HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 1999.09.09 - 25893September 9, 1999
REPORT (Misc. #99217)
BY: PERSONNEL COMMITTEE, THOMAS A. LAW, CHAIRPERSON
RE: MR #99217 CIRCUIT COURT - FAMILY DIVISION - OAKLAND COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND BUDGET 1999-
2000
To the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Personnel Committee having reviewed the abOve referenced resolution on September 1, 1999,
recommends to the Oakland County Board of Commissioners the resolution be adopted.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Personnel Committee, I move the acceptance of the foregoing report.
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
- 7
v
Personnel Committee Vote:
Motion carried on unanimous roll call vote with Moffitt absent.
Miscellaneous Resolution 4 99217 AUGUST 19, 1999
BY: Public Services Committee, Frank H. Millard, Chairperson
RE: CIRCUIT COURT - FAMILY DIVISION - OAKLAND COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND BUDGET
1999-2000
TO: The Oakland County Board of CommissiOners
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS, pursuant to provisions of Act 280 of the Public Acts of 1975,
Oakland County is required to develop and submit a plan and budget for the
provision of funding of foster care services to the Child and Family Services
Office of Juvenile Justice, Family Independence Agency, annually; and
WHEREAS, The Oakland County Circuit Court - Family Division, Co unty of
Oakland, and the Oakland County Family Independence Agency have developed the
attached foster care services budget for the State's fiscal year, October, 1,
1999, through September 30, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Public Services Committee has reviewed this budget and
recommends its submission to the State Office.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the Oakland County Board of
Commissioners authorizes submission of the 1999-2000 Oakland County Child Care
Fund Budget to the State Office of Child and Family Services Office of Juvenile
Justice, Family Independence Agency.
MR. CHAIRPERSON, On behalf of the Public Services Commettee, I moye-the
adoption of the foregoing resolution.
PUBLIt 'ISERVICES COMMITTEE
panicSMIgga_g001
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote.
irbt Circuit Court
for tbe ifoixtb juticial Circuit of fificbillan
COURTHOUSE TOWER
1200 N TELEGRAPH RD DEPT 404
PONTIAC MI 48341-0404 EDWARD SOSN1CK TELEPHONE
CIRCUIT JUDGE (248) 858-0340
July 13, 1999
Commissioner Frank Millard, Chairperson
Public Services Committee
Oakland County Board of Commissioners
RE: 1999-2000 Child Care Fund Budget
Dear Commissioner Millard,
Enclosed is the proposed 1999-2000 Child Care Fund Budget (original plus 15 copies), as
required by Act 280, P.A. of 1975, as amended.
Also included is the resolution requesting board authorization to submit the 1999-2000 Child
Care Fund Budget, as prepared, to the State of Michigan's Family Independence Agency.
Please place this on the August 10th Public Services Committee agenda and notify my office
when the budget is signed.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Honorable Edward Sosnick
Chief Circuit Judge
/Pc
Enclosure
cc: Robert L. Bingham, Family Division Administrator/Juvenile Register
Judith K. Cunningham, Circuit Court Administrator
Gem Hall, Director Oakland County FIA
Dr. Thomas Gordon, Director Institutional and Human Services
John L. Cooperrider, Probate Court
Miscellaneous Resolution
BY: General Government Committee
RE: Circuit Court - Family Division - Oakland County Child Care Fund Budget 1999-2000
TO: The Oakland County Board of Commissioners
Mr. Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS, Pursuant to provisions of Act 280 of the Public Acts of 1975, Oakland County is
required to develop and submit a plan and budget for the provision of funding of foster care services to the
Child and Family Services Office of Juvenile Justice, Family Independence Agency, annually; and
WHEREAS, The Oakland County Circuit Court Family Division, County of Oakland, and the
Oakland County Family Independence Agency have developed the attached foster care services budget for
the State's fiscal year, October, 1, 1999 through September 30, 2000; and
WHEREAS, The General Government Committee has reviewed this budget and recommends its
submission to the State Office;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, ThatIthe Oakland County Board of Commissioners
authorizes submission of the 1999-2000 Oakland Count . Child Care Fund Budget to the State Office of
Child and Family Services Office of Juvenile Justice, Family Independence Agency.
MR. CHAIRPERSON, On behalf of the General Government Committee, I move the adoption of
the foregoing resolution.
BY:
TYPE OF CARE
I. CHILD CARE FUND
A. Family Foster Care
B. Institutional Care
C. In Home Care
D. Independent Living
E. sum-anus
F. Revenue --
G. Net Expenditure
00 y_ 0
IV. TOTAL EXPENDITURE $18,128,666
COUNTY CHILD CARE BUDGET SUMMARY
Michigan Family Independence Agency (FIA)
Child and Family t ervices
; County
Oakland
Fiscal Year
I October 1, 1999 — September 30, 2000
Court Contact Person
fiohn Cooperrider,
F1A Contact Person
Mel Kaufman
Telephone Nurnlier
248.858.0256
Telepnone Number
248.975,4820
I ANTICIPATE EXPENDITURES I
I RA COURT I COMBINED
$ 888,250 $ 2j$ 888,250
$ 2,115,500 $ 16,106,739 $ 18,222,239
$ 0 $ 2,523,826 $ 2,523,8261
$ 67,500$ 78,531 $ 145,8511
$ 3,071,250 $ 18,708,916 $ 21,780,166
$ 0 $ 3,660,500 $ 3,660,500
$ 3,071,250 $ 15,048,4161$ 18,119,666
COST SHARING RATIOS County 50c1/0/State 50%
II. CHILD CARE FUND
Foster Care During Release Appeal
Period
COST SHARING RATIOS County 0%/State 100%
III. JUVENILE JUSTICE SERVICES FUND
Basic Grant
COST SHARING RATIOS County 01'0/State 100%
$15,000.00 Maximum
BUDGETDEVELOPMENTCERTIFICATION
THE UNDERSIGNED HAVE PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THE PRO3RAM BUDGET PRESENTED ABOVE. We certify that the budget
submAted above represents an anticipated gross expenditure for the fiscal year October 1, igi thru September 30,
(year) (year)
Prescing uoge Date1
.... . .41/Ar ..4 7/7 A r Courr rector of FIA Signet re Date
6 9
-
Chaaberson, Board of Commissioners Signature Data
AND/ County Executive Signature Date
OR
FIA-r.....91 (Rev. 3-9a) Previous edition obsolete The Farray Independence Agency will not discriminate against any nat- AuThoRrri: Act 87. pubbcaticin of 197e. as amended.
viduai or group because of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, COMPLETION: Required. marital status, political beliefs or disability. If you need help wilh readng, PENALTY: State reimbursement will be wrthhekt from local writing, hearing, etc., under the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are ___.
Invited to make your needs known to an PA trice in your (=um. government
PRIOR YEAR
(12 lionth Period)
FROM:
January 1, 1997
TO:
THIS YEAR
(Most Recer: 12 Months)
FROM:
January 1, 1998
TO:
DIFFERENCE
(Totals)
PERCENT (SECTION B)
REPORTED ITEM
688 930 2. Number of Substantiated CPS Cases + 35%
240 332 3. Number of Petitions Filed + 38%
105 226 4. Number of Adjudications +115%
CHILD CARE FUND SUMMARY REPORT
Michigan Family Independence Agency (FA)
Child and Family Services
COURT-JUDICIAL SUMMARY REPORT
(Section A completed by Family Division of Circuit Court)
Section A is required from all courts as part Of the Annual Plan and Budget process.
I PRIOR YEAR THIS YEAR DIFFERENCE
(12 Month Period) (Most Recent 12 Months) (Totals)
1FROM: ' ' FROM: I
(SECTION Al January 1, 1997 , January 1, 1998 PERCENT
REPORTED ITEM TO: :10:
December 31, 1997 :Decarber 31, 1998 ;
Doling. Neglect Total 1 Dellnq. Neglect Total
Required information Abuse I Abuse 1+or-1
I. JUDICIAL (For all Youth Served) I 1. Number of Youth Having Petitions/Written Complaints Filed 6,265 305 6,57016,033 1 343 6,3761 — 3%
2. Number of Youth Having Petitions Authorized 2,407 226 2,63312,135 281 2,416 — 8%
3. NuMber of Youth Adjudicated 2,080 200 2,28011,932 226 2,158 — 5%
4. Number of Youth With Placeable AdjudicationsiDispositions n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
5. Number of Court Wards at Beginning of 12 Month Period 1,938 880 2,818 1 2,156 761 2,917 + 4%
I
6. Number of Court Wards at End of 12 Month Period 2,156 761 2,91711,860 776 2,636 — 10%
7. Number of State Ward Commitrnents (Act 150 & 220) 36 92 1281 49 116 165 ; + 29%
FIA - CHILDREN'S PROTECTIVE SERVIES (CPS) SUMMARY REPORT
(Section B completed by County Family Independence Agency)
Section B is required from all county FIA Departments having Child Care Fund SOP-Accounts as part of the Annual Plan and Budget process.
Required Information
Decemter 31 19971Decamber 31, 1998
Doling. Neglect Total Delinq. ; Neglect Total
Abuse Abuse + or - I
I. CPS, PETITION, and ADJUDICATIONS
1. Number of CPS Complaints Investigated $1644 4,276 + 17%
The Family Independence Agency will not discnminate against any individual or group
because of race. sex. rekgion. age, national origin, color. mantal status. political beliefs or
disability. II you need held well reading, whting. heanng, etc., under the Americans with
Disabilities Act, you are Irmted to make your needs known to an FIA office in your county,
AUTHORITY: PA 87 of 1978.
COMPLETION: Is required.
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOmPLETION: Child care fund will riot be reimbursed.
FIA-4472 (Rev. 3-98) Previous edition obsolete,
1N-HOIE CARE CERTIFICATION
Fund Restrictions and Program Requirements
In-Home Care (INC) program expenditures are restricted to new or expanded programs that are alternatives to out-of-home
institutional or foster care. IHC funds may not be used to duplicate services.
A. ELIGIBLE CLIENTS/STAFFING
I. Children under the jurisdiction of the Court, as an aitemathe to removal from the child's home, provided that:
a. such care is an alternative to detention or other out-of-home care and:
* a written complaint has been received and accepted by the Court
* the expenditures are not for judicial cost
* the caseload size or services are intensive
* non-scheduled payments are not made to pay for basic family needs otherwise available through public
assistance programs
* the parent(s) and the youth have agreed in writing to receive IHC services, or a temporary order has been
entered pending an adjudication hearing; or
b. such care is provided to children who at the dispositional hearing are ordered into INC as an alternative to foster
care or other out-of-home care, and:
* the expenditures are not for judicial costs •
* the services are intensive, and
* non-scheduled payments are not made to pay for basic family needs otherwise available through public
assistance programs
2. The IHC early return option may be used to accelerat the early return of a youth from family foster care,
institutional care, or other out-of-home care when the case identifies an early return goal and the services are
provided to members of the child's family. The case plan should identify the family strengths and deficiencies
which, if corrected, would permit the youth to be returned home early. 1HC services would typically be provided
to the family during the time that the youth is in out-of-home care and, if necessary, for a period of time after the
youth has return to the family.
3. The County Family Independence Agency (FIA) may provide IHC services if the juvenile court orders care and
supervision of a court ward.
4. The County F1A may provide IHC services from its Subaccount for substantiated Protective Services cases,
provided that:
* such 1HC services prevent the need to petition the juvenile court for removal or prevent placement in voluntary
foster care, and
* non-scheduled payments are not made to cover basic family needs otherwise available through public assistance
programs.
5. IHC funds shall not be used to meet the court staff-to-youth population ratio of 1 to 6,000 as specified in the
Juvenile Court Standards and Administrative Guidelines for the Care of Children.
6. Court staff hired after 4/30/85, who are responsible for case plan development and monitoring, must meet the
qualifications established in the Juvenile Court Administrative Guidelines for the Care of Children.
* Supervisory Personnel *Probation Officers *COunselors
7. County FIA staff and supervisory staff providing direct IHC services must meet the standards set forth in Rules
400.6124, 400.6126 and 400.6128 of the Administrative 17.ules for Child Placing Agencies.
8. County FIA staff and supervisory staff providing direct IHC services must be state civil servants assigned to
classifications and levels equivalent to staff and supervisOrs in the state foster care program.
9. IHC reimbursements for program and administrative office space, county purchased supplies, salaries and wages
for county employees who provide direct services or supPort for these services are subject to the same restrictions
as reimbursements in county -operated institutions.
(continued on back side)
DATE:
B. USE OF THE IN-HOME CARE OPTION FOR NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
If all other IHC requirements are met, bud2eted non-scheduled payments for services available to youth in foster care
may be provided to your." M their on home. (Non-scheduled payments are defined in the Child Care Handbook).
C. CASE RECORD DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
Individual case documen:ation is required for all IHC clients. A caseload list is required for ever : :HC component. As
a minimum, case records must include the following:
• family case assessment which identifies, by service component, the problems and need for IHC ser. ices
• day of intake
' type of compliant:allegation. supoored as follows:
(I) delinquency — a copy of the complaint or court order, when applicable, placing the child in IHC as par of a
formal disposition.
(2) abuse/neglect — allegation and substantiation entered on the MA-133 in Department cases:
* treatment plan which identifies the treatment. objectives and the action steps and timetables which will be used to
reach the objectives
• case plan changes as a result of supervisor/case worker or contracteelcontractor case reviews
* quarterly progress reports
* dates, type and purpose of service contacts made with the client. Note: weekly face to face contatt is -required
* legal status of youth and the family, and
* the living arrangement of the youth at termination of IHC services.
Note: Case record content for all foster care cases, under the supervision of a county FIA. should be maintained
according to Services Manual item 722(6a-9). It is suggested that all IHC material be kept in the first inside section of
the foster care file.
IFIC service purchases from a private or public provider requires a contract unless the service is supportive of a large
component (i.e., clothing or dental work for a youth serviced through an established 1HC program as for example.
supervision). These non-scheduled payments do not require contracts.
