HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions - 2000.03.09 - 26121MARCH 9, 2000
MISCELLANEOUS RESOLUTION # 0 0 0 4 7
BY: Planning and Building Committee, Charles E. Palmer, Chairperson
DRAIN COMMISSIONER -ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT PROJECTS GRANT;
$408,000 GRANT APPLICATION/ACCEPTANCE
To the Oakland county board of commissioners
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
WHEREAS, the Drain Commissioner proposes to implement the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System General Wastewater Discharge Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Separate
Storm Water Drainage Systems issued by the State of Michigan; and
WHEREAS, the County Of Wayne through the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration
Project has offered technical assistance and federal grants to government entities for addressing and
improving the water quality and recreational use of the Rouge River; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the grant is to enable the county and local units of government within
the Rouge River and other watershed to evaluate alternative approaches for controlling sources of water
pollution; and
WHEREAS, illicit discharge elimination, public education and sub-watershed management
planning are considered examples of the types of activities included in the Storm Water General Permit
which will assist in restoring the water quality of the Rouge River and other river systems within Oakland
County; and
WHEREAS, Oakland County Drain Commissioner has applied for and awarded $408,000 of
federal grant reimbursement from the County of Wayne; and
WHEREAS, the total project cost is $812,337, of which $404,337 is Oakland County matching
funds; and,
WHEREAS, the required County match will be charged to the maintenance funds from the
respective county drains, and will be partially reimbursed by local municipalities; and
WHEREAS, no additional county personnel are required, and all grant funds will go towards illicit
discharge elimination, public education and sub-watershed management planning; and
WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") has established Grant
conditions and regulations that require the County to act as the responsible party with respect to the grant,
including those provisions described within 40 C.F.R. Part 31; and
WHEREAS, the USEPA will supervise the grant and grant conditions in order that the grant be
used in accordance with the requirements of the law; and
WHEREAS, acceptance of this reimbursement grant does not obligate the County to any future
commitment; and
WHEREAS, the grant agreement has been approved through the County Executive's Contract
Review Process.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Oakland County Board of Commissioners
approves the application and accepts reimbursement in the amount of $408,000 for the illicit discharge
elimination, public education and sub-watershed management planning activities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Drain Commissioner and the Chairperson of the Board
of Commissioners are authorized to sign the grant agreement and to approve grant modification and
extensions, within fifteen (15) percent of the original award, consistent with the grant agreement approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Interlocal Agreements be entered into between the Drain
Commissioner and the local communities prior to any work being done.
Chairperson, on behalf of the Planning and Building committee, I move the adoption of the
foregoing resolution.
PLANNING AND BUILDING COMMITTEE
Planning and Building Committee:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call
Vote with Palmer absent.
Final Other * Extension
RISK MANAGEMENT AND SAFETY:
Approved Disapproved * Modify * Date: Signature
Modify * Date: :fryclo Signature:
2-e90 .
Modify * Date: 2--- 8-2 Signatu
Viztt
CONTRACT/PROGRAM REVIEW REQUEST
Date: January 20, 2000
To: Joseph Colaianne, Corporation Counsel
From: William E. Klockow, Deputy & Manager, Drain Engineering & Construction Division
Title/Subject: Drain Commissioner - On-Site Sewage Disposal Management Projects Grant
File # Department:
Contact Person: Philip Sanzica, P.E. Telephone #: (248) 858-1031
STATUS: (Check appropriate box)
Initial 7 Revision #
* If "other" is checked, please explain:
Date: Is Board Resolution required? No x Yes — Resolution #
PERSONNEL DEPT:
CZ Approved , Disapproved * Modify * Date: 3/2/0C
MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET:
It Approved , Disapproved *
CORPORATION COUNSEL:
t/1 Approved Disapproved *
CONTRACT/PROGRAM SYNOPSIS:
Apply and accept $408,000.00 in grant cost reimbursement funds to enable the County to evaluate
alternative approaches for controlling illicit discharge pollution, public education and sub-watershed
management planning.
* When "Disapproved" is noted or "Modify" is requested, attach explanation.
Risk Management & Safety — Revised 2/98
INTER
OFFICE MEMO
To: George W. Kuhn, Drain Commissioner
James Porter, P.E., Chief Deputy Drain Commissioner
William E. Klockow, P.E. Deputy & Manager, Engineering & Construction
From: Joseph W. Colaianne, Assistant Corporation Couns
File: 2000-0060
Date: 02/09/00
Re: Inter-Agency Agreement for RPO Grant for Onsite Sewage Disposal management
Projects Grant
You have contacted this Department pursuant to the County's policy regarding
Contract/Program Review with respect to the above referenced matter. Please be
advised that I have reviewed and approved of the proposed IAA. The IAA appears to
contain the same provisions that I had modified with the approval of Wayne County's
Corporation Counsel with respect to the IAA grant received for the Septage
Unloading Facility.
Nonetheless, I have three concerns that should be resolved with respect to the
acceptance of this grant. First, Risk Management & Safety should be consulted with
respect to any potential risks in carrying out the activities required under this grant
and if necessary obtain insurance coverage for these potential risks.
Second, the IAA references activities that the OCDC will be undertaking on behalf of
certain communities located within the Rouge Watershed. See "Attachment A, page
3" of the IAA. Unless there is an inter-local agreement between the County and the
respective communities, it is my opinion that you do not have the legal authority to
assign county personnel to perform functions on behalf of these communities. This
requires approval via a resolution from the BOC, as well as resolutions from the
municipality. Without a resolution from the BOC and resolutions from the
municipalities authorizing the approval of an interlocal agreement for the services
requested, it is possible that the Drain Commissioner, and his employees may lose
the protections afforded by the governmental immunity statute and/or county
indemnification for officials and employees, in the event of personal or property
damage.
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY / CLIENT COMMUNICATION
Finally, as with the IAA for the Septage Unloading Facility, this proposed IAA has
certain "Fare Share" requirements provided in Article VI, paragraph 6.4 of the IAA. If
any of the grant funds are to be used to engage a contractor/subcontractor, the
recipient of the funds [i.e. Oakland County] must ensure to the fullest extent possible
that a certain percentage for equipment, supplies and construction and services be
made available to organizations owned or controlled by women and/or socially and
economically disadvantage individuals and historically black colleges and
universities. These percentages are reflected in Article VI, paragraph 6.4, of the IAA
and the attachments thereto. According to Wayne County's Department of
Corporation Counsel, these percentages must be complied with in the bid selection
process of contractors/subcontractors.
Should you have any questions, please call.
Cc: Phillip Sanzica, P.E., Asst. Chief Engineer, OCDC
• Page 2
ROUGE RIVER STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
ROUGE RIVER ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT PROJECTS
GRANT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF WAYNE AND THE COUNTY OF OAKLAND
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this . day of
between the County of Wayne, Michigan, a body corporate and Charter County ("County") and the
County of Oakland, a body corporate pursuant to 1973 PA 139, as amended, by and through its
Drain Commissioner (hereinafter referred to as "Entity").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the County is the recipient of and is responsible for the administration of,
certain federal grant funds referred to as the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration
Project Grant ("Grant").
WHEREAS, the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") has
established Grant conditions and regulations that require the County to act as the responsible party
with respect to the Grant, including those provisions described within 40 C.F.R. Part 31.
WHEREAS, the USEPA will supervise the Grant and Grant conditions in order that the
Grant be used in accordance with the requirements of the law.
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to follow certain administrative procedures and
cooperate on the various tasks to be undertaken in order for the County to comply with the Grant's
requirements and objectives.
WHEREAS, the Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project ("Rouge
Project") is a comprehensive watershed-wide program addressing wet weather pollution problems
ranging from controlling combined sewer overflows ("CSO") to storm water runoff in the Rouge
River.
WHEREAS, one of the purposes of the Grant is to enable the County and local units of
Government within the Rouge River Watershed to evaluate alternative approaches for controlling
sources of water pollution.
WHEREAS, implementing the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
General Wastewater Discharge Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Separa:e Storm Water
Drainage Systems (Permit No. MIG610000) ("Storm Water General Permit") issued by The
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality ("MDEQ") for the local unit will further the Grant's
goal to improve water quality and recreational use of the Rouge River.
WHEREAS, illicit discharge elimination, public education and subwatershed management
planning are considered examples of the types of activities included the Storm Water General Permit
which will assist in restoring the water quality of the Rouge River.
WHEREAS, the Storm Water General Permit .4ctivities set forth in this Agreement would
further the goals of the Grant.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS
CONTAINED HEREIN, the parties hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
SCOPE OF PROJECT
1.1 The County will provide a portion of the Grant to Entity to enable the Entity to do the
activities described in Attachment "A"
1.2 The budget presented in Attachment "A" along with the scope of work in Attachment "A"
specify the performance of the work as anticipated at the time the contract is signed.
1.3 The Entity agrees to submit a Final Project Summary Report at the project end to assist the
County in the grant close-out process. The Final Project Summary Report should generally be 4-10
pages in length and should include:
A. A summarized clear description of the project. In addition to the project description,
the report should include the following.: project objectives; major elements of the
project; project highlights; project products completed (project products are listed
in Attachment "A"); and project highlights.
Comments on how the completion of this project benefited or is projected to
improve the Rouge River. •
C. A written set of recommendations to other local governments and agencies that
evaluates the benefits and cost effectiveness of the project. The evaluation should
consider the total project cost. The recommendations should also summarize how
the project was evaluated and the evaluation results of the effectiveness of the
project.
Comments on how the results of this project are transferable to other communities
or agencies.
E. List of all task products completed. The list should include the official name of the
products
ARTICLE H
SCHEDULE OF WORK
The Time Frame for the project milestones completion is contained in Attachment "A". 2.1
2
ARTICLE IV
CONTRACT ADMLNISTRATION AND PAYMENT
ARTICLE III
FINANCIAL PROVISIONS AND BUDGET
31 The detailed budget is contained in Attachment "A" and will be considered an approximation
based on the best information available at the time of this Agreement. The internal distribution of
the monies allocated among project elements may be modified by the Entity up to a total cumulative
transfer among direct cost categories not to exceed 10% of the total budget without written
approval by the County. Other modifications to the budget will be only upon written Agreement
between the County and the Entity.
3.2 The County will provide from the Grant 50.22 percent of approved, allowed, and eligible
costs for activities outlined in Attachment "A". The total amount to be reimbursed to the Entity
shall not exceed $408,000. The Entity shall provide a minimum matching of costs of $404,337 or
49.78 percent of approved costs, which may be satisfied by demonstrating either cash or in-kind
services from non-federal sources.
3.3 The County will hold the final 10 percent of the total federal fund allowable to the Entity
until the completion of the project by the Entity as ideitified in Attachment "A''. Upon comple6on
of all the tasks by the Entity, the approval of the Entity task products by the County, and the
approval of the Entity submittal of the documentation of the final project cost by the County, the
remaining 10 percent of the federal funds will be reimbursed to the Entity.
3.4 BUDGET
The budget for this project is listed in Attachment "A".
3.3.1 The total budget will be sub-categorized as follows:
A. Personnel expenses.
B. Fringe benefits.
C. Travel costs.
D. Equipment costs.
E. Supply costs.
F. Construction costs.
G. Other necessary costs (specifying nature of necessity and cost).
H. Direct charges from others (a:tach copy of invoice).
I. Indirect costs (specifying nature of necessity and cost).
J. Total amount requested.
4.1 This Agreement will be administered on a cost reimbursement basis. The Entity shall sz:brnit
3
uur _
to the County project status reports and invoices on standard forms provided by the County.
4.2 All reports and invoices shall be submitted at least quarterly, no more than forty (40) days
after each quarter end date. Reimbursements shall not be allowed without a status report
submission.
4.3 Invoices must clearly identify:
A. Total program outlays to the date of the invoice.
B. The non-federal share of amount expended.
C. The federal share of amount expended.
D. The federal payments previously received.
E.The reimbursements requested for the billing. period.
F. Project work element detail.
G. Project direct costs and outside services.
H. Time sheets for hourly employees and labor distribution sheets for salaried
employees.
I. Documentation of all contractor COM.
4.5 The invoices must be certified for completeness and correctness by an appropriate Entity
official.
4.6 All invoices will be paid by the County within thirty (30) days of receipt of funds from the
USEPA.
4.7 The Entity will provide documentation to the County that demonstrates compliance with
federal and state regulations before payments will be processed. The Entity will prepare all cost
estimates for implementation of the planned activities, including a breakdown of eligible and
ineligible cost items, with respect to grant funding. These cost estimates will be provided in a
format to be established by the County.
4.8 The Entity will exercise the necessary contract oversight and administration of any
subcontracts. These duties include, but are not limited to construction inspection and negotiating
and executing change orders (where construction is to occur), monitoring project progress,
responding to subcontractor or citizen complaints, coordinating between different subcontracts, and
overseeing, subcontractor's compliance with the approved project plans and specifications. These
activities are to be done in accordance with procedures established by the Grant and by 40 C.F.R.
31.1, et seq.
4.9 All reports, invoices, and work products required under this contract will be transmitted to
A the Director of Watershed Management Division, Department of Environment, Wayne County, care
of Mr. Razik Alsaigh, Roue Program Office, 220 Bagley Suite 920, Det -oit Michigan 48226.
ARTICLE V
AUDIT AND ACCESS TO RECORDS
5. 1 The Entity will maintain and retain financial records and supporting documentation in
accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures and in accordance with the requirements
of federal and state regulations. •
5.2 The Entity will cooperate with and assist the County with respect to federal or state audit
review related to the use of Grant funds. This cooperation shall include preservation of the
necessary documentation and access to the records until federal and/or state audit resolution
processes have been completed and notification of records disposal has been received by the
County. The Entity will cooperate with the County with respect to evaluating audit findings of this
Agreement_ _
5.3 The Entity will be responsible for the reimbursement of any Rinds required to be returned
to the USEPA due to Entity actions or omissions, as determined by audit findings and hold the
County harmless from any repayment therefrom.
ARTICLE VI -
GENERAL PROVISIONS
6. 1 This Agreement is expected to be funded in part with funds from the USEPA_ The Entity
will not enter into any agreements with either the United States or any of its departments, agencies,
or employees which are or will be a party to this Azreement or any lower tier subagreement for
monies related to this specific project. This Agreement is subject to regulations contained in 40
C.F.R. Part 31 in effect on the date of the assistance award for this project.
6.2 The Entity understands that the County has no funds other than the Grant Rinds ZG pay for
the project costs. All costs other than the Grant funds associated with the activities which are the
subject matter of this Agreement will be the responsibility of the Entity.
6.3 The Entity will cooperate with the County to ensure timely completion of the tasks
undertaken as part of the project. Cooperation includes, but is not limited to sharing information
and records, participation in applicable committees, and assisting in development and evaluation of
water quality improvement alternatives.
