately dealt with by other police departments. The Prosecutor's Office is presently divided into eight major divisions consisting of the Administration Division, Warrants Division, Circuit Court Division, Appellate Court Division, Family Support Division, District Court Division, Juvenile Court Division, and the Criminal Investigations Division. Each division is headed by a chief who maintains direct supervisory control over personnel assigned to the division. Family Division of the Circuit Court: With recent changes in the circuit and probate court legislation, Oakland County's Family Division is charged with the sole and exclusive jurisdiction to promote more efficient and effective services to families and individuals. Oakland County is the second largest probate court district in Michigan with four elected Probate Judges and a staff of 227 employees to serve its 1,083,000 residents. Oakland County Family Division of the Circuit Courts exercises exclusive jurisdiction in such matters as juvenile delinquency, neglect, abuse, adoption proceedings and juvenile traffic offenses, including delinquency and child protective proceedings and handling cases of families and children under the age of 17 who are alleged or adjudicated to be delinquent or neglected and abused. Children's Village: Children's Village is Oakland County's residential facility for children and youths who have been referred by the Family Division of the Circuit Court, district and circuit courts, the Prosecuting Attorney, various juvenile courts throughout Michigan, and the State Department of Social Services. The facility presents a unique tri-dimensional approach to residential care and treatment for youngsters awaiting the adjudicative and/or disposition phases of the court process, as well as those committed by disposition orders for the purpose of residential treatment and maintains 213 beds in multiple living units located on a campus setting. The Children's Village School, accredited by the North Central Association of High Schools and Colleges, completes the self-contained/one-location feature of the facility, allowing for regular and special education programs for grades 6-12. Office of Community Corrections: Michigan's Community Corrections Act of 1988 grants funds to local governments to develop Community Corrections programs. Public Act 511 was enacted to increase the range of sanctions and services available for non-violent adult offenders who would otherwise be incarcerated in state prisons and local jails. To this end, Oakland County's Comprehensive Plan for Community Corrections, which was approved by the State in 1994. includes the addition of those sanctions and services essential to the development of a comprehensive corrections system. Through the development of a local Community Corrections Division. the foundation has been set to begin to address providing alternatives to incarceration that: 1) protect the public; 2) punish the offender; 3) hold the offender accountable; 4) increase v v restitution to victims of crime; 5) provide needed rehabilitative services (e.g., substance abuse and mental health counseling, job training and placement, and continuing education opportunities): and (6 free up valuable jail space for more serious, violent criminals. 2. Project Design a. Plan of action Purpose Area = 2 - Juvenile Diversion; The plan of action is to directly address the identified needs in this area by the creation of a Teen Court to be implemented by the Prosecutor's Office. The project provides enhanced system options using a restorative justice model within a peer setting, teen court is a ternidescribing a diversion program for first-time juvenile offenders which involves youth and the community in the justice system. Additionally, the teen court will increase the capacity to develop youth competence. Cases are referred to the teen court by law enforcement, the Family Court, prosecuting attorney, city attorney, parents and school officials. Cases which may be considered for teen court are those involving first-time offenders. If the referral is accepted, the juvenile may avoid having a delinquency record by offering a plea to the charges and appearing before the teen court jury for sentencing. At the teen court hearing the jury, prosecuting attorney, defense attorney, bailiff and court clerk are youth volunteers who have been previously trained by the teen court coordinator. The judge is an adult attorney who has also volunteered his/her time to sit as teen court judge after listening to a presentation of the facts by the prosecuting attorney and the defense attorney. The teen jury deliberates and returns with a sentence derived from a pre-approved list of disposition alternatives. These alternatives may include community services, restitution and service on a future teen court jury. Jurisdictions which have an operating teen court report less than a 5% recidivism rate following successful completion of the teen court program. Purpose Area 7. 