1HC funds and services are subject to state review and audit and non-compliance with the above restrictions and
requirements may result in withholding or repayment of state reimbursement.
All IHC contractual services purchased with county appropriated monies shall be the sole responsibility of the county. The
signature of the County FIA Director must be with authority from the County to enter into contractual agreements on
behalf of the County for the expenditure of the County Child Cate Funds.
The county must have all IHC contracts processed through the county's formal contract approval procedures.
The signatures below certify that IHC policy stated in this document have been reviewed. It is understood that these are
conditions for claiming IHC fund reimbursement.
Presiding Judge of Family Division of Circuit Court, Juvenile Division
and/or
County Director of Family Independence Agency as Agent of the County
DATE: 47/Cy
Word/K:CCF:ihccert
Rev. 3/99
IN-HOME CARE SUMMARY
Michigan Family Independence Agency (FIA)
County Oakland
List all service components which make up the IHC program and specify the requested information for
each.
CCF Other Public Gross
(Service Component) (Adm. Unit) Expenditure Funding Expenditure
A) Intensive Probation Court $731,751 $731,751
B) CHOICE Parent Education Court $ 24,425 $ 24,425
1
O) Psychological Clinic Court $580,850 $580,850
0) Wraparound Services Court $ 41,120 $ 41,120
1
E) Day Student Prgram County . $821,080 $821,080
Work Education Day 9 Student Program County $305,220 $305,220
*G) Project START County $ 11,880 $106,920 $118,800
*H) J.A.M. $ 7,500 $ 67,500 $ 75,000 Subtotal - EcoVY 12,523,826 $174,420
Subtotal - RA ! I
TOTAL IHC $2,523,826 $174,420 $2,698,246
II. For each service component listed above, complete a separate 1N-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT
BUDGET DETAIL REPORT (FIA-2094), filling in the appropriate budget items.
*NOTE: These are JAIBG Grant Projects.
1
AUTHORITY: Act 87, Pubic Acts ol t 978, as amended.
COUPLE-TIM Required
PENALTY: Slate reinforcement wit ltde wellhead trom local
government. 1
The Family trepenOencsAgencyw not clisaiminate against any
individual or group because ol racci sex. religion. age, national
ongin, cOiX, marital status, political bOds or cisabety. it you need
help lam marring, veiling. hearing, etc., under the Americans with
Cisabilies Act, you are exited to make your needs knovm to an FIA
olfice ra your county.
FIA-2093 (Ray. 3-88) Previous edilon obsolete.
Thee Period Covered
MOW THRU: 1999 septa:1.20
T,Idanri Piliwg1
k 248 ) 858-0046
0 SEW
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GilAtilIT PROGRAM COMPONENT
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Fitt* Independence Agency
One of these forms must be corrcleted for EACH In Horne Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there wa
State Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for next fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued camper
roomy/vim me
1 Intensive Probation
iconvormiMaragerNme
Pamela S. Howitt, Ph.D./Ron Auten
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
1. CCIAPCCENT STATUS
CONMHUED Tow Now
CHECK ONE
N HOE cmie
RAMC GRANT
Accirdeasint Unt
E3 COURT 0
FiEvisED
2. TARGET PCPULATX344(S) SERVED
A. Chldom Undo Juedullon el Cowl s cetiocuerr fp NEM=
B. Ctddrtn NOT unser Asisddion et Cast
0 V4RrTTD1 colavarr fl NANITAPMATED C.P4 ou ONLY) cmcce4 uKELY TO CCOAEIJICJUilSOICT1Ce4 CC THE 0
3. ARENS) CC WEN= IMPACT • (Check perry emo(e) oter)
A REDUCTION IN:
O Nunter of Youth Petitioned
1:1S Number of Adjucfications
O Nurrter of Days of Fan* Foster Care
Nurrtor of Days of Out-of-Home Deterdion
0 Number of Days of Shelter Care
Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
0 Number of State Was Committed (Act 150 & 220)
4. sERvKZE F00.113
Provide sae}, intervention to treat within the child's home
0 Effect early return from foster or institutional care
IL SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR ICOMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL
YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cod's (year-tadate and projections if fiscal year is not compete).
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and COSA3 projected for the next fiscal year.
Thee Period Reported OtS. I Li_ thns Sept. 30.4..1_ Tim. fowled R•polled Oct. I (11_ theta &KC 30 S
1 5. 6. ACTUAL NUMBER 7. ACTUAL COST IL RRO..ECTED NUMBER 9. PROJECTED CO
—.1.n
138 Y-T-D
'A. Number of Youth/Family Served 194 Projected 210
1 B. Nunlier of Service Units 15,667 Y-T-D
I (Define Service Unit . calendar d4ys 26,858 Projected 7,800
r----Et in nome care. 424,918 Y-T-D
i C. Total Corrponent Cost 637,377 Proje=ed 1731,751
D. Average Cost Per Unit 23.73 per daN.- 19.36
3,285 per youth 3,485 E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family
ctuai figures represent 8 month fiscal year 1999 data.
AUMORITY: PA. 17 of 1975.
COMPLETION: it itesdred.
CONSEOUF-NCE FOR HONCOtARLETCN: CAN awe funds *A noll be teintessed.
FLA.4471 (346)
Ths FIN* Indiperdents Avow, ea not decrirrantee spin elrf 110411" ar
because et tece. Ni. NOM age. MINN orleIrt, caw mob pksi Wel
datbIly. I ye, Ned Nip ugh realm. wane. her1no. Mc.. ender IND Nolikano
0680119Act ani kw00410 male needs Maim* anflA WOO Wu
= SCe OVER -
4. IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuinglor ending oamponents and should correspond
lo areas of intended identried in Section' 1.3.
ia. mama CR ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
AREAS OR IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NURSER% OR DAYS 12. COSTS
, A Youth Petitioned
I i B. Mudications , r .
C. Days of Family Foster Cars .
• D. Days of Out-of-Horns Detention .
1 ' E. Days of Shelter Care ,
F. Days of Residendal Treatment Care ,
. G. State Wards Cornrrittsd
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components In effect during the mast recent local year this "action must be compiatad
13. Assess strengths, moires,' andproblern areas of tit component. Assess the Intended knpact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s), or cause(*) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Accourd for all
youth served by this component.
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be c:orrpleted for all corrpiments, except those being termiiutted, each year. (Narrative
may be attached)
We are projecting 37,800 days of in-hpme care. A service unit is defined as
calendar days of in-home care. (See Pr gram Description).
B. Number of Calendar Days of In Home Care - 37,800
1
•
In-Home Care / Basic Grant Program Component
Report / Request
1 11. Service and Cost Information for Fisc I Year Completed or Being Requested
for Next Fiscal Year: (All financial and program figures are projections based
on actual experience October 1, 1998 through April 30, 1999).
A. Number of Youth Served
We project service to 210 youth. Seven Workers with an average caseload of fifteen
and an average length of service of 180 days.
C. Total Component Cost -$731,751
Actual cost for 1998-1999 is based on aclual eight months October 1, 1998 through
May 30, 1999 projected over the fiscal y§ar is
III. IMPACT EVALUATION - Must be Sompleted for continuing or ending
components. lActual Reduction
Areas of Impact 10. Number of Youth 11. Numbers or Days 12. Costs
A. Youth Petitioned
B. Adjudications 44 125 250,875
C. Days of Family Foster Care I
,
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention 15 1979 334,451
E. Days of Shelter Care
1 F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 31 21,660 3,660,540
A
G. State Wards Committed
Ill
B. Oakland County's research and experience indicate that 87% of the youth
serviced by Intensive Probation would1recidivate if not provided with Intensive
services. Intensive Probation serviced 1194 youth in 1998-99 (Youth targeted for
reduction). If Intensive services had not been provided to this population, we would
have expected 169 adjudications. Our actual experience was that 44 new
adjudications occurred. We, therefore, experienced a reduction of 125 (fewer youth
adjudicated).
Each new adjudication cost $2007 to pnOcess through the system from signing of
the petition through entering of a new disposition. A cost reduction of $250,875 was
experienced by the 125 (fewer youth adjiidicated). The 125 fewer adjudications X
2007 = $250,875 cost reduction.
Ill
D. A consequence of Intensive youth' re-adjudicating is frequently temporary
detention pending Court actions leading to a new disposition being entered. Our
experience is 50% of this population wo4.11d be placed in detention for an average
of 42 days.
A reduction of 125 fewer adjudicated youth X 50% X 42 (average days of detention)
results in a reduction of 2625 days of detention. From that group we must subtract
those who received a short term detentiOn as a consequence of rule violation but
no petition had been filed. Therefore, Intensive Probationers would have served
2625 (days of detention) - 646 of those iays (short term detention as part of the
original disposition) which equals 1979 d ys of reduced care. The current per diem
of our Children's Village detention center is $169. The cost reduction achieved is,
therefore, $169 ( per diem) X 1979 red ction in detention days.= $334,451 (cost
reductions).
III. F. It is projected that 75% of the Intensi4 population would be placed residentially
if not for Intensive Probation. One hundrd ninety-four received services in 1998-
99. Seventy-five percent of this population or 145 youth would have been placed
residentially. Our actual youth placed totaled 31. The reduction of youth placed
residentially is, therefore, 114. The Children's Village current per diem is $169.
114 (Reduction of youth placed) X 190 (AVerage length of stay at Children's Village)
= 21,660 (Reduction in days of care) X $1169 = $3,660,540 (cost reductions).
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during *e most recent fiscal year, this section
must be completed.
13. Assess strengths, weakness' alnd problem areas of this component.
Assess the intended impact arelas and results. Explain the reason(s),
or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and
the actual. Account for all youtserved by this component.
All figures are prorated based on October, 1998 through April, 1999 actual figures.
One hundred ninety-four youth were seNed by the Intensive Probation Program.
Eighty-four percent of the youth were successful in community placement. Sixteen
percent were placed residentially.
We are targeting an average caseload si* of fifteen youth for the new fiscal year.
This projects to 210 youth served. In 1998L we projected 210 youth served. We will
involve supervision to identify additional iritensive youth.
V. Program Description:
See attachment.
INTENSIVE PROBATION
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
Intensive Probation is designed to maintain high risk delinquents in their
community in lieu of residential care, while safeguarding the community
as much as possible. Caseload size is limited to 15. A team approach,
including paid paraprofessional intern monitors, assures frequency and
intensity of contacts. Special tools have been designed to give probation
staff the repertoire of responses needed to work with this high risk
population.
CLIENT CRITERIA
Youngsters placed on Intensive Probation either have the offense history
or the level of dysfunction to a point where they would have been placed
out of the home had it not been for this program. Often, Consent Probation
or Standard Probation failures will be tried on Intensive Probation.
Among the "risk factors" to be considered are:
1. Prior offense history.
2. Prior Court intervention history.
3. Seriousness of the offense.
4. Family or client history of substance abuse.
5. Family or client history of mental health problems.
6. School record - dttendance, achievement, conduct.
7. Family criminal history.
8. Family violence history - physical, sexual, or spousal abuse.
i listory of negative peer relationships.
METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION
After authorization of a complaint, cases are assigned geographically, and
the receiving area staff assesses what level of intervention best serves
client need. Intensive Probation orders are entered by the judge or Court
referee. In the case of a youth who is already on a Standard Probation
order, the caseworker must present a supplemental petition to the Court
to increase the level of supervision to intensive. A program description is
provided and contract is signed by the client family prior to disposition.
The assigned caseworker and intern are responsible for the individual
treatment plan implementation.
The caseworker has the ability to move the.youngster back and forward
through the four phases of Intensive Probation as they see necessary. The
10
caseworker is allowed flexibility, on any case, to use creative corbetitivni.tt,
on clients (Electronic Tether, short stays at Children's Village, home
detention, etc.).
The student interns maintain a high level of contacts, such as daily phone
contact, including weekends and past 5:00 p.m. Regular contacts are ilia&
with school, parents, and any other agencies involved with clients.
The Court Psychological Clinic has devised a special group therapy
curriculum for youngsters and a parent education component for families.
Area casework staffing meetings select youngsters and help develop an
individualized treatment plan. A "motivation fund" is available to reward
and shape client behavior.
A youth placed on Intensive Probation can expect to receive at least the
following services:
I. One face-to-face interview within five days after disposition to insure
understanding of the Court's expectations and establish timelines for
compliance with order.
2. Explanation of Youth Community Service and/or Restitution
requirements and a list of sites for completing assignment, as well as
explanation of Court costs, etc.
3. Referral of parent to Court Clinic parent guidance program
(C.H.O.I.C.E.).
4. Referral of youth to the Court Clinic adolescent group or other therapy
program if appropriate.
5. Contacts with caseworker and intern as follows:
Phase I Caseworker - Two face-to-face Interviews per week.
(30 days) Intern - Two face-to-face Interviews per week,
- Random checks of whereabouts at night,
on weekends, at school,
Phase 11 Caseworker - Two face-to-face interviews per week,
(60 days) Intern - Two face-to-face interviews per week,
- Random checks of whereabouts at night,
on weekends, at school,
Phase Ill Caseworker - Two face-to-face interviews per week.
(60-90 days) Intern - Two face-to-face interviews per week.
- Random checks of whereabouts at night,
on weekends, at school,
Phase IV Caseworker - One face-to-face interview per week.
(30 days) Intern - One face-to-face interview per week,
11
0 Basic Grant
iv
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT
Michigan Family Independence Agency (FIA)
Child and Family Services
semi= GmPenal (FIJI 711Worm)
IntPrisive Probation
A. PERSONNELIEovees of the Court of RAI
tsawymmagin 1
mmEg4 socrioN NO.HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST
Gary Contesti Intensive Caseworker 40 hrs/wk. 52,996.08
Alice Hagerman , 52/996.08
Bill Hamilton ts 11 52/032.51
Liz_Jamieson . " ,, 48/178.25 ,
Paula Jefferson " " 39,758.00
Bryan McCaffrey . i,
1- , I, 48,178.25 • ., Corene Munro ,, 1 48,178.25 tt Palmer Sesti Intensive CasewOrk Supervisor 63/628.35
• , Subtotal $405,945.77
,
,
2.ft120SomillagOody)
Gary Contesti (Fringe Benefits equal to 39% of Salary) 20,668.47
Alice Hagerman 1T 4U,bbb.1-1/
Bill Hamilton 11 20,292.68
Liz Jamieson .1.tbits2
Paula Jefferson 11 15,505.62
Bryan McCaffrey 11 . zu,2z.68
11 20,292.68 Corene Munro
Palmer Sesti i, z44.1.06
,
Subtotal .- 161,325.18
$
Total Amerind 567,270.95
S. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees Identified In "A" above)
1. Trawl Rata / Mk 604001 taa. 4 law YEARLY COST
Personal Mileage 20,000
2. &miss and Illiderala (Owalptionf.xraplea)Mach Extra arisat I tiesder . • 15166c6T Electronic Surveillance .