6.4 The Entity warrants that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31 and, as
applicable, all provisions contained in the Grant. In the event there are any conflicts between the
provisions of this Agreement and the terms of the Grant, the Grant terms will prevail. The Grant
document and the terms and conditions of the Grant are included here in Attachment "B". The June
16, 1998 correction letter of the uant fair share goals from EPA is also included here in Attachment
"B". The fair share goals for the Grant as identified in that letter are as follows:
3
Construction 20% Minority Business Enterprise (MBE) 10% Woman Business Enterprise (WBE)
Services 20%MBE 10%WBE
Equipment 8%MBE 4%WBE
Supplies 8%MB E 4% WB E
6.5 The Entity is responsible for securing all necessary permits from regulatory agencies and is
responsible for obtaining any professional services necessary for the Project Activities. The Entity
will act at all times in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations, and will secure any
permits and negotiate the terms of agreements in accordance with those requirements.
6.6 If the Entity secures any interest in lands, including easements, these acquisitions will be in
accordance with applicable federal law and regulations including 49 C.F.R., Part 24 and state
statutes related to the taking of interests in land.
6.7 With respect to construction projects, the Endo, is responsible for conducting post project
evaluation and certifying that any construction meets the approved design criteria. These
certifications will be submitted to Wayne County and the USEPA and MDEQ, where appropriate,
in accordance with the Grant requirements and applicable regula tions. If the project does not meet
the design criteria, the Entity will be responsible for taking the necessary corrective measures. -
6.8 The ownership of any facilities constructed under this Agreement shall remain with the
Entity. The Entity agrees to operate and maintain the facility consistent with the Grant project goals
and in accordance with the requirements of the applicable federal and state statutes and regulations,
Grant conditions, and local ordinances.
6.9 The Entity warrants that it will comply with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 31.32 relating
to any equipment including computers and peripheral computer equipment purchased as part of this
grant assistance project
6.10 Any amendment to this agreement must be in writing, and signed and acknowledged by a
duly authorized representative of each party.
ARTICLE VII
WAIVER OF BREACH
7.1 No failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any term of this Agreement or
to exercise any term after a breach, constitutes a waiver of any breach of the term. No waiver of
any breach affects or alters this Agreement, b every term of this Agreement remains effective with
respect to any other existing or subsequent breach.
6
ARTICLE VIII
TERMINATION
8.1 This Agreement will terminate after the final audit and final resolution of any issues related
thereto as described within 40 C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart D.
3.2 This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by the County for its
convenience. The Entity must be given: (1) not less than thirty (30) calendar days written notice
of intent to terminate; and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the County prior to termination.
This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in 'writing by the Entity for its convenience.
The County must be given: (1) not less than thirty (30) calendar days written notice of intent to
terminate; and(2) an opportunity for consultation with the Entity prior to termination.
8.3 If termination for convenience is effected by the County or the Entity, an equitable
adjustment in the Agreement price will be made. The equitable adjustment for any termination will
provide for payment to the Entity for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to termination.
Equitable adjustment also will include termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by the Entity
and approved by the County, relating to -personnel hired specifically for activities related to this
Agreement, provided such costs are eligible and allowable under the terms of the Grant.
8.4 Upon receipt of a termination notice pursuant paragraphs 8.2 or 8.3, above, the Entity will:
(1) promptly discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver
or otherwise make available to the County all data, drawings, specifications. reports, estimates,
summaries, and such other information and materials as may be accumulated by the Entity in
performing this Agreement, whether completed or in process.
8 5 Upon termination pursuant to paragraphs 8.2 or 3.3. above, the Count! may take over the
work and prosecute the same to completion by Agreement with another party or otherwise.
3.6 All notices of termination will be sent certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt
requested.
ARTICLE a
LIABILITY
9.1 All liability, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judgments arising out
of activities of the Entity will be the sole responsibility of the Entity and not the responsibility of
the County. Nothing herein will be construed as a wavier of any governmental immunity by the
Entity, its agencies, or employees have as provided by statute or modified by court decisions.
9.2 All liability, loss, or damage as a result of claims, demands, costs, or judcznents arising out
of activities of the County will be the sole responsibility of the County and not the responsibility of
7
the Entity. Nothing herein will be construed as a wavier of any governmental immunity by the
County, its agencies, or employees have as provided by statute or modified by court decisions.
ARTICLE X
DIDEMNIFICATION
10.1 To the extent as permissible under Michigan law, the Entity will indemnify, defend, and save
harmless the County. its officers, boards, employees, and agents from and against any and all
liabilities, obligations, damages, penalties, claims, costs, charges, and expenses (including, but not
limited to fees and expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses, and other consultants) which may be
imposed upon, incurred by, or asserted against the County, its boards, officers, employees, and
agents, by reason of any act or omission of the Entity, its personnel, employees, agents, or
subcontractocs, in the performance of this Agreement.
10.2 To the extent as permissible under Michigan law, the County will indemnify, -defend, and
save harmless the Entity, its officers, boards, employees, and agents from and against any and all
liabilities, obligations, damages, penalties, claims, costs, charges, and expenses (including, but not
limited to fees and expenses of attorneys, expert witnesses, and other consultants) which may be
imposed upon, incurred by, or asserted against the Entity, its boards, officers; employees, and
agents, by reason of any act or omission of the County, its personnel, employees, agents, or
subcontractors, in the performance of this Agreement.
10.3 The provisions of Article X shall survive the expiration or any termination of this Agreement
for a period of three (3) years.
10.4 Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, no provision in this Azeement is
intended, nor shall any such provision be construed, as either waiving or constituting a waiver of
any public or governmental immunity afforded to the County or Entity. and/or Counr!s or Entity's
agents, employees, representatives as provided by applicable statutes and/or court decisions.
ARTICLE XI
LNSURA,.NCE
11.1 Unless the Enity is self-insured, the Entity shall purchase and, to the extent permissible by
law, have the County, its officers, commission, boards, and employees named as additional parties
insured under the policy or policies of insurance and maintain such insurance so as to protect the
County from claims set forth below which may arise out of or result from the project services,
whether such services be by the Entity, by any subcontractor, or by anyone directly or indirectly
employed by the Entity, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable:
11.2 Throughout all phases of the project and for a period of three (3) years after final completion
and acceptance by the County of the project services, the Entity shall keep in force. at its sole cost
and expense, a professional liability insurance policy for claims for damages arising out of an error,
8
omission, or negligent act in the performance of professional services, with limits of One Million
($1,000,000) dollars per claim and One Million ($1,000,000) dollars in the aggregate for each
twelve (12) month period. The Entity agrees that the policy may not be substantially modified or
canceled without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the County and shall promptly notify the
County of any failure to renew such policy as necessary prior to final completion of the Project.
11.3 Throughout all phases of the project and for a period of three (3) years after inal completion
and acceptance by the County of the project services, the Entity shall keep in force, at its sole cost
and expense, with insurance companies authorized to do business in the State cf Michigan, the
following insurance coverages:
11.3.1 Workers' Compensation which meets Michigan's statutory requirements, or other
similar employee benefit act of any other state applicable to an employee.
11.3.2 Employers' Liability Insurance, in conjunction with Worktrs' Compensation
Insurance for claims for damages because of bodily injur-:-. occupational sickness or disease, or death
of an employee when Workers' Compensation may not be an exclusive remedy. Such insurance
shall be subject to limits of liability of not less than Five Hundred Thousand $50C.00) dollars for
each incident.
11.3.3 General Liability Insurance for claims for damages because of bodily injury or death of
any person, other than the Entity's employees, or damage to tangible property of others, including
loss of use resulting therefrom. Such insurance shall be subject to bodily injury limits of not less
than $500,000 per occurrence and $ 1,000,000 annual aggregate and property damage limits of not
less than $500,000 per occurrence or combined bodily injury,properry damage limits of not less than
$750,000 per occurrence and $ 1,000,000 annual aggregate
11.3.4 Contractual Liability Insurance for claims for damages that may arise from the Entity
contract under Article X concerning indemnification for errors, omissions, or negligent acts in the
course of the professional service or other provision within this Agreement, to the extent that such
kinds of contractual liability are insurable in connection with, and subject to, limits of liability not
less than for the professional liability insurance and general liability insurance set forth in
subparagaphs 11.2 and 11.3.3, above.
11.3.5 Comprehensive Automobile Liability coverage, including coverage for a owned, hired,
and non-owned vehicles with coverage of One Million (51.000,000) dollars per occurrence for
bodily injury and property damage combined.
11.3.6 Comprehensive Automobile Insurance required by law for claims arising from
ownership, maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle owned or non-owned. County, or for-hire
vehicles, with $ 1,000,000 single limit of liability.
9
11.4 Certificates of insurance or self-insurance shall be provided to the County prior to
commencing Project Services under this Agreement. Said certificates shall contain a provision that
coverage afforded shall not be canceled, materially modified, or allowed to expire unless the
insurance carrier has given at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the County.
11.5 The County and the Entity waive all rights against each other and their consultants, agents,
and employees for damages covered by any property casualty insurance during the Project Services,
but only to the ex-tent covered by such insurance.
11.6 Compliance by the Entity with the requirements of this Article as to carrying insurance and
furnishing proof thereof to the County, shall not relieve the Entity of its liabilities and obligations
under this Agreement.
11.7 The provisions of this Article shall survive the expiration of any termination of this
Agreement for a period of three (3) years.
ARTICLE XII
NON-DISCRIMINATION
12.1 In accordance with the United States Constitution and all federal legislation and regulations
governing fair employment practices and equal employment opportunity, the Entity shall comply
with:
A. Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352, 73 Stat. 252) and
the United States Department of Justice regulations (28 C.F.R. Part 52) issued
pursuant to Titles VI and VII;
B. Environmental Protection Agency regulations (40 C.F.R., Parts 7 and 12);
C. The Age Discrimination Act of 1985 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 6101-07);
D. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. Sec. 794);
E. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et. seq.) and its
associated regulations; and
F. The Michigan Constitution and all state laws and regulations governing fair
employment practices and equal employment opportunity, including but not limited
to the Michigan Civil Rights Act of 1976 (P.A. 453) and the Michigan Handicappers
Civil Rights Act (P.A. 220 of 1976), and the Wayne County Fair Employment
Practice Resolution of April 14, 1970.
10
12.2 The Entity agrees that it will not discriminated against any person, employee, consultant or
applicant for employment with respect to his or her hire, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of
employment because of his or her religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight,
marital status, or a handicap that is unrelated to the individual's ability to perform tasks particular
to a job or position.
12.3 The Entity further agrees that it will require each contractor performing services under this
Agreement to agree to the provisions of this Article.
12.4 The Entity is responsible for complying with all federal and state laws and regulations
regarding competitive bidding.
ARTICLE XIII
ASSIGNABILITY
13 1 This Agreement will be binding upon and enure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their
respective heirs and assigns.
13.2 Neither of the parties hereto may assign this Agreement without the prior written consent
of the other.
ARTICLE XIV
VALIDITY
14.1 If any provision of this Agreement or the application to any person or circumstance is, to
any extent, judicially determined to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Agreement,
or the application of the provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is
invaid or unenforceable, is not affected and is enforceable, provided the invalid provision does not
substantially alter the contract or make execution impractical.
ARTICLE XV
ENTIRE AGREEMENT
15.1 This document, including any attachments, contains the entire agreement between the
parties.
15.2 Neither party has made any representations except those expressly se: forth herein.
15.3 No rights or remedies are or will be acquired, by either party by implication or otherwise
unless set forth herein.
11
ARTICLE XVI
PATENTS, COPYRIGHTS, AND RIGHTS LN DATA
16 1 If this Agreement involves research, developmental, experimental, or demonstration work
and any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of, or imder this Agreement the
Entity and the County shall retain joint authority to patent or license.
16.2 The parties agree that any plans, drawings, specifications, computer programs, technical
reports, operating manuals, and other work submitted, or which are specified to be delivered under
this Agreement, or which are developed or produced and paid for under this Agreement are subject
to the rights of both parties and both parties shall retain an irrevocable license to reproduce, publish
and use in whole or in part and to authorize others to do so
16.3 This Agreement is funded in part by the USEPA and is therefore subject to the reporting and
rights provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 30, Subpart D including Appendix B and Appendix C.
16.4 This clause shall be included in all subcontracts.
ARTICLE XVII
YEAR 2000 COMPLLOCE
17.1 The following, terms, when used in this Article, are understood by the parties to be defined
as in subparagraphs (a) through (f) of this Paragraph.
(a) Certification:
the act of providing, written testimony of qualification of a process and or product as
pertains to Year 2000 Compliance, including identification and documentation of all formats
of Date Processing, and Date Exchange, which formats may include International Standards
Organization (ISO) standards and other, generally accepted, documented methods of date
representation. •
(b) Date Exchange:
the interchange of date data between two or more systems or system elements.
(c) Date Processing:
the handling of date data within a system or system element.
(d) Information Products:
products and / or services involving or including, but not limited to hardware, software,
firmware, rniddleware and embedded systems including but not limited to Electronic Data
Interface (EDT) and other interfaces for the exchange of data, whether acting, alone or
combined as a system.
(e) Year 2000 Compliant:
the quality of a system to provide all of the following functions:
(i) flawless handling of date information. via US standa:ds, before, during., and
after January 1, 2000, including but not limited to accepting date input.
providing date output, executing , single-century formulas, executing mufti-
12
century formulas and performing calculations on any and all dates and / or
portions thereof, specifically including but not limited to dates in the year
1999 and all subsequent years;
(ii) accurate operation, without interruption, before, during, and after January
1, 2000, without any change in operations associated with the advent of the
new century, including but not limited to leap-year calculations;
(iii) proper response to two-digit year-date input such that a system or system
element resolves any ambiganty regarding century in a disclosed, defined and
predetermined manner;
(iv) storage and output of all date information in ways that are unambigalous as
to century; and
(v) interaction with other systems or system elements whereby date data is
exchanged accurately, without exception, and whereby no data is corrupted
by the interaction, whether or not the data be date-related, and whereby the
co-operation does not otherwise adversely affect the performance of any
system, system element or system component.
(f) Non-Year 2000 Compliant:
any system which is not Year 2000 Compliant.
17.2 Notwithstanding any provision elsewhere contained in this Aueement, the Entity expressly
represents and warrants that all Information Products supplied to the County under this Agreement
are fully Year 2000 Compliant according to the definitions and standards herein contained.
17 :3 The Entity expressly warrants that all Information Products which the Entity will acquire
under this Agreement are Year 2000 Compliant such that any other Information Products, when
used in combination with the Information Products which the Entity will acquire hereunder, will
properly execute all Date Exchange and Date Processing functions, whether the other Information
Products were written, manufactured, produced or performed by the Entity or by a third party.
17.4 The Entity agrees that it shall accomplish and document all modifications necessary to
ensure that all Information Products previously provided or to be provided or maintained by the
Entity in the future under this Agreement are or will be Year 2000 Compliant, as herein defined.