12 - Juvenile After Care; This project design is to begin meeting the needs of juvenile after care for the Oakland County Family Court, in collaboration with Children's Village. The project is for after care services for residentially placed youth and assists in the efficiency of tracking juveniles through the system. This initiative is called "Supervised Transitional And Re-entry Tracking," or Project START. The initiative will be implemented by the Family Court Division of Probate Court. A recent theme in juvenile justice program development has been the need to balance the goals of protecting public safety and holding juveniles accountable with the goals of competency development and rehabilitation for individual offenders. Intensive supervision models which demonstrate the most promise of success are those that combine increased social control and surveillance with provision of services / specialized treatment and "normalization opportunities'. (ie. job training and placement, education, life skills training). Advances in program research. design and technology in the past few years now make it possible to target specific populations of youth most in need of services (through risk assessment), and provide the necessary surveillance ( through use of tethers, tracking devices, etc). Thus, one onent of the program will be utilization of the Michigan Family Independence Agency quency Risk Assessment Scale to help determine youth to be enrolled. The Risk ,sment Scale can be re-administered after completion of the aftercare program to measure fects of the services on risk for re-adjudication. Secondly. we will use electronic .11ance equipment as appropriate. It is anticipated that we will focus primarily on youth who ss than 17 years of age at time of discharge, who have been in placement at the secure rth building of Children's Village and/or who present with a high risk profile on assessment n-es. additional key features of the project will be: over-arching case management services ied by the contractor, to include coordinated pre-discharge planning, service provision and al; liaison with court caseworkers monitoring of youth and family progress; 24-hour crisis -Ise; communication and reporting to coin, and contacts with the youth prior to discharge ablish a working rapport. -ding to research sponsored by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, huler and Armstrong, 1991; 1992; National Institute of Justice, 1998), nine different e areas have been identified for inclusion in aftercare programs that have proven successful d the country. These elements will be included in the START project. These are: 1) alized treatment for designated youth, such as substance abuse treatment, mental health lent for youth with continuing emotional problems, etc.; 2) Educational opportunities, :ing careful planning with school personnel regarding the re-enrollment of youth /lents regarding assistance to be provided in managing youngsters in school, etc. (This is a )nsideration, especially for younger offenders, since school personnel are often somewhat ant to accept the return of youth, and/or may be quick to expel later); 3) Job Training and -nent; 4) Living arrangements to be facilitated, if youth are not returning to their own es; 5) Social Skills and basic living skills training; 6) Structured recreation and leisure .ies; 7) Client-centered counseling , including group and individual as appropriate; 8) y counseling; and 9) Health services, including nutritional counseling, preventative .aintenance etc. se Area # 7 - Juvenile Probation; The project will provide the Court with an additional 3ri to hold youth accountable without escalating to a more restrictive higher cost ition. Referrals will be processed through weekly staffing of probation officers and isors. Cases may also be referred by Intake referees as a result of a written case nce agreement. The program will be called J.A.M. (Juvenile Alternatives for nduct). Implementation is the responsibilities of the Family Court Division of the Probate --y focus of the program is accountability. You have failed in your responsibility, therefore, to report to J.A.M. Program content will include topics of importance to this at risk .tion. The components are to include: A) educational skills including prevention of drug _ohol use, smoking. HIV. STD. anger management/conflict resolution, employment skills z. B) youth community service: C) recreation or physical challenge component. Service be provided by a contract agency who would have responsibility for staffing, site, program / management and liaison with the Court. Purpose Area # 1 - Juvenile Facilities Improvement; The first proposed capital improvement project at Children's Village will construct a secure corridor linking the existing maximum security detention unit to the medical- unit wing of the same building. This will provide a connecting wing that would provide a safe, secure and private means by which to convey detainees to/from the medical unit. This additional connecting corridor would contain electronically operated and locking doors and be under closed-circuit television (CCTV) surveillance and equipped with intercom audio equipment. The projects will be implemented by the Oakland County Department of Facilities Management. Additional capital improvTment funds are required for the previously identified space needs to house the In-Step program, a community-based central juvenile diagnostic and referral center. For this project, the Oakland County Community Corrections Division has identified two potential sites for this endeavor; both locations, however, are older buildings that are in need of significant repair. Dollars secured from this grant would be utilized to upgrade either facility, with Oakland County supporting with matched funds. Additional grant dollars are being sought from the Byrne Memorial Formula Grant Program for the administration of this program. Tentative costs for renovation of either facility is estimated to be approximately $100,000 over two years. b. Schedule of accomplishments The following action steps and time tasks are in a rough chronological sequence. The timetable assumes a project start date of June 1, 1999. All program outcomes will be captured and all grant funding will be expended within 12 months of this date. Juvenile