Communications 800
Stationery 200
•
3. Other Coda (Cdacriplonetampisa) Attach Exalt Shad Il Weave ' Ro004 YEARLY COST
Client Motivation 4120
Equipment Rental 120
Travel and Conference 300
--14-17rlopace Rental Lost Aiiocafion - .. 17/5,0
Telephone 9270
I ,
° Must wad* Mk the Madded ard lads NNW $ kwamagmadodWdadastsCNMCdm I Md4PmgramSuppod Op, /L -rn 7,D -Icnuu Add Madbmic
cUoMmpCRITY hn W
p
.
p
POWdIMSmimmnit —The
unOt mit Icr
F
i
s
le
* al Nintlapsad
.
m
1 4
a
1
x
6
*
11
i
.
m
W
p
N
a
0
11 s
W
al
a
dw
l"
alla
"
ill
W
s
. m
av
o
a
d
nt
M
a
a
m
w
ka
PlaO
ldWat
W
a' W
WI
S J
c
01.14.1 Ws and MOP 1110 lellillgi Iraingjeallre de. WOW Iii Anardasa la PININAt UM Railansidal sibs ulleuld tves bal tasimamara. tbsbIllseMe. we am Mild le aft vow Ands Imam is an Mann injour awe
ANINM SW YOM Pandasediondarads. Coninus an odor id
I C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
I i. Unl Rem UMT TOTAL UNITS,
NAME(S) RATE • - . CONTRACT YEARLY COST
Clinical Interns 8.75 3 33,600
Interns/Monitors 250 hrs. @ 6.85/750 hrs. @ 7.47 8 58,520
2. Ckeed-End Contracts
Tomi Contractual 92,120
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE Anicipated No. Units Average Coat of
(Descdpion) b be Provided Each Smvice Unit YEARLY COST
• Toll Non-Sch;ickiled
E. SERVICE COMPONENT - IN HOME CARE OR BASIC G
I s (Arid Tomis for A. B, C, and 0 above) Total Service Component Cost IliI 731.750.95
If you plan to fund any portion of this service cormonent with other pubic revenue including other Chid Care
F. PUBLIC REVENUE: Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (Le. third party payments) specify the
Mowing
SOURCE PURPOSE YEARLY COST
1
I
I
Total Public Revenue PP. I $
G. Subtract Total Public Ravenua from Total &IMP Component Cost (E-F)
- TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRAN; HET ANTIaPATED SIC MATCHABLE WIDICITURE •
. . peas CMOs Lama Other Ammo) po. 731,750.95
PIA4MWOW34b0W0
In-Home Budget retail Report
B. Program Support
1. Personal Mileage. Oakland Conty reimbursement rate is $.325 for all
employees. The $20,000 mileage reimbursement would cover the seven
casework, eight intern, one superVisor and three clinical intern positions.
2. Electronic Surveillance
This option remains a favorite of
those entering ICU from temporary
of program failure. We anticipat
youngsters with a possibility of anc
cases. As in years past, we re
caseloads warrant. Increase is ne
has been at capacity for most of
utilization of tether equipment.
staff, both as a front end transition for
detention and as a consequence for short
a an ongoing usage of ten units for ICU
ther four for court ordered home detention
:ain the flexibility to increase capacity if
eded as Oakland County detention facility
1999. This has required an increase in
Communications
Cellular phones are now available
the cellular phones increases the
It allows for quick response to thE
to all Intensive Caseworkers. The use of
efficiency and effectiveness of staff time.
needs of this high risk population.
3. Client Motivation Fund
This has been a part of our programming since the Early Offender Program's
inception. The fund is designed to shape behavior by providing specific
rewards. Part of the money is a so used to underwrite group reward and
enrichment activities.
C. Contractual Services
Intern/Monitors
Each probation staff is paired with a pad, paraprofessional intern/monitor. This
team approach results in extra client overage. The Intensive worker in the
southwest quadrant is assigned two ii
geographic area. Each intern or monitor i
rate for the first 250 hours is $6.85; this re
over last year. For the remaining 750 hc
per hour; a .22 cent rate increase.
items to assist in coverage of a large
; allowed to work 1,000 hours. The hourly
lects a rate increase of .20 cents per hour
urs, each intern is paid at a rate of $7.47
8 interns X $6.85/hr. X 250 hours = $13,1700
8 interns X $7.47/hr. X 750 hours = $44, 20
Total $58,520
Clinical Interns
The Clinical interns assist the speciall!
youngsters, as well as diagnostic testing
of our intervention and we depend on th
rate reflects a .25 cent per hour cost of Ii
Clinic interns by one to a total of three.
designed group therapy for our project
Ind consultation. This is an important part
ir expertise and professionalism. Hourly
ing increase. This request increases the
3 interns at an hourly rate of $8.75
40 weeks X 32 hours per week = $33,600
A REDUCTION IN:
0 Number of Youth Petitioned
aNurnber of Adjuricat. ions
aNumber of Days of Fan*/ Foster Care
0 Number of Days of Out-of-Horne Detention
o Nurrber of Days of Sheker Care
Ei Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
o Nurrber of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
IN HOME CARE/BASIC •
REPORT
msn Fumy •
One of these forms must be compieted for EACH In Horne
State Reimbursement during the pest Fiscal Year or proposed
PROGRAM COMPONENT
EQUEST
Agency
(re or Basic Grant Service component for which there was
arnext fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued component
t Comment The CHECK ONE Tinto Period Covered
I Intensive Probation/CHOICE Parent Education .3 N HONE CARE FRClik19 9 9 7141th BASIC GRANT OCL 1. — 3e0t. 302000, I Coarocreni Manager Name Adrredierdbre UM Telegemne Nutter les...
Pamela S. Howitt, Ph.D./Bernard Gaulier, Ph.D. g coon* 0 FIA ( 248 ) 858-0247
. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply. -
I. CCSAPONENT STATUS
ff COWTINUED 0 TERMINATED IN REVISE)
2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
A Chicken Under Judedlcdon ol Court .
jC oa.prcuerr 0 mestEcr
& mow NOT Undii.Arimiclon ol Cowl • •
0 WRITTEN cceristAerr ' 0 SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. (FIA ONLY) El CHILDREN LXELY TO COME uweri .15,05301Cyla4 or THE cum
1 A oc•rel FVC IllinSIMICT MAIIMPT _ If•frorAN mair.... ra.1...• .....A. • • mow nn•n ••••••• • iyaumftwa r.1.••=1“....110/ •
4. SEIWCE FOCUS
2 Provide catty intervention to treat within the chid's home
0 Effect early return from foster or institutional care
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL
YEAR:
•
INSTRUCTIONS: • '
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete).
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Thee Period Reported Om 1 _a thru Sept 30 9k. Time Period Reported Oct. 1 22_ thru Sept_ 30aaQ(
5. 5. ACTUAL NUMBER 7. ACTUAL COST 5. PACUECTE) NUMBER 9. PROJECTED cosi'
142 Parents (4131erig5Eh A. Number of Youth/Farrily Served of 113 Youth
S. Number of Service Units
(Define Service Unit al calenelAr dtys of 19,775 21,000
lir imrrL
C. Total Component Cost 22,740 24,425
p.
D. Average Cost Per Unit 1.15 1.16
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Farr* 160 163 ______
AUTHORITY: PA. $7 ol 1975. —The Fr* Indepershinto Agency MI nee deodninem spinet en/ Indlidelual or gmuc
temps at rem sae. religion. ags, raliond orIgIrk coke. auggeisegge, gelid Wats or COMPLETION: Is required. Noo ran CONSECUENCE FOR PoNcomptErtet oriels:8n Itnds ell nate reeTtersee. dalba4` I Y re" helP illin 1"cliva. . helf"" °L. ungar II.
lloane
Dead. yOU ant ItrAled to make your needs known le an FIA ollem. 10100, alurcY
— SEE OVF.H ria-4471 (3-95)
IN: IMPACT EVALUATION Must be correlated for +=Miming csi ending correonants and shouki comaspond
to areas of intended identified in Section 1.3.
ia. MUMS C. UMW= reoucroas
AREAS C4t WA= YOUTII WAD It. migillUti CO OM 12. COSTS
A. Youth Pettoned . .
1
I , 8. AcNuckations 44 125 250,875
C. Days of Farnily Foster Care
O. Days of Olkof-Homs Detendon 125 1,979 334,451
I : E. Days of Shelter Care
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 31 21,660 3,660 540
G. State Wards Committed '
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
con,:int. For ALL Components in effect during Vie most recent Sepal this section must be completed
13. Assess strengths, weapon' and problem areas of this Assess the intended impact areas and tomb.
Explein the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference batman th. projecied No.'s and cost and the actual. Accourt for all
youth served by this component
See Attachment.
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION • Must be corrcleted for all cornpo
may be attached)
s, except those being termiissted, each year. (Narrative
See Attachment.
timate): 142 parents of 113 youth.
DETAILED EXPENDITURE REPORT
Therapist Salary
1011/99 through 9/30/99 $ 20, 820.00
Program Support
Mileage 620.00
Tx Supplies 300.00
Postage/printing 100.00
Building 550.00
Telephone 350.00
Subtotal I $1,920.00
, Total Program Costs $22.740.00
Number of parents/youth referred:
Octoberl, 1998 through September 30, 1999 (
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATI
In 1998 (and projected through the end of the1
program will have had 142 parent referrals. Th
Court jurisdiction. This represents a large more
program, resulting in a larger number of individ
(120 parents of 100 youth had been the project
attend six out of eight classes to complete the s
was able to increase the proportion of parents c
98-99 fiscal year), the CHOICE
se parents represent 113 youths under
se in the number of referrals to this
als served than had been anticipated
d number). Parents are required to
ries. Even with referrals up, CHOICE
mpleting the class to 85%.
In 1998-99 the CHOICE program continued its
used to create realistic everyday scenarios par
techniques taught were reviewed and revised t
the use of the same parenting concepts previou
section continues to be a popular component, a
parents find most helpful. Role-playing encour
taught, providing them with a comfortable envir
questions. Parent feedback regarding CHOICE
support as the most important element of the e
on their own, to continue to meet monthly in ord
found so helpful. Caseworkers, referees and p
sources for CHOICE. The attendance at the sa
the new Troy facility offers a spacious area for
offices offers a convenient alternative to coming
contributes to the overall high attendance and clompletion rates.
mphasis on updating the materials
nts can relate to. The parenting
reflect current events, while continuing
ly developed. The anger management
d is often identified as the one that
ges parents to practice the techniques
nment within which they can ask
is positive. Parents often identify group
perience. One set of parents decided,
r to have the group support they had
ychologists are the main referral
ellite office in Walled Lake is good, and
roups. Offering CHOICE in satellite
to the Pontiac Courthouse, and
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION:
Problem statement:
The goal of the parent education program is to assist parents of adjudicated youth to
learn effective parenting methods, and to provide parents with a support network to
reduce their feelings of helplessness. The program is named C.H.O.I.C.E., or Court
Help On Improving Control and Effectiveness.
Service provided and definition of service unit:
This program is based on research, which shows that youth are more likely to recidivate
when their families are identified as highly dysfunctional. In order to reduce repeat
adjudications and avoid out-of-home placement 4 for youths, parents' management
11 skills are strengthened through training and rol play. We expect a group size of 9-10
parents each, for a total of approximately 150 p rents receiving services annually. This
represents approximately 120 youth, who are u der intensive probation for an average
of 175 days per youth. The number of Service nits represents the number of in-
home care days (120 youth x 175 care days = 2 ,000 units of service).
Project administration:
The parent education groups are run by a part-ti
Chief of Clinical Services, with clinical supervisic
Psychologist. The psychologist participates in c
issues in parent and family functioning. The thei
in parenting-guidance counseling, will provide Ix
(maintain case records, provide written progress
-ne psychologist who reports to the
n provided by a Clinic Senior
asework staff meetings to discuss
-apist, especially recruited for expertise
lth direct and indirect services
reports, etc.).
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GFU
14.4chigan Family Inds
Child and F
BUDGET DETAIL REPORT
lance Agency (FIA) •
r Sevices
Sanwa Concede (Fel Mao Nom) Odd Ow
TtiF Probation/CHOICE Parent Educati GliOHOMCaty 0 Basic Grant
A. PERSONNEL fEmolovess of the Court of FIAT Adrrinistrative Unit a RA EL Court
1. Slay and Wages
NAME(S) FUNCMON NO. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST
Karen Wiater _Theraoist 21,450
•
,
2. Rev, Steeds npedly)
Pat—t. flQfl illit1131 pi)sitiQn -
•
'
Total Personnel Or• 21,450
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees Identified In "A" above)
1. Trate - Rd I ills Eddie No. of Mlle YEAFLY COST
Travel to Satellite Offices .325 30064 . 975
2. Staplos and Motadds iDosodpIlortf.sardsd Masts Elba neat I dude
YEARLY COST
•
• ts ventories materials motivational funds 1,000
-
3. Ms, Cows posadonfaanpiss) Attach Eon Mad 11 Noeud• YEARLY COST
Postage/Printing 111----
Rnilding gparP S;(1
•
'r-e4-e14-4-8-Pre 444-----
• we amply en Sio dotindons and Ids Odd
kr asen opened WNW Ind Chld Cans
Nasitook Toti Regram Support Pi. 2,975 Fard .