17.5 The Entity warrants that if it uses InformaEon Products to perform any service under this
Agreement, all such Information Products will be Year 2000 Compliant as defined herein. E in the
course of performing its obligations under this Aga-eement. the Entity uses specific Information
Products in collaboration with one another such that a system is created, then the warranty c.,f this
Paragraph shall apply to the system as well as to the specific Information Products.
17.6 The Entity warrants that Wit provides an electronic data interface or any other interfaces to
be used in the exchange of data between the County and the Entity for the purpose of moni:ring,
updating, billing, ordering, or similar purposes, such interfaces are fully Year 2000 Compliant.
13
17.7 The Entity agrees that upon any request by the County, the Entity will perform
comprehensive testing necessary to demonstrate that all Information Products provided or used
under this Agreement are Year 2000 Compliant, and the Entity will furnish the County with any
requested Certification, as herein defined, along with supporting documentation. The Entity agrees
that the County may request and receive other forms of verification that Information Products are
Year 2000 Compliant, including, but not limited to, witness testing, and audit testing. Nothing in
this Paragraph shall be construed, interpreted or understood to in any way alter, affect or modify
the meanings or significance of any of the other provisions contained herein.
17.8 The Entity agrees that it will promptly remedy any breach of any warranty contained in the
foregoing Paragraphs (2) through (7) at no additional charge to the County. Remedy of a breach
may be through the correction, upgrade or replacement of any Non-Year 2000 Compliant
Information Products provided or used by the Entity under this Agreement with functionally
equivalent Information Products which are Year 2000 Compliant. I4 arler its best efforts, the Entity
is unable to accomplish the correction or replacement of the Non-Year 2000 Compliant Information
Products within 45 days of notification by the County of the failure of the Information Products to
attain Year 2000 Compliance the Entity agrees that it will refund to the County any amounts paid
by the County for the Information Products provided or used, and unexceptionally indemnify and
hold the County harmless from and against any and -all liability, loss or eXpens, including,
reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in connection with Non-Year 2000 Compliant Information
Products. Nothing, in this Paragraph 17-8 shall be construed to limit any rights or remedies
otherwise available under this Agreement with respect to defects other than Year 2000 Non-
Compliance.
17.9 This Agreement supersedes all previous agreements between the Entity and the County
which regard Year 2000 Compliance. Except as expressly modified, the terms and conditions of
the original agreements will remain in full force and effect. The foregoing, Year 2000 provisions
constitute the entire accord between the parties as regards Year 2000 Compliance for this
Agreement. These provisions shall survive terinination or expiration of this Agreement.
17.10 Notwithstanding any provision elsewhere contained in this Agreement, the Year 2000
provisions contained in this Article, shall only apply to Information Products supplied to County,
and/or acquired by Entity pursuant to this Agreement.
ARTICLE XVIII
JURISDICTION AND GOVERNING LAW
18.1 This Agreement, and all actions arising from it. must be governed by, subject to. and
construed according to the law of the State of NEchizan.
ARTICLE XIX
EFFECTIVE DATES
19.1 This Agreement becomes effective immediately upon signing by both parties and shall allow
for billing all costs incurred from June 30, 1999. This Agreement, unless extended by mutual
written agreement, expires on May 30, 2001. Should the USEPA require reimbursement by the
County of funds transferred to the Entity for costs incurred prior to this Agreement, the Entity shall
be responsible _for any such reimbursement.
ARTICLE XX
PARTY REPRESENTATIVES
20.1 The County's representative for this Agreement is the Director of Watershed Management
Division, Department of Environment, Wayne County. The Entity representative for this
Agreement is the Oakland County Drain Commissioner. Either parry may assign alternate
representatives upon written notification of the other party.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as
of the date and year first written above.
COUNTY OF WAYNE, MICHIGAN
By:
EDWARD H. McNA.MARA.
Its: Chief Executive Officer
OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN
By:
GEORGE W KURN
Its: Drain Commissioner
By:
Its: Chairman. Board of Commissioners
JOFLN P _MCCULLOCH JOFLN P _MCCULLOCH
15
ATTACHMENT "A"
to
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
between
WAYNE COUNTY AND THE OAKLAND COUNTY DRALN COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE
for
STORM WATER GENERAL PERMIT ACTIVITIES
The Oakland County Drain Commissioner Office (OCDC) was issued Certificate of Coverage No.
NI:G.610042 on September 7, 1999 from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality for
voluntary coverage under the NPDES Storm Water General Permit MIG610000 (General Permit).
The General Permit expires April 1, 2003. Also, several communities in the Main 1-2 and the Middle
1 subwatersheds have received Storm Water General Permits. Under these Certificates of Coverage,
the Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office proposes to perform the following activities with
support from a grant through Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project:
1. Illicit Discharge Elimination Program
Implement those elements described herein as Task Products of the Illicit Discharge Elimination
Program, that support the Illicit Discharge Elimination Plan as submitted with the Main 1-2
subwatershed communities/agencies applications for coverage under the General Permit.
2. Public Education Program
Implement those elements described herein as Task Products of the Public Education Prom -am, that
support the Public Education Plan as submitted with the Main 1-2 and Middle 1 subwatersheds
communities/agencies applications for coverage under the General Permit.
3. Subwatershed Management Planning
Participate in the Main 1 -2 Subwatershed Advisory Group and in development of the Main 1 -2
Subwatershed Management Plan.
TASK DESCRIPTION. SCHEDULE PRODUCTS AND PROGRESS REPORTING
1. Illicit Discharge Elimination Program
Task Description: Implementation of those elements described herein as Task Products of the
Illicit Discharge Elimination Program, that support the Illicit Discharge Elimination Plan
(I:DEP) that is included in the OCDC and Main 1 -2 subwatershed communities General
1
ATTACHMENT "A"
to
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
between
WAYN. E COUNTY AND THE OAKLAND COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE
for
STORM WATER GENERAL PERMIT ACTIVITIES
The Oakland County Drain Commissioner Office (OCDC) was issued Certificate of Coverage No.
MIG610042 on September 7, 1999 from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality for
voluntary coverage under the NPDES Storm Water General Permit NIIG610000 (General Permit).
The General Permit expires April 1, 2003. Also, several communities in the Main 1-2 and the Middle
1 subwatersheds have received Storm Water General Permits. Under these Certificates of Coverage,
the Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office proposes to perform the following activities with
support from a grant through Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project:
1. Illicit Discharge Elimination Program
Implement those elements described herein as Task Products of the Illicit Discharge Elimination
Program, that support the Illicit Discharge Elimination Plan as submitted with the Main 1-2
subwatershed communities/agencies applications for coverage under the General Permit.
2. Public Education Program
Implement those elements described herein as Task Products of the Public Education Program, that
support the Public Education Plan as submitted with the Main 1-2 and Middle 1 subwatersheds
communities/agencies applications for coverage under the General Permit.
3. Subwatershed Management Planning
Participate in the Main 1-2 Subwatershed Advisory Group and in development of the Main 1-2
Subwatershed Management Plan.
TASK DESCRIPTION. SCHEDULE PRODUCTS AND PROGRESS REPORTING
1. Illicit Discharge Elimination Program
Task Description: Implementation of those elements described herein as Task Products of the
Illicit Discharge Elimination Program, that support the Illicit Discharge Elimination Plan
(MEP) that is included in the OCDC and Main 1-2 subwatershed communities General
1
Permit Applications (Applications). A copy of the IDEP from the Oakland County Drain
Commissioner Application is attached to this IAA.
Task Schedule: This task will begin June 30, 1999 and continue until March 31, 2001
Task Progress Reporting: Reports will be sent to Wayne County Rouge Program Office
(RPO)quarterly documenting progress and achievements including copies of reports required
in the Applications. The progress reports will be provided in accordance with guidelines
developed the by the RPO. Reporting of illicit discharge investigations will include the use
of the Illicit Discharge Elimination Tracking and Reporting software application developed
by the RPO.
Task Products: The following will be completed and documentation submitted to the
RPO by March 31, 2001 unless otherwise specified.
The OCDC has an existing Rouge Project sub-grant "Oakland County Illicit Connection
Programs", executed on November 19, 1998. The scope and budget for this project was
revised per OCDC request dated October 19, 1999 and Wayne County approval dated
-November 5, 1999. This grant provided funding for illicit discharge investigation activities
within Oakland County Drains. The following illicit discharge investigation activities will be
performed and documented by the OCDC under the November 19, 1998 grant:
• Complete review of existing documentation and develop prioritized list of illicit
connection detection activities.
• Educate permit inspectors and maintenance employees about the need to find and
eliminate illicit discharges and how to report them if they are found.
• Visually screen storm water outfalls to Oakland County Drains within the Rouge
Watershed.
• Ten percent of outfalls with persistent dry weather discharges will be tested for the
presence of E. Coli.
• Develop prioritized list for follow up and perform additional testing for suspicious
outfalls that had a dry weather flow during the visual screening.
• Visually inspect the storm drainage system upstream of outfall in areas where in
stream water quality problems have been confirmed through sampling and in areas
where complaints have been reported.
• Perform illicit discharge survey at OCDC-owned and operated buildings, yards and
maintenance facilities within the Rouge River Watershed.
• Implement a county-wide complaint system to log water quality-related complaints
and investigate them.
• Maintain list of illicit discharges and correction status of each.
• Develop procedure to coordinate complaint response and follow up.
• Develop Rouge River Drainage map to digitally indicate the ownership of the
drainage courses in the Rouge Watershed in Oakland County .
Under this inter-agency agreement, the Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office will
perform 1DEP activities for one or more of the following communities in the Main 1-2
Subwatershed:
-Auburn Hills -Beverly Hills -Bingham Farms
-Bloomfield Hills -Bloomfield Township -Farmington Hills
-Franklin •Lathrup Village -Pontiac
-Southfield -Southfield Township -West Bloomfield Twp
-Birmingham -Rochester Hills -Troy
-Oak Park
The following activities will be performed by the Oakland County Drain Commissioner's
Office on behalf of the communities listed above. These activities will be funded by the
budget identified in this inter-agency agreement:
• Complete review of existing documentation and develop prioritized list of illicit
connection detection activities.
• Develop complaint form to identify details of complaint, corrective action(s) and date
of corrective action.
• Visually screen all of the storm sewer ottfalls to the Rouge River that are under the
control of each municipality.
• Map the locations of screened storm water outfalls on community storm sewers maps.
• Develop prioritized list for follow up and perform additional testing for outfalls that
had a suspicious dry weather flow during the visual screening.
• Perform follow up to find the source of suspicious discharges through use of visual
inspection and/or testing of discharges within the storm drainage system upstream of
the site of the suspicious discharge. Other options that will be considered to find an
illicit connection or discharge are televising the sewer or dye testing premises in the
proximity of the discharge. •
• If an illicit discharge is suspected, the OCDC shall send letters to the local
municipality alerting them to the problem that is under investigation and to solicit their
assistance in finding the source.
• First year Report (due July 1, 2000) and Final Project Summary Report (referenced
in Article 1.3 of the IAA, due at the end of the project, March 31, 2001). These
reports should summarize:
(1) The status of all task activities indicated above,
(2) The status of the activities performed under the 11/19/98 inter-agency agreement,
(3) The following activities will be performed by municipalities, using funds other than
those identified in this inter-agency agreement:
Review legal basis for correcting illicit discharges and develop revisions, as
needed (All). Prepare ordinance and present to local legislative body, if
necessary; (All)
3
Follow up on overflows of sanitary sewer manholes or cross connections to
storm sewers system, if detected, and develop a plan to solve the problem(s);
(All)
The sanitary sewer system will be reviewed to determine areas of the
community that do not have sanitary sewers available. Cost estimates will be
prepared to determine the feasibility of extending sanitary sewers to those
areas; (All)
Examine files of water and sewer customers to determine if any properties are
not being served by a sanitary sewer (Auburn Hills, Pontiac);
Examine maps to determine precise number and location of storm drainage
structures located in the Rouge Watershed (Auburn Hills);
- Visually inspect each manhole and catch basin twice at different times of the
day (Auburn Hills);
- Develop sanitary sewer master plan (Farmington Hills);
Develop and implement systematic method of identifying storm sewer storm
sewer outfalls as a result of new construction (Farmington Hills);
Develop map of storm sewer systems (Bloomfield Twp.);
- Verify storm sewer catchments and identify sewer ownership (Bloomfield
Twp., Southfield);
Monitor new construction and identify additional storm sewer outfalls
(Bloomfield Twp., Southfield); and
Provide distance of sanitary sewers that have been televised (Bloomfield
Twp., Southfield).*
Any changes to the illicit discharge elimination program and the task products indicated above must
be approved in writing by Wayne County.
2. Public Education Program
Task Description: Implementation of those elements described herein as Task Products of the
Public Education Program, that support the Public Education Plan that is included in the
OCDC Application dated January 26, 1999 as Attachment 7 and the Public Education Plans
for the Middle 1 and Main 1-2 subwatershed communities. A copy of the Public Education
Plan in the OCDC Application is attached to this IAA.
Task Schedule: This task will begin June 30, 1999 and continue until March 31. 2001.
Task Progress Reporting: Reports will be sent to the RPO quarterly documenting progress
and achievements including copies of reports required in the Applications. The progress
reports will be provided in accordance with guidelines developed by the RPO.
4
Task Products: Public Education activities to be implemented under this agreement will be
performed by three agencies: Friends of the Rouge (FOTR), SOCWA and the Oakland
County Drain Commissioner's Office. The Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office will
oversee and report on all activities performed by outside agencies. The following will be
completed and documentation submitted to the RPO by March 31, 2001 unless otherwise
• specified.
The following activities will be performed by the Oakland County Drain Commissioner's
Office for the Main 1-2 subwatershed:
• Design information display table ("Our Actions" display). The display will address
watershed-wide development issues.
• Prepare and distribute slide presentations and fact sheets on watershed management
_ _issues for home owner associations within Oakland County, as requested.
• Perform presentations to home owner associations, upon request.
• Install ten tributary signs at County Road and Rouge River crossings.
• Purchase and distribute 5,000 copies of the Rouge Recreational Guide.
• Provide 500 copies of the Rouge Project public education brochure "Do Your Down
Spouts Lead to the Rouge?" to the Main 1-2 communities.
• Develop - strategy for educating the public about illicit discharge impacts on the
environment in order to promote reporting.
• Provide watershed education to city, township and village personnel in charge of
hotlines.
• Distribute 500 fact sheets on fertilizer and pesticide application to the Main 1-2
communities.
• Distribute 100 packets of educational materials concerning the ultimate point and
potential impacts from storm water pollutants to the Main 1-2 communities.
• Provide storm drain marking materials for ten Main 1-2 subwatershed communities.
• Include a public education component in Rouge watershed drainage improvement
projects controlled by OCDC.'
The following activities will be performed by the Oakland County Drain Commissioner's
Office for the Middle 1 subwatershed:
• Install Rouge tributary signaze at river crossings.
• Prepare videos and display brochures/ flyers regarding. the Rouge Friendly Business
Program.