Diversion: Time tasks include: 1) project design, 2) hiring project coordinator, 3) identification of project specific resources, 4) project initiation, and 5) program evaluation. Juvenile After Care: Time tasks include: 1) project design, 2) bid packages assembled and available to bidders, 3) review bids, 4) award project contract, 5) program initiation and implementation, 6) monitoring contract compliance, and 7) program evaluation. Accountability-Based Sanctions: Time tasks include: 1) project design, 2) bid packages assembled and available to bidders, 3) review bids, 4) award project contract, 5) program initiation and implementation, 6) monitoring contract compliance, and 7) program evaluation. Juvenile Facilities Improvement - Time tasks include: 1) A&E design, 2) bid packages assembled and available to bidders, 3) review construction bids, 4) award construction contract, 5) construction, and 6) monitoring contract compliance. c/7 c. List of organizations, contractors, vendors Resource requirements for the implementation of the Coordinated Enforcement Plan fall into three categories: organizational resources, technical resources and staffing resources. Organizational Resources : The majority of the organizational and administrative functions to complete the action steps and time tasks outline in this Plan will be accomplished by an inldnd effort of existing county staff. Part of this effort will also include collaboration among the existing program elements identified earlier in the Plan. Technical Resources: The Oakland County government will tap its extensive in-house technical resources, while relying on the extensive technical resources and information from the Family Independence Agency and•the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Additionally, technical support and information from appropriate local organizations will be sought. Staffing Resources: It is anticipated a majority of the staffing pattern for completion of the action outline in the Plan will be through professional services contracts. The only staff position required will be for the teen court coordinator. This staff person will be selected based on their skills and organizational capabilities as related to the teen court. This staff person will be supervised and will report to the project leader within the Prosecutor's Office. Juvenile Diversion: To successfully implement the Teen Court program in Oakland County, it is necessary to hire a Teen Court Coordinator. The coordinator should play a significant role in getting the program up and running in Oakland County, and after implementation would have the following job responsibilities: 1) Receive referrals from the court, law enforcement or the prosecutor's office, 2) Send out information packet and plea date to juvenile and parents, 3) Communicate with the referee to determine if plea was taken, 4) Schedule a date and time for each juvenile for their teen court appearance, 5) Recruit volunteers, 6) Train volunteers, 7) Monitor all community service hours and restitution payments, 8) Attend all teen court sessions, 9) Maintain all forms and records, 10) Reports to referral sources, 11) Follow-up and monitor offenders, 12) Support and encourage volunteers, and 13) Responsible for ensuring that funding is available for the court. In order to have sufficient training and education to serve as teen court coordinator the candidate must have a bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university and some background or experience in criminal justice. Juvenile After Care: To implement the project, Family Court will issue an request for proposals (RFP) for service providers able to deliver the above described services for the START project. This project will contract with a private, not-for-profit provider to implement aftercare programming for 19 youth most at risk to repeat offend. Juvenile Probation: To implement this Juvenile Alternatives for Misconduct (J.A.M.) project, Famil), Court will issue an request for proposals (RFP) for service providers able to deliver the above described services for the Juvenile Alternatives for Misconduct project. This project will contract with a private, not-for-profit provider to implement the program for 500 sanctioned youth. Juvenile Facilities Improvement: Construction work will be completed by an outside contractor. The contractor will be hired following County procurement procedures and policies. 3. Results or Benefits Expected - Evaluation a. Quantitative Outcomes Juvenile Diversion - Project outcomes of the Oakland County Teen Court project are linked to the problem statement and will focus on two dimensions: effort and effect. The project effort evaluation will answer thrquestion of what was in fact done by the collaborative and their program staff. If positive effects are found in this kind of effort, it is essential to be able to document what activities produced which effects. Second, program effects will be assessed not only through measurement of variables directly addressed in the project plan, but through measurement of those variables that could indicate unanticipated results because of a lack of local base line data. The key project objectives and measurable events of the Teen Court project are: 1) To provide misdemeanor level services to 150 target defined referred youth with 95% of those youth completing the teen court diversion program; 2) To increase the level of restorative justice within the positive peer environments in 90% of those served youth who participate in the teen court program; and 3) To increase the youth feeling of self-esteem and reduce the current level of recidivism within