The Roy Indopmbence Awry ell not sisatindo agent ose MANN at lido AUMORITY: Ad V. Mb Ad el 11171, as affendod. Wads of tad saw. NOM. ape. mind ad" Dior, did steam polidbolets at CONPLETM a sonked.
PENALTY: id odeborsamont id be Weald tont bed gotimment. talobalYA YIN Toon bolo INN ANIIIIS vein& holoird. dc.. indsr Iht Piroxicargs wen
Clannlos Ad yes sal Indod to ads yam mods down to on RA ane Is yds seedy
F1A-2010 (Rsw. NM Redd anon Odd. Canines on other side
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1. UM Rola UNIT TOTAL UNITS/
NAME(S) RATE (Demise) CONTRACT YEAFILY COST
1 aceseFEnd Contra=
To Contractuai 100 _o _
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units krone Cod of
(Description) b be Provided Each Smite Unit YEARLY COST
• Toed tion-Stheduled _
E. SERVICE COMPONENT- IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
(Add Totals br A, 13, C, and D aixwe) Toad SIDIViCO Compareint Cost Ow 4
If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other pubic revenue including other Chid Care
Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the F. PUBLIC REVENUE following:
SOURCE . PURPOSE YEARLY COST
— 0 — Total Putt= Revenue IF
G. Subtract Total Public R•vonuo from Total Simko Component Cost (E-F)
I .
TOTAL COST TO BASIC ORAN% NET ANTICIPATED INC MATCHABLE IMPENIXTUNIE Is
Rom Cads Less °Mir Arnow) 24 425
CHECK CNE
HOME CARE
fl SASE GRANT
Abneniskelse UN
=car piA
nue Peeod Coveted
FROM THRU:
1.1999 sect 30. 200C
Telephone Waft,
( 248 ) 858-0247
980
1270
$477,500 $580,250
$376 per evaludtion
$487 per youth4family_served.
.447
$581
Indent:.
IN HOME CARE/BAS1C G PROGRAM COMPONENT
REPORT /REQUEST
Michigan Fan* Agency
One of these forms must be coned for EACH In Home
State Reimbursement during the past Focal Year or proposed
pare or Basic Grant Service component for which there was
for next fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued cornponer
caroor•nt Tbe
Psychological Clinic
,C4mVallim ManagowMow
Pamela S. Howitt, loh.n.Aprhara (7,An1igo-, Ph n
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
1. CC/APO/ENT STATUS
CcerrNteo 0 TERM NATED
2, TARGET PCPULATION(S) SERVED
A. Ctderen UnOw.luileSzlen al Cant
• oeuiouewr 0
B. Chen NOT Unisr.IJImidlon Can •
wRrrre4 coaewrr sueirrAimmo cps 0,4 aim 0 CHILDREN UNELY 'roc UNDER JURISDICTICH OF THE CCU
1. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check parry rip$) only.)
A REDUCTION IN:
O Number of Youth Petitioned
O Number of Acilucications
E Number of Days of Family Foster Care
o Number of Days of Out-of-Horne Detention
o Number of Days of Shelter Care
• Nurrter of Days of Residential Treatment Care
O Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
4. SEFIVICE FOCUS
E Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
• Effect early return from foster or institutional cam
SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL
YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cod's (year4. sand projections d fiscal year is not complete).
• in columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for - next fiscal year.
Thee Peeled Reported Oce--Ti-Mr----Ihre 5. 30 Thee Period Mooned O. 1 2.9_ Mr/ Sept 30204
5. 6. ACTUAL WISER 7. ACTUAL cosi' a. PROJECTED NUMBER 9. PROJECTED COST
A_ Number of Youth/Far* Served
3. Number of Service Units
(Define Service Unit =
C. Total Component Cost
D. Average Cost Per Unit
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Farnily
ALITHOFUTY: P.A. 97 441197S.
COMPLETION; Is tequIreel.
CONSEQUENCE FOR tioracoartznort CMS caN lields red be velneulsed.
Fip.4471 (546)
Fatirsimr4wWww========
Ois
.11 ye. nod MO vet nobs wet& Awl% Ng war Om NINdow• eft
AcL re are Med Se mils worms* Imo Is at MA aim IVIIIRRIref
- SEE OVER '
588
392 42,300 5,922,000
42,300 1,692,000
III. :kVA CT EVALUATION - Must be completed for ccaidnuing
to areas of intended identlied in Sation 1.3.
ending convorients and should correspond
ARIAS OF IMPACT
A. Youth Petitioned
10. NUMMI OF
MOM WAVED
ISTRAVITO 01118:4.CTICNIII
11. NUMMI OR DAYS
8.A4udcarions
C. Days of Farrell Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention
E. Days of Shelter Care
F. Days of Risidential Treatment Care
G. State Wards 03rrstitted
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT VALUATION:
For ALL Components In effect during the most recent
13. Assess strengths, weakness* and problem arms of this
apish the reseon(s), or criuse(s) for the calfwence
youth served by this component.
For 1998-99, it had been estimated that the Ps
evaluations, 600 of which are for youth involv
In actuality, the Clinic will have performed 1
cn delinquents pr neglected minors. Our experi
of the dispositional recommendations coming fr
youth are for in-home services and 60% of the
from the neglect population are for in-home se
of days and costs for residential treatment an
Delinquent Population:
388 youth X 40% = 235 youth X 180 days (avg.
Neglect Population:
392 youth X 60% = 235 X 180 days (ave. length
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be conpleted for all convo
may be attached)
1 Hearing officers make decisions regarding the ou
.h the Court. The role of the psychological clinic i
•assist the Court in making. decisions regarding dis
-linquency and neglect cases. These clinic reports
whether out-of-home placement is needed or should
The clinic uses standard psychological interview
•1 the treatment needs of a particular youth or fami
-sfunctional. The evaluator recommends specific int
zmily geared toward maintaining the least restrictiv
-doing psychological evaluations early on in the ca
rly and therefore the likelihood of out-of-home pla
owledge of local services available and can recomme
lse offered by the Court and local agencies. The i
•terventions and parent-agency agreements which avoi
The psychologists employed (or contracted) by the
_censure in the State of Michigan. They report to t
recOmmendations which help the Cour CHM elicKi
year this section must be completed
Assess the intended impact areas and results.
the projected No.'s and cod aml the ached. Aamunt for all
chological Clinic would perform 1000
in neglect or delinquency matters.
70 evaluations representing 980 evaluations
nce and research tells us that 40%
the evaluations of delinquent
ispositional recommendations coming
ices. Thus, calculations for reduction
family foster care are 4s follows:
nth of stay) = 42,300 X $140/day = $5,922,000
f stay) = 42,300 X $40/day = 1,692,000
, except those being laminated, each year. (Narrative
-of-home placement of youth who are involved
to prepare psychological evaluations
sition or continued jurisdiction in
elp the hearing officer in determining early
e continued.
nd testing methods to assess the mental statu!
y identified as disturbed or highly
rvent ions to address the needs of the youth/
environment and preserving the family.
e, appropriate services are provided
ement is reduced. The evaluators have
d local community services, including
formation is the report is used to develop
or reduce the need for out-of-home placement
psychological clinic have limited, orfull
e Chief of Clinical Services. The clinicians
rt makijog
in makina their *detAPRIPPtigliAIMEETS "NMIDEI
Basic Grant
I Swam Cessaossis fug llasfisms)
Psychological Clinic
ammo*
ED In Horne Care
GZSdance IN-HOME CARE/BASIC BUDGET DETAIL REPORT
Miditan Family I Agency (F1A)
Odd and F Services
A. PER5CWINELILIMOVIOOS Of MO cowl Of HAP AdmE Ll i_a_zissaw_istfitise UM F1 t turgysiww.p.
NAME(S) SAKM04 MIHOURIMMUM YEARLYOOST
Scott Allen Senior Psychologist 32 hrs. 65,954
Anne Campbell Senior Psychologist 32 hrs. 65,954 ..
Rod Yeacker Clinical Psychologist II 32 hrs. 51,888 . . : .- • • .: .
James Windell Clinical Psychologist II 32 hrs. 51,888
Ann Wiersma Clinical Psychologist II 32 hrs. 51,888 • ,
Gabe Martinezd iT132 81.1 111 M ccIglo 2„...itt_hv Gillvar lilt H 13 V4 ..„ 100t
Subtotal 468,730
Scott Allen 25,722
Wipk.e Campbell 25-,722
Rod Yeacker 20,236
.,cialeb Wiudell 20,236
Wayne Macintosh 20,236
Ann Wiersma • 20,236 • . .
. Gabe Martinez 20,236
rattly uliiyara 2,472
Subtotal-' 175,332
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in abate.) Total Personnel 644,062
LlIsssi fts/111110 EsikasisNe.allass YEEMILYOOST 4
2.3upaftswelmonibpsomplimemmisONIPMBOWIftWIMer4eW WEAR-YOU= •
Testing Materials 141,00-0
Caw Gaels MesupSonlEmnpiss MUM EMm Shm0 1 MmeesW 'MARY OUST 3.
-
• Med amply MA Me ssenlion• we bids bled $
la oval apses's,' WNW in In Chid Can
Red Miesteed.
To Program Suwon 10. ---14mQ00
MITHOWNI Pis V. Rein Ad* d UM as sassoSsi Th. Rs* IrdspenOmm *pm IA nd elsdiminde spins mg IndMISSI ce pm)
amOURCIt Si mobsd. beam NUM sm. sejlen. OM sidadd OWN dice, NNW dos, pallid beads at
doldill% 1 Yon oss0 MO se osseln0. wail& hiding ele. 'mid is Aindicans men
Rftelat SUM NIMMInommord Wil be WMPeld Ited WI 01.611$8,1 Ad, yew eve POW le arid yekor needs down le an RA Wks brow waft
Fin.20ss Mem iss) Restos anon abeelels. Coninue On ealer
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1 i. unit neon UNIT 'TOTAL UNITS,
HAMS) RATE (Des:rin) CONTRACT YEARLY COST
• Pc4,64a1aeira1 Consultants_ anar 6 hr eval. 10 contracts 72,000
(Estimated volume of 150 evaluatioas)
2. Ciased.End Contra=
Total Contractsai 72,000
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE std11I.ireI.d No. Units Arwage Cost of
(Descripien) ID be Piovided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
• Total Non-Schisiuled
E. SERVICE COMPONENT - IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT •
i i (Add Totis ix A. B. C, and 0 abaft) Toted Sonic* CancensrA Cost
s
726,062
PI you plan to fund any portion of this Sent* component with other pubic revenue including other Chid Care
F. PUBUC REVENUE Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (Le. third party payments) specify the
following:
SOURCE 1 PURPOSE YEARLY COST
1
1
I
*Note: 80% of total cost attributed to juvenileWmPubrocRmmlue
delinquent and neglect evaluations.
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F)
TOTAL COST TO BASIC AN PET ANTICIPATED INC MATCHABLE EXPO4CITURE • 580,850
(Gross Cone Lamm Other Revenue) Illio
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRAN1I PROGRAM COMPONENT
REPORT/R QUEST
Michigan Family Indefendence Agency
One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care or Basic Grant Service component for which there was
State Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed foil next fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued component.
Component Tile CHECK ONE Time Period Covered
Es' W HOME CARE FROM: 'THRU: A.PAR0uNID SERVICES 7 BASIC GRANT oat, 99 sooty), 2000
Component Manager Narne Acartustratrve Una Telephone Nurnber
Pamela S. Howitt, Ph.D. l_xl cOU EFLA ( 248 ) 858-0247
j PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
1. COMPONENT STATUS
a cotirmeo TERMINATED 7 REVISED 0 NEW
. 2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
A_ Meidren Under Jurbdiction of Court
7 DELINQUENT gi NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court
WRITTEN COMPLAINT SUBSTANTIATE) C.P.S. (PIA ONLY) El CHILDREN UKELY TO COME UNDER JURISDICTION OF THE COURT
. 3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check primary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN: E Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
n Number of Youth Petitioned CI Number of Days of Shelter Care
7 Number of Adjudications E Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
E Number of Days of Family Foster Care ID Number of State Wards Committed (Act ISO& 220)
4. SERVICE FOCUS
7 Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
7 Effect early return from foster or institutional care
n l. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL
YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and costs (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete).
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
l'Im• Period Reported Oct. 1 .aa. thru Sept 30 9) Time Period Reported Oct. 1 _99thru SapL 302000
5. 6. ACTUAL NUMBER 7. ACTUAL COST 8. PROJECTED NUMBER 9. PROJECTED COST
enw,
: A. Number of Youth/Family Served 8 11
i B. Number of Service Uni.t3 a ys of
(Define Service Unit .nome cp r e 2696 4015
C. TCtal Component Cost ////// $41 /120 1/11/ $41 / 120
jD.Averqe CostPert,Jnitt ///// ///// $10.24 ---------41.5.5
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family ///// $5,140 ///// $3,738
The Farndy Independence Agency wl not dfacrininate agairra any Individual or group AUTHCRITY: PA 87 of 1978. because ct race. MX, relkion, age. national °risen. color, martal status, poillicel beliefs or COMPLETICW: is required. disability. if you need help %nth reading. writing, hearing, Mo., under the Malmo with CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Ctakt care funds will not be reimbursed. Disabilities A. you are trilled to make your needs known to an FL office In your county.
- SEE OVER - FIA-4471 (3-90)
IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or
:o areas of intended identified in Section 1,3.
ing components and should correspond
10. NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED ¶1. NUMBERS OR DAYS ; 12. COSTS
1 A. Youth Petitioned I ,
i i B. Adjudications 2 5 ' $15,000
O. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention
2. Days of Shelter Care
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 224 1216 1 $206,720
G. State Wards Committed
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13. Assess strengths, weakness' and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all
youth served by this component.