It is anticipated that an agreement will be made between the OCDC and Friends of the Rouge
for services to be provided to Oakland County communities. An annual plan will be prepared
and submitted to the RPO/Wayne County with regard to the following activities that are
anticipated to be performed by Friends of the Rouge in the Main 1-2 subwatershed:
• Maintain the Rouge Education Project in twenty six Main 1-2 schools in school year
2000-2001.
• Coordinate and promote ten Rouge Rescue/River Day activity sites
5
Coordinate four Watershed Habitat Inventory events
Work with SOCWA and OCDC to identify and implement opportunities to educate
the public on application and disposal of pesticides and fertilizers.
The following activities will be performed by the Friends of the Rouge for the Middle 1
subwatershed: •
• Expand the Rouge Education Project in the Middle 1 subwatershed.
• Perform storm drain marking
It is anticipated that an agreement will be made between Oakland County and SOCWA for
programs to be coordinated for Oakland County communities by SOCWA_ The following
activities are anticipated to be performed by SOCWA in the Main 1-2 subwatershed:
_Co-sponsor three information outreach workshops to present information on _
environmentally-friendly lawn and garden care.
• Work with communities and OCDC to develop a coordinated watershed-wide effort
on waste handling, collection, and disposal of household hazardous waste, sanitary
wastes, yard waste and animal wastes.
• Work with OCDC and FOTR to identify and implement opportunities to educate the
public on application and disposal of pesticides and fertilizers.
The following activities will be performed by the SOCWA for the Middle 1 subwatershed:
• Ecological _gardening class for citizens.
• Storm water public. education outreach at cities and regional events.
The OCDC will prepare a First year Report (due July 1, 2000) and Final Project Summary
Report (referenced in Article 1.3 of the IAA, due at the end of the project, March 31, 2001).
These reports should summarize the status of all task products indicated above, including (at
a minimum):
Copies of all relevant media releases (newspaper, TV, etc.) and other
published materials (workshop materials, slide presentations, fact sheets, etc.)
Summary of activities coordinated with Friends of the Rouge.
Summary of activities coordinated with SOCWA.
Summary of tributary signs posted.
Summary of workshops held and presentations made.
Documentation on efforts to educate the public about illicit discharge impacts
on the environment in order to promote reporting.
Documentation of work with communities and SOCWA to develop a
coordinated watershed-wide effort on wasze handling, collection, and disposal
of household ha72rdous waste, sanitary wastes, yard waste and animal wastes
Documentation of work with SOCWA and FOTR to identify and implement
opportunities to educate the public on application and disposal of pesticides
and fertilizers.
Documentation of effort to include public education component in drainage
improvement projects.
Any changes to the public education program and the task products indicated above must be
approved in writing by Wayne County.
3. Subwatershed Management Planning
Task Description: The Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office will work cooperatively
with other members of the Main 1-2 Subwatershed Advisory Group (SWAG) to prepare a
subwatershed management plan meeting the requirements of the General Permit. The first
of this work will include the development of a Public Participation Process which must be
approyed by the NEDEQ.
Within this overall planning effort, the Oakland County Drain Commission's Office will attend
meetings of the Main 1-2 SWAG and will attend any additional meetings scheduled for the
public participation and subwatershed planning effort. The OCDC will provide information
as requested by the SWAG to assist in development of the Main 1-2, subwatershed
management plan. The OCDC will provide timely review and comment on draft copies of
letters, public brochures, announcements, reports, and municipal resolutions and the Main 1-2
subwatershed management plan as requested by the SWAG.
Task Schedule: This task will begin June 30, 1999 and will end May 30, 2001. The
Subwatershed Management Plan for the Main 1-2 subwatershed is due May 28, 2001. The
Public Participation Process Plan for the Main 1-2 subwatershed is due December 3, 1999.
Task Progress Reporting: Reports will be sent to the RPO quarterly documenting the Oakland
County Drain Commission's Office individual efforts in the planning, work. The Wayne
County/RPO will prepare a monthly progress report on the entire SWAG collective
subwatershed management planning effort of the Main 1-2 SWAG.
Task Products:
• Participation in the Main 1-2 SWAG.
• Subwatershed Management Plan for the Main 1-2 Subwatershed.
• Public Participation Process plan for the Main 1-2 Subwatershed.
7
,LI
BUDGETS. FUNDING AND DOCUMENTATION OF TOTAL COST
Total Project Cost (for Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office) =5812,337
Funding from Rouge Project Federal Grant (for Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office
Activities) =S408,000
Funding from Oakland County Drain Commissioner's Office (for Oakland County Drain
Commissioner's Office Activities) = $404,337
Funding for each task is as follows:
Task Number and Title Total Cost Wayne County Oakland County
_ _ RPO Cost Drain
Commissioner's
Office Project Cost
1. Illicit Discharge
Elimination Program for the
Main 1-2 Subwatershed $420,000 SO $420,000
2. Public Education Program
a. Main 1-2 Subwatershed $296,337 SO S296,337
b. Middle 1 Subwatershed $96,000 SO . S96,000
3. Subwatershed
Management Planning for
Main 1-2 Subwatershed $150,000 S150,000 SO
• Total Project Cost $962,337 S150,000 S812,337
Federal Funding $558,000 S150,000 $408,000
Oakland County Drain
Commissioner's Office Funds S404,337 SO S404,337 i
Both parties agree that the Rouge Project federal grant funds for Task 3, Subwatershed
Management Planning, shall be retained by Wayne County to pay for services by the RPO to
prepare the Main 1-2 subwatershed management plan. The RPO will submit to the Main 1-2
SWAG a proposal outlining in detail the services and costs for performance of the work in Task 3.
After thorough review and discussion by the SWAG and the RPO on the cost and scope of the
planning work, if there is any reduction or increase in the cost, this change shall be reflected in an
amendment to this Agreement.
"
4 tit rf.'
f •
= /7!.r'-' . 4
8
Project cost shall distinguish between costs for contracts for planning and design versus costs for
construction or implementation of programs, as follows;
Contractual Total Budget Wayne County OCDC
RPO Cost Cost
3. Participate in Main 1-2
Subwatershed Management Plan $150.000 $150,000
Sub-Total $150,000 $150,000 $0
Construction/Implementation Total Budget Wayne County OCDC
RPO Cost fag
1. Illicit Discharge Elimination
Program in the Main 1-2 $420,000 $0 $420,000
2. Public Education Program
a. Main 1-2 Subwatershed $296,337 $0 $296,337
b. Middle 1 Subwatershed $ 96.000 10 $ 96_000
- -
Sub-Total $812,337 $0 $812,337
Total S962,337 $150,000 S812.337
Oakland County Drain Commission will document its work performance and local cost for each task
as follows:
Contractual Documentation Method
3. • Participation in the Time sheets & cost summary tables for in-
Subwatershed Plans kind services
Construction/Implementation Documentation Method
1. Oakland County Drain Time sheets & cost summary tables for in-
Commissioner's Office IDEP kind services
2. Oakland County Drain
Commissioner's Office Public Time sheets and cost summary tables for in-
Education Program kind services
Reimbursement of Costs
The following identifies the funding distribution and percent reimbursement for the City of Wayne
under this Inter-Agency Agreement:
Total Cost Rouge Project Local Funds Rouge Project %
Federal Grant Funds Federal Grant Funding
$812,337 $408,000 $404,337 50.27%
I: \TECH\ WATERNIGT,WMD6.4\RAE99FUNDINCOMMUNIT OCDCOCDC.-VITA.WPD November 30. 1999
0
ILLICIT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION PLAN
FOR OAKLAND COUNTY
Submitted by: George Kuhn, Drain Commissioner
OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN
ONE PUBLIC WORKS DRIVE, BUILDING 95 WEST
WATERFORD, MI 48328-1909
PH: (248)858-0958
FAX: (248)858-1066
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document details an illicit discharge elimination plan for all Departments of Oakland County
within the Rouge River Watershed. The Oakland County Drain Commissioner's office (OCDC) is
the lead applicant with support from other departments. The Oakland County portion of the Rouge
Watershed has been further subdivided into three subwatersheds, the Main 1/2, the Upper and the
Middle 1. The OCDC will coordinate the work with the three Storm Water Advisory Groups
(S WAGS), the multiple municipal interests, the Rouge Remedial Action Plan Advisory Council
(RRAC) and other Oakland County Departments to assure an effective effort. The Oakland County
communities within the Rouge watershed include:
*Auburn Hills *Beverly Hills . •Bingham Farms
*Birmingham •Bloomfield Hills •Bloomfield Twp.
•Commerce Twp. •Farmington •Farmington Hills
*Franklin •Lathrup Village *Lyon Twp
*Novi . *Novi Twp. *Oak Park '
•Pontiac . •Rochester Hills •Southfield ,----- 7,-,--N
•Southfield Twp. •Troy *Walled Lake (_) ,;(c-
*West Bloomfield Twp. •Wixom ,/ --------
In 1987, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) required Phase I storm water
NPDES permits for municipal separate storm sewer systems for cities with population over 100,000,
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
Loarumthininccouid.p..pd
Owoj
1
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
LoaklandbirsirscomAdep.wpd
certain industries, and construction sites over 5 acres in size to complete the permit process. Phase
II of this permit process has been drafted and is currently out for public comment. The requirements
as drafted apply to communities with population over 50,000 or more than 1,000 people per square
mile, construction sites over 1 acre in size, and several additional industial categories. It is expected
that all of the Rouge River Watershed within Oakland County, except Lyon Township, will be
included in Phase II coverage.
In anticipation of the Phase II storm water requirements, the MDEQ developed the Michigan NPDES
General Storm Water Permit (General Permit) Municipal entities which seek coverage under this
General Permit are required to fulfill a series of requirements which closely match those expected
under the federal program.
This application identifies a program which will fulfill the requirements of both the current General
Permit and the anticipated Phase II NPDES Program. The plan also is divided into both a short term
program (covering the initial permit period) and a proposed long term program (for application under
the Phase H program.) This division recognizes that once a thorough illicit connection program has
been completed and the majority of the illicit discharges have been identified and eliminated, a lesser
program is sufficient to contain future problems.
This plan includes a description of a program to find, prioritize, and eliminate illicit discharges and
illicit connections identified during dry weather screening activities and a description of a program
to minimize infiltration of seepage from sanitary sewers and septic systems into the separate storm
water drainage system. The.plan also identifies the interaction and responsibilities of the OCDC as
it pertains to other Oakland County Departments and the local communities which he serves.
• This general Illicit Discharge Elimination Plan includes a series of department specific assignments.
As the program proceeds, these assignments may shift. The final division of work between the
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
oakJandidrunconvidep w7ci
3
departments will be detailed in the Oakland County Storm Water Pollution Prevention Initiative.
Once illicit discharges are identified, the type of remedial action required is dependent on the
jurisdiction in which the guilty facility falls. The institutional arrangements to address the problem
areas will vary from subwatershed to subwatershed and, in fact, may vary within the subwatershed.
Illicit discharges are governed by a combination of state, county and local ordinances. The OCDC
as the permit applicant will monitor the entire drainage system currently under the jurisdiction of
Oakland County including county drains and county road drainage. As areas are identified as being
impacted by illicit discharges, the MDEQ and the contributing local unit of government will be
notified. The success or failure of the removal process will be monitored by the OCDC. The actual
illicit connection removal will remain the responsibility of the local unit of government.
Some communities have chosen to contract with the OCDC to pursue illicit connections upstream
of the county drainage system. In these communities, the OCDC will accept the responsibility of
identifying the individual cross connection. In these cases, the actual removal will be coordinated
through the local municipality, the County Health Division and/or the Prosecutor's office. The final
enforcement vehicle will be detailed as part of the Oakland County Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Initiative.
George W. Kuhn
Oaldand Counry Drain Commissioner
January 26. 1999
I. aucind/draInconwidep,wpd
.1
2.0 ILLICIT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION PLAN FOR OAKLAND
COUNTY
The Illicit Discharge Investigation Base Program represents the long term program to which Oakland
County can commit for both current and future NPDES requirements. As storm water travels
downhill it not only transports pollutants but it also passes through multiple political jurisdictions.
Thus, an effective illicit connection program must not only identify problems and the sources of
those problems but must also identify the entity responsible for the elimination of the pollutants
source. For this to work effectively, a variety of government entities must work cooperatively.
Additionally to assure that efficiency is maintained, one unit of government must take the lead. In
Oakland County, the OCDC has been charged with this leadership role. The Oakland County Board
of Commissioners established a study group consisting of multiple county departments to provide
guidance to the OCDC. The OCDC will continue to report to the study group, as well as the County
Board of Commissioners, as the process proceeds.
One weakness of the Phase I storm water permitting effort was the prescriptive sampling
requirements which resulted in large costs but very little useful information. In an effort to eliminate
the shortcomings of the Phase I storm water permitting process, the OCDC will focus their efforts
on those areas which suggest that the watet quality is degraded and that the cause for degradation
is unknown. As these problem areas are identified, the OCDC will work upstream to pinpoint the
likely entry of the pollutant.
2.1 Environmental Coordinator
The OCDC will appoint or designate an Environmental Coordinator to oversee and to be responsible
for compliance with the requirements of the General Permit. Initially Phillip Sanzica, P.E. will serve
as the Environmental Coordinator. In the event this responsibility is transferred to another
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
I oarJandidninccevidep.wpd
5
individual, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) will be notified in writing.
2.2 Existing In Stream Water Oualitv Data
The Rouge Program Office (RPO) has initiated a long term, inseam monitoring program which
documents the water quality of the Rouge River under a variety of flow conditions. It is anticipated
that the RPO and/or the MDEQ will maintain this monitoring program to measure the success of the
multiple water quality programs currently underway. This data will represent the benchmark data
from which the field investigations will be designed.
Prior to any field investigations, a complete investigation of existing documentation will be
completed to assist in prioritizing all illicit connections detection activities. This investigation will
involve the review of the large amount of data collected by the Rouge River National Wet Weather
Demonstration Program (RRNWWDP) and information available through the Oakland County
Health Division. This water quality data will be screened for consistently high concentrations of
bacteria. Bacteria is the most obvious indicator of sanitary discharges into the river. There are also
areas where there is little or no benthic life present. This would indicate pollutant sources other than
sanitary sewage but may also suggest an illicit discharge. Once an area of the river has been
identified as having known contamination., the area will be targeted for future prioritization analysis
which will ultimately determine which areas will require additional field activities.
2.3 Complaint Line
The OCDC maintains a 24 hour, 7 days a week complaira line. This operation has historically
focused on flooding issues. As part of the General Permit effort, the personnel responding to citizens
complaints will receive training on how to properly respond to pollution complaints. This effort
coupled with an expanded public education effort will allow the public to become the "eyes and
ears" to help identify pollutant sources.