the target population. Juvenile After Care - Among the measures to be used is the Delinquency Risk Assessment Scale. Specific data collection instruments and reporting formats will be determined in coordination with the contractor. We anticipate overall lowering of risk scores as a result of program participation. Court records will provide re-adjudication data, and we project a 10% decrease in recidivism rates for the program participants, relative to non-participants. Additionally, in coordination with the service provider, we expect to set up program performance measures related to the number of youth completing the program, counseling progress, the number of youth successfully re-enrolled in school or participating in job placement training and others. Benefits to the community are two-fold. First, if just three of the total youngsters served are prevented from recidivating and being returned to placement, the cost savings realized will pay for the program. Further, there will be some (minimal) revenues generated through charges to program participants whose families are able to pay. (Currently, for example, the court recoups over $200,000 annually for probation fees assessed to the families, based upon an ability-to-pay formula established by Reimbursement). The second community benefit is less tangible, but obviously equally important. This is the protection of the community through the prevention of additional serious crime which might 4/q otherwise be perpetrated by these releasees. Again, the population we propose to serve is at highest risk to fail in their community adjustment. By providing aggressive supports for school, work, family and individual counseling needs, we hope to improve their chances of success, and better ensure public safety. Juvenile Probation: Court records will provide data relating to violation of probation and the movement of youth to a more restrictive and costlier placements. We anticipate a higher success rate of youth on community based treatment plans as a result of this intervention. The cost of a youth being placed at the Oakland County Children's Village is approximately one hundred seventy dollars a day with an average length of stay of one hundred ninety five days for a total cost of thirty-three thousand one hundred fifty dollars. If only two youth become successful probationers innead of being placed in the Children's Village the program will be cost effective. Probationers will be held accountable for minor violations that otherwise might not be dealt with. Juvenile Facilities Improvement - Because this is a capital program component, outcome evaluation is derived solely from the completion phases and contract monitoring of the construction and renovations. b. How the data is collected Statement of confidentiality: Project evaluation and performance indicators will be designed with ethical concerns being the major consideration over the chosen paradigm for assessment procedures. Likewise, any statistical analyses collected from the Oakland County juvenile delinquency projects presented in this plan will provide the maximum degree of confidentiality permitted under state and federal law and in accordance with the requirement for accountability to the community. Juvenile Diversion - Quantitative outcomes and performance indicators for the teen court will include mainly simple outcomes analysis in conjunction with pre/post expert observer evaluation, both in teen court activities as well as contacts with positive peer environments within a restorative justice model. Measures of self esteem will be accomplished by any one of several standardized indicators for this value. The specific instrument is currently not identified. The indicator for this component will be driven directly from the overall objectives for the teen court and will teed into a comprehensive and meaningful analysis of the project outcomes. Juvenile After Care - The expected results for Project START will be measured by the Delinquency Risk Assessment Scale. Specific data collection instruments and reporting formats will be determined in coordination w-with the contractor. We anticipate overall lowering of risk scores as a result of program participation. Court records will provide re-adjudication data, and the project a 10% decrease in recidivism rates for the program participants, relative to non-participants. Additionally, in coordination with the service provider, we expect to set up program performance measures related to number of youth completing the program counseling /50 progress, number of youth successfully re-enrolled in school or participating in job placement training and others. Juvenile Probation - Data collection for the Juvenile Alternatives for Misconduct will be coordinate with the service provider to measure "customer satisfaction" through participant survey. Juvenile Facilities Improvement - Construction completion evaluation data collection will consist work progress compare to time line milestones. This data will be collected on a quarterly basis. 