SEE ATTACHED "WRAPAROUND MID-YEAR REPORT"
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be completed for all compon rts, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative
may be attached) 1 9 9 9-2000
Increasingly, youth with serious emotio al disturbance are referred to the
court for formal intervention as a resu t of delinquent conduct which is
secondary Lo having a psychiatric disor6er. These youngsters are typically
identified in early childhood as having multiple adjustment problems. They
receive services from a variety of agen.ies, often without coordination.
Through a partnership with FIA, schools local community mental health, and
other service organizations, some of th ,se youth can be matntained in their
own homes. Youth in this special, high risk population have significant rates
of repeat offending if untreated. (Our research suggests 87% of these
youngsters will re-offend.) Through ap.ropriate interventions, we anticipate
reducing the number of new adjudication. and maintaining these 11
selected youth in the community,. with n. new criminal offenses (a total of1C1
fewer adjudications). By maintaining t ese 11 youth in their homes, rather
than in residential placement, we achie e a cost savings of: 11 x $170 x 180
days (average residential length of sta ) = $336,600-$30,600 = $306,000.
(See Attachment)
FA-4471 (3 (9) USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDEC
T WRAPA OUND
Mid Year Report
4/30i 99
1200 W. Nur
Waterford, Mich
on Road
igan 48328
05/19/99 WED 11:52 [TX/RX NO 71221
Introduction
n
The purpose of this report is to provide a r view of the Wraparound
Program's activities through examination o mid year data demonstrated
through the supportive services given to r idents of Oakland County with
the continuing goal of maintaining children' placement in their own homes.
The services were delivered by the Wraparound staff housed 1200 W. Huron
Road in Waterford, Michigan. Wraparound is funded by support from Strong
Families/ Safe Children, the Oakland County Community Mental Health
Authority, Oakland Schools and the Oakland County Probate Court.
It is the mission of Wraparound to prevent the out of home placement of
children who have been identified at risk of such removal by the community
through Court, FIA, school or CMHA assessment.
i The result of out of placement ranges frorr substantially longer periods of
separation than what was clinically indicate due to lack of available beds and
services to increased family isolation and df sfunction. Research strongly
supports that each time a child is removed from his or her home, the child is
emotionally damaged, permanently and irre ocably.
Wraparound works to assemble a team of s pport for the child and family
which strengthens, or help create, the flat ral supports the family has in
place. Through Wraparound's coordination f necessary services, by
establishing contact and support from corn unity wide agencies, schools,
religious organizations, judicial system, poll e departments and businesses,
the child and family can determine what th y need in order to be successful
and gain the skills Nasser to effectively ma age the problems which posed
the risk if out of home placement of their c lid.
Wraparound has been in place in Oakland County since 1994. The program
became fully staffed in 1999, and now has three full time facilitators and a
supervisor serving the families of Oakland County.
05/19/99 WED 11:52 [TX/RX SO 71221
Demographic Information
Demographic information is collected from the clients at the time of intake.
Information gathered includes age and sex of family members, residency,
income, ethnicity and referral source.
Information also includes number of past incidents of hospitalizations,
removal from home and/or interventions by Protective Services,
involvement with Probate Court, suspensions from school, and a history of
truancy problems.
Information collected throughout the perio4 of Wraparound involvement
includes out of home placements and the rumber of referrals to the Court
and FIA.
The following information represents infornfiation gathered from the pool of
clients referred to Wraparound during this iscal year. The number of
families screened for participation in Wrap round so far has been 23
families, with 20 of those families being sc eened as appropriate for
participation.
The three families that were found to be ineligible for participation in
Wraparound were notified through the referring source, with a forwarded list
of suggested agencies and services that may assist them in obtaining the
assistance that they need.
Client Base
Total number of families referred to Wrap round so far for this year: 2 3_
Total number of families eligible to particip te in Wraparound: _El
Total number of children served within eligible Wraparound families: aa
05/19/99 WED 11:52 [TX/RX NO 7122]
Ethnicity:
African American 22%
White 65%
Biracial 8.5%
(Native American/White)
Biracial 4.5%
(African American/White)
Income:
Income measures gross income for the ent ire family
Annual income less than $10,000 4%
Annual income between $10,000 and $25,0 0 48%
Annual income between $25,000 and $40,000 35%
Annual income over $40,000 13%
05/19/99 WED 11:52 [TX/RX NO 7122]
Residency:
(by city)
Auburn Hills
Brandon Township
Clarkston (3)
Hazel Park
Madison Heights (2)
Novi
Oak Park
Pontiac (4)
Rochester Hills
Royal Oak
Southfield
Troy
Waterford
05/19/99 WED 11:52 [TX/RX NO 71221
year, not at the
Males
Females 27%
73%
Age of children served by Wraparoun
Age reflected is the age of the children thi
time of referral.
Ages 0-5 0%
Ages 6-8 3%
Ages 9 -10 15%
Ages 11-12 21%
Ages 13-14 15%
Ages 15-16 19%
Ages 16-17 13%
Ages 17-18 14%
Sex:
This breakdown by sex reflects the populat
Wraparound.
on of the children served by
05/19/99 WED 11:52 [TX/RX NO 71221
Parental Age
ents participating in Wraparound This breakdown reflects the age of the pa
this year, not at the time of referral.
Under 25 years 13%
25-30 years 13%
31-35 years 22%
36-40 years 17%
41 -45 years 26%
46 years and older 8%
05/19/99 WED 11:52 [TX/RX NO 7122]
The amount of time spent at home without the child being placed in an
unplanned residential setting (to include psychiatric placement, foster care,
juvenile detention or shelter placement) is tsrgeted to increase with the
facilitation of Wraparound services.
The measurement of the success of this is ound to be the total number of
days spent by children in out of home place ent with Wraparound
involvement as compared to the number of ays spent in out of home
placement before Wraparound was involved with the child or the family.
The data that follows represent days in out f home placement this year as
compared to the last six months of the yeah before the family was involved
in Wraparound.
Percentage of increase or decrease in psyc iatric hospital stays: -21%
Increase or decrease in foster care placeme ts: - 9 4%
Increase or decrease of placement in reside tial treatment facilities: -35%
Increase or decrease in placement into juven le detention facilities: -78%
Satisfaction Data
a id A Quality Plan has been developed to track a d monitor a number of areas
for Wraparound. Among the data tracked is he underlapping and overlapping
components of services delivered to a child nd family participating in
Wraparound. Underlapping services are thos for which there are no current
functions, and overlapping services being th se which may risk duplication.
05/19/99 WED 11:52 [TX/RX NO 7122]
Wraparound will also continue to measure i
marking against other counties with similar
serve on coalitions for intra county progre
's effectiveness by bench
programs and will continue to
;s. These efforts will be recorded.
Other data includes a satisfatction survey
the families at quarterly intervals on a yea
survey for the referral source so that Wrai
it's response to the community it serves.
or the children and parents of
ly basis as well as a satisfaction
around may continually improve
TOTAL P.10
05/19/99 WED 11:52 [TX/RX NO 7122]
ATTACHMENT - 1999-00 REPORT/REQUEST
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION... 1
5.B. Number of Service Units: Service Unit = On calendar day of in-home care
*6. Actual Number
A. Number of Youth/Family Served FY 98-99: 11
B. Number of Service Units (In-Home Care Da s):
(365 x 8) - 224 days residential care (project: d through 9/30/99) = 2696 days
7. C. Actual Cost (Projected thru 9-30-98):
2080 Hr. Contract ServicesgS14.90/hr.= $3 ,000+680 Hr. Contract Services @
$14.90/hr.-410,120441,120
C. Case Number
98-03183-NA
98-06118-DL
95-60105-NA
98-03631-YA
98-01751-DL
94-00834-YA
99-16417-DL
92-00378-YA
III. LMPACT EVALUATION
B. Adjudications - Reductions - FY 98-99
1 The population of youth served by these highl individualized, intensive services is at very high risk
to recidivate. Our research suggests that almo t 90% would re-offend in the absence of intervention.
In fact, 2 of the 8 youth served were re-adju icated and statistically, we would have predicted that
7 would be. Therefore, we have a reduction f 5 adjudications. at an average cost of $3,000.
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care - ReducOons
tai Historically, virtually all of the youth in the getved population would be placed out-of-home as part
of their treatment. In fact, 1 of the 8 you served by the Wraparound project was placed in a
residential treatment center for a total of 224 da s (projected through 9/30/99),
Thus, a reduction of 1216 days was achieved
(6 months average length of stay x 8 youth = 1440 days predicted
1440 - 224 = 1216)
1 The average cost of residential care availabl locally is $170/day, for a cost savings of
1216 x S170 = $206,720
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (Continued)
The program is jointly administered by the court, in its
of FIA, Probate Court, school districts, and CMH. The
and referred by the Court Casework/Clinic Units. Case
through OC Intermediate School District. The duties p
crisis intervention, monitoring treatment plans and m;
In FY 1998-99, the target population was amended to
youth (i.e. those diverted from formal court invoIvem
problems who present with histories of involvement wii
represent payment for contractual services for 1.3 Ir1E,
apacity as a member of the community team composed
11 selected youth funded by the court will be identified
management services are provided by contractual staff
rformed include facilitating family sessions, providing
intaining records, liaisoning with other agencies, etc.
dude both adjudicated delinquent and pre-delinquent
nt_ as well as those youth with multi-system complex
Protective Services on neglect complaints.) The costs
taff (full caseload = 8 youth) 1/3 caseload = 3 youth).
NOTE: We have found through experience that th
necessitated a reduction in caseload expectat
intensity of services required by this population has
ons from 10 per FT facilitator to 8.
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT
Michigan Family Independence Agency (RA)
Child and Family Services
j SO1V1C0 C.onvonent (FuN TilelName) Cisick One
I WRAPAROUND SERVICES E In Home Care 0 Basic Grant
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court of FlA) Administrative Unit tll MA • Court
1. Salary and Wages
NAME(S) FUNCTION 1 NO. HOURS/WEEK YEARLY COST
- I
-
2. Fringe Benefits (Specify)
$
Total Personnel II1•
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above)
1. Travel Rae / Mile I Estimate No. of Mies YEARLY COST
;
2. apples and Materials (DesalpUorvExamples) Attach Extra Sheet I Needed* YEARLY COST
1 3. Other Costs (DesalptIon/Examples) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed' RateAirkt YEARLY COST
" Must compri with the definitions and Imits listed $ tor mutt operated Willies In the Chid Care
Fund hancbook. Total Program Support III•
The Family Independence Agency will not discriminate against any frilvidual of group AUTHCNITY: NI 87, Public Acts of 1978, as amended. because of race, sex. religion, age, national origin. ior, marital status, OWN beasts or COMPLETION: Is requited. disablity. If you need he with readng, writing, hearing, etc.. under the Airwricans with
PENALTY: Stale reimbursement MI be withheld from kcal government Disabilities Act, you me inviled to make your needs known lo an FM office In yotr county.
FIA-2094 (Rev. 3-98) Previous edition obsolete. Contnue on other side.
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1.tiniliRmie UNIT TOTAL UNITS;
NAME(S) RATE 1 (Descnbel . CONTRACT YEARLY COST
11 hr.
1 FTE Wraoaround Facilitator 14.90 casemcmt: 2080 311000
11 hr. ,
.33 FTE Wraoaround Facilitator 14 . 90 icaseircrnt: 680 10,120
1 1 !
1 i
2. Cdosed-End Contracts
Oakland County Intermediate School District emolovscontract
staff orovidinc contractual services under an acreement between
ISD, Oakland County Community Mental Health Authority and the
Court.
Total Contractual PO. 41,120
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
'TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of
(Description) to be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
Total Non-Scheduled Ili
E SERVICE COMPONENT - IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
(Add Totals for A. B. C, and 0 above) Total Service Component Cost id HI ,Iao
It you plan to fund any portion of this service oomponent with other public revenue including other Child Care
Funds or Basic F. PUBLIC REVENUE: Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the
following:
SOURCE PURPOSE YEARLY COST
$
Total Public Revenue 41,120
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F)
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE S
(Gross Costs Loss Other Revenue) 110'
REPORT/RE QUEST
Michigan Family Indeperidence Agency
One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care
State Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for n
or Basic Grant Service component for which there was
:xt fiscal year as a new. revised. or continued component.
Component Title CHECK ONE Tsne Period Covered T IN HOME CARE n FROM: THRU: Day Student Program 7 BASIC GRANT Oct. 1 1998 sect. 30. 1999
Component Manager Name Administrative Unit . Telephone Number
Dr. Janet McPeek / Crossroads For Youth IX COURT RA • ( 248 ) 628-2561
' PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that adolv.
1. COMPONENT STATUS
F: CONTINUED I. TERMINATED Eli REVISED 7 NEW
2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
A. Children Under Jurisdicuon ot Court
7 DELINQUENT 7 NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court
0 WRITTEN COMPLAINT 0 SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. (RA ONLY) E CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURISDICTION OF THE COURT I
3 AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check pnmary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN: Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
Number of Youth Petitioned E Number of Days of Shelter Care
Number of Adjudications Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
1111 Number of Days of Family Foster Care E Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
4 SERVICE FOCUS
Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
Effect early return from foster or institutional care
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL
YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete).
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Time Period Reported Oct. 1 . ri thru Sept. 30 . ' Time Period Reported Oct. 1 6. 17, thru Sept. 30 111
5. 6. ACTUAL NUMBER 7. ACTUAL COST 8. PROJECTED NUMBER 9. PROJECTED COST
A. Number of Youth/Family Served 139 150
B. Number of Service Units
(Define Service Unit --: 12,180 13,000
C. Total Component Cost 769,288.80 821,080
D. Average Cost Per Unit 63.16 63.16
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family 5,534.45 5,474
The Family Independence Agency will not discriminate against any individual or group AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 011978. because of race, sex, religion, age. nauonar origin. color, mantel status, political beliefs or
COMPLETION: is required. disability. If you need help with reading. "rating, heanng, etc.. under the Americans with 1
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLER funds ON: Child care fus will not be reimbursed. Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an FIA office in your county.
PIA-4471 (3-98) — SEE OVER
:1. IMPACT EVALUATION - e ,:i.;f7pletec, 70r ano snu
areas of intended identified in Section 1.3.