_
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
I: osIdandidnancom/i dep. wpd
6
To tailor the complaint receipt and documentation effort, local government field departments, such
as the Department of Public Works (DPW) will be interviewed to inquire about any complaints
received from the public or unusual observations of the river or storm outfalls. In addition,
enforcement agencies such as the MDEQ, Oakland County Health Division and/or the Oakland
County Prosecutor's office will also be interviewed to determine if any documentation may exist on
occurrences which would be indicative of an illicit discharge. The information collected during
these interviews will be used in prioritizing areas of the river for field investigations.
2.4 Reconnaissance Survey
The OCDC maintains an ongoing reconnaissance survey to establish the condition of their drains.
Similarly, the Road Commission for Oakland County (RCOC) regularly surveys their drainage
-systeni. Once again, this effort has traditionally focused on drainage and flooding issues. As part
of the General Permit effort, these inspectors will be given specific training to aid in the detection
of illicit discharges. In addition to these general surveys, a one-time specific reconnaissance surveY
of the outfalls and major discharge points to the river will be performed to locate any dry weather
discharges. These dry weather discharge locations may be indicative of illicit connections.
1. The 06DC has identified the location of the drainage systems under their jurisdiction and
the point of discharge for each. The OCDC will work with the kCOC to assemble similar
information pertaining to the road drainage system. When the discharge is to a drainage
systems owned and maintained by yet another, non-county entity, this third entity will be
identified and notified. The information collected under this activity will be of sufficient
detail for its inclusion in the Oakland County Geographic Information System (GIS).
2. As part of their search for illicit drain connections, all outfalls (aboveground discharge
points) leaving any county jurisdiction shall be visually inspected during dry weather
periods to identify obvious signs of cross connections. These will include indications of
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
LoakiandidrainconVidep.wpd
7
fluids, gross solids, discolorations and odors. Ten percent of those outfalls with persistent
dry weather discharges will be tested for the presence of E. coll. As experience is gained on
this program, the percentage of outfalls to be analyzed may vary.
3. Locations identified by visual screening, complaints and water quality data that require
follow-up, will be prioritized and re-visited during dry weather periods. Those that are
suspected of discharging polluting material during dry weather periods will be tested based
on water quality problems found in the river. Assistance in sample collection and testing
may be requested of the Oakland County Health Division (OCHD) and the Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) when a significant pollutant or complex
problem is found.
4. Permit engineers, inspectors and maintenance workers and administrators from the OCDC
will receive training to help them identify possible illicit discharges and how to report them.
Personnel to receive training will include all superintendents, forepeople, crew leaders,
survey crews and mowing crews. Potential illicit discharges will be reported to the
Environmental Coordinator.
2.5 Support of Local Communities
The OCDC will continue to work with the Main 1-2, Upper and Middle 1 SWAGs, the RRAC and
all participating communities to develop watershed management plans and non-duplicative Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Initiatives.
ri
tit
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
I: mid soddrai ',cowl dep. wpd
8
1
3.0 ILLICIT DISCHARGES PRIORITIZATION
In addition to the base program described in the previous section, a more intensive program will be
required under the initial program. Because there has historically been little effort expended on
identifying and eliminating illicit discharges, it is anticipated that during the initial permit program,
the program will require an intensive effort. Thus, as the Base Program proceeds, several areas of
the river will be selected for further investigation procedures. In addition, based on information
collected-during the preliminary process, it may become evident that some areas of the river will
need no further investigation. In these "clean" areas, only an ongoing review of the continuous water
quality monitoring is required. Areas selected for further investigation will most likely contain storm
outfalls from numerous drainage areas.
Sources that are discharging sewage or other pollutants will be investigated in the following priority:
1. Areas in which in-stream water quality problems that have been confirmed by sampling will
be identified. The Environmental Coordinator will determine if off site drainage is
contributing to water quality problems and will develop a plan for further investigation or
correction.
2. Complaints related to the discharge of polluting materials will be investigated as they are
reported by the county employees or the general public through the compliant system.
3. Those outfalls that are identified to have yielded the highest E. coli bacteria results will be
reinvestigated by a visual inspection of the storm drainage system upstream of the outfall.
In addition, water sampling and testing will be done as necessary to find the source of the
illicit connection.
9
4. Suspicious discharge other than bacteria, will be prioritized based on the estimated impact
on the river.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999 .
I eaklandidrstocomlidep.*pd
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
uouimaidnumon,Adcp.wyd
I 0
4.0 PLAN TO ELIMINATE ILLICIT DISCHARGE AND CONNECTION
Once the areas are selected for field investigations, facilities within these areas will need to be
prioritized for investigation. These facilities may consist of county facilities, industrial complexes,
commercial facilities, residential neighborhoods, recreational areas, etc.
A visual inspection of outfalls to County owned and maintained storm sewers that discharge into
the Rouge Riverwill be performed during the period covered by this permit. Suspicious discharges
identified from available water sampling data, complaints and visual inspections will then be
prioritized for sampling. Investigations will be made to locate the sources of pollutants or to find
additional evidence of the origin. Those agencies responsible for transporting the illicit discharges
- - -
will be notified and requested to correct the problem and monitor the discharge to assure correction
is satisfactorily completed.
1. When-a potentially illicit discharge is identified, the Environmental Coordinator will attempt
to identify the ownership of the discharge point. If another jurisdiction is identified, a
complaint will be forwarded to that jurisdiction in writing. If the discharge is from an
individual home or business, the local municipality will be notified in writing. In the event
the illicit discharge is suspected to be sanitary sewage, the OCHD will also be notified.
2. The existing authority of the OCDC and the local municipalities will be used to address illicit
discharge and connections. In the event inadequate progress is made, assistance may also be
requested from the OCHD or the MDEQ to obtain correction_
3. If overflows of sanitary sewer manholes or cross connections to a storm sewer are detected,
they will be reported to the local units of government for further action.
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
toalcludidniocodep.wpd
11
4. After the County has been issued coverage under the general permit, the standard
construction specifications will be modified to require contractors to identify and report
potential illicit connections as part of their permit requirements. The wording of the permit
guidelines will be developed as part of the approved Oakland County Storm Water Pollution
5. The OCDC commits to performing an illicit discharge survey at all Oakland County owned
and-operated buildings, yards and maintenance facilities within the Rouge River Watershed.
George W. Kuhn
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
LoaldandidniacoaVidep.wpd
12
5.0 PLAN TO MINIMIZE INFILTRATION OF SEEPAGE FROM
SANITARY SEWERS AND SEPTIC SYSTEMS INTO SEPARATE
STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
1. The OCDC field personnel will receive training to identify areas where on-site sewage
disposal system (OSDS) are suspected of having failed_ This includes the identifications of
bypass pipes (cheater pipes) and areas where the drain field has failed and sewage is leaching
into open drains. Reports of these failures will be forwarded to the Environmental
Coordinator for appropriate action.
2._ OSDS round to be experiencing problems or failing will be referred to the property owner
and the Oakland County Health Division.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
I : ealtlardidramcornAdep..7)
1.3
6.0 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
Within twelve months of the issuance of the Certificate of Coverage the following will be done:
1. A plan and timetable will be prepared in cooperation with the other county departments to
seek and find the sources of suspicious discharges that have been identified in association
with storm water drainage from the county drains within the Rouge River Watershed.
2. A county-wide complaint system will be in place to log complaints and investigate them.
3. A visual screening of 20% of the outfall sewers within the Rouge Watershed will be
completed.
4. Pei-mit inspection and maintenance employees of the OCDC will have been informed about
the—ne-iii-to find and eliminate illicit discharges and be informed as to how the complaint
system will be made available to them.
5. A list of illicit discharges and the corrections status of each will be maintained by the
Environmental Coordinator.
6. A procedure will be developed in cooperation with the OCHD, the MDEQ and the
Prosecutor's office to coordinate complaint responses and follow up.
7. An Oakland County, Rouge River Drainage map will be initiated to digitally indicate the .
ownership of the drainage courses.
Twelve to sixty months following the issuance of Certificate of coverage the following will be
accomplished:
1. Visual screening of the remaining outfalls will be completed.
2. Suspicious outfalls that had a dry weather flow during visual screening will be tested for
suspected pollutants.
3. The Oakland County/Rouge River Drainage Map will be completed and recorded in digital
form in the Oakland County GIS.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
1: orldasdidnioccenoidep.wpd
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
tosIduseYdraiacomfidep.wpd
15
7.0 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORTS
At the end of the second year and every year thereafter, the Environmental Coordinator will prepare
and submit to the MDEQ the following reports:
pg
cil
II
1. A summary report will be prepared listing the number of complaints received, investigated
and the general results of the investigation along with any actions that were taken place to
correct the problem. An index map will be included, to show the areas under investigation.
2. A listing of the entities found to be improperly connected to the storm or sanitary sewer will
be prepared and maintained by the OCDC.
3. A listing of on-site sewage systems found to be improperly functioning and actions taken to
correct problems will be prepared and maintained by the OCDC. - -
4. A list of outfalls and manholes tested and results of those tests will be prepared and included
in the annual report.
8.0 THE ROLE OF THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT
While the OCDC has the legal authority to preclude pollutants from being discharged to their
drainage ways, as a practical matter this is very difficult. There are very few entry points which
represents the discharge of a single discharger. Thus, should the county choose to block off the entry
point of contaminated flow, many law abiding customers would be impacted.
For this reason, it is imperative to work cooperatively with the local units of governments and
thereby facilitate the investigations of the upstream collection systems.
Some commimities will choose to manage their own collection system. In these cases, the OCDC
will notify them of the suspected illicit connection as well as notifying the MDEQ. The community
will then be left to their own devices to investigate, identify and remediate the illicit discharge.
These communities would also likely have requested individual coverage under a General Permit
and therefore would be managing their own illicit connection program._ _
Other communities will choose to relegate their responsibility to the OCDC. In these cases, the
communities would seek coverage under the General Permit but would also enter into an
interagency agreement between the community and the OCDC to grant the OCDC the authority to
investigate illicit discharges within the cities collection system in return for a fee to be paid to the
OCDC.
January 26, 1999
1: add anddrai warrai dep..pd
16
I
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
1111
17
9.0 PREVENTION OF FUTURE ILLICIT DISCHARGES
Once a thorough program of illicit discharges has been completed, an on-going effort will be
initiated to prevent reoccurrence of these problems. The program will be divided into two
categories, traditional illicit connections and failing septic fields.
9.1 Illicit Connection
All new taps into a county owned and operated storm water collection system must certify that the
--) connection is free from illicit discharges and must be approved by the permit engineer. The (
procedures required for this certification will be developed as part of the approved Oakland County
_Storm Water Pollution Prevention Initiative.
9.2 Plan to Minimize Infiltration of Seepage from Sanitary Sewers and Septic Systems into
Separate Storm Water Drainage System
Any OSDS found to be failing and draining into a county right of way will be forwarded to the local
community and the OCHD. Failures are expected to be identified as part of the OSDS evaluation
program and in response to complaints. City policies and requirements for connection to sanitary
sewers will remain the purview of local 'units of government and will be reviewed to provide
incentives to connect to the sanitary sewer and/or to ease the financial burden of sewer connection.
The detailed site inspection will be left to the local municipality and/or the OCHD.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26. 1999
Loaklandldraiscomlidep.wpd
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
Laakimactraiscowidg.wpd
18
10.0 POST IMPROVEMENT WATER QUALITY EVALUATION
Upon completion of the illicit connection elimination activities, water quality will be evaluated to
document conditions of the water quality following the remeciiation effort_ This water quality data
is required in evaluating the effectiveness of the illicit connection elimination program.
and the OCDC will oversee the long term water quality sampling program.
The RPO
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999 .
wp1vrawstsed1cowxygOpubliced.wpd 1
PUBLIC EDUCATION PLAN
OAKLAND COUNTY
SUBMIllED BY: GEORGE ICIJIL\1, DRAIN COMMISSIORER
OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN
ONE PUBLIC WORKS DRIVE, BUILDE\IG 95 WEST
WATERFORD, Ml 48328-1907
PH: (248) 858-0958
FAX: (248) 858-1066
This periiiit application is submitted by the Oakland County Drain Commissioner (OCDC) seeking
coverage for all County owned and/or oprated facilities within the Rouge River Watershed. The
public education efforts will be carried out by a number of County departments but will be
coordinated through the Drain Commissioners Office. These department include but are not limited
to: the Department of Facilities Maintenance and Operatiods - (FM&O), the Department of
Community and Economic Development (DCED), the Department of Human Services (DHS), and
the Parks and ReCreation Department (PRD).
This Public Education Plan follows the format recommended by the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and includes the six major sections required in the Permit A
majority of the public education effort identified in the permit application is most appropriate to
local municipalities. In such cases Oakland County will take a support role. Other areas are more
appropriate at a County level. In this later case, the OCDC will coorainste with both the local
cities/townships/villages (CTV) and other County departments. The requirements as defined in the
permit application are as follows:
1. REQUIRED ELEMENTS
a. Encouragement of public reporting of the presence of illicit discharges or improper
disposal of materials into applicant's separate storm water drainage system.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
wTA-virsiteo.cooarrnAir.blieed wpd 3
To the maximum extent practicable, the Office of the OCDC will address the County
responsibilities by promoting and supporting existing public involvement programs such as the
Rouge Education Project, the Rouge Rescue, the Rouge Friendly Business Program and the
Rouge Friendly Neighborhood Program. Activities would include such projects as storm drain
stenciling, River Watch and River Stewards.
Existing public education efforts and anticipated future efforts for each of the Required
Elements are briefly described below.
a. .Encourage the public to report illicit discharges or improper disposal into
'storm sewers.
'Existing Effort:
None.
Future Effort:
As part of this Illicit Discharge Elimination Plan, the OCDC is establishing a
centralized complaint sysiem for the reporting, responding and tracking of
environmental complaints. The OCDC staff shall work with the CTVS and
support them if called upon. Additionally, the OCDC will insure that supported 'fl
CTV "hot lines" are educated properldA strategy for educating the public about
illicit discharge impacts on the environment will be developed in order to promote
reporting.
b. Education of the public on the availability, location and requirements of
facilities for the disposal or drop-off of household hazardous waste, travel
trailer sanitary wastes, chemicals, grass clippings, leaf litter, animal wastes,
and motor vehicle fluids.
2.0 ILLICIT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION PLAN FOR OAKLAND
COUNTY
The Illicit Discharge Investigation Base Program represents the long term program to which Oakland
County can commit for both current and future NPDES requirements. As storm water navels
downhill it not only transports pollutants but it also passes throus± multiple political jurisdictions.
Thus, an effective illicit connection program must not only identify problems and the sources of
those problems but must also identify the entity responsible for the elimination of the pollutants
source. For this to work effectively, a variety of government entities must work cooperatively.
Additionally to assure that efficiency is maintained, one unit of government must take the lead. In
Oakland County, the OCDC has been charged with this leadership role. The Oakland County Board
of Commissioners established a study group consisting of multiple county deparments to provide
guidance to the OCDC. The OCDC will continue to report to the study group, as well as the County
Board of Commissioners, as the process proceeds.