4. Controlled Substance Abuse Testing Policy Please find a copy of the complete controlled substance abuse policies for drug identification and testing as Attachment A of this Plan. a. Purpose IDENTIFICATION POLICY: Employees of the Oakland County Probate Court will advocate and administer chemical abuse and dependency prevention and education programs for individuals who are recipients of services delivered by the court. TESTING POLICY: Casework staff will enforce court policy of zero tolerance for alcohol and other drug use by adjudicated juveniles. Unless approved by supervisor, screens ordered will test for the minimum number of substances. b. Category of Juveniles to be Tested The category of juveniles that are tested are adjudicated juveniles known or suspected of using illegal substances and alcohol within the policies protocol. c. Test Site With parent/juvenile input, a determination is made as to which lab will be used, from a list of those under a contract with the County. d. Treatments Interventions & Options If assessment indicates chemical dependency/abuse may exist, staff will develop action plan to address the problem. Staff will provide referrals to appropriate intervention programs and meet with minor and parents regarding concerns and effects of dependency. As appropriate, recommend will be made to the Judge that substance abuse assessment/treatment program participation be part of court ordered service plan/rules of probation. Staff will secure necessary release; of information from juvenile and/or parent and monitor juvenile's assessment/treatment program (and, as applicable, parent's) compliance with probationary rules and specific court orders. e. Test 1. Authorization Authorization for testing is based in Oakland Family Court Division existing policies (please refer to Attachment A). Family Court Division staff will present written request stating that random urine screens be placed on the court order and, if ordered, add to probation rules and inform juvenile of possible consequences of positive test results. 2. Chain of custody Contracting/approved testlites need to show sufficient internal safeguards to provide reasonable assurances that no tampering with the test, or test results will occur. 3. Staff training Because only confirmation testing is used at pre-approved test sites, there is minimal staff training needed to implement and enforce policy guidelines. 4. Preferred method of testing Urinalysis. 5. Frequency Urine screens is done on a random basis not to exceed two per month for each individual pursuant to County policy. 6. Initial Screening and Confirmation Initial screening, with the option of confirmation testing as required, is done through the use of a laboratory. ". Confidentiality Records, by process of internal policies and procedures, maintain the same level of confidentiality as all other juvenile records. f Response to Test Results Clean drug test: No graduated rewards for negative test results are currently in place. Dirty drug test: In consultation with supervisor, the staff will develop individual plans with graduated sanctions to deal with positive test results, including the possibility of a petition for violation of probation order, and recommendations for appropriate diagnostic evaluation and treatment. Family Court Division staff will report juvenile's compliance/non-compliance on adjourned hearing report. The report is specific as to number of tests, dates, and results. • • g. Sanctions Where a juvenile's behavior conflicts with court directives, determine whether or not case should be returned for supplemental disposition. h. Forms for Data Collection and Program Monitoring Please fuld data as it is curTently captured in Attachment B. The data can be formatted to conform with information suggested by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Program - American Parole and Probation Association Drug Testing Forms. ADDENDUM TO THE ORIGINAL PLAN DATED APRIL 22, 1999 May 21, 1999 Revised June 1, 1999 Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant The Oakland County Regional Juvenile Crime Enforcement Coalition COORDINATED ENFORCEMENT PLAN 1. Problem to be Addressed a. Identih the scope of the existing juvenile crime problem in your jurisdiction. There is currently no community-based juvenile central diagnostic and referral center in Oaldand County to which families can be referred to for comprehensive evaluation of delinquent juveniles toward individualized treatment plans for social and judicial accountability. In terms identification of the problem as it exists in Oakland County that creates the need for the a central diagnostic and referral center, local statistics suggest Oakland County mirrors the rest of Michigan in juvenile crime statistics. b. Describe the existing programs to address the juvenile crime problem Office of Community Corrections: Michigan's Community Corrections Act of 1988 grants funds to local governments to develop Community Corrections programs. Public Act 511 was enacted to increase the range of sanctions and services available for adult offenders who would otherwise be incarcerated in state prisons and local jails. To this end, Oakland County's Comprehensive Plan for Community Corrections, which was approved by the State in 1994, includes the addition of those sanctions and services essential to the development of a comprehensive corrections system. Through the development of a local Community Corrections Division, the foundation has been set to begin to address providing alternatives to incarceration that: 1) protect the public; 2) punish the offender; 3) hold the offender accountable; 4) increase restitution to victims of crime; 5) provide needed rehabilitative services (e.g., substance abuse and mental health counseling, job training and placement, and continuing education opportunities); and (6 free up valuable jail space for more serious, violent criminals. 2. Project Design a. Plan of action Purpose Area 7 - In-Step Program. This is a for the implementation of a community-based s- V juvenile central diagnostic and referral center for families including daily monitoring, drug testing, and treatment. The goal of this program is to break the cycle of substance abuse and related crimes by juvenile justice case processing through effective evaluation of the juvenile offender towards identification for the appropriate array of sanctions and services for offenders and their families. The Oakland County Division of Community Corrections will be the primary recipient and lead agency for controlling and completing all aspects and activities proposed in this grant proposal. The Oakland County Division of Community Corrections has the managerial and financial capability to ensure proper planning, management, and completion of the project described in this proposal. The community-based juvenile central diagnostic and referral center, referred to as the "In - STEP Program" will enhance services available to the courts, communities and families by providing a one stop shop approach with services under one roof, thus alleviating the need to send parent(s) and youth to multiple locations. The In - STEP program partners will dev!lop a collaboration various treatment agencies schools, specialized centers and providers to become a unique central diagnostic and treatment provider. To directly address the problem of juvenile justice case processing and juvenile offender evaluation and assessment at intake for initial identification for the appropriate array of sanctions and services for offenders and their families, the funding from this proposal will create a community-based juvenile central diagnostic and referral center, referred to as the "In STEP Program" within a demonstration area of Waterford Township in Oakland County. The juvenile justice system in Oakland County has always played a leadership role with innovative programming at all phase of the process. Like the adult system, the juvenile justice system is charged with community protection, holding youth (offenders) accountable for their behavior, as well as helping youth develop productive lives. Day reporting centers are quickly becoming a formidable alternative to multiple treatment referrals and noteworthy intermediate sanction. They emphasize strict surveillance and offer an extensive array of program services, including intensive mental health and substance abuse counseling, housing assistance, educational assistance, and other supports for offenders and their families with multiple needs. Participants can be required to report to the center on a regular and frequent basis to be checked for drug usage and receive services as well. Drug testing will be administered on a random basis throughout the week. The Oakland County criminal justice system is constantly burdened with a large population of juvenile and adult offenders, resulting in an overcrowded court system that is constantly overwhelmed with finding alternative forms of punishment restitution, and rehabilitation. b. Schedule of accomplishments The following action steps and time tasks are in a rough chronological sequence. The timetable assumes a project start date of June 1, 1999. All program outcomes will be captured and all grant funding will be expended within 12 months of this date. In-Step Program: Time tasks include: 1) project design, 2) hiring project coordinator, 3) identification of project specific resources, 4) project initiation, and 5) program evaluation. /5-‘ c. List of organizations, contractors, vendors Resource requirements for the implementation of the Coordinated Enforcement Plan fall into three categories: organizational resources, technical resources and staffing resources. Organizational Resources : The majority of the organizational and administrative functions to complete the action steps and time tasks outline in this Plan will be accomplished by an inlcind effort of existing county staff. Part of this effort will also include collaboration among the existing program elements identified earlier in the Plan. Technical Resources: The Oakland County government will tap its extensive in-house technical resources, while relying off the extensive technical resources and information from the Family Independence Agency and the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Additionally, technical support and information from appropriate local organizations will be sought. Staffing Resources: It is anticipated a majority of the staffing pattern for completion of the action outline in the Plan will be through professional services contracts. The staff position required for the teen court coordinator will be selected based on their skills and organizational capabilities as related to the teen court. This staff person will be supervised and will report to the project leader within the Prosecutor's Office. Additionally, the three staff positions for the In-Step Program will be supervised and will report to the project leader within the Oakland County Office of Community Corrections. 3. Results or Benefits Expected - Evaluation a. Quantitative Outcomes Objectives are measurable events that can be realistically achieved within the grant period. The goal of the In-Step program is to provide juvenile offenders and their families with support services that promote positive change and reduce the risk of substance abuse and recidivism. Toward that end, the following objectives have been targeted over the 12-month period. Objective #1 - To assess 100% of juveniles referred to the In-Step program. This will be accomplished through the use of the JASAE assessment tool, and will be administered by the Program Specialist and/or case manager. Objective #2 - To provide service to at least 95% of assessed juveniles. The wide array of services available through the In-Step program should accommodate most of the juveniles' needs. However, it will be the responsibility of the case manager to identify those individuals who require services that are beyond the scope of this program and refer them to the appropriate source. Objective #3- To maintain 85% parental involvement in family group sessions. In order to make a significant impact on juveniles, their associations and home environment need to be addressed as well. The facilitator from the family group will be responsible for monitoring parental attendance and scheduling groups at times conducive for parental involvement. Objective #4 - To achieve a negative (clean) drug test percentage of 70% overall. Case managers will be responsible for testing clients as often as deemed necessary. Participants who test positive will be subject to the appropriate sanctions for a dirty urine. Consistently imposing these sanctions will lead to a reduced rate of use. Objective #5 - To achieve a level of at least 75% successful terminations The assessment of the offender and resulting supervision plan are key components to impacting juvenile behavior. The PrTgram Specialist/case manager will be responsible for the development of the supervision plan. Objective #6 - To realize a rearrest rate among successful termination of no more than 10%. Objective #7 - To realize a recurrence of drug use among successful terminations of no more than 10%. The above two objectives will be achieved through the array of professional services offered through the In-Step program, as well as through a strong aftercare and follow-up program. b. How the data is collected Statement of confidentiality: Project evaluation and performance indicators will be designed with ethical concerns being the major consideration over the chosen paradigm for assessment procedures. Likewise, any statistical analyses collected from the Oakland County juvenile delinquency projects presented in this plan will provide the maximum degree of confidentiality permitted under state and federal law and in accordance with the requirement for accountability to the community. The In-Step Program - A comprehensive case management software will be used to track offender participation. The software will capture demographic information, as well as case reporting information. The following outcome measures will be included as data fields and may be queried at any time. Number of offenders referred to program Number of eligible participants Number of participants accepted Number of drug tests Number of positive drug tests Number of sanctions used Number of terminations - successful and unsuccessful Number of offenders reporting re-use of substances Number of offenders re-arrested Base line information will be gathered from the assessment tool (JASAE-Juvenile Automated Substance Abuse Evaluation) administered on each participant that is referred to the program. The instrument will be re-administered at 6 and 12 months after completion to measure any significant change. The Program Specialist wilt be responsible for contacting participants 3,-6, 9, and 12 months after completion to inquire about substance use or re-arrest. In addition, the Program Specialist will make the appropriate contacts to determine if the participant has had additional Police or Court contacts. The evaluation will be conducted by Waterford Schools; however the particular evaluator has not yet been selected. VP 4. Controlled Substance Abuse Testing Policy Please find a copy of the complete controlled substance abuse policies for drug identification and testing as Attachment A of the original Coordinated Enforcement Plan dated April 22, 1999. Amount C. TRAVEL Purpose of Travel Cost per Mile Lodging I Meals JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY DiCENTIVE BLOCK GRANT (JAIBG) BUDGET DETAIL & SUMMARY I. BUDGET DETAIL FOR ALL PROGRAMS (Use Whole Dollars Only) A. PERSONNEL (Salary and Wages) Name and Position Title I Hourly or Dail:. Hours or Days 1 Amount [ Salary Rate Devoted 1 Teen Court — Coordinator Position Grade 9 I Base 1 FTE $37,102 InStep — Coordinator Position Grade 12 , Base I 1 FTE I 40,962 In Stag — Case Manager PTNE I 15,460 ' InStep — Typist Base I 1 FTE 21,023 1 , I 1 f. Salaries & Wages I Total - I $114,547 B. FRINGE BENEFITS Description and Calculation Method I Amount Teen Court — Fringe for Grade 9 I $14,564 InStep — Fringe for Grade 12 I 21,710 InStep — Work. Comp. for Case Manager 1 1,438 - InStep — Fringe for Typist I 11,142 1 Fringe Benefits 1 -Total $48,854 None Total Travel $ —0— D. EOUIPNIENT Item Quantity Purchase Price Monthly Lease Amount (if applicable) Children's Village — AIRBS $17,426 InStep — Communications 4 Phones 2,660 i _. Total Equipment $20,086 Issued 2199 /5-1 r E FOREGOING RESOLUTION 5'5 '-1EREBY brooks Patt9n. County Executivb - I No Resolution #99171 July 15, 1999 Moved by Douglas supported by Schmid the Personnel Committee, Planning and Building Committee and Public Services Committee Reports be accepted. A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the reports were accepted. Moved by Douglas supported by Schmid the resolution be adopted. AYES: Gregory, Jensen, Law, McCulloch, McPherson, Melton, Millard, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Patterson, Schmid, Sever, Suarez, Taub, Amos, Causey-Mitchell, Colasanti, Devine, Dingeldey, Douglas, Galloway, Garfield. (23) NAYS: None. (0) A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted. STATE OF MICHIGAN) COUNTY OF OAKLAND) I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the Oakland County Board of Commissioners on July 15, 1999 with the original record thereof now remaining in my office. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this l5t„A day/Of July, 1999. G. William Caddell, County Clerk