0 NUMBER OF I ESTIMATED .=EDUCTIONS
AREAS OF mPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR DAYS 12. COSTS
A Youth Petitioned
3 Adjudications
-. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention
E. Days of Shelter Care
'. Days of Residential Treatment Care RATE: 169.00 139 12,180 1,289/192
G. State Wards Committed
V. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13. Assess strengths, weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all
youth served by this component.
I. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be completed for all components, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative
-lay be attached)
USE ADDMONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. 11A-4471 (3-98) (Back)
1. Will not break any laws
2. Will obey the reasonable and law ul commands of your parents
3. Will obey the rules of Camp Oak and at the program site and at
home
4. Will participate with Camp Oak and, Probate Court, and parents
in the development and implement tion of his/her treatment plan
5. Will be expected to participate 'n all aftercare programming
NOTE:
After three absences from the progran, your case will be reviewed for
possible placement in a more restrictive program.
What happens if you do not comply? Camp Oakland and the Probate
Court have a number of options, depe ding on your behavior:
-Work details
-Increased length of time in the on-te program
-Immediate return to the referee or judge to consider:
-Short-term placement in Boys' anch, Girls' Ranch, or Work
Education
-Recommendation for full-time place ent out-of-home
I understand the services being o fered by the Camp Oakland Day
Student Program. I understand t at remaining in the community
depends upon complying with the courl order and the rules established
by Camp Oakland. I agree to participate in the Day Student Program.
(Youngster Signature) (Date)
I/We understand that our son/daughter will be participating in the
Camp Oakland Day Student Program. ../We will cooperate v to the best
of our ability, to ensure compliance with the court order and rules
set up by Camp Oakland.
(Parent Signature) (Date)
(Parent Signature) (Date)
(Guardian Signature) (Date)
Check One
In Home Care Basic Grant
3ervtce Component !Full TitlerNarnei
DRAT Stuciprit- Proaram
YEARLY COST Rate / Mile ' Travel Estimate No. of Miles
2 Supplies and Matenals (eescncinort/ExerrxSes) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed' YEARLY COST
3. Omer Costs (DescnotiorvExampies)Attacn Extra Sheet if Needed' RaterUnit YEARLY COST
0
• Must comply with the delinMons arts hmits listed
for court operated facilities in the Child Care
nil 1-earv1hrink Total Program Support OP'
1 IN-riUIVIE l;Atir..../1:),Ait., 6 nAiN t m Lit..le. I LJt. INIL ntrvm n
Michigan Family Independe ce Agency (FIA)
Child and Family ervices
A DraCt11111\1F1 MrnnInuexac rvf them cif PIA)
• Satary and Wages
NAME(S)
County
Administrative Unit r=1 FIA X IIINICX
FUNCTION I I NO. HOURSWEEK YEARLY COST
2. Fringe Benefits (Specify)
; S
Total Personnel 11. ! 0
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above)
AuTHORITY Act 87, Public Acts of 1978, as amended.
COMPLETION: Is required.
PENALTY: State reimbursement vnil be withheld from local government.
The Fmtly Independence Agency will not disr_nmsnate against any individual or group
because of race, sex, religion, age, national ongin, odor, marital status, political beliefs or
disaorkty, If you need help with reading, writing. heanng, etc.. under the Americans with
Disabilties Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an FIA office in your county.
FIA-2094 (Rev. Me) Previous edition obsolete. Continue on other side.
SOURCE PURPOSE YEARLY COST
_ . CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
• un'a 0 y"----- L Student Program UNIT TOTAL UNITS,
NAME S) RAE iCescnbei CONTRACT YEARLY COST
Per Diem $63.16 days 13,000 $821,080
,
2 Ciosea-Eno Contracts
Total Contractual 00, . s 821,080
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE AntiCipated No. Units Average Cost of
(Description) to be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
n
Total Non-Scheduled 0. : 0
E. VRVICE COMPONENT - IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
(Add Totals for A, B, C. and D above) Total Service Component Cost OP-
s 821,080
If you plan to fund any portion of this service com onent with other public revenue including other Child Care
Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this compone t is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the F. PUBLIC REVENUE* • taticwina:
0 Total Public Revenue
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component' Cost (E-F)
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE IS
(Gross Costs Les* Other Revenue) IO• 1 821,080
L
FIA-2094 'Rev. 3-98) (Back)
104 jr,-i' i rl iflru.r , 1 C...
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Family Independence Agency
c( One Of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care r Basic Grant Service component for wnicn there was
State Relmoursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for net fiscal year as a new. revised, or continued component.
- -Talent Ttle , CHECK ONE - r-,e Perico Coverec..
1 . ;m THFL; Work Education Day Student Program IN HOME CARE om.
, BASIC GRANT rt: 11998 sec: 3c: 1999
-conent Manager Nar-e Aorniastrative ,..nit 'e eonone Nurrce•
_ Dr. Janet McPeek / Crossroads For Youth COURT — '' ( 248 ) 628-2561
PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
ZOMPCNENT STATUS —
—X CONTINUED Li TERMINATED REVISED — NEN _
:. TARGET POPULATIONISI SERVED
A. Children UrKlerJurtsoction of Court
V DELINQUENT 7 NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court
-.1 . WRITTEN COMPLAINT 0 SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. (F1A QNL ) E CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURISDICTION OF THE COURT .
3 AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check pnrnary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN: E Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
— Number of Youth Petitioned r— Number of Days of Shelter Care
---: Number of Adjudications Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
---. Number of Days of Family Foster Care E Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
: SERVICE FOCUS
— R-ovide early intervention to treat within the child's home
— Effect early return from foster or institutional care
. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL
YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete).
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Time Period Reported Oct. 1 thru Sept. 30 Tim* Period Reported Oct 1_ thns Sept 30
5. 6. ACTUAL NUMBER 7. ACTUAL COST 8. PROJECTED NUMBER 9. PROJECTED COST
1
A. Number of Youth/Family Served 40 40
3. Number of Service Units
(Define Service Unit = ) 2,211 3,000
:. Total Component Cost 224,947.10 305,220
.?, Averaae Cost Per Unit 101.74 101.74
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family 5,623.68 7,630.50 _
The Family Independence Agency WI not discriminate against any individual or group i
AUTHORITY: P.A. 87 al 1978. because of race. sex. religion, age, national ongun. color, mama! status. political beliefs or I
COMPLETION: is required disability. It you need help with reading. *ming. heanng. etc. under the Ath(theans with i
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care hinds will not be reimbursed. Disab lilies Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an FIA office in your county. 1
— SEE OVER- A-4471 (3-98)
Ill., IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ehding components and should correspond
f intended identified in Section 1.3.
10, NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBERS OR DAYS 1 12. COSTS
A. Youth Petitioned
B. Adjudications
C. Days of Family Foster Care
D. Days of Out-of-Home Detention 1 I
E. Days of Shelter Care
, F. Days of Residential Treatment Care RATE: 169.00 40 2 /211 148,712
G. State Wards Committed
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal y r this section must be completed
13. Assess strengths, weakness' and problem areas of this compo ent. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between tte projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all
youth served by this component.
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be completed for all compone ts, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative
may be attached)
USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. FIA-4471 (3-98) (Back)
ease from institutions are
unacceptable behavior.
n residential care has been
(12) months.
CAMP OAKLAND YOUTH PROGRAMS, INC.
WORK EDUCATION DAY "I'UDENT PROGRAM
Rationale
This program addresses two impor t
population it is designed to se
offers a natural progression fro
restrictive program while uphold
continued community protection.
in many cases, allow for an earl'
in institutional care. The addl..
component to the current Work Ed
affords agencies the opportunity
care, which is in keeping with f .
without sacrificing the need for
this challenging population. It
families the added incentive tha.
there can be a more timely reunii
opportunity to move from residen.
home for participation in Day Tr..
P..: P NTA
Statement of the problem.
1. Too many youth following re
returning to problematic or
2. The average length of stay
at least nine (9) to twelve
.ant alternatives for the
e. First, this program
residential care to a less
mc- the mandate for
Second, the program will,
er release date for youth
ion of the Day Student
cation residential program
to practice reduced cost of
scal responsibility,
structure and treatment for
gives youth and their.
, as progress is made,
ication with the
ial placement to r eturn
atment.
PROGRAM OBJECTIVE
,
The cost of care has risen
ten (10) years.
3
significantly over the past
Program Obective:
1. To provide a transitional p riod to those youth who are
either being released from institutional care or are in
the community exhibiting p blematical or unacceptable
behavior.
2. T o provide an alternative
care.
to long-term institutional
3. To work directly with famil
problems and issues involvi
their families.
ies and the community on
ng these at-risk youth and
4. To provide intensive educational programming as well as
job preparation, training id placement.
5. To maintain safety in the c.mmunity by having the youth
participate in the program twelve (12) hours per day,
six days per week, with a • adual reduction in the
number of days spent not t. exceed two (2) (weekend)
days per week.
6. To increase individual an. family problem
solving/conflict resolutio skills and to facilitate
personal growth toward eve tual independence as a .
responsible young adult.
Pooulation/Length of Stay:
1. State wards and status offe ders either in the
community or currently in o t-of-home care.
2. Youth between the ages of 15 and 17 years of age.
3. Up to six (6) months in the program with four-and-a-
half (4.5) months of afterc re services.
This program will provide the following services:
1. Therapy:
a. Individual
b. Group
c. Family
ent
nt
2. Academics:
a. Educational Como
b. Vocational Compon
c. Job Training, preparation and placement
3. Work Program
4. Aftercare 1
County
Administrative Unit FIA X CADVXX
NO. HOURSWEEK - YEARLY COST FUNCTION
C'ecc One
In Home Care — Basic Gram
IN-•L;Ailt t„,Artcdorkit..., uribkivI LJ C t..d etlL ricrk.rn
Michigan Family Independence Agency (FIA)
Child and Family Sleryices
.3.•rvice Canoonent (Full Title/Namei
Work Education Day Student Proaram
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the fs,u ,rt MAI
' Saiary ana Wages
NAME (SI
2. Fringe Benefits (Specify)
Total Personnel 0
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above
' Trayei Rate / Mile Estimate No. of Mlles 1 YEARLY COST
2. Supplies and Materials (Description/Examples( Attach Extra Sheet if Needed* YEARLY COST
3. Other Casts iDescnotion/ExarripIes) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed
Rate/Urn YEARLY COST
I
_
• Must comply with the definitions and limits listed i S for court operated facilities in the Child Care 0 Total Program Support NI, '
J•mierialiiiiiiiiill‘r ;
The Family Independence Agency will not discriminate against arty inovklual or group AuTHOPITY: Act 87, Public Acts 011978, as amended. because of race, sex. religion, age, national ongin, color, marital status_ ookticai beliefs or COMPLETION: Is required. disabiley. if you need nerp with reading, wilting, hearing, etc.. under the Amencans with PENALTY: State reimbursement will be withheld from local government. Disabil ties Act, you are voted to make your needs known to an FIA otke in your county.
PiA.2094 (Rev. 3-98) Previous edition obsolete. Continue on other side.
UNIT
RATE ' (Describe)
TOTAL UNITS,
CONTRACT YEARLY COST
0
I $
Total Service Component Cost Pr I 305,220 I_ (Add Totals for A, B, C. and 0 above)
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
't-wWilitet Education DaUpdent Program
1
Per Diem $101.74 days 3,000 $305,220
I
2. Closed-End Contracts 1
Total COntractual 305,220
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE
(Description)
Antipipated No. Units
tb be Provided
Average Cost of
Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
Total Non-Scheduled 0r.
E. SERVICE COMPONENT - IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
If you plan to fund any portion of this service com onent with other public revenue including other Child Care
Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this compone t is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the F. PUBLIC REVENUE: followina:
r—
SOURCE PURPOSE YEARLY COST
_
1
Total Public Revenue 00. 0 1 1
G. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component! Cost (E-F)
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE $
(Gross Costs Les Other Revenue) IP. 305,220
FiA-2094 (Rev. 3-98) (Back)
7 NEGLECT
SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. (RA ONL
TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
Children Under Jurisdiction of Court
Te DELINQUENT
B. Children NOT Under Jurtsdiction ot Court
n WRITTEN COMPLAINT 1 CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME LACER JURISDICTION OF THE COURT
IN HOME CARE/BAS1C GRANT PROGRAM COMPONENT
REPORT/REQUEST
Michigan Family Independence Agency
One of these forms must be completed for EACH In Home Care Or Basic Grant Service component for which there was
State Reimbursement dunng the past Fiscal Year or proposed for net fiscal year as a new. revised. or continued component.
.noorent Title
Project START
–corert Manager Name
Dr. Pamela S. Howitt
CHECK ONE
! XX IN HOME CARE ,== BASIC GRANT
Administrative Unit
la COURT — •-'1A
T me Pena: 0.:,verea
FRCM 099 THRU 2000
Sect 30
Taiecrone Nurroer
( 248 ) 858-0247
PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that at:icily.
COMPONENT STATUS
CONTINUED I TERMINATED I REVISED JX, NEW
AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT - (Check primary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN:
7 Number of Youth Petitioned
Number of Adjudications
7 Number of Days of Family Foster Care
Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
7 Number of Days of Shelter Care
Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 220)
: SERVICE FOCUS
-X Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
-X Effect early return from foster or institutional care
SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL
YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-date and projections if fiscal year is not complete).
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
lime Period Reported Oct. 1 thru Sept. 30 Time Period Reported Oct. 1 99 thru Sept. 30
5. 6. ACTUAL NUMBER 7. ACTUAL COST 8. PROJECTED NUMBER 9 PROJECTED COST
k
2. NilmliFir of Youth/Family Served 22 youth
3 Number of Service Units
(Define Service Unit = Days 3,960 days
- Total Comoonent Cost $ 118,800
-) Averace Cost Per Unit $ 30/day
F. . Average Cost Per Youth/Family $5,400/youth .
The Family independence Agency will not discriminate against any individual or group
.2, uTHORITY . P.A. 87 of 1978. because of race. sex, religion, age, national ongon, color. mental status. polific.sibeliefs or ! :OMPLETION: is required,
:ONSEOUENCE FOR NONCOMPLET1CN: Chad care funds will not be reimbursed. disabialy. If you need help with reading, writing, neanng, etC., under the Amencans with ;
Dittablities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an FIA office in your county_ !
— SEE OVER- A-4471 (198)
11 2,090 $ 353,210 = Days of Residential Treatment Care
3. State Wards Committed
V. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
,1. 10.1PACT EVALUATION - Must be completed or continuing or ending components and should correspond
areas of intended identified in Section 1.3.
AREAS OF IMPACT
A. Youth Petitioned
3. Adjudications
2 Days of Family Foster Care
10 NUMBER OF
YOuT)-4 SERVED
ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
1 t NUMBER'S OR DAYS '2 20513
11 $ 22,077
2 Days of Out-of-Home Detention . 11 462 $ 78,078
3 Days of Shelter Care
this section must be completed
nt. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal yea
13. Assess strengths, weakness and problem areas of this compon
Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between
youth served by this component.
'. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be completed for all component. except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative
-ay be attached)
See Attachment for Program Des ription
USE ADDMONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED. 4.-4471 (3-96) (Back)
Service Component IFui Title,Name)
Project STAFC2
' Check Cre
in Home Care Basic Grart
IN—HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT
Michigan Family Independ4nce Agency (FIA)
Child and Family Services
FUNCTION
A. PERSONNEL (Employees of the Court of FIA)
• Simone and Wages
NAMEjS1
Administrative Unit FIA Coun
NO. HOURS. WEEK YEARLY CCST
2. Fringe BOnelitS (Soectly)
Total Personnel pp.
3. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above)
.. Travel Rate i Mile Estimate No. of Miles YEARLY COST
2 Supplies and MatenaisiDescnptiorVExampies) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed` YEARLY COST
3 Other Costs (DescniotionrExampies) Attach Extra Sheet it Needed Rate/Unit YEARLY COST
' must comer, with the definitions and limits listed
tor court operated facilities in the Child Care Total Prograrn Support po. Fund Handbook.
The Family Independence Agency will not discnminate against any individual or grouP I AUTHORITY! Act 87. Public Acts of 1978, as amended. because of race, sex, religion. age, national ongin, color, mental status, political beliefs or 1 COMPLETION: Is required disability. If you need help with reading. wnting, neanng, etc., under the Americans with PENALTY: State reimbursement will tie withheld from local government. Disabilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an FIA office in your county. ,
Continue on other side. IA-2094 (Rev. 3.98) Previous edition obsolete.
UNIT TOTAL UNITS.
RATE (Cescnbe) CONTRACT YEARLY COST
gates
NAMESI
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Contracted Agency Service Provider '$30/day 3,960 days $ 118,800
C..csea-End Contracts
ramcaritmcww Opp. 1 118,800 1
D. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
TYPE OF SERVICE Anbapated No. Units Average Cost of
(Description) to be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST
I
I
i s
Total Non-Scnecluled 1110.
E SERVICE COMPONENT - IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
'Add Totals for A, B, C, and D above) Total Service Component Cost III. 118,800
If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care
Funds or Basic Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the
• PUBLIC REVENUE: follow •-
SOURCE PURPOSE YEARLY COST
Note: 90% of the costs will be charged to tl -e JA_BG grant.
--------Only-10T-Will ce suomitteo tor cniic care rum:I
reimbursement.
I 10%
Is
Total Public Revenue I
t.._
. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component i ost (E-F)
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTIC! ATED IPIC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE $
(Grose Costs Less er Revenue) 1111b 11,880
:1A.2094 (Rev. 3-98) (Back)
PROJECT START
( SUPERVISED TRANSISITION AND RE-ENTRY TRACKING)
A PROPOSAL FOR AFTERCARE SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIALLY PLACED YOUTH
Problem Identification
According to prominent experts in the field of juvenile justice, two of the most troubling
deficiencies in the system today involve: the limited attention devoted to adequately preparing
youth for return to the community while they are in confinement; and the failure to monitor and
reinforce the skills developed in treatment, once the youth are released ( see for example
Altschuler and Armstrong, 1992, Fagan, 1990; Springer, 1991). These systemic problems,
coupled with the existence of certain identifiable risk factors among the population of juvenile
delinquents, have contributed to an alarming rate of 1 . ecidivism among previously placed
youngsters.
i Nationally, estimates run as high as 60%, and local atistics suggest that up to 50% of the
youngsters completing a Childrens Village treatment program are subsequently re-adjudicated.
While many youngsters manage to re-enter comm ty living without significant disruption,
research indicates that a sub-group are likely to have serious adjustment problems. Moreover, an
examination of Oakland County records reveals that most recidivism occurs between four and
nine months post-release. This is consistent with f ings in other jurisdictions ( Fagan, 1990).
Currently, youth released from Childrens Village tre
follow-up from institutional staff, per Child Care Fu
attempted to supplement these efforts by extending I
need more intensive. and/or longer term services in
communities. It is clear, however, that we have insu
the volume and intensity needed. This proposal reqt
atment programs receive 60 days of aftercare
ad guidelines and limitations. The court has
robation supervision to those youth who
)rder to successfully transition back to their
fficient resources to provide the services in
tests funding to contract with a private, not-
for profit provider to implement aftercare programming for those youth most at risk to repeat
offend. The outcome we hope to achieve is a reduction in the rate of failure and relapse.
Project Design
a) Scope
A recent theme in juvenile justice program developr
of protecting public safety and holding juveniles acc
development and rehabilitation for individual offenc
demonstrate the most promise of success are those ti
surveillance with provision of services/specialized ti
opportunities"(ie job training and placement, educat
lent has been the need to balance the goals
ountable. with the goals of competency
ers. Intensive supervision models which
tat combine increased social control and
eatment and -normalization
ton, life skills training).
y in the past few years now make it possible Advances in program research. design and technolo
er-archina case mana ement services
e-discharge planning, service provision and
f youth and family progress, 24 hour crisis
VG • II ill 111 g • S. D1112
as substance abuse treatment. mental health
ems etc.
aing with school personnel regarding the re-
e to be provided in managing youngsters in
or younger offenders, since school personnel
youth, and/or may be quick to expel later).
not returning to their own families.
individual as appropriate.
preventative self-maintenance etc.
to target specific populations of youth most in need pf services (through risk assessment), and
provide the necessary surveillance ( through use of t- thers, tracking devices etc). Thus, one
component of the program will be . • • • • • - ich . an Famil Indelende e A!encv
Delinquency Risk Assessment Scale to help determi e youth to be enrolled. The Risk
Assessment Scale can be re-administered after corn•letion of the aftercare program, to measure
the effects of the services on risk for re-adjudication Secondly we will use electronic
surveillance equipment as appropriate. It is anticipat-d that we will focus primarily on youth who
are less than 17 years of age at time of discharge, w o have been in placement at the secure A-
North program of Childrens Village and/or who pre4
measures.
ent with a high risk profile on assessment
Two additional key features of the project will be: o
provided by the contractor, to include coordinated p
referral, liaison with court caseworkers, monitoring
response, communication and reporting to court; an
to establish a working rapport.
According to research sponsored by the Office of Ju
( Alstshuler and Armstrong, 1991; 1992; National I
service areas have been identified for inclusion in a
around the country. These are:
enile Justice and Delinquency Prevention,
stitute of Justice. 1998), nine different
ercare programs that have proven successful
1. Specialized treatment for designated youth, such
treatment for youth with continuing emotional probl
2. Educational opportunities, including careful pl
enrollment of youth, agreements regarding assistanc
school etc. ( This is a key consideration, especially
are often somewhat reluctant to accept the return of
3. Job Training and Placement
4. Living arrangements to be facilitated, if youth ar
5. Social Skills and basic living skills training.
6. Structured recreation and leisure activities.
7. Client-centered counseling . including group and
8. Family counseling.
9. Health services, including nutritional counseling.
b) Implementation Plan
We propose to issue an RFP for service providers a'
We will target agencies already known to be involv
level/and or in other counties. Preliminary inquiry
be expected.
Program costs: (0.:, S30.00 / day X 180 days = S5
22 youth at S5400 = $118,000
Ile to deliver the above described services.
:d with such services at the local and state
uggests that a perdiem cost of $ 30.00 can
00 per youth
Expected Results
Among the measures to be used is the Delinquency Risk Assessment Scale (previously
referenced). Specific data collection instruments and reporting formats will be determined in
coordination with the contractor. We anticipate overall lowering of risk scores as a result of
program participation. Court records will provide re-adjudication data, and we project a 10%
decrease in recidivism rates for the program participants, relative to non-participants.
Additionally, in coordination with the service provider, we expect to set up program performance
measures related to number of youth completing the program, counseling progress. number of
youth successfully re-enrolled in school or participating in job placement training and others.
References
Altschuler, D. and Armstrong, T., ( 1991). "Intensive Aftercare for the High-Risk Juvenile
Parolee: Issues and Approaches in Reintegration and Community Supervision" in Armstrong_ T.,
ed., Intensive Interventions with High-Risk Youths, New York: Criminal Justice Press.
Altschuler,D. and Armstrong, T., ( 1992). "Intensive Aftercare for High-Risk Juvenile Parolees:
A Model Program Design", John Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies.
Fagan, J., ( 1990). -Treatment and Reintegration of Violent Juvenile Offenders: Experimental
Results". Justice Quarterly. vol 7, 233- 263.
National Institute of Justice ( 1998). "Reintegrating fuvenile Offenders Into the Community:
OJJDP's Intensive Community-Based Aftercare Dernonstration Program". Research Preview,
December Issue.
Springer, J. ( 1991). "Selective Aftercare for Juveni e Parolees: Administrative Environment
and Placement Decisions", in Armstrong, T., ed., Int nsive Interventions with High-Risk Youth
New York: Criminal Justice Press.
IN HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT P ROGRAM COMPONENT
)UEST
Jence Agency
REPORT/RE
Michigan Family lndepen
Time Period Covered
FROM:
Oct. 1. 1999
Telephone Number
THRU:
sect. 30. 2000
( 248 ) 858-0247
tzl One of these forms must be completed for EACH in Home Care r Basic Grant Service component for which there was
State Reimbursement during the past Fiscal Year or proposed for n xt fiscal year as a new, revised, or continued component.
Component Title
J.A.M. (Juvenile Alternatives for Misconduct)
:omponent Manager Name
Dr. Pamela S. Howitt
I. PROGRAM SPECIFIC INFORMATION: Check all that apply.
COMPONENT STATUS
E CONTINUED 7 TERMINATED
CHECK ONE a IN HOME CARE E BASIC GRANT
Administrative Unit
COURT ---' PIA
0 REVISED E NEW
2. TARGET POPULATION(S) SERVED
A. Children Under Jurisdiction of Court
DEUNOUENT 0 NEGLECT
B. Children NOT Under Jurisdiction of Court
WRITTEN COMPLAINT E SUBSTANTIATED C.P.S. (FIA E CHILDREN LIKELY TO COME UNDER JURISDICTION OF THE COURT
3. AREA(S) OF INTENDED IMPACT (Check pnmary area(s) only.)
A REDUCTION IN:
O Number of Youth Petitioned
• Number of Adjudications
El Number of Days of Family Foster Care
4 SERVICE FOCUS
2 Provide early intervention to treat within the child's home
Effect early return from foster or institutional care
Ex Number of Days of Out-of-Home Detention
0 Number of Days of Shelter Care
Number of Days of Residential Treatment Care
El Number of State Wards Committed (Act 150 & 2201
II. SERVICE AND COST INFORMATION FOR FISCAL YEAR COMPLETED OR BEING REQUESTED FOR NEXT FISCAL
YEAR:
INSTRUCTIONS:
• In columns 6 & 7 enter the actual number and cost's (year-to-dafte and projections if fiscal year is not complete).
• In columns 8 & 9 enter the numbers and costs projected for the next fiscal year.
Tim e Period Reported Oct. 1 thru Sept. 30 Time Period Reported Oct. 1 99 thru Sept. 30 00
5. I 6. ACTUAL NUMBER 7. ACTUAL COST 8. PROJECTED NUMBER 9. PROJECTED COST I
, A. Number of Youth/Family Served
B. Number of Service Units
(Define Service Unit = weekends
C. Total Component Cost
, D. Average Cost Per Unit
E. Average Cost Per Youth/Family
AUTHORITY! P.A. 87o( 1978.
COMPLETION: is required.
CONSEQUENCE FOR NONCOMPLETION: Child care funds will not be reimbursed.
PIA-4471 (3-98
500
1 weekend/youthl
0 weekends/annuzlly
75/000
$150/youth/weekle
$150/youth/weekie
i T Family Independence Agency will not discnminate against any individual or grow
b se of race, sex, religion, age, national origin, color, marital status, political beliefs or
di 'lily. If you need help with reading, writing. hearing, etc.. under the MUNICOrts with
Di abilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an FlA office in your county.
weekend — SEE OVER —
2 day program - flat rate
1G. NUMBER OF ESTIMATED REDUCTIONS
IMPACT EVALUATION — Must be completed for continuing or ending components and should correspond
:o areas of intended identified in Section 1.3.
AREAS OF IMPACT YOUTH SERVED 11. NUMBER'S OR DAYS 12. COSTS
A Youth Petitioned
B. Adiudications 50 100,350
C. Days of Family Foster Care
D Days of Out-of-Home Detention 50 2,100 $354,900
F Days of Shelter Care
F. Days of Residential Treatment Care 50 9,500 1,605,500
G. State Wards Committed
IV. PROGRAM ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION:
For ALL Components in effect during the most recent fiscal year this section must be completed
13. Assess strengths, weakness and problem areas of this component. Assess the intended impact areas and results.
Explain the reason(s), or cause(s) for the difference between the projected No.'s and cost and the actual. Account for all
youth served by this component.
V. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - Must be completed for all compone
may be attached)
s, except those being terminated, each year. (Narrative
SEE ATTACHMENT FOR PROGRAM DESCRIPTI
FIA-4471 (3-98) taackt USE ADDMONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED.
Saiary and Wages
NAME(S)
IN-HOME CARE/BASIC GRANT BUDGET DETAIL REPORT
Michigan Family Independence Agency (FIA)
Child and Family Services
Service Component (Full TitleName)
7 M
; Check One , xx In Home Care Li Basic Grant
it41.11,QMILLacailmersidalaaigulgi.F.LW Administrative Unit FA D Court
FUNCTION i NO. HOURSMEEK YEARLY COST
2. Fringe Benefits (Specify)
i s
Total Personnel I
B. PROGRAM SUPPORT (For employees identified in "A" above)
-. Travei Rate / Mile Estimate No. of Miles YEARLY COST
2. Suomes and Matenals (Description/Exarnoles) Attach Extra Sheet if Needed' YEARLY COST
3. an er Costs iDescnptiordExamples) Attacn Extra Sheet if Needed" RateUnit YEARLY COST
• Must comply with the definitions and limits :toed ! s for court operated facilities in the Child Care Total Program Support ill• i
.1nWilif1lkiliiiga
The . amity Independence Agency will not discriminate against any individual or group AUTHORITY: Act 87. Public Acts of 1978, as arnendeo. because of race, sex. religion, age, national origin, color, mental status, political beliefs or COMPLETION: Is required. disability. If you need help with reading, wnting, heanng. etc.. under the Americans with PENALTY: State reimbursement will be wit/Wield from local government. Oisat ilities Act, you are invited to make your needs known to an FIA office in your county.
IA-2O94 (Rev. 3-98) Previous edition Obsolete, Continue on other side.
unit Rates
NAME(S)
C. 'CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
, UNIT TOTAL UNITS/
RATE (Descnbe) I CONTRACT YEARLY COST
Contracted Agency Service Provider 1$0/
,iweekend ; 500 youth $ 75,000
2 Closed-End Contracts
Total Contractual 1111.
p. NON-SCHEDULED PAYMENTS
$ 75,000
TYPE OF SERVICE Anticipated No. Units Average Cost of ! (Description) to be Provided Each Service Unit YEARLY COST I
i $ „
Total Non-Scheduled 011. 75/000
COMPONENTE SERVICE - IN HOME CARE OR BASIC GRANT
$
'(Add Totals for A. B. C. and 0 above) Total Service Component Cost OP.
If you plan to fund any portion of this service component with other public revenue including other Child Care
Funds or Basic F. PUBLIC REVENUE: Grant monies, or if this component is generating revenue (i.e. third party payments) specify the
fnilnwinn-
SOURCE PURPOSE YEARLY COST
1 ,
t iiitaimlif mfif Hip. Ggimil-A tai 1 1 hp rthrapcl o thaL J'ApG arant ‘
On y 10% wi n be submitted for child care fund
- HO ::..H.-1 10%
Total Public Revenue Pi
g. Subtract Total Public Revenue from Total Service Component Cost (E-F)
TOTAL COST TO BASIC GRANT, NET ANTICIPATED IHC MATCHABLE EXPENDITURE $
(Gross Costs Less Other Revenue) 1111' 7,500 I
FIA-2094 (Rev. 3-98) (Back)
JUVENILE XLTERNATIVES FOR MISCONDUCT (J.A.M.)
1. Problem to be addressed
a.
Accountability based sanctions:
The family court provides delinquency services to over 3.300 youth each year. Service to this
population is provided along a continuum of care beginning with consent probation at S3 per day
through commitment to F.I.A. at a cost of S212 per day. We have identified the need for
accountability based sanctions for youth receiving services in their own home.
Youth under court supervision do not make changes simply because we now have a court order.
The behaviors do not always measure up to the expectations the court has placed on them. They
may engage in -technical violations", such as not making restitution payments. violation of
tl) school rules , not maintaining employment or other ehaviors which are not criminal in nature
but are not in compliance with court orders. These b haviors may not be serious enough to
require a residential placement. A consequence shoilt of residential is needed to hold youth
accountable.
i We have few alternatives available to deal with these technical violations. We occasionally may
place a youth in a residential facility for a weekend. hese spaces are extremely limited and
usually not available on a timely basis. A Program o daytime weekend days will fill the void in
cost effective manner. The information presented wil be designed to meet the needs of and
promote changes in this at risk population. The pare of the youth will also be asked to
participate where appropriate.
2. Project Design a Plan of Action
The project will provide the Court with an additional sanction to hold youth
accountable without escalating to a morelrestrictive higher cost disposition.
Referrals will be processed through weekly staffings of probation officers and
supervisors. Cases may also be referred by Intake referees as a result of a
written case conference agreement. The program will be called J.A.M. (Juvenile
Alternatives for Misconduct). Implementation is the responsibilities of the Family
Court Division of the Probate Court.
Primary focus of the program is accountaloility. You have failed in your
responsibility, therefore, you are to reportIto J.A.M.
Program content will include topics of impbrtance to this at risk population. The
components are to include: A) educational skills including prevention of drug and
alcohol use, smoking, HIV, STD, anger m4nagement/conflict resolution,
employment skills training; B) youth community service; C) recreation or physical
challenge component. Service would be drovided by a contract agency who
would have responsibility for staffing, site , program management and liaison
with the Court.
3. Results or benefits expected -evaluation
Juvenile accountability -Court records will provide data relating to violation of probation and
the movement of youth to a more restrictive and costlier placements. We anticipate a higher
success rate of youth on community based treatment plans as a result of this intervention. We
will coordinate with the service provider to measure" customer satisfaction" through participant
survey.
The cost of a youth being placed at the Oakland countly Childrens Village is approx one hundred
and seventy dollars a day with an average length of sty of one hundred ninety five days for a
total cost of thirty four thousand one hundred twentyc ollars. If only two youth become
successful probationers instead of being placed in the hildrens Village the program will be cost
i
effective.
Probationers will be held accountable for minor violat ons that otherwise might not be dealt with.
clProgram Costs: $150 per youth X 10 youth per w ek X 50 weeks = $75,000
VOAKLAND COUNTY CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
MISSION STATEMENT
We believe in the inherent abilities and rights of individuals to effect positive
changes in their life-styles and value systems that would result in a more
successful adaptation to community living. We believe that by providing a
continuum of care in a treatment-oriented milieu, utilizing the least restrictive
setting necessary; that these aforementioned changes will be facilitated and
reinforced. We further believe that the focia of such treatment services is with
the client and the client's family and that service delivery is aimed at achieving
the earliest and most reasonable return of the client to the community; while,
at the same time, keeping in mind the safety and welfare of the community.
PROGRAM STAYEMENT
ld Children's Village presents a unique comprehensive tri-dimensional
approach to residential care and treat nt. Pre-adjudicated and/or pre-
dispositional children and youths receive nitial treatment services under the
auspices of either the Shelter Care Program, for children who have been
temporarily assigned to the facility for reasons of neglect or abuse; or in the
Secure Detention Program, for youths whig have been identified as posing a
, risk to the community or themselves. .
Youths who are placed at the facility by 4positional order receive long-term
treatment and rehabilitative services through the Residential Treatment
Program.
The presence of the on-campus Children' Village School, accredited by the
North Central Association of Schools and Colleges, completes the self-
contained/comprehensive approach to rsidential care and provides an
educational program spanning the grade I els of Kindergarten through 12th
grade. Consequently, residents are prov ided with an educational program
tailored to meet their needs, and recei e grades and credits which are
transferable to their community schools. !
OAKLAND COUNTY CHILDREN'S VILLAGE
A division of the County Executive's Department of Human Services, Children's Village is
the County of Oakland's residential facility for children and youths who have been referred
by the Oakland County Family Court, District Courts, Circuit Court, Office of the
Prosecuting Attorney, the Family Independence Agency, and various courts outside of
Oakland County. The facility presents a unique tri-dimensional approach to residential
care and treatment for youngsters awaiting the adjudication and/or dispositional phases
of the court process, as well as those committed by dispositional orders for the purpose
of residential treatment. The Village maintains 220 beds in multiple living units located on
a campus setting adjacent to the County Service Center, The Children's Village School,
accredited by the North Central Association of High Schools and Colleges, completes the
self-contained/one location feature of the facility, allowing for regular and special
education programs for grades K-12.
The care providing/service delivery functions of the facility are organizationally structured
to reflect the short-term aspects of secure detention and shelter care (Intake Treatment
Services) and the long-term nature of rehabilitatiOn (Residential Treatment Services).
INTAKE TREATMENT SERVICES
PURPOSE: To provide a safe and secure environment and essential services to boys and
girls between the ages of birth and 18 years who re in need of temporary shelter, secure
detention or transitional care. These services elate to the formal admittance of new
residents to the facility; and to the assessment of needs and subsequent assignment to
an appropriate living unit as well as the implemertation of initial and/or interim treatment.
GOALS: The primary goal of the Intake Treatment Services Team focuses on meeting the
immediate needs of the resident-clientele while keeping in mind the welfare of the
community. In so doing, team members consider the input of the referring agency or
person (e.g., police department, Protective Services, parents or court staff) as well as the
nature of the offense and the emotional and physical state of the client•at the time of
admission.
ADDITIONAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES: Torent the youth and family to the facility,
to assist them toward understanding the court p ocess and, if necessary, to prepare the
youth for future out-of-home placement.
To asses the needs for the resident to make desired behavioral changes, identifying same
for the resident and then guiding and monitoring the resident in terms of achieving
behavioral changes.
To provide feedback to the referring agency as to the resident's adjustment, progress and
unmet needs as they relate to further casework/treatment planning.
ul SECURE DETENTION SERVICES: As an al emative to jail for males and females,
residing in two secure (i.e., locked) units, who ar awaiting court process or placement in
a Children's Village treatment program or with ott er agencies, and have been deemed to
be a risk to community and/or sett Receive shot -term services including emotional and
's Village Overview
2 -
physical health assessment and treatment and crisis intervention. Length of stay: 30 days,
or less, but may exceed due to court process, or problematic behaviors.
SHELTER CARE/TRANSITIONAL SERVICES: For children, ages birth to 18, temporarily
removed from their own homes for reasons of parental neglect, dependency or who have
been involved with court for home or school difficulties. May be awaiting reunification with
family, foster care, placement with other agencies or placement in Village residential
treatment program. Children reside in open (i.e4, non-secure) living units and receive
short-term treatment services. Length of stay: 30 days, or less; but, may exceed due to
court process.
RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT SERVICES
i PURPOSE: To provide comprehensive treatment Services n a residential setting to youths
who have been identified as being in need of out-of-home placement. Essential to this
service delivery is the partnership involvement &Parents and guardians and the Family
Court with the facility staff in the ongoing treatment process. Additionally, protection for
the community is addressed via the continuum ofsecurity levels.
GOALS: To provide a structured treatment milieu for dysfunctional youngsters that will
facilitate and promote psychological growth via means of internalizing emotional controls,
the enhancement of self-esteem, an increased sense of responsibility and a heightened
awareness of the rights of others. Recognizing that ultimate achievement of this goal is
a continuous process that will extend beyond the client's stay in the Village, the main
objective is to provide the degree and intensity of Services for the resident and family that
would enable the youth to move from the facility to a less-restrictive setting in the least
amount of time necessary to achieve the identified treatment goals.
RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PROGRAM: Provides correctional/ rehabilitative services
to adjudicated youths, ages 12 to 18 years, who have been placed by dispositional orders
of the Family Court or by referral from the Familypdependence Agency. Youths reside
in either open (i.e., non-secure) living units or a Secure (i.e., maximum security) setting
depending upon the severity of their delinquency and dysfunctional behavior.
The Residential Treatment Services program is behaviorally-based, utilizing a therapeutic-
milieu approach to daily living. Standard services nclude individual counseling and group
therapy with individualized service plans, including aftercare. Specialized services include
individual psychotherapy, psychiatric care, family therapy and employment training.
Length of stay is open-ended, based upon individualized needs and the progress made
by youth and family toward achieving those objectives.
The Residential Treatment Services program serves as a lower-cost alternative to youths
having to be committed to the state system of care.
02-98
Resolution #99217 August 19, 1999
The Chairperson referred the resolutidn to the Personnel Committee and the
Finance Committee. There were no objections.
FISCAL NOTE (M.R. #99217) September 9, 1999
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: CIRCUIT COURT-FAMILY DIVISION - OAKLAND COUNTY CHILD CARE FUND BUDGET
1999-2000
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed
the above referenced resolution and finds:
1. Under the provisions of Act 280 of the Public Acts of 1975, Oakland
County is required to develop and submit a plan and budget for
funding foster care services to the Child and Family Services Office
of the Juvenile Justice, Family Independence Agency.
2. The Circuit Court - Family Division and Oakland County Family
Independence Agency has developed foster care services budget for
the period covering October 1, 1999 through September 30, 2000.
3. The figures provided are estimates based on current available data
and may not reflect the eventual adopted budget and/or expenditures
for the program.
4. The application reflects $21,780,166 in gross expenditures and
$3,660,500 in offsetting revenues, with the net expenditure
estimated to be $18,119,666 an increase of $888,052 over the FY 1999
net expenditure.
5. Should the state approve this budget, and should they continue to
reimburse the County for 50% of the budgeted cost, Oakland County
will receive $9,059,833 in Child Care Fund reimbursement.
FINANCE COMMITTEE
/aiAcfr
FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Millard absent.
L Brooks P rson: County Executive EIKE Date
William Caddell, County Clerk
In
Resolution #99217 September 9, 1999
Moved by Millard supported by Amos the Personnel Committee Report be
accepted.
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the report was accepted.
Moved by Millard supported by Amos the resolution be adopted.
AYES: Taub, Amos, Appel, Causey-Mitchell, Colasanti, Coleman, Devine,
Dingeldey, Douglas, Galloway, Garfield, Gregory, Jensen, Law, McCulloch,
McPherson, Melton, Millard, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Patterson, Schmid, Sever,
Suarez. (25)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
EB • :07,0HE FOR!
V/ 3 in
I HEREB HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners on September 9, 1999 with the original
record thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this dayof September, 1999.