One weakness of the Phase I storm water permitting effort was the prescriptive sampling
requirements which resulted in large costs but very little useful information. In an effort to eliminate
the shortcomings of the Phase I storm water permitting process, he OCDC will focus their efforts
on those areas which suggest that the watet quality is degraded and that the cause for dezadation
is =known. As these problem areas are identified, the OCDC will work upstream to pinpoint the
likely entry of the pollutant. .
2.1 Environmental Coordinator
The OCDC will appoint or designate an Environmental Coordinator to oversee and to be responsible
for compliance with the requirements of the General Permit. Initially Phillip San74ca, P.E. wlll serve
as the Environmental Coordinator. In the event this responsibility is transferred to another
Geurg: W. Kuhn -
0a4and County Drain Commissioner
Jantmry 26, 1999
I: ow:and/dna mom; dep..*
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
mematnhadkounty spfublIced. wpd 5
opportunities, mechanisms and information for educating the public on these
issues. The OCDC office will work with the PRD to obtain and distribute fact 1.
sheets on fertilizer and pesticide application from the MSU Extension Service, )• -
SOCWA and the Rouge Program Office (RPO).
d. Public education concerning materials and procedures for residential car
washing.
Existing Effort:
• • None.
Future Effort: •
The OCDC will support local community efforts to modify residential car
,washing practices.
e. Public education concerning the ultimate discharge point and potential
impacts from storm water pollutants.
Existing Effort:
None.
Future Effort:
The OCDC and DCED will distribute educational materials utilizing existing
information available from the State, the RPO and educational institutions. The
OCDC and DCED will also provide responses to requests for drain maintenance
services.
f. Public education for citizen responsibility and stewardship.
Existing Effort:
Within Oakland County, 28 schools of eight different municipalities are currently
participating in the Rouge Education Project. The FOTR coordinates four Rouge
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26. 1999
wowairsh.koiwywouolicga..pa 7
participates in the Middle 1 and the Upper Subwatersheds. To date, these groups have
focused on the concerns of the municipal and County entities impacted by the storm
water management requirements. As these responsibilities have become better defined,
an outreach effort has been initiated. ThiS effort has resulted in the participation of the
FOTR, the Clinton River Watershed Councils, the SOCWA and the RRAC. Additional
participation will be encouraged.
It is anticipated that the Watershed Planning Public Participation process will also be a
-forum for involving stakeholders in the development/modification of our community's
public education plan. Oakland County is a sttkeholder in this group but only a
stakeholder. The County must look to the communities for leadership in addressing the
neighborhood groups and the block clubs. This is where true public education can be
effective. The County will be a full participant in this process. Revisions and input
regarding the Public Education Plan are expected and welcome throughout the Watershed
Plan development process.
3. PRIORITY CONCERNS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE FIRST YEAR
Based on comments received from stakeholders, the County will initially focus its first
year of public education efforts on relatively simple concepts such as "Watershed
Awareness," "Storm Water Management' and "Our Actions Affect the River" targeted at
home and business owners in Oakland County. Although the Rouge River passes
through Oakland County, few people see it on a daily basis. Raising awareness about the
connection of the Rouge River to our County with upstream and downstream public
access areas will be a priority.
Educating County staff and fostering cooperation and partnerships with existing
organizations, groups and agencies involved in educating the public regarding storm
water management will also be a priority in the first year.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Cram Commissioner
January 26, 1999
vIA.nulhedNcounry gpowiiced. wpd 9
5. OTHER ORGANIZATIONS ASSISTLNG WITH PUBLIC EDUCATION
List the organization, the program assistance and the contact person.
l ORGANIZATION . PROGRAM CONTACT
Friends of the Rouge Rouge Education Project, Rouge Rescue, Tracy Cyr
(FOTR) Rouge Stewards Program Jim Graham ,
Southeast Oakland Household Ha7ardous Waste Collection/ Lillian Dean
County Water Authority Education, Yard Waste Management and Tom Waffen
(SOCWA) Healthy Lawn and Garden Program
. Rouge Program Office Rouge Friendly Business Program Karen Reaume
(RPO)
E. L. Johnson Nature Stewards of the Land E. L. Johnson
Center Nature Center
Oakland Schools 'If You Love This Earth" Lamoine Motz
Science, Matharnatics & Dave Houzel
Technology Center
_ _6. SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION - YEAR 1
Based on comments received from stakeholders, Oakland County will encourage
participation in the following public education activities in this first year.
Activity #1:
Target Audience:
Messages:
Description:
Timetable:
Responsibility:
Heighten Visibility & Promote School Water/Resource Monitoring.
City Council, school officials, and all residents.
Although water quality has improved, pollutants remain in the water
Presentations to City Councils and School Boards encouraging
participation in the Rouge Education Project. Contact teachers
currently participating in Rouge Education Project. Prior to
presentations, press releases to heighten visibility. t .Coordinate
presentations with OCDC staff, teachers and students.
Ten presentations throughout permit period.
Oakland County Environmental Cocrdinator
Timetable:
Responsibility:
Timetable:
Responsibility:
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
wpkwasnhedkauntygp1pubiicaiwpd 11
Messages:
Description:
Timetable:
Responsibility:
Activity #5:
Target Audience:
Messages:
Description:
Activity #6:
Target Audience:
Messages:
Description:
groups.
"Dump no waste. Drains to Rouge River."
Support FOTR program that actively and systematically stencils
storm drains and shares information throughout the residential
neighborhoods and commercial business areas of communities.
Coordinate efforts between OCDC, FOTR and Oakland Schools.
Immediately.
Oakland County Environmental Coordinator
Tributary Signage at County Road & River Crossings.
Drivers, passengers and citizens.
Connection to the river. You are in a Rouge River community.
Signs will be placed at roadway/river crossings identifying the Rouge
River and its tributaries (e.g. 'Creek Tributary of Rouge River").
Additionally, watershed/subwatershed boundaries will be identified
(e.g. "Welcome to Rouge River Watershed", or "Entering Franklin
Branch Watershed").
10 signs to be installed during permit period.
Oakland County Environmental Coordinator
Co-sponsor Information Outreach Workshops.
Community residents.
Environmentally-friendly lawn & garden tare.
Work with SOC WA, MSU Extension and FOTR. Three workshops
will be held throughout the permit period to inform residents about
healthy lawn and garden principles and practices.
The permit period.
Public information officer. -
Georgc W. Kuhn .
Oakland County Drain Commissioncr
January 26, 1999
13
Responsibility: Public Information officer.
I
7. RELATIONSHIP TO WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING
Based on initial discussions with fellow subwatershed communities, effective public
education regarding storm water management will be a specific goal of the Watershed
Management Plan. The Public Education Plan as submitted with the permit application is
recognized as simply the beginning and is therefore somewhat vague. With experience
gained as Watershed Management progresses, appropriate modifications will be made to the
Public Education Plan.
8. PLAN FOR EVALUATING IMPACTS
The Public Education Plan will be evaluated based on progress made towards the objectives _
described above. We are cognizant of the public survey performed by the RPO in 1993. It
is anticipated that through the Watershed Planning Public Participation process, we will be
able to gauge our community's baseline awareness of storrn water management and
perception of the Rouge River. •
During the Watershed Management Plan development process, the need to evaluate the
success or impact of the Public Education Plan will be likely and will be discussed. Oakland
County will participate in future surveys and/or studies to evaluate public education plan
impacts with fellow subwatershed communities, the Friends of the Rouge, as well as other
organizations and agencies involved in storm water management/watershed management
educational efforts.
Simple mechanisms for evaluating the impact of the individual Public education activities
described above will also performed. Tracking the participation of the community schools,
community groups, and individuals in existing Rouge River educational programs will be
one method of evaluating impacts. It is anticipated that the evaluation methods and results
will be briefly described in the annual permit report.
Page 1 of
Site Name
01)
S.:e/Project Cost Obiigation
Organization) Deobiigatioi
rrn cco .E-3,000,CCO
Attachment "B"
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 1. ASSISTAN 10 O. 2. LOG NUMBER
XF.T..c. 574.3-C,4-) 05-X -CCO
-EPA ASSiSTANCE AGREEMENT / AMENDMENT
3."1/11A9F2W2R9SS8 1 4. MAIU a_ NG I',/,
1 PART I - ASSISTANCE NOTIFICATION INFORMATION 4114 i
16. AGREEMENT TYPE I 6. PAYMENT METHOD • . •
I c...100....or•is Agronimonit I D attrareat Aeonourament E Acti Nu.... ACH - 0512
! Grant Agreement X Send Payment Roquette bs 17. TYPE OF ACTION
I ;mamma.= Amencivaant COMPTROLLER BRANCH, MF-10J 'CONTINUATION
' 8. RECIPIENT --5. PAYEE
P. WAYNE COUNTY- MICHIGAN WAYNE COUNTY - MICH:GAN la-
lc 415 CLIFFORD 415 CUFFCRID I I DETROIT, MI 48226 DETROIT, MI 48226
IP II
I E
N EIN NO. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 10. RECIPIENT TYPE
IT 380048P5 13 COUNTY OR PARISH
lo 11. PROJECT MANAGER AND TELEPHONE NO. 12. CONSULTANT (WWT Cannarucclian Grams only)
I Fl JAMES E MURRAY
IG . N/A
1 (313) 224-3631
...
E 13. ISSUING OFFICE (CITY / STATE) 14. EPA PROJECT/ STATE OFFICER AND TELEPHONE NO..;
P US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WOjCIK A ACQUISMON-ASSISTANCE BRANCH WATER DIVISION
I C US EPA, REGIONS, MC-10J WS-15..I. (312 586-0174
77 'N JACKSON BLVD ,•
Jr CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590
IA 15. EPA CONGRESSIONAL LIAISON bi PHONE 16. STATE APPL ID (0:i...et...snow., 17. SCIENCE FIELD 118. PROJECT STEP
IC (weer C.onetrusaton Graff= Croy)
I 7 .. BARBARA BROOKS, (202) 260-5660 N/A ., NA N/A
1 7.3.7.1TORY AUTHORITY 20. REGULATORY AUTHORITY I 21. STEP 2 - 3 de STEP 3 (rovrr c....men Grans Only)
_ AO CFR PART 31 a. inastrnero Lame 1 1
FY 1997 A2PROPRIATIONS ACT h. Phsect Type N/A I 1
C. Trertmefft Ptliceris I
-1 . :-.. 104-294 . I a Simsne 742z.c.-
22. PROJECT TITLE AND DESCRIPTION ROUGE RIVRR NATIONAL W ,c7 WE=T-iER DEMONSTRAT7ON
---.•
23. PROJECT LOCATION tarm in.o•cumi b.. P-0«lice
vef t P'ace I county stave 1 Goagramonal °Mr=
ROUGE RIVER WATERSHED I WAYNE MI i MU LT IF LE
24. ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (CFOA Pregnant No. ir rrUe) . 25. PROJECT PERIOD 25. 3UOGET-PER100
06/01/98 -12/31/0C 06/01/98 - 12/31 /CO
27. COMMUNITY POPULATION I 25. TOTAL BUDGET PERIOD COST 25. TOTAL PROJECT PERIOD COST
("NWT 'Z.'s...trochee Grants Only) N/A 529,090,909 529,090,909
FUNDS FORMER AWARD 1 ' THIS ACTION AMENDED -DIAL
I -:....-1 ;71R 7217C 000
1, SI.
cefit in-,nC A rne..wt 4 ,...
2:- Unmsenchrat Pnor 7 mr 3atanee J 0
- 'r.....3. Other reoaratFume 3 0
! 1m. Reentrant GOrrtnbution -, 13.050.90P
1. z.s. Strut Carnnburton :2) 0
! :A. Local C..artsrttaroon n n
,..i ,...!
17. Other C.aarztbutton 0 0
3.. Alio...ao. P*otabt Coot SC 52P,0P0.909 1
Document
Control
Number
PWX010
FY I oorop. Budget I
.Organizationi
98 ": I 0530AK9
Program
Element
N3X
biec:: c:ass;
41.11i
EPA Form 5710-7.1.4 5.12). dot:daces Dag-nous adenoma and EPA Foe.... 57,0.1a.3..7.. ana O. ad of nfoch aro O0a004oto.
PART il - APPROVED BUDGET ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: X 99574.1-04-0 Page 2 of 5
TABLE A- OBJECT CLASS CATEGORY TOTAL APPROVED ALLOWABLE
040.-.......awoonl 7.: 7 BUDGET PERIOD COST
.---- I. PERSONNEL i 6756.308
FRINGE BENEFITS - 1 701.929
.t. TRAVEL 78.100
• 4. EQUIPMENT 68.700
5. SUPPUES 26.200
6. CONTRACTUAL 8.246.703
7. CONSTRUCTION 18.595.000
3. OTHER 70.069
, 9. TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES $28.843.009
10. INDIRECT COSTS: RATE 17.00 % BASE 1.458.237 247,900
11. TOTAL (Share: Recipient 45.00% Federal 55.00 x,) 629.090,909
S15.200,CC0 12.. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT •
TABLE 3- PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION
(Non......orwetheno
2-
..
.t. -
S.
S.
I 7.
i 3.
, 9.
...,
12. TOTAL (Share: Recipient % Federal S.)
12. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
TABLE C - PROGRAM ELEMENT CLASSIFICATION
(Construction) •
1. ADMINISTRATION EXPENSE
2. PRELIMINARY EXPENSE
Z. '...AND STRUCTURES. RIGHT-OF-WAY
4. ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING BASIC FEES .
5. OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING FEES
5. PROJECT INSPECTION FEES
7. LAND DEVELOPMENT
3. RELOCATION EXPENSE
9. RELOCATION PAYMENTS TO INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESS
IC. DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL
12. EQUIPMENT
I:. MISCELLANEOUS .
14. TOTAL :Len ...1 /Iry t31
15. ESTIMATED INCOME :I! sctiiic.oicl
I S. NET PROJECT AMOUNT (Line 14 minus 151
17. LESS: INELIGIBLE EXCLUSIONS
13. ADO: CONTINGENCIES
. TOTAL (Share: Recipient % Federal %.)
2C. TOTAL APPROVED ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
.R4 =Ion 5700-20A (Hey 5-32)
•
Page 3 of 5 ASSISTANCE IDEN-71FICA7ION: X 995713-34-o PART W - AWARD CONDITIONS
— TERMS AND CONDITIONS
THIS AWARD IS IN RESPONSE TO THE RECIPIENT'S JUNE 3, 1997, APPLICATION.
1. RECYCLED PAPER
Pursuant to EPA Order 1000.25, dated January 24, 1990, the recipient agrees to use recycled
paper for all reports which are prepared as a part of this agreement and delivered to the
Agency. This requirement does not apply to reports which are prepared on forms supplied
by EPA. Tnis requirement applies even when the cost of recycled paper is higher than that
of virgin paper.
2. SMALL BUSINESS IN RURAL AREAS
By accepting this agreement, the recipient agrees to comply with Section 129 d Public Law
100-590, the Small Business Administration Reauthorization and Amendment Act of 1988.
Therefore, if the recipient awards a contract under this assistance agreement, it will utilize the
following affirmative steps relative to Small Business in Rural Areas (SBRAs):
a.. Placing SBRAs on solicitation lists;
b. Ensuring that SBRAs are solicited whenever they are potential sources;
c. Dividing total requirements when economically feasible, into small tasks or
quantities to permit rmiximum partidpation by SBRAs;
d. Establishing delivery schedules, Where the requirements of work will permit,
which would encourage participation by SERAs; "
e. Using the services of the Small Business Administration and the Minorty
Business Development Agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce, as
appropriate; and
f. Requiring the contractor, if it awards subcracts, to take the affirmative steps
in subparagraphs a. through e. of this condition.
3. FAIR SHARE
Tne recipient must ensure to the fullest extent possible that at :east 8% (Equipment), 8%
(Supplies) and 20% (Constucticn) of Federal funds for prime contracts or sub—Cintracts for
supplies, construction, equipment or services are made available to organizatcrs owned or
controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals and historically black
colleges and universities, and that at least 4% (Equipment), 4% (Supplies), and 8%
(Construction) of such funds are made available to organizations owned or cont -oiled by
women.
The reCpient agrees, in the even: of any con7acting, to induce in its bid documents a 8%
(Equipment), 8% (Supplies) and 20% (Construction) MBE and 4% (E-quipment), 4% (Supplies),
.-and 8% (Construction) WEE "Fair Share" and require all of its prime contractors to inciude in
their documents for subcontracts 8% (Equipment), 8% (Supplies) and 20% (Construction) MEE
and 4% (Equipment), 4% (Supplies), and 8% (Construction) WEE "Fair Share" percentages.
The recipient also agrees to comply with the six affirmative steps of :72 "Fair Share" pciicy
stated in 40 CFR 30.66(b), 31.36(e) or 35.680(a), as appropriate..
iP2 r,r, 5700-7.•jg 5-.1::1
PART Ut — AWARD CONDMONS ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: X 99574-14A-4 Page 1 of 5
In the event race and/or gender neutral efforts prove to be inadequate to achieve a fair'snare
objective for MBEs/WBEs, the recipient agrees to notify EPA in advance of any rice and/or
gender conscious action it plans to take to more closely achieve the fair share objective.
The State and/or recipient agrees to submit EPA Forni 570G-52A "MBEJWBE Utilization Under
Federal Grants, Cooperative Agreements, and other Federal Financial Assistance", to the EPA
award official beginning with the Federal fiscal year quarter the recipient awards its firs:
contract and continuing until all contracts and subcontracts ;lave been reported. These reports
must be submitted to the award official within 30 days of the end of the Federal fiscal quartE.--..r
(January 30, April 30, July 30 and October 30).
PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION
The recipient agrees to ensure that all conference, meeting, conventiorror
training space funded in whole or in part with Federal funds, complies with the
Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990.
5. The recipient agrees that prior to initiating any work associated with Project
Groups Three (G3) "Wetlands Restoration Projects" and Four (G4) "Wetlands and
Recreation", the recipient shall submit, and receive USEPA approval for, further
detailed Work plans for activities associated with these project groups. The
recipient agrees that USEPA shall be provided with at least 45 days to review and
provide comments on these detailed work plans. The recipient further agrees that it
will comply with 'Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of
Mitigation Banks" dated August.1995.
ASSISTANCE IDENTIFICATION: X 99574304-0 Page 5 of 5
SPECIAL CONDITIONS icom,....wri
THE UNITED STATES,OF AMERICA BY THE U.S ENVIRONMENTAL ROTF_CTION AGENCY
TYPED NAME AND TITLE- JO LYNN TUB, DIRECTOR
WATER DIVISION. R.::-.7ON 3
SIGN F AWA
SIGNATURE TYPED NAME AND TITLE /
/1W/9474,26
&-r-f-L7
co.?, rmin 5777.-*14 f1:1,;
PART IV
NOTE: The Agreement must be completed in duplicate and the Original returned to the Grants Administration Division for Headquarters
awards and to the appropriate Grants Administration Office for State and local awards within 3 calendar weeks after receipt or
within arty extension of time as may be granted by EPA.
Receipt of a written refusal or failure to return the properly executed document within the prescribed time, may result in the
withdrawal of the offer by the Agency. Any change to the Agreement by the recipient subsequent to the document being signed
by the EPA Award Official, which the Award Official determines to materially after the Agreement, shall void Me Agreement.
OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE
The United States of America, acting by and through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), hereby offers
assistance/amendment to the WAYNE COUNTY - MICHIGAN -
RECIPIENT ORGANIZA 1Of
costs incurred up to and not exceeding 16.000.000 for the support of approved budget period effort des cribed
ASSISTANCE AMOUNT
in application (including all application modifications) cited in Item 22 of this Agreement
ROUGE RIVER NATIONAL WET WEATHER DEMONSTRATION
for 55.00 s of all =proved
, included herein by reference.
DATE AND TITLE
ISSUING OFFICE (Grant. Administration Orrica)
ORGANIZATION / ADDRESS
ACQUISMON-ASSISTANCE BRANCH
US EPA. REGION 5, MC-10J
77 W JACKSON BLVD
AWARD APPROVAL OFFICE
ORGANIZATION / ADDRESS
WATER DIVISION
US EPA, REGION 5, W-'5J
77 .-44/ JACKSON BLVD
This agreement is s6bject to app#able U.S/Environmental Protection Agency statutory provisions and assistance regulations. In
accepting this award or amendiient andbty payments made pursuant thereto, (I) the uncersi-gned represents that he is duly
authorized to act on behalf of the recipient organization, and (2) the recipient agrees (a) that the award is subject to me
applicable provisions of 40 CFR Chapter I , Subchapter B and of the provisions of this agreement (Parts I thru IV), and -p) that
acceptance of any payments constitutes an agreement by the payee that the amounts, if any found by EPA to have been
overpaid will be refunded or credited in full to EPA.
BY AND ON BEHALF OF THE DES:GNATED RECIPIENT OR3ANIZAT4ON
D7 1-4
ASS:STANCE IDENTIFICATION:- X 99574342
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
C TERM AND CONDITION NUMBER 9 HAS BEEN ADDED AS FOLLOWS:
9. Y2K COMPLIANCE
Your assistance agreement may produce electronic date-sensitive data or systems that use
such data. Any information technology purchased, produced, submitted or exchanged under
this agreement must be capable of processing data according to EPA's Data Standard for
representation of calendar dates (EPA Directive 2100, IRM Policy Manual, Chapter 5, Data
Standard). This information is located on the EPA website
(http://www.epa.gov/irmpolia/polman/chaptr05.txt.html#calendar). Information technology
acquired under this agreement should be consistent with the technical Year 2000
requirements as described in the Federal Acquisition Regulation 39.002. This information is
located on the official GSA website (http://www.arnetgovifar/97-05/htrn1/39.html).
ALL PREVIOUSLY CITED TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME.
i 71.1
EPA F 00.2.38 (4.1 1144)
•
•
:-
REPLY TO "rtE ATTENTICN CF
MC-103
"I •
. • o •
-* • ..ea'"
•
• •el (g•
7 .•
0.0 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 7,
imA REGION 5
'111111Irri 77 WEST JACKSON ECULEVARO
CHICAGO, IL 6604-3590
4( .goit-`4
Ali 1 6 1998
Mr. 3utler Benton. jr.
Director of Acirninistration
Wayne County Department of Environment
415 Clifford
Detroit. MI 43226
Re: WBE/M3E Fair Share Goals
Dec: Mr. Benton:
This letter will confirm our telephone call of June 15. 1998 regarding the con -.endon c: the
services goals of all of Wayne County Deparanent of Environment's proposed fair share for your
assistance agreements with the United States Environmental protecton Agency (USEPA). As
you may know. under TiSEPA's interim MBEWBE 1.-,clicy, these goals r.-..ay also be used by local
government and non-orotit recipients in your state in Lieu of conducdng an independent
availability analysis.- On behalf of-Region 5, vie-thank :Lou and your staff for their courtesy and
cooperation during this process. For Fi."93, the fair share goals for your a_ssiszance agreement(s)
will :
SRF Construction 20% MBE 10% 17,7 7
Service 20% MBE 10% WBE
Equipment 3% MBE 4% W13 7
Supplies 8% HBE WBE
Although I..ISEP.A.'s final MBE/Vv.-3E policy is still under consideration, because of the
United Stares Supreme Court holding in Aci2rand v. Pena, it is bossibie CSEPA state grant
recipients may be required to perform an annual availability analysis before a grant can be
awarded. Similarly, the draft Final MBP/Vv-3E. Guidance recuires all grantees to track their
acqu:sition of supplies. services. equipment and construction by dernog.raphic status of the
contractor or vendor. We realize that thee requirements may :lace additionai burdens on your
resources and we urge you to plan for them in advance. According to i.:SEPA's Office of
General Counsel. at least part of the expense of performing an availabili7y analysis would be an
allowable expense under LTSEPA's State Revolving Fund and S.ioerfund z-.-.ants.
Rec-oclectRecyciacie•?nreec wqr: lecataze ClaaseC Irms ort 50% Fecorce Pacer 2C s1sLrr.erl
USEPA's Grants Adminiszation Division and Office of Small and Disadvantaged
Business Utilization are directing the revisions to the NIBEWBE policy. It is their intention to
promulgate formal MBEiWBE regulations applicable to all USEPA nu. Since they will affect
your USEPA grants. we sugg.est that you consider commenting on the proposed regulations
during the rule making process.
If I can be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call. My direct dial number is
(312) 353-5677.
Sincerely,
Robert I. ardson -
Regional 1VE3F1WBE Coordinator
cc: Robert Springer
Assistant Reonal Administrator
Lynn Donley
Associate Regional Counsel
THIS LEllhR WAS ALSO SENT TO THE FOLLOWING PERSONS:
M. GADE
G. HUGHES
5. HAMILTON
P. LARSON
.T. NOVA.K
• • C'
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999 .
wpkwatrshed NcountygOpubliced.wpd
LI
PUBLIC EDUCATION PLAN
OAKLAND COUNTY
SUBMITTED BY: GEORGE KUHN, DRAIN COM1vISSI6RER
OAKLAND COUNTY, MICHIGAN
ONE PUBLIC WORKS DRIVE, BUILDING 95 WEST
WATERFORD, Si11 48328-1907
PH: (248) 858-0958
FAX: (248) 858-1066
This pdrhalt application is submitted by the Oakland County Drain Commissioner (OCDC) seeking
coverage for all County owned and/of oprated facilities within the Rouge River Watershed. The
public education efforts will be carried out by a number of County departments but will be•
coordinated through the Drain Commissioners.Office. These departments include but are not limited
to: the Department of Facilities Maintenance and Operations (FM&O), the Department of
Community and Economic Development (DCED), the Department of Human Services (DHS), and
the Parks and Recreation Department (PRD).
local municipalities. In such cases Oakland County will take a support role. Other areas are more
appropriate at a County level. In this later case, the OCDC will coordinate with both the local
majority of the public education effort identified in the permit application is most appropriate to
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and includes the six major sections required in the Permit. A
This Public Education Plan follows the format recommended by the Michigan Department of
- cities/townships/villages (CTV) and other County departments. The requirements as defined in the
permit application are as follows:
1. REQUIRED ELEMENTS
a. Encouragement of public reporting of the presence of illicit discharges or improper
disposal of materials into applicant's separate storm water drainage 'system.
2
1
b. Education of the Public on the availability, location and requirements of facilities for
the disposal or drop-off of household ha7nrdous waste, travel trailer sanitary wastes,
chemicals, grass clippings, leaf litter, animal wastes, andmotor vehicle fluids.
c. Education of the Public regarding acceptable application and disposal of pesticides
and fertilizers.
d. _ _Education of the Public concerning preferred cleaning materials and procedures for
residential car washing.
e. Education of the Public concerning the ultimate discharge point and potential impacts
from the separate storm water drainage system serving their place of residence.
f. Education of the Public about their responsibility and stewardship in their watershed.
Education of the Public concerning management of riparian lands to protect water
quality.
Throughout the term of the permit it is anticipated that a combination of public information
mechanisms will be used to inform the Oakland County residents and businesses of their
impact on water quality of the Rouge River. These mechanisms will include community
newsletters; cable TV programs/ads; brochures/flyers in public facilities and public facility
displays.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
velAwairshedncountygp \,publiced.wpd
g.
3
pg
To the maximum extent practicable, the Office of the OCDC will address the County
responsibilities by promoting and supporting wdsting public involvement programs such as the
Rouge Education Project, the Rouge Rescue, the Rouge Friendly Business Program and the
Rouge Friendly Neighborhood Program. Activities would include such projects as storm drain
stenciling, River Watch and River Stewards.
Existing public education efforts and anticipated future efforts for each of the Required
Elements are briefly described below.
a. Encourage the public to report illicit discharges or improper disposal into
storm sewers.
Existing Effort:
None.
Future Effort:
As part of this Illicit Discharge Elimination Plan, the OCDC is establishing a
centralized complaint system for the reporting, responding and tracking of
environmental complaints. The OCDC staff shall work with the CTVs and
support them if called upon. Additionally, the OCDC will insure that supported/fl
CTV "hot lines" are educated properb:JA strategy for educating the public about
illicit discharge impacts on the environment will be developed in order to promote
reporting.
b. Education of the public on the availability, location and requirements of
facilities for the disposal or drop-off of household hazardous waste, travel
trailer sanitary wastes, chemicals, grass clippings, leaf litter, animal wastes,
and motor vehicle fluids.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
wp \waushal cauntygpkpubliced.wpd
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
v..pkwiarsimincountygpkpualiccd.wpa 4
Existing Efforts:
Waste handling, collection and disposal has been the purview of the local
municipalities for many years. The County retains the responsibility for planning
and regulating some aspects of the industry. Drainage areas in which waste
handling practices cause foreign materials to enter a County drainage network is
an area where multiple agencies retain some responsibility. The OCDC will work
with municipalities to assure that improper practices are discontinued. In
- — addition, the Southeast Oakland County Water Authority (SOCWA) has been
active in collecting household ha7nrdous wastes and educating the Oakland
County citizens on how to reduce and use these materials.
Future Effort:
The OCDC will work with the local communities -and SOCWA to develop a— --
coordinated watershed-wide effort. Staff will also work to identify potential
information gaps (e.g-. travel trailer sanitary wastes) and investigate opportunities,
- — ----- other mechanisms, and information for better promoting the water quality benefits
of properly handling and disposing of these materials. Staff will also work with
other Oakland County Departments to better coordinate, expand and improve their_
educational efforts in this regard.
c. Public education concerning application and disposal of pesticides and
fertilizers.
Existing Effort:
None.
Future Effort.
The OCDC is aware of both the SOCWA Healthy Lawn and Garden Program,
which addresses yard waste reduction and water quality protection, as well as the
Friends of the Rouge (FOTR) efforts to curb the use of pesticides and fertilizers.
Over the term of the permit and the watershed planning process, the OCDC staff
will work with SOCWA and FOTR, as well as others, to identify and implement
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
mAwatrshedkountyip%publiced, wpd 5
opportunities, mechanisms and information for educating the public on these
issues. The OCDC office will work with the PRD to obtain and distribute fact
sheets on fertilizer and pesticide application frornthe MSU Extension Service).
enonr A ("1.47". rD SOCWA and UL Program Office (RP O).
d. Public education concerning materials and procedures for residential car
washing.
Existing Effort:
None.
Future Effort:
The OCDC will support local community efforts to modify residential car
,washing practices.
e. Public education concerning the ultimate discharge point and potential
impacts from storm water pollutants.
Existing Effort: _
None.
Future Effort:
The OCDC and DCED will distribute educational materials utilizing existing
information available from the State, the RPO and educational institutions. The
OCDC and DCED will also provide responses to requests for drain maintenance
services.
f. Public education for citizen responsibility and stewardship.
Existing Effort:
Within Oakland County, 28 schools of eight different municipalities are currently
participating in the Rouge Education Project. The FOTR coordinates four Rouge
g.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
wpkwainheckountygp1publiced.wpd 6
Rescue sites within the County each year. Storm drains have been stenciled in
several areas in the County.
.Future Effort:
Oakland County is presently working With FOTR, Oakland Schools, local
communities and the RPO to promote the variety of ongoing public education
programs being implemented by these entities. Efforts to coordinate storm drain
stenciling, the River Watch Program, and Rouge Rescue sites between
communities, school districts, and schools are underway. These efforts will be
continued.
Public education concerning management of riparian lands to protect water
quality.
Existing Effort:
The DCED has Sponsored several workshop to promote "Smart Development"
These programs encourage protection of riparian lands.
Future Effort:
A public education component will be included in all new drainage improvement
projects to inform the residents of Oakland County of the negative impact of some
types of development on Water quality. The DCED will continue to promote
"Smart Growth" as well as encourage the vision of the Rouge River as a resource
worth protecting.
2. STAKEHOLDERS, INDIVIDUALS, AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED IN
THE PROCESS OF PREPARING THE PUBLIC EDUCATION PLAN
The OCDC continues to facilitate the Rouge River Main 1/2 Subwatershed and
,
•
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26. 1999
wOwatrthedkautrygOpubliced.wpd 7
participates in the Middle 1 and the Upper Subwatersheds. To date, these groups have
focused on the concerns of the municipal and County entities impacted by the storm
water management requirements. As these responsibilities have become better defined,
an outreach effort has been initiated. ThiS effort has resulted in the participation of the
FOTR, the Clinton River Watershed Councils, the SOCWA and the RRAC. Additional
participation will be encouraged. •
It is anticipated that the Watershed Planning Public Participation process will also be a
_ •
-forum for involving stakeholders in the development/modification of our community's
public education plan. Oakland County is a stakeholder in this group but only a
stakeholder. The County must look to the communities for leadership in addressing the
neighborhood groups and the block clubs. This is where true public education can be
effective. The County will be a full participant in this process. Revisions and input
regarding the Public Education Plan are expected and welcome throughout the Watershed
Plan development process.- - - -
3. PRIORITY CONCERNS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE .FIRST YEAR
Based an comments received from stakeholders, the County will initially focus its first
year of public education efforts on relatively simple concepts such as "Watershed
Awareness," "Storm Water Management" and "Our Actions Affect the River" targeted at
home and business owners in Oakland County. Although the Rouge River passes
through Oakland County, few people see it on a daily basis. Raising awareness about the
connection of the Rouge River to our County with upstream and downstream public
access areas will be a priority.
Educating County staff and fostering cooperation and partnerships with existing
organizations, groups and agencies involved in educating the public regarding storm
water management will also be a priority in the first year.
8
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
wp waushed\ccunlygpnpubliced.wpci
As the Watershed Planning process progresses, it is expected that additional, or more
specific, priorities will be identified and the Public Education Plan will be modified
accordingly.
4. OBJECTIVES FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION
a. guild general awareness of the Rouge River and tributaries, as well as the daily
impact of activities on this resource among Oakland County citizens.
b. — Improve the public's perception of the Rouge River's existing and future potential
as a natural resource, recreational resource and community asset (i.e..foster
;stewardship and enthusiasm for the river).
c. Develop and implement public involvement and education programs for the
citizens in Oaldand County. This will require the dissemination of informational
materials and coordination of activities to build awareness and foster stewardship.
d. Realize increases in the number of individuals, schools and other special groups in
.0aldand County that participate in existing Rouge River educational efforts (e.g.
River Watch, Rouge Education Program, SOCWA Healthy Lawn and Garden
Program).
1
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
wOwaushedNcountygOpublicai wpd I 9
5. OTHER ORGANIZATIONS ASSISTING WITH PUBLIC EDUCATION
List the organization, the program assistance and the contact person.
L ORGANIZATION _ . PROGRAM CONTACT
Friends of the Rouge Rouge Educatiosi Project, Rouge Rescue, Tracy Cyr
(FOTR) . Rouge Stewards Program Jim Graham
Southeast Oakland Household Hazardous Waste Collection/ Lillian Dean
County Water Authority Education, Yard Waste Management and Tom Waffen
(SOCWA) Healthy Lawn and Garden Program - _
Rouge Program Office Rouge Friendly Business Program Karen Reaume
(RPO)" _
E. L. Johnson Nature Stewards of the Land E. L. Johnson
Center Nature Center _
Oakland Schools ' "If You Love This Earth" Lamoine Motz
Science, Mathamatics & Dave Houzel
Technology Center - _
_6. SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION PLAN WITLEMENTATION - 'YEAR 1
Based on comments received from stakeholders, Oakland County will encourage
participation in the following public education activities in this first year.
Activity in:
Target Audience:
Messages:
Description:
Timetable:
Responsibility:
Heighten Visibility & Promote School Water/Resource Monitoring.
City Council, school officials, and all residents.
Although water quality has improved, pollutants remain in the water
Presentations to City Councils and School Boards encouraging
participation in the Rouge Education Project. Contact teachers
currently participating in Rouge Education Project Prior to
presentations, press releases to heighten visibility.it_Coordinate
presentations with OCDC staff, teachers and students.
Ten presentations throughout permit period.
Oakland County Environmental Coordinator
Timetable:
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
vlAwarrAcdkounrygopubiiceci.wo 10
Activity #2: Design Information Display Table ("Our Actions" display) for OCDC
Lobby.
Target Audience: Contractors, developers and citizens.
Messages:
Description:
Timetable:
Our actions affect the Roilge River.
The watershed-wide "Our Actions" display addressing development
issues will be borrowed/modified from the RPO. A graphic designer
will be hired to create posters; or a contest among elementary school
classes will be held to create posters. Holders for education
flyers/brochures will be provided on the display.
Completed during permit period.
Oakland County Environmental Coordinator
- Activity #3:
Target Audience:
Messages:
Description:
Responsibility:
Home Owner Association Presentations.
Home owner association boards & residents.
Messages listed in Activity #1 of this plan, plus:
• Stewardship, involvement activities
• Detention pond maintenance & responsibilities
Slide presentation and fact sheets, based on available- information,
will be produced and distributed to all home owner associations
__within-cuir corniJ.f Presentations will be available upon request.
Information packets will be available within one year of issuance of
Certificate of Coverage.
Oakland County Environmental Coordinator
Activity #4:
Target Audience:
Storm Drain Stenciling.
Residential neighborhoods, commercial districts, schools and youth
S.
Timetable:
Responsibility:
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
wpkwatrthesiScountygp Npubliced.wpd 11
Messages:
Description:
Timetable:
Responsibility:
Activity #5:
Target Audience:
Messages:
Description:
groups.
"Dump no waste. Drains to Rouge River."
Support FOTR program that actively and systematically stencils
storm drains and shares information throughout the residential
neighborhoods and- commercial business areas of communities.
Coordinate efforts between OCDC, FOTR and Oakland Schools.
Immediately.
Oakland County Environmental Coordinator
Tributary Signage at County Road & River Crossings.
Drivers, passengers and citizens.
Connection to the river. You are in a Rouge River community.
Signs will be placed at roadway/river crossings identifying the Rouge
River and its tributaries (e.g. "Creek Tributary of Rouge River").
Additionally, watershed/subwaterslied boundaries will be identified _
(e.g. "Welcome to Rouge River Watershed", or "Entering Franldin
Branch Watershed").
10 signs to. be installed during permit period.
Oakland County Environmental Coordinator
Activity #6:
Target Audience:
Messages:
Description:
Timetable:
Responsibility:
Co-sponsor Information Outreach Workshops.
Community residents.
Environmentally-friendly lawn & garden tare.
Work with SOC WA, MSU Extension and FOTR. Three workshops
will be held throughout the permit period to inform residents about
healthy lawn and garden principles and practices. -
The permit period.
Public information officer.
Timetable:
Responsibility:
Activity #8:
Target Audience:
Messages:
Description:
Timetable:
Responsibility: - -
Activity #9:
Target Audience:
Messages:
• George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
wo.ursheoraxulrygo.pogiZsd.vixi 12
Activity #7: Rouge Rescue: A Community Event.
Target Audience: Rouge Rescue Volunteers.
Messages:
Description:
Description:
Timetable:
Rouge River is a community asset. Thank you for your efforts.
Improve coordination- & heighten promotion of annual Rouge Rescue.
• Celebrate the resource and show appreciation to volunteers
• Provide refreshments, etc., for an opportunity to socialize with
volunteers
• Set up displays and provide educational materials.
To be developed.
OCDC.
Rouge Recreational Guide.
Golfers, other recreational users, and residents.
Increase visibility of recreation locations and amenities connected to
the river and heighten watershed awareness.
Purchase and distribute multiple copies of the Rouge Recreational
Guide developed by the Public Education Committee of the Rouge
RAP Advisory Council.
Immediately.
Oakland County Environmental Coordinator
Distribute "Do Your Downspouts Lead to the Rouge?" Brochure.
Communities and citizens.
Disconnect downspouts and sump pumps connected to storm/
sanitary sewers.
Provide multiple copies of the "Do Your Downs .; o”ts Lead to the
Rouge?" Brochure to all Rouge River Watershed communities.
Brochure shall then be included in water and sewer bills to residents.
The permit period.
George W. Kuhn .
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26,, 1999 .
wpkwursheacountygp \publiced.wpd
13
Responsibility: Public Information officer.
7. RELATIONSHIP TO WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING
Based -on initial discussions with fellow subwatershed communities, effective public
education regarding storm water management will be a specific goal of the Watershed
Management Plan. The Public Education Plan as submitted with the permit application is
recognized as simply the beginning and is therefore somewhat vague. With experience
gained as Watershed Management progresses, appropriate modifications will be made to the
Public Education Plan.
8. PLAN FOR EVALUATING IMPACTS
The Public Education Plan will be evaluated based on progress made towards the objectives
described above. We are cognizant of the public survey performed by the RPO in 1993. It
is anticipated that through the Watershed Planning Public Participation process, we will be
able to "rgauge our community's baseline awareness of storm water management and _
perception of the Rouge River.
During the Watershed Management Plan development process, the need to evaluate the
success or impact of the Public Education Plan will be likely and will be discussed. Oakland
County will participate in future surveys and/or studies to evaluate public education plan
impacts with fellow subwatershed communities, the Friends of the Rouge, as well as other
organizations and agencies involved in storm water management/watershed management
educational efforts.
Simple' mechanisms for evaluating the impact of the individual Public education activities
'described above will also performed. Tracking the participation of the community schools,
community groups, and individuals in *existing Rouge River educational programs will be
one method of evaluating impacts. It is anticipated that the evaluation methods and results
will be briefly described in the annual permit report.
14
9. DATE FOR ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
111 A date will be set upon issuance of the Certificate of Coverage by the Michigan Department
of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). For planning purposes, we anticipate that the first
Annual Report will be due approximately on the first anniversary of MDEQ's issuance of
the Certificate of Coverage to Oakland County.
S.
George W. Kuhn
Oakland County Drain Commissioner
January 26, 1999
wowursmcncouarygp‘publiced *pa
FISCAL NOTE (M.R. 4t00047) March 9, 2000
BY: FINANCE COMMITTEE, SUE ANN DOUGLAS, CHAIRPERSON
IN RE: DRAIN COMMISSIONER - ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL MANAGEMENT PROJECTS GRANT;
$408,000 GRANT APPLICATION/ACCEPTANCE
TO THE OAKLAND COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Chairperson, Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to Rule XII-C of this Board, the Finance Committee has reviewed
the above referenced resolution and finds:
1. The Oakland County Drain Commissioner has applied to Wayne County
for grant funding from the Rouge River National Wet Weather
Demonstration Project, Rouge River Storm Water Project Grant.
2. Total project cost is $812,337 of which $408,000 will be
reimbursed by the grant award, and $404,337 is County Match, which
will be charged to the maintenance funds from the respective
County Drains.
3. The FY 2000 Special Revenue budget should be amended, as specified
below, to recognize this new grant:
Revenues
1-61-111777-35540-0113 Federal Grant Revenue
1-61-111777-35540-0905 Reimbursement General
Total Grant Revenue
FY 2000
$408,000
$404,337
$812,337
Expenditures
2- 61-2 1177 7-3554 0-2001
2- 61-2 1177 7-3554 0-2 07 4
2- 61-2 1177 7-3554 0-25 60
2- 61-2 1177 7-3554 0-25 60
Salaries Regular - Illicit Insp. $126,000
Fringe Benefits - Illicit Insp. $ 84,000
Consulting Expense Illicit Insp. $210,000
Consulting Expense Public Education $392,337
Total Grant Expenditures $812,337
Net of Revenues & Expenditures P±D
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FINANCE COMMITTEE VOTE:
Motion carried unanimously on a roll call vote with Palmer absent.
Resolution #00047 March 9, 2000
Moved by Palmer supported by McCulloch the resolution be adopted.
AYES: Garfield, Gregory, Jensen, Law, McCulloch, McPherson, Melton,
Millard, Moffitt, Obrecht, Palmer, Patterson, Schmid, Sever, Suarez, Taub, Amos,
Appel, Buckley, Causey-Mitchell, Colasanti, Coleman, Dingeldey, Douglas,
Galloway. (25)
NAYS: None. (0)
A sufficient majority having voted therefor, the resolution was adopted.
STATE OF MICHIGAN)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND)
I, G. William Caddell, Clerk of the County of Oakland, do hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution is a true and accurate copy of a resolution adopted by the
Oakland County Board of Commissioners on March 9, 2000 with the original record
thereof now remaining in my office.
In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and iaffixed the seal of the
County of Oakland at Pontiac, Michigan this 9thaay gi March, 2Q
G. William Caddell